The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - May 3, 2000 F-01 PHCOUNCIL COMMUNICATION��{EORts J AGENDA TITLE: Conduct Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for the annexation and prezoning of parcels 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049-080-06, 28, 16-19 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-74 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-2; the prezoning of .parcels 049-080-32 & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -00-01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project. MEETING DATE: May 3, 2000 PREPARED BY: Konradt Bartlam, Community Development Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Planning Commission's recommendation for the prezoning of parcels 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049-080-06, 28, 16-19 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-74 from San Joaquin County I- G to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-32- & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation to certify Negative Declaration ND -00-01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The proposed area of annexation includes sixteen individual parcels totaling 127.43 acres. The properties are at the northeast corner of Lodi bounded by the existing City boundary on the south and west, the Mokelumne River on the north, and the Central California Traction railroad right-of-way on the east. Each parcel or portions thereof will be assigned City zoning designations of M-2, Heavy Industrial, M-1, Light Industrial or FP, Floodplain to take the place of their existing County zoning designations of I -G, General Industrial or AU -20, Agriculture Urban Reserve. The proposed City zoning designations are consistent with the existing HI & LI, Heavy and Light Industrial General Plan land use designations, which is why there was no request for a General Plan Amendment. This annexation and prezoning was prompted by Robert Mondavi, Inc. who has plans to purchase parcels 049-040-05, 27, 28, & 049-089-06, for the development of a warehouse, distribution, bottling and labeling facility for their winery business (see Vicinity Map). There are no plans for development of the remaining parcels, however; the property owners have requested to be included in the annexation. The remaining parcels of the annexation will be available for development in compliance with the provisions of their assigned zoning designation as established and regulated by the City of Lodi. APPROVED: H. Dixon nn — City Ma ger cc0009.dcc 04125/00 Council Communication Meeting Date: May 3. 2000 Page 2 The land in the annexation area has been farmed in the county for many years. When the General Plan was adopted in 1991, several blocks of land in the industrial corridor east of Highway 99 within the sphere of the General Plan, including the subject properties, were designated LI & HI, Light Industrial & Heavy Industrial. From Staff visits to the site, it appears that a majority of the land that was once farmed has since been cleared in preparation for urbanization. The existing land uses are as follows: Parcels 049-020-09 and 049-080-32 contain a combined total of 15.29 acres and are currently used as settling ponds for the winery located on a portion of 049-080-33. Parcel 049-080-33 contains 19.56 acres and is developed with a 300,000 square -foot warehouse building and a few smaller buildings totalling approximately 64,000 square -feet. Parcel 049-080-78 contains 6.28 acres and is approximately one-third vacant on the north end and the remainder is two-thirds vineyard. Parcels 049-080-05, 74, & 77 contain a combined total of 21.87 acres and are all unimproved dirt lots. Parcels 049-080-16 thru 19 are all 5 acres in size, relatively unimproved dirt lots, with a single family residence on 16, 18 & 19. Parcel 049-080-06 contains 15 acres, fronts on Guild Avenue on the west property line and Lime Street on the north property line, has a single family residence and a few delapidated barns, and approximately 3 acres of cherry orchard fronting Lime Street. The remainder of the parcel is unimproved. Parcel 049-080-28 contains 5 acres of cherry orchard, and fronts Lime Street on its north property line and the CCT right-of-way on its east property line. Parcel 049- 040-27 contains 0.77 acres and has a single family residence. Parcel 049-040-28 contains 8.89 acres and is an unimproved dirt lot. Parcel 049-040-05 contains 15 acres with a 4 acre orchard fronting Guild Avenue. The remainder of the property is unimproved. The three different City zoning designations involved in this prezone request include M-2, Heavy Industrial, M-1, Light Industrial and FP, Floodplain. Of the three, FP zoning is the only one that we believe needs explanation. As stated in the subject line of this memo, parcels 049-020-09 and 049-080-32 are required by Lodi Municipal Code §17.51.050 to be prezoned FP, Floodplain. The floodplain boundary is established by following the contour of the base flood elevations as surveyed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA Map 060299-01656, revised July 4, 1988, illustrates the two properties in Zone A14, which is a flood hazard area. Approval of the prezone of the two properties to FP is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance and will continue the City's commitment to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Staff finds that the proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City's boundary. The proposed Mondavi Warehouse requires City services which would be difficult and possibly unfeasible in the County. Given the close proximity of the proposed Mondavi warehouse to the existing City limits, staff finds that the City would be irresponsible to allow its development in the County under County development standards. Although the remaining properties have no plans for development at this time, the properties form a grouping that is contiguous to the existing City boundaries. The City has anticipated annexing this land from the County as evidenced by the existing General Plan designations of LI and HI, Heavy and Light Industrial. Furthermore, the City has planned and is prepared to provide services to this area. Since continued development of our industrial corridor on the east side of Highway 99 should be furthered by Council Communication Meeting Date: May 3. 2000 Page 3 taking the subject properties into the City at this time, we favor the proposed Annexation and Prezoning. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item on April 12, 2000 at a regularly scheduled meeting. Property owners within 300 -feet of the area of annexation were notified of the Planning Commission's intent to recommend that the City Council annex and prezone the area. Approximately 10 to 12 people were in attendance; however, no one spoke for or against the proposal. After further discussion between Staff and the Planning Commission, the Commission unanimously recommended approval. FUNDING: None required Konradt Bartlam Community Development Director Prepared by: Mark Meissner, Associate Planner MM Attachments '�; ' ' MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department To: Planning Commission From: Community Development Department Date: April 12, 2000 Subject: The request of Robert Mondavi Inc. for the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for the prezoning of parcels 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049-080-06, 28, 16-19 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-74 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-OSO-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to NI -2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080- 32 & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -00- 01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project_ SUMMARY The request of the applicant for prezoning of the subject parcels is the first step in the annexation process. The proposed area of annexation includes sixteen individual parcels totaling 127.43 acres. The properties are at the northeast corner of Lodi bounded by the existing City boundary on the south and west, the Mokelumne River on the north, and the Central California Traction railroad right-of-way on the east. Each parcel or portions thereof will be assigned City zoning designations of M-2, Heavy