Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - June 19, 2002 G-02 PHAGENCY/ CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA TITLE: AGENCY to consider adoption of resolution certifying completion of the final Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1; adopting a statement of findings, facts, and overriding considerations; and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring plan AGENCY to consider adoption of resolution finding that the use of taxes allocated from Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the project COUNCIL to consider adoption of resolution considering and making findings as to the final Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Redevelopment Plan for Lodi Redevelopment Project No. l; adopting a statement of findings, facts, and overriding considerations; and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Plan COUNCIL to consider adoption of resolution finding that the use of taxes allocated from the Lodi Redevelopment Project for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing outside the project area will be of benefit to the project COUNCIL to consider introduction of Ordinance adopting the proposed Redevelopment Plan MEETING DATE: June 19, 2002 PREPARED BY: Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: Conduct the Joint Public Hearing concerning the actions related to the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1. Subsequent to the Public Hearing, adopt the two Agency resolutions and two City Council resolutions as well as the first reading of the draft ordinance adopting the Redevelopment Plan. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The actions before the Agency and City Council represent the culmination of several years' worth of work to identify and prepare a plan for Redevelopment Project Area No. 1. This plan encompasses some 1,200 acres of land generally bounded by Turner Road, the downtown core, the U.P. railroad right-of-way, Cherokee Lane and Highway 99. The purpose of the joint public hearing is to a) certify the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) on the plan and b) take final action on the plan by both the Redevelopment Agency and City Council. Final Environmental Impact Report As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) an Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the firm of Wagstaff & Associates. The program EIR is intended to inform the Agency and Council about the APPROVED: H. Dixon Flynn -- City Manager 0217.doc 06/11/02 Council Communication Meeting Date: June 19, 2002 Page 2 potential environmental consequences of the Plan approval. The document should serve as a decision making tool when reviewing all relevant materials concerning the proposal. The report identifies those required topic areas that are expected to have significant impact, identifies potential mitigation measures that could minimize the impact and identifies reasonable alternatives to the project. This EIR shows 21 potential impacts related to the implementation of the plan. Those topic areas include Land Use & Visual Factors, Population Housing & Employment, Transportation & Parking, Infrastructure & Public Facilities, Drainage & Water Quality, Noise, Air Quality, Vegetation & Wildlife, and Cultural & Historic Resources. Of the potential impacts assessed, one area cannot be mitigated to a level that is considered less than significant. Impact 10-2, Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases is considered a significant unavoidable impact. In summary, because the Valley is considered a non -attainment area, any increase in the cumulative condition (all projects in total) result in air quality impacts that cannot be lessened with any measure proposed. As a result of this situation, the Agency and City Council must make a specific finding within the resolution certifying the Environmental Impact Report, which overrides the impact. Not to lessen the degree of seriousness regarding this issue, but virtually any activity that occurs within the San Joaquin Valley that contributes to air quality impacts, creates a significant unavoidable impact as well. Use of 20% Housing set-aside outside of the Project Area The California Redevelopment Law allows Redevelopment Agencies to use its housing set-aside funds outside of the project area. The resolutions before the Agency and City Council provide for the flexibility built into State Law. Final use of the funds is always at the Agency/Council discretion; therefore, staff feels comfortable exercising this option. From an implementation standpoint, this action would allow housing funds to be spent anywhere in the City. Redevelopment Plan The Redevelopment Plan before the City Council is identical to the Plan that the Redevelopment Agency adopted on May 15, 2002. This Plan as well as the supporting documents have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the Project Area Committee. Both bodies have taken unanimous actions to recommend that the City Council adopt the Plan and support the Project Area goals. The Plan and the Report on the Plan, contains all of the required documentation for consideration of the actions in front of the City Council. The two documents are incorporated by reference in the City Council Ordinance and are on file with the City Clerk, Library, and the Community Development Department. FUNDING: None required Konradt Bartlam Community Development Director Prepared by: Community Development Director KB/lw Attachments AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. RDA2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI CERTIFYING THE COMPLETION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WHEREAS, as the Lead Agency, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as "CEQA'), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the "State CEQA Guidelines") and procedures adopted by the Agency relating to environmental evaluation; and WHEREAS, the Agency transmitted for filing a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR and thereafter in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to those state agencies which have discretionary approval or jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the Redevelopment Plan, to the affected taxing agencies, and to other interested persons and agencies, and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting comments on the Draft EIR was published in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to adopt changes suggested, to incorporate comments received during the public review period pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and to incorporate the Agency's responses to said comments, and as so revised and supplemented, a Final EIR was prepared by the Agency; and WHEREAS, the Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR as revised and supplemented to incorporate all comments received and the responses of the Agency thereto and is part of the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Redevelopment Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Agency hereby certifies that the Final EIR for the Project is adequate and has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto and that the Agency has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to adopting this resolution. The Agency hereby finds that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Agency. Section 2. The Agency hereby adopts the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations relating to the environmental impact of the Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (including, without limitation, the mitigation measures therein set forth). Based 1 Exhibit A upon such Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, the Agency hereby finds that all significant environmental effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened except the following unavoidable adverse impact: (1) Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases. Based upon the foregoing, the Agency finds and determines that the Redevelopment Plan will have a significant effect upon the environment but that the benefits of the Redevelopment Plan outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts for the reasons set forth in the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, in particular, Part V thereof. Section 3. The Agency hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Plan set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Upon approval and adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council, the Agency Secretary is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Joaquin pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of CEQA and Section 15094 of the State CEQA Guidelines, along with two copies of the Certificate of Fee Exemption as required pursuant to Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5(c). Dated: June 19, 2002 I hereby certify that Resolution No. RDA2002- was passed and adopted by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: MEMBERS— EMBERS—NOES: NOES: MEMBERS— EMBERS—ABSENT: ABSENT: MEMBERS— ABSTAIN: MEMBERS — Attest: SUSAN J. BLACKSTON Secretary PHILLIP A. PENNING Chairperson RDA2002- 2 Exhibit A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., "CEQA") provides, in Section 21081, that: "[N]o public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless both of the following occur: "(a) The public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: "(1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. "(2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. "(3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. "(b) With respect to significant effects which were subject to a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment." As defined in CEQA, "'significant effect on the environment' means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment." (Public Resources Code Section 21068.) II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT PROPOSED FOR APPROVAL For purposes of CEQA, the "project" addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") is the adoption and phased implementation of the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project"). As more particularly identified in the Final EIR, the Project Area covers approximately 1,184 acres of land within the City of Lodi, including commercial, industrial, parks, residential and public right of way land uses. Under the Redevelopment Plan, the Project would be developed in accordance with the land uses designated and permitted by the General Plan for the City of Lodi. The Final EIR describes the environmental impacts that may occur as a result of the adoption and phased 1 Exhibit A implementation of the Redevelopment Plan and identifies, where applicable, measures which would mitigate significant effects on the environment to a level of insignificance. Findings regarding the significant effects of the Project are set forth below. III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT; FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT This Part III identifies the potentially significant and unavoidably significant effects of the Project as determined by the Agency, including the findings and facts supporting the findings in connection therewith. The Final EIR discussed Hazardous Materials but no impacts were anticipated. The following areas were discussed in the Final EIR and include mitigation measures that are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan or are unavoidably significant effects on the Project: A. Land Use and Visual Factors 1. Environmentallmpact Adverse Land Use Compatibility Impacts. Some project - facilitated land use changes within the Project Area could result in adverse land use compatibility impacts. Given the proximity of some existing, planned and anticipated residential uses in the Project Area to existing and planned commercial and industrial areas, project -assisted development could introduce significant new land use conflicts among specific residential, commercial and industrial developments. Finding: The mitigation feasible and shall be required The mitigation measures will significant' level. measures identified below are in or incorporated into the Project. reduce the impact to a 'less than Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) During City review and prior to approval of individual projects within the Project Area, emphasize the need to avoid significant new land use conflicts between non-residential and residential development, between sensitive new commercial uses and existing nuisance -prone commercial and industrial uses, and between new nuisance prone commercial and industrial uses and sensitive existing commercial uses. (b) During review procedures and the formulation of conditions of approval, require assurances to City satisfaction of: (1) adequate land use separation, scale transition, and noise buffering; (2) creative siting of buildings to avoid conflicts; (3) adequate protections against light, glare, and shadow impacts; (4) adequate odor control; (5) adequate offstreet parking provisions; (6) adequate and safe truck access and offstreet loading z Exhibit A provisions; and (7) other common measures warranted to avoid such land use conflicts. 2. 3. Environmental Impact Visual Impacts on Specific Streetscapes Within the Project Area. The visual quality of future development in specific opportunity areas within the Project Area would directly affect the quality of important city streetscapes. Without adequate design control, the Project could facilitate new industrial or mixed- use/commercial development that could adversely affect the visual quality of these highly visible industrial and mixed-use streetscapes, as well as the visual character of surrounding neighborhoods, and of the central area as a whole. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Through the City's currently adopted development permit and design review process, future development in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall be subject to particularly focused and detailed design review. Implement specific visual impact mitigation guidelines set forth in the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Development Standards and Guidelines and Central City Revitalization Program in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately protect and enhance the visual quality of these areas. (b) Applications for future development and property improvements that are subject to discretionary approval in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall incorporate the appropriate combination of specific design guidelines listed in section 4.3 of the EIR in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately reduce project related visual impacts on streets, residential neighborhoods, and the central area as a whole. Environmental Impact Potential Impacts on Visual Character and Image of Eastside Residential Neighborhood. Project facilitated new multi -family development built in the Eastside neighborhood would have the 3 Exhibit A potential to clash visually with the neighborhood's older, predominantly single-family residential character. Finding: The mitigation measure identified below is feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measure will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In review and processing of residential development projects within the Eastside residential neighborhood, place special emphasis on implementation of locational strategy contained in the Central City Revitalization Program to protect and improve the visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. Encourage locations at the edge of the neighborhood and require appropriate visual buffering and scale transition between new multi -family structures and existing single-family development, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission. B. Population, Housing and Employment Environmental Impact Potential Jobs/Housing Balance Impacts. Project -facilitated development and the projected addition of a substantially greater number of jobs than housing units in the Project Area may exacerbate the existing jobs/housing imbalance (weighted towards jobs in comparison to the County as a whole). Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implementation of mitigation measures identified below in Section III.C.1 of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations pertaining to project -related commute period vehicular traffic increases and associated project and cumulative transportation system impacts. C. Transportation and Parking 1. Environmentallmpact 4 Exhibit A 7 Impact on Intersection Sianalization Requirements. Additional redevelopment related traffic would increase PM peak hour traffic volumes at the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection above criteria levels set by Caltrans to determine whether installation of a traffic signal is warranted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Caltrans has established eleven possible tests, or "warrants", for determining whether installation of a traffic signal should be considered. Usually, two or more of these must be met before a signal is warranted. The EIR analysis indicates that only the warrant related to peak hour traffic volume would be met for the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection. The City shall monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine Street -Central Avenue intersection, and when two or more Caltrans signal warrant criteria are met, shall place the intersection on the City's priority list for signalization. Infrastructure and Public Facilities 1. Environmental Impact Anticipated Water Supply Impacts. Anticipated increases in commercial activity, employment and residential population associated with the Project would result in corresponding increases in the demand for water service. The City is prepared to provide the additional domestic water necessary for anticipated additional development in the Project Area, but water table fluctuations due to basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty regarding available water supply for the City's future needs. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implement the City of Lodi General Plan Land Use and Growth Management Element policies which require the City to (1) develop new facilities, as necessary, to serve new develop in accordance with the City's Water, Wastewater and Drainage Master Plans, and (2) assess water, wastewater and drainage 5 Exhibit A development fees on all new residential, commercial, office and industrial development sufficient to fund required systemwide improvements. 2. Environmentallmpact Water Distribution System Inadequacies. The existing water distribution system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: As project facilitated development takes place over the next 20 years, implement remaining needed central area water distribution system improvements identified in Chapter 8 of the City's Water Master Plan. Water conservation should also be promoted as the Project Area redevelops. 3. Environmentallmpact Sewage Collection System Inadequacies. The existing wastewater collection system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Continue to implement the central area sewage collection system improvements identified as needed in the City of Lodi General Plan, and the City's Sanitary Sewer System Technical Report, including planned improvements to the Eastside neighborhood collection system. 4. Environmental Impact Police Service Demand in Project Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for police services in the Project Area. 6 Exhibit A 5. 6. Findin : The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Police Department shall monitor the rate of additional police calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional officers and facilities (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Police Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Environmental Impact Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service Demand in Project Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for fire protection and emergency medical services in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Fire Department shall monitor the rate of additional fire protection service calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional firefighters and equipment (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Fire Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Environmental Impact School Service Demand. Existing Lodi Unified School District (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional school population generated by project -facilitated residential development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The 7 Exhibit A mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Redevelopment Agency shall make the statutory pass- through payment of tax increment revenue to the LUSD and the San Joaquin County Office of Education pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 33607.5. (b) City shall require developers in the Project Area to pay state authorized school impact fees to the extent approved by the LUSD. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional impact fees negotiated with LUSD. 7. Environmental Impact Project Park Demand. Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area are already operating at capacity. Project -facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area would incrementally increase the demand for park and recreation services. Based on estimated population increase in the Project Area, the City will need approximately 1.83 acres of additional park land to meet the increased demand. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall ensure that at least 1.83 acres of parkland is developed within or convenient to the Project Area. As project -facilitated build -out takes place in the Project Area, adequate corresponding park and recreation provisions shall be provided through required dedication of land and/or in -lieu payment of City adopted park and recreation fees. E. Drainage and Water Quality 1. Environmental Impact Erosion, Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. Building construction and infrastructure improvements in the Project Area could further degrade downstream water quality. Factors contributing to downstream water quality problems include soil disturbance during construction, new impervious surfaces created with project -facilitated developments, increased vehicle traffic, and s Exhibit A herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers from new landscaping associated with project -facilitated development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) City shall require applicants for each future project - facilitated development requiring a discretionary approval to comply with all applicable state, regional and City water quality provisions. (b) For projects involving the grading of more than five acres, applicant shall be required to (1) file with the Regional Water Quality Control Board a Notice of Intent to comply with the Statewide General Permit for Construction Activities, (2) prepare and implement a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (including erosion control plan) if grading is involved, (3) implement a monitoring, inspection and documentation program to assure the effectiveness of control measures, (4) obtain or comply with existing General Stormwater Discharge Permits for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (5) comply with the NPDES Phase II Non -Point Discharge program. F. Noise 1. Environmental Impact Exposure of Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive Environmental Noise Project facilitated intensification of and changes in land uses in the Project Area could expose additional people to noise levels exceeding acceptable levels. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Noise impacts can be reduced through appropriate site planning, construction of noise barriers, and/or incorporation of noise insulation features into a project's design as specified in the City of Lodi General Plan. Evaluate the impact of each 9 Exhibit A redevelopment -facilitated discretionary development application in the Project Area on the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources. (b) Require noise assessments for all redevelopment - facilitated discretionary applications in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, and for noise -generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plan when proposed adjacent to noise sensitive land uses. 2. Environmental Impact Redevelopment Facilitated Construction Noise. Residential and other noise -sensitive uses located adjacent to project -facilitated construction activities could be exposed to noise levels that would interfere with normal activities. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require the use of a combination of the following reasonable construction practices for projects when noise - sensitive receptors are located in the project vicinity, including restricting construction to avoid noise generating activity in the early morning, evening, and on Sundays and holidays, muffling and properly maintaining all internal combustion engine driven equipment, locating stationary noise -generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors, routing construction traffic to and from the project site via designated truck routes, utilizing "quiet' air compressors and other stationary noise sources where such technology exists, and designation of a "noise disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. G. Air Quality 1. Environmentallmpact Construction Activity Air Quality Construction activities facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan could generate construction period exhaust emissions and fugitive dust that could affect local air quality. In addition, buildings constructed prior to 1979 could have Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) which could be released into the air during building demolition. io Exhibit A Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Findina: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require that individual redevelopment -facilitated projects involving new construction shall comply, where applicable, with the current San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ("SJVUAPCD") Regulation VIII requirements. In addition, the City may also require a limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site, suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 miles per hour, and/or a limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMs. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD and City required control measures. 2. Environmental Impact Lona -Term Regional Emissions Increases Emissions resulting from new vehicle trips generated by redevelopment facilitated intensification in the Project Area would, by the year 2020, generate Reactive Organic Gases and Nitrogen Oxides in amounts that would exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for each pollutant. These emissions would constitute a significant project impact and would be expected to contribute to a significant cumulative impact. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. Notwithstanding incorporation of these mitigation measures, the Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases are an unavoidable significant effect. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project make the alternatives infeasible and outweigh this significant effect. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Where practical, future development proposals shall ii Exhibit A include physical improvements that would act as incentives for pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of travel. (b) Employment -generating development projects of 10,000 square feet or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and shower/locker facilities for employees. (c) Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpool/vanpool incentives, develop an employee rideshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. The specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project are more particularly described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Part V of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations. H. Vegetation and Wildlife Environmental Impact Potential Loss of Special -Status Species Redevelopment - facilitated development consistent with the City of Lodi General Plan may result in impacts on special status species. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: If disturbance to suitable giant garter snake habitat is proposed as part of a redevelopment assisted development or improvement project, systematic surveys shall be conducted before such a development is approved in order to determine definitively whether any giant garter snakes occur. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and in compliance with specifications of section 5.2.4.8 of the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan. 2. Environmental Impact Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts Redevelopment -facilitated development could affect potential jurisdictional wetland habitat. 12 Exhibit A Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All redevelopment -facilitated development that would involve modifications to potential wetlands and other waters, such as seasonal wetlands that could be present in vacant or under used parcels, shall be coordinated with representatives of the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as required by federal and state law, to ensure that any required mitigation protocols and associated project design modifications are incorporated into proposed improvement plans during the initial stages of project review. Cultural and Historic Resources 1. Environmental Impact Project -Related Potentials for Disturbance of Archaeological Resources Development encouraged and improvements funded by the proposed redevelopment program could disturb sensitive archaeological resources in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In the event that subsurface cultural resources are encountered during approved ground -disturbing activities for a redevelopment program -related construction activity, work in the immediate vicinity shall be stopped and a qualified archaeologist retained to evaluate the find. The discovery or disturbance of any cultural resources should also be reported to the Central California Information Center, and if prehistoric, to the Native American Heritage Commission. Identified cultural resources should be recorded on a State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 422. Mitigation measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. 2. Environmentallmpact 13 Exhibit A Destruction/Degradation of Historic Resources Project - facilitated development in the Project Area has the potential to destroy or substantially degrade historic resources, if these resources are not identified or recognized and their maintenance, rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not promoted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All future redevelopment -assisted public improvement projects and private development projects shall be evaluated for the presence of and potential impacts on historic resources. If disturbance of a historic resource cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be implemented. The City and private sponsors of future individual projects on sites that contain unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a qualified professional architectural historian prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project -facilitated development. IV. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT CEQA requires that an EIR describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project or to the location of the Project which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the Project and to evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. Section 15126(d)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that the "discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or to its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly." As more particularly set forth in the Final EIR, the Project was compared to the following alternatives: (1) a "no project' alternative; (2) a modified Project Area boundary; (3) a modified list of Project Area redevelopment actions and/or modified allocation of redevelopment funds to the various actions; (4) an alternative Project Area location; and (5) the Project incorporating the mitigation measures listed in the Final EIR. The following discussion briefly summarizes the listed alternatives. 14 Exhibit A No Project Alternative: Under the No Project alternative, the Redevelopment Plan would not be adopted. No actions would be taken by the Lodi Redevelopment Agency to remove blighting conditions and stimulate additional private investment in the proposed Project Area. No Redevelopment Agency funding would be provided towards housing assistance in the Project Area, and no Redevelopment Agency actions would be taken to fund infrastructure and facility improvements, or to redevelop property. Although it is not possible to quantify the exact level of public and private development that would occur in the proposed Project Area under the No Project alternative, it is reasonable to assume that, with no Redevelopment Agency activity in the Project Area to fund public improvements and to attract an increased level of private investment, existing blighting conditions would remain or worsen. The No Project Alternative is not a viable alternative because it will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area. Modified Project Boundary Alternative: This alternative would be similar to the proposed project in terms of allocation of funding, but would involve either a reduced area boundary or an enlarged area boundary. Under the reduced area boundary, the overall effectiveness of the redevelopment program would be lessened, since selected activities would have to be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the reduced tax increment revenues accruable to the Redevelopment Agency. If the reduced boundary alternative were selected, the extent of potential growth in the Project Area subject to redevelopment assistance and incentives would be reduced and a corresponding decrease in the land use, traffic, public services, visual, vegetation and wildlife, noise, air quality, and other impacts identified in the EIR could be anticipated. The reduced project area alternative will not effectively reduce and eliminate the blight existing throughout the Project Area and therefore is not a viable alternative. The enlarged area boundary alternative would not be a viable alternative under state redevelopment law. The proposed boundaries of the Project Area were carefully selected based on identification of areas that contain blighted conditions, could benefit from redevelopment activities, and could meet certain other redevelopment law parameters. A combination of blight and general urbanization conditions has not been identified outside the Project Area at the present time. Modified Redevelopment Activities: This alternative would include the same boundaries proposed by the project, but with a modified allocation of project -generated revenues to redevelopment activities within the Project Area. The modified allocation would increase the percentage of total project -related revenue for affordable housing from approximately 20 percent (as proposed in the Project) to approximately 35 percent, with the 15 percent difference taken from the public infrastructure improvement, site assembly and other components of the redevelopment program. Although this alternative would have some positive environmental effects, it would also reduce the beneficial land use compatibility effects of the project, reduce the rate of market rate housing and job growth, and decrease the funding available for storm drainage and flood control improvements, assistance for preservation and maintenance of historic resources, and development driven hazardous waste clean-up. This alternative could further result in a reduced overall level of physical rehabilitation in the proposed Project Area and an associated reduction in facilitation of blight elimination. Because this alternative will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, it is not a viable alternative. Alternative Project Area Location: This alternative examined the potential for the Project Area to be located on other sites. However, the boundaries of the proposed Project Area were precisely established based on the maximum area within which identified blighted 15 Exhibit A conditions currently occur, in combination with other urbanization parameters set forth in state redevelopment law. No additional areas are currently identified in the project vicinity that appear to meet redevelopment law criteria for blight. The fundamental purpose of the redevelopment project is to authorize activities and financing to enable the Redevelopment Agency to eliminate blighted conditions. Redevelopment Agency establishment of an alternative site for the Project Area would fail to attain the basic objectives of the proposed project. Therefore, this is not a viable alternative. Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures: This alternative consists of the Project as proposed with the incorporation of all mitigation measures recommended in the EIR. As stated above, the mitigation measures recommended in the EIR shall be incorporated into the Project. This is therefore the Project to be considered by the City Council and the Agency. This alternative effectively achieve the goals of the Redevelopment Project and would mitigate all environmental effects to a less than significant levels, except for long-term regional emissions of air pollutants, which is a significant and unavoidable effect. Finding: After consideration of all the alternatives, the Agency and City Council find that the Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures is the "environmentally superior" alternative since the proposed Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures most effectively achieves the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, and provides a funding source for the proposed public improvements which are necessary to alleviate existing blighting conditions in the Project Area. In addition, all potentially significant impacts identified in the Final EIR except for the long-term regional emissions have been eliminated or reduced to a less than significant level by incorporation of appropriate mitigation measures as part of the proposed Project. V. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS CEQA requires a public agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. As set forth in Part III hereof, the Agency and the City Council have determined that the only unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is the following: Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases. The Agency and the City Council find that the above -referenced unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is acceptable when balanced against its benefits. This finding is based on the following facts: The Project will serve a critical need, that being the elimination and prevention of the spread of blight and deterioration in the Project Area and the conservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed Project Area in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, the General Plan for the City of Lodi and local codes and ordinances. 2. The promotion of new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area will prevent the loss of and facilitate the capture of commercial sales activity. 16 Exhibit A 3. The Project will allow for the elimination of blight through abatement or code enforcement, rehabilitation and reconstruction, new development, and the assembly of parcels into more developable sites for more desirable uses. 4. The Project will result in the elimination or amelioration of certain environmental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular circulation systems, inadequate storm drainage systems, inadequate off-street parking, and other similar public improvement deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area. 5. New construction within the Project Area will result in an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. 6. Project implementation would result in the retention and expansion of businesses by means of redevelopment and rehabilitation activities and by encouraging and assisting in the cooperation and participation of owners, businesses, and public agencies in the revitalization of the Project Area. 7. Revitalized commercial and industrial development will result in the creation and development of local job opportunities and the preservation of the area's existing employment base. 8. Project implementation will strengthen the economic base of the Project Area and the City by installing needed site improvements and stimulating commercial, industrial, and residential development. 9. Project implementation will expand and improve the City's supply of affordable housing. 17 Exhibit A EXHIBIT "6" MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST--LODI REDEVELOPMENT PLAN June 7, 2002 The environmental mitigation measures listed in column two below have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for the Lodi Redevelopment Plan in order to mitigate EIA -identified environmental impacts. A completed and signed chart will indicate that each mitigation requirement has been complied with, and that City and State monitoring requirements have been fulfilled with respect to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. IDENTIFIED IMPACT LAND USE AND VISUAL FACTORS Impact 4.1: Adverse Land Use Compatibility Impacts. In addition to beneficial land use compatibility effects, some project -facilitated land use changes within the Project Area could result in adverse land use compatibility Impacts. Given the proximity of some existing, planned and anticipated residential uses in this area to existing and planned commercial and industrial areas, project -assisted intensification could introduce significant new land use conflicts among specific residential, commercial, and industrial developments (e.g., traffic, visual, light, noise, parking, odor and other conflicts). Such project -induced effects represent potentially significant adverse land use compatibility. Impact 4.2: Visual Impacts on Specific Streetscapes Within the Project Area. Portions of the industrial rail corridor and east industrial subareas have been Identified by City staff (see subsection 4.3.2) as anticipated industrial development opportunity areas, and are largely visible from adjoining major through - routes (e.g., Cherokee Lane, Lockeford Street, Stockton Street, Pine Street and Lodi Avenue) and from adjoining residential neighborhoods and the downtown. Similarly, anticipated commercial development Intensification along Lodi Avenue West and the Cherokee Lane Corridor (see section 4.3.2) would be highly visible from those primary travel routes. The visual quality of future development in these RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Mitigation 4.1: During City review and prior to approval of individual development projects within the redevelopment area, emphasize the need to avoid significant new land use conflicts between non-residential and residential development, between sensitive new commercial uses and existing nuisance -prone commercial and industrial uses, and between new nuisance prone commercial and industrial uses and sensitive existing commercial uses. During these review procedures and the formulation of conditions of approval, require assurances to City satisfaction of: (1) adequate land use separation, scale transition, and noise buffering; (2) creative siting of buildings to avoid conflicts; (3) adequate protections against light, glare, and shadow impacts; (4) adequate odor control; (5) adequate offstreet parking provisions; (6) adequate and safe truck access and offstreet loading provisions; and (7) other common measures warranted to avoid such land use conflicts. implementation of these measures would be expected to reduce potential land use compatibility Impacts to a less -than - significant level. Impl. Entit ' Type of Monitoring Action Timing Re ulrements Monitoring and Verification Ent City, Verify during plan Prior to any Lodi lndi- check bldg. or Redevelop- vidual grading ment Agency appli- permit or City cants Mitigation 4.2: Through the City's currently- City, adopted development permit and design review indi- process, future development in the Industrial Rail vidual Corridor, and East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane appli- Corridor and Lodi Avenue West subareas shall be cants subject to particularly focused and detailed design review. Implement specific visual impact mitigation guidelines set forth in the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Development Standards and Guidelines and Central City Revitalization Program that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately protect and enhance the visual quality of these areas. In addition, applications for future new developments and Verify during plan Prior to any Lodi check and design bldg. or Redevelop - review grading ment Agency permit or City I - Impl. Entity. Implementation Entity Page t WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entity . Implementation Entity Page 2 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date specific opportunity areas would directly affect property improvements subject to discretionary the quality of these important city streetscapes. approval in the industrial rail corridor, east Without adequate design control, the project industrial area, Cherokee Lane corridor and Lodi could facilitate new industrial or mixed- Avenue West subareas, shall incorporate the uselcommercial development that could appropriate combination of specific design adversely affect the visual quality of these highly guidelines listed under this mitigation In section visible industrial and mixed-use streetscapes, as 4.3 of this EIR in a manner that, to the satisfaction well as the visual character surrounding of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval neighborhoods, and of the central area as a Committee and Planning Commission, are whole. Such possible effects constitute a sufficient to adequately reduce project -related potentially significant.adverse visual impact visual impacts on streets, residential neighborhoods, and the central area as a whole. Implementation of these two measures would reduce the potential adverse visual impacts of development in these subareas to a less -than - significant level. Impact 4.3: Potential Impacts on the Visual Mitigation 4.3. In the review and processing of City, Verify during plan Prior to any Lodi Character and Image of the Eastside residential development projects within the indi- check and design bldg. or Redevelop - Residential Neighborhood. Although the eastside residential neighborhood, place special vidual review grading ment Agency Eastside neighborhood has been downzoned to emphasis on implementation of locational appli- permit or City preclude infiltration of additional multi -family strategies contained in the Central City cants development within predominantly single-family Revitalization Program to protect and improve the areas, some multi -family development would be visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. expected to occur along the edge of downtown. Encourage locations at the edge of the Such project -facilitated multi -family development neighborhood and require appropriate visual has the potential to add to Eastside buffering and scale transition between new multi - neighborhood visual deficiencies created by family structures and existing single-family existing, poorly designed, multi -family residential development, to the satisfaction of City staff and units. Project -facilitated new multi -family units the City's Architectural Approval Committee and would have the potential to clash visually with Planning Commission. This measure would the neighborhood's older, predominantly single- reduce the impact to a less -than -significant family residential character. Such an effect level. would represent a potentially significant adverse visual Impact. POPULATION AND HOUSING Impact 5.1: Potential JobslHousing Balance Mitigation 5.1: Implement Mitigations 6-1 and City stall Monitor traffic Annually Lodi Impacts. Project -facilitated development may 10-2 pertaining to project -related commute period volumes at Pine Redevelop - contribute to the existing jobsihousing imbalance vehicular traffic increases and associated project StreettCentral Ave. ment Agency In Lodi (weighted towards jobs in comparison to and cumulative transportation system and air intersection; install or City the County as a whole). The projected addition quality impacts. Implementation of these signal when of a substantially greater number of jobs than measures would reduce the one identified warranted housing units in the Project Area would significant environmental effect associated with 1 - Impl. Entity . Implementation Entity Page 2 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 I - Impl. Entity = Implementation Entity Page 3 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date exacerbate this imbalance. Such an effect project -related incommuting increases to a less - would constitute a potentially significant than -significant level. adverse impact TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING Impact 6-1: Impact on Intersection Mitigation 6-1. Caltrans has established 11 City stafl Monitor traffic Annually Lodi Signalization Requirements. The added PM possible tests or "warrants" for determining volumes at Pine Redevelop - peak hour traffic due to the redevelopment- whether installation of a traffic signal should be StreettCentrai Ave. ment Agency related additional traffic would increase PM peak considered. These warrants each consider intersection; install or City hour volumes above Caltrans Signal Warrant different criteria such as peak hour traffic volume, signal when #11 criteria levels at the Pine Street/Central pedestrian volume, presence of school children, warranted Avenue all -way -stop intersection. Although and accident history. Usually, two or more projected PM peak hour operation at this "warrants" must be met before a signal is intersection with the project would not exceed warranted. The fact that this EIR analysis LOS D, this signal warrant effect would indicates that Warrant #11 (related to peak hour represent a potentially significant Impact. traffic volumes) would be met Indicates that a detailed signal warrant analysis covering all possible Caltrans warrants is appropriate. The City shall therefore monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection, and when two or more Caltrans signal warrant criteria are met, shall place the intersection on the City's priority list for signalization. This measure would reduce this Impact to a less -than -significant level. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Impact 7.1-1: Anticipated Water Supply Mitigation 7.1-1. Implement the following two City Develop new Condition of Lodi Impacts. Additional development facilitated by City of Lodi General Plan Land Use and Growth and/or facilities as approval for Redevelop - or otherwise associated with implementation of Management Element policies: redevel. necessary; assess major new ment Agency the proposed redevelopment plan and agency established fees on development or City associated increases in commercial activity, The City shall develop new facilities, as staff new development projects employment, and residential population (see necessary, to serve new development in housing, population and employment increase accordance with the City's Water, estimates in section 5.3 of this EIR) would result Wastewater, and Drainage Master Plans. in corresponding increases in the demand for (Policy 1) water service. The City, as water purveyor, is prepared to provide the additional domestic The City shall assess water, wastewater, and water necessary for anticipated additional drainage development fees on all new development in this area, including anticipated residential, commercial, office and industrial project -facilitated commercial growth and development sufficient to fund required population increases, within the City's existing systemwide improvements. (Policy 2) water entitlements and distribution systems. I - Impl. Entity = Implementation Entity Page 3 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entity s Impbmentatlon Entity Page 4 WP5116161 FEIRI MMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date However, while aquifers yield water readily to City and Redevelopment Agency implementation the CHO welts, water table fluctuations due to of these two policies as project -facilitated basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty development takes place over the next 20 years regarding available water supply for the City's would ensure that project -related impacts on the future needs. Anticipated project -facilitated adequacy of City water sources would be reduced growth within the redevelopment area would to a less -than -significant level. therefore be considered to have a potentially significant Impact on water service. Impact 7.1-2: Water Distribution System Mitigation 7.1-2: As project -facilitated City Implement water Condition of Lodi Inadequacies. The existing water distribution development takes place over the next 20 years, and/or distribution system approval for Redevelop - system may not be adequate to serve Implement remaining needed central area water Redevet improvements as major new ment Agency anticipated new redevelopment -facilitated distribution system improvements identified in Agency needed development or City development and intensification in the Project Chapter 8 of the City s Water Master Plan. Water staff projects Area. This potential deficiency represents a conservation should also be promoted as the potentially significant impact Project Area redevelops. Implementation of these measures would reduce project -related water distribution impacts to a less -than -significant level. Impact 7.2-1: Sewage Collection System Mitigation 7.2-1: Continue to implement the City Implement sewage Condition of Lodi Inadequacies. The existing wastewater central area sewage collection system and/or collection system approval for Redevelop - collection system serving the Project Area may Improvements identified as needed in the City of Redevei improvements as major new ment Agency not be adequate to serve anticipated new Lodi General Plan, and the City's Sanitary Sewer Agency needed development or City development and intensification in the Project System Technical Report, including the planned staff projects Area. This potential deficiency represents a improvements to eastside neighborhood collection potentially significant impact system. Implementation of these measures over the next 20 years would reduce project wastewater collection system impacts to a less- thansignb7cant level. Impact 7.3-1: Police Service Demand Mitigation 7.3-1: The Police Department shall Lodi Annual response Annual Lodi Impacts in Project Area. Plan -facilitated monitor the rate of additional police calls per year Police time monitoring monitoring; Redevelop - development and intensification within the associated with the Project Area and the Dept. reports; normal condition of ment Agency Project Area would increase demands for police adequacy of associated response limes. As and City review of Individual approval for or City service. The City of Lodi Police Department warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall staff discretionary project major new may require additional staffing or equipment to provide additional officers and facilities (funded applications projects serve these added demands. The proposed through the City's general fund). Following redevelopment plan would therefore have a established City procedures, the Police potentially significant impact on police Department shall also review discretionary services. approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Implementation of these measures would reduce the impact to a less-than-signiAeant level. 1 - Impl. Entity s Impbmentatlon Entity Page 4 WP5116161 FEIRI MMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entity = Implementation Entity Page 5 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 7.41: Fire Protection and Emergency Mitigation 7.4-1: The Fire Department shall Lodi Fire Annual fire call Annually Lodi Medical Service Demand Impacts In the monitor the rate of additional fire protection Dept. monitoring reports; Redevelop - Project Area. Project -facilitated development service calls per year associated with the Project normal review of ment Agency and intensification within the Project Area would Area and the adequacy of associated response individual or City increase demands for fire protection and times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the discretionary project emergency medical services. Depending on the City shall provide additional firefighters and applications type of use, density, and occupancy of individual equipment (funded through the City's general project -facilitated developments, the City of Lodi fund). Following established City procedures, the Fire Department may require additional staffing Fire Department shall also review discretionary or equipment to meet its fire protection goals. approvals for project -facilitated commercial and The proposed redevelopment plan may therefore residential development within the Project Area. have a potentially significant impact on fire These measures would reduce the impact to a protection and emergency medical services. less -than -significant level. Impact 75-1: School Service Demand Mitigation 7.5-1: The Lodi Redevelopment City Ensure all pass- Prior to final Lodi Impacts. Existing Lodi Unified School District Agency shall make the statutory pass-through and/or throughs and school project Redevelop- (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may payment of tax increment revenue to the LUSD Redevel fee payments have approval for ment Agency not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the and the San Joaquin County Office of Education Agency been made new projects or City additional school population generated by pursuant to Health and Safety Code section staff project -facilitated residential development. The 33607.5. In addition, the City of Lodi shall require project -related increase in demand for school developers in the redevelopment area to pay service would therefore represent a potentially state -authorized school impact fees to the extent significant impact approved by the LUSO. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional impact fees negotiated with the LUSD. These measures would be expected to enable the LUSO to fund school improvements necessary to accommodate students from project -facilitated development, reducing this impact to a less -than - significant level. Impact 7.6-1: Project Park Demand Impacts. Mitigation 7.6-1: Mitigation for Park Demand City Verify parkland Prior to Lodi Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area Impacts. The City shall ensure that at least 1.83 and/or dedication or fee grading or Redevelop - are already operating at capacity. Project- acres of parkland is developed within or Redevel payment during plan building ment Agency facilitated development and intensification in the convenient to the Project Area. As project- Agency check permit or City Project Area would incrementally increase the facilitated buildout takes place in the Project Area, staff demand for park and recreation services. As adequate corresponding park and recreation discussed in chapter 5 (Population, Housing, provisions shall be provided through required and Employment) of this EIR, it is estimated that dedication of land and/or in -lieu payment of City project -facilitated development would generate adopted park and recreation fees. Implementation approximately 210 additional households in the of this measure would reduce this Impact to less - Project Area. Based on the anticipated citywide than -significant levels. year 2020 household size of 2.56 persons (see Table 5.2 in section 5.3), the 210 new households would generate a population increase of approximately 538 people. Based on the most recent City park acreage standard 1 - Impl. Entity = Implementation Entity Page 5 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Fruity = Impierient tion Entity Page a WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date (3.4 acres per 1,000 persons), this new population increment would generate a demand for approximately 1.83 acres of additional parkland. Additional project -facilitated employment growth, estimated at 2,014 jobs by the year 2020, may also generate some additional demand for park and recreation services In the Project Area. Existing Project Area facilities do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate this additional demand. This project effect would therefore represent a significant impact DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY Impact 8.1: Project -Related Erosion, Mitigation 8.1: The City shall require the City Verify during plan Prior to Lodi Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. applicant for each future project -facilitated and/or check and during grading Redevelop - Redevelopment program -facilitated building development requiring a discretionary approval to Redevel construction -period permit, and ment Agency construction and infrastructure improvements in comply with all applicable state, regional and City Agency inspections during or City the Project Area could further degrade water quality provisions and, for projects involving staff grading downstream water quality. Associated factors the grading of more than five (5) acres: (a) file that may contribute to downstream water quality with the RWQCB a Notice of Intent to comply with problems include soil disturbance during the Statewide General Permit for Construction construction, new impervious surfaces created Activities, (b) prepare and implement a project - with project -facilitated developments; and specific Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan increased vehicle traffic, and herbicides, (including an erosion control plan) if grading is pesticides, and fertilizers from new landscaping involved, (c) implement a monitoring, inspection, associated with project -facilitated development. and documentation program to assure the This combination of factor; represents a effectiveness of control measures, (d) obtain or potentially significant Impact comply with existing General Stormwater Discharge Permit(s) for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (e) comply with the NPDES Phase 11 Non -Point Discharge program. Implementation of these requirements would reduce this Impact to a less -than sigafflcant level. NOISE Impact 9-1: Project -Related Exposure of. Mitigation 9.1: Noise impacts can be reduced City Condition of During Lodi Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive through appropriate site planning (e.g., setbacks, and/or individual project individual Redevelop - Environmental Noise. Project -facilitated noise -protected areas), construction of noise Redevel approval; verify project ment Agency Intensification of and changes in land uses In barriers, and/or incorporation of noise insulation Agency during plan check environ. or City the Project Area could expose additional people features into a project's design as specified in the staff; that any required review to noise levels exceeding acceptable levels--i.e., to noise levels identified in the Lodi Genera( City of Lodi General Plan. As part of the future environmental review process for Individual indi- vidual noise studies have been completed Plan as "conditionally acceptable; "normally projects, new developments facilitated by the appii- unacceptable" or "unacceptable" for the redevelopment plan shall be evaluated. Evaluate cants associated land use. Such new exposure each redevelopment -facilitated discretionary 1 - Impl. Fruity = Impierient tion Entity Page a WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 IDENTIFIED IMPACT possibilities constitute a potentially significant impact Impact 9-2: Redevelopment -Facilitated Construction Noise. Construction activities can generate considerable noise levels. Construction activities facilitated by the redevelopment program could include site grading and preparation, building demolition, construction of foundations and buildings, installation of utilities, paving of roadways, and construction of parking lots. The noise effects of these future construction activities would depend upon the amount of activity, the type of equipment used, and the noise control measures used. Residential and other noise -sensitive uses located adjacent to project -facilitated construction activities could therefore be exposed to noise levels that would interfere with normal activities. This possibility constitutes a potentially signiflcant Impact RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) development application in the Project Area with respect to the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources such as SR 99, Cherokee Lane, Stockton Street, Lodi Avenue, Tokay Street, other arterial roadways, and/or the UPRR. Also, require noise assessments for all redevelopment -facilitated discretionary applications where noise -sensitive receptors are proposed in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, such as subareas 1, 3 and 4, and for noise -generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plar when proposed adjacent to noise -sensitive land uses. The results of the noise assessments and the measures identified to reduce noise levels shall be incorporated in the project plans sufficien to meet stipulated exterior and interior noise level standards. All such evaluations shall be completed to City satisfaction by a qualified acoustical consultant. With Implementation of measures identified throughout such evaluations to meet these standards, this potentially significan impact would be reduced to a lass-than- significent level. Mitigation 9-2: To reduce the potential for noise impacts resulting from project -facilitated construction activities, implement a combination o the following measures at all construction sites when noise -sensitive receptors are located in the project vicinity. The combination of measures shall be evaluated on an individual, project -by - project basis and shall be sufficient to achieve compliance with applicable City General Plan and/or Noise Ordinance standards at affected receptors. ■ Noise -generating construction activity shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturdays. No construction activities should occur on Sundays or holidays. ■ All internal combustion engine driven equipment shall be equipped with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment JIONITORING ►ERIFICATION mpl. Type of Monitoring lming lonitoring and 9ntity' kation iequirements brification Entity signature Date 11 tnd/or aedeve kgency staff, ndi- ddual )roject tppli- :ants individual project ! ronstr. approval; verified ;grading or during construction wilding) )ennit; verify luring ronstruction tedevelop- rent Agency lr City I - Impl. Entity a Implan antatlon Entity Page 7 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Imp[. