HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances - No. 1788ORDINANCE NO. 1788
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODl ADOPTING A
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF 257.76
ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD
BETWEEN HIGHWAY 12-KETTLEMAN LANE AND HARNEY LANE
(SOUTHWEST GATEWAY) (DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT GM-05-001) ___-_______--__-________________________-----------------__---_--------- _--____-_-_-_-_-___-------------------_---------------------------------
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODl AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The properties subject to this Development Agreement include the following:
257.76 acres located on the west side of Lower Sacramento Road between
Highway 12-Kettleman Lane and Harney Lane - Assessors Parcel Numbers
058-040-02, 058-040-04, 058-040-05, and 058-040-1 4.
058-030-09, 058-030-03, 058-030-04, 058-030-05, 058-030-06, 058-040-01,
SECTION 2. The applicant for the requested Development Agreement is as follows:
Frontier Community Builders
SECTION 3. The requested Development Agreement is summarized as follows:
Development Agreement GM-05-001 is an agreement between the City and the developer in
which the developer agrees to provide certain benefits to the City in exchange for a vested right
to proceed with the development consistent with the development approvals. The term of the
Development Agreement is 15 years. The vested right the developer obtains is the ability to
proceed with the development as approved and to avoid the imposition of new regulations on
subsequent discretionary approvals (i.e. vesting tentative maps) for the development.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby finds that the proposed Development Agreement is
consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the zoning for the proposed
Development.
SECTION 5. The City Council, by Resolution No. 2006-209, has certified the Lodi Annexation
Environmental Impact Report for the proposed project.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby adopts Ordinance No. 1788 approving the Development
Agreement by and between the City of Lodi and Frontier Community Builders. Further, the City
Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the Settlement Agreement between the City of
Lodi, Citizens for Open Government, and Frontier Community Builders and incorporates its
provisions into the Development Agreement as Exhibit K. In the event of a conflict between the
Development Agreement and the Settlement Agreement, the terms of the Settlement
Agreement shall control.
1
SECTION 7. No Mandatory Duty of Care. This ordinance is not intended to and shall not be
construed or given effect in a manner which imposes upon the City, or any officer for employee
thereof, a mandatory duty of care towards persons or property within the City or outside of the
City so as to provide a basis of civil liability for damages, except as otherwise imposed by law.
SECTION 8. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any
person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications of the ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application. To this end, the provisions of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular
portion thereof.
SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be published one time in the “Lodi News-Sentinel,’’ a daily
newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Lodi, and shall take effect
30 days from and after its passage and approval.
WAN HITCHCOCK
Mayor P City NDI Clerk JOHL
State of California
County of San Joaquin, ss.
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. 1788
was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held November 15,
2006, and was thereafter passed, adopted, and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said
Council held December 6, 2006, by the following vote:
______-__-_____--___--------------------------------------------------
AYES:
NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
COUNCIL MEMBERS - Beckman, Hanson, Johnson, and Mounce
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS - None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS - Mayor Hitchcock
I further certify that Ordinance No. 1788 was approved and signed by the Mayor on the date of
its passage and the same has been publis ant to law. P AND1 JOHL
City Clerk
City Attorney
2
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Document entitled to free recording
Government Code Section 6103
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Lodi
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
Attn: City Clerk
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR
RECORDERS USE)
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF LODl
AND FRONTIER COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC.
FOR FCB SOUTHWEST GATEWAY PROJECT
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RECITALS .......... ..............................................
................................
2. Property ............................... ...............................................
....................................
6. Project Approvals
7. Need for Services ...................................
8. Contribution to Cos ............................. 5
9. Development Agreement Resolution Compliance
10.
11.
Consistency with General and Specific Plan. .....................................
Creation of Career-Oriented Employment Opportunities
......................................
1. Incorporation of Recitals. ......................................................
2. Description of Property. .....................................
3. Interest of Landowner .__ ....................................................
............................................. 6
6.4. Additional Conditions .... .....................................
6.5 Annexation
7.1.
7.2.
7.3.
Rules Regarding Permitted Uses. ...........................
Rules Regarding Design and Construction. ..........................................
Changes in State or Federal Law. ..............................
7.4. Uniform Codes Applicable. ....... .............................................
Existing Fees, Subsequently Enacted Fees, Dedications, Assessments and Taxes ................... 19
8.2. Existing Fees, Exactions and D ............... ....................................... 20
9. Community Facilities District. .............................................. ............................. .20
8.
8.7. Processing Fees and Charges.
8.3 Subsequent Development Imp
9.1.
9.2.
9.3. Community Facilities District
Inclusion in Community Facilities District
Use of Community Facilities District Revenu
10.
11, Amendment or Cancellation .... ...............................................
11 .I. Modification Because of te or Federal Laws
11.2. Amendment by Mutual Consent ...............................
Processing of Subsequent Development Applications and Building Permits .............................. 22
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
2
11.3. Insubstantial Amendments. ................. .............................................
......................... 23
12.
13. Annual Review. ..............................
Term of Project Approvals ........................................
......................... .24
............................................
................................................... 24 14. Default
15. Estoppel Certificate .................. ..............................................
16. Mortgagee Protection; Certain
16.1. Mortgagee Protection. ............ ..........................................................
16.2. Mortgagee Not Obligated ............................................................ ........................ 26
Notice of Default to Mortgagee and Extension of Right to Cure ............................................ 27
17. Severability ....... .............................................. ......... 27
18. Applicable Law. ....................................................... ..................................................... 27
Permit Processing ................. ............................................
16.3.
19.
20.
Attorneys' Fees and Costs in Legal Actions By Pa ......... 27
Attorneys' Fees and Costs in Legal Actions By Third Parties to the Agreement and Continued
......................................... 20
25. Insurance.
.................................... 29
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
3
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
FCB SOUTHWEST GATEWAY PROJECT
This Development Agreement is entered into as of this 6th day of December, 2006, by
and between the CITY OF LODI. a municipal corporation ("City"), and, FRONTIER
COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC. ("Landowner"). City and Landowner are hereinafter collectively
referred to as the "Parties" and singularly as "Party."
RECITALS
1. Authorization. To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private
participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic risk of development, the
Legislature of the State of California adopted Government Code Section 65864, et seq. (the
"Development Agreement Statute"), which authorizes the City and any person having a legal or
equitable interest in the real property to enter into a development agreement, establishing
certain development rights in the Property which is the subject of the development project
application.
2. Property. Landowner holds a legal or equitable interest in certain real property
located in the City of Lodi, County of San Joaquin, more particularly described in Exhibit A-I
attached hereto (the "Property"). Landowner represents that all persons holding legal or
equitable interests in the Property shall be bound by this Agreement.
3. Proiect. Landowner has obtained various approvals from the City (described in
more detail in Recital 6 below) for a mixed use project known as FCB Southwest Gateway (the
"Project") to be located on the Property.
4. Public Hearing. On October 25, 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of
Lodi, acting pursuant to Government Code Section 65867, held a hearing to consider this
Agreement and the Planning Commission action has been reported to the City Council.
5. Environmental Review. On November 15, 2006, the City Council certified as
adequate and complete, the Lodi Annexation Environmental Impact Report ("EIR) for the
Southwest Gateway Project. Mitigation measures were required in the EIR and are
incorporated into the Project and into the terms and conditions of this Agreement, as reflected
by the findings adopted by the City Council concurrently with this Agreement.
6. Proiect Aoprovals. The following land use approvals (together the "Project
Approvals") have been granted for the Property, which entitlements are the subject of this
Agreement:
6.1. The EIR. The Mitigation Measures in the EIR are incorporated into the
Project and into the terms and conditions of this Agreement (City Resolution No. 2006-209);
859465 4 Version 5 Final 11/09/06
6.2. A General Plan Amendment (the “General Plan”), (attached hereto as
Exhibit B) approved by the City on November 15, 2006 (City Resolution No. 2006-21 1);
6.3. The Zoning of the Property (attached hereto as Exhibit 6-1) approved by
the City on December 6, 2006 (City Ordinance No. 1787);
6.4. The Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Project (attached hereto
as Exhibit C-1) to be subsequently considered by the City through a noticed public hearing
process. (The parties agree that the large lot subdivision map included herein is for illustrative
purposes only and shall not be effective until approved through a notice public hearing process
by the City. If approved by the City, the Large Lot Subdivision Map shall thereafter be included
within the Project Approvals listed herein);
6.5. Reserved;
6.6. The Development Plan and Infrastructure Plan for the Project (attached
hereto as Exhibit D). approved by the City on December 6, 2006 by Ordinance No. 1788;
6.7. The Growth Management Allocations, as required by Chapter 15.34 of
the Lodi Municipal Code, as set forth in Exhibit E. approved by the City on December 6, 2006 by
Ordinance No. 1788;
6.8. This Development Agreement, as adopted on December 6, 2006 by City
Ordinance No. 1788 (the “Adopting Ordinance“); and,
6.9. The Annexation Approvals granted by San Joaquin County Local Agency
Formation Commission as shown in Exhibit F attached hereto.
7. Need for Services and Facilities. Development of the Property will result in a
need for municipal services and facilities, some of which will be provided by the City to such
development subject to the performance of Landowner’s obligations hereunder. With respect to
water, pursuant to Government Code Section 65867.5, any tentative map approved for the
Property will comply with the provisions of Government Code 66473.7.
Contribution to Costs of Facilities and Services. 8. Landowner agrees to
contribute to the costs of such public facilities and services as required herein to mitigate
impacts on the community of the development of the Property, and City agrees to provide such
public facilities and services as required herein to assure that Landowner may proceed with and
complete development of the Property in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. City and
Landowner recognize and agree that, but for Landowner’s contributions set forth herein
including contributions to mitigate the impacts arising as a result of development entitlements
granted pursuant to this Agreement, City would not and could not approve the development of
the Property as provided by this Agreement and that, but for City’s covenant to provide certain
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
5
facilities and services for development of the Property, Landowner would not and could not
commit to provide the mitigation as provided by this Agreement. City's vesting of the right to
develop the Property as provided herein is in reliance upon and in consideration of Landowner's
agreement to make contributions toward the cost of public improvements as herein provided to
mitigate the impacts of development of the Property as development occurs.
