The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - June 16, 1993 PH (6)os CITY OF LOD1 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Planning Commission's Recommendation for a General Plan Amendment Which Consists of the Following: 1. Request of J. Jeffrey Kirst to redesignate the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (Hwy 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west from PR, Planned Residential, and 0, Office to LDR, Low Density Residential and 0, Office; and 2. Request of Ronald B. Thomas, et al to redesignate the parcels at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 22250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) from PR, Planned Residential to LDR, Low Density Residential. MEETING DATE: June 16, 1993 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation for a General Plan Amendment which consists of the following: 1. request of J. Jeffrey Kirst to redesignate the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (Hwy 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west from PR, Planned Residential, and 0, Office to LDR, Low Density Residential and 0, Office; and 2. request of Ronald B. Thomas, et al to redesignate the parcels at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) from PR, Planned Residential to LDR, Low Density Residential; BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Both of the requests are the first step toward annexation and are in conformance with the General Plan as adopted by the City Council on June 12, 1993. The PR, Planned Residential designation was put in the plan to provide the Planning Commission and City Council with a means to review each development project at the earliest possible stage. The LDR designation is for single-family densities. The Kirst or Helmle projE;t consists of an office -institutional designation along Kettleman Lane which can be constructed at any time. The remainder of those properties are in Phase II of residential development which does not occur until 1995 and later. APPROVED: • THOMAS A. PETERSON! %Ir City Manager ecyclod °+A°' cc -1 CCCD93.29/TXTD.OIC Public Nearing to Consider the Requests of J. Jeffrey Kirst and Ronald B. Thomas for a General Plan Amendment June 16, 1993 Page two The Thomas or Richards Ranch project is in Phase I of residential development and could compete for allocations this year. It should be noted that the development plan shows an elementary school and neighborhood park. The school site has been requested by Lodi Unified School District and the park site conforms to the Parks Master Plan being considered by the City Council. FUNDING: None Required. Jam s B. Sc ro er C unity Deve opment Director JBS/cg Attachments CCCD93.29/TXTD.01C CITY COUNCIL THOMAS A. PETERSON PHILLiP A. PE�.`+I^4O. Maya CITY OF L O D I "" ""�'`" )ACK A. SIECLOCK JENNIFER A1. PERRIN Mayor Pro Tempore city Clerk RAY C. 0"1.%PORT CITY HALL "r1 WEST PINE STREET $Oe myATT STEPHEN ). AMNN P.O. BOX 3006 LO01. CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 City Attorney JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER rM) 334-56U FAX Boll April 13, 1993 Mr. J. Jeffrey Kirst c/o FCF Development Associates P.O. Box 1259 Woodbridge, CA 95258 Dear Jeff: RE: Helmle Addition General Plan Amendment Prezoning Negative Declaration At its meeting of Monday, April 12, 1993 the Lodi City Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the following requests of J. Jeffrey Kirst: 1. for a general plan amendment to redesignate the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (State Route t 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west from PR, Planned Residential, to.LDR, Low Density Residential and 0, Office; 2. to prezone the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west R-1, Single -Family Residential, R-2,. Sings Family Residential,and RCP, Residential -Commercial- Professional; and 3. to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the CcMunity Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. These recommendations have been forwarded to the City Clerk. She will inform you of the time and place of the City Council's public hearing on these requests. Sincerely, t JAMES S. SCHROEM11 ccxitunity Development Director R 0 Mn "VH V W" I IL; Excerpts from Planning Commission Minutes of April 12, 1993 The next public hearing was the request of J. Jeffrey Kirst for a General Plan amendment to (1) redesignate the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation District canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west from PR, Planned Residential, and 0, Office, to LDR, Low Density Residential, and 0, Office; (2) to prezone the same parcels to R-2, Single -Family Residential and R -C -P, Residential- Commercial- Professional; and (3) to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. Community Development Director Schroeder introduced this matter to the Planning Commission. Mr. Schroeder explained that the project area is an island of the county that is almost totally, surrounded by the City. For that reason, when the applicant requested annexation of his property to the City, it was decided that the entire area between Lower Sacramento Road and the Woodbridge Irrigation District canal would all have to be annexed to the City at one time. Mr. Schroeder explained that he was recommending one change from the proposed prezoning request instead of designating the entire residential area as R-2, he recommended that the strip of land immediately south of the Sunwest Subdivision be prezoned R -i, requiring lot sizes of 6500 square feet which would be more consistent with the larger lots in the Sunwest Subdivision. He felt that a strip approximately 300 feet in depth would be sufficient. The remainder of the area would be prezoned R-2, a single-family zone that allows smaller lot sizes. The 300 foot strip adjacent to Kettleman Lane would be given a zoning of R -C -P, Residential -Commercial-Professional. Commissioner Griffith asked if the City has an exclusive office zone, one that permits only office uses. Mr. Schroeder stated that the closest zoning would be the R -C -P zoning, primarily an office and professional zoning but it allows certain types of residential uses. Commissioner Griffith asked if this would include residential or apartment uses. Mr. Schroeder indicated that these types of uses are permitted in the R -C -P zone to a density not to exceed 10 units per acre. Chairman Mindt then opened the public hearing to the audience