HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 20, 1999 F-02 PHCITY OF I,ODI COUNCIL COMM[TNICATION
AGENDA TITLE: Conduct a Public Hearing to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation
that the City Council adopt a Prezone requested by Oliver Tecklenburg and William
Beckman for the properties located at 5215 & 5333 E. Kettleman Lane. The
requested Prezoning is from AU -20, Agriculture Urban Reserve to U -H, Unclassified
Holding District and to initiate annexation of the property into the City of Lodi.
MEETING DATE: October 20, 1999
PREPARED BY: Community Development Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to consider the
recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt Prezoning
and initiate annexation of the property as stated above.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The request of Oliver Tecklenburg and William T. Beckman is
the first step in the annexation process. The nine (9) acre parcel
and the 18 acre parcel are adjacent to each other at 5215 and 5333
East Kettleman Lane, and are directly -adjacent to the existing
City boundaries. When the General Plan was adopted by the City Council in 1991, several blocks of land
in the industrial corridor east of Highway 99 within the -sphere of the General Plan, including the subject
properties, were designated LI, Light Industrial. Therefore, no General Plan Amendment is necessary,
only the Prezoning.
On September 22, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing to consider the request. Subsequent to
staffs presentation, there were several questions from the Commission about the annexation and its
implications on development in this area. In response, Director Bartlam provided some insight about the
overall development of the industrial area east of Highway 99 as well the potential for locating a business
park in this area. Commissioners also asked for more detail and clarification about what is and is not
allowed in the U -H, Unclassified Holding District. Following this question and answer period, the
Commission approved a recommendation to the Council for the Prezoning from A -U, Agricultural Urban
Reserve to U -H, Unclassified Holding. This recommendation also comes with a request to begin the
annexation proceedings.
Staff feels that annexation of the two subject properties makes sense from a Planning perspective. While
there are no plans for development at this time, the properties are contiguous to existing City boundaries.
The City has anticipated adding this land to the City as evidenced by the City General Plan designation of
LI Light Industrial on these properties, which is already in place. Furthermore, the City is prepared to
provide services such as water and sewer to this location. However, we do have reservations about
opening the door at this time for development without any foreknowledge about what may take place. In
order to maintain a comfortable level of control over development that may occur here, we are
recommending the U -H, Unclassified Holding District zoning be placed on the land at this time.
APPROVED:
H. Dixo Flynn -- City M nager
cc9921.doc 10/12/99
Council Communication
Meeting Date: October 20, 1999
Page 2
The U -H, Unclassified Holding District, Section 17.54.020 (B) of the Zoning Ordinance reads,
"This district designates land to be held in an agricultural, non -urban state as reserve for future uses.
Land will be held in this district until a need for the land exists, at which time it will be developed in a
manner pending proper timing for the economical provision of utilities, major streets, and other
facilities. "
Section 17.54 goes on to list the following permitted uses in the U -H zone, as follows;
A. Single family dwellings... each lot being a minimum of twenty acres;
B. Farms and ranches....
C. Farms and ranches for the grazing of cattle, sheep, or horses... provided that such grazing is not a part
of nor conducted in conjunction with any dairy, livestock feed yard, livestock sales yard or other
prohibited use;
D. Public recreation and parks areas.
Several other conditional uses are permitted in the U -H zone which are in one way or another accessory or
related uses to those listed above. Such conditional uses are supportive of or tied to either agriculture,
livestock, or recreational uses. In addition, buildings and uses of an administrative, educational, religious,
cultural, or public service type similar to those allowed in an R-1 zone with a Use Permit are allowed in
the U -H district.
A major City Council project for the coming two (2) years is the development of a business park.
Business parks are generally considered a higher end industrial development that is attractive to
companies looking for an image conscious location. The City, in cooperation with the San Joaquin
Partnership, believes the area located along Kettleman Lane east of Highway 99 is well suited for this
type of development. Therefore, one of the tasks that has been given to our Zoning Code consultant is to
develop a new zoning district that would accommodate this standard. It is anticipated once this work is
complete, the property would be re -zoned to that district. While we do not like to generalize about the
type of end user, it is rather common for high tech industries to want this increased level of development
quality. Unfortunately, there are not any examples within the County; however, the Solano Business Park
in Fairfield and Hacienda in Pleasanton, are along the lines envisioned. Since continued development of
our industrial corridor on the east side of Highway 99 should be furthered by taking the subject properties
into the City at this time, we favor the Annexation and Prezoning to U -H, Unclassified Holding District.
