HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - May 2, 2001 G-02 PH(D CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the
City Council for the rezoning of 255 East Harney Lane from C -S, Commercial Shopping to
C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, and a recommendation that the City Council certify
Negative Declaration ND -01-01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project.
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2001
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council approve the Planning Commission's
recommendation of approval for the rezoning of 255 East Harney Lane
from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial,
and the recommendation that the City Council certifies Negative
Declaration ND -01-01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The parcel is within the City of Lodi, is primarily zoned R-2, Single
Family Residential with a one -acre portion on the corner zoned C -S,
Commercial Shopping. The zone change is a proposal to rezone the
one -acre portion of land at the northeast corner of Stockton
Street and Harney Lane from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. No General Plan
Amendment is required because C-1, Neighborhood Commercial zoning is consistent with the existing General
Plan land use designation of NCC, Neighborhood Community Commercial.
The zone change is necessary to correct a mistake that occurred as part of the original annexation and prezoning of
the parcel back in 1995. Although requested by the applicant, the property should not have been zoned C -S,
because by ordinance C -S zoning cannot be established on parcels less than 2 acres in size. The change in zoning is
a technicality, given that permitted uses in either the C -S or C-1 zone are fundamentally the same. The differences
are primarily in the development standards, including setbacks, lot coverage, signage, and approval processes.
Staff finds that the change in zoning is consistent with the General Plan and is necessary for the legal and proper
development of this corner.
FUNDING: None required
Prepared by: Associate Planner, Meissner
MM
Attachments
APPROVED:
EI
:
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
Dixon Flynn -- City Mariager
01-16.doc 04/24/01
U
1935
�3 nN7tiT:oi
n
+
U-11 9
—O
92-
c:
RriY
BBJ-.�
L_a-V'
H _0 E,
warn
pnU
dI
19933
2o^Cao„i
L[
Dt o, ^
ry r C ] 006 200
Ip0
J n
r ...+ 2040 Ipl 1012 20, O
204, ti ry I n 2044
I: I 'P o 202 y
2047 .205 `� 2050 2024
n
� �
056 s ? ^ ^ ^
i 030
205 II 2, 1 j
N � �
semi - �`�
oC
r.
Z
O
n ry 20.7 6
206 Q)ti _ aee 21po oven^ n.
r.. r n n r ^' Iipg 212
102
^ I n = _
. I ,u e S 106 211 110 21 2114 212
210 I n �
7 21
1 106
Y
211 - 112 211
I 212 116
120 21
2114
o<
2101
O
211 L 116 2127 L 122 212
212 _ 0 062 2,33 2126 2,2 2126 2139
2120Salas
Ie rI
RI
(,n
212 n ^ w 066 2139 134 213 1 32 2145
n n • tat
nI
2126
n
220.
22t0
Park
lewiln r. 1� 2145 3 140 21 215
r A „: 2151 p2u6 2+ ole r
nln 116 2205 Z2206 220 2207
n _ 216
210
2211 212 220 2216 2211
2231 220 221
r a r 224
302
222 221
rio e n 22] 115
C
_ 2306
I
o - n
2210
- 311
Z e e c o 2320
2303
O 326
32
1J
J
i
a n
332
o I o
2250
- _ 233 2336
n
J66
2411
2405
392
2167 T 396'5
I
2427
241
'
2112
'o
> m 2416
63
2129
Culbertson Dr. 2"°
r 170 1]5
2443
161
CIf.
n n n 52;
1 1a.
I_ 187
a _201
y
ti
�
32 252p^
J
I OJ
herr t• I
n
n
n 2526
n
279.
07
.y 170 15
2501
2532
Iner z
2534
- 22 21
n m
22 ` 2]
5" (I wood Dr.
n
e r re lJy
J
+
I = n 2364 -
Inl
HARNEY LN
HARNEY
I
I
VICINITY
MAP
MINUTES
LODI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
CARNEGIE FORUM
305 WEST PINE STREET
LODI, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY MARCH 28, 2001
The Planning Commission met and was called to order by Chairman McGladdery.
Commissioners Present: John Beckman, Steven Crabtree, Randall Heinitz,
Tim Mattheis, John Schmidt, and Chairman McGladdery
Commissioners Absent: John Borelli
Others Present: Konradt Bartlam, Community Development Director, Mark Meissner,
Associate Planner, Stephen Schwabauer, Assistant City Attorney, and Lisa
Wagner, Secretary.
