Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Report - January 18, 1989 PH (6)
TO: FROM: C 0 u N C I L THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE COMMUNICATION COUNCIL MEET IPtG DATE: JANUARY 18, 1989 SUBJECT: REQUESTS OF MARC SIEGAL FOR AN At1EN0hiE" t 70 THE LA i0 USE L -11E^ i OF THE GENERAL PLAN, A REZONING APJD ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION INDICATED ACTION: That the City Council conduct public hearings on the following requests of Marc Siegal, c/o First Fidelity Realty Group: 1. to amend the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan by r e i satin the p c t t 2500 Wiest Turner Road APN Oe2-sb3g0-39,t.C.A.rloial� from Office -Institution 1 to Commercial. 2. t o rezone the parcel at 2500 West" Turner" Road (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from R -C -P, Residential -Commercial - Professional to C -S, Commercial Shopping Center. 3. to certify the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate envi ronniental documentation on the above projects. The public hearings may be conducted concurrently, but the items must be acted on -, separately. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The purpose of this request is to provide the zoning so that , the developer can build a 9 6 acre shopping center owith�16,960�squarpe Jee�t --ea- 1arg�s hen" heprou g eRnl osf rl indicated that the center would be anchored with a 42,000 square foot, full-service Safeway and a 19,000 square foot Thrifty Drug Store. A full service supermarket i s similar to Fry's, Raley's or the newest Lucky's in the types of departments within the market. At the Planning Commission hearing the developer offered to assist in paying for a traffic signal at the major street intersection. Presumably this same offer will be made at the Council hearing. If the City Council approves the requests, the Public !forks Department should be authorized to negotiate with the developer on the amount of sewer capacity that will be available to the center pending the completion of the White Slough expansion. If the request is denied, the existing Safeway Store on East Lodi Avenue will still close because it cannot compete with the larger, mere modern markets built around the City in the last few years. Although a sad situation for the eastside, an econoniic fact of life for the grocery chain. J.MCS B. SCRO ER C611Mur;ity Development Director CC89/l/TXTD.0IC January 11, 1989 I I I fil-I I I FiTl I I If I Y) fill Ill Pam an rr iT.1 i it lilt, 11 rilTl;l tri% H"HIMIF 1 P lllir_ ^_ ('� fl .i ! I"' 111111 1 I � 4 Mueprtss Shopping C--mtr-- Pik VICINITY MAP T—SAV-" l.H aeras Winepress Shopping Center Rezone & GPA Z 88 02 12-27-88 NOTICErOF •l1BLI w, RING TO CIONSIDIIZ THE PLAOff ff ' ; ISSi`0 S"',RECOMMENDED APPROVAL - OF -- - OF THE REQIJEST OF MARC SIEGEL, -C/0 FIRST FIDELITY REALTY GROUP TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LODI GENERAL PLAN BY REDESIGNATIPiG THE PARCEL AT 2500 WEST TURNER ROAD (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. GLOBAL) FROM OFFICE -INSTITUTIONAL TO SAL NOTICE IS EREBY GIVEN that on -Wednesday, January 18, 1989, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommended approva? of the request of ^tare Siegel, c/o First Fidelity Realty Group to amend the land use element of the Lodi General Plan by redesignating the parcel at 2500 West Turner Road (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from R -C -P, Residential -Commercial-Professional to C -S, Commercial Shopping. - Information regarding this item may"be"obtained in"°the'_; office ofthe Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California- All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or scmeone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to -the -City -Clerk, 221 west Fine Street, Lodi, at or prior to, the public hearing. Ey Order Of The Lodi City Council: Alice M, Reimche City Clerk Dated: January 4, 1989 Approved as to form: . -azi Bobby W. McNatt City Attorney PH/5 TXTA.02D CRDPOiNU N0. 1445 AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LODI GENERAL PLAN 6Y REDESIGNATING THE PARCEL LCCATED AT 2500 WEST TURNER ROAD (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. GLOBAL) FROM OFFICE -INSTITUTIONAL TO GCMMHUNL BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan i s hereby amended by redesignating the parcel located at 2500 West Turner Road (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from Office -m nstitutional to Commercial. SECTION 2. All ordinances and parts of crdinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. 4-00" Ut SECTION t t, 3 MCC - k. Nem Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published i n the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. Attest: ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk Approved this day of 1AMEN W. PINKERTON, JP,. hIayor -1- . State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. I, Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held by the Following dote: Ayes : Council Members - Noes : Council Members - Absent: Council Members - Abstain Council Members I further certify that Ordinance No. was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passaqe and the same has been published pursuant to law. Approved as to Form BOBBY W. McNA.TT City Attorney ORD1445•/TXTA.OIV H -2- At ICE M. REI"CNE City Clerk COUNCIL COMMUNICATION 10: THE CITY COLZ40, COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1989 FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE SUBJECT: REQUESTS OF MARC STEGAL IOR AR AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF YE GENERAL PLAN, A REZONING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION INDICATED ACTION: That the City Council conduct public hearings on the following requests of Marc Siegal, c/o First Fidelity Realty Group: to amend the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan by redesignating the parcel at 2500 blest Turner Road (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from Office -Institutional to Commercial. 2. to rezone the parcel at 2500 West Turner Road TAP?? 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from R -C -P, Residential-Commercial- Professicnal to C -S, Commercial Shopping Center. 3. to certify the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. The public hearings may be conducted concurrently, but the items must be acted on separately. BACKGROUND=INFORMATION �lhex purpose of tf s` o v id K4 oiling"so` that` the" ''developer `can"`bu`ild'a`'9'A acre shopping center with 116,960 square feet of building area. At the Planning Commission public hearing the proponents indicated that the center would be anchored with a 42,000 square foot, full-service Safeway and a 19,000 square foot Thrifty Drug Store. A full service supermarket is similar to Fry's, Raley's or the newest Lucky's in the types of departments within the market. At the Planning Commission hearing the developer offered to assist in paving for a traffic signal at the major street intersection. Presumably this same offer will be made at the Council hezring. If the City Council approves the requests, the Public Works De�)artment should be authorized to negotiate with the developer on the amount of sf.wer capacity thst will be available to the center pending the completion of the White Slough expansion. If the request is denied, the existing Safeway Store on East Lodi Avenue will still close because it cannot compete with the larger, more modern markets built around the City in the last few years. Although a sad situation for the eastside, an econon.ic fact of life for the grocery chain. LMlmunity S B. SC ROL�DER Development Director CC8)9/1/TXTD.01C January 11, 1989 4 El L EIE P URW 1 4, W �tl It t'r,`��h M C-.��j t 5�1, 1ILT Ilitt, 11 I I rl, rll I f f.1711=11.1 I it H !IIII I I I Ill U", Mr-pmT Shoppiar. C=tcr C—CePt=E Ste Plary VICINITY MAP NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSUa THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECONMENDED APPROVAL CF THF REQUEST OF MARC STEGEL, C/O FIRST FIDELT`Y REALTY GROUP TO REZONE THE PARCEL AT 2500 WEST TURNER ROAD (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. GLOBAL) FROM R -C -P, RESIDENTIAL -COMMERCIAL -PROFESSIONAL TO C -S, SAL SHOPPING NOTICE TS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, January 18, 1989, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Lodi City Council wi 1 l conduct a public hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommended approval of the request of Marc Siegel, c/o First Fidelity Realty Group to rezone the parcel at 2500 West Turner Road (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from R -C -P, Residential -Commercial -Professional to C -S, Commercial Shopping. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, Cal ifornia. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someam—el s e raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 west Pine Street, Lodi, at or prior to, the public hearing. Alice M. Reimche City Clerk Dated: January 4, 1989 Approved as to form: Bobby W. McNatt City Attorney PH/4 TXTA.02D ORDINANCE NO. 1446 AN ORDINANCE OF THE LGDI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY REZONING THE PARCEL LOCATED AT 2500 WEST TURNER ROAD (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. GLOBAL) FROM R -C -P, RESIDENTIAL -COMMERCIAL -PROFESSIONAL TO C -S, CONMERCIAL SHOPPING BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Official District "tap of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi Municioal Code i s nereby amended by rezoning the parcel located at at 2500 West Turner Road (APN 029-C30-39, R.C.A. Global)` from R -C -P, Residential -Commercial -Professional to C -S, Commercial Shopping. The alterations, changes, and amendments of said Official District Map of the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by the City Planning Commission and by the City Council of this City after public dear-. ,ngs hei ��n conformances-Withf,prov sions of LTitie I7do Municipal Code and the laws of the State of California applicable thereto. SECTION 2. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi Nt%Ns Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulatior printed and published i►, the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. -1- Approved this dayof JAMES W. PINKERTON, JR. Mayor Attest ALICE M. RDIVKM City Clerk State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. 1, Alice M. Reimche., City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of sai.d_Qounci 1 held by the following -vote:- Ayes vote: Ayes: Council Members - Noes Council Members F F _ . se.m,.3.dRa»,..3�f`�s .�1 Absent : Council Members - Abstain: Council Members - I further certify that Ordinance No. was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law. ALICE M. REIMCNE City Clerk Approved as to Form f—/— - - -- BOBBY W. McNATT City Attorney ORD1446/TXTA.OIV -1- C O U N C I L C C M M U N I C A T I O N TO: THE CITY LOUNCIL COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1989 FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE SUBJECT: REQUESTS OF MARC SIEGAL FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND UE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN, A REZONING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION INDICATED ACTION: That the City Council conduct public hearings on the following requests of Marc Siegal, c/o First Fidelity Realty Group: 1. to amend the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan by redesignating the parcel at 2500 West Turner Road (AFN 029-030-39, R.C,A, Global) from Office -Institutional to Commercial. 2. to rezone the parcel at 2500 West Turner Road (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from R -C -P, Residential -Commercial - Professional to C -S, Commercial Shopping Center. 3. to certify the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. The public hearings may be conducted concurrently, but the items must be acted on separately. 8AGKG1t9iiNA INFORMATION: The purpose of theeestito pid q0: 'th t th de�rel open can bl � t d a 9 6 acre }shoppTn ° c'e`n ff with MONO eet°'° of building area. At the Planning Commission public hearing the proponents indicated that the center would be anchored with a 42,000 square foot, full-service Safeway and a 19,000 square foot Thrifty Drug Store. A full service supermarket is similar to Fry's, Raley's or the newest Lucky's i n the types of departments within the market. At the Planning Commission hearing the developer offered to assist in paying for a traffic signal at the major street intersection. Presumably this same offer will be made at the Council hearing. If the City Council approves the requests, the Public Works Department should be authorized to negotiate with the developer on the amount of sewer capacity that will be available to the center pending the completion of the White Slough expansion. If the request is denied, the existing Safeway Store on East Lodi Avenue will still close because it cannot compete with the larger, more modern markets built around the City in the last few years. Although a sad situation for the eastside, an economic fact of life for the grocery chain. J,MSB. SCRO ER Cb4muni ty Development Director CC89/l/TXTD.01C January 11, 1989 arcnC sb— 76 wiaqrr= shopping: 2!!c-: TY Coacept=f Site P!:air VICINITY MAP Winepress Shopping Center Rezone & GPA in NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER, THE PLANNING COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION TO CERTIFY THE FILING OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION BY ?HE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, January 18, 1989, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, cne Lodi City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider the Planning Conmission's recommendation to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the following projects: 1. Proposed amendment of the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan by redesignating the parcel at 2500 West Turner Road (APN 029-030-39 R C A r ; Global} from Office -Institutional to Commercial. 2. Proposed rezoning cf the parcel az 2500 West Turner Road (APN 029-030-39, R.C.A. Global) from R -C -P, Residential -Commercial-Professional to C -S, Commercial Shopping. Information regarding this item may be obtained i n the office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter..;.::,;.:.~:..::;:, .; r: ;�,: i y .., ... Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing. � ..If you challenge enge `t e subject matter, in court you.. ;may, be u limited imitede�tsbco,r ri riabeisdin.i. gnE:o,thn 441's sesyior�woeon:es-raisa"p11 thoin'g' ik notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 west Pine Street, Lodi, at or prior to, the public hearing. By Order Of The Lodi City Counci 1 : Alice M. Reimche City Clerk Dated: January 4, 1989 Approved as to form: � �,� Bobby W. McNatt City Attorney PH/6 TXTA. 02D r T�' anded Im' -'-it CE NfriVE R t sil '4� IL L: MH :1, Pnrll 41- Tall Y Building City of I-Ocil Community Developmcnt Department Elf) Assocl.'Ites 0 c t o b e , 18, 1 SS EXPAINDED INITIAL STUDY FOR THE WINEPRESS CENTER Submitted to: City of Lodi Submitted by: EIP Associates 131 I 1 Street Sacramento, CA 95814 October 30, 1988 1. INTRODUCTION -2. TABLE OF CONTENTS Report PRE) EET DESORIPTION Project Location Table of Contents 1i 3. SUMMARY OF Drainage 5-2 Plant I_.ife 5-? Lig�it and Glare 5-2 d'Use Land 5-3 Transportation; Circulation 5-3 Public Services 5-s Utilities . 5-8 Aesthetics 5-s Mandamry Fin ings of Significance 5-9 6. REPORT PREPARATION 6.1 l 7. APPENDICES Appendix A: Air Quality 7-1 Appendix B: Noise 7-9 Appendix C: Traffic 7-15 Appendix D: Responses to Coriments 7-44 _ 88158 List of Tables y LIST OF TABLES Table 5-1 Weighted Sound Levels and Human Response 5-3 Table 5-2 Level ofService Urban/Suburban Streets 5-6 Table 5-3 Existing Traffic Conditions 5-7 Table 5-4 Trip Generation Analysis 5-9 . . Table 5-5 Trip Pattern 5-8 Distribution `.�1}-3 "Y1-`�' :rid �' A .✓ti5i' .i eF,•reY J .:x rkr-.; F+�'M J'c.iY i h, R6r{'Yn'8n , xi1M 3' YYz'-..§XG!'i'^Svet��,_ Table S-6 `• ary of Capacity' Ahalysis Summ 5-11 Table 5-7 Signal Warrant Analysis -1Q Table 5-8 Mitigated Capacity Analysis 5-17 -- `Yc--t4ii+a'-.e-*rc•'ua.m #F^`-:,'•x_lii zC'.:.,.r.,p!YlJ;'¢ 'ij.?*;IFi"�::.4§43F.4,P • - f 010 "M Ik List cf Figures LIST OF FIGURES 1. Introduction 1. INTRODUCTION PROPOSED ACTION The project applicant. Mark Siegal, First Fidelity Realty Group, proposes to construct 116,960 square foot shopping. center on 9.61 acres at the corner of Turner anti Lower Sacramento Roads. Construction of the shopping center will require a G. neral Plan Amendment and Rezoning as the project site is currently zoned for office and professional uses. WOW TO USE THIS REPORT This report includes five sections `Project Description; Summary of'Fmdirigs; InitraI WF Study Checklist, Environmental Evaluation, and Appendices. The Project Description section=includesa discussion -of the location -of the site, a - - discussion of necessary permitting actions, the proposed facilities, and schematic drawings of the proposed project. The Summary of Findincs section of this report presents an overview of the results and conciusions of the evaluation The Summary is meant to provide a general discussion of potentiact tmpacwand available mitigattan measures for use by the City in determining appropriate CEQA processing. out by EIP Associates based on the results of our field reconnaissance and research during repi?rt preparation. The Environmental Analysis section presents a topic -by -topic evaluation of the proposed project based on issues identified as potentially significant in the Initial Study Checklist.. The results of field visits, data collection and review, and agency contacts are presented in textual form, with topics organized to follow the Initial Study listing which precedes this section. The Appendices section will include the technical data used in compiling the Initial Study, where appropriate. 1-1 S8158 2. Project Description 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION The Winepress Shopping Center parcel is located in northwestern Lodi. The project site Is bordered by Turner Road on the north, Lower Sacramento Road on the east, and by the City/County line on the west and south (Figure 2-2). The parcel is currently used for agricultural uses (vineyards and row crops) and the RCA office building. The adjacent land uses include agricultural, residential and the Woodlake Plaza Shopping Center on the northeast corner of Turner and North Lower Sacramento Roads. PROJEGTTCHARACTERI5TIC5.� The project proposes development of a`116,960 square foot shopping center on 9.61 acres. The project includes a supermarket, retail use space, tour pads and 476 parking spaces (Figure 2-3). The approval of the Winepress Shopping Center would necessitate the conversion of currently designated Professional Office use to Commercial Shopping Center designation to allow development of a shopping center. Construction o£the praje6t would include the expansion and installation of necessary public service infrastructure such as sewer lines, water mains, and other utilities Stormwater from the site would -be';pt ed to Lodi Lake Sewage.from`the' project : would flow by gravityto the treatment facility located southwest of the City. 1 . - ,., , ..: -• 'NECESS APPROVAI:S .., ...- , a, In order to develop the site as proposed, the applicant must receive a variety of approvals from the City of Lodi. The current designations for the site allo,.v for professional office uses. Therefore, a Rezoning and General Plan Amendment will be required for project approval. 88158 2-1 AREA N/LAP FIGURE 2-1 SAN FRANCISCO SACRAMENTO LODI rOCr,TON --aA SITE LOCATION MAP mll Jill FIGURE 2-2 ----^,`_ 1�:-,=rst:���Countiy^Ctnbr..