HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - March 3, 1993 PH (10),r OF
ClrOF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to Review :he Report and Proposed Ordinance on Truck
Parking and Travel on City Streets
MEETING DATE: March 3, 1993
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That, after conducting a public hearing, the City Council
introduce the appropriate ordinance modifying the following
Lodi Municipal Code (LMC) Sections based on the attached
"Report on Truck Parking and Travel on City Streets":
° LMC Section 10.52.050, Parking Restriction's (Exhibit 1)
1. Change the definition of "residential district", for the purpose of this
Section, to state that if each side of the street is zoned differently, the
more restrictive zone would apply to both sides of the street (Alternative 1).
2. Change the wording "maximum gross weight of five tons" to "maximum gross
vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds" to conform with the California Vehicle
Code.
° LMC Section 10.52.010, Vehicle Travel Restrictions on City Streets
1. Chaoge the wording in rder to make it clear that it is legal to regulate
vehicle travel based on the number of axles, as provided in the California
Vehicle Code (Exhibit 2).
2. Change the existing restrictions on the streets shown below due to the ease
in police enforcement provided by commercial vehicle travel restrictions based
on vehicle axles (Exhibit 3):
° Holly Drive (all) - change from "commercial vehicles and vehicles over 3
tons prohibited" to "commercial vehicles over 2 axles prohibited".
° Tokay Street (from Stockton Street to Cherokee Lane) - change from
"commercial vehicles and vehicles over 5 tons prohibited" to "rommc.-cia'
vehicles over 2 axles prohibited".
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the February 3, 1993 meeting, City Council set this
public hearing based on the report prepared by Public Works
staff regarding truck parking and travel on City streets.
The report includes complaints and problem areas received
through the City's complaint system regarding truck parking and truck travel, the
existing regulations and restricted locations, past discussions and Council action
on truck issues. This report is summarized below:
APPROVED _ 07- 'l • Lf�-e7� `�
THOMAS A. PETERSON
recycfed Daps
City Manager
cc- I
CPHTRUCK/TXTW.02M (CO.COM) February 23, 1993
Public Nearing to Review the Report and Proposed Ordinance on Truck Parking and
Travel on City Streets .
March 3, 1993
Page 2
Report Summary
Staff has prepared three Alternatives addressing truck parking and travel issues.
Alternative 1 is to modify the existing truck parking ordinance by changing the
definition of "residential district" as defined in the LMC Section 10.52.050. Under
this Alternative, truck parking would be prohibited adjacent to non -residentially
zoned areas located on two-lane roadways if a "residential district" exists across
the street, unless it has reverse frontage. Alternative 2 is to consider repealing
the existing truck parking ordinance and establishing a "truck route" system,
thereby allowing truck parking only along those routes. Alternative 3 is to leave
the existing truck parking ordinance as is and install no -parking zones as truck
parking problems are reported. A summary of the advantages and disadvantages of
these Alternatives is presented in the attached table.
After reviewing the Alternatives and comments received regarding this matter, staff
recommends that the City Council approve Alternative 1 since it satisfies the City's
intent to prohibit truck parking near residences while providing considerably more
available truck parking than Alternative 2. Also, the amount of additional
restricted area will not severely affect the total amount of City-wide truck parking
currently available. Staff has no major objections to Alternative 2 since it can be
used to regulate truck travel as well as truck parking and can be written to
eliminate truck parking in residential areas, similar to the existing truck parking
ordinance. Staff's major concern is the reduction in available truck parking and
that truck parking would not be permitted in commercial and industrial areas not on
a truck route. Staff does not recommend Alternative 3 due to its ineffectiveness in
controlling truck parking and the cost to evaluate, install and maintain no -parking
zones. Also, an excessive amount of passenger vehicle parking would have to be
eliminated in order to keep trucks from parking in undesirable areas.
Recommendation
Based on the findings of this Report, staff recommends that Council approve
Alternative 1 (modifying the existing truck a -irking ordinance). If Council approves
Alternative 2, staff would need to prepare an ordinance to be introduced at a future
date. If Council chooses Alternative 3, no action is required at this time. Staff
will prepare a list of locations where "no -parking" zones have been requested and
return to Council at a future date.
Whether or not Council chooses to act on the truck parking issue, staff recommends
that Council approve Item 2 of LMC Section 10.52.050 (parking restrictions) and
Items 1 and 2 of LMC Section 10.52.010 (vehicle restrictions on City streets) since
these Sections are needed for enforcement purposes.
CPHTRUCK/TXTW.02M (CO.COM) February 23, 1993
Public Hearing to Review the Report and Preposed Ordinance on Truck Parking and
Travel on City Streets
March 3, 1;93
Page 3
FUNDING: To be determined.
ack Ronsko
bii Works Director
Prepared by Paula J. Fernandez, Association Traffic Engineer and
Rick S. Kiriu, Senior Engineering Technician
JLR/PJF/RSK/im
Attachments
cc: City Attorney
Police Chief
Street Superintendent
Associate Traffic Engineer
Gary Lund, Independent Trucking Industry
Local Trucking Industry
Concerned citizens
CPHTRUCK/TXTW.02M (CO.COM) February 23, 1993
51
REPORT
}
ON
TRUCK PARKING AND TRAVEL ON CITY STREETS
January, 1993
Prepared by the City of Lodi Public Works Department
TABLE OF CONTENTS
• Appendix 1................................................................... 6-7
• Appendix 2................................................................... 8-9
• Exhibits........................................................................ A -H
Pages)
•
Complaints/Problem Areas ..........................................1
•Truck Parking
. Truck Travel
•
Existing Regulations and Restricted Locations..........
2
• Truck Parking
• Truck Travel
•
Put Discussion/Council Action ...................................
3
•
Alternatives..................................................................3-4
Alternative t
Alternative 2
• Alternative 3
•
Discussion .............................................................
.......4
•
Recommendations........................................................5
• Appendix 1................................................................... 6-7
• Appendix 2................................................................... 8-9
• Exhibits........................................................................ A -H
1
• COi`iPLAIi /PROBLEi41 AREAS
Annually, the city receives sevesd complaints related to trucks. The majority of the complaints received
are related to truck parking causing sight problem, followed by truck travel on city streets and no
created by trucks parking near residences. The types of complaints received and problem locations
identified from 1988 to the present are stwwn below.
Truck Parking
Over half (69°!•) of the truck complaints received are related to truck parking. Of these, the majority of
complaints are due to trucks parking too close to intersections and driveways that are creating sight
problems for drivers attempting to enter the roadway. Other complaints received are trucks parking in
residential area and noise created by truck motors and refrigerator units. The legal truck parking locatiotts
where complaints have been received are listed below and shown on Exhibit A. The list includes both sight
problems and noise complaints and are shown in order with streets having the most complaints at the top.
• Cherokee bane - all
• Kettleman Lane - all
Lockeford Street - east and west of Pleasant Avenue
Tokay Street - east of Main Street
• Stockton Street - north of Neuharth Drive and south of Mission Street
Mills Avenue - south of Turner Road
• Beckman Road - south of Industrial Way
Pleasant Avenue - north of Lockeford Street
Elm Street - west of Ham Lane
Locations where complaints have been received and truck parking is illegal under the existing truck parking
ordinance are listed below.
• Harney Lane - east of Hutchins Street
• Ham Lane - south of Vine Strut
• Walnut Stmt -west of Ham Lane
• Kettleman Lane - can of Central Ave= (Lodi Academy)
• Central Avenue - north of Kcmkm an Lane
• Cherokee Lane - south of Almond Drive
• Lower Sacramento Road - south of Turner Road
Truck Travel
Approximately one out of six (15116) of the truck complaints received are related to truck travel on City
streets. The streets where truck travel is legal and complaints have been received are listed below and
shown on Exhibit B. They are listed in order with the streets «ith the most complaints at the top.