The minutes of January 24, 2001 were approved as mailed with John
Schmidt abstaining from the vote.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
The request of the Community Development Director for the Planning
Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for the rezoning of
255 East Harney Lane from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial, and a recommendation that the City Council certify Negative
Declaration ND -01-01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project.
This item was presented to the Commission by Associate Planner Meissner. He noted
that the project site was located on a one -acre portion of land at the northeast corner of
Stockton Street and Harney Lane. No General Plan Amendment was required because
the C-1 zoning designation was consistent with the existing General Plan land use
designation of NCC, Neighborhood Community Commercial. The parcel is close to 9
acres in size and is primarily zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential with the one -acre
portion on the corner zoned C -S, Commercial Shopping.
Due to an oversight, when the property was originally annexed into the City, the one -
acre site should have been zoned CA rather than C -S because a C -S zoning cannot be
established on parcels less than 2 acres in size. Staff was in favor of the zone change
and found the change to be consistent with the General Plan and was necessary for the
proper development of the corner.
Hearing Opended to the Public
Jeffrey Kirst, Tokay Development, represented the property owners. Mr. Kirst
concurred with the proposed rezoning.
Wendell Logan, 311 E. Harney Lane. Mr. Logan was interested in rezoning his
property at 311 E. Harney for commercial use. He stated that his property would be
impacted by the commercial zoning. He did not want a mini -market next to his home.
Commissioner McGladdery responded that the whatever zoning Mr. Logan was
3-2b.doc
7:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
January 24, 2001
interested in, he would have to make an application for the rezone. Mr. Bartlam
responded that Mr. Logan's property was located between two pieces of land currently
zoned for residential and they would remain unchanged.
Commissioner Heinitz asked what the differences were in the C -S and C-1 zonings.
Mr. Bartlam responded that the differences were primarily in the development
standards, which regulates setbacks, lot coverage, and the process in which a
development gets approved.
Sam Barner, 13475 S. Stockton Street. Mr. Barner owns property located south of the
subject parcel. He asked what was planned for the subject parcel. Mr. Bartlam
encouraged Mr. Barner to speak with the developer (Mr. Kirst) for more information.
He further added that the City would be installing a traffic signal at the intersection of
Harney Lane and Stockton Street in the near future.
Hearing Closed to the Public
The Planning Commission on motion of Commissioner Schmidt, Crabtree second,
certified Negative Declaration (ND -01-01) as adequate environmental documentation
by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Crabtree, Heinitz, Schmidt, Mattheis,
and Chairman McGladdery
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Borelli
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
The Planning Commission on motion of Commissioner Schmidt, Crabtree second,
approved to recommend to the City Council the rezoning of 255 East Harney Lane
from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial by the following
vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Crabtree, Heinitz, Schmidt, Mattheis,
and Chairman McGladdery
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Borelli
ABSTAIN: Commissioners
The request of the Luckey Company and the Lodi Unified School District for the
Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for a
General Plan Amendment and Prezoning for 1041 & 1171 East Harney Lane.
The General Plan Amendment is from PR, Planned Residential to LDR, Low
Density Residential and PQP, Public Quasi/Public, and the Prezoning from San
Joaquin County AU -20 to R-2, Single Family Residential and PUB, Public. The
request also includes a recommendation that the City Council certify Negative
Declaration ND -00-12 as adequate environmental documentation for the project.
3-28.doc
DMEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department
To: Planning Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: March 28, 2001
Subject: The request of the Community Development Director for the Planning
Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for the
rezoning of 255 East Harney Lane from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1,
Neighborhood Commercial, and a recommendation that the City Council
certify Negative Declaration ND -01-01 as adequate environmental
documentation for the project.
SUMMARY
The Parisis Zone change is a proposal to rezone a one -acre portion of land at the corner of Stockton
Street and Harney Lane from C -S, -Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. The
property is located at 255 East Harney Lane, Assessor Parcel Number: 062-290-09. No General Plan
Amendment is required because C-1, Neighborhood Commercial zoning is consistent with the
existing General Plan land use designation of NCC, Neighborhood Community Commercial.