Industrial, M-1, Light Industrial or FP, Floodplain to take the place of their existing County zoning designations of I -G, General Industrial or AU -20, Agriculture Urban Reserve. The proposed City zoning designations are consistent with the existing HI & LI, Heavy and Light Industrial General Plan land use designations, which is why there is no request for a General Plan Amendment. This annexation and prezoning was prompted by the applicant who has plans to purchase parcels 049-040-05, 27, 28, & 049-089-06, for the development of a warehouse, distribution, bottling and labeling facility for their winery business (see Vicinity Map). There are no plans for development of the remaining parcels, however; the property owners have requested to be included in the annexation. The remaining parcels of the annexation will be available for development in compliance with the provisions of their assigned zoning designation as established and regulated by the City of Lodi. BACKGROUND The land in this area has been farmed in the county for many years. When the General Plan was adopted by the City Council in 1991, several blocks of land in the industrial corridor east of Highway 99 within the sphere of the General Plan, including the subject properties, were designated LI & HI, Light Industrial & Heavy Industrial. From our visits to the site, it appears that a majority of the land that was once fanned has since been cleared in preparation for urbanization. !w I:tCommunity Dew -too menOY13nnin-ISrAF RP'iL000hZ•00-02.doc The existing land uses are as follows: Parcels 049-020-09 and 049-080-32 contain a combined total of 15.29 acres and are currently used as settlin; ponds for the winery located on a portion of 0=49-080-33. Parcel 049-080-33 contains 19.56 acres and is developed with a 300,000 square - foot warehouse building and a few smaller buildings totalling approximately 64,000 square -feet. Parcel 049-080-78 contains 6.28 acres and is approximately one-third vacant on the north end and the remainder is two-thirds vineyard. Parcels 0=49-080-05, 74, & 77 contain a combined total of 21.87 acres and are all unimproved dirt lots. Parcels 049-080-16 thru 19 are all 5 acres in size, relatively unimproved dirt lots, with a single family residence on 16, 18 & 19. Parcel 049-080- 06 contains 15 acres, fronts on Guild Avenue on the west property line and Lime Street on the north property line, has a single family residence and a few delapidated barns, and approximately 3 acres of orchard fronting Lime Street. The remainder of the parcel is unimproved. Parcel 049- 080-28 contains 5 acres of cherry orchard, and fronts Lime Street on its north property line and the CCT right-of-way on its east property line. Parcel 049-0=40-27 contains 0.77 acres and has a single family residence. Parcel 049-040-28 contains 8.89 acres and is an unimproved dirt lot. Parcel 049-040-05 contains 15 acres with a 4 acre orchard fronting Guild Avenue. The remainder of the property is unimproved. ANALYSIS The three different City zoning designations involved in this prezone request include M-2, Heavy Industrial, M-1, Light Industrial and FP, Floodplain. Of the three, FP zoning is the only one that we believe needs explanation. As stated in the subject line of this memo, parcels 049-020-09 and 049-080-32 are required by Lodi Municipal Code § 17.51.050 to be prezoned FP, Floodplain. The floodplain boundary is established by following the contour of the base flood elevations as surveyed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA Map 060299-0165B, revised July 4, 1988, illustrates the two properties in Zone A14, which is a flood hazard area. As _stated briefly above, the two properties are currently developed as settling ponds for the nearby wineries. Staff believes that these properties have been used for this purpose and not otherwise developed with structures because of their known flood hazard. Approval of the prezone of the two properties to FP is consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance and will continue the City's commitment to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Staff finds that the proposed annexation is a logical extension of the City's boundary. The proposed Mondavi Warehouse requires City services, which would be difficult to obtain in the County. From a required service standpoint, its development in the County would not only be difficult but may also be unfeasible. Given the close proximity of the proposed Mondavi warehouse to the existing City limits, staff finds that the City would be irresponsible to allow its development in the County under County development standards. Although the remaining properties have no plans for development at this time, the properties form a grouping that is contiguous to the existing City boundaries. The City has anticipated annexing this land from the County as evidenced by the existing General Plan designations of LI and HI, Heavy and Light Industrial. Furthermore, the City has planned and is prepared to provide services to this area. Iw VCommuniry Dcvt(opmentlPlanning\S—iAFrRP k-'OM\Z•00-0_'.doc Since continued development of our industrial corridor on the east side of Highway 99 should be furthered by taking the subject properties into the City at this time, we favor the proposed Annexation and PrezoninQ. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the request of Robert Mondavi Inc. for the prezoning of parcels 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049-080-06, 28, 16-19 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-1; the prezonin.- of parcel 0,49-080-74 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County AU - 20 to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-32 & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -00-0I as adequate environmental documentation for the project.. ALTERNATNE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS • Approve the Requests with Alternate Conditions • Deny the Requests • Continue the Requests Respectfully Submi d, Reviewed and Concur, _110� Mark I eissner Konradt Bartlam -- --Associate Planner Community Development Director y1GM Iw JACommunity Dcvclopment\PlannimgLSr:;.-=1?T'a00012-00-0'-.duc CITY OF LODI PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report MEETING DATE: April l2, 2000 APPLICATION NO'S: Annexation for Robert Mondavi Inc., Rezone No. Z-00-02. REQUEST: The request of Robert Mondavi Inc. for the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for the prezoning of parcels 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049-080-06, 28, 16-19 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to iVi-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-74 from San Joaquin County I -G to IM- 1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-32 & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -00-01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project. LOCATION: Lime St. Next to RR Tracks, 049-080-28; No Site Address, 049- 080-74; No Site Address, 049-080-77; No Site Address, 049- 080-78; 17429 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-16; 17446 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-05; 17536 North Guild Avenue, 049- 040-28; 17555 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-17; 17568 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-27; 17611 North Guild Avenue, 049- 080-18; 17626 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-06; 17649 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-19, 17822 North Guild Avenue, 049- 080-05; 18050 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-33; 18151 North Guild Avenue, 049-020-09; 18180 North Guild Avenue, 049- 020-32. APPLICANT: Robert Mondavi Inc. 84I Latour Court Napa, CA 94558 OWNERS: 049-080-28 049-020-09, 049-080-32, 33, 74, 77, & 78 049-080-16, 17 049-040-05 049-040-28 & 27 049 -080 -IS 049-080-06 049-080-19 049-080-05 John Zunino 4240 E. Acampo Road Acampo, CA 95220-9501 Lodi Storage Associates 2950 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 330 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 James Boyd William Mason Vesta Mason Chester Leroy Ferdun Mason/Ferdun Robert Moreland Edward Atwood 17429 N. Guild Avenue 911 W. Elm Street 17563 N. Guild Avenue 650 Kite Hill Road 36 Pembrook Ct. 1769 N. Guild Avenue 36 Pembrook Ct. Iw JACommunity