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date ■ Stationary noise -generating equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a construction Project Area. • All construction traffic to and from the project site shall be routed via designated truck routes where possible. Construction -related heavy truck traffic in residential areas shall be prohibited where feasible. • "Quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources shall be used where technology ebsts. • A "noise disturbance coordinator" shall be designated who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator would determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and would require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site and included in the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule. (The City should be responsible for designating a noise disturbance coordinator and the individual project sponsor should be responsible for posting the phone number and providing construction schedule notices). Implementation of this measure would reduce the potential for project -related impacts due to construction noise to a less -than -significant level. I - Impl. Entity = Implementation Entity page s WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entity . Implementation unity Page 9 WP5116161F0RWMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date AIR QUALITY Impact 10-1: Construction Activity Air Mitigation 10-1: The City shall require that City Condition of Condition of Lodi Quality Impacts. Construction activities individual redevelopment -facilitated projects within and/or individual project grading Redevelop - facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan the Project Area involving new construction shall Redevel approvals; verified permit; verify ment Agency could generate construction period exhaust comply, where applicable, with current Agency during grading during or City emissions and fugitive dust that could affect SJVUAPCD Regulation VIII requirements, which staff; construction local air quality. In addition, buildings currently include the following: indi- constructed prior to 1979 could have Asbestos vidual Containing Materials (AGMs), which could be a Appropriate dust suppression for land project released into the air during building demolition. clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land appli- Such construction -period air emissions laveling, grading, cut and fill and demolition cants possibilities represent a potentially s/gnlflcant activities, such as the effective application of impact water or pre-soaking; Effective stabilization of all disturbed areas of a construction site, including storage piles, which are not being actively used for seven or more days; Control of fugitive dust from on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads; and Removal of accumulations of mud or dirt at the end of the work day or once every 24 hours from public paved roads, shoulders and access ways adjacent to the site, for the duration of the activity. Regulation Vlll also requires a Dust Control plan for construction activity that will include 40 acres or more of disturbed surface area, or will include moving more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials on at least three days. In addition, where appropriate, the City may also wish to require the following: A limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph); ■ Installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site; 1 - Impl. Entity . Implementation unity Page 9 WP5116161F0RWMCHT.616 1 - ImpL Entity . impratnantation Entity Page 10 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date it Suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 mph; and/or ■ A limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. Prior to each the start of construction, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD- and City -required control measures. To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs, and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMs. With implementation of these Regulation VIII controls and the above additional measures, project -related construction period air emissions impacts would be reduced to a less -than - Significant /eve/. Impact 10-2: Long -Term Regional Emissions Mitigation 10-2: The following emissions control City Condition of Condition of Lodi Increases. Emissions resulting from new strategies shall be applied to redevelopment and/or individual project project Redevelop- vehide trips generated by redevelopment- program -facilitated development activities within Redevel approvals, incl. approvals; ment Agency facilitated intensification in the Project Area the Project Area: Agency annual reporting verify through or City would, by the year 2020, be expected to exceed staff; requirements annual the applicable thresholds of significance for Where practical, future development indi- reporting Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Nitrogen proposals shall Include physical vidual reqmnts Oxides (NOJ, resulting in a significant project Improvements, such as sidewalk project Impact When this increase in "mobile improvements, landscaping, lighting and the appli- emissions" is considered cumulatively with installation of bus shelters and bicycle cants possible new industrial "stationary sources" of parking, that would act as Incentives for emissions that could locate within the pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of redevelopment area, the total of project -related travel. indirect and direct emissions would also exceed applicable significance thresholds. As a result, Employment -generating development the project would also be expected to contribute projects of 10,000 square feet (approximately to a significant cumulative impact 25 employees) or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and shower/locker facilities for employees. 1 - ImpL Entity . impratnantation Entity Page 10 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 I - imp). Entity - Imphmnntatlon Entity Page 11 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpool/vanpool incentives, develop an employee rideshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. Implementation of these measures would assist in reducing identified project and cumulative impacts on long -tern regional emissions levels. The URBEMIS7G program estimates that the above measures would reduce regional indirect emissions by five to seven percent. This reduction would not reduce this impact to a less - than -significant level even in the absence of potential industrial emissions. Since no other feasible measures are available, these identified project and cumulative effects on regional air emissions would represent a significant unavoidable impact. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Impact 11-1: Potential Loss of Special -Status Mitigation 11-1: If disturbance to suitable giant City Require completion During Lodi Species. Although chances of encountering garter snake habitat (i.e., drainage ditches) is and/or of giant garter snake individ. Redevelop - special -status species in the Project Area are proposed as part of a redevelopment -assisted Redevel survey if existing project ment Agency low, redevelopment -facilitated development individual development or improvement project, Agency drainage ditch will environ. or City consistent with the adopted City of Lodi General systematic surveys shall be conducted before staff; be affected by review; prior Plan may result in impacts on special status such a development is approved in order to indi- project; ensure to grading species. This possibility represents a determine definitively whether any giant garter vidual implementation of permit potentially significant Impact snakes occur. Such surveys shall be conducted project mitigation plan and issuance by a qualified wildlife biologist or a herpetologist appli- coordination with following applicable guidelines of the California cants juris. agencies Department of Rsh and Game (CDFG) and/or (USACOE, USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to and/or CDFG) if provide a conclusive determination on presence or habitat affected absence of this animal specie. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed In consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the CDFG and USFWS, and in compliance with specifications of the SJMSCP, section 5.2.4.8. Implementation of this measure would ensure protection of possible populations of special -status animal species (i.e., giant garter snake) in the Project Area, mitigating potential impacts to a less-than-signiNcant level. I - imp). Entity - Imphmnntatlon Entity Page 11 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entrly a Implementation Entity Page 12 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 11-2: Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts. Mitigation 11-2: All redevelopment -facilitated City During project Prior to Lodi Redevelopment -facilitated development development that would involve modifications to and/or environ. review, if approval of Redevelop - consistent with the adopted City of Lodi General potential wetlands and other waters, such as Redevel wetlands appear to grading ment Agency Plan could affect potential jurisdictional wetland seasonal wetlands that could be present in vacant Agency be present, req. permit or City habitat. This possibility represents a potentially or underused parcels, shall be coordinated with staff; biologist to significant impact. representatives of the California Department of indi- determine if Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of vidual wetlands are present Engineers, as required by federal and state law, project and as cond. of to ensure that any required mitigation protocols appli- devel. permit, req. and associated individual project design cants implementation of modifications are incorporated into proposed any Jude. agency improvement plans during the initial stages of mitigation reqmnts. project review. implementation of this measure would ensure that potential impacts on wetland resources are minimized and adequate replacement is provided, mitigating this potential Impact to a less -than -significant level. CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact 12-1: Project -Related Potentials for Mitigation 12-1: In the event that subsurface City Grading inspection Cond. of Lodi Disturbance of Archaeological Resources. cultural resources are encountered during and/or and reporting grading Redevelop - Development encouraged and improvements approved ground -disturbing activities for a Redevel permit; ment Agency funded by the proposed redevelopment program redevelopment program -related construction Agency inspection or City could disturb sensitive archaeological resources activity, work in the immediate vicinity shall be staff; during in the Project Area. This possibility represents a stopped and a qualified archaeologist retained to indi- grading potentially significant impact evaluate the find. The discovery or disturbance of vidual any cultural resources should also be reported to project the Central California Information Center (CCIC), appli- and if prehistoric, to the Native American Heritage cants Commission. Identified cultural resources should be recorded on a State Department of Parks and recreation (DPR) Form 422 (archaeological sites). Mitigation measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. Implementation of this measure would reduce this potential Impact to a less-than-signH/cant level. 1 - Impl. Entrly a Implementation Entity Page 12 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Imp1. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 12-2: Destruction/Degradation of Mitigation 12-2: Evaluate all future project- City During environ. Prior to Lodi Historic Resources. Project -facilitated assisted public improvement projects and private and/or review for individ. approval of Redevelop - development in the Project Area has the development projects for the presence of, and Redevel projects, ensure that grading or ment Agency potential to destroy or substantially degrade potential impacts on, historic resources. If Agency any affected building or City historic resources, if these resources are not disturbance of a Project Area historic resource staff; historical resources permit Identified or recognized and their maintenance, cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be indi- have been identified rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not implemented. The City and private sponsors of vidual and mitigation promoted. Such destruction or degradation future individual projects on sites that contain project program would be considered a potentially significant unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a appli- implemented as Impact. qualified professional architectural historian cants appropriate prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project -facilitated development. Implementation of these measures would reduce this potential impact to a less -than - significant level. 1 - Impl. Entity = Implementation Entity Page 13 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING, IMPROVING, AND PRESERVING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW- AND MODERATE -INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") which would result in the allocation of taxes from the Project Area to the Agency for the purposes of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) requires that not less than twenty percent (20%) of all taxes so allocated be used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2(g) of the Community Redevelopment Law provides that the Agency may use such funds outside the Project Area if a finding is made by resolution of the Agency and the City Council that such use will be of benefit to the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that the use of taxes allocated from the Project Area for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. Dated: June 19, 2002 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I hereby certify that Resolution No. RDA2002- was passed and adopted by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: MEMBERS— NOES: EMBERS—NOES: MEMBERS— ABSENT: EMBERS—ABSENT: MEMBERS— ABSTAIN: EMBERS—ABSTAIN: MEMBERS — Attest: SUSAN J.BLACKSTON Secretary RDA2002- PHILLIP A. PENNINO Chairperson RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI CONSIDERING AND MAKING FINDINGS AS TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN WHEREAS, as the Lead Agency, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as "CEQA"), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the "State CEQA Guidelines"), and procedures adopted by the Agency relating to environmental evaluation; and WHEREAS, the Agency transmitted for filing a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR and thereafter in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to those state agencies which have discretionary approval or jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the Redevelopment Plan, to the affected taxing agencies, and to other interested persons and agencies and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting comments on the Draft EIR was published in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to adopt changes suggested, to incorporate comments received during the public review period pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and to incorporate the Agency's responses to said comments, and as so revised and supplemented, a Final EIR was prepared by the Agency; and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing was held by the Agency and the City Council of the City of Lodi (the "City Council") on June 19, 2002, on the Redevelopment Plan and the Final EIR, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, and all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto have been heard, and said Final EIR and all comments and responses thereto have been considered; and WHEREAS, the Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR, as revised and supplemented to incorporate all comments received and the responses of the Agency thereto, and is part of the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Lodi is a Responsible Agency, as defined in Section 21069 of the Public Resources Code, with respect to the Redevelopment Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Final EIR and has duly reviewed and considered the Final EIR prepared and certified by the Agency prior to adopting this resolution and acting on the Redevelopment Plan. Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations relating to the environmental impact of the Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (including, without limitation, the mitigation measures therein set forth). Based upon such Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, the City Council hereby finds that all significant environmental effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened except the following unavoidable adverse impacts: (1) Long Term Regional Emissions Increases. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council finds and determines that the Redevelopment Plan will have a significant effect upon the environment but that the benefits of the Redevelopment Plan outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts for the reasons set forth in the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, in particular, Part V thereof. Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Plan set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Upon approval and adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council, the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Joaquin pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of CEQA and Section 15096(i) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Dated: June 19, 2002 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk 2002- MAS/CCResoEIRFndgs 2 10/2/01 EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 fl1i1:Zi1111OA 4LeL The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., "CEQA') provides, in Section 21081, that: "[N]o public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless both of the following occur: "(a) The public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: "(1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. "(2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. "(3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. "(b) With respect to significant effects which were subject to a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment." As defined in CEQA, "'significant effect on the environment' means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment." (Public Resources Code Section 21068.) DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT PROPOSED FOR APPROVAL For purposes of CEQA, the "project" addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") is the adoption and phased implementation of the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project"). As more particularly identified in the Final EIR, the Project Area covers approximately 1,184 acres of land within the City of Lodi, including commercial, industrial, parks, residential and public right of way Exhibit A land uses. Under the Redevelopment Plan, the Project would be developed in accordance with the land uses designated and permitted by the General Plan for the City of Lodi. The Final EIR describes the environmental impacts that may occur as a result of the adoption and phased implementation of the Redevelopment Plan and identifies, where applicable, measures which would mitigate significant effects on the environment to a level of insignificance. Findings regarding the significant effects of the Project are set forth below. III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT; FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT This Part Ill identifies the potentially significant and unavoidably significant effects of the Project as determined by the Agency, including the findings and facts supporting the findings in connection therewith. The Final EIR discussed Hazardous Materials but no impacts were anticipated. The following areas were discussed in the Final EIR and include mitigation measures that are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan or are unavoidably significant effects on the Project: A. Land Use and Visual Factors 1. Environmental Impact Adverse Land Use Compatibility Impacts. Some project - facilitated land use changes within the Project Area could result in adverse land use compatibility impacts. Given the proximity of some existing, planned and anticipated residential uses in the Project Area to existing and planned commercial and industrial areas, project -assisted development could introduce significant new land use conflicts among specific residential, commercial and industrial developments. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) During City review and prior to approval of individual projects within the Project Area, emphasize the need to avoid significant new land use conflicts between non-residential and residential development, between sensitive new commercial uses and existing nuisance -prone commercial and industrial uses, and between new nuisance prone commercial and industrial uses and sensitive existing commercial uses. (b) During review procedures and the formulation of conditions of approval, require assurances to City satisfaction of: (1) adequate land use separation, scale transition, and noise buffering; (2) creative siting of buildings to avoid conflicts; (3) Exhibit A 2. adequate protections against light, glare, and shadow impacts; (4) adequate odor control; (5) adequate offstreet parking provisions; (6) adequate and safe truck access and offstreet loading provisions; and (7) other common measures warranted to avoid such land use conflicts. Environmental Impact Visual Impacts on Specific Streetscapes Within the Project Area. The visual quality of future development in specific opportunity areas within the Project Area would directly affect the quality of important city streetscapes. Without adequate design control, the Project could facilitate new industrial or mixed- use/commercial development that could adversely affect the visual quality of these highly visible industrial and mixed-use streetscapes, as well as the visual character of surrounding neighborhoods, and of the central area as a whole. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Through the City's currently adopted development permit and design review process, future development in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall be subject to particularly focused and detailed design review. Implement specific visual impact mitigation guidelines set forth in the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Development Standards and Guidelines and Central City Revitalization Program in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately protect and enhance the visual quality of these areas. (b) Applications for future development and property improvements that are subject to discretionary approval in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall incorporate the appropriate combination of specific design guidelines listed in section 4.3 of the EIR in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately reduce project related visual impacts on streets, residential neighborhoods, and the central area as a whole. Exhibit A B. 3. Environmentallmpact Potential Impacts on Visual Character and Image of Eastside Residential Neighborhood. Project facilitated new multi -family development built in the Eastside neighborhood would have the potential to clash visually with the neighborhood's older, predominantly single-family residential character. Finding: The mitigation measure identified below is feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measure will reduce the impact to a "less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In review and processing of residential development projects within the Eastside residential neighborhood, place special emphasis on implementation of locational strategy contained in the Central City Revitalization Program to protect and improve the visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. Encourage locations at the edge of the neighborhood and require appropriate visual buffering and scale transition between new multi -family structures and existing single-family development, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission. Population, Housinq and Employment 1. Environmental Impact Potential Jobs/Housing Balance Impacts. Project -facilitated development and the projected addition of a substantially greater number of jobs than housing units in the Project Area may exacerbate the existing jobs/housing imbalance (weighted towards jobs in comparison to the County as a whole). Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implementation of mitigation measures identified below in Section III.C.1 of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations pertaining to project -related commute period vehicular traffic increases and associated project and cumulative transportation system impacts. Exhibit A C. M Transportation and Parking 1. Environmentallmpact • Impact on Intersection Sianalization Requirements. Additional redevelopment related traffic would increase PM peak hour traffic volumes at the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection above criteria levels set by Caltrans to determine whether installation of a traffic signal is warranted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Caltrans has established eleven possible tests, or "warrants", for determining whether installation of a traffic signal should be considered. Usually, two or more of these must be met before a signal is warranted. The EIR analysis indicates that only the warrant related to peak hour traffic volume would be met for the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection. The City shall monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine Street -Central Avenue intersection, and when two or more Caltrans signal warrant criteria are met, shall place the intersection on the City's priority list for signalization. Infrastructure and Public Facilities 1. Environmentallmpact Anticipated Water Supply Impacts. Anticipated increases in commercial activity, employment and residential population associated with the Project would result in corresponding increases in the demand for water service. The City is prepared to provide the additional domestic water necessary for anticipated additional development in the Project Area, but water table fluctuations due to basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty regarding available water supply for the City's future needs. Finding: The mitigation and shall be required in mitigation measures will significant level. Exhibit A measures identified below are feasible or incorporated into the Project. The reduce the impact to a less than 2. Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implement the City of Lodi General Plan Land Use and Growth Management Element policies which require the City to (1) develop new facilities, as necessary, to serve new develop in accordance with the City's Water, Wastewater and Drainage Master Plans, and (2) assess water, wastewater and drainage development fees on all new residential, commercial, office and industrial development sufficient to fund required systemwide improvements. Environmental Impact Water Distribution System Inadequacies. The existing water distribution system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: As project facilitated development takes place over the next 20 years, implement remaining needed central area water distribution system improvements identified in Chapter 8 of the City's Water Master Plan. Water conservation should also be promoted as the Project Area redevelops. Environmental Impact Sewage Collection System Inadequacies. The existing wastewater collection system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Continue to implement the central area sewage collection system improvements identified as needed in the City of Lodi General Exhibit A 9 5. Plan, and the City's Sanitary Sewer System Technical Report, including planned improvements to the Eastside neighborhood collection system. Environmental Impact Police Service Demand in Project Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for police services in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Police Department shall monitor the rate of additional police calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional officers and facilities (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Police Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Environmental Impact Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service Demand in Proiect Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for fire protection and emergency medical services in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Fire Department shall monitor the rate of additional fire protection service calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional firefighters and equipment (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Fire Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Exhibit A 11 7. Environmental Impact School Service Demand. Existing Lodi Unified School District (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional school population generated by project -facilitated residential development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Redevelopment Agency shall make the statutory pass- through payment of tax increment revenue to the LUSD and the San Joaquin County Office of Education pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 33607.5. (b) City shall require developers in the Project Area to pay state authorized school impact fees to the extent approved by the LUSD. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional impact fees negotiated with LUSD. Environmental Impact Project Park Demand. Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area are already operating at capacity. Project -facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area would incrementally increase the demand for park and recreation services. Based on estimated population increase in the Project Area, the City will need approximately 1.83 acres of additional park land to meet the increased demand. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall ensure that at least 1.83 acres of parkland is developed within or convenient to the Project Area. As project -facilitated build -out takes place in the Project Area, adequate corresponding park and recreation provisions shall be provided through required Exhibit A E. F. dedication of land and/or in -lieu payment of City adopted park and recreation fees. Drainage and Water Quality 1. Environmentallmpact Erosion. Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. Building construction and infrastructure improvements in the Project Area could further degrade downstream water quality. Factors contributing to downstream water quality problems include soil disturbance during construction, new impervious surfaces created with project -facilitated developments, increased vehicle traffic, and herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers from new landscaping associated with project -facilitated development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) City shall require applicants for each future project - facilitated development requiring a discretionary approval to comply with all applicable state, regional and City water quality provisions. (b) For projects involving the grading of more than five acres, applicant shall be required to (1) file with the Regional Water Quality Control Board a Notice of Intent to comply with the Statewide General Permit for Construction Activities, (2) prepare and implement a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (including erosion control plan) if grading is involved, (3) implement a monitoring, inspection and documentation program to assure the effectiveness of control measures, (4) obtain or comply with existing General Stormwater Discharge Permits for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (5) comply with the NPDES Phase II Non -Point Discharge program. Noise 1. Environmental Impact Exposure of Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive Environmental Noise Project facilitated intensification of and changes in land uses in the Exhibit A 'M Project Area could expose additional people to noise levels exceeding acceptable levels. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Noise impacts can be reduced through appropriate site planning, construction of noise barriers, and/or incorporation of noise insulation features into a project's design as specified in the City of Lodi General Plan. Evaluate the impact of each redevelopment -facilitated discretionary development application in the Project Area on the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources. (b) Require noise assessments for all redevelopment - facilitated discretionary applications in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, and for noise -generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plan when proposed adjacent to noise sensitive land uses. Environmental Impact Redevelopment Facilitated Construction Noise. Residential and other noise -sensitive uses located adjacent to project -facilitated construction activities could be exposed to noise levels that would interfere with normal activities. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require the use of a combination of the following reasonable construction practices for projects when noise - sensitive receptors are located in the project vicinity, including restricting construction to avoid noise generating activity in the early morning, evening, and on Sundays and holidays, muffling and properly maintaining all internal combustion engine driven equipment, locating stationary noise -generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors, routing construction traffic to and from the project site via designated truck routes, utilizing 10 Exhibit A G. Air Quality 1. 2. "quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources where such technology exists, and designation of a "noise disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. Environmental Impact Construction Activity Air Quality Construction activities facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan could generate construction period exhaust emissions and fugitive dust that could affect local air quality. In addition, buildings constructed prior to 1979 could have Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) which could be released into the air during building demolition. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require that individual redevelopment -facilitated projects involving new construction shall comply, where applicable, with the current San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ("SJVUAPCD") Regulation VIII requirements. In addition, the City may also require a limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site, suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 miles per hour, and/or a limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMs. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD and City required control measures. Environmental Impact Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases Emissions resulting from new vehicle trips generated by redevelopment facilitated intensification in the Project Area would, by the year 2020, generate Reactive Organic Gases and Nitrogen Oxides in ii Exhibit A H. amounts that would exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for each pollutant. These emissions would constitute a significant project impact and would be expected to contribute to a significant cumulative impact. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. Notwithstanding incorporation of these mitigation measures, the Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases are an unavoidable significant effect. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project make the alternatives infeasible and outweigh this significant effect. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Where practical, future development proposals shall include physical improvements that would act as incentives for pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of travel. (b) Employment -generating development projects of 10,000 square feet or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and shower/locker facilities for employees. (c) Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpool/vanpool incentives, develop an employee rideshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. The specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project are more particularly described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Part V of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations. Vegetation and Wildlife 1. Environmental Impact Potential Loss of Special -Status Species Redevelopment - facilitated development consistent with the City of Lodi General Plan may result in impacts on special status species. Finding: The mitigation and shall be required in mitigation measures will significant" level. 12 Exhibit A measures identified below are feasible or incorporated into the Project. The reduce the impact to a "less than Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: If disturbance to suitable giant garter snake habitat is proposed as part of a redevelopment assisted development or improvement project, systematic surveys shall be conducted before such a development is approved in order to determine definitively whether any giant garter snakes occur. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and in compliance with specifications of section 5.2.4.8 of the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan. 2. Environmentallmpact Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts Redevelopment -facilitated development could affect potential jurisdictional wetland habitat. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All redevelopment -facilitated development that would involve modifications to potential wetlands and other waters, such as seasonal wetlands that could be present in vacant or under used parcels, shall be coordinated with representatives of the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as required by federal and state law, to ensure that any required mitigation protocols and associated project design modifications are incorporated into proposed improvement plans during the initial stages of project review. I. Cultural and Historic Resources 1. Environmental Impact Proiect-Related Potentials for Disturbance of Archaeological Resources Development encouraged and improvements funded by the proposed redevelopment program could disturb sensitive archaeological resources in the Project Area. 13 Exhibit A E Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In the event that subsurface cultural resources are encountered during approved ground -disturbing activities for a redevelopment program -related construction activity, work in the immediate vicinity shall be stopped and a qualified archaeologist retained to evaluate the find. The discovery or disturbance of any cultural resources should also be reported to the Central California Information Center, and if prehistoric, to the Native American Heritage Commission. Identified cultural resources should be recorded on a State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 422. Mitigation measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. Environmental Impact Destruction/Degradation of Historic Resources Project - facilitated development in the Project Area has the potential to destroy or substantially degrade historic resources, if these resources are not identified or recognized and their maintenance, rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not promoted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All future redevelopment -assisted public improvement projects and private development projects shall be evaluated for the presence of and potential impacts on historic resources. If disturbance of a historic resource cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be implemented. The City and private sponsors of future individual projects on sites that contain unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a qualified professional architectural historian prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. 14 Exhibit A Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project -facilitated development. IV. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT CEQA requires that an EIR describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project or to the location of the Project which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the Project and to evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. Section 15126(d)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that the "discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or to its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly." As more particularly set forth in the Final EIR, the Project was compared to the following alternatives: (1) a "no project" alternative; (2) a modified Project Area boundary; (3) a modified list of Project Area redevelopment actions and/or modified allocation of redevelopment funds to the various actions; (4) an alternative Project Area location; and (5) the Project incorporating the mitigation measures listed in the Final EIR. The following discussion briefly summarizes the listed alternatives. No Project Alternative: Under the No Project alternative, the Redevelopment Plan would not be adopted. No actions would be taken by the Lodi Redevelopment Agency to remove blighting conditions and stimulate additional private investment in the proposed Project Area. No Redevelopment Agency funding would be provided towards housing assistance in the Project Area, and no Redevelopment Agency actions would be taken to fund infrastructure and facility improvements, or to redevelop property. Although it is not possible to quantify the exact level of public and private development that would occur in the proposed Project Area under the No Project alternative, it is reasonable to assume that, with no Redevelopment Agency activity in the Project Area to fund public improvements and to attract an increased level of private investment, existing blighting conditions would remain or worsen. The No Project Alternative is not a viable alternative because it will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area. Modified Project Boundary Alternative: This alternative would be similar to the proposed project in terms of allocation of funding, but would involve either a reduced area boundary or an enlarged area boundary. Under the reduced area boundary, the overall effectiveness of the redevelopment program would be lessened, since selected activities would have to be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the reduced tax increment revenues accruable to the Redevelopment Agency. If the reduced boundary alternative were selected, the extent of potential growth in the Project Area subject to redevelopment assistance and incentives would be reduced and a corresponding decrease in the land use, traffic, public services, visual, vegetation and wildlife, noise, air quality, and other impacts identified in the EIR could be anticipated. The reduced project area alternative will not effectively reduce and eliminate the blight existing throughout the Project Area and therefore is not a viable alternative. The enlarged area boundary alternative would not be a viable alternative under state redevelopment law. The proposed boundaries of the Project Area were carefully selected 15 Exhibit A based on identification of areas that contain blighted conditions, could benefit from redevelopment activities, and could meet certain other redevelopment law parameters. A combination of blight and general urbanization conditions has not been identified outside the Project Area at the present time. Modified Redevelopment Activities: This alternative would include the same boundaries proposed by the project, but with a modified allocation of project -generated revenues to redevelopment activities within the Project Area. The modified allocation would increase the percentage of total project -related revenue for affordable housing from approximately 20 percent (as proposed in the Project) to approximately 35 percent, with the 15 percent difference taken from the public infrastructure improvement, site assembly and other components of the redevelopment program. Although this alternative would have some positive environmental effects, it would also reduce the beneficial land use compatibility effects of the project, reduce the rate of market rate housing and job growth, and decrease the funding available for storm drainage and flood control improvements, assistance for preservation and maintenance of historic resources, and development driven hazardous waste clean-up. This alternative could further result in a reduced overall level of physical rehabilitation in the proposed Project Area and an associated reduction in facilitation of blight elimination. Because this alternative will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, it is not a viable alternative. Alternative Project Area Location: This alternative examined the potential for the Project Area to be located on other sites. However, the boundaries of the proposed Project Area were precisely established based on the maximum area within which identified blighted conditions currently occur, in combination with other urbanization parameters set forth in state redevelopment law. No additional areas are currently identified in the project vicinity that appear to meet redevelopment law criteria for blight. The fundamental purpose of the redevelopment project is to authorize activities and financing to enable the Redevelopment Agency to eliminate blighted conditions. Redevelopment Agency establishment of an alternative site for the Project Area would fail to attain the basic objectives of the proposed project. Therefore, this is not a viable alternative. Proiect Incorporating Mitigation Measures: This alternative consists of the Project as proposed with the incorporation of all mitigation measures recommended in the EIR. As stated above, the mitigation measures recommended in the EIR shall be incorporated into the Project. This is therefore the Project to be considered by the City Council and the Agency. This alternative effectively achieve the goals of the Redevelopment Project and would mitigate all environmental effects to a less than significant levels, except for long-term regional emissions of air pollutants, which is a significant and unavoidable effect. Finding: After consideration of all the alternatives, the Agency and City Council find that the Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures is the "environmentally superior" alternative since the proposed Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures most effectively achieves the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, and provides a funding source for the proposed public improvements which are necessary to alleviate existing blighting conditions in the Project Area. In addition, all potentially significant impacts identified in the Final EIR except for the long-term regional emissions have been eliminated or reduced to a less than significant level by incorporation of appropriate mitigation measures as part of the proposed Project. 16 Exhibit A V. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS CEQA requires a public agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. As set forth in Part III hereof, the Agency and the City Council have determined that the only unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is the following: Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases. The Agency and the City Council find that the above -referenced unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is acceptable when balanced against its benefits. This finding is based on the following facts: The Project will serve a critical need, that being the elimination and prevention of the spread of blight and deterioration in the Project Area and the conservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed Project Area in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, the General Plan for the City of Lodi and local codes and ordinances. 2. The promotion of new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area will prevent the loss of and facilitate the capture of commercial sales activity. 3. The Project will allow for the elimination of blight through abatement or code enforcement, rehabilitation and reconstruction, new development, and the assembly of parcels into more developable sites for more desirable uses. 4. The Project will result in the elimination or amelioration of certain environmental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular circulation systems, inadequate storm drainage systems, inadequate off-street parking, and other similar public improvement deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area. 5. New construction within the Project Area will result in an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. 6. Project implementation would result in the retention and expansion of businesses by means of redevelopment and rehabilitation activities and by encouraging and assisting in the cooperation and participation of owners, businesses, and public agencies in the revitalization of the Project Area. 7. Revitalized commercial and industrial development will result in the creation and development of local job opportunities and the preservation of the area's existing employment base. 8. Project implementation will strengthen the economic base of the Project Area and the City by installing needed site improvements and stimulating commercial, industrial, and residential development. 17 Exhibit A 9. Project implementation will expand and improve the City's supply of affordable housing. is Exhibit A EXHIBIT "B" MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST--LODI REDEVELOPMENT PLAN June 7, 2002 The environmental mitigation measures listed in column two below have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for the Lodi Redevelopment Plan in order to mitigate EIR-identified environmental impacts. A completed and signed chart will indicate that each mitigation requirement has been compiled with, and that City and State monitoring requirements have been fulfilled with respect to Public Resources Code Section 21081.8. IDENTIFIED IMPACT LAND USE AND VISUAL FACTORS Impact 4.1: Adverse Land Use Compatibility Impacts. In addition to beneficial land use compatibility effects, some project -facilitated land use changes within the Project Area could result in adverse land use compatibility impacts. Given the proximity of some existing, planned and anticipated residential uses in this area to existing and planned commercial and industrial areas, project -assisted intensification could introduce significant now land use conflicts among specific residential, commercial, and industrial developments (e.g., traffic, visual, light, noise, parking, odor and other conflicts). Such project -induced effects represent potentially significant adverse land use compatibility. Impact 4.2: Visual Impacts on Specific Streetscapes Within the Project Area. Portions of the industrial rail corridor and east industrial subareas have been identified by City staff (see subsection 4.3.2) as anticipated industrial development opportunity areas, and are largely visible from adjoining major through - routes (e.g., Cherokee lane, Lockeford Street, Stockton Street, Pine Street and Lodi Avenue) and from adjoining residential neighborhoods and the downtown. Similarly, anticipated commercial development intensification along Lodi Avenue West and the Cherokee Lane Corridor (see section 4.3.2) would be highly visible from those primary travel routes. The visual quality of future development in these RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Mitigation 4.1: During City review and prior to approval of Individual development projects within the redevelopment area, emphasize the need to avoid significant new land use conflicts between non-residential and residential development, between sensitive new commercial uses and existing nuisance -prone commercial and Industrial uses, and between new nuisance prone commercial and industrial uses and sensitive existing commercial uses. During these review procedures and the formulation of conditions of approval, require assurances to City satisfaction of: (1) adequate land use separation, scale transition, and noise buffering; (2) creative siting of buildings to avoid conflicts; (3) adequate protections against light, glare, and shadow impacts; (4) adequate odor control; (5) adequate offstreet parking provisions; (6) adequate and safe truck access and offstreet loading provisions; and (7) other common measures warranted to avoid such land use conflicts. Implementation of these measures would be expected to reduce potential land use compatibility impacts to a less -than - significant level. Impl. 2111V Type of Monitoring Action Timing Re uirements Monitoring and Verification Ent process, future development In the Industrial Rail vidual Corridor, and Fast Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane appli- City, Verify during plan Prior to any Lodi indi- check bldg. or Redevelop- vidual grading ment Agency appli- permit or City cants sufficient to adequately protect and enhance the Mitigation 4.2: Through the City's currently- City, adopted development permit and design review indi- process, future development In the Industrial Rail vidual Corridor, and Fast Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane appli- Corridor and Lodi Avenue West subareas shall be cants subject to particularly focused and detailed design review. Implement specific visual impact mitigation guidelines set forth In the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Development Standards and Guidelines and Central City Revitalization Program that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City s Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately protect and enhance the visual quality of these areas. In addition, applications for future new developments and Verify during plan Prior to any Lodi check and design bldg. or Redevelop - review grading ment Agency permit or City 1 - Impl. Entity . Implementation Entity Page 1 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 I - Impl. Entity n Implementation Entity Page 2 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date specific opportunity areas would directly affect property improvements subject to discretionary the quality of these important city streetscapes. approval in the industrial rail corridor, east Without adequate design control, the project industrial area, Cherokee Lane corridor and Lodi could facilitate new industrial or mixed- Avenue West subareas, shall incorporate the use/commercial development that could appropriate combination of specific design adversely affect the visual quality of these highly guidelines listed under this mitigation in section visible industrial and mixed-use streetscapes, as 4.3 of this EIR in a manner that, to the satisfaction well as the visual character surrounding of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval neighborhoods, and of the central area as a Committee and Planning Commission, are whole. Such possible effects constitute a sufficient to adequately reduce project -related potentially significant adverse visual impact. visual impacts on streets, residential neighborhoods, and the central area as a whole. Implementation of these two measures would reduce the potential adverse visual impacts of development in these subareas to a less -than - significant level. Impact 4.3: Potential Impacts on the Visual Mitigation 4.3: In the review and processing of City, Verity during pian Prior to any Lodi Character and Image of the Eastside residential development projects within the indi- check and design bldg. or Redevelop - Residential Neighborhood. Although the eastside residential neighborhood, place special vidual review grading ment Agency Eastside neighborhood has been downzoned to emphasis on implementation of locational appli- permit or City preclude infiltration of additional multi -family strategies contained in the Central City cants development within predominantly single-family Revitalization Program to protect and improve the areas, some multi -family development would be visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. expected to occur along the edge of downtown. Encourage locations at the edge of the Such project -facilitated mufti -family development neighborhood and require appropriate visual has the potential to add to Eastside buffering and scale transition between new multi - neighborhood visual deficiencies created by family structures and existing single-family existing, poorly designed, multi -family residential development, to the satisfaction of City staff and units. Project -facilitated new multi -family units the City's Architectural Approval Committee and would have the potential to clash visually with Planning Commission. This measure would the neighborhood's older, predominantly single- reduce the impact to a less -then -significant family residential character. Such an effect level. would represent a potentially significant adverse visual Impact POPULATION AND HOUSING Impact 5.1: Potential Jobs/Housing Balance Mltlgation 5.1: Implement Midgatlons 6-1 and City stafl Monitor traffic Annually Lodi Impacts. Project -facilitated development may 10-2 pertaining to project -related commute period volumes at Pine Redevelop - contribute to the existing jobsthousing imbalance vehicular traffic increases and associated project Street/Central Ave. ment Agency in Lodi (weighted towards jobs in comparison to and cumulative transportation system and air intersection; install or City the County as a whole). The projected addition quality impacts. Implementation of these signal when of a substantially greater number of jobs than measures would reduce the one identified warranted housing units in the Project Area would significant environmental effect associated with I - Impl. Entity n Implementation Entity Page 2 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entity a Implementation Entity Page 3 WP5116161 FE/RI MMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date exacerbate this imbalance. Such an effect project -related incommuting increases to a less - would constitute a potentially significant than-signif/cant level. adverse impact TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING Impact 6-1: Impact on Intersection Mitigation 6-1. Caltrans has established 11 City stall Monitor traffic Annually Lodi Signalization Requirements. The added PM possible tests or "warrants" for determining volumes at Pine Redevelop - peak hour traffic due to the redevelopment- whether installation of a traffic signal should be StreeUCentral Ave. ment Agency related additional traffic would increase PM peak considered. These warrants each consider intersection; install or City hour volumes above Caltrans Signal Warrant different criteria such as peak hour traffic volume, signal when #11 criteria levels at the Pine Street/Central pedestrian volume, presence of school children, warranted Avenue ail -way -stop intersection. Although and accident history. Usually, two or more projected PM peak hour operation at this "warrants" must be met before a signal is intersection with the project would not exceed warranted. The fact that this EIR analysis LOS D, this signal warrant effect would indicates that Warrant #11 (related to peak hour represent a potentially significant impact traffic volumes) would be met indicates that a detailed signal warrant analysis covering all possible Caltrans warrants is appropriate. The City shall therefore monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine Street/Ceniral Avenue intersection, and when two or more Caltrans signal warrant criteria are met, shall place the intersection on the City's priority list for signalization. This measure would reduce this Impact to a less-tha"Ignftfcant level. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Impact 7.1-1: Anticipated Water Supply Mitigation 7.1-1. Implement the following two City Develop new Condition of Lodi Impacts. Additional development facilitated by City of Lodi General Plan Land Use and Growth and/or facilities as approval for Redevelop - or otherwise associated with implementation of Management Element policies: redevel. necessary; assess major new ment Agency the proposed redevelopment plan and agency established fees on development or City associated Increases in commercial activity, The City shall develop new facilities, as staff new development projects employment, and residential population (see necessary, to serve new development in housing, population and employment increase accordance with the City's Water, estimates in section 5.3 of this EIR) would result Wastewater, and Drainage Master Plans. in corresponding Increases in the demand for (Policy 1) water service. The City, as water purveyor, is prepared to provide the additional domestic The City shall assess water, wastewater, and water necessary for anticipated additional drainage development fees on all new development in this area, including anticipated residential, commemiel, office and industrial project -facilitated commercial growth and development sufficient to fund required population increases, within the City's existing systemwide improvements. (Policy 2) water entitlements and distribution systems. 1 - Impl. Entity a Implementation Entity Page 3 WP5116161 FE/RI MMCHT.616 1 - Impt. Entity - Implementation Entity Page 4 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date However, while aquifers yield water readily to City and Redevelopment Agency implementation the City's wells, water table fluctuations due to of these two policies as project -facilitated basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty development takes place over the next 20 years regarding available water supply for the City's would ensure that project -related impacts on the future needs. Anticipated project -facilitated adequacy of City water sources would be reduced growth within the redevelopment area would to a less -than -significant level. therefore be considered to have a potentially significant Impact on water service. Impact 7.1-2; Water Distribution System Mitigation 7.1-2; As project -facilitated City Implement water Condition of Lodi Inadequacies. The existing water distribution development takes place over the next 20 years, and/or distribution system approval for Redevelop - system may not be adequate to serve implement remaining needed central area water Redevel Improvements as major new merit Agency anticipated new redevelopment -facilitated distribution system improvements identified in Agency needed development or City development and intensification in the Project Chapter S of the City's Water Master Plan. Water staff projects Area. This potential deficiency represents a conservation should also be promoted as the potentially significant impact Project Area redevelops. implementation of these measures would reduce project -related water distribution impacts to a less -than -significant level. Impact 7.2-1: Sewage Collection System Mitigation 7.2-1: Continue to implement the City Implement sewage Condition of Lodi Inadequacies. The existing wastewater central area sewage collection system and/or collection system approval for Redevelop - collection system serving the Project Area may improvements Identified as needed in the City of Redevel improvements as major new ment Agency not be adequate to serve anticipated new Lodi General Plan, and the Clty's Sanitary Sewer Agency needed development or City development and intensification in the Project System Technical Report including the planned staff projects Area. This potential deficiency represents a improvements to eastside neighborhood collection potentially significant impact system. Implementation of these measures over the next 20 years would reduce project wastewater collection system impacts to a less- than-signiflcant level. Impact 7.3-1: Police Service Demand Mitigation 7.3-1: The Police Department shall Lodi Annual response Annual Lodi Impacts in Project Area. Plan -facilitated monitor the rate of additional police calls per year Police time monitoring monitoring; Redevelop - development and intensification within the associated with the Project Area and the Dept. reports; normal condition of ment Agency Project Area would increase demands for police adequacy of associated response times. As and City review of individual approval for or City service. The City of Lodi Police Department warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall staff discretionary project major new may require additional staffing or equipment to provide additional officers and facilities (funded applications projects serve these added demands. The proposed through the City's general fund). Following redevelopment plan would therefore have a established City procedures, the Police potentially significant impact on police Department shall also review discretionary services. approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Implementation of these measures would reduce the impact to a less -than -significant level. 