-- SITE PLAN Turner Road FIGURE 2-3 --4pr — is JOY II u ioi. �11. Li I fiii I fi 11ffi It Il 1, 1I -TV I Iilf it i I Il 'd I I I Fri L 11 1T, T1 LU Id I I LEGEND Total Acreage 9.61 acres Building SIT 116,960 sf %coverage 27.9 Parking: Required: 456 spaces Shmm: 476 spires Winepress Shopping Center Conceptual Site Plan SOURCE: TDK Architects Planners 2-4 88158 3. Summary of Findings 3. SUMMARY OF FINDLVGS AREAS OF POTENTIAL IMPACT The areas of potential impact were identified following review of the Initial Study, review, of the site plan and available technical data, contacts with concerned agencies and several site visits. The areas of concern were identified as: sA Erosion if Air Quality I Drainage it Preemption of agricultural land Noise Light and glare -- ,:5 >: Changes- in planned`laiid uses' Access and circulation Provision of public services DETERIMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE The following fist briefly summarizes the results of the evaluations performed for the site. Roadways in the vicinity of the project generallyy provide an acceptable level of service. Planned improvements, including a new Chestnut Bridge and signals at the intersections of Lower Sacramento Road/West Elm Street and,.Lower Sacramento Road/West Lodi Avenue -Sargent' Road, `will improve conditions at these locations .Although traffic will increase as a result of the project, no improvements will be --, ,�reguued as.a.ciu�tbresul - - _ - Incrersed Noise bevels Construction related to noise will be experienced in the project neighborhood during the construction phase of the project, however these noise levels should not be significant. The noise levels in the area after construction will primarily be a function of vehicle traffic. These future noise levels (existing plus cumulative area buildout) will increase substantially. However, the project itself will not contribute significantly to these noise levels. Consideration should be given to future Ievels when designing the structures on-site in order to mitigate effei is of cumulative area buildout. 3-1 88158 �v-eY-<•,�. ,�,T,,,,�,ip - .yy.. .r. 3n;. :;,,... 7 Ki 3. Summary of Findings Increased Air Pollution The project will result in a small, incremental increase in regional air pollution. Although future cumulative air quality is expected to generally decline, the project does not represent a significant percentage of this problem. Changes in Planned Land Uses The change from office and professional to shopping center use will not significantly affect future land uses in the area. The provision of shopping facilities in an area currently with few such projects will serve to minimize vehicle trips to other areas o Lodi. There is no inherent incompatibility in the proposed use with surrounding uses. Nightlighting is the only potential effect of the project on neighboring whfidk a auftfl= -eed!avw&ktsand can be easily mitigated by landscapingan - careful design attention. Any developmi nt in Lodi requires the conversion of prime agricultural soils, however this parcel i_ within the City -limits -and -designated. Sxr urban uses. Erosion, drainage and provision of public services were found to have no impact arf$ require no mitigation. Following evaluation of the Site Plan and the environmental constraints of the site, it does not appear that any unmitigatable adverse impacts would be generated by project construction and operation. The potentially significant impacts to community resources that were considered include .increased vehicle .vo umes,increased::noise :. Od `—b7itlt;acn e fi , , 'Chra l -,7"f fn�tT a do. » 4, Initial Study Checklist 4. INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST INTRODUCTION In determining if this project may have a signiricant impact on the environment, the primary and secondary effect of the following po Pntial impacts were considered and determmatio: s made as to whether th=thu t wJy1q generate significant effects. In'other ecklist was complete Environmental Evaluation in order to identify areas of concern (Environmental impacts checked as "maybe" or 'des" are further discussed in Chapter 5 - Environniplal Evaluation)_ _ The Summary. of Findings 3) presents the results of the Enviro tion which was performed based on the issues identified in the Initial Study GWOM 4-1 88158 1. Background If. 4, initial Study Checklist ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent Mark SiepaI 2. Address and Phone Ntumher of P:apa�,r�nc - First Fidelity Realty CTrmin Sacramento CA 9MI-) 3. Date of Checklist Submitted October 18. 1988 4. Agency Requiring Checklist City of Lodi - Community Development Department 5. Name of proposal, if applicable Winepress Shopping nter Environmental Impacts (Explanations ofall "yes" and "maybe' answers required on attached sheets) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a Unstable earth conditions or changes in b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? X C Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site:' X f. eposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the. ocean or any bay, inlet or lal X 4-2 88158 Yes Mavbg No g, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, o- similar hazards'? X 2 Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air einissions or deterioration of ambient air quality b. The creation of objectionable odors? C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: fi a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface water ntnofP X C. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X d. ebioanize in the amount of surface water in any water X rschMean urfa Atex or utRany alteiati filOw 'or surface water quail including but not limited to temperature. dissolved oxygen or turbiditv f. Alteration of the direction or rate of ground waters? Change in quantity ofground waters, either through 4 direct additions or withdrawals, or through intercep- tion of an aquifer by cuts or excavations " ` '��'^~'�^' ��' ' ^•� the amount cCwater other- wise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? X X;< 5 b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants'? C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Animal Life. Will the proposed result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers Of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish aaid shellfish, benthic organisms or,insects)?. b. Reduction of..the''numhers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals', C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Noise. Will the` proposal, result in a. Increases in existing ncise levels? Light and Glare. Will the proposal: Frodtice new light or glare'! Land Use. Will the proposal: Result in a substan- tial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Yes Mavbe xD X X X X X X X X X 4-5 88158 ;;�yv aJ•i�+:�,.'�'.mraF ':.: :`, iol,KUi Kw,.s�:ti3*.i�dC.w i-A,?F4 Aw,,.cf� ssr,J,va �:xY�c.•dN,'�+trvaa`.:iv , � .. 7xm.,x., . ..-u .:,,i,: ,. u.;aik�, t..-tJe,a�'wy"•x�.��.`':. Yes MaYnP ]� 12. Housi g. Will th proposal affect existin housing or create a demand for additional housir X 13. 'Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation system? X d Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alteration .o waterborne, rail or 3ir traffic'? _ f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern- mental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? 000— _... _ . b. Ponce protection? X C. Schools? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities?� e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?� L C+her governmental services? X 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of enemy. or require the development of new sources of energy'! -X 4-5 88158 ;;�yv aJ•i�+:�,.'�'.mraF ':.: :`, iol,KUi Kw,.s�:ti3*.i�dC.w i-A,?F4 Aw,,.cf� ssr,J,va �:xY�c.•dN,'�+trvaa`.:iv , � .. 7xm.,x., . ..-u .:,,i,: ,. u.;aik�, t..-tJe,a�'wy"•x�.��.`':. Yes Mavbe bLo- 1b. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the foliowing utilities? X - a. Power or natural gas? X b. Communications systems? X :.r.c. ,,—.:Water2..::... d. Sewer or septic tanks? X e. Storm water drainage? -- f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of an health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposuie of people to potential health hazards'? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public new? 29 . ecreation Will the ro osal result in an impact 't upon the'quality `or`q anttp y of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Cultural Resources: a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological sire':' b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? C. Does the propcz .1 have the potential to cause t" a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d . Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X X X X X X X _X— Yes Mavbe Ua _ 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish orwildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered, plant of animal eliminate important examples of the ma}or periods of California history or prehistory? X b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A shcrt-term impact on the environment is cne which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) C. Does the project have irnacts which are indiv- idually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant). __X_ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on humanbeings,4either diiectlyotztdirectly . 3 ., :. 4-7 88158 5. Environmental Evaluation 5. EIWIROIVI' E, NTAL EVAL UA TION INTRODUCTION The following environmental analysis is based on review of the proposed site plan maps, contacts with responsible agencies, review of literature pertinent to the site v and surrounding area or -the issues raised by prolectzmplementation, and the results of on-site reconnaissance. The text is organized in the same order as the City of Lodi checklist. For those issues that require an understanding of the existing conditions on the site, a brief summary paragraph is provided. It should be noted tKat the checklist was filled out before the following analysis. Therefore. the following text serves to analyze the relative significance of the impact. ISSUES IDENTIFIED IN INITIAL STUD AS NEEDING FURTHER EVALUATION 1. EARTH b. Disruptions In order to construct the project, the site will need to be graded in preparation for overcovering with buildings and a parking lot. On-going agricultural use of the,parcel �. has resulted in virtually level topography: "Therefore?`although Borrie grading`wiiI be required to prepare the site, extensive earthwork will not be rewired Noo.exxy rt: of soils:' antici ' ated P6 Zs p C. Wind or Water Erosion Following project construction, any areas of soil which may remain will be la> ,,caped,,tp preven erasion and enhance aesthetics AlI'sformwater runoff for the " site will enter a storm drain system and be conveyed to Lodi Lake. AIR Air Emissions As discussed in Appendix A -Air Quality Analysis, the general trend in the Lodi area is tow,•rds a gradual cumulative decline in regional air quality. Traffic related to the project will represent a minor and incremental decrease of overall regional air quality. So, although the project does not conflict with any policies contained in the San Joaquin County Air Quality Management Plan, overall growth in the Lodi area may result in exceedence of Plan goals. S-1 SS 15S 5. Environmental Evaluation. Construction related impacts would consist primarily of dust during site preparation activities. Waterinz of the site will reduce this impact by approximately 50 percent. Regular use of tarpaulins on haul trucks and daily cleanup of street mud and dust at the project site will further reduce impacts. s. WATER b. Drair:aae Following project construction, most of the site will be covered with impervious surfacing. As the parcel is currently in agricultural uses, very little runoff drains from the psrcel. The increase in impervious surfacing will result in an increase in stormwater runoff. However, the parcel will not generate sufficient quantities of runoff to exceed the capacity of detention basins serving the site. 4. PLANT LIFE d. Reduction in Acreage The project site is currently used for agricultural vineyard and row crops. The use of the site for contn7,ercial uses will preclude further agricultural use of the site. The project is located within City boundaries and is designated for urban uses. The preemption of agricultural soils by City development has been addressed in previous planning documents and environmental review processes. 6 NOISE fs n� T�Tnrra T avalc Noise levels in the project vicinity are primarily a function of vehicle noise. Appendix B presents a through discussion of existing and projected noise levels near the project site. The conclusion of this analysis was that the project itself will not generate significant operational noise levels, that project related traffic will generate a minor increment to area noise levels and that cumulative volumes of traffic resulting from buildout in Lodi will increase noise levels substantially. It was determined that the project building design and construction will need to anticipate these future noise volumes by implementing appropriate insulation and design features (i.e., w-indows oriented away from area roadways where feasible). Table 5-1 presents a general overview of noise levels and their effects on human beings. Construction related noise will be an unavoidable but short term result of the project. 7. LIGHT AND GLARE The project will require night lighting. The configuration of the development will result in landscaped buffers along thc. west and south property lines, where the truck 5-2 SS15S 5_ Environmental Evaluation TABLE 5-1 WEIGHTED SOUND LEVELS AND HUMAN RESPONSE SOUNDSOURCE Carrier Deck Jet Operation Jet Takeoff (200 feet) Discotheque Auto Horn (3 feet) Riveting Machine Jet Takeoff (2,000 feet) Shout (0.5) N.Y. Subway Station Heavy Truck (50 feet) Pneumatic Drill (50 feet) Freight Train (50 feet) Freeway Traffic (50 feet) Air Conditioning Unit (20 feet) Light Auto Traffic (50 feet) Living Room Bedroom Library Soft Whisper Q15 feet) Broadcasting Qtudio dB(A) RESPONSE CRITERIA 150 Painfully Loud 140 Painfully Loud 130 Limit Amplified Speech 120 Maximum Vocal Effort 120 Maximum Vocal Effort 120 Maximum Vocal Effort 110 Maximum Vocal Effort 100 Very Annoying 100 Very Annoying 100 Very Annoying :::.... 90 90 Hearing Damage (8 hours Hearing Damage �8 hours 80 Annoying 70 Telephone Use Difficult 70 Telephone use Difficult 60 Intrusive 60 Intrusive 50 Quiet 40 Quiet 40 Quiet 40 Quiet 30 Very Quiet 20 Very Qciet 10 Just Audible 0 Threshold of Hearing Typical A -Weighted sound levels taken with a sound -level meter and expressed as decibels on the scale. The "A" scale approximates the frequency of the human ear. Source: U.S. Council on Environmental Quality 1970. 5-3 38158 5. Environmental Evaluation loading and unioading areas will be located. These areas could require night lighting if after -hour deliveries to the loading docks are to occur. Parking areas in the center of the project will also be screened from; Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road by landscaping and buildings. In both cases, loading and parking areas, the installation of lighting fixtures which focus the light source onto the arca of activity and away from surrounding areas should be required. Attention to detail in the design review process will be sufficient to preclude the creation of glare on properties to the west and south which will ultimately be developed in residential uses. 8. LAND USES The City of Lodi General Pian currently designates the project site as Professional Office. The conversion of the parcel to Shopping Center (C; S) represents a departure from the original land use contemplated for the area. However; `the land directly opposite the site, at Woodhaven Lane and Turner Road, is a commercial shopping center. Together these two parcels, along with a small area at Turner Road and Rutledge Drive, constitute the only shopping center uses west of Ham Lane and north of Lodi Avenue. Development of this area in shopping uses will serve the northwestern section of Lodi and Woodbridge and minimize cross toun commuting for essential services. The land use itself is not in compatible with existing or proposed uses assuming that it is appropriately designed and landscaped. 13. TRANSPORTATIO[CIRCULATION Figure 2-2 in the Project Description provides a map showing the location of the ++roposed project. Access to the proJ'ect site is planned to be provided via Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road. The critical intersections analyzed to this report were determined from discussions with the City of Lodi staff. These intersections are listed below: .11 Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road JK Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane Woodhaven Lane and Eilers Lane Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street A Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road Lower Sacramento Road is a two-lane roadway connecting Lodi to the City of Stockton to the south and to the City of Galt to the north. Turner Road. Elm Street, and Lodi Avenue are major east/west collectors going through the Cinr of Lodi. In the vicinity of the project site, Turner Road has two lanes. The intersection of Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road is signalized. Woodhaven Lane is a two-lane street that extends north from Turner road to about one hundred feet north of Eilers Lane where it dead ends. A bridge is planned to be constructed over the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal in the near future which will connect Woodhaven Lane with Chestnut Street in Woodbridge. 1'he intersection of 5-4 S815S 5. Environmental Evaluation Woodhaven Lane and Eilers Lane was assumed to be controlled by a STOP -sign on Eilers Lane at Woodhaven Lane after the construction of this bridge. West Elm Street is a two-lane roadway which is wide enough to accommodate four lanes. This road is controlled by a STOP -sign at its intersection with Lower Sacramento Road. The intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street meets the traffic signal warrants at the present time and is number five or?the list of the intersections waiting to be signalized in Lodi. The intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road also meets the traffic signal warrants and it is number two on the priority list of the intersections to be signalized. This intersection is currently controlled by STOP -signs on all four approaches. P.M. peak hour turning movement counts were conducted by TJKM in July 1987 at the intersections of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane, Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road. To update these counts, appropriate growth rates were applied. -rhe turning movement counts for the remaining intersections were obtained from the City of Lodi. To analyze the signalized and four-way STOP -sign -controlled intersections, the critical movement summation method of capacity analysis was used. This method involves consideration of "critical" (or high volume) conflicting movements and is based on information from a number of sources including Highway Cap acir)' RTaracsal, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board,. 1985. The volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio is an mdicationof the level of service (LOS) at which an intersection is operating. The LOS classification system is a scale which ranks street, highway, and intersection operations based on the amount of traffic and traffic operations. A complete descrT i tion of the system is included in the Highway Capacity Manual (special Report 209Highway Research Board, 1955. Briefly, the level of service ranking system is 3 scale with a range of A through F (See Table 5-2). Level A represents free Flow conditions and level F represents jammed or capacity conditions. The relationship of V/C ratio to level of service is given. in Table 5-2. For the existing conditions, the intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street was analyzed using the unsignalized method of capacity analysis. This analvsis utilizes a computer program written by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, and is in accordance with the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. Table 5-3 shows the existing P.M. peak hour traffic: conditions at the study intersections. Also, shown on this table are the projected levels of service at these intersections after the construction of the Chestnut bridge over the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal. It was projected that approximately 400 cars would use this bridge to travel to and from Woodbridge during the P.M. peak hour. The intersections of Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road are presently operating at unacceptable levels -of service. These intersections meet the traffic signal warrant criteria and are on the 5-5 55155 TABLE 5-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR URBAN AND SUBURBAN ARTERIAL STREETS LEVEL OF SFi3Vlf'F DESCRIPTJON VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO* A Freeflow. low. Very slight or no delay. If signalized, conditions are such that 0.00-0.60. no approach phase is fullyutilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Turning movements are east made and nearly all drivers find.freedom of o ration. B Stabie flow. Slight delay. if signalized, an occasional approach phase 0.61-0.70 is fully utilized. Vehicle platoons are formed. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within grcups of vehicles This levet is suitable operation for neral design purposes. C Stable flow. Acceptable delay. If signalized a few drivers arriving at 0.71-0.80 the end of a queue may occasionally have to wait through one signal cycle. Back-ups may devetop behind turning vehirJes. Most drivers feel some- what restricted. D Approaching unstable flow. Tolerabledelay. Delays may be substantial 0.81-0.90 during short periods, but excessive back-ups do not occur. Maneuver- ability is severely limited during short periods due to temporary back- ups. to E. rghsnrat 0.91=1.00le usignaleycles. Thereartypicallyiong queues ofvehicles upstream ofthe intersection. F Forced fiow. Excessive delay. Intersection operates below capacity. Varies' Jammed conditions. Back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement, Volumes may vary widely, depending principally on the downstream back-up conditions. References: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No 209, Transportation Research Board, 1985. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report No. 87, Highway Research Board, 1,%5. TJKM. In general, volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratios cannot be greater than 1.00, unless the lane capacity assumptions are too low. Also, if future demand projections are considered for analytical purposes. a ratio greater than 1.00 might be obtained, indicating that the projected demand would exceed the capacity. 88158 i ' I'AB]LE 5-3 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS DO t EXISTING CONDITIONS A EXISTING CONDITIONS W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE INTERSECTION ? LOS LOS Turner & Lower Sacramento C 0.72 8 °a 0.63 Turner & Lower Sacramento/ A 0.44 A `' ' 0.45 Woodhaven Woodhaven & Ellers a; Lower Sacramento & ? p* --* — West Elm «> �^ Lower Sacramento & D 0.81 D 0.81 West Lodi/Sargent * Unsignalized method of capacity analysis. m 0 5 w O S. Environmental Evaluation City's priority list to be signalized. Conditions at these intersection will improve to acceptable levels when they are signalized. a. Generation To determine the impacts of the proposed Winepress Shopping Center, a trip generation analysis was performed for this project. The trips generated by this development were then distributed and assigned onto the surrounding streets. The trip generation rates for this study were obtained from the linstitute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, fourth Edition, 1987. According to Trip Generation, approximately 40 percent of the trips generated by a shopping center of this size involve vehicles passing by on their way to another destination. These "pass -by" trips come directly from the traffic stream passing development on the adjacent street system. The amount of "pass -by" trips estimated to enter and exit a shopping center does not affect the driveway volumes but does affect the amount of traffic added to the adjacent street system. Table 5-4 shows the number of new and "pass -by' trips generated by the proposed Winepress Shopping Center. Also shown on this table is the number of trips generated by the existing designation for the project site. It can be seen from this table that, when compared to the. existing designation, the proposed project would generate 3,324 additional new trips per day. with 188 additional new trips during the P.M. peak hour. A trip distribution pattern based on likely origins and destinations for trips both leaving and entering the site was developed for the proposed project. 'Table 5-5 shows this distribution pattern. Based on the percentages shown on this table, the traffic generated by the project was distributed and assigned on to the street system. North 20 TABLE 5-5 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN South East 35 30 West 15 To evaluate the impacts of this proposed Winepress Shopping Center, a P.M. peak hour analysis was performed for the intersections of Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road, Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane, Woodhaven Lane and Eilers Lane, Lower Sacramento and West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road. This analysis included determination of levels of service for existing, existing plus project and cumulative plus project conditions. 5-8 88158 F-( �{ o co cl)� N Y Q Z! N Ni C7 . C7 '_} '" - Cl) E•— Q tlt L o (o � 4 LU - a: a CC -mn"] 00 Q c � � 0 Tr o n CD o � e �`x Z 3 — � i N toz z O o w .0 J Q Qa.?f v a� (0 Q W LU o r. u1 CL -J o ~a LL � Q � LL cc .. LL I.L Q r uj _ Li. CO g 0 CCA Ci) -� O cV U,, T� m C% Gc V.. U O O i= Q m U a) cn c m v1 -� wa C c0 U LSU ` y U S G 0. m y Ii H CA11 LL a` U') w O c z°� Y 5-9 88158 5. Environmental Evaluation Results of the intersection capacity analysis for this study are shown on Table 5-6. The existing and currulat`ve traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5-1. The turning movement volumes at th:, .udy intersections are shown on Figures 5-2 and 5-3. It can be seen from Table 5-6 that the intersections of Lower Sacramento Road with West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Saraent Road are operating at unacccptable Level of Service D under the existing conditions with or without the proposed project. It can also he seen from this table that the proposed project would not have significant-inipact on the study intersections. To evaluate the need for a traffic signal at the intersections of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodliaven Lane and Woodhaven Lane and Eilers Lane a signal warrant analysis was performed. The results of this analysis is shown on T abl ; 5-7. _ TABLE 5-7 The intersections of Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi ,Avenue/Sargent Road are presently operating a: unacceptable levels of service. Thcse intersections meet the traffic signal warrant kriteria and are an the city's priority list to be sign tlizeO. q.on tttons at these intersection will improve to acccptable levels when they are signalize It should be noted that according to the Spcc;fic Plan for the City of Lodi, Lower .Sacramento Road is planned to be a divided roadway with raised median in front of -the project site, The Specific Plan would need to be revised to allow for median openings for the project access paints. 5-10 SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Existine, E.xistin�z + Cumulative= Cc . dittons 'N'/Chestnut Pro'ect W/ Project hestnut W/Chestnut Bridge Bridge Bridge Intersection Warrant Warrant Warrant Turner & Lower No No Yes Sacramento/Wood haven Woodhaver. & Eilers No No No Notes: Yes = Meets warrant No == Doe. not meet warrant The intersections of Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi ,Avenue/Sargent Road are presently operating a: unacceptable levels of service. Thcse intersections meet the traffic signal warrant kriteria and are an the city's priority list to be sign tlizeO. q.on tttons at these intersection will improve to acccptable levels when they are signalize It should be noted that according to the Spcc;fic Plan for the City of Lodi, Lower .Sacramento Road is planned to be a divided roadway with raised median in front of -the project site, The Specific Plan would need to be revised to allow for median openings for the project access paints. 5-10 � r.! CAD � Y, | . ! -FABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF CAPACITY ANALYSIS P.M. PEAK HOUR , + PROJEC EXISTING CONDITION EXISTING PROJECT [»CUMULATIVE W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE\ W/CHESTNUT BEI G % w/CHESTNUT BR DG L TERS CTION # LOS yj C \ Las V/C - ] � LOS YI—C `® q Turner &Lower Sacramonto ? 8 c : O 0.65D Q� Tum« &Lower S Jarmo * 0.45 A 0.5 = C : 0.7 Woodhaven � fl . Wo���n&OEa A A � D Lower Sacramento &� M � � B -- � , 0.660.66 W� em - ) . .Low«S2amenm& { D cm D Op / D® $a7 . West Lodi Sari: � . . Umi\nal«ed me1Wocapacity BnalA - »,«Ttgs iMersectionwa:sastob0«kif 'e`under■h°cumulv condors. .. .. . . .. . PM PEAK -HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/CHESTNUT BRIDGE FIGURE 5-1 i CHESTNUT ST., -..,I o f `\ � o!/jam C V PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE O of ui �� 3 i r ' ! i � •' z ata �,E TURNER I -----I EXISTING UM1IU LATIV FILERS• i FIGURE 5-2 z w > f v 1 263: o , oI , F 31 r -!C)Ai 304 TURNEP. 55 7 y o ru . 3a o< to ��--W. EUA 4 2 r • , 4C II I JA PT 1 F c! I PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE i O z Lu i 33 w ^{ s 161 7 - �'-J r 8 r L- SARGEHT W. LODI --• � 6791 FIGURE 5-3 SOURCE: T KM 5-14 ei A �ft EXISTING I�--; EXISTING -;- T HULA T IV PRCJECT SOURCE: T KM 5-14 ei A 5. Environmental Evaluation In addition, as part of the Specific Plan. frontage roads are proposed on the east and west sides of Lower Sacramento Road. It is recommended that the west frontage road end at a cul-de-sac prior to reaching the project site. There are no mitigation measures recommended due to the proposed project. b. Parking The project proponent intends to construct 476 parking spaces. This exceeds the zoning requirement of 456 spaces and will adequately serve the needs of the development. -.- c. Transportation System - The projected future traffic volume used for this study were obtained from ?he City of Lodi Transportation Model developed by T.IKM. This model was prepared by generating, future daily traffic volumes for the City of Lodi study using the urban transportation package for microcomputers (MINUTP). The future land nses - assumed in the city-wide traffic study were the build -out of area within the existing city limits and estimates of possible development in the General Plan boundaries around the city. The proposed Winepress Shopping Center was also included in the City of Lodi Transportation Model. Therefore, the volumes obtained from this model were used to analyze the cumulative plus project traffic conditions. The p.m. peak hcur turning movement volumes were estimated to be 10 percent of the daily traffic volumes. In addition, since the Chestnut Bridge is planned to be constructed in the near future, the cumulative analysis was performed with this bridge. Under the cumulative plus project conditions the intersections of Turner Road and - north Lower Sacramento Road, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent road would be operating at Level of Service D. It should be noted that this LOS would occur even without the proposed project. As can be seen from Table 5-7. the intersection of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane would meet the traffic signal warrant criteria under the cumulative plus project conditions. The following mitigation measures would be required to mitigate traffic conditions occurring after the build -out of the study area, and are in addition to the -y improvements needed under existing conditions. It should be noted that these measures will be required even without the proposed project. Mitiowt inn 'Measures 1. Signalize the intersection of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhavtn Lane. 2. Widen the westbound approach of the intersection of Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road to accommodate a separate right - turn lane. two through lanes, and a left -turn lane. 5-15 SS15S 5. Environmental Evaluation ;. Widen the intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road to accommodate a left -turn lane, a through lane, and through/right-turn lane on the northbound and southbound approaches. 4. Add a right -turn lane to the northbound approach of the intersection of Woodhaven. and Eilers Lane. 5. Widen Lower -Sacramento Road between Turner Road and l%ettleman Lane to four Ianes. ys ,t 6 - hn rove.the intersection of:Lowez Sacramento Road and West Elm Streetto accommodate a through'lane And sl' ared through/.ight-turn Iane on, the northbound approach, and a left -1 urn lane and two through xr lares`on'thesouthbound approach. Tables-;&shows"th mitiQated`capacitynnalysis for this' studv. d. Circulation/Movement The project will not create any new roads or intersections. Approximately fourty percent (40%) of the traffic drawn to the site will be a result of ` drive-by"of existing traffic rather than creating a significant new component to the overall circulation pattern. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES a & h. Fire/Police The project will result in a commitment from the City to provide necessary protection. Consultation with the affected agencies during the final site planning stages will insure that agency's suaQestions to unprove safety and serviceability are met. y 16. UTILITIES e. Drainage The project will result in increased stormwater drainage as the site is covered with building and parking surfaces. Storm drain facilities in the area will be sufficient to accommodate the increased runoff. IS. AESTHETICS Construction of the project will change the character of the site from open. agriculture and office uses to a developed shopping center. The Wine and Roses Bed and Breakfast is located to the north of the project site and is screened by heavy vegetation. 5-16 88158 INTERSECTION Turner& Lower Sacramento Turner& Lower Sacramento/ Woodhaven TABLE S-8 MITIGATED CAPACITY ANALYSIS P•M. PEAK HOUR EXISTING CONDITION W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE LOS VLC N/A N/A N/A N/A EXISTING + PROJECT W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE LOS VAC N/A N/A N/A N/A * Unsignallzed method cf capacity analysis. N/A = No improvementsaro recommendedforthis Intersection. CUMULATIVE + PROJECT W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE LOS B 0.70 C 0.72 C* A C 0.48 0.73 Woodhaven & Eliers },{ N/A N/A ; N/A N/A Lower Sacramento & A ` 0.45 8{ A 0.50 West Elm a �� Lower Sacramento & R 0.61 B 0.65 West Lod(/Sargent * Unsignallzed method cf capacity analysis. N/A = No improvementsaro recommendedforthis Intersection. CUMULATIVE + PROJECT W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE LOS B 0.70 C 0.72 C* A C 0.48 0.73 5_ Environmental Evaluation The site plan includes landscaping along the entire perimeter of the site, with particular emphasis to the areas along Turner and Lower Sacramento Roads. Careful integration of landscaping and the structures proposed along Turner Road will serve to minimize any conflicts. Design treatment consideration should be given to the portions of the structures facing Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road to prevent the construction of "blankwalls" facing these roadways. 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a. Degradation The project will not affect either the habitat or individuals of any rare or endangered plant or animal species. b. Short -Term Goals The project will not generate any significant long-term adverse effects for the following reason: the on-site development will not generate any adverse effect. C. Cumulative Although use of the site will increase and change in nature and the lake will increase, it does not appear that the use will generate any significant impacts. As discussed in an item -by -item basis in sections 1-20, the impacts of the project will be localized, will not exceed standards, will not create any secondary impacts and will not degrade thu local environment. d. Humans As stated in 20e, the project will not generate any substantial effects on human beings. SIR 15S e 6. Report Preparation 6. REPORT PREPARATION This EIR has been prepared by EIP Associates, Inc. under contract to the City of Lodi. The consultants who prepared each section are listed below. Kate Burdicki o ec�ManaQ r/Land Use i ce aneou5? ections Geoff Hornek Air Qualit;,/Noise Jeff Clark/Angie Raygani(TJKM) Traffic Graphics and production provided by. Diane Hussey Mark Biegaj Leilani Ferrari Kin, Fountain Bobi Lyons gut Appendices 7. APPENDICES 7-1 :., 8818 WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER EIR AIR Q(JA'.ITY SFTTTNO �r ti�la`.r,ry Rank rouTId The 19% Clear- Air Act gave the U.S. EriJironmental Protaction ?agency (EPA) -the authority to set federal ambient air quality standards. The Act indicated the need for primar, standards to protect public health ark secondary standards +o pro-beo•t. public: welfare from effects such as vislUility reduction, soiling, nuisance, and other fo=rms of damage -,It also required that the federal standards oe designed to protect those geopis 0S�W0 suscept ble to respira'# or y dist.i-ess, suci3 �s asthpiatics, iiia elderly'; "very young children, people already weakened by illness, and persons engagedin in -strenuous work or exercise (all termed "sensitive receptors"). In .1971, the EPA established federal standards for five major "criteria" /1/ air pollutants: photochemical oxi0ar_ts (ozone), carbon monoxide NO), suspended ;articulates (n.b., originally the standard applied to particulates o_;army t;+iarjlieter,-erimed tt'z al suspended pa _4 cu,13 _: 5 or TSP, but the sZ2ndard was _recently changed to apply only to particulates less than 10 microns in diameter, termed FMio ), nitrogen dioxide (302 ), and sulfur dicside (S02). State standards were established in California starting in 1969, pursuant to the Mul-ord-Carrell Act. The state and federal standards, given in Table A, provide acceptable durations for specific contaminant levels in order to protect sensitive receptors from adverse effects. TABLE A: FZoDERAL ANT' STATE AMBIENT AIR. QUALITY STANDARDS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Averaging Federal Federal California ` me Frimary S_ardzr_d Secor_dar�: Stam and Standard, Ozone l -hou-• 0.12 ppm 0.1 2 ppm 0.10 ppm ,arbon 2.onoxide : -huur 35.0 ppm 35. 0 ppm 20.0 gpm 8 -: ou r 9.O ppm 9.0 ppm 9.0 PPM 'nitrogen Dioxide 1 -hour --- --- 0.25 Ppm annual 0.05 ppm 0.05 ppm --- Sulfur Dioxide 1 -hour --- --- 0.5 ppn 24 - hour 0.14 ppm --- 0.05 ppm 4:u.nual 0.03 ppm -- --- suspended 24-hour 150 ugjm3 __- 50 ug/M3 ,=articulates/l/ annual, 50 ug/m3 --- 30 ag/m3 7pm = parts per million, ug/m3 z micrograms per cubic meter SLaLe _ural federal. standards are for particuinte material less than 10 microns in diameter, usually designated PVio. P 0- The 1977 C%!e`anArAct Amendments required that each state identify areas within its borders (i.e., non -attainment areas) that do not meet federal primary standard and devise a State Implementation Pian (SIP), subject to EPA approval, to attain federal primary standards no later than 1987- The California standards do not have specific attainment dates. The Cali-fornia Air Resources Board (CARS) coordinates and oversees both state and federal air pollution control pro -grams in California. As part of this 7esronsibility, Sze CAPS monitors existing air quality, establishes state standards (which in many cases are ;.-:ore stringent than 'ederal standards, as shown in Table A), limits allowable emissions from vehicular sources, and is responsible for putting together the SIP. The CARB has divided the State into =many single and multi -county air basins- Authority for air quality management within them has been given to local Air Pollution (:ontrolDistricts (APCD) which develop local non -attainment plaris within their jurisdiction. The San Joaquin Valley has been designated a3 an air basin by the CAFE but no sin le APCD has jurisdiction over the whole Valley_ At the northern end of the Sen Joaquin Valley, Sar, Joaquin has its own XPCD, the San Joac=uin County APCD. Q,tz SL1Aa1it`:Prgblepis and. San Joaguin 'Valle The r.;ARB and the local AP'R's operate a number of ambient air quality monitoring stations throughout the Valley which measure the ambient concentrations of the above-mentioned pollutants. The data show a general trend of worsening air as one moves from north to south in the Val' e, . C basis 1211. ,r.::n_- o t:le Say: Joaquin `iailey is 'currently designated a non -attainment are2 for ozone, CO, 2nd TSP, while the portion of Kern County near Bakerfield is ncn-attainment for S0. Federal standards for;; NO2 : are; being met throughout the Valley: Table.. summarizes -the highe3t `measured `pollutant concentrations for ozone, CO, and particulates at monitoring atations in San joaquin County (all located in Ctocktor.) and shows how they compare with state and/or federal ambient air cluAl'.