• Mills Avenue - Turner Road to Lodi Avenue
Pioneer Drive - west of Cherokee Lane
• Church Street - south of Kcaleman Lane
Wimbledon Drive - east of Ham Lane
Century Boulevard - east of Cherokee Lane (complaints regarding potential truck traffic when street is
extended to Stockton Street in 1993)
No complaints have been received at locations where truck travel is currently restricted, however, the street
leaving the most truck travel complaints was Almond Drive. This stre--t is not listed above since
commercial vehicle restrictions were implemented by City Council in November of 1992_
TRUCK 1. DOC 1 01/27/93
• EXISTING REGULATIONS and RESTRICTED LOCATIONS
Truck Parking
The city's existing truck parking ordinance prohibits truck parking on any street in a "residential district"
(Exhibit Q. A "residential district" is defined as residentially zoned area designated by the City Zoning
Code (any "R " district) and includes schools, parks, playgrounds, community centers, churches, museums,
golf courses (excluding miniature golf courses) and similar recreational uses of a nonconnnercial nature,
and public utility service buildings located in a residential district. Commercial vehicles in the process of
being loaded or unloaded are ecerrtpt from this restriction. Truck parking is legal adjacent to all other areas
such as areas Zoned commercial and industrial. However, all vehicles, including.commercial vehicles are
subject to the 72 consecutive hour parking limit specified in the Lodi Municipal Code. Since =oning
boundaries extend only to the middle of the street, the existing truck parking ordinance allows truck parking
across the street from some residences. %1= this situation occurs on a narrow street, the noise created by
trucks is still close enough to affect these residents.
In addition to the existing truck -parking ordinance, section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code (Exhibit
D) allows local authorities to prohibit or restrict the stepping, standing or parking of vehicles six feet or
more in height within 100 feet of any intersection, on certain streets or highways, or portions thereo&
during all or certain portions of the day. This restriction is selective since it prohibits the parking of only
the vehicles crating a sight problem (vchicics six feet or more in height). Parking of vehicles under six feet
high would be permitted. This is especially effective at locations where parking demand is high or where
eliminating parking for all vehicles would erste a hardship for the adjacent business. Currently this
restriction exists on the street shown below. lite Police Department has indicated that they have
experienced no enforcement problems with this installation.
• Cherokee Lane - (west side) from Almond Drive to 100 feet north of Almond Drive
Truck Travel
Currently, citywide truck travel is not regulated except for four residential streets and street segments
where truck travel is restricted. These restrictions are based on both vehicle weight and number of axles.
Tcae enforcement at thcs'- restrictions are performed by the Police Department. Currently, only one officer
is trained to identify and cats: commercial vehicks exceeding posted weight restrictions. In order to cite
violators using this type of restriction. the vehicle must be driven to the truck scale on Main Street north of
Lodi Avenue to be weighed. Since this is the only scale available within a reasonable distance, and it is not
open 24 hours a day, this restriction is rzret4 enforced. It is easier for the Police Department to enforce
truck travel restrictions based on the number of vehicle axles since any police officer can cite violators and
no vehicle weighing is required. All of the existing streets with commercial vehicle restrictions are shown
below.
• Holly Drive - commercial vehicles and vehicles over three tons prohibited
• Tokav Street from Stockton Street to Cherokee Lane • commercial vehicles and vehicles over five tons
prohibited
• Almond Drive from Cherokee Lane to Stockton Street - commercial vehicles with three or more axles
arc prohibited
• Turner Road from Highway 99 to Lower Sacramento Road (north) - commercial vehicles with three
axles or more are prohibited (excluding commercial vehicles originating or making deliveries within the
City of Lodi)
TRUCK 1. DOC 2 01127193
• PAST DISCUSSION/COUNCIL ACTION
Past discussion and council action related to truck parking and truck routes are sho«tt on Appendix 2.
• ALTERNATIVES
Staff has prepared throe alternatives addressing these alternatives. The first alternative is to modify the
existing truck parking ordinance (Lodi Municipal Code Section (LMC) 10.52.050) by changing the
definition of "residential district". The second alternative is to consider repealing the existing truck parking
ordinance and establishing a "Truck Route" systems thereby allowing truck parking only on those routes.
The third alternative is to leave the existing truck parking ordinance as is, and install "no parking" zones as
truck parking problems are reported. Discussion on these alternatives is shown below. The advantages
and disadvantages to these alternatives are summarized on Exhibit E.
AIternative 1
MODIFY THE EXISTING TRUCK PARKING ORDINANCE (LMC 10.52.050)
Change the definition of "residential district", for the purpose of this section, to state that if each side of the
street are zoned differently, the more restrictive zone would apply to both sides of the strut. This
definition, as proposed, would not apply to state highways, wide streets (four lanes or more), or where the
residential sitz of the street has reverse frontage. All of the other restrictions in the existing truck parking
ordinance would remain in effect Staff has discussed this defirution change with the City Attorney,
Municip- I Court Judges, and Police Chief and received no objections.
The basic change that will occur with this modification is the prohibition of truck parking in areas that the
existing truck parking ordinance was originally designed to take care of, but coi;A not due to the
interpretation of "residential district". Under this alternative, truck parkin; would be prohibited adjacent to
non -residentially zoned areas located on two lase roadways if a "residential distrix" exists across the street
unless it has reverse frontage. This would result in truck parking continuu+g to be legal adjacent to
shopping centers and eating establishments on Kettleman Lane and on Turner Road. Truck parking in
areas such as north Mills Avenue and Church Street south of Kertleman Lane where residences exist across
the street would be illegal. The large map (Exhibit F) indicates existing restricted areas and additional
areas where truck parking would be restricted under this definition.
Alternative 2
REPEAL. EXISTING TRUCK PARKING ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISH TRUCK ROUTE
SYSTEM
This alternative would designate streets where through truck travel would be permitted. Only trucks in the
process of making a pick up or delivery would be allowed to deviate from these routes, thus parking off the
route would be prohibited. Truck parking in commercial and industrial areas not on a truck route would be
illegal. The initial proposed truck routes are the same streets and portions of streets proposed to city
council when the traffic resolution was adopted in October of 1987. These routes are indicated on
Appendix 2 and show on Exhibit G.
TRUCK 1. DOC 01127193
Alternative 3
MAKE NO CHANGES TO THE EXISTING TRUCK PARKING ORDINtVNCE AND INSTALL "NO
PARKING" ZONES AS FUTURE PROBLEMS OCCUR
Posting %a parking" signs to regulate truck parking in areas not covered by the existing truck parking
ordinance would require removing oti-street parking for all vehicles just for the purpose of discouraging
truck parking. If the truck parking problems are occurring adjacent to intersections, restricting truck
parking of vehicles six feet in heigh: and over can be used. Either of these methods will result in the
installation and maintenance of numerous restricted parking zone signs.
• DISCUSSION:
Alternative 1
Alternative 1 satisfies the city's intent to prohibit truck parking near residences. Under this alternative F
truck parking would only be allowed where residences exist in commercial tune districts. Parkbg at the
few locations where this condition -xists can be restricted if truck parking problems occur. This alternative
would result in restricting truck parking on 4 of the I 1 stints and street segments where truck parking
complaints have been reported. The only location on the complaint list where truck parkin? would be legal
adjacent to residences is on Lockeford Street east of Pleasant Avenue, because in this area both sides of
Lockeford Street is zoned commercial.
Under this alternative, the availability of truck parking adjacent to the PCP cannery area on Stockton Strcet
and General Mills on Mills Avenue would be affected .Both PCP and General Mills have indicated that on
street parking for trucks is not needed for their businesses.
Alternative 2
Alternative 2 will severely reduce the number of locations where truck parking would be allowed since
truck parking is allowed only on truck routes. If this alternative is chosen, restricting truck parking
adjacent to residences along these routes should be restricted in a similar fashion as the existing truck
parking ordinance. Also, since determining truck route violators is difficult, the benefit of a truck route just
for the purpose of restricting truck parking may be overkill. None of the streets where truck travel
complaints have been reported are recommended as truck routes.
Alternative 3
Alternative 3 would continue to make it difficult to regulate track parking since it would be legal at all
locations not coveted by the existing truck parking ordinance or where no other parking restrictions exist.