1 - Impt. Entity - Implementation Entity Page 4 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 I - Impi. Entity a Implementatlon Entity Page 5 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 IAONITORING fERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE mpl. Type of Monitoring liming lonitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) =ntity' Actinn Tequiremenis 'erification Entity lianature Date Impact 7.41: Fire Protection and Emergency Mitigation 7.41: The Rre Department shall odl Fir Annual fire call \nnually odi Medical Service Demand Impacts In the monitor the rate of additional fire protection )eat. monitoring reports; tedevelop- Project Area. Project -facilitated development service calls per year associated with the Project normal review of vent Agency and intensification within the Project Area would Area and the adequacy of associated response individual it City increase demands for fire protection and times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the discretionary project emergency medical services. Depending on the City shall provide additional firefighters and applications type of use, density, and occupancy of individual equipment (funded through the Citys general project -facilitated developments, the City of Lodi fund). Following established City procedures, the Fire Department may require additional staffing Fire Department shall also review discretionary or equipment to meet its fire protection goals. approvals for project -facilitated commercial and The proposed redevelopment plan may therefore residential development within the Project Area. have a potentially significant impact on fire These measures would reduce the impact to a protection and emergency medical services. less -than -significant level. Impact 7.5-1: School Service Demand Mitigation 75-1: The Lodi Redevelopment :ity Ensure all pass- 'dor to final odi Impacts. Existing Lodi Unified School District Agency shall make the statutory pass-through tnd/or throughs and school iroject iedevelop- (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may payment of tax increment revenue to the LUSD iedeve fee payments have tpproval for vent Agency not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the and the San Joaquin County Office of Education kgency been made iew projects )r City additional school population generated by pursuant to Health and Safety Code section itaff project -facilitated residential development. The 33607.5. In addition, the City of Lodi shall require project -related increase in demand for school developers in the redevelopment area to pay service would therefore represent a potentially state -authorized school impact fees to the extent significant impact. approved by the LUSD. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional impact fees negotiated with the LUSD. These measures would be expected to enable the LUSD to fund school improvements necessary to accommodate students from project -facilitated development, reducing this impact to a less -than• significant level. Impact 7.6-1: Project Park Demand Impacts. Mitigation 7.6-1: Mitigation for Park Demand ;Ity Verify parkland 3dor to odi Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area Impacts. The City shall ensure that at least 1.83 tnd/or dedication or fee )rading or iedevelop- are already operating at capacity. Project- acres of parkland is developed within or iedew payment during plan wilding nent Agency facilitated development and intensification in the convenient to the Project Area. As project- 4gency check iermit rc City Project Area would incrementally increase the facilitated buildout takes place in the Project Area, :tall demand for park and recreation services. As adequate corresponding park and recreation discussed in chapter 5 (Population, Housing, provisions shall be provided through required and Employment) of this EIR, it is estimated that dedication of land and/or in4leu payment of City project -facilitated development would generate adopted park and recreation fees. Implementation approximately 210 additional households in the of this measure would reduce this impact to less - Project Area. Based on the anticipated citywide then-signif/cant levels. year 2020 household size of 2.56 persons (see Table 5.2 in section 5.3), the 210 new households would generate a population increase of approximately 538 people. Based on the most recent City park acreage standard i I - Impi. Entity a Implementatlon Entity Page 5 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 1 -1mpL Entity . Implementation Emmy page 6 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Imps. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date (3.4 acres per 1,000 persons), this new population increment would generate a demand for approximately 1.83 acres of additional parkland. Additional project -facilitated employment growth, estimated at 2,014 jobs by the year 2020, may also generate some additional demand for park and recreation services in the Project Area. Existing Project Area facilities do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate this additional demand. This project effect would therefore represent a significant impact. DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY Impact 8-1: Project -Related Erosion, Mitigation 8-1: The City shall require the City Verify during plan Prior to Lodi Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. applicant for each future project -facilitated and/or check and during grading Redevelop - Redevelopment program -facilitated building development requiring a discretionary approval to Redevel construction -period permit, and ment Agency construction and infrastructure improvements in comply with all applicable state, regional and City Agency inspections during or City the Project Area could further degrade water quality provisions and, for projects involving staff grading downstream water quality. Associated factors the grading of more than five (5) acres: (a) file that may contribute to downstream water quality with the RWQCB a Notice of Intent to comply with problems include soil disturbance during the Statewide General Permit for Construction construction, new impervious surfaces created Activities, (b) prepare and Implement a project - with project -facilitated developments; and specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan increased vehicle traffic, and herbicides, (including an erosion control plan) R grading is pesticides, and fertilizers from new landscaping involved, (c) implement a monitoring, inspection, associated with project -facilitated development. and documentation program to assure the This combination of factors represents a effectiveness of control measures, (d) obtain or potentially significant impact comply with existing General Stonnwater Discharge Permit(s) for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (e) comply with the NPDES Phase II Non -Point Discharge program. Implementation of these requirements would reduce this impact to a less-than,s/gnif/cant level. NOISE Impact 9-1: Project -Related Exposure of. Mitigation 9.1: Noise Impacts can be reduced City Condition of During Lodi Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive through appropriate site planning (e.g., setbacks, and/or individual project Individual Redevelop - Environmental Noise. Project -facilitated noise -protected areas), construction of noise Redevel approval; verify project ment Agency Intensification of and changes in land uses in barriers, and/or incorporation of noise insulation Agency during plan check environ. or City the Project Area could expose additional people features into a projects design as specified in the staff; that any required review to noise levels exceeding acceptable levels--i.e., City of Lodi General Plan. As part of the future indi- noise studies have to noise levels identified in the Lodi General environmental review process for Individual vidual been completed Plan as "conditionally acceptable," "normally projects, new developments facilitated by the appli- unacceptable" or "unacceptable" for the redevelopment plan shall be evaluated. Evaluate cants associated land use. Such new exposure each redevelopment -facilitated discretionary 1 -1mpL Entity . Implementation Emmy page 6 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entity a Impiwnentation Entity Page 7 WP5116161FE/RIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Imps. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date possibilities constitute a potentially significant development application In the Project Area with Impact respect to the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources such as SR 99, Cherokee Lane, Stockton Street, Lodi Avenue, Tokay Street, other arterial roadways, and/or the UPRR. Also, require noise assessments for all redevelopment -facilitated discretionary applications where noise -sensitive receptors are proposed in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, such as subareas 1, 3 and 4, and for noise -generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plan when proposed adjacent to noise -sensitive land uses. The results of the noise assessments and the measures identified to reduce noise levels shall be incorporated in the project plans sufficient to meet stipulated exterior and interior noise level standards. All such evaluations shall be completed to City satisfaction by a qualified acoustical consultant. With implementation of measures identified throughout such evaluations to meet these standards, this potentially significant impact would be reduced to a less -than - Significant level. Impact 9-2: Redevelopment -Facilitated Mitigation 9-2: To reduce the potential for noise City Condition of Condition of Lodi Construction Noise. Construction activities impacts resulting from project -facilitated and/or Individual project constr. Redevelop - can generate considerable noise levels. construction activities, implement a combination of Redevel approval, verified (grading or ment Agency Construction activities facilitated by the the following measures at all construction sites Agency during construction building) or City redevelopment program could include site when noise -sensitive receptors are located in the staff, permit; verify. grading and preparation, building demolition, project vicinity. The combination of measures indi- during construction of foundations and buildings, shall be evaluated on an individual, project -by- vidual construction installation of utilities, paving of roadways, and project basis and shall be sufficient to achieve project construction of parking lots. The noise effects of compliance with applicable City General Plan appli- these future construction activities would depend and/or Noise Ordinance standards at affected cants upon the amount of activity, the type of receptors. equipment used, and the noise control measures used. Residential and other noise -sensitive Noise -generating construction activity shall uses located adjacent to project -facilitated be restricted to the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 construction activities could therefore be PM, Monday through Friday, and 8:00 AM to exposed to noise levels that would interfere with 5:00 PM on Saturdays. No construction normal activities. This possibility constitutes a activities should occur on Sundays or potentfally significant Impact. holidays. ■ All internal combustion engine driven equipment shall be equipped with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. 1 - Impl. Entity a Impiwnentation Entity Page 7 WP5116161FE/RIMMCHT.616 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Imps. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date ■ Stationary noise -generating equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a construction Project Area. ■ All construction traffic to and from the project site shall be routed via designated truck routes where possible. Construction -related heavy truck traffic In residential areas shall be prohibited where feasible. • "Quiet' air compressors and other stationary noise sources shall be used where technology exists. • A "noise disturbance coordinator' shall be designated who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator would determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and would require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site and Included in the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule. (The City should be responsible for designating a noise disturbance coordinator and the individual project sponsor should be responsible for posting the phone number and providing construction schedule notices). Implementation of this measure would reduce the potential for project -related impacts due to construction noise to a less -than -significant level. 1 - ImpL Entity = Implementation Entity page a WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 I - Im,I. Entity . Implementation Entity Page 9 WP5116161FE1RIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date AIR QUALITY Impact 10-1: Construction Activity Air Mitigation 10-1: The City shall require that City Condition of Condition of Lodi Quality Impacts. Construction activities individual redevelopment -facilitated projects within and/or individual project grading Redevelop - facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan the Project Area involving new construction shall Redevel approvals; verified permit; verify ment Agency could generate construction period exhaust comply, where applicable, with current Agency during grading during or City emissions and fugitive dust that could affect SJVUAPCD Regulation Vill requirements, which staff; construction local air quality. In addition, buildings currently include the following: indi- constructed prior to 1979 could have Asbestos vidual Containing Materials (ACMs), which could be Appropriate dust suppression for land project released into the air during building demolition. clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land appli- Such Construction -period air emissions leveling, grading, cut and fill and demolition cants possibilities represent a potentially significant activities, such as the effective application of impact. water or pre-soaking; • Effective stabilization of all disturbed areas of a construction site, including storage piles, which are not being actively used for seven or more days; - Control of fugitive dust from on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads; and ■ Removal of accumulations of mud or dirt at the end of the work day or once every 24 hours from public paved roads, shoulders and access ways adjacent to the site, for the duration of the activity. Regulation VIII also requires a Dust Control plan for construction activity that will include 40 acres or more of disturbed surface area, or will include moving more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials on at least three days. In addition, where appropriate, the City may also wish to require the following: + A limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph); • Installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site; I - Im,I. Entity . Implementation Entity Page 9 WP5116161FE1RIMMCHT.616 1 - Impt. Entity = Implementation Entity Page 10 WP5116161FElRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date • Suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 mph; and/or • A limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. Prior to each the start of construction, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD- and City -required control measures. To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs, and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMs. With implementation of these Regulation VIII controls and the above additional measures, project -related construction period air emissions impacts would be reduced to a less -than - significant level. Impact 10-2: Long -Term Regional Emissions Mitigation 10-2: The following emissions control City Condition of Condition of Lodi Increases. Emissions resulting from new strategies shall be applied to redevelopment and/or individual project project Redevelop - vehicle trips generated by redevelopment- program -facilitated development activities within Redevei approvals, incl. approvals; ment Agency facilitated intensification in the Project Area the Project Area: Agency annual reporting verify through or City would, by the year 2020, be expected to exceed staff; requirements annual the applicable thresholds of significance for Where practical, future development indi- reporting Reactive Organic Gases (ROO) and Nitrogen proposals shall include physical vidual reqmnts Oxides (NOJ, resulting in a significant project improvements, such as sidewalk project Impact. When this increase in "mobile improvements, landscaping, lighting and the appli- emissions" is considered cumulatively with Installation of bus shelters and bicycle cants possible new industrial "stationary sources" of parking, that would act as incentives for emissions that could locate within the pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of redevelopment area, the total of project -related travel. Indirect and direct emissions would also exceed applicable significance thresholds. As a result, Employment -generating development the project would also be expected to contribute projects of 10,000 square feet (approximately to a significant cumulative impact 25 employees) or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and shower/locker facilities for employees. 1 - Impt. Entity = Implementation Entity Page 10 WP5116161FElRIMMCHT.616 1 - Impl. Entity . Implementation Entity Paye I WP5116f61FE/RIMMCHT.6f6 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date • Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpool/vanpool incentives, develop an employee rideshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. Implementation of these measures would assist in reducing identified project and cumulative impacts on long-term regional emissions levels. The URBEM187G program estimates that the above measures would reduce regional indirect emissions by five to seven percent. This reduction would not reduce this impact to a less - than -significant level even in the absence of potential industrial emissions. Since no other feasible measures are available, these identified project and cumulative effects on regional air emissions would represent a significant unavoidable impact. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Impact 11-1: Potential Loss of Special -Status Mitigation 11-1: If disturbance to suitable giant City Require completion During Lodi Species. Although chances of encountering garter snake habitat (i.e., drainage ditches) is and/or of giant garter snake individ. Redevelop - special -status species in the Project Area are proposed as part of a redevelopment -assisted Redevel survey If existing project ment Agency low, redevelopment -facilitated development individual development or Improvement project, Agency drainage ditch will environ. or City consistent with the adopted City of Lodi General systematic surveys shall be conducted before staff; be affected by review; prior Plan may result in impacts on special status such a development is approved in order to indi- project; ensure to grading species. This possibility represents a determine definitively whether any giant garter vidual implementation of permit potentially significant Impact snakes occur. Such surveys shall be conducted project mitigation plan and issuance by a qualified wildlife biologist or a herpetologist appli- coordination with following applicable guidelines of the California cants jugs. agencies Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and/or (USACOE, USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to and/or CDFG) if provide a conclusive determination on presence or habitat affected absence of this animal specie. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the CDFG and USFWS, and in compliance with specifications of the SJMSCP, section 5.2.4.8. Implementation of this measure would ensure protection of possible populations of special -status animal species (i.e., giant garter snake) in the Project Area, mitigating potential impacts to a Iess-than-significant level. 1 - Impl. Entity . Implementation Entity Paye I WP5116f61FE/RIMMCHT.6f6 1 - ImpL Entity . Implementation EntRy Paye 12 WP5116161FE/RIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 11-2: Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts. Mitigation 11-2: All redevelopment -facilitated City During project Prior to Lodi Redevelopment -facilitated development development that would involve modifications to and/or environ. review, if approval of Redevelop - consistent with the adopted City of Lodi General potential wetlands and other waters, such as Redevel wetlands appear to grading ment Agency Plan could affect potential jurisdictional wetland seasonal wetlands that could be present in vacant Agency be present, req. permit or City habitat. This possibility represents a potentially or underused parcels, shall be coordinated with staff; biologist to significant impact. representatives of the California Department of indi- determine if Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of vidual wetlands are present Engineers, as required by federal and state law, project and as coed. of to ensure that any required mitigation protocols appli- devel. permit, req. and associated Individual project design cants Implementation of modifications are incorporated into proposed any juds. agency improvement plans during the Initial stages of mitigation regmnts. project review. Implementation of this measure would ensure that potential impacts on wetland resources are minimized and adequate replacement is provided, mitigating this potential impact to a less -than -significant level. CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact 12-1: Project -Related Potentials for Mitigation 12-1: In the event that subsurface City Grading inspection Cond. of Lodi Disturbance of Archaeological Resources. cultural resources are encountered during and/or and reporting grading Redevelop - Development encouraged and improvements approved ground -disturbing activities for a Redevel permit, ment Agency funded by the proposed redevelopment program redevelopment program -related construction Agency inspection or City could disturb sensitive archaeological resources activity, work in the immediate vicinity shall be staff; during in the Project Area. This possibility represents a stopped and a qualified archaeologist retained to indi- grading potentially significant impact evaluate the find. The discovery or disturbance of vidual any cultural resources should also be reported to project the Central California information Center (CCIC), appli- and If prehistoric, to the Native American Heritage cants Commission. Identified cultural resources should be recorded on a State Department of Parks and recreation (DPR) Form 422 (archaeological sites). Mitigation measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. Implementation of this measure would reduce this potential impact to a less-than-s/gnHlcant level. 1 - ImpL Entity . Implementation EntRy Paye 12 WP5116161FE/RIMMCHT.616 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entityt Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 12-2: Destruction/Degradation of Mitigation 12-2: Evaluate all future project- City During environ. Prior to Lodi Historic Resources. Project -facilitated assisted public improvement projects and private and/or review for individ. approval of Redevelop - development in the Project Area has the development projects for the presence of, and Redevel projects, ensure that grading or ment Agency potential to destroy or substantially degrade potential Impacts on, historic resources. If Agency any affected building or City historic resources, if these resources are not disturbance of a Project Area historic resource staff; historical resources permit Identified or recognized and their maintenance, cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be indi- have been identified rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not implemented. The City and private sponsors of vidual and mitigation promoted. Such destruction or degradation future individual projects on sites that contain project program would be considered a potentially significant unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a appli- implemented as impactt qualified professional architectural historian cants appropriate prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project -facilitated development. Implementation of these measures would reduce this potential impact to a less-dran- significant level. I - Impt. Entity . Implementation Entity Page 13 WP5116161FEIRIINMCHT.616 T1091 IL11 9 [*7►1ilk [0xKIAYa A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING, IMPROVING, AND PRESERVING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW- AND MODERATE -INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project (the "Project") which would result in the allocation of taxes from the Project Area to the Agency for the purposes of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) requires that not less than twenty percent (20%) of all taxes so allocated be used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2(g) of the Community Redevelopment Law provides that the Agency may use such funds outside the Project Area if a finding is made by resolution of the Agency and the City Council that such use will be of benefit to the Project; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that the use of taxes allocated from the Project Area for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. Dated: June 19, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk 2002- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lodi (the "City Council") has received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project (the "Project"), as approved and recommended by the Agency, a copy of which is on file at the office of the Agency at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, and at the office of the City Clerk at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, together with the Report of the Agency to the City Council on the proposed Redevelopment Plan, including: (1) the reasons for selection of the Project Area; (2) a description of the physical and economic conditions existing in the Project Area; (3) a description of specific projects proposed by the Agency in the Project Area and an explanation as to how the proposed projects will improve or alleviate the conditions existing in the Project Area; (4) the proposed method of financing redevelopment of the Project Area, including an assessment of the economic feasibility of the Project and an explanation of why the elimination of blight and redevelopment of the Project Area cannot be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone or by the City Council's use of financing alternatives other than tax increment financing; (5) a plan for the relocation of families and persons who may be temporarily or permanently displaced from housing facilities as a result of the Redevelopment Plan; (6) an analysis of the Preliminary Plan for the Project; (7) the Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi (the "Planning Commission"); (8) a record of the summary of consultations with the Project Area Committee; (9) the Final Environmental Impact Report; (10) a neighborhood impact report; (11) a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies and responses to written objections and concerns expressed by affected taxing agencies during the consultations; and (12) an Implementation Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reported that the Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Lodi and has recommended approval of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Project Area Committee ("PAC") for the Project has submitted its report and recommendations concerning the Redevelopment Plan, and has recommended approval of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency prepared and circulated a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the "Draft EIR") on the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto, and the Draft EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to incorporate comments received and responses thereto, and, as so revised and supplemented, a Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") was prepared and certified by the Agency; and WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council have reviewed and considered the Final EIR on the Redevelopment Plan and have each adopted a Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations applicable to the environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR; and WHEREAS, the City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, on June 19, 2002, to consider adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and certification of the Final EIR on the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, a notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in the Lodi News Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Lodi, once a week for four successive weeks prior to the date of said hearing, and a copy of said notice and affidavit of publication are on file with the City Clerk and the Agency; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing and a statement concerning acquisition of property by the Agency were mailed by first-class mail to the last known address of each assessee of each parcel of land in the proposed Project Area as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of San Joaquin; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by first-class mail to all residential and business occupants within the proposed Project Area; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each taxing agency which receives taxes from property in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Report of the Agency, the Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission, the Report and Recommendations of the PAC, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Final EIR; has provided an opportunity for all persons to be heard and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Redevelopment Plan; and has adopted written findings in response to each written objection to the Redevelopment Plan from an affected taxing entity or property owner; and WHEREAS, all actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the purpose and intent of the City Council with respect to the Project Area is to accomplish the following: (a) the elimination of blighting influences and the correction of environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including, among others, buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work, small and irregular lots, faulty exterior spacing, obsolete and aged building types, mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, substandard alleys, and inadequate or deteriorated public improvements, facilities, and utilities; (b) the assembly of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area; (c) the replanning, redesign, and development of portions of the Project Area which are stagnant or improperly utilized; (d) the provision of opportunities for participation by owners and tenants in the revitalization of their properties; (e) the strengthening of retail and other commercial functions in the Project Area; (f) the strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area and the community by the installation of needed site improvements to stimulate new residential, commercial, and light industrial expansion, employment, and social and economic growth; (g) the expansion of employment opportunities; (h) the expansion, improvement, and preservation of the community's supply of housing available to low- and moderate -income persons and families; and (i) the installation of new or replacement of existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities. 2 Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: (a) The Project Area is a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes declared in the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.). This finding is based upon the following facts, as more particularly set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council: (1) The Project Area is predominantly urbanized. (2) The Project Area is characterized by and suffers from a combination of blighting physical and economic conditions, including, among others: buildings that are deteriorated and dilapidated; buildings suffering from defects in design or physical construction; buildings with serious building code violations; buildings which are defective in design and have faulty or inadequate utilities; buildings which are substandard in design; incompatible uses; lots of irregular form and shape and of inadequate size for proper usefulness which are under multiple ownership; depreciated or stagnant property values and impaired investments; low lease rates; vacant and underutilized parcels; residential overcrowding; a high crime rate; and inadequate public improvements, parking, and utilities. (3) The combination of the conditions referred to in paragraph (2) above is so prevalent and so substantial that it causes a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical and economic burden on the City which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise or governmental action, or both, without redevelopment. (b) The Redevelopment Plan will redevelop the Project Area in conformity with the Community Redevelopment Law and in the interests of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. This finding is based upon the fact that redevelopment of the Project Area will implement the objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law by: aiding in the elimination and correction of the conditions of blight; providing for planning, development, redesign, clearance, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of properties which need improvement; improving, increasing, and preserving the supply of low- and moderate -income housing within the community; providing additional employment opportunities; and providing for higher economic utilization of potentially useful land. (c) The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the facts, as more particularly set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council, that under the Redevelopment Plan the Agency will be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including tax increments; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance will depend on the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increments generated by new investment in the Project Area; and that under the Redevelopment Plan no public redevelopment activity will be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity. (d) The Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Lodi, including, but not limited to, the housing element, which substantially complies with state housing law. This finding is based upon the finding of the Planning Commission that the Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Lodi. (e) The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan would promote the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the City of Lodi and will effectuate the purposes and policy 3 of the Community Redevelopment Law. This finding is based upon the fact that redevelopment, as contemplated by the Redevelopment Plan, will benefit the Project Area by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the physical and economic conditions of the Project Area. (f) The condemnation of real property, as provided for in the Redevelopment Plan, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan, and adequate provisions have been made for the payment for property to be acquired as provided by law. This finding is based upon the need to ensure that the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight. (g) The Agency has a feasible method and plan for the relocation of families and persons who may be displaced, temporarily or permanently, from housing facilities in the Project Area. This finding is based upon the fact that the Agency's plan for relocation, as contained in the Report of the Agency to the City Council, and the Redevelopment Plan provide for relocation assistance and benefits according to law and authorize the Agency to provide other assistance as determined to be appropriate under the circumstances. (h) There are, or shall be provided, within the Project Area or within other areas not generally less desirable with regard to public utilities and public and commercial facilities and at rents or prices within the financial means of the families and persons who may be displaced from the Project Area, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings equal in number to the number of and available to such displaced families and persons and reasonably accessible to their places of employment. This finding is based upon the fact that in the event any residential displacement is caused by the Redevelopment Plan, no person or family will be required to move from any dwelling unit until suitable replacement housing is available. (i) Families and persons shall not be displaced prior to the adoption of a relocation plan pursuant to Sections 33411 and 33411.1 of the Community Redevelopment Law; and dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income within the Project Area shall not be removed or destroyed prior to the adoption of a replacement housing plan pursuant to Sections 33334.5, 33413, and 33413.5 of the Community Redevelopment Law. 0) Inclusion of any lands, buildings, or improvements in the Project Area which are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the entire area of which they are a part; and any area included is necessary for effective redevelopment and is not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax increment revenues from such area pursuant to Section 33670 of the Community Redevelopment Law without other substantial justification for its inclusion. This finding is based upon the fact that the boundaries of the Project Area were chosen as a unified and consistent whole to include all properties contributing to or affected by the blighting conditions characterizing the Project Area. (k) The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could not reasonably be expected to be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency. This finding is based upon the facts, as more particularly set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council, that because of the higher costs and more significant risks associated with development of blighted areas, individual developers are unable and unwilling to invest in blighted areas without substantial public assistance and that funds of other public sources and programs are insufficient to eliminate the blighting conditions. (1) The Project Area is a predominantly urbanized area as defined by subdivision (b) of Section 33320.1. This finding is based upon the facts, as more particularly set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council, that approximately 99.7 percent of the land 4 in the Project Area has been or is developed for urban uses and approximately 0.3 percent of the land in the Project Area is an integral part of an area developed for urban uses. (m) The time limitations in the Redevelopment Plan, which are the maximum time limitations authorized under the Community Redevelopment Law, are reasonably related to the proposed projects to be implemented in the Project Area and the ability of the Agency to eliminate blight within the Project Area. This finding is based upon the facts that redevelopment depends, in large part, upon private market forces beyond the control of the Agency and shorter time limitations would impair the Agency's ability to be flexible and respond to market conditions as and when appropriate and would impair the Agency's ability to maintain development standards and controls over a period of time sufficient to assure area stabilization. In addition, shorter time limitations would limit the revenue sources and financing capacity necessary to carry out proposed projects in the Project Area. Section 3. The Council is satisfied that permanent housing facilities will be available within three (3) years from the time occupants of the Project Area are displaced and that, pending the development of the facilities, there will be available to the displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their displacement. Section 4. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Redevelopment Plan, certain official actions must be taken by the City Council; accordingly, the City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Redevelopment Plan; (b) directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City of Lodi having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with the Redevelopment Plan; (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action on proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan; and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding, including the expenditure of moneys, necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. Section 5. The Council is satisfied that written findings have been adopted in response to each written objection received from affected taxing entities or property owners either before or at the noticed public hearing. Having considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any aspect of the Redevelopment Plan, the Council hereby overrules all written and oral objections to the Redevelopment Plan. Section 6. The mitigation measures, as identified in Council Resolution No. , adopted on June 19, 2002, and Agency Resolution No. , adopted on June 19, 2002, making findings based upon consideration of the Final EIR on the Redevelopment Plan, are incorporated and made part of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Section 7. That certain document entitled "Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1,° a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and attached hereto, is hereby incorporated by reference herein and designated as the official "Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1." Section 8. The City of Lodi Building Department is hereby directed for a period of at least two (2) years after the effective date of this Ordinance to advise all applicants for building permits within the Project Area that the site for which a building permit is sought for the construction of buildings or for other improvements is within a redevelopment project area. 5 Section 9. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, and the Agency is hereby vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Redevelopment Plan. Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of San Joaquin County a notice of the approval and adoption of the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to this Ordinance, containing a description of the land within the Project Area and a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area have been instituted under the Community Redevelopment Law. Section 11. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of the description and statement recorded pursuant to Section 10 of this Ordinance, a copy of this Ordinance, and a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the Project Area, to the auditor and assessor of the County of San Joaquin, to the governing body of each of the taxing agencies which receives taxes from property in the Project Area, and to the State Board of Equalization within thirty (30) days following adoption of this Ordinance. Section 12. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the Lodi News Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Lodi. Section 13. If any part of this Ordinance or the Redevelopment Plan which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Redevelopment Plan, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Redevelopment Plan if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. Section 14. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Attest: SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk Approved this day of , 2002 PHILLIP A. PENNINO Mayor 31 State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. I, Susan J. Blackston, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. was introduced at a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 and was thereafter passed, adopted, and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held , 2002 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — 1 further certify that Ordinance No. was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law. Approved as to Form: RANDALL A. HAYS City Attorney 7 SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (Notice to Property Owners and Statement Regarding Acquisition of Property) Pre=Sort Center of Stockton, Inc. 3806 Coronado #A I, d 7 -e& , whose business address is _ Stockton, CA 952m [[ , California , do hereby certify that I mailed a copy of the attached Notice of Joint Public Hearing (the "Notice") and statement regarding acquisition of property by the Agency (the "Statement") to each assessee of land in the _ Redevelopment Project Area as shown on the last equalized assessment roll, according to the list of such assessees and their addresses attached to this Certificate, and that I personally mailed such Notice and Statement by depositing a COPY of same, addressed to each such listed last known assessee, first-class mail, postage prepaid, in the United States mail at n California, on 2002 . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. DATED:� o� 200 c,15 -4421U , California ATTACHMENTS (1) Notice of Joint Public Hearing (Title) (2) Statement Regarding Acquisition of Property (3) List of Assessees and Addresses MAS/Certl*W94ot TFR'ropOwn 10/8/01 p4vdwm dAw oemaaol Pop 23 CITY COUNCIL PHILLIP A. PENNING, Mayor SUSAN HITCHCOCK, Mayor Pro Tempore EMILY HOWARD KEITH LAND ALAN S. NAKANISHI Dear Property Owner: CITY OF LODI CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241 -191 0 (209) 333-6711 FAX(209)333-6842 May 16, 2002 H. DIXON FLYNN City Manager SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk RANDALL A. HAYS City Attorney The City Council of the City of Lodi (the "City Council") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") invite you to attend a joint public hearing concerning the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project"), which will be held on Wednesday, June 19, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi California. Enclosed with this letter is the official notice of the joint public hearing, which includes a legal description and map showing the boundaries of the proposed Project Area. The general goals and objectives of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are to: (1) eliminate blighting influences and correct environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including, among others, buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work, small and irregular lots, faulty exterior spacing, obsolete and aged building types, mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, substandard alleys, and inadequate or deteriorated public improvements, facilities, and utilities, (2) assemble land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area, (3) replan, redesign, and develop portions of the Project Area which are stagnant or improperly utilized, (4) provide opportunities for participation by owners and tenants in the revitalization of their properties, (5) strengthen retail and other commercial functions in the Project Area, (6) strengthen the economic base of the Project Area by stimulating new investment, (7) expand employment opportunities, (8) provide an environment for social and economic growth, (9) expand, improve, and preserve the community's supply of housing available to low- and moderate -income persons and families and (10) install new or replace existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities. The latest equalized assessment roll indicates that you own property in the proposed Project Area. In order to carry out the Redevelopment Plan, the Agency will have the power to acquire property by purchase or condemnation in order to eliminate blight, provide public improvements and facilities, and permit development in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. All property in the Project Area is, therefore, subject to the possibility of acquisition by purchase or condemnation by the Agency under the circumstances set forth in the Redevelopment Plan. You may inspect and/or obtain copies of the proposed Redevelopment Plan and all related documents at the offices of either the City Clerk or the Agency, each located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi California. Your further inquiries and attendance at the public hearing are, of course, welcome. If you have any questions, please call Rad Bartlam, Community Development Director, at (209) 333-6711 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Very truly yours, i I4. Dixon Fl nn Executive Director CITY COUNCIL PHILLIP A. PENNING, Mayor SUSAN HITCHCOCK, Mayor Pro Tempore EMILY HOWARD KEITH LAND ALAN S. NAKANISHI De mayo el 16 de 2002 Querido Dueno de Propiedad: CITY OF LODI CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209) 333-6711 FAX(209)333-6842 H. DIXON FLYNN City Manager SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk RANDALL A. HAYS City Attorney El consejo de la ciudad de Lodi (el "Consejo de Ciudad") y de la agencia del reconstrucci6n de la ciudad de Lodi (la" agencia") le invita a que atienda a una audiencia p6blica comun reference al plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n (el "plan del reconstrucci6n") para el proyecto No. 1 (el" proyecto"), que del reconstrucci6n de Lodi sera llevado a cabo el mi6rcoles, de Juno el 19 de 2002, en 7:00 P.M. en los compartimientos del consejo de la ciudad, calle del oeste del Pine 221, Lodi California. Incluido con esta carts es el aviso oficial de la audiencia publica comdn, que incluye una descripci6n y un mapa legal que demuestra los Ifmites del drea propuesta del proyecto. Las metas y los objetivos generales del plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n son: (1) eliminar influencias de marchitamiento y corrijn deficiencias ambientales en el area del proyecto, incluyendo, entre otras, los edificios en los cuales es insegura o malsana para que las personas vivan o trabajen, las porciones pequeiias e irregulares, espaciamiento exterior culpable, hacer anticuado y los tipos constructivos envejecidos, caracter mezclado o las aplicaciones vacantes que cambian de puesto, las utilizaciones del suelo incompatibles y poco rentables, los callejones inferiores al nivel normal, y mejores instalaciones, de utilidades publicas inadecuadas o deterioradas, (2) monta la tierra en los paquetes convenientes para el desarrollo moderno, integrado con la circulaci6n peatonal y de vehfculos mejoran en el area del proyecto, (3) replan, el reajuste, y desarrolla las porciones del area del proyecto que son estancadas o utilizadas incorrectamente, (4) proporcione las oportunidades para la participaci6n de los duenos y de los arrendatarios en la revitalizaci6n de sus caracterfsticas, (5) consolida al por menor y otras funciones del anuncio en el area del proyecto, (6) consolida la base econ6mica del area del proyecto estimulando la nueva inversi6n, (7) amplfa posibilidades de empleo, (8) proporciona un ambiente para el desarrollo social y econ6mico, (9) amplia, mejor, y preserva de fuente de la communidad de cubierta disponible para el punto bajo y personas familias de moderada renta (10) instalan nuevo o substituyen mejores, instalaciones de utilidades pdblicas existentes en las areas que se sirven actualmente inadecuado con respecto a tales, instalaciones de utilidades. El rodillo igualado mss ultimo del gravamen indica que usted posee la caracteristica en el area propuesta del proyecto. Para realizar el plan del reconstrucci6n, la agencia tendra la energfa de adquirir la caracterfstica por la compra o la condenaci6n para eliminar destrozo, proporciona mejores instalaciones publicas, y permite el desarrollo de acuerdo con el plan del reconstrucci6n. Toda la caracteristica en el area del proyecto estA, por to tanto, conforme a la posibilidad de adquisici6n por la compra o la condenaci6n al lado de la agencia bajo circunstancias dispuestas en el plan del reconstrucci6n. Usted puede examinar y/o obtener copias del pian propuesto del reconstrucci6n y de todos los documentos relacionados en las oficinas del vendedor o de la agencia, Cada uno situado en la Calle del oeste del Pine 221, Lodi California de la Ciudad. Sus investigaciones y atenci6n posteriores en la audiencia publica son, por supuesto, recepci6n. Si usted tiene cual-quier pregunta, Name por favor Rad Bardam, Director del desarrollo de la comunidad, en (209) 333-6711 entre 8:00 manana y 5:00 P.M., de lunes a viernes. Sinceramente, . Dixon Flynn - Director Del Ejecutivo De NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 AND THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACT REPORT RELATING THERETO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Lodi (the "City Council') and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on June 19, 2002, at 7.00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, to consider and act upon the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1(the "Project") and to consider all evidence and testimony for or against the approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. At any time not later than the hour set forth above for the hearing of comments on or objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan, any person may file in writing with the City Clerk of the City of Lodi a statement of objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. At the day, hour, and place of the hearing, any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan, or who deny the existence of blight in the proposed Project Area or question the regularity of any of the prior proceedings, may appear before the City Council and the Agency and show cause why the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted. . In addition, the City Council and the Agency will, at the same time and place, hold a joint public hearing to consider the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan and consider all evidence and testimony for or against the certifications of the Final EIR. At the day, hour and place of the hearing, all interested persons desiring to comment on, or having objections to, the content or adequacy of the Final EIR may appear before the City Council and the Agency and be heard. The general goals and objectives of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are to: (1) The elimination of blighting influences and the correction of environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including, among others, buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work, small and irregular lots, faulty exterior spacing, obsolete and aged building types, mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, substandard alleys, and inadequate or deteriorated public improvements, facilities, and utilities. (2) The assembly of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area. (3) The replanning, redesign, and development of portions of the Project Area which are stagnant or improperly utilized. (4) The provision of opportunities for participation by owners and tenants in the revitalization of their properties. (5) The strengthening of retail and other commercial functions in the Project Area. (6) The strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area by stimulating new investment. (7) The expansion of employment opportunities. (8) The provision of an environment for social and economic growth. (9) The expansion, improvement, and preservation of the community's supply of housing available to low- and moderate -income persons and families. (10) The installation of new or replacement of existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities. A map showing the general location in the City of the proposed Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. A copy of the legal description of the Project Area is available upon request, free of charge, at the offices of the City Clerk and the Agency, whose address is given below. Interested persons may inspect and, upon payment of the costs of reproduction, obtain copies of the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project, the Agency's Report to the City Council, and any other information pertaining thereto at the office of the Agency and the office of the City Clerk, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. The Agency has adopted "Rules Governing Participation by Property Owners and the Extension of Reasonable Preferences to Business Occupants in the Lodi Redevelopment Project" for the purpose of implementing those features of the proposed Redevelopment Plan providing for participation by property owners and business occupants in the proposed Project Area. Copies of said rules are available for public inspection at the office of the Agency. By order of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi. Dated: May 16, 2002 Ci Jerk, City of Lodi Secrdtary, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi AVISO DE LA AUDIENCIA PUBLICA COMUN EN EL PLAN PROPUESTO DEL RECONSTRUCCION PARA EL PROYECTO NO. 1 Y EL INFORME FINAL DEL RECONSTRUCCIbN DE LODI DE LAS CONSECUENCIAS PARA EL MEDIO AMBIENTE QUE SE RELACIONA ADEMAS EI AVISO POR ESTE MEDIO SE DA a eso el consejo de ciudad de la ciudad de Lodi (el consejo de la ciudad.) y la agencia del reconstrucci6n de la ciudad de Lodi (el Agency.) llevara a cabo una audiencia publica comun de Junio el 19 de 2002, en 7:00 P.M. en los compartimientos del consejo de ciudad, situados en la calle del oeste del Pine 221, Lodi, California, para considerar y para actuar sobre el plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n (el plan del desenvoluimiento.) para el proyecto No. 1 (el Project del reconstrucci6n de Lodi.) y para considerar toda la evidencia y testimonio para o contra la aprobaci6n y la adopci6n de reconstrucci6n propuesto plan. Que la hora disponga en cualquier momento no mas no adelante arriba para los comentarios sobre o las objeciones que oven hablar a el plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n, cualquier persona puede archivar en escribir con el vendedor de la ciudad de Lodi una declaraci6n de objeciones al plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n. En el dfa, horn, y el Lugar de la audiencia, de cualquiera y de todas las personas que tengan cualquier comentario en las objeciones ala reconstrucci6n propuesto porel plan, o quienes niegan la existencia del destruyo en el area propuesta del proyecto o preguntan la regularidad de los procedimientos anteriores, puede aparecer ante el consejo deia ciudad y la agencia y la demostraci6n quo causen el plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n que no debe ser adoptado. Ademas, el consejo de la ciudad y la agencia, en el mismo tiempo y lugar, Nevar a cabo una audiencia publica comun para considerer el informe final de las consecuencias para el medio ambiente (el Final EIR.) en el plan propuesto de reconstrucci6n y considere toda la evidencia y testimonio para o contra las certificaciones del EIR final. En el dfa, la hora y el lugar de la audiencia, todas las personas interesadas que desean comentar encendido, o teniendo las objeciones a, el contenido o la suficiencia del EIR final pueden aparecer ante el consejo de ciudad y la agencia y para ser ofdos. Las metas y los objetivos generales del plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n son: (1) La eliminaci6n de influencias de marchitamiento y de la correcci6n de deficiencias ambientales en el Brea del proyecto, incluyendo, entre otras, edificios en los cuales es insegura o malsana para que las personas vivan o trabajen, porciones pequenas a irregulares, espaciamiento exterior culpable, tipos constructivos obsoletos y envejecidos, caracter mezclado o aplicaciones o vacantes que cambian de puesto, utilizaciones del suelo incompatibles y poco rentables, callejones inferiores al nivel normal, y mejores, instalaciones, y utilidades publicas inadecuadas o deterioradas. (2) El montaje de la tierra en los paquetes convenientes para el desarrollo moderno, integrado con la circulaci6n peatonal y de vehfculos mejorada en el Brea del proyecto. (3) El replanning, el reajuste, y el desarrollo de Ias porciones del area del proyecto que son estancadas o utilizadas incorrectamente. (4) La disposici6n de las oportunidades para la participaci6n de los duenos y de los arrendatarios en la revitalizaci6n de sus caracterfsticas. (5) La consolidacibn de la venta al por menor y de otras funciones comerciales en el area del proyecto. (6) La consolidacibn de la base econ6mica del area del proyecto estimulando la nueva inversi6n (7) La extension de las posibilidades de empleo. (8) La disposici6n de un ambiente para el desarrollo social y econ6mico. (9) La extensi6n, la mejora, y la preservaci6n de la fuente de communidad de cubierta disponible para el punto bajo y las personas y familias de la moderado-renta. (10)La instalaci6n de nuevo o del re-emplazo mejorias, de instalaciones y de utilidades publicas existentes en las areas que se sirven actualmente inadecuado con respecto a tales mejorias, instalaciones y utilidades. Un mapa que demuestra la localizaci6n general en la ciudad del area propuesta del proyecto se une a esto como objeto expuesto A e hizo una pieza de esto. Una copia de la descripci6n legal del area del proyecto esta disponible por requerimiento, gratuitamente, en las oficinas del vendedor de la ciudad y de la agencia, que direcci6n se da abajo. Las personas interesadas pueden examinar y, sobre el pago de los costos de reproducci6n, obtener copias de la reconstrucci6n propuesto plan, el informe final de las consecuencias para el medio ambiente para el proyecto, el informe de Agencia al consejo de ciudad, y cualquier otra .informaci6n que pertenece ademas en la oficina de la agencia y la oficina del vendedor de la ciudad, situada en la calle del oeste del Pine 221, Lodi, California. La agencia ha adoptado los Reglas que gobernaban la participacibn por los duenos de caracteristica y la extension de preferencias razonables a los inquilinos del negocio en el proyecto del reconstrucci6n de Lodi con el fin de poner esas caracteristicas en ejecucio'n del plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n que preveia la participaci6n de los duenos de caracteristica y de los inquilinos del negocio en el area propuesta del proyecto. Las copias de las reglas dichas estan disponibles para la inspecci6n publica en la oficina de la agencia. Por orden del consejo de La Ciudad y de la agencia del reconstrucci6n de la ciudad de Lodi. Anticuado: De mayo el 16 de 2002 Vendedor, U Ciudad de Lodi Secretaria, Agencia del Reconstrucci6n de la Ciudad de Lodi i o C= 0 0 323 West Elm Street Lodi, Cafrfornia 95240-2003 Phone (209) 368-6618 BAUMBAGH & PIAZZA, INC. FAX(209)368-6610 September 3, 2001 JOB NO. 0048 CITY OF LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY Commencing at a brass disk at the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence South 11° 03' 40" West 97.99 feet to an angle point on the South line of State Highway Route No. 12 and the True Point of Beginning; thence along the South line of said Highway the following four courses: (1) South 860 52' 18" West, 55.24 feet, (2) South 830 26' 17" West, 500.90 feet, (3) South 84° 34' 39" West, 299.36 feet, (4) North 89° 46' 57" West, 453.16 feet; thence North 03° 15' 30" East, 703.0 feet to the North line of Tamarack Drive; thence South 86° 41' 04" West, 10.0 feet; thence North 030 04' 04" East, 67 feet; thence South 860 41' 04" West, 25 feet; thence North 03' 04' 04" East, 100 feet; thence North 86' 41' 04" East, 25 feet; thence North 030 04' 04" East, 215 feet; thence North 86° 22' 04" East, 12.70 feet; thence North 02° 25' 44" East, 329.86 feet; thence North 860 41' 04" East, 22.86 feet; thence North 03° 00' 04" East, 112.7 feet; thence South 860 41' 04" West, 32.91 feet; thence North 03° 04' 04" East, 36.96 feet; thence North 860 41' 04" East, 10 feet; thence North 030 04' 04" East, 252.60 feet more or less to the North line of Park Street; thence along said North line and its westerly projection South 86° 39' 04" West, 223.11 feet to the West line of School Street; thence along the West line of School Street the following four courses: (1) North 03' 05' 34" East, 417.09 feet, (2) North 03° 00' 04" East, 558.90 feet, (3) North 02° 54' 29" East, 1322.86 feet, (4) North 030 12' 49" East, 943.28 feet to the South line of Chestnut Street; thence along the South line of Chestnut Street, South 850 21' 00" West, 325.78 feet to the southerly projection of the East line of Church Street; thence along the East line of Church Street, North 02° 50" 00" East, 165.00 feet; thence South 85° 21' 00" West, 250.00 feet to the West line of an alley; thence along the West and South lines of said alley the following three courses: (1) North 20 50' 00" East, 10.00 feet, (2) North 290 45' 17" West, 33.11 feet, (3) South 85' 21' 00" West, 495.00 feet to the East .line of Lee Avenue; thence along the East line of Lee Avenue, South 02° 50' 00" West, 200.00 feet to the South line of Chestnut Street; thence along the South line of Chestnut Street, South 850 21' 00" West, 301.39 feet to the East line of Hutchins Street; thence along the East line of Hutchins Street, South 01' 04' 00" East, 73.86 feet; thence South 890 31' 30" West, 944.15 feet; thence North 01° 04' 00" West, 296.40 feet; thence South 89° 31' 301, West, 57.85 feet; thence South 01' 04' 00" East, 5.00 feet; thence South 89° 31' 30" West, 390.00 feet; thence South 01' 04' 00" East, 384.80 feet; thence South 89° 31' 30" West, 232.00 feet; thence North 1° 04' 00" West, 240.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 24 of TURNAGE SUBDIVISION as filed in Volume 11 of Maps and Plats, page 119, San Joaquin County Records; thence South 89° 31' 30" West, 100.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot 24' thence along the East line of Orange Avenue, North 010 04' 00" West, 134.80 feet; thence South 89° 31' 30" West, 50.00 feet; thence South 01° 04' 00" East, 10.80 feet; thence South 89° 31' 30" West, 97.30 feet; thence North 010 07' 15" West, 40.00 feet; thence South 89' 31' 30" West, 157.34 feet to the West line of Fairmont Avenue; thence along the West line of Fairmont Avenue, South 01' 11' 30" East, 78.00 feet; thence South 890 31' 30" West, 219.11 feet to the West line of the CULBERTSON TRACT as filed in Volume 11 of Maps and Plats, page 53, San Joaquin County Records; thence North 010 11' 30" West, 114.80 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 29 of the CULBERTSON TRACT; thence South 890 31' 30" West, 219.11 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 30 of said CULBERTSON TRACT; thence along the West line of said CULBERTSON TRACT, South 01° 11' 30" East, 161.00 feet; thence South 89° 31' 30" West, 259.11 feet to the West line of Ham Lane; thence along the West line of Ham Lane, North 010 11' 30" West, 270.00 feet to the centerline of Lodi Avenue; thence continue along the West line of Ham Lane, North 010 05' 20" West, 91.14 feet; thence along the North line of Lot 17 of HUTCHINS HOMESTEAD ADDITION NO. 3 and its westerly project, North 89° 33' 37" East, 180.96 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 17; thence North 01° 12' 00" West, 10.00 feet; thence North 890 331 37" East, 115.96 feet; thence along the West line of Sunset Drive, South 01' 19' 00" East, 10.00 feet; thence North 890 33' 37" East, 175.96 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 51 of said subdivision last described; thence North 01° 26' 00" West, 9.21 feet; thence North 890 33' 37" East, 115.96 feet; thence along the West line of Fairmont Avenue, South 01° 32' 00" West, 4.21 feet; thence North 89° 33' 37" East, 175.96 feet; thence South O10 45' 00" East, 5.