and asked if anyone wished to speak on this matter. The first speaker was Jeff Kirst. Mr. Kirst stated that he had signed an agreement with Lodi Unified School District for his property, agreeing to pay the required school impaction fees. He stated that he was not sure about the other properties, although he felt some of the other property owners were also in the process of entering into agreements with the school district. He stated he did not oppose the requirement of R-1 zoning adjacent to the Sunwest Subdivision. He did, however, request some flexibility on the requirement for a 300 foot width for the R-1 zoning. He stated that the actual width may be plus or minus 25 feet depending on the final layout of the lots and the street width. He anticipated that there would be two rows of lots with a center street, but he wasn't sure of the exact dimension that would be required. The Commission agreed to allow some flexibility in that dimension. T The Commission asked Mr. Kirst if he plans to have residential uses within the portion of R -C -P zoning on his property. He stated he has no plans for residential uses at present. The next speaker was Darrell Sasaki, 1806 West Kettleman Lane, Lodi. Mr. Sasaki stated he represents two properties located at the east end of the subject area. He stated that the property owners he represents are in favor of the proposal and are willing to sign agreements with Lodi Unified School District. The next speaker was Joe Handel. Mr. Handel stated that he owns property adjacent to the existing Nazerine Church. He is in favor of the proposal and added they are planning to put a retirement_ facility on their portion of the property adjacent to Kettleman Lane. The final speaker was Mamie Starr, Lodi Unified School District. Ms. Starr explained that the school district has been in contact with most of the property owners in the subject area and was attempting to obtain funding agreements with the property owners. She noted th?t because of the number of different property owners, the process was taking longer than normal. She hoped, however, to have signed agreements with all the property owners prior to the matter being reviewed b;- the City Council. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission took the following actions. On a motion by Commissioner Rasmussen and a second by Commissioner Griffith, the Planning Commission, on a 4-0 vote, approved the certification of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the proposed project. Next, on a motion by Commissioner Rasmussen and a second by Commissioner Griffith, approved the request for a General Plan amendment to redesignate the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation District canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west from PR, Planned Residential, and 0, Office, to LDR, Low Density Residential, and 0, Office and to prezone the same parcels in the following manner: a 300 foot+l- strip immediately south of the Sunwest Subdivision to R-1, Residential, Single -Family. The remainder of the residential area to be prezoned R-2, Residential, Single Family and the 300 foot strip adjacent to Kettleman Lane to be prezoned R -C -P, Residential- Commercial - Professional. The motion was approved on a 4-0 vote. CITY COUNCIL THOMAS A. PETERSON PHIUIP A. PENNINO. +.laver CITY OF L O D I citV JACK A. SIECLOCK IElvm ifER Ak PERRIN� Gtr Clerk mavar Pro remoom CITY HALL. M WEST PINE STREET 5109 CNATT RAY Q DAVENPORT P.O. Box 3M Gtr Anomer STEPHEN 1. MANN. LOOT. CALIFORNIA 95247.7910 JOHN R. IRandvl S: IOER QM 334-5634 FAX CM April 14, 1993 Mr. Ronald B. Thomas c/o Richards Ranch Partnership P.O. Box 1598 Lodi, CA 95241-1598 Dear Ron: RE: Richards Ranch General Plan Amendment Prezoning Negative Declaration At its meeting of Monday. April 12, 1993 the Lodi City Planning Cow ssion recommended that the City Council approve the following requests of Ronald B. Thomas, et al: 1. for a general plan amendment to redesignate the parcels at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APR 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APR.. 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APR 062-290-07) frog PR, Planned Residential to LDR, Low Density Residential; 2. to prezone the parcels at 13737 A. Cherokee Lane (APR 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APR 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) R-2, Single- Family Residential; and 3. to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Comimunity Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. These recommendations have been forwarded to the City Cleric. She will inform you-. of the time and place of the Council's public hearing on these requests. Sincerely, r � r WSB. SCHRO DER nity Development Director cc: City Clerk Laura E. Bainbridge, Attarrey at Law if BX MOT. - SsfrrsaR Parer/ .vw.er�aewl Oma \ LAYOUT LINE FOR PRDOOSCD Fi2OW-AGE RWAD. Richard's Ranch Additicn Genera! Pan Amendment Prezone & Neg. Dec. C-?ALU'93-02 Z-73.04 NO -02 :5 Cb'. -t2 -a3 A f !i 67M fit VIA—mild 4 I v ax .971 r I v ax Excerpts from Planning Commission Minutes of April 12, 1993 Chairman Mindt declared that now was the time and place for the public hearing on the requests of Ronald B. Thomas et al (1) for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the parcels at 13737 North Cherokee Lane, 2250 South Stockton Street and 13845 North Cherokee Lane from Planned Residential to Low Density Residential; (2) to prezone the same parcels R-2, Single -Family Residential; and (3) to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. Community Development Director Schroeder introduced this matter for the Planning Commission. Mr. Schroeder explained that the proposed development is consistent with the previously approved subdivisions in the area. The applicants are requesting approval of the General Plan Amendment and Prezoning so they may begin annexation procedures to bring the three properties into the City. Once the properties are annexed to the City the applicants 'will be required to return to the Planning Commission with a more specific development plan for their approval. Chairman Mindt opened the public hearing for comments from the public. The first speaker was Lowell Flemmer, 558 Riverside Drive, Woodbridge. Mr. Flemmer stated that he represents the Richards Ranch property but was also speaking for the Gallegos and Beckman properties. He felt the proposal is a good project, consistent with the surrounding area. He noted that