Regulating truck parking under this alternative will require the continued cvaluation and council action on
parking restriction locations where truck parking is a problem. Due to the amount of passenger vehicle
parking that would have to be eliminated and the quantity of "no parking" signs that would have to be
installed and maintained, this alternative is not practical.
TRUCK 1. DOC 4 01/27!93
• RECOMMENDATION:
The following three proposed modifications to existing ordinances will require that a public hearing be set.
Regardless if council chooses to address the existing truck parking situation, staff feels that it important
that the remaining ordinance modifications be made to clarify the weight limit used to restrict commercial
vehicle parking and the use: of vehicle axles in regulating vehicle travel, since they are currently being
enforced by the Police Departinent. The three proposed modifications are showrt below.
In regards to truck pathrtg on city streets, staff recommends that the city council approve changing the
definition of "residential dis-rict" as defined in LMC Section 10.52.050 (Alternative 1), since it satisfies the
city's intent to prohibit truck parking near residences while providing considerably more available truck
parking than Alternative 2. Also, the amount of additional restricted area will not severely affect the total
amount of citywide truck parking currently available. Staff has no major objections to Alternative 2 since
it can be used to regulate truck travel as well as truck parking and can be written to restrict truck parking
in residential areas, similar to the existing truck parking ordinance. Staffs major concern is the
considerable reduction of available truck parking and that truck parking would not be permitted in
commercial an industrial areas off of the truck routes. Staff does not recommend Alternative 3 due to its
ineffectiveness in controlling truck parking and the cost to evaluate, install and maintain "no parking"
zones. Also, an excessive amount of passenger vehicle parking would have to be eliminated in order to
keep trucks from parking in undesirable areas.
Staffs other concern regarding this code section (LMC 10.52.050), is how weight limit restrictions are
specified. To conform with the California Vehicle Code, it is recommended that the "maximum gross
might of five tons" be changed to "maximum gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds".
The final item for council review is the existing ordinance regulating commercial vehicle travel on city
streets (LMC 10.52.010). Staff feels the wording should be changed in order to make it clear that it is legal
to regulate vehicle travel based on the number of axles the vehicle has, as provided in the California
Vehicle Code. The existing ordinance is attached as Exhibit H. Due to the ease of enforcement provided
based on vehicle axles, staff also recommends that the streets listed below be changed as shown. Any
future vehicle travel restrictions will be proposed based on vehicle axles.
• H lly Drive (all), change from "commercial vehicles and vehicles over 3 tons prohibited" to
"commercial vehicles over 2 axles prohibited"
• Tokay Street (from Stockton Street to Cherokee lane), change from "commercial vehicles and vehicles
over 5 tons prohibited" to "commercial vehicles over 2 axles prohibited"
TRUCK 1.DOC 1 0 1l27l93
Annendix I
The following concerns were expressed at the meeting with the Chwaber of Commerce and
through the city's traffic complaint system.
If the City is going to continue to eliminate truck parking, they should provide parking
lots.
Providing off-site parking lots for trucks is not a responsibility of the City; however, regulating
parking in the public right-of-way is. The City's responsibility is to provide roadways that are safe
to travel and review locations where truck parking problems are reported.
The trucking industry provides an important service to the City so we should not
discourage trucking in Lodi by regulating truck parking.
The trucking industry does provide a valuable service to the city. Under the existing ordinance,
there are several locations in the city where truck parking is legal.
Would small commercial businesses in areas that are surrounded primarily by residences
be allowed to park their trucks on the street.
Trucks belonging to a commercial business .would be allowed to park on the street adjacent to their
business unless they are on a two lane street where the opposite side of the street is in a "residential
district" without reverse frontage. On site parking will not be affected.
Should the weight limitations specified in the existing truck parking ordinance be reduced
or split into categories to allow "U -Haul" and "Ryder" type of trucks.
Reducing or splitting weight limitations into categories is not recommended. Since the idea behind
restricting truck parking is to prohibit the size of truck that could become a problem, reducing
-weight limitations could result in an ineffective ordinance by permitting unwanted truck parking.
Splitting weight limitations into categories would make enforcement very difficult for Police
Officers. Not on:, •;:a:Ad this option require many different types of signs and be confusing to
drivers it would also require special training for the Police Department to be able to determine
which category the truck beiongs in as well as if the truck is illegal or not. Since truck parking is
permitted in residential areas during deliveries and pick ups there dots not seem to be a need to
lower the existing weight limitations to allow these rapes of trucks.
TRUCK200C 6 01/22/93
I
Trucks should be parked only for deliveries, no other reason
Allowing trucks to park only while making deliveries would certainly take care of many of our
truck parking problems; however, it is not very reasonable solution to the truck parking problem.
Just like everyone else, trucks drivers may need to stop to eat, sleep or rest. The city feels it
reasonable to permit truck parking for these purposes as long as they are in a suitable location.
Residential streets in Lodi are too narrow to allow truck parking
It is agreed that truck parking should not be permitted on residential streets for many reasons in
addition to street width. Under the existing truck parking ordinance, truck parking is permitted on
only a few residential streets where commercial er industrial zoning exists on one side of the street.
Eliminate truck parking on residential streets
See comunent to preceding item.
Trucking Campanies in or near the city limits should have parking facilities for their
equipment
Based on field surveys related to complaints, staff does not believe that trucks from local trucking
companies play much of a role in the truck parking problems reported to the city. Staff believes
that most of the truck packing problems in residential areas are due to independent truckers who
live in or are visiting Lodi.
Parked trucks give Lodi the pictr_.e that we do not care about the residents of our
community
The reason a truck parking ordinance was created is to benefit the residents in the community.
Based on all of the goods and services provided by the trucking industry, truck parking is bound to
occur. The city is doing as much as possible to balance the need for truck service and the neces of
the community.
Streets with no commercial uses should be posted with a weight limit
Posting weight limit signs on every street in town where no commercial uses exists is not a
reasonable solution due to the large number of signs which would have to be installed and
maintained. Establishing a truck route system is the only way to regulate citywide truck travel
since it would not allow truck travel off of the route unless in the process of making a pick up or
delivery.
TRUCK2.DOC 7 01/22193
I
Appendix 2
• TRUCK PARKING
November 1987 - Truck Parking Ordinance (L.M.C. 10.52.050) adopted by city council
June 1992 - Staff proposed modifications to the existing truck parking ordinance
Council directed staff to discuss modifications with the trucking industry, Pacific Coast Producers, and
the Chamber of Commerce.
• TRUCK ROUTES
November of 1986 - Establishing truck routes in Lodi was first discussed
The consulting firm of TJKM conducted an analysis of potential truck routes through the city. The
recommended truck routes %vere:
• Cherokee Lane - all
• Hutchins Street - south of Kettleman Lane
• Kettleman Lane (State Highway 12) - all
• Lower Sacramento Road - all
• Turner Road - from Lower Sacramento Road/Woodhaven Lane to Lower Sacramento Road (norh)
Kettleman Lane is part of the State Highway System and is therefore under Caltrans jurisdiction.
July, August, and October of 1987- Public meetings were held regarding truck routes
As a result of these meetings betwtien the city and the trucking industry the following streets were
proposed as truck routes. The streets staff recommended by both trucking firms and city staff are
indicated with an asterisk ('). The remaining streets staff had no recommendation on.
• Beckman Road - from Kettleman to Victor
• Beckman Road - from Lockeford to Turner
• Cherokee Lane - all '
• Cluff Avenue - from Turner to Victor'
• Ham Lane - from Harney to Turner
• Hutchins Street - from Kettleman to Lodi
• Hutchins Street - Kettleman to Harney '
• Kettleman Lane (State High ay 12) - all '
• Lodi Avenue - all
• Lower Sacramento Road - all
• Stockton Street - all '
• Turner Road - all '
• Victor Road - all '
TRUCK3.DOC 8 01/22193
October 1987 - Traffic Ordinance introduced excluding the entire section on commercial vehicles
and truck routes
This section was excluded due to objections by the residents and businesses on Kettleman Lane and
because it was determined that any action by the council to establish Turner Road as a truck route
would require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) because establishing a weight
limit could have a significant impact on the business community and other streets and residents. The
estimated cost for the preparation of this EIR was $42,000 (1987 estimate).