FUNDING: None required
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
Prepared by: Eric Veerkamp, Associate Planner
EWV
Attachments
G ,
MEiv10RANDLIM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department
o'
To: Planning Commission
From: Community Development Department
Date: September 22, 1999
Subject: Request of Oliver Tecklenburs and William T. Beckman for a Prezoning from
AU -20, Agriculture Urban Reserve to U -H, Unclassified Holding District, for the
properties located at 5215 and 5333 East Kettleman Lane.
SUMMARY
The request of the applicants is the first step in the annexation process. The western parcel is 9 acres,
and the east parcel is 18 acres. The properties are adjacent to each other at 5215 and 5333 East
Kettleman Lane, and are directly adjacent to the existing City boundary. No firm plans for development
exist at this time, so there are few details about any business or activity that may be located here in the
future. The only request under consideration right now is the Prezoning and subsequent Annexation.
BACKGROL?ID
The land at this location has been farmed in the county for many years. When the General Plan was
adopted by the City Council in 1991, several blocks of land in the industrial corridor east of Highway 99
within the sphere of the General Plan, including the subject properties, were designated LI. Light
Industrial. According to Mr. Tecklenburg, the family has decided that the time is right to annex to the
City, making the land available for urbanization.
ANALYSIS
With regard to the U -H, Unclassified Holding District, Section 17.54.020 (B) of the Zoning Ordinance
states that "This district designates land to be held in an agricultural, non -urban state as reserve for future
uses. Land will be held in this district until a need for the land exists, at which time it will be developed
in a manner pending proper timing for the economical provision of utilities, major streets, and other
facilities." This section of the Zoning Ordinance goes on to list the following permitted uses in the U -H
zone, as follows;
A. Single family dwellings... each lot being a minimum of twenty acres;
B. Farms and ranches....
C. Farms and ranches for the grazing of cattle, sheep, or horses... provided that such gazing is not a part
of nor conducted in conjunction with any dairy, livestock feed yard, livestock sales yard or other
prohibited use;
D. Public recreation and parks areas.
Several other conditional uses are permitted in the U -H zone which are in one way or another accessory
or related uses to those listed above. Such conditional uses are supportive of or tied to either agriculture,
livestock, or recreational uses. In addition, buildings and uses of an administrative, educational,
religious, cultural, or public service type similar to those allowed in an R-1 zone with a Use Permit are
allowed in the U -H district.
Iw JACommunityDevelopmentlPlanning�i—riFFRP'nl999\z-99-03.doe
Staff feels that annexation of the two subject properties makes sense from a Planning perspective. While
there are no plans for development at this time, the properties are contiguous to existing City boundaries.
The City has anticipated adding this land to the City as evidenced by the City General Plan designation
of LI Light Industrial on these properties, which is already in place. Furthermore, the City is prepared to
provide services such as water and sewer to this location.
However, we do have reservations about opening the door at this time for development %without any
foreknowledge about what may take place here. In order to maintain a comfortable level of control over
development that may occur here, we are recommending the U -H, Unclassified Holding District zoning
be placed on the land at this time.
A major City Council project for the coming t%vo (2) years is the development of a business park.
Business parks are generally considered a higher end industrial development that is attractive to
companies looking for an image conscious location. The City, in cooperation with the San Joaquin
Partnership, believes the area located along Kettleman Lane east of Highway 99 is well suited for this
type of development. Therefore. one of the tasks that has been given to our Zoning Code consultant is to
develop a new zoning district that would accommodate this standard. It is anticipated once this work is
complete, the property would be re -zoned to that district
While we do not like to generalize about the type of end user, it is rather common for high tech industries
to want this increased level of development quality. Unfortunately, there are not any examples within the
County; however. the Solano Business Park in Fairfield and Hacienda in Pleasanton, ars along the lines
envisioned.
Since continued development of our industrial corridor on the east side of Highway 99 should be
furthered by taking the subject properties into the City at this time, we favor the Annexation and
Prezoning to U -H. Unclassified Holding District.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for adoption
of the Request of Oliver Tecklenburg and William T. Beckman for a Prezoning from AL -20, Agriculture
Urban Reserve to U -H, Unclassified Holding District, for the properties located at 5215 and 5333 East
Kettleman Lane. subject to the conditions on the attached Resolutions.