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 86 of said subdivision last described; thence North 890 33' 37" East, 115.96 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 86; thence along the West line of Orange Avenue, North 010 45' 00" West, 24.85 feet; thence North 89° 33' 10" East, 187.60 feet; thence South O1° 45' 00" East, 25.00 feet; thence North 89° 33' 10" East, 127.60 feet; thence along the West line of Avena Avenue, South O1° 45' 00" East, 0.80 feet; thence North 890 31' 30" East, 192.50 feet; thence North 01° 45' 00" West, 22.00 feet; thence North 89° 31' 30" East, 132.50 feet; thence along the West line of Cresent Avenue South 01° 45' 00" East, 24.80 feet; thence North 89° 31' 30" East, 380.20 feet; thence along the West line of Rose Avenue North 01° 45' 00" West, 60.00 feet; thence North 89° 31' 30" East, 230.10 feet; thence along the East line of an alley South 010 45, 00" East, 56.70 feet; thence North 890 31' 30" East, 150.10 feet; thence along the West line of California Street North 01° 45' 00" West, 56.70 feet; thence along the westerly projection of the South lines of Lots 14 and 6 of Block 8 of HUTCHINS HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION as filed in Volume 6 of Maps and Plats, page 27, San Joaquin County Records, North 890 31' 30" East, 380.00 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 6; thence along the West line of Hutchins Street the following nine courses: (1) North 010 19' 00" West, 50.00 feet, (2) South 890 31' 30" West, 10.00 feet, (3) North 010 19' 00" West, 50.00 feet, (4) North 89° 31' 30" East, 10.00 feet, (5) North 01° 19' 00" West, 50.00 feet, (6) South 890 31' 30" West, 10.00 feet (7� North 01' 19' 00" West, 220.00 feet to the North line of Walnut Street, (8) along the West line of Walnut Street, North 890 31' 30" East, 10.00 feet, (9) North 010 19' 00" West, 20.12 feet to the westerly extension of the North line of an alley; thence along the North line of the alley and its westerly projection the following five courses: (1) South 870 09' 56" East, 160.03 feet, (2) South 02' 50' 04" West, 3.26 feet, (3) South 87° 09' 56" East, 50 feet, (4) South 02° 50' 04" West, 6.46 feet, (5) South 870 09' 56" East, 520.0 feet to the West line of Pleasant Avenue; thence along the West line of Pleasant Avenue, North 030 00' 04" East, 1050 feet to the South line of Pine Street; thence along the South line of Pine Street North 86° 59' 56" West 360 feet to the southerly projection of the West line of Lee Avenue; thence along the West line of Lee Avenue and its southerly projection North 03° 00' 04" East, 960 feet to the North line of Locust Street; thence along the North line of Locust Street, South 861 59' 56" East, 360 feet to the West line of Pleasant Avenue; thence along the West line of Pleasant Avenue, North 03° 00' 04" East, 450.85 feet to the westerly projection of the North line of Lockeford Street; thence along the North line of Lockeford Street and its westerly projection South 86' 59' 56" East, 374.90 feet to an angle point; thence leaving the North line of Lockeford Street, South 80° 27' 13" East, 95.2 feet more or less to the Northeast corner of Church and Lockeford Streets; thence South 86° 59' 56" East, 297.5 feet to the Northwest corner of Lockeford and School Streets; thence along the West line of School Street and its northerly projection North 01° 33' 50" East, 322.64 feet to the North line of De Force Avenue; thence along the North line of De Force Avenue, North 88° 48' 10" East, 28.95 feet more or less to the West line of School Street; thence along the West line of School Street the following seven courses: (1) North 000 27' 40" East, 111.98 feet, (2) South 890 O1' 06" East, 2.71 feet, (3) North 00* 04' East, 801.9 feet, (4) South 85° 34' 58" West, 20.13 feet, (5) North 00° 33' 35" East, 395.14 feet more or less to the North line of Forrest Avenue, (6) along the North line of Forrest Avenue, North 86° 12' East, 19.46 feet to the West line of school Street, (7) along the West line of School Street and its northerly projection North 000 11' East, 427.54 feet to the North line of Louie Avenue; thence along the North line of Louie Avenue, North 89° 05' 30" East, 392.45 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 25 feet, a central angle of 881 00, and an arc length of 38.40 feet; thence along the West line of Sacramento Street, North 01' 05' 30" East, 664.20 feet; thence North 02° 35' 32" West, 105.78 feet to the North line of Turner Road; thence along the North line of Turner Road the following ten courses: (1) North 82* 26' 47" East, 82.11 feet, (2) North 890 26' 30" East, 8.00 feet, (3) South 82° 25' 42" East, 70.71 feet, (4) North 89° 26' 30" East, 130.45 feet, (5) North 030 00, 04" East, 15.03 feet, (6) North 890 26' 30" East, 100.20 feet, (7) North 03° 00' 04" East, 15.03 feet, (8) North 89° 261 30" East, 246.04 feet, (9) South 78° 54' 30" East, 122.53 feet, (10) North 890 26' 30" East, 242.59 feet; thence South 0° 33' 30" East, 40.00 feet to the centerline of Turner Road; thence along the East line of Stockton Street as delineated on that Map of "COLONY RANCH" as filed in Volume 24 of Maps and Plats at page 50, San Joaquin County Records and its northerly_projection South 03° 10' 40" West, 694.37 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet, a central angle of 93° 53, and an arc length of 32.77 feet; thence along the North line of Donner Avenue and its easterly projection North 89' 17' 40" East, 841.11 feet to the East line of Calaveras Street; thence along the East line of Calaveras Street, South 00° 42' 20" East, 412.49 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 20 feet, a central angle of 90° and an arc length of 31.42 feet; thence along the North line of Pioneer Drive, North 890 17' 40" East, 66.79 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 11 of "LAWRENCE RANCE SUBDIVISION, UNIT NO. 1" as filed in Volume 13 of Maps and Plats, page 143, San Joaquin County Records; thence along the West line of said subdivision last described the following four courses: (1) South 40° 23' 40" West, 79.64 feet, (2) South 000 42' 20" East, 104.04 feet, (3) South 82' 45' 10" West, 52.31 feet, (4) South 00° 59' 20" East, 358.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Lot 20; thence along the southwesterly line of said Lot 20, South 610 36' 20" East, 57.38 feet; thence along the West lines of Lots 20 through 24 inclusive, South 00° 59' 20" East, 276.44 feet; thence South 220 57' 20" East, 53.45 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 25; thence along the South lines of Lots 25 through 38 inclusive, North 89° 17' 40" East, 818.60 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 38; thence North 00° 42' 20" West, 840.0 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 116; thence along the South line of Pioneer Drive, North 89° 17' 40" East, 366.3 feet to the West line of Cherokee Lane; thence North 75° 581 31" East, 510.71 feet to a point on the East line of Beckman Road, said point also being a point on a curve from which the radial bears South 86° 04' 31" East; thence along the East line of Beckman Road the following ten courses: (1) southeasterly along a curve to the left having a radius of 770.0 feet, a central angle of 24° 29, 4711, an arc length of 329.21 feet and a chord bearing South 080 19' 24" East, 325.86 feet, (2) South 20° 34' 18" East, 360.71 feet, (3) along a curve to the left having a radius of 1970 feet, a central angle of 06° 01, 42" and an arc length of 207.27 feet, (4) South 26' 36' 00" East, 138.05 feet, (5) South 250 44' 07" East, 131.90 feet, (6) South 26° 36, East, 38.33 feet, (7) along a curve to the left having a radius of 372 feet, a central angle of 28° 58' 30" and an arc length of 188.12 feet, (8) South 551 34, 30" East, 157.89 feet, (9) along a curve to the right having a radius of 178 feet, a central angle of 55° 07' 30" and an arc length of 171.26 feet, (10) South 000 27' 00" East, 119.60 feet; thence South 430 45' 12" East, 36.35 feet to the North line of Lockeford Street; thence along the North line of Lockeford Street, South 87° 00' East, 1272.54 feet to the northerly projection of the East line of Cluff Avenue; thence along the East line of Cluff Avenue and its northerly projection the following five courses: (1) South 01° 09' 46" East, 331.92 feet, (2) South 89' 48' 44" West, 2.0 feet, (3) South 01c' 09' 46" East, 128.89 feet, (4) North 89' 48' 44" East, 2.0 feet, South 010 09' 46" East, 354.67 feet to the South line of Mounce Street; thence along the South line of Mounce Street, North 890 48' 44" East, 289.19 feet to the northerly projection of the West line of Parcel "A" as delineated on that map filed in Book 7 of Parcel Maps, page 13, San Joaquin County Records; thence South 010 09' 46" East, 712.42 feet to the intersection of the southerly projection of the West line of said Parcel "A" and the South line of Pine Street; thence along the South line of Pine Street, North 89° 53' 16" West, 321.23 feet to the centerline of Cluff Avenue; thence continuing along the South line of Pine Street, South 890 31' 32" West, 673.61 feet to a point of non-tangential curvature; thence along a curve to the left having a radius of 30 feet; a central angle of 90' 31' 3211, an arc length of 47.40 feet and a chord that bears South 49° 10' 52" West, 42.62 feet to the most southerly corner of that property conveyed to the City of Lodi by deed recorded in Book 3792 of Official Records, page 312, San Joaquin County Records and the East line of Kelley Street; thence along the East line of Kelley Street and its southerly projection, South 010 09' 47" East, 1200.42 feet to the South line of the Central California Traction Company Right of Way; thence along the South line of said Right of Way, North 876 16, West, 856.95 feet to the West line of State Highway Route No. 99; thence along the West line of Highway 99 the following four courses: (1) South 00' 49' 00" East, 29.94 feet, (2) South 030 51' 12" East, 600.66 feet (3) South 000 48' East, 3032.54 feet, (4) South 010 10' 10" East, 261.88 feet to the North line of the South half of the Southwest quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence North 87' 40' 50" West, 138.24 feet; thence South 00 35' 30" East, 10.0 feet; thence South 47° 19' 10" West, 38.20 feet; thence North 870 40, 50" West, 266.09 feet; thence North 42° 40' 50" West, 38.20 feet; thence North 0" 35' 30" West, 10.0 feet; thence along the said North line last described, North 870 40' 50" West, 252.96 feet to the East line of Cherokee Lane; thence South 610 45' 43" West, 192.91 feet more or less to the intersection of the South line of Poplar Street and the West line of Cherokee Lane; thence along the South line of Poplar Street the following three courses: (1) South 85° 47' 10" West, 617.50 feet, (2) South 000 36' 30" East, 10.0 feet, (3) South 85° 47' 10" West, 620.30 feet to the East line of Central Avenue; thence along the East line of Central Avenue South 00° 36' 35" East, 1160.74 feet to the North line of State Highway Route No. 12; thence South 000 37' 30" East, 110.14 feet; thence along the South line of said Highway 12 the following five courses: (1) South 860 29' West, 44.05 feet, (2) along a curve to the left having a radius of 3945 feet, a central angle of 4° 05' 08" and an arc length of 281.30 feet to a point of reverse curvature, (3) along a curve to the right having a radius of 5892.19 feet, a central angle of 4° 05' 08" and an arc length of 420.15 feet, (4) South 890 29' West, 592.36 feet, (5) South 74° 33' 28" West, 71.79 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing acres more or less. No. ExxCIVIL 9.3t�= 05 �r F CAO CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (Notice to Taxing Agencies) I, 4whose business address is " S boot- , California. Jodo hereby certify that I mailed a copy of the attached Notice of Joint Public Hearing (the "Notice") to the goveinme body of each taxing agency which receives taxes from property within the 1 _ Redevelopment Project Area, according to the list of taxing agencies attached to this Certificate, and that I personally mailed such Notice by depositing a copy of same, addressed to each such taxing agency, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, in the United States mail at _1 California, on 444 2002. Copies of all returned receipts are on file in the office of the City Clerk. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. DATED:.2002— lid- California (Title) ATTACHMENTS (1) Notice of Joint Public Hearing (2) List of Taxing Agencies and Addresses MAs/certMailNotdffffaxAV 10/8/01 NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.1 AND THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RELATING THERETO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Lodi (the "City Council") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on June 19, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, to consider and act upon the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1(the "Project") and to consider all evidence and testimony for or against the approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. At any time not later than the hour set forth above for the hearing of comments on or objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan, any person may file in writing with the City Clerkof the City of Lodi a staterrient-of'objectibhs to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. At the day, hour, and place of the hearing, any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan, or who deny the existence of blight in the proposed Project Area or question the regularity of any of the prior proceedings, may appear before the City Council and the Agency and show cause why the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted. . In addition, the City Council and the Agency will, at the same time and place, hold a joint public hearing to consider the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan and consider all evidence and testimony for or against the certifications of the Final EIR. At the day, hour and place of the hearing, all interested persons desiring to comment on, or having objections to, the content or adequacy of the Final EIR may appear before the City Council and the Agency and be heard. The general goals and objectives of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are to: (1) The elimination of blighting influences and the correction of environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including, among others, buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work, small and irregular lots, faulty exterior spacing, obsolete and aged building types, mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, substandard alleys, and inadequate or deteriorated public improvements, facilities, and utilities. (2) The assembly of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area. (3) The replanning, redesign, and development of portions of the Project Area which are stagnant or improperly utilized. (4) The provision of opportunities for participation by owners and tenants in the revitalization of their properties. (5) The strengthening of retail and other commercial functions in the Project Area. ,1 (6) The strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area by stimulating new investment. (7) The expansion of employment opportunities. (8) The provision of an environment for social and economic growth. (9) The expansion, improvement, and preservation of the community's supply of housing available to low- and moderate -income persons and families. (10) The installation of new or replacement of existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities. A map showing the general location in the City of the proposed Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. A copy of the legal description of the Project Area is available upon request, free of charge, at the offices of the City Clerk and the Agency, whose address is given below. Interested persons may inspect and, upon payment of the costs of reproduction, obtain copies of the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project, the Agency's Report to the City Council, and any other information pertaining thereto at the office of the Agency and the office of the City Clerk, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. The Agency has adopted "Rules Governing Participation by Property Owners and the Extension of Reasonable Preferences to Business Occupants in the Lodi Redevelopment Project" for the purpose of implementing those features of the proposed Redevelopment Plan providing for participation by property owners and business occupants in the proposed Project Area. Copies of said rules are available for public inspection at the office of the Agency. By order of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi. Dated: May 16, 2002 Ci Jerk, City of Lodi Se tary, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi COMPANY FIRST LAST TITLE ADDRESS CITY ZIP NAME NAME EAT CODE San Joaquin Mr. Lopez Administr County Stockton CA 95202 County Manuel ator Courthouse 222 E. Weber Avenue Lodi Unified Mr.:Bi1j1H-uyett Superinten 1305 E. Lodi CA 95240 School dent Vine Street District San Joaquin Dr. Sam Schauer Superinten 5151 Pacific Stockton CA 95207 Delta man dent/Presi Avenue College dent San Joaquin Mr. Wentwo Superinten PO Box Stockton CA 95213 - Office of Fredrick rth dent of 213030 9030 Education A. Schools San Joaquin Mr. Tom Flinn Director 1810 E. Stockton CA 95205 County Hazelton Flood Avenue Control & Water Conservation District San Joaquin Mr. John Stroh Manager 7759S. Stockton CA 95206 Mosquito Airport Way Abatement North San Mr. Ed Steffani General Joaquin Manager Water Conservation District ru- 01 tl,�rnci lk� _. -` l, y -! CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (Notice to Businesses and Residents) I, Z AA, 4 &e -r/5' , whose business address is M.� California do hereby certify that I mailed a copy of the attached Notice of joint Public Hearing (the "Notice") to each business and resident in the Redevelopment Project Area, according to the list of such businesses and residents and their addresses attached to this Certificate, and that I personally mailed such Notice by depositing a copy of same, addressed to each such listed business and resident, first-class mail, postage prepaid, in the United States mail I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. (Title) ( !1 California ATTACHMENTS (1) Notice of Joint Public Hearing (2) List of Assessees and Addresses MAS/CertMailNotcJPHResidents 10/8/01 tbIRedev_Tenants 06/12/2002 DAMEK DON 80155 GALLATIN RD BOZEMAN MT 597150000 1341 S CENT DAMS STEW 816 EVERT CT LODI CA 952420000 232 E MAPLE FZAL SAFDA 230 E VINE ST LODI CA 952404656 118 E OAK HRENS EAR PO BOX 7689 STOCKTON CA 952670000 524 E HILBOR SAN MOHA 2010 W ESTMORA AVE STOCKTON CA 952100000 428 E LODI AR SHER 816 S CENTRAL AV #A LODI CA 952400000 816S CENTR AM MOH 2145 SANDALWOOD DR STOCKTON CA 952100000 316 E HILBOR MOHA 724 S WASHINGTON ST LODI CA 952400000 326 E LOCUS LBRECHT R PO BOX 596 LODI CA 952410596 242 E VINE LDRETE IGN 5151/2 S SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 517S SACRA LLMENDING 8954 REDMAN RD VALLEY SPRI CA 952520000 20 N MAIN LQUIST JAC 17 S CHURCH ST LODI CA 952400000 31 S CHURCH LTAF MUHA 325 ACACIA ST #C LODI CA 952400000 532 E HILBOR NAYA GERA 611 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 609S CENTR NAYA VICTO 6o3 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 6W S CENTR NOERSON J 1003 W OAK ST LODI CA 952400000 328 E LODI NDERSON N 506 GERARD DR LODI CA 952420000 22 N HOUSTO DERSON R 402 DAISY LODI +CA 952400000 931 S WELLS NDERSON R 11255 LOWER SACRAMENTO R LODI CA 952420000 224 N MAIN NDERSON S 304 RAINIER DR -ODI CA 952420000 645 E WOOD NDRADE MA 9009 W HWY 12 LODI CA 952420000 304 E CYPRE NDREASEN 411 LEWIS RD #312 SAN JOSE CA 951110000 234 E HILBOR NGEL SALV 224 E REDWOOD ST LODI CA 952400000 231 E MAPLE RAMBULA M 11318 HERMSST NORWALK CA 906500000 321 E PINE RIOLA DON PO BOX 2114 LODI CA 952410000 721S CHERO RSHAO MOH 1019 PRIEBE ST LODI CA 952400000 331 E LODI SGHAR ALI 816 S CENTRAL LODI CA 952400000 326 E EDEN SSOC COMM RANDLE BAR 300 E CARPENTER FREEWAY IRVING TX 750620000 720S CHERO SSOC FINAN AVCO FINANC 11344 COLOMA RD GOLD RIVER CA 956700000 229 E REDWO SVITT ROBE 429 E LODI AVE LODI CA 952400000 425 E LODI TLANTIC RIC TAX DEPT SS PO BOX 2485 LOS ANGELES CA 900510000 225 S CHERO TWOOD, ED 36 PEMBROOK CT MORAGA CA 1945560000 1105S SACRA VILA DAVID 237 MAPLE ST LODI CA 952400000 1316 E LODI VITIA ROQU I 2112 S ORANGE AVE LODI CA 952400000 731 S SACRA AN SADA320 E TOKAY ST LODI CA 952400000 320 E TOKAY M MOHA 1764VER DR RI STOCKTON CA 952040000 307S CENTR VEDO AN IPO BOX 66 LODI CA 952410000 1227 S WASHI IZ ABDUL & P O BOX 604 LODI CA 952410000 216 E HILBOR IZ SHABNA 230 FLORA ST LODI CA 952404115 215 E HILBOR B N K DEVELO PO BOX 9367 STOCKTON CA 952080000 621 E HALE B V K INVEST BOB BASSO 5405 N PERSHING AVE SUITE C STOCKTON CA 952070000 1323 S CENT BAETA CIDALI 21284 N RAY RD LO01 CA 952420000 1311 S CENT AFFONI IVE ROGER A BAF 1175 ORANGEWOOD OR LODI CA 1952400000 118W OAK AHADUR KH 33 N CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 230 N CENTR ALESTERI R PO BOX 1642 'LODI CA 952411642 422 E RAILRO ANK OF NEW ADVANTA MO 10790 RANCHO BERNARDO RD SAN DIEGO CA 921270000 317 E PINE ARBEE ROB 131 RIDGE DR LODI CA 952400000 702E WAINU ARBER KEN 2323 REILE AVE ESCALON CA 953200000 513E ELM ARRIOS LUI 4251/2 E FLORA ST LODI CA 952400000 425 E FLORA ASSETT 00 24615 N TULLEY RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 1416 E LOCUS UER GLEN 558 FELL ST SAN FRANCIS CA 941020000 412 E HILBOR BAUER GLEN 2140 W WALNUT ST LODI CA 952420000 521 E TOKAY AUER RICK PO BOX 926 GALT CA 956320000 417E LOCUS BAUER VERN 2140 W WALNUT ST LODI CA 952420000 533 E HILBOR BAUM JAMES 1225 RIVERGATE DRLODI CA 952400000 320 N CHERO BAUM JAMES PO BOX 639 ACAMPO CA 952200639 621 E LOCKE BAUMBACH D 2886 STONEYCREEK CIR ACAMPO ICA 952200000 528 E HILBOR BAUMBACK D 1807 W LOCUST LODI CA 952420000 540 E ELM BBJ PROPERT BETTY SCHILL 149 S WETHERLY DR LOS ANGELES CA 900480000 115 S SCHOO BEACON OIL ERNST -& YOU PO BOX 2938 SAN ANTONIO TX 782992938 35 N CHEROK BECKER WIL 1951 JONATHAN AVE SAN JOSE CA 951252569 325 E CONCO BECKMAN CA I P O BOX 1300 LODI CA952410000 211 W OAK BECKMAN CH 850 E KETTLEMAN LN LODI CA 952400000 ION MAIN ECKMAN DO PO BOX 1537 LODI CA 1952411537 214 S SACRA EE ANNA B 351 LA SETTA DR LODI CA 952423319 234 E FLORA ELANGER R 2372 BRITTANY LN LODI CA 952420000 338 N MAIN ENDER GAR 5325 E HARNEY LN LODI CA 952400000 436 E WALNU ENDER GAR WILLIAM G SH 19232 PERRYMAN RD LODI CA 952420000 08 S CENTR ENDER IRVI PO BOX 1014 OODBRIDG CA 952580000 1300 S WASHI ENNETT W I 322 N SCHOOL ST LODI CA 952400000 320 N SCHOO ENSON.NANI 125 VIA MEDICI PTOS CA 950030000 727 N SACRA ENTZ PLUMB BEVERLY B B 2581 CENTRAL PARK DR LODI CA 952420000 201 E OAK ENTZ ROGE 11506MARIPOSAWAY LODI CA 952420000 351 N STOCK EOSHANZ E SANDRA G CO 0B S V=DBRIDG CA 952580000 217 E PINE ERMUDEZ D 2088 BRYANT ST SAN FRANCIS CA 941100000 429 E EDEN BERNSTEIN L iP 0 BOX 3213 ELMACERO CA 956180000 203 N HOUST £RRETH TE 26574 N HWY 99 ACAMPO CA 952200000 810S CENTR BERTOLONE 1610 CALABRESE WAY GILROY CA 950200000 113 N CHERO BETTENHAUS 1038 PORT CHELSEA CIR LODI CA 952400000 24 E TOKAY IANCHI L D 909 S PLEASANT AVE LODI CA 9524000DO 220 E FLORA IETZ DALTO 5585 E ARMSTRONG RD LODI CA 952400000 926S CENTR LEHM GLEN 719 W WALNUT ST LODI CA 952400000 346 E OAK LEWETT C 1550 IRIS DR LODI CA 952420000 229S SACRA LOMGREN G 16830 N LOCUST TREE RD LODI CA 952400000 319 E WALNU OCKMON GL 15503 N FINE RD LINDEN -CA 952360000 1125S WOOD OHNET KEIT IP 0 BOX 667 LODI CA 952410000 1004 S CHER OMAN ROY 1250 BU DO AVE #206 AMPBELL CA 950080000 654 E ANA annwnee KAT 1n49 112 S GARFIELD LODI CA 952400000 1049 S GARFI Page 1 tbIRedev_Tenants 06/12/2002 NOTTO RJ 3294 W SARGENT RD LODI CA 952400000 112 E LODI BORDERS AD BOSSERT DE 1111 SIMPKINS RD LDENE MCC 605 PRINGLE AVE #10 NAPA GALT CA CA 945580000 956320000 _ 231 E VINE 315S SACRA BOU CHANM1105 PLEASANTWOOD CT BOUMA GERA NTHONY & J 1029 S CHURCH ST WEN JOH % 1165 TRITON DR W EN ROB 3592 W SARGENT RD STOCKTON CA LODI CA FOSTER CITY CA ILODI CA 952100000 952400000 944040000 952400000 115N CHERO 100 E OAK 233S SCHOO 530S MAIN WLES GLA 5828 FAIRLANE RD-ACAMPO CA 952200000 324 E FLORA BOW SER CO BRADSHAW BRAGE DAVI 08 KERMIT LN 1 ALTAMOUNT DR 3165 ROGERS AVE FAIR OAKS CA ORINDA CA WALNUT CRE CA 956280000 945630000 945960000 205 E CHERR 900 S GARFIE 820S GARFIE REGMAN PE 11701 E KETTLEMAN LN 'LODI CA 952400000 1119 S CENT REWER TH 741 GROVE AVE SACRAMENTO CA 958150000 636 E ANA RISTOW FR PO BOX O WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 120 W LOUIE RISTOW ST 21304 N HWY 99 ACAMPO CA 1952200000 16 W LOUIE # ROWN DANT DAN BROWN 3385 BOTFUHER RD ALLEY SPRI CA 952520000 335E EDEN ROWN, MAT 291 EMERALD OAK DR GALT CA956320000 312 S GARFIE BUDISELICH 4514 E WATERLOO RD STOCKTON CA 952150000 224S HUTCHI BUIRCH WAY 1 209 S CALIFORNIA ST LODI ICA 1952400000 222 E HILBOR BURKE SUSA 11260 GOLFVIEW RD LODI CA952400000 306 W LOCUS BURLINGTON 1430 EDGEWOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 810 N SACRA BURLINGTON 910 N HAM LN LODI CA 952400000 108 N SACRA URLINGTON MR & MRS BR PO BOX 700 LODI CA 1952410000 720 N SACRA USBY CURTI 27 WESTWOOD AVE LODI iCA :952420000 515S CENTR USH JUNE M6D9 W OAK ST LODI 'CA '952400000 127 N SACRA UTLER ROB 13741 SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA CA 1950700000 428 E LOCUS UTLER WILL 117251 TRETHEWAY RD #33 LOCKEFORD CA 952370000 308 N CHERO UZUNIS GA 1964 LUCAS RD LODI CA 952420000 400 E LODI R STAR INC 741 S CHEROKEE LN I CA 952400000 541 E MAPLE ADENA JOS MR & MRS CA 613 WASHINGTON ST LODI CA 952420000 245 E TOKAY ADENA JOS •931 RANCH RD GALT CA 956320000 613S WASHI ADENA MAR 1441 1/2 E TOKAY ST LODI CA 441 E TOKAY ADENA PAB 09190 TRIOLO ST OODBRIDG CA 000 509 E LODI PO BOX 136 OODBRIDG CA 000 209 E TOKAY 233 1/2 TOKAY ST LODI CA 000 233 E TOKAY AHUE ISMA 944 S STOCKTON ST LODI CA R952400000 000 940 S STOCK 1810 CORBIN LN LODI CA 000 516S SCHOO AHUE PEDR 721 W TOKAY ST LODI CA 000 517 E LOCUS ALDWELL RI 6346 E ACAMPO RD CAMPO CA 709 416 N SCHOO CALOSSO FR 15751 E PROUTY RD GALT CA 956320000 1212 E MOUN AMPBELL VI 1824 JACKSON ST LODI CA 952420000 436 E LODI ANEPA WAR 131 S ORANGE AVE LODI CA 952400000 16 S SCHOOL ANTON ANT 1029 S CHURCH ST LODI CA 952400000 357 E WALNU APPS GORD 3302 CALIMYRNA RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 1416 E HILBOR ARACOZA S 1 540 NAPLES ST APT 6 CHULA VISTA CA 1919111837 412 E LODI ARLIN JOHN 1241 ADAMS ST #1035 -SAINT HELEN CA 945741925 1224 E EDEN ARLSON DU 2421 ROCKINGHAM CIR .LODI CA 952420000 11 S GARFIEL AROSELLA 859 DORCHESTER CIR LODI CA 952400000 616 S STOCK CARPENTER 17550 BOWSER RD iLODI CA 952400000 940 VICTOR ARPENTER 1409 CORTE CANALETTE BAKERSFIELD CA .933090000 1121 S LLOYD ARRILLO HU PO BOX 395 BURSON CA 952250000 433 E MAPLE ASTRO ELIS 65 W ARMSTRONG RD LODI CA 952420000 868 S WOOD ATO MICHA PO BOX 114 LOCKEFORD ICA 952370114 840 S CHERO ENTRAL ASS GENE ANDER 1004 BONNER AVE FREMONT CA 945360000 424 E LOCUS ENTRAL CAL AT&F RAILWA 920 SE QUINCY OPEKA KS 666120000 17 E LODI ENTRAL VAL MICHAEL COL 13 S CALIFORNIA ST LODI CA 952400000 500E ELM ERVANTES 2181/2 STOCKTON ST LODI CA 952400000 218 N STOCK HAHAL DAY 3251 SOUTHWYCKETERR FREMONT CA 945360000 924S GARFIE HARLES MA P 0 BOX 276043 SACRAMENTO CA 958276043 651 N CHERO HARLESWO 18932 BENEDICT DR WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 201 N SACRA HAVEZ JES 5425 GOVERNOR CIR STOCKTON CA 952106702 411 E CHERR HAVEZ JOS PO BOX 1132 WOODBRIDG ICA 952580000 106 E FLORA HAVEZ ROM 121/2 RAILROAD AVE LODI CA 952400000 412 E RAILRO HRISTENSO DELJNA CHRIS 160 W 1600 SOUTH OREM UT 840580000 217 E EDEN HRISTOLOS 1819 W LODI AVE LODI ICA 952400000 37 S PLEASA ISNEROS P PORFIRIO V Cl 1519 MARIPOSA RD STOCKTON SCA 952050000 910S CHERO LARK ALBE 530 N CROSS LODI CA 1952420000 120S MAIN LARK DOUG PO BOX 1673 LODI CA 1952410000 307 E KETTLE LARK HOW 797 E HWY 12 LODI ICA 952400000 16N CHEROK LARK JAME 1544 PORTOLA AVE STOCKTON CA 952090000 508 E HILBOR LARK FAME 4995 E HARNEY LON LODI CA 952400000 405 E OAK LAUSEN,DOI 620 W LOCUST ST LODI CA 952400000 821S LLOYD LAY ELNOR 650 HALE RD LODI CA 952400000 _917S GARFIE LUFF MARK 6750 LEESBURG PL _ STOCKTON CA 952070000 808S GARFIE OBARRUBIO ' 1100 S SCHOOL ST LODI CA 952400000 325 E CYPRE OHN ARTHU 421 COWIL CT PORTOLA VAL CA 940280000 224 E TOKAY OLE JAMES 4125 FIVE MILE DR STOCKTON CA 952193206 330 E MAPLE OLEINS GAR 18995 SWEET WILLIAM SONOMA CA 954760000 i845S CHERO OLEINS ROY PO BOX S WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 212 E PINE OLOMA PRE P 0 BOX 997 ORINDA CA 945630000 638 E HALE OMPORATO 1301 S CHURCH ST LODI CA 952400000 404 S SCHOO OMPTON D 01 S AVENA AVE LODI CA 952400000 645 E HALE ONDON W IL 3191/2 E WALNUT ST LODI CA 952400000 319E WALNU ONNELLY D 341/2 E ELM ST LODI CA 952400000 534 E ELM ONTRERAS 1011 S GARFIELD LODI ICA 952400000 816S GARFIE OOK DEBOR PO BOX 9170 STOCKTON CA 952081170 35 N WASHI OOK SCOTT 1245 S SCHOOL ST LODI iCA 952402000 116 S CENTR OOKE LANG. 282 E HWY 4 MURPHYS ICA 952479611 12 W CHESTN Page 2 tblRedev_Tenants 06/12/2002 DOPER GAR 11177 N HAM LN DOPER TED 404 PALM OPP SHIRLE 483 SUNSET RT 3 ORDERO O 5161/2 EAST ELM ST ORNWELL V 10179 LYNETTE CT RABTREE J RED SHIELD S PO BOX 13070 REWS JERK 828 EUCALYPTUS CT KIST KEITH PO BOX 221118 RUZ EVARIS 4371/2 E FLORA ST RYSTAL ENT JEFFREY & CA PO BOX 1259 UELLAR J R 801 DOLORES ST ULBERTSON 212 N CRESCENT ULBER7SON 101 E LOCUST ST ULBERTSON 212 N CRESCENT AVE UMMINGS D DALE CUMMIN 3840 MARKET CT N31 UNNINGHAM 719 J STREET URRY MICR 635 ALDEN GLEN DR USLIDGE KA 1020 BROADWAY UTLER DAVI 425 N SACRAMENTO ST DAD SHER 306112 E VINE ST DAIS CAROL 2111 LIDO CIR DALRYMPLE 431 E PINE ST DAMMEL ED 02 ROYAL OAKS CT DANCER BON 430 VALLEY DR ANIEL PAUL 13145 BORDEN RD DANIELS DER 5405 HILLSIDE AVE LORI IgA LODI CA SAN ANDREA :CA LODI CA LINDEN CA SACRAMENTO CA LODI CA CARMEL CA LODI CA WOODBRIDG CA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA SHINGLE SPRI CA LATHROP CA RACY CA STOCKTON CA LODI CA LODI CA STOCKTON CA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA HERALD CA EL CERRITO CA 952400000 952400000 652490000 952400000 952360000 958133070 952422187 939221118 952400000 952WOODO 952400000 1952400000 952400000 9524000W 956827222 953300000 953760000 952050000 952400000 952400000 952070000 952400000 952400000 952400000 956380000 945300000 524 E LOCUS 325 E ELM 10 S WASHI 516 E ELM 324 E MISSIO 217E LOCKE 338E MAPLE 521 E PINE 1437 E FLORA 1310 S WASHI 801 E DELOR 119E LOCUS 212 N MAIN 111 E LOCUS 927S WELLS 424 E ELM .820 S CENTR 645 E ELM 29 N SACRA 306 E PINE 11S SACRA 431 E PINE 5 W ELM 800 S CHERO 513E HAROL 45 E KETTLE ANIGER CU 8 W LODI AVE LODI CA 952403516 28 E OAK AUSE ROSA AVEY PAUL ! 4130 E LOCUST ST 971 PALOMA LODI STOCKTON CA CA 952400000 952090000 06 E LOCUS 653 E PINE DCS PROPER 1937 CHAMBERS CIR BRENTWOOD CA 945130000 232 E HILBOR DE SANTIAGO 2331/2 MAPLE ST LODI CA 952400000 233 E MAPLE DEAN JAMES 16 N CRESCENT AVE LODI CA 952400000 307 W ELM DEAN TIMOT 2220 S HAM LN LODI CA 952420000 321 W LODI DEFENBAUGH 701 HOLLY DR LODI CA 952400000 4 W SPRUCE EGRANDMO 2734 SEQUOIA ST LODI CA 952424690 532 E ELM EJONG ORV 16040 N TECKLENBERG RD LODI ICA 952400000 101 N CHURC EL RIO SAN 5 E OLIVE AVE LODI CA 952429227 1901S CENTR ELACRUZ R 504 E OAK ST LORI CA 952400000 1502 E OAK ENMAN VIVI P 0 BOX L WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 331E ELM DENNY DOUG 19869 N HWY 99 ACA CA 952200000 300 E MISSIO DEROBERTIS 11647 E PELTIER RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 649 E J DIAB. FAROUKI 10608OAK WILDEAVE STOCKTON CA 952120000 220S CHERO DIAMOND INE 341 1/2 E WALNUT LODI CA 952400000 341 E WALNU DIANI DIANE 32 ELM ST EL CERRITO CA 945300000 308 E LORI IAS PEDRO 1326 W MAGNOLIA ST STOCKTON CA 952030000 711 S WASHI IEHL RANDY 1215 N LOWER SAC RD LODI CA 95242DODO 15W DAISY IN. MOHAMM 1236 S STOCKTON ST LODI CA 952400000 215 E TOKAY IVERSIFIED 19391 N BENEDICT DR WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 118 N SCHOO DIXON MARVI 500 S CRESCENT AVE LODI CA 952400000 815 S LLOYD DJORDJEVICH 12528 COTTONWOOD LODI CA 952420000 215 S PLEASA DOLLINGER L 101E HWY 12 _ODI CA 952420000 655 E JOAQUI DOMINGUEZ 14455 E JUNIPER AVE LOCKEFORD CA 952379606 208 N STOCK DONALD GER MARILYN GRA 1001 W ELM ST LODI CA 952400000 17 S SCHOOL DOTY EDGAR 1 7180 REALTY RD LODI CA 952400000 416 S SCHOO REGE C J & ISIDNEY D DR 14351 N VINTAGE RD LODI CA 952400000 323 S STOCK REGE.EARLI 2012 KENWAY CT LODI CA 952420000 315 S STOCK REGE.VERNI 1519 W ELM ST LORI iCA 952420000 520S CENTR DURRELL DE 1119 RIVERGATE DR LORI CA 952400545 631 E OAK UTKA GREG 1311 W CENTURY LODI ICA 95240ODDO 921 S WELLS ASLEY.PAULI 216 N SCHOOL ST LODI CA 952400000 N SCHOO ASTERLING 2301 CABRILLO CIR LODI CA 952420000 EASTERN IND 634 E LOCKEFORD ST LODI CA 952400DOO �RA �341 DELMAYER 2548 52ND ST SACRAMENTOCA 958170000 DWARDS C 5810 E PELTIER RD CAMPO CA 952200000 601 N EHLERS LOR 530 KENSINGTON WAY LODI CA 9524200DO 217 N SACRA EHLERS LOR 217 N SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 205 N SACRA EICHELE LEE 848 CHENEY CT LORI CA 952400000 433 E FLORA EJAZ MOHAM 05 E HILBORN ST LODI CA 952400000 229 E HILBOR ELLIOTT R K 1001 W ELM LODI CA 952400000 114 W LOCUS ELLWEIN GE BERNICE WIL 1000 YORK ST LODI CA 952400000 201 E EDEN NSMINGER 221 AUDUBON DR LODI CA 952400000 729 S CENTR NSMINGER 16 WINDSOR LODI CA ;952400000 341 E WATSO SPARZA EF 1151 BRADFORD CIR LODI :CA 1.952407037 415 E CONCO ESQUEDA JE HABITAT FOR 31 E VINE ST STOCKTON 'CA 952020000 403S GARFIE UGENIKOS 257 ANNAMARIA LIVERMORE CA 945500000 343 E PINE VANS W G & 1614 W VINE ST LODI CA 952400000 640 E LOCKE FANDRICH D 14630 N BECKMAN RD LODI CA 952400000 820S WOOD FARMERS & M ATTN, MR SC 121 W PINE ST LODI CA 952400000 7 N SCHOOL FARR. KEITH 711 LOUIE ST LODI CA 952400000 426 E RAILRO FARRAGHER ARROW AD PATRICK P FA 1036 YOKUTS CT 29 KELLY ST LODI LODI CA CA 952400000 952400000 526 E LODI 41 S KELLY ASZER C & 636 DAISY AV _ODI 'CA 952400000 108 E WALNU EDERAL NAT PNC MORTGA 539 S 4TH AVE LOUISVILLE -KY 402020000 321 E ELM EDERAL NAT GMAC MTG C 401 W 24TH ST NATIONAL CIT CA 919506608 17 E EDEN EDERAL NAT 539 S 4TH AVE LOUISVILLE KY 2022531 237 N CENTR EDERAL NAT COUNTRYW ID 400 COUNTRYWIDE WAY SV -35 SIMI VALLEY CA 930650000 408 S CENTR EDERIGHI D wI I nlnre MIT 13131 E LOCKE RD {F9d FI rnaiTnN LOCKEFORD LORI CA CA 952370000 952420000 1233 S WASHI 431 E ELM Page 3 tbIRedev_Tenants 06/12/2002 FELTON CHA 1702 S MILLS AVE LODI CA 952420000 701 N SACRA FFCA ACOUISI 17207 N PERIMETER DR SCOTTSDALE 852550000 21 W LODI FIELD JOHN F 3928 DELAWARE AVE STOCKTON CA 952040000 721 S SACRA FINCH DONAL 139 S CRESCENT LODI CA 952400000 524S SCHOO FISCHER MY 604 REDBUD DR ROCKLIN CA 956770000 429 E WALNU FITZGERALD ROY M O CON 11 WATSON ST LODI CA 952400000 209 E WATSO LECK REUB 525 CONNIE LODI CA 952400000 440E FLORA LICKINGER E HARNEY LN LODI CA 952400000 835 S SACRA LORES CAR 9 S MILLS AVE LODI CA 952400000 _ 444 E LODI LORES DON 1938 ANDERSON AVE LODI CA 952400000 515 S GARFIE OREMAN MI 316 S PLEASANT AVE LODI CA 952404031 333 E WATSO FOUST BILL O 1157 N HAM LN LODI CA 952422324 840 N SACRA FRANCIS DAN 2618 MINTON CT PLEASANTON CA 945880000 S WASHI ERASER LEN 717 N PLEASANT AVE APT 3 LODI CA 952401139 428E RAILRO FRENCH CAM TTN NORMA 166 FRANK WEST CIR ISTOCKTON CA 952060000 930 E VICTOR BEY LELAN AFM E TAYLOR RD 11 ODI CA 952400000 219 N WASHI REY PHYLLI 1332 W PARK ST LODI CA 952420000 1110E LAW RE REY TIMOT 317 CORK OAK LODI CA 952420000 1350 N MAIN FROGUE STE 6005 BREA AVE STOCKTON CA 952070000 736 S SCHOO FRUITS DREX 24605 N WATKINSON RD CAMPO CA 952200000 1001 S CENT FUJIKAWA HI 708 PARK ST LODI CA 952400000 200 N CHERO FUKUNAGA A 14704 N BECKMAN RD LODI CA 952400000 330 E PINE ABRIEL APO 2216 ALPINE DR LODI 1952400000 322E VINE ABRIEL C T 217 MANZANITA CT LODI CA 952420000 417E CONCO ALLAGHER 13294 E HARNEY LN LODI CA i9524DDOOO 332 E HILBOR ALVAN JOS 19145TRIOLO ST WOODBRIDG CA 952589042 512 E EDEN ANSINGER 901 S CRESCENT LODI CA 952400000 353 E LODI ARCIA JUAN 121 N SACRAMENTO ST #3 LODI CA 952400000 116 N SACRA ARCIA JUAN 116 N SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 225 E FLORA ARCIA RAFA 115 FORREST AVE LODI CA 952400000 11088 SACR ARCIA RAM 845 DUNDEE WAY STOCKTON CA 952100000 329 E PINE ARCIA SILV 1145 GLENHURST DR -ODI CA 952400000 212 E FLORA ARRID0 JO 249 DOVER DR GALT CA 956320000 315 E ACACIA ARRISON S 933 N LINCOLN AVE LODI CA 952400000 331 E OAK ARZA FRAN 36 RIVER OAKS LODI CA 952400000 212 S WASHI ATES DAVID 540 E HARNEY LN LODI CA 952420000 437 E ELM AUNA CESA 1401 VIN ROSE DR -ODI !CA 952420000 428 E PINE AUNA LIDIA 241 E TOKAY ST -ODI CA 952400000 417 E FLORA AYTAN MAN 237 REDWOOD -ODI CA 952400000 233 E REDWO ELSOMINI SI 1806 N WILSON WAY STOCKTON CA 952050000 715 S CHERO EORGE MA 9855 E LIBERTY RD GALT CA 956320000 520 E HAROL ERALIS DIMI EMANUEL GE 1120 W LOCUST ST LODI CA 952400000 429 E PINE ERALIS STA 1442 VOELKER DR LODI CA 952400000 312 E PINE ERLACK JO 101 N LOMA DR LODI CA 952400000 '9W LOCUST EWEKE LAN 1045 S CHEROKEE LN LODI CA 952400000 102 S HANSE IANNONI JO 1680 VENICE DR SO LAKE TAH CA 961506608 216 E LODI IANNONI JO GERILYN INGL 2528 TAMARISK AVE STOCKTON CA 952070000 1301 S CENT IANULIAS C 3220 PROVINCE TOW NE CT MODESTO CA 953550000 920S CHERO INI KENNET 10899 E WOODBRIDGE RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 331 E KETTLE IOVANNONI 390 TROPICANA WAY UNION CITY CA 945870000 802 S LLOYD IPSON BEN 2441 BALMORAL ST UNION CITY CA 945870000 440 E FLORA ISLER MAR 400 E PINE ST LODI CA 952400000 412 E PINE ISLER MAR 5361 N LINN RD CAMPO CA 952209736 400 E PINE LADIUS GE jAMES & BAR 24 MOCKINGBIRD CIR SANTA ROSA CA 954090000 18 N SCHOOL LADUSH BE 42o E WATTERS RD FRENCH CAM CA 952310000 301 E FLORA LENN JERR JEROME HER 4341 ST ANDREWS DR STOCKTON CA 952190000 326 E PINE LORY PROP RICHARD WO 23438 N BRUELLA RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 18 S MAIN OMEZ HERI 947 WOODROW LODI CA 952400000 947 S WOOD OMEZ SALV PO BOX 695 LOCKEFORD CA 952370000 604 E PINE ONZALES IN 942 WOODROW ST LODI CA 952400000 942 S WOOD OODWILL IN 1129 S GRANT STOCKTON CA 952020000 200 E OAK RAFFIGNA 151 S CORINTH LODI CA 952420000 405 N SACRA REENWOOD 027 WOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 215 E CHERR REGG DAR 611 YORK ST LODI CA 952400000 536 E LOCUS REVER ZAN 1432 PARK ST LODI CA 952420000 11N CENTRA REY LARRY V479 BOBBIE WY ROHNERT PA CA 949280000 529E LOCUS RIFFIN R L & 119 N CRESCENT AV LODI CA 952400000 122S BECKM RIFFITH GE 2430 ELMWOOD CT LODI CA 952422831 218 N STOCK ES RON RES. 1540 N SAN JOAQUIN STOCKTON ICA 952040000 403 S SACRA RITTS GER 125356 FORTUNA DR VALENCIA CA 913550000 636 S WASHI ROSS DALE 1912 SANTA YNEZ DR LODI CA 952420000 213S KELLY ROSS OTTO 12871 GROSS CT GALT CA 956328872 819S WOOD RUEBELE S 5 S ROSE ST LODI CA 952400000 220 E CHERR GUERRERO 1331 S WILSON WAY RTOCKTQN CA 952050000 111 N SACRA UGLIMETTI 1230 HEATHER DR IMURPHYS ICA 952470000 01 S MAIN UL MOHAM 747 S CENTRAL AVE LODI ICA 952400000 313 E TOKAY UMS LLOYD 731 BIRCHWOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 537E HILBOR UTHMILLER 1310 EDGEWOOD DRLODI CA 952400000 1024E VICTO UTIERREZ 7148 KUHL OR COMMERCE CA 900400000 329E HILBOR UTIERREZ 3116 OTTO DR STOCKTON CA 852090000 946 S CENTR UTIERREZ 237 MAPLE LODI CA 952400000 436 E EDEN UTIERREZ J 1 1012 YULONI DR CA 952400000 942 S LLOYD UTIERREZ L 1830 S SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 201 E CHARL GUTIERREZ 1134 DOWNING DR LODI CA 952400000 405 E LOCUS H C SHAW CO PO BOX 31510 STOCKTON CA 952130000 1150 E VICTO HABERMAN L 611 CARIGNANE CT LODI CA952400000 509 E WALNU ABITAT FOR 31 E VINE ST STOCKTON CA 952020000 335 N STOCK wrvuinoru 1517 FI mri INnV nR LODI CA 19524DO000 505 E WALNU Page 4 tblRedev_Tenants M1212002 HADAD ABDE 1906 ROYAL CREST DR -ODI CA 952420000 24 W ELM 314 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952404102 320 S CENTR 3958 ROUND VALLEY CIR STOCKTON CA 952070000 220 N SACRA 8 E LOCKEFORD ST LODI CA 952400000 10 E LOCKEF KELLY NORDE 4012 TRICIA WAY VFRANK N HIGHLANDS CA 956600000 425 E PINE 1419 LAKE ST LODI CA 952420000 114 N GARFIE 2 E PINE ST LODI CA 952400000 100 S CHERO SON JOH 11644 E PELTIER RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 .408 N SCHOO NSON RIC 1300 S CENTRAL AVE -ODI CA 952405909 1239 S LIESIG ANSON RIC 724 S CRESCENT AVE -ODI CA 1952404W8 212 E VINE RO DENNI 301 A PLEASANT AV -ODI _ CA 952400000 730 S CENTR HARD OLGA 620 N SCHOOL ST -ODI CA 952400000 424 E OAK HARK HULDA DONNA M KO 1515 S CHEROKEE LN LODI CA 952400000 412S SCHOO HARRIS STEV 934 BRADFORD WAY BENICIA CA 945103615 230S LEE RISON R 19560 RIVER BIRCH #5 SONORA CA 953700000 300 E MAPLE YES IVAN 1 1622 E ACAMPO RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 226 S PLEASA YN BRIAN 8'0E HARNEY LN LODI CA 952420000 1 W LODI YNES BER ! 307 EMERALD OAK DR GALT CA 956320000 312 E MISSIO EAGARTY F 11251 EDGEWOOD DR LODI CA 1952400000 11 S CHURCH EFFEL KEN 11 S AVENA AVE LODI CA 952400000 513 S SACRA HEIDEN BEN 1515 KEAGLE WY LODI CA 952420000 46N HOUSTO HEIDEN EUG 46 N HOUSTON LANE LODI CA 952400000 38 N HOUSTO EILIG MEYE PROPERTY M 12560 WEST CREEK PARKWAY RICHMOND VA 232380000 220 S CHURC EINE ELMER 704 WINDSOR DR LODI CA 952400000 12 W VINE EINITZ RAN 70 N LOWER SAC RD LODI CA 952420000 441 E TOKAY ENDERSON 21 S SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 13 W PINE ERFINDAHLJERRY GLENN 2243 MACARTHUR PKWY LODI ICA 952420000 616 N SCHOO HERMOSILLO 10069 RIVER OAKS DR STOCKTON ICA 952090000 507 E ELM ERRERA JO 1 26217 N HWY 99 ACAMPO CA 952209532 965 S WOOD ERRMANN El 11740 N HAM LN LODI CA 952400000 312 E LOCUS HERRMANN J 6453 MULBERRY LN STOCKTON CA 952120000 409 E WALNU ERRMANN T 19 OUASHNICK RD STOCKTON CA 952120000 322 E ELM HERTZ REALT 3527 MT DIABLO BLVD #292 LAFAYETTE CA 945960000 27 N SACRAM ERZSTEIN S PENTHOUSE 1170 SACRAMENTO ST SAN FRANCIS CA 941040000 1104 E TURNE ESS BEVER PO BOX 35 LODI CA 952410000 533 E MAPLE ESS HUGO 823 TILDEN DR LODI CA 952423717 219S LEE ESS IDA M T 1505 W IRIS DR LODI 'CA 952420000 319 E OAK ESS OSKAR 838 VIRGINIA AVE LODI CA 952420000 739S CENTR HIBNER JOHNAMADOR PINE 19304 FIR DR PIONEER CA 956660000 424 E WALNU HIBNER JOHN 4814 HARVEST RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 341 E FLORA ICKS JIMMY 200 RIVER OAKS DR LODI CA 952400000 615 E PINE HILL JAMES E 225 S CRESCENT AVE LODI CA 952400000 23 N CENTRA ILLIARD GL 23333 TRETHEWAY RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 842 S WASHI INSZ CANDI 613 N PLEASANT AVE LODI CA 952400000 529E HILBOR INSZ GLENN 801 LAVER CT LODI CA 952420000 347 E LODI OAG BEVER 1230 W LOCUST ST LODI CA 952400000 1007 LLOYD OFFMAN AL 26490 N DUSTIN RD ACAMPO CA 952209626 420 E OAK HOFFMANN V 1 13714 E PINTO LN LODI CA 952400000 305 E CONCO HOHN JOSEP 1715 S CHURCH ST LODI CA 952400000 110S CHURC OLLOWAY E 608 S SCHOOL ST LODI CA 952400000 16 W TOKAY OLT JOSEP 3156 THISTLEDOWN CT PLEASANTON CA 945660000 1211 S CENT ONEA DONA 7309 CAMELLIA LN STOCKTON CA 952070000 225 E HILBOR OPPER STA 725 COSTA DR LODI CA 952400000 '625 N SACRA QRST CHAR 437 E WALNUT -ODI CA 952400000 117 S GARFIE ROVAT W IL 1556 IRIS DR -ODI -CA 1952400000 425 E HILBOR UGHES G M 1022 DANIELLE ST CHOWCHILLA ICA 936102132 400 N SACRA UPPERT INE, 1313 W LOCKEFORD ST -ODI CA 952400000 310S SCHOO UST ROY S 1 1146 LAKEWOOD DR -ODI CA 952400000 20 W LOCUST LITTON MAR 2250 S SCARBOROUGH DR #36 ODI CA 952400000 522 E PINE 11 UTZ T K & M 1250 RIVERGATE DR -ODI CA 952400000 735S SACRA HUTZ THEOD ENOCH ENTE 915 ALMADEN AVE SAN JOSE CA 951100000 322 E ELM YSKE ED 831 YORK LODI CA 952400000 1502 E LODI BARRA RAM 2211 SEAHAW K LN LODI CA 952407814 803S LLOYD IBRAHIM ABD 100 N SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 47 N SACRAM IBRAHIM MOH 120 VINEYARD DR LODI CA 952400000 504 S SCHOO IMC MORTGA INDUSTRY MT 5901 E FOWLER AVE TAMPA iFL 336172362 306 E PINE INGS LAURA RUSSELL M IN 9601 OAKWILDE STOCKTON CA 952120000 334 E LODI INTERLAKE M 550 WARRENVILLE RD ISLE IL 605324387 1028 S SCHO INTERLAKE M 1029 S SACRAMENTO ST CA 952400000 9018 SACRA IRFAN MOHA 833 N CHURCH ST VQDI I CA 952400000 1236 S STOC [TEN DONALD 1539 PORTOLA CKTON A 952070000 903 S CENTR TO Y & J K T 10540 STOKES AVE PERTINO CA 950140000 516E LOCUS AIME JOSEFI 9181ST ST GALT CA 956320000 304 E LODI AMEEL MOH 6602 TABLE TOP CT STOCKTON CA 9521000DO 111 S STOCK JAPANESEAMi 23 N STOCKTON ST LODI CA 952400000 210 E ELM JENNY, W ERN 315 E WALNUT ST LODI CA 952400000 504 E HAROL JOHN GRAFFI JOHN A FRAF 5221 E ACAMPO RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 2 W PINE JOHNSON, DO STEPHEN R & 15521 N DAVIS RD LODI CA 952420000 1131 S STOC JOHNSON.ER 13001 LUPINE RD ANCHORAGE AK 995160000 504 E WALNU JOHNSON.FR 3016 PARK OAK DR LODI CA 952420000 24 N SCHOOL JOHNSON, FR SCHAFFER SU PO BOX 667 LODI CA i9524100DO 704S GARFIE JOHNSTON.0 915 COOPER CT STOCKTON CA 952100000 8008 GARFIE ONES RACH 3519 DEL MONTE WY SANLEANDR CA 945780WO 320 E HILBOR ONES SAND 9308 CROCKER RD GRANITE BAY CA 957466728 241 E WATSO DAN STE 25S SUNSET LODI CA 952400000 700 S SCHOO EPH JOA 931 CARDINAL ST LODI CA 952400000 317 E TOKAY ZAKIAN B ERALDINE B IZ 07 RIVER OAKS DR LODI CA 952400000 115S CHERO IMI MAHM 1 1375 OLE HANSEN RD EUREKA CA 955039565 4 N SCHOOL Page 5 tblRedev_Tenants 06/12/2002 EMP GEOR PAUL B KEMP 72 THE ALAMEDA SAN JOSE CA 951260000 200 E VINE EMPF JAME 7621 BE LAMPHIER MILWAUKIE OR 972220000 224 E HILBOR N AJMAL 1722 REISLING DR LODI CA 952400000 1020 S WASHI AN AMAN 1139 S CRESCENT AVE LODI CA 952400000 307 E WATSO AN AYUB & 157 MULBERRY Cl LODI CA 952400000 436 E PINE N FIDA & 22 WASHINGTON LODI CA 952400000 306 E ELM KHAN IMRAN 747 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 216 N WASHI HAN M AKR 213 E PINE ST LODI CA 952400000 433 E LOCUS KHAN MOHA 310 N MILLS AVE LODI CA 952420000 524 E ELM AN MOHA 420 LASALLE DR OODBRIDG CA 952580000 312 N SCHOO HAN MOH 33 N CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 416E RAILRO HAN MOHA AN 515 S PLEASANT AVE LODI CA 952400000 404 E ELM MOHD 15 N SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 227 E REDWO MUZAF E MURRAY AVE LODI CA 952400000 802 S STOCK AN.RAVEZil 9579 BAYPOINT WAY ELK GROVE CA 1956240000 303 E ELM HAN.SAEEDI 217 REDWOODLODI CA 952400000 205 E HILBOR AN SAFDA 2113 ALPINE DR LODI CA 952400000 928S WELLS 828 SANDROCK WAY AN. SALEE SALE11361 SACRAMENTO CA 958280000 304 E ACACIA KHAN YAOUB24 ACACIA ST LODI CA 952400000 409 E LOCUS HAN YASMI50 S GARFIELD #31 LODI CA 952400000 17 W SIERRA KHAN YOUSA24 ACACIA ST LODI CA 952400000 918S WELLS KHAN ZAMAN10 N MILLS AVE LODI CA 952420000 316 E LOCUS HATAB LIME02 ACACIA ST LODI CA 952400000 333 E ACACIA IEDROWSKI31 1ST ST LODI CA 952400000 615 E LODI IGGENS JEA E FAIRMONT FRESNO CA 937040000 1512 N CHERO IM JAMES D 700 S HAM LN LODI CA 952420000 18W PINE IRSCHENMA 115 LOUIE AVE #238 LODI CA 952400000 21 N HOUSTO (IRSCHENMAI 1112 PINOT NOIR LODI CA 952400000 1011 S WOOD IRSTEN DAV 1324 MIDVALE RD LODI CA 952400000 112 S CHURC LEMENS GIL 508 E LOCUST ST LODI CA 952400000 941S WOOD LOCKO GOR 32 KINGFISHER LN HORSESHOE NC 1287420000 420 E CONCO UTSON TE 1562 EDGEWOOD DR LODI iCA 1952400453 203S SCHOO OEHLER KE 9755 ORR ROAD GALT ICA 1956320000 114 N WASHI KOENIG WAL 19323 TAMI LN WOODBRIDG ICA 1952580000 8098 LLOYD KOKIOUSIS P STEVEN COTT 125 N PLEASANT AVE LODI CA 952400000 2418 PLEASA KONSCHAK R VIRGIL KONS 1125 S SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 _1124S SACK KOOYMAN BE 1 19317 N PERRYMAN RD _ODI CA 952420000 360 E LODI ORT DOUGL 1 2311 W COCHRAN RD LODI CA 952420000 330 E OAK KRAAI JOHN 1 351 DEL MONT ST _ODI CA 952420000 520 E HILBOR KRANT2 ROB 1 8 N CALIFORNIA ST _ODI CA 952400000 245 E FLORA KUEHNE DOU 105 N HUTCHINS ST LODI CA 952420000 17W LOCKEF KULP ROBER 518 ST CLAIRE DR LODI CA 952400000 621 N CHERO MANNA JO 10168 LYNETTE CT LINDEN CA 952360000 116 N HOUST DOUCEUR 2311 LIDO Cl STOCKTON CA 952070000 619 S SACRA RKIN EUGE 6572 E KETTLEMAN LN LODI CA 952400000 439S SACRA RSEN HAR 502 S CHURCH ST LODI CA 952400000 834 S WASHI RSSON DO 1717 PROVIDENCE WAY LODI ICA 952424745 312 N MAIN URO JEFF 2414 W KETTLEMAN W #210-11 LODI CA 1952420000 220 E PINE VIERI ANT 1 412 S WASHINGTON ST LODI ICA 952400000 428 E CHERR VIERI MICH 1298 MICHAELTIN CT MANTECA CA 953360000 445 E TOKAY E NGOC HU 10443 OAKW ILDE AVE STOCKTON CA 952120000 211S KELLY EA JANE 1931 HOLLY DR LODI CA 952420000 207 E WALNU EANDRO MI I 6102 E HWY 26 STOCKTON CA 952150000 18W VINE EAR JEFFER 2357 ROCKINGHAM CIR LODI CA 952420000 311 E WATSO EE GEORGE BENNETT REA 709 W KETTLEMAN LN LODI CA 952400000 308 E POPLA EE H MAX & 1225 W ARMSTRONG RD LODI CA 952400000 510 E MURRA EHR MARY T 11250 EDGEWOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 200 E LODI EMLEY SUZ 115389 E JAHANT RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 27 E LOCUST VY G ALLA 18855 E KETTLEMAN W LODI CA 952400000 501S CENTR EW RAYMO 24365 LA HOMA YORBA LINDA CA 926860000 321 E HILBOR EW WAN & 130 WOODLAND CT MILPITAS CA 950350000 310S CENTR LEW IS DARR 924 LAKE HOME DR LODI CA 952400000 544 E OAK LIEBELT ADE 571 W TADDEI RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 437 E CONCO LINER FLOYD 423 W FORREST LODI CA 1952400000 419 E TOKAY LIPPERT JEF 766 LOUIE AVE LODI CA 952400000 230 E LODI LIPPERT WAL 1425 HOLLY DR LODI CA 952420000 918S GARFIE LIPSCOMB D _ 105-A E PINE ST LODI CA 952400000 2 N MAIN LIRA RAUL 1518 BURGUNDY DR LODI CA 952424508 500 E HAROL LITFIN ROBE 1445 S CHEROKEE LN LODI CA 952400000334 E PINE LITTLE ROLA 15 S GARFIELD LODI CA 952400000 711 5 GARFIE LOBAUGH W 100 PIERCE POINT RD POINT REYES CA 949560000 216 E FLORA OCKE JAME 511 WILLOW GLEN DRLODI CA 952400000 906S GARFIE OCKE MICH ERESA LEGR 1000 W PINE ST LODI CA 952400000 503 S SACRA ODI CITY CE ANTHONY M B 800 W MARCH LN SUITE 360 STOCKTON CA 952190000 109 N SCH00 ODI FAB IND INTERLAKE C 1029 S SACRAMENTO ST CA 952400000 1100 S SACR 001 HOTEL I 1001 6TH ST #200 AMENTOCA 958140000 5 S SCHOOL ODI JOHN & 220 S SUNSET CA 952400000 116 N CENTR OIS P BALLA 2331 W HWY 12 CA 952420000 15 N SACRAM ONGMIRE RI DAVID E LON 860 COMANCHE CT MORE CA 945500000 313 E VINE OOCK DARL 22091 N BRUELLA RD PO CA 952200000 423 E POPLA OPEZ MARTI 1730 W 41 ST PL NGELES CA IGROVE 900620000 23 W DE FOR ORETZ FRA 10884 FRANKLIN BL ROVE CA 957580000 441 E EDEN ORIMER DE DENISE BAUM 1031 W TURNER RD CA 952420000 204 E EDEN OW BARBAR 1032 HIGHLAND ST EJO CA 945900000 215 W LODI UNG KEN A 240 N CHEROKEE LN CA 952400000 606 E LOCKE URTSEMA H 6002 PORTSMOUTH CIR KTON CA 952190000 412 E EDEN & P INVEST 1021 BLACK DIAMOND WAY CA 952400000 108 E ELM MACHADO_ M 1523 RIMBY AVE CA 952400000 233 E FLORA Page 6 1blRedev_Tenants 06/1212002 AILLOUX DE 24239 SUTTENFIELD RD MAISCH MAU 6178 MYRTLE AVE ALL STANLE 1001 LAKE HOME DR J ST 1660 EDGEWOOD DR KEVIN C 2841 OAKMONT DR A 7129 OAK CREEK DR GRA JOHN A GRAF 5221 E ACAMPO RD 113 CONNIE ST RON 1739 EDGEWOOD DR BU 959 WOODROW ST MARTIN GAYL 9404 WINDSOR SHADE DR MARTIN RUS 625 CARDINAL AVE RTIN TON E WOODBRIDGE RD ARTINEZ AR NORTH AMERI 2105 W MARCH LN #A ARTINEZ EN 20066 N KENNEFICK ARTINEZ NA 3704 22ND AVE MARTINEZ R 2204 NEWBURY CIR MASONIC TEM 315 W PINE ST MASSOD MO 360 E LODI AVE MASTRIANO 1086 NEW PORT AVE MATA BERNA HABITAT FOR 31 E VINE ST AYERS FRE 1233 BRANDYW INE DR CCARTY JA 63 S CRESCENT AVE CCARVER D 326 E OAK ST CCAULEY M 1118 TENEIGHTH WAY CCOMBS O 363 S SUNSET DR CAMPO CA LONG BEACH CA LODI CA LODI CA SAN BRUNO CA000 STOCKTON CA CAMPO CA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA MECHANIESVI VA LODI CA CAMPO CA STOCKTON CA ACAMPO CA SACRAMENTOCA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA GROVER BEA CA STOCKTON CA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA ACRAMENTO,CA LODI CA 00 23 00 00 000 000 000 000 000 231160000 952400000 952200000 952076407 :952200000 958204427 952400000 952400000 952400000 934330000 952020000 952400000 952400000 952400000 958160000 .952400000 933 S GARFIE 404E WALNU 812 S STOCKANILDI 235E HILBORAO 419 W LODIARCHICK 325E KETTLEARILYN 10 S SCHOOL FIE 303 E OAKMARKLE 309 E ELMMARQUEZ 705 S SACRA —15W TOKAY 15 W OAK 209 S STOCK 229 E TOKAY 532 E LOCUS 329 E VINE 546 E WALNU 321 W PINE 356E LODI 233S PLEASA 222 E REDWO 112S MAIN 218 N CHERO 23 N SACRAM 201 W LODI # 209E FLORA CLAUGHLIN ' MCMANUS R SHERRELL C MCW ILLIAMS 19211 E LIBERTY RD IB16 CALLE PLUMA 1245 S SUNSET DR CLEMENTS CA SAN CLEMEN CA LODI CA 952270000 926730000 952400000 233S LEE 241 E MAPLE 2088 SCHOO MEDICIS CON 170 LIBBY ST CEANSIDE CA 920540000 909 S GARFIE EHLHAFF F 2141 W LODI AVE LODI CA 952420000 109 N CHURC EHLHAFF R 331 KRISTMONT LODI CA 952420000 240S LEE MEIDINGER L 823 S MILLS AVE LODI CA 952420000 411 E ELM MEIDINGER S 1022 LAUREL AVE LODI CA 952420000 123 E PINE MEINECKE H 1240 S STOCKTON ST LODI CA 952400000 1244 S STOC EISSNER R 2387 FUNSTON AVE SAN FRANCIS CA 941160000 233 S CHURC ELENDREZ 328 W LOUIE ST 'LODI CA 952400000 17 N WASHIN ENDEZ JOH 1543 VISTA DR IODI CA 952420000 119 S STOCK ENDONCA A 2629 AGATE CT SANTA CLARA CA 950510000 316 E VINE ENDONCA 1600 AMBERLEAF WAY_ LODI CA 952420000 09 N STOCK ENDOZA JO 2601 E ARMSTRONG RD LODI A 952400000 20 S MAIN ERKLE ALA 16375 NEHWY240 NEWBERG R 971320000 16S WASHIN MERTZ VICT 709 S CRESCENT AVE LODI CA 952400000 520 E RAILRO METZGER HO 4767 E HARVEST RD CAMPO CA 952200000 532 E LOCUS EYER PAULI 793 DOUGHERTY RD CAMPO CA 952200000 307 E POPLA MEYERS L P 131 S AVENA LODI CA 952400000 21 W LOCUST MILLA LUCY 7580 W MCKINLEY FRESNO CA 937220000 1809 S SACRA ILLER'S WA 507 ST CLAIRE DR !LODI CA 952400000 920 E VICTOR ILLER MARV 330 S MAIN ST LODI CA 952400000 312S MAIN ILLER VERN 410 HAROLD ST LODI CA 952400000 430 E MAPLE ILLERS WAR 1 507 ST CLAIRE AVE LODI CA 952400000 932 E VICTOR ILLS FRANK MARSHALL & 404 W PINE ST *14 LODI CA 952400000 5 N SCHOOL INHAS ROS 9463 LOCKERIDGE WAY SACRAMENTOCA 958290000 408 E RAILRO ITCHELL RI 870 RIDGE RD RAILROAD FL CA 952480000 521 E ELM OITOSO RO 8158 E LIBERTY RD GALT ICA 956320000 501 E HILBOR OITZGER M STATTEGG H 8046 GRAZ AUSTRIA, EUR XX 000000000 _910S GARFIE MOJALLI MAH 421 LESLIE AVE STOCKTON CA 952070000 840S CENTR MONTELARO 1544 PEREZ DR PACIFICA CA 940440000 1201S CENT MONTERO JO 1000 LAFAYETTE ST SUITE F SNATA CLARA CA 950500000 323 E LOCUS MORITA CALVI 4 N MAIN ST LODI CA 952400000 8 N MAIN MORK BRUCE 786 W IDGEON FOSTER CITY CA 944040000 238 N RUSH MORRIS BRO 2929 SW VESTA ST PORTLAND OR 972190000 125 S SCHOO OSOUITO A 5503 S AIRPORT WY STOCKTON CA 952060000 1200 N BECKM OULES ANT 10848 MIGUELITA RD iSAN JOSE iCA 951272714 734 S STOCK MOUNCE MA 54 N CLUFF AVE LODI CA 952400000 150 N CLUFF MOURAD SO 4409 LORENZO LN STOCKTON CA 952070000 314 E WALNU OYER THO 548 CHERRY AVE 1SAN JOSE CA 951290000 610 E PINE UELLER DA 12 N HAM LN LODI CA 952420000 735 S WASHI ULLENR H 53 MULBERRY LN STOCKTON CA 952120000 513 E LOCUS ULLER CAR 1400 EDGEWOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 412S SACRA UNSCH L K 2221 LANDON LN SACRAMENTOCA 958250000 321 N SACRA URGUTA AN SERGIO RAMI 1131 S PLEASANT AVE LODI ICA 952405723 620S CENTR MURPHEY L F 1109 EASTRIDGE DR MODESTO CA 953550000 428 E RAILRO MUSOLINO B BOB CATON 1212 N CALIFORNIA ST STOCKTON CA 952020000 .511 S STOCK MUSTIN DAVI 1 N SUNSET DR LODI CA 952400000 512 E PINE MUTHER FRE 904 SYLVIA DR LODI CA 952400000 208 E PINE NAEF LEON G 903 W LUCAS RD LODI CA 952420000 115 W WALN AGATA KEVI 5080E NADOTTI RD STOCKTON CA 952150000 332 E TOKAY AGEL ARDE ARDEL BETZ 24261 BARNES LN COVELO CA 954280000 413 E VINE NAGEL GERA 5625 M STREET SACRAMENTO CA 958190000 315 E WATSO KAMURA J 4106 YACHT HARBOR DR STOCKTON CA 952040000 11 N SCHOOL UGHTON 9218E SIERRA CLOVIS CA 936110000 301 E OAK VA JOSE & 2407 S BANYAN DR LODI CA 952400000 122 N SACRA NELSON STE 913 WELLSWOOD AVE LODI CA 952400000 913S WELLS EUMAN RIC 910 COLOGNE CT LODI CA 952420000 519 E LODI NEWCO HOLZ RM ENGINEER 1129 S SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA ICA 952410000 1231 S SACK NEWTON RO 621 N GRANT AVE LODI 952400000 216 E TOKAY NICKEL R FT RICHARD NIC 107 BAWDEN AVE GRASS VALLE CA 959450000 1515S WASHI Page 7 tblRedev_Tenants 06112/2002 NICOLAOU AL STEVEN NICO 2437 BRITTANY CT NICOLAOU BI STEVEN NICO 2437 BRITTANY CT _ NICOLAOU WI 1502 FIR AVE NINE SAC SEL FIDELITY NAT 200 GALLERIA PKY STE 1695 NISAR MOHA 7 STANISLAUS ST 0 CAL CONF C DUANE FUR 12606 N MUNDY RD O CAL CONF IRENE RODAC 317 E ACACIA ST O CAL CONF 730 S FAIRMONT AVE ORTHERN C LENFORD RE 1940 VIRGINIA OPITON JAM 118453 IRONSTONE ST _... UNEZ FELIP i 3857 E EMERSON RD NUNEZ FELIP 3857 EMERSON RD UNEZ LIONE LEONIL NUNE 20639 N HWY 99 BRION TOM 1539 PORTOLA AVE CHOA DAVI 1426 IRIS DR CHOA JUDI 2509 GOLDFINCH DR CHSNER JO 5 CHESTNUT ST LODI CA LODI CA SAN LEANDR CA TLANTA GA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA LODI CA WOODBRIDG CA952580000 CAMPO CA CAMPO CA CAMPO, CA STOCKTON CA LODI CA CEDAR PARK TX -ODI CA 952420000 952420000 945780000 303390000 952400000 952400000 952405903 952400000 952420000 +952209391 952200000 _ 952200000 952080000 952420000 786130000 952400000 533 E WALNU 511 E ELM 524 E OAK 450 N CHERO 333 E LOCUS 1239 S WASHI 317 E ACACIA 1054 S CENT 15 W PINE 1226 S LIEBIG 15 S CENTR 739 S WASHI 322E POPLA 319E CYPRE 237E CHERR 513E HILBOR 1014S CENT CWEN FINA 1675 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD WEST PALM B FL 334010000 5W VINE DD FELLOW 6 S PLEASANT AVE -ODI CA 952400000 218 W PINE ESTERMAN 2129 SI NWEST DR -ODI _ CA 952420000 421 E WALNU GREN WAY PO BOX 1344 -ODI CA 952410000 225 N RUSH HLHAUSER 2020 CABRILLO Cl -ODI CA 952420000 9W SPRUCE KAZAKI HAR 2143 W ELM ST LODI CA 952400000 537 E EDEN LSON EDW 1306 BURGUNDY CT LODI CA 952400000 101 E LODI OLSON REX I 478 SANDSTONE CT WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 125E LODI RDONEZ H 101 9 S GARFIELD ST LODI CA 952400000 .404 E OAK ROZCO JOS 421 HERALD ST LODI CA 952400000 401 E LOCUS RT MICHAE 534 OLD ORCHARD DR DANVILLE CA 945263655 4 N CENTRAL RTIZ IGNACI 432 E MAPLE LODI CA 952400000 814 S WOOD S LODI LLC ATTN PETER 1120 BROCKMAN DR SONOMA CA 954760000 360 S CHERO TTERSTETT 1111 MAC ARTHUR BLVD SAN LEANDR CA 945770000 1317 S CENT OUTREACH MI 715 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 935 S CENTR WEN SUSA 19060 CREEKVIEW DR LOCKEFORD CA 952370000 407 W LODI PACIFIC COAS 631 N CLUFF AVE LODI --CA 952400000 741S STOCK PACIFIC COAS 621 N CLUFF AVE LODI CA 952400000 839S STOCK PAIGE KENNE 1720 WINDJAMMER CT LODI CA 952420000 103 E ELM PANIAGUA D 5333 E WASHINGTON ST STOCKTON CA 952150000 420 E LODI PANSKY EMIL 901 JACKLING DR HILLSBOROU CA 940100000 121S CHERO AREDES HE 03 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 326 E CYPRE PARK DAVID 1 547 E RIVERSIDE DR WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 820 S CHERO ASCUAL SA 853 DORCHESTER LODI CA 952400000 209 N SCHOO ASCUAL SA 853 DORCHESTER CIR LODI CA 952400000 925 S LLOYD PATEL GHAN .i 112 N SCHOOL ST #8 LODI CA 952400000 106 N SCHOO PEARSON TH 936 LLOYD ST DI CA_ 952400000 936 S LLOYD PEDEN CRAI 572 ISLAND PL CA 940650000 21 E ELM PENA SEBAS MARTHA MOR 1824 MARIPOSA WAYDI IREDWOO:D:C:l CA 952420000 415 E TOKAY PERALES JO 133 MULBERRY CIRDI CA 952400000 906 S WOOD PERLEGOS P 15506 N CURRY RDDI CA 952409338 541 ELOCUS ERMAN DEL 19690 N HWY 99 #85 CAMPO CA 952200000 613S CENTR ERRY LORE 1225 E ACAMPO RD CAMPO CA 952200000 844 S WOOD PETERSEN 10 N LOWER SAC RD LODI CA 952420000 228 S HUTCHI ,L PETERSEN 515 W LODI AVE LODI CA 952400000 510 E LODI ,L PFEFFERKOR 2345 REDWOOD ST V'S CA 932770000 206 E FLORA PHILLIPS GAY 514 S SCHOOL ST LODI 'CA 9524D0000 614S SCHOO PHILLIPS,KEN 1316 ARUNDEL CT LODI CA 952420000 18 S PLEASA IC N SAVE IN PROPERTY TA 3336E 32ND ST #217 TULSA OK 741350000 380 S CHERO PIETROS'S PI 317 E KETTLEMAN LN LODI CA 952400000 321 E KETTLE PINHEIRO LA 365 SANTA CLARA ST STOCKTON CA 952070000 504 E TOKAY PINKERTON H 1 42 N CLUFF AVE LODI CA 952400000 36 N CLUFF PINNELL BET 806 BEL AIR CT LODI CA 952400000 220 W LOCUS PIRES MANU'23381 N DEVRIES LODI CA 952420000 437 E LOCUS PITAMBER RA 1118 ROCKINGHAM DR ROSEVILLE CA 956760000 603 N CHERO PITCHFORD 1525 W ELM ST LODI CA 952420000 436E LOCUS POCOCK LAU OLANSKY G 02 KINROSS WAY 2418 FARNSWORTH DR STOCKTON LIVERMORE CA CA _ 952100000 945500000 800 S WOOD 104S PLEASA OLENSKE R 2520 S HAM LN LODI CA 952400000 309 E FLORA ORTSCHELL 13430 E PELTIER RD ACAMPO CA 1952200000 314 N CHERO OWELL HAR 1201 ROSEWOOD D OVELAND CO 805370000 306 E MAPLE ROHASKA D 610 W TURNER RD LODI CA 952400000 401 N SACRA URDY BRAN 315 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 311S CENTR PURVIS DAME 601 N SCHOOL ST LODI CA 952401231 321 E MAPLE ADIR ABDUL LI MOHAMM 1020 S PRIEBE ST LODI CA 952400000 1025 S PRIEB AYYUM AJAIl 925 S GARFIELD LODI CA 952400000 921 S GARFIE UAYYUM.AJI R 8 P PROPE 925 S GARFIELD ST 0 HARDING BL -ODI ROSEVILLE CA CA 952400000 956780000 929 S GARFIE 623 N CHERO RADOTIC PET 15495 TECKLENBURG RD LODI CA 19524000DO 412S STOCK ADOTIC PET ALSTON JO 1 MIREZ PA 1 728 S CENTRAL AVE 2012 EDGEWOOD DR 321 E TOKAY ST LODI LODI LODI CA 'CA CA 952400000 952400000 952400000 220 N WASHI 124 E WALNU 314 E LOCUS MSEY.CYN11 321 LA VIDA LODI ---CA 952420000 323 E ELM RANDHAWA 1 900 S CHEROKEE LN LODI CA 952400000 910S CHERO RASHID FAYE. 127 S SACRAMENTO ST LODI CA 952400000 37 S SACRAM RAY MAURIC 1 !755 S FAIRMONT AVE SUITE A-1 LODI _ - CA^_ 952400000 1011 E PINE RAYMOND INVI 817 S CENTER ST STOCKTON CA 952060000 16 E LOCKEF REESE CECIL 836 GREENWOOD DR LODI CA 952400434 206E HILBOR REICH PROPE 1432 E LODI AVE LODI CA 952400000 500 E OAK REICH GLEN 801 S CHURCH ST o O�2 1 Ovl 11= WII I IA O'U1Ad N CAWI FR LODI ACAMPO CA CA 952400000 1952200000 432 E LODI 125 N HOUST Page 8 tbIRedev_Tenants 06/12/2002 DOROT 936 LAKE HOME DR LODI CA 952400000 210 E CHERR BE BEN CLARA MILES 445 61ST ST __OAKLAND CA 946091304 316 E TOKAY Y KEVIN 2305 W BENJAMIN HOLT STOCKTON CA 952070000 100 E LODI IG LAR 1421 CARDINAL ST LODI CA 952420000 432 E TOKAY WIG LEA 8897 E KETTLEMAN LN LODI CA 952400000 343 N STOCK IG NO 5933 E ARMSTRONG RD LODI CA 952407225 9348 CENTR WIG SHA 319 N STOCKTON ST LODI CA 952400000 323 N STOCK OLDS R IRIVERASALV E TOKAY ST LODI CA 952400000 505S MAIN DOUGL 1 FREEDOM WAY HARLEYSVILL PA 194380000 420 E TOKAY ANSRUD 520 PATRICK WAY LOS ALTOS CA 940220000 744 S CENTR LE ROB 712 CROSS ST LODI CA 952420000 339 N STOCK POULOS 2389 N RAY RD LODI CA 952400000 733 S SACRA LDI TON 7200 E REALTY RD LODI CA 952409504 218E WATSO EDWIN 10821 N LOWER SAC RD STOCKTON .CA 952100000 421 E OAK RA IREN 2553 COTTONWOOD DR LODI CA 952420000 337 E WALNU RA SALV ANN CERNEY 45 HUNTER SQUARE PLAZA STOCKTON CA 952020000 307 E LODI RIVINIUS DEN ROBERT G & 1115 LAKEWOOD DR LODI CA _ 952400000_ 115 S STOCK ROBERTS AL 26297 N CHEROKEE LN GALT CA 956320000 27W ELM RODRIQUEZ 72 HILLCREST RD WATSONVILL CA 950760000 220 E REDWO ROGAN _WILLI 12620 N DAVIS RD LODI CA 952429550 EMS STOCK ROMAN CATH 211 W WALNUT ST LODI CA 952400000 215 W WALN OMAN CATH 215 W WALNUT ST LODI ICA 952400000 219S CHURC OSEMARIE R 1 N CHEROKEE LN LODI CA 952400000 228S SACRA ROSEN T H & 833 KRISTEN CT LODI CA 952420000 21 N STOCKY ROSS FRANK 1231 S PLEASANT AVE 'LODI CA 952400000 J312 E OAK ROTT RITA M 932 SYLVIA DR LODI CA 952400000 415E WALNU OWE HARO 1815 W VINE ST LODI CA 952420000 1116 E LAWRE UND FRANC DOLLY KIESZ 609 HAMPTON DR LODI CA 952420000 315 E CONCO RUNGE DONA! 11128 DARTHMOOR CR__ LODI CA 952400000 1104 S SACR AKS LILA J T HANFORD FR 47 KEARNEY ST SAN FRANCIS CA 941080000 230 N CHERO SALIM MORA 6721 EL CAPITAN CIR STOCKTON CA 952100000 407S STOCK SANJOAQUIN IATTN NICK IS '222 E WEBER AVE ROOM 12 STOCKTON CA 952020000 4158 SACRA AN JOAQUINJATTN MICHAE'222 E WEBER ST STOCKTON CA 952020000 315 W ELM ANCHEZ SO FRANCISCO J 333 DAISY AVE LODI CA 952401142 308E HILBOR SANCHEZ MA 233 WATSON ST ILODI CA _952400000 231 E WATSO SANTANA GU 14700 N POTATO RD LODI CA 952420000 1223 N GARFIE ANTANA JA 4649 QUASHNICK RD STOCKTON CA 1952122517 1436 E TOKAY ANTANA JO 12 BLACKBERRY CT ILODI CA 952420000 517 E HAROL ANTOS CEL 421 E WALNUT ST LODI CA 952400000 1420 E WALNU ARVIS BRIA BRIAN KING S 11391 WEST LN LODI CA 952420000 717 S WASHI ASAKI FRAN 5800 E ACAMPO RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 204 N SACRA ASAKI GEO 315S LOWER SAC RD LODI CA 952420000 200 N SACRA AUCEDA RU 500 BRANDYWINE DR LODI CA 1952400000 835 S CENTR AUSEDA RU 171§PEACH ST _ODI CA 952400000 226 E WATSO YEED MOH 706 CARDINAL ST LODI CA 952400000 220 E MAPLE SCARBERRY 1700 S CENTRAL AVE _ODI CA 952400000 704S CENTR SCARBERRY 172 WEST E ST GALT CA 956320000 700S CENTR SCHAEFFER 413 61ST STREET 3AKLAND A 946090000 938 S CENTR SCHAFER LE 1821 N HUNTER ST STOCKTON CA 952040000 316 E FLORA SCHAFFER G 207 RIVER OAKS DR LODI CA 952400000 118 N CHURC SCHARFFENB 1510 EDGEWOOD DR LODI ICA 952400000 214 W LOCKE SCHEFLO MITI 1711 WINDJAMMER CT LODI CA 952420000 335 E OAK SCHLAHT RIC 3477 BODE DR S LAKE TAHO CA 961500000 520 E TOKAY SCHLEISSNER 219 PROSPECT AVE PRINCETON NJ 085405303 537 E ELM SCHLENKER 620 MORRIS WAY SACRAMENTO CA 958640000 315 E OAK CHMIERER J N LOMA DR LODI ICA 952420000 808 S WOOD CHULENBUR 15470 MOORE RD 1LOD1 ICA 952420000 910S SCHOO CHULTZ JU 730 N CALIFORNIA ST LODI ICA 952400000_ 225 W OAK CHULTZ RO 11662 N HAM LN SP 55 LODI CA 952420000 802 S CENTR CHULZ DAR 1206 CHIANTI DR LODI 952400000 300 E LODI COTT ALEX 841STEVE WAY LODI .952420000 429 E MISSIO EC OF HUD N AMERICAN 31 EAST AVE STE 200 ALBI0N 144111678 967S LLOYD ECOFHUD US DEPT OF H 925 L STREET _ SACRAMENTO ENY 1958143702 608 S WASHI EC OF HUD 777 12TH ST #200 SACRAMENTO 958090000 404 E FLORA EEFRIED JOH SEEFRIED 3508 LYDIA LN MODESTO 953570706 13 E ELM EIBEL LA 25157 EUNICE AV CAMPO CA 952200000 12 W SIERRA EMAS LIMITE JOHN SEMAS 1181 FORREST LAKE RD CAMPO CA 952200000 26 N CHEROK EVENTH DAYLENFORD RE 940 VIRGINIA ST LODI CA 952420000 111 N STOCK EVENTH DAY NORTHERN C 701 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 350 E TOKAY HADDY RON 11662 HAM LN LODI CA 952400000 408 E WALNU HAH BISMIL 747 S CENTRAL AVE LODI CA 952400000 516 E TOKAY SHAH GUL H 1420 PARK LODI CA 952420000 831S SACRA SHAH M & C E 1905 AYER AVE LODI CA 952420000 324 E HILBOR SHAH SYED & 2910 WHITE OAK WAY LODI CA 952420000 .334 N MAIN SHAKOOR FY 9 W SIERRA VISTA PL LODI CA 952400000 7 W SIERRA V SHAW WILLIA GARY D BEND 19232 PERRYMAN RD LODI CA 952420000 125 E LOCUS HIMAMOTO I 174 E WOODBRIDGE RD !WOODBRIDG CA 952580000 114 N CHURC HIVELY LOR OKAY GLASS 1 N SACRAMENTO ST +LODI CA 952400000 10 W FORRE HOAIB SHAK 747 S CENTRAL AVE LODI :CA 952400000 15 S GARFIE HORTT WY 417 E LONGVIEW AVE STOCKTON CA 952070000 19 S WASHI IDHU MAHE 19031 CINDY WAY OODBRIDG CA 952580000 548 S SACRA ILIVERDIS D 550 VIRGINIA ST LODI CA 952400000 335 E PINE 22600 N PEARL RD CAMPO,. CA _ 952200000 300 E EDEN Al2031 KENWAY CT LODI CA 952420000 428E EDEN 134 OXBOW RD ISLETON CA 956410000 1120S SACK MKADBURG, 545 VISTA RIO CT OODBRIDG CA 952580000 1011S CENT 138 ALMENDRAL AVE THERTON CA 940280000 240 E HILBOR 617 S LOWER