January 1988 - Staff recommends that the city does not proceed with the EIR
In spite of the advantages provided by the establishment of truck routes staff had some reservations
about having an EIR prepared. Also, since in January of 1988 a new state law went into effect allowing
cities to restrict truck parking in residentially zoned areas, thus, the primary reason truck routes were
considered no longer applies.
June 1988 - Council directed staff to prepare a study on prohibiting through trucks on Turner
Road
July 1988 - Resolution number 88-97 adopted restricting through trucks on Turner Road
As directed by council, staff presented resolution number 88-97, prohibiting trucks on Turner Road
between Highway 99 and Lower Sacramento Road (north). The restriction does nM apply to truck
traffic originating or making deliveries within the city of Lodi.
TRUCKIDOC 9 01/22/93
F�o-
Exhibit
CITY i i�
TRUCK PARKING
PROBLEM AREAS
A
!d:\7RTFflC`,:RECTRK
Exhibit B
CITY OF 'LO D I TRUCK TRAVEL
PUSUC WORKS DE?;.R TMEy77 PROBLEM AREAS
m:`j, PA'%C\:ir-C'RK2
'h ibit C
CITY. O F L o D I Lodi Municipal Code
• • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Section 1 0.52.050
10.52.09-0 Parking restrictions.
A. It is unlawful to park a commercial
vehicle exceeding a maximum gross
weight of five tons on any street in a
residential district. For the purposes of
this section. "residential district" is
defined as residentially zoned areas des-
ignated by the city zoning code (any "R --
district) and includes schools, parks.
playgrounds, community centers,
churches, museums, golf courses
(excluding miniature golf courses) and
similar recreational uses of a noncom-
mercial nature, and public utility service
buildings where they are located in a resi-
dential district.
B. This section shall not prohibit
parking of commercial vehicles in the
process of being loaded or unloaded.
(Ord. 1410 § 1 (part), 1987)
CITY OF IODI
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Local Regulations
Exhibit D
California Vehicle Code
Section 22507
22507. Local authorities may, by ordinance or resolution, prohibit
or restrict the stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles, including, but
not limited to, vehicles which are six feet or more in height (including
any load thereon) within 100 feet of any intersection, on certain streets
or highways, or portions thereof, during all or certain hours of the day.
The ordinance or resolution may include a designation of certain streets
upon which preferential panting privileges are given to residents and
merchants adjacent to the streets for their use and the use of their guests,
under which the residents and merchants may be issued a permit or
permits which exempt them from the prohibition or restriction of the
ordinance or resolution. With the exception of alleys, no such ordinance
or resolution shall apply until signs or maridngs giving adequate notice
thereof have been placed A local ordinance or resolution adopted
pursuant to this section may contain provisions which are reasonable and
necessary to ensure the effectiveness of a preferential parking program,
Truck Parking and Travel Alternatives
ALTERNATIVES ADVANTAGES
Alternative 1, Modify Eliminates truck parking adjacent to residences (except
existing ordinance those in commercial zone districts)
Allows truck parking adjacent to all major shopping centers
Provides more available truck parking locations than
Alternative 2
Eliminates truck parking adjacent to residences, except for
Alternative 2., Establish those on a truck route
truck routes
Ease of parking enforcement for Police Department. Trucks
parked off of routes would be in obvious violation.
Restricts both truck parking and truck travel off of truck
routes
Alternative 3, Install "no Signs provide easiest Police Department enforcement and
parking" zones notification to public
Allows for specific placement of restricted parking areas
TRUCK.XLS
DISADVANTAGES
Difficult for Police Department to enforce
Duo to lack of signs, public would continue to be unaware
of restricted areas
Has no effect on truck travel
Truck parking allowed only on truck routes. Illegal adjacent
to all commercial and industrial areas off of routes
Difficult to determine truck route violators. Police
Department would have to follow possible violators
Truck parking adjacent to residential locations would be
allowed unless signs or prohibited by ordinance
Allows truck parking adjacent to all residences unless signs
are posted
Difficult to regulate •ruck parking. Trucks may move as 'no
parking' zones are aL. Jed
Large number and high cost of sign installation
Other than at intersections (where 6' + restriction could be
used), parking would be eliminated for all types of vehicles
Exhibit F (Wall Map)
TO BE LCCATED IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
DUR11.1; THE COUNCIL MEETING AND
WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW PRIOR TO THE
MEETING IN THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC SECTION, LOCATED ON THE SECOND
FLOOR OF THE CITY HALL BUILDING AT 221 WEST
PINE STREET
r
'N
.Q
H
w
CITY OFLODI
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Extti t
TS,e
di Municipal Code
ction 10.52.010
10.x2.010 Vehicle weight limits in
city streets.
A. Whenever the traffic resolution of
the city designates and describes any
street or portion thereof as a su=4 the
use of which is prohibited by any com-
mercial vehicle and/or by any vehicles
ending a ma3dmum gross weight as is
therein specified, the public works direr -
tor shall erect and maintain appropriate
signs on those ste=ts affected.
B. No vehicle weight limit or
restriction shall be established under this
soon without a public hearing. (Vehi-
cle Code § 21101.) (Ord. 1410 § 1 (part),
198-1)
CITY OF LORI
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PARKING.DOC
EXHiB.'T 1
L.M.C. Sec 10.52.050 (Modified)
10.52.050 Parking restrictions
A. it is unlawful to park a commercial vehicle
exceeding a maximum gross vehicle weight orrm tons
rating of 10.000 Pounds on any street in a residential
district For the purposes of this section, "residential
district" is damned as residentially zoned areas
designated by the city zoning code (any "R--" district)
and includes schools, parks, playgrounds. community
centers, churches, museums, golf courses (excluding
miniature golf courses) and similar recreational uses of
a noncommercial nature, and public utility service
buildings where they arc located in a residential
district. Also, for the Purposes r -f this section where
the district boundary lies in the center of the street the
"residential district" includes both sides of the street
exeeX1 on State Nighwayr. streets with four or more
through lanes or where the residential side has an
approved 6 foot high fence located in the back of the
sidewalk (Vehicle Code. 22507.5)
B. This section shall not prohibit parking of
commercial vehicles in the process of being loaded or
unloaded. (Ord. 1410, 1 (part), 1987)
CITY OF LODI
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
LIMITS.DOC
EXHIBIT 2
I. M.C. Sec 10,52.010 (Modified)
10.52.010 Vehicle weight limits in city streets.
A. Whenever the traffic resolution of the city
designates and describes any street, of portion thereof
as a street, or particular highw-ay, the rise of which is
prohibited by certain vehicles, any commercial Nthicte,
and/or by any vehicles exceeding a maximum gross
weight as is therein specified, the public works director
shall erect and maintain appropriate signs on those
streets affected.
B. No vehicle weight limit or restriction shall be
established under this section without a public
hearing. (Vehicle Code 21101.) (Ord.1410, 1 (pan),
1987)
T
CITY OFLODI
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT 3
Section SA -Weight Limit/
Commercial Vehicle Restrictions
The streets or portions of streets listed below are hereby defined and established as streets
of which the by commercial %chicles and/or vehicles exceeding the maximum gross•
weight specified is prohibited and shall be governed by the provisions of the Traffic
Ordinance.
Commercial vehicles and vehicles over 2 axles prohibited:
Ho.ty Drive
Tokay Street from-tockton Street to Cherokee Unc
WEIGHT.DOC
IF]
Table
Truck Parking and Travel Alternatives
ALTERNATIVES ADVAMGES DISADVANTAGES
Alternative 1, Modify Eliminates truck parking adjacent to residences Difficult for Police Department to enforce
existing ordinance lexcept those in commercial zone districts)
Allows truck parking adjacent to all major shopping Due to tack of signs, public would continue to be
centers unaware of restricted areas
Provides more available truck parking locations than Has no effect on truck travel
Alternative 2
Alternative 2, Establish Eliminates truck parking adjacent to residences,
truck routes except for those on a truck route
Ease of parking enforcement for Police Department.