ALTERNATIVE PLA:NINLNG COMMISSION ACTIONS
• Approve the Requests with Alternate Conditions
• Deny the Requests
• Continue the Requests
Respectf Ily Submitted,
Eric W. Veerk' 1
Associate Planner
EWV
Rev' ed and Concur,
1
Konradt Bartlam
Community Development Director
lw !:\Community Development\Planning\STAFFRP R19991Z-99-03.doc
CITY OF LODI
PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report
MEETING DATE:
September 22. 1999
APPLICATION NO'S:
Annexation for Oliver Tecklenburg and William T. Beckman,
Rezone No. Z-99-03.
REQUEST:
Request of Oliver Tecklenburg and William T. Beckman for a
Prezoning from AU -20, Agriculture Urban Reserve to U -H,
Unclassified Holding District.
LOCATION:
5215 and 533 3 East Kettleman Lane. parcel no's. 049-070-25,
and 049-070-24.
APPLICANT:
William T. Beckman
107 North Avena
Lodi, CA 95240
OWNER:
same
Site Characteristics:
The rectangular shaped parcels at 5215 and 5333 East Kettleman
Lane are nine (9) acres and 18 acres respectively. Both parcels
together have a frontage on Kettleman Lane totaling roughly 850
feet and extend north approximately 1,300..feet to the existing
City limits. Both parcels have flat topography with no
remarkable visual_ attributes. The parcel at 5333 Kettleman Lane
does contain four detached farmhouses and related outbuildings
fronting onto Kettleman Lane. The remainder of this piece to
the north and to the east contains a cherry orchard. The west
parcel, at 5215 Kettleman Lane, is an open dirt field containing
no structures or other improvements.
General Plan Designation:
LI, Light Industrial
Zoning Designations:
AU -20, Agricultural Urban Reserve (San Joaquin County zoning
designation)
Property Size:
Nine (9) acres and 18 acres for a total of 27 acres.
Adiacent Zoning and Land Use:
North: M-1, Light Industrial. To the north of the project site is industrial land within
the City currently the site of industrial warehouse buildings on Vine and Guild
Streets.
South: AG -40, General Agriculture. Adjacent on the south, across Kettleman Lane, is
vineyard property with three farmhouses and related outbuildings fronting onto
Kettleman Lane.
East: AU -20, Agricultural Urban Reserve. Adjacent on the east is a ranch home and
farmland planted in grape vineyards.
West: M-1, Light Industrial. Adjacent on the west side of the property is farmland
within the City limits planted in grape vineyards.
Iw JACommunity Development\Planing0TAFFRMI999a-99-03r.doc
Neighborhood Characteristics:
This neighborhood is located in the extreme south east corner of the City. The industrial areas
on the east side of Highway 99 have seen a lot of building activity in the past couple of years and
the area continues to develop. In the most immediate vicinity are large warehouse uses and retail
uses such as restaurants, a gas station, and an auto dealership.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS:
Negative Declaration ND -99-04 has been prepared in accordance with CEQA. This document
adequately addresses possible adverse environmental effects of this project. No significant
impacts are anticipated.
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE:
Legal Notice for the General Plan Amendment and Rezone and was published on September 11,
1999. A total of 14 notices were sent to all property owners of record within a 300 -foot radius of
the subject property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for
adoption of the request of Oliver Tecklenburg and William T. Beckman for a Prezoning from
AU -20, Agriculture Urban Reserve to U -H, Unclassified Holding District, for the properties
located at 5215 and 5333 East Kettleman Lane. The recommendations shall.be subject to the
conditions listed in the attached resolutions.
ALTERNATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS:
• Approve the Requests with Alternate Conditions
• Deny the Requests
• Continue the Requests
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicinity Map
2. Negative Declaration
3. Draft Resolutions
Iw 1:\Community Development\PlanninoTAFFRM1999\Z-99-03r.doc 2
CIOI-66-Z
E)uol uDw@M4GA �S03 Mg 9 L Z9
_Z� zg
t -n b� oz-nv
f5u!PIOH Pawissoioun 'HD
E)l
uolpxguuV uOul�oaq/binqual�3el
c •Q/
tj I gl 3tv WEI &17Hs wu
avow
WTI
.7r OI Wol
n6
ION
9 11 Lr;�=
�Xllo p
AAP
D,
;w xwaw
P,41
to-
v crZ1001
.V -AM OUo
.00."
