HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - April 21, 2010 D-15 PHAGENDAITEMb**15
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Set Public Hearing for May 5, 2010 to Consider the Appeal of
Brandt -Hawley Law Group on Behalf of Charles and Melissa
Katzakian Regarding the Decision of the Planning Commission to
Approve a SPARC Review for the Reynolds Ranch Commercial
Development
MEETING DATE: May 5,2010
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Set public hearing for May 5, 2010 to consider the appeal
of Brandt -Hawley Law Group on behalf of Charles and
Melissa Katzakian regarding the decision of the Planning Commission to approve a SPARC
reviewfor the Reynolds Ranch Commercial Development.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Pursuant to Lodi Municipal Code Section 17.72.110 and
17.81.070, Charles and Melissa Katzakian filed an appeal
regarding the decision of the Planning Commission on March 24, 2010, to approve a SPARC
review of the proposed Reynolds Ranch commercial development. The appeal was filed in a
timely manner and the appropriate fee was paid. The City Council may now set the matter for a
public hearing to consider the appeal. It is recommended that the matter may be heard at the
regularly scheduled meeting of May 5, 2010 along with the hearing that was set on March 17,
2010 for the same date that will hear the appeal filed by Charles and Melissa Katzakian for the
Planning Commission approval of the Costco Use Permit and SPARC application.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FUNDING AVAILABLE:
KB/kic
NotApplicable
Not Applica
- —r-, 6
Attachments:
1. Planning Commission Resolution PC 10-07
2. Staff Reportfrom the March 24,2010, Planning Commission meeting
3. Draft minutesfor the March 24,2010, Planning Commission meeting
4. Appeal letter
APPROVED:
Blair K��* Manager
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 10-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI FOR THE APPROVAL OF
THE REQUEST OF JENNIFER KRAUTER, RMB ARCHITECTS ON BEHALF OF SAN JOAQUIN
VALLEY LAND CO., FOR SPARC REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED REYNOLDS RANCH SHOPPING
CENTER LOCATED 322 EAST HARNEY LANE
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed public
hearing, as required by law, on the requested Use Permit and Site Plan and Architectural
Review in accordance with the Government Code and Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 17.84,
Amendments; and
WHEREAS, an application was filed by Jennifer Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley
Land Co., LLC., 227 Watt Avenue., Second Floor., Sacramento, CA; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located at 322 East Harney Lane, more particularly described as
Assessor's Parcel Numbers 058-130-17, 058-130-18, 058-130-19, portion of 058-130-16
and portion of 058-110-55; and
WHEREAS, the project site is zoned Planned Development 39; and
WHEREAS, the Project is consistent with all elements of the General Plan, and in particular, the
following General Plan Goals and Policies:
A. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, "To provide adequate land and
support for the development of commercial uses providing goods and services to Lodi
residents and Lodi's market share."
B. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, Policy 7, "in approving new
commercial projects, the City shall seek to ensure that such projects reflect the City's
concern for achieving and maintaining high quality."
C. Land Use and Growth Management Element, Goal E, Policy 3, "The City shall
encourage new large-scale commercial centers to be located along major arterials
and at the intersections of major arterials and freeways."
WHEREAS, the design and improvement of the site is consistent with all applicable standards adopted
by the City. Specifically, the project has met the requirements of the Lodi Zoning Ordinance
with particular emphasis on the standards for large retail establishments; and
WHEREAS, approval of the requested architectural drawings will allow the construction of a commercial
buildings that will comply with the City's Zoning Ordinance and Building Code regulations;
and
WHEREAS, the design of the proposed project and type of improvements are not likely to cause public
health or safety problems in that all improvements will be constructed to the City of Lodi
standards; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR),
consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, the Final EIR, including comments and responses to comments, was certified by the City
Council on August 30, 2006; and
WHEREAS, an Addendum to the certified and Final EIR, including comments and responses to
comments, was certified by the City Council on September 17, 2008; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred.
Based upon the evidence in the staff report and project file, the Planning Commission makes the
following findings:
1 . The approval of the proposed commercial development was considered as part of a previously
approved EIR, whereby it was determined that there would not be significant impacts on the
environment, cumulative or otherwise, provided mitigation measures were implemented.
2. No new impacts were identified in the public testimony that were not addressed as normal conditions
of project approval in the Initial Study.
3. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed type of developed and proposed builing
configurations.
4. The development complies with the intent of the City development policies and regulations in that the
General Plan, Goal E, Policy 3, which encourages increasing the tax base, creating employment
opportunities for residents and attracting new businesses. The proposed commercial shopping
center will also provide employment opportunities for residents.
5. The design of the proposed project and type of improvements are not likely to cause public health or
safety problems in that all improvements will be constructed to the City of Lodi standards.
6. The proposed development will be operated in a manner determined to acceptable and compatible
with surrounding development in that conditions have been added that require the operator to
maintain the property.
7. No variance from the Lodi Municipal Code is approved by this action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Lodi that SPARC Application No. 1 O -SP -02 is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions:
Community Development Department, Planning:
1 . The developer will defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its agents, officers, and employees harmless
of any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval, so long as the
City promptly notifies the developer of any claim, action, or proceedings, and the City cooperates fully
in defense of the action or proceedings.
2. No outside storage of material, crates, boxes, etc. shall be permitted anywhere on site, except within
the trash enclosure areas as permitted by fire codes. No material shall be stacked higher than the
height of any trash enclosure screen wall and gate.
3. All storage of cardboard bales and pallets shall be contained within the area designated for such use.
No storage of cardboard or pallets shall be visible from public right the way.
4. Outdoor display and/or sale of merchandise shall be limited to the specific area for such display is
approved by SPARC (marked as attachment A). At no time shall outdoor storage or display be
allowed outside of the specifically approved area or within the parking area, drive aisle or required
sidewalks and ADA path of travel of the center.
5. No seasonal, temporary or permanent outdoor storage or display of merchandise shall be permitted
within the parking lot, except as otherwise permitted by the City through the special events review
process.
6. The project proponent shall provide a trash enclosure or compactor for each building. The said
enclosures shall be constructed of split face C.M.U. block and shall match the color of the buildings
so that the visual and acoustic impacts of these functions are fully contained and out of view from
adjacent properties and public streets, and no attention is attracted to the functions by the use of
screening materials that are different from or inferior to the principal materials of the building and
landscape. The enclosures shall also have metal gates and shall have roof features per the City's
Stormwater Design Standard Plan requirements.
7. Trash enclosures shall be designed to accommodate separate facilities for trash and recyclable
materials. Trash enclosures having connections to the wastewater system shall install a sand/grease
trap conforming to Standard Plan 205 and shall be covered.
8. A minimum of two trash receptacles shall be placed at a customer entry to each building. Trash
receptacles shall be a decorative, pre -cast concrete or metal type with a self-closing metal lid. Design of
the receptacles shall be submitted with the building permit application for tenant improvements for review
and approval by the Community Development Director.