SACTO RD #A3 LODI CA 952420000 213 E CHARL Page 9 tblRadev_Tenants 06/12/2002 GHTERB 8403 TERRACE DR STOCKTON CA H FRED 901 N HAM LN LODI iCA H FRED 901 N HAM LANE LODI CA MIWAYN 4246 BLACKSWAIN STOCKTON CA ER VIR 621 E LOCKEFORD ST #110 LODi CA ER VIR 21 E LOCKEFORD ST #10 LODI CA AN GR 19391 BENEDICT DR OODBRIDG CA AN GR 19391 N BENEDICT DR WOODBRIDG CA AL NARI 980 CHATSWORTH CIR STOCKTON CA AL NARI 720 LORRAINE #107 STOCKTON CA 7OMALNARI 'A NE R KARE 38378 REDWOOD TERRACONT CA HERN P PROPERTY TA 1700 FARNAM ST 10TH FLRrFLOO O ORLA1434 ARUNDEL CT CA L ROBE RED SHIELD S 1401 EL CAMINO AVE 4TH AMENTO CA ON MILT 1761 CORBIN CT CA CY HUG 1025 W OAK ST CA LE JACQ 12855 E COLLIER RD CA N L L LIF LENNETTE L E 1009 BLOSSOM RIVER WAJOSE CA NBERG DELORES LEE 1045 SHERIDAN RD ETKA IL TOCKTON S GUARANTY F 33 DOUGLAS AVE #600 AS X TOFFREGEN 365 CALAERO DR LA MESA CA TRAIN CHER 1430 LORIMER WY ROSEVILLE CA STRATTON,W 844 S SCHOOL ST LODI 'CA STREYLE EL 1530 BURGUNDY DR LODI CA STROH ARTH 4571 PINE VALLEY CIR KTON 'CA STUTZ SIEGF 921 DIANNA DR CA 952120000 952400000 952400000 952090000 952402423 952402423 952580000 952580000 952090000 952100000 681022010 945360000 952420000 958152744 952420000 952400000 956320000 951230000 930000 752520000 919410000 956780000_ :952400000 '952420000 952190000 952400000 326 E HAROL 411 E EDEN 407E EDEN 316 S OAK 412E OAK 24 N CENTRA 10 W LOCUST 21 W ELM 720 S WASHI 223 E LOCUS .0 E LODI 301 E MAPLE 232 E CHERR 230S CHERO 433 E CHERR 217S SACRA 814 S LLOYD 522E WALNU 215 E LODI 200 N CHURC .114 S STOCK 415 S CHERO 842 S SCHOO 309 E MAPLE 200 E WATSO SHI SUAREZ JES 502 N PLEASANT AVE �LODI CA 952400000 SIOSUBLABAN F 1906 ROYAL CREST DR CA 952420000 ERO SUBLABAN M 902 E VICTOR RD DI CA 952400000 PLE NO SUPLABAN ZI 1333 EDGEW000 DR DI CA 952400000 DI W EARINGEN 00 2ND ST #34 �GALT CA 956320000 CRACERVANTES 301 ACACIA ST DI CA 952400000 NTAORMINA P 223 N CHURCH ST LDI CA 952400000 KEF APIA EVA B RICHARD A TA344 JAMES DR ROSEVILLE CA 956780000 AUNTON DU 1313 W LOCKEFORD ST LODI CA 952420000 ECKLENBUR ' 14660 N WELLS LN LODI CA 952400000 ECKLENBUR 935 S CHEROKEE LN LODI CA 952400000 TEMPLE.DAL '117 RUTH CT #9 SACRAMENTOCA 958190000 ION ENENTE PR 8009 SAN DIEGO WAY STOCKTON CA 952090000 ERESI SAL, ONY D TERE 21706 N KENNEFICK RD CAMPO CA 952200000EPA T GARY BREGM 5453 BABCOCK AVE NORTH HOLL CA 916070000 Z 1313 E ACAMPO RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 432E PINE L 1421 GLENHAVEN,DR MODESTO CA 953550000 441 E FLORA _ P 5151LOSCERRITOS DR STOCKTON CA 952120000 340 E EDEN PHOMPSON RL 11336 ALTA MESA RD WILTON CA 956930000 716S CENTR F 2510ARDEELN SSANFRANCI- 940800000 220 E TOKAY R %25242 N DUSTIN RD CAMPO CA 952200000 236 E EDEN LI 1882 ROLAND AVE CAMARILLO CA 930100000 429 E TOKAY OUMAZOS K 1 ;618 LAS JUNTAS ST MARTINEZ CA 945530000 1041S GARFI OUMAZOS $ 2266 HARBORVIEW DR MARTINEZ CA 945530000 1124S WOOD TOVAR.ARTUI 4657 E ACAMPO RD CAMPO CA 952200000 505 E HAROL OVAR ERNE 1331 HOLLY DR LODI CA 952420000 412 E VINE RAUSCH DO 1800 S CHURCH ST LODI CA 952400000 330 E TOKAY RAVAILLE P 18888 S NORTH RIPON RD RIPON CA 953660000 528 E WALNU RAVERSO RI 2615 W HWY 12 LODI CA 952420000 1006 S CENT RIOLO RUS 1827 EDGEWOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 923 S CHERO SOUKALAS 501 E LOCUST ST LODI CA 952400000 204 N GARFIE SUSAKI GEO 228 N STOCKTON ST LODI CA 952400000224 N STOCK URNER MAR 20646 WOODINVILLE DUVALL R WOODINVILLE WA 980720000 5 N SACRAME NIGER. THO 179 ELMINYA DR PACHECO CA 945530000 233 E FLORA UNION PACIFI BARBARA HO 1416 DODGE ST ROOM 830 AHA NE 681790000 48 E OAK ALENZUELA 15 LIVE OAK CT CA 952422048 425 E ELM AN EXEL AN 19919 VAN EXEL RD CA 952420000 104 S WASHI AN LEEUW E TED & LEONE 2446 STONEY CREEK CIR MPO CA 952200000 320 E CHERR AN STEENB& 1029 S SCHOOL ST [ODI CA 952400000 821 S SACRA ANDERLANS 1320 S SACRAMENTO ST CA 952400000 1345 S SACKARGAS MAN 412 W CENTURY BLVD CA 952400000 512S CENTR EIL ROSE T 838 BELAIR DR ENE OR 974040000 504 E ELM ETTER ROB 26490 DUSTIN RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 235 E KETTLE INTAGE INV 14281 VINTAGE RD LODI CA 952400000 100S BECKM IRAMONTES 309 E OAK ST LODI CA 952402917 228 N WASHI VIRAMONTES 407 SPARROW LN LODI CA 952400000 836 S CENTR IRAMONTES 546 E LOCUST ST LODI CA 952400000 528E LOCUS AGERS GA 6140 WOOD CT WEED CA 960940000 322 N MAIN AG NER CH 1602 ROYAL CREST DR -ODI CA 952400000 223 E FLORA AG NER GE 1000 SYLVIA DR -ODI _ CA 952400000 4N HOUSTO AGNER LES E KETTLEMAN LN -ODI CA 952400000 223 E KETTLE AGNER TH 1 _!225 1820 SCARBOROUGH DR LODI CA 952400000 220 E VINE AGNER WA LEILANI WAG 1428 MARIPOSA WAY -ODI CA 952420000 440 E VINE AITLEY JAM 46 ALMOND DR -ODI CA 952400000 19 W PINE ALKER DONI 222 WABASH AVE SAN JOSE CA 951281935 244 E TOKAY ALLACE MI 1 4504 LIN GATE ST PLEASANTON CA 945660000 839S LLOYD ANG SHU C 1 907 S EVERT CT LODI CA 952400000 611 E_ PINE ASID MALIK HAFIZ A BAOI 304 E FLORA ST LODI CA 952400000 324 E LOCUS EBER EDNA P O BOX 535 LODI CA 952410000 312 E FLORA EBER HER230 N CHURCH ST LODI CA 952400000 E LOCUST EBER MAR =n -AY unw 820 W TURNER RD lgAiqo N nIISTIN Rn LODI ACAMPO CA CA 952400000 1952200000 1102 N HOUST 530 E RAILRO Page 10 tblRedev_Tenants 06/12/2002 IMIL, 17202 NE 85TH PL #13204 REDMOND WA 980526638 2 W LOCKEF ELCH JANI PO BOX 693152 STOCKTON 'CA 952693152 408 E OAK ELD MARG 1244 LIEBIG ST LODI CA 952400000 241 E ACACIA ELLENBROC� 2030 W LODI AVE LODI CA 952420000 1004 S PRIES ENZL YOUN I 337 DAISY AVE LODI CA 952400000 9 N SACRAME ENZL GEOF 337 DAISY AVE LODI CA 952401107 200S SCHOO OW MI ,EDWARD N & 3002 SEA GULL LN STOCKTON CA 952190000 4 E FLORA IRA M 7943 KEMPER CT PLEASANTON CA 945880000 1111S SCHOO PATRI 8635 W SAHARA AVE SUITE 580 LAS VEGAS NV 891170000 338 E PINE ROY R 3810 E BARRON RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 324 E EDEN SIDE T 150E METTLER RD LODI CA 952420000 931S LLOYD LEON 1106 DEVINE DR LODI CA 952400000 541 E HILBOR MARVI 537 ST CLAIRE LODI CA 952400000 14 N MAIN CH GO 16716 EL BALCON AVE SAN LEANDR CA 945780000 415 E OAK MS FL9645 E ACAMPO RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 624N SCHOO JEIRA. AMS GL 1 692 E HARNEY LN LODI CA 952400000 7 W DE FORC AMS J D' P 0 BOX 471 COULTERVILL CA 953110000N VET PO BOX 18 LINCOLN CITY OR 973670000ER EDDI AVE I ON CA952420000 ELIZAB NT AVE LODI CA 952400000 900 S SACRA ENS CEN EXECUTIVE DIAQUIN ST STOCKTON CA 952020000 29 S WASHIN JANICW LN V609LEAR:NED LODI CA 952400000 1325 S CENT DS MICH N WAY MODESTO CA 953552000 209 E CHERR DY HAR D AVE STOCKTON CA 952050000 115E LOCKS OOLSTRUM 23438 N BRUELLA RD ACAMPO CA 1952200000 14 S MAIN R GROUP LL LYNN SURBE 6543 REGIONAL CT DUBLIN CA 1945680000 217 E LOCUS RIGHT W H 520 KENSINGTON WAY LODI CA 1952400000 214 N SACRA EPOLEAS G _ 8211 KING RD LOOMIS CA 956500000 212 E EDEN ADAV ANIL 35 CHENAB CT FREMONT CA 945390000 232S HUTCHI AMASHITA 13 CONNIE ST LODI CA 952400000 238 S PLEASA ARBOROUG 8404 E ORCHARD RD ACAMPO CA 952200000 512 S STOCK ASIN RALPH PO BOX 2262 LODI CA •952412262 536 E HILBOR BARRA HEN 1142 RIVERGATE DR #10 LODI CA 952400000 427 E LOCUS ERALIS JOH 1 1163 NORTHWOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 415 E PINE IP VIOLET T 1200 EDGEWOOD DR LODI CA 952400000 10 S MAIN OUNG C W 8619 BLUFF LA FAIR OAKS CA 956280000 242 E CHARL DUNG DOU 1 4656 GREENOAK LN STOCKTON CA 952120000 523 MURRA OUNG JOHN 206 ACACIA ST _ODI CA 952400000 206 E ACACIA YOUNG JOHN 600 TARA PL LODI CA 952400000 500 E LODI MAN QAMA 436 E ELM ST LODI CA 952400000 436 E ELM MAN REHA 428 1/2 N SCHOOL ST LODI CA 952400000 428 N SCHOO MANIAN N 201 E KETTLEMAN LN LODI CA 952400000 207 E KETTLE MORA SR 257 ROYAL OAKS CT LODI CA 952400551 214 E TOKAY REFAKIS J 10051 E HWY 12 LODI CA 952400000 720 E LODI IMMERMANS JERALD ZIMM 1124 GREEN OKAS WAY OOK FRFIIF 129408 THIRD PL SW FL iREDONDO ICA AWA 952400000 980230000 612 S CENTR 10 N SCHOO Page 11 NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO.1 AND THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RELATING THERETO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Lodi (the ,City Council") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") will hold a joint public hearing on June 19, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, to consider and act upon the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No.1 (the "Project") and to consider all evidence and testimony for or against the approval and adoption of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. At any time not later than the hour set forth above for the hearing of comments on or objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan, any person may file in writing with the City Clerk of the City of Lodi a statement of objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan. At the day, hour, and place of the hearing, any and all persons having any comments on or objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan, or who deny the existence of blight in the proposed Project Area or question the regularity of any of the prior proceedings, may appear before the City Council and the Agency and show cause why the proposed Redevelopment Plan should not be adopted. In addition, the City Council and the Agency will, at the same time and place, hold a joint public hearing to consider the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan and consider all evidence and testimony for or against the certifications of the Final EIR. At the day, hour and place of the hearing, all interested persons desiring to comment on, or having objections to, the content or adequacy of the Final EIR may appear before the City Council and the Agency and be heard. The general goals and objectives of the proposed Redevelopment Plan are to: (1) The elimination of blighting influences and the correction of environmental deficiencies in the Project Area, including, among others, buildings in which it is unsafe or unhealthy for persons to live or work, small and irregular lots, faulty exterior spacing, obsolete and aged building types, mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, incompatible and uneconomic land uses, substandard alleys, and inadequate or deteriorated public improvements, facilities, and utilities. (2) The assembly of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area. (3) The replanning, redesign, and development of portions of the Project Area which are stagnant or improperly utilized. (4) The provision of opportunities for participation by owners and tenants in the revitalization of their properties. (5) The strengthening of retail and other commercial functions in the Project Area. (6) The strengthening of the economic base of the Project Area by stimulating new investment. (7) The expansion of employment opportunities. (8) The provision of an environment for social and economic growth. (9) The expansion, improvement, and preservation of the community's supply of housing available to low- and moderate -income persons and families. (10) The installation of new or replacement of existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities. A map showing the general location in the City of the proposed Project Area is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. A copy of the legal description of the Project Area is available upon request, free of charge, at the offices of the City Clerk and the Agency, whose address is given below. Interested persons may inspect and, upon payment of the costs of reproduction, obtain copies of the proposed Redevelopment Plan, the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project, the Agency's Report to the City Council, and any other information pertaining thereto at the office of the Agency and the office of the City Clerk, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. The Agency has adopted "Rules Governing Participation by Property Owners and the Extension of Reasonable Preferences to Business Occupants in the Lodi Redevelopment Project" for the purpose of implementing those features of the proposed Redevelopment Plan providing for participation by property owners and business occupants in the proposed Project Area. Copies of said rules are available for public inspection at the office of the Agency. By order of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi. Dated: May 16, 2002 Ci Jerk, City of Lodi Secr6ary, Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi AVISO DE LA AUDIENCIA PLJBLICA COMUN EN EL PLAN PROPUESTO DEL RECONSTRUCC16N PARA EL PROYECTO NO. 1 Y EL INFORME FINAL DEL RECONSTRUCC16N DE LODI DE LAS CONSECUENCIAS PARA EL MEDIO AMBIENTE QUE SE RELACIONA ADEMAS El AVISO POR ESTE MEDIO SE DA a eso el consejo de ciudad de la ciudad de Lodi (el consejo de la ciudad.) y la agencia del reconstrucci6n de la ciudad de Lodi (el Agency.) llevara a cabo una audiencia publica comun de Junio el 19 de 2002, en 7:00 P.M. en los compartimientos del consejo de ciudad, situados en la calle del oeste del Pine 221, Lodi, California, para considerar y para actuar sobre el plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n (el plan del desenvoluimiento.) para el proyecto No. 1 (el Project del reconstrucci6n de Lodi.) y para considerar toda la evidencia y testimonio para o contra la aprobaci6n y la adopci6n de reconstrucci6n propuesto plan. Que la hora disponga en cualquier momento no mas no adelante arriba para los comentarios sobre o las objeciones que oyen hablar a el plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n, cualquier persona puede archivar en escribir con el vendedor de la ciudad de Lodi una declaraci6n de objeciones al plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n. En el dia, hora, y el lugar de la audiencia, de cualquiera y de todas las personas que tengan cualquier comentario en las objeciones ala reconstrucci6n propuesto porel plan, o quienes niegan la existencia del destruyo en el area propuesta del proyecto o preguntan la regularidad de los procedimientos anteriores, puede aparecer ante el consejo deia ciudad y la agencia'y la demostraci6n quo causen el plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n que no debe ser adoptado. Ademas, el consejo de la ciudad y la agencia, en el mismo tiempo y lugar, llevar a cabo una audiencia publica comun para considerar el informe final de las consecuencias para el medio ambiente (el Final EIR.) en el plan propuesto de reconstruccio'n y considere toda la evidencia y testimonio para o contra las certificaciones del EIR final. En el dfa, la hora y el lugar de la audiencia, todas las personas interesadas que desean comentar encendido, o teniendo las objeciones a, el contenido o la suficiencia del EIR final pueden aparecer ante el consejo de ciudad y la agencia y para ser ofdos. Las metas y los objetivos generales del plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n son: (1) La eliminaci6n de influencias de marchitamiento y de la correcci6n de deficiencias ambientales en el area del proyecto, incluyendo, entre otras, edificios en los cuales es insegura o malsana para que las personas vivan o trabajen, porciones pequeiias a irregulares, espaciamiento exterior culpable, tipos constructivos obsoletos y envejecidos, cardcter mezclado o aplicaciones o vacantes que cambian de puesto, utilizaciones del suelo incompatibles y poco rentables, callejones inferiores al nivel normal, y mejores, instalaciones, y utilidades publicas inadecuadas o deterioradas. (2) El montaje de la Cierra en los paquetes convenientes para el desarrollo moderno, integrado con la circulaci6n peatonal y de vehfculos mejorada en el area del proyecto. (3) El replanning, el reajuste, y el desarrollo de Ias porciones del area del proyecto que son estancadas o utilizadas incorrectamente. (4) La disposici6n de las oportunidades para la participaci6n de los dueflos y de los arrendatarios en la revitalizaci6n de sus caracterfsticas. (5) La consolidaci6n de la venta al por menor y de otras funciones comerciales en el area del proyecto. (6) La consolidaci6n de la base econ6mica del area del proyecto estimulando la nueva inversion (7) La extensi6n de las posibilidades de empleo. (8) La disposici6n de un ambiente para el desarrollo social y econ6mico. (9) La extensi6n, la mejora, y la preservaci6n de la fuente de communidad de cubierta disponible para el punto bajo y las personas y familias de la moderado-renta. (10)La instalaci6n de nuevo o del re-emplazo mejorias, de instalaciones y de utilidades publicas existentes en las areas que se sirven actualmente inadecuado con respecto a tales mejorias, instalaciones y utilidades. Un mapa que demuestra la localizaci6n general en la ciudad del area propuesta del proyecto se une a esto como objeto expuesto A e hizo una pieza de esto. Una copia de la descripci6n legal del area del proyecto esta disponible por requerimiento, gratuitamente, en las oficinas del vendedor de la ciudad y de la agencia, que direcci6n se da abajo. Las personas interesadas pueden examinar y, sobre el pago de los costos de reproducci6n, obtener copias de la reconstrucci6n propuesto plan, el informe final de las consecuencias para el medio ambiente para el proyecto, el informe de Agencia al consejo de ciudad, y cualquier otra informaci6n que pertenece ademas en la oficina de la agencia y la oficina del vendedor de la ciudad, situada en la calle del oeste del Pine 221, Lodi, California. La agencia ha adoptado los Reglas que gobernaban la participacidn por los duenos de caracterfstica y la extensi6n de preferencias razonables a los inquilinos del negocio en el proyecto del reconstruccidn de Lodi con el fin de poner esas caracteristicas en ejecucio'n del plan propuesto del reconstrucci6n que prevefa la participaci6n de los duenos de caracterfstica y de los inquilinos del negocio en el area propuesta del proyecto. Las copias de las reglas dichas estan disponibles para la inspecci6n publica en la oficina de la agencia. Por orden del consejo de La Ciudad y de la agencia del reconstrucci6n de la ciudad de Lodi. Anticuado: De mayo el 16 de 2002 �� �A�\ Vendedor, Ciudad de Lodi Secret aria, Agencia del Reconstrucci6n de la Ciudad de Lodi I FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED LODI I REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I I ISCH Number: 2001102060 I I Prepared by the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI I and WAGSTAFF AND ASSOCIATES ' Urban and Environmental Planners June 2002 IWP5116161FE1RICOVER.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Lodi Redevelopment Agency Contents June 7, 2002 Page i I CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION................................................... 1-1 I 1.1 Relationship Between DEIR and FEIR ............................... 1-1 1.2 Proposed Project 1-1 2. RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR ........................ 2-1 2.1 Index of All Comments Received .................................. 2-2 I 2.2 Responses to Written Comments .......................:::::...... 2-5 2.3 Minutes of the Public Hearing and Responses to Oral Comments 2-27 3. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR (ERRATA) .............................. 3-1 I Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 WP5116161 FEIRI CONTENTS.616 Final EIR ' Contents Page ll t I t i I Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Lodi Redevelopment Agency 1. Introduction June 7, 2002 Page 1-1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DEIR AND FEIR In conformance with Section 15132 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statutes and Guidelines (2001), the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the proposed Lodi Redevelopment Plan consists of two volumes: (1) the Draft EIR (DEIR), which was distributed for public review and comment on March 12, 2002; and (2) this Final EIR document, which includes responses to comments received by the Lead Agency (the Lodi Redevelopment Agency) during the public review period on the Draft EIR, plus a set of revisions made to the Draft EIR in response to comments received during the public review period. None of these revisions involves an increase in the significance of any impacts or a significant new impact, mitigation, or alternative not already considered in preparing the Draft EIR. Certification of this FEIR by the City of Lodi Redevelopment Agency and Lodi City Council must occur prior to any final action by the Redevelopment Agency and City Council on the proposed redevelopment project. 1.2 PROPOSED PROJECT Pursuant to California Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et sea.), the Lodi Redevelopment Agency, in cooperation with the City of Lodi, is proposing to adopt and implement the Lodi Redevelopment Plan. The proposed plan program ("the project") includes: (1) establishment of an approximately 1,184 -acre project area boundary; (2) adoption of an associated redevelopment plan which identifies a blight - reduction and economic revitalization program for the area, including such activities as public infrastructure improvements, building rehabilitation, land assembly, provision of quality affordable housing, elimination of unsafe and incompatible conditions and land uses, and other neighborhood improvement and commercial revitalization measures; and (3) establishment of associated funding strategies, including tax increment financing, and other state -mandated redevelopment authority powers, to carry out these actions. The project is intended to improve those physical and economic conditions in the proposed Lodi project area that cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise or governmental action, or both, without redevelopment. The proposed redevelopment actions would be intended to assist and stimulate private development efforts within the redevelopment plan area, which in turn would be expected to generate the additional tax increment funding needed to implement the redevelopment actions. WP511616IFE/RIF-1.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 1. Introduction Page 1-2 This brief summary should not be relied upon for a thorough understanding of the proposed project. Please refer to Chapter It/ (Project Description) of the March 2002 Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Lodi Redevelopment Plan for a more complete description of the proposed project. WP5116161 FEI R I F-1.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Lodi Redevelopment Agency 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR June 7, 2002 Page 2-1 ' 2. RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT EIR I After completion of the Draft EIR, the Lead Agency (the Lodi Redevelopment Agency) is ' required under CEQA guidelines to consult with and obtain comments from other public agencies having jurisdiction with respect to the project, and to provide the general public with an opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR. The Lead Agency is also required to respond in fwriting to substantive environmental points raised in this Draft EIR review and consultation process. tThe Draft EIR was distributed for public review and comment on March 12, 2002 for the required 45 -day public review period. A public hearing on the adequacy of the Draft EIR was conducted by the Lodi City Planning Commission at its regular meeting of Wednesday, April 24, 2002. Written comments on the Draft EIR were submitted in the form of three letters received by the Agency during the Draft EIR public review period and one letter received after I the close of the public review period. Oral testimony pertaining to the Draft EIR was received from one person at the April 24, 2002 public hearing. This Response to Comments chapter includes the following sections: ■ an index to comments (section 2.1), which lists the persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR and indicates by code where the written responses of the Lead Agency are provided in this chapter; • a responses to comments section (section 2.2), which includes copies of the letters received, followed by the responses of the Lead Agency to each comment pertaining to an environmental issue. Each comment pertaining to an environmental issue is coded in the right margin of the letters and memoranda; and ■ minutes of the April 24, 2002 Planning Commission hearing relating to the Lodi Redevelopment Draft EIR (section 2.3). IWP5116161FEIRIF 2.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 2.1 INDEX OF ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED Final EIR , 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-2 2.1.1 Written Comments Submitted During the Public Review Period Response Name/AQency Code Issues and Concerns 1. Terry Roberts, State 1.1 State -required 45 -day public review Clearinghouse; April 26, period on DEIR closed on April 25, 2002. 2002; comments from all state agencies received during that period attached; lead agency compliance with State Clearinghouse Draft EIR review requirements acknowledged. 2. John Cadreft, Air Quality Planner, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Northern Region; April 24, 2002. 3. Megan Cambridge, Chief, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Expedited Remedial Action Program Unit; April 25, 2002. W P5116161 FEI AI F-2.616 2.1 Comment acknowledges Draft EIR finding of a significant unavoidable long- term operational air quality impact, the need for implementation of all feasible mitigation measures, and the need for a Lead Agency Statement of Overriding Considerations. 2.2 Reference to enclosed Asbestos Compliance Assistance Bulletin. 2.3 Reference to recent air emissions regulation revision. 3.1 Reference to recently discovered potential exposures to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emanating from Lodi's contaminated groundwater plume and request that EIR be revised to address potential VOC vapor intrusion and the need for associated mitigation. 3.2 Suggestion that Draft EIR should also discuss potential public health impacts associated with project and cumulative air quality impacts. 3.3 EIR should include identification of significance criteria for health effects from PCE and VOC vapors in indoor air and discussion of potential mitigation measures. ' Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-3 2.1.2 Written Comments Submitted After the Close of the Public Review Period 4. Terry Roberts, State 4.1 Transmittal of letter received after close Clearinghouse; May 3, of Draft EIR public review period (April 2002. 26, 2002 Caltrans letter). 5. Tom Dumas, Chief, 5.1 Caltrans response to NOP should be California Department of included in Draft EIR. Transportation, Caltrans Office of Intermodal 5.2 Planning; April 26, 2002. 5.3 Lane geometrics diagrammed on Figure 6.2 are incorrect. Inconsistent statements from Draft EIR reiterated regarding City LOS standard and Draft EIR LOS criteria. 5.4 EIR should discuss justification for using pass -by rate of 25 percent; rates in excess of 15 percent require consultation with Caltrans. 5.5 Correction to footnote on Draft EIR page 6-16. 5.6 Caltrans will need to review Crane Transportation Group traffic study (not attached to Draft EIR). 2.1.3 Oral Comments Received At the Public Hearing 6. Georgianna Reichelt, 6.1 Comment made on merits of Manteca, CA; April 24, redevelopment; no comments on Draft 2002. EIR adequacy. WP5116161FE1R1F 2.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 WP5116161FEIRIF 2.616 Final EIR ' 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-4 ' Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-5 2,2 RESPONSES TO WRITTEN COMMENTS The following section includes reproductions of four letters received during and after the Draft EIR public review period, immediately followed by the Agency's response to substantive comments therein pertaining to the adequacy of the Draft EIR. These comments and responses are correlated by code numbers added to the right margin of the letters. WP 5116161 FE! R I F-2.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Lodi Redevelopment Agency 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR June 7, 2002 Page 2-6 i WP5116161 FEI RI F-2.616 nnT U,7 CUUC -7i AUT'I7 4.11 I Ur LULL GUO-JJJ -oOTG �D• C 1 ^� STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0,400 Gov -error's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse�� Gray Davisl 2000 Tal Finney GOVERNOR � (RECEIVED INTERIM ntRECrOa Kotnadt ("rad") Bardam MAY Q 1200 Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi COIYM UW Y DE1rFJ.OPMENT DEPT 221 West Pine Street M' OF LODI Lodi, CA 95240 Subject: Lodi Redevelopment Pian SCH#: 2001102060 Dear Komadt ("Rad") Bartlam: The State Clearinghouse submittal the above named Draft BIR to aclecocd state apticies for review. The review period closed on April 25, 2002, and no state agencias submitted comments by drat date. This letter acknowledges that you Gave complied with the .Stade Ckerfnghouse review requirements for draft envavnmen al documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. please call the State Clearinghouse at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the envirammental review process. If you bare a question about the above-named project, pic= refer to the too -digit State Clearinghouse somber when contacting this of ice. Sincerel , . TerryRoberts Director, state clearinghouse 3400 TENTH STREET P.O. R= 3044 SACBA)"N70, CALi'FOLNIA 93511-3044 9=6-443-0613 FAX 976-333-3016 www.opr.es.gov 17 1.1 nnT u.7 cuuc a:ourn k.11 T Ur LUJJ1 Cuts_JJJ-bulte Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base 13CN# 2001102060 Projoa M Lodi Redevelopment Plan Load Apoeoy Lodi, City of Typo EER Draft EIR Doac*don The proposed project Is the adoption and impiementation of the Lodi Padevelopment Pian. The proposed plan would sell forth a program of redevelopment actions to foster rwitallzaiim and Increased private economic investment, and Improve housing conditlone and opportunity In the projsal area. The plan-IdenitRed redevelopment actions include, but would not be limited to, marketing and promotion, economio incentives, commercial and residential building rehabilitation, selsrnIc strengthening and historic preservation assistance, parking and pubilc infrastructure Improvements (storm drainage, Wastewater and water, streetlighting, etc), traffic Improvements (signellzatlon and other improvements at crttical intersections), pedestrian and bbAW network Improvements, common area landscaping, land acquisition and site assembly tc faciftats desirable development and affordable twusing assistance. lead Agency C•otlteCt ... __,_ .._ _ . _. __ .... _ _ .._:. . __._._....._. _ ._._. Nan» Konradt ('Rad") Bartlern - — Agawy Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi PNorrs 208.833.8711 Fax 208.338-6134,2 errrali Addmw 221 West Pine Street city LOCH State CA 22p 96240 Project Location County San JWdn MW Lodi Replon Cross streets Lodi Avenuelt3tackton 81rW IRM"f ilio. Township Range Seatlarr 6aas Proximity to: MiEhways Highway 90 Airports RaDways Union Pacific WaWmys South of Mpkelunne giver tiofraois Lwx1 Vas- Residential, coff nemW,, hndustdol, pubiio facilaias, lmdtuUonaf PrWo tboties Asethetic/Viwal; Agdouitural Land; Air Quality; Ardwoologioo-Hstoric; Drainege/Absorptlon; Eocnomiee/Jobs; Flood Plain/Flooding; Forest LandlFbe Hazard; Noise; Popuiatton/Housing Balance; Public Services, Reareation/Parks; SchoolWniversitles; SawerCapacny; Solid Waste; Toxla'Haxardous; Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Duality; Water Supply; Wetlancif ftarian; Wildlife; Growth Inducing; Landues; Cumulative Enacts Raylsiv ft Resources Agency; Department of Fish and Same, Region 2; Office of Hlatorlc PrsaerAWon; Apsrw* Department of Paries and Reoreation; Department of Water Resources; Caltrans, Disbict 10; Department of Housing and Community Development; Reglonal Water Quality Control Bd., Reglon 5 (Sacramento); Depar�truent of Toxic Substances Control; Native American- Heritage Commission; Stab Lands Contmiselon Dais Rettefved 03/12/200Q Brut of Review 03112/2002 End of Review 04/25/2002 Note; Blanks in data fields reaukfrom insufficient information provided by lead agency. i t i i i i WK eb 2UU2 5: JUHM UL l 7 OF LUD1 eub-33a-5Ei42 APR -25-2002 1055P X05 sod do.-lwar Llllta IN". i4w ivem ftw. aimserm G "ou /iaMo*%T— 'jCs r 2261JUM IrOdTtItt !)d'Z Al,e3 '� 421A.,42 _ LmdAaew: 1. 1 ad-ulerwe �. Cow Pmtle: Kti®dif'Jtrl'1lt�lflrt ROW AUINW tl► xi Ci G jl r ..� 1kRr f1M1 rif87� Cby: tAdl tip: .lD1.E Gbury: e../a.sd. i i i i Pryw Laweea GGt so w:.. C{dr"Mlal('OaliWfb: Nw y1 �1 Orme am" -�A..... "+uaaw zlowaitt"All -_ Total A,wemn.{Au Im watt a aMtr: Note it A W M:rlatltl: sn". d" ' am Ate: artay� ialaou: Daetllaral f•f Ct�kl 4rtrCaa y,f a (FtmwICaGliHli0. "NAI �u 1114.R % ❑JJ O:ixj•�ij MNfA �M1.fa�ilA: t:.rA AfMt`_ l'.+b ••� +"hdtillir• ��.. •••••�•�•"�;:,�ise . iaia"tld �Jt Awa `4ee1 ►a.rr , ia.as.Mt �: Cow" niall� Wire Tnm~. Neoaaioetl ; � � �� AmiO.11cN{IWI R"a:t'MivPleriiq iaiFiWr}r:ti�:,.',;,;," A/ate0rlk Ayitl#aY1lAitd Pon" LsNtRla Him M. o11'{'ll irpee SMalrr- j . , Wlelf IOala}aM 'VIM VIM be� a � P lawDWi3 lWuaddadn l:7+ieeal dwlWuu "oro&vnwbh6Me�MIWia R *arm eaa tlarsaaewfamw plea Ute Rom" Mumma% MdM*L We i6 bou. i./arearsrl [;AwPAMd p►e(fdla!tgtl ado Ilgn,y�d.Mlp1PM�Nl�l�on•dt qN Loa�.F�VOtacatnnt Pff�hi u;'TM Plopoaaa RIR WaWd alt trout a Propeant a)1PINV CIPMOM aelbna V it»lat raviNUMIft Ird krcra+aad peva* a>otnmaet: kRVOCA 1, and """ Am" aottdleana and CppOritrta)r in the Pr*W Am& Tho Om -Woof Ned rldawkpmul edl, - b aluda. bN wtwi0 mA be tMliilad b. rrrrkapnp erd pAmoilalf. aaOnoplG inantl+ms. OttRltRerslal and raaidanitaat belNYlp rah"hft. &Shoopttiratpltmnkly aid hletwlo praaanulln eaWwwc pmftg Orin pWbk i Mdraaamum atgnotmmerb WAm warepa, taaatataAter and water, abaa!!{p Ong. ab.) aat6e 91mao new (MgmiNsewn and diner Pnpre►ra"tern at eaapl kdarmaimDria), oode Glen and bieyCia natweAc lmpowtnmett, teranlen ana Mildees,4Rp. land aeWsMan sed Mta aarmbry ;;, blaoritata tlaekattla da+rMaO��. entl atlorlMbN betrsNtg aaaktaraa. ahM dorhylwwe OeMed; I)tilvt (7nlakpG hu)Utemlt to ills 191WWMf ewu..A.w.... Alsl..iadll ach+eaMauANCa �� tract rlsafe itpk Stage C)saebatbdaww ?4wber as all CaaMa=* 2001i0:000 Placa Axn.rtl Nae suarau W.ry a tha L.aa A f.aq ra.aaa":e: 25 11 Int 3— bE"faa ,.. _.,suet a wrawye. _CMM Ctaaa _ C1IMabkWM4 �ilionradiwall� _� traa"ta.ca..n a.anry as Pln 1taR eluieleReearwlhe x Perla dr Aatl anAoah.low :zbw arrarCMM onmemo" fear) Dnalrompnew . Aw"pm l -JL COW # / U ia"a t Apbasilai Roab6Saraa 9tadCaimmw8tec �O/aata imrlc"1 ..� AR>t-Aiy�tltPAJ.o Atte -altar idltatriM rm�ala ,� 1ore�aaaw.eleMp.aA swlC�i CMervrrtl.it =swum; wao:aaw Swam W �L Rea. wQM N= saae libw'= MAwt Cwr.aime Ied.Peatleai Comm bwv Can ZIAW Aloha uftel Can" =Slat. MWW Mai. —Titmplol i-AAaft:r TOTAL P-05 .5 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR ' 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-10 1. Terry Roberts, State Clearinghouse; April 26, 2002. 1.1 This letter acknowledges agency compliance with State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft environmental documents and transmits State Agency letters received before the end of the Draft EIR public review period--i.e., on or before April 25, 2002. WP5116161 FE/RI F-2.616 i Hem ew auue 1: usF'P1 4 1 1 7 ut- L UV l San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District April 24, 2002 Konradt Bartram, Community Development Director City of Lodi 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 94519 eua-���-otr4c P.e 2 RECEIVED APR 2 9 2002 COMMILI "Y DEYaDPWNTiDEP`I" CITY OF LODI SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (SCH # 2001102060) Dear Mr. Bartlam: The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the proposed project and offers the following comments: The San Joaquin Valley's air quality has been designated nonattainment by the EPA and by the Air Resources Board (ARB) for 03 (ozone) and PM -10 (fine particulate matter, dust). The Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) and the California Clean Air Act require areas that are designated nonattainment to reduce emissions until standards are met. . Based on the information provided, the District agrees that both short term construction related impacts as well as long term operational air quality impacts will occur as a result of this project. Even with the Inclusion of mitigation measures, the air quality impacts can not be fully eliminated. Thus, this project wait make it more difficult to meet state and federally mandated emission reductions and air quality standards. As a result, implementation of all feasible mitigation measures and addption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations for adverse air quality impacts would be appropriate from an air quality perspective. One of the issues that will-adsein conjunction with any proposed demolition or renovation of the existing buildings in the project area is compliance with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). Specifically, the primary air pollutant of concern is asbestos. To ascertain whether this project is subject to NESHAPS, the project applicant is advised to review the enclosed Asbestos - Compiiance. Assistance Bulletin, dated December 1994. Leaf Sexton is the Northern Region's District contact for the program and is available should you need further assistance. David L. Crow Executive Director/,4ir Pollutioi Control Officer Norther» Region office Central Region Office 4230 Kiernan Avenw. Suite 130 1990 East Gertyshurg Avenue 0'40deStA, CA 93354-9322 FneenO, C..A 937'26-0244 (209) 557-6400 - FAX (209) 557-6475 (559) 230-6(100 - FAX (559) 2306061 WWW.V.IIP1'Atr.Otf,' L.1 (i .Z' Souihem Region Office 2740 M Stree(, Suite 275 Balcersfleld, CA 93301.2373 (661) 3266900 - FAX (5611 32"985 f�VV VVV VYTi� Lodi Redevelopment Agency April 24, 2002 Lodi Redevelopment Project DEIR Page 2 Section 10.3.2 Air Quality Page 10-8: Regulation VII I has recently been amended, with the revision becoming effective May 15, 2002, the revisions are available on the District web site at www.vallevair.ora. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (209) 545-7000. Sincerely, J n Cedrett Air Quality Planner APCD REF*20' 76 Northam Region Z.t i i 1 Mrtc eb euue l:ufrn L,21T Ur LUU1 eUU-sjzi-bbge SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Compliance Assistance Bulletin. December,1994 Asbestos Synopsis RegWs.WAsbestos-Ca70ift (1) Friable asbestos-amtaining material (ACM). Materials (RAM MOO: (2) Gategary 1 nonfrlable AGM In poor condition and 'has become friable' or that has or w II? be subjected to santAng, grinding, gutting, or abrading, (3) Oetegay II nonfAabie ACM that has a high probability of becoming, or as become, crumbled, pufverhed, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the materia) In the course of demolitlon or ranom n. FrMb11sAsbwW&-00ftk p Any material containing more fhen 1 percent asbestos, as delarmined by Polarized Ught Malm-At /ACM): Mlotcwxpy (PLM) tasting, which, when dry, can be a ambled, pulveRzed, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Calegay I norrhtebfe ACM; Any asbestos-containlrnl packstfle; gaskets, realfent floor coverings, and eept•alt roofing products oprntalni ng more trier: 1 i emsnt asbestos as determined by PLM iesb%. CRlgporylinoahfi OACM: Any asbefte-contalnlnp materials, excluding Category 1 ACM, conte ning more than 1 percent asbestos as determined by PLM testing, which when dry, cannot be crumbled, puNeAzed. or reduced to powder by hand pressure. fussuottonr done by, or under the direction of a Ca!-06MA certlied oxtsukant prior to: • Any regulated demolition. • Any renovation activity in which moue linen 1st) sq. fL of any builcing material or 2e0 linear feat of pipe Insulation will be disturbed. An Inspection is not required If this material to be disturbed Is stipulated to bo asboatoa-containing and wll be removed in accordance with the NESHAP. • A schematic showing the location of all tooted materials. • The following data tcral asbestos -containing metsrtals; 1. -ha amount and description of each material. 2. Percent asbastcs content, 3. Whether or not the material Is friable. Notiffeation. An aebea:os notllbatbn must be submlited to the Distract at laser 10 wonting deva� pdm to, 1. Any regulatad demolition. 2. Any renovation in which more than IW sq. fL or 280Inear ft. of RACM will be disturbed. A vWy of the Asbestos &wp&Wc n Reperit must be Included with the NoWallon. Notifi: scion will not be considered complete, nor will the 10 working day nollos period begs until all requirec lrfom alton and feet have been submitted to fits Dist ict. Iia: District RUe 3080 requires that nonrefundable asbestos Mea be received along with asbestos job notifications. Fees must be paid for regulated asbestos abatemert projects and regulated demolition projects, whitMar or net aahaah a In presROL Demolltlen Rat_ ■eye Fen.,: The California Health and Safety Cede requires that the city or county buldtng official have proof of oompiiance with, or exemption from, the asbestos notification requirement batons he or she Issues a demoihion permit. After Ata District has received is demolition notification and Is satlaaed that the NESHAP notification requirements have been r.Dmaled WM,1he Dllftriot 01 Wus a Demotion Reletiee Forrtl to the person who subm tted the rtottfk dm. RowM and Waste Diaeesall The asbestos nollfloation must also Identity any bullding materiels which will be racycled after removal from a projsct. The name of this recycling oorrtractor and location of such activity mist be iden"so. nric co cuuc a a uvrn -.a i r ur "W"A cum-.a�a-vv�c SAN JOAOUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Compliance Assistance Bulletin- December, 1994 Asbestos Synopsis lip Prior 10 any or demolition of a heiitty l ConWell an asbestos In$Psr tion of the site before: Any renovation which 160 eq. 1t. o1 bulding materials, or 260 linear feet of pipe Insulation WI be disturbed, or -Any damolition of a facility with or without asbestos-contalning materials Imo: Submit an asbestos notiieabon form for any regulated renovation or dernolklon, 10 work ng days belore the activity. Efts: Fees must be paid to the District with the notification for all regulated renovations and demolitions. naMcd tlon Rateaae Form: Prior to any demolition, you must have completed a demolition roieess form. Upon Its approval by the District thisslgned form may be used as proof (needed by the ouilding official) of compliance with, or exemption from, the NESHAP notifk adon requirements. 3ubrnh this form to the bullding department with your application for a derrdit k permit. Appiicabliky, ExcfflMai subject to the NESHAP (regulated faclllise) include all commercial buildings, apartments with more than 4 units, other structures and nowporiabie equipment. Single family dwellings may be exempt but only on a sae by case basis. Dernontions subject to the NESHAP (regulated demolitions) are demolitions of facilities described abovo, whether or not asbestos Is present. Regulamd ronovatlen applies to any activity In which 150 sq. R. of regulated sabeatascontaini,ng building mato ials or 260 linger sbestos-conrahing pipe Insulation Is disturbed ata regulated facility. 00allnitione FadJty�s Fedides sub)acf b the rule Inlets "al structures. Installations, buildings and equipmsnt, sxoept for sirgle family dmIlinge and apartments moth four or fewer dwelling units." Single fatuity dwellings and spartmento are also subject to the regulation if: -These Is more than one building at a site being renovated or demolished, o• -Tbs building had been used for, or is being removed for a commercial or pubic use, or Is io be used as a training bum Mweloe. Demolkiw: In addition to the total deatruction of a stricture. demolitions Include "the removel of any at nluirof load-bearing member from a fadilty, together with any related handling operations or the Intentional burning of a louldlirlg (training bums conducted by a fire lighting agency). Also, the separation of a structure from its foundation prior to relocstion Is a demolition. Reravafibry Altering a faclNty or or* or more 1011ty comptaertts in any way, including the stripping or removal of regulated esbsstwoontaining material (RACM) from a facility component Renovatlorm include all activities in which osbeebos could be disturbed at a regulated facility, Including the clean up and reffani of debris from buildings w ch have burned. �2 1 ' Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-15 2. John Cadrett, Air Quality Planner, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Northern Region; April 24, 2002. 2.1 The EIR authors concur that emissions increases are significant and unavoidable. Accordingly, page 15-2 of the Draft EIR cites long-term cumulative regional air emissions increases as significant and unavoidable. 2.2 A discussion of the potential for release of toxic air contaminants (i.e., asbestos) and compliance with National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS) during demolition of existing buildings has been added to page 10-8 of the DEIR under Impact 10.1, Construction Activity Air Quality Impacts, in response to this comment. Specifically, additional measures to address asbestos removal have been added to page 10-9 of the DEIR under Mitigation 10.1 (see errata for DEIR pp. 10-8 and 10-9 in chapter 3 herein). 2.3 The discussion on page 10-8 pertaining to Regulation VIII has been amended in response to this comment to reflect the cited recent revisions to this regulation (see errata for DEIR to p. 10-8 in chapter 3 herein). WP5116161 FEI R I F-2.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR ' Lodi Redevelopment Agency 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR June 7, 2002 Page 2-16 i i i i i i i 1 WP510161FEIRF--2.616 I Mr. Konradt ("Red") Barham Redevelopment Agency City of Lodi 221 West Pine Street Lodi, Callfornis 95240 NOTICE OF COMPLETION (NOC) FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SCK #2001102060 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EiR) Dear Mr. Barilam: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Lodi Redevelopment pian. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DTSC offers the following comments on the Draft EIR. Recently, DTSC in cooperation with the City, has discovered new information related to potential significant public health impacts from exposures to volatle organic compounds • (VOCs) emanating from Lodes contaiminated groundwater plume, VOC vapors from the contaminated groundwater plume and soil in the City's central area have migrated to air in the City Hall Annex (Annex). Some of these VOCs are suspected or known human carcinogens, and may cause significant health risks. The City has implemented exposure controls in the building. Studies are proposed to determine If other buildings In the vicinity of the Annex may also be impacted by VOC vapors. The Draft EiR describes the wide spread VOC contaminated soil and groundwater in the redevelopment area. The recent indoor air testing indicates that VOC vapors may have migrated to buildings located in proxImly to where high concentrations of contaminated groundwater and soil exist. This can potentially Impact future land uses in the redevelopment area including schools, residences, day care centers and other sensitive environments, DTSC requests modification throughout the Draft ElR to addreos the potential for VOC vapor intrusion from contaminated soil and groundwater, including consideration of appropriate mitigation measures during building renovation, construction and now developrnent. rao emnw rhw*w fmkv 0oUbmin n reel. Every 01rtramram needs ra lake tmmait le Ballon ic roduao MW Cnnalal Ow - rot iNst or ttinple wens you can' mgd+s e * maod and Out your mrotpy gosh, age our wea•dN 0 www d"saefi.pay. ® printed on Recycled Paper nrm ca CAJUC U;01rn11 4,11T Ur LUL1 209-333-6842 p.2 PPR -25-2062 10-54 P.02/es ,. Department of Toxic Substances Control Edwin F. Lowry, Director ' 8800 Cal Center Drive Winston H. Hickox Sacramento, California 95826-3200 Gray Davis Agency secretary Govemor ' California Environmental Protection Agency April 25, 2002 Mr. Konradt ("Red") Barham Redevelopment Agency City of Lodi 221 West Pine Street Lodi, Callfornis 95240 NOTICE OF COMPLETION (NOC) FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SCK #2001102060 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EiR) Dear Mr. Barilam: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed Lodi Redevelopment pian. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), DTSC offers the following comments on the Draft EIR. Recently, DTSC in cooperation with the City, has discovered new information related to potential significant public health impacts from exposures to volatle organic compounds • (VOCs) emanating from Lodes contaiminated groundwater plume, VOC vapors from the contaminated groundwater plume and soil in the City's central area have migrated to air in the City Hall Annex (Annex). Some of these VOCs are suspected or known human carcinogens, and may cause significant health risks. The City has implemented exposure controls in the building. Studies are proposed to determine If other buildings In the vicinity of the Annex may also be impacted by VOC vapors. The Draft EiR describes the wide spread VOC contaminated soil and groundwater in the redevelopment area. The recent indoor air testing indicates that VOC vapors may have migrated to buildings located in proxImly to where high concentrations of contaminated groundwater and soil exist. This can potentially Impact future land uses in the redevelopment area including schools, residences, day care centers and other sensitive environments, DTSC requests modification throughout the Draft ElR to addreos the potential for VOC vapor intrusion from contaminated soil and groundwater, including consideration of appropriate mitigation measures during building renovation, construction and now developrnent. rao emnw rhw*w fmkv 0oUbmin n reel. Every 01rtramram needs ra lake tmmait le Ballon ic roduao MW Cnnalal Ow - rot iNst or ttinple wens you can' mgd+s e * maod and Out your mrotpy gosh, age our wea•dN 0 www d"saefi.pay. ® printed on Recycled Paper APR -25-20M 10255 Mr. Konradt ("Rad') Sartlem April 25, 2002 Page 2 The Hazardous Materials (Section 13.0) of the Draft FIR should also examine the potential for significant public health impacts to receptors exposed to VOCs emanating from the contaminated soil and groundwater plumes in the proposed redevelopment area. This should Include an examination of potential emulative impacts due to long- term regional air emissions from mobile and slationary souroes, noted in the EIR to be a significant unavoidable effect. The Draft EIR should include an identification of significance criteria for health effects from PCE and other VOC vapors in indoor air and a discussion of potential mitigation measures. Appropriate mitigation measures should be identified on the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist in the Draft EIR along with their monitoring actions. If you have any questions or need additional inforrnatlon, please contact me at (916)255-3727. Sincerely, Megan ridge, Chief Expedited Remedial Action Program Unit cc. Mr. Fran Forkas Water and Wastewater Superintendent City of Lodi Department of Public Works 1331 South Ham Lane Lodi California 95242.3995 Mr. Mike Vivas, P.E. Hazardous Substance Engineer Expedited Remedial Action Program Unit Northern California -Central Cleanup Operations Branch Department of Toxic Substances Control 8800 Cal Center Drive Sacramento, California 95826-3200 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-19 3 Megan Cambridge, Chief, Expedited Remedial Action Program Unit, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, April 25, 2002. 3.1 The Draft EIR, on pages 13-2 through 13-11, describes the potential hazardous materials implications and project impacts related to the groundwater plume, including current litigation regarding the assignment of responsibility for cleanup of suspected groundwater contamination sources, the fact that "remediation may be required on a project by project basis prior to initiation of any redevelopment -related construction that may have the potential to disturb or disperse already contaminated groundwater" (page 13-8), and that under current local and state hazardous materials remediation requirements, "[Ajpplicants in the Project Area would be required to complete a health and safety plan to prevent worker and public exposure to hazardous substances" (page 3-19). Based on these facts, the Draft EIR identified no significant adverse impact related to the existing groundwater contamination and the proposed redevelopment activities. The Draft EIR described the recent detection of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in the groundwater plume. The comment indicates that more recently other emissions, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), have been identified as emanating from the existing groundwater plume. ' 3.2 In response to this letter, the discussion in the Draft EIR of potential impacts and mitigation needs related to possible redevelopment activity (future project -facilitated new development and existing building and infrastructure improvement activity) has ' been revised as follows: ■ EIR page 13-2 has been revised to add (in addition to PCE and TCE) VOCs as a ' detected contaminant in existing groundwater contamination plumes in the Project Area; and ' 3.3 EIR page 13-8 has been revised to add specific references to PCEs, TCEs, and VOCs in the description of the remediation that may be required on a project by ' project basis prior to initiation of any redevelopment -related construction that may have the potential to disturb or disperse already contaminated groundwater. ' WP51WMFE/RIF-2.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 WP5116161FEIRIF 2.616 Final EIR 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-20 i i i MHY 'U9 PUUP a:3Lpm U1 TY U.F LUBI eu9-a:Ja—bbge 13.4 STATE. OF CALIFORNIA Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse • Gray Davis TdBnney RECEIVED tt+rra><aans cot�aa>aoa lvlay 3, aao2 MAY 07 Kmva& ("RaO eater COWaitrmr WYLOPMENT DEPT Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi CITY OF Lon 221 West Pine Street Lodi, CA 95240 Subject Lodi Redeveiopmsnt Ply SCBA: 2001102060 Dear Kom* (°Rad")Harlots The aoalaaed =nmont (a) on you Draft BIR was (woo) received by the State Cleatingbom after the and d I of tin state review period, which closed on April 25, 2002. We are forwarding these c0antegts to you because they provide information or raise issues that should be addressed in your $nal environmental The California Environmental Quality Act does not require Lad Agencies m negxmd to late comments. However, we eaconrage yon to incorporate these additional commats itrto your final awk mn=W docammt and to consider tWn.prior to taking final action on the propooed project. Please contact 6e States Clearinghouu at (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions concornins the environmental review p=ou,. If you have a question regarding the above-named project, please rater to the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number (2001102060) when contacting this office. Sincerely, TturyR Senior Planner, State Cleuinghouse E,nclasatea cc: Rexxrces Agency 0 1400 TENTH 5T$SET r.0. B08 3044 58CRAKENT0. =IF08NIA 978 3044 W-446-6613 FLZ 96-333-3cas WWW-6Fr-=VV i� Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR ' 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-22 4. Terry Roberts, State Clearinghouse; May 3, 2002. 4.1 This letter forwards an April 26, 2002 letter (#5) that was received from Caltrans, responding to the Draft EIR. Letter #5 is dated April 26, 2002 and was received by the State Clearinghouse after the end of the state review period, which closed on April 25, 2002. The Lead Agency is not required to respond to such late comments; however, responses to letter #5 have been prepared by the EIR authors for informational purposes (letter #5 follows, followed by the Lead Agency responses). WP5116161FEIRIF 2.616 i i i i RPR 30 2002 8:07AM CITY OF LODI 208-333-8042 p.2 Apr -29-02 03:03P Caltrans Oistrict 10 1'M111;ll1„tAl.pY!>aNfn.�:: �ylll'I'ti�, 171 Mi..U� 111:{'t� 'r!� f)4 A�17( 71.!j1NtI AUrNCY DEPARTMENT OF' RANSPt7RTA'1-110N 1'.t). n )X 2061197011. t 1ARTMA WAY) !rl'tll.MIX VA %KZU) '{'tfls (700) 9W1-4941 1911 r?I r. OU 110 41.1921 FAN (2041904•71w1 Apn 1 26, 2002 Mr. Brian GrWidge Stag Clearinkhom t4tH)Tei ith Strect Sacramento. CA 95914 Dotar Mr. t' rattidgc: 209 946 7194 10 -SJ -12-17.4:47 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Kunradt Bartlnm 2001102060 P. 02 l INAY r -G„ nYo'►tri:Crr Thank you for the- upptwtunity to review the I.otli Redevelopmoul flim. The proposexl plan would sat i1orth it prognim of rcdevclrniment actions to ruatCr mvitahzatiom in Clic project arca. Some ul' the Irian-identitiom4 rmlevLlnpmem. sections. include. but would not bc: lithited to, commurc:inl and residential building r0mbilitakon, seismic stmigtitcning and historic P11001-vatiOlt NtisirtUmv, parking and public it ilhimirueture Imlirovement% (clonn dtainago, wumewawr and watca-, street lighting, cte.), traffic impruvemcntc (tiigttttliratinn azul other' itnpruvumcnts at critical intcr.suctions), palumi-imi and bicycle nmwurk impruvuments. common area landsciqming, land acquisition and site assembly to rsciliiate dosinablo duvelappimm awl ati'nrdahic housing asvistatico. 't'llo Man ..over- talc L'ity of IAxli, npltroximately I,1114 scrod and numcmus AM's. i have revimed the pmi oscd pruimt. and airculacd it with the various C'altilaits depanmtrlts urld have the rollowing C011111YUMs ttnol QU(;% iurlt,: TRAFF IC V PERAnONS: ' 1. Foomote I at the buttum or Pap: 1.5 stoles Mitt "A NOP of'a Drull EIR dated Oetobcr 26, 2000 was issuod to intut-wited ttrid respunsiibiu ugrrioics.” Did C'altranx review and commoitt Ott this? If so, Caltrans mosponym to the NO? should lie iuuluded im this document. i i i 2. Pigurc 6.3 shows the intro ection at SJ -12 and Cheroku Lane. as having right tum poukcb limn hath norttlbutind and stti:il.ithounrl (:'hooker, l.anc. These Air not correct. 1;6,41ir16! Itme g ollletriCA Iior the f ulside Innes are As .1 S1101VII thru- alld right -turn llanc. 1. Pup: (r -r), parugrup'n b. l . l (c)(2) :maks that lhu 1-mli Public Works Du cirtmc;W stain' requic-mcd ux4 or LOS Div; the jmwrmc acceupoibk; upurmiiom .." oven ilwttyh the Chy'.< Getiernl 111mi eks it stanthird ul'LOS C. 4. Page 6-12 paragraph 6.2 states that "The City shall itrive to maintain I..cvcl of Service Con lrwttl s tmots and at intcr:icctinng." rQWW1W1.VA) rh,r; h.'"10711 All f: MMS 01400001$ Ilutbtliry/ wlra:+a 011t(W 110' 6.1 5.z j;07 15•4 Apr -29-02 03:04P Caltrans District 10 209 946 7194 P.03 Mr. Brian (iruititlp April 26, 2002 Nip z 4. PRge 0-1 h shows that the Lane! Use Cherukm kine. Shopping C'emcr it using is a "Zi% Pal.,;-hv tts i)ivCrtud Linkod Trip C'npium" According to page 4 al' the TIS Ouidc, "... l$ulrrt:tium greater than 13% requit-es conxultation and a+empttancc by Caltruns. The justification 1'ur excoodinb a 15% reduction should bir dimmsed in the '1 mmc lmpaca study", 6. l' oo mote I or; Page 6-16 needs to have `1naf'Gc" rrltlnced by "Trampuitution" far iTL• (inmituic orTransnortatian Engineers). 7. The Traffic Study cumplatmi by frttrtc Ttim.4porm-Oun Qroup k not anaclkA to dais divutttCttt (i.r. not located in the Appendix). Traffic Operation will Ilecd to ;.cvicw IN-; 'frac: Study in order to vvra1y/idcn1jry any other impacti and trw:ded irnprttvcsnu;r+t�. If YOU ha,vt: any (1"Vonx nr would like to di.%cum our am-rnycntt; in more detail, ftltme contact DAvid Cooper al (209) 948- 7190 david craotvrfiiKlnt.ciLjgnv). SInceraly, i T4 om -1,t , . `1 t r 1 TOM DU M A Vii, shier urfitx of Infurmodal Planning, TUMP UIW 1111WY1W!% 1110jid11v AAW MM Vrla{r4Meliu, {ww� ylw N �u.ql tM� W N 11t �► YG �.I p. M I .N111A u i i J i i i 1 i Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-25 5. Tom Dumas, Chief, Office of Intermodal Planning, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans): April 26, 2002. Note: As previously noted, this comment letter was received after the close of the public review period on April 25. CEQA does not require written response or changes to the Draft MR for letters submitted after the close of the review period. The responses outlined below have been provided for informational purposes only. 5.1 There is no CEQA requirement that responses received on the NOP be included in the Draft EIR document. Rather, such responses are routinely not included in the Draft EIR. Responses received to the NOP for this EIR are available for public review at the offices of the City of Lodi Community Development Department, Lodi City Hall, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi (telephone 209-333-6711). 5.2 Although exclusive right turn lanes are not striped on the north and southbound Cherokee Lane approaches to State Route 12, there is more than adequate pavement width on both intersection approaches allowing right turning vehicles to separate from through traffic. Several field observations by Crane Transportation Group confirmed that right turning drivers were using both approaches in this manner. In addition, the City of Lodi traffic engineer approved this assumption based upon her own experience and observations of intersection operation. 5.3 Comment noted. City Public Works staff requested that LOS D be used as the poorest acceptable intersection operation. This input was partially based on a recent Caltrans study (provided to Crane Transportation Group by City Public Works staff) that used LOS D as the minimum acceptable operation for intersections along State Route 12 in Lodi. 5.4 Comment noted. The statement that the City will strive to maintain LOS C does not conflict with accepting LOS D as the poorest acceptable intersection operation. See also response to comment 5.3. 5.5 The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) has gathered research data detailing the percent pass -by traffic capture expected by shopping centers based upon both the square footage of the center as well as the volume of traffic along streets adjacent to the center (ITE, Trip Generation Handbook --An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice, October 1998). Based upon these criteria, as well as direction and concurrence from the City of Lodi Traffic Engineer, the 25 percent pass -by capture used in this study reflects the lowest of the two pass -by capture rates that were calculated using the two different criteria. 5.6 Comment noted. I 5.7 A separate traffic study was not conducted for this project. Intersection capacity worksheets have been provided to City staff and are available on request. The full IWP51MMFE1RIF--2.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR ' 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-26 content of the Crane Transportation Group analysis is included as chapter 6 of the Draft EIR. i J 1 i i i i WP5116161 FE/F?I F--2.616 i i Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-27 2.3 MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC HEARING AND RESPONSES TO ORAL COMMENTS A public hearing on the Draft EIR was conducted on Wednesday, April 24, 2002 during a regular meeting of the City of Lodi Planning Commission. A copy of the minutes for that meeting follows, with all public comments received pertaining to the proposed Lodi Redevelopment Plan coded in the right-hand margin. A response to these coded comments follows the meeting minutes. WP51 %6161FEIRIF 2.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 WP5116161FEIRIF 2.616 Final EIR ' 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-28 i PINY ub euue e::;Ijvm UITY OF LODI 209-333-6e42 MINUTES LODI CITY PLANNING COMI MSION WEDNESDAY CARNE,GIE FORUM 305 WEST PINE STREET LODI, CALIFORNIA April 24, 2002 The Planning Commission met and was called to order by Chairman Crabtree. Commissioners Present: John Beckman, Randall Heinitz, Dennis White, and Chairman Crabtree. Commissioners Absent: Tim 1 st is, Jon McGladdery, and David Phillips Others Present: Konradt Bartlam, Community Development Director, Mark Meissner, Associate Plamer, and Lisa Wagner, Secretary. The minutes of April 10, 2002 were approved with Commissioner Heinitz abstaining from the vote, PUBLIC HEARINGS The request of Michael Collins for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map -to Create a S -lot St;We Family. Residential Subdivision at 425 & 429: Westeus�t Street. This item was. presented.to the Commission by Associate Plaxrnmr. ' dark.:.::: Meissner. The project is a eve -lot tentative subdivision map made,franri*o existing: lots, one lot curieritly lids d home and an upholstery shop and the other4ati- has a home:.,::: upon it. The.largest;lot•will•bo-9,000 square feet, the smallest arobnd 4;700 sgitare6,et;; and the remaining;lois..will be around 6,500 square feet. The applicant:wAi deiriolish• is : the existing upholstery shop and home on Lot 1, leaving the home on Lot 2.z. In 1993'a 74at subdivision was granted yet never built. In 2000, the applicant requested- a parcel map, which was denied for an inability to provide two covered parking spaces for the houses fronting Locust Street, and other issues related to the two flag lots. Staff felt that the lots this time were well proportioned and that each will be able to provide two - covered parking stalls, including Lot 2. Commissioner Heinitz asked if the lot sizes were similar to those recently approved on Locust and Lee Streets. Associate Planner Meissner replied that the lots meet today's lequiremew and were comparable to the lots previously approved on Locust and Lee Streets. Hearing Opened to the Public Joe Murpby, Dillon & Murphy, 1820 W. Kettleman Lane. Mr. Murphy represented the applicant. He was in agreement with the proposed requirements for the project. Commissioner Beckman asked W. Murphy why the applicant went from 7 lots to 5 lots. Mr. Murphy responded that the previous plan had flag lots and watt much smaller than the lots being proposed 7:00 P.M. ROLL CALL N1114 TTES April 10, 2002 F.2 ?0 t Hearing Closed to the Public The Planning Commission on motion of Commissioner Beckman, Heinitz second ' approved the request of Michael Collins for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map to Create a 5 -lot Single Family Residential Subdivision at 425 dt 429 West Locust Street by the follcming vote: ' AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Heinitz, White, and Crabtree NOES: Commissioners: , ABSENT: Commissioners: Matthies, McGladdery-, and Phillips ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ' PLANP G MATTERS Public Comment for the Lodi Redevelopment Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report Document. Community Development Director Bmtlam presented the next matter to the commission. He explained the Commission would be receiving public comment on the Lodi Redevelopment Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) t at the meeting and all comments received would be responded to in writing and addressed and added to the final EIR. The comment period will close on April 25, 2002. The prograiirwas started 2 years ago and includes. 1,200'ecres•and'encompasses the do�vuti a ilea; theorkee•Lane to Kettleman Lane, and -1 -6d' i*vClill :" Md-... docttiiiehi coibr'sthe' area'for the next 30 years. It is'alsa cixbcks far oonaiatenBy with the'Gg Code. The commentsroczici strd onl j deal%rich the EIR sliecifiw anti p6milimonts on the project will haveaBatiiier-fi :aall! ce to be disoass • :. ..