`,y standard:, Air Quality Planning qzj!_Q= of i n the rtgr-q San Joaquin Valley_ -Planning for the attainment and maintenance, of federal and state air quality standards San Joaquin County is the joint responsibility of the Sar. Joaquin County Planning Department, the Sar. Joaquin County APCD, and the Sen Joaquin County Couituil of Governments. Together they authored the San Joaquin County Air Quality Management Plan in 1982. The Plan was adopted and forwarded Lu the CARE fur incorporation into the SIP. The Plan analysis showed that the federal standard for ozone could be attained by a 28% or 27.2 tons/day ROG emission reduction betwsen 1979 and 1987. A proportional rollback calculation used to determine the CO emission 'reduction needed for attainment indicated Chat a 9% or 27.7 tons/day reduction would be sufficient. Since the Plan projected ROG and CO emissl.on reductions of 37% (36.9 tons/day) and 19% (59.6 tons/day) relative to the -1979 GmiSsion baseline, attainment seemed guaranteed. P 0� ...--------- •----..-------------------------------------------------- ABLE 4- SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AIR POLLUTANT DATA SUMMARY 1985-1987 P:3T,TJJTANT i-)'TC}Nr. Highest 1 -hour (ppm) Days > 0.12 ppm Hays > 4.10 pym CARBON MONOXIDE Highest 1 -hour (ppm) Days > 35.0 ppm Davy 5 20:'0 "Ppm Highest 8 -hour Days > S. 0 ppct1 Highe5 , 1 -;lour (ppm) Days > 95.0 PPm Days > 20.0 yynt STAT ION Stockton (Maripoza) Stockton ;Hazelton) Stockton (Hazelton) Stockton (Ci aremont ) STANDARD 1985 1986 1987 0.12/0-10 35.0/20.0 9.0 J J 0/20, 0 0.14 0.14 5 3 33 30 ?_2.0 17.3 0 0 0 0 6.3 9.3 0 1 13.0 19.0 0 0 0 0 0.16 1 53 iiig::sst 8 -roux Stccktct: 9-0 8.4 12.1 12.9 Days > 9.0 ppm (Claremont) 0 1 1 �:�?it� ICuh�,T•� ,, " Uzgliest24- hour `: TSP ' Stockton 150.0 229 233 200 Days > 150 ug/ma (Hazelton) 5 2 4 Annual average TSP 60.0 94.9 80.6 83.7 Year > 60 ug/m3 Yes Yes Yes Highest 24-hour PM,o Stockton 50.0 114 196 158 Days > 150 ug/m-1 (Hazelton) 0 1 1 Annual average PM1 0 30.0 48.0 45.9 43.6 Ye.ar.. > 5U u5/213 No Nc No .-ppm =parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; ug/m3 z micrograms per cubic mA�er SOURCE: Calirornia Air Quality Data, California Air Resources Board, 1985-1987 However, readings in excess of the federal ozone t'ite CO standards were still -being recorded in San Joaquin County in 1987. Since one exceedarce of the Vederal standards per year is not considered a violation, San Joaquin County can claim to have met the Clean Air Act deadline. However, since the .highest :eadings exceed the federal standards by a significant margin, the County cannot. claim to have eliminated the potential for future standard vic:lation,� This potetitial can be expected to grow as the years go on because population and employment in San Joaquin County is growing faster than anticipated under Plan assumptions_ The 4- made no recommendations of measures to reduce emissions of ,particulate matter so that the federal secondary standard for TSP could be atterinAd. 4 WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER FIR ATR QUALITY IMPACTS F a_ Project a r quality impacts comprise two ca egories: r-empora_y ?mpac;s due to project construction and long-term impacts due to or�oject operation. Impacts in each category car. be classed as having ef. ects on regional. or t;i ftt s t. ruatio^_::c D_3G�.S ~-Regiunal and Local Scale Construction activities would temporaries increase TSP and Pt.`_: concentrations _,near the project site. Equ;rment and vehicles generate dust daring clearing, excavation and grading C6nn-ruction vehicle tzaffIc on un pa" -gid surfaces also generates dust, as would wind blowing over exposed earth. It is no-, r,7 ssible -o estimate accurately the pt -t, o ccncuntrat.:JTls that would occur at or adjacent tc the construction sites because such concentrations are very sensitive to local meteorology and topography and to variations in soil —silt and moisture content. however, EPA measurements take:, d' -ring apartment and shopping center constructicn in the southwester: United States provide a rough "indication of the amount of particulate emissions. These measurements indicate „that approximately 1.2 tons of dust are emitted per acre per month: of construction activity./3/ The EPA istinates that about; 45% o* this dust is -comprised of large particles, which settle out rapidly on nearby horizontal :.rfaces. Large diameter particulates generated by construction are, therefore, -oma' concern more as a soiling nuisance rather than for its unhealthful impacts. Unless mitigated, the remaining fractior. of PMio may cause standard violations in the vicinity of the construction site. Construction equipment and worker commute vehicles would e m i t exhaust at the "construction sites thereby contributing to the regional pollutant totals_ Because vehicle/equipment emissions would be relatively small In comparison to operational emissions, they would not be significant on the regional scale. —Unless mitigated, equipment emissions nay cause spot violations cf the CO standards in the site vicinity. Odors of construction equipment exhaust would 'probably be noticeable in the environs of the project site for the duration of construction. Operational Im a� cts —RHgiorjal Sc:al� 'Orrc::e Ole project is complete, emissions from vehicles associated with —project operation would add.to the regional totals. The traffic -related project ROG and NOr emissions would be 0,031 and 0.050 tons per day, ,.4respectively, as shown in Table G. ROG and NG'x are chemical _recursors to vz��rte and the Plan focused on ROG emissions reduction as the primary way to reduce regional ozone, levels.: ..Ordinarily, an ROG emissions inzrement of -0.031 tons/day to a regional total of Ei tons/day would not cause a measurable increaso in ozone. However, despite the ROG emissicrl control., :measures currently' in force. ozone remain a problem in San .icaquin County_ .t is also very probable that ozone levels will increase and additional w_ P 0: violations of the federal standard will occur in future years, if Sar. Joaquin's higher -than -anticipated population growth continues. Although the -.project would not directly conflict with any of the strategies contained in the Plan, by serving a higher population base in San Joaquin County, it would be a contributor to any future ozone problem in the County. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : TABLE G: EMISSIONS FROM PROJECT UENERATED TRAFFIC (TOMS/DAY).. Pollutant Carbon Monoxide Reactive '/A Nitrogen Oxides San Joaquin County. Project/a,/ 2000/b/ 0.475 238 0.031 62 0.050 63 /a/ Emissions due to vehicular sources were estimated by using the California Air Resources Board (CARB) ORBEMIS2 model. An average vehicle• �.~. r�v:4 �s �a� �...J '�. ... .,...r .. �... .. .f .S.__.. `. �+�..'�:_ .-._ �. _ ►.._ VV iS<-, ^i�": �v .' .. --and NCx were assumed. /b/ Countywide vehicular emissions were obtained from the GARB. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Local scale -The project has the potential for affecting local CO levels, especially' nea busy intersections. CO Qoncentrations were estimated for existing traffic 'conditions, future traffic conditions without the project, and future „ traffic conditions with the project by separately estimating the background and local CO components for each case. The background component was obtained from CARB/APCD monitoring data and the local componants were estimated by using the CAUNE4 model (see Appendix A for a listing of ''modeling assumptions) . The components were then added to obtain the total ,CO concentration. Table H shows the worst-case curbside CO concentretion$'' at the three intersections where project traffic is expected to have the —grRAteat jMpaCt. " Modelingshows violations of the eight-hour CO standard at all three ,.intersections. It also shows little prospect for significant improvement over the next 12 years. Increases in traffic volumes due to the project and other developments would largely cancel out the beneficial effects of reduced vehicular emissions and traffic flow improvements. However, the project increment to total CO levels would be small in comparison to the: contribution of cumulative traffic. P 04 TABLE WORST CASE. CURBSIDE CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS AT SELECTED INTERSECTIONS IN THE PROJECT VICINITY (IN PPM) Sta :da.ds 1 1 .0 20.0 20.0 20.0 - 8 -hr. 9.0 9.0 9.0 S.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -.The tabulated concentrations are the sums of a background component,' which includes the cumulative effacts of all CO sources in the project vicinity, - and. a,local _ ;component, which reflects the effects of vehicular traffic on roadways in the -vicinity of the intersection. Future background components were obtained by reviewing CO monitoring data from the nearest CARE/APCD -monioring station. Local components were obtained by using the CALINE4 air quality model. EMFACM vehicular emission rates, traffic data provided by TJKM Associates, and parameters characteristic of worst-case dispersion meteorology in the San Joaquin 'Valley were used as input to the model (see Appendix A for a summary of the input data and a discussion or' the -methodology used in choos o the CO background). Standard violations are underlined " K I T I GAT I O N MEASURES Dust emissions' related to construction can be reduced approximately 50% by ..watering exposed earth surfaces wring excavation, grading and construction activities. All construction contracts should require watering in late morning and at the end of the day; the frequency of watering should increase if wind speeds exceed 15 mrh. Conditions of approval should also require daily cleanup of mud and dust carried onto street surfaces by construction 'vehicles " 'Throughout excavation, haul trucks should use tarpaulins or other effective covers.- Upon completion of construction, contractors should taka `measures to reduce wind eres.ion. Replanting and repaving should be completed as soon an possible. Unnecessary idling of construction equipment s-hould be avoided. Cumulative growth in pan Jcaquin County and Lodi should be lim_�ed''or` additional air quality control measures should be adopted by the APCD to =d ucC the County ROG and CC -missions. With Project y Without Averaging Existing Project Unmitigated Mitigated lntarsection Time 1988 2000 2000 2000 Turuwr/ 1 -hr. 18.9 19.7 19.9 i8.3 t o w e r Sacramento 8 -hr. 1y.2 11_7 11 10.7 Luwlez Lacramento/ 1 -hr. 19.3 17.5 18.0 ., 17.2 10 '' Lower SacramenLu/ 1 -hr. 19.7 20.4 21.1 19.9 West Lodi/Sargent 8 -hr. 11.7 12.2 12.7 >>_8 Background 1-lr ;2,p 12.0 12.0 i2.0 8 -hr. 6.3 3.3 6.3 6.3 Sta :da.ds 1 1 .0 20.0 20.0 20.0 - 8 -hr. 9.0 9.0 9.0 S.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -.The tabulated concentrations are the sums of a background component,' which includes the cumulative effacts of all CO sources in the project vicinity, - and. a,local _ ;component, which reflects the effects of vehicular traffic on roadways in the -vicinity of the intersection. Future background components were obtained by reviewing CO monitoring data from the nearest CARE/APCD -monioring station. Local components were obtained by using the CALINE4 air quality model. EMFACM vehicular emission rates, traffic data provided by TJKM Associates, and parameters characteristic of worst-case dispersion meteorology in the San Joaquin 'Valley were used as input to the model (see Appendix A for a summary of the input data and a discussion or' the -methodology used in choos o the CO background). Standard violations are underlined " K I T I GAT I O N MEASURES Dust emissions' related to construction can be reduced approximately 50% by ..watering exposed earth surfaces wring excavation, grading and construction activities. All construction contracts should require watering in late morning and at the end of the day; the frequency of watering should increase if wind speeds exceed 15 mrh. Conditions of approval should also require daily cleanup of mud and dust carried onto street surfaces by construction 'vehicles " 'Throughout excavation, haul trucks should use tarpaulins or other effective covers.- Upon completion of construction, contractors should taka `measures to reduce wind eres.ion. Replanting and repaving should be completed as soon an possible. Unnecessary idling of construction equipment s-hould be avoided. Cumulative growth in pan Jcaquin County and Lodi should be lim_�ed''or` additional air quality control measures should be adopted by the APCD to =d ucC the County ROG and CC -missions. P a-, CALINE4 INPUT DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t'_eteo; ulw�r Wind Speed Wind Angie Stability Mixing Height -Avr,roging Time Surface Roughness Temperaturts Traffic. 1 meter per second CALINE4 finds worst case Fasquill-Turner class F 1000 meters 1 hour 108 centimeters 50 degrees F _r3$Ii C vol'. 3^tom _ data ta.Lrl __ _zaf`fic an a Associates. T e speeds assigned 4o vehicles, as shown below, reflected the LOS -dependent deiays experienced at intersections according tc data supplied by the Highway Capac;it:y Ma.ival: CO Baekgrvurtc4Cc�ny n Lratioi nom' ause no CO monitoring is being done in Lodi no data on the CO background in the vicinity of the project is readily available. Consequently, data from the closest CARB/AFCu monitoring stations, the Mariposa, Hazelton; and ,Claremont stations in Stockton, were examined. Since Lodi`. is a smaller city than Stockton, tha existing CO background is probably lower than.Stockton's The lowest of the highest CO concentrations measured in Stoektcn'< (i.e. , the 1985 readings at the Hazelton station, 12.0 Fpm one-hour and 6 3.ppm 'eight-hour)were used as the existing CO background for the project vicinity. The CO background was assumed to remain at present levels over the next 12 years. Data from Stockton's Hazelton station was.:..used over data `f'rvsa Lht—_ Claremont statioa because the concentrations wereAo'wer..and, therefore, less likely to be influenced by strong local sources Delay Avg- Speed LOS (sec.) (mph) ------------ A 16 24 20 C 2% 15 T) 35 15 E 40 15 F >40 10 Emiasian Factors Emission factors given below were generated- by the CARB'.s:EMFAi,7P( computer pxa�ram. A _3 7 At 20 mph 1988 63 48 37 2000 39 30 24 CO Baekgrvurtc4Cc�ny n Lratioi nom' ause no CO monitoring is being done in Lodi no data on the CO background in the vicinity of the project is readily available. Consequently, data from the closest CARB/AFCu monitoring stations, the Mariposa, Hazelton; and ,Claremont stations in Stockton, were examined. Since Lodi`. is a smaller city than Stockton, tha existing CO background is probably lower than.Stockton's The lowest of the highest CO concentrations measured in Stoektcn'< (i.e. , the 1985 readings at the Hazelton station, 12.0 Fpm one-hour and 6 3.ppm 'eight-hour)were used as the existing CO background for the project vicinity. The CO background was assumed to remain at present levels over the next 12 years. Data from Stockton's Hazelton station was.:..used over data `f'rvsa Lht—_ Claremont statioa because the concentrations wereAo'wer..and, therefore, less likely to be influenced by strong local sources Appendix B APPEND. B -NOISE ANALYSIS WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER NOISE SETTING P 'a The human response to environmental noise is subjective and varies considerably prom individua� to individual. The effects of noise can range from interference with sleek, concentration, and communication, to the causation of physiological and psychological stress, and, at the highest Intensity levels, to hearing loss- Excessive noisa can also adversely affect fa . -m animals and wildlife. Listed below are several examples of the noise levels associated with common situations, given in A -weighted decibels (abbreviated dBA; an explanation of the decibel scale and other essential aspects of acoustics can be found in Appendix A): Jet takeoff at 200 feet 125 dBA Di:ic:v,i,titr.4ue 215 d3A Motorcycle a. 20 feet 110 dBA }might train at 50 feet 95 dBA Freeway traffic at 50 feet 80 dBA Vacuum Cl eanL-r 70 dBA Ave.rxge. Office 50 dBA Lib.740 dBA Recording aTudio 20 dBA Leaves rustling 10dBA ree"77 xrenk. s Environmental noise fluctuates in intensity over time and several descriptors of time -averaged noise levels are in use. The two most common are Ldn and _ CNEL. Ldn, the day -night average noise level, is the 24-hour average of the noise intensity, with a 10 dBA "penalty" added during night hours (10:00 FM to 7:00 AM) to account for the greater sensitivity to noise during this period. (;Nx:ls, the community equivalent noise level, is similar to t,dn , but adds an additional 5 dBA penalty to evening noise (7:00 PM to 10:00 PM). In order to limit population exposure to physically and/or psychologically damaging noise levels, the State of California, the various County governments, and most municipalities in the State have established standards and ordinances to control noise. The California Department of Health Services' (DHS) Office of Noise Control has studied the correlation of noise levels and their effects on human activity associated with di-fferent land uses. San Joaquin County and the City ..of Lodi have adopted a sat of land use compatibility guidelines based on DHS findings; these guidelines are presented in Table A. The Table shows the 'noise levels (in this case, Lan) below which certain land uses would be - compatible with the exterior noise environment with no special noise abatement requirements (i.e., for residential and commercial uses, Ldn's of 60 dBA and 70 dBA, respectively). It also shows the noise levels above which the land ,.use would be considered unacceptable due to the difficulty of providing the needed noise abatement (i.e., for residential and commercial uses, Ldn's of 75 dBA and 85 dBA, respectivai:r} . Finally, the Table indicates that there is often_ a large range of exterior noise levels with which a land use could be "made compatible if the necessary noise abatement features are included in the design (i.e., nor residential and commercial uses, noise ranging from 60 dBA to 75 dBA and from 70 dBA to 85 dBA-; respectively, could be acconirnodated by a J P 83 including adequaie abatement features). -------------------- .TABLE A: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENV T RONMENTS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Community Noise Exposure I.a n or CNEL (dBA ) Land Use Category 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 . ------------ Residential - Single Family, a a/b b b c d d Duplex, and Mobile Homes Reslaerntial -- Multi -Family a a a/1 b c Transient Lodging- a a a/t b c c d Schools, Libraries, Churches a a aft a/b c '`c d Hospitals, Nursing Homes Auditoriums ,, Concert. b b b b/d d a -� -" Hall:, Ampnitheaters Sports Arena, Outdoor b b b b b/d d d Sl�r_c�.ator snort:, Playgrounds, a a a a a/c d d .' Neighborhood Parks _ Go If Courses, Riding a a a a a/c c d Stables, Water Recreation, CAmeteries Office Buildings, a a a a b b/G c Business Commercial, Profn3aionZl Industrial, Manufacturing, a a a a a/b b/c Utilities, Agriculture __ KEY . a. Normal lr, Aacgpj;_ib_" - land use is satisfactory, buildings need no special noise insulation. -- b. Conditionally Accent4b" - new construction should he undertaken only after acoustic analysis and installation of noise insulation. Conventional construction but with closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. I J_occpp.+sahle. - new construction should be discouraged. If construction does proceed, acoustic analysis to determine the , insulation needed is required. d,Ciea..ly U=- 1� new cgnstruction should not be undertaken. SOURCE: Office of Noise Control, California Department of Health Services ? 