HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances - No. 666ORDINBNCE No, 666
AX ORDIMAJTOE APPROVING TEE BNNHtATION OF CERTAIN
UNIHEABITED TERRITORY, SESIGIATED "CHURCH STREET
ADDITION" TO TEE CITY OF LODX
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE: CITY OF LODIr
WHEREbS, an the 16th day of Detmnbezz, 1959, the Councril of
the City of Lodi did pass and adopt Resolution No. 2280 gfving
noticre of the propoelel to annex oertain uninhabited territory to
the City of Ladi, said territory being therein designated as "Churoh
Street Addition," said Resolu.t;ion describing fhe boundaries of the
territory proposed to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, said Resolution la. 2280 did ooataln a noticre of the
day, hour an8 plaoe when and where the Counoil of the City would
hear protests made by any person owning real property within the
Cerrltory proposed to be annexed, the time of said hearing being
not less than forty nor more than sixty days from the date of passage of 8 a58 Resolution; and
WHEREBS, aaid Resolution was duly published in socrordaaee with law; and
WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of hbruary, 1960, at the hour of 8 p*m.,
in the Council Chambers in the City Hall of the City of Lobi, County
of San Joaquin, State of California, 8aid time and pLaae being the
day, hour and place fixed in rraid Besolnt5on No. 2280 for hearing
protests to the said meration, the said Cfty Counoil did hear and
pas8 upon all protesta made to the proposed annexsfion arid did
determine that protesfrs had not been mde by the owners of one-half of the value of the prfvatiely owned t.errito,r;y proposed to be annexed
BIS shown by the last equalised aeaessment roll, nor by publio bwners of one-half of the value of fh8 publSoXy own86 territory propoaed .
to be annexed as determined by said legislative body8 and
WHEREAS, said territory is osntiguous to the City of Lodi, and
is uafnhabited territory fa the county of' s8a Joaqufn;
NOW, THEREFORE, the said Council of the City of sod% doe8
hereby spprove the annexation of the territory hex?eSnafter desoribed
to the City of Lodi, and does hereby further orasin that the said
territory be and is hereby annexed to the City of Lodi,
That said territory, the annexation of whicsh Ca the City of
Lodi $8 herein approved, is all that territory situate in the County
of' Saa Joaquln, State of' California, more psrtioularly describe& a8
follows t
A portion of the SouChwest Qu er of SeatSon 12 and
im, San Joaquin the Northwest Quartey of Seotion 1 ship 3 North,
Rartge 6 East;, Mount Diab
ty, Californiat and rticultwzy deaoribed as
Begirrning at the Morthwes-fr corner of edd Section I33
ia the true poinf of beghning; along a line parallel &o the North line of
2ch line is also a boundary Pine of the
0.14 feat; thence Nozthar3y along a line
& the bet line of Sa&d SeOtiOn 200
paxaZlel to %fie We~t line of said Seotion, also a City
boun&Wy, 225,03 feet ta the North line of KettlZeman Lane; ehanoe Easter along a line
feet Bforth 0 th line of Seu
Lingti Line, fsst more or leas,
Church Stree ue Scrutherly alo
lfm bP Church Street 25 feet, more OF lew, to the North
line of Seofion 13; thenae GonLinuing South 2* 41' West
8. oziginsl eenfer line of Church Street, aleo a
ale1 w5Ch the Seotioa 182
8 or ~QB, to he property
it itffie, iS5e9.2t3 ~CerXy along a
dtred,ed to Peter and S.t;avraula Iar?ls 88 rerocrrded an Offioial
Reoordra, Volume 1774, page 409, 8an Joaquin County Recordrr; ortherly along the East line of
feet, more Or lesa, to the SOU* eb to Edward Barbara asr reom in Offioial
lU&e 877, pBg8 381, is County Reoords;
erly along the Somt the Barbera prop-
et, mo2e 02 18f38, to the We@% line of said
mce Northerly along %he West line of said
Secltion 1,113 feet, more or lese, fo the true point -of
rty thm dssaribsd wmtsiniag 23.9
ed thda 24th day a$ February, 1960.
Aft86ft BUTRZCE G$RSBbL-I;)I, City Clerk
State of California
County of Bawl Sbaquin { sfi.
BXCE QBR1B;CllfiQL c y Clerk of the City af LodS an8 ex Offfoio ChJrk of the City 6ou City, do hereby oertify
a regular meeting of said
City Ccrnnofl held February 5, I960 and Wa8 &ereafter paseed, adopted
and ordered to print at a re@%asly addourned meeting held Febru-
ary 24, 1960 by the falftawirr$ voter
AYES : Councilmen + Gabertsim, ESstaakian, Mitohell, Robinson
and Brows
NOES: Counoilrnen - H6ne
ABSENT; Councilmen = None
I further certify that Ordiaanae 30, 666 was approved and signed
by the Playor on the date of its passage and that the same has been
published pursuant to law.
BEATRSCE GABXBALDZ
City Clerk