}•V X13 1 .. t.• ., .. .: '.�.� :. '.. Heading Qpeped to,tbe Public _ ; : ,. :.•�' ' .. ' Georgianna Reichelt, 3605 E. Louise Drive, Manteca, CA. Ms. Reichelt was present to 6� also represent the land Utilization Alliance. She was against redevelopment for a wide variety of reasons and the impacts it may have. The City -41in debt itself and she felt ' strongly against eminent domain. She did not like the idea of giving bond=free money to developers or to retail stores. She felt that private industry should come in on their own. Redevelopment takes money away from the General fund, special districts, and ' school districts. Redevelopment has not enhanced or benefited any area She was not able to make any comments on the EIR because she never received a copy of the document, ' Hearing Closed to the Public Mr. Bartlam responded that the availability of the draft EIR was noticed in the Lodi News Sentinel 45 days ago in a published ad. Also, both a legal ad and a published ad regarding the meeting being held on April 24, 2002 were published in the Lodi News 1 Sentinel 10 days prior to the meeting. 4-24Aoc 2 1 MHT Ub eUUe 9:40rn U11T Ur LULL euu-333-684a ` Commissioner Beckman asked Mr. Barham if school funding would be reduced with the Agency in place. Ivir. Bardam responded that about 70°% of increment would go to ' the redevelopment program and 30'/9 back to taxing entities. The schools would not lose any fiords they currently receive. The benefit to the schools is that several school facilities are located within the Redevelopment Project Area, The County would be the biggest loser for fiords. Updatt to Growth Management Program ' Mr. Bartlam made the presentation to the Commission. In the 1980's a measure was adopted by the citizen's of Lodi to slow growth. The measure was overturned by the Legislature. In 1987 a 2% annual cap was voted in. In 1991 the plan was cognized through the General Plan update. The plan includes scoring of projects, based on location. There are three categories, low, medium, and high density. Development Plans are only accepted during the month of May each year. Since 1989 to 2000 -there have been thousands of units to allocate, but less than half have been requested. Unallocated balances arc over 2000 units. During the last 10 years no multi units have been built. A City initiated General Plan Amendment will be created in the future to prezone properties for fiigh-density proj eets. ACTIONS .01F THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COM M=E .'Coinmisii+onei-Heinitz stated that a new Marshall' -s store ivas**+ed-for the Target -ShO centenat the last meeting. .As.t iere.waitio�furdw business to be brought°before°thi),:Plannigg Commission, Chairman 'Czabiree adjounaed the session at S. p.m. Respectfully submitted, isa wagger Secretary Ia4.doe p.4 co Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR , 2. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR Page 2-32 6. Georgianna Reichelt, Manteca, California; comment at public hearing, April 24, 2002. 6.1 The commentor's general opposition to redevelopment is noted. This comment does not pertain to the adequacy of the Draft EIR. No response is required; however, as noted by the Community Development Director at the public hearing, schools would not lose any funds they currently receive, and several schools within the redevelopment area could potentially benefit from the redevelopment program. Pages 7-13 through 7- 17 of the Draft EIR include a complete discussion of the redevelopment plan's potential impact on school services. The availability of the Draft EIR for public review and the date of the public hearing were both legally noticed in the Lodi News -Sentinel on April 13, 2002. A published advertisement was also published in the Lodi Sentinel -News on April 18, 2002, announcing the public hearing for the Draft EIR. "5116161FEIF?IIF 2.616 i t i i 0 i r Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR 3. Revisions to the Draft EIR (Errata) Page 3-1 3. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR (ERRATA) The following section includes all revisions to the Draft EIR since its release in March 2002, including those made in response to public comments received during the Draft EIR public review period. All text revisions in the following errata section are indicated by an "r" in the left margin next to the revised line. All of the revised pages supersede the corresponding pages in the Draft EIR. None of these changes represents a significant increase in impact or a significant new impact or mitigation need not already discussed in the Draft EIR. WP5116161FE1FAF 3.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 WP5716161 FEl R I F-3.616 Final EIR ' 3. Revisions to the Draft EIR (Errata) Page 3-2 i i 17 L 11 i i Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Errata Lodi Redevelopment Agency 5. Population, Housing, and Employment June 7, 2002 Page 5-9 Overall Population and Housing Impacts. The project would be expected to facilitate and encourage improvement to the Project Area housing stock and, by extension, population growth within the Project Area. As indicated in Table 5.2, it is estimated that between the ' years 2001 and 2020, the Project Area housing total would increase by an estimated 210 units with the project (roughly 4.1 percent of the projected Citywide 2001-2020 housing increase of 5,160 units'). This anticipated project -related housing increase and associated ' population increases would not in and of themselves constitute a significant direct adverse environmental impact, since such increases (less than 5 percent) would not substantially affect current SJCOG projections for the year 2020. ' Based on an average household size of 2.56 persons per household, the associated population increase associated with 210 additional housing units (538 persons) would be well within the allowable two -percent annual population increase under the City's Growth Management Plan. ' Mitigation for Overall Population and Housing Impacts. No significant adverse housing or population impacts have been identified; no mitigations are required. Housing Needs Impacts. Implementation of the housing assistance components of the redevelopment plan would assist the City in meeting its General Plan Housing Element identified housing objectives and policies pertaining to affordable ownership units, overall ' housing stock rehabilitation, housing reconstruction, and promotion of residential infill. The project assistance actions are expected to result in the rehabilitation of existing units and construction of additional units affordable to low- and moderate -income households. In addition, the completion of project -assisted blight elimination and public facility and infrastructure improvements would help to accelerate the overall rate at which all types of housing are developed in the Project Area, and, indirectly, the City as a whole. These overall ' housing needs impacts would be beneficial. Mitigation for Housing Needs Impacts. No significant adverse housing needs impacts have ' been identified; no mitigation is required. ' r Housing Displacement Impacts. Potential housing displacement within the Project Area r would be mitigated through means set forth in the housing program component of the r Redevelopment Implementation Plan, which is periodically updated in five-year increments. 'From Table 5.1, the total number of additional dwelling units in the Lodi area between 2000 and ' 2020 would be 5,732 units (27,008 minus 21,276), amounting to approximately 287 units per year or 5,159 units between 2002 and 2020; say 5,160. 1 WP5116161FEIR15-8.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR Errata 5. Population, Housing, and Employment Page 5-9A r Redevelopment assistance to or participation in actions that would cause displacement of a substantial number of low- and moderate -income residents would be prohibited by the plan. r Replacement housing would be required if a planned redevelopment project would result in r the destruction of existing affordable housing. WP5116161FEIRI5-R.616 ' Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Errata Lodi Redevelopment Agency 5. Population, Housing, and Employment June 7, 2002 Page 5-10 1 ' r As a result, no significant impacts related to displacement of residential uses would be r expected to occur as the result of Agency eminent domain powers. ' Housing Displacement Mitigation. No significant adverse impacts have been identified; no mitigations are required. ' Temporary Employment Impacts. Additional construction jobs would also be created by the ' project -assisted economic, real estate, and infrastructure development between the years 2001 and 2020. The actual number of temporary jobs created by the project activities between 2001 and 2020 would depend on the construction dollars spent; a total cannot be ' accurately quantified at this time. Nevertheless, these project -generated employment opportunities would represent a significant beneficial economic impact of the project. These construction jobs would also result in significant, temporary adverse impacts on traffic, noise ' and air quality, which are discussed in corresponding, subsequent chapters of this EIR (chapters 6, 7 9, and 10, respectively). Mitigation for Temporary Employment Impacts. No significant adverse impacts have been identified; no mitigation is required. Permanent Employment Impacts. The project would encourage the development of ' additional commercial/retail/restaurant space, office space, and industrial uses in the redevelopment area. For purposes of "worst-case" environmental impact assessment, this ' EIR assumes that the project would be highly successful in stimulating such development. As indicated in Table 5.2, as many as 2,014 net additional jobs, have been projected in this EIR for the Project Area by the year 2020, facilitated in large part by the redevelopment program. ' This increase in the rate of central area job development would constitute a significant beneficial economic impact, and is a project goal. Such a central area job increase could also result in significant secondary adverse impacts on traffic, public services, noise, air quality, etc., as discussed in corresponding, subsequent chapters of this EIR (see chapters 6, 7, 9, and 10, respectively). ' Mitigation for Permanent Employment Impacts. No significant adverse permanent employment impacts have been identified; no mitigation is required. ' WP511616VEtRl5-R.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 7.6.5 Impacts and Mitigation Measures Final EIR 7. Infrastructure and Public Services Page 7-20 Impact 7.6-1: Project Park Demand Impacts. Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area are already operating at capacity. Project -facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area would incrementally increase the demand for park and recreation services. As discussed in chapter 5 (Population, Housing, and Employment) of this EIR, it is estimated that project - facilitated development would generate approximately 210 additional households in the Project Area. Based on the anticipated citywide year 2020 household size of 2.56 persons (see Table 5.2 in section 5.3), the 210 new households would generate a population increase of approximately 538 people. Based on the most recent City park acreage standard (3.4 acres per 1,000 persons), this new population increment would generate a demand for approximately 1.83 acres of additional parkland. Additional project -facilitated employment growth, estimated at 2,014 jobs by the year 2020, may also generate some additional demand for park and recreation services in the Project Area. Existing Project Area facilities do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate this additional demand. This project effect would therefore represent a significant impact (see criteria (a), (b) and (c) under section 7.6.3, Significance Criteria, above). Mitigation 7.6-1: Mitigation for Park Demand Impacts. The City shall ensure that at least 1.83 acres of parkland is developed within or convenient to the Project Area. As project -facilitated buildout takes place in the Project Area, adequate corresponding park and recreation provisions shall be provided through required dedication of land and/or in -lieu payment of City adopted park and recreation fees. Implementation of this measure would reduce this impact to less -than -significant levels. 7.7 SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING ' 7.7.1 Setting Central Valley Waste Services, a private company, is under contract with the City to provide ' refuse collection services citywide. Solid waste collected in the Project Area is transported by collection vehicles to the Lodi transfer station. The currently permitted daily solid waste inflow at the Lodi transfer station is sufficient to accommodate current waste flows.' 1 ' 'Rebecca Areida, City of Lodi Public Works Dept.; written communication with Wagstaff and Associates, November 2001. WP5116161FEIRI7-R.616 ' Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 i i Final EIR Errata 10. Air Quality Page 10.8 (e) Fail to carry out appropriate controls for construction dust. (The SJVUAPCD significance threshold for construction dust impacts is based on the appropriateness of construction dust controls. The SJVUAPCD guidelines provide feasible control measures for construction emission of PM,(, beyond that required by district regulations. If the appropriate construction controls are to be implemented, then air pollutant emissions for construction activities would be considered less than significant.) 10.3.2 Short -Term Construction Period Air Quality Impacts Impact 10-1: Construction Activity Air Quality Impacts. Construction activities facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan could generate construction period exhaust emissions and fugitive dust that could affect local air quality. In addition, buildings constructed prior to 1979 could have Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs), which could be released into the air during building demolition. Such construction -period air emissions possibilities represent a potentially significant impact (see criterion (e) under subsection 10.3.1, "Significance Criteria," above). Construction activities associated with redevelopment program -facilitated public and private development in the Project Area would include grading, building demolition, building construction, and paving. Because there is no specific building project associated with the proposed redevelopment plan, construction -phase impacts can only be analyzed qualitatively. Construction activities associated with intensification of land uses and infrastructure improvements in the Project Area would generate pollutants intermittently. Generally, the most substantial air pollutant emissions would be dust generated from site grading. Wind erosion and disturbance to exposed areas would also be sources of dust emissions. If uncontrolled, these emissions could lead to both health and nuisance impacts. PM,, is a component of dust. Without any dust control measures, visible dust clouds extending beyond the construction site could occur. Although temporary, this would r be considered a significant adverse impact to air quality. r The SJVUAPCD regulates construction period dust emissions through its Regulation VIII, r which was updated in May 2002. The provisions of Regulation Vlll pertaining to construction activities require: r Appropriate dust suppression for land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land r leveling, grading, cut and fill and demolition activities, such as the effective r application of water or pre-soaking; ■ Effective stabilization of all disturbed areas of a construction site, including storage r piles that are not being actively used for seven or more days; Control of fugitive dust from on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads; and WP511616IFE/R110-R.616 r r r r r r r r r r r r Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Errata Lodi Redevelopment Agency 10. Air Quality June 7, 2002 Page 10-8A ■ Removal of accumulations of mud or dirt at the end of the work day or once every 24 hours from public paved roads, shoulders and access ways adjacent to the site, for the duration of the activity. In addition to the construction period dust concern, all buildings constructed or remodeled prior to 1979 have the potential for Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs). Since many buildings within the Project Area were built prior to 1979, there is some potential for disturbance of ACMs during building demolition. It is only when ACMs are disturbed or the materials become damaged that asbestos becomes a hazard. When the materials become damaged, the fibers can separate and become airborne. Potential health problems associated with long-term asbestos inhalation include asbestosis, mesothelioma, lung cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer (EPA, 2002). There is no known "safe" exposure level for airborne asbestos, so any disturbance of ACMs could constitute a potentially significant adverse impact. WP5116161 i= E18110 -R. 618 ' Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR Errata 10. Air Quality Page 10-9 i Regulation Vlll does not require any formal dust control plans or permits, but violations of the requirements of Regulation Vlll are subject to enforcement action. Violations are indicated by the generation of visible dust clouds and/or generation of complaints. Mitigation 10-1: The City shall require that individual redevelopment -facilitated projects within the Project Area involving new construction shall comply, where applicable, with current SJVUAPCD Regulation Vill requirements, which currently include the following: • Appropriate dust suppression for land clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land leveling, grading, cut and fill and demolition activities, such as the effective application of water or pre-soaking; • Effective stabilization of all disturbed areas of a construction site, including storage piles, which are not being actively used for seven or more days; ■ Control of fugitive dust from on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads; and • Removal of accumulations of mud or dirt at the end of the work day or once every 24 hours from public paved roads, shoulders and access ways adjacent to the site, for the duration of the activity. Regulation VIII also requires a dust control plan for construction activity that will include 40 acres or more of disturbed surface area, or will include moving more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials on at least three days. Prior to the start of construction on projects of this type, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD- and City -required control measures. In addition, where appropriate, the City may also wish to require the following: • A limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph); ■ Installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site; ■ Suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 mph; and/or ■ A limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. IWP511616WE/R110-R.616 r r r r Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR Errata 10. Air Quality Page 10-9A To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs, and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMs. With implementation of these Regulation VIII controls and the above additional measures, project -related construction period air emissions impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. WP5116161 FEI R110 -R. 616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Errata Lodi Redevelopment Agency 12. Cultural and Historic Resources June 7, 2002 Page 12-4 ■ The city shall work with property owners in seeking registration of historical structures as State Historic Landmarks or listing on the National Register of Historic Places. (Policy 3, page 10-8) 12.3 IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 12.3.1 Significance Criteria Based on the CEQA Guidelines,' the project and project -facilitated future development activities would be considered to have a significant cultural resources impact if they would: (a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical or archaeological resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5; (b) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature; or (c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. 12.3.2 Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact 12-1: Project -Related Potentials for Disturbance of Archaeological Resources. Development encouraged and improvements funded by the proposed redevelopment program could disturb sensitive archaeological resources in the Project Area. This possibility represents a potentially significant impact (see criteria (a) through (c) under subsection 12.3.1, "Significance Criteria," above). The Project Area has some potential for containing buried or obscured prehistoric cultural resources, particularly in the following locations: in the vicinity of the Mokelumne River; other suitable habitation areas to be determined through historical maps of the area; and areas either on or adjacent to previously existing riparian habitat. Due to the broad and general nature of the proposed redevelopment plan and associated future development activities, it is difficult to forecast the specific effects of future project -facilitated development on archaeological resources. However, there is a chance of encountering archaeological sites in the Project Area during project -facilitated construction activities. These construction activities (e.g., grading, excavation) could disturb or destroy such archaeological resources (e.g., lithic materials, trash scatters, historic articles). 'CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, items V{a) through (d). WP5116161FE1R112-R.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Errata Lodi Redevelopment Agency 13. Hazardous Materials June 7, 2002 Page 13-5 Subsequently, a Phase I Hazardous Materials Assessment (Henshaw Associates, 2001) was also prepared, providing for a site -wide soil -gas and grab -groundwater sampling program, a source area confirmation sampling program, and installation and sampling of shallow ' r groundwater monitoring wells. A supplemental file review was also completed. Four major contamination "hot spots" were identified, including three areas either partially or completely within the proposed Project Area (see Figure 13.2): r ■ The area bounded by Pine Street and Tokay Street on the north and south, and Hutchins r Street and Sacramento Street to the west and east; ' r ■ The area bounded by Walnut and Tokay Streets to the north and south, and California r and Hutchins Streets to the west and east; and r ■ The area bounded by Turner Road and the City softball complex to the north and south, r and the UPRR and Stockton Street to the west and east. r These hot spots are located partially or completely within three redevelopment plan subareas: downtown/Lodi Avenue West (subarea 1 on Figure 4.3); and the industrial rail corridor r (subarea 2 on Figure 4.3); and the public facilities subarea (subarea 6 on Figure 4.3). Some r additional PCE groundwater contamination also exists in the eastside residential neighborhood (subarea 3 on Figure 4.3).' r In the course of these investigations, the DTSC, in cooperation with the City, has discovered r new information related to potential significant public health impacts from expsoures to volatile r organic compounds (VOCs) emanating from this contaminated groundwater plume, in addition r to the aforementioned PCE and TCE contamination. VOC vapors from the contaminated r groundwater plume and soil in the City's central area have migrated to air in the City Hall r Annex (Annex). Some of these VOCs are suspected or known human carcinogens, and may r cause significant health risks. The City has implemented exposure controls in the building. r Studies are proposed to determine if other buildings in the vicinity of the Annex may also be r impacted by VOC vapors. r Recent indoor air testing indicates that VOC vapors may have migrated to buildings located in r proximity to where high concentrations of contaminated groundwater and soil exist. This can r potentially impact future land uses in the redevelopment area, including schools, residences, r day care centers, and other sensitive environments. The City of Lodi anticipates that the federal court will exercise jurisdiction over the claims of the People of the State of California and the City of Lodi concerning investigation and remediation of Lodi Area of Contamination and will execute a final, non -appealable order compelling a responsible parry to perform all actions necessary including, but not limited to, developing and implementing a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study and any Interim Remedial Actions necessary to protect human health and the environment. If the federal court 'Henshaw Associates, Inc., Figures 3-5 and 3-6. WP5116161 FEIRI 13-R.616 Lodi Redevelopment Plan Lodi Redevelopment Agency June 7, 2002 Final EIR Errata 13. Hazardous Materials Page 13-5A fails to enforce a final order, the Phase II tasks described in the Phase I report (Henshaw Associates, 2001, Appendix H) will be implemented by the City of Lodi.' (b) Asbestos and PCB Potentials. Older commercial, industrial and residential buildings within the Project Area could contain asbestos and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The adverse health effects associated with asbestos exposure have been extensively studied. Studies have demonstrated that inhalation of asbestos fibers may lead to increased risk of developing respiratory or abdominal cancers. There is no known safe level of exposure. The presence of asbestos in a building does not necessarily mean that the building poses a health hazard. In many cases, the asbestos within buildings is inaccessible or sealed within another 'Henshaw Associates, Inc., p. 35. WP5116161 FE1 A113-8.616 ' Lodi Redevelopment Plan Final EIR Errata Lodi Redevelopment Agency 13. Hazardous Materials June 7, 2002 Page 13-8 i (c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; or (d) Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5, and as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. 13.3.2 Proposed Project Hazardous Material Goals and Actions The proposed redevelopment plan' includes the following identified proposed action I pertaining to Project Area hazardous materials (from Table 3.2 in Chapter 3, Project Description): Facilitate a hazardous materials clean-up program. ' 13.3.3 Impacts and Mitivation Measures Project -Facilitated Hazardous Waste Remediation. The City is required by state hazardous materials regulatory agencies, under the purview of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, r to assign or accept responsibility for clean-up the groundwater contamination (PCE, TCE, and r VOCs) in the areas mentioned in the "Setting" section above. The City is currently involved in litigation with insurance companies representing prior site occupants suspected of earlier contamination. Responsibility for cleanup of suspected groundwater contamination sources will be determined and cleanup is expected to occur pending a final decision in this litigation? IMost of this clean-up will occur independently of the Redevelopment Plan. However, remediation may be required on a project by project basis prior to initiation of any redevelopment -related construction that may have the potential to disturb or disperse already r contaminated groundwater, including measures during building renovation, construction, and r new development to address the potential for PCE and/or TCE contamination, and for VOC r vapor intrusion from contaminated soil and groundwater. Mitigation for Project -Facilitated Hazardous Waste Remediation. No significant adverse impacts have been identified; no mitigation measures are required under CEQA. ' Project -Facilitated Exposure to Existing Hazardous Materials Contamination. Project - facilitated construction has the potential for exposing construction workers and future site occupants to spills, leaks and other discharges of existing hazardous materials or wastes (e.g., existing contaminated groundwater, historical underground fuel tanks, oil storage operations, etc.). Therefore, all project -facilitated public improvement and private development projects would be required to comply with all applicable existing federal-, state- and city - mandated site assessment, remediation, removal and disposal requirements for soil, surface I'Seifel et al., January 2002. 2Rad Bartlam, City of Lodi Community Development Department; personal communication with Wagstaff and Associates, October 2001. WP5116161 FEI R 113-R.616 I — -VU I u,_rw .n_al I I Iii -L. I I iii IYU. GU9JUy I U64 P. 02 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STE11 E OF CALIFORNIA County of Saiz joaguin 1 am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I ani over the age of eighteen years and not a patty to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the j printer of the Lodi News -Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily, except Sundays and holidays, in the City of Lodi, California, County of San Joaquin and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court, Department 3, of the County of San Joaquin, State of California, under the date: of May 26th, 1953. Case Number 65990; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than non- pareil), has been published in each .regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates to -wit:: May...22,..r29., June...l., 5'...12..... all in the year....... 2002 r I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true anti correct. bated at Lodi, California, this ...,.1 ........day of June2002 ......... =. r . .................. . gnature This space is for the County Clerk's piling Stamp Proof of Publication of Lodi Redevelopment Agency Plan NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC NEARING ON TI IE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TRE LODI RFOEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 ANO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT TIEPOIIT FIELA71NO Tf1EIIETO NOTICE Is I ienEny GIVEN that that Cay Council of the City of Lodi (live 'Chy Council -I and Nvo Redevelopment Agency of Oe Cay of Loch (lire "Agency") will fold a joint publlc,heoring on June 19. 2002, at 7:00 13 M. at Ilia Cay Council Chandlers, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, to consider and act upon Ilia proposed naleveloprnenl Plan (lire -nodevelopment Plan') ks live Lodi Redevelopment Projecl No. I (ete'I'ejocl') and lo con - War all evidence and testimony for or against Ile approval and adoption of the proposed RadeveloMnanl W. At any Uma not later than the low set kalh above lot live loerkrg of con"neals on or objections to the proposed Redeveloprnonl Plan, any poison may Ilia In will- ing wish am Cay Clark at Ilia City of Lodi a staemerd M objections to the proposed Ttrakwekrpmenl Plan. At Ilia cloy, hour, and fAccco at the hooting. any and as persons having any commends on at olryncMurs M If* proposed fledovafolrnanrl flan, or who dairy Iha nxis. Ounce M blight M Ilio proposed d'rolecl Area or Floostirm this nigolarlty of airy of ma Inner pro• cnarkngs. cony appear before the City Council aril the Agency aril slow cause why lire pro- posed Radovaknincard Plnn should not he annpled. in fI(klipon. live City Council and tire Agency will, at Ills same lime and place, holaf.e,jolnf pub kc tveoIF ng to conifer The Final Environmental Impact Report (oro 'Fkw EIR") on the pra- : posed RadeveMgnerd Trion and considw ON evidence and losamany for Or against Hca cerh- Ik:alions of IM Final EIR. At the day, lour and place of the lneerkg, AN Interested persons dasking In comment or, or having obiocdon s To, Ilia coolant M ardetluar-y of liar Final OR may spotter bolos live City Ccoocd and the Aoenrcy sod be hoord. The general goals and Mljeclivasof ilia proposed Rodowdopmerd Plan are to: f I )The elimination of blighlirxJ Inkmoces and the correction of onvlronerental deficiencies In live Projecl Area, Including. among ollmid. buildings In which Il Is unsafe or unheawry kr per. to Nva or wank, smell and irregular lona, faultyedlmkN spacing. obsolete and agedlank!• Ing types, mixed chewier or skilling uses a vacancies. Incompnlible end uneconornic land vises. substandard alleys, and Inadequate or, delorioraled public knptovemernls. Iacilifles, and utilities. (2)Tho assembly at land Into parcels suitable for modem, Integrated development with fmpvoved pedestrian and vehicular circulation lo the Project Area. (7) The replanninti. redesign, sed development of portions of the Project Area which acs stagnant of fropcoperly Wilized. (4) rho provision of oprinrluMlms for, parliclpallon by owners and lennnts fit the revitalization of their prcrgoties. (5)The strengthening of retail and office commenclal funcikru M the Projecl Ares. (0)The shenglltenkwJ of Ito econoacc base of Ola Project Area by sllrmrlating now Invest. nand. (7)Tlm exponsfon of employment opporlunilles. (0) The provision of an elwkoMlent for social and economic growth. (9) The expansion, improvement, mkt preservation of the community's supply of housing available M low and modorete-Income persons and famillos. (10) The inslallation of new or ceplacomeM of existing punlic knproveraards, facilities and ulll- dies to areas which are currently inaftiviolefy served with regvd to such Improvements, facilities And utailles. A map showing the general oration In Ilia Clry or the proposed Project Ares is attached here- to as Exhibit A and made a (into heron!, A copy of gat legal daxciption of am Project Avon Is available upon rarpreal, free of charge, au the olflcea of the City Clerk and the Agency, whose address is given below, Interested persons may inspocl and, upon payment of Ila costs of reprakrclion, obtain copies of the proposed fladevelopmenl Plan, the Final Enviruneental Impact Flepall lot the Pnf)gcl, the Agencys Report to Ills City Council, and any over Informitlton pertaining Nrere- lo of pie office of Ilia Agency and Ile office of Ilia City Clerk, located at 221 Wesl Fine Slneol, Loci, Cakfocide. The Agency fine Wfopted'Flules Governing Parficipotfon by Prgrerly Owners and ora PROOFOP Extension of lleasonntAn Preferences to thmiviss Mcirponts In "to Lodi Il LoedevelopmeM i k Project -lot lire purpose of Implementing those pealuros of the proposed nodaveloior ant Plan Providing for lanNclpnlion by property Owners and Iosiness occupants in IM proposed Project Aron. Collins of sold ruins aro mraNnbln lot public insrredlon at the office M ave Agency. By order el Ila elly 47no-11 nod tho Rodrwnlrymmril Agnnn•.y M can City M Isms. Dalen: Mary 10.2002 Susan ,l ranrkdnn °`fix yMc�WN'lHfNrr firy nlledi rmnn�+v�mnar.nr�o.. RtDtVr..LOPMENT PROILCT AREA May 22, 29. Jum S. 12, 2002 —4391 � � 7 CERTIFICATION OF CERTAIN OFFICIAL ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 I, H. Dixon Flynn, Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that pursuant to the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.), the following official actions have been taken by the City Council of the City of Lodi (the "Council'), the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi (the "Planning Commission') and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency"), in connection with the preparation of the Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1: 1. Council Resolution No. 2001-93, adopted on April 18, 2001: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lodi Designating a Redevelopment Survey Area. 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-20, adopted on July 11, 2001: Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi Selecting the Boundaries of the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 Within the Redevelopment Survey Area and Approving a Preliminary Plan for the Redevelopment of the Project Area. 3. Agency Resolution No. RDA2001-01, adopted on September 5, 2001: Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi Accepting the Preliminary Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1. 4. Council Resolution No. 2001-254, adopted on November 7, 2001: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lodi Confirming the Election and Appointment of Members to the Project Area Committee of the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1. 5. Agency Resolution No. RDA2002-01, adopted on February 6, 2002: Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi Approving the Preliminary Report to Affected Taxing Entities on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1. 6. A Notice of Completion of the Draft Environmental Impact Report on the Redevelopment Plan was prepared and filed on March 12, 2002, and published in the Lodi News Sentinel on March 19, 2002. 7. Agency Resolution No. RDA2002-02, adopted on May 1, 2002: Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi Referring the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 to the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi. 8. Planning Commission Resolution No. 02-17, adopted on May 8, 2002: Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi Making Its Report and Recommendations on Adoption of the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1. 9. Agency Resolution No. RDA2002-03, adopted on May 15, 2002: Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi Approving and Adopting the Report to the City Council on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1, Submitting Said Report, Proposed Redevelopment Plan and Final EIR Relating Thereto to the City Council and Consenting to and Requesting the City Council to Call a Joint Public Hearing on said Redevelopment Plan and the Final EIR Relating Thereto. 10. Agency Resolution No. RDA2002-04, adopted on May 15, 2002: Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi Approving and Adopting Rules Governing Participation by Property Owners, and the Extension of Reasonable Preferences to Business Occupants in the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1. 11. Council Resolution No. 2002-99, adopted on May 15, 2002: Resolution of the City Council of the City of Lodi Consenting to and Calling a Joint Public Hearing on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the Final EIR Relating Thereto. The documents reflecting the official actions referred to herein are contained in the official records of the Council, the Planning Commission and the Agency, and are incorporated herein by reference with the same effect as though set forth in full in this Certification. Dated: June 19, 2002. / ecutive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi CITY OF LODI PROOF OF PUBLICATION REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY LEGAL NOTICE INSTRUCTIONS FOR JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 19, 2002 PUBLISH (DATES): May 22, 2002 May 29, 2002 June 1, 2002 June 5, 2002 June 12, 2002 TEAR SHEETS WANTED: 1 EXTRA (ONLY) DELIVER TO: Planning Department AFFIDAVIT & BILL TO: City of Lodi, 221 W. Pine Street, Community Development Department DATE: May 16, 2002 ORDERED BY: Konradt Bartlam TITLE: Community Development Director Fax: 369-1084 LW Document2 JUN -19-02 WED 01:00 PM THE LODI NEWS SENTINEL FAX NO. 2093691084 pr 02 PROOF OF PUBLICATION This space is for the County Clerk's pilling Stamp (2015.5 C-C..P.) STME Of, CALIFORNIA County of San' 'Joaquin I am a citizen of the Unitcd States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I atn over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the Lodi News -Sentinel, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily, except Sundays and holidays, in the City of Lodi, California, County of San Joaquin and which news- paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court, Department 3, of the County of San Joaquin, State of California, under the date of May 26th, 1953. Case Number 65990; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than non- pareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates to -wit:: May 22, 29, June 1, 5, 12 Lilt in the year...... 12002......... 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Codi, California, this ...,.1 ...,....day of June 2002 gnature RECEIVED 2002 JUN 19 PM 1: 39 CITY CLERK CITY OF LODI Proof of Publication of Lodi"Redevelopment Agency Plan NOTICE OF JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. I AND TI{E FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT nELATING THERETO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Use City Council of the City of Lodi (the *City Council') and the Redevelopment Agency o1 the City of Lodi (the "Agency") will laid a Joint pubkJteering on June 19. 2002, at 7:00 p.m. in It's City Council Chambers, located at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi. California. 10 consider and act upon the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "nadevelopment Plan')'lor the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. I (te'Project-)_ and to con- sider all evidence and testimony for or against the approval and adoption of Me proposed Redevelopment Plan. At any time not later than the hour set forth above lot pe hearing of comments on or objections to (he proposed Redevelopment Plan, any person may Ilia in will- ing wth Ila City Clark at the City of Lodi a statement of objections to the proposed netivekapmenl Plan. At the day, hour. and plata of the hearing, any and all persons having ally c(rnnems on or obinchtms to Ila Proposed Redevetop i ani Plan, or wla dally Ilia mus. lance.. Might In ere proposed Project Area in question tho negtdanty, of any of Ihe prat pro- coenfirgs. may appear before the City Council and the Agency and stow cavae why the pro• posed riedevoknpnnenl Plan should rat be adopted. In "ditipn, the City Council and the Agency wIM, at tie some Him and place, hokl.ejoint pub Nc heeR lo rnrns the Final Enwkonmenut impact Repent (lie -Final EIR") on the go- -: posed Radevelopnent Plan and consider all evidence and lostmory for a against the carli- fications of the Final EIR. At the day, hen and piece of the hearing, to Interested persons desiring to comment on, or laving objections to, the content or adequacy of the Final EIR may appear before oto City Camcil and the Agency and be heard, The general goals and objectives of lha proposed AaNiayelopment Plan are to (I IThe elimination of blighting Inlhrences and Ohs correction at erwkon manlal deficiencies In Ila Project Area, Including, among others, buildings In which N Is unsafe or unhealthy for per- sons to five or work, small and kregular lots" faulty exterior spacing. Obsolete and aged build - kV types. mixed character or shifting uses or vacancies, Incompatible and uneconornic land uses. substandard alleys, and Inadequate or deterraaled public improvements, facilities, and utilities, (2)The assembly of land Into parcels suitable for modem, integrated development with improved pedestrian and vehicular circulation in the Project Area. (3) The raprarpdng, redesign, arxf tlovebpxnent of portions of the Project Arae which are slagneM or Imprnperty utilized. (4)Tte provision a oloarhmllies 6w participation by owners and lanwots In the revitalization OI their properties. (5)The strengthening of retail and other commercial functions In the Project Area. (8)The strengthening of 8a economic base of the Project Area by stimulating new Invest. Pant. (7)The expansion of employment opportunities. (8) The provision of an ernkonmeal for social and economic growth. (9) The expansion, Improvement, and presenvatfon of the Community's supply of housing available to pow and moderate -.income persons and families. (10) This installation of new or replacement of existing public Improvements. facilities and ullt- ttes to areas which are currently irracloaaalely served with regard to such Improvemanls, facilities and ullklies. A map slowing the general location in the City of the proposed Project Area is attached here- to as Exhibit A and made a part hereof, A copy of the legal description of the Project Area Is available upon request, Igoe of charge, at the offices of the CNy Clork and to Agency, whose address Is given below, Interested persons may inspect and, upon payment a the costs of reproduction, obtain Copies of the proposed Redevelopment Plan, Ulo Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project, the AgenC)/9 Report t0 the City Council, and any alar Information pertaining there- to at the Office of Ile Agency and to oil" of the City Clerk, located at 721 West Fine Street. Lod. California. I The Agency has adopted "Rules Governing Participation by Property Owners end the 'C Extension a ReasaaMe Preferences 10 Business Occupants In the Lodi Redevelopment ! PROOF OF Project" hp/ Ihe purpose of implementing those features of the proposed Redevelopment Plan i providing lor paraclpaaorl by Properly owners and business occupants 1 Project Area. Copies of said rules are available for public In the proposed ofthe ��y. rw nntspeclbn at the otka a the By order of the City Council and Ilia Redevelopment Agency of the City of LOCH. Dated: May 18.2002 Susan J Rlackskpl :xaeerx Jennifer Perrin Page 1 of 1 From: Lew & Barbara McWilliams [mcwilliams@softcom.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:41 PM To: cityclrk@lodi.gov; nakanishi@lodi.gov; pennino@lodi.gov; hitchcock@lodi.gov; howard@lodi.gov; land@lodi.gov Subject: Redevelopment -Lodi Since I am unable to be at the meeting tonight, I am sending you my thoughts about the redevelopment project. Thanks, Barbara McWilliams 6/19/02 Barbara McWilliams 208 S. School St. Lodi, CA. 95240 June 19, 2002 I am unable to attend the meeting tonight as I am busy completing preparations for a family wedding this weekend. I have no problem with a Redevelopment Agency being formed within the boundaries shown. I am opposed to the use of the taxes for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing outside of the Project Area. I feel this type of housing should be part of the housing plans that Lodi develops just like it does for any other housing —apartments, medium to upper end housing. Money from the blighted area should not be used to satisfy something the city should have been doing all along. Redevelopment money, in my opinion, would be best used to eliminate blighting influences and correct environmental deficiencies in the Project Area as listed on the May 16, 2002 cover letter to property owners in the Redevelopment area--- item #1 of the general goals and objectives. Respectfully, Barbara McWilliams AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. RDA2002-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI CERTIFYING THE COMPLETION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN WHEREAS, as the Lead Agency, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as "CEQA"), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the "State CEQA Guidelines") and procedures adopted by the Agency relating to environmental evaluation; and WHEREAS, the Agency transmitted for filing a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR and thereafter in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to those state agencies which have discretionary approval or jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the Redevelopment Plan, to the affected taxing agencies, and to other interested persons and agencies, and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting comments on the Draft EIR was published in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to adopt changes suggested, to incorporate comments received during the public review period pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and to incorporate the Agency's responses to said comments, and as so revised and supplemented, a Final EIR was prepared by the Agency; and WHEREAS, the Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR as revised and supplemented to incorporate all comments received and the responses of the Agency thereto and is part of the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Redevelopment Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Agency hereby certifies that the Final EIR for the Project is adequate and has been completed in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and local procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto and that the Agency has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR prior to adopting this resolution. The Agency hereby finds that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the Agency. Section 2. The Agency hereby adopts the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations relating to the environmental impact of the Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (including, without limitation, the mitigation measures therein set forth). Based upon such Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, the Agency hereby finds that all significant environmental effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened except the following unavoidable adverse impact: (1) Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases. Based upon the foregoing, the Agency finds and determines that the Redevelopment Plan will have a significant effect upon the environment but that the benefits of the Redevelopment Plan outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts for the reasons set forth in the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, in particular, Part V thereof. Section 3. The Agency hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Plan set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Upon approval and adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council, the Agency Secretary is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Joaquin pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of CEQA and Section 15094 of the State CEQA Guidelines, along with two copies of the Certificate of Fee Exemption as required pursuant to Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5(c). Dated: June 19, 2002 I hereby certify that Resolution No. RDA2002-05 was passed and adopted by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: MEMBERS — Howard, Land, and Mayor Pennino NOES: MEMBERS — Nakanishi ABSENT: MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: MEMBERS — Hitchcock Attest: SUSAN J. BLACKSTON Secretary Chairperson RDA2002-05 STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., "CEQA") provides, in Section 21081, that: "[N]o public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless both of the following occur: "(a) The public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: "(1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. "(2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. "(3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. "(b) With respect to significant effects which were subject to a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment." As defined in CEQA, "'significant effect on the environment' means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment." (Public Resources Code Section 21068.) DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT PROPOSED FOR APPROVAL For purposes of CEQA, the "project' addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") is the adoption and phased implementation of the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project"). As more particularly identified in the Final EIR, the Project Area covers approximately 1,184 acres of land within the City of Lodi, including commercial, industrial, parks, residential and public right of way land uses. Under the Redevelopment Plan, the Project would be developed in accordance with the land uses designated and permitted by the General Plan for the City of Lodi. The Final EIR describes the environmental impacts that may occur as a result of the adoption and phased 1 Exhibit A implementation of the Redevelopment Plan and identifies, where applicable, measures which would mitigate significant effects on the environment to a level of insignificance. Findings regarding the significant effects of the Project are set forth below. III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT; FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT This Part III identifies the potentially significant and unavoidably significant effects of the Project as determined by the Agency, including the findings and facts supporting the findings in connection therewith. The Final EIR discussed Hazardous Materials but no impacts were anticipated. The following areas were discussed in the Final EIR and include mitigation measures that are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan or are unavoidably significant effects on the Project: A. Land Use and Visual Factors 1. Environmentallmpact Adverse Land Use Compatibility Impacts. Some project - facilitated land use changes within the Project Area could result in adverse land use compatibility impacts. Given the proximity of some existing, planned and anticipated residential uses in the Project Area to existing and planned commercial and industrial areas, project -assisted development could introduce significant new land use conflicts among specific residential, commercial and industrial developments. Finding: The mitigation feasible and shall be required The mitigation measures will significant" level. measures identified below are in or incorporated into the Project. reduce the impact to a "less than Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) During City review and prior to approval of individual projects within the Project Area, emphasize the need to avoid significant new land use conflicts between non-residential and residential development, between sensitive new commercial uses and existing nuisance -prone commercial and industrial uses, and between new nuisance prone commercial and industrial uses and sensitive existing commercial uses. (b) During review procedures and the formulation of conditions of approval, require assurances to City satisfaction of: (1) adequate land use separation, scale transition, and noise buffering; (2) creative siting of buildings to avoid conflicts; (3) adequate protections against light, glare, and shadow impacts; (4) adequate odor control; (5) adequate offstreet parking provisions; (6) adequate and safe truck access and offstreet loading z Exhibit A provisions; and (7) other common measures warranted to avoid such land use conflicts. 2 3. Environmental Impact Visual Impacts on Specific Streetscapes Within the Proiect Area. The visual quality of future development in specific opportunity areas within the Project Area would directly affect the quality of important city streetscapes. Without adequate design control, the Project could facilitate new industrial or mixed- use/commercial development that could adversely affect the visuali quality of these highly visible industrial and mixed-use streetscapes, as well as the visual character of surrounding neighborhoods, and of the central area as a whole. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Through the City's currently adopted development permit and design review process, future development in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall be subject to particularly focused and detailed design review. Implement specific visual impact mitigation guidelines set forth in the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Development Standards and Guidelines and Central City Revitalization Program in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately protect and enhance the visual quality of these areas. (b) Applications for future development and property improvements that are subject to discretionary approval in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall incorporate the appropriate combination of specific design guidelines listed in section 4.3 of the EIR in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately reduce project related visual impacts on streets, residential neighborhoods, and the central area as a whole. Environmental Impact Potential Impacts on Visual Character and Image of Eastside Residential Neighborhood. Project facilitated new multi -family development built in the Eastside neighborhood would have the 3 Exhibit A potential to clash visually with the neighborhood's older, predominantly single-family residential character. Finding: The mitigation measure identified below is feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measure will reduce the impact to a "less than significant' level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In review and processing of residential development projects within the Eastside residential neighborhood, place special emphasis on implementation of locational strategy contained in the Central City Revitalization Program to protect and improve the visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. Encourage locations at the edge of the neighborhood and require appropriate visual buffering and scale transition between new multi -family structures and existing single-family development, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission. B. Population, Housing and Employment 1. Environmentallmpact Potential Jobs/Housing Balance Impacts. Project -facilitated development and the projected addition of a substantially greater number of jobs than housing units in the Project Area may exacerbate the existing jobs/housing imbalance (weighted towards jobs in comparison to the County as a whole). Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implementation of mitigation measures identified below in Section III.C.1 of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations pertaining to project -related commute period vehicular traffic increases and associated project and cumulative transportation system impacts. C. Transportation and Parking 1. Environmentallmpact 4 Exhibit A i7 Impact on Intersection Signalization Reauirements. Additional redevelopment related traffic would increase PM peak hour traffic volumes at the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection above criteria levels set by Caltrans to determine whether installation of a traffic signal is warranted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Caltrans has established eleven possible tests, or "warrants", for determining whether installation of a traffic signal should be considered. Usually, two or more of these must be met before a signal is warranted. The EIR analysis indicates that only the warrant related to peak hour traffic volume would be met for the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection. The City shall monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine Street -Central Avenue intersection, and when two or more Caltrans signal warrant criteria are met, shall place the intersection on the City's priority list for signalization. Infrastructure and Public Facilities 1. Environmentallmpact Anticipated Water Supply Impacts. Anticipated increases in commercial activity, employment and residential population associated with the Project would result in corresponding increases in the demand for water service. The City is prepared to provide the additional domestic water necessary for anticipated additional development in the Project Area, but water table fluctuations due to basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty regarding available water supply for the City's future needs. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implement the City of Lodi General Plan Land Use and Growth Management Element policies which require the City to (1) develop new facilities, as necessary, to serve new develop in accordance with the City's Water, Wastewater and Drainage Master Plans, and (2) assess water, wastewater and drainage 5 Exhibit A development fees on all new residential, commercial, office and industrial development sufficient to fund required systemwide improvements. 2. Environmentallmpact • Water Distribution System Inadequacies. The existing water distribution system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area. • Findin : The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. • Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: As project facilitated development takes place over the next 20 years, implement remaining needed central area water distribution system improvements identified in Chapter 8 of the City's Water Master Plan. Water conservation should also be promoted as the Project Area redevelops. 3. Environmental Impact • Sewage Collection System Inadequacies. The existing wastewater collection system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development. and intensification in the Project Area. • Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. • Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Continue to implement the central area sewage collection system improvements identified as needed in the City of Lodi General Plan, and the City's Sanitary Sewer System Technical Report, including planned improvements to the Eastside neighborhood collection system. 4. Environmentallmpact • Police Service Demand in Proiect Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for police services in the Project Area. 6 Exhibit A 5. 6. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Police Department shall monitor the rate of additional police calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional officers and facilities (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Police Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Environmental Impact Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service Demand in Project Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for fire protection and emergency medical services in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Fire Department shall monitor the rate of additional fire protection service calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional firefighters and equipment (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Fire Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Environmental Impact School Service Demand. Existing Lodi Unified School District (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional school population generated by project -facilitated residential development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The 7 Exhibit A mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Redevelopment Agency shall make the statutory pass- through payment of tax increment revenue to the LUSD and the San Joaquin County Office of Education pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 33607.5. (b) City shall require developers in the Project Area to pay state authorized school impact fees to the extent approved by the LUSD. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional impact fees negotiated with LUSD. 7. Environmentallmpact Project Park Demand. Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area are already operating at capacity. Project -facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area would incrementally increase the demand for park and recreation services. Based on estimated population increase in the Project Area, the City will need approximately 1.83 acres of additional park land to meet the increased demand. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall ensure that at least 1.83 acres of parkland is developed within or convenient to the Project Area. As project -facilitated build -out takes place in the Project Area, adequate corresponding park and recreation provisions shall be provided through required dedication of land and/or in -lieu payment of City adopted park and recreation fees. E. Drainage and Water Quality 1. Environmentallmpact Erosion. Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. Building construction and infrastructure improvements in the Project Area could further degrade downstream water quality. Factors contributing to downstream water quality problems include soil disturbance during construction, new impervious surfaces created with project -facilitated developments, increased vehicle traffic, and s Exhibit A herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers from new landscaping associated with project -facilitated development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) City shall require applicants for each future project - facilitated development requiring a discretionary approval to comply with all applicable state, regional and City water quality provisions. (b) For projects involving the grading of more than five acres, applicant shall be required to (1) file with the Regional Water Quality Control Board a Notice of Intent to comply with the Statewide General Permit for Construction Activities, (2) prepare and implement a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (including erosion control plan) if grading is involved, (3) implement a monitoring, inspection and documentation program to assure the effectiveness of control measures, (4) obtain or comply with existing General Stormwater Discharge Permits for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (5) comply with the NPDES Phase II Non -Point Discharge program. F. Noise 1. Environmental Impact Exposure of Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive Environmental Noise Project facilitated intensification of and changes in land uses in the Project Area could expose additional people to noise levels exceeding acceptable levels. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Noise impacts can be reduced through appropriate site planning, construction of noise barriers, and/or incorporation of noise insulation features into a project's design as specified in the City of Lodi General Plan. Evaluate the impact of each 9 Exhibit A redevelopment -facilitated discretionary development application in the Project Area on the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources. (b) Require noise assessments for all redevelopment - facilitated discretionary applications in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, and for noise -generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plan when proposed adjacent to noise sensitive land uses. 2. Environmentallmpact Redevelopment Facilitated Construction Noise. Residential and other noise -sensitive uses located adjacent to project -facilitated construction activities could be exposed to noise levels that would interfere with normal activities. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require the use of a combination of the following reasonable construction practices for projects when noise - sensitive receptors are located in the project vicinity, including restricting construction to avoid noise generating activity in the early morning, evening, and on Sundays and holidays, muffling and properly maintaining all internal combustion engine driven equipment, locating stationary noise -generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors, routing construction traffic to and from the project site via designated truck routes, utilizing "quiet' air compressors and other stationary noise sources where such technology exists, and designation of a "noise disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. G. Air Quality Environmental Impact Construction Activity Air Quality Construction activities facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan could generate construction period exhaust emissions and fugitive dust that could affect local air quality. In addition, buildings constructed prior to 1979 could have Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) which could be released into the air during building demolition. io Exhibit A Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require that individual redevelopment -facilitated projects involving new construction shall comply, where applicable, with the current San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ("SJVUAPCD") Regulation VIII requirements. In addition, the City may also require a limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site, suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 miles per hour, and/or a limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMs. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD and City required control measures. 2. Environmentallmpact Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases Emissions resulting from new vehicle trips generated by redevelopment facilitated intensification in the Project Area would, by the year 2020, generate Reactive Organic Gases and Nitrogen Oxides in amounts that would exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for each pollutant. These emissions would constitute a significant project impact and would be expected to contribute to a significant cumulative impact. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. Notwithstanding incorporation of these mitigation measures, the Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases are an unavoidable significant effect. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project make the alternatives infeasible and outweigh this significant effect. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Where practical, future development proposals shall 11 Exhibit A include physical improvements that would act as incentives for pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of travel. (b) Employment -generating development projects of 10,000 square feet or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and shower/locker facilities for employees. (c) Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpool/vanpool incentives, develop an employee rideshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. The specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project are more particularly described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Part V of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations. H. Vegetation and Wildlife 1. Environmentallmpact Potential Loss of Special -Status Species Redevelopment - facilitated development consistent with the City of Lodi General Plan may result in impacts on special status species. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: If disturbance to suitable giant garter snake habitat is proposed as part of a redevelopment assisted development or improvement project, systematic surveys shall be conducted before such a development is approved in order to determine definitively whether any giant garter snakes occur. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and in compliance with specifications of section 5.2.4.8 of the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan. 2. Environmental Impact Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts Redevelopment -facilitated development could affect potential jurisdictional wetland habitat. 12 Exhibit A Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All redevelopment -facilitated development that would involve modifications to potential wetlands and other waters, such as seasonal wetlands that could be present in vacant or under used parcels, shall be coordinated with representatives of the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as required by federal and state law, to ensure that any required mitigation protocols and associated project design modifications are incorporated into proposed improvement plans during the initial stages of project review. I. Cultural and Historic Resources 1. Environmental Impact Project -Related Potentials for Disturbance of Archaeological Resources Development encouraged and improvements funded by the proposed redevelopment program could disturb sensitive archaeological resources in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In the event that subsurface cultural resources are encountered during approved ground -disturbing activities for a redevelopment program -related construction activity, work in the immediate vicinity shall be stopped and a qualified archaeologist retained to evaluate the find. The discovery or disturbance of any cultural resources should also be reported to the Central California Information Center, and if prehistoric, to the Native American Heritage Commission. Identified cultural resources should be recorded on a State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 422. Mitigation measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. 2. Environmentallmpact 13 Exhibit A Destruction/Degradation of Historic Resources Project - facilitated development in the Project Area has the potential to destroy or substantially degrade historic resources, if these resources are not identified or recognized and their maintenance, rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not promoted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All future redevelopment -assisted public improvement projects and private development projects shall be evaluated for the presence of and potential impacts on historic resources. If disturbance of a historic resource cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be implemented. The City and private sponsors of future individual projects on sites that contain unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a qualified professional architectural historian prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project -facilitated development. IV. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT CEQA requires that an EIR describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project or to the location of the Project which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the Project and to evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. Section 15126(d)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that the "discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or to its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly." As more particularly set forth in the Final EIR, the Project was compared to the following alternatives: (1) a "no project" alternative; (2) a modified Project Area boundary; (3) a modified list of Project Area redevelopment actions and/or modified allocation of redevelopment funds to the various actions; (4) an alternative Project Area location; and (5) the Project incorporating the mitigation measures listed in the Final EIR. The following discussion briefly summarizes the listed alternatives. 14 Exhibit A No Project Alternative: Under the No Project alternative, the Redevelopment Plan would not be adopted. No actions would be taken by the Lodi Redevelopment Agency to remove blighting conditions and stimulate additional private investment in the proposed Project Area. No Redevelopment Agency funding would be provided towards housing assistance in the Project Area, and no Redevelopment Agency actions would be taken to fund infrastructure and facility improvements, or to redevelop property. Although it is not possible to quantify the exact level of public and private development that would occur in the proposed Project Area under the No Project alternative, it is reasonable to assume that, with no Redevelopment Agency activity in the Project Area to fund public improvements and to attract an increased level of private investment, existing blighting conditions would remain or worsen. The No Project Alternative is not a viable alternative because it will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area. Modified Project Boundary Alternative: This alternative would be similar to the proposed project in terms of allocation of funding, but would involve either a reduced area boundary or an enlarged area boundary. Under the reduced area boundary, the overall effectiveness of the redevelopment program would be lessened, since selected activities would have to be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the reduced tax increment revenues accruable to the Redevelopment Agency. If the reduced boundary alternative were selected, the extent of potential growth in the Project Area subject to redevelopment assistance and incentives would be reduced and a corresponding decrease in the land use, traffic, public services, visual, vegetation and wildlife, noise, air quality, and other impacts identified in the EIR could be anticipated. The reduced project area alternative will not effectively reduce and eliminate the blight existing throughout the Project Area and therefore is not a viable alternative. The enlarged area boundary alternative would not be a viable alternative under state redevelopment law. The proposed boundaries of the Project Area were carefully selected based on identification of areas that contain blighted conditions, could benefit from redevelopment activities, and could meet certain other redevelopment law parameters. A combination of blight and general urbanization conditions has not been identified outside the Project Area at the present time. Modified Redevelopment Activities: This alternative would include the same boundaries proposed by the project, but with a modified allocation of project -generated revenues to redevelopment activities within the Project Area. The modified allocation would increase the percentage of total project -related revenue for affordable housing from approximately 20 percent (as proposed in the Project) to approximately 35 percent, with the 15 percent difference taken from the public infrastructure improvement, site assembly and other components of the redevelopment program. Although this alternative would have some positive environmental effects, it would also reduce the beneficial land use compatibility effects of the project, reduce the rate of market rate housing and job growth, and decrease the funding available for storm drainage and flood control improvements, assistance for preservation and maintenance of historic resources, and development driven hazardous waste clean-up. This alternative could further result in a reduced overall level of physical rehabilitation in the proposed Project Area and an associated reduction in facilitation of blight elimination. Because this alternative will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, it is not a viable alternative. Alternative Proiect Area Location: This alternative examined the potential for the Project Area to be located on other sites. However, the boundaries of the proposed Project Area were precisely established based on the maximum area within which identified blighted is Exhibit A conditions currently occur, in combination with other urbanization parameters set forth in state redevelopment law. No additional areas are currently identified in the project vicinity that appear to meet redevelopment law criteria for blight. The fundamental purpose of the redevelopment project is to authorize activities and financing to enable the Redevelopment Agency to eliminate blighted conditions. Redevelopment Agency establishment of an alternative site for the Project Area would fail to attain the basic objectives of the proposed project. Therefore, this is not a viable alternative. Proiect Incorporating Mitigation Measures: This alternative consists of the Project as proposed with the incorporation of all mitigation measures recommended in the EIR. As stated above, the mitigation measures recommended in the EIR shall be incorporated into the Project. This is therefore the Project to be considered by the City Council and the Agency. This alternative effectively achieve the goals of the Redevelopment Project and would mitigate all environmental effects to a less than significant levels, except for long-term regional emissions of air pollutants, which is a significant and unavoidable effect. Finding: After consideration of all the alternatives, the Agency and City Council find that the Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures is the "environmentally superior, alternative since the proposed Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures most effectively achieves the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, and provides a funding source for the proposed public improvements which are necessary to alleviate existing blighting conditions in the Project Area. In addition, all potentially significant impacts identified in the Final EIR except for the long-term regional emissions have been eliminated or reduced to a less than significant level by incorporation of appropriate mitigation measures as part of the proposed Project. V. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS CEQA requires a public agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. As set forth in Part III hereof, the Agency and the City Council have determined that the only unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is the following: Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases. The Agency and the City Council find that the above -referenced unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is acceptable when balanced against its benefits. This finding is based on the following facts: The Project will serve a critical need, that being the elimination and prevention of the spread of blight and deterioration in the Project Area and the conservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed Project Area in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, the General Plan for the City of Lodi and local codes and ordinances. 2. The promotion of new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area will prevent the loss of and facilitate the capture of commercial sales activity. 16 Exhibit A 3. The Project will allow for the elimination of blight through abatement or code enforcement, rehabilitation and reconstruction, new development, and the assembly of parcels into more developable sites for more desirable uses. 4. The Project will result in the elimination or amelioration of certain environmental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular circulation systems, inadequate storm drainage systems, inadequate off-street parking, and other similar public improvement deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area. 5. New construction within the Project Area will result in an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. 6. Project implementation would result in the retention and expansion of businesses by means of redevelopment and rehabilitation activities and by encouraging and assisting in the cooperation and participation of owners, businesses, and public agencies in the revitalization of the Project Area. 7. Revitalized commercial and industrial development will result in the creation and development of local job opportunities and the preservation of the area's existing employment base. 8. Project implementation will strengthen the economic base of the Project Area and the City by installing needed site improvements and stimulating commercial, industrial, and residential development. 9. Project implementation will expand and improve the City's supply of affordable housing. 17 Exhibit A • EXHItsit ..1s-- � MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST--LODI REDEVELOPMENT PLAN June 7, 2002 The environmental mitigation measures listed in column two below have been Incorporated into the conditions of approval for the Lodi Redevelopment Plan in order to mitigate EIR-identified environmental impacts. A completed and signed chart will indicate that each mitigation requirement has been complied with, and that City and State monitoring requirements have been fulfilled with respect to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. IDENTIFIED IMPACT LAND USE AND VISUAL FACTORS Impact 4.1: Adverse Land Use Compatibility Impacts. In addition to beneficial land use compatibility effects, some project -facilitated land use changes within the Project Area could result in adverse land use compatibility impacts. Given the proximity of some existing, planned and anticipated residential uses in this area to existing and planned commercial and industrial areas, project -assisted intensification could introduce significant new land use conflicts among specific residential, commercial, and industrial developments (e.g., traffic, visual, light, noise, parking, odor and other conflicts). Such project -induced effects represent potentlaity signlf/eant adverse land use compatibility. Impact 4.2: Visual Impacts on Specific Streetscapes Within the Project Area. Portions of the industrial rail corridor and east industrial subareas have been Identified by City staff (see subsection 4.3.2) as anticipated Industrial development opportunity areas, and are largely visible from adjoining major through - routes (e.g., Cherokee Lane, Lockeford Street, Stockton Street, Pine Street and Lodi Avenue) and from adjoining residential neighborhoods and the downtown. Similarly, anticipated oommerdal development Intensification along Lodi Avenue West and the Cherokee Lane Corridor (see section 4.3.2) would be highly visible from those primary travel routes. The visual quality of future development In these t - impl. Entity . implementation Entity Page 1 RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Mitigation 4.1: During City review and prior to approval of individual development projects within the redevelopment area, emphasize the need to avoid significant new land use conflicts between non-residential and residential development, between sensitive new commercial uses and existing nuisance -prone commercial and Industrial uses, and between new nuisance prone commercial and industrial uses and sensitive existing commercial uses. During these review procedures and the formulation of conditions of approval, require assurances to City satisfaction of, (1) adequate land use separation, scale transition, and noise buffering; (2) creative siting of buildings to avoid conflicts; (3) adequate protecilons against tight, glare, and shadow impacts; (4) adequate odor control; (5) adequate offstreet parking provisions; (6) adequate and safe truck access and offstreet loading provisions; and (7) other common measures warranted to avoid such land use conflicts. Implementation of these measures would be expected to reduce potential land use compatibility Impacts to a less-than- slgniNcant level. mpl. type of Monitoring Timing i n fiction Re ui n e� Corridor, and East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane ippii- Corridor and Lodi Avenue West subareas shall be ants subject to particularly focused and detailed design )ity, ✓erify during plan 'rlor to any 'rdi- *Wk )idg. or idual irading tppll- City staff and the GRys Architectural Approval )ermit ants suffident to adequately protect and enhance the Mitigation 4.2: Through the City's currently- Illy. adopted development permit and design review idi- process, future development in the Industrial Rail idual Corridor, and East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane ippii- Corridor and Lodi Avenue West subareas shall be ants subject to particularly focused and detailed design review. Implement specific visual Impact mitigation guidelines set forth In the General Plan, ZQnina Ordinance, Downtown Development Standards and Guidelines and Central City Revitalization Pro ram that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the GRys Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are suffident to adequately protect and enhance the visual quality of these areas. In addition, applications for future new developments and Aonitorina and Md ledevelop- nent Agency rr City Verify during plan 2dorto any Lodi fiedc and design �Idc or Redevelop - review trading mens Agency )ermtt or City IMPS 116161 FEI RI MMCHT. 616 0 0 0 1- Impl. Entity s rmphmantaeon Entity Page 2 WP5116161FEIRI MMCHT.616 MONITORING /ERIFICATiON Impl. ype of Monitoring riming Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' kation Requlrements Verification Entity ilgnature Dote specific opportunity areas would directly affect the quality of these important city streetecapes. Without adequate design control, the project could facilitate new industrial or mixed- use%ornmercial development that could adversely affect the visual quality of these highly visible Industrial and mixed-use strestscapes, as well as the visual character surrounding neighborhoods, and of the central area as a whole. Such possible effects constitute a potentially signifleent.adverse visual Impact. Impact 4.3: Potential Impacts on the Visual ierify during plan Prior to any Lodi Character and Image of the Eastside residential development projects within the Indi- check and design bldg. or Redevelop - Residential Neighborhood. Although the eastside residential neighborhood, place special vidual review grading ment Agency Eastside neighborhood has been downzoned to emphasis on implementation of locational appli- permit or City preclude infiltration of additional multi -family strategies contained in the Central City cants development within predominantly single-family Revitalization Program to protect and improve the areas, some multi -family development would be visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. expected to occur along the edge of downtown. Encourage locations at the edge of the Such project-facilttated mum -family development neighborhood and require appropriate visual has the potential to add to Eastside buffering and scale transition between new multi - neighborhood visual deficiencies created by family structures and existing single-family existing, poorly designed, multi -family residential development, to the satisfaction of City staff and units. Project -facilitated new multi -family units the City's Architectural Approval Committee and would have the potential to clash visually with Planning Commission. This measure would the nelghborhood's older, predominantly single- reduce the impact to a lass-then.slgniBcant family residential character. Such an effect level. would represent a potentially significant adverse visual Impact POPULATION AND HOUSING Impact 5:1: Potential Jobs/Housing Balance Mitigatlon 5.1: Implement MINgations 6.1 and City stat Monitor traffic Annually Lodi Impacts. Project -facilitated development may C 2 pertaining t ✓plumes at Pine Redevelop - contribute to the existing jobsthousing imbalance is Street/Central Ave. ment Agency In Lodi (weighted towards jobs in comparison to transportation system and air ntersecdon: Install or City the County as a whole). The projected addition ipa o. )Ir 1 i n c f f • ee signal when of a substantially greater number of jobs than t f would reduce I one identified ivarrantad housing units in the Project Area would I in: 1- Impl. Entity s rmphmantaeon Entity Page 2 WP5116161FEIRI MMCHT.616 I - Imps. Entity. ImpWwtstion Entity Page 3 WP511616WEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date exacerbate this imbalance. Such an effect project -related incommuting increases to a less - would constitute a potentially slgnlllcent roan-signtllcant level. adverse Impact. TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING Impact 6-1: impact on Intersection Mitigation 6-1. Caltrans has established 11 City stall Monitor traffic Annually Lodi SignaliMlon Requirements. The added PM possible tests or `warrants' for determining volumes at Pine Redevelop - peak hour traffic due to the redevelopment whether Installation of a traffic signal should be Street/Central Ave, ment Agency related additional traffic would increase PM peak considered. These warrants each consider intersection; install or City hour volumes above Caltrans Signal Warrant different criteria such as peak hour traffic volume, signal when iii 1 criteria levels at the Pine Street(Central pedestrian volume, presence of school children, warranted Avenue all -way -stop intersection. Although and accident history. Usually, two or more projected PM peak hour operation at this "warrants' must be met before a signal is Intersection with the project would not exceed warranted. The fact that this EIR analysis LOS D, this signal warrant effect would indicates that Warrant #11 (related to peak hour represent a potentlelty significant impact. traffic volumes) would be met Indicates that a detailed signal warrant analysis covering all possible Caltrans warrants is appropriate. The City shall therefore monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine StreetlCentral Avenue Intersection, and when two or more Cattrans signal warrant criteria are met, shalt place the intersection on the City's priority list for signaiization. This measure would reduce this Impact to a less -than -significant level. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Impact 7.1-1: Anticipated Water Supply Mitigation 7.1-1. Implement the following two City Develop new Condition of Lodi Impacts. Additional development facilitated by City of Lodi General Plan Land Use and Growth and/or facilities as approval for Redevelop - or otherwise associated with implementation of Management Element policies: redevel. necessary; assess major new ment Agency the proposed redevelopment plan and agency established fees on development or City associated Increases in commercial activity, ■ The City shall develop new facilities, as staff new development projects employment, and residential population (see necessary, to serve new development In housing, population and employment increase accordance with the City's Water, estimates in section 5.3 of this EIR) would result Wastewater, and Drainage Master Plans. in corresponding increases In the demand for (Policy 1) water service. The City, as water purveyor. is prepared to provide the additional domestic ■ The City shall assess water, wastewater, and water necessary for anticipated additional drainage development fees on all new development in this area, including anticipated residential, commemk4 off ee and frtdustrlal project -facilitated commercial growth and development sufiident to fund required population increases, within the _City's existing systemwide improvements. (Policy 2) water entitlements and distribution systems. I - Imps. Entity. ImpWwtstion Entity Page 3 WP511616WEIRIMMCHT.616 • 1'. IrW. EMay ■ rmpkmentsdan Entity Page 4 WP5116161FEIRI UMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verificatlon Entity Signature Date However, while aquifers yield water readily to City and Redevelopment Agency implementation the City's wells, water table fluctuations due to of these two policies as project -facilitated basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty development takes place over the next 20 years regarding available water supply for the City's would ensure that project -related impacts on the future needs. Anticipated project -facilitated adequacy of City water sources would be reduced growth within the redevelopment area would to a less-than-stgntAcant level. therefore be Considered to have a potentially slgnfllcant Impact on water service. Impact 7.1.2: Water Distribution System Mitigation 7.1-2: As project-fadlitated City Implement water Condition of Lodi Inadequacies. The existing water distribution development takes place over the next 20 years, and/or distribution system approval for Redevelop - system may not be adequate to serve Implement remaining needed central area water Redevel Improvements as major new ment Agency anticipated new redevelopment-faciiftated distribution system improvements identified in Agency needed development or City development and intensification in the Project Chapter 8 of the City's Water Master Plan. Water staff projects Area. This potential deficiency represents a conservation should also be promoted as the potentially Significant impact Project Area redevelops. Implementation of these measures would reduce project -related water distribution impacts to a less-thensignirlcant level. Impact 7.2-1: Sewage Collection System Mitigation 7.2-1: Continue to implement the City Implement sewage Condition of Lodi Inadequacies. The existing wastewater central area sewage collection system and/or collection system approval for Redevelop - collection system serving the Project Area may improvements identified as needed in the City of Redevel improvements as major new ment Agency not be adequate to serve anticipated new Lodi General Plan, and the City's Sanitary Sewer Agency needed development or City development and intensification in the Project System Technical Report including the planned staff projects Area. This potential deficiency represents a Improvements to eastside neighborhood collection potentially signiRcant impact. system. Implementation of these measures over the next 20 years would reduce project wastewater collection system Impacts to a less - than significant level. Impact 7.3-1: Police Service Demand Mitigation 7.3-1: The Police Department shall Lodi Annual response Annual Lodi Impacts in Project Area. Plan -facilitated monitor the rate of additional police calls per year Police time monitoring monitoring; Redevelop - development and intensification within the associated with the Project Area and the Dept. reports; normal condition of ment Agency Project Area would increase demands for police adequacy of associated response times. As and City review of individual approval for or City service. The City of Lodi Police Department warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall staff discretionary project major new may require additional staffing or equipment to provide additional officers and facilities (funded applications projects serve these added demands. The proposed through the City's general fund). Following redevelopment plan would therefore have a established City procedures, the Police potentially significant Impact on police Department shall also review discretionary services. approvals for project-facilltated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Implementation of these measures would reduce the Impact to a less-Marr-elgnitleant level, 1'. IrW. EMay ■ rmpkmentsdan Entity Page 4 WP5116161FEIRI UMCHT.616 I - impt. Entity - Implamenlation Entity Page 5 WP511616IFEiMMMCHT.816 MONITORING VERIFICATIONImpl. IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 7.4-1: Fire Protection and Emergency Mitigation 7.4-1: The Fire Department shall Lodi Fire Annual fire call Annually Lodi Medical Service Demand Impacts In the monitor the rate of additional fire protection Dept. monitoring reports: Redevelop - Project Area. Project -facilitated development service calls per year associated with the Project normal review of ment Agency and intensification within the Project Area would Area and the adequacy of associated response individual or City Increase demands for fire protection and times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the discretionary project emergency medical services. Depending on the City shall provide additional firefighters and applications type of use, density, and occupancy of individual equipment (funded through the City's general project-fadlitated developments, the City of Lodi fund). Following established City procedures, the Fire Department may require additional staffing Fire Department shall also review discretionary or equipment to fleet Its fire protection goals. approvals for project -facilitated commercial and The proposed redevelopment plan may therefore residential development within the Project Area. have a potandally significant Impact on fire These measures would reduce the impact to a protection and emergency medical services. less-than-signH/cent level. Impact 7.5.1: School Service Demand Mitigation 7.5-1: The Lodi Redevelopment City Ensure all pass- Prior to final Lodi Impacts. Existing Lodi Unified School District Agency shall make the statutory pass-through and/or throughs and school project Redevelop- (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may payment of tax increment revenue to the LUSD Redevel fee payments have approval for ment Agency not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the and the San Joaquin County Office of Education Agency been made new projects or City additional school population generated by pursuant to Health and Safety Code section staff project -facilitated residential development. The 33607.5. In addition, the City of Lodi shall require project -related Increase in demand for school developers In the redevelopment area to pay service would therefore represent a potentially state -authorized school impact fees to the extent significant Impact. approved by the LUSD. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional Impact fees negotiated with the LUSD. These measures would be expected to enable the LUSD to fund school improvements necessary to accommodate students from project -facilitated development, reducing this impact to a less -than - significant level. Impact 7.6-1: Project Park Demand Impacts. Mitigation 7.6-1: Mitigation for Park Demand City . Verify parkland Prior to Lodi Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area Impacts. The City shall ensure that at least 1.83 and/or dedication or fee grading or Redevelop - are already operating at capacity. Project- acres of parkland is developed within or Redevel payment during pian building meat Agency facilitated development and intensification in the convenient to the Project Area. As project- Agency check permit or City Project Area would incrementally Increase the facilitated buildout takes place in the Project Area, staff demand for park and recreation services. As adequate corresponding park and recreation discussed In chapter 5 (Population, Housing, provisions shall be provided through required and Employment) of this EIR, it is estimated that dedication of land and/or in-ileu payment of CRY project-fadlitated development would generate adopted park and recreation fees. Implementation approximately 210 additional households in the of this measure would reduce this impact to less - Project Area. Based on the anticipated citywide than-slgnlRcant levels. year 2020 household size of 2.56 persons (see Table 5.2 in section 5.3), the 210 new households would generate a population increase of approximately 538 people. Based on the most recent City park acreage standard I - impt. Entity - Implamenlation Entity Page 5 WP511616IFEiMMMCHT.816 I - hnpL Entity a Implementation Entry Page 6 WP5116161 FE1191 MMCHT. 616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE impL Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date (3.4 acres per 1,000 persons), this new population increment would generate a demand for approximately 1.83 acres of additional parkland. Additional project -facilitated employment growth, estimated at 2,014 jobs by the year 2020, may also generate some additional demand for park and recreation services in the Project Area. Existing Project Area facilities do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate this additional demand. This project effect would therefore represent a significant impact. DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY Impact 8-1: Project -Related Erosion, Mitigation 8-1: The City shall require the City Verily during plan Prior to Lodi Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. applicant for each future project -facilitated and/or check and during grading Redevelop. Redevelopment program -facilitated building development requiring a discretionary approval to Redevel constructlon-period permit, and mem Agency construction and infrastructure Improvements in comply with all applicable state, regional and City Agency Inspections during or City the Project Area could further degrade water quality provisions and, for projects Involving staff grading downstream water quality. Associated factors the grading of more than five (5) acres: (a) file that may contribute to downstream water quality with the RWQCB a Notice of Intent to comply with problems include soil disturbance during the Statewide General Permit for Construction construction, new impervious surfaces created Activities, (b) prepare and Implement a project - with project -facilitated developments; and specific Slormwater Pollution Prevention Plan increased vehicle traffic, and herbicides, (including an erosion control plan) If grading is pesfickles, and fertilizers from new landscaping involved, (c) implement a monitoring, inspection, associated with project -facilitated development. and documentation program to assure the This combination of factors represents a effectiveness of control measures, (d) obtain or potentlelly s/gnif ent Impact comply with existing General Stormwater Discharge Permit(s) for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (e) comply with the NPDES Phase If Non -Point Discharge program. Implementation of these requirements would reduce this Impact to a less-thans/gnlHeani level. NOISE Impact 9-1: Project -Related Exposure of. Mitigation 9.1: Noise impacts can be reduced City Condition of During Lodi Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive through appropriate site planning (e.g., setbacks, andfor individual project Individual Redevelop - Environmental Noise. Project -facilitated noise -protected areas), construction of noise Redevel approval; verify project ment Agency intensification of and changes in land uses in barriers, and/or incorporation of noise Insulation Agency during plan check environ. or City the Project Area could expose additional people features into a project's design as specified in the staff; that any required review to noise levels exceeding acceptable levels--I.e.,Ciiy of Lodi General Plan. As part of the future indi- noise studies have to noise levels Identified in the Lodi General environmental review process for individual vldual been completed Pian as "conditionally acceptable; "normally projects, new developments facilitated by the appll- unacceptable" or "unacceptable" for the redevelopment pian shall be evaluated. Evaluate cants associated land use. Such new exposure each redevelopment facilitated discretionary NOW I - hnpL Entity a Implementation Entry Page 6 WP5116161 FE1191 MMCHT. 616 1 - Imp/ Entry - InVk wntation Entity Pap 7 WP5116161FE/RiMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION DENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE ImpL Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date 3ossibilities constitute a potentially signiflcant development application in the Project Area with impact respect to the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources such as SR 99, Cherokee Lane, Stockton Street, Lodi Avenue, Tokay Street, other arterial roadways. and/or the UPRR. Also, require noise assessments for all redevelopment -facilitated discretionary applications where noise-sensithre receptors are proposed in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, such as subareas 1, 3 and 4, and for noise -generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plan when proposed adjacent to noise -sensitive land uses. The results of the noise assessments and the measures identified to reduce noise levels shall be incorporated in the project plans sufficient to meet stipulated exterior and Interior noise level standards. All such evaluations shall be completed to City satisfaction by a qualified acoustical consultant. With implementation of measures identified throughout such evaluations to meet these standards, this potentially significant impact would be reduced to a less -than - significant level. Impact 9-2: Redevelopment -Facilitated Mitigation 9-2: To reduce the potential for noise City Condition of Condition of Lodi Construction Noise. Construction activities impacts resulting from project -facilitated and/or individual project constr. Redevelop - can generate considerable noise levels. construction activities, implement a combination of Redevel approval; verified (grading or ment Agency Construction activities facilitated by the the following measures at all construction sites Agency during construction building) or City redevelopment program could include site when noise -sensitive receptors are located in the staff; permit; verify. grading and preparation, building demolition, project vicinity. The combination of measures Indi- during construction of foundations and buildings, shall be evaluated on an Individual, project -by- vidual construction installation of utilities, paving of roadways, and project basis and shall be sufficient to achieve project construction of parking lots. The noise effects of compliance with applicable City General Plan appti- these future construction activities would depend and/or Noise Ordinance standards at affected cants upon the amount of activity, the type of receptors. equipment used, and the noise control measures used. Residential and other noise -sensitive Noise -generating construction activity shall uses located adjacent to project -facilitated be restricted to the hours of 7:00 AM to 7A0 constriction activities could therefore be PM, Monday through Friday, and 8:00 AM to exposed to noise levels that would Interfere with 5:00 PM on Saturdays. No construction normal activities. This possibility constitutes a activities should occur on Sundays or potentially s/gri t/eant impact holidays. • All internal combustion engine driven equipment shall be equipped with Intake and exhaust mufflers that are In good condition and appropriate for the equipment. 1 - Imp/ Entry - InVk wntation Entity Pap 7 WP5116161FE/RiMMCHT.616 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date ■ Stationary noise -generating equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a construction Project Area. ■ All construction traffic to and from the project site shall be routed via designated truck routes where possible. Construction -related heavy truck traffic in residential areas shall be prohibited where feasible. a "Quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources shall be used where technology exists. • A "noise disturbance coordinator" shall be designated who would be responsible for responding to arty local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator would determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and would require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site and Included In the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule. (The City should be responsible for designating a noise disturbance coordinator and the individual project sponsor should be responsible for posting the phone number and providing construction schedule. notices). Implementation of this measure would reduce the potential for project -related Impacts due to construction noise to a less-than-sign(flcant I level. 1 - Impl. Entity a ImplsmerMa lon Entity nage a WP5116161FE/RIMMCHT.616 0 0 0 1 - Impl. Entity - Implamantatron Entity Page 9 WP5116161 FEIRIMMCNT .616 MONITORING VERIFICATION Imps. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date AIR QUALITY Impact 10-1: Construction Activity Air Mitigation 10-1: The City shall require that City Condition of Condition of . Lodi Quality Impacts. Construction activities individual redevelopment-facllitated projects within and/or individual project grading Redeveiop- facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan the Project Area Involving new construction shall Redevel approvals; verified permit; verify ment Agency could generate construction period exhaust comply, where applicable, with current Agency during grading during or City emissions and fugitive dust that could affect SJVUAPCD Regulation VIII requirements, which staff. construction local air quality. In addition, buildings currently include the following: indi- constructed prior to 1979 could have Asbestos Adual Containing Materials (ACMs), which could be Appropriate dust suppression for land project released into the air during building demolition. clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land appli- Such construction -period air emissions leveling, grading, cut and fill and demolition cants possibilities represent a potentially signNlcant activities, such as the effective application of Impact water or pre-soaking; ■ Effective stabilization of all disturbed areas of a construction site, including storage piles, which are not being actively used for seven or more days; • Control of fugitive dust from on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access.roads; and • Removal of accumulations of mud or dirt at the end of the work day or once every 24 hours from public paved roads, shoulders and access ways adjacent to the site, for the duration of the activity. Regulation Vill also requires a Dust Control plan for construction activity that will include 40 acres or more of disturbed surface area, or will include moving more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials on at least three days. In addition, where appropriate, the City may also wish to require the following: • A limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to IS miles per hour (mph); • installatkm of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all tricks and equipment leaving the site; 1 - Impl. Entity - Implamantatron Entity Page 9 WP5116161 FEIRIMMCNT .616 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE mpl. Type of Monitoring riming I Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity` Action l isquirements I verification Entity ftneture l Date Impact 10-2: Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases. Emissions resulting from new vehicle trips generated by redevelopment - facilitated Intensification in the Project Area would, by the year 2020, be expected to exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ, resulting in a s/gnMant pmlect impact When this Increase in "mobile emissions" is considered cumulatively with possible new industrial "stationary sources" of emissions that could locate within the redevelopment area, the total of project -related Indirect and direct emissions would also exceed applicable significance thresholds. As a remit, the project would also be expected to contribute to a signlllcant cumulative impact. 1 - lmpt Ernity. ImplsmU tion Entay Page 10 ■ Suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 mph; and/or • A limitation on she size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. Prior to each the start of constnrction, the applicant shall submit a dust confrof plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD- and City -required control measures. ■ Employment -generating development projects of 10,000 square feet (approximately 25 employees) or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and showemocker facilities for employees. Condition of project approvals: verity through annual reporting regmnts .odi 4edevelop- nent Agency )r City WP5116161 FEIRI MMCHT.616 I MNIVUon 10-2: The following emissions control 'My Condition of strategies shall be applied to redevelopmentmd/or , Individual project program -facilitated development activities within 9edevel. approvals, Ind. the Project Area: kgency annual reporting math, requirements • Where practical, future development ndt- proposals shall include physical ddual Improvements, such as sidewalk )roject improvements, landscaping, fighting and the tppli- installation of bus shelters and bicycle :ants parking, that would act as incentives for pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of travel. ■ Employment -generating development projects of 10,000 square feet (approximately 25 employees) or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and showemocker facilities for employees. Condition of project approvals: verity through annual reporting regmnts .odi 4edevelop- nent Agency )r City WP5116161 FEIRI MMCHT.616 1 - Impi. Entity . impletrtemalltnt F.rttity Page I WP5116161FE/RIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Data • Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpoollvanpool incentives, develop an employee rideshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. Implementation of these measures would assist in reducing identified project and cumulative Impacts on long-term regional emissions levels. The URBEMIS7G program estimates that the above measures would reduce regional indirect emissions by five to seven percent. This reduction would not reduce this Impact to a less - than -significant level even in the absence of potential Industrial emissions. Since no other feasible measures are available, these identified project and cumulative effects on regional air emissions would represent a significant unavoidable impact. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Impact 11-1: Potential Loss of Special -Status Mitigation 11-1: If disturbance to suitable giant City Require completion During Lodi Species. Although chances of encountering garter snake habitat (I.e., drainage ditches) is and/or of giant garter snake individ. Redevelop - special -status species in the Project Area are proposed as part of a redevelopment -assisted Redevel survey if existing project ment Agency low, redevelopment -facilitated development individual development or improvement project, Agency drainage ditch will environ. or City consistent with the adopted City of Lodi General systematic surveys shall be conducted before staff; be affected by review; prior Plan may result in impacts on special status such a development Is approved in order to indi- project; ensure to grading spades. This possibility represents a determine definitively whether any giant garter vidual implementation of permit potentially significant impact snakes occur. Such surveys shall be conducted project mitigation plan and issuance by a qualified wildlife biologist or a herpetologist appli- coordination with following applicable guidelines of the California cants jurls. agencies Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) and/or (USACOE. USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to and/or CDFG) If provide a conclusive determination on presence or habitat affected absence of this animal specie. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the CDFG and USFWS, and in compliance with specifications of the SJMSCP, section 52.4.8. Implementation of this measure would ensure protection of possible populations of special -status animal species (i.e., giant garter snake) in the Project Area, mitigating potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. 1 - Impi. Entity . impletrtemalltnt F.rttity Page I WP5116161FE/RIMMCHT.616 • • v C pp O L 1p Croy E t u g d O mcff o~ A ro 8 CL w my c� a m= r� w c Z•5— a— mg•O >b. >� Om3aav3m��8E CL C -00 E U WccQ w S•5 aro 6 c 0 96.6;.w LDv 0 Cc 0 15R �� ro C.$ m•s m� �e� m � m a E•� E c ii°DE 3 cicr Naa ro c� and m oL aE o U CO v o o" EE�EEm�mr �cC`�mow �Ip ro tll m r � m N 72 a3g� �5 8Vo cE ^cY z _ � Nror WC� mm9C Se -g is—a 'S7 W d m O1 em d� E� gCrm8Ac C m 3 h N S O 5 •s m m. m ro W Q ro m m 82 S�� •O t oim�� a- E a0 «, > ro N O . EDrLiw- `ro E E CL L° E 0 0 o� € c �m' E E�,ro N 0 E aE a �mQE�i� Z O iscro $� RccE F v 5 a °a � w m mr £oaa8-=� > NT S 'O C m C, O m Q 0 'co r > $ U m ! Q E o m E 0 cm c c � c • • v C pp O L 1p Croy E t u g d O mcff o~ A ro 8 CL w my c� a m= r� w c Z•5— a— mg•O >b. >� Om3aav3m��8E CL C -00 E U WccQ w S•5 aro 6 c 0 96.6;.w LDv 0 Cc 0 15R �� ro C.$ m•s m� �e� m � m a E•� E c ii°DE 3 cicr Naa ro c� and m oL aE o U CO v o o" EE�EEm�mr �cC`�mow �Ip ro tll m r � m N 72 a3g� �5 8Vo cE ^cY z _ � Nror WC� mm9C Se -g is—a 'S7 W d m O1 em d� E� gCrm8Ac C m 3 h N S O 5 •s m m. m ro W Q ro m m 82 S�� •O t oim�� a- E a0 «, > ro N O . EDrLiw- `ro E E CL L° E 0 0 o� € c �m' E 5 E�,ro N E aE a �mQE�i� W iscro $� RccE FE W 5 a °a me U mr £oaa8-=� 5 • • IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE mpl. Type of Monitoring tming I lonitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVALI Srdity' Action lequircments I erification Entity Impact 12.2: Destruction/Degradation of Historic Resources. Project -facilitated development in the Project Area has the potential to destroy or substantially degrade historic resources, if these resources are not Identified or recognized and their maintenance, rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not promoted. Such destructlon or degradation would be considered a potentially significant Impact. 1 - Imps. Entgy a Impbmantation Entity Page 13 Mitigation 12-2: Evaluate all future project - assisted public Improvement projects and private development projects for the presence of, and potential Impacts on, historic resources. If disturbance of a Project Area historic resource cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be Implemented. The City and private sponsors of future individual projects on sites that contain unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a qualified professional architectural historian prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project-facifitated development. Implementation of these measures would reduce this potential Impact to a less -than• significant level. :fly ind/or ►gency ,taff; ndi- Idual rcoject Ippii- :ants During environ. review for individ. projects, ensure that any affected historical resources have been Identified and mitigation program Implemented as appropriate Irior to pproval of Irading or iuilding iermit ods ledevelop- tent Agency ,r City s FERIFICATION signature Date WP511616I FEI RI MMCHT. 616 AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. RDA2002-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING, IMPROVING, AND PRESERVING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW- AND MODERATE -INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") which would result in the allocation of taxes from the Project Area to the Agency for the purposes of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) requires that not less than twenty percent (20%) of all taxes so allocated be used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2(g) of the Community Redevelopment Law provides that the Agency may use such funds outside the Project Area if a finding is made by resolution of the Agency and the City Council that such use will be of benefit to the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LODI DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that the use of taxes allocated from the Project Area for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. Dated: June 19, 2002 I hereby certify that Resolution No. RDA2002-06 was passed and adopted by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: MEMBERS — Howard, Land, and Mayor Pennino NOES: MEMBERS — Nakanishi ABSENT: MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: MEMBERS — Hitchcock PHILLIP A. P NINO Chairperson Attest: SUSAN J. BLACKS ON Secretary RDA2002-06 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI CONSIDERING AND MAKING FINDINGS AS TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1; ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN WHEREAS, as the Lead Agency, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared an Environmental Impact Report (the "EIR") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project") pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as "CEQA:'), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the "State CEQA Guidelines"), and procedures adopted by the Agency relating to environmental evaluation; and WHEREAS, the Agency transmitted for filing a Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR and thereafter in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines forwarded the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse for distribution to those state agencies which have discretionary approval or jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the Redevelopment Plan, to the affected taxing agencies, and to other interested persons and agencies and sought the comments of such persons and agencies; and WHEREAS, notice to all interested persons and agencies inviting comments on the Draft EIR was published in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Draft EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to adopt changes suggested, to incorporate comments received during the public review period pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and to incorporate the Agency's responses to said comments, and as so revised and supplemented, a Final EIR was prepared by the Agency; and WHEREAS, a joint public hearing was held by the Agency and the City Council of the City of Lodi (the "City Council") on June 19, 2002, on the Redevelopment Plan and the Final EIR, following notice duly and regularly given as required by law, and all interested persons expressing a desire to comment thereon or object thereto have been heard, and said Final EIR and all comments and responses thereto have been considered; and WHEREAS, the Final EIR consists of the Draft EIR, as revised and supplemented to incorporate all comments received and the responses of the Agency thereto, and is part of the Agency's Report to the City Council on the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Lodi is a Responsible Agency, as defined in Section 21069 of the Public Resources Code, with respect to the Redevelopment Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has evaluated all comments, written and oral, received from persons who have reviewed the Final EIR and has duly reviewed and considered the Final EIR prepared and certified by the Agency prior to adopting this resolution and acting on the Redevelopment Plan. Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations relating to the environmental impact of the Redevelopment Plan for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (including, without limitation, the mitigation measures therein set forth). Based upon such Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, the City Council hereby finds that all significant environmental effects have been eliminated or substantially lessened except the following unavoidable adverse impacts: (1) Long Term Regional Emissions Increases. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council finds and determines that the Redevelopment Plan will have a significant effect upon the environment but that the benefits of the Redevelopment Plan outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts for the reasons set forth in the Statement of Findings, Facts, and Overriding Considerations, in particular, Part V thereof. Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Plan set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Upon approval and adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council, the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Joaquin pursuant to the provisions of Section 21152 of CEQA and Section 15096(i) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Dated: June 19, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002-131 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Howard, Land, Nakanishi, and Mayor Pennino NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock SUSAN J. BLACKSTON City Clerk 2002-131 MAS/ CCResoEIRFndgs 2 10/2/01 EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF FINDINGS, FACTS, AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., "CEQA") provides, in Section 21081, that: "[N]o public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless both of the following occur: "(a) The public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: "(1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. "(2) Those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. "(3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. "(b) With respect to significant effects which were subject to a finding under paragraph (3) of subdivision (a), the public agency finds that specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment." As defined in CEQA, "'significant effect on the environment' means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment." (Public Resources Code Section 21068.) II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT PROPOSED FOR APPROVAL For purposes of CEQA, the "project" addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") is the adoption and phased implementation of the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project"). As more particularly identified in the Final EIR, the Project Area covers approximately 1,184 acres of land within the City of Lodi, including commercial, industrial, parks, residential and public right of way Exhibit A land uses. Under the Redevelopment Plan, the Project would be developed in accordance with the land uses designated and permitted by the General Plan for the City of Lodi. The Final EIR describes the environmental impacts that may occur as a result of the adoption and phased implementation of the Redevelopment Plan and identifies, where applicable, measures which would mitigate significant effects on the environment to a level of insignificance. Findings regarding the significant effects of the Project are set forth below. III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT; FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT This Part III identifies the potentially significant and unavoidably significant effects of the Project as determined by the Agency, including the findings and facts supporting the findings in connection therewith. The Final EIR discussed Hazardous Materials but no impacts were anticipated. The following areas were discussed in the Final EIR and include mitigation measures that are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan or are unavoidably significant effects on the Project: A. Land Use and Visual Factors 1. Environmentallmpact Adverse Land Use Compatibility Impacts. Some project - facilitated land use changes within the Project Area could result in adverse land use compatibility impacts. Given the proximity of some existing, planned and anticipated residential uses in the Project Area to existing and planned commercial and industrial areas, project -assisted development could introduce significant new land use conflicts among specific residential, commercial and industrial developments. Finding: The mitigation feasible and shall be required The mitigation measures will significant" level. measures identified below are in or incorporated into the Project. reduce the impact to a 'less than Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) During City review and prior to approval of individual projects within the Project Area, emphasize the need to avoid significant new land use conflicts between non-residential and residential development, between sensitive new commercial uses and existing nuisance -prone commercial and industrial uses, and between new nuisance prone commercial and industrial uses and sensitive existing commercial uses. (b) During review procedures and the formulation of conditions of approval, require assurances to City satisfaction of: (1) adequate land use separation, scale transition, and noise buffering; (2) creative siting of buildings to avoid conflicts; (3) Exhibit A adequate protections against light, glare, and shadow impacts; (4) adequate odor control; (5) adequate offstreet parking provisions; (6)' adequate and safe truck access and offstreet loading provisions; and (7) other common measures warranted to avoid such land use conflicts. 2. Environmentallmpact Visual Impacts on Specific Streetscapes Within the Proiect Area. The visual quality of future development in specific opportunity areas within the Project Area would directly affect the quality of important city streetscapes. Without adequate design control, the Project could facilitate new industrial or mixed- use/commercial development that could adversely affect the visual quality of these highly visible industrial and mixed-use streetscapes, as well as the visual character of surrounding neighborhoods, and of the central area as a whole. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Through the City's currently adopted development permit and design review process, future development in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall be subject to particularly focused and detailed design review. Implement specific visual impact mitigation guidelines set forth in the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Development Standards and Guidelines and Central City Revitalization Program in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately protect and enhance the visual quality of these areas. (b) Applications for future development and property improvements that are subject to discretionary approval in the Industrial Rail Corridor, East Industrial Area, Cherokee Lane Corridor and Lodi West subareas, as designated in the EIR, shall incorporate the appropriate combination of specific design guidelines listed in section 4.3 of the EIR in a manner that, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission, are sufficient to adequately reduce project related visual impacts on streets, residential neighborhoods, and the central area as a whole. Exhibit A B. 3. Environmentallmpact Potential Impacts on Visual Character and Image of Eastside Residential Neighborhood. Project facilitated new multi -family development built in the Eastside neighborhood would have the potential to clash visually with the neighborhood's older, predominantly single-family residential character. Finding: The mitigation measure identified below is feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measure will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In review and processing of residential development projects within the Eastside residential neighborhood, place special emphasis on implementation of locational strategy contained in the Central City Revitalization Program to protect and improve the visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. Encourage locations at the edge of the neighborhood and require appropriate visual buffering and scale transition between new multi -family structures and existing single-family development, to the satisfaction of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval Committee and Planning Commission. Population. Housing and Employment 1. Environmental Impact Potential Jobs/Housing Balance Impacts. Project -facilitated development and the projected addition of a substantially greater number of jobs than housing units in the Project Area may exacerbate the existing jobs/housing imbalance (weighted towards jobs in comparison to the County as a whole). Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implementation of mitigation measures identified below in Section III.C.1 of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations pertaining to project -related commute period vehicular traffic increases and associated project and cumulative transportation system impacts. Exhibit A C. 0 Transportation and Parking 1. Environmental Impact Impact on Intersection Signalization Requirements. Additional redevelopment related traffic would increase PM peak hour traffic volumes at the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection above criteria levels set by Caltrans to determine whether installation of a traffic signal is warranted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Caltrans has established eleven possible tests, or "warrants", for determining whether installation of a traffic signal should be considered. Usually, two or more of these must be met before a signal is warranted. The EIR analysis indicates that only the warrant related to peak hour traffic volume would be met for the Pine Street/Central Avenue intersection. The City shall monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine Street -Central Avenue intersection, and when two or more Caltrans signal warrant criteria are met, shall place the intersection on the City's priority list for signalization. Infrastructure and Public Facilities Environmental Impact Anticipated Water Supply Impacts. Anticipated increases in commercial activity, employment and residential population associated with the Project would result in corresponding increases in the demand for water service. The City is prepared to provide the additional domestic water necessary for anticipated additional development in the Project Area, but water table fluctuations due to basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty regarding available water supply for the City's future needs. Finding: The mitigation and shall be required in mitigation measures will significant level. Exhibit A measures identified below are feasible or incorporated into the Project. The reduce the impact to a less than 2. 3. Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measure is incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Implement the City of Lodi General Plan Land Use and Growth Management Element policies which require the City to (1) develop new facilities, as necessary, to serve new develop in accordance with the City's Water, Wastewater and Drainage Master Plans, and (2) assess water, wastewater and drainage development fees on all new residential, commercial, office and industrial development sufficient to fund required systemwide improvements. Environmental Impact Water Distribution System Inadequacies. The existing water distribution system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: As project facilitated development takes place over the next 20 years, implement remaining needed central area water distribution system improvements identified in Chapter 8 of the City's Water Master Plan. Water conservation should also be promoted as the Project Area redevelops. Environmental Impact Sewage Collection System Inadequacies. The existing wastewater collection system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Continue to implement the central area sewage collection system improvements identified as needed in the City of Lodi General Exhibit A 4. 5. Plan, and the City's Sanitary Sewer System Technical Report, including planned improvements to the Eastside neighborhood collection system. Environmental Impact Police Service Demand in Project Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for police services in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Police Department shall monitor the rate of additional police calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional officers and facilities (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Police Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Environmental Impact Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service Demand in Project Area. Project -facilitated development and intensification within the Project Area would increase demands for fire protection and emergency medical services in the Project Area. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: Fire Department shall monitor the rate of additional fire protection service calls per year associated with the Project Area and the adequacy of associated response times. If warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall provide additional firefighters and equipment (funded through the City's general fund). Following established City procedures, the Fire Department shall also review discretionary approvals for project -facilitated commercial and residential development within the Project Area. Exhibit A 6. rA Environmental Impact School Service Demand. Existing Lodi Unified School District (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the additional school population generated by project -facilitated residential development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Redevelopment Agency shall make the statutory pass- through payment of tax increment revenue to the LUSD and the San Joaquin County Office of Education pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 33607.5. (b) City shall require developers in the Project Area to pay state authorized school impact fees to the extent approved by the LUSD. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional impact fees negotiated with LUSD. Environmental Impact Project Park Demand. Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area are already operating at capacity. Project -facilitated development and intensification in the Project Area would incrementally increase the demand for park and recreation services. Based on estimated population increase in the Project Area, the City will need approximately 1.83 acres of additional park land to meet the increased demand. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall ensure that at least 1.83 acres of parkland is developed within or convenient to the Project Area. As project -facilitated build -out takes place in the Project Area, adequate corresponding park and recreation provisions shall be provided through required Exhibit A E. F. dedication of land and/or in -lieu payment of City adopted park and recreation fees. Drainage and Water Quality 1. Environmental Impact Erosion. Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. Building construction and infrastructure improvements in the Project Area could further degrade downstream water quality. Factors contributing to downstream water quality problems include soil disturbance during construction, new impervious surfaces created with project -facilitated developments, increased vehicle traffic, and herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers from new landscaping associated with project -facilitated development. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a less than significant level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) City shall require applicants for each future project - facilitated development requiring a discretionary approval to comply with all applicable state, regional and City water quality provisions. (b) For projects involving the grading of more than five acres, applicant shall be required to (1) file with the Regional Water Quality Control Board a Notice of Intent to comply with the Statewide General Permit for Construction Activities, (2) prepare and implement a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (including erosion control plan) if grading is involved, (3) implement a monitoring, inspection and documentation program to assure the effectiveness of control measures, (4) obtain or comply with existing General Stormwater Discharge Permits for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (5) comply with the NPDES Phase 11 Non -Point Discharge program. Noise 1. Environmentallmpact Exposure of Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive Environmental Noise Project facilitated intensification of and changes in land uses in the Exhibit A 2. Project Area could expose additional people to noise levels exceeding acceptable levels. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Noise impacts can be reduced through appropriate site planning, construction of noise barriers, and/or incorporation of noise insulation features into a project's design as specified in the City of Lodi General Plan. Evaluate the impact of each redevelopment -facilitated discretionary development application in the Project Area on the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources. (b) Require noise assessments for all redevelopment - facilitated discretionary applications in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, and for noise -generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plan when proposed adjacent to noise sensitive land uses. Environmental Impact Redevelopment Facilitated Construction Noise. Residential and other noise -sensitive uses located adjacent to project -facilitated construction activities could be exposed to noise levels that would interfere with normal activities. Findin : The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require the use of a combination of the following reasonable construction practices for projects when noise - sensitive receptors are located in the project vicinity, including restricting construction to avoid noise generating activity in the early morning, evening, and on Sundays and holidays, muffling and properly maintaining all internal combustion engine driven equipment, locating stationary noise -generating equipment as far as possible from sensitive receptors, routing construction traffic to and from the project site via designated truck routes, utilizing io Exhibit A "quiet" air compressors and other stationary noise sources where such technology exists, and designation of a "noise disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. G. Air Quality 1. Environmentallmpact Construction Activity Air Quality Construction activities facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan could generate construction period exhaust emissions and fugitive dust that could affect local air quality. In addition, buildings constructed. prior to 1979 could have Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) which could be released into the air during building demolition. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a "less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: City shall require that individual redevelopment -facilitated projects involving new construction shall comply, where applicable, with the current San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ("SJVUAPCD") Regulation VIII requirements. In addition, the City may also require a limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site, suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 miles per hour, and/or a limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avoid excessive dust. To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMs. Prior to the start of construction, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD and City required control measures. 2. Environmental Impact Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases Emissions resulting from new vehicle trips generated by redevelopment facilitated intensification in the Project Area would, by the year 2020, generate Reactive Organic Gases and Nitrogen Oxides in ii Exhibit A H. amounts that would exceed the applicable thresholds of significance for each pollutant. These emissions would constitute a significant project impact and would be expected to contribute to a significant cumulative impact. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. Notwithstanding incorporation of these mitigation measures, the Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases are an unavoidable significant effect. Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project make the alternatives infeasible and outweigh this significant effect. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: (a) Where practical, future development proposals shall include physical improvements that would act as incentives for pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes of travel. (b) Employment -generating development projects of 10,000 square feet or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and shower/locker facilities for employees. (c) Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpool/vanpool incentives, develop an employee rideshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. The specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project are more particularly described in the Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Part V of this Statement of Findings, Facts and Overriding Considerations. Vegetation and Wildlife Environmental Impact Potential Loss of Special -Status Species Redevelopment - facilitated development consistent with the City of Lodi General Plan may result in impacts on special status species. Finding: The mitigation and shall be required in mitigation measures will significant" level. iz Exhibit A measures identified below are feasible or incorporated into the Project. The reduce the impact to a 'less than 2. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: If disturbance to suitable giant garter snake habitat is proposed as part of a redevelopment assisted development or improvement project, systematic surveys shall be conducted before such a development is approved in order to determine definitively whether any giant garter snakes occur. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and in compliance with specifications of section 5.2.4.8 of the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Plan. Environmental Impact Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts Redevelopment -facilitated development could affect potential jurisdictional wetland habitat. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All redevelopment -facilitated development that would involve modifications to potential wetlands and other waters, such as seasonal wetlands that could be present in vacant or under used parcels, shall be coordinated with representatives of the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, as required by federal and state law, to ensure that any required mitigation protocols and associated project design modifications are incorporated into proposed improvement plans during the initial stages of project review. Cultural and Historic Resources 1. Environmental Impact Proiect-Related Potentials for Disturbance of Archaeological Resources Development encouraged and improvements funded by the proposed redevelopment program could disturb sensitive archaeological resources in the Project Area. 13 Exhibit A 2. Findin : The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: In the event that subsurface cultural resources are encountered during approved ground -disturbing activities for a redevelopment program -related construction activity, work in the immediate vicinity shall be stopped and a qualified archaeologist retained to evaluate the find. The discovery or disturbance of any cultural resources should also be reported to the Central California Information Center, and if prehistoric, to the Native American Heritage Commission. Identified cultural resources should be recorded on a State Department of Parks and Recreation Form 422. Mitigation measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. Environmental Impact Destruction/Degradation of Historic Resources Project - facilitated development in the Project Area has the potential to destroy or substantially. degrade historic resources, if these resources are not identified or recognized and their maintenance, rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not promoted. Finding: The mitigation measures identified below are feasible and shall be required in or incorporated into the Project. The mitigation measures will reduce the impact to a 'less than significant" level. Facts in Support of the Finding: The following mitigation measures are incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan: All future redevelopment -assisted public improvement projects and private development projects shall be evaluated for the presence of and potential impacts on historic resources. If disturbance of a historic resource cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be implemented. The City and private sponsors of future individual projects on sites that contain unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a qualified professional architectural historian prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. 14 Exhibit A Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project -facilitated development. IV. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROJECT CEQA requires that an EIR describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project or to the location of the Project which could feasibly attain the basic objectives of the Project and to evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. Section 15126(d)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that the "discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or to its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or would be more costly." As more particularly set forth in the Final EIR, the Project was compared to the following alternatives: (1) a "no project' alternative; (2) a modified Project Area boundary; (3) a modified list of Project Area redevelopment actions and/or modified allocation of redevelopment funds to the various actions; (4) an alternative Project Area location; and (5) the Project incorporating the mitigation measures listed in the Final EIR. The following discussion briefly summarizes the listed alternatives. No Proiect Alternative: Under the No Project alternative, the Redevelopment Plan would not be adopted. No actions would be taken by the Lodi Redevelopment Agency to remove blighting conditions and stimulate additional private investment in the proposed Project Area. No Redevelopment Agency funding would be provided towards housing assistance in the Project Area, and no Redevelopment Agency actions would be taken to fund infrastructure and facility improvements, or to redevelop property. Although it is not possible to quantify the exact level of public and private development that would occur in the proposed Project Area under the No Project alternative, it is reasonable to assume that, with no Redevelopment Agency activity in the Project Area to fund public improvements and to attract an increased level of private investment, existing blighting conditions would remain or worsen. The No Project Alternative is not a viable alternative because it will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area. Modified Project Boundary Alternative: This alternative would be similar to the proposed project in terms of allocation of funding, but would involve either a reduced area boundary or an enlarged area boundary. Under the reduced area boundary, the overall effectiveness of the redevelopment program would be lessened, since selected activities would have to be reduced or eliminated to compensate for the reduced tax increment revenues accruable to the Redevelopment Agency. If the reduced boundary alternative were selected, the extent of potential growth in the Project Area subject to redevelopment assistance and incentives would be reduced and a corresponding decrease in the land use, traffic, public services, visual, vegetation and wildlife, noise, air quality, and other impacts identified in the EIR could be anticipated. The reduced project area alternative will not effectively reduce and eliminate the blight existing throughout the Project Area and therefore is not a viable alternative. The enlarged area boundary alternative would not be a viable alternative under state redevelopment law. The proposed boundaries of the Project Area were carefully selected 15 Exhibit A based on identification of areas that contain blighted conditions, could benefit from redevelopment activities, and could meet certain other redevelopment law parameters. A combination of blight and general urbanization conditions has not been identified outside the Project Area at the present time. Modified Redevelopment Activities: This alternative would include the same boundaries proposed by the project, but with a modified allocation of project -generated revenues to redevelopment activities within the Project Area. The modified allocation would increase the percentage of total project -related revenue for affordable housing from approximately 20 percent (as proposed in the Project) to approximately 35 percent, with the 15 percent difference taken from the public infrastructure improvement, site assembly and other components of the redevelopment program. Although this alternative would have some positive environmental effects, it would also reduce the beneficial land use compatibility effects of the project, reduce the rate of market rate housing and job growth, and decrease the funding available for storm drainage and flood control improvements, assistance for preservation and maintenance of historic resources, and development driven hazardous waste clean-up. This alternative could further result in a reduced overall level of physical rehabilitation in the proposed Project Area and an associated reduction in facilitation of blight elimination. Because this alternative will not meet the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, it is not a viable alternative. Alternative Project Area Location: This alternative examined the potential for the Project Area to be located on other sites. However, the boundaries of the proposed Project Area were precisely established based on the maximum area within which identified blighted conditions currently occur, in combination with other urbanization parameters set forth in state redevelopment law. No additional areas are currently identified in the project vicinity that appear to meet redevelopment law criteria for blight. The fundamental purpose of the redevelopment project is to authorize activities and financing to enable the Redevelopment Agency to eliminate blighted conditions. Redevelopment Agency establishment of an alternative site for the Project Area would fail to attain the basic objectives of the proposed project. Therefore, this is not a viable alternative. Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures: This alternative consists of the Project as proposed with the incorporation of all mitigation measures recommended in the EIR. As stated above, the mitigation measures recommended in the EIR shall be incorporated into the Project. This is therefore the Project to be considered by the City Council and the Agency. This alternative effectively achieve the goals of the Redevelopment Project and would mitigate all environmental effects to a less than significant levels, except for long-term regional emissions of air pollutants, which is a significant and unavoidable effect. Finding: After consideration of all the alternatives, the Agency and City Council find that the Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures is the "environmentally superior" alternative since the proposed Project Incorporating Mitigation Measures most effectively achieves the basic goal of eliminating and removing blight in the Project Area, and provides a funding source for the proposed public improvements which are necessary to alleviate existing blighting conditions in the Project Area. In addition, all potentially significant impacts identified in the Final EIR except for the long-term regional emissions have been eliminated or reduced to a less than significant level by incorporation of appropriate mitigation measures as part of the proposed Project. 16 Exhibit A V. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS CEQA requires a public agency to balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. As set forth in Part III hereof, the Agency and the City Council have determined that the only unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is the following: 1. Long -Term Regional Emissions Increases. The Agency and the City Council find that the above -referenced unavoidable environmental consequence of the Project is acceptable when balanced against its benefits. This finding is based on the following facts: 1. The Project will serve a critical need, that being the elimination and prevention of the spread of blight and deterioration in the Project Area and the conservation, rehabilitation and redevelopment of the proposed Project Area in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, the General Plan for the City of Lodi and local codes and ordinances. 2. The promotion of new and continuing private sector investment within the Project Area will prevent the loss of and facilitate the capture of commercial sales activity. 3. The Project will allow for the elimination of blight through abatement or code enforcement, rehabilitation and reconstruction, new development, and the assembly of parcels into more developable sites for more desirable uses. 4. The Project will result in the elimination or amelioration of certain environmental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular circulation systems, inadequate storm drainage systems, inadequate off-street parking, and other similar public improvement deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area. 5. New construction within the Project Area will result in an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. 6. Project implementation would result in the retention and expansion of businesses by means of redevelopment and rehabilitation activities and by encouraging and assisting in the cooperation and participation of owners, businesses, and public agencies in the revitalization of the Project Area. 7. Revitalized commercial and industrial development will result in the creation and development of local job opportunities and the preservation of the area's existing employment base. 8. Project implementation will strengthen the economic base of the Project Area and the City by installing needed site improvements and stimulating commercial, industrial, and residential development. 17 Exhibit A 9. Project implementation will expand and improve the City's supply of affordable housing. is Exhibit A o a s cV CL E d m � E o C �a s m o t LU m C E 3 9 o d w v `o m e m c a m m at w c gm Zg a mo E ■ Z m ■ W B. o v aCL CL 3ca O �s W orN Wi 0" t C LU O �$ J 83 W 1— L a c E Y S LLI a E cR E V , Z 0 R m Om co Z m 0 Ea c F U m Z O E crn w m c m Q m c m 0 d o v m E c 8 5 =.r rn 'o e W6L CO r� g> p, a p m ��mU i¢ E o C m co ¢ E o m C m or m o Q `o Q 15 c �' 15 $ Darn g� 2LFSC a�tMa m crn r 0 o. d tMM C o V Y m >`� E v CL a D W Z W D U�•Smc� u S-0 cm w o =mmmcpc rSc C .8 1 m mm mrCa ' GW m w+ cwam���'mvcmmcoim to�m m�o��aaa$�o�o ma=corn 3m�NcwFSmcw�Uro WAcmoo O N ^ gE=8vmm$mcc°n�'�_�oior-° aEi �oammEFEm$m�is$mc' U m m $$_� o E Ca U «c o D CD E Of a E itl m; m a 42 o v B$ 6 r 3 m` m mEco $cmv-roof m= c o v -m m- o �mCr-=•19mmmo>.ga�os�� m E w 0¢ o c - `° /° °' E 3 E.. >'sc ma- L'�omm vma 8e e 5cyS+c '_ a CD .na aw a m m E c o a °i E v_ �1IJi E«1^q V CL my m Q E 2 E -V a �m«eocamovmamo°6n- t nn t � � $ac$ vm Ec3atara�$ ci0i3�.da m� a � q r = r = = m m o e g am m m c$ me m Lmm{, EE Em=° -mea maE mSFEc;F�o� IA C C O 32 AM m m m m m E - 1 8 2 o c.o Q m aQ10 - cmc m c $ cCL mCL o c a vmiSf c p°n1 ac `2L CL CL a m« E $� y m Of EE �mfgma MScna vv a USS rack 5 m L a -S 0no� 0 l6i,qc$cE o� E v L•� T� m m1.0 c ek-'sIa lerpu ElaCL ¢UU a3 a A - iA6 •O � z m m 0/ m NQ @ 0 C T►- scdc-, CDT $ a m ,L4( o •a m c m� rce'c wYc'v QI cp a m-- EM �ac m�.$•o lid«s c CL mcNq• o amy E cl my °1�C� E m rNLCcm QyC NE,W Oaf ? L.00 co O a m ` a C _p -" m �+Sdmoar-rc 13o� > mmW.WOZaUjocli Drrmm�� of �� m mcc 'M m. y CA C ESE 7 umor c�y OLD' t EQ9 ev m om"�j10m- CLI 12 aOL _w_mein I cab BV -1 to M i X R ro z a 3 0 0 0 I - sops. Enaty a tmplea— l rt Entity Page 2 WP5116161FE1RIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl.Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) F�rtity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date specific opportunity areas would directly affect property Improvements subject to discretionary the quality of these Important city streetscapes. approval in the industrial rail corridor, east Without adequate design control, the project industrial area, Cherokee Lane corridor and Lodi could facilitate new industrial or mixed- Avenue West subareas, shall Incorporate the use/commercial development that could appropriate combination of specific design adversely affect the visual quality of these highly guidelines listed under this mitigation in section visible industrial and mixed-use streetscapes, as 4.3 of this EIR in a manner that, to the satisfaction well as the visual character surrounding of City staff and the City's Architectural Approval neighborhoods, and of the central area as a Committee and Planning Commission, are whole. Such possible effects constitute a sufficient to adequately reduce project -related potenflally sfgniticant adverse visual impact. visual impacts on streets, residential neighborhoods, and the central area as a whole. Implementation of these two measures would reduce the potential adverse visual Impacts of development in these subareas to a less-then- signmMt level. Impact 4.3: Potential Impacts on the Visual Mitigation 4.3: In the review and processing of City, Verify during plan Prior to any Lodi Character and Image of the Eastside residential development projects within the Indi- check and design bldg. or Redevelop - Residential Neighborhood. Although the eastside residential neighborhood, place special vidual review grading ment Agency Eastside neighborhood has been downzoned to emphasis on implementation of locational appli- permit or City preclude infiltration of additional multi -family strategies contained in the Central City cants development within predominantly single-family Revitalization Program to protect and improve the areas, some multi -family development would be visual character and integrity of the neighborhood. expected to occur along the edge of downtown. Encourage locations at the edge of the Such project -facilitated multi -family development neighborhood and require appropriate visual has the potential to add to Eastside buffering and scale transition between new multi - neighborhood visual deficlendes created by family structures and existing single-family existing, poorly designed, multi -family residential development, to the satisfaction of City staff and units. Project -facilitated new multi -family units the City's Architectural Approval Committee and would have the potential to clash visually with Planning Commission. This measure would the neighborhood's older, predominantly single- reduce the impact to a less-than-6IgMlfcant family residential character. Such an effect level, would represent a potentlaq significant adverse visual impact: POPULATION AND HOUSING Impact 5.1: Potential Jobs/Housing Balance Mitigation 5.1: implement Mitigations 6.1 and City, stafl Monitor traffic Annually Lodi Impacts. Project -facilitated development may 10-2 pertaining to project -related commute period volumes at Pine Redevelop - contribute to the existing jobsihousing imbalance vehicular traffic Increases and associated project Streel/Central Ave. ment Agency in Lodi (weighted towards jobs in comparison to and cumulative transportation system and air intersection: install or City the County as a whole). The projected addition quality impacts. implementation of these signal when of a substantially greater number of jobs than measures would reduce the one Identified warranted housing units to the Project Area would significant environmental effect associated with I - sops. Enaty a tmplea— l rt Entity Page 2 WP5116161FE1RIMMCHT.616 1 - Impr. Entry ■ Imprementatren Entry Page 3 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT:616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDMON OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date exacerbate this imbalance. Such an effect project -related Incommuting increases to a less - would constitute a potentially significant than -significant level. adverse impact. TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING Impact 6-1: Impact on Intersection Mitigation 6-1. Caltrans has established 11 City stafl Monitor traffic Annually Lodi SignaltiWion Requirements. The added PM possible tests or "warrants" for determining volumes at Pine Redevelop - peak hour traffic due to the redevelopment- whether Installation of a traffic signal should be Street/Central Ave. ment Agency related additional traffic would increase PM peak considered. These warrants each consider Intersection; install or City hour volumes above Caltrans Signal Warrant different criteria such as peak hour traffic volume, signal when #11 criteria levels at the Pine Street/Central pedestrian volume, presence of school children, warranted Avenue all -way -stop intersection. Although and accident history. Usually, two or more projected PM peak hour operation at this "warrants" must be met before a signal is Intersection with the project would riot exceed warranted. The fact that this EiR analysis LOS D. this signal warrant effect would indicates that Warrant #11 (related to peak hour represent a potentially significant Impact traffic volumes) would be met indicates that a detailed signal warrant analysis covering all possible Caltrans warrants Is appropriate. The City shall therefore monitor traffic volumes and conditions at the Pine Street/Central Avenue Intersection, and when two or more Caltrans signal warrant criteria are met, shall place the intersection on the City's priority list for signaiization. This measure would reduce this Impact to a less-the"Ignlllcant leval. INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Impact 7.1-1: Anticipated Water Supply Mitigation 7.1-1. Implement the following two City Develop new Condition of Lodi Impacts. Additional development facilitated by City of Lodi General Pian Land Use and Growth and/or facilities as approval for Redevelop - or otherwise associated with Implementation of Management Element policies: redevel. necessary; assess major new ment Agency the proposed redevelopment plan and agency established fees on development or City associated increases in commercial activity, The City shalt develop new facllifies, as staff new development projects employment, and residential population (see housing, population and employment Increase necessary, to serve new development In accordance with the City's Water, estimates in section 5.3 of this EIR) would result Wastewater, and Drainage Master Plans. In corresponding Increases in the demand for (Policy 1) water service. The City, as water purveyor, is prepared to provide the additional domestic - The City shall assess water, wastewater, and water necessary for anticipated additional drainage development fees on all new development In this area, including anticipated resldantlal, commereW, office and industrial project -facilitated commercial growth and development sufifdent to fund required population increases, within the City's existing systemwide Impnnrements. (Policy 2) water entitlements and distribution systems. wood 1 - Impr. Entry ■ Imprementatren Entry Page 3 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT:616 0 0 0 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE rnpi. Type of Monitoring Timing I Monitoring and T (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements I Verification Entity Signature Date However, while aquifers yield water readily to Me City's wells, water table fluctuations due to basin overdraft give rise to some uncertainty regarding available water supply for the City's future needs. Anticipated project -facilitated growth within the redevelopment area would therefore be considered to have a potentially significant impact on water service. Impact 7.1-2: Water Distribution System Inadequacies. The existing water distribution system may not be adequate to serve anticipated new redevelopment -facilitated development and intensification In the Project Area. This potential deficiency represents a potentially significant Impact Impact 7.2-1: Sewage Collection System Inadequacies. The existing wastewater collection system serving the Project Area may not be adequate to serve anticipated now development and intensification in the Project Area. This potential deficiency represents a potentially signitieant impact. Impact 7.3-1: Police Service Demand Impacts in Project Area. Plan -facilitated development and Intensification within the Project Area would Increase demands for police service. The City of Lodi Police Department may require additional staffing or equipment to serve these added demands. The proposed redevelopment pian would therefore have a potentially significant impact on police services. City and Redevelopment Agency Implementation of these two policies as project -facilitated development takes place over the next 20 years world ensure that project -related impacts on the adequacy of City water sources would be reduced to a less-than-slgnlNcant level. Mitigation 7.1-2: As project -facilitated development takes place over the next 20 years, implement remaining needed central area water distribution system improvements identified in Chapter 8 of the City's Water Master Plan. Water conservation should also be promoted as the Project Area redevelops. Implementation of these measures would reduce project -related water distribution impacts to a less-than-signittcant level. Mitigation 7.2.1: Continue to implement the central area sewage collection system improvements Identified as needed in the City of Lodi General Plan, and the City's Sanitary Sewer System Technkal Report, including the planned Improvements to eastside neighborhood collection system. Implementation of these measures over the next 20 years would reduce project wastewater collection system impacts to a less - than -significant level. 'Ity ind/or hgency teff ;ity tnd/or ►gency, ,tall Mitigation 7.3-1: The Police Department shall I .odi monitor the rate of additional police calls per year • 3olice associated with the Project Area and the )so. adequacy of associated response times. As ind City warranted by the monitoring data, the City shall staff provide additional officers and facilities (funded Lodi through the City's general fund). Following monitoring; established City procedures, the Police reports; normal Department shall also review discretionary ment Agency approvals for project-facliftled commercial and approval for residential development within the Project Area. discretionary project Implementation of these measures would reduce he Impact to a 1ws4hsn a/gniHeant levet. projects Implement water Condition of Lodi distribution system approval for Redevelop - Improvements as major new ment Agency needed development or City projects I Implement sewage Condition of Lodi collection system approval for Redevelop - Improvements as major new ment Agency needed development or City projects � J I I 1 Annual response Annual Lodi time monitoring monitoring; Redevelop - reports; normal condition of ment Agency review of Individual approval for or City discretionary project major new applications projects 1 -Imps. Entity - Implem ritelon Entity Page 4 WP5116161FEIRIMMCHT.616 1- Impl. Entity : Implemematlon Entity Page 5 WP5116161 FEIFIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 7.41: Fire Protection and Emergency Mitigation 7.41: The Fire Department shall Lodi Firf Annual fire call Annually Lodi Medical Service Demand impacts in the monitor the rate of additional fire protection Dept. monitoring reports; Redevelop - Project Area. Project-facllitated development service calls per year associated with the Project normal review of ment Agency and intensification within the Project Area would Area and the adequacy of associated response individual or City increase demands for fire protection and times. if warranted by the monitoring data, the discretionary project emergency medical services. Depending on the City shall provide additional firefighters and applications type of use, density, and occupancy of Individual equipment (funded through the City's general project -facilitated developments, the City of Lodi fund). Following established City procedures, the Fre Department may require additional staffing Fire Department shall also review discretionary or equipment to meet its fire protection goals, approvals for project -facilitated commercial and The proposed redevelopment plan may therefore residential development within the Project Area. have a potentially signifleant Impact on fire These measures would reduce the impact to a protection and emergency medical services. less-than-s/gn/flcant level. Impact 7.5-1: School Service remand Mitigation 7.5-1: The Lodi Redevelopment City Ensure all pass- Prior to final Lodi Impacts. Existing Lodi Unified School District Agency shall make the statutory pass-through and/or throughs and school project Redevelop- (LUSD) schools serving the Project Area may payment of tax Increment revenue to the LUSD Redevel fee payments have approval for merit Agency not have sufficient capacity to accommodate the and the San Joaquin County Office of Education Agency been made new projects or City additional school population generated by pursuant to Health and Safety Code section staff project -facilitated residential development. The 33607.5. In addition, the City of Lodi shall require project -related increase in demand for school developer in the redevelopment area to pay service would therefore represent a potentially state -authorized school Impact fees to the extent significant Impact. approved by the LUSD. Individual project applicants may also choose to enter Into agreements with the LUSD to provide additional impact fees negotiated with the LUSD. These measures would be expected to enable the LUSD to fund school improvements necessary to accommodate students from project -facilitated development, reducing this impact to a less-than- signi fcant level. Impact 7.6-1: Project Park Demand Impacts. Mitigation 7.6-1: Mitigation for Park Demand City Verify parkland Prior to Lodi Park and recreation facilities in the Project Area Impacts. The City shall ensure that at least 1.83 and/or dedication or fee grading or Redevelop - are already operating at capacity. Project- facilitated development and intensification in the acres of paridand is developed within or convenient to the Project Area. As project- Redevel Agency payment during plan check building permit ment Agency or City Project Area would incrementally increase the facilitated buildout takes place in the Project Area, staff demand for park and recreation services. As adequate corresponding park and recreation discussed in chapter 5 (Population, Housing, provisions shall be provided through required and Employment) of this EIR, it is estimated that dedication of land and/or In4leu payment of City project -facilitated development would generate adopted park and recreation fees. Implementation approximately 210 additional households in the of this measure would reduce this impact to less - Project Area. Based on the anticipated citywide than-signitJcant levels. year 2020 household size of 2.56 persons (see Table 5.2 in section 5.3), the 210 new households would generate a population increase of approximately 538 people. Based on the most recent City park acreage standard 1- Impl. Entity : Implemematlon Entity Page 5 WP5116161 FEIFIMMCHT.616 • I - MWL Entity . implementation Entity Pogo 6 WP5116161 FEIRI MMCHT.616 AONITORING JERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE mpl. Type of Monitoring Imfng Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Isquirements Verification Entity Signature Date (3.4 acres per 1,000 persons), this new population increment would generate a demand for approximately 1.83 acres of additional parkland. Additional project -facilitated employment growth, estimated at 2,014 )obs by the year 2020, may also generate some additional demand for park and recreation services in the Project Area. Existing Project Area facilities do not have sufficient capacity to accommodate this additional demand. This project effect would therefore represent a signiNaent impaeL DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY Impact 8.1: Project -Related Erosion, Mitigation 8.1: The City shall require the ;Ity Verity during plan Drior to Lodi Sedimentation and Urban Runoff Pollutants. applicant for each future project -facilitated utdfor check and during Trading Redevelop - Redevelopment program -facilitated building development requiring a discretionary approval to I iedevel construction -period 3ermit, and ment Agency construction and infrastructure improvements in comply with all applicable state, regional and City + ►gency inspections luring or City the Project Area could further degrade water quality provisions and, for projects involving staff 3rading downstream water quality. Associated factors the grading of more than five (5) acres: (a) file that may contribute to downstream water quality with the RWQCB a Notice of intent to comply with! problems Include soil disturbance during the Statewide General Permit for Construction construction, new impervious surfaces created Activities, (b) prepare and implement a project - with project -facilitated developments: and specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan increased vehicle traffic, and herbicides, (including an erosion control plan) N grading is pesticides, and fertilizers from new landscaping Involved, (c) Implement a monitoring, inspection, associated with project -facilitated development. and documentation program to assure the This combination of factors represents a effectiveness of control measures, (d) obtain or potentially significant Impact comply with existing General Stormwater Discharge Permit(s) for Industrial Activities, where applicable, and (e) comply with the NPDES Phase 11 Hon -Point Discharge program. Implementation of these requirements would reduce this Impact to. a less -than -significant level. ! NOISE Impact 9.1: Project -Related Exposure of. ! Mitigation 9.1: Noise Impacts can be reduced City Condition of During Lodi Sensitive Land Uses to Excessive through appropriate site planning (e.g., setbacks, amVor i xVvk rrel project ! ndividual Redevelop - Environmental Nolse. Project-factNtated noise -protected areas), construction of noise Redevel approval; verily )roject ment Agency intensification of and changes In land uses In barriers, andfor incorporation of noise Insulation Agency during plan check grMron. or City the Project Area could expose additional people features Into a projects design as specified in the staff; that any required review 16 noise levels exceeding acceptable levels—i.e., _ City of Lodi General Plan. As part of the future Inds- noise studies have to noise lasts Identified In the Lodi General ! environmental review process for individual vidual been completed Plan as "conditionally, acceptable; "nomtally projects, new developments facilitated by the appli- urmc ceptable" or "unacceptable for the redevelopment plan shall be evaluated. Evaluate cants associated land use. Such new exposure each redevelopment-fadBtated discretionary I - MWL Entity . implementation Entity Pogo 6 WP5116161 FEIRI MMCHT.616 0 0 0 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE impl. I Type of Monitoring Timing I Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements I Verification Entity Signature Date possibilities constitute a potentially significant development application in the Project Area with impact respect to the noise environment, particularly when proposed near major transportation noise sources such as SR 99, Cherokee Lane, Stockton Street, Lodi Avenue, Tokay Street, other arterial roadways, and/or the UPRR. Also, require noise assessments for all redevelopment -facilitated discretionary applications where noise -sensitive receptors are proposed in areas adjoining commercial or industrial noise sources, such as subareas 1, 3 and 4, and for nolse-generating development facilitated by the redevelopment plan when proposed adjacent to noise-senettive land uses. The results of the noise assessments and the measures identified to reduce noise levels shall be incorporated in the project plans sufficient to meet stipulated exterior and Interior noise level standards. All such evaluations shall be completed to City satisfaction by a qualified acoustical consultant, With implementation of measures identified throughout such evaluations to meet these standards, this potentially significant Impact would be reduced to a less -than - significant level. Impact 9-2: Redevelopment=Facilitated Construction Noise. Construction activities can generate considerable noise levels. Construction activities facilitated by the redevelopment program could include site grading and preparation, building demolition, construction of foundations and buildings, installation of utilities, paving of roadways, and construction of parking lots. The noise effects of these future construction activities would depend upon the amount of activity, the type of equipment used, and the noise control measures used. Residential and other noise -sensitive uses located adjacent to project -facilitated construction activities could therefore be exposed to noise levels that would interfere with normal activities. This possibility constitutes a potentially s/gnllicent impact 1 - Impt. Entity a implamantatlon Entity Page 7 Mitigation 9-2: To reduce the potential for noise Impacts resulting from project-fadlitated construction activities, implement a combination of the following measures at all construction sties when noise -sensitive receptor; are located in the project vicinity. The combination of measures shall be evaluated on an Individual, project -by - project basis and shall be sufficient to achieve compliance with applicable City General Plan and/or Noise Ordinance standards at affected receptors. • Noise -generating construction activity shall be restricted to the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM, Monday through Friday, and 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturdays. No construction activities should occur on Sundays or holidays. All internal combustion engine driven equipment shall be equipped with Intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition and appropriate for the equipment. City and/or Agency staff, indi- vidual project appli- cants Condition of Individual project approval; verified during construction Condition of constr. (grading or building) permit; verify. during construction Lodi Redevelop- ment Agency or City V IR5116161FEfRIMMCHT.616 0 0 0 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date • Stationary noise -generating equipment shall be located as far as possible from sensitive receptors when sensitive receptors adjoin or are near a construction Project Area. • All construction traffic to and from the project site shall be routed via designated truck routes where possible. Construction -related heavy truck traffic In residential areas shall be prohibited where feasible. • "twist" air compressors and other stationary noise sources shall be used where technology exists. • A "noise disturbance coordinator" shall be designated who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator would determine the cause of the noise complaint (e.g., starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and would require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented. A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site and included in the notice sent to neighbors regarding the construction schedule. (The City should be responsible for designating a noise disturbance coordinator and the Individual project sponsor should be responsible for posting the phone number and providing construction schedule notices). Implementation of this measure would reduce the potential for project -related impacts due to construction noise to a less-then-signNlcant level. I - hV1. Entity s InVWrentatian Entay Page a WP5116161FE/RiMMCHT.616 0 0 0 1 - IML Entity . ImpWnantation Entity Page 9 WP5f16f61FF1RIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date AIR QUALITY Impact 10.1: Construction Activity Air Mitigation 10-1: The City shall require that City Condition of Condition of Lodi Quality Impacts. Construction activities individual redevelopment-fadlitated projects within and/or individual project grading Redevelop - facilitated by the proposed redevelopment plan the Project Area involving new construction shall Redevel approvals; verified permit; verify merit Agency could generate construction period exhaust Comply, where applicable, with current Agency during grading during or City emissions and fugitive dust that could affect SJVUAPCD Regulation VIII requirements, which staff; construction local air quality, in addition, buildings currently Include the following: indi- constructed prior to 1878 could have Asbestos vidual Containing Materials (ACMs), which could be Appropriate dust suppression for land project released Into the air during building demolition. clearing, grubbing, scraping, excavation, land appli- Such construction -period air emissions leveling, grading, cut and fill and demolition cants possibilities represent a potentially signitieant activities, such as the effective application of Impact water or pre-soaking; • Effective stabilization of all disturbed areas of a construction site, including storage piles, which are not being actively used for seven or more days; ■ Control of fugitive dust from on-site unpaved roads and off-site unpaved access roads; and ■ Removal of accumulations of mud or dirt at the end of the work day or once every 24 hours from public paved roads, shoulders and access ways adjacent to the site, for the duration of the activity. Regulation Vill also requires a Dust Control plan for construction activity that will Include 40 acres or more of disturbed surface area, or will include moving more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of bulk materials on at least three days. In addition, where appropriate, the City may also wish to require the following: ■ A limitation on traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour (mph); a Installation of wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site; 1 - IML Entity . ImpWnantation Entity Page 9 WP5f16f61FF1RIMMCHT.616 • 1 - "L Entlry .1n4ftmen%t1an Entay Page 10 IMP5116161FEIRI MMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE impl. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date ■ Suspension of excavation and grading activities when winds exceed 20 mph; andlor • A limitation on the size of the area subject to excavation, grading or other construction activity at any one time to avold excessive dust. Prior to each the start of construction, the applicant shall submit a dust control plan demonstrating compliance with all SJVUAPCD- and City -required control measures. To mitigate any potential demolition -related air quality Impacts from ACMs, the demolition contractor would be required to comply with all local, state and federal regulations regarding determination of existence of ACMs, and proper removal and disposal to reduce air quality risks associated with airborne ACMa. With implementation of these Regulation VIII controls and the above additional measures, project -related construction period air emissions Impacts would be reduced to a less-tharr- signl/leant level. Impact 10-2: Long -Term Regional Emissions MKIgation 10-2: The following emissions control City Condition of Condition of Lodi Increases. Emissions resulting from new strategies shall be applied to redevelopment and/or individual project project Redeveiop- vehicie trips generated by redevelopment- program -facilitated development activities within Redevel approvals, incl. approvals; ment Agency facilitated Intensification in the Project Area the Project Area: Agency annual reporting verify through or City would, by the year 2020, be expected to exceed staff, requirements annual the applicable thresholds of significance for Where practical, future development indi- reporting Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) and Nitrogen proposals shall include physical viduat reqmnts Oxides (NOJ, resulting in a significant project Improvements, such as sidewalk project Impact When this increase in "mobife improvements, landscaping, fighting and the appii- emisslons" is considered cumulatively with installation of bus shelters and bicycle cants possible new industrial "stationary sources" of parking, that would act as incentives for emissions that could locate within the pedestrian, ale and transit modes of redevelopment area, the total of project -related travel. indirect and direct emissions would also exceed applicable significance thresholds. As a result, Employment -generating development the project would also be expected to contribute projects of 10,000 square feet (approximately to a significant cumrrlaews Impact 25 employees) or more shall be required to provide secure and weather -protected bicycle and showerAocker facilities for employees. NEW 1 - "L Entlry .1n4ftmen%t1an Entay Page 10 IMP5116161FEIRI MMCHT.616 1- Impl. Entity - Implamentatlon Entity Page 11 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 MON VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE mpl. p pe of Monitoring Type Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date • Employment -generating development projects shall provide carpool/vanpool incentives, develop an employee ddeshare incentives program, or use other feasible transportation demand measures to reduce vehicle trip generation. Implementation of these measures would assist in reducing identified project and cumulative impacts on long-term regional emissions levels. The URBEMiS7G program estimates that the above measures would reduce regional Indirect emissions by five to seven percent. This reduction would not reduce this impact to a less - than -significant level even in the absence of potential industrial emissions. Since no other feasible measures are available, these Identified project and cumulative effects on regional air emissions would represent a signif/cant unarroldable impact. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE Impact 11-1: Potential Loss of Special -Status Mitigation 11-1: if disturbance to suitable giant City Require completion During Lodi Species. Although chancres of encountering garter snake habitat (i.e., drainage ditches) is and/or of giant garter snake Individ. Redevelop - special -status species In the Project Area are proposed as part of a redevelopment -assisted Redevel survey if existing project mens Agency low, redevelopment-facilflated development individual development or Improvement project, Agency drainage ditch will environ. or City consistent with the adopted City of Lodi General systematic surveys shall be conducted before staff; be affected by review; prior Plan may result In Impacts on special status such a development is approved in order to Inds• project; ensure to grading species. This possibility represents a determine definitively whether any giant garter vidual Implementation of permit potenHalfy sfgnit/cant Impact snakes occur. Such surveys shall be conducted project mitigation plan and issuance by a qualified wildlife biologist or a herpetologist appli- coordination with following applicable guidelines of the Califomia cants juris. agencies Department of Rsh and Game (CDFG) and/or (USACOE, USFWS U.S. Rsh and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to and/or CDFG) if provide a conclusive determination on presence or habitat affected absence of this animal specie. If any populations are encountered, an appropriate mitigation plan shall be developed in consultation with, and meeting the mitigation criteria of, the CDFG and USFWS, and in compliance with specifications of the SJMSCP, section 5.2.4.8. Implementation of this measure would ensure protection of possible populations of special -status animal species (i.e.. giant garter snake) In the Project Area, mitigating potential impacts to a Jess-dwn-s/ 11flcant /etre/.Mod 1- Impl. Entity - Implamentatlon Entity Page 11 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 0 0 0 1 - hML Entity - Impkmentatlon Entity Page 12 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 MONITORING VERIFICATION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Monitoring timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Date Impact 11-2: Jurisdictional Wetland Impacts. Mfttgatlon 11-2: Ali redevelopment -facilitated City During project Prior to Lodi Redevelopment -facilitated development development that would involve modifications to and/or environ. review, if approval of Redevelop - consistent with the adopted City of Lodi General potential wetlands and other waters, such as Redevel wetlands appear to grading merit Agency Pan could affect potential jurisdictional wetland seasonal wetlands that could be present in vacant Agency be present, req. permit or City habitat. This possibility represents a potentially or underused parcels, shall be coordinated with staff; biologist to slgnlHcant Impact representatives of the California Department of indi- determine If Fish and Game and the U.S_ Army Corps of vidual wetlands are present Engineers, as required by federal and state law, project and as pond. of to ensure that any required mitigation protocols appli- devel. permit, req. and associated individual project design cants Implementation of modifications are incorporated Into proposed any juds. agency Improvement plans during the initial stages of mitigation regmnts. project review. Implementation of this measure would ensure that potential Impacts on wetland resources are minimized and adequate replacement is provided, mitigating this potential Impact to a less-than-slgni leant level. CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact 12-1: Project -Related Potentials for Mitigation 12-1: In the event that subsurface City Grading inspection Cond. of Lodi Disturbance of Archaeological Resources. cultural resources are encountered during and/or and reporting grading Redevelop - Development encouraged and improvements approved ground -disturbing activities for a Redevel permit; ment Agency funded by the proposed redevelopment program redevelopment program -related construction Agency Inspection or City could disturb sensitive archaeological resources activity, work in the immediate vicinity shall be staff; during ih the Project Area. This possibility represents a stopped and a qualified archaeologist retained to indi- grading potentially significant impact. evaluate the find. The discovery or disturbance of vidual any cultural resources should also be reported to project the Central California Infonnallon Center (CCIC), appii- and If prehistoric, to the Native American Heritage cants Commission. Identified cultural resources should be recorded on a State Department of Parke and recreation (DPR) Forth 422 (archaeological sites). Mitigation measures prescribed by these groups and required by the City should be undertaken prior to resumption of construction activities. Implementation of this measure would reduce this potential impact to a less-than-stgnificant level. NUNN 1 - hML Entity - Impkmentatlon Entity Page 12 WP511616IFEIRIMMCHT.616 • IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Imps. Type of Monitoring Timing Monitoring and (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity' Action Requirements Verification Entity Signature Data Impact 12-2: DestructlonMegradation of Mitigation 12-2: Evaluate all future project- City During environ. Prior to Lodi Historic Resources. Project -facilitated assisted public improvement projects and private and/or review for indMd. approval of Redevelop - development in the Project Area has the development projects for the presence of, and Redevel projects, ensure that grading or ment Agency potential to destroy or substantially degrade potential Impacts on, historic resources. If Agency any affected building or City historic resources, if these resources are not disturbance of a Project Area historic resource staff', historical resources permit identified or recognized and their maintenance, cannot be avoided, a mitigation program shall be indi- have been Identified rehabilitation or appropriate reuse are not implemented. The City and private sponsors of vidual and mitigation promoted. Such destruction or degradation future Individual projects on sites that contain project program would be considered a potentially significant unlisted structures 45 years or older shall have a appli- Implemented as Impact qualified professional architectural historian cants appropriate prepare a report to evaluate the suitability of the structure for historic status. If the structure is determined to be eligible for historic status, the Lodi Planning Commission should determine whether the structure should be preserved in place, offered for relocation to another site, or documented with photographs and a report for submittal to a museum or library prior to demolition. Alternatively, a single survey of the Project Area shall be completed and any buildings 45 years of age or older be evaluated and their potential architectural and/or historic significance be determined, prior to any project -facilitated development. Implementation of these measures would reduce this potential Impact to a less-than- signilkant level. 1- Impl. Entity - Implemxrtaeon Entity Page 13 WP5116161 FEIRIMMCHT.616 RESOLUTION NO. 2002-132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE LODI REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCREASING, IMPROVING, AND PRESERVING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW- AND MODERATE -INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi (the "Agency") has prepared a proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Lodi Redevelopment Project (the "Project") which would result in the allocation of taxes from the Project Area to the Agency for the purposes of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) requires that not less than twenty percent (20%) of all taxes so allocated be used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2(g) of the Community Redevelopment Law provides that the Agency may use such funds outside the Project Area if a finding is made by resolution of the Agency and the City Council that such use will be of benefit to the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that the use of taxes allocated from the Project Area for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing available at affordable housing cost outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. Dated: June 19, 2002 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002-132 was passed and adopted by the Lodi City Council in a special joint meeting of the Lodi City Council and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lodi held June 19, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Howard, Land, and Mayor Pennino NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Nakanishi ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock SUSAN J. BLA STON City Clerk 2002-132