9. The project proponent shall take reasonable necessary steps to assure the orderly conduct of
employees, patrons and visitors on the premises to the degree that surrounding residents and
commercial uses would not be bothered and that loitering is not permitted.
10. No recreational vehicles, including trailers, shall be parked or stored overnight at the shopping center.
Further, no vehicle, including trailers, shall be parked at the shopping center for the principal purpose
of advertising or display. It shall be a prim facie violation if the advertising medium utilized on the
vehicle is a sign, device, or structure separate from the vehicle, or if the sign or device is integrally
affixed to the vehicle and the copy is readily changeable and such sign, device or structure exceeds
nine square feet in area and the vehicle is parked on the business premises for which the advertising
relates, or in reasonable proximity thereto, and the location of the advertising is reasonably calculated
to direct an observer towards the business. It shall still be considered that advertising was the
principal purpose of the parking, notwithstanding the fact that the vehicle is driven to and from the
business premises on daily basis.
11. The owner shall maintain in good repair all building exteriors, walls, lighting, trash enclosures,
drainage facilities, driveways and parking areas. The premises shall be kept clean. Any graffiti
painted on the property shall be painted out or removed within 48 hours of occurrence.
12. Vending machines, video games, amusement games, children's rides, recycling machines, vendor
carts or similar items shall be prohibited in the outside area of all storefronts. The storefront
placement of drinking fountains and ATM machines shall be permitted subject to the review and
approval of the Community Development Director.
13. The applicant shall submit appropriate plans to the Community Development Department for plan
check and building permit. The final plans shall include the architectural features such as the
approved colors, the building elevations including the cornice, trim caps, and curbed canopy, and
other elements approved by the Planning Commission. Any significant alteration to the building
elevations as approved by the Planning Commission shall require approval by the Planning
Commission.
14. The finished building shall be consistent with the plans approved by the Planning Commission and as
conditioned herein.
15. All buildings shall comply with the requirements of Planned Development 39 zoning district and meet
setback requirements. All buildings shall implement building elements and materials illustrated on the
submitted elevation or otherwise consistent with the architectural theme presented on the submitted
elevation of the major tenant building.
16. A final color palette shall be submitted with the first building permit application and shall be in
substantial conformance with colors and materials approved by the Lodi Planning Commission.
17. The proposed building must comply with all Planning Commission requirements; as well as the
requirements of the Community Development, the Public Works, the Electric Utility and the Fire
Departments; and all other utility agencies.
18. The location and details of the cart corrals within the parking lot shall be submitted with the building
permit application for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Cart corrals shall
be provided in the parking lot adjacent to buildings and distributed evenly throughout the parking lot
rather than concentrated along the main drive aisle. In addition, physical measures to prevent the
removal of carts from the property shall be provided. Such measures shall be submitted with the building
permit application. Further, cart corrals shall be permanent with a design that is consistent with the
theme of the Reynolds Ranch shopping center. Portable metal corrals shall be prohibited.
19. All signage shall be in compliance with a detailed Sign Program that shall be submitted to the
Development Community Director for review and approval with the first building plan review. Said
program shall require all signs to be individual channel letter at the standards provided by the zoning
ordinance.
20. Any bollards installed in a storefront location shall be decorative in style and consistent with the
theme of the shopping center. Plain concrete bollards, or concrete filled steel pipe bollards shall not
be permitted.
21. Hardscape items, including tables, benches/seats, trashcans, bike racks, drinking fountains, etc. shall
be uniform for all stores throughout the shopping center.
22. All roof mechanical equipment and any satellite dish equipment shall be fully screened from ground -
level view within 150 feet of the property.
23. The loading area shown in front of the plans shall be stripped and posted with "NO PARKING —
LOADING ONLY" signs to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
24. Fire Lanes shall be identified and marked per Lodi Municipal Code Sec 15.40.100 in locations
determined by the Fire Marshall. Plans with marked fire lanes shall be returned to planning and copy
kept at the Fire Prevention office.
25. A photometric exterior lighting plan and fixture specification shall be submitted for review and
approval of the Community development Director prior to the issuance of any building permit. Said
plans and specification shall address the following:
a) All project lighting shall be confined to the premises. No spillover beyond the property line
is permitted.
b) The equivalent of one (1) foot-candle of illumination shall be maintained throughout the
parking area.
c) All parking light fixtures shall be a maximum of twenty-five 25 feet in height.
d) All fixtures shall be consistent throughout the center.
26. Exterior lighting fixtures on the face of the buildings shall be consistent with the theme of the center.
No wallpacks or other floodlights shall be permitted. All building mounted lighting shall have a 90 -
degree horizontal flat cut-off lens unless the fixture is for decorative purposes.
27. All exterior construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through
Saturday. No exterior construction activity is permitted on Sundays or legal holidays.
28. A reciprocal agreement for ingress, egress, and parking shall be executed between all parties within
the proposed shopping center and that document shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy.
29. Sidewalks and parking lots must be kept free of litter and debris to minimize the amount of wind-
blown debris into surrounding properties. If pressure washed, debris must be trapped and collected
to prevent entry to the storm drain system. No cleaning agent may be discharged to the storm drain.
If any cleaning agent or degreaser is used, washwater shall not discharge to the storm drains; wash
waters should be collected and discharged to the sanitary sewer. Discharges to the sanitary sewer
are subject to the review, approval, and conditions of the City wastewater treatment plant.
30. The applicant shall submit a landscaping and irrigation plan to the Community Development
Department for review and approval. Landscaping materials indicated on the conceptual landscape
and irrigation plan may be changed per the review of the Community Development Director or
designee but shall not be reduced in amount. The applicant shall provide, at minimum, 433 large
parking lot trees to be distributed within the parking lot.
El
31. The applicant shall select and note on all plans common tree species for the parking lot and
perimeter areas from the list of large trees as identified in the Local Government Commission's "Tree
Guidelines for the San Joaquin Valley".
32. Project must receive and comply with all terms of the Cal Trans encroachment Permit necessary. Any
conditions imposed by Cal Trans for the encroachment permit that result in site plan modifications
shall be reviewed by City staff for consistency with Project approvals.
33. All landscaped area shall be kept free from weeds and debris, maintained in a healthy growing
condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Unhealthy, dead, or
damaged plant materials shall be removed and replaced promptly.
34. The operation of the business shall comply with all applicable requirements of the Municipal Code.
35. The project shall incorporate all mitigation measures as specified in the adopted Final Environmental
Impact Report for Reynolds Ranch Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2006012113).
36. Prior to any ground disturbance, the applicant shall notify the San Joaquin County Council of
Governments (SJCOG, Inc), and shall schedule a pre -ground disturbance survey, to be performed by
an SJMSCP biologist, to determine applicable Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMMS). The
City shall not authorize any form of site disturbance until it receives an Agreement to Implement
ITMMS from SJCOG, Inc.
37. The City shall not issue a building permit for the proposed project until the San Joaquin County
Council of Governments determine what, if any, Incidental Take Minimization Measures (ITMMS)
apply to the project and until the San Joaquin County Council of Governments verifies all applicable
ITMMs have been fully and faithfully implemented.