Dcvelopment'PlanningLST.At- R°D.20001Z-00-02r.doc Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Orinda, CA 94583 Morass, CA 94556-2619 Lodi, CA 95240 Morasa, CA 94556-2619 Site Characteristics: The subject properties sit within San Joaquin County and are located on the east and west sides of North Guild Avenue. The properties are relatively flat with no unusual or extraordinary topographic features. To the north of the project site is the lvlokelumne River and settling ponds for the Eastside Winery. To the south is the existing City limits which runs along the north property lines of the light industrial zoned properties fronting Victor Road (State Hwy 12). To the west is the existing City limits which runs along the east property lines of the heavy industrial zoned properties in the City fronting North Cluff Avenue and East Turner Road. To the east beyond the Central California Traction Company railroad right-of-way is vineyardfagrieultural land in the County. Parcels 049-020-09 and 049-080-32 contain a combined total of 15.29 acres and are currently used as settling ponds for the winery located on a portion of 049-080-33. Parcel 049-080-33 contains 19.56 acres and is developed with a 300,000 square - foot warehouse building and a few smaller buildings totalling approximately 64,000 square -feet. Parcel 049-080-78 contains 6.28 acres and is approximately one-third vacant on the north end and the remainder is two-thirds vineyard. Parcels 049-080- 05, 74, & 77 contain a combined total of 21.87 acres and are all unimproved dirt lots. Parcels 049-080-16 thru 19 are all 5 acres in size, relatively unimproved dirt lots, with a single family residence on 16, 18 & 19. Parcel 049-080-06 contains 15 acres, fronts on Guild Avenue on the west property line and Lime Street on the north property line, has a single family residence and a few delapidated barns, and approximately 3 acres of orchard fronting Lime Street. The remainder of the parcel is unimproved. Parcel 049-080-28 contains 5 acres of cherry orchard, and fronts Lime Street on its north property line and the CCT right-of-way on its east property line. Parcel 049-040-27 contains 0.77 acres and has a single family residence. Parcel 049-040-28 contains 8.89 acres and is an unimproved dirt lot. Parcel 049-040-05 contains 15 acres with a 4 acre orchard fronting Guild Avenue. The remainder of the property is unimproved. General Plan Designation: HI, Heavy Industrial & LI, Light Industrial Zoning Designations: I -G, General Industrial & AU -20, Agricultural Urban Reserve (San Joaquin County zoning designations) Property Size: Sixteen parcels totaling of 127.43 acres. Adiacent Zoning and Land Use: North: AU -20, Agricultural Urban Reserve. To the north of the project site are the Mokelumne River and settling ponds of the Eastside Winery outside the City limits. South: M-1. Light Industrial. Adjacent on the south side of the property is a mixture of mostly vacant land, a few residences, and limited industrial uses within the City limits. Iw JACommunity DcvelopmentTlanning\STAFTRFTC OMZ•00-0?r.doe South: vl-1, Light Industrial. Adjacent on the south side of the property is a mixture of mostly vacant land, a few residences, and limited industrial uses within the City limits. East: AG40, General Agriculture. Adjacent on the east, across the Central California Traction railroad right-of-way, is vineyard property. West: M-2, Heavy Industrial. Adjacent on the west are various heavy industrial uses in the City including an autobody shop, mini storage, enclosed and open storage yards, and the Central California Waste transfer station. Neighborhood Characteristics: This neighborhood is located in the extreme northeast corner of the City. The industrial areas on the east side of Highway 99 have seen a lot of building activity in the past couple of years and the area continues to develop. In the most immediate vicinity are open storage yards, small industrial warehouse uses, and the waste transfer station. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS: Negative Declaration ND -00-01 has been prepared in accordance with CEQA. This document adequately addresses possible adverse environmental effects of this project. No significant impacts are anticipated. PUBLIC BEARING NOTICE: Legal Notice for the Annexation and Prezone was published on April, 1 2000. A total of 33 notices were sent to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of the subject property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for the - - Mondavi Inc. to prezone parcels 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049-080-06, 28, 16-19 request of Robert from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-1; to prezone parcel 049-080-74 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-1; to prezone parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County Ali -20 to M-2; to prezone parcels 049-080-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-2; to prezone parcels 049-080- 32 & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -00-01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project. The recommendations shall be subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. ALTERINATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS: Approve the Requests with Alternate Conditions • Deny the Requests • Continue the Requests ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Negative Declaration 3. Draft Resolution Iw J!.Community Developmrnt\Ptanning\-STAFFRPTi l-000kl-oo-02.-.4oe 650 Kite Hill Rd. Orinda, CA 94563 925 254 7670 Tuesday, April 4, 2000 Rad Bartlam, Community Dev. Dir. City of Lodi P.O. Box 3006 Lodi CA 95241-1910 Reference: 4/12/00 hearing on prezoning of parcels This letter is in support of the Robert Mondavi Inc. request APR `� i I C ; T Y 0 LS I As the owner of parcel 049-080-18 (17611 Guild Ave.) I am pleased that Robert Mondavi Inc. is interested in the development of Lodi. I am convinced that Lodi residents will be the beneficiary of anything that the Robert Mondavi organization chooses to do. The organization is internationally successfully acclaimed. If Lddi has the good fortune to have this organization expand within the city the additional tax base and employment should easily offset any community inconvenience. This area is already changing to one of industry and commerce. To try and stop or slow it now would be a disservice to the community and an unfair restraint to current property owners. As a past resident of Lodi, I am excited at the potential prospects for Lodi expansion in this area. If there had been more job opportunities when I lived there, I probably would still be a resident. Sincerely, Cheter L. Ferdun _2,GE Z? -;,:, nul o�+p xauu2 iA��uOU NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 00-01 MGM North Guild Avenue Properties Annexation APPLICANT: Robert Mondavi Properties, Inc. PREPARED BY: CITY OF LODI Community Development Department P.O. BOX 5006 LODI, CA 95241 March, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE PROJECTDESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 2 ENVIRONMENTALCHECKLIST FORM .............................................................................................. 3 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ................................................................................................ 9 DETERMINATION. ............................................................................................................................. 13 VICINITYMAP.................................................................................................................................... 14 CITY OF LODI North Guild avenue Properties Annexation PROJECT DESCRIPTION Robert Mondavi Properties, Inc. is proposing to annex and pre -zone 16 properties totaling 127.43 acres at the northeast corner of Lodi. The properties are located as follows: 1. Lime St. Next to RR Tracks 049-030-28 2. No Site Address 049-080-74 3. No Site Address 049-080-77 4. No Site Address 049-080-78 5. 17429 North Guild Avenue 049-080-16 6. 17446 North Guild Avenue 049-040-05 - 7. 17536 North Guild Avenue 049-040-28 8. 17555 North Guild Avenue 049-080-17 9. 17568 North Guild Avenue 049-040-27 10. 17611 North Guild Avenue 049-080-18 11. 17626 North Guild Avenue 049-080-06 12. 17649 North Guild Avenue 049-080-19 13. 17822 North Guild Avenue 049-080-05 14. 