9. Development Aqreement Resolution Compliance.. City and Landowner have
taken all actions mandated by, and fulfilled all requirements set forth in, the Development
Agreement Resolution of the City of Lodi, as set forth in the City Council Resolution No. 2005-
237 for the consideration and approval of the pre-annexation and development agreement.
10. Consistencv with General and Specific Plan. Having duly examined and
considered this Agreement and having held properly noticed public hearings hereon, the City
found that this Agreement satisfies the Government Code s65867.5 requirement of general plan
consistency.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and
covenants hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Preamble, the Recitals and all defined terms set
forth in both are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if set forth herein in full.
2. Description of Property. The property, which is the subject of this Development
Agreement, is described in Exhibit A-I and depicted in Exhibit A-2 attached hereto ("Property").
3. Interest of Landowner. The Landowner has a legal or equitable interest in the
Property. Landowner represents that all persons holding legal or equitable interests in the
Property shall be bound by the Agreement.
4. Relationship of Citv and Landowner. It is understood that this Agreement is a
contract that has been negotiated and voluntarily entered into by City and Landowner and that
Landowner is not an agent of City. The City and Landowner hereby renounce the existence of
any form of joint venture or partnership between them, and agree that nothing contained herein
or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making the City and
Landowner joint venturers or partners.
5. Effective Date and Term.
5.1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement ("Effective Date") is
December 6, 2006, which is the effective date of City Ordinance No. 1788 adopting this
Agreement.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
6
5.2. m. Upon execution, the term of this Agreement shall commence on
the Effective Date and extend for a period of fifteen (15) years, unless said term is terminated,
modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement. Following the expiration of
the term, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect. Said
termination of the Agreement shall not affect any right or duty created by City approvals for the
Property adopted prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to the approval of this Agreement
nor the obligations of Sections 20, 24 or 25 of this Agreement. In the event that litigation is filed
by a third party (defined to exclude City and Landowners or any assignees of Landowner) which
seeks to invalidate this Agreement or the Project Approvals, the expiration date of this
Agreement shall be extended for a period equal to the length of time from the time the summons
and complaint andlor petition are served on the defendant(s) until the judgment entered by the
court is final and not subject to appeal; provided, however, that the total amount of time for
which the expiration date shall be extended as a result of such litigation shall not exceed four
years.
5.3. Automatic Termination Upon Completion and Sale of Residential - Lot. This Agreement shall automatically be terminated, without any further action by either
party or need to record any additional document, with respect to any single-family residential lot
within a parcel designated by the Project Approvals for residential use, upon completion of
construction and issuance by the City of a final occupancy permit for a dwelling unit upon such
residential lot and conveyance of such improved residential lot by Landowner to a bona-fide
good-faith purchaser thereof. In connection with its issuance of a final inspection for such
improved lot, City shall confirm that all improvements, which are required to serve the lot, as
determined by City, have been accepted by City. Termination of this Agreement for any such
residential lot as provided for in this Section shall not in any way be construed to terminate or
modify any assessment district or Mello-Roos Community Facilities District lien affecting such
lot at the time of termination.
6. Use of Property.
6.1. Vested Riqht to Develop. Landowner shall have the vested right to
develop the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Project
Approvals, the City's existing policies, standards and ordinances (except as expressly modified
by this Section 6.1 and Section 8.3) and any amendments to any of them as shall, from time to
time, be approved pursuant to this Agreement. Landowner's vested right to develop the
Property shall be subject to subsequent approvals; provided however, except as provided in
Section 6.3, that any conditions, terms, restrictions and requirements for such subsequent
intensity of development, or limit the rate or timing of development set forth in this Agreement,
so long as Landowner is not in default under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the vested rights
granted herein, Landowner agrees that the following obligations, which are presently being
developed, shall apply to development of the Property:
approvals shall not prevent development of the Property for the uses, 91 reduce the density and
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
7
6.1.1 Payment of a development fee for a proportionate share of the
design and construction cost of the Highway 99 interchange
project at Harney Lane.
6.1.2 Payment of Agricultural Land Mitigation fee, as identified in
Mitigation Measure LU-2, pursuant to the ordinance and/or
resolution to be adopted by the City of Lodi.
6.1.3 Payment of Electric Capital Improvement Mitigation fee (see
Section 6.4.10) pursuant to the ordinance andlor resolution to be
adopted by the City of Lodi.
6.1.4 Payment of development fee for proportionate share of the costs
of designing and constructing a water treatment system and/or
percolation system for treatment of water acquired from
Woodbridge Irrigation District (see Section 6.4.4) pursuant to the
ordinance anlor resolution to be adopted by the City of Lodi.
With regards to the fees identified in Sections 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.1.3. and 6.1.4 and these fees only,
Landowner hereby consents to their imposition as conditions of approval on any discretionary or
ministerial land use entitlement subsequently granted by the City including but not limited to
issuance of building permits. City agrees that the fees payable by the Landowner pursuant to
Sections 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.1.3 and 6.1.4 shall be adopted in conformance with applicable law, and
shall apply uniformly to all new development on properties within the City that are zoned
consistent with the Project Approvals, or apply uniformly to all new development on properties
that are similarly situated, whether by geographic location or other distinguishing circumstances.
Except for the fees identified in this Agreement including but not limited to the Project
Approvals, Sections 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4 and 8.3, no other subsequently enacted
development or capital fee shall be imposed as a condition of approval on any discretionary or
ministerial decision. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the fees applicable to the
development pursuant to the Project Approvals and this Agreement may be increased during
the term of this Agreement provided that (1) such increases are limited to annual indexing (i.e.
per the Engineering News Record Index, or the CPI. or other index utilized by the City) and as
provided in current fee ordinances and (2) the increased fees are adopted in conformance with
applicable law, apply uniformly to all new development on properties within the City that are
zoned consistent with the Project Approvals, or apply uniformly to all new development on
properties that are similarly situated, whether by geographic location or other distinguishing
circumstances. The initial adjustment shall be effective as of four years after the Effective Date
of the Agreement and shall be calculated based on the difference in the applicable index from
the numerical rate at the end of the month following the third year after the Effective Date and
the numerical rate at the end of the month following the fourth year after the Effective Date, All
subsequent increases shall be based on the annual change in the applicable index.
Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, index adjustments to the fees set forth in Section 8.2,
subsections 2, 3 and 4 shall be effective annually as set forth in the relevant ordinances and
resolutions. Moreover, Landowner will be subject to the indexing called for above even if
Landowner has filed a complete application for a Vesting Tentative Map and will not vest
against such indexing until payment of the fees as called for in this Agreement.
859465 8
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
6.2. Permitted Uses. The permitted uses of the Property, the density and
intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, provisions for reservation
or dedication of land for public purposes, location and maintenance of on-site and off-site
improvements, location of public utilities and other terms and conditions of development
applicable to the Property, shall be those set forth in this Agreement, the Project Approvals and
any amendments to this Agreement or the Project Approvals. City acknowledges that the
Project Approvals provide for the land uses and approximate acreages for the Property as set
forth in Exhibit B-1 and Exhibit 8-2.
6.3. Moratorium, Quotas, Restrictions or Other Growth Limitations
Landowner and City intend that, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, this
Agreement shall vest the Project Approvals against subsequent City resolutions, ordinances and
initiatives approved by the City Council or the electorate that directly or indirectly limit the rate,
timing, or sequencing of development, or prevent or conflict with the permitted uses, density
and intensity of uses or the right to receive public services as set forth in the Project Approvals;
provided however Landowner shall be subject to rules, regulations or policies adopted as a result
of changes in federal or state law (as provided in Section 7.3) which are or have been adopted on
a uniformly applied, City-wide or area-wide basis, in which case City shall treat Landowner in a
uniform, equitable and proportionate manner with all properties, public and private, which are
impacted by the changes in federa( or state taw.
6.3.1 Allocations Under City Growth Management Proqrarn
a. Allocations Required Prior to Map Approval
Consistent with the City’s Growth Management Program, which shall apply to the Project,
except as otherwise provided herein, no tentative map for any portion of the Property shall be
issued until such time as Landowner has obtained allocations for each residential unit within the
area covered by such map, consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance (Ordinance
1521), codified as Section 15.34 of the City of Lodi Municipal Code.
b. Schedule of Allocation of Residential Units
The following schedule of residential unit allocations shall apply to the Project
(i) Initial Allocation:
As of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the following number of residential units shall be
initially allocated to the Project from the City’s reserve of unused allocations (“Initial Allocation”):
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06 9
300 Low Density units
300 High Density units (300 units shall be used to construct 300 apartment units
adjacent to Highway 12IKettleman Lane as shown in the Project Approvals)
Except for the requirement set forth in Section 6.3.l(a) above the Initial Allocation has been
determined to be exempt from and in compliance with the provisions of the Growth
Management Ordinance and Resolutions 91-170 and 91-171 (timing and point system
requirements).
(iiJ Subsequent Annual Allocations:
As of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Landowner shall be entitled to apply for future
annual allocations in three-year increments. and on a rolling basis. Provided that Landowner
otherwise complies with the City’s Growth Management Program, Landowner shall be entitled to
annual allocations set forth in Exhibit E (“Annual Allocations”). If Landowner elects in any year to
request fewer allocations than provided for in Exhibit E or if the term of any allocation granted
expires before it is used as part of obtaining a subdivision map, Landowner shall be entitled to
receive, upon submission of a complete growth management allocation application, additional
allocations after the eighth year of this Agreement and through the term of this Agreement
including any extension thereto granted pursuant to Section 5.2. The total number of growth
management allocations granted hereunder shall be limited to the number of residential units
approved as part of the Project Approvals excltiding any senior housing residential units. The
use of such allocations shall be restricted to the year for which such allocations were made,
consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Landowner
may request additional allocations, over and above those set forth in Exhibit “E”, and City may
grant such allocations in its discretion, provided such additional allocations are consistent with
the City‘s Growth Management Allocation Program, Resolutions 91-170 and 91-171, subject to
such additional community benefits andlor exactions negotiated upon such a request.
