HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances - No. 722BE IT
ORDfTBMCE HO. 722
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE BWNEXATION -
NATED "NOR!T!H LOMA DRIVE ADDITION" TO TEE
OF CERTAIN UWIBHABITPED TERRITORY, DESIG-
CITY OB LODI
ORDBIRED BY THE COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF L 0131 :
WHEREAS, on the 7th day of March, 1962, the Council of the
City of Lodi did pass and adopt Resolution No. 2518 giving notice
of the proposal to annex certain uninh8bited territory to the
City af Lodi, said territory being therein designated as "North
Soma Drive Addition", said Resolution desoribing the boundaries
of the territory prOp08ed to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 2518 did contain a notice of the
day,hour and plaoe when and where the Council. of the City would
hear protests made by any person owning real property within the
territory proposed to be annexed, the time of said hsarirrg being
not less than forty nor nore than sixty dqs from the date of passage of said Resolution; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution was duly published in acoordanoe
tzith law; and
WHEREAS, on the 17th day of April 1962, at the hour of 8 p.m*,
in the Counail Chambers irr the City Hall of the City of Lodi,
County of S~tn Joa in, State of California, said time and place
being the day, ho and place fixed in sad Resolution No. 2518 for hearing protests to the said annexation, the said City Council
did heal: and ps8s wan all protests made to the proposed annex- ation and did-determine that protests had not been made by the
owners of one-half of the vvalue of the privately-owned territory
proposed to be annexed as shotdn by the last equalized assessment
roll, nor by. public owners of one-half of the vaue of the
publfclpowned territory proposed to be annexed aa determined by
said legislative body; and
WHEREAS, said territory is contiguous to the City of Lodi
and is uninha,bit&d territory in the County of SWI Joaqufn; and
WHJBEU, the Planing Commission has recommended thst the
territory proposed far annexation be olassified in the R-2 one-
family rpsidentittl d istrice;
NOW, TPHEREFORE, the said Counoil of the City of Lodi doe8
hereby approve the annexation of the territory hereinafter
desoribed to the City of Lodf, and does hereby further ordain
that the said territory be and is hereby annexed to the City of
Lodi and said territory ls hereby alassffied in the R-2 one-family residential districte
That said territory, the annexation of which to the City
of Lodi is herein approved, is all that territory situate in
the County of San Joaquin, State of California, more particularly
deacribed 8s f ollowsr
A portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 2,
Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and
Meridian, San Joaquin County, California, and more
particularly described as f ollows:
Beginning at the Pfortheast corner of Lot 25, Gerard Traot, as filed for reoord on August 8, 1916 in
Volume 8, page 62, San Joaquin County Records; thence
Southerly 757.34 feet along the East lines of Lots
25, 28, 33 and 36, Gerard Tract, this line also a
boundary line of the City of Lodi, to the Horth line
of Lookef ord Street (formerly Lockeford Avenue) ; thenoe
Westerly along the North line of Lockeford Street,
also a City Limit line, 442.8 feet to the centerline of Loma Drive (also formerly Locrkeford Avenue); thence
Hortherly dong the oenterline of Lama Drive, also a
City Limit line, 757.34 feet to the extended North line
of Lot 25, Gerard Tract; %hence Easterly along the
North line of said Lot 25, $42.8 feet to the point of beginning; the area Bhus desoribed containrng 7.7 acres
more or less,
Approved this 2nd day of May 1962
BOZANT KATZAKIAN, Mayor
Attest? BEATRICE GARIBALDI, Gity Clerk
State of California
Cuunty of San Jaaquin, as+'
1,BEATRICE GARIBALDI, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do
hereby oestify that Ordinance No. 722 was introduced at an
adjourned regular meeting of the City Counoil Of the City of Lodi held April 17, 1962 and was thereafter passed, adopted and mdered to print at a regular meeting heldt Nay 2, 1962 by the following
vote:
AYESI Councilman - BROW, CULBERTSON, DOW,
ULLWN and K&l?ZBICIPN
NOES: Councilmen - HONE
ABSEMTr Councilmen - NONE
I further certify that Ordinanoe No, 722 was approved and
Piigned by the Mayor on the date of its passage and that the sane
has been published pursuant to law.
BEATRICE GBRIBALDI
City Clerk
-2-