18050 North Guild Avenue 049-080-33 15. 18151 North Guild Avenue 049-020-09 - - 16. 18180 North Guild Avenue 049-020-32 At present, the subject parcels lie outside the City of Lodi boundaries in San Joaquin County. In order to develop within the City, Robert Mondavi Inc. has applied for annexation to the City Lodi, and for a zoning change from I -G, General Industrial and AU -20, Agriculture Urban Reserve (County zoning), to M-2, Heavy Industrial, M-1, Light Industrial and FP, Floodplain. The proposed M-1 and M-2 zoning designations are consistent with the existing General Plan land use designations. The floodplain zoning shall be established by contour of the base flood elevations as surveyed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FENIA). Parcels 049-080-06 & 049-040-05, 27, & 28 are to be purchased by Robert Mondavi Inc. for the development of a warehouse, distribution, bottling and labeling facility for their winery business. The remaining parcels of the annexation will be available for development in compliance with the provisions of their zoning designation as established and regulated by the City of Lodi. 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORIM 1. Project title: North Guild Avenue Properties Annexation 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Lodi -Community Development Department Box 3006, Lodi, CA 9241 3. Contact person and phone number: Mark Meissner Associate Planner (209)333-6711 4. Project location: San Joaquin County, CA.; Addresses and Parcel Numbers listed above in Project Description Lodi, CA 9240. 5 Project sponsor's name and address: Robert Mondavi Properties Inc. 841 Latour Court Napa, CA 9458 6. General plan designation: LI & HI, Light & Heavy Industrial. 7. Zoning: I -G, General Industrial & AU -20 Agricultural Urban Reserve, (County Zoning). 8. Description of project: See "Project Description" section above. 9 Surrounding land uses and setting: The subject properties sit within San Joaquin County and are located on the east and west sides of North Guild Avenue. The properties are relatively flat with no unusall or extraordinary topographic features. To the north of the project site is the Mokelumne River and settling ponds for the Eastside Winery. To the south is the existing City Limits which runs along the north property lines of the light industrial zoned properties fronting Victor Road (State Hwy 12). To the west is the existing City Limits which runs along the east property lines of the heavy industrial zoned properties in the City fronting North Cluff Avenue and East Turner Road. To the east beyond the Central California Traction Company railroad right of way is vineyard/agricultural land in the County. Parcels 049-020-09 and 049-080-32 contain a combined total of 15.29 acres and are currently used as settling ponds for the winery located on a portion of 049- 080-33. Parcel 049-080-33 contains 19.36 acres and is improved with a 300,000 square -foot warehouse building and a few smaller buildings totalling around 64,000 square -feet. Parcel 049-080-78 contains 6.28 acres and is approximately 113`d vacant on the north end and the remainder is 2/3fd5 vineyard. Parcels 049- 080-05, 74, & 77 contain a combined total of 21.87 acres and are all unimproved dirt lots. Parcels 049-080-16 thru 19 are all 5 acres in size, relatively unimproved dirt lots, with a single family residence on 16, 18 & 19. Parcel 049- 080-06 contains 15 acres, fronts on Guild Avenue on the west property line and Lime Street on the north property line, has a single family residence and a couple of barns, and approximately 3 acres of orchard fronting Lime Street. The remainder of the parcel is unimproved. Parcel 049-080-28 contains:5 acres of cherry orchard, and fronts Lime Street on its north property line and the CCT right-of-way on its east property Iine. Parcel 049-040-27 contains 0.77 acres and has a single family residence. Parcel 049-040-28 contains 8.89 acres and is an unimproved dirt lot. Parcel 049-040-05 contains 15 acres with a 4 acre orchard fronting Guild Avenue. The remainder of the property is unimproved. 10 Other public agencies whose approval is required: San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a ("Potentially Significant Impact" by the checklist on the following pages. 21 Land Use and Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Population and Housing ❑ Biological Resources ❑Geological Problems 21 Water ❑ Air Quality ❑ Energy and �i+lineral Resources ❑Hazards ❑ Noise ❑ :Mandatory Findings of Significance H Public Services H Utilities and Service Systems ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Recreation 4 ENVIRO:NNIENUAL IMPACTS: Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than 1. LAND USE AND PLANNIiNG. Would the proposed: Significant mitigation Signitcant N. Impact Incorporated Impact Imp. a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ❑ 0 ❑ b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by ❑ ❑ 0 agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? Cl ❑ ❑ Ls d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., impacts to soils or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established ❑ ❑ ❑ community (including a low-income or minority community)? 11 POPULATION AND HOUSLYG. Would the proposal. a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ❑ ❑ ❑ �JJ - b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ �j through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ❑ ❑ ❑ �J b) Seismic ground shaking'. ❑ ❑ ❑ �( c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard.? ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 r) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from ❑ ❑ {Jf ❑ excavation, grading or fill? g) Subsidence of land? ❑ ❑ ❑ R1 h) Expansive soils? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 i) Unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than IV. WATER. Would lite proposal result in: Significant mitigation Significant NO All "No"- Reference Source: See Project Description Impact Incorporated Impact Impa, a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ surface runoff, b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as Cl 0 ❑ ❑ flooding? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration orsurface water quality ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ❑ ❑ ❑ I?J 5 e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ❑ ❑ ❑ E Q Change in the quantity of ground water, either through direct additions or ❑ 0 ❑ B withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavation or through substantial loss of ground water recharge capability? g) altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater'. ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 I) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 public water supplies? V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: All "No " Reference Source: Appendix H, A25 & Environmental Seton„ Sec. 3.3: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected Cl 0 E7 Cl air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 c) alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 climate? d) Create objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ ❑ H VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: All "No" Reference Source: See Project Description a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ 0 Q 0 b) Hazards to safety from design feature, (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous ❑ 13 13 Q intersections) or incompatible uses (e.-.1 farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ❑ ❑ Cl 0 d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite? ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists'. ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 I) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., ❑ ❑ ❑ Q bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ❑ ❑ ❑ 1✓7 Potentially Potentially Significant Las than VTI. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: Significant Unless Significant NO Impact mitigation Impact Impa, Incorporated a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds'. b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)'. E3 ❑ ❑ ❑' c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., oak forest, coastal ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 habitat, etc.)'