BACKGROUND
The subject parcel is within the City of Lodi, is primarily zoned R-2. Single Family Residential with
a one -acre portion on the corner zoned C -S, Commercial Shopping. The zone change is necessary to
correct a mistake that occurred as part of the original annexation and prezoning of the parcel back in
1995. Although requested by the applicant, the property should not have been zoned C -S, because
by ordinance C -S zoning cannot be established on parcels less than 2 acres in size. The change in
zoning is a technicality, given that permitted uses in either the C -S or C-1 zone are fundamentally the
same. The differences are primarily in the development standards, including setbacks, lot coverage,
signage, and approval processes.
A few of the major differences between the two zones are outlined in the following table:
While it is possible to develop the property under the C -S zoning, staff finds that it makes sense to
correct the error. Staff finds that the chance in zoning is consistent with the General Plan and is
necessary for the legal and proper development of this corner.
Z-01-01.doc
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for the
rezoning of 25 5 East Harney Lane from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial, and a recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -01-01 as
adequate environmental documentation for the project. The recommendations shall be subject to the
conditions listed in the attached resolution.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
Approve the Request with Alternate Conditions
Deny the Request
Continue the Request
Respectfully Submitted,
Mark Meissner
Associate Planner
MGM
Z-01-01.doc
Reviewed and Concur,
f
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
CITY OF LODI
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: March 28, 2001
APPLICATION NO: Rezone No. Z-01-01
REQUEST: The request of the Community Development Director for the
Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City
Council for the rezoning of 255 East Harney Lane from C -S,
Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, and a
recommendation that the City Council certify Negative
Declaration ND -01-01 as adequate environmental
documentation for the project.
LOCATION: 255 East Harney Lane (062-290-09)
APPLICANT: City of Lodi
221 West Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
OWNERS: Park Place Development, LLC
c/o Ron Thomas
P.O. Box 1598
Lodi, CA 95241-1598
Site Characteristics: The subject property sits within the City and is located on the
northeast corner of South Stockton Street and East Harney Lane.
The property is vacant, relatively flat, and has no unusal or
extraordinary topographic features.
General Plan Designation: NCC, Neighborhood Community Commercial
Zoning Designation: C -S, Commercial Shopping
Property Size: 8.81 -acres, Area of Rezone 1 -acre.
Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
North: R-2, Residential Single -Family; LDR, Low Density Residential.
South: AG -40, General Agriculture (County); PRR, Planned Residential Reserve.
East: R-2, Residential Single -Family; LDR, Low Density Residential.
West: M-2, Heavy Industrial; HI, Heavy Industrial.
Neighborhood Characteristics:
The project area is north of Harney Lane and diagonally across from a few rural residences. To
the west of the project site across Stockton Street is a partially developed parcel with a
Montessori School. To the east is vacant land zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential. To the
north of the project site is the remainder of this parcel of land zoned R-2, Single -Family
Residential and planned for the development of the Parisis Property Subdivision.
LW %\LODLN`TS40ENT001\DEPARTMENTS\Community Dei•elopment\Plannin,�\STAFFRPlL'001`Z-01-Olr.do:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS:
Negative Declaration ND -01-01 has been prepared in accordance with CEQA. This document
adequately addresses possible adverse environmental effects of this project. No significant
impacts are anticipated.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
Legal Notice for the rezone was published on March 17, 2001. A total of 20 notices were sent to
all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the subject property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Pianning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for the
rezoning of 255 East Harney Lane from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial, and a recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -01-01
as adequate environmental documentation for the project. The recommendations shall be subject
to the conditions listed in the attached resolution.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS:
• Approve the Request with Alternate Conditions
• Deny the Request
• Continue the Request
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Negative Declaration
3. Draft Resolution
Lw WLODNNTS40ENT00I \DEPARTMENTS\Community Development\PlanninglSTAFFRPT1'0011Z-01-01 r.doc
LFI�ass a���=`^I�., nlnl:°I nl~In�lw l'n 19J9 � -+fit-�w,_Tla
n i« 3. R� � N-1 9
VICINITY MAP
i
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 01-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR FOR APPROVAL OF REZONING Z-01-01 TO THE LODI CITY COUNCIL.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed
public hearing, as required by law, on the requested Rezoning in accordance with the Government Code and
Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 17.84, Amendments;
WHEREAS, the property is located at 255 East Harney Lane, Lodi, CA 95242, Assessor's Parcel
No. 062-290-09;
WHEREAS, the project proponent is the City of Lodi Community Development Director, 221
West Pine Street, Lodi, CA 95240;
WHEREAS, the property has zoning designations of R-2, Single Family Residential and C-1,
Neighborhood Commercial;
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of
the City of Lodi as follows:
1. Negative Declaration File No. ND -01-01 has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided there under. Further, the
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with
respect to the project identified in this Resolution.