38. The project shall incorporate all mitigation measures as specified in the adopted Final Environmental
Impact Report for Reynolds Ranch Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2006012113). Specifically,
Mitigation Measure 3.2.2 subjects the Reynolds Ranch development to participate in the San Joaquin
County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMSCP). This includes payment
of Open Space Conversion fees in accordance with the fee schedule in -effect at the time construction
commences. The applicant shall pay, in accordance with the SJMSCP fee schedule, the fees based
on the gross acreage of the overall Reynolds Ranch project as described above, and include all
public use acreage as outlined in a "per acre" schedule to be prepared in cooperation with the
developer, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of
the next building permit within the project by the applicant or any subsequent property owner.
39. All ground level utilities—shall be screened from public view. All screening shall be done using
materials that are architecturally compatible with the buildings(s) or shall be screened by landscape
40. No variance from any City of Lodi adopted code, policy or specification is granted or implied by this
resolution.
41. This resolution does not constitute a complete plan check. Additional comments and conditions will
be provided when more complete plans are submitted for building permit application review for the
project.
Community Development Department, Building:
42. All plan submittals shall be based on the City of Lodi Building Regulations and currently adopted
2007 California Building code.
43. Southwest Quadrant: It appears the following sites will require additional accessible parking spaces
as required by CBC 11 29B Table 11 B-6
a) Major D & Major C providing 288 parking spaces 4 H/C parking spaces shown 7 H/C Parking
Spaces Required.
b) Shops 5, Shops 6a, Shops 6 providing1l 17 parking spaces 4 H/C parking spaces shown 5 H/C
Parking Spaces Required.
c) Shops 7 providing 87 parking spaces 2 H/C parking spaces shown 4 H/C Parking Spaces
Required.
d) Shops 8 providing 87 parking spaces 2 H/C parking spaces shown 4 H/C Parking Spaces
Required.
44. Walkways and sidewalks along the accessible routes of travel (1) shall be continuously accessible,
(2) have maximum 1/2" changes in elevation, (3) are minimum 48" in width, (4) have a maximum 1/4"
per foot side slope, and (5) where necessary to change elevation at a slope exceeding 5% (i.e., 1:20)
shall have ramps complying with 2007 CBC, Section 1133B.5. Where a walk crosses or adjoins a
vehicular way, and the walking surfaces are not separated by curbs, railings or other elements
between the pedestrian areas and vehicular areas shall be defined by a continuous detectable
warning which is 36" wide, complying with 2007 CBC, Section 1133B.8.5.
45. All entrances and exterior ground floor exit doors to buildings and facilities shall be made accessible
to persons with disabilities. Such entrances shall be connected by an accessible rout (complying with
Section CBC 11 14B1.2) to public transportation stops, to accessible parking and passenger loading
zones and to public streets or sidewalks. All accessible routs are also required to comply with
Detectable warnings at hazardous vehicular area CBC 11 33B.8.5. Currently the partial site plans fails
to show how any of the requirements will be achieved around the following buildings. Major B, Major
A-11, Major, A-2, Major A-3, Major D, Major C and Drug 1.
46. Fire rated construction of walls and protection of openings shall be provided where required due to
construction type, occupancy and location on property or proximity to other structures. 2007 CBC,
Sections 702, 704.3, 704.8 and Tables 601, 602, 704.8
Public Works Department:
47. The applicant shall provide specifications and calculations for the Kristar Stormwater System. The
Stormwater Development Standards Plan Worksheet must be provided before the issuance of the
Building Permit.
48. Remove the eastbound stops located at the four-way stop just east of the Reynolds Ranch Pkwy and
Rocky Lane intersection. By removing the stops at this intersection the traffic will have less of a
chance to backup into Reynolds Ranch Pkwy.
49. The site must conform to the Stormwater Development Standards Plan (DSP) requirements. The
DSP Worksheet must be provided before the issuance of the Building Permit.
50. Outdoor loading/unloading dock areas must conform to City of Lodi's Stormwater Development
Standards Plan section 3.1.5.
51. The applicant shall provide a truck route for the entire site with the building permit plans for review
and approval by the Public Works Department. The entrances shall be STAA Long truck compliant
(see Highway Design Manuel pg 400-11).
52. The applicant shall provide locations of all utilities throughout the site with the building permit plan for
review and approval by the Public Works Department. Utilities along the truck routes must be
protected.
53. All offsite improvements must be completed or substantially completed and bonded at or before the
time of the first Certificate of Occupancy within the project.
54. Payment of the following prior to building permit issuance unless noted otherwise:
a. Filing and processing fees and charges for services performed by City forces per the Public
Works Fee and Service Charge Schedule.
b. Habitat Conservation Fee.
31
c. Stormwater Compliance Inspection Fee prior to building permit issuance or commencement
of construction operations, whichever occurs first.
55. Payment of the following prior to temporary occupancy or occupancy of the building unless noted
otherwise:
a. Development Impact Mitigation Fees
b. Wastewater Capacity Impact Mitigation Fee.
C. County Facilities Fees.
d. Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF).
e. Water Treatment Facility Impact Mitigation Fee.
Electric Utility Department:
56. The project proponent shall prepare and submit legal description for easements for review and
approval. Said legal description shall be submitted to the Lodi Electric Department, Electric
Engineering Section.
57. Harney Lane street widening plans shall be submitted to the Electric Utility Department.
58. The applicant shall submit load calculations and Electric drawings to Electric Utility as part of a
building permit process. Load calculations and Electric drawings are needed for service equipment
location, PUE requirements, and service sizing. Should the load calculations and Electric drawings
require a change of site plan, the Planning Department shall forward the site plan to the Planning
Commission for review and approval.
59.The Developer shall pay for Electric Utility Department charges in accordance with the Electric
Department's Rules and Regulations.
Dated: March 24, 2010
1 certify that Resolution No. 10-07 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Lodi at a regular meeting held on March 24, 2010 by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
NOES:
Commissioners:
None
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Mattheis
ATTEST:
Secretary, Planning Commission
Attachment:
A. Outdoor Display Area Plan
Reynolds Ranch m
T -H &R At IE Y
Exhibit A: Outdoor 01aft Am
LODI
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: March 24, 2010
APPLICATION NO: SPARC: 10 -SP -02
REQUEST: Request for Planning Commission approval of a SPARC application
concerning the Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center. (Applicant: Jennifer
Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley Land Co.,
LLC. File No. 1 O -SP -02).
LOCATION: 322 East Harney Lane. Approximately 15 acres located at the
southwest corner of Harney Lane and State HWY 99.
APPLICANT: Jennifer Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley
Land Co., LLC., 227 Watt Avenue., Second Floor., Sacramento, CA.
PROPERTY OWNER: San Joaquin Valley Land Company CO.,LLC, 1420 S. Mills Ave.,
Suite K, Lodi, CA 95242
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the site and
architectural plan of the proposed Reynolds Ranch shopping center, subject to the conditions listed
in the attached draft resolution.