the project includes both a school site, as requested by the Lodi Unified School District, and a park site, as requested by the City of Lodi. The map before the Planning Commission was somewhat tentative since neither the school district nor the City of Lodi have made final commitments to the location or configuration of the proposed school and park. He hoped these matters would be worked out prior to returning to the Planning Commission with a specific development plan. Commissioner Griffith asked about the possibility of inclusionary or affordable housing within this project. Mr. Flemmer stated that they are attempting to make the housing as affordable as possible. However, as planned, the project would contain only single-family lots. The next speaker was Jeff Kirst, 18826 North Lower Sacramento Road, Woodbridge. Mr. Kirst explained that the applicants had been in negotiation with the Lodi Unified School District. The plan shows a school site which will be offered to Lodi Unified School District. If the district does not want or need the school site, the land will be converted to single-family home sites. He stated that they are in the process of signing an agreement for school fees with the school district. The next speaker was Mamie Starr of the Lodi Unified School District. Ms. Starr stated that the school district is neither opposed nor in favor of the project. The school district's only request was that the approval of the project be conditioned upon the property owners signing written agreements with the school district for the payment of the appropriate school impaction fees. Following the hearing on this project, the Commission took the following actions. On a motion by Commissioner Griffith and a second by Commissioner Rasmussen, the Planning Commission, on a 4-0 vote, approved the certification of the negative declaration as adequate environmental documentation on this project. Next, on a motion by Commissioner Rasmussen and a second by Commissioner Griffith, the Planning Commission, on a 4-0 vote, approved the General Pian amendment request to redesignate the parcels at 13737 North Cherokee Lane, 2250 South Stockton Street and 13845 North . Cherokee Lane from PR, Planned Residential, to Low Density Residential and to prezone the same parcels to R-2, Single -Family Residential. DECLARATION OF MAILING On June 3, 1993 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit W; said envelopes were addressed as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "8" attached hereto. There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi. California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true. and correct. Executed on June 3, 1"3, at Lodi, California. Jennifer M. Perrin City Clerk •1 A Peg4i 14icolim Deputy City Clerk DEC#01/TXTA.FdM NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC IZZARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an Wednesday, June 16, 1993 at the hour of 7;00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a Continued Public Hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi CA, to hear the following matter: a) Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council approve the following requests of J. Jeffrey Kirst: 1. for a general plan amendment to redesignate the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the vest from PR, Planned Residential, to LDR, Low Density Residential and O, Office; 2. to prezone the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west R-1, Single -Family Residential, R-2, Single -Family Residential, and RCP, Residential -Commercial -Professional; and 3. to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, at or prior to, the Public Hearing. Dated: June 2, 1993 By Order of the Lodi City Council Myin i ! ei,_(&,,Clerk Approved as to form: Bobby W. McNatt City Attorney 14 ' _ - -- - - - - - - --- Cs �•/.cam PUBLIC HEARING LIST MAN VII ( IST ron. FILE 0 AVO owNGn•S NAME MAXWO ADDnESS CITY, STATE zr . _ 3G 511r.9-11(3 '% u a - irY Y w'- Hg7oYj!el1z 11D yl a y V ��' r+ 0 4 - r w � cam!% .1 � r —/o e�• u/ 4 -ane —// J d hh ah a ct o e - i9 i � • ..��q royQ/ Cbts� o- �/ -•77 „ /Vo -2 ff,r✓'dh& oe ffi, figs-rl, i f�i,� �.� t / 7 7 Z �V Z;V77 1 4, AJ 'n --fZ� - it .X /�--`-'-� w WA •% � ',4 '� Sta�/�_ /5% /A S' /•!(i�M FSS' � `�L:! / . .rd efc_ Cro�rcA pu`C /: / J ./s _ _ Df IrIl If` UI:AOIAIf�- 1 IQT PUBLIC HEARING LIST MAII ING LIS r ron: I FILE 0 AV# OWNEII-S NAME MARANO ADIXIESS CITY. STATE zip aga -243-- I-71clTier 7 q C-27/77 23 12- h-- 1? 6 /T 12�n,,19 Z- 0- A/ �!,4 H shgzp a , /-, ,P�q 'A/ d R IK � A 7 -1/v Af;ZA2 /OOP5dele1 17' '1- /-f ,jr /7//7 P, -"r r Z 7.1 6; Or v 14" - -s-/? /9,00 W V-7 tit es A-- O '790 /e A hI-'h,-1117!9 233 -0 Ile, A (21 Mir- e P. 1w, -/0 rAal- le.5 A Z16k -I, 7r,; ed Z- VdWI -4644'1 e r Ile,- 5wz,u [Is,) - 4 r-lilolv pf-ST Ale)Aei2 4 -7c lt,hljcfrL cl?e.1ic-r1-crcL 4:502 -oz. � hoy v .-,z �4 I)Llezled Knw1q;,ir 3!�z 21- 0174,;d d e.5 t Al aq -l7 -jEdl /IZL / -1 - Z�-)dta /Z/ 0-- 1-sw eli-Idinlil Lodi /F 91/ce (710)( r --y Dimyg�ti`ajle$� Al;�I&, — Ash D), k-9 a�lv- 11 AL 1/1) Tvs( 00 47 ry o -.z 7Dl ZZ 6171n -Q; C- -t 2f4b;2�r i�/-S 17111JAg jpVe 4e el) 0 sy ki al ,, Aloe rw,, A., tv/).- �, I? se ( P h IP A A P. ljZfj ,,c. 4rai 6) f5ply �Z/- 4,140 0 PUBLIC HEARING LIST MALIING I IST rOn: Alelt k 1941JI'li-4.1 FILE AI'/ OWNEWS NAME MAILING AoonESS CITY, STATE ZIP o - a �5;r uo - � t� rglx4l l EF ,ri -To-z /, ft Q ^ f'r 77 V ' ✓� 0 let —�� < —0.7 _CZ et Z ^TES r— / _ a y i-'Rw-lee -LY" r /; /_ Ind; C* 1'•A'e/ e, 1/ /I6 A chhf` J PUBLIC HEARING LIST MAII.ING I ISt ron: Alehitle lf�6/oc L. FILE f AP/ OWN[n'S NAME MAILING AnonEss CITY, STATE ZIP - f�ZO - OS .. -•_ vb o ,► ,. r05, ' �'. A:Y/) / e1,r _ --/7 o h/7 nb,j u 1-nr-[.L2I-n/Zcl r O i ,r /y0 - gl // 440 90Z1LrLc=i-6 C X 0.7 > O `33 _.. t Q•! .We i v L r l _ - S F ` ' v �72714- 0 U: -OHO - /Y ?