2. It is found that the one acre portion of the parcel to be rezoned is located at 255 East Harney Lane,
Lodi, CA 95242, Assessor's Parcel No.: 062-290-09.
3. It is found that the requested change of zoning from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial is not in conflict with adopted plans or policies of the General Plan of the City and will
serve sound Planning practice.
4. It is further found that the land of the proposed rezone is physically suitable for the proposed
development.
5. The Planning Commission of the City of Lodi hereby recommends approval of Rezone Z-01-01 to the
City Council of the City of Lodi.
Dated: March 28, 2001
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 01-07 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Lodi at a regular meeting held on March 28, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Beckman, Crabtree, Heintiz, Mattheis, Schmidt, and Chairman
McGladdery
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Borelli
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Secretary, Planning Commission
Res0107.doc
OPCS�L ZOiG M A?
LEGEND
PZSIDENTUL ZONES:
P-! - SF:L2 PAYILT
LM:Li F.YILT
l-�- u. Dalin
!-:.. tum ex •P•N'YL11M
!.Y]- YPIUY Oe11SST i.P.xTY
!-N]- w:x ]exstrr (aP•ttypRj�
R ] - k.Vr Nep ]lyC.iFYCT•
CO?/kERCIAL ZONES:
:_-(. xa�taoNNaoo w*�:n ;nl;slxt
0; iE3 ZONES: i
r.� - FusJe
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY
REZONING 255 EAST HARNEY LANE (APN 062-290-09) FROM
C -S, COMMERCIAL SHOPPING TO C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Official District Map of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi
Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
1 -acre parcel located at 255 East Harney Lane (APN 062-290-09) is
hereby rezoned from CS, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached, which is on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
Section 2. A Negative Declaration (ND -01-01) has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
provided thereunder. Further, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered
the information contained in said Negative Declaration with respect to the project
identified in their Resolution No. P.C. 01-07.
Section 3 - No Mandatory Duty of Care. This ordinance is not intended to and shall not
be construed or given effect in a manner which imposes upon the City, or any officer or
employee thereof, a mandatory duty of care towards persons or property within the City
or outside of the City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as
otherwise imposed by law.
Section 4 - Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to
any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application. To this end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective
of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
Section 5 The alterations, changes, and amendments of said Official District Map of
the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by the City Planning Commission
and by the City Council of this City after public hearings held in conformance with
provisions of Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Code and the laws of the State of California
applicable thereto.
Section 6 All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed
insofar as such conflict may exist.
Section 7. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News Sentinel", a
daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi and shall
be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval.
Approved this day of , 2001
ALAN S. NAKANISHI
Mayor
Attest:
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
City Clerk
State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.
I, Susan J. Blackston, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No.
was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held
May 2, 2001 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular
meeting of said Council held , 2001 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS —
further certify that Ordinance No. was approved and signed by the Mayor on the
date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law.
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
NDALL A. HAYS
City Attorney
OPOS L ZONING tiIIIAIIP
LEGEND
s2D-e�TIAL ZONES:
i-�- L DOAT
=l g .vMyar.
M-IfJ- r.1 VY -. (—cKt)
MMi• SCI( ndlft (.l.rndtl
M -
".4
IICT:
M-=•• x.rs-nne luC.Mrunq
CONNERCIAL ZONES:
M -O- nrorsase..t imitr
.-1 +C:H MpaaO
C•_-
C•! . -PAnf -.4 Cd:iM
OTi3� ZO!�ES:
V•M
w±L4:i.J
n.
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ND -01-01) AS ADEQUATE
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE REZONE OF
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 255 EAST HARNEY LANE, LODI, CA
WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Planning Commission and City
Council on March 28, 2001 and May 2, 2001 respectively, on the following described
Rezone:
Rezone a one -acre parcel located at 255 East Harney Lane (APN 062-
290-09) from CS, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached, which is on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration (ND -01-01) has been prepared in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the
Guidelines provided thereunder. Further, the Planning Commission has reviewed and
considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with respect to the
project identified in their Resolution No. P.C. 01-07; and
WHEREAS, it is the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council
approve its finding that the Negative Declaration is adequate environmental
documentation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council has reviewed all
documentation and hereby certifies the Negative Declaration as adequate environmental
documentation for the rezone of 255 East Harney Lane.
