Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 19, 1993 PHos CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONL Ilk AGENDA TITLE: Consider the Appeal Received from Chris Keszler Regarding the Planning Commission's Denial of his Request for a General Plan Amendment to Redesignate a Portion of the Parcel Located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) from P -R, Planned Residential Lo NCC, Neighborhood/Community Commercial and to Prezone the Parcel C-5, commercial Shopping. MEETING DATE: May 19, 1993 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider the appeal of Chris Keszler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan amendment to redesignate a portion of the parcel at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) from P -R, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighborhood/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Wine and Roses Country Inn is located adjacent and to the east of the proposed shopping center site. The shopping center developer and the owners of the inn proposed to integrate the two uses into a compatible site plan. The Commercial zoning at the northwest corner of Turner Road and Woodhaven Lane was originally approved to accommodate the country inn. Shopping center development was not proposed at that time. On March 1, 1989 the City Council denied a General Plan Amendment and rezoning for a shopping center on a 9.6 acre site at the southwest corner of the Turner Road and Woodhaven Lane -Lower Sacramento Road intersection (i.e. site of MCI building). Section 17.84.050 of the Lodi Municipal Code provides as follows: "Disapproval Recommendation - Appeal to Council. If the report of the Planning Commission recommends disapproval of the proposed change or amendment or reclassification, the applicant upon notification of such action may, within twenty days thereafter, appeal to the City Council. After public hearing with due notice as provided in this chapter the City Council may by a four-fifths vote of the entire council grant an appealed application and adopt by the vote an ordinance effecting such proposed changes or portions thereof." The City Council may approve the General Plan amendment with a simple majority. However, the prezoning to C -S, Commercial Shopping, requires a four-fifths vote of the entire council. APPROVED: w THOMAS A. PETERSON �r recycled paper City Manager CC -1 CCC093.20/TXTD.01C Appeal of Chris Keszler re Planning Commission. denial of GPA amendment and Prezoning May 19, 1993 Page two The section of the Planning Commission Minutes of march 22, 1993 which deals with these requests is attached for the City Council's information. This public hearing was continued from the Regular Session of May 5, 1993 at the request of the applicant's attorney, Ronald M. Stein. FUNDING: None required. s B. Schro er C pity Development Director JBS/cg Attachments CCCD93.20/TXTQ.OIC i % Of tt • W ti L• � � R• a m h G � N O • h r----.--!�-J� , I i VICINITY MAP Bridgetown 1 General Plan Amendment Prezoning AG to CS Negative Declaration GPA W 93-01 Z-93-02 ND -93-02 03-08-93 % t&'W"Kc! tt • W ti O � R• a m Il'r.. � ` tai O G L r----.--!�-J� , I i VICINITY MAP Bridgetown 1 General Plan Amendment Prezoning AG to CS Negative Declaration GPA W 93-01 Z-93-02 ND -93-02 03-08-93 % t&'W"Kc! tt • W O � Z N O • r w 3 Z e 01:0 ;D w (f 1 1 e �+ w �• hV.v 591.5 '— �• ,�� + N Vs 0 3/' �� If) •n D 4 � w f AN JIAY t/t G//INJ Jam. •. Z GJ'Y /.� l /Ol O rjo R f. 3!•!!I w �. / 9tYP,q 7 rA'#M'aAyrn A ft:• AMP 5 �q U lPddd' ♦�� to. •1. I. PI' [NdRJt17 WO I �--- - l i� �w. r----.--!�-J� , I i VICINITY MAP Bridgetown 1 General Plan Amendment Prezoning AG to CS Negative Declaration GPA W 93-01 Z-93-02 ND -93-02 03-08-93 SITE PLAN _ too= I r a IU*A . 4x? u. .Mks u. YW lomw Imo STOP[) • . 3LW as. aws aaxvti • 12,3.O L. . ILM f1. NO OYROORh • -l�3.t- MAL Om *Aim .tfA . lam sr. �t SM& 00 SO yJ f6IAl O.TIM�: PW On ' ?M IK!) .077 i'��� .*L C...a 'm �' L • Y4 . 116 T.7.LL RR MCA • Off K /- 079.33L s1. •I-. . It.61 /L (70ti7i • - •/-) I Bridgetown l General Plan Amendment Prezoning AG to CS Negative Declaration GPA -LU -93-01 Z-93-02 NL -93-02 PAGE 2 OF 2 03-08-92 T EXCERPTS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 22, 1993 The first public hearing was the request of Chris R. Kessler and A. Fred Baker: 1. For a General Plan Amer,dTent to redesignate the parcel at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighborhood/Community Commercial; 2. To prezone the parcel at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) C -S, Commercial Shopping Center; and 3. To certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation or, the above projects. Senior Planner David Morimoto introduced this matter for the Planning Commission and explained that the applicants have requested an amendment to the General Plan from a designation of Planned Residential to Neighborhood Community Commercial to accommodate a commercial shopping center proposed for a 9.55 acre parcel at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) at the northwest corner of Turner Road and Woodhaven Lane. The area would be prezoned C -S, Commercial Shopping Center. The project would include a 49,000 square foot supermarket, a 26,000 square foot drug store and several free-standing pads for smaller stores. The applicants wish to tie into the existing Wine & Roses Bed and Breakfast complex to the west. Mr. Morimoto read a letter from A. Fred Baker in support of the project. Vice Chairman Rasmussen asked if there was a staff recommendation. Mr. Morimoto read a memorandum from the Public Works Department which dealt with possible impacts, drainage and trips generat,,d. Commissioner Griffith voiced concern over the need for an EIR since the general plan looked at the project area as residential not commercial, a significant change. Commissioner Hitchcock felt a negative declaration on the project was not adequate and asked about the need for an environmental impact study. She wondered about the impact on other commercially designated land and if there could be a trade of this approximately 10 acre parcel for 10 acres of residentially designated property elsewhere in the City. Staff indicated that this would be possible if the Planning Commission and City Council felt it is warranted. Both Commissioners Griffith and Hitchcock felt there should be a new traffic and circulation study. Commissioner Marzolf inquired what development phase the project is in and whether the rezoning would affect the phasing. Mr. Morimoto explained that the parcel currently is in Phase II of the Growth Management Plan. However, that