` u vr- j - .?g MA' _30it _ DECLARATION OF MAILING On June 3, 1993 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "H" attached hereto. There is a regular daily ccrmwnication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 3, 1993, at Lodi, California. Jennifer M. Perrin City Clerk I Peg :`'Iticolini Deputy City Clerk DEC#01/TXTA.FRM NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, June 16, 1993 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a Continued Public Hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West pine Street, Lodi CA, to hear the following matter: a) Planning Commission's recommendation that the City Council approve the following requests of Ronald B. Thomas, et al: 1. for a general plan amendment to redesignate the parcels 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APR 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) from PR, Planned Residential to LDR, Low Density Residential; 2. to prezone the parcels at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) R-2, Single -Family Residential; and 3. to certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be made at said hearing. if you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, at or prior to, the Public Hearing. Dated: June 2, 1993 By Order of the Lodi City Council �Cler rin �Ity Approved as tp form`': / t Bobby W. McNatt City Attorney NOTICE05/TXTA.02J Isn E)NIU .•i onend C77v��11 19j n:('�� E07 •A lvrtlx,! 170 1.r - ,,,- �-,r- ,. � - 7n r ` Fep -7,e r // Al U d///7�h- - / '' •. / / 14 v D >2`- ,tIZ 3fVIS'A117 SS3U0()V DN1l1VW 31NVNS.UINMO IdV 311J / '1103 1Sil FJN IIIVW cuz/a6li// 7ZIlplvkly ruyb/�-?I!/ Isn E)NIU .•i onend C77v��11 19j n:('�� ORDINANCE NO. 1578 AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE LODI GENERAL PLAN BY REDESIGNATING THE PARCELS LOCATED WITHIN THE ARRA BOUNDED BY THE WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION CANAL ON THE NORTH AND EAST, WEST KEITLEMAN LANE (HIGHWAY 12) ON THE SOUTH, AND LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD ON THE WEST WK'S 027-040-10. 11, 12, 16, 17, 32. 63. 64, 65, 66 and APN'S 031-040-07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20) FROM PR, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL, AND O, OFFICE TO LDR, LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND O, OFFICE, AND REDESIGNATING THE PARCELS LOCATED AT 13737 N. CHEROKEE LALlE (APN 062:290-18), 2250 SOUTH STOCKTON STREET (APN 062-290-08), AND 13845 NORTH CHEROKEE LANE (APN 062-290-07) FROM PR, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL TO LDR, IOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL aaassaasasassaaasaas�assaassaaasaaaaasaaamassaasasssasasaaasamasasss::s B8 IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan is hereby amended by redesignating the parcels located within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation Canal on the north and east, West Kettleman Lane (Highway 12) on the south, and Lower Sacramento Road on the west (APN'S 027-040-10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 32, 63, 64, 65, 66 and APN'S 031-040-07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20) from PR, Planned Residential, and O, Office to LDR, Low Density Residential and O, Office, as shown on the Vicinity Map, on file in the office of the Lodi City Clerk. { SECTION 2, The Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan is hereby amended by redesignating the parcels located at 13737 N. Cherokee Larne (APN 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) from PR, Planned Residential to LDR, Low Density Residential, as shown on the Vicinity Map, on file in the office of the Lodi City Clerk. -1- SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. Approved this day of 1993 PHILLIP A. PENNINO } mayor i Attest: JENNIFER M. PMRIN City Clerk State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. I, Jennifer M. Perrin, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1578 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held June 16, 1993 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Noes: Council Members - Absent: Council Members - Abstain: Council Members - -2- I further certify that e?rdinance No. 1578 was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law. Approved as to Form BOBBY W. HCNATT City Attorney ORD1578/':XTA.OIV -3- JENNIFER N. PERRIN City Clerk ow CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Planning Commission's Recommendation to Approve the Request of J. Jeffrey Kirst to Prezone the Parcels Within the Area Bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal on the North and East; Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the South and Lower Sacramento Road on the West to R-1, Single -Family Residential, R-2, Single -Family Residential and R -C -P, Residential -Commercial -Professional MEETING DATE: June 16, 1993 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the request of J. Jeffrey Kirst to prezone the parcels within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal on the ^orth and east; Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the south and Lower Sacramento KoVi en the west to R-1, Single -Family Residential, R-2, Single -Family Residential and r -C -P, Residential-Ccmmercial-Professional. (See attached map) The prezoning serves two purposes. First, it is required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) before reorganization (i.e. annexation) proceedings begin. Secondly, it makes the zoning map consistent with the General Plan. The R -C -P zoning matches the south side of Kettleman Lane. The R-1 zoning provides the necessary buffer for the Sunwest subdivision. FUNDING: None required. a s B. Schro er unity Development Director JBS/cg Attachments APPROVED: THOMAS A. PETERSON ` City Manager �ycted vapw 90 M CCCD93.27/TXTD.01C r zl0 U ORDINANCE NO. 1579 a¢a asszaa. ss aesa sa AN ORDINANCb OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING TITS OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY PREZONING THE PARCELS LOCATED WITHIN THE AREA BOUNDED BY THE WOODBRIDGE IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL ON THE NORTH AND EAST; IMTTLEMAN LANE (STATS ROUTS 12) ON THE SOUTH; AND LOWER SACRAXEN TO ROAD ON THE WEST (APN'S 027-040-10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 32, 63, 64, 65, 66 and APN•S 031-040-07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20) TO R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, R-2, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDHXTIAL AND R -C -P, RESIDENTIAL -COMMERCIAL - PROFESSIONAL, WITH A CON.'IITIOK RELATING TO SCHOOL FACILITIES FUNDING. xsaa=sassas ssaxxaxxsasexsxscsxsassasaxaxasaassaaa=ss�a xssacassassasasasa BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION --I- Official District Map of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Cede is hereby amended as follows: The parcels within the area bounded by the Woodbridge Irrigation District Canal on the north and east; Kettleman Lane (State Route 12) on the south; and lower Sacramento Road on the west (APHIS 027-040-10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 