•Am
-Ww
1j
N,
drW 1H.1
SOD" f A"Mf
n6
ION
9 11 Lr;�=
�Xllo p
D,
;w xwaw
v crZ1001
.V -AM OUo
.00."
•Am
drW 1H.1
n6
ION
9 11 Lr;�=
�Xllo p
wir.-T,
;w xwaw
Aclww
•Am
n6
ION
9 11 Lr;�=
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 99-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LODI
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE REQUEST OF OLIVER
TECKLENBURG AND WILLIAM T. BECKMAN FOR A PREZONING FROM AU -20,
AGRICULTURAL URBAN RESERVE TO U -H, UNCLASSIFIED HOLDING DISTRICT,
FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 5215 AND 5333 EAST KETTLEMAN LANE,
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO'S. 049-070-25 AND 24
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly
noticed public hearing, as required by law, on the requested General Plan Land Use Amendment
in accordance with the Government Code and Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 17.84,
Amendments:
WHEREAS, the property is located at 5215 and 5333 East Kettleman Lane, Assessor's
Parcel No's. 049-070-25, and 24;
WHEREAS, the project proponent is Oliver Tecklenburg and William T. Beckman,
14860 North Wells Lane, Lodi, CA 95240;
WHEREAS, the property has a Zoning designation (county) of AU -20, Agricultural
Urban Reserve;
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the approval of this request have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lodi as follows:
1. Negative Declaration File No. ND -99-04 has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided
thereunder. Further, the Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained
in said Negative Declaration with respect to the project identified in this Resolution.
2. It is found that the area to be Prezoned are the parcels located at 5215 and 5333 East
Kettleman Lane, Assessor's Parcel No's. 049-070-25, and 24.
3. It is found that Prezoning this property is not in conflict with adopted plans or policies of the
General Plan of the City and will serve sound Planning practice.
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Lodi hereby recommends approval of the Prezoning
of the parcels located at 5215 and 5333 East Kettleman Lane, Assessor's Parcel No's. 049-
070-25, and 24 to the City Council of the City of Lodi, subject to the following additional
conditions;
The conditions listed below will be required at the time of development of the subject
parcels.
a) Design and installation of all public utilities and street necessary to serve the parcels in
accordance with City Master Plans including the following "off-site" improvements:
i) Expansion of C -Basin to serve the parcels;
ii) Installation of master storm drain trunk line along north parcel boundaries and
northerly to C -Basin including outlet structure;
iii) Extension of all public utilities in Kettleman Lane;
iv) Extension of water and wastewater mains from north parcel boundaries
westerly to Beckman Road.
Note that the developer may be eligible for reimbursement from others for the cost of
certain improvements. It is the developer's responsibility to request reimbursement and
submit the appropriate information per the Lodi Municipal Code § 16.40.
b) Dedication of street right-of-way as required by the City of Lodi.
c) Dedication of public utility easements as required by the various utility companies and
the City of Lodi.
d) Payment of fees in conformance with the Public Works Fee and Service Charge
Schedule. Fees to be paid shall be those in effect at the time of development.
e) Abandonment/removal of wells, septic systems and underground tanks in conformance
with applicable City and County requirements and codes.
Dated: September 22, 1999
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 99=11 was passed and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Lodi at a continued meeting held on September 22, 1999, by the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Crabtree, Heinitz. McGladdery, Rasmussen, and
Mattheis
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners: Borelli and Schmidt
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
ATTEST:
Secretary, Planning Commission
ORDINANCE NO. 1682
AN ORDINANCE OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY 'OF LODI AND THEREBY
PREZONING THE PARCELS LOCATED AT 5215 AND 5333 E.
KETTLEMAN LANE (APN #049-070-25 AND 049-070-24) TO U -H,
UNCLASSIFIED HOLDING DISTRICT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE LODI CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Official District Map of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi
Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
The parcels located at 5215 and 5333 E. Kettleman Lane (APN #049-070-25 and 049-
070-24) is hereby prezoned as follows:
9 -acre parcel and 18 -acre parcel — U -H, Unclassified Holding District, as
shown on the Vicinity Map, on file in the office of the City Clerk.