9. TMFACTS Cor,stru-c oise_ Construction activities would temporarily generate high noise levels on and around the site over the entire period of project construction. Table B shows outdoor noise levels likely to be experienced during construction phases. Since noise from localized sources typically falls off by about 6 dBA with each doubling of distance from source to receptor, receptors -located within about 1400 feet of construction would experience noise greater than 60 dBA during the noisiest phases of construction, disturbing communication and tranquility. Noise abatement provided by walls, windows, and doors of nearby buildings would reduce indoor noise levels by 20 to 50 dBA (dependir-g on such factors a5 the material composition of the wall, wall/window area ratio, etc. The average hone attenuates noise by about 20 dBA), but construction noise may disturb the concentration, communication, and repose of people inside nearby }jtl'1 �r�1T1�8. t TABLE J: TY`✓ICAL CON ..TRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT 50 PEE'T (dBA) /a/ EouivM!tnt, and Home AApl,i,- n..._c.�, prepared by Bolt, Beranek, and Newman for tha J.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 31, 1971, p, 00 operational Nol_rn After build -out of the pro-Jact site, noise levels on and around the project site wool, continue to be dominated by vehicular traffic. Table C shows how the Ldn along roadways bordering the site would change as traffic volumes increase and land uses change in coming years. Future noise contours would be ^ farther from the curbside than they are at present because more traffic, both project -related and cumulative development -related, will be using the local streets. The future noise levels over most of the site for all future development scenarios would be normally acceptable for a commercial use such as a shopping center. However, any of the project structures located within the 70 dBA contours may need added insulation to protect internal receptors from excess noise exposure. Any new residential uses contemplated for the project vicinity and located within. the 60 dBA contours may need added insulation to protect internal receptors from excess noise exposure. Commercial/Industrial Construction Average Housing Construction Construction Phase Noise Level Average Noise Level Gr,oundc iearing 84 84 Exr:Ava t- ion 89 88 Foundations 78 81 Erhu1, i 82 { FLnishing 89 88 s /a/ Taken from tloise f,tpm anstructinn Equi=ment and Operatic s. Building EouivM!tnt, and Home AApl,i,- n..._c.�, prepared by Bolt, Beranek, and Newman for tha J.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 31, 1971, p, 00 operational Nol_rn After build -out of the pro-Jact site, noise levels on and around the project site wool, continue to be dominated by vehicular traffic. Table C shows how the Ldn along roadways bordering the site would change as traffic volumes increase and land uses change in coming years. Future noise contours would be ^ farther from the curbside than they are at present because more traffic, both project -related and cumulative development -related, will be using the local streets. The future noise levels over most of the site for all future development scenarios would be normally acceptable for a commercial use such as a shopping center. However, any of the project structures located within the 70 dBA contours may need added insulation to protect internal receptors from excess noise exposure. Any new residential uses contemplated for the project vicinity and located within. the 60 dBA contours may need added insulation to protect internal receptors from excess noise exposure. F a! TABLE C: DISTANCES TO Ldn NOISE CONTOURS ALONG MAJOR ROADWAYS NEAR THE PROJECT SITE (FEET FROM CENTERLINE) -------------- sting Ldn Future Ldn 0 Ldn =7 Ldn=60 Ldn=70 Tu rri*4r Road 79 8 200 20 (West of Woodhaven) Woodhave-n vane 85 ° 154 15 ( Nan th of Turner) _. Lower Sacramento Rd. 148 15 220 22 (Ncr h of Turner) Luwer Sacramento P.d, 123 13 240 25 (Sou-ih of TurnHr) Estimates based on FKWA Highway 1'rafric NQzse Fre4�ction Mo4A.1: U.S. Z n De-ar..N,e::t of transpUrtat3cr.; December � 973. The noise contours shown in Table C were calco-fated without account being taken of acoustic attenuation afforded by man-made structures or terrain features. in actuality, the row of structures closest to the roadway would provide some shielding of more distant receptors from traffic noise and move' the contours close,: to the roadside than indicated. MITIGATT NS ,.. Construction activities should be limited to daylight hours during weekdays and construction equipment should be muffled or controlled ti; the degree shown in Tabla D. The project architect should consider whether structures located within the 70 dBA contours, as given in Table C, need added insulation to protect internal receptors from excess noise exposure. If it is needed, then the installation o: such insulation should be made a condition of project approval. Future residential uses contemplated for the project vicinity and located within the 60 dBA contours, as given in Table C, may reed added insulation to protect internal receptors from excess noise exposure. The City of Lodi should consider this before approving such uses and require developers to - provide adequate acoustic insulation for residential units. P 96 . --- ------------------------..._ - -------------------» ----------_--------- TABLE D: TYPICAL CONSTRUCTI'.'N EQUIP"MNT NOISE (ciBA) /a/ other.{ saw-- Vibrators 78 76 75 75 /a/ -- Taken from Noise.-froConstruction Ecu3.vmelit an Qperatlony, Nouinment. and Home App,11ang , prepared by Dolt, Beranek, and Newman for the C.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 31, 1971. /b/ Estimated levels obtainable by selecting quieter procedures or machines -and implementing noise control features requiring no major redel sign or extreme cost. Noise Level at 50 Fees t,7ithout With Feasible Equipment Type Noise control Noise Control./b/ - Eart'."0vins ; Frust Loa&-rs 79 75 Dackhoes 85 75 Dozers 80 75 Tracto_s 80 - 75 Nscrapewrs 88 80 {�radcrs 85 7 Pati�ra 89 . ;: 60 Ma}e_ials Har_jline: Concrete Mixers 85 75 Concrete.: -Pumps 82 75 crsnRa 83 75 Derz'i.ck., $8 75 Stationary: Pumps 76 75 Ggneratnrx 78 75 Go�:pzcssnrs 8i `75 - IC�1pAGt.. _ Pile Dri=vers 101 95 Jack 11ammerg 88 75 Rock Dr' 3. I'm' 98 80 Pne=Atic Tools Be 80 other.{ saw-- Vibrators 78 76 75 75 /a/ -- Taken from Noise.-froConstruction Ecu3.vmelit an Qperatlony, Nouinment. and Home App,11ang , prepared by Dolt, Beranek, and Newman for the C.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 31, 1971. /b/ Estimated levels obtainable by selecting quieter procedures or machines -and implementing noise control features requiring no major redel sign or extreme cost. Appendix A - Acoustic Fundamentals Sound is a mechanical form of radiant energy which is transmitted by pressure waves i ; the a4- r It is characterized by two parameters: amplitude and frequency. Amplitude is the difference between ambient air pressure and the peak presnure of the sound wave. Amplitude is measured in decibels (dB) on a logarithmic rather than a linear scale. As a consequence, the pressure difference in a 10 dB sound is 10 times that of a 0 dB sound, a 20 dB sound is 100 times the pressure. di fArence, a 30 dB sound 1000 times, and so on. Another feature of the decibel scale is the way in which sound amplitudes from multiple sources add. A 6b dB point source of sound, say a truck, when joined by another similar source results in a sound amplitude of 68 dB, not 130 dB (i.e., doubling the source strength increases the sound pressure 3y 3 dB) . Amplitude is interpreted by the ear as corresponding to different degrees of loudneq§. Laboratory measurements correlate a 10 dB increase in amplitude with a ` perceived doubling of loudness and establish 2 dB change in amplitude as the 4 7�_ :'� C� for the average perzor,. Frequency is the number of fluctuations of the pressure wave per second. The unit of frequency is the Hertz (abbreviated Eiz; one Hz equals on4 cycle per second). The human ear is not equally sensitive to sound of different ;:re�uenc=�s. §oL-?;4a-l95 ba_._ -a_ heard at all and the ear is pore sensitive to sound in the higher porton of this range than usually 1Y tie�swn the �edri.n nom@ a:: xG* dec oels M tiv „y n�sysCo een e normal is range ci human_ hearing extends frcm about 0 dBA to about 140 dBA. w APPENDIX C -TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 7-15 Appendices TRAFFIC IM PACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER IN THE CITY OF LODI TJKM Transporkon Consultants 9801 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 300 Fair Oaks, California 95628 se/war 87.00 or. I ar INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to analyze the traffic impacts tf the proposed Winepress Shopping Center in the City of Lodi. The project site is located in the southwest corner of the intersection of Turner Road 'and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane, and is plannec to consist of 111,480 square feet of commercial uses. The project site is currently designated for office uses. In completing this study, a p.m. peak hour analysis was performed for the intersections of Turner Road and north Lowor Sacramonto Road. Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane, Woodhaven Lane and Eilers Lane, Lower Sacramento Road'and West Eim Street, and Lower Sacramento Read anu West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Lane. The analysis d" the proposed project. performed in this study, included trip generation, distribution, and assignment cf the traffic from the project, and determination of levels of service for existing, existing p:Us project, and cumulative plus project conditions. Appropriate mitigation measures were then recommended. s EXISTING CONDITIONS Fxi tl g Roadway Notwork Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location cf the proposed project. Access to the project site is planned to be provided via Turner Road and Lower Sacrmanto Road. The critical intersections analyzed in this report were determined from discussicns with the City of Lodi staff. These intersections are listed below: --Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road 'urner Rcad and L_)wer Sacramento Rradr'Wecrih3vnn Lane 4Voochaven Lana and &ars Lana --Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street .-Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road Lower Sacramento Road is a two-lane roadway connecting Lodi to the City of Stockton to the south and to the City of Galt to the north. Turner Road, Elm Street, and Lodi Avenue are majoreast/west collectors going through the City of Lodi. In the vicinity of the project site, Turner Foad has four lanes. The intersection of Turner Road and north Lower Sacrainento Road is signalized. Woodhaven Lane is a two-lane street that extends north from Turner Road to about one hundrod feet north cf Eilers Lane where it dead ends. A bridge is planned to be constructed over the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal in the near future which will connect Woodhaven Lane with Chestnut Street in Woodbridge. The intersection of Woodhaven Lane and Elm Lane was assumed to be controlled by a STOP sign on Eilers Lane after tho construction cf this bridge. West Elm Street is a two-lane roadway which is wide enough to accommodate four lanes. �-This road is controlled- by a. STOP -sign at its Intersection with Lower Sacramento Road The intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and West Min Street meets the traffic signal. warrants at the present lime and Is number five on the list of the intersections waiting to be signalized in Lodi, 1, r ......... ..... ....... ....... ......... ................ ... ...... .............. ...... ........__.............. ....... . Tho intersection of Lower Sacramenlo Road and West Lodi Avenue/ Sargent Road also meets the tt signal warrants and it is number two on the priority list of the intersections to bo signalized. This intersection 8 currently controlled by STOP -signs on all four approaches. Existino Traffl P.M. peak hour turning movement counts were conducted by TJKh1 in July 1987 at the intersections of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane. Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street. and Lower Sacramento Road and WestLocii Avenue/Sargent Road. To update these counts, apprcpriate growth rates were applied. The turning movement counts for the remaining intersections were obtained from the City of Lodi. To analyze the signalized and four-way STOP -sign -controlled intersections, the critical movement summation method of capacity analysis was used. This method involves consideration of 'critical' (or high vglume) conflicting movements and is based on information from a number of sources including Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board. 1985. The volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio is an indication of the level d service (LOS)at which an intersection is operating. The level of service classification system is a scale which ranks street, highway, and intersection operations based on the amount of trafficand traffic operations. A complete doscription of the system is included in the Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209) Highway Research Board, 1985. Briefly, the level of service ranking system is a scale with a range of A through F. Level A represents free flow conditions and level F represents jammed or capacity conditions. The relationshipof V/C ratio to level of service is given in Table I. 3 its �����, ��� 1 II �I � \�C .ry ""'�7.I�t II II r 'j Y; i .tc ,r :.•I,.r.,.,, Woopepl ee a 1 .;�•��.� .V..,1 •I �._.--_:,,,_� rya, 1°a I - 1� N��•" sir ,` �. --� (,.;`� �I;IJ•,,`• �' � 3I t.n..•a r 1.%00 9 a � ��••i<11't a '7yI lilt .:PAOJ9 CT SITE 17 SILK ,W ,r x J ! jl.—_11C 11 q I +1st I m n.' �...1p1nrr o..K • � In•H °� I t M ICdll 11 °�� •r � ' 1i1'iI It •, •r 1. Rfl M II tl, 5 V-1V.N4TY •IAASP TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PREP FIGURE 1 WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER ......... ................ ... ...... .............. ...... ........__.............. ....... . Tho intersection of Lower Sacramenlo Road and West Lodi Avenue/ Sargent Road also meets the tt signal warrants and it is number two on the priority list of the intersections to bo signalized. This intersection 8 currently controlled by STOP -signs on all four approaches. Existino Traffl P.M. peak hour turning movement counts were conducted by TJKh1 in July 1987 at the intersections of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane. Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street. and Lower Sacramento Road and WestLocii Avenue/Sargent Road. To update these counts, apprcpriate growth rates were applied. The turning movement counts for the remaining intersections were obtained from the City of Lodi. To analyze the signalized and four-way STOP -sign -controlled intersections, the critical movement summation method of capacity analysis was used. This method involves consideration of 'critical' (or high vglume) conflicting movements and is based on information from a number of sources including Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board. 1985. The volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio is an indication of the level d service (LOS)at which an intersection is operating. The level of service classification system is a scale which ranks street, highway, and intersection operations based on the amount of trafficand traffic operations. A complete doscription of the system is included in the Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209) Highway Research Board, 1985. Briefly, the level of service ranking system is a scale with a range of A through F. Level A represents free flow conditions and level F represents jammed or capacity conditions. The relationshipof V/C ratio to level of service is given in Table I. 3 Y; ......... ................ ... ...... .............. ...... ........__.............. ....... . Tho intersection of Lower Sacramenlo Road and West Lodi Avenue/ Sargent Road also meets the tt signal warrants and it is number two on the priority list of the intersections to bo signalized. This intersection 8 currently controlled by STOP -signs on all four approaches. Existino Traffl P.M. peak hour turning movement counts were conducted by TJKh1 in July 1987 at the intersections of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane. Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street. and Lower Sacramento Road and WestLocii Avenue/Sargent Road. To update these counts, apprcpriate growth rates were applied. The turning movement counts for the remaining intersections were obtained from the City of Lodi. To analyze the signalized and four-way STOP -sign -controlled intersections, the critical movement summation method of capacity analysis was used. This method involves consideration of 'critical' (or high vglume) conflicting movements and is based on information from a number of sources including Highway Capacity Manual. Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board. 1985. The volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio is an indication of the level d service (LOS)at which an intersection is operating. The level of service classification system is a scale which ranks street, highway, and intersection operations based on the amount of trafficand traffic operations. A complete doscription of the system is included in the Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209) Highway Research Board, 1985. Briefly, the level of service ranking system is a scale with a range of A through F. Level A represents free flow conditions and level F represents jammed or capacity conditions. The relationshipof V/C ratio to level of service is given in Table I. 3 U Stable low. Slight delay. It signalized, an occasional approach phase 0.00 -o 70 Isholy LANUIXI Vollicloplatoons arulournod Many drivers begin t)luol Somewhat restriGtedwithfn groups of Vehicle$ This level is suitable operation lor rural design purposes C Stable Rbw. Acceptable delay. Ifsignalizeda few drivers arriving at 0 71-0 80 the end of a queue may occasionally have to wait through one signal cycle. Back-ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feet some- what restricted, 0 Approaching unstable flow. Tolerable delay. Delays may be substantial 0.81-090 during short porlods, but excessive back-upsdo not occur. Maneuver- abilitylis severely limited during short periods due to temporary back. UPS E Unstable How. fintollerablo delay. Delay may be groat, up to several 091-100 signal cycles. There are typically long queues of vehicleswailing upstream of the Intorsoction F Forced flow. Fxcosslve delay. Intersection operates below capacity. VarlLsl Jammed conditions. Back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent Prin movement. Volumes may vary widely. dopendIR9 c1pally on the dawnstream bm*,W sonditions: aj. _References:Highway Caocity Mantil, Speciat'liteport Na 209. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity manbal, Special Report No. 87, Highway Research Board.: 1965. -TJK M. . ... .. AI)PI mfine —r -t ho mr—t— Ihn, I M „dace lho 1--n capacity assumptions are too low. Nso, if luture demand projections are considered for analytical purposes. a ratio greater than 100 might be obtained. indicating that the projected demand would exceed trio capacity. 