32, 63, 64, 65, 66 and APNIS 031-040-07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20) are hereby prezoned R-1, Single - Family Residential, R-2, Single -Family Residential and R -C -P, Residential-Commercial-Pr(%fessional, as shown shown on vicinity map on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 2. The above-described prezoning shall be conditioned upon the signing by the developer and/or owner of said parcels prior to the effective date hereof, of an agreement with Lodi Unified School District for the provision of school facilities funding. Failure to execute such agreement shall delete the parcel(s) subject thereto from the effects of this ordinance. -1- I up SECTION 3."' The alterations, changes, and amendments of said Official District Map of the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by the city Planning Commission and by the City Council of this City after public hearings held in conformance with provisions of Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Code and the laws of the State of California applicable thereto. SECTION 9. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be published one time in the %Lodi News Sentinel•, a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. 1993 Attest: JENNIFER M. PERRIN City Clerk State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. Approved this day of ____, PHILLIP A. PSNNIN0 Mayor -2- I, Jennifer M. Perrin, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1579 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held June 16, 1993 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held , 1993 by the following vote: Ayes: Council'Members - Noes: Council Members— Absent: Council -Members - Abstain: Council Members - I further certify that Ordinance No. 1579 was approved and signed.by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law. Approved as to Form BOBBY W. MCNAZT City Attorney ORD1579/TXTA.OIV -3- JENNIFER M. PBRRIN City Clerk (-,DtCITY OF LODi COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Consider the Request of Ronald B. Thomas, et al to Prezone the Parcels at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN D62-290-07) R-2, Single- Family Residential. MEETING DATE: June 16, 1993 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation. to approve the request of Ronald B. Thomas, et al to prezone the parcels at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) R-2, Single- Family Residential. The prezoning serves two ,purposes. First, it is required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) before reorganization (i.e. annexation) proceedings begin. Secondly, it makes the zoning map consistent with the General Plan. The R-2, Single -Family zoning matches the surrounding zoning in the southeast area. FUNDING: None required. Ja s B. Schr r unity Development Director JBS/cg Attachment APPROVED: ! `� THOMAS A. PETERSON �� City Manager CC -1 CCCD93.26/TXTD.0IC r n+ I W ORDINANCE NO. 1580 sxsssaasxaassasssa AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY PRE20NING THE PARCELS LOCATED AT 13737 N. CHEROKEE LANE (APN 062-290-18), 2250 SOUTH STOCKTON STREET (APN 062-290-08), AND 13845 NORTH CHEROKEE LANE (APN 062-290-07) R-2, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, WITH A CONDITION RELATING TO SCHOOL FACILITIES FUNDING. xaa�aca=ccs==ssssasazzzsszsassaasszaasssaassssssa=sasssassazssasssa�aas BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Official District Map of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: The parcels located at 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 2250 South Stockton Street (APS 062-290-08), and 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) R-2, Single -Family Residential, as shown on vicinity map on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 2. The above-described prezoning shall be conditioned upon the signing by the developer and/or owner of said parcels prior to the effective date hereof, of an agreement with Lodi Unified School District for the provision of school facilities funding. Failure to execute such agreement shall delete the parcel(s) subject thereto from the effects of this ordinance. SECTION 3. The alterations, changes, and amendments of said Official District Map of the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by the City Planning Cocmission and by the City Council of this City after public hearings held in conformance with provisions of Title 17 of the -1- Lodi Municipal Code and the laws of the State of California applicable thereto. SECTION 4. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict i.. herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. SECTION S. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and g published in the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. P Approved this day of 1993 ; i PHILLIP A. PENNINO Mayor Attest: JENNIFER M. PERRIN City Clerk State of California County of San Joaquin, s3. I, Jennifer M. Perrin, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1580 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held June 16, 1993 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held , 1993 by the following vote: -2. Ayes: Council Members - Noes: Council Members - Absent: Council Members - Abstain: Council Members - } I further certify that Ordinance No. 1580 was approved and signed by Y the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to lay. E JENNIFER M. PERRIN City Clerk Approved as to Form t i BOBBY W. MCNAATT ; t City Attorney ' s ORD1580/TXTA.01V WE OF CITY OF L ODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION s AGENDA TITLE: Consider Certifying the Filing of Negative Declarations by the Community Development Director as Adequate Environmental Documentation on the J. Jeffrey Kirst (Helmle) and the Ronald B. Thomas, et al (Richards Ranch) Projects. MEETING DATE: June 16, 1993 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider certifying the filing of negative declarations by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the J. Jeffrey Kirst (Helmle) and the Ronald B. Thomas, et al (Richards Ranch) projects. Since both projects conform to the General Plan, Negative Declarations are adequate environmental documentation. FUNDING: None required. 2es B. Schroed r unity Development Director JBS/cg Attachments APPROVED: - -- THOMAS— PETERSON recycled paperCity Manager CC -1 CCC093.28/TXTD.01C iE.i7__M :..