. d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)'. ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 R e) Wildlife dispersal migration corridors? ❑ VIII. ENERGY A,%4D `lINERAL RESOtiRCES. Would Ilse proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plan? ❑ b) Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ❑ c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be ❑ of future value to the region and the residents of the State? M HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances ❑ (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency ❑ evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ❑ d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ❑ e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ❑ X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increase in existing noise levels? ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposed have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) lire protection? ❑ b) Police protection? Cl c) Schools? ❑ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads.? ❑ e) Other government services? ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ L ❑ ❑ 8 Q ❑ ❑ 8 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 13 VA XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilitie:s a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal'. g) Local or regional water supplies? XIII. AESTHETICS. %uld the proposal: _ a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? Potentially ❑ ❑ Significant ❑ ❑ Potentially Gniess Less than ❑ Significant mitigation Significant N_ Impact Incorporated Impact Ind ❑ ❑ 0 C ❑ ❑ 0 C ❑ ❑ ❑ R ❑ 0 ❑ C ❑ ❑ 0 C ❑ ❑ 0 C ❑ 0 ❑ C' _ a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 c) Create light or glare:' ❑ ❑ ❑ � CIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Disturb archaeological resources? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 ethnic cultural values? d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential ❑ ❑ ❑ impact area'. XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other ❑ ❑ ❑ 21 recreational facilities? b) Affect recreation opportunities? ❑ ❑ 0 8 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than XVI. MANDATORY FLN'DINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Significant mitigation Significant INC Impact Incorporated Impact lmps a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or pre -history? ❑ ❑ ❑ PJ b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals:' c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 d) Does the project have environmental effects which will rause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses used. June 1991. City of Lodi General Plan EIR. This area was identified in the Lodi General Plan and discussed in the Environmental Impact Report SCH# 9020206 a) Mitigation measures. See Attached Summary for discussion. SUiyMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS An explanation of potentially significant impacts follows. Measures included in this summary shall be treated as mitigation where indicated. LAND USE AND PLANNING I. a) The properties in question are currently designated as LI, Light Industrial and HI, Heavy Industrial. No change in General Plan designation is being requested. The zoning is currently a San Joaquin County zoning, having a designation of I -G, General Agriculture & AU -20, Agricultural Urban Reserve. The project will be Re -zoned to a designation of M-1 and M-2, corresponding to the General Plan designations of LI and HI. Action by the City Council to make the requested changes will mitigate any impacts due to conflicts to less than significant levels. X d) The subject properties taken together equal approximately 127.43 acres ranging in land use from a fully improved industrial project to a vacant dirt lot (see 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting. Page 4). Aside from the 4 properties that are planned for development as a warehouse, distribution, bottling and labeling facility for Robert Mondavi Inc., it is unknown at this time what will be built on the remaining properties, or when. It is however, certain that the land would at some point be converted to industrial uses. Page 3-2 of the General Plan Policy Document identifies the conversion of agricultural land as an adverse impact of residential, commercial and industrial development. In order to mitigate the adverse impacts of converting farm land to urban uses, Chapter Three of the General Plan Policy Document specifies on page 3-4, among other things, that the City shall encourage the preservation of agricultural uses surrounding the city and to discourage any premature urbanization of farmland. Specific policies in the Conservation Element are aimed at delaying the loss of prime agricultural lands and facilitating their continued use, including, 1. Designating an open space greenbelt around the urbanized area of the City. 2. Support the continuation of agricultural uses on lands designated for urban uses until such time that urban development is imminent. 3. Allow the continuation of viable agricultural activities around the city. Annexing the Mondavi properties will take roughly 127.43 acres of agricultural land out of production; however, its proximity to land within the City limits reduces its suitability for continued farming. Inappropriate and premature conversion of productive agricultural land would occur if "leap frog' development were taking place, involving development of land not adjacent to the existing City limits. Annexing and developing the subject - property is in keeping with the General Plan policies stated above. Therefore, potential adverse impacts associated with the conversion of the subject property from agricultural to urban uses are mitigated to less than significant levels. WATER IV. b) As stated in the project description of this document, the City of Lodi will be zoning the areas of the annexation found to be within the floodplain and floodway by the Federal Emergency Management Agency as FP, Floodplain District. The City's floodplain zoning designation, § 17.51 of the Lodi Municipal Code, was originally established in cooperation with the National Flood Insurance Program. The Mokelumne River floodplain boundary was defined as those areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration through a scientific and engineering report entitled "The Flood Insurance Study for the City of Lodi," dated April 1973. Revisions to the original maps were published, June 18, 1987. The Health and Safety Element of the General Plan specifically identifies the potential flood hazards from the Mokelumne River, and has established a goal to prevent loss of lives, injury, and property damage and appropriate policies to meet that goal. One more notable policy from page 9-3 of the General Plan Policy Document states that "The City shall continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program and ensure that local regulations are in full compliance with standards adopted by FEMA." 9 Annexing the subject properties and establishing FP zoning appropriately is in keeping with the General Plan policies and therefore mitigates potential flood impacts to less than significant levels. PUBLIC SERVICES XI. a), b) The chane from County agricultural Iand to the eventually development of heavy and light industrial uses will generate the need for additional fire and/or police services. The City-wide Development Impact Mitigation Fee schedule was adopted to insure that new development generates sufficient revenue to maintain specified levels of service in town. Page 9-5 of the General Plan Policy Document states that the City shall add personnel, equipment, or facilities necessary to maintain a minimum three (3) minute travel time for fire calls. Page 9-6 of the Policy Document goes on to state that the City shall also strive to maintain a staff ratio of 3.1 police officers per 1,000 population with response times averaging three (3) minutes for emergency calls and 40 minutes for non emergency calls. Impact fees are calculated on new development, such as this proposed -new industrial, to generate enough revenue to preserve these service levels, thereby mitigating any potential adverse impacts on fire and/or police protection to less than significant levels. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS XII. d) The General Plan EIR points out on page 10-2 that at the time the General Plan was prepared in 1989, there was a design treatment capacity of 6.2 MGD. A planned (and later completed) expansion increased capacity to 8.5 MGD in 1991. Assuming that residential growth was going to continue at the planned two (2) percent annual rate, and that flows would increase at a proportionate rate, the City's White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility (WSWPCF) has adequate capacity for the life of the 20 year plan. In fact, residential growth has not reached the two (2) percent mark since the plan was adopted. Over the last five (5) years, growth has not even approached two percent, but rather has averaged .970. This being the case, there is estimated to be excess carrying capacity at the WSWPCF, enough to mitigate any impacts of the new light industrial use to less than significant levels. e) The General Plan EIR, page 10-3 outlines the City's storm water collection, distribution, and disposal system. In Lodi, storm water is discharged to the Mokelumne River and the Woodbridge Irrigation District (WID) Canal. Due to the proximity of the project area to the Mokelumne River, the drainage will flow to the river. Storm runoff from the development of the project site will not impact the City's existing drainage basins which reduces impacts to less than significant. fl Page 10-1 of the General Plan EIR explains that the water supply for the entire City is provided by a groundwater aquifer, tapped into by a system of interconnected City wells. According to Lodi standards, one water well shall be maintained per each 2,000 population. New wells are drilled as necessary to provide an adequate supply commensurate with growth. At the time the General Plan was drafted in 1987, water demand stood at 13.7 1MGD. In I991, it had grown to 14.1 MGD. According to estimates prepared in 1991, development provided for by the General Plan would 11 create demand for approximately 7.8 2NIGD of water, or 67 percent more than the current amount. As stated previously in this Negative Declaration, due to the affect of the City's Growth i'vIanagement Program, growth has not reached the levels anticipated in 1991, reducing the anticipated per capita consumption of water. In addition, increased water conservation efforts by the City beginning in 1995 have also reduced the per capita consumption of water to less than expected levels. Further augmenting the City's ability to meet demand, especially during peak periods, is a one million gallon storage tank located on Thurman Street, in the industrial district east of Highway 99. This tank can be Filled during off peak periods and made available during periods of excessive usa?e. With 25 water wells currently in operation and another expected to come on line by the fall of 2000 there is estimated to be a sufficient supply of water. Considering the aforementioned mitigating factors, any impacts on the water supply created as a result of the Mondavi Properties annexation/reorganization are reduced to less than significant levels. 12 DETERMENT ATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE declaration will be prepared. El I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I rind that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ 1 rind that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 3) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets' if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" ❑ I find that although the.proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures 2haL ar osed 7nthe proposed project Signature: Date: jt 7—,9-a Printed Name: Llark Meissner For: Citv of Lodi 13 RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 00- . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE REQUEST OF ROBERT MONDAVI INC. FOR THE PREZONING OF PARCELS 049-040-05,27, & 28,049- 080-06,28,16-19 8,049- 080-06,28,16-19 FROM SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AU -20 TO M-1; THE PREZONING OF PARCEL 049-080-74 FROM SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY I -G TO 1NI-1; THE PREZONING OF PARCEL 049-080-03 FROM SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY AU -20 TOM -2; THE PREZONING OF PARCELS 049-080-33,77, & 78 FRO. -N1 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY I -G TO M-2; THE PREZONING OF PARCELS 049-080-32 & 049-020-09 FROM SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY I -G TO FP; AND THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY NEGATIVE DECLARATION ND -00-01 AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PROJECT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law, on the requested prezonin� and negative declaration in accordance with the Government Code and Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 17.84, Amendments; WHEREAS, the properties are located at Lime St. Next to RR Tracks, 049-080-28; No Site Address, 049-080-74; No Site Address, 049-080-77; No Site Address, 049-080-78; 17429 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-16; 17446 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-05; 17336 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-28; 17555 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-17; 17568 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-27: 17611 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-18; 17626 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-06; 17649 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-19; 17822 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-05; 18050 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-33; 18151 North Guild Avenue, 049-020-09; 18180 North Guild Avenue, 049-020-33; WHEREAS, the project proponent is Robert Mondavi Inc., 841 Latour Court, Napa, CA - 94558; WHEREAS, the properties have zoning designations (county) of I -G, General Industrial and AU -20, Agricultural Urban Reserve, WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUNT), DETERIMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi as follows: 1. Negative Declaration File No. ND -00-01 has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided thereunder. Further, the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with respect to the project identified in this Resolution. It is found that the area to be Prezoned includes parcels located at Lime St. Next to RR Tracks, 049-080-28; No Site Address, 049-080-74; No Site Address, 049-080-77; No Site Address, 049-080-78; 17-129 Notch Guild Avenue, 049-080-16; 174;6 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-05; 17536 North Guild Avenue, 049-04110-28; 17555 North Guild Avenue, 049-080- 17; 17568 North Guild Avenue, 0=19-040-27; 17611 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-18; 17626 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-06; 17649 North Guild Avenue, 019-080-19; 17822 Worth Guild Avenue, 049-080-05; t8050 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-33; 18151 North Guild Avenue, 049-020-09; 18180 North Guild Avenue, 049-020-32. 3. It is found that Prezoning this property is not in conflict with adopted pians or policies of the General Plan of the City and will serve sound Planning practice. 