4 5 0 I TABLE I The intersections of Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street and Woodhaven LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR URBAN AND SUBURBAN ARTERIAL STREETS Lane and Eilers Lane were analyzed using the unsignalized method d' caDacitv analysis- This anulyals utilizes a comPLItur program written by the I siltwie of VOLUME Transportation Studies at tho University of California, BerhJey, and Is in accordance —T LEVEL TO with the 1905 Highway Capacity Manual. OF IERVIC DESCRIPTION CAPACITY 4 Table It shows the existing p rn. peak hour traffic conditions at tho study A Free flaw. Very slight or no delay. If signalized. conditions are such that 000-oEIG intersections. Also, shown on this table are the projected levels of seryics at these J no approach phasels fullyutlilzod bytralte and novehIcle wads longer intersections after the construction d' the Chestnut bridge over the Woodbridge than one red Indication Turning movements are easily made, and nearly all drivers find freedomof operation. Irrigation Canal. It was projected that approximately 400 cars would use this bridge to travel to and from Woodbridge during the p.m. peak hour. U Stable low. Slight delay. It signalized, an occasional approach phase 0.00 -o 70 Isholy LANUIXI Vollicloplatoons arulournod Many drivers begin t)luol Somewhat restriGtedwithfn groups of Vehicle$ This level is suitable operation lor rural design purposes C Stable Rbw. Acceptable delay. Ifsignalizeda few drivers arriving at 0 71-0 80 the end of a queue may occasionally have to wait through one signal cycle. Back-ups may develop behind turning vehicles. Most drivers feet some- what restricted, 0 Approaching unstable flow. Tolerable delay. Delays may be substantial 0.81-090 during short porlods, but excessive back-upsdo not occur. Maneuver- abilitylis severely limited during short periods due to temporary back. UPS E Unstable How. fintollerablo delay. Delay may be groat, up to several 091-100 signal cycles. There are typically long queues of vehicleswailing upstream of the Intorsoction F Forced flow. Fxcosslve delay. Intersection operates below capacity. VarlLsl Jammed conditions. Back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent Prin movement. Volumes may vary widely. dopendIR9 c1pally on the dawnstream bm*,W sonditions: aj. _References:Highway Caocity Mantil, Speciat'liteport Na 209. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity manbal, Special Report No. 87, Highway Research Board.: 1965. -TJK M. . ... .. AI)PI mfine —r -t ho mr—t— Ihn, I M „dace lho 1--n capacity assumptions are too low. Nso, if luture demand projections are considered for analytical purposes. a ratio greater than 100 might be obtained. indicating that the projected demand would exceed trio capacity. 4 5 0 I (a W FUTURE CONDITIONS To determine the impacts of the proposed Winepress Shopping Center, a trip generation analysis was performed for this project. The trips generated by this development were then distributed and assigned onto the surrounding streets. 0"eneralion Tho trip goneration rates for this study were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(rm), Trip Generatiop, Fcurth Edition, 1987 According to Trip Generation, approximately 40 percent of the trips generated by a shopping center of this size involve vehicles passing by on their way to another destination. These "pass -by" trips come directly from the traffic stream passing the development on the adjacent street system. The amount of "pass -by" trips estimated to enter and exit a shopping center does not affect tho driveway volumes but does affect the amount of traffic added to the adjacentstreet system. Table III shows the number cf new and 'pass -by" trips generated by the proposed Winepress Shopping Center, Also shown on this table is the number of trips generated by the existing designation for the project site. It can be seen from this table that, when compared to the existing designation, the proposed project would generate 3,324 additional new trips per day, with 186 additional new trips during the p.m. peak hour. Z F¢>I o d o o m Z h 2 w ry U p� rp Kcc =O UJ x a z a O r 'R Z z P o W p U O L d F V N OI V 6 p O w W U. o e 8 W Z Fq o rn W N N Vg' a 6 FUTURE CONDITIONS To determine the impacts of the proposed Winepress Shopping Center, a trip generation analysis was performed for this project. The trips generated by this development were then distributed and assigned onto the surrounding streets. 0"eneralion Tho trip goneration rates for this study were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(rm), Trip Generatiop, Fcurth Edition, 1987 According to Trip Generation, approximately 40 percent of the trips generated by a shopping center of this size involve vehicles passing by on their way to another destination. These "pass -by" trips come directly from the traffic stream passing the development on the adjacent street system. The amount of "pass -by" trips estimated to enter and exit a shopping center does not affect tho driveway volumes but does affect the amount of traffic added to the adjacentstreet system. Table III shows the number cf new and 'pass -by" trips generated by the proposed Winepress Shopping Center, Also shown on this table is the number of trips generated by the existing designation for the project site. It can be seen from this table that, when compared to the existing designation, the proposed project would generate 3,324 additional new trips per day, with 186 additional new trips during the p.m. peak hour. ..:. ; .. .. .:r .. .. r.:: •._Lai. .:...-:... O^ m -- y 0) m O 7` - :S::q::s..-� ::"'.;. mm D v.. m o >> mK v 0-- F<c y4c n e a m a s e - OK 'O m O m m t0 y n < p TABLE 111 @ Oi O <: N Q 0 x ? a CL ?.� C.o ma 0 TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS w.� c o < n TRIP GENERATION RATES TM GENERATION a. o o P.M. PEAK HOUR P.M. PEAK HOUR Q v 5 t�D IICF OEJAiFi� DA16V TOTAL *AN •BOUT DAI' IST L E r Qrcoosed Prosect N. C7 N C - m �G ^ m -_ to -.- Shopping Cerner 111,480 S r 71.5 59 :9 51 7.971 656 322 336 - TE/KSF TE/KSF a n m 3 NS c m N O^ o [� m< Reducttonforpassby hips (405e.) Ila m m H- a o c r - - - Total , sew hips 4.783 395 193 202 J O^ m -- y 0) m O 7` mm D ca 041 m o >> mK v 0-- F<c y4c n e a m a OK 'O m O m m t0 y n < p @ Oi O <: N Q 0 x ? a CL ?.� C.o ma 0 H Ix w.� c o < n ty 1 a. o o � ? m n m m ^� c ' Q v 5 c 3 d m _ o N. C7 N C - m �G ^ m m 7 o n cr 'D m fu a a n m 3 NS c m N O^ o [� m< m m H- a o c w m m < a a v? m w p < m tta n• C 9 N co m Q. 3cn 3 t° � Co Qcc^i.� m-oo C -Ni L9 m (A CL n� ED o ry m n m O m m 3 o Q a -� W n rn n m m x c0 'D <° 0 m< a f m m C a' O C o C O O O n m c n e t5 m m m ° �' C- 17, Z3 m Fr m CL m n o N Q a m v 0� o y n w CD 3 O1 0 V a m o o f Q 3 tS R o c D 0 �+ Q. p 9 0 © o N O c O C .� m LQ CD N. m 7 to Or a m •a d 0 O- a m v0 H m Z :3i W m o a 0 3 o n y m m n 3 (D m acr 5g a o F m CL CL -7 a N - m m� m co �. N o f a 5W 30 rJ 4 'D c C N a �N N O' CD m m 7 N >> m i ^ m p m o a . a 3 m m 'A a CD a m m C m °f a a °' m n ? a s m ztD CL Lc. C m n a i' w to tD 6 3 m o Y g CD a O. a cr cr N to w 7 `G< -O.. m G S TRAFFIC IMPACTANALYSIS To evaluate the impacts of this proposed Winepress Shopping Center,`a p.m. peak hour analvsis was nerformed for the intersections of Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road, Turner Road and Cower Sacramonto ROad/Woodhaven Lane, Woodhaven Lane and Bers Lane, Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road. This analysis included determination of levels cP service for existing, existing plus project and cumulative plus project conditions. Results of the intersection capacity analysis for this study are shown on Table V. The existing and cumulative traffic volumes are shown on Figure 2 The turning movementvolumes at the study Intersections are shown on Figures3 and 4. It can be seen from 'fable V that the intersections of Lower Sacramento Road with West Elm Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road are operating at unacceptable Levelof Service under the existing conditions with or without the proposed project. It can also be Seen from this table that the proposed projectwould not nave a significant impact on the study intersections. Under the cumulative plus project conditions the intersections of Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road, and Woodhaven Lane and Eilers Lane would be operating at Level of Service D. The mitigation measures recommended for these intersections are presented in the'Mitigation Measures' section of this study. It should be noted that according to the Specific Plan for the City of Lodi, Lower Sacramento Roads planned to be a divided roadway with raised median in front of the project site. The specific plan would need to be revised to allow for median openings for the project access points. In additlrnn, as part of the Specific Plan, fronlago roads are proposed on the aast and west sides of Lower Sacramento Road. It is recommended that the east frontage road end at a le -sac priorto reaching the project site. 10 . CHESTNUT ST. p G ' V r r O r 43i r r' MAIN x i. . J f X : O470 ,. a 91 970 0 10 t 1216 W 44 O 3 625 TURNER 1120 # r ROAD 740 1170 " e2o 1210 :..J 1390 2283 2s PROJECT ' `0 1 37 9 SITE LEGEND UFM = EXISTING rl-2-1-fl = EXISTING + PROJECT CUMULATIVE + PROJECT ' 910 1 eo lsaa F WEST z m ELM STREET s 160 1ao f m 420 1070 12ao Isla %f.% .t11T RQ&U WEST LOW AVENUE 66 4 0 Baa 970 909 # 1140 0 99e 1 a PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFICNO,LUMES W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE TRAFFIC IMPACT: ANALYSIS FOR :THE PREPARED BT FIGURE WINEP..R:ESS`. SHOPPING CENTER 2 O Y 7 3 J O _ EE `Y i $ARO ENT �� �. LOCI -41 l� TURNER 3 = w a< W� 3u o< J 09 = W O t• W t- a 1Ir � EIjLeR3, W. ELM EX , STING+8-W �ISTING TULATIVROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PIA PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE_ TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE FIGURE WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER'S 3 WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER O Y 7 S .T- ��� _ $ARO ENT �� �. LOCI l� EY(STING (�� kXPRISTQFrT UIIULAPROJECTTIV r PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE FIGURE WINEPRESS SHOPPING CENTER 4 I J I F O c N N U fill < Q I u _ Y W { f di— (W� O n m pQ W 0U`� v m m W U r Q o o c S U. om U C U O m O' UrIn a w 00 0 y �Q y�j I Y LU 6 Ol a Go w 3 I J Traffic gilgrial Warrants To evaluato the need for a traffic signal at the intersections of Turner Road and Lower Sacramonto Road/Woodhaven Lane and Woodhaven Lane acid Eilers Lane a signal warrant analysis was performed. The results of this analysis is shown on Table VI. As can be seen from Table A the intersection rf Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane would meet the traffic signal warrant critenas under the cumulative plus project conditions. TABLE vl SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS EXISTING EXISTING t CUMULATIVE t CONDITIONS PROJECT PROJECT W/CHESTNUT W, CHESTNUT W/CHESTNUT BRIDGE BRIDGE BRIDGE INTE05EQTTON .wAnRAI T .!6Ar A T WARRANT Turner & Lower NO NO YES Sacramento/Woodhaven Woodhaven & Ellers NO NO NO Notes: Yes= Meets warrant No = Does not meet warrant 12 0. F O c N N U fill < Q I u _ Y W E pQ W 0U`� v m m U r Q o o c S U. om g r UrIn 2 3 y�j Go w 3 8 o {�{�.ry, O O b w E 4' c JUA m 11 Traffic gilgrial Warrants To evaluato the need for a traffic signal at the intersections of Turner Road and Lower Sacramonto Road/Woodhaven Lane and Woodhaven Lane acid Eilers Lane a signal warrant analysis was performed. The results of this analysis is shown on Table VI. As can be seen from Table A the intersection rf Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane would meet the traffic signal warrant critenas under the cumulative plus project conditions. TABLE vl SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS EXISTING EXISTING t CUMULATIVE t CONDITIONS PROJECT PROJECT W/CHESTNUT W, CHESTNUT W/CHESTNUT BRIDGE BRIDGE BRIDGE INTE05EQTTON .wAnRAI T .!6Ar A T WARRANT Turner & Lower NO NO YES Sacramento/Woodhaven Woodhaven & Ellers NO NO NO Notes: Yes= Meets warrant No = Does not meet warrant 12 MITIGATION MEASURES Exlstlnn CLQD_d1 rr 9 Th9 intersections of Lower Sacramento Road and West. Film Street, and Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/Sargent Road are preseotly operating at unacceptable levels of service. These intersections meet the traffic signal warrant «'. criterias and are on the City's priority list to be signalized. Conditions at these intersecuonswill improve to acceptable levels when they are signalized. There are no mitigation measures recommended due to the proposed project. Cumulative Plus Prgject r'ondldons me following mitigation measures would be required to mitigate traffic conditions occurring atter the build -out d the study area, and are in addition to the improvements needed under existing conditions. —Signalize the intersection cf Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane. —Widen the westbound approach of the intersection of Turner Road and north Lower Sacramento Road to accommodate a separate right -turn lane, two through lanes, and a left -turn lane. —Widen the intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and West Lodi Avenue/ Sargent Road to accommodate a left -rum lane, a through lane, and through/right-turn lane on the northboundand south boundapproaches. —Add a right -turn lane to the northbound approach of the intersection of Woodhaven Laneand Elers Lane. --Widen Lower Sacramento Road between Turner Road and Kettleman Lane to lour lanes. --Improve the intersectionof Lower Sacramento Road and West Elm Street to accommodato a through lane and a shared through/right tUn lane on the nonhhound approach, and a left -turn lane and two through lanes on the southbound approach. Table VII shows the mitigated capacity analysis for this study 14 TABLE VII MITIGATED CAPACITY ANALYSIS P.M. PEAK HOUR EXISTING CONDITION s EXISTING+PROJECT W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE t. W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE rr to INTERSECTION V(1 C. kA Tuner & Lower Sacramento N/A B i N/A NfA N/A 0.50 Turner 8 Lower Sacramento/ )R N/A N/A �-,l N/A N/A to Woodhaven C. D D A 0.50 Woodhaven & Eaars ?.,$ N/A N/A 0.48 Lower Sacrame:uo & %{ A 0.45 West Elm v B 0.55 4? C Lower Sacramento & B 0.81 West Lodi/Sargem • Unsignalized method of capacity anaiysls N/A > No improvements aro recommendod for this Intersection. �• is nn 0 0 00 o� 00 CUMULATIVE + PROJEC W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE Ora Y& 8 0,70 C 0.72 N/A N/A C. D D A 0.50 � 3 D 0.48 u A n B 0.55 4? C 0.73 75 S __ $ a. a 4< ��i oz 3 7 n r• o L4 L 2 �l E`QQ i -1 Hti �r DYD :? , c n C o- oD85 x 00 �lu:. �• is nn 0 0 00 o� 00 CUMULATIVE + PROJEC W/ CHESTNUT BRIDGE Ora Y& 8 0,70 C 0.72 N/A N/A C. c =`1 A 0.50 A 0.48 B 0.55 4? C 0.73 D Z c =`1 77 75 S __ $ n o L4 L 2 �l E`QQ i Hti DYD :? , n C 00 �lu:. L 3 L� rata: roerleM sbulsso'D loou:5 An U .;=I -100Y ION st—S 0 100405 - r Ltgtltjtfy.A cl: (] saA 11 M: c II '3;No - r.; OO j OSt'•' 1n) NYedn 'M -------- 'dod 000'01 > to Apunwwoo taltlosl !o eale On [llnq ul Iti) nYdntl (] ............. qdw M OIIIeII laOrlt blew 10 pa Ods Imil,:) udw pods 4ntoLddy :ts lint, mow - pOoQS uOrolddV Iro11!* :IS Jolt" o> u. alYO T 1.0 S1NVHlitiM lVN[JSS �L•i�Vkll D laovs wrllelA tw.stol:) loou-. aOs' O sla"!IddY I j 501 al I rinl n IfwL.H up t ad D of: O SDA, 09tdsil Ys N.OP S1N3n3dtn03donnmNln lo. r Ioa1 ,r w • o0t 0001 ox`R. rvron ownlOA uelASOpad wnw lu lly - C ANYHtiYM O p«OOOrtl [r 6...wa.11 Vr..r Nr.+l avr i«.tS IOI•n .Nrl w.... .^I Ir.l 0 �r��'3 LCIM. OqS. 1 Ntl IMI rt.la 11$ rov'n X6`1 �acY a d go, 1 l n�ad sol 1 0.. 0pS �w>IOaY 4.c`g 1n) NYedn 'M -------- 'dod 000'01 > to Apunwwoo taltlosl !o eale On [llnq ul Iti) nYdntl (] ............. qdw M OIIIeII laOrlt blew 10 pa Ods Imil,:) udw pods 4ntoLddy :ts lint, mow - pOoQS uOrolddV Iro11!* :IS Jolt" o> u. alYO T 1.0 S1NVHlitiM lVN[JSS �L•i�Vkll D laovs wrllelA tw.stol:) loou-. aOs' O sla"!IddY I j st—ttor7 IUr1Y - f 11/Y�tlYM D of: O SDA, 09tdsil Ys N.OP S1N3n3dtn03donnmNln ❑ ON D SIA 031=3$11Ys 1:001 ownlOA uelASOpad wnw lu lly - C ANYHtiYM O p«OOOrtl [r 6...wa.11 Vr..r Nr.+l avr i«.tS IOI•n .Nrl w.... .^I Ir.l 0 �r��'3 LCIM. OqS. Ntl IMI rt.la 11$ rov'n X6`1 �acY a d go, 1 l n�ad sol of oo, tt st 14Nbrar Nc(I lozu rota lanl Hr11 nro, 6�Z1 I DL`l� I I a4 D+s stt at o,a•oov crop rltt _ 71 l.Id d n d I n L4 +D ON O =aA 031tiSUYS ):OB ifafa>•...r -I .ur ON D :OA 031:isIlYS ::OOI S1N3M3tlI^O3dnnnlNm N>,Mt urs o111etj tnonutluo0 IO uoltdnliilul - 2 1NYFiHVM D lWottoM fr G.rfrVo�l l VW. frlrn,larl 1«IIS rplp/t .arl NNr..eur unl 1111 LO Hr.I.N '31 pN. Nlr•T.H .. ..Ir< f0., c1 Ol Nru LG / .t o to+l, Nn luu -. A•+•n w ooe to, a, an.v S1N3^3dlrg3d r•^'+•d•^ {] ON 0 saA � IUAICA urlllsaoAd wnwru tri - C LNYHHVM N[U 1M.r m.0 .00.l ,«qS n+wt '+•tab'ty bt'I I hLi tl� 0.'r OOO OSt o0L O hb)I �,ls,coln� rilt> _ ttafl. u C9, d n � D ON D taJ. 031.1sILYt %Ot uu.+ •• ••«, .«1 D ON tf k 0—MLLYS %-001 SLN3•{3NIttD3ti rwllNln O IOA 1rin0.UOA wnwlulMr 1 LNYUUVM 1n) NYedn 'M -------- 'dod 000'01 > to Apunwwoo taltlosl !o eale On [llnq ul Iti) nYdntl (] ............. qdw M OIIIeII laOrlt blew 10 pa Ods Imil,:) udw pods 4ntoLddy :ts lint, mow - pOoQS uOrolddV Iro11!* :IS Jolt" o> u. alYO T 1.0 S1NVHlitiM lVN[JSS �L•i�Vkll D laovs wrllelA tw.stol:) loou-. aOs' O sla"!IddY I j st—ttor7 IUr1Y - f 11/Y�tlYM ON O ti.A Il MIS II /N Podl. t r 11oat r,WL ✓ e a d go, 1 l n�ad sol 00(1 odor o+[•ro _ W.1 009 rY. N>,Mt urs d ^ Nlr•T.H .. ..Ir< f0., D M! D =*A 03.:mies Ycs S1N3^3dlrg3d r•^'+•d•^ {] ON 0 saA 0313S11Ys wot IUAICA urlllsaoAd wnwru tri - C LNYHHVM (] «[oac.o ar 6.n •vdl,..... l++�t>•`• tN.tt Yam .wrr �„Y,.......nt tN. ro ....«w 's10v. hLi .rtl ltpr ri •. 101 «.It YeV � i.>sH hb)I o!ool a tt t.r,6,H Nbtl lellr .ot+.� 100.. , nS ro•r,t 0t9 006 set at •w —1 wog ' ivq'tv )i18 .yrs: -y _d rn yn ON ❑ saA 031:fsays Y.09Iflt.>•.. ON ❑ taA 0313SILYS %'Mt .r .. a.e toe, S1N3n3dn03d ryMlNln ollirlj tnOnulluC'J Io vogpnDalVl - Y LNYUMVM D p•f000r0 .. 6..trVO•�1.wr 4M+INS INrIT AIS wrl Nr"�"'�Y u/11 Net M M...•u 31fY.'. ltau 1Or 11 INf �`t� a[ -Csa lora 1 . wnS ..rrn al b>++M (Sa.orN 6C` irC[IIO.tI IOTI .1N.It rdm '• °z I 0„•. OOT ost ox »w 4 '•yr .ler p[ I «�:M:w. u r I^ ON , sal. 031-4=%It Yds <.u.>v.. .. ....f ♦«r _.: 'P ON D taA 031dSILYB %001 ISN3•f31/tn03tf .tll.nNln suAMIOA frin�lu.A W—u•rt - t ltlYHtl YM IN NYBtin (y lH) lYtlnti ........ -dod 000'01 > !o Al!unwwo9 pelelosl so tare on lllnq ul ❑ •-........... 4dw M : :11l1rA )**,I$ lolrw !o wads IrOpuo , 4dlu poa0s ((Oro-dY It0111!') lo.!t, u0.4 c o..M uzro/ddV I[7l:lY) --'t . (J, y -t- :1S Lofm I.I.JfI VUdVI L O S a G Jy R Q H M 0 is a Y Q O � a Y ^�5 t S n Il x n A Q D bo � P Clio 80 9 C $ o f i r =9 1 CD D 3 z r �L 9 Q H Y a t n A Q D bo � P Clio 9 C $ o f i r =9 1 3 . 0 RURAL (R) r I• .4 lical speed of major street traffic 40 0104 as of isolated COMMUnIty of < 10.000 POP - -------- In b.ilt up a, UASAN M WARRANT I mmi—s- V41hicul" VOIW" ioaf% SATISFIED Y.3 (3 No *--C". 80% SATISFIED Yes till, say Aop, 5w -'oo tad i� L T—-9 WAARANT 2 InteffuP110" Of Cont""Ous T,alflc -71 ZZZ. —? I'!!nTfl 100% SATISFIED Yes C1 No . 80% SATISFIED Yes 0 A u Csl 5125 — A -IC 4,;�G '750, tooTO 9-4 bO, 75 23 7-17— L • Wye MARRANT I minimum Pedestrian Volvrtta IGO's SATISFIED Yes 0 �w 8C% SATISFIED Yes C3 No 0 u A e— 600 "20 1—qleo TJPN IN.EFScCT1ON CAPAC1T'FdALYSf�a_ !u• 1:2g.. v I rf r EFiSECT I ON 1 LOWER S»C. and TU1 NER f )D I t ,} (*E,4- HOUR. - COU(lT GATE/TIME: CCrIDITION E:<I^aT1NG PM PEAT: HR,+W/U CHF^aTNUT 00ADGE FILE WINE = RIGHT=THPU LEFT_ -r v ' LEFT 106 --- t.0 1.1 1 . 1 1.0 =•;4 F.IG}+.T STREcT NAME: THF.0 --21 -^-. 2.1 (NO. OF LANES) 2.1:--- 1`,S THRU TURNER RIGHT 1.--- • .1 1.0 1.1 1.1 ':1.0 --- 6 LEFT `;FLIT PHASE? . ---i N v v 4 ,i) LEFT THRU R I GHT:" S-R.E=T NAME: LOWER SAC. SPLIT PHASE' Y as__,_=ss ay., r.A3:x.ax�ax.sbx=�vA=cm.A.A a,=exa OREGINAL ADJUSTED V/C CRITICAL MIJJL•MENT VOLUME VOLUME CAPACITY.. RAT fa V.,r -------------------------------------- ---- ---- NG RIGHT (R) 1.504 0316 THRU (T) >J 3�i 1500 ..0200 LEFT (L) 54 &l 181)4 4.0.60 r a I w:u) ?. V:,67 wa? ----------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- 55 _55 RlRHT (R) 94 94 15?() 0.06'_7 THRU iTi 1500 (*,ft024 LEFT (1) 34Z 1bO0 ..?L; it.__E?7 + R 97 1500 0. 064 7 -----------•------------------ - -- E9 RIGHT (R) I 1 15 0,:) 0.0007 THRU (T) 221 221 151, 0.a70 LEFT (L) 106 106 r.I-,00 ?,0707 0.0707 T . R 222 3150 0.0705 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- WB RIGHT (R) G94 7,94 1500 0.3627 0._6'_7 THRU (T) 158 158 150 ).00022 LEFT (L) 6 6 'f-150!1 1!.0040 T n 55_ 315'1 .1757 VGLUME-TO-OPACITY RATIO FOR THEaINTERSEUTIOEJ: Ai JUSTMENT FOR LOST 'l=LL OW TIME;-IliQ -----------1,----------------------- f.-------------------------`------- TOTAL OLUME•-TO-CAPACITY RATIO. IrirERSECT:OrJ LEVEL OF SERVICE: ;; C I =r.jU.-TE.r., =AGR EIGHT. -TURN OE{ 4El) r4f Ca :Lccad by T,;l:'M Transportation Consi tants; Pleasanton. CA. IS.7 ,t 'vl"FI R•IT �RS`cCT U�N CAr A�:T'i (;rd,�1.'i5L5 :- .. TNTER3(c4'1'lt:1J !Ji)OL''!; :%EL1 a TLIRI;EFi LOCI COUNI' DATE,'TIHL PEAl• HCUF': CONDITION.-E:(IGTINGi:,pl FCAtz.-HR.