�_= Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Department has determined that the following proposal will have no 'Significant Impact on the Envirtlmw 0. Su porting doczm>e =tion is available in the form of a "Preliminary EnvirOtIDCmtal Assessment" and is avail- able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City }tall Building, M W. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance of this Declaration to the Planning Commission may do so no later than the. date indicated as `Last date to Appeal". Date Jan. 2n, 1993 Project Title: HELMLE ADDITION Responsible Agency: Lodi Plannino Dent. Contact Person: Eric Veerkamp NATE OF PERSON; FIRM, OA AA;lYCY ttNDERTAKING PROJECT: J. Jeffrey Kirst, et al. Address: City: County: P.O. Box 1259 Woodbridge 95258 San Joaquin Area Code: Phone: (209) 334-0670 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PMPOSE, AND LOCATION . The applicant is requesting annexation of 22 parcels of land, Ar N's 027-040-10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 32, 63, 64, 65, 66 and 031-040-07, 08,. 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19 and 20 to the City. The applicant is requesting a General Plan designation of LDR and 0, and -a prezoning to R-2 and R -C -P. The land, bounded by the WID canal on the east and north, by State Rte. Hwy. 12 on the south, and by S. Lower Sacramento Rd. on the west, is intended for single-family homes and commercial/Drofessional uses. Project Location City Project Location Uvity LODI SAN JOAQUIN CDMTY Last Date to Appeal: Aaaress Where Preliminary Environment Assessment is Availa5le: March 5, 1952 LODI CITY PLANNING DE?T. 22I W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240 Phone: (209) 334-5634 Environmental Assessment R TIIAL STUDY 1. PROJECT TITLE Iiclmle Addition 2. LOCATION Generally bounded by the WID Canal on the North and East sides, St Rt: Iiitthway 12 on the South, and South Lower Sacramento Rd. on the West 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project involves the annexation of 22 parcels of land (approximately 99 saes) to the City ofLndi and a General Plan Amendment from PR (Planned Residential) and O (Of5m) to LDR (Lm Density Residential) and O (Office). in addition, a prezoning to R-2 (Single Family) and R -CP (Resideatiat-Commerdal Professional) is necessary. 4. General Plan Designation (A) Existing (City), (B) Proposed (A) _ PR. Planned Residential and 0. Office (B) L.DR Low Density Residential and 0. Office 5. Site Description and surrounding land use: The site of the proposed project is mostly agriculture (gapes) with 16 homes, one business (fruit stand) and a church. The site is bordered on the south directly across St. Rt. IErghway 12 by rammerdaVprodissional uses, on the wet across S. Lower Sacramento Rd. by agriculture, on the north by single-family homes, and on the east across the WID irrigstim canal by Lodi's Municipal Serge Getter and maintenance yard. In addition, a 20 acre shopping center is proposed adjacent to the south-west corner of the project area. 6. Zoning (A) Existing (Cmtoty). (B) Proposed (A) I -PA, Interim Prooxted Agriculture to mr'•, a _:r -14 (B) R-2. Single Family, and RCP, Residential- Commercial- Professional a. Substantial alteration of natural topography, soil or subsoil features? NO b. Substantially degrade surface or grand water quality? NO c Substantially de pkw surface or ground water resources? NO d. Substantially intafee with ground water flow or recharge? NO e. Cause a significant affect related to flood, erosion or siltation? NO f. Substantial mmrkrexrx with the habitat of any species of fish. wildlife or plant? NO g Violate ambient air quality standards at create substantial air emissions or objectionable odors? NO h. Substantially increase ambient noise or dam level for adjoining areas? NO L Substantial re duCbm of Wasting cropland? MAYBE j. Expose individuals or property to geologic. public health, traffic. flood, seismic or otbe r hazards? NO k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic effect? NO 1. Result in the disruption or alteration of an archeological, historical or paleontological site? NO m. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in any natural resources? NO n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? NO o. Necessitate major occasion of watc, sea=, storm drain, electrical lines or public toads? YES p. Substantial increase in demand for or utilization of public services such as schools or fire or police protection? YFS q. Substantially change transportation patterns related to existing traffic load, strcet rapacity, parking availability or traffic safety? YES I r. Induce mbuantiai growth, concembation or displacement of population? YES s. Result in rn alteration or conflict with existing or planned land uses? NO t. Conflict with adopted plan% goals or policies of the City o[Lodi? NO Impacts of the project and thew See attached Mitigation Measures to Reduce Pow'We Adverse lugmu Identified by Initial Study: See attached RECONOwMIDATION: Negative Decla:avoo is M:�• • as �� Helmle Addition, General Plan Amendment, and Prezone Environmental Assessment- Initial Study Impacts of the project and their magnitude: i. Lodi's General Plan has identified the conversion of prime agricultural land as an adverse impact of development. This project will convert some prime agricultural land to urban uses; however, of all the annexations to the City cf Lodi, this one is the most logical considering its isolation from other San Joaquin County agricultural lands. The parcels which together make up this project constitute a peninsula of San Joaquin County bordered on all sides except a portion of the west by the City of Lodi. The city's General Plan specifies that it shall encourage the preservation of agricultural uses surrounding the city and that support of agricultural uses shall continue until such time that urban development is i;*nninent. Policies in the conservation element of the General Plan are aimed at delaying the loss of prime agricultural lands and facilitating such uses. Some of these policies include adopting a "right to farm" ordinance for adjacent landowners, establishing buffer zones between urban uses and agricultural uses, and designating an open space greenbelt around the urbanized area of the city. It is reasonable s to expect that this land could not feasibly continue as an agricultural use because of the existing surrounding commercial and residential uses. In light of this, the impacts of the conversion of this farmland are deemed to be less than significant. o. Required