phasing plan only applies to residential land. T Commissioner Griffith cited the time spent consideri.ig the General Plan Update and felt the designation should remain residential. Chairman Rasmussen then opened the discussion to the public and asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to speak in favor of the project. The first speaker was Kris Cromwell, 2505 West Turner Road, one of the owners of Wine & Roses Country Inn. She stated she felt the project would be a.; asset to the community as well as being compatible with her bed and breakfast inn. The next speaker was Del Smith, 2505 West Turner Road, one of the owners of Wine & Roses Country Inn. He stated the future of Wine & Roses Inn depends on compatible development to the west of their property and requested the Planning Commission's support for the project. Commissioner Stafford expressed concern that the pads on the south We of the project might be occupied by fast food businesses. Mr. Smith assured him that that type of business would not be desirable. Ron Bernasconi, 212 Evergreen, representing the applicants, felt a major anchor shopping center will improve local economy by providing 200 to 250 jobs, capturing sales tax dollars and result in reduction of cross-town trips, rather than increasing traffic in the area. Richard Prima, Assistant City Engineer, reiterated that planned improvements will provide adequate traffic handling in the nearby intersection of Turner Road and Woodhaven Lane. Mr. Bernasconi pointed out that changing the residential designation of the property to commercial will relieve overcrowding in local schools. Commissioner Griffith felt there would only be a slight economic benefit from increased sales tax and doubted it would generate 200 to i50 full time jobs. He said 4 or 5 new shops could draw away business from the downtown area. Mr. Griffith expressed concern about possible vacant pads/stores causing the project to deteriorate. Mr. Bernasconi stressed that this is a quality project by local developers who would not abandon it. Attorney Ron Stein, 5345 North E1 Dorado Street, Stock+on, representing the applicants, stated the staff study shows little .,pact and questioned what issues should be addressed that require an EIR. Steve Pechin, 323 West Elm Street, engineer for the project, agreed that the Initial Study prepared by staff indicates no significant effects and cited the Target shopping center as a comparable project that was covered by a negative de-laration. He felt an EIR would be money spent uselessly. Roger Stafford mentioned a letter that had been received from San Joaquin Partnership supporting efforts to bring jobs to the City. Vice Chairman Rasmussen then invited those in the audience who wished to speak in opposition to the project to come forward. Bruce Salsbury, 2501 West Turner Road, owner of the Salsbury Market in Woodlake Plaza, questioned the need for a large supermarket. He was concerned about competing with such a large store and stated he chose his location because it was in a primarily residential neighborhood. The second speaker was Helen Stevens, 616 West Turner Road. She cited heavy traffic on Turner Road, her concern for school children going to and from school and felt there was no need for more commercial in the area. The next speaker Buck Lucas, 18196 North Davis Road, said Lodi is losing its farm community character and didn't want to see another supermarket So in. Victor Goehring, 19353 Del Rio Drive, Woodbridge, stated he thought a shopping center in the area of Turner and Woodhaven would generate too much traffic and urged the City to coordinate future planning with the county. Tom Gau, 2336 Eilers Lane, felt delivery trucks and other service vehicles would disturb the neighborhood and felt a grocery store of almost 50,000 square feet was too large for the area. Lance Selkirk, 2323 Eilers Lane, was concerned about noise generated by delivery trucks at night. He suggested a better use for the parcel would be a retirement community. Jim Reed, 2330 Eilers Lane, said the project would increase traffic and felt it would not be good for Wine & Roses. There being no one else in the audience wishing to speak on the matter, Vice Chairman Rasmussen closed the public portion of the hearing. After some additional discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Hitchcock and seconded by Commissioner Griffith that the Planning Commission not recommend certifying a negative declaration on the Bridgetown General Plan Amendment and prezone request of Chris R. Keszler and A. Fred Baker. The motion failed on a 3-3 vote. The Commissioners then discussed further the negative declaration. A motion was made by Commissioner Stafford and seconded by Commissioner Lapenta to recommend certifying a negative declaration on the Bridgetown General Plan Amendment and prezone request of Chris R. Keszler and A. Fred Baker. The motion carried by a vote of 4-2 with Commissioners Hitchcock and Griffith voting "no." Commissioner Marzolf then moved that the Planning Commission deny the Bridgetown General Plan Amendment and prezone request of Chris R. Keszler and A. Fred Baker. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Griffith and passed by a vote of 4-2 with Commissioners Rasmussen and Stafford voting "no." Vice Chairman Rasmussen then called for a brief recess. The meeting was reconvened after a 10 minute recess. 10'd SZOM& W LAW 0MCE OF RONALD M. STEIN SM)Pffn AT LAR aw xoxm ro. rZ)FAM SUM 7 waxticsiDir. CALIFORM HSo7 (SOfr) i78•l4Y1 PAX (209) 478-OAM May 3, 1993 city counca Vc Jer>rder Perrin City Clerk 221 West Pine Lodi. Califomia 95240 Request for ConMM lance Deaf City CMICtl Members, ZZ :fi0 3663-£0-AtiW on behalf of my client Dr. Cris Kanter and Fred Baker, l respectively request a oontinuance of iters One on Vie Wednvsrday Mw, S. 1993, City Cane Agenda entitled: The Appeal from the P rvdrkg ^.ontmiselon's denial of their request for a General Plan Amend tent to RedeurlgrMe a portion of the panel located at 451 East Turner Roo, (APN 018-230-M from P -R, Planned Resldential to NCC. Nelghportrood Cornmunityr Commercial and to Prezone the Parcel CS, Commercial Shopping. I would ask that this mite be continued until the City Council Meeting of May 19,1993. The purpose of the request for the continuance is to respond to some of the vonoenls raised at the Planning Commission hearing on this item. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely Yours. Ronald Maris Stein Tod ZZs- ££i GW- :01 Fac -MK- -' N3&m l sitj,YU ST :6© £G. £ii .k" -u 41 LAW OFFICE OF RONALD M. STEIN ATTORNEY AT LAW 5345 NORTH EL DORADO, SUITE 7 Si'OCKTON. CALIFORNIA 95207 (209) 478-2621 FAX (209) 478480.98 May 3, 1993 City Council 1/c Jennifer Perrin City Clerk 221 West Pine Lodi, Catifomia 95240 Request for Continuance Dear City Council Members, RECEIVED 93 MY -5 all 8: 55 iP!1t�'f FE':t H. PERREN CITY CLERK CITY or Low dote: Fax copy received on 5/3/93, 9:15 a.m. On behalf of my client Dr. Cris Keszler and Fred Baker, i respectively request a continuance of item One on the Wednesday May 5, 1993; City Council Agenda entitled: The Appeal from :he Planning Commission's denial of their request for a General Plan Amendment to Redesignate a portion of the parcel located at 451 East Turner Road, (APN 015-230-28) from P -R, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighborhood Community Commercial and to Prezone the Parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping. 1 would ask that this matter be continued until the City Council Meeting of May 19,1993. The purpose of the request for the continuance is to respond to some of the concerns raised at the Planning Commission hearing on this item. Thank you in advance for your consideriJon of this matter. Sincerely Yours, 2, Ronald Mark Stein BOSWELLS-PLEASRNTON TEL No.346-9472' May . 5.93 9:34 P.01 f ei ' •a -Fey e,14 T Y a.�t•''J7:� r-[•"f�....'��"Irv,•t>t ,�.•C-C.GC.. ,ar'�..:��R�•rt�tc'.� �. V..'✓"�,-. .. `.�`•��.. ti�1� .i !Y.:�'S !.[�^It +" �. ...rt' 'YL.�.�ltf� •�R ! r- •, j'� � n �_ x P �{,�ttf•{.A—i��i.tj' . ���1 f/•L- ;� j t �Y' � � it � •si r)n i� !� �. e:_.--��f/. .�„Lc.c,/'-fi��..rr. ,.t �.C'. ''C.'�f .�ts��tQ.-•a.lti{.�..E' :/�'� � ;� '�� t�f:�'C.: C:�.r't�•L rl•.�' �'�' c�.�{te i;..e C.C. ► k OL pe "•' ... t�r't� �.L••X. �.�-'C( ,�,o �?••tGP-sc.�C.. /t'i•cP. C�.{;-sem.. �Y.•!�'�� . f;. y _s BRIDGETOWNE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 317 West Lodi Avenue RE- MEIVc0 Lodi, California 95240 (209) 333-2881 8:43 May 3, 1993 City Council CITY OF LODI P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, Ca 95240 Dear Mayor and Councilmcxt Thank you for meeting with our representatives last week to discuss the merits of our Appeal. We feel our project is consistent with the general welfare and deserving of your support. Accordingly, we would like to clarify and expand upon some of the issues addressed in your recent Council Communication. Since July of 92 we have been working closely with your Staff and agree with your Staffs Initial Study, which indicates there are no significant impacts associated with the rezoning. Please note, at the Planning Commission hearing, in response to Vice Chairman Rasmussen's request for a recommendation; your Staff recommended the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation. Then, Dave Morimoto read a Memorandum from Jack Ronsko iadicating Public Works had determined that adequate utility facilities had been constructed to accommodate the rezoning. Further, the Memorandum indicated roadway improvements planned for Turner and Lower Sacramento Roads would provide adequate capacity for the rezoning. Attached is Jack Ronsko s Memorandum. Finally, it is important to note that Commissioners Stafford and Rasmussen acknowledged the need for flexibility in a General Plan and additional commercial zoning in Northwest Lodi from a long-term perspective, We appreciate your consideration of this additional information and look forward to working with the City to enhance the quality of life we enjoy in Lodi as a result of your fine efforts. Yours very truly, CHRIS R. KESZLER T— TOWN& COUNT -3y RECEIVED PROPERTIES o lY-3 AM 9--46 428 W. PINE STREET • LODI. CA 95240.209-369- April 17W. �, RKP,R1;�i Lodi City Council �';! i 1111 LQI. 221 W. Pine , Lodi, Ca. -95240 Gentlemen; As a local businessman and a property owner on Lower Sacramento Rd. I am very much in favor of the project: Wine and Roses Country Village. The corner of Turner Road and Lower Sacramento Road is a p.ime location for commercial and business usage. The plan, that Wine & Roses developers are wanting approval on, would truely enhance the existing development. And at the same time, extend itself to the future needs of Lodians. Through this plan they can achieve the maximum use of the property without jeopardizing the romantic ambiance of the beautiful corner known to all in Lodi, as the Towne Property". Sincep/ly, a Randall JV Heinz Broker "FCi-:l4'ED F 7 Vi g. ?.g May 14,1993 City Council CITY OF LODI P.O. Box 3006 Lodi, Ca 95240 RE: Wine and Roses Country Village A'07wer SaciwuwiNi Riad w 1VOOw,..'l:A Dear Mr. Mayor and Councilmen. I'm sending you this letter today in relation to the proposed Wine d: Roses Country Village. I am a homeowner in Park West and a homemaker as well. As you know it's difficult to make ends meet these days therefore, Ism always shopping around for the best value. Time is not always on my side for I have 2 children attending Reese Elementary School and I try to be an involved parent with the school. Having a shopping center located closer to my home would give me more quality time at home. I fully support this development and hope K is approved since Lob. continues to grow on the northwest side and with more growth you'll need to offer more services to our community. Thank you for taking time to read my letter and for your consideration. Sinoemly, % Mrs. Brenda Poore 306 Evergreen Drive Lodi, CA 95242 aECElI/ED May 11 . 1993 Lodi City Council t ; CITY OF LODI P_ O. Box 3006 Lodi, CA 95240 RE: REZONING - NORTHWEST CORNER TURNER & WOODHAVEN LOD I . CAL I F,ORN I A Dear Mayor and Councilmen: I recently attended a meeting to learn more about the rezoning issue referred to above. After listening to ill the facts I am in favor of this project for the following reasons. #1 The Wine and Roseb Country Inn property is currently zoned correctly. They are requesting an additional 9 acres adjoining their property be rezoned. This additional acreage would make a lot of sense considering the projected growth already approved on your General Plan. #2 The only main opposition is based on a 'self preservation issue-..(i.e. Salisbury's Market). Even if you reject the rezoning.of the nine acres. it would not necessarily prevent Wine and Roses from sacrificing their inn to build on the existing Property that is already zoned commercial. #3 Finally, it makes good economic sense_ Lodi needs the jobs. the City needs the revenue this project would bring in. In closinn I would like to say that I live in the area that would be affected by this project, and I can honestly see no reason the City should prevent this project from moving forward. Sincerely( Dennis b Kim Lillard 2715 Madrone Drive Lodi. CA 95242 May 14. 