Landowner is not required to apply for such allocations on an annual basis. Landowner may
instead comply with all development plan and related requirements under the Growth
Management Ordinance and Resolutions 91-170 and 91-171 every third year, at which time
Landowner may apply for allocations for the next three-year period. After the expiration of the
year for which an Annual Allocation was issued to Landowner, Landowner may submit a request
and be issued by the City another Annual Allocation, such that Landowner may maintain, on a
rolling basis, a number of allocations equal to three Annual Allocations. Except for allowing the
Landowner this flexibility in terms of the number of years for which Landowner may apply, all
requests for Annual Allocations must otherwise comply with the Growth Management Ordinance
and Resolutions 91-170 and 91-171.
The requirement that Landowner apply for Annual Allocations does not alter the vested rights of
the Project, specifically as to the General Plan and zoning designation of the Project.
Growth Manaqement Ordinance in full force and effect: (C)
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
10
Except where otherwise specifically stated herein, nothing in this section 6.3.1 is intended to
modify in any way the City's Growth Management Program, including its exemptions under
Section 15.34.040 (e.g., for senior citizen housing).
Section 6.3.2
(a)
Future Growth Control Ordinances/Policies, Etc.
One of the specific purposes of this Agreement is to assure
Developer that, during the term of this Agreement no growth-managernent ordinance, measure,
policy, regulation or development moratorium of City adopted by the City Council or by vote of
the electorate after the Effective Date of this Agreement will apply to the Property in such a
manner so as to the reduce the density of development , modify the permissible uses, or modify
the phasing of the development as set forth in the Project Approvals.
(b) Therefore, the parties hereto agree that, except as otherwise
expressly provided in the Project Approvals, Sections 6.1, 6.3.1 or 6.4 or other provision of this
Agreement which expressly authorize City to make such pertinent changes, no ordinance,
policy, rule, regulation, decision or any other City action, or any initiative or referendum voted on
by the public, which would be applicable to the Project and which would affect in any way the
rate of development, construction and build out of the Project, or limit the Project's ability to
receive any other City service shall be applicable to any portion of the Project during the term of
this Agreement, whether such action is by ordinance, enactment, resolution, approval, policy,
rule, regulation, decision or other action of City or by public initiative or referendum.
City, through the exercise of either its police power or its
taking power, whether by direct City action or initiative or referendum, shall not establish, enact
or impose any additional conditions, dedications, fees or other exactions, policies, standards,
laws or regulations, which directly relate to the development of the Project except as provided in
Sections 6.1, 6.3.1, or 6.4 herein or other provision of this Agreement which expressly allows
City to make such changes. Nothing herein prohibits the Project from being subject to a (i) City-
wide bond issue, (ii) City-Wide special or general tax, or (iii) special assessment for the
construction or maintenance of a City-wide facility as may be voted on by the electorate or
otherwise enacted; provided that such tax, assessment or measure is City-wide in nature, does
not discriminate against the land within the Project and does not distinguish between developed
and undeveloped parcels.
(d)
(c)
This Agreement shall not be construed to limit the authority of
City to charge processing fees for land use approvals, public facilities fees and building permits
as they relate to plumbing, mechanical, electric or fire code permits, or other similar permits and
entitlements which are in force and effect on a city-wide basis at the time those permits are
applied for, except to the extent any such processing regulations would be inconsistent with this
Agreement.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
11
(el Notwithstanding subdivision (b), the City may condition or
deny a permit, approval, extension, or entitlement if it determines any of the following:
(1) A failure to do so would place the residents of the Project
or the immediate community, or both, in a condition dangerous to their
health or safety, or both.
(2) The condition or denial is required in order to comply with
state or federal law (see Section 7.3).
6.4. Additional Conditions.
6.4.1. Timinq of Dedications and Improvements of Parks
other than DeBenedetti Park Landowner agrees to dedicate park land and complete
construction of all the park improvements within the Southwest Gateway area as described and
set forth in the Project Approvals at its sole cost and expense. The lists of the parks and park
improvements contemplated herein are set forth in Exhibit "I" and "J". Landowner and City
agree that the provision of land and the construction of all park facilities and installation of
equipment within the Project boundaries will satisfy Landowner's Quimby Act obligations for the
Southwest Gateway project as set forth in Lodi Municipal Code. Therefore, Landowner shall not
be obligated to pay any additional park fees, other than the payments required pursuant to
Section 6.4.8, and Landowner shall not be entitled to any credit for the value of the
improvements constructed or equipment installed. The phasing of such improvements shall be
in compliance with the Phasing Schedule included in Exhibit I.
With regards to the park improvements listed in Exhibit J, prior to approval by the City of the first
tentative subdivision map, Landowner shall prepare plans and specifications for all park
improvements included in the Southwest Gateway Project Approvals and submit those plans
and specifications to the City for review and approval which approval will not be unreasonably
withheld provided that the plans and specifications contain all park improvements listed in
Exhibit J and satisfy all applicable conditions of approval included in the Project Approvals. The
Landowner shall construct the parks in compliance with the approved plans and specifications.
The City will inspect improvements during construction. If improvements are of poor quality
andlor do not meet the requirements of approved plans and specifications, the City will notify
the Landowner in writing and the Landowner, at its sole cost, shall correct any errors or
deficiencies. The Landowner shall construct the parks to the satisfaction of the City, which shall
be defined as compliance with the approved plans and specifications.
6.4.2 Pavment of Utility Exit Fees The Lodi Electric Utility is a
city-owned and operated utility that provides electrical utility services for residential, commercial
and industrial customers in Lodi. As the proposed project sites would be annexed to the City of
Lodi, the Lodi Electric Utility would provide electrical utility services to the project site. To the
extent that Landowner is assessed "exit fees," also known as "Cost Responsibility Surcharges,"
by Pacific Gas & Electric for its departing load, Landowner shall pay said fees when they are
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
12
due. Landowner may, at its option and at its own cost, request a Cost Responsibility Surcharge
Exemption from the California Energy Commission for any qualified departing load pursuant to
Title 20, California Code of Regulations, Section 1395, et. seq. Forms for the exemption are
available on-line at httD://www.enerqv.ca.qov/exit feesldocuments/2004-02-
18 PGE EXEMP APPL.PDF City makes no representation that Landowner is eligible for
exemptions pursuant to these regulations. Landowner agrees to save, defend, indemnify and
hold harmless City from any and all costs, judgments or awards owed to Pacific Gas & Electric
arising out of or related to City's provision of electrical utility services to the project site.
6.4.3 Maintenance of Specified Public Improvements
Landowner agrees to provide or pay for all park, median strip, and other landscaping
maintenance and repairs for two years for lands dedicated by the Landowner to the City and
accepted by the City. In the event that Landowner chooses to pay the City for the costs of
maintenance and repair, the City shall provide an estimate of the annual costs and the
Landowner shall pay the full amount within thirty calendar days after the City by U.S. Mail or
email, transmits the estimate to the Landowner. If the amount paid to the City exceeds the
actual amount incurred by the City plus reasonable staff costs to administer the contract, the
City shall, within a reasonable period of time, refund the difference to the Landowner.
6.4.4 Water Treatment andlor Percolation Cost Landowner shall pay
a fee based on the proportionate share of the costs of designing and constructing a water
treatment system andlor percolation system for treatment of water acquired by the City from the
Woodbridge Irrigation District. Landowner shall pay the fee as required under the fee program
to be development by the City, but in no event later than when water service connection for
each residential, office and commercial unit is provided.
6.4.5 Utilitv Line Extension City is preparing a policy pursuant to
which property developed will pay the actual costs of capital improvements necessary to extend
utility services to a development. Landowner acknowledges that such an extension is
necessary to implement the Project Approvals on the Property. Landowner agrees to pay the
City, pursuant to the policy to be adopted by the City, the costs of the capital improvements
necessary to extend utility services to the Property.
6.4.6 Payment for Park and Recreation Department
Equipment
In addition to construction of any park and public works improvements required pursuant to the
Project Approvals and this Agreement, Landowner shall pay One Hundred Thousand U.S.
dollars ($100,000) to the City for use to acquire equipment for the Lodi Parks and Recreation
and Public Works Departments. The amount payable hereunder shall be paid based upon the
following schedule of payments:
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
13
Payment Due Date Payment Amount
1. Payment of $1 00,000 for acquisition of parks equipment/
Lawnmower upon the effective date of this Agreement.
6.4.7 Improvements to be Desianed and Constructed by
Landowner Within or Adjacent to the Project Boundaries
The Project Approvals require the installation of specified public and private improvements.
Landowner shall, as specified in the Project Approvals, either design, engineer and construct
the following improvements or pay the City the appropriate fee for the design, engineering and
construction of said improvements. The obligations imposed on the Landowner herein shall be
in addition to any other obligations set forth in this Agreement
In the event that any of Developer's improvements encroach upon any city facilities, property or
rights of way, developer shall indemnify City against any and all expenses, including legal fees,
incurred by the City to secure replacement facilities, property or rights of way.
6.4.7.1 Surface Water Facilities
Transmission Main (Proportionate share of the total design, engineering and construction costs)
Storage Tank (Proportionate share of the total design, engineering and construction costs)
6.4.7.2 Water Supply Facilities
One new water well to cover proposed development within the Southwest Gateway area. The
well will be installed in the Southwest Gateway area at the location identified in the Project
Approvals or approved by the City Engineer. The well shall be installed and operational on or
before January 1, 2010 or earlier if otherwise required by the Water Master Plan.
6.4.7.3 Water Distribution Facilities
All water pipes and related infrastructure in all streets.
Any interim or temporary facilities as determined necessary by the Public Works Director
6.4.7.4 Sewer Collection Facilities
All sewer pipes and related infrastructure in all streets.
Any interim or temporary facilities as determined necessary by the Public Works Director
6.4.7.5 Recycled Water Facilities
All recycled water pipes and related infrastructure for irrigations systems located in or on
streets, public and private school sites (to property boundary line only), places of assembly
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
14
including but not limited to religious facilities (to property boundary line only), and high density
residential sites.