Trucks parked off of routes would be in obvious
violation.
Restricts both trick parking and truck travel off of
truck routes
Alternative 3, Install Signs provide easiest Police Department
'no parking' zones enforcement and notification to public
Allows for specific placement of restricted parking
areas
TRUM ALS
Truck parking allowed only on truck routes. Illegal
adjacent to all commercial and industrial areas off of
routes
Difficult to determine truck route violators. Police
Department would have to follow possible violators
Truck parking adjacent to residential locations would
be allowed unless signs or prohibited by ordinance
Allows truck parking adjacent to all residences
unless signs are posted
Difficult to regulate truck parking. Trucks may
move as 'no parking' zones are added
Large number and high cost of sign installation
Other than at intersections (where 6' + restriction
could be used), parking would be eliminated for all
types of vehicles
ORDINANCE NO. 1567
==nss===ssaassa-xx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI
AMENDI14G LODI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 10.52.010 AND 10.52.050
RELATING TO TRUCK PARKING AND TRAVEL ON CITY STREETS
xaxxxxxxoxxzxaxaaxax:zzsszaxasaszaaaasassaasaassaaasazsaaazassaaszsssss
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION i. Lodi Municipal Code Section 10.52.010 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
10.52.010 Vehicle weight limits in city streets.
A. Whenever the traffic resolution of the city designates and
describes any street, 0j portion thereof as a street, 9X
particular highway.. the use of which is prohibited by certain
vehicles, any commercial vehicle and/or by any vehicles exceeding
a maximum gross weight as is therein specified, the public works
director shall erect and maintain appropriate signs on those
streets affected.
B. No vehicle weight limit or restriction shall be established
under this section without a public hearing. (Vehicle Code
Section 21101)
SECTION 2. Lodi Municipal Code Section 10.52.050 is hereby amended to
read as follows:
-1-
T
10.52.050 Parking restrictions.
A. It is unlawful to park a commercial vehicle exceeding a
maximum gross vehicle weight 169 fj)i¢ jjWd rating of 10.000
pounds on any street in a residential district. For the purposes
of this section, "residential district" is defined as
residentially zoned areas designated by the city zoning code (any
"R-" district) and includes schools, parks, playgrounds,
community centers, churches, museums, golf courses (excluding
miniature golf courses) and similar recreational uses of a
noncommercial nature, and public utility service buildings where
they are located in a residential district. Also. for the
proses of this section where the district boundary lies in the
center of the street. the "residential district" includes both
sides of the street 2xSept on StMpg HiShways, s ,reete with four
or more through lanes or where the residential side has an
approved 6 foot high fence located in the back of the sidewalk-,
(Vehicle Code Section 22507.5)
B. This section shall not prohibit parking of commercial
vehicles in the process of being loaded or unloaded.
SECTION 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi
News Sentinel", a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and
-2-
published in the City of Lodi and shall be i., force and take effect
thirty days from and after its passage and approval.
Approved this day of
PHILLIP A. PENNINO
Mayor
Attest:
JENNIFER M. PERRIN
City Clerk
xxsssxmssxxsxxssaxxasszzaszsazmaaasassssasasasaaaxaasassaa:asssmssass:a
State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.
I, Jennifer M. Perrin, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby
certify that Ordinance No. was introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Lodi held March 3, 1993 and was thereafter
passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said
Council held , 1993 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members -
Noes: Council Members -
Absent: Council Members -
Abstain: Council Members -
a
I further certify that Ordinance No. was approved and signed by
the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published
pursuant to law.
Approved as to Form
BOBBY W. McNATT
City Attorney
ORD1567/TXTA.OIV
Wz
JENNIFER M. PERRIN
City Clerk
`-y,._z..•� ,. , _ �' / . `� ter, , ` h
Z7
- -_"{vY t'�•' r`r�`?�ry -T-_
fl -'? �' ? s J Z . - a '� -r
v} r"`7" �`z'-�-Y✓ ��
•7 V /
4
L
�, �-ry-�ji^"� .•.-.'>7-i-�Y^ mss.-., i2i . �;// ,/ cr,/ / ,/'+`^'�J(��'
L„_ 'r F z-
�,v �j7'; C
"'line and U�oses Country Dnn
9 %fel and Trifaurant
2SOS c'W Tww 5 d. ,Codi, California 95242
96w(209)334 -6W Sax (209) 334-6570
March 1 st, 1993
City of Lodi
City Council Members
221 West Pine Street
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, Califomia 95241-1910
Dear City Council Members.
We are a commercial comer in which the city ordinarce allows overnight commercial
truck parking. We feel these large truck and trailers have no place clustered at
neighborhood commercial sites for the following reasons:
1. The trucks create a dangerous hindrance to ingress and egress traffic to
adjacent properties.
2. The truck parking allows diesel powered refrigerated trucks to run all night.
In our situation it is less than 200 feet from our Hotel and personal home.
These motors have a percussion effect that make it impossible to sleep.
3. The city requires all business to provide on site parking. Off sits truck and
trailer parking seems inconsistent with this ordinance.
4. In our situation, trucks must pass through residential neighborhoods to get
parked or turned around.
5. Multiple truck parking bring visual blight to our comer.
For these reasons we feel trucks have no place in residential neighborhoods. They
belong in truck routes and industrial areas. We urge you to change this ordinance to
disallow truck and trailer parking in neighborhood commercial properties.
Sinc rely,
1 a;
Del G. Smith
Ile
��
.47-d-L �CL,� a-..�. p-o-, cL,
tne..CE,, �, cz, LL � 0,AJam'
1IIvvV/// __'�./t.�-o�.i
GY._.& CJ•�-. - '�-� --1 J\��Yn-tL1�. C� 1y i-�t.y__...Ory 02vi �C'Li�e eJ._. ...
tom,
I
CITY COUNCIL
THO.W:5 A. PETERSON
PHILLIP A. PENNINO. flavor
CITY OF L O D I
City aaH
JACK A. SIECLOCK
JENNIFER I" PERRiN
City Clerk
Mavor Pro Tempore
RAY C. DAVENPORT
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
808 .%4cNATT
STEPHEN J. MANN
P.O. BOX 3006
P-0.
City Attorney
CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
IOHN R. (Randv) SNIDER
(209) 334-5634
FAX 1209) 333-6-M
February 24, 1993
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Review the Report and Proposed Ordinance on Truck Parking
and Travel on City Streets
Enclosed is a summary of staffs "Report on Truck Parking and Travel on City Streets" which will
be reviewed by City Council at the public hearing on Wednesday, March 5, 1993, at 7:30 pm. At
this hearing, Council will be discussing the alternatives shown in the Report. If you would like to
comment on this item, you are welcome to attend this hearing which will be held in the City
Council Chamber, Carnegie Forum, 305 West Parc Street.
The complete Report is available in the Traffic Division located on the second floor of City Hall,
221 West Pine Street, between the hours of 8:00 am. and 5:00 pm., Monday through Friday.
If you wish to communicate with the City Council, please contact Jennifer Perrin, City Clerk, at
333-6702.
If you have any questions about the item, please call Paula Fernandez, Rick Kiriu or me at
333-6706.