1993 City Council P.O. Box 3006 Lodi. Ca 95240 RE: KINE & ROSES COUNTRY VILLAGE Dear Mayor and Councilmen: REC`lVPt- D ,� �.Y ►� AM 9:28 ?ERRI' RK Al I live close to Turner Road and Ham Lane and have to drive all the way to Smart Foods on Kettleman & Hutchins because it is too expensive to shop at Raleys and Salisbury's. I would like to have a neighborhood shopping center close to my home. If we do not provide a neighborhood center in northwest Lodi I fear that the addition of Walgreens at Elm and Ham will increase traffic and endanger children who attend Reece Elementary School and Lodi High. Yours very truly. /42,74— Cynttrrest t 514 Avenue Lodi, California 95240 GEORGE L. BARBER • �a i F p aJ' ai j"<i'j , 1 222 EASE ;VENUE F FOURTH DIiRKTMEMBER STOCKTON- CALIFORNA 952 02 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS " .. ! r' t : I , ` • t TELEPHONE 4W3113 THORNTON. 793.2788 STOCKTON 933-6363 FMAkWJE May 19, 1993 AMWi 1b The Honorable City Council City of Lodi Lodi, California 95290 Dear Council Members: I am writing this letter on behalf of Kris Cromwell and Del and Sherri Smith, who are seeking a change of zoning for the purpose of expanding the Wine and Roses Country Inn to a larger project which will include a neighborhood market and retail shops. The change of zoning is necessary in order for them to secure long-term financing. The owners of the Wine and Roses Country Inn have certainly made this historical estate an important part of the community of Lodi and San Joaquin County. They have proven to be responsible business partners in the community, and now tl..ey have the opportunity to expand. I believe their proposed project will be an asset to our community, not only because it will create 260 more permanent jobs, but it will generate millions of dollars in tax revenues. Therefore, I would like to take this opportunity to urge the members of the Lodi City Council to give this project every consideration. incerely, GEORGE L. BARBER GLB:lms . W HAY -19-93 WED 13:42 JAMES W, BAUM FAX N0. 209 369 7567 P.02 James W. Baum 3360 E. Womtfte Road Acenvo, Cari(omi9 95220 12091369.1314 FAX 1209) 369.7557 May 19. 1993 Lodi City Council. Subject - Rezone Turner Road & Loner Sacramento Road When Safeway wanted to build on this corner the owner of Salsbury Market opposed the rezoning because he alraady pro- vided a grocery store on this corner and it would Orive'MM out of business. This reasoning is Hogwash - First, the planning decisions made should not take into account the financial Kell -being.; of any business. This is not supposed to be a controlled economy. By giving him a monopoly on the north Lodi.business that is just what the city did. SAcond, he does not run a complete grocery and meat store. The facts are I Kent to his market one day and asked the butcher if he had any Italian prosciutto. The butcher laughed at me - he thought I was kid- ding. Those of us on the north side now must either go to Raleys or Bettleman Lane to grocery shop, hence, my wife just grocery shops in Stockton. - j There is no question as to thA need for a full line grocery store in north Lodi. If you persist in refusing to allow one, perhaps, the county will and Lodi will loose all the sales tax - revenue* Please vote YES on this rezone. aures W. Baum n.,^n Dti vonrc lri Tkin Mrnhila Nnmo Inriiis-try 17:07 FROM W I NJE COLUTRY REALTORS TO 3335795 P.02 541 6--Lmi HAM LANE; SUITE C / LODI, CA- 95242 / (209) 334.5403, FAX (209) 334-0903 0 EXCERPTS FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 22, 1993 ' The first public hearing was the request of Chris R. Kessle. and A. Fred Baker: r�. 1. For a General Plan Amendment to redesignate the parcel at 451 t+ East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighborhood/Community Commercial; z �� k- '�'� 2. To pritz�me the parcel at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) C -S, Commercial Shopping Center; and ;.; 3. To certify the filing of a negative declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above projects. Senior Planner David Morimoto introduced this matter for the Planning Commission and explained that the applicants have requested an amendment to the General Pian from a designation of Planned Residential to Neighborhood Community Commercial 0 accommodate a commercial shopping center proposed for a 9.55 acre parcel at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28) at the northwest corner of Turner Road and Woodhaven Lane. The area would be prezoned C -S, Commercial Shopping Center. The project would include a 49,000 square foot supermarket, a 26,000 square foot drug store and several free-standing pads for smaller stores. The applicants wish to tie into the existing Wine & Roses Bed and Breakfast complex to the west. Mr. Morimoto read a letter from A. Fred Baker in support of the project. Vice Chairman Rasmussen asked if there was a staff recommendation. Mr. Morimoto read a memorandum from the Public Works Department which dealt with possible impacts. drainage and trips generated. Commissioner Griffith voiced concern over the need for an EIR since the general plan looked at the project area as residential not commercial, a significant change. Commissioner Hitchcock felt a negative declaration on the project was not adequate and asked about the need for an environmental impact study. She wondered about the impact on other commercially designated land and if there could be a trade of this approximately 10 acre parcel for 10 acres of residentially designated property elsewhere in the City. Staff indicated that this would be possible if the Planning Commission and City Council felt it is warranted. Both Commissioners Griffith and Hitchcock felt there should be a new traffic and circulation study. Commissioner Marzolf inquired what development phase the project is in 1 and whether the rezoning would affect the phasing. Mr. Morimoto r explained that the parcel currently is in Phase II of the Growth Management Plan. However. that phasing plan only applies to residential land. Commissioner Griffith cited the time spent considering the General Plan Update and felt the designation should remain residential. Chairman Rasmussen then opened the discussion to the public and asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to speak in favor of the project. The first speaker was Kris Cromwell, 2505 West Turner Road, one of the owners of Wine & Roses Country Inn. She stated she felt the project would be an asset to the community as well as being compatible with her bed and breakfast inn. The next speaker was Del Smith, 2505 West Turner