Provide up to a maximum of $50,000 to partially fund the City of Lodi Recycled Water Master
Plan Study.
6.4.7.6 Storm Drainaqe Facilities
All stormwater pipes and related infrastructure in all streets and basins.
All stormwater detention basins, control structures, pumping facilities and appurtenant piping
and controls.
Any interim or temporary facilities as determined necessary by the Public Works Director.
Developer will be entitled to apply for reimbursement under Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 16.40
for benefit received by undeveloped properties as a result of the construction of the
improvements required by this paragraph. Without limiting in any manner, the City Council's
future exercise of its legislative discretion in the public hearing called for by Chapter 16.40, the
parties anticipate that the benefited properties will be those set forth in Exhibit J. The parties
also expressly acknowledge the final determination of benefited properties shall be determined
pursuant to process set forth in Chapter 16.40.
6.4.7.7 Streets and Roads
(i) Design and construct all streets within the Project Boundary as set forth in the Project
Approvals.
(ii) Dedicate land necessary for and design and install improvements including curb, gutter,
sidewalk and landscaping on the west side of Lower Sacramento Road between Lodi Shopping
Center and Harney Lane. The land dedicated and the improvements installed shall be
consistent with Lodi standards and the Project Approvals.
(iii) Dedicate land adjacent to the Project frontage which is necessary for expansion of Harney
Lane between Legacy Estates Unit No. 1 and the western City sphere of influence boundary as
established in the General Plan and as necessary to comply with the City standards and Project
Approvals. In addition, in the event that City, in compliance with applicable laws, takes action to
form an assessment district to pay the costs of design and construction of Harney Lane as
described herein, Landowner agrees to cast all votes within the control of Landowner in favor of
formation of the assessment district and to not protest the formation of the assessment district.
In the event, that City elects not to create an assessment district or there are not sufficient votes
cast in favor of the assessment district to allow its formation, Landowner shall, at its sole cost,
design and construct the improvements to Harney Lane adjacent to the Property necessary to
meet City standards and to comply with the Project Approvals.
(iv) Payment of fees assessed for recent underground utility improvements related to Lower
Sacramento Road pursuant to Lodi Resolution No. 2007-52, dated March 21, 2007. The fee
amount payable as of the Effective Date is $596,004.00. The amount payable shall be
increased consistent with the index provision of Lodi Municipal Code 15.64.080. The amount
due is based on the proportionate share of demand for the improvements arising from the
859465 15 Version 5 Final 11/09/06
Project Approvals. The fee shall be paid no later than acceptance of the first tentative
subdivision map for processing.
(v) Dedication of necessary land, design and installation of transition roadway lane adjacent to
the Property along Highway 12IKettleman Lane.
(vi) Payment of Fair Share Costs for traffic mitigation measures that are not projects within the
Streets & Roads Fee Program.
6.4.7.8 Sewer Trunk Facilities
Realignment to location approved by City and reconstruction of Domestic Trunk and Industrial
Trunk Lines that presently cross the Property.
Pursuant to Lodi Resolution No. 2004-29, pay existing reimbursement obligations which
presently total $300,206.43 related to the Harney Lane Sewer Lift Station and Trunk Line. The
amount payable shall be paid upon submission of the first tentative subdivision map which
covers in part any portion of parcels 058-040-01, 058-040-02, 058-040-04, 058-040-05 or 058-
040-14.
6.4.8 DeBenedetti Park Construction
Within six years of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Landowner shall pay the City Eight
Million U.S. dollars ($8,000,000) for the design, engineering and construction of DeBenedetti
Park as set forth in the Improvement Plans for DeBenedetti Park, Phase I and Phase 2,
December 2004 plan. Landowner may satisfy part or all of this obligation through the provision
of services necessary to design and construct DeBenedetti Park provided that (1) Landowner
requests and obtains advance written approval from the City for any design or construction
services provided which said approval shall include an agreed upon value of said services, and
(2) Landowner complies with all applicable laws including but not limited to laws requiring
payment of prevailing wages for any construction services or actions.
Landowner acknowledges that City will enter into contracts to design and construct Debenedetti
Park. As consideration for City’s agreement to authorize satisfaction of this obligation,
Landowner agrees to the following payment schedule:
1. Not later than three (3) years after the approval of this Agreement by the City
Council, Landowner shall pay the City two million U.S. Dollars ($2,000,000). In the event, that any party other than the City or Landowner file a litigation challenging the
approval by the City of the Project Approvale, the payment specified herein shall be
due not later than four (4) years after the approval of this Agreement by the City
Council. Landowner’s failure to pay the amount required herein shall be considered
a material default of this Agreement.
Not later than five years after the approval of this Agreement by the City Council,
Landowner shall pay the City an additional three million U.S. Dollars ($3,000,000).
2.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
16
Landowner's failure to pay the amount required herein shall be considered a material
default of this Agreement.
No later than six years after the approval of this Agreement by the City Council.
Landowner shall either (1) pay the City an additional three million U.S. Dollars
($3,000,000) or (2) provide a letter of credit payable to the City or other form of
security acceptable to the City in an amount equal to $3,000,000. The letter of credit
or other form of security shall be subject to review and approval as to form by the
City Attorney. Landowner further acknowledges that the City may choose to obtain
financing for the design and construction costs of DeBenedetti Park and Landowner
agrees that the letter of credit or other form of security provided for herein shall be
required to be in a form that is necessary to assist the City in obtaining financing at
competitive market interest rates. City agrees that Landowner may substitute a
letter of credit, in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney, for a lesser
amount upon satisfaction of a portion of the total obligation set forth herein. Upon
delivery of such replacement letter of credit and its approval as to form by the City
Attorney, the City will release and convey to Landowner the prior letter of credit. City
further agrees that the other form of security may be in the form of a promissory note
and deed of trust secured by a portion of the Property which has a value equal to a
minimum of $3,000,000. The outstanding principal balance set forth in the
Promissory Note shall not accrue interest. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
set forth herein, the entire outstanding payment obligation required pursuant to this
section shall be payable in full upon the sale or other Transfer of the Property
encumbered by the Deed of Trust ("Restricted Property") or (ii) the occurrence of an
Event of Default as specified in the Promissory Note or Deed of Trust.
3.
The Deed of Trust shall be recorded against the Restricted Property subordinate only to
such liens as City may approve in writing. The City will not unreasonably withhold
consent to subordinate the Promissory Note and Deed of Trust to construction financing
for the Project provided that the principal amount of such construction financing does not
exceed seventy-five percent (75%) of the appraised fair market value of the Project and
the Restricted Property, and provided further that the senior lender agrees to provide
reasonably adequate protections to City, including reasonable notice and cure rights in
the event of default, and an agreement that if, prior to foreclosure of the senior loan, the
City takes title to the Restricted Property and cures the default, the lender will not
exercise any right it may have to accelerate the loan by reason of the transfer of title to
the City.
The parties further agree that the if final $3,000,000 payment required herein has not
been paid by or before the end of the eighth year after approval of this Agreement by the
City Council, the City may require payment pursuant to the terms of the letter of credit or
other form of security provided and may foreclose on the deed of trust and promissory
note.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06 17
6.5 Annexation
The ability to proceed with development of the Property pursuant to the Project
Approvals shall be contingent upon the annexation of the Property into the City. Pending such
annexation, Landowner may, at its own risk, process tentative parcel maps and tentative
subdivision maps and improvement or construction plans and City may conditionally approve
such tentative maps and/or improvement plans in accordance with the Entitlements, provided
City shall not approve any final parcel map or final subdivision map for recordation nor approve
the issuance of any grading permit for grading any portion of the Property or building permit for
any structure within the Property prior to the annexation of the Property to the City.
City shall use its best efforts and due diligence to initiate such annexation process,
obtain the necessary approvals and consummate the annexation of the Property into the City,
including entering into any annexation agreement that may be required in relation thereto,
subject to the City's review and approval of the terms thereof. Landowner shall be responsible
for the costs reasonably and directly incurred by the City to initiate, process and consummate
such annexation, the payment of which shall be due in advance, based on the City's estimate of
such cost, and thereafter as and when the City provides an invoice(s) for additional costs
incurred by City therefore in excess of such estimate.
7. Applicable Rules. Requlations, Fees and Official Policies.
7.1. Rules Reqardinq Permitted Uses Except as provided in this
Agreement, the City's ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations and official policies governing
the permitted uses of the Property. the density and intensity of use, the rate timing and
sequencing of development, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and
provisions for reservation and dedication of land shall be those in force on the Effective Date of
this Agreement. Except as provided in Section 8.2, this Agreement does not vest Landowner's
rights to pay development impact fees, exactions and dedications, processing fees, inspection
fees, plan checking fees or charges.
7.2. Rules Reqardinq Desian and Construction. The Project has been
designed as a Planned Development pursuant to Chapter 17.33 of the Lodi Municipal Code.
Design, improvements and construction standards shall be as set forth in Project Approvals
including the Development Plan, and shall be vested for the term of this Agreement. Unless
otherwise provided within the Development Plan or expressly provided in this Agreement, all
other ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations and official policies governing design,
ImprOVe~ent and construction standards and SpeCifications applicable to the Project and to
public improvements to be constructed by the Landowner shall be those in force and effect at
the time the applicable permit approval is granted.
7.3. Changes in State or Federal Law. This Agreement shall not preclude
the application to development of the Property of changes in City laws, regulations, plans or
policies, the terms of which are specifically mandated and required by changes in State or
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
18
Federal laws or regulations. These changes may include any increase in an existing fee or
imposition of a new fee that are necessary for the City or Landowner to comply with changes in
State or Federal laws or regulations, including but not limited to sewer, water and stormwater
laws or regulations.