PROJECT/AREA DESCRIPTION
General Plan Designation: NCC- Neighborhood Community Commercial.
Zoning Designation: Planned Development (39).
Property Size: Approximately 50 acres.
Adjacent General Plan, Zoning and Land Use:
SUMMARY
The project proponent requests approval of site plan and architecture of the Reynolds Ranch
shopping center. The City's Zoning Code requires all plot plans for projects within the commercial
zoning districts receive site plan and architecture review approval. The proposed Reynolds Ranch
General Plan
Zone
Existing Conditions
North
NCC- Neighborhood Community
Planned Development
COSTCO site and further north
Commercial.
(39)
are residences
South
NCC, community commercial and 0
Planned Development
Vacant parcels and Blue
—Office
(39)
Shield office.
East
GA, General Agriculture (San
AG -40, Agricultural
State Highway 99, and east of
Joaquin County)
Uses (San Joaquin
that Agricultural, residential
I
County)
and cemetery uses.
West
NCC, community commercial and 0
Planned Development
Agricultural Uses and east of
—Office
(39)
that are residential uses within
the Reynolds Ranch
annexation.
SUMMARY
The project proponent requests approval of site plan and architecture of the Reynolds Ranch
shopping center. The City's Zoning Code requires all plot plans for projects within the commercial
zoning districts receive site plan and architecture review approval. The proposed Reynolds Ranch
commercial development involves the construction of approximately 345,795 square feet of
commercial retail uses, representing a variety of retail sales and services, to be contained in 19
buildings of varying sizes. The primary use will be a Home Depot. Since the Planning Commission
approved the COSTCO, and since this project is within the same shopping center, staff feels the
Planning Commission should review the site plan and architecture of the remainder of the shopping
center to ensure consistency and architectural coherence.
BACKGROUND:
The Reynolds Ranch project was annexed in to the City of Lodi in 2006 as a mixed-use
development. As part of the annexation process, an environmental impact report was prepared and
certified, new General Plan and zoning designations were approved and a Development Agreement
was signed. The development includes retail and residential uses, Public Park, fire station, self -
storage facility, and the Blue Shield office complex, a major component of the development.
In the summer of 2008, the developer requested to amend previous approvals. Specifically, the
developer requested a General Plan Amendment to increase the size of the commercial acreage
from 40.5 acres to 75.6 acres and reduce the residential acreage from 96.6 acres to 78 acres. The
applicant's request was first considered by the Planning Commission at its hearing of August 27,
2008 and continued to September 10, 2008. At that hearing, the Planning Commission approved
the Vesting Tentative Map and recommended the City Council amend the General Plan for the
Reynolds Ranch development. The City Council, acting upon the Planning Commission's
recommendation for approval, amended the General Plan at their meeting of September 17, 2008.
On February 10, 2010, COSTCO Wholesale requested approval of a Use Permit to allow the sale of
alcoholic beverages and approval of site plan and building elevation of the COSTCO Wholesale
warehouse. At their regular hearing of February 10, 2010, the Planning Commission approved the
COSTCO Wholesale's request for a Use Permit and SPARC application. The COSTCO Wholesale
site is immediately north of the project site.
ANALYSIS:
Site Plan:
The project proponent requests approval of site plan and architecture of the Reynolds Ranch
shopping center. The City's Zoning Code requires all plot plans for projects within the commercial
zoning districts receive site plan and architecture review approval. Over time, this review has been
done through the Use Permit process for shopping centers and through SPARC review for
individual buildings. This item has been brought to the Planning Commission because it requires
site plan and architecture review and approval. Since the Planning Commission approved the
COSTCO warehouse, and since this project is within the same shopping center, staff feels the
Planning Commission should review the site plan and architecture of the remainder of the shopping
center to ensure consistency and architectural coherence.
The proposed Reynolds Ranch commercial development involves the construction of approximately
345,795 square feet of commercial retail uses, representing a variety of retail sales and services, to
be contained in 19 buildings of varying sizes (excluding the COSTCO building). The site layout
places buildings close to streets and access points. The primary use will be Home Depot, which will
occupy approximately 106,154 square feet of floor area, including approximately 28,086 square feet
for a garden center. Two moderate sized retailers would be located on in the eastern portion of the
center. Three moderately sized spaces ranging in size from 22,000 to 33,000 sq. ft. will be located
southwest of the site (west of the proposed Home Depot). The remaining shell buildings will be
distributed throughout the site and will range in size from 13,225 square feet to 3,200 square feet.
These buildings will be occupied by fast food franchises, sit-down restaurants, financial
services/bank, professional/business services, and other retail sales and services.
The Home Depot warehouse proposes seasonal and permanent outdoor display and sales area.
The proposed seasonal outdoor display and sales area would be located within the parking lot north
of the building (10,000 sq. ft), a permanent outdoor storage area would be located within the
parking lot west of the building (170 sq. ft), and permanent display area immediately outside of the
building. The larger seasonal outdoor display and sales area would displace approximately 40
parking spaces while the western storage area would be permanent and would occupy 17 parking
stalls (attachment C). The seasonal display and sales area would be for seasonal items such as
Christmas trees, trees, plants, and nursery materials etc. The permanent outdoor display area
would be for items such as propane, and promotional items.
In the past the City's Planning, Building, and Fire departments have all worked diligently with
applicants on concerns regarding the location of outdoor display areas. Outdoor sale and display
area often cause concerns regarding safety. Outdoor display and sale of items within a parking lot
of a store disrupt traffic circulation, and force patrons to load their purchases within the fire lane
whereby fire lanes could be blocked, which would threaten public safety by restricting emergency
vehicle access. Further, items displayed in outdoor display and sales area often cause non -storm
water flows and other deleterious materials to enter the storm drain system. The most effectively
way to reduce non-stormwater discharges to the stormwater drainage system is to eliminate
sources of pollutants. In addition, outdoor merchandise could spill out into the drive aisles and
disrupt vehicle and pedestrian circulations patterns, thereby creating safety issues.
In the past the Planning Commission has approved similar requests for outdoor display areas,
particularly for home improvement businesses such as Lowe's and Lodi Shopping Center. In both of
those cases the approved outdoor display area is limited to the area immediately outside of the
buildings. Outdoor display, storage or sale of merchandise within the parking lot has been explicitly
prohibited. Staff recommends that conditions be placed on the proposed project to limit outdoor
sales immediately outside of the building (similar to Lowe's) and no additional permanent or
seasonal outdoor storage/display area be permitted, unless the design is made permanent with
appropriate fencing, landscaping, etc.
Architecture:
The architectural theme of the shopping center is early agricultural style articulated by canopies,
overhangs, wood type siding, recessed columns, metal roofing, red bricks, and tower elements.
Additionally, there is a free standing arch element provided. Sample elevations are provided under
Attachment D. The proposed colors for the Home Depot include shades of gray and silver,
accented with awnings, metal roof and decorative architectural elements designed to break up the
mass appearance. Although the proposed architectural design of the center is consistent with the
building design standards and design elements established in the LIVIC 17.58 Design Standards for
Large Retail Establishments, architectural design of the previously approved COSTCO building
drastically differs from the remainder of the shopping center. Staff will work with both applicants to
ensure architectural coherence for the site is achieved consistent with the municipal code and
conditions placed on the COSTCO approval.