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Lodi hereby recommends approval of the Prezoning of the parcels located at Lime St. Next to RR Tracks, 049-080-28; No Site Address, 049-080- 74; No Site Address, 049-080-77; No Site Address, 049-080-78; 17429 North Guild Avenue, 049-OSO-16; 17446 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-05; 17536 North Guild Avenue, 049-040- 28; 17555 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-17; 17568 North Guild Avenue, 049-040-27; 17611 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-18; 17626 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-06; 17649 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-19; 17822 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-05; 18050 North Guild Avenue, 049-080-33; 18151 North Guild Avenue, 049-020-09; 18180 North Guild Avenue, 049-020-32 as described in the title of this resolution. Dated: April 12, 2000 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 00-_ was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi at a continued meeting held on April 12, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: ATTEST: Secretary-, Planning Commission 000? Sb SZ=9i 90 JC, X41 5"''xzuu2 tA2pu0W\9N!NOZ\: CITY OF LODI NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING r$F Date: May 3, 2000 Carnegie Forum s . - 305 West Pine Street, Lodi Time: 7:00 p.m. For information regarding this notice please contact: Jacqueline L. Taylor Interim City Clerk Telephone: (209) 333-6702 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, May 3, 2000 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing to consider the following matter: a) Set Public Hearing for May 3, 2000 to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval to the City Council for the annexation and prezoning ofparcels 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049- 080-06, 28, 16-19 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-74 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-2; the prezo6ing of parcels 049-080-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-32 & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -00.01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Department Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing - scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing. If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing. By Order of the Lodi City Council: Ja ueline L. T for Inte 'm City Clerk Dated: April 19, 2000 Approved as to form: Randall A. Hays City Attorney JACITYURKTORMSWOTCOODOC 4119100 �y�Cpp U pqC/Fpitic�`V DECLARATION Set A Public Hearing For May 3. 2000 To Consider Planning Commission's Recommendation Of Approval For Annexation And Prezoning(Mondavi Properties, East Of Cluff Road, North Of Hwy 12/Victor Road) On April 20, 2000 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A'; said envelopes were addressed as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and the places to which said envelopes were addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 20, 2000, at Lodi, California. ORDERED BY: JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR INTERIM CITY CLERK JacqJeline aylor Intet City k Jennifer M. Perrin Deputy City Clerk decmail/forms WBR, Inc. Max & Joan Lee U Lodi Storage Associates P.O. Box 66001 1225 Armstrong Road 2950 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 330 Stockton, CA 95206 Lodi, CA 95240 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Cal Waste Stockton Cellular Telephone Theron Kettelman P.O. Box 122283 5400 Carmon Point 642 N. Cluff Avenue Ft. Worth, TX 76121-2283 Kirkland, WA 98033 Lodi, CA 95240 James Boyd Chester Leroy Ferdun Robert Moreland 17429 N. Guild Avenue 650 Kite Hill Road 17649 N. Guild Avenue Lodi. CA 95240 Orinda, CA 94583 Lodi, CA 95240 East Side Winery Edward Atwood John Zunino P.O. Box 440 36 Pembrook Ct. 4240 E. Acampo Road Lodi. CA 95241 Moraga, CA 94556-2619 Acampo. CA 95220-9501 William Mason John Taylor Fertilizers Co. Vesta Mason 911 W. Elm Street P.O. Box 15289 17568 N. Guild Avenue Lodi, CA 95240 Sacramento, CA 95813 Lodi, CA 95240 Dorothy Mettler Tetsuo Matsumoto FV & DE McClaine 17900 Cherry Road 1335 E. Lockeford Street 1321 E. Lockeford St. Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Calpine Containers Gary Guthrie Donald Ford 140 Gregory Lane, Suite 180 P.O. Box 1240 P.O. Box 577 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Lodi, CA 95241 Lockeford, CA 95237 Donald Ford William & Marian Johnson Alberta Sproul 639 E. Lockeford Street 909 Tara Place 6655 Sproul Lane Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Colorado Springs, CO 80918 Robert Sanauinetti James Miller Duane Bechthold 5221 E. Acampo 17519 N. Kennison Lane 17577 N. Kennison Lane Acampo, CA 95220 Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Henry Buchmiller Bradley Clasen Southern Pacific Railroad 17655 N. Kennison 17601 N. Kennision 1700 Farnam Street, 10th Floor South Lodi; CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Omaha.INE 68102-2010 Joraen Sorenson Jim Munro East Side Winery 17711 Kennison Lane P.O. Box 864 6100 E. Hwy 12 Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95241 Lodi, CA 95240 ORDINANCE NO. 1691 AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY PREZONING PARCELS LOCATED AT 049-040-05, 27, & 28, 049-080-06, 28, 16-19 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-74 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-1; the prezoning of parcel 049-080-05 from San Joaquin County AU -20 to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-33, 77, & 78 from San Joaquin County I -G to M-2; the prezoning of parcels 049-080-32 & 049-020-09 from San Joaquin County I -G to FP; and the recommendation that the City Council certify Negative Declaration ND -00- 01 as adequate environmental documentation for the project. ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Official District Map of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows: The parcels listed below consist of 16 individual parcels totaling 127.43 acres which are hereby prezoned as shown below and on the Vicinity Map, on file in the office of the City Clerk: 1.) Lime Street next to RR Tracks 049-080-28 S.J. Co.AU-20 to M-1 2.) No Site Address 049-080-74 S.J. Co. I -G to M-1 3.) No Site Address 049-080-77 S.J. Co. I -G to M-2 4.) No Site Address 049-080-78 S.J. Co. I -G to M-2 ---5.) 17429 North Guild Avenue 049-080-16 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 6.) 17446 North Guild Avenue 049-040-05 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 7.) 17536 North Guild Avenue 049-040-28 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 8.) 17555 North Guild Avenue 049-080-17 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 9.) 17568 North Guild Avenue 049-040-27 S:J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 10.) 17611 North Guild Avenue 049-080-18 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 11.) 17626 North Guild Avenue 049-080-06 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 12.) 17649 North Guild Avenue 049-080-19 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 13.) 17822 North Guild Avenue 049-080-05 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-2 14.) 18050 North Guild Avenue 049-080-33 S.J. Co. I -G to M-2 15.) 18151 North Guild Avenue 049-020-09 S.J. Co. I -G to FP 16.) 18180 North Guild Avenue 049-020-32 S.J. Co. I -G to FP Section 2. The alterations, changes, and amendments of said Official District Map of the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by the City Planning Commission and by the City Council of this City after public hearings held in conformance with provisions of Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Code and the laws of the State of California applicable thereto. Section 3 - No Mandatory Duty of Care. This ordinance is not intended to and shall not be construed or given effect in a manner which imposes upon the City, or any officer or employee thereof, a mandatory duty of care towards persons or property within the City or outside of the City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law. Section 4 - Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. To this end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof. Section 5. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar as such conflict may exist. Section 6. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News Sentinel', a daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval. Approved this ^ day of , 2000 STEPHEN J. MANN Mayor Attest: JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR Interim City Clerk State of California County of San Joaquin, ss. -- f, Jacqueline L. Taylor, Interim City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1691 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held May 3, 2000 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said Council held , 2000 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — I further certify that Ordinance No. 1691 was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law. JACQUELINE L. TAYLOR Interim City Clerk Approved as to Form: ,Ltd RA DALL A. HAYS City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 2000-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION AS ADEQUATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE MONDAVI ANNEXATION/REORGANIZATION AND REZONE WHEREAS, public hearings were held by the Planning Commission and City Council on April 12, 2000 and May 3, 2000 respectively, on the following described Mondavi Annexation/Reorganization and Rezone: a) Proposed Mondavi Annexation/Reorganization to the City of Lodi of an area comprising of 127.43 acres more or less adjacent to the City limits located at the northeast corner of Lodi bounded by the existing City boundary on the south and west, the Mokelumne River on the north, and the Central California Traction railroad right-of-way on the east and withdrawal of said 127.43 acres from the Mokelumne Rural County Fire Protection District, Northern San Joaquin County Water Conservation District, and the San Joaquin County Resource Conservation District, located within the area to be annexed to the City of Lodi, Assessor Parcel Numbers as follows, and as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; 1.) Lime Street next to RR Tracks 049-080-28 2.) No Site Address 049-080-74 3.) No Site Address 049-080-77 4.) No Site Address 049-080-78 5.) 