Road, one of the owners of Wine & Roses Country Inn. He stated the future of Wine & Roses Inn depends on compatible development to the west of their property and requested the Planning Commission's support for the project. Commissioner Stafford expressed concern that the pads on the south side of the project might be occupied by fast food businesses. Mr. Smith assured him that that type of business would not be desirable. Ron Bernasconi, 212 Evergreen, representing the applicants, felt a major anchor shopping center will improve local economy by providing 200 to 250 Jobs, capturing sales tax dollars and result in reduction of cross-town Lrips, rather than increasing traffic in the area. Richard Prima, Assistant City Engineer, reiterated that planned improvements will provide adequate traffic handling in the nearby intersection of Turner Road and Woodhaven Lane. Mr. Bernasconi pointed out that changing the residential designation of the property to commercial will relieve overcrowding in local schools. Commissioner Griffith felt there would only be a slight economic benefit from increased sales tax and doubted it would generate 200 to 250 full time jobs. He said 4 or 5 new shops could draw away business from the downtown area. Mr. Griffith expressed concern about possible vacant pads/stores causing the project to deteriorate. Mr: Bernasconi stressed that this is a quality project by local developers who would not abandon it. Attorney Ron Stein, 5345 North E1 Dorado Street, "tockton, representing the applicants. stated the staff study shows litt,e impact and questioned what issues should be addressed that require an EIR. Steve Pechin, 323 West Elm Street. engineer for the project, agreed that the Initial Study prepared by staff indicates no significant effects and cited the Target shopping center as a comparable project that was covered by a negative declaration. He felt an EIR would be money spent uselessly. Roger Stafford mentioned a letter that had been received from San Joaquin Partnership supporting efforts to bring jobs to the City. a Vice Chairman Rasmussen then invited those in the audience who wished to speak in opposition to the project to come forward. T Bruce Salsbury, 2501 West Turner Road, owner of the Salsbury Market in Woodlake Plaza, quest'idned the need for a large supermarket. He was concerned about comoeting with such a large store and stated he chose his location because it was in a primarily residential neighborhood. The second speaker was Helen Stevens, 616 West Turner Road. She cited heavy traffic on Turner Road, her concern for school children going to and from school and felt there was no need for more commercial in the area. The next speaker Buck Lucas, 18196 North Davis Road, said Lodi is losing its farm community character and didn't want to see another supermarket go in. Victor Goehring, 19353 Del Rio Drive, Woodbridge, stated he thought a shopping center in the area of Turner and Woodhaven would generate too much traffic and urged the City to coordinate future planning with the county. Tom Gau, 2336 Eilers Lane, felt delivery trucks and other service } vehicles would disturb the neighborhood and felt a grocery store of almost 50,000 square feet was too large for the area. Lance Selkirk, 2323 Eilers Lane, was concerned about noise generated by delivery trucks at night. He suggested a better use for the parcel would be a retirement community. Jim Reed, 2330 Eilers Lane, said the project would increase traffic and felt it would not be good for Wine & Roses. s There being no one else in the audience wishing to speak on the matter, Vice Chairman Rasmussen closed the public portion of the hearing. After some additional discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Hitchcock and seconded by Commissioner Griffith that the Planning Commission not recommend certifying a negative declaration on the Bridgetown General Plan Amendment and prezone request of Chris R. Keszler and A. Fred Baker. The motion failed on a 3-3 vote. The Commissioners then discussed further the negative declaration. A motion was made by Commissioner Stafford and seconded by Commissioner Lapenta to recommend certifying a negative declaration on the Bridgetown General Plan Amendment and prezone request of Chris R. Keszler and A. Fred Baker. The motion carried by a vote of 4-2 with Commissioners Hitchcock and Griffith voting "no." Commissioner Mar2olf then moved that the Planning Commission deny the Bridgetown General Plan Amendment and prezone request of Chris R. Keszler and A. Fred Baker. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Griffith and passed by a vote of 4-2 with Commissioners Rasmussen and Stafford voting "no." Vice Chairman Rasmussen then called for a brief recess. The meeting was reconvened after a 10 minute recess. MFR 22 '93 14:41 CITY OF _JDI MEMORANDUM. City of Lodi, PubHo Works Department TO: Community Development Director FROM: Public Warks Director DATE: March 19, 1903 `: P.1 1 RECEIVED MAR 191993 ca►1xuxlft DEY AkTK at V ecus SUBJECT: Bfidgetown Rezoning We have met with the project engineer and reviewed our concerns over drainage and wastewater capacity. The trunk Tines and basin were originally sized with the Park West development the downstream portions of the facilities have been constructed. Based on the conservative land use assumptlona for the Towne Ranch and Bddgetown areas we made at that time and the fact that Towne Ranch has been approved with only low-densRy devetopmen% these facilities can accommodate the increase in runoff and wastewater from the proposed rezoning, in addition, we asked the engineer to recheck the calculations for the Towns Ranch facilities; he found that no changes are needed. The net tmMe generation Increase for this rezoning Is approximately 1800 vehicles per day. With the planned roadway Improvements for Turner Road and lower Sacramento Road. adequate capacity we be avanave for this project. There vAl be some local access Issues that will need to be resolved at the site plan review st4ge. Jack Ron" a Wada Director JLPAcpdep oac AstoaW� CMA EnpinMr- Orniopnwit a+rylo.� a.ummon i Me= BRIDOTN.DOC 9 .pril 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C-$, Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS Cgeez, PR DATH---- .— ra. (Mel -F4 q k/j,) OPF9 'DC- e 333 --06 3V A T55 LUC' CC6 L L j 'April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, F; Commercial Shopping Center." r. HAMR ADDRESS DATE r .. ; G 3 CY��,fQS1 YlH ✓S ^ (/v:,�v,.� -�2 % �/ 5 3 116 Y"G-plc. `l, �i• M� Ae�2MoI� Wi 13 cC�_ Ci 3 1- 1 t: &Q `1 `!/ '. ?f,c Sf (rf. C(:ccz(/3/ y .14 U T fir—z ... u� y- ;- E�.?