I
Ronsko
Works Director
n.R/R.SKP.m
Enclosure
cc: Ciry Clerk
TRUCKLIpOC
1
c.Y\ G�
&NAME
&ATTN
&ADD
&CITY
ARNEY PRIN
MAIN S7 BODY SHOP
52 IN ST
DI CA 95240
MIKE PATEL
RANCHO GRANDE MOTEL
807 S CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
RICK LONG
WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES
1831 S STOCKTON ST
LODI CA 95240
ALAN BOHMAN
LODI ACADEMY
1230 S CENTRAL AVE
LODI CA 95240
LARRY WEAVER
CORNER POCKET BILLIARDS
725 S CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
SCOTT FREEMAN
A & J AUTO
521 N CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
OTTO ALBREHT
ARBOR CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL
900 N CHURCH ST
LODI CA 95240
LARRY BOWLES
TOKAY BOWL
620 S TOKAY ST
LODI CA 95240
LES DABRITZ
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
P 0 BOX 386
LODI CA 95''40
PENNY MATTOS
944 S STOCKTON ST
LODI CA 95240
HAROLD HENNEY
468 PIONEER DR
LODI CA 95240
MR & MRS DAVID MITTLEIDER
1925 ROBERT ST
LODI CA 95242
ED WALLACE
1430 S CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
SHIRLEY PLATH
1439 VOELKER DR
LODI CA 95240
STEVE & CONNIE SCHNABEL
1107 WIMBLEDON DR
LODI CA 95240
ALFRED JOACHIM
609 RIMBY AVE
LODI CA 95240
OR HOMER
325 W LOCKEFORD ST
LODI CA 95240
ALICE STOVER
231 W LOCKEFORD ST
LODI CA 95240
ARLENE SCHLABS
25 S MILLS AVE
LODI CA 95242
DAVE KIRKCALDY
1806 S CHURCH ST
LODI CA 95240
GERALDINE PESSOA
621 EUREKA AVE
LODI CA 95240
JIM PARKER
1993 CARMEL CR
Lodi CA 95242
JOHN KONANZ
72 N PACIFIC AVE
LODI CA 95242
JANE HOLDEN
207 E WALNUT
CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
LODI CA 95240
DON SOARES
359 E CENTURY BLVD
LODI CA 95240
GARY LUNO
P 0 BOX 22
LODI CA 95241 J
GEORGE BARNES
2250 SCARBOROUGH OR #65
LODI CA 95240
LU BENSON
714 N MILLS AVE
LODI CA 95242
BERNICE HANSON
1336 W ELM ST
LODI CA 95242
BILL BARTON
1456 KEAGLE WAY
LODI CA 95242
CHARLIE BECKMAN
850 E KETTLEMAN LN
LODI CA 95240
ROBERT'S PETROLEUM
930 E VICTOR RD
LODI CA 95240
PAUL E VAZ TRUCKING
12856 E HARNEY LN
LODI CA 95240
TOM ZAYAS INC
26353 N VAIL RD
THORNTON CA 95686
D H WINN TRUCKING INC
19555 N TULLY RD
LOCKEFORD CA 95237
VALLEY MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION INC
415 S SACRAMENTO ST
LODI CA 95240
BOB L TONN TRUCKING
7000 E KETTLEMAN LN
LODI CA 95240
CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
TIGER LINES INC
P 0 BOX 1940
LODI CA 95241
TERESI TRUCKING
900 1/2 E VICTOR RD D
LODI CA 95240
T & T TRUCKING INC
11396 N HWY 99
LODI CA 95240
STRIBLING BROS LIVESTOCK TRANSPORTATION
13226 MC FARLAND
GALT CA 95632
SHULZ BROS. TRUCKING
24375 N KENNEFICK RD
GALT CA 95632
RAUSSER BROS TRUCKING
11964 E LIBERTY RD
GALT CA 95632
POTTER ENTERPRISES INC
6t5 E-PiN �0. Baf. sw-6
WPI ,GA 762-gI -ZED3
PIE NATIONWIDE
2007 N WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205
MATHESON FAST GHT INC
102 E WAL T
LODI 95240
MR TRUC
860 INE ST
I CA 95240
LODI TRUCK SERVIC.
1430 8 CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
KISHIDA TRUCKING
19555 N HWY 99
ACAMPO CA 95220
KISHIDA TRUCKING CO
1725 ACKERMAN
LODI CA 95240
JSG TRUCKING CO INC
19400 N HWY 99
CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
ACAMPO CA 95220
CHARLIE GUESS TRUCKING
12101 E BRANDT RD
LOCKEFORD CA 95237
GARCIA'S, TRUCKING
4679 E HARVEST RD
ACAMPO CA 95220
FTG CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
804 N CLUFF AVE
LODI CA 95240
LES CALKINS TRUCKING
19501 N HWY 99
ACAMPO CA 95220
CABRAL TRUCKI VICE
P O BOX
LOW CA 95241-0132
C W ENTERPRISES
23987 N HWY 99
ACAMPO CA 95220
BODINE TRUCKING
23835 N DUSTIN RD
ACAMPO CA 95220
BEACH TRU
1353 E RD
CA 95632
FRANK C ALEGRE TRUCKING INC
803 N CLUFF AVE
LODI CA 95240
PACIFIC COAST PRODUCERS
32 E TOKAY ST
LODI CA 95240
GENERAL MILLS INC
P 0 BOX 3002
LODI CA 95241-1906
fre d attd Gera le e IDufro
a30� `Iosetru fv Jc
�rminlo Urias
X12 Ruf Iedc)Dr.
I .6, , CA 4r. Z
CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
CITY COUNCIL
THOMAS A. PETERSON
PHILCity
A. ,titavor
CITY OF L O D I
Manager
JACK A CLOCNO,
LACK .� SIECIOCK
UNNIEER M PERRIN
`•favor Pro Tempore
City Clerk
RAY C. DAVENPORT
01Y HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET
R0(t.McNATT
STEPHEN (. MANN
P_O. BOX 3006
P-0.
City Attorney
CALIFORNIA 95231-1910
IOHn R (P.andv) SNIDER
(209) 333-56.13
February 24, 1993
Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc.
803 N. Cluff Ave.
Lodi, CA 95240
Subject: Request for Comments at Public Hearing to Review the Report and Proposed Ordinance
on Truck Parking and Travel on City Streets
On Wednesday, March 3,1993, a public hearing will be held regarding truck parking and truck
travel on City streets. This muting Hill be held in the City Council Chamber, Carnegie Forum,
305 West Pine Stroet, and will commence at 7:30 p.m. Lodi City Council invites )vu to attend
this meeting and wants your specific input on this subject matter. Enclosed is a copy of
background information on this item.
The complete report is available in the Traffic Division located on the second floor of City Hall.
221 West Pine Street, betwneen the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
If you wish to communicate with the City Council, please contact Jennifer Perrin, City Clerk, at
333-6702.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact Paula Fernandez or
me at 333-6706.
L
J6*o=rks
o
P
Director
XR/RSK/im
Enclosure /
cc: City Clerk
Associate Traffic Engineer
TRUCK2DOC
CITY COUNCIL
PHILLIP A. PENNINO. Mayor
)ACK A SIEGLOCK
Mayor Pro Tempore
RAY G. DAVENPORT
STEPHEN I MANN
JOHN R !Randy) SNIDER
Lodi Truck Service
1430 S. Cherokee Ln.
Lodi, CA 95240
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET
P.O. BOX 3016
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241.1910
(209) 334-5634
FAX (2091 313-6,79S
February 24, 1993
THOMAS A. PETERSON
City :Manager
JENNIFER M. PERRIN
City Clerk
BOB McNATT
City Attorney
Subject: Request for Comments at Public Hearing to Review the Report and Proposed Ordina=
on Truck Parking and Travel on City Strays
On Wednesday, March 3,1993, a public hearing will be held regarding truck parking and truck
travel on City streets. Ths meeting will be held in the City Council Chamber, Carnegie Forum,
305 West Pine Street, and veill comma= at 7:30 p.m. Lodi 6iy C--wi :i', uivaes you to attend
this meeting and wants your specific input on this subject matter. Enclosed is a copy of
background information on this item.
The complete report is available in the Traffic Division located on the second floor of City Hall,
221 West Pine Street, between the hours of 8:00 am. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
If you wish to communicate %ith the City Council, please contact Jennifer Perrin, City Clerk, at
333-6702.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact Paula Fernandez or
me at 333-6706.