7.4. Uniform Codes Applicable. Unless otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, the Project shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform
Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical and Fire Codes, City standard construction
specifications, and Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, relating to Building Standards,
in effect at the time of approval of the appropriate building, grading, encroachment or other
construction permits for the Project. If no permits are required for infrastructure improvements,
such improvements will be constructed in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform
Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical and Fire Codes, City standard construction
specifications, and Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, relating to Building Standards,
in effect at the start of construction of such infrastructure.
8. Existinq Fees, Newly Enacted Fees, Dedications, Assessments and Taxes.
8.1. Processinq Fees and Charqes. Landowner shall pay those processing,
inspection, and plan check fees and charges required by City under then current regulations for
processing applications and requests for permits, approvals and other actions, and monitoring
compliance with any permits issued or approvals granted or the performance of any conditions
with respect thereto or any performance required of Landowner hereunder.
8.2. Existinq Fees, Exactions and Dedications Landowner shall be
obligated to provide all dedications and exactions and pay all types of fees as required for the
types of development authorized by the Project Approvals as of the Effective Date of this
Agreement. With regards any fees applicable to residential development, the Parties agree that
the fees shall be payable at the earliest time authorized pursuant to the Government Code
Section 66007 as it exists as of the Effective Date of this Agreement. The specific categories of
fees payable are listed below. The dedication and exaction obligations and fee amounts
payable shall be those obligations and fee amounts applicable (indexed as set forth
hereinbelow) as of the date that the Landowner’s application for the applicable vesting tentative
map is deemed complete. For any development for which the Landowner has not submitted a
vesting tentative map, the dedication and exaction obligations and fee amounts payable shall be
those obligations and fee amounts applicable (indexed as set forth hereinbelow) as of the date
the final discretionary approval for that development is granted by the City.
Standard City Development Impact Fees Payable by the Landowner include:
1.
2.
3.
Development Impact Fees (Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 15.64)
San Joaquin County Regional Transportation Impact Fee (Lodi Municipal Code
Chapter 15.65
County Facilities Fee (Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 15.66)
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06 19
4. San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space
Development Fee (Lodi Municipal Code Chapter 15.68)
Any existing fees may be increased during the term of this Agreement provided that such
increases are limited to annual indexing (i.e. per the Engineering News Record Index, or the
CPI, or other index utilized by the City) and as provided in current fee ordinances. The initial
adjustment shall be effective as of four years after the Effective Date of the Agreement and shall
be calculated based on the difference in the applicable index from the numerical rate at the end
of the month following the third year after the Effective Date and the numerical rate at the end of
the month following the fourth year after the Effective Date. All subsequent increases shall be
based on the annual change in the applicable index. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence,
index adjustments to the fees set forth in subsections 2, 3 and 4 of this section shall be effective
annually as set forth in the relevant ordinances and resolutions. Moreover, Landowner will be
subject to the indexing called for above even if Landowner has filed a complete application for a
Vesting Tentative Map and will not vest against such indexing until payment of the fees as
called for in this Agreement.
8.3. New Development impact Fees, Exactions and Dedications.
Landowner aarees to the Dav the develoDment fees identified in Section 6.1. includina
specifically sukections 6.1 .I'th;ough 6.1.4, oi this Agreement. With regards any fees applicable
to residential development, the Parties agree that the fees shall be payable at the earliest time
authorized pursuant to the Government Code Section 66007 as it exists as of the Effective Date
of this Agreement.
Except as expressly provided herein, Landowner shall not be obligated to pay or provide any
development impact fees, connection or mitigation fees, or exactions adopted by City after the
Effective Date of this Agreement. Notwithstanding this limitation, Landowner may at its sole
discretion elect to pay or provide any fee or exaction adopted after the Effective Date of this
Agreement.
8.4. Fee Reductions To the extent that any fees payable pursuant to the
requirements of Sections 8.1 are reduced after the operative date for determining the fee has
occurred, the Landowner shall pay the reduced fee amount.
9. Community Facilities District. Formation of a Community Facilities District
for Public Improvements and Services.
9.1. Inclusion in a Community Facilities District. Landowner agrees to
cooperate in the formation of a Community Facilities District pursuant to Government Code
Section 53311 et seq. to be formed by the City. The boundaries of the area of Community
Facilities District shall be contiguous with the boundaries of the Property excluding the portion of
land zoned for commercial or office development. Landowner agrees not to protest said district
formation and agrees to vote in favor of levying a special tax on the Property in an amount not
to exceed $600 per year per single family attached or detached residential dwelling units and
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
20
$1 75 per year for each attached multi-family rental unit as adjusted herein. The special tax
shall be initiated for all residential dwelling units for which a building permit is issued, and shall
commence to be levied beginning the subsequent fiscal year after the building permit is issued.
Landowner acknowledges that the 2007-2008 special tax rate for the units in the. Project will not
exceed $600 per single-family attached or detached dwelling unit and $175 per year for each
attached multi-family rental unit and that the special tax shall increase each year by 2% in
perpetuity. A vote by Landowner against the levying of the special tax or a vote to repeal or
amend the special tax shall constitute an event of default under this Agreement.
9.2. Use of Community Facilities District Revenues Landowner and City
agree that the improvements and services that may be provided with the special tax levied
pursuant to Section 9.1 may be used for the following improvements and services:
a.
b.
d.
e.
f.
9.
h.
C.
I.
Police protection and criminal justice services;
Fire protection, suppression, paramedic and ambulance services;
Recreation and library program services;
Operation and maintenance of museums and cultural facilities;
Maintenance of park, parkways and open space areas dedicated to the
City;
Flood and storm protection services;
Improvement, rehabilitation or maintenance of any real or personal
property that has been contaminated by hazardous substances;
Purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, or rehabilitation or any
real or tangible property with useful life of more than five years: and,
Design, engineering, acquisition or construction of public facilities with a
useful life of more that five years including:
1. Local park, recreation, parkway and open-space facilities,
2. Libraries,
3. Childcare facilities,
4. Water transmission and distribution facilities, natural gas, telephone,
energy and cable television lines, and
5. Government facilities.
Landowner and City agree that Property does not presently receive any of these services from
the City and that all of these services are new services.
9.3. Community Facilities District for Residential Propertv - Financinq.
In addition to the funding provided as part of the Community Facilities District identified in
Section 9.1, City acknowledges that Landowner may desire to finance the acquisition or
construction of a portion of the improvements described in Section 8.2 through the Community
Facilities District. The costs associated with the items identified in Section 8.2 shall be in
addition to the annual cost imposed to comply with Section 9.1. The following provisions shall
apply to any to the extent that the Landowner desires to fund any of the improvements set forth
in Section 8.2 through the Community Facilities District:
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
21
9.3.1 issuance of Bonds. City and Landowner agree that, with
the consent of Landowner, and to the extent permitted by
law, City and Landowner shall use their best efforts to
cause bonds to be issued in amounts sufficient to achieve
the purposes of this Section.
9.3.2 Payment Prior to Issuance of Bonds. Nothing in this
Agreement shall be construed to preclude the payment by
an owner of any of the parcels to be included within the
CFD of a cash amount equivalent to its proportionate share
of costs for the improvements identified in Section 8.2, or
any portion thereof, prior to the issuance of bonds.
9.3.3 Private Financing. Nothing in this Agreement shall be
construed to limit Landowner's option to install the
improvements through the use of private financing.
Acquisition and Payment. City agrees that it shall use its
best efforts to allow and facilitate monthly acquisition of
completed improvements or completed portions thereof,
and monthly payment of appropriate amounts for such
improvements to the person or entity constructing
improvements or portions thereof, provided City shall only
be obligated to use CFD bond or tax proceeds for such
acquisitions.
9.3.4
10. Processinq of Subsequent Development Applications and Buildinq Permits
Subject to Landowner's compliance with the City's application requirements including,
specifically, submission of required information and payment of appropriate fees, and assuming
Landowner is not in default under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City shall
process Landowner's subsequent development applications and building permit requests in an
expeditious manner. In addition, City agrees that upon payment of any required City fees or
costs, City will designate or retain, as necessary, appropriate personnel and consultants to
process Landowner's development applications and building permit requests City approvals in
an expeditious manner.
11. Reserved
11. Amendment or Cancellation
11.1. Modification Because of Conflict with State or Federal Laws. In the
event that State or Federal laws or regulations enacted after the Effective Date of this
Agreement prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement or
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
22
require changes in plans, maps or permits approved by the City, the parties shall meet and
confer in good faith in a reasonable attempt to modify this Agreement to comply with such
federal or State law or regulation. Any such amendment or suspension of the Agreement shall
be approved by the City Council in accordance with the Municipal Code and this Agreement.
11.2. Amendment by Mutual Consent. This Agreement may be amended in
writing from time to time by mutual consent of the parties hereto and in accordance with the
procedures of State law and the Municipal Code.
11.3. Insubstantial Amendments. Notwithstanding the provisions of the
preceding Section 12.2, any amendments to this Agreement which do not relate to (a) the term
of the Agreement as provided in Section 5.2; (b) the permitted uses of the Property as provided
in Sections 6.2 and 7.1; (c) provisions for reservation or dedication of land; (d) the location and
maintenance of on-site and off-site improvements; (e) the density or intensity of use of the
Project; (f) the maximum height or size of proposed buildings or (9) monetary contributions by
Landowner as provided in this Agreement shall not, except to the extent otherwise required by
law, require notice or public hearing before either the Planning Commission or the City Council
before the parties may execute an amendment hereto.
11.4. Amendment of Project Approvals. Any amendment of Project
Approvals relating to: (a) the permitted use of the Property; (b) provision for reservation or
dedication of land; (c) the density or intensity of use of the Project; (d) the maximum height or
size of proposed buildings; (e) monetary contributions by the Landowner; (f) the location and
maintenance of on-site and off-site improvements; or (9) any other issue or subject not identified
as an “insubstantial amendment” in Section 12.3 of this Agreement, shall require an amendment
of this Agreement. Such amendment shall be limited to those provisions of this Agreement,
which are implicated by the amendment of the Project Approval. Any other amendment of the
Project Approval(s) shall not require amendment of this Agreement unless the amendment of
the Project Approval(s) relates specifically to some provision of this Agreement.