17429 North Guild Avenue 049-080-16 6.) 17446 North Guild Avenue 049-040-05 7.) 17536 North Guild Avenue 049-040-28 8.) 17555 North Guild Avenue 049-080-17 9.) 17568 North Guild Avenue 049-040-27 10.) 17611 North Guild Avenue 049-080-18 11.) 17626 North Guild Avenue 049-080-06 12.) 17649 North Guild Avenue 049-080-19 13.) 17822 North Guild Avenue 049-080-05 14.) 18050 North Guild Avenue 049-080-33 15.) 18151 North Guild Avenue 049-020-09 16.) 18180 North Guild Avenue 049-080-32; and b) Rezone the area bounded by the existing City boundary on the south and west, the Mokelumne River on the north, and the Central California Traction railroad right-of-way on the east as follows: WHEREAS, it is the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council approve their finding that the Negative Declaration is adequate environmental documentation; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all documentation and hereby certifies the Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the above- mentioned Mondavi Annexation/Reorganization and Rezone. Dated: May 3, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000-75 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held May 3, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Land, Nakanishi and Mann (Mayor) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Pennino OLU JAC UELINE . TAYL Inter City Cl 2000-75 Address Parcel No. Zoning Change 1.) Lime Street next to RR Tracks 049-080-28 S.J. Co.AU-20 to M-1 2.) No Site Address 049-080-74 S.J. Co. I -G to M-1 3.) No Site Address 049-080-77 S.J. Co. 1-G to M-2 4.) No Site Address 049-080-78 S.J. Co. I -G to M-2 5.) 17429 North Guild Avenue 049-080-16 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 6.) 17446 North Guild Avenue 049-040-05 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 7.) 17536 North Guild Avenue 049-040-28 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 8.) 17555 North Guild Avenue 049-080-17 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 9.) 17568 North Guild Avenue 049-040-27 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 10.) 17611 North Guild Avenue 049-080-18 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 11.) 17626 North Guild Avenue 049-080-06 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 12.) 17649 North Guild Avenue 049-080-19 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-1 13.) 17822 North Guild Avenue 049-080-05 S.J. Co. AU -20 to M-2 14.) 18050 North Guild Avenue 049-080-33 S.J. Co. I -G to M-2 15.) 18151 North Guild Avenue 049-020-09 S.J. Co. I -G to FP 16.) 18180 North Guild Avenue 049-080-32 S.J. Co. I -G to FP WHEREAS, it is the Planning Commission recommendation that City Council approve their finding that the Negative Declaration is adequate environmental documentation; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all documentation and hereby certifies the Negative Declaration as adequate environmental documentation for the above- mentioned Mondavi Annexation/Reorganization and Rezone. Dated: May 3, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000-75 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held May 3, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Land, Nakanishi and Mann (Mayor) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Pennino OLU JAC UELINE . TAYL Inter City Cl 2000-75 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED MONDAVI ANNEXATION/REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the Local Government Reorganization Act; and WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organization is the annexation to the City of Lodi of an area comprising of 127.43 acres more or less adjacent to the City limits located at the northeast comer of Lodi bounded by the existing City boundary on the south and west, the Mokelumne River on the north, and the Central California Traction railroad right-of-way on the east and withdrawal of said 127.43 acres from the Mokelumne Rural County Fire Protection District, Northern San Joaquin County Water Conservation District, and the San Joaquin County Resource Conservation District, located within the area to be annexed to the City of Lodi, Assessor Parcel Numbers as follows, and as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; 1.) Lime Street next to RR Tracks 049-080-28 2.) No Site Address 049-080-74 3.) No Site Address 049-080-77 4.) No Site Address 049-080-78 5.) 17429 North Guild Avenue 049-080-16 - 6.) 17446 North Guild Avenue 049-040-05 7.) 17536 North Guild Avenue 049-040-28 8.) 17555 North Guild Avenue 049-080-17 9.) 17568 North Guild Avenue 049-040-27 10.) 17611 North Guild Avenue 049-080-18 11.) 17626 North Guild Avenue 049-080-06 12.) 17649 North Guild Avenue 049-080-19 13.) 17822 North Guild Avenue 049-080-05 14.) 18050 North Guild Avenue 049-080-33 15.) 18151 North Guild Avenue 049-020-09 16.) 18180 North Guild Avenue 049-080-32; and WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi and detached from the Mokelumne Rural County Fire Protection District, Northern San Joaquin County Water Conservation District, and the San Joaquin County Resource Conservation District, is uninhabited; and WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by this reorganization; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows: (1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban confines of the City and will generate service needs substantially similar to that of other incorporated urban areas which require municipal government service; (2) Annexation to the City of Lodi of the subject area will result in improved economics of scale in government operations while improving coordination in the delivery of planning services; (3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of San Joaquin will benefit from the proposed reorganization as a result of savings to the County by reduction of County required services in unincorporated but urban oriented area; (4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi is geographically, socially, economically and politically part of the same urban area of which the City of Lodi is also a part; (5) The subject area is within the Lodi Sphere of Influence; and (6) Future inhabitants in the subject area will gain immediate response in regard to police and fire protection, unlimited City garbage and trash collection service, street lighting service, a modern sewer system, other municipal services, and improvement of property values. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lodi City Council that the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the proposed "Mondavi Annexation/Reorganization" which includes annexation of 127.43 acres more or less, and detachment from the Mokelumne Rural County Fire Protection District, Northern San Joaquin County Water Conservation District, and the San Joaquin County Resource Conservation District as described in Exhibit A attached hereto. This is all subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions. Dated: May 3, 2000 -----=------------------------------------------------------------ I hereby certify that Resolution No. 2000-76 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held May 3, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Land, Nakanishi, and Mann (Mayor) NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Pennino AC ELINfk AY Inted City Cie 2000-76