system -wide improvements necessary to serve this annexation have been accounted for in the General Plan. For this project, such improvements include, enlarging ; the existing drainage basin south of Century Blvd. (G Basin) to add needed capacity and extending new water, sewer, and electrical lines to serve the annexed properties. The city periodically prepares new public works capital improvement needs assessment studies to imswe that required services will always be sufficient to meet the increased demand on water, sewer, storm drain, and electric -d services. The city assesses residential and commercial development on a "fair share" basis in order to provide necessary service extensions. The additional service extensions will be developed in accordance with the city's master plan for development and the impacts are therefore mitigated to less than sigri ficam. p. The city will assess fees on a "fair share" basis on all new development to fund any required additional police and fire services. The city endeavors to maintain a staff ratio of 3.1 police officers per 1,000 population with response times averaging three (3) minutes for emergency calls and 40 minutes for non emergency calls. The city will also add personnel, equipment, or facilities necessary to maintain a minimum three (3) minute travel time for fire calls. Such efforts mitigate the impacts on police and fire services to less than significant. Additionally, confiuion by emergency personnel regarding the location of these properties when responding to a call further justify annexation to the city. L, The city will assist the Lodi Unified School District with the siting of school facilities to insure optimum placement and will require developers to coordinate their efforts with the LUSD in an attempt to minimize or prevent school overcrowding. The city supports efforts by the Lodi Unified School District to collect school facility fees which are assessed on new development to provide the necessary facilities. q. The city periodically updates public works capital improvements needs assGsst studies to insure that new facilities called for in the General Plan Circulation Element remain consistent with the city's growth projections. A traffic fee schedule applied to new developments, and state and federal funds where appropriate will pay for needed new traffic infrastructure to meet the increased demand. r. The city's General Plan is based on a two (2) percent limit on annual housing growth Development will be regulated based on a building permit allocation system so as not to exceed two percent growth in any given year. Since this annexation is consistent with the General Plan's intent for residential and commercial -development and will not exceed the growth limitations, the impacts am deemed to less than significant. r N&ESM*ii4=_ rsY- F" Notice is hereby given that the City of Lodi Planning Deparment has deterained that the following prcpml will have no "Significant Ic pacr an the Envirorc*=". Supporting documentation is available in the form of a "?reliminary Envirocmwtal Assessment" and is avaiI- able for public review in the Planning Department Office, City Rall Building, 221 Y. Pine Street. Anyone wishing to appeal the issuance of this Qeclaration to the Planning Caaaission may do so no later than the. date indicated as 'Last date to Appeal". Date March 8, 1993 Project Title: RICHARDS RANCH GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, PREZONING ANO ANNEXATION Responsible Agency: Lodi Plannino Dent. Contact Person: NAME OF PERSON.- FIRM, OR Arw-NCY UNDERTAKING PROJECT: RONALD B. THOMAS Address: City: County: P.O. Box 1598 Lodi San .1Cantlin Area Code: Pie; (209) 334-5521 PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND LOCATION! Annex three contiguous parcels of land totaling 43 acres to the City of Lodi. The properties are located adjacent to the southeast corner of the City, between South Stockton Street and the Hwy 99 frontage road and north of Harney Lane. Current county addresses are 13737 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 13845 N. Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) and 13910 N. Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08). Amend the General Plan to redesignate the parcels from PR, Planned Residential, to LDR, Low Density Residential; prezone to R-2, Residential, Single -Family to permit construction of 215 single-family homes. Project Location City Project Location Counrf LODI SAN JOAQUIN CWM Last Date to Appeal: Aaeress 'Where Pre icslnary Environment - Assessment is Available: March 30, 1993 LODI Ci71' PLANNING DE7. ZZ N. Pine St., Lcdi, CA 95240 Phone: (2091, 2-14-:634 r�. Illll® - eas 01 godl ENVIRONMENTAL r COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY 1. PROJECT TITLE RICHARDS RANCH ANNEXATION AND PREZONING AND GENERAL PLAN AMEND - 2. LOCATION 13669 & 13845 N. Cherokee Lane and 13910 N. Stockton St. MENT 3. -PROJECT DESCRIPTION Annex three parcels of land totaling 43 acres located north of Harney Lane between Stockton Street and Cherokee Lane. Prezone property to R-2, Single -Family Residential to permit construction of approximately 215 single-family dwellings. A General -Plan Amendment would redesignate the property from PR to LDR (Low Density Residential) 4. General Pian Designation (A) Existing (city), (a) Proposed (A) Planned �ok.?d'onfi•ia7; (8) Low Density Residential t� ; •- 5.• Site description and surrounding land use See attached ': -... zS?.r .•,{Zir C, _..i «Tr �Z' i`.: l.a4x�,.4•• _' =T� h�. 6 =Zoning"(A) Existing,.(a) Proposed- A Sin' tiin:County zoning-s:GA,;Generat.+ ' () 4 r �' .: +�„ '- . fRl 'r_ity `tt=2 Sinate-Famiiv ResidentialY�. �i a �P� �-'" �t,.�3 • ".'�'��; �3 ±",. 4 rl�:_if�.Cis"i'�'.s�,'z.l_U:f.�'i' +R'.•�•4 it �.t `�i F ey �Ni-1t :tEie=ProjectaHave a;5'gnif.icant+Effect f ., k, A4 RE _the.:Following Impacts! 5 e � y � ./• ;tiM'f�� .ie n-� �,y.7r'�•,��Gt �:�'!+p. .`�-.'�.fb"' �3^;,el �,. ,�.�:-"> 7z'�n'ti..ha. .• a+ Xr. ? 1.' � ��i�_ .^ ��'�" ti aSubstantfat;aFteeatton of_nataral �tcpography,tsoFia ,,,- or_;_ bso „ b. ,Substantially degrade surfaceor-groundwater qualrty�`' ..�X `��C Substantially dept g ..t- •�.,, ,.� � ��,,� > ete surface or rouridMwter wt�F . a�.,r� , t resources.,...:;..;., ;: ............r.::93 �T �4'+LX d:ci•Substaritsally -interfere with groundwater flow i•x r�.� *• recharge: '...: : r. --ter: ..~--rt � �;.: �J.J v�f..i..��'�•{wr .��•,.�T�.•...:f��r•,�rr(�`•�t-l�Cf��,��lliri��. ��i_5.:.�.�Y� .S'�±,pE1< `t..