�-� ,rte '✓�. v. .. E'�' %_ Via" . r i_.i ' I $� �—'C�tl r �J `1- � 'r n^�� 7 i iJ f� �� �' :,� ��� j''�•�'�'�' C v'� 1 Liu yc Ll � � j� - .46-191 ?4 �S17z e//j�yo U . b 1nj ► s E� � may, t-�: ► c ��� 4 ; 5 3 r r� 23.S,1NA 5 C.C�-AIx e A-77 bc< res• ��{ �� 20 � at��e� o r�L `Y� 1 S � ; � April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the �A following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning* Commission.a denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28. from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to proton* the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS / DATE (T- C( lz� ZXcr Z/ j j.Cj,, ol Jim 1 -k- jjj� 19 ' C3 17 Ag I ry'r 744Z PV -1 60(tw 1900 U), -PO,W, 6-3-3 vaj Y -C April 13, 1993 Listed below is the male and address of those people oyposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." NAM ADDRESS DATE �C7Ci OW L-1 ' �2y/ tv. Tu -liek q. o- �3 dLcy (o 40 '1 5 3 i �zC�►'�' 1396/ w�--r�lrrlY=,�', woc�d�%fit `�' �'9.f '{!a? t (vim. r �c� • L �'tt �% �� 3 -93 - tL yC`7 !J �rr7E� ' �,� /oma o Com. j �,�.✓� � �( -�`r' - l3 ti Q l W April 13. 1993 C-71 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals (4 Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APH 015-230-28 from PR# Planned Residential to NCC. Neighbor/Community Commercial and to presone, the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." HAMEC ADDRESS DATE Ibr-I 2- 0 Pr, 93 Q q Lic L,., —1 Pd, jLet-Q 27 X, cue? ef o a3Scf ttlavlctU (-iY- Lce oo I't C'v') I/ Ii" ; I . 0 /t' /, C-1 3 3 193 Z4 April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeal "Appeal received from Chris Kessier regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS _ DATE 7 ` � J t�Z �,O G &y_ 3 V3 �4)ttdh �c�J� q! q -Its to £sem., ) 4 3 3. � � Gtr/E�'' r�l��/Y���.��,��s�v��:�ti �• Y���i� J � j0—i,,,z k Ocj , <:,4 1-4 ilr. IF, L•L L.. G:�-a-' IYyt.- t_-...- .rte a��C.. (�(' /1/•�.'x q � / 14%x' Apiil 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS DATE A/ C) 93 --,.jL4 b4l 0 -9`3 11. Z3y�VOU- IV -93 44 - Cf L. �7 3 q�� T ri n 73 (0 4/,;0 1000 AreA 134\&^ S ze L-t!r IXO, c -V q-13 - y3 April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeal3 "Appeal received from Chris Keszler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESSDATE V btx Iia . t�VdbT _ -.. VV(-c1'10?� 19 c13 .J 3,0. �lG�"Z ; �-,-tli� bio C� - (JL)�, � 3`�-���'`� •�' 1 � " l3 VNM ;�� 1 C• F,�U1i C fr1 �9Z � /'Yf9/�7f70. IQv�� //CAo•r�,.0 3 J % - !� / G S� /� .�O — 7 .7 -M,-Tuk eY- a��'s- �,2/ct� ice• 1, 0,j ;4y ;7q -T -71 Z� -1 /k/0 . DEt�'►Guii '�%�� (kt '.S'��.� r 'uxObr.U1 k 5-14'7 �i i.�i9��S �?�u.7 i .�Z J S7` GLy,�,f'• . I�tjr _ 93 Z-1 Q( cf Sz- y= rvtn 1 /9357 QST at, U10"At."./ 3G•y-C, -S-o I s �Y7 ; _. _ l- �� ._ 'i:i' �. r• �_ `.- I_i, •�.-�C:. rte. ! i►ilu: <—'r t C vtr s Ttflj 1 L7 J,M r, -i F.��SC.�.( '.�5. Gk`% !/� Cit`•/ Al- April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate paroel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PRp Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S. Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS _-... _ DATE jli���- oSA-.,Robb 1 � 741 1 3 1 idly jso - /A, t . )'v r c- 1 L.9 k< 7. C*k . ,(a.....i4/on��� ��s�7- �� ►/r, Ps .��� -gR _0 GUS /so, 5�� ff La -&a /�P �lJ� Z/- / 7 -Q=P J 301 ;14 r F�S`r .-vns 10,E 5f rs �775/ - �5-17Id '93- gif4A rl' 1J �� �c ,� �? rQ�� (• 1 `�3 VO 7 e..1 +iec/f C. Ij 1q,e©rv-t l`�/1 1�%C7il-s j o ,c; c;1r}c�c���/I do '41.). W''It 1l 1 V' Flf v l�Gl1 April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR9 Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping -Center." 3 NAME ADDRESS DATE _. S Tau 11ct.c�-� zZ22 %q U, ILI elo -7LILI 00 1' k -+ dM nn!, S� / 12. l' leu �e e I. OL 1S. ,fz Ib'a4s �, C!(I�r A�- 1 C- :Ao• ,;-'? Lvbvd.b r � �GL�L April 13. 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located*at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR. Planned Residential to NCC. Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S. Commercial Shopping Center." NAME • � -f �L9'urp yADDRESS_ L 4/670 r3�,/"44-rt s J f 5v cJ T',, --u.- 2.J 7V. Qvje)xLk q OkAt L U CAR U)(�E�f )i,"�c.CiCAv� S2� I <c h292-1 L5.40- WA a4()r !8 8w w •iu2ub'�Z �. Yo, L C �, erg,t <� N In.�/�s A" 4�- ,�oQr, C gtaq� 6*7 Z0�AMn. ��+� Z�y (7 � - Tc-C2n.►T lL INS J.S. SS DTE y !02 93 4-13-473 IV -/3 - 99 q - �3- 5.? : SSZq z :5-'-) `/-/ y_; v sT til Lt �' 3 3 << 33-f J5') Z April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address'Tr those people opposed to the following rezoning appeal "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCCe Neighbor/Cowunity Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S. Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS _ DATE l`j,'l!41 ty L delt, Z `�� �,��'1� pkv,► ��..� ���i�c�,�rs � �J.� �. flat D& ,2Ofe 0 q14- LO y� i ,A y� ?f --13 nn 1�.,. >s 4 8 } N , .�. _. � 1 • `I '.Z y_ Y 3 ' � „ �Y t 1 O 6 i y,1. �..� �l � � ccte.. A4. CI. 9s zti� Lusa )r 1/11- i o � V, � df Q .�►1 G�--4� �- ` � }`�'-r �i (.L �� � � `� � -� K -t.0 ���-�1G� •�(,,(.%•C �� (ill. �I F� ,�'`�- April 13, 1993 Listed below is the:name and address of those people opposed to the following --rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." ME ADDRESS _ DATE w.7J� � -_--IVA1%3 jQOL)U 5103 V crC�c ��' l,�;c �r_5;:•�>c %�-1341,3 Liu t tZ21- �;�i�x�31='� �� C; 4 l 3 1,3 �I f Y, is K C-„ �(r.y 2�fcx� £ «�� �A �� 1 �?o % L_o��, , (A i2., j a 0 c�. �LIL a � r I I lC Ni-,Is VA z /42,c CF 3 Gev 9s2- ��jj CZ�Lnc S �� Ll G'C:, St'�=1/: ��"G. Tij :'.�iiG %•� ys, a -•o - 93 -73 S— /C'-- -15.93 1. <", V 1 , '*'Ll JAC April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Keazler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR. Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S. Commercial Shopping Center." NAMR ADDRESS _ DATE _ _- � 1:3�0 6 )ao"-euk L Je L.od ; 3 S. � 64,751 �Ei `' 7 . �%/Q��Q �jJr- �,' RH �{dU sv. L � cusp �z•Zj Go�l� yr��/ 9 14 wows..- Q_+ A k.= f Ct, eTD 1 April 13,, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denialof his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prozone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center," NAME ADDRESS DATE k'io Nw— IC IY V67 4 'A'Mit'ri wZCNcrQoc� 10 (9-5 t � I?-? ? j P4, Z e,ZW VU11A d -Z Df. Lc-CUcl5242 1 C. 66,4�,O a C 7 � v' -4e7 April 13P 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCCv Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S. Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS DATE y � 1 �- 93 19 2 c--/" April 13. 