Signa.
ge:
The approval of project signage is not a part of the current review and would be subject to City of
Lodi codes and requirements to ensure they complement the building architecture and landscaping.
Signage applications and approvals would be completed separately. However, the applicants have
illustrated the location and design of the signs they intend to use. All wall mounted signs will have to
be individual letters and no cabinet "canned" signs would be permitted. This would be consistent
with previously approved shopping centers (condition #19). It is unclear at the moment if the project
will include free standing signs. One free standing sign per shopping center is permitted under the
LIVIC 17.63 Signs. A free standing sign will require a separate building permit and, if necessary,
SPARC review and approval.
Traffic Circulation/Parking:
As shown the site plan, the primary access to the proposed shopping center is provided from
Harney Lane via Reynolds Ranch Parkway. As shown on the site plan, the main entrance to the
project parking lot is from the proposed signaled drive which intersects Reynolds Ranch Parkway.
Three secondary access points are also provided from Reynolds Ranch Parkway, located further
south. These access points provide satisfactory traffic circulation in and out of the shopping center.
In accordance with Lodi Municipal Code (LMC) Section 17.58.110, buildings are located close to
streets and parking is provide behind the buildings, which reduces the undesirable visual impact of
the paved parking surface. Parking spaces are distributed around all buildings. The City's large
design standards for large retail establishments allows a maximum parking stalls five spaces for
every one thousand square feet of building space. The proposed shopping center contains total of
345,795 square feet of tenant spaces. The proposed development allows a total 1,729 parking
spaces (General Retail 5/1000), 1,728 spaces are being provided, which includes ADA compliant
parking stalls for each building. Consistent with the COSTCO approval conditions and the existing
Blue Shield development, parking lot light fixtures must be a maximum of twenty-five feet in height
and no spillover beyond the property line will be permitted. This would ensure all light fixtures
throughout the center are consistent. A condition has been added to require the applicant to provide
a photometric plan prior to the issuance of building permits (condition # 25).
Landscaping:
In accordance with Lodi Municipal Code (LMC) Section 17.58.110, landscaping requirements for
these types of projects are one shading tree per four parking spaces, one large tree per 500 sq. ft. of
open space, 25% of all trees must be 15 gal. or larger, 25% of all shrubs must be 5 gal. or larger, and
groundcover must be provided where necessary. Landscaping must achieve minimum fifty percent
shading requirement within five years of planting. The applicant has submitted a generic landscape
plan, which calls for various large shade trees, smaller trees, shrubs and ground covers distributed
throughout the parking. Given the size of the building, the project proponent is required to provide
433 larger shade (one tree per four stalls) distributed within the parking lot interior and additional
one tree for every 500 sq. ft. open space. As shown the plans, the applicant provides 418 large
parking lot trees and 353 open space shading tree. Supplementing the trees, there would also be a
variety of medium to small shrubs, ground cover and special grasses for swale areas for the Home
Depot parking lot. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide additional parking lot trees
to reduce island -heat effect and to meet the City's standards (condition # 30). As shown the
landscape palette, substantial amount of the proposed plant material for the new site would be
drought tolerant and would use less water than other common species. The proposed irrigation
system uses deep root watering bubblers for parking lot shade trees to minimize usage and ensure
that water goes directly to the intended planting areas.
Once site development and construction is completed, the proposed Home Depot alone will employ
approximately 100 to 150 employees during three daily shifts (the store proposes to be open 24
hours a day, 7 days a week). The proposed development is consistent with the City's General Plan
and is an attractive addition to the City in that the proposed commercial development will provide
much needed services to the City of Lodi, enhance the City's economic viability, increase the tax
base and provide employment opportunities for residents. The proposed development is in full
conformance with the applicable City regulations, including LMC Section 17.58 of the Municipal
Code Design Standards for Large Retail Establishments. These standards were adopted in 2004
specifically to deal with the design of large scale retail establishments. The applicant's project
meets or exceeded each of these standards as presented and conditioned. Therefore, staff is
recommending that the Planning Commission approve this request.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
Legal Notice for the Use Permit was published on March 13, 2010. 52 public hearing notices were
sent to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the project site as required by
California State Law §65091 (a) 3. Public notice also was mailed to interested parties who had
expressed their interest of the project. No protest letter has been received.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS:
• Approve with additional/different conditions
• Deny the SPARC request
• Continue the request
Respectfully Submitted,
Immanuel Bereket
Assistant Planner
Concur,
Konradt Bartlarn
Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Site Plan (including truck path and landscape plans)
C. Color Elevation
D. Resolution
LODI PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING DJUFT
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 24,2010
1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
The Regular Planning Commission meeting of March 24, 2010, was called to order by Chair Cummins
at 7:00 p.m.
Present: Planning Commissioners — Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
Absent: Planning Commissioners — Mattheis
Also Present: Community Development Director Konradt Bartlam, Deputy City Attorney Janice
Magdich, Assistant Planner Immanuel Bereket, and Administrative Secretary Kari
Chadwick
2. MINUTES
"February 10, 2010"
MOTION /VOTE:
The Planning Commission, on motion of Commissioner Heinitz, Kiser second, approved the
Minutes of February 10, 2010 as written.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a) Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on file in
the Community Development Department, Chair Cummins called for the public hearing to consider
the request for approval of a SPARC application concerning the Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center.
(Applicant: Jennifer Krauter, RMB Architects on behalf of San Joaquin Valley Land Co., LLC. File
No. 10 -SP -02)
Director Bartlarn gave a brief PowerPoint presentation based on the staff report.
Commissioner Olson asked if the Morse/Skinner Ranch is on a historical registry or if the
owners have a State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Letter. Director Bartlam stated that it
is on a federal registry.
Commissioner Kiser asked if the timeline for the Harney lane improvements is still gong to be
on schedule with the opening of the center. Director Bartlarn stated that the off site
improvements for Harney Lane are included in condition number 53.
Hearinq Opened to the Public
Dale Gillespie, applicant, came forward to answer questions. Mr. Gillespie asked to revise
condition number 38 of the resolution which pertains to the Habitat Fees. He would like to
create a schedule for the Community Development Director showing the fees for the roads
and detention basin distributed evenly amongst all of the permits for the project.
Commissioner Heinitz asked when the first planning for this project started. Gillespie stated
that the planning of this project started in late 2005 early 2006.
Kiser asked for clarification regarding the fees being distributed. Mr. Gillespie stated that
for all of the public spaces he would like to have a schedule dividing those spaces evenly
amongst all of the permits within the project area.
Hennecke asked if there was a fee schedule already presented. Mr. Bartlam stated that the
fee schedule that is referenced in the condition is the San Joaquin COG schedule. The fee
Continued DRAFT
schedule that Mr. Gillespie is referring to is something he is going to be presenting. Mr.