-W.t7 CHEGTHUT-GRICG=--=ILE WIN=-'== RIGHT THRU LEF 18 1Z9 -17 . NORTH -- v -- LEFT 11 --- 1,l) 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.4) --- =I RIGHT CTFEET t1AME: THRU 1:9 -- 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.0�--- 153 THRU TURNER RIGHT 69 --- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 --- 183 LEFT SPLIT PHASE? Y v v 11Z 166 LEFT THRU RIGHT STREET NAME: WOODHAVEN SFLIT PHASE"' . i7RIGlNAL A='ADJUSTED ,//,r_3A=_-"n7ICAL 6=- MO'/E:!11EP17 VOLUME VOLUME I CAPAC I TY R!,, 10 V'': .. - --- --------- - ------- -------------- NG RIGHT (R) 1.56 t) k _ 1500 . !000 TFOtU (T) 1 13 1 1 3 1650 C).".'6G5 LEFT i I_ i ,).. �� 1 �� ,i 1.0-67 SC+ RIi-jHr (R) I 11� Iri)0 j,i:120 THRU (T ) 139 139 1501) 0.0427 LEFT (L) 27 27 15t)i) tj.(I Ic0 T . R 157 1500 0.1041 'i. 1+,+7 ---- - - ---_---------------------------------------- -------------- EE RIGHT (R) 09 > [ 1 00 0.1, 00 TH'r:U (T) 139 139 sY0': t?.01:1 0.0421 LEFT (Li 11 11 1E00 0.007v ---------------------------------------'--------------------------------- WE' RIGHT (R) 21 0 1 150() 0,01,"00 THRID (T) 153 15": 1!,50 1.0927 LEFT (L) 1003 1(3 1500 0.1220 1.20 VOLUME-TO-CAFACITY RATIO FOR THE INTERSECTION: 0124 rD•JuSTMEiaT FOR LOST YELLOIJ TIME: ?.1C' --------------- --------- -__----------_•- _-_•------------------__----------- TOTAL VOLUME -TO -CAPACITY RATIO: 0.44 IrITERSECTICN LE'dEL OF SERVICE: A V ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT TURrl ON RED Cavaicoad by TJR't1 Transportation Consultants, Plzasantcn. C..; 1=87 b - I a E 1 m tl N{ 2 1 I rU noo= J a m{ NI ml Cil I JF G 1 Y I i i 1 3 I O L C i o f r-(1 1 0 1 �• -t I D C Y m m -• I m T 1 m 2 1 m S •-• 1< I 2 i, I . r.^ -+ C I -•t C .,`_ -1 C S i -1 C y I m I L7 y N 11m a r -I-- I r-1^ r-+^• 1 r -i 1'-i:�1 N -• _i M T •- t_! a f L: m d13,L a z ImD tl I 1 1>zo f G7. Cthhh'p NG 9 1 U . . .- T D n •- •- i r) ••• l N i LJ •-' 1'r O m0 I 'h PI 1P•- f a - l O 0 0 O W a�3rt 79 N w . J• m21.1 O -+a t 1 I- ImD 1 W- O c z . - w 1 1 1 1 1. w: VL 4• C O .� 1, ... ; F. E. 0 7 7 7 7 t• 1 •- G 1 r* nl •w t rO a ! 1 1 OL+ r ?] 7l 1 O N •- I tJ •- t o h) •' I (.: 1'r C O 7 m a GTi 1 £m U tr 4: I GO• 1 GAO]tJ 1 tJP-1 CN 1 1 0) to v 1 to ^• W i•] I F N •0 G 1 3 -i D 11 O V Li - �• n -;1z] 1 1 1 Imml a '{i1 N11,1O [in HnNw it --iD m ct R, I 1 _3_(a A--1 t -- -- 1 I N I 1 1 1 h -• r J -, uu1 �• d G rI i m � ,.: 1 a7il ii a 1 i tl N O- Lx i LM1 U' t'I 1 0 1.41 Lx L4 1 LIS P I D l -• 00 1 Litt 1 0 1 �� M O �• �• C. ' 1 C- O v v 1 •_ v 1 •-• ' c i = to a 1 I r. u 1 ! t ! is , d i `- E fr t O Y C' _, 1 .•4•'s 1vvvO 1 OGv t in 1 ? 1 m 1 C OQO 1 ^••'G 1 rJ0••'v 1 vt�lO 7 < y / n Amti• 1 3 !r m 1 U• I tl V 1 •t, U i m •: r• I y m .- .0 1� i] u 1 0 i P (.) V id I vidIt m It 7 Q _ 1 7 1 + n O LA n •• a o - 1 1 r 1 h v atl I 1 a 1 ., t• 1 �t N r a rJG u] =•- r I x w I td 1 4 M un;- • u r .� mAv LaA u c o a 7 0: J- - '--- 1 tl 1 1 1 ( iJ •~- iJ C- •m 1 D •tt L+ C• A •o h 7 D •� O �, O ft « l; v n «• n o > 7 at N T li T C • J iJ (1 a N• O 3 In Z' - e 1 C T It Cl -- - n '• A A 7 N rt U• 'i n toN V V Ll u ^t I _ £ -/ � n ii � • +ED Ri -1 r m o_4 z; - -r h]• O 7 1 o _ u �D a j D I' u m 7 3 x m m . + Y x it ul c. m r,R 1-4 7 M n Jtl �. J•f 1 ,a JO 1 w . •..� n w a I r. in a nw+.r,+•1n O F r tU •- 3 W ID I N] O m 1 - •- U a W N +• - ... .. - N ii i• f.l 7 r. 0 7 - - - LF.9 O 1 ti. _. y O Q b - I a E 1 m tl N{ 2 1 I rU noo= J a m{ NI ml Cil I JF G 1 Y I i i 1 3 I O L C i o f r-(1 1 0 1 �• -t I D C Y m m -• I m T 1 m 2 1 m S •-• 1< I 2 i, I . r.^ -+ C I -•t C .,`_ -1 C S i -1 C y I m I L7 y N 11m a r -I-- I r-1^ r-+^• 1 r -i 1'-i:�1 N -• _i M T •- t_! a f L: m d13,L a z ImD tl I 1 1>zo f GJ 11 O_u u I f- . 1'O •-' a, -1. T D n •- •- i r) ••• l N i LJ •-' 1'r O m0 I 'h PI 1P•- f a 1 1 I r a 0 !G i t0 La t-! 1 .-Cd tJ"I A4:v 1 z Z 1 Ii - - m21.1 O -+a t 1 I- ImD 1 W- O c z r D 1 N< a i t r h 1 m O m 1 •G D Y � 1 i 1 1 I 1, ... ; F. E. Z N-1 I r* nl •w t rO a ! 1 1 OL+ r ?] 7l 1 O N •- I tJ •- t o h) •' I (.: 1'r C O 7 m a GTi 1 £m U tr 4: I GO• 1 GAO]tJ 1 tJP-1 CN 1 1 0) to v 1 to ^• W i•] I F N •0 G 1 3 -i D 11 O V Li - �• n -;1z] 1 1 1 Imml a it --iD m ct R, •-G I i 1 I 1 1 _3_(a A--1 t -- -- 1 I N I 1 1 1 h -• r J -, uu1 �• d G t n ! 1' 1 I D � I Z u •- .- ... I .- ...- 1 ... I r• 1 ?f i,l 3- 1 i tl N O- Lx i LM1 U' t'I 1 0 1.41 Lx L4 1 LIS P I D l -• 00 1 Litt 1 0 1 �� M O �• �• C. ' 1 C- O v v 1 •_ v 1 •-• ' c i = to a 1 I r. u 1 ! t ! is , d i `- I h H 1 1 1 I fr t O Y C' _, 1 .•4•'s 1vvvO 1 OGv t in 1 ? 1 m 1 C OQO 1 ^••'G 1 rJ0••'v 1 vt�lO 7 < y / n Amti• 1 3 !r m 1 U• I tl V 1 •t, U i m •: r• I y m .- .0 1� i] u 1 0 i P (.) V id I vidIt m It 7 Q _ 7 1 It ! 1 I 1 c 1 a 1 1 1 + h a o - 1 1 r 1 h v atl I 1 a 1 ., t• 1 �t N r a rJG u] =•- I x w I td 1 4 M un;- • u r .� .. 1 Y 1 1 1 1 t Y 1 t 1 1 u z z II � 1 tl 1 1 1 ( iJ •~- iJ C- •m 1 k 1 1 1 1 I m noo= in It t u: y N -• _i M T •- t_! a f L: m d13,L 1 V• I 1 I y it -I Z I 1 1 Ii - I> -- II m 1, ... ; it LM1 zf - p Of -1 u r Il r V Li - �• O r it --iD m ct R, 1 1 x r, it Z u M ^1 A--1 t -- -- 1 •-• t -- -- r J -, uu1 �• d G tft '+ � 11 ••, - I ] -t it ? - c i = r •- is , d i `- cum I in 1 «r it ' _ y T v m It 7 Q _ G - - c c a a o - N r a rJG u] M un;- • u r .� .. u z z II � Y iJ •~- iJ C- •m n C r in �I T li T C • J N r I I 1 C T It Cl -- - n '• I n toN u ^t I i � £ -/ � n ii � • Ri -1 r m o_4 z; x a t cz o _ u �D a j D u m to 3 x m m . Y x it T-il M .;17ERSECTIQIi :-_;FAC.T'r :,NAL -/S.5 IC. _4, S i! 17c=. S c 10 r1l I LOWEa C: -C • an.: TURNER LOD I '=Dur, r f)A rE! T i HIE: P=Ab HOUR i.Cf 1L'f C1ON EXISTING PH PEAT• HR. -W/ CHESTNJI" Elf -E 3E FT'_E 4JIFIE RIGHT THRU LEFT 30 292 NORTH <--- v --- LEFT 90 --- I.O 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 --- 77Z RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU ---- 2.1 (NO. OF i1,NES) ;.1<--- 237 THRU 'rUFNER RIGHT 1 --- 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 --- 6 LEFT SPLIT FHASE? N v v 54 ZO 55 LEFT THRU RIGHT STREET NAME: LOWER SAC. SPLIT PHASE? Y aII............................... =.................. • •...TICAL=RAS== TED MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUMEI CAPACITY RATIO V -C ------------------------------------------------------------------------ N8 RIGHT (R) 57 55 1500 0.0:67 THRU (T) 1500 LEFT (L) 54 54 1500 .. X',61j T . F: 85 +500 1". 0567 0.,%Z67 ------------^---------------- -- SD FIGHT (R) BO 80 1500 iJ.05> THRU ( T i 3 1.=,04 LEFT (L) 292 292 1500 0.1947 0.194 T r R 83 . S,)') i. 055 3 ------- - - - ----- EE RIGHT (R) 1 1 1`A') 0.4007 THRU (T) 2721 272 ..5,) i,.086Z LE -'°T (L) 9.i 90 15Q.) 0 ,!;6,)0 ir, Qb,)0 T + n 277, .;150 Cr , 0867 ------------------ ------------------------------------------------------- WEs :.:3HT rR) Z-15 1500 0 =_77•).__._ THF:IJ (T) 217 217 150 0.0689 LETT (L) 6 6 150; 0!.,.)040 1R 552 150 1 :) .1752 VOLUME -TO -CAF CITY RATIO -FOR THE iNTERSECT10t1i 0.57 ADJUSICHEHT FOR LOST YELLOW TIME: 0.10 ------•-------------------------------- ----- T u,i_ Vr)L(fr•ff[-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 15.6.5 tUr(i ri d l,!:T lr)ri I-LVEL OF SERVICE: r.+ Y-.J'J`ifED FCF. RIGHT TUhN Orl RED - -..e!^.(>d by T4K.11 Transaortation .cns'Jit.anta. Plriasanton. CA. .1987 1 j L PI rmk S::,�'r t(Jhl _ W')G�)H:�VEi•: .an.] T014NEr L:)qi i (UI .l I i E. T :.,!L : Ic.::r. HQL:+: CONDIT:Of=1)I-n ISTifI(g-PM- PEAK -HF.�+-)_=(=HLST-LUT-DRIDGi:-=-FILE b;IN($==^_ RIGHT THRU LEFT 13 1.11 7G NORTH LEFT 11 --•- 1 0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.G --- 80 RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU 1"= -•--. 2.0 (NO. OF LANES) 1.4:--- 15> THRU TURN£F RIGHT 69 --- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 --- 169 LEFT SPLIT PHASE? -- Y v J 55 129 150 LEFT rl`F:U RIGHT STREET NAME:W000HAVE:N SPLIT PHASE" `t __-�===... =..................... x=sj ..II ORIGINALADJUSTEDV ..ITI.ALa-oIIsn MOVEMENT VOLUME VOLUME 1, CAPACITY RATIO V/C ------------------------------------------------------------------^----- NE4 RIGHT (P? 150 0 t 150:) {r,i:1000 THRU T'i 124 19 1651) 0,0782 I_EF r (L) 5 5 55 15.!0 iJ .0:'67 '. ---------------.--------'--J------------^---------- -------- SP. RIGHT (R) 10 18 1"TO ir,!rt'2:) THRU (1') 15=. L3- l_,o 0. l,i_!, I -EFT (L) 73 713 15000 r),rjj]rj T I R 170 iS0!i ii. 114!; 0.114,) --------•-----------'- ' --------------------^------------------ E8 FIGHT (F:', 69 : Y 150iJ 0:.00,)6) THR(i (T) 1'i l'9 3:!%i, 0,0.121 0.1)4^.l LEFT (L) I1 11 15)0 0.007: -- ----------------•--------------------------------------- WB RIGHT (R) 84 it 1500 O.JijOi THRU (T) t5 z 157. 1650 0.0927 LEFT (L) 169 169 150,) 0.1127 0.1127 =IIIIIIIIIIUIIy=_�.==aa�II=IInII �- >a=cIIaa=mIIIIII:c-zII�IIs_====:=II9IISIIII=SSIIII:II� VOLUME -TO -CAPACITY RATIO FOR THE INTERSECTION: 0.Z°; ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST YELLOW TIME: Q. l!, ----------------- ^._..---_ ___-----_^--.__-_.-.__._- __.-_.-- _------ ••_' ---- _-_ _^-- TOTAL VGLUNE-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: ).45 Ir1TER-SECTION LEVEL. OF S£fWICG.: A Y AD.JU3TCD FOR RIGHT TURN (7Pl FED Duan: toDetl by TJI:M TranbUprtat:LQw f (o,.%d;.(ntun, C.1, I`?U' r :: n w M .- .- . .- y"; a -. - on in r ' 0 J V Q•14 LUU - - +� n cinn00r wGr 3 i I- m c J - cJ W W m W mn v �'1= a„ u n 3 w P n m r YO0 IJ 0. JI . LVvCd C7 D•-41Ot10A M r* 0 11 v 7 Ci 7 V = Gr a m -� m V--• •n V Y M w M.A A CR v •0 W Ii 1 LF I- N Dir 1ROJUV 7 co LIJE w 11 3 _ LR m r '7 c. l r .• - - 1 ••OtJ iJ IJ- 3 nW3v:.77 - 1 L W D G LA C• In LR •O r W rt t* •- l •.. 7 J W n 9+ � fP I l w y. 7 n L rt ui 1 n .tfa 7 0 3 7 •- + S Y� r 7 r* T m to r r•. w c 1 m— -- E � 7 7 5 n �r f;{ �'.,-`Satihl4.Z:Ck - C.._.a�.�. ...�.� yKGX: %.`�''YF�O'_G _ .-#F'.: .-mm'_ '^','c «.-.-•ht--�,-..:.' ..E y..s�„_ o>r -<0'a vocRi�Iri - -- N Y'Om O .-< T c3 .O K a7 coonn'o w-1 wGOZUv x - 1 O G O O m W l'I 'S -1 W 7 a W Y •- W 0 .L - �. f l•A 0 7 7 7 7 7 -S u s r O 1 p E W Ca « M Y M A A LJ m m w W W N i l l l 2 •• G W W a n e n F: m Y. __ n I m W DntD D' J to � 4 . r ` ( 1 !a 1 '; an ':.;_ z :.. .'`"`'xd' aty.rx�+„.; '.: U Z x1117{:: A” sm'"'v!&+"•,€1'`�'s""r--:... „r; .:r. �....-- - n .� «'«"� .0 •o to o ,non v, r 1 1 - - D •>]�l v A -4 L 1 l n 0 W r - m 11 -- Y«..«yvLa W n„ 7 W (d -0(a0Om 1 W 13 63 G OU V .- 3'- r w`: LU F f',1 CI -1 IM W L 7 7 m J di -- 't d '1 C. C r G +, rt 7 hi Y. 10 7 . - O W a it : NJ Y1 �r+U G n W a nW.,n•.�n _ _ I p r •n 0 � W rt En •-c n a •. r* n m o m rJ _ 0 _ u.3 .n o 1 D 0 'I n rm , 7 6 O D W � W n t+ � .o n G ry 4 I I 1 1 Om 1 LOWE*, SAC in.: TUR: EP LOD COU: I T Cir. TE. T C Ml-- PEAP. i-vCUR,: -rrjori WiCHESMUT C-RlDGE U-cE 14'HE EXISTING PROJECT RIGHT THRU LEFT 99 NORTH <--- v --- LEFT L 1.1 1.1 1.1) 1.1 --- 3--E RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU __97 --- Z.1 (NO. OF LANES) -.I< 27,4 THRU TURNER RIGHT 1 1. .() 1.1 1.1 1.0 --- 6 LEFT SFLIT PHASE'? <--- LC.T (IiRU r� R 16ill, STREET NAME: LOWER SAC. SPLIT PHASE' Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C _:-171CAL N ')Y F_ i I r--',' i T VOLUME VOLUME C A PA C Z TY RATIO v." C - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - '------- - ------------------------------------------------------ NG ------------------------------------------------------ND RIGHr (R.) 55 5t I500 Q.v-67 THRU (T) 3c; 1500 0. LEFr (L) 54 54 1500 0.0:16"' ------------------------------------------------------------- S 8 RIGHT (R) 99 99 150f) THRU iT) :3 3 1100 t). LETT (L) 272 292 1500 0.1947 1c47 I , R 102 1y00 '.1 . 06a.'. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ELq R16HT (R) I I 1 0. 0007 THNU ( r) 292 1,?" ' 1, :150 0.1)9 LEFT (L., 110 110 1500 0.07_= 0.07.'." T * R 293 :3 150 0.09'0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- 14D RIGHT (R) 3:11 5 227-, THRU (T) 236 276 1 4 0.0749 LEFT (L) 6 6 1500 (1.0040 R, 571 150 0.11313 VOLUME-TO--APACITY RATIO FOR THE INTERSECTION: -------Al',-JU--'.iTMCNT FOR LOST YELLOW Tli-IE: 0. ----------------------------------------------------------------- rou,i_ VOLAMC-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: ltlFl-_-RSEcrlOrt LEVEL OF ISLRVICE; s ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT. -TURN ON RED De,otooe,j by rjf,,tl Transportation Consulttlnts. Floasantc'i. CA. t';E7 it I rl-7- 3a Cl !r -N LOWER SAC and W. LOD! LOCI CCUMT y,T E. CONG: T I PIN _:,fSTING PM FICAK HR. -W/ CHESTNIJr BRIDGE FILE WIN;? RIGHT THRU LEFT 122 2S 41 r 10 R TH <--- 'ol LEFT 208 --- i t.1 1.1 1.0 1 .0 --- 114) RIGHT STREET NAME THRU 163 1.0 (NO. OF LAMES) 1 .,)< I THRU W. LODI RIGHT 13 1.0 1. 1 .0 1 .0 t .1) --- I LEFT SPLIT PHASE'> Y 24 LEFT THRU RiGHr STREET NAME: LOWER SAC SPLIT PHASE' Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED CR I T 1 C;,t- MOVENENT VOLUME VOLUME: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CAFAC I TY pil r 10 V/c P NEI R.;GHT 140 29 s I ThIRU T) LEFT (L.) Z4 __4 ------------------------------------------------------------------ It"'10 SIGHT RIGHT (R) 12l- 122 0.66 1 ---------- ,HF,u ( r) 29-1 28:; 1 t; 00 0. 1887 LCFT (1-) 41 41 1 027-; T R 4015 --------------------------------------------------------- 1 t5c"') _T 0 0. 2700 EZ, RIGHT (R.) 17 SO() --------------- rhi;sj (T) 161, 165 16--0 1"87 0.I_"07 tl- j ---------------------------------------------------------------- - ------0. - WE, RIGHT (R! 110 9 f 15)(1 0.0660 THRU (Ti 1 1zm: 1 ("806 (L) 61 61 15-)0 0.0407 ........................................ ...... VOLUME -TO -CAPACITY RATIO FOP THE INTERSECTION: ADJUSTNENT FOR LOST YELLOW TIME: 10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Til')TAL YGI-i-ME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: 3 1 -`JTER.SE-TiCN LEVEL OF SERVICE. D 5 F, ir. fm i Gi i r T lirir I Or I Al -:v Dei!opod by T -D M Transoortation CQnizultanti. Pleasanton, CA. I967 I 1 1 Om 1 LOWE*, SAC in.: TUR: EP LOD COU: I T Cir. TE. T C Ml-- PEAP. i-vCUR,: -rrjori WiCHESMUT C-RlDGE U-cE 14'HE EXISTING PROJECT RIGHT THRU LEFT 99 NORTH <--- v --- LEFT L 1.1 1.1 1.1) 1.1 --- 3--E RIGHT STREET NAME: THRU __97 --- Z.1 (NO. OF LANES) -.I< 27,4 THRU TURNER RIGHT 1 1. .() 1.1 1.1 1.0 --- 6 LEFT SFLIT PHASE'? <--- LC.T (IiRU r� R 16ill, STREET NAME: LOWER SAC. SPLIT PHASE' Y ORIGINAL ADJUSTED V/C _:-171CAL N ')Y F_ i I r--',' i T VOLUME VOLUME C A PA C Z TY RATIO v." C - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - '------- - ------------------------------------------------------ NG ------------------------------------------------------ND RIGHr (R.) 55 5t I500 Q.v-67 THRU (T) 3c; 1500 0. LEFr (L) 54 54 1500 0.0:16"' ------------------------------------------------------------- S 8 RIGHT (R) 99 99 150f) THRU iT) :3 3 1100 t). LETT (L) 272 292 1500 0.1947 1c47 I , R 102 1y00 '.1 . 06a.'. -------------------------------------------------------------------- ELq R16HT (R) I I 1 0. 0007 THNU ( r) 292 1,?" ' 1, :150 0.1)9 LEFT (L., 110 110 1500 0.07_= 0.07.'." T * R 293 :3 150 0.09'0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- 14D RIGHT (R) 3:11 5 227-, THRU (T) 236 276 1 4 0.0749 LEFT (L) 6 6 1500 (1.0040 R, 571 150 0.11313 VOLUME-TO--APACITY RATIO FOR THE INTERSECTION: -------Al',-JU--'.iTMCNT FOR LOST YELLOW Tli-IE: 0. ----------------------------------------------------------------- rou,i_ VOLAMC-TO-CAPACITY RATIO: ltlFl-_-RSEcrlOrt LEVEL OF ISLRVICE; s ADJUSTED FOR RIGHT. -TURN ON RED De,otooe,j by rjf,,tl Transportation Consulttlnts. Floasantc'i. CA. t';E7 1 - ,l � 1 11 1 11 I li � T -+ N O- f•1 I it r -1 T l r 1 -y r -+ T I r -i 7; O N -i x .-• .-i -:: :J .-• -1 I D < U ni S 1 fillT S m S -• I Ai >- �• 1 < 4 Ul ti 1 ur D O! C O U TTGI 1 11;.0 1 t T 11 cl 1 '7 zt cl 1 m' N -+ a aM. N ^ 11 -IC S 1 -ic T i -ICS i -+c T 1 11 1, '� a � 7'•-; tl m 7± t c c U -1 f -1 i w• -/ 1 -i I f!I N m A is to N -1 to 2 N •• 1 1 •` •� i I I PI •0. •O H m •-• m H i N Z 1 1 1 N «• •t Zt -+r 1 ZO 11 1 I 1 tl / < •• l i 1 •_ - C 3 -+ - ^ c 1 -+ 1 Y J I 1 1 G 3 a m G 7. t n U , t f 1 O 11 m it •• - .� ? m 1 �T li 1 I I <7? II •• JJ- Y 1J - + 1 O T U t 1 1 I O •-• 1 y r -1 1 n P U •- •- I - I •- t •-• 1 r GJ l -1 In O 1 n a p V aJ l iJ '0 0- , 'J V [1 I Ca A `J - C^ U A Y N F L7 1L 1 1 r^ U Ol 1•J T 1 •- �0 0 1 CO N V i L•7 •0 •� 1 3 u E _ _ - y m +-1 1 0-4 it 1 1 1 1 m D t, O r h' n i -1 G R to r v l U: It t 1 1 i r H O m 1 �• Z ^ t p 6^ O t l -O 7 •kl 11 u , 1 I 1 11 O 'n .^ I O 1 cl T a -- cl --+ O - O I: 1 T U i 1 1 t u T -+ �+ •_ •• I 'O "' 1 •_ •• V -i a o-1 S ^ it 1 1 I 1 U P E O c I m, n i P a c . o Y+ c _ w in I r- N i I <o It s n j Y m :* - -< -1 r D It 1 I 1 1 O L 11 _YE T O U 11 C UJ 11 O 111 fp 1V) i 1 C7•, •O v 1 �0 n J-) V 1 La Jl J I B -i 11 In Itl N 7 ._ ... 1 r m r (..._ Y m : J - n m 1 •- it .• i + 1 1 +• .- 17 11 •- 1 Ul i V r a 171 ^ •O1 --+u J 1 1 u c= IG. JI alma -i W -� ' .. 1 mTN 1 I 1 a x v v •an 1 •• m u 1 1 1 n -+ -+ H t w .. r, 1 Z U Y CJ [n A VI 1 CR t^l Ca 1 Ca Ca N Ca Ca 0• Ca I S• N G G O J'- 0vv11 1 1 C, Lt. v I sm _• G -1 11 h Y S L1 - - _- . r•r 1 7?l N _ - - G - i N <.••.1 1 1 �• }.. N m - m l N 1 171 U v a 1 i v 1 v In I m U J 1 1 1 1 II V I ( 1 N -+ ... - 1 x- in t U J 1 i 1 N -f C i Z• N J G U.. I. - v! C 6 I i N m V @- it 1) C. - v 1 I T N •D CD JJ G� H T 1-3 •" 1 :. rr. 1 :. 1 -• v I I� < N Z C T= - w 1 N t l O •: • I t J A .� ( W (a •- f J i0 :O G I -+ -. u P _t t 11 Ln 1.O 1 m 1 -U 1)L A 1 0 -,. I •-n 11 to r --< m 8 0cG I II (1 IJ v i V t) Q 1 Z4u V V I `J Z+ ��, t o 11 n1 ^ O i- 11 I I i i L ..1 11 p Y Y r •• G - - '- 7 1 it 1 1 I 1 U ••1 S •-, a- t U 1 I I I N a n 1 11 n u a 1) :� 0 1 •� 1 c I � u [n rn N li _ cm ;l m L N r Cc La I^ A 11 Ca 1 N l u 1 I r l i l U -+ z m i➢ 7• C• 1 W ( 1 IJ 1 ..J 1 •1 m G it �l I- It i I I 1 r II i.'Tt 3= S- G I it 1 I I I II ' Y or 1 II I 1 I II L P U m 1 11 I 1 ! 11 (A 3 N 1 u 1 1 i n m Jr a �r Y -.., 1 -,: 1 1 . 1.,.'..(; Y "bt-'af•`',^Wwi,:'g`.•.<sw-�.•aa.-- "'-'.-:'p•� s� �a=.'�r`:�•.. may- a�,'.•-�, �-.,.•- :.. _... a .,�� -. t _ ..:., t. _ ,_- I. :-- 1 - h - f - - tn�znG_< _ •r U .y L]n n0[7-0 [nOD-1OtJ• 7 O •- If 6$ a $ rli d -w Z ft7 1 G p Gm , N l l z l 2 II n Y n W W _ • -iTi 13 (ir 17 [7 m D l 2 7 GJ OJ ,` iJ tl 1J ( < t r « Y :3a G D itA �,� N a n N. •• + -r•. O LF t� c n a - - . 4 Ln 1 p p l + Z 7 - O 1 v 3D Z--fEr, 3s 1 L4 U•L�iJ J� 3 R 2 3 m •G � b v , r -La rt illn n w �- 1 R l l J O : C W W s r�R� IIR1 . s N w !n N 7 W 9• L _ _ - G a ti 3 L, 3 JG N r N r w o r u IA C .. t 1 O G 7 3 O « O W '- z a ,l r 4 r .0 r r •G Q 1)l iJ i i 1 1 I ^ -1r-i T•.I r 1 T t G fit •-. I m ._.. I + ff T G) t T -ic T. f -tC 2 7 i t i m 1 1 1 I 1 G I 1 G •-� Cn Cn 1J 1 1,3 C •- .- 6i 17 I t� 3 Z 1 T i 1 - I I i f 1 I f J t tJ .- 7 t ti •- 1 t I r C 1 i - I cA 1 :L,tnr� I c CE 11 —ar:l CM, It i LN III s „ 1 w i +•b: I 1 t 1 1 7 1 I 1 r 1 r .. r 1 .- .- r .- I •- •- •- I Tf Cn A Tn 1 L9 A Ln I U (P Ln C4 1 CC c La, i •. 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 L LD •_• 1:.f C -1 :1 W I - U I -1 1 -I v C• 1 V •_ •:1 i•! t I) 4! I L, ' 1 N n 1 x 1 u � I z. m -- tl r r C. tl I x On - G)nnn n'D '•7 1 H 1 x 1 :7 %D x u a 1)l iJ i i 1 1 I ^ -1r-i T•.I r 1 T t G fit •-. I m ._.. I + ff T G) t T -ic T. f -tC 2 7 i t i m 1 1 1 I 1 G I 1 G •-� Cn Cn 1J 1 1,3 C •- .- 6i 17 I t� 3 Z 1 T i 1 - I I i f 1 I f J t tJ .- 7 t ti •- 1 t I r C 1 i - I cA 1 :L,tnr� I c CE 11 —ar:l CM, It i LN III s „ 1 w i +•b: I 1 t 1 1 7 1 I 1 r 1 r .. r 1 .- .- r .- I •- •- •- I Tf Cn A Tn 1 L9 A Ln I U (P Ln C4 1 CC c La, i •. 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 L LD •_• 1:.f C -1 :1 W I - U I -1 1 -I v C• 1 V •_ •:1 i•! t I) 4! I L, ' 1 N n 1 x 1 u � I z. m -- tl r r On - G)nnn n'D t•). ❑ taw ai000a :7 %D C ' (JI L i9 Cn N Nm to IL L .•. W T Z -1 a. T C 1 •< _0 m ona+1-_ —o n .-. Z (n- Ir . .. .. l :. t_4 3 N -. t mn IL ❑ w w « « •D 6l C• •u O n . N r .... O n + r to •• Ln Ln :, ,r 7 u C J u _ O r -y _ tiW 7,C, CS i; C n n c u K r 71 ed t) Cn 7 fi n W O Al - 7 a D tl it t) •J '• , •_ :D D' t IJ © w ~O - •- a` Z -+F,3 Ln 11 .- m l TC'I _• ,D •a C 3 R 1� Si a �❑ 7 7 O wri O 4 R nl d O L 9 R O C ID _. to N 7 N w '0 R. O. 7 0 3 7 3 n R n, u w ,a - v m O 1.. 3 f- tJ 3 J ❑ O O l J i7 •• u: J C,❑ C, C l N n Q r. 7 .• v 1)l iJ i i 1 1 I ^ -1r-i T•.I r 1 T t G fit •-. I m ._.. I + ff T G) t T -ic T. f -tC 2 7 i t i m 1 1 1 I 1 G I 1 G •-� Cn Cn 1J 1 1,3 C •- .- 6i 17 I t� 3 Z 1 T i 1 - I I i f 1 I f J t tJ .- 7 t ti •- 1 t I r C 1 i - I cA 1 :L,tnr� I c CE 11 —ar:l CM, It i LN III s „ 1 w i +•b: I 1 t 1 1 7 1 I 1 r 1 r .. r 1 .- .- r .- I •- •- •- I Tf Cn A Tn 1 L9 A Ln I U (P Ln C4 1 CC c La, i •. 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 L LD •_• 1:.f C -1 :1 W I - U I -1 1 -I v C• 1 V •_ •:1 i•! t I) 4! I L, ' 1 N n 1 x 1 u � I 0 z. m -- tl r r - t:, r -1 C ' (JI N ` r T Z -1 in - r m C 1 •< _0 L _ D .