Section 2. The alterations, changes, and amendments of said Official District Map of
the City of Lodi herein set forth have been approved by the City Planning Commission
and by the City Council of this City after public hearings held in conformance with
provisions of Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal Code and the laws of the State of California
applicable thereto.
Section 3 - No Mandatory Duty of Care. This ordinance is not intended to and shall not
be construed or given effect in a manner which imposes upon the City, or any officer or
employee thereof, a mandatory duty of care towards persons or property within the City
or outside of the City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as
otherwise imposed by law.
Section 4 - Severabilitx. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to
any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other
provisions or applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid
provision or application. To this end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective
of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
Section . All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed
insofar as such conflict may exist.
Section 6. This ordinance shall be published one time in the "Lodi News Sentinel", a
daily newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi and shall
be in force and take effect thirty days from and after its passage and approval.
Approved this day of , 1999
KEITH LAND
Mayor
Attest:
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.
I, Alice M. Reimche, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No.
1682 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held
October 20, 1999 and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a regular
meeting of said Council held , 1999 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members -
Noes: Council Members -
Absent: Council Members -
Abstain: Council Members -
I further certify that Ordinance No. 1682 was approved and signed by the Mayor on the
date of its passage and the same has been published pursuant to law.
ALICE M. REIMCHE
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
RANDALL A. HAYS
City Attorney
R-1
L
C-2
PROPOSED ZONING MAP
gpSlDGnnwr wn�•
hl - POIi IWYY
µ - MOIL /YMYY
1-10' YOM OYf+IY���
M� �OfY00.MpRwY1r•MMI
�OO�IYRY Q��
%WIAL %OWW-
a.a.- ..orLL � twnM+s1
C_O - re..MM% Dano
OTHER ZONES:
y_y - yMou,leo�
M - .010
RESOLUTION NO. 99-164
A RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR APPLICATION TO
THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED TECKLENBURG/
BECKMAN ANNEXATION/REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING THE
DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY WITHIN THE AREA
PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODI
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the Local Government
Reorganization Act; and
WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change of organization is the annexation
to the City of Lodi of an area comprising of a 9 -acre parcel and a 18 -acre parcel more or
less adjacent to the City limits located at 5215 and 5333 E. Kettleman Lane; and
withdrawal of said 9 -acre parcel and 18 -acre parcel from the Woodbridge Rural County
Fire Protection District, Northern San Joaquin County Water Conservation District, and
Road District No. 4, located within the area to be annexed to the City of Lodi, (APN's
049-070-25 and 049-070-24), as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference; and
WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi and
detached from the Woodbridge Rural County Fire Protection District, Northern San
Joaquin County Water Conservation District, and Road District No. 4 is uninhabited; and
and
WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by this reorganization;
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows:
(1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban confines of the City and
will generate service needs substantially similar to that of other incorporated urban
areas which require municipal government service;
(2) Annexation to the City of Lodi of the subject area will result in improved
economics of scale in government operations while improving coordination in the
delivery of planning services;
(3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of San Joaquin will benefit
from the proposed reorganization as a result of savings to the County by reduction of
County required services in unincorporated but urban oriented area;
(4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi is
geographically, socially, economically and politically part of the same urban area of
which the City of Lodi is also a part;
(5) The subject area is within the Lodi Sphere of Influence; and
jmp UOMNTWENTOOI\Admin`,CAICITY\RES\Rcsl9991Res99-164.doc
(6) Future inhabitants in the subject area will gain immediate response in
regard to police and fire protection, unlimited City garbage and trash collection service,
street lighting service, a modern sewer system, other municipal services, and
improvement of property values.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Lodi City Council that the San
Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve
the proposed "Tecklenburg/Beckman Reorganization" which includes annexation of a 9 -
acre parcel and a 18 -acre parcel, more or less, and detachment from the Woodbridge
Rural County Fire Protection District, Northern San Joaquin County Water Conservation
District, and Road District No. 4, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto. This is all
subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions.