Bartlarn stated that he will read into the record the proposed language at the appropriate
time. Hennecke asked if this will impact the construction of the basin or other public
spaces. Mr. Bartlam stated that the basin and pumping station were constructed at the time
of the Blue Shield project. Mr. Gillespie added that it isn't the intention to have any of the
fees frozen, just distributed evenly.
Kiser asked if this is similar to what Manteca is proposing to help spur the economy. Mr.
Bartlarn stated that this is not similar. This is meant to be more of a fair share proposal for
the entire project.
Chair Cummins asked if there is a groundbreaking date set. Mr. Gillespie stated that
possibly in July of this year.
Public Portion of Hearing Closed
Commissioner Kiser stated his appreciation of the architecture of the project and
recommends approval.
Commissioner Kirsten stated that there are legitimate concerns regarding the traffic, but
doesn't feel that there is anyone that would like to stand in the way of the project. He also
feels that the traffic issues will get worked out in the end.
Commissioner Hennecke asked to hear the revised verbiage for condition number 38. Mr.
Bartlarn stated that:
o The project shall incorporate all mitigation measures as specified in the adopted
Final Environmental Impact Report for Reynolds Ranch Project (State
Clearinghouse Number 2006012113). Specifically, Mitigation Measure 3.2.2
subjects the Reynolds Ranch development to participate in the San Joaquin County
Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan (SJMHCP). This
includes payment of Open Space Conversion fees in accordance with the fee
schedule in -effect at the time of construction commences. Prior to issuance of thp.
first buildiRg peFrnit f9F the ReyRolds RaRGh develeprReRt, the appliGaRt shall pay—,+R
S-I.M.H.G.P fee GGhedule, f9F the rVenstruir-lieR and GGR;pletieR of the OR
q — detention basiR (9.93 aGFes), ReyRelds R;;nrh PaFkWay (11.98 aGres), pu4:Rp
statiOR (.20 aGre) and ease.rne.nt A. (5.24 aGres) the applicant shall pay in
accordance with the San Joaquin Multi -Species Habitat Plan fee schedule the fees
based upon the gross acreage of the overall Reynolds Ranch Project as described
and include all public use acreage as outlined in a per acre schedule to be
prepared with the developer which will be subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director prior to the next building permit issuance within the project
by the applicant or any other subsequent property owner.
MOTION /VOTE:
The Planning Commission, on motion of Kiser, Heinitz second, approved the request of the
Planning Commission for a SPARC application concerning the Reynolds Ranch Shopping
Center subject to the conditions in the Resolution. The motioned carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Commissioners — Heinitz, Hennecke, Kirsten, Kiser, Olson, and Chair Cummins
Noes: Commissioners — None
Absent: Commissioners — Mattheis
4. PLANNING MATTERS/FOLLOW-UP ITEMS
None
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND CORRESPONDENCE
Continued
None
6. ACTIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
DIUFT
Director Bartlam referenced the memo in the packet and stated that staff is available for questions. Mr.
Bartlam added that the appeal that was filed on the Costco approval is set to go to the City Council on
th
May 5
7. GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE
Director Bartlarn stated that the General Plan is scheduled for adoption on the April 7 th City Council
meeting. Within the next thirty days a draft Housing Element should be ready for the Commission's
review.
8. ACTIONS OF THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
None
9. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
Commissioner Kirsten stated that the Committee met today and the donation of the "Right to Spring"
sculpture may have hit a snag. The owner has decided to place some conditions on the donation that
would place penalties on the project if it wasn't in place where they wanted it placed by a certain date.
The owner also mentioned that the item is still for sale, so if the City doesn't act in time the donation
could just go away.
10. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC
None
11. COMMENTS BY STAFF AND COMMISSIONERS
Director Bartlam stated that the 700 Forms are due by April 1 st in the City Clerk's office.
12. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, the meeting was adjourned
at 7:35 p.m.
ATTEST:
Konradt Bartlarn
Planning Commission Secretary
BRANPT.-HAWLEY LAW GROUP
Legal As.5istant
Cliauvet House PO Box 1659 )eanie Rapleton
Su-�in Brarxit-Hawley Glen Ellen, Califomia 95442
F��
April 2, 2010
=1
Xz-
70
Mayor Phil Katzakian and
< -<
Members of the City Council
0C)
N)
c/o Randi Johl, City Clerk
C.
City of Lodi
2;yr
221 W. Pine Street
f\>
Lodi, CA 95240
Q itycleqk C9a) lod i. qov
Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Action of March 24, 2010
SPARC 10 -SP -02
322 East Harney Lane; Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center
Dear Honorable Mayor Katzakian and Councilmembers:
On behalf of Charles and Melissa Katzakian, owners of the Historic Morse
Skinner Ranch House on the Reynolds Ranch site, and Lodi Tomorrow, I appeal
the referenced actions of the Planning Commission taken on March 24, 2010.
This is filed within the 10 business day period required by the Municipal Code.
The original Reynolds Ranch approvals were based on a project
description that stated in relevant part that "the proposed project would adaptively
reuse the Morse Skinner Ranch House and water tower, a significant historic
resource listed on the National Register of Historic Places and eligible for listing
on the California Register of Historical Resources." The EIR analysis and project
approvals always anticipated that the historic site would be adaptively reused in a
manner compatible with the big box retail planned for the commercial site, such
as a restaurant, following federal standards for rehabilitation and reuse.
Thus, the land use incompatibilities of continued residential use on the
Reynolds Ranch site were not anticipated and have never been studied as
required by the California Environmental Quality Act.
This discretionary site plan and architectural review approval of the
PPM5erVatfOnlawyevs.com
707.938,3900 , fax 707.938.3200 - susanbh@
I
Reynolds Ranch SPARC Appeal
April 2, 2010
Page 2
Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center relies on the 2006 project description and EIR
Supplemental environmental review is triggered by the developers' failure to
comply with mitigations requiring protections of our historic property via
conversion to commercial use.
The Planning Commission's findings are not supported by substantial
evidence, because the continued residential use of our historic property is not
compatible with the commercial development on this site and was not studied in
the prior EIR or Initial Study. The Home Depot, in particular, provides access
directly to the rear of our residential property, and planned parking will
substantially surround us. Our historic house remains in residential use, NOT
adaptive reuse, and we have been given no viable alternative but to stay there.
We note that although we brought this problem to the Commission's
attention last month relative to the Costco SPARC approval, the current staff
report makes no mention of the historic Morse Skinner Ranch House or land use
incompatibilities. The current application cannot be approved due to the removal
of a key project component affecting our historic property. A supplemental EIR is
required before you can consider approval of the Home Depot or other Reynolds
Ranch commercial development.
