Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances - No. 448In the City Council City of Lodi Lodi, California ORDINANCE NO. U.8 ORDERING THE VACATIOPJ OF STURLA STREET, A PORTI[ORI 03' SOUTH LEE AVENUE AND AH ALLEY IN BLOCK 6, ALL IE? STUBLA SCHOOL 4DDXTION IN THE CITY OF LODI WHEBiiiAB, $his City Oouncil, acting in accordance with Che proviEiions of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code of this State (The Street Vacation Act of 19421, did on the 18th day of July, 1951, pass and adopt its Resolution of Inten- tion No. 1623, cil to vacate S public alley in Block 6 of Sturla School Addition, all as particu- larly described in said Resolution, and erein declaring the intention of said City Coun- rla Street, a portion of South Lee Avenue and a WNEREAS, Notice of said intended vacation was regularly given by publication and by posting, both in time, form and manner as required by law as is evidenced by affidavits on file and of record in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Lodi, and WHEREAS, Zn accordance with the provision stated in said Resolution No. 1623 and also contained in the posted notiues of the adoption of said Resolution, notice was given that a public hearing would be held before said City Council in cil Ohambers, City Hall, Lodi, California beginning at 8:L5 oqclock ph. of Wednesday, August 15, 1951, where and when any person intereatied in or objecting to said street vacation aould appear and be heard in relation thereto, and' the Gity Coun- - t that time and place a public hearing wat3 held ch hearing was regularly continued to September 5, 1951, and again to September 19, 1951, and testimony received and heard at a11 of said hearings for and against the vacation Ord. 448 - 2 contemplated, particularly the vacation of Sturla Street, and f rorn the evid en did on the 19t;h day of September, 1951, determine that said streets are unnecessary for present or future public use. (excepting an easement in the,portion of alley to be vacated) and did so find and declare, now therefore, submitted, the City Council of the City of Lodi, THE CITY COUHCZL OF THE CITY QF LODI DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 2. The following described street, portion of street and public alley in the City of Lodi is hereby ordered vacated, closed up and abandoned: STURLA STREET FRON SOUTH PLEASANT AVENUE TO SOUTH WUTCHDJS STREET (QUIlflY AVENUE); SOUTH LEE; AVENUE FRO24 THE SOUTI4 LINE OF THE ALLEY IN BLOCKS FIVE (5) AND SIX (6) OF STURLA SCHOOL ADDITION TO THE NORTH LINE OF STURLA STFLEET AID THE TWENTY-FOOT WIDE ALLEY IN SAID BLOCK SIX (6), ALL IN STURLA SCHOOL ADDITION AND AS DELINEATED OM THE OFFICIAL FIAP TKEREOF FILED APRIL 6, 1920, la BOOK OF KIPS, VOL. 10, PAGE 6, SAN JQAQUIW COUITY RECORDS, Reserving, however, and excepting from the vacation of said alley in Block 6, the permanent easement and right therein to maintain, operate and construct lines of pipe, conduit, cables, poles, equipment and fixtures for the operation of water, sewer, gas, telephone a in said alley, a11 as see forth in Bection 8330 of the 3treets and Highways Coda, electric lines now located in or to be located Section 2. 'Phis ordinance shall be published one time in The Lodi Times, a newspaper of general circulation printed n the City of Lodi and shall be in force and take Ord., 448 - 3 effect at the time and in the manner provided by law. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this ordinance Lo be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Joaquin County as required by Section 8324 of the Streets and Highways Code of this State, Approved this 3rd day of October 1951. Attest; J. F. BLA~ELY City Clerk COUNT9 OF SAN JOAQUIM STATE OF CALIFORMIA ) ss. CITY OF LODX 1 H. J. TOLLlVER ’ , ,.A I, J. F. BLAKELY, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that the foregoing ORDIRANCE NO. 448 was regu- larly introduced in the City Council of said City on September 19, 1951, and was thereafter passed, adopted and ordered to print at a subsequent meeting of said City Gouncil held on 1951, by the following vote: ciaen, RINN, HASKELL AND TOLLIVER NOES: Comoflmen, BULL AND PRESZLER ABSENT? Councilmen, NONE I FURTHER CERTIFY that said ORDINANCE NO. 448 was approved by the Mayor on the date of its passage and that the same has been published pursuant to law.