1.14
J L. onsko
Pu 'c W rks Director
JLR/RSK/Im
Enclosure f
cc: Citv Clerk
Associate Traffic Engineer
TRULY -1 DOC
CITY COUNCIL
PHILLIP A. PENNINO, .Mawr
;ACK A. SIEGLOCK
Mayor Pro Tempore
RAY C DAVENPORT
STEPHEN I MANN
JOHN R !Rand►) SNIDER
Teresi Trucking
900 1R E. Victor Rd.
Lodi, CA 95240
CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL. 221 WEST RINE STREE t
P O. BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
(209)334-5634
: AY (2091,13 1 674;
February 24, 1993
THOMAS A PETERSON
Cit), Manager
it��lE[R M. PERRIN
City Clerk
BOB Atc�ATT
City Attorney
Subject: Request for Comments at Public Ifearing to Review the Report and Proposed Ordinance
on Truck Parking and Travel on City Streets
On Wednesday, March 3,1993, a public hearing will be held regarding truck parking and truck
travel on City streets. This meeting will be held in the City Council Chamber, Carnegie Forum,
305 West Pine Street, and will commence at 7:30 p.m. Lodi City Council invite you to attend
this meeting and wants your specific input on this subject matter. Enclosed is a copy of
background information on this item.
The complete report is available in the Traffic Division located on the second floor of City hall,
121 West Pine Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
If you wish to communicate with the City Council, please contact Jea►nifer Perrin, City Clerk, at
333-6702.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please contact Paula Fernandez or
me at 333-6706.
orcack. Ronsko
Works Director
JLR/RSK/Im
Enclosure
cc: City Clerk
Associate Traffic EnginOCT
is •,. ._..
T7 P
GENERAL MILLS, INC. • TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS DIYIBION
P.O. 00: X002 • Lodi. California 95241.19"
February 24, 1993
ROBERT K. WHEELER
Mr, lack L Ronsko
Public Works Director
Boa 3006
Lodl, CA 95241-1910
Dear lack,
This letter is in regards to the f'ruck Parking and Dwel Alternatives Ordinance %Mich
comes up for public hearing in the March 3. 1993, City Council meeting.
We have studied the alternatives proposed by the Public Works Staff and are in
complete agreement with their recommendation on the first alternative which ►vould
modify the truck parking ordinance by changing the definition of rrsldential district.
To assist in the objective to minimize truck parking on Qty streets, General Mills Will
assure that there is adequate parking on plant grounds for all our truo� traffic.
We would, however, appreciate your support to relieve an area of concern. In E=hibit
B of the $gport on Truck Parking and Travel on Ctty Streets, Mills Avenue has been
identified as a 'Truck Travel Problem Area' from Turner Road to Lodi Avenue.
It is of extreme importance to General Mills that truck travel not be restricted on that
portion of Mills Avenue from Turner Road to our Mills Avenue entrance. Our truck
scale is located at that gate and all trucks delivering ingredients are weighed in and
out. Also, the Mills Avrnue entrance Is needed to avoi4 trejfic back up at the Tuner
Road entrance.
iR closure, l %vuld like to express my appreciation for your attention to our concerns
prior to the council meeting.
Sincerely,
R. K. Wheeler
cc: Tom Peterson
Phil Pennino
Jack Sieglock
Randy Snider
Ray Davenport
Steffe Mann
(Q)CITY OF LUDO ACTION SLIP
ADMII19PRADON
OATt
TO,
F-06
ACTION L'.'DICAr[D,
0 As Fkoq,.Vd 0 P%*.,d 0 Fpr Ty"
0 0 Rotmd Vim, QW 0 Fc, F"
0 0 was - me 0 FW M&"
[I APWWW 0. WA cap Elect r:] copy"Inm P-mveswo
0 pown c. pwa" ohneD Fo, row 5-9mbrus
0 Loo's 0-scuss Psa" C~ [J P44SO TSk@ C.0 of Vlft
PWONFI
REMA 5
104. 1
1,m,ze
W
i; C'ETY, t_E;
✓'ar,Uar-y 30. 19-9
Honorable Mayor Phil Peninno
Council Aretaber s:
SUW-PCT: Truck Parking and Travel or. City Sirc.cts
Thcr area bordered by Lower Sacramento Rr.-a:. lTurner Road/ Ham .
Lane/ Lodi Avenue is primarily residential. On the cr)rRar of
Mm Street and Mills Avenue =s Reese which is P, -6th
grade. The pircei at Mills Avenue and LC<-k,for'd Street aloo
belonys to Lodi Unified Scl:ocl District with the Potential of
becoming mother sate.
There are a large nurriter- of childr n using ?dills Avenue now
'plus the High &-ho,;-tudent:, fixm; Lodi llgh), and not to
restrict the traffic fi ,,u. large trucks is very dangerr?us.
There are no commercial areas in thi's arca that need to be
served by trucking that cannot be reached frcm any of the
fringe streets r..•entioned at the beginning of this letter.
These same border streets are also directly accessible from
both major highways vii:. either L'kji Aver„re or Turner RcNid and
Lower Sacramento end Ham Lane.
My major cor.cern is in theaffected ,:r -ea travel and defer to
the t`ity Staff as to the parkins. issue.
�,�V.� • ��fix,C ��:''L.IL.�' 1.-1-r/
''r s. A-Icn>
CITY COUNCIL
PHILLIP A. PENNINO, Mayor
JACK A. SIEG:OCK
- Mayor Pro Tempore
RAY C. DAVENPORT
STEPHEN J..MANN
JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
Mrs. Arlene Schlabs
25 South Mills Avenue
Lodi, CA 95242
THOMAS A. FETERSON
City Manager
CITYOF L O D I P 711 7 4E�4wIFER M PERRIN
City Clerk
CITY HALL. 221 WEST :.NE STREET
P.O. BOX 3006
LODI. CALIFORNIA `_41-1910
(209)334-563+
FAX (.'091 3 i)•b 9S
February 22,1993
Subject: Truck Travel on Mills Avenue between Lodi Avenue to Turner Road
'BOB MeNATT
City Attorney
Thank you for express!ng your concerns regarding truck travel on Mills Avenue between Lodi Avenue and
ur rer Road. As you may bn aware, a public hearing reg. ng track parking and truck travel is
scheduled to be reviewed by city council ou Wednesday, M trch 3,1993. The meeting will be held in the
City Council Chamber, Carnegie Forum. 305 West Pine Street and will begin at 7:30 p.m. Additional
information regarding this meeting pill be sent to you prior to the meeting. The concerns indicated in
your letter sent to the M ,yor and City Council have also been for -r to the Public Works Department,
and will be included with other comments received on this subject.
StalFs recommendation regarding this issue is to modify to the existing Truck Parking Ordinance and not
establish a Truck Route System.H^�^! : er, if council chooses to establish a Truck Route System, stall'
would not recommend Mills Avenue as a truck route. if council does not establish a Trude Route System
this does not mean that Mills Avenue could not be studied separately for a commercial vehicle restriction
and presented to council at future meeting.
We urge you to attend this meeting if you would like to express your support of establishing a Truck Route
System. If you have any questions or comments regarding this tette: or the public hearing, please contact
Rick Kiriu or me at 333-6706.
Paula J. Fernandez
Associate Traffic Engineer
cc: City Clerk
MILLS.DOC
0
DECLARATION
DECLARATION OF MAILING
on February 5, 1993 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I
deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage
prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked
Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed as is more particuAarly shown
on Exhibit "8" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi,
California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on February 5, 1993, at Lodi, California.
Jennifer M. Perrin
City Clerk
Pegff diiQiini
Deputy City Clerk
DEC#01/TXTA.BRM
o. CITY
OLODIF
� bTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
h 3, 1s93
CARNEGIE FORUM
305 West Pine Street. Lodi 0 p.m.
F
ation regarding this Public Hearingntact:
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
Telephone: 333-6702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
March 3, 1993
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., or as
soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a
public hearing to consider the following matter:
a) To review the report and proposed ordinance on truck parking and
travel on City streets.
All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this
matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior
to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said
hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in
this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West
Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing.