Dated: October 20, 1999
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 99-164 was passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held October 20, 1999 by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — Hitchcock, Mann, Nakanishi,
Pennino and Land (Mayor)
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS — None
ALICE M. R I CHE
City Clerk
99-164
jmp%\L,OD[i3TS40ENT001%Admin`,CAIC1TWtES1Res 1999\Res99-164.doc
Oliver Tecklenbur; Annexation EXHIBIT A
!� 5333 E. Kettleman Lane
The East eighteen (18) acres of the following described tract:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE i4s) of Section Seven
(7), Township Three (3) North, Range Seven (7) East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian,
and running thence Northerly along the West line of said Southeast Quarter (SE'/) of
Section Seven (7), Township and Ranke as aforesaid, eighty (80) rods; thence at right
angles Easterly fifty-four (54) rods; thence at right angles Southerly eighty (80) rods;
thence at right ankles Westerly fifty-four (5 4) rods to the point of beginning
[EXHIBIT Al
William Beckman Annexation
5215 E. Kettleman
The real property located in the County of San Joaquin, State of California, described as
follows:
The West 9 acres of the following described tract; Commencing at the Southwest corner
of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 3 North, Range 7 East, Mount Diablo
Base and Meridian, and running thence Northerly along the West line of said Southeast
Quarter of said Section 7, 80 rods, thence at right angles Easterly 54 rods; thence at right
angles Southerly 80 rods; thence at right angles Westerly 54 rods to the point of
beginning.
CITY OF LODI
Carnegie Forum
305 West Pine Street, Lodi
c J
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Date: October 20, 1999
Time: 7:00 p.m.
For information regarding this notice please contact:
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
Telephone: (209) 333-6702
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, October 20, 1999 at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as the matter may be heard, the City Council will conduct a Public Hearing to consider the
following matter:
a) Set Public Hearing for October 20, 1999 to consider Planning Commission's recommendation that
the City Council adopt a Prezone requested by Oliver Tecklenburg and William Beckman for the
property located at 5215 & 5333 EastKettleman Lane. The Prezoning request is from AU -20,
Agriculture Urban Reserve to UH, Unclassified Holding District and to initiate annexation of the
proeprty into the City oftodi.
Information regarding this item may be obtained in the office of the Community Development Department
Director, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views and
comments on this matter. Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing
scheduled herein, and oral statements may be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk, 221 West Pine Street, at or prior to the Public Hearing.
By Order of the Lodi City Council:
Alice M. Reirnche
City Clerk
Dated: October 6, 1999
Approved as to form:
Randall A. Hays
City Attorney
JACrrYURKIFORMSINOTCOD. DOC 1013199
SOF(
a r O
'0(IFOR�DECLARATION OF MAILING
Set Public Hearing for 10/20/99 - Consider Planning Commission's
Recommendation that Council adopt a Prezone requested by Oliver Tecklenburg
and William Beckman for property at 5215 & 5333 East Kettleman Lane
On October 7, 1999 in the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited in
the United States mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a
copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed
as is more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
There is a regular daily communication by mail between the City of Lodi, California, and
the places to which said envelopes were addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on October 7, 1999, at Lodi, California.
ORDERED BY:
ALICE M. REIMCHE
CITY CLERK
Jennifer M. Perrin
Deputy City Clerk
decmail/forms
OLIVER TECKLENBURG
ANNEXATION AND PREZONE
FirstName
LastName
Addressl
City
State
Postal
Code
3.
Barbara
Craig
2150 Scherwood
Modesto
CA
95350
Avenue
4.
GFLIP
920 S. Cherokee
Lodi
CA
95240
Lane, Suite A
5.
Arthur and
Hoffman
2418 E.
Acampo
CA
95220
Lorene
Woodbridge Road
6.
Robert
Kelly
P.O. Box
Lodi
CA
95241
7.
Marvin
Hansen
5100 E. Kettleman
Lodi
CA
95240
Lane
8.
Lester
Wagner
225 E. Kettleman
Lodi
CA
95240
Lane
9.
Phillip
Lemons
5174 E. Kettleman
Lodi
CA
95240
Lane
10.
James
Wafford
5200.E. Kettleman
Lodi
CA
95240
Lane
11.
Georgia
Perlegos
- 2375 S. Cherokee -
Lodi
CA
95240
Lane
12.
Daniel
Corlett
5470 E. Kettleman
Lodi
CA
95240
Lane