11.5. Cancellation by Mutual Consent. Except as otherwise permitted
herein, this Agreement may be canceled in whole or in part only by the mutual consent of the
parties or their successors in interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Any fees paid pursuant to this Agreement prior to the date of cancellation shall be retained by
City.
66452.6(a), the term of any parcel map or tentative subdivision map shall automatkally be
12. Term of PrOiect Approvals. Pursuant to California Government Code Section
extended for the term of this Agreement.
13. Annual Review.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
23
13.1. Review Date. The annual review date for this Agreement shall occur
either within the same month each year as the month in which the Agreement is executed or the
month immediately thereafter.
13.2. Initiation of Review. The City's Planning Director shall initiate the
annual review by giving to Landowner written notice that the City intends to undertake such
review. Within thirty (30) days of City's notice, Landowner shall provide evidence to the
Planning Director to demonstrate good faith compliance with the Development Agreement. The
burden of proof, by substantial evidence of compliance, is upon the Landowner. The City's
failure to timely initiate the annual review is not deemed to be a waiver of the right to do so at a
later date; accordingly, Landowner is not deemed to be in compliance with the Agreement by
virtue of such failure to timely initiate review.
13.3. Staff Reports. City shall deposit in the mail to Landowner a copy of all
staff reports, and related Exhibits, concerning contract performance at least three (3) days prior
to any annual review.
13.4. Costs. Costs reasonably incurred by the City in connection with the
annual review shall be paid by Landowner in accordance with the City's schedule of fees and
billing rates in effect at the time of review.
13.5. Non-compliance with Aclreement: Hearing. If the Planning Director
determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Landowner has not complied in good faith
with the terms and conditions of the Agreement during the period under review, the City Council,
upon receipt of any report or recommendation from the Planning Commission, may initiate
proceedings to modify or terminate the Agreement, at which time an administrative hearing shall
be conducted, in accordance with the procedures of State law. As part of that final
determination, the City Council may impose conditions that it considers necessary and
appropriate to protect the interest of the City.
13.6. Appeal of Determination. The decision of the City Council as to
Landowner's compliance shall be final, and any Court action or proceeding to attack, review, set
aside, void or annul any decision of the determination by the Council shall be commenced within
thirty (30) days of the final decision by the City Council.
14. Default. Subject to any applicable extension of time, failure by any party to
substantially perform any term or provision of this Agreement required to be performed by such
party shall constitute a material event of default ("Event of Default"). For purposes of this
Agreement, a party claiming another party is in default shall be referred to as the "Complaining
Party," and the party alleged to be in default shall be referred to as the "Party in Default." A
Complaining Party shall not exercise any of its remedies as the result of such Event of Default
unless such Complaining Party first gives notice to the Party in Default as provided in Section
15.1.1, and the Party in Default fails to cure such Event of Default within the applicable cure
period.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
24
14.1. Procedure Renardinq Defaults.
14.1.1. Notice. The Complaining Party shall give written notice of
default to the Party in Default, specifying the default complained of by the Complaining Party.
Delay in giving such notice shall not constitute a waiver of any default nor shall it change the
time of default.
14.1.2. - Cure. The Party in Default shall diligently endeavor to
cure, correct or remedy the matter complained of, provided such cure, correction or remedy
shall be completed within the applicable time period set forth herein after receipt of written
notice (or such additional time as may be deemed by the Complaining Party to be reasonably
necessary to correct the matter).
14.1.3. Failure to Assert Any failures or delays by a
Complaining Party in asserting any of its rights and remedies as to any default shall not operate
as a waiver of any default or of any such rights or remedies. Delays by a Complaining Party in
asserting any of its rights and remedies shall not deprive the Complaining Party of its right to
institute and maintain any actions or proceedings, which it may deem necessary to protect,
assert, or enforce any such rights or remedies.
14.1.4. Notice of Default. If an Event of Default occurs prior to
exercising any remedies, the Complaining Party shall give the Party in Default written notice of
such default. If the default is reasonably capable of being cured within thirty (30) days, the Party
in Default shall have such period to effect a cure prior to exercise of remedies by the
Complaining Party. If the nature of the alleged default is such that it cannot, practicably be
cured within such thirty (30) day period, the cure shall be deemed to have occurred within such
thirty (30) day period if: (a) the cure shall be commenced at the earliest practicable date
following receipt of the notice; (b) the cure is diligently prosecuted to completion at all times
thereafter; (c) at the earliest practicable date (in no event later than thirty (30) days after the
curing party's receipt of the notice), the curing party provides written notice to the other party
that the cure cannot practicably be completed within such thirty (30) day period; and (d) the cure
is completed at the earliest practicable date. In no event shall Complaining Party be precluded
from exercising remedies if a default is not cured within ninety (90) days after the first notice of
default is given.
T4.1.5. Leqal Proceedinas. Subject to the foregoing, if the Party
in Default fails to cure a default in accordance with the foregoing, the Complaining Party, at its
option, may institute legal proceedings pursuant to this Agreement or, in the event of a material
default, terminate this Agreement. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the parties may
pursue all other remedies at law or in equity, which are not otherwise provided for or prohibited
by this Agreement, or in the City's regulations if any governing development agreements,
expressly including the remedy of specific performance of this Agreement.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
25
14.1.6. Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated
following any Event of Default of Landowner or for any other reason, such termination shall not
affect the validity of any building or improvement within the Property which is completed as of
the date of termination, provided that such building or improvement has been constructed
pursuant to a building permit issued by the City. Furthermore, no termination of this Agreement
shall prevent Landowner from completing and occupying any building or other improvement
authorized pursuant to a valid building permit previously issued by the City that is under
construction at the time of termination, provided that any such building or improvement is
completed in accordance with said building permit in effect at the time of such termination.
15. Estoppel Certificate. Either Party may, at any time, and from time to time,
request written notice from the other Party requesting such Party to certify in writing that, (a) this
Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the Parties; (b) this Agreement
has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing, or if so amended, identifying the
amendments; and (c) to the knowledge of the certifying Party the requesting Party is not in
default in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, or if in default, to describe
therein the nature and amount of any such defaults. A Party receiving a request hereunder
shall execute and return such certificate within thirty (30) days following the receipt thereof, or
such longer period as may reasonably be agreed to by the Parties. City Manager of City shall be
authorized to execute any certificate requested by Landowner. Should the party receiving the
request not execute and return such certificate within the applicable period, this shall not be
deemed to be a default.
16. Mortgagee Protection; Certain Riqhts of Cure.
16.1. Mortqaqee Protection. This Agreement shall be superior and senior to
any lien placed upon the Property, or any portion thereof after the date of recording this
Agreement, including the lien for any deed of trust or mortgage ("Mortgage"). Notwithstanding
the foregoing, no breach hereof shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any
Mortgage made in good faith and for value, but all the terms and conditions contained in this
Agreement shall be binding upon and effective against any person or entity, including any deed
of trust beneficiary or mortgagee ("Mortgagee") who acquires title to the Property, or any portion
thereof, by foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise.
16.2. Mortaaqee Not ObliQated. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section
17.1 above, no Mortgagee shall have any obligation or duty under this Agreement, before or
after fOreClOSUre or a deed in lieu of foreclosure, to construct or complete the construction of
construction or completion, or to pay, perform or provide any fee, dedication, improvements or
other exaction or imposition; provided, however, that a Mortgagee shall not be entitled to devote
the Property to any uses or to construct any improvements thereon, authorized by the Project
Approvals or by this Agreement, unless Mortgagee agrees to and does construct or complete
the construction of improvements, or guarantees such construction of improvements, or pays,
improvements, or to guarantee such GonstruGtion of improvement$, or to guarantee such
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
26
performs or provides any fee, dedication, improvements or other exaction or imposition as
required by the Project Approvals.
16.3. Notice of Default to Mortqaqee and Extension of Riqht to Cure. If
City receives notice from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given
Landowner hereunder and specifying the address for service thereof, then City shall deliver to
such Mortgagee, concurrently with service thereon to Landowner, any notice given to
Landowner with respect to any claim by City that Landowner has committed an Event of Default.
Each Mortgagee shall have the right during the same period available to Landowner to cure or
remedy, or to commence to cure or remedy, the Event of Default claimed set forth in the City's
notice. City, through its City Manager, may extend the cure period provided in Section 15.1.2
for not more than an additional sixty (60) days upon request of Landowner or a Mortgagee.
17. Severability. Except as set forth herein, if any term, covenant or condition of
this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity or circumstance shall, to any
extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such
term, covenant or condition to persons, entities or circumstances other than those as to which it
is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby and each term, covenant or
condition of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law;
provided, however, if any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or
unenforceable and the effect thereof is to deprive a Party hereto of an essential benefit of its
bargain hereunder, then such Party so deprived shall have the option to terminate this entire
Agreement from and after such determination.
18. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
19. Attorneys' Fees and Costs in Legal Actions By Parties to the Aqreement.
Should any legal action be brought by either party for breach of this Agreement or to enforce
any provisions herein, the prevailing party to such action shall be entitled to reasonable
attorneys' fees, court costs, and such other costs as may be fixed by the Court.
20. Attorneys' Fees and Costs in Leaal Actions By Third Parties to the
Agreement and Continued Permit Processing. If any person or entity not a party to this
Agreement initiates an action at law or in equity to challenge the validity of any provision of this
Agreement or the Project Approvals, the parties shall cooperate and appear in defending such
action. Landowner shall bear its own costs of defense as a real party in interest in any such
attorneys' fees expended by City in defense of any such action or other proceeding and shall
pay any attorneys fees and costs that may be awarded to the third party or parties. The City
agrees that in the event an action at law or in equity to challenge the validity of the Project
Approvals is filed by a third party other than by a state or federal agency, the City will continue
to process and approve permit applications that are consistent with and comply with the Project
action. Landowner shall rQimburse City on an equal basis for all reasonable court costs and
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
27
Approvals unless a court enjoins further processing of permit applications and issuance of
permits.