-. Z (n- Ir m ..) .. - y, _ • I ! 1 - i; K r Al - - - v -Ti -_ 0 I 1 i r - t:, r -1 C ' (JI N ` r T Z -1 in - r m C 1 •< _0 L _ D .-. Z (n- Ir m ..) .. fn l Ui I I u t I - L'I - :) 1 li U :I ♦ �I 'f'. CI { 1,t �, r� I + t -t in It - -1 17 n 0 I m -i 1! �- •- I - I CA til D I L -I -i ( I a I 1 r -1 11 I `. D A i D7 IJ Ln 1 i7 C4 Ili I 1 U Ii 1 1 a, C f I. I-i< it I i o T a, I -i U t - { C z J ]� 1 til u t 1 I Im v 11 1 1 o _ u7 -1 I r •� 11 1 1 I •( -, iT 1 O is (n CA I P O' I •- P G to z 1 £-n a 11• -UA i1 1 4.O. 4 1 11 aJ D U -• L I O II .� .• O• a 1 v O: 1•3 IA of it C4 a: l 1 1 1 T It 1 •• i m 2 u 1 I 1 11 I t 1 tl Cr •- i.1 •- I tJ •- LJ ^^ 1 1 -1 it - Lit •- to I •- L4 to i Ln C4 Cr, Lq 1 m n Ln O - i U) ll 1 I m it r, 11 It c� f •• 1: i�! �• .- i•t I t J G t.l ' t i.l O - I II A t;• V A I C• : 1 O 1•] v V i t1 iT- 0' .O •O 1 to Lnq tiJ t:! 1 t^7 1J i..l fU 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 F t I I I 11 Gi 1 %• V II II I Cn I tJ I 1 n 1 i I n i 1 u 1 I i 1 11 1 I I u t t 1 11 I 1 O r 1 r � i r, - . -t 2 1 D < IF,O I 0 0 1 1 L r P.5 I C C i3 :7? r � I c, a cr [a I 1 in m m 1 3 t fr mo 1 ti I - O 3ri ?m i Ti 1, r -t 1 D I I ll v < t r .-. t C r- D I O) •< l� A "D I -1 G Z O D t .^7i 5H t <7 rr O n - -m-: 1 TO + T I O rz _ La •-: D i c n -t l 1z `u •• O 1 2 -1 x c i m z I T N 1 In • i m , n r i � a • I ;Ci i I I ^ I -1r -iT t r -ii I O +zl�n I ,tsc: i m T z, -1 r Rnn-• - m cc5n= - _ k l k m C •. , - - U• It nt It l'1 m Ln u a 1 q m k n - < 5 r•. n/ I I i N p Y 1'1 y - R (�• r•. - I - - 1 cT p :- c -1 Q 0 1 Ln I F -t V q < r• c •-- c 1:Y - v °n Z r C I: zIYG r ur r -- F n. 1 •- Z •-^ t .- G7 q D I f . m r i* 1 O 1 •-• I Y i Al s < -i u al tl 1- • 17 t -I u I• • .: i 4 •- r- Z •- C4 7.1 p C L D 7. S -- -- 1 •- to •- 1 •- -• A P O 7 N m ,•• •-O 1 N I n Or F 4 IJ •:! It Ln c:, u r tl I: G u• O L6 _ -+ s t - ..1 -i T c ari x ll C _ u s ^• y ani u 11 l i In I;I x n - 1• lit r z•m an -+ m T. __ p -• 2 P Cn Ln u u F = T• (fi ••J m II II •• II p m m ] ! in .1 � � �i c O •• C 4 x v T r c- r X, m - C. ► s Pt -1 2 to 71 N m in n It It F T r 6 - _ k l k m C •. , r, It nt It I I 1 p j, < 5 r•. n/ N Y 1'1 y r•. - I - - 1 cT p :- c -1 Q 0 1 Ln I F -t V q < r• c 1:Y - C I: _b 1 m 1 _P r k r_ •, tl 1- a z• t c -rl 1 1 I N m ,•• r n -1 IJ •:! It Ln c:, u r tl I: G u• O L6 _ -+ s u zcr - ..1 -i T c ari x ll C _ u s ^• y ani u 11 l i In I;I n - 1• r z•m an -+ m T. __ p It 2 P i? u u (fi ••J m II II •• II p D . u 1 � • w � n n < T -- 1 z L\ 11 ,1 r1 ^ I t m n^ I Ul U C l O u 1 � 1 D . 11 U) Z 11 • w � n n < T -- r L\ 11 ,1 r1 ^ I n^ C, n n''I 1'") T Ul U C l O u Z w l l l l P 6 C N+- -• < n a u MMMMG Ip; .• T• Li r, Y, "\ l l S C . 11 tl YI Y• Fl N I 1 1 11 n O c -• -1 v c 11 in -• 1 m 2 I- I C 11 in 711 G n & N .•. 0 it y D U) ZO 0 11'n u, i }'Ti 7} : 1 ,n 11 -1 n �•Cl r: - Ix y -/ r 11 � - I• a ril m D ..• r - .... «.. tA6Ln �� 0 • J W U -I * I: r-- r, --i - - _ 1 -• l 7 •- a p 10 c ,U-1 m -1 x -- - `- Ii Z •011Gm -J •-3 f aam0 w n ��c.•�a a m .. n 73 -t r Z O u G 0 7 w «• n o c c 1 II H _ G v C , p � U; Y: .•. S .- y 11 n. .- ] N U• D n n 0 p a nx o n m ] G S _ -• 0 •D N N ....... iJ 11 r UI w fj f,i 1 "u i 1 1 •• 7 1.) r 1 -i G_ J ]moii a-^ I, [4 t.. U - - .• _ - ' r -+ 9 �n 1 s• ,- 1 J. • , i 3 Z 11 r U a , -I C � J CI y x 1 1 1 r = II CI- - o - r� 1n -< u r a } M. -1 I _• , G u a'n- _ r ?r-, -, it , 11 ! 1 1 it T y r. __ __ 1 .�. 1 D . 11 U) Z 11 T -- r 11 ,1 r1 ^ I it a7 n v x Z Ir, n p CI 2 < n a u _ n n OZ p - N I 1 1 11 n O c -• -1 v c 11 in -• 1 m 2 I- I C 11 in it y D U) ZO 0 11'n u, i }'Ti 7} : 1 ,n 11 -1 n �•Cl r: - Ix y -/ r 11 a ril m D ..• r - _ J V 'D r -I * I: r-- r, --i - - p i J 0 m -1 x -- - `- Ii Z 1 I f u -1 73 -t r Z O u G 1 II H _ ., I. M. p a nx o n m _ ....... 1 "u i 1 1 1 -i n O ]moii a-^ I, [4 - .• _ - ' r -+ 9 �n 1 s• ,- 1 J. • , i 3 Z 11 r -I m I. CI y x 1 1 1 r = II CI- - r� 1n -< u r a } M. -1 I _• , u a'n- _ r ?r-, -, it , 11 ! 1 1 it T y r. __ __ 1 .�. 1 __ _- r_. y a •� _{ U Z p D •� _ K11 z EP 'T ?;T p a 1 -) iT i :: I r C 11 _ CR _ r t1 ] I < ,_, D Z �1 !: iL f Cn �I M t ...: 1 O u, x i II LI •� 1 4- A• •: J Ca p} 1 y 1i D c n- •' _ rI y -i T it 7 r i'; it •-+ 11 +• I w +• IJ it - i4 • (J; 1 V r ii :-- •- u.. Yt 2 x 1 u .. m If 1 x r; - i II - 1 :7 It li �• -. n 1 1 y 4 - •- is , - i n r •-- I r .- .- •- i T x 1: N �L i4 1 (fl i5 l4 1 u tt. 1 i 11 - ' it ri 11 -•u 1 I 1 u- u. _ 0 ID 0 a I. 1: r Z: p 4 d.- V •,1 �J 1. IJ 4L.t- Ll-- .,-L.1; m 1 n -• T �. -4 c n n .I. , T.• n to to 1• ' 7 If x m z al " . 1 ,- U is 11, m c a i,• I i-3 is ,1 1 r-1 �: a m rl m v a• C: Ell x, 1 i , r -, Z. •• 1 i r 11- Z T II 1: - x I n T, �1 In i! 11 1 1 n Ill 111 :I Y I A 11 UJ I 7 I 11 LL I 41 I CI 1 i r-1711 .yrti7, I r-ts - �• -i f D II .,1 1• 1 In .T • 1 m i 1 "� 2 -IL 2 i �iL 2 i -I C: I -1C as m I-.mur-+�r-f-• r -I- Ir�- l: 1'I O l m -, it• - T -ir I Z It 11 In I 'n Y n I 1 I Gl 1 i J D P it i! •' IJ + IJ ••' •'• 1 U •-• 1 •- Q� •- -1 Ill O I l I11 J .1I I •- 1 -3 �r I i t •-. 11 4: •- Ln t J 1 •- IJ Ln I in a m D . mn l o -i it N-< II i 1 i -<D 11 I t 1 C m -i11 1 N -i I r •+ n 1 I C m It 1 £-n 11 v I V 1 l _J I IU 1 L4 Ln J I V•Q. 7 U •-• T 1 O I! t- •- Cn 1 •,: •✓ C• I J •- IJ 1 ib v1 .. i in 2 u 1 1 i 1 i 1 .- 1 1 M u to a rn , to o• Ln t Cn Ln Cn Cn f Ln P In Ui li 1 I i 1 m n 1 I n 11 I I I I ti II i 1 i i 1 7 I it PU C.1 C•iJO i« J•-• Cl 1 JvJ ~ 1 u.?0- I JO•J i, {l �i iJ I Cn v U 1 11 1 1 1 ! u 1 I 1 • 1 a I 1 1 1 u i 1 1 • 1 11 i 1 1 •- I C it i •-• 1« I c i G I L 1 ,ii I v it J 1 1 11 I 1 I I II I i t I II J 1 1 1 n 1 I i 1 u I I I n 1 i I u it Z in 7) 1 a >x• i < I, a u C n-1 'r Zi I .+ m-1 m 11 , C C III r ci 7Jr i Ns a ^l J cr Nsl i n u r 1 r i-1 1 C, n -1 li - •-• I t N =t O 3 i f i it 1 z n 1 n v u I G: I I G T li 1 nuc I J- m T <:I I .-, Rl ,7 1 O -i II I ul c T r v 1-i, n + T 1 1 II I C z 0 -n D 1 T it r O — •-i I m 11 1 N -i I i! I rt m1 1 r'O If 1 F• T i G 0 m < m I ,: it co I u t L U i a 7) It 1 CI C, ] •• 1 m 2 a I N 1 ••na ! 9 _ I {1 y 1 11 ,l_4 i L" '!t C. a 3 I in 11 •_ 1 •_ _ _ in it 1 1 m it O It m r, u 11 1 rl. t G II •_ _• 1 •_ It �11 •_ U t 11 I 11 i) h 1 if U •'• ! f1- •:, is 7 I i! « •-� I « I •- J • 1 11 t n u I �- i c--• a s z u r 1 n 1 f •_ U i 1 a ca t J, n{ N I• Cn 1 a 1 i u I ! n 1 11 I i 11 u 7) -i r u 2 m I z t N I T I J to a In i 1 1 U i a 1 u Z a i• I 1 - a 3 1 O It m I It 1 i a - GJ N = � �- i c--• a s z u r y O n{ M T ' 0 11 L4a I n U) O I TI O L fl n � CUT il T C' m -4 U it - -- -- 1 •- m •'- I -- - I [' I ti 11 It m m T n u I; v _ ;I a r T n_ 11 m i r i: C 2 I N N ,l -1 u r r t m -' J n It in m ; T a 71 I% G I; 11 n It I m m o m c m It _' n S u z a na 7) u C, C m G n T, u o -, r If - ,) 1 It it U) 11 m m u - m z t N I T to i 1 1 z n I CJ 1 m 7, 1 N y O I TI I � I I Im I 1 I [' I ti m m i S 1 T l0 r T i nl m i r i: C 2 I N N ,l -1 r t m -' J in m 1 I m m - .. ,I e- r•. 1 m l � 1 � m i T ], GI Cl 1 1 C1 ?s 1 l x y r _ 1 ter•+ Itl O) n I ` 3 - inn 1 O -i 1 It 1 1 I li _ •- " O 1 0 C, 1, { -i 11 -+ C �. i C C _ I -1 C n m P •- f i o �-1 { n > f - io 1 -+m a r-1- --t••- t ry- 1 r-1-• -t rJ rl < I 3 1 Il -- �- n lJ n --- I -• -: +r I u I ^+ l_ 1 ti 1 1 a. --,l r .0 r + .•T) ca L-1 P U O U :• r l l N0- tJ o I •- i t .� N C6 �, C5 i;+ IJ F C I v? n 0 JI - zm u n n^ p�u_ � m i T ], GI Cl 1 1 C1 ?s 1 l x y r _ 1 ter•+ Itl O) n I ` 3 - inn 1 O -i 1 It 1 1 I li O 1, { -i U ! T n m P •- f i o �-1 { n > f PIS 1 -U li Itl •-• T 71 C Ci 6 11 < 7? 1 cl CJ U I' I� m >. 1 J 17 �) t I•i r l •• Ri 1 - L -, n N -1 t R1 ) N rl 1 r) Y 1 � 1 11 I - 1. 1 •• =1 G, c [ I C: i I tii 7? It � ]• ) I - I 7S __ -• 1 P 1 ^ VI m •_ 1 __ _' p rl m 1 v T O1 n 1f O S I •. 1 J I- L I C II a = 1: r I 1 t '" 7• ;: 1;1 r i:• 7 -1 1 i - 1 a. --,l r .0 r + .•T) ca L-1 P U O U :• r l l N0- tJ o I •- i t .� N C6 �, C5 i;+ IJ F C I v? n 0 JI r y r = m u n n^ p�u_ � GI X 'il- ~' v 1 It 1 1 I li ''1 ,, a -t 1: -• C� i n •- f i I. C: 7 :I > f l7 lv li Itl •-• 70 N I t I a w I' I� - i 17 I ... ., ) �. 1 1 -f 1 UI 3 11 .. G U1 -, n N 11 =1 G, if r •- tii 7? It � ]• p U 7S __ -• 1 m •_ 1 __ _' p rl m 1 l -I T O1 n 1f O S I •. 1 J I- L I C II a = 1: r '" 7• ;: 1;1 r i:• 7 -1 m i 1 I iJ "i II t ! m i> ,: :_ - -i 71 •+ Ii ]- u -� Y• v •- _ N_91, ir' in '- u Oi Ij i 1 O 11 1 L - 1 L•. i ' 1. - I) 1 •-' e U C! m L Lt) ,q : , 1 •- L) i c Gi :: C i� '. � b •�- /: 1 C1 11 1 7 _ I C� .. ', , r) u. I -! 1i _ p � _ '-; C'1 n -i 7 -1 T' V 1 I I m n li r l - 11 +� I I +•� f +r _ 1; ^ __ _. t •- I � 11 i. C%� ^ ; ^• I1 al RI n 11 W I. j, it m u; u < -- I r.: m u n • � ~' v 1 It 1 1 I li ''1 70 N = 0 1 O if -:r, y - - - i 17 I ... ., ) �. 1 1 -f 1 UI 3 11 .. G U1 J Y II ! - I Cn ^ i Ci 1; - - •. '� l -I T O1 n 1f O S I •. 1 J I- L I C II a = 1: r '" 7• ;: 1;1 r i:• 7 -1 m i 1 I iJ "i II t ! m i> ,: :_ - •.; I: -i Itl i%; v - N_91, ir' in '- Ij i 1 O 11 1 L - 1 L•. i ' 1. - I) - •-' C! m L Lt) ,q : , 1 •- L) i c Gi :: C i� '. � b •�- /: 1 C1 11 1 7 _ I C� .. ', , r) u. I -! 1i _ p � _ '-; C'1 n -i 7 -1 T' V 1 I I m n li r l - 11 +� I I +•� f +r _ 1; ^ __ _. t •- I m tl: .- 7 - _. 1 i. C%� ^ ; ^• I T f �_ _ 1 � - _ I < -- I I 1 __ 11 ❑ 1- • i r•, u nu ) I ur r.T :I xj u r c l aF 1 w nr.m Sl - . ^ n I I. 1 I 1 it 1 n I I 1 r1 n H cm I Ln • u 1, C. i - -+ rl 7• = 1 •_ a .. t .'.i u - , 1 , r' a 'n - :L ,: • 1; .^_ AD T. In itDL, 1, <u n:Y^ In T in T T "1 31 71 1 :71 C, I in I c c c :r. It 0:1r IIt O I --i In it IFIn 4 r I Ci 17:11 1 1 4 0 co r, 1, •- ��i . III --. Lit tl I t4 1 o D -4 : m r, 1 0 It 1A r - r - Ile I Ut -< It O 77 z - C, I -( rI T. I T it 3 fit f 0 ti I I rjU I E -11 1, tJ 14 13 1 CI o n �o Is 14 T., 3: it in it sw in IL I r'l it if I FE I,,. IT, k.l 02 7j - In cl ro r c 4;n It 5. 03 In a LA A 01 3l 1 it 01 1 4 L4 Y 01. 1 -1 a K -4 N it Amu cl J!I?, r 1: C, t6 In vl co it 3 14 sw in FE I,,. 02 7j - In cl ro r c 4;n It 5. In a T, a K -4 N it Amu cl J!I?, r 1: C, 11 C. In it it 11 J -4 C 1, 3 or It m V It 0 X I. It 7. < D i7 tl If. — --1 0 c r r; al itZ 73 In tp li r. -n T It 4. In F; 1: m I -` 11 2 z it 1. z 11 T, II In a a 14 G It '-I L n L4 1; Tu, IT r fl, n m '✓ rL 13 Ill T t - a, la 4 Ln I LA in rt L cr a D c 3 " • rj "D u. ID It t- C. 0. 0. I 1 -.4 C.) D 6 m • P 1 1 C: D C -y I T) In zGicot iQ in LL In ill 7+ I C (= t II i . U1 -1 m c i 1 ill < 1 1 1 �I n C, I m -i 1 C C i -1 OO i 7) O 3 1 -I 1 3 •- z m 0 7 r 1 U u I 1 x - 1 ?)r 1 n -i11 C17 1 O -+ In C r 1, 1 W. -< 0 T 1 � .. 1 D 1 i P 7 n O 1 m w z m l r I r ,ZI1 II O I ] V < L I E O I L m u 1 3 � .• 1 mx I w 1 ••m+ C• ' 1 1 n i Z W 1 In n G i G I W I = I a 1 •• I G 1 I 7 1 I n I I L I I 1 I i I 1 I CI + y 1 I Oi• .p Ci) m 1 3.1 O r I 3 Co. u � i 'tl G] 1 ii � 1 1� 1 I 1 1 I J I .- 1 � I u •- I r c l Ld in 1 .• v l (n Cn 1 r i 1 R r- I 1 1 I r- < < U I I , r c I I 1 1 (R m l 1 I 1 U I 1 ! I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I n 1 1 1 I V G 1 %.- I J t 1) 1 J •• I L cn o 1 c < � 0� 1 r;a 1 0�•(a 1 •••n I 1 i I i 1 I I 1 i 1 I I 1 1 I 13 IA 0 ,1 1 e 1 I x r-iS I r7 N it n 1 17,,C1 ! i '1T-1 rat 1 .. T r i( 3 ^ 11 In 1 -y m tt r -(^ 1 r-1 -s - -1 (' I -• o u I- 1 _ •-. c H. J - 3 li t CJ T It - 1 l - Pl II 1 n If O V Cd 1 •- V F) ! U- hl s = I- o O p i.� ..:..x a 1. ' {, � m I- •-• N 1 1 Pi< 1t -o x J I 0 .? 71 1 z 1 it C. V V I- V 1 1) c, I% I O U t- •- (A i v G I V •- tJ Ln •- I fi-' it t 1 M it i I -1 II (R A Ln 1 (n U- (n ! •- to ^lit 1 m 11 Q (Q •� 1 .• (n •'✓ i L4 G In C w i to 11 i 1 In It 1 f 1 n u 1 1 .L 1 1 II 1 1 I -+ If I 1 nl SI < -y L 1 U• -p I -n I I 1 I I I i I rl 1 'A -1 li, 1 I i i i II • v 1 •-• "• f •- -• I l i -,l i i- 'I 17 41 :i Ln 1 J= V •:' 1 iJ •=• •U !Y ) i V 1 ' •- ..1 J I II U -r, •� i J0J z, D s It I t -i e n`• P1 C • I I7 1 I H t 1 ul i II i I I I 11 l G I 1 • 1 • I� q I I 1 _� 11 1� l 1 1 m u in r, •.1 1 = isJ q 0' 1 O 1 :.1 1 J:� lit 1 u 1 1 t - 11 1 1 1 1 l u 1 1 1 < I I u 1 1 u 1 1 i 1• I 11 1 I I rl 1 - ;- _ _1 ^ C� 'A -1 r 6 n r, •_- R1 r n z, r, s �. -i e n`• P1 C 1 i ul r m u lit = - 1 1 II - P < 1 I 1• < u r•i R1 , r X. _ .. 1. I% .- 1 1 •- L7 1 7]SI II S I H r G P Ar 1I n n m - - L' C 1, C N - [n I UI I V r q <-• in T i c 1 i • = H 3 - li m in T•• in - - f' u Y [zj 1,1 x T w 1 u - 17 it a N :- (n m r m T 7 C r u) T T i.1 n •• U r -1 `T 11 M 711 G „ tl T it m ?t O m w -, m m >? x A ^ 1• T, In n- _ M m ci t: m n - ;- _ _1 ^ C� R1 r I z, r, .I C 1 i ul r m u lit = � 1 f 1 I 1• < I R1 , r X. r m- -I- rn -,I 1 •- 1 _ o .- 1 1 •- L7 1 7]SI I u, P Ar n - L' in T i I I i -t rJ li n in [zj 1,1 x 1 n T it -I C 'y u) T u: r -1 `T - it m x A ^ 1• In m m - ;- _ _1 ^ C� r - l'1 .I 1 f- r Appendix C APPENDLY D - RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Received Durifig the 30 -Day Review Period Responses and Comments The following section includes the comments received on the Winepress Expanded Initial Study during the 30 -day pbulic review period. Directly following each comment is the EIP response to that comment. _;. SSl�S TATE OF CALIFORNIA-3USINESS. MANSFORTATICN AND HOUSING AGENCY GECRGE DEUKMEJIAN, Goran DEPARTMENT OF 1 RANSPORTATIC�N = .O. aOK 20A S (1976 :. CHARTER WAY) TOCKTON, CA 95201 T TDD (2M 9-M:9) 948-7936 November 16, 1988 Mr. John Keene State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Room t 21 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Mr. Keene: 10 -SJ -Lodi Winepress Shopping Center Expanded Initial Study SCH 488103101 Caltrans has reviewed the Expanded Initial Study forthe proposed Winepress Shotgping Center located at the southwest corner of Turner Road and-, acramen Roa.: in Lodi. Due to the size and location cf the proposed project, it does not appear that this project will have a significant impact on the State Highway System. However, the Draft ElR should provide a thorough traffic anaiysis of the local circulation system. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this project. if you have any questions regarding this report you may contact me at the above noted number. cc: P Verdoorn/SJCCOG bcc: D Cowell A Johnson/w attachment Very truly yours, KENNETH W. BAXTER ATSD Coordinator Response to Comments Department of Transportation Comment Response 3 Comment noted, no response required. G g¢.o �?3 Fi<9 �c n i SSI�S LYw� I fodii ung§1 e d za:; I h I I d"1i� rriict FACILITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT . .1300 West; Lodi Avenue &M4'S lodr�"Calff&in a 95242'' Mailing Address: 315 West Lockeford Street, Lodi, California 95240 November 17, 1988 t David Morimoto "Zi Associate.Planner City of Lodi 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA .95241 Re: Expanded Initial Study for Winepress Shop,ing Center Dear David, Thank.youfor;requesting any comments Lodi Unified School District:mayhave relative to subject. We have no comments at this point in time. S" c ly, i. Mary Joan Starr Facility Planner MJS:cw Lodi (209) 331.7217 Stockton (209) 953-8217 i „��6'1'�r�'`n�x�.�. Ects -- Y.. _ . ,.,. .... .. , ....- -�. t : _ .. '.'. . M• �.r�'�' -- �..� u', a',�£b" L :�-r� �`e1t-�+» _ ;��`� - . Response to Comments Lodi unified School t ibcrict Comment Response 1 Comment noted, no response required. UTILITY DEPARTMENT � CITY OF LODI • 221 WEST PINE ST. (P.C. BOX 320) a LODI, CA 95241 (209) 334-5634 = � Fp ! -- – - - — – —------- I DATE — X/0 V, , J A% ? i � •SSG �Q cam¢ (/� n/7� ►� r, � �J L� r cav DATE Response to Comments City of Lodi Utility Department 88158 RECEIVED E!P �;^'To MEKORANDUM, City of Lodi , Publ i c Works Department - r...; .>,'•^w"i Vii. .77 Z F - k T0: Community Development Director FROM : Public Works Director DATE . November 28, 1988 'y t A, ZIT - ;T SUBJECT: Winepress Expanded Initial Study W have reviewed the Winepress Shopping Center Expanded Initial Study and have a few comments: Typographical and miscellaneous errors are noted in the attached copy of the study. 2. Pages 5 - 15, top paragraph - vie assume it is recommended that the planned west Frontage Road be terminated south of the project site. 3. While it was not explicitly stated, the project should construct all the improvements along its frontage. This should include Lover Sacramento Road as a condition of the project approval. 4. The traffic analysis did not include the driveways. W recommend that the project include sufficient street width to provide left turri lanes and transitions. "No Parking" may be provided on -street to provide additiocal width if approved by the City Council. 5. The on-site plan should be revised to eliminate the drive-through!.3, opening a jacen to the Turner Road driveway. Jac L. Ronsko Public Works Director JLR/RCP/jmr �, MCDD04/TXTW.OIJ Response to Comments City of Lodi Public Works Department Comment Response I Typogrnphical and micsellaneous errors have been corrected within the text of this report. Typoraphical error has been corrected within the text of this report. 3 Comment represents opinion of the Public Works Department. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider this comment during their deliberations. 4 Comment represents opinion of the Public Works Department. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider this comment during their deliberations. 5 Comment represents opinion of the Public Works Department. The Planning Commission and City Council should' consider this comment during their deliberations. SSl5S a _oma HENRY M. HIRATA DIRECTOR COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS P O BOX 1810 - 1810 E. HAZELTON AVENUE STOCKTON. CALIFORNIA 95201 (2091 488.1000 EUGENE DELUCCHI CHIEF DEPUTY OIRECTOR THOMAS R. FLINN DEPUTY DIRECTOR MANUEL LOPEZ DEPUTY DIRECTOR RICHARD C. PAYNE DEPUTY DIRECTOR W7?;=OR70C :'HCa?T,.jG f 'T>JmDM - {Cr.M NIT_AE STUD - Dear Mr. mor=mc-c: The fol.?owi comments are submitted -_e2 _cnse to _: scone a.^.I_' Conten;_ of the env- _onmenta_ revl.ew fc':' she -`Jove name_ .Jr•cje^l. Tn arc et_ 1 ccnt r abute, L- Jthe neem _ or i utura imechanism traff J - Sc funding Teo a^ S^gna ^ M. t0 const_,.:C= the improvements required for mitigat_on wol—Il . annea.. to be Justified. Traffic entering an:4 ex "zLi.nC the _ oro 4ec-: :lav adverseiv ImpaC ttit� Capaclty u= --he ad_:ining roads. The traffic studv should analyze access provisions and offer alternatives such as Gaecele'_atic C' lanes at a^rrCach tC driveways and median construction to control left turn mcvemen�.: as mitigating measures tC i_rlit tile imD3CtS on these ma.-cr roadways. Constraction of the F_,1 !_ width of Turner Rcad and -ower 'Sacramento Road, including deceleration and _..._=_ erect-' cn 1 3_ _ lanez, would appear ilarranzed. - - T;'`_an:e _ -Lu -.^.e ocoort-,; .; �v to c'=L•'l^1_nt on t ,i-- _ '--• ._ You avc a n v C' e z as re 7:- a r n,zt^_Ta._-=_ ..ear -a =a1 I „e- j, Response to Comments County of San Joaquin Department of Public Works Comment Response 1 Comment represents opinion of the Department of Public Works. The Planning Commission and City Council should corisider this comment during their deliberations. 2 Comment represents opinion of the Department of Public Wcrks. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider this comment during their deliberations. 88158 -an PTUJOIXIeD 8.4- 0a �uens:nd 'sjuawn:)clg TrzuawuojiAue -41eap :I,_: GSNa(bJPUPU aqzQS ay-. p,,Tjd=o aAvq nol, 1UL7 SD51PMPtOu�Pc -:`1,?T C -LU aOUeTUGAU--z' js6TT:Ira 3n0A IP A0UD52 a.'I .40E:Iuop;ncA qrqa Puawlwcoa} wk 1U0j'Ar31;T:1vT1z] ao UcTiewcgul 6a0u: paau nc'A 'T U01je.2i D mj'avbat, mcji, 6ujdopv uT ,sn .anon, .7o3 papee-lo,, e aso:;L Lplm .11aq) 1.1cKidn'; C -L uoTaOas STt4, Aq p2ain5aa osjE zic, sa-,Duabc "'A0L;e5p eLp Aq P;)ACadd? -10 ,no aq oj,pa_,Tnbc._, tae qz)jLim io A:)uabe cL,:t ;o asTaaadxa )o vc•:r Ur uly."r. 6;1? q3jU,-. -.1:IC1r0:1d V LIT D0AT0AL, OS014a &i.:Jueasqris ascw Aluc -.v-4s 1.au,?5e '.njqnd ;Izol'po ic A.yjaolc PJCTSLa SO: F„ G"q jo tO-L',Z uo,,jo•S aou s•spejd Am am 7ielp os., S'a_'ara_ld z4qa C� Ja,aa a-, -AIZ-3e7pz�M-T OL-:; i,.;i-4cxj esqpTd 13app:o ul lou nLn gj .'3-j")jdLuo:) S1 ojwilvd anon aLyj 92nrup oz uo1a.0Tciwc:) po ,""M Moll",, OSeajd 'r,'JUM'-'r:- MP Pel1N4a E;c'4 at:L;a Paou T11M. noi, ILL.:C: zo POsOl*ut- 114a LO (a::s)S1 ur-:z, sau cc aLp put: ;aSojzl m�.: F1 po'.:;xIoz sz'*'0u@5z ;:lczs Si?:{ JOI)ROA4Dc, ')bj jrC(.j i0l"0192, 01'3s d0o(IS SSS.ldMtp, 3;3))S OULd '.S-Jy -,17 da61 k08v3G9v GHW 0t111t_ltjlllld ?1) 371330 33, Response to Comments Office of Planning and Research Comment - Restnonse 1 This letter serves as a cover letter for other State agency comments and does not require a response. SS15S