We will provide further evidence and testimony at the appeal hearing.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
cc: City Attorney Steve Schwabauer
Steve Herum
Please immediately confirm receipt
of thisfax by calling 333-6702
CITY OF LODI
P. 0. BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEALS OF BRANDT-HAWLEY
LAW GROUP ON BEHALF OF CHARLES AND MELISSA KATZAKIAN
REGARDING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO
APPROVE: 1. SPARC REVIEW AND USE PERMIT FOR COSTCO
WHOLESALE DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. SPARC REVIEW FOR
REYNOLDS RANCH SHOPPING CENTER AND HOME DEPOT
PUBLISH DATE: SATURDAY, APRIL 24,2010
TEAR SHEETS WANTED: One (1) please
SENDAFFIDAVITAND BILILTO:
DATED: TH U RSDAY, AP RI L 22,2010
ORDERED BY: RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK
JENNIFER M. ROBISON, CMC
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK
City of Lodi
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
MARIA BECERRA
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
Faxed to the Sentinel at 369-1084 atA �AM (time) on qjrMln pate) �2_ pages)
LNS Phoned to confirm receipt of all Oages at _(t1m6) ' _ m" CF MB (initials)
fbnns\advins.doc
OF
DECLARATION OF POSTING
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER APPEALS OF BRANDT-HAWLEY LAW GROUP
ON BEHALF OF CHARLES AND MELISSA KATZAKIAN REGARDING THE
DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE: 1. SPARC REVIEW
AND USE PERMIT FOR COSTCO WHOLESALE DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. SPARC
REVIEW FOR REYNOLDS RANCH SHOPPING CENTER AND HOME DEPOT
On Friday, April 23, 2010, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a Notice of
Public Hearing to consider appeals of Brandt -Hawley Law Group on behalf of Charles
and Melissa Katzakian regarding the decision cf the Planning Commission to approve:
I -SPARC review and Use Permit for Costco Wholesale Development; and 2. SPARC
review for Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center and Home Depot (attached and marked as
Exhibit A) was posted at the following locations:
Lodi Public Library
Lodi City Clerk's Office
Lodi City Hall Lobby
Lodi Carnegie Forum
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 23, 2010, at Lodi, California.
J NIFER ROBISON, CMC
ASSISTANT CITY CLERK
N:\Administration\CLERK\Forms\DECPOSTCDD.DOC
ORDERED BY:
RANDIJOHL
CITY CLERK
MARIA BECERRA
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
DECLARATION OF MAILING
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDERAPPEALS OF BRANDT-HAWLEY LAW GROUP ON
BEHALF OF CHARLES AND MELISSA KATZAKIAN REGARDING THE DECISION OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE: 1. SPARC REVIEWAND USE PERMIT FOR
COSTCO WHOLESALE DEVELOPMENT; AND 2. SPARC REVIEW FOR REYNOLDS
RANCH SHOPPING CENTER AND HOME DEPOT
On Friday, April 23, 2010, in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the
United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a Notice of
Public Hearing to consider appeals of Brandt -Hawley Law Group on behalf of Charles and
Melissa Katzakian regarding the decision of the Planning Commission to approve: 1 . SPARC
review and Use Permit for Costco Wholesale Development; and 2. SPARC review for Reynolds
Ranch Shopping Center and Home Depot, attached hereto Marked Exhibit A. The mailing list
for said matter is attached hereto, marked Exhibit B.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and the
places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty cf perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 23, 2010, at Lodi, California.
Fomis/decmail.doc
ORDERED BY:
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI
MARIA BECERRA
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
CITY OF LODI
Carnegie Forum
305 West Pine Street, Lodi
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date: May 5,2010
Time: 7:00 p.m.
For information regarding this notice please contact:
Rand! Johl
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 333-6702
INUTIVE OF I UBLIC HEARIN
r
'IT A
"Y Hi
E =-PB IT A
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 5, 2010, at the hour of
7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will
conduct a public hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to
consider the following matter:
a) Appeals of Brandt -Hawley Law Group on Behalf of Charles and
Melissa Katzakian Regarding the Decision of the Planning
Commission to Approve:
1 . SPARC Review and Use Permit for Costco Wholesale
Development; and
2. SPARC Review for Reynolds Ranch Shopping Center and Home
Depot
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the Community Development
Department, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, (209) 333-6711. AR interested persons
are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written
statements may be filed with the City Clerk, City Hall, 221 W. Pine Street, 2 nd
Floor, Lodi, 95240, at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral
statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine
Street, at or prior to the close of the public hearing.
Zy der of the Lodi City Council:
o h0F
City Clerk
Dated: April 21,2010
D. Stephen Schwabauer
City Attorney
CLERK\PUSHEAR\NOTICES\notcdd2.doc 4/20/10
Appeal of Reynolds Ranch& Costco PC approvals (5-5- 10 City Council Meetin�EX H 18 IT BI
OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
I ZIP
KATZAKIAN, CHARLES S
MELISSA
PO BOX 2484
LODI
CA
195241
ROBERT L & C W REYNOLDS FAM
LL
23290 N PEARL RD
ACAMPO
CA
95220
SKINNER RANCH HOLDINGS LP
1420 S MILLS AVE SUITE
L
LODI
CA
95242
SOUTH RIVER RANCH LLC
4920 E HOGAN IN
LODI
CA
95240
ROBERT & CAROLYN REYNOLDS
ETAL
PO BOX 725
WOODBRIDGE
CA
95258
MILLER, DONALD W & NANCY C TR
071 E HARNEY LN
LODI
CA
95240
WENDELL & DORATHEA
311 E HARNEY IN
LODI
CA
95242
-LOGAN,
THAYER, WALTER A & JOANNE M
TR
325 E HARNEY IN
LODI
CA
I A
95240
MILLER, DONALD W & NANCY C TR
349 E HARNEY IN
LODI
CA
95240
MILLER, DONALD W & NANCY C TR�349
E H=ARNEY IN
LODI
CA
95240
:L AMO BLVD APT
1610
LAKEWOOD
CA
90715
WARREN, FRANK L & MAXINE
308 DRIFTWOOD DR
LODI
CA
95240
BUSTILLOS, ANDREW L & STACEY
314 DRIFTWOOD DR
LODI
CA
95240
HABER, BONIFACIO A JR &
RIZALI
PO BOX 51525
PALO ALTO
CA
94303
KUMARI, VIJAY & SARITA
PO BOX 18085
SAN JOSE
CA
95158
SINGH, KASHMIR ETAL
2513 MERCATO IN
LODI
CA
95240
JASON & KIMBERLY
PO BOX 411
SEASIDE
CA
93955
-GAWEL,
KEN & JENNIFER
2506 MARANO LN
LODI
CA
95240
-AIELLO,
TROXCLAIR, CRAIG & ELIZABETH
2512 MARANO IN
LODI
CA
95240
LOPEZ, ROBERTO & GUADALUPE
2511 MARANO LN
LODI
CA
95240
MENDOZA, ELVIS 0
2505 MARANO IN
LODI
CA
95240
BARAZON, LITA V
2504 VALLINI IN
LODI
CA
95240
ELECTRONIC MORTGAGE SERVICING
HERRERA, JESUS RAMIREZ_L__ __I.