++•.:��c..,�C'� e. :'Cause "a significant :affect related to flood, erosion." _ or.siltation................................ X = f. Substantial interference with the habitat of any - species of fish, wildlife or plant .................... X 9. Violate ambient air quality standards or create substantial air emissions or objectionable odors...... X h.- Substantially increase ambient noise or glare level for adjoining areas ............................. X I. Substantial reduction of existing cropland............ X j. Expose individuals or property to geologic, public health, traffic, flood, seismic or other hazards...... X Ft4.: I Yes No Maybe k. Have a substantial, demonstrable, negative aesthetic effect ............................................... X 1. Result in the disruption or alteration of an archeological, historical or paleontological site.... X m. Cause or allow substantial increase in consumption in any natural resources ................................ X n. Results in the use or waste of substantial amounts of fuel or energy ....................................... X o. Necessitate major extensions of water, sewer, storm drain, electrical lines or public roads .............. X p. Substantially increase demand for or utilization of public services such as schools or fire or police protection........................................... X q. Substantially change transportation patterns related .-_to existing traffic load, street capacity, parking availability or traffic safgtjr_::_. . l�iili {X . - _.. r { r. Induce substantial growth, -concentration or•displace- ment"of"population. .... .. ........... s `Kesult:.in an aiteratton'or. conflict with. existing or, %� s' �'� v•;i ��- ._t - `:•,,.�;'r,s.-.�:�. w--vs.i.k.�`i4 +fir• c Z.y.Y' Y F tanned land', use�asr.�:�.:............ J , :[ -=:^ ,F'tF#,�.,a.,r .'►[�+N'i,��at(!1 ""•�74I��i" �Y•' tra C,.t1'�I{yiLrij7f .:<it1' '•�K� !�` i,:` f A. ,,.0 + T RGGiv 1W �•?:. =�tl r t�:.��Confti L:w�t(i adopted planss,,. goals or, pol icaiesIA of �" r .C'i'tY'ofiCodirL+ :�i!: _ ..�t. Is [i YIMoVLrl s' Y. _ ..r ., .r• ��(...t�rr...{. e;:ra ::^"i 1pi{+^.. •afwa �.;-}s.�.y.7 .MiK�fs r-3•a11iiM`AfhT\�li.�t.::�•�. '' _ I w .SL�s.'� rT' i~7i�rY��Y�'.,3"-yvli.l� ��• � _�S_A+� :.O.fR jpd�'3.� _..�Jy.w+t�:.:ia�.:,J+..'," -` ^ ' a'•%; w%' -• .y; :. i +.•..M �� 5r -ri`..!y"14 I,t}+f 1 .T 7t'F.' �f -�F ►s'• ��"�Ls�li1 }f 'M7a ['leis' �.FStii�' Tis`:s,�4 W. ✓'l y� res to act identified K(See at ached)Su(i) administe p>SovsionsYof City's,GrowttifMa genie tsPlaq. °-+�(D) r�o,�i _aQDlfcant to oa`v�a11a1olica9te school impactibn-fees 4 or orovide r a♦ ,..... .t.::Y ::+s�7 G r :7.cs: •fda..+f xx>.. K.T.:s4i+� wi,Ka4 land fora a hnnl Site_ RECOMMENDATION Negative Declaration EIR X Conditional Negative .. Declaration EIR/1-81 JAMES B. SCHROEDER E7glronmen al Review Officer �,' 8411j( V '1'!�ct.�1,' Date -J f 7 Project Description At the request of the property owners, the City of Lodi is proposing to annex three contiguous parcels of land totaling 43 acres to the City of Lodi. The properties are located adjacent to the southeast corner of the City, between South Stockton Street and the Hwy 99 frontage road and north of Harney Lane (see map). Current county addresses are 13737 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-18), 13845 North Cherokee Lane (APN 062-290-07) and 13910 North Stockton Street (APN 062-290-08). The project applicants are also requesting a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the parcels from PR, Planned Residential, to LDR, Low Density Residential, and a prezoning to R-2, Residential Single -Family which would permit the proposed 215 lot single-family project. Site Description The subject properties are located adjacent to the southeast City limits. The properties all contain farm houses and related barns and structures. All three properties are in agricultural use, primarily vineyards. The properties are surrounded by urban uses on two sides. On the north are existing or proposed residential subdivisions, including Johnson Ranch I and II subdivisions and the Bangs/Colvin subdivisions. On the west, across Stockton Street is an industrial subdivision with a mix of industrial and commercial uses. Salas Park/Basin is also located to the west. South of the subject properties are agricultural uses, including a commercial greenhouse operation. On the east is State Hwy 99. Possible Significant Environmental Impacts i. Substantial Reduction of Existing Cropland Construction of a residential subdivision on these parcels of land will convert 43 acres of prime agricultural land to urban uses. The only way to avoid this impact would be to prohibit any further development in and around Lodi. Since this would lead to an almost total ban on all new development, it is not a reasonable mitigation for this impact. The City has adopted a Growth Management Plan (GMP) in conjunction with their General Plan. The GMP limits new residential development to a maximum of 2% annually. This 2% figure is less than historical rates and was specifically adopted to help limit the premature urbanization of agricultural land. While the GMP does not eliminate the conversion of prime agricultural land, it limits and regulates the amount of land converted to a reasonable level. Impact - Less than significant. P. Substantially Increased Demand for Public Services, Including coos The proposed project could result in the construction of 215 single-family residences. Based on a student generation rate of 0.96 students (K-12) per household, the project could generate approximately 206 school aged children. These students could impact the Lodi Unified School District (LUSD) which is currently experiencing difficulties with overcrowded schools. To mitigate this impact, the City will require as a condition of approval that the developers enter into an agreement with the LUSD. The developers must agree to pay the current school impaction fee or its equivalent to help fund new classroom construction. An alternative would be for the developer to 3 provide land to the school district for a site for a proposed middle school for that area. Impact - Less than significant. r Summar s a The project will not have any significant environmental impacts that can not be mitigated to less than significant levels. The project conforms to the City's General Plan residential density levels for the area. These buildout levels were discussed and examined in the City's EIR which was prepared for the General Plan, adopted in 1991. a