21. Transfers and Assiqnments. From and after recordation of this Agreement
against the Property, Landowner shall have the full right to assign this Agreement as to the
Property, or any portion thereof, in connection with any sale, transfer or conveyance thereof,
and upon the express written assignment by Landowner and assumption by the assignee of
such assignment in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G, and the conveyance of Landowner's
interest in the Property related thereto, Landowner shall be released from any further liability or
obligation hereunder related to the portion of the Property so conveyed and the assignee shall
be deemed to be the "Landowner," with all rights and obligations related thereto, with respect to
such conveyed property. Prior to recordation of this Agreement, any proposed assignment of
this Agreement by Landowner shall be subject to the prior written consent of the City Manager
on behalf of the City and the form of such assignment shall be subject to the approval of the City
Attorney, neither of which shall be unreasonably withheld.
22. Aqreement Runs with the Land. Except as otherwise provided for in Section
15 of this Agreement, all of the provisions, rights, terms, covenants, and obligations contained in
this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their respective heirs, successors and
assignees, representatives, lessees, and all other persons acquiring the Property, or any portion
thereof, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever. All of
the provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitude and shall constitute
covenants running with the land pursuant to applicable laws, including, but not limited to,
Section 1468 of the Civil Code of the State of California. Each covenant to do, or refrain from
doing, some act on the Property hereunder, or with respect to any owned property; (a) is for the
benefit of such properties and is a burden upon such properties: (b) runs with such properties;
and (c) is binding upon each party and each successive owner during its ownership of such
properties or any portion thereof, and shall be a benefit to and a burden upon each party and its
property hereunder and each other person succeeding to an interest in such properties.
23. Bankruptcy. The obligations of this Agreement shall not be dischargeable in
bankruptcy.
24. Indemnification. Landowner agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless
City, and its elected and appointed councils, boards, commissions, officers, agents, employees,
and representatives from any and all claims, costs (including legal fees and costs) and liability
for (1) any personal injury or property damage which may arise directly or indirectly as a result
of any actions or inactions by the Landowner, or any actions or inactions of Landowner's
contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees in connection with the construction,
improvement, operation, or maintenance of the Property and the Project, provided that
Landowner shall have no indemnification obligation with respect to the gross negligence or
willful misconduct of City, its contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees or with respect to
the maintenance, use or condition of any improvement after the time it has been dedicated to
and accepted by the City or another public entity (except as provided in an improvement
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06 28
agreement or maintenance bond) and (2) any additional mitigation required, including but not
limited to payment of any mitigation fees that may be imposed, as a result of a lawsuit filed by a
third party challenging or seeking to invalidate the Project Approvals.
25. Insurance.
25.1. Public Liabilitv and Property Darnaqe Insurance. At all times that
Landowner is constructing any improvements that will become public improvements, Landowner
shall maintain in effect a policy of comprehensive general liability insurance with a
per-occurrence combined single limit of not less than two million ($2,000,000) dollars and a
deductible of not more than fifty thousand ($50,000) dollars per claim. The policy so maintained
by Landowner shall name the City as an additional insured and shall include either a severability
of interest clause or cross-liability endorsement.
25.2. Workers' Compensation Insurance. At all times that Landowner is
constructing any improvements that will become public improvements, Landowner shall
maintain Workers' Compensation insurance for all persons employed by Landowner for work at
the Project site. Landowner shall require each contractor and subcontractor similarly to provide
Workers' Compensation insurance for its respective employees. Landowner agrees to
indemnify the City for any damage resulting from Landowner's failure to maintain any such
insurance.
25.3. Evidence of Insurance. Prior to commencement of construction of any
improvements which will become public improvements, Landowner shall furnish City satisfactory
evidence of the insurance required in Sections 26.1 and 26.2 and evidence that the carrier is
required to give the City at least fifteen (15) days prior written notice of the cancellation or
reduction in coverage of a policy. The insurance shall extend to the City, its elective and
appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, employees and representatives and to
Landowner performing work on the Project.
26. Excuse for Nonperformance. Landowner and City shall be excused from
performing any obligation or undertaking provided in this Agreement, except any obligation to
pay any sum of money under the applicable provisions hereof, in the event and so long as the
performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed, retarded or hindered by act of God,
fire, earthquake, flood, explosion, action of the elements, war, invasion, insurrection, riot, mob
violence, sabotage, inability to procure or general shortage of labor, equipment, facilities,
materials or supplies in the open market, failure of transportation, strikes, lockouts,
condemnation, requisition, laws, orders of governmental, civil, military or naval authority, or any
other cause, whether similar or dissimilar to the foregoing, not within the control of the Party
claiming the extension of time to perform. The Party claiming such extension shall send written
notice of the claimed extension to the other Party within thirty (30) days from the
commencement of the cause entitling the Party to the extension.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
29
27. Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the
sole protection and benefit of the Landowner and, the City and their successors and assigns.
No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision in this Agreement.
28. Notices. All notices required by this Agreement, the enabling legislation, or the
procedure adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65865, shall be in writing and
delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid.
Notice required to be given to the City shall be addressed as follows:
CITY OF LODl
City Manager
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
Notice required to be given to the Landowner shall be addressed as follows:
FRONTIER COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC.
10100 Trinity Parkway, Suite 420
Stockton, California 95219
Either party may change the address stated herein by giving notice in writing to the other party,
and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.
Form of Agreement; Recordation: Exhibits. Except when this Agreement is
automatically terminated due to the expiration of the Term of the Agreement or the provisions of
Section 5.3 (Automatic Termination Upon Completion and Sale of Residential Lot), the City shall
cause this Agreement, any amendment hereto and any other termination of any parts or
provisions hereof, to be recorded, at Landowner's expense, with the county Recorder within ten
(10) days of the effective date thereof. Any amendment or termination of this Agreement to be
recorded that affects less than all of the Property shall describe the portion thereof that is the
subject of such amendment or termination. This Agreement is executed in three duplicate
originals, each of which is deemed to be an original. This Agreement consists of 31 pages and
14 Exhibits, which constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the parties.
and to undertake such actions as may be necessary to effectuate the intent of this Agreement.
29.
30. Further Assurances. The Parties agree to execute such additional instruments
31. City Cooperation. The City agrees to cooperate with Landowner in securing all
permits which may be required by City. In the event State or Federal laws or regulations
enacted after the Effective Date, or action of any governmental jurisdiction, prevent delay or
preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, or require changes in
plans, maps or permits approved by City, the parties agree that the provisions of this Agreement
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
30
shall be modified, extended, or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State and
Federal laws or regulations or the regulations of other governmental jurisdictions. Each party
agrees to extend to the other its prompt and reasonable cooperation in so modifying this
Agrement or approved plans.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Lodi, a municipal corporation, has authorized the
execution of this Agreement in duplicate by its Mayor and attested to by its City Clerk under the
authority of Ordinance No.1788, adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi on the 6th day of
December, 2006, and Landowner has caused this Agreement to be executed.
“CITY “LANDOWNER
CITY OF LODI,
a municipal corporation
FRONTIER COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC.
By: By:
Blair King Name:
City Manager Its:
ATTEST:
Randi Johl
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
D. Stephen Schwabauer
City Attorney
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
31
EXHIBIT LIST
Exhibit A-I:
Exhibit A-2:
Exhibit 8:
Exhibit 8-1:
Exhibit C-1:
Exhibit C-2:
Exhibit D:
Exhibit E:
Exhibit F:
Exhibit G:
Exhibit H:
Exhibit I:
Exhibit J:
Exhibit K:
Legal Description of the Property
Diagram of the Property
General Plan Land Use Map
Zoning Map for Project Site
Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
Reserved
Development Plan and Infrastructure Map for the Property
Growth Management Allocations
Annexation Approvals
Form of Assignment
Schedule of Improvements
Park Improvements
Required Park Amenities
Settlement Agreement among Frontier Community Builders, Inc.,
Citizens for Open Government and the City of Lodi
859465
Version 5 Final 11109/06
xxxii
EXHIBIT A-I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of San Joaquin,
City of Lodi, and is described as follows:
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
RECEIVED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
for
ANNEXATION PURPOSES
ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
BEING A PORTION OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 6
EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING ATTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15, THENCE, S 00" 01' 59 E
75.01 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 15 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST LINE, S 00" 01' 59" E 5208.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15,
S 89" 14'47" E 1162.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE PROJECTION OF THE
MOST SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP FILED FOR
RECORD IN BOOK 16 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGE 87, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS,
THENCE, LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE, ALONG SAID PROJECTED LINE, N 05" 39 54 E 230.51 FEET,
THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1, N 89" 14' 47" W 50.43 FEET, THENCE, N
00" 01' 12" W 410.00 FEET, THENCE, S 89" 14' 47" E 185.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID PARCEL 1, THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, S 00" 01' 12 E 261.18 FEET
TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LABELED "INSTRUMENT #
80060064"AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP FILED FOR RECORD IN BOOK 28 OF SURVEYS,
PAGE 47, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LAST SAID
PARCEL, S 89" 14' 47" E 1000.00 FEET, THENCE, S 00" 01' 12 E 378.50 FEETTO THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID SECTION 15, THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, S 89" 14'47" E 320.67 FEET TO THE
SOUTH ONE QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 15, THENCE ALONG THE NORTH-SOUTH CENTERLINE Or SAID SLGTIQN 15, N 00" 00 25" W 2639.00 FEET TO THE CENTER OF SAID
SECTION 15, THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH-SOUTH CENTERLINE, N 00" 00 08 E
0
1321.38 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST
ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH ONE-
HALF OF THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15, N 89" 12' 16" W 1321.83 FEET,
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE N 00" 00 08" W 828.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE CITY OF LODl WELL SITE, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY LINES OF
SAID WELL SITE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:
1.
2.