Dated: May 2, 2001
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2001-102 was passed and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held May 2, 2001, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Howard, Land, Pennino and
Mayor Nakanishi
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
SUSAN J. BLA`OKSTON
City Clerk
2001-102 y
1I11�1 I'i Ll
IIS
I.=! I I I I I I I i {`I I t
�y�' Illllllilll►� ��_�►11�r'-��
z
0 'ten ;; 1f� Iii
=�u III111111
I. illl!I It __
fllilll^-=! Il�i{i[{!ill
LZ
��� • � r� I t i I I
i E 01PV v�D Z 0 I\I N C
SUBJECT:
Please immediately confirm receipt
of this fax by calling 333-6702
CITY OF LODI
P. O. BOX 3006
LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910
ADVERTISING INSTRUCTIONS
SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 2, 2001 TO CONSIDER PLANNING
COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE REZONING OF 255 E. HARNEY
LANE
PUBLISH DATE(s): SATURDAY, APRIL 21, 2001
TEAR SHEETS WANTED: Three (3) please
SEND AFFIDAVIT AND BILL TO: SUSAN BLACKSTON, CITY CLERK
City of Lodi
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
DATED: APRIL 19, 2001
ORDERED BY:
JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
FaxZ to the Sentinel at 369-1084 at J
Sharon Phoned to confine receipt of all
forms%advins.doc
at
iPUNIFERP. PERRIN
TY CITY CLERK
on 4II 911 I (date) (pages)
•. CITY OF LODI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Carnegie Forum Date: May 2, 2001
} , - 305 West Pine Street, Lodi Time: 7:00 p.m. .
For information regardinn this notice please contact:
Susan J. Blackston
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 333-6702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 2, 2001 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing at the Carnegie Forum,
305 West Pine Street, Lodi, to consider the following matter:
a) Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for the rezoning of 255
East Harney Lane from C -S, Commercial Shopping to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, and a
recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -01-01 as adequate
environmental documentation for the project.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Department
Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and
comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing
scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi City Council:
Susan J. Blackston -
City Clerk
Dated: April 18, 2001
Approved as to form:
Randall A. Hays
City Attorney
J:\CITYCLRK\F0RMSInctcdd2_doc 4/1&pt
6
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Joaquin.
I am a citi7.en of the United States and a resident of
the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen
years, and not a party to or interested in the above -
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the
printer of the Lodi News -Sentinel, a newspaper of
general circulation, printed and published daily,
except Sundays and holidays, in the City of Lodi,
California, County of San Joaquin, and which news-
paper has been adjudged a newspaper of general
circulation by the Superior Court, Department 3, of
the County of San Joaquin, State of California,
under the date of May 26th, 1953, Case Number
65990; that the notice, of which the annexed is a
printed copy (set in type not smaller than non-
pareil), has been published in each regular and
entire issue of said newspaperand not in any supple-
ment thereof on the following dates, to -wit:
.......... Aipr i 1..2 1 ....................................
all in the year .2801.
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at Lodi, California, this ....2.1...., day of
....... A,pri 1 ................... .2081.
W.L. . .........
Signature
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
RECEIVED
Ctty C'Qrk
City ofLoai
Proof of Publication of
. Public Hearing...... .
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
NOTICE QF ltUSUC NEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY ,GIVEN that on
-Wednesday. IAa1f 2,2001 at the hour of 7:00
heard rth�e City C,orur�ie fter as end tate Puyaie
Hearing at the Carnegie Forum, 305 West Pine
Street. Lodi, to consider the following matter:
a) Planning Commission's recommendation of
approval to the City Council for the rezoning of
255 East Harney Lane from GS, Commardal
Shopping to C.1, Neighborhood Commercial. and
a recommendation that the Ctty Council t:artity
Negative Declaration ND -01-01 as adequate
environments, documentation for the Project.