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission',$ denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located -at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR. Planned Residential to NCC. No Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S. Commercial Shopping Center." NAME ADDRESS DATE Zi - I& - 53 j q.n 533 gotOW6TPAX--VOPpitiAGE CA- • S'Ip-- 93 A�Qv e7. /�&4 12j, Ar 17 i �I. I • f, 11? Iq, I April 13, 1993 Listed below is.the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal. received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission'a denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located -at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PRS Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to proton* the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center." 3 i s HAVE ADDRESS -.DATE ✓7 Z Q 1Z I a a 1t I Y � _ i •k I v I 4, April 13P 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appeals "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commisston"s denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCCI, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center," AMR ADDRESS DATE 41. -3.e,4 2 4:2 lot-? ,8, .1 y Zu 221, e"14 Vj c44 -:,CS, A. ej65 E:j L- C --I2.5 t - ANL- , /-ODj 4 N 15. tR /-V C v W April 13, 1993 Listed below is the name and address of those people opposed to the following rezoning appealo "Appeal received from Chris Kessler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APH 015-230-28 from Pit. Planned Residential to NCC, Neighbor/Community Commercial and to presone the parcel C -Sp Commercial Shopping Center." N YE ADDRESS .,O. Sib 5•. G�ZAi✓G� nvE r; fit.. JI. �6 T4s - �c{ o . AaN_- E; lc� DATE 4--74A3 Lf S=3 -y3 %11 May 19, 1993 LODI CITY COUNCEL C/O City Clerk 305 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95242 Re: . `Wi ie & Roses Country Village Re -zoning Petition I would like to take this opportunity to express support to Kris Cromwell & Dol Smith in their attempt to re -zone their property to facilitate their planned expansion. It is our opinion that leis Cromwell & Del Smith have only the utmost concern for the beauty and character of this historic landmark. Their demonstrated commitment and improvement to this property is a testiment to their desire to make the Wine & Roses a significant asset to the City of Lodi. Their planned expansion, with this re -zoning approval, can only improve upon a very successful and desirable place to visit. As you can see by our address, their drawing power is high. We frequent their establishment at least once a month and hope to continue to do so. We hope the Ci Y of Lodi will vote in support of this rezoning request. Thank you for accepting our opinion and support. Sin4erely, = Helen & Lloyd T. Petersen 6845 Lincoln Oaks Drive Fair Oaks, CA 95628 it d... r r •� fir- Y. � ��w., ; . ham+ •� ..,A,y„u ���'�, ��t•c„t ` 1�+�., `t ~, ~ f \ ••~' �� _� f,^L `t is 1 � � \ _ ,4 t • ��. � .:1 r 'I "���� - _ -. ` ;�•!yt ,, -r k 7 Ak. ` � �, � _ a W `'i, ��. •:�'• moi` t' .� ��,�w '� it AO Mot tot -�, . Y,. } ) L�4 y}�,^.N .I _ • y :>, ,-1,? � .�� GYM �-` r- ::.y ink �.-,��+���ti� �•'�� 's :. .. _ a.. �� p I• amu,. r ��.-x ��. �, _ ,a �. ,�. -,ice+ a •. .- -. t' - '_. ��.,:e � - --,-..'.'• i� ` = c • �' e ��, r• •• y t' ..�,'7 - `,:� it �� Ski. ' � • ��H � ._ t T� •� ..� j � ��Vf ,1 fit .r .- .•�I► s1 r' Yom• 17 �, � ..�;. � "'.:- �,'SS IS 11'P rec•Ul)ll/tend i mir ilill to cilli/ couple ill 10fT Ol' lI/l y tl hO I(Wllt tO be, r• wrote Illie collple !ll their /*O(lilt 1/ C�tII/'l�. accented by it two -columned Ballard Company table and an antique Singer sewing machine, Eyeq naming INC guest rooms was an act of lore — each after one of the owners grandmothers, each with a diary named for that grandmother, con- taining guest,' glowing sentinicnts about their star. "\\'e will recommend dour inn to any couple in lore. or io anyone who watts+ Its lir in lore,- w role ane couple who ;pent their wedding night in 1lrucic's Suite. If lore named these rooms, it surely had a hand in their design, each one furnished with IIrasured family heir- looms and carefully rc•srttl-ed antiques. Emma -s Room is decidedly Victorian. %,.ith ictori t- ttith floral wallcoyerings and a peony pink mid berry Waverly ensemble nn Illi wrought -iron 11CL 1. mid a large nudlioncd window testooned in lace. The mittk1uc oak dressrl, topped with it harp-shalxd towel holder, is :t perfect complement it) the old-fashioned wash- stand and early-I400s drop-leaf taht. that belonged to the room's nanicsake. :\n alcove. which serves as a tiny sitting W0111. holds a buih-in bcnClt uphol- stcrcd and tulted in coordinating fabric, — a perle, t hideaway Uir dn-:uncrs. 1:6— Room, whici shares :I hath tytth lit::ma'.. i, done in huttrrcup yellow and mauve and ;tats a queen -size teak Spindle lied with matching night stand. two houdoir cnairs, a Iace- drapctl tabic, and :1,1 r\quisitc• IC%%Ci- tone china lamp add Io the period decor. along with tic '�chuntachcr fabrics that coyer the w•in.lows :end the hili %%ILII .nwchul" sham> end pillim- I+ut I)rucie" quite 1s th:• nnr the \\arwickc I.tcr.r ntoa. [Is +.ills ai'i don/* in a Ralph Lauren floral. accented 1--a." u.S�Irctc •inn uuus it, all styles and hreakfast mems (,raced tyith sycamore/*.. nt,tplc.. hemlocks, and ancient ponderosa pines. the grounds arc a luyrly spot for croquet err lust for lingering wider the sun- dapplcd shade of the tree. ( ocur d'Alene• is all old-taShioned lawn tyith rtld-lashioncd pur.uns. loll .1 nni': tl;rnw from the out. swumning, Ivatill" •.tindsurhng..illd iters lc:lvAim-, take plain (,it the hurt:. .ptlrkl!n�_, lake. known as one of the country's bluest. And a real treat is the handstand with its m -the -park %army of entertainment, which bruits the Iowrtsfolk out onto tit• Ltw'n it) hear a visiting symphony on a haltny sprint; or sunnncr night. ,f Ill, 1l,nni.l; hut, it)S \Irhhut fhltr, (t.iur 1'aL nr. hiaho. •s'3X14. _'trtiGt i uilri h.1, �ui.i 100th.. rni 4dli ti/phot. hdlh kali% l" 31,11 I-te'AlONI (alnr :11.1110.1 3' � i-w-nca � � r ;,�..