By Order Of the Lodi City Council:
f M. Perrin
ity Clerk
Dated: February 3, 1993
Approved as to form:
--Bobby W. McNatt
City Attorney
&NAME
&ATTN
&ADD
&CITY
ARNEY PRIN
MAIN S T BODY SHOP
52 IN ST
DI CA 95240
MIKE PATEL
RANCHO GRANDE MOTEL
807 S CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
RICK LONG
WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES
1831 S S13CKTON ST
LODI CA 95240
ALAN BOHMAN
LODI ACADEMY
1230 S CENTRAL AVE
LODI CA 95240
LARRY WEAVER
CORNER POCKET BILLIARDS
725 S CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
SCOTT FREEMAN
A & J AUTO
521 N CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
OTTO ALBREHT
ARBOR CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL
900 N CHURCH F-
LODI CA 952--o
LARRY BOWLES
TOKAY BOWL
620 S TOKAY ST
LODI CA 95240
LES DABRITZ
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
P 0 BOX 386
LOP' CA 95240
PENNY MATTOS
944 S STOCKTON ST
LODI CA 95240
0
IT
HAROLD HENNEY
468 PIONEER DR
LODI CA 95240
MR & MRS DAVID MITTLEIDER
1925 ROBERT ST
LODI CA 95242
ED WALLACE
1430 S CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
SHIRLEY PLATH
1439 VOELKER DR
LODI CA 95240
STEVE & CONNIE SCHNABEL
1107 WIMBLEDON DR
LODI CA 95240
ALFRED JOACHIM
609 RIMBY AVE
LODI CA 95240
OR HOMER
325 W LOCKEFORD ST
LODI CA 95240
ALICE STOVER
231 W LOCKEFORO ST
LODI CA 95240
ARLENE SCHLABS
25 S MILLS AVE
LODI CA 95242
DAVE KIRKCALDY
1806 S CHURCH ST
LODI CA 95240
GERALDINE PESSOA
621 EUREKA AVE
LODI CA 95240
JIM PARKER
1993 CARMEL CR
Lodi CA 95242
JOHN KONANZ
72 N PACIFIC AVE
LODI CA 95242
JANE HOLDEN
207 E WALNUT
CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
LODI CA 95240
DON SOARES
359 E CENTURY BLVD
LODI CA 95240
GARY LUND
P 0 BOX 22
LODI CA 95241
GEORGE BARNES
2250 SCARBOROUGH OR #65
s LODI CA 95240
t. LU BENSON
714 N MILLS AVE
LODI CA 95242
BERNICE HANSON
r 1336 W ELM ST
` LODI CA 95242
BILL BARTON
1456 KEAGLE WAY
t
LODI CA 95242
CHARLIE BECKMAN
850 E KETTLEMAN LN
LODI CA 95240
ROBERT'S PETROLEUM
{ 930 E VICTOR RD
LODI CA 95240
t
PAUL E VAZ TRUCKING
x 12856 E HARNEY LN
LODI CA 95240
} TOM ZAYAS INC
26353 N VAIL RD
THORNTON CA 95686
i
±
D H WINN TRUCKING INC
19555 N TULLY RD
LOCKEFORD CA 95237
VALLEY MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION INC
415 S SACRAMENTO ST
LODI CA 95240
BOB L TONN TRUCKING
7000 E KETTLEMAN L:i
LODI CA 95240
-- CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
TIGER LINES INC
P 0 BOX 1940
LODI CA 95241
TERESI TRUCKING
900 1/2 E VICTOR RD
LODI CA 95240
T 8 T TRUCKING INC
11396 N HWY 99
LODI CA 95240
STRIBLING BROS LIVESTOCK TRANSPORTATION
13226 MC FARLAND
GALT CA 95632
SHULZ BROS. TRUCKING
24375 N KENNEFICK RD
GALT CA 95632
RAUSSER BROS TRUCKING
11964 E LIBERTY RD
GALT CA 95632
POTTER ENTERPRISES INC
-615 1NE ST- P-0. 1304 -2-10-6
LODI ,CA 452-l1 -2,03
PIE NATIONWIDE
2nO7 N WILSON WY
STOCKTON CA 95205
MATHESON FAST GHT INC
102 E WAL T
LODI 95/240
MR TRUC ER'"
860 INE ST
I CA 95240
LODI TRUCK SERVICE
1430 S CHEROKEE LN
LODI CA 95240
KISHIDA TRUCKING
19555 N HWY 99
ACAMPO CA 9522
KISHIDA TRUCKING CO
1725 ACKERMAN
LODI CA 95240
JSG TRUCKING CO INC
19400 N HWY 99
CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
ACAMPO CA 95220
CHARLIE GUESS TRUCKING
12101 E BRANDT RD
LOCKEFORD CA 95237
GARCIA'S TRUCKING
4679 E HARVEST RD
ACAMPO CA 95220
FTG CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
804 N CLUFF AVE
LODI CA 95240
LES CALKINS TRUCKING
19501 N HWY 99
ACAMPO CA 95220
CABRAL TRUCKI VICE
P 0 BOX
CA 95241-0132
C W ENTERPRISES
23987 N HWY 99
ACAMPO CA 95220
BODINE TRUCKING
23835 N DUSTIN RD
ACAMPO CA 95220
BEACH TRUCKING
13531 IVIE RD
GALT CA 95632
FRANK C ALEGRE TRUCKING INC
803 N CLUFF AVE
LODI CA 95240
PACIFIC COAST PRODUCERS
32 E TOKAY ST
LODI CA 95240
GENERAL MILLS .INC
P 0 BOX 3002
LODI CA 95241-1906
fre d alma (,ora ie e 11u f m
0301 v0semi ft
LAAi , en w2`i Z
f ri11!rto U665
tfi2 huF;edcy, N--
1 cA t, CA X162 il
CTRUCKPK.LST/TXTW.02M
CITY COUNCIL
PHILLIP A. PENNINO. Mavor
JACK A. SIEGLOCK
Mayor Pro Tempore
RAY G. DAVENPORT
STEPHEN 1. MANN
JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER
Mrs. Arlene Schlabs
25 South Mills Avenue
Lodi, CA 95242
CITY OF LORt:1,.._
CITY HAIL. 221 WEST PINE STRFE%-^
P.O. BOX 3006
LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241.1910
(209)334.5634
1AX 12091 1336195
February 22.1993
Subject: Truck Travel on Mills Avenue between Lodi Avenue to Turner Road
THOMAS A. PETERSON
City Manager
JENNIFER M. PERRIN
City Clerk
BOB 1 CNATT
City Attomey
Thank you for expressing your concerns regarding truck travel on Mills Avenue between Lodi Avenue and
Turner Road. As you may be aware, a public hearing regarding truck parking and truck travel is
scheduled to be reviewed by city council on Wednesdny. March 3,1993. The mating will be held in the
City Council Chamber, Carnegie Forum. 305 West Pine Street and will begin at 7:30 p.m. Additional
information regarding this meeting will be sent to you prior to the meeting. The concerns indicated in
your letter sent to the Mayor and City Council have also been forwarded to the Public Works Department.
and will be included with oiher comments received on this subject.
Stan's recommendation regarding this issue is to modify to the existing Trude Parking Ordinance and not
establish a Truck Route System. However, if council chooses to establish a Truck Route System, staff
would not recommend Mills Avenue as a truck route. If council does not establish a Trude Route System,
this does not mean that Mills Avenue could not be studied separately for a commercial vehicle restriction
and presented to council at future meeting.
We urge you to attend this meeting if you would like to express your support of establishing a Truck Route
System. If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter or the public hearing, please contact
Rick Kiriu or me at 333-6706.
I '
Paula J. Fernandez
Associate Trac Engineer
cc: City Clerk
MiLLS.DOC
Cie -
1 3 3 V 0 N O M A N O H I M O N 0gs
41
R
ITS
G:
yip
M
LO
b Q1 CD
i4 Q�tn
a 1 i3Ci
� 3
O Q Q
Y 1-r N t.7
Y
t; :r z3ZO
J W Z Y
t �t.),
0 0
a . �+'�71_N H
X
3 f
i
A�
O W T
Z ry
J C -
r