.. Information rigarding'this Item may be obtained
-in. the Office of ftte Community Development
oapertment Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lode,
Catifornis.''All Interested Persons ere irvilad to
present their views and comments an this neatter.
statements -may be vnittt the CIH
Writfan
Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled
herein, and Orel statements may be made at said
hearing.
11 you chanongs the subject matter In court, you
Mordy Rase Issues limited to raising aIssues .you or
eons else raised at .the .P.ublic Hearing
described in this notice or in written corresllat-
dence delivered to the City Clerk 221 West Pine
Street: at or prior to the Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi CIH COencfl:
Susan J. Slackston
city Clerk. - .
.Dated: April 18.2001 _
Approved as to form:
Randall A. Hays .
City Attorney _ 3288
April 21, 2001 • .
3288
DECLARATION OF MAILING
Notice: Public Hearing on May 2. 2001 to Consider Planning Commission's
Recommendation for the Rezoning of 255 E. Harney Lane
On April 19, 2001 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the
United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a
copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed
as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and
the places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 19, 2001, at Lodi, California.
ORDERED BY:
JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
decmaiUforms
ORDERED BY:
SUSAN BLACKSTON
CITY CLERK, CITY OF LODI
AAAI�--
JWFERPA. PERRIN
PUTY CITY CLERK
_ FxH��iTB
255 E. Harney Lane
1) 06229008;BECKMAN, DOLORIES E TR ETAL ;PO BOX 1537 ;LODI ;CA;95241
2) 06229009;PARISIS, ANGELOS S TR ;9949 FERNWOOD AVE ;STOCKTON ;CA;95212
3) 06229025;THAYER, WALTER & JOANN M ETAL;311 E HARNEY LN ;LODI ;CA;95242
4) 06229026;THAYER, WALTER & J M ;325 E HARNEY LN ;LODI ;CA;95240
5) 06229030;PERLEGOS, GEORGIA ETAL ;PO BOX 1823 ;LODI ;CA;95241
6) 06241009;SIMPSON, TIMOTHY D & M J ETAL ;2405 S STOCKTON ST STE 1 ;LODI
;CA;95240
7) 06241010;DEL CASTILLO, MARCIANO & B ;13191 N HWY 99 ;LODI ;CA;95240
8) 06241016;HAAS, MICHAEL R ETAL ;PO BOX 2300 ;LODI ;CA;95241
9) 06241017;FRITZ, DANIEL G & AMY S TR ;1234 RIVERGATE DR ;LODI ;CA;95240
10) 06241018;PAPPOUS, ANASTASIOS & C ;5395 ENTRADA OLMOS ;SAN JOSE ;CA;95123
11) 06241020;TARDITI, TERRY TR ETAL ;11698 N HWY 99 ;LODI ;CA;95240
12) 06241025;PLUMMER, DENNIS W TR ETAL ;1011 S CHEROKEE LN ;LODI ;CA;95240
13) 06241015;VOLKERT, JOHN L & INEKE M TR ;2506 MAGGIO CI ;LODI ;CA;95240
14) 6257026;PARK PLACE DEVELOPMENT LLC ;PO BOX 1598 ;LODI ;CA;95241
15) 05813002;VARNER, SAMUEL J ;13475 N STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
16) 05813003;HAZELET, KENNETH E & DEBRA ;13409 N STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
17) 05813008;MCLEAN, JEFFREY JOHN ETAL ;4044 E HARNEY LN ;LODI ;CA;95240
18) 05813007;KAYAYAN, BEDROS TR ;13322 N STOCKTON ST ;LODI ;CA;95240
19) 05813024;TSUTSUMI, AGNES M TR ETAL ;3725 E ARMSTRONG RD ;LODI ;CA;95240
,tOF�
u
�p
DECLARATION POSTING
On Thursday, April 19, 2001 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, a copy of
a Notice of Public Hearing for May 2, 2001 to consider the Planning Commission's
recommendation for the rezoning of 255 E. Harney Lane, (attached hereto, marked
Exhibit "A") was posted at the following three locations:
Lodi Public Library
Lodi Police Public Safety Building
Lodi City Hall Lobby
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on April 19, 2001, at Lodi, California.
ORDERED BY:
SUSAN J. BLACKSTON
CITY CLERK
Jacqueline L. Taylor
Deputy City Clerk
AA A. i -4y
Jen er M. Perrin
Deputy City Clerk
forms`decpost.doc