MARIA
2756 E BIDWELL ST STE
300
2509 VALLINI IN
FOLSOM
LODI
CA
CA
95630
-
95240
'IZA TH
TROXCLAIR, CRAIG & ELIZABETH
2512 MARANO IN
LODI
CA
95240
MEZA, JOSEFINA ETAL
437 PORTA ROSSA WAY
LODI
CA
95240
EIGHT DIGITS LLC
6777 EMBARCADER0 DR #3
STOCKTON
CA
95219
GAMA, JOSE
2450 MONTEBELLO WAY
LODI
CA
95240
WILSON, GERMAYNE ETAL
2458 MONTEBELLO WAY
LODI
CA
95240
YOUNG, GARVIN & STEPHANIE
1824 VICTORIA DR
LODI
CA
95242
KERLIN, DELRAY & CYNTHIA JAG
1808 AUTUMN WAY
LODI
CA
95242
�MM, JOHER, M
1 1112 RIVERMTE DR
LODI
CA
95240
IROMAN CATHOLIC WELFARE CORP
ST
1105 N LINCOLN ST
I
STOCKTON
CA
I
95203
I
DELTA PACKING COMPANY PTP
6021 E KETTLEMAN LN
LODI
4cC
AA
1 95240
FELKINS. JEANETTE L TR
23480 N DEVRIES RD
LODI
1 95242
JAConimunity Development\Planning\Lists\Agenda Mailing Lists\AGENDA I DOC Page 1
04/22/2010
Company
FirstName
LastName
Addressl
City
State
— - — --n —1
95242
- --
1.
Keith
Selleseth
2350 St.
Lodi
CA
Anton
Drive
2.
Senator
Cogdill
1308W.
Ripo
CA
95366
Dave
Main St.,
n
Suite C
3.
Anne M.
Cemey
900 W.
Lodi
CA
95240
Vine Street
4.
Ernest
Golladay
1924
Lodi
CA
95242-2305
Edgewood
Dr.
5.
Bertha
Castro
2912
Lodi
CA
95242
Femwood
Dr.
6.
Baumbach
Steve
Pechin
323 W.
Lodi
CA
95240
& Piazza,
Elm Street
Inc.
7.
CalTrans,
Attn: IGR
Planning
P.O. Box
Stock
CA
95201
District 10
2049
ton
.8.
Coldani
Leonard
Bull
1806 W.
Lodi
CA
95242
X
Realtors
Kettleman
Lane
9.
Lew-
Mr. Gary S.
Davis
P.O. Box
Ceres
CA
95307-1033
Garcia-
1033
Davis
10.
Lodi
24S.
Lodi
CA
95240
X
District
School St.
Chamber
of
Commerce
11.
Lodi
P.O. Box
Lodi
CA
95241
Iniproveme
3006
nt
Comn-jittee
12.
Lodi
Attn: Art
Hand Jr.
1305 E.
Lodi
CA
95240
X
Unified
Vine Street
School
District
13.
San
Attn:
Garretson
249-
Stock
CA
95202
Joaquin
Debbie
Hunter
ton
county
Street,
Assessor's
Room 303
Office
14.
S. J.
1810 E.
Stock
CA
95205
X
county
Hazelton
ton
Planning
Avenue
Depart.
15.
Teichert
Terry
Miles
PO Box
Stock
CA
95201
Constructi
1118
ton
on
16.
W estern
500S.
South
CA
I
Real Es!tate
s I
Airport
Sa--
News
I
P, '
JAConimunity Development\Planning\Lists\Agenda Mailing Lists\AGENDA I DOC Page 1
04/22/2010
Company FirstName LastName Addressl City State PostalCode Minutes
I isco I I
JACommunity Development\Planning\Lists\Agenda Mailing Lists\AGENDAI.DOC Page 2
04/22/2010
Kari Chadwick
Distribution List Name: Reynolds Ranch project
Members:
C. Griff
Gary Tsutsurni
J. Kurt Roberts
Janna Scott
Mark Hogenhout
Melissa Katzakian
Paula Fernandez
Wally Sandelin
cgdff44@comcast.net
Teeingoff2002@yahoo.com
j kurtroberts@scbglobal.net
jannascott@yahoo.com
Mhogenhout@collierspanish.com
chaskat@sbcglobal.net
PJF@Iodi.gov
wsandelin@lodi.gov
Kari Chadwick , C -NIJLs� �A (at -IE -y,
Distribution List Name:
Members:
Bill Cummins
Bill Cummins -Work
Dave Kirsten
Debbie Olson
Randy Heinitz
Steven Hennecke
Tim Mattheis -Work
Timothy Mattheis
Planning Commission
pastorbillc@aol.com
pastorbill@bearcreekchurch.com
dave@kirsten.com
Debbie.Olson@pacbell.net
dhntzrdy@sbcglobal.net
shenecke@pacbell.net
TM@wmbarchitects.com
tkmhome@sbcglobal.net
� MI,
Distribution List Name: Planning Commission Agendas
Members:
Anne Cemey
acerney@inreach.com
CaliforniaPoso
CaliforniaPoso@yahoo.com
Carmen Bais
Garmenbais@mypermail.com
Chris
Chrissenkeresty@Yahoo.com
Connie O'Brien
cobrien@metrostudy.com
Crystal Kirst
ckirst@gmail.com
DanielThigpen
dthigpen@recordnet.com
Demy Bucaneg (Lodi EUD)
dbucaneg@lodielectric.com
Eileen St Yves (LIC)
EileenSt.Yves@comeast.net
Erin Arago
earago@sheppardmullin.com
Erin Arago
earago@yahoo.com
Greg Harp
gharp@sjconstruction.com
Jacki Roth
jacki_jr@yahoo.com
Janet L. Hamilton
jhamilton@lodi.gov
Janice Magdich
jmagdich@lodi.gov
Jeff Hood
jhood@lodi.gov
John Beckman
johnb@biadelta.org
John Johnson
john@johnejohnson.com
Joseph Wood
jwood@lodi.gov
Kevin Donnelly
kdonnelly@lodi.gov
Lindy Combs
mecombs@sjcphs.org
Maggie Creamer
maggiec@lodinews.com
Marty Willett
mwilleft@g-rem.com
Melissa Katzakian
chaskat@sbcglobal.net
Michael Caruba
Michael@Duncanda.com
PattyAnderson
panderson@firstam.com
Pete Gibson
pgibson@fcbhomes.com
Ron DuHamel
duhamel@sboglobal.net
Sandy Meyers
SMeyers@pd.lodi.gov
Scott Kime
SKime@flintco.com
Steve Pechin
bpengineers@sbcglobal.net
Susan Lake
slake@lodi.gov
Tammy M. Minatre
tminatre@agspanos.com
Ted Deehr
tdeehr@surewest.net
Terri Lovell
tlovell@lodi.gov
Wes Reed
wreed@mve.net
Kari Chadwick
Distribution List Name: SPARC Members
Members:
Keith Selleseth
carkei@sbcglobal.net
MitchellSlater
msiater@lodiusd.net
Reyes Jaramillo
ray—pridelands@yahoo.com
RogerStafford
staf4ds@comcast.net