� ` 'AJt `�. r r f"� � L r•p'. `e �'y,, _ .IR 1 CC Y Zp- �f. r--~. war 1111110 It, tlaIll hr. .m as '1 hr Inn, frra ccrc•tn.un imtticctl o,';, ?neural �ur�ts who knee cacti other sliglid% and returned Ics than a %car later i, ,get nmrrtcd allure than- seh•et At another, a than in formal attire and tennis shoes parachuted t:na, the lam n — tine :t[ the groomti bu%lncNS a,v+Ciates, vehom the bride hadn't incited. fia elate, the most notcwonhc event has been that of Khs son who fell in love with their new chef, Sherri, a graduate of the Culinan• Acadenl in San Frnlcisco. The couple were married a %car and a half later and now Kris hitt two 11randc•hildren, in addition to an excellent full-scn-icc restaulant. But it doesn't take a wedding; to enjr • , ,rad r zf I,IY r t ri.n.0 , at the inn. ]'he ren atmclylhen bLwnls with ils?ss:ra nmunce. Guc�t rooms told ni have floril ;nil Rii musical mines: Eve +cern, \1'itd K(lsr. Kusc Ever LA "N NNJEQE r.rrrut,(r Garden: Edelweiss; The Sound of Music: �,,� " •^ ^•+ Gmntst•l — theme no brats fing, hilt *here is a The "Belle Epotine" lives on at La Pinsonniere in Charlevoix bras ted. The Ilonevnuxnl suite, \\'hitt• Luc and Promises, is an attic aeric, with t • ::1. \;..:It I,,; , is a"Ila ?I,•y.,l.l,u\ w.I?. the t tans h fl.m. "'l -I ..,,,t t, 11,Jl .,valla I,..\, Frenlh doors opening unto a tc•r.aix that UI'-It1Y. All.1\\JRI \\ ]ill ... 0 UIiY N 1.11. alt\ll tl„1h. rdmi ! J.\.illl - inH,. a ovc*look. the Lanlen vvhrre the etiolate t.J0111 \\11101111 .1:11Wt.•itndi,1 In .I ( I.­,a� i1 +.1 t.{ i{t'1ll.l �\ � m.tc have just leen wcd. \\'till the Lent of h-murrd;r.lh. tt,,,•t 1.1.11 t,'w„ ,I(,M.In lilt\ Ir.(�rult cedars rising; up, it impart` LA PINION Nil: RL. C ,tp,-,,-I Aea lc, (Il.trfrvotx (?ucl,t:, (,(11 Ilk) sonic•tlum, of the flavor of a treehouse. Phone 4I S. hbi--i•} 11 Fax i I8 -b65-7 1 ill Mild weather lures 1ucsts to indulgC in i r(xtuct_ hadminion. or ltoncshoes till the (;round. A live -minute w•alh leads to Lodi I;ckC — to .vett». fxa:at, or fish. (.011 is :tistt teaches there s(•rms little left w rtth:uuc a HOT�LS L'HORSET \\•ine and hose. star ilwt its proprietors and their location haven't already provi(Ird. n: ghat tend R+w%C,uenen Inn. 2505 11Iiunil R,tal, Ll,h. CA 9324_1: 2+1h!/3.34-(+'LK4. fist Su,>( ntimt.. in, hedill „ is .nit,: all n/r»irntc 1% aim. 1Lite-\ S1-111. , S! _�. int heehrt* (tell haul JuV. Lum h entree% Invn S1 dinner :Rlrt•iS frim SI1. c"lurllution polis Wit i Ielitur .at ow No srnoki rR. \ 1C. AC, PISA. S T11e Jilt i until• inn value. C:a11 now o In New Yor1; State 2 IN :ATIONS YARD 9 CANNES • LOIRE VALLEY �ia� rirz J�Zeiir 6YC1jV M DAxtt t. %IAMOFI'� 1110TOORAMY BY ALEC MARSHALL ,wanted to create a place [till of Zhe kind of inspirational love that t makes people (lance on ceilings," says David Thorne, owner, operator — and lead guitarist, pedal bassist, and vocalist — at the Thornewood Inn in Great Barrington, Massachusetts. Today high school sweethearts David and Terry run their t�wc %c guest -room inn with daughters laurie and Christy, and it occupies most of their time. But David ;pent a lot of time in his younger days on the road, seriously Pursuing a musical career. tic had been offered a recording contract with Airics Records. and discussed some possibi- lnes with Capitol Records — hut there came a point when he recognised the bottom line. "One thing you realize as a professional musician." he says. "is that you can -t walk- around alkaround with stars in your eyes." David didn't_ lie looked around :and got invol- ved in tnanagenlent training lilt a furniture company. %leanwhile. Terry. who now- was busy raiSIT11- C\wO children. had discovered her OWI talents lOr business }ha• opened :t shop fashioned atter an old-stvlc ire Cream pallor A Musician and Desi--ner Soar to the Top of the Charts in ti'Iassar usettsr Berkshires where she not only served food but also sold antiques and gift items. It wasn't long after this that David was offered two furniture franchises and the couple moved to Stockbridge, Massachusetts, where they continued to prosper. But David, ever the artist, syn cane to another crossroads, one that called for more freedom to indulge his creative energy. Terry sup- ported him in making a change. "Thais why I've hecn happily married twctaty-sir wears: remarks David. -Wiatu amt_ing is how Tem' endu red when I was on the road pur- suing, a musical career." And so the couple decided to open an inn where David could operate a night club and play his music. passed by this big old house for years. always commen- ting on how nice it w•as.- David waxes nostalgically about the inn's beginnings. 'When it went up for sale, it \was really more than we could afford to spend. Then it canto up Ior sale again. We slyke to the new owners. and they were really ready to move on.' he explain.. •'[-hey cut us a deal' we bou1hl the house.' r M CITY OF LODI 221 WEST PINE STREET LODI, CALIFORNIA 95240 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - CHRIS KESZLER APPEAL PUBLISH DATES: MONDAY, MAY 10, 1993 TSAR SHEETS WANTED: THREE AFFIDAVIT AND SILL TO: JENNIFER M. PERRIN, CITY CLERK DATED: MAY 5, 1993 ORDERED BY: �7 PE ICOLINI DEPUTY CITY CLERK ADVINS/TXTA.02J DECLARATION OF MAILING On May 7, 1993 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi. California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on May 7, 1993, at Lodi, California. 44^ - J rifer 19 Perrin City Clerk Peggy Nicolini Deputy City Clerk DEC#01/TXTA.FRM °. COMIMM NXTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF. .001 Date: may 19, 93 ' �. CARNEGIE FORUM 7:00 p.m. 305 West Pine Street. i.odi Time: For Information regarding this Public Hearing Please Contact: L�ti"Illl�li� Jennifer M. Perrin City Clerk Telephone: 333.6702 CONTINMD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING May 19, 2993 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, at the hour of 700p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a Continued public hearing to consider the following matter: a) Appeal received from Chris Keszler regarding the Planning Commission's denial of his request for a General Plan Amendment to redesignate parcel located at 451 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-28 from PR, Planned Residential to NCC, Neighborhood/Community Commercial and to prezone the parcel C -S, Commercial Shopping Center. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing. By Order Of the Lodi City Council: fere .Perrin y Clerk May 5, 1993 Dated: �Ap„QLoved aq to form: Bobby W. McNatt City Attorney PUBLIC HEARING LIST MAILING MAILING LIST FOR: ��l'/dLIL'rL'Lt�/'j Z �PiJI > P!`C_CnE / FILE 0 I AP. OWNER•S NAME MAILING AOOnESS CITY. STATE ZIP '54r—1 ,. ,1 t -2Ze__ of Qiv '- / pF'i o / e _ /� ✓ A/ „ 44 ol - 3 'th n �! e5 I . • ,! r rKQ -o 'l G? J J7 —7Z — o / O -AA - ri- ✓ 7-Aol 7C -32 Gi,c 17 C.01 utili oll re Pr114t1c.70 F,71 IV rlzz� S 2506 lu",entr Id - _ e -,)&) &Wn. A44No�•tt+_Ed B !3ucY Gu CA s ?1.% ve-rgf adv 3;� is • elak Sr*.ea+ a� QI iJ�Y �urt�teY •• 1$Iq(o N:Clivi s eo_ai G l u3. T r lcdi —X—VAL cj C it Lodi CodI Cts. a 95.205 9.751%0 .moo G jq 35 3 Nj Qw op► ao b 'bac oar r coZ RMS 'kilo SSUMV emly" 3KYN S u3KMo I dV • 3ild b0S ITI DNlYr1 ISI -I JN11dVaH oriand