N 89" 12' 53" W 427.50 FEET
N 00" 00' 08" E 417.50 FEET, a -
THENCE, N 89" 12' 53" W 894.20 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
CONTAINING 262.708 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
C:\Docufflenls and Senings\Tom.OFFICE.OOaml Senimp\Temwary Internet Files\MK%nLEGAL DESCRIPTION.doc
EXHIBIT A-2
DIAGRAM OF THE PROPERTY
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
I ANNEXATION MAP
PER PUNYLD RPEIDENTIALLLSLPVE
SOURCE: CITY OF LODI, 2005
~ ~~
I:UOD531 wside swgatc\6gunAFig~IVA4 81 14'64'061
Exhibit B-1 Zoning Map
EXHIBIT C-I
Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
---
262
EXHIBIT C-2
Reserved
859465
Version 5 Final I1/09/06
EXHIBIT D
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND INFRASTRACTURE MAP FOR THE PROPERTY
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
EXHIBIT E
SOUTHWEST GATEWAY PROJECT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOCATION TABLE
Development Agreement
Within the Calendar Year One Year
after Effective Date
Within the Calendar Year Two Years
Applicable Date I Allocation
Effective Date of 1 300 Low Density units (Reserve)
300 High Density units (Reserve)
59 Low Density units
75 Medium Density units
59 Low Density units
after Effective Date
Within the Calendar Year Four Years
after Effective Date
Within the Calendar Year Five Years
after Effective Date I29 Medium De-nsity units
Within the Calendar Year Three Years 1 59 Low Density units
28 Medium Density units
59 Low Density units
28 Medium Density units
59 Low Density units
after Effective Date
Within the Calendar Year Seven Years
after Effective Date
Within the Calendar Year Eight Years
after Effective Date
after Effective Date
Within the Calendar Year Six Years 1 59 Low Density units
58 Low Density units
58 Low Density units
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
EXHIBIT F
ANNEXATION APPROVALS
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
San Joaquin LAFCo
1860 E Hazelton Avcnue
Stockton, CA 95205
Short Form Desiana-
SOUTHWEST GATEWAY REORGANIZATlON TO THE CITY OF LODI
(LAFC 16-06)
Annexation of 3 18 acres to the City of Lodi with concurrent detachments from the
Woodbi~idge Fire Protection District and the San Joaquin County Resource Conservation
District
1.
2.
Fiied pursuant to action by the City of Lodi
The name of each district or city involved in this change of organization or
reorganization and the kind or type of change of organization ordered for each
sucli city or district are as follows.
CITY OR DISTFUCT TYPE OF CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION
City of Lodi
Woodhridge Fire Protection District
San Joaquin County Resource
Conservation District
Annexation
Detachment
Detachment
3
4.
5.
6.
The city or districts are located in the following county (ies): San Joaquin.
Boundary description for said formation or change has been attached as Exhibit A.
Terms and conditions, if any, are provided in said resolution, attached
I hereby certify that the action taken by adoption of the above cited resolution
complies with the boundaries and conditions specified by the Local Agency
Formation Coinmission of San Joa County in Resolution No. 1172. A
Local Agency Formation Commission
Completion Date: July 16, 2007
<-E"TCohIP
SAN JOAQUIN LAFCO CONDUCTNG AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. I172
RESOLIJTION ORDERJNG THE SOUTHWEST GATEWAY REORGANIZATION
TO THE CITY OF LODI (LAFC 16-06)
WI-IEREAS, the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO), on March 16,
2007, appiiived LAFCO Resolution No. 1168, approving the Southwest Gateway Reorganization to
the City of Lodi (LAFC 16-06), with certain terms and conditions;
Wl-IEREAS, llie reorganization consists of the annexation of temtory to the City of Lodi with
concurrent detachment from the Woodbridge Fire Pi-otection District and thc San Joaquin Resource
Conscrvaiion District;
WHEREAS, the Commission did set forth the reasons for reorganization, made findings and
detenninations, including those requii-ed of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQ.4), and
appi-oved teims and conditions of reorganization described in Exhibit A, LAFCO Resolution No. 1168,
hcr-eLo and by this reference incorporated lmein;
WHEREAS, tlic affected boundaries of the reorganization are described in Exhibit B, attached;
WHEREAS, the territory is uninhabited and did not have 100% owner consent;
WHEREAS, Goveinnient Code Section 56029 designates the Coiiunission as the Conducting
Authority to conduci proceedings for the reorganization pursuant to Part 4 of Division 3 of
Govemieiit Code conunencing with Section 57000;
WHEREAS, the Coinmission directed the Executive Officer, pursuant to Govemnent Code
Section 56881 (d), to initiate protest proceedings pursuant to Part 4, commencing with Section 57000;
WHEREAS, the Execulive Officer set the proposal for a hearing on April 24, 2007, at the hour
of 1 I :OO a.m., in the Carnegie Forum, Lodi City Hall, 305 West Pine Street, Lodi, California;
WHEREAS, notice, in the fonn and manner required by law, has been given for the conducting
authority proceedings by the Executive Officer, pursuant to Govemnent Code Section 57025;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Coveinnicnt Code Section 57002, the Executive Officer has
conducted flie dilly noticed public hearing on the reorganization for the purpose of receiving written
protests;
WHEREAS, the conducting authority proceeding hearing was concluded on April 24,2007;
WHEREAS, after the conclusion of the hearing, the Commission shall detennine the value of
any written protests received;
WHEREAS, three written protests were received either prior to, or upon conclusion of the
hearing, and finds that the value of written protests received and not withdrawn is less than a majority
of the landowners owning more than 50% of the assessed value of land within the teintory.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE SAN JOAQUM LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION HEREBY RESOLVES, DETERMDJES, AND ORDERS as follows:
1. Certifies as a Responsible Agency, [he Commission has reviewed and considered the City
of Lodi’s Envirorunental lmpact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2005092096) and adopts
the CEQA Findings and Stateinent of Overriding Consideration as certified by the City of
Lodi.
The subject reorganization is hereby ordered pursuant to Goveimnent Code Seclion
57075b);
2.
3. Directs the Executive Officer to file a Certificate of Completion and record this
reorganization in the manner stated in Government Code Section 57000 et. seq. upon
receipt of the appropriate State Board of Equalization Fees; the map and legal description
prepared pursuant to the requirements of the State Board of Equalization and accepted to
form by the Executive Officer, and the specified terms and conditions;
The City of hdi shall record a Certificate of Williamson Act Contract Termination for
Contract No. 75051 6 for Assessor Parcel Number 058-030-03 (former Assessor’s Account
Numbers 62346 and 057-050-03) with the County Recorder at the same time as the
Executive Officer files the Certificate of Completion if it exercises its option not to succeed
to this contract; and;
4.
5. The reorganization is subject to the temis and conditions contained in LAFCO Resolution No.
1168, Exhibit A, and the boundaries further described on the map and legal description,
Exhibit B hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18* day of May 2007 by the following vote:
AYES: Coinmissioners Edward J. Chavez, Steven Nilssen, Larry Ruhstaller, Jack Snyder
NOES: None
THE f0REGOfNG IS A CORRECT COPY OF
THE ORIGINAL ON fI1E IN THIS OFFEE
Fonnation Commission
RESOLUTION NO. 1168
BEFORE THE SAN JOAQUM LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
APPROVING THE SOUTHWEST GATEWAY REORGANIZATION
TO THE CITY OF LODI (LAFC 16-06)
WHEREAS, the above entitled proposal was initiated by filing by the City of Lodi and
on January 9, 2007, the Executive Officer certified the application filed for processing in
accordance with the Local Govenm1ent Reorganization Act; and
WIIEIEAS, thc Commission held a public hearing 011 tlie proposed reorganization on
March 16, 2007, in thc Board of Supervisors Chambers, County Courthouse, pursuant to notice
of lieariiig which was posted and mailed in accordance with Slate law; and
WIEREAS, at said hearing the Commission heard and received evidence, both oral
and written regarding the proposal, and all persons present were given an opportunity lo be
heard; and
WIIEREAS, the City of Lodi approvcd an Envirorunenlal Impact Repoi-t Tor the
project, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA
Guidelines:
WIEIIEAS, there is one Williamson Act Contract within the boundaries of the
proposed aimexation territory;
WI-JEIIEAS, the subjcct territory is uninhabited and does not have 100% owner-
consent;
NOW, TNERJ3ORE, the San Joaquin Local Agency Fomiation Commission DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER as follows:
Section 1, Cei-tifies that, as a Responsible Agency, the Co~nniission has reviewed
and considered lie City of Lodi’s Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No.
2005092096.
Section 2. Determines, pursuant to government Code Section 56754, the City of
Lodi may exercise its oplion to not succeed to the rights, duties, and powers of tlie Williamson
Act Contract for APN 058-030-01 pursuant to Section 51243.5 because:
a. City of Lodi Resolution No. 3623, “Protesting Execution of a California
Land Conservation Contract,” passed on September 18, 1973, resolved
that the City protests the execution of the California Land Conservation
contract initiated by John and Am Van Ruiten, Assessor’s Account
Numbers 45546 and 62346. Assessor’s Account Number 62346 is now
APN 058-030-03. The resolution identified the affected contract and the
February 15,2007
SOUTHWEST GATEWAY ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF LODl
San Joaquin County California
A portion of Sections 15 and 22. Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo
Base and Meridian, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the northwest corner of said Section 15. said corner being in State
Highway Route No. 12 (also known as Kettleman Lane) right-of-way; (1) thence along
the north line of said Section 15, being in said Highway's right-of-way, South 89"12'53"
East, 1,321.75 feet to the Lodi City Limit line; thence along said City Limit line the
following seventeen (17) courses (being courses 2 through 18): (2) South O"00'08"
West, 75.01 feet, (3) North 89"12'53" West, 427.50 feet, (4) South O"00'08" West,
41 7.50 feet, (5) South 89"12'53" East, 427.50 feet, (6) South O"00'08" West, 828.63
feet, (7) South 89"12'16" East, 1,361.83 feet to the east line of Lower Sacramento
Road, (8) along said east line, North O"00'08" East, 499.77 feet, (9) South 89"11'22"
East, 621.51 feet.(lO) South O"00'08" West, 406.18 feet, (11) South 89"11'22" East,
530.15 feet (12) South Oo11'12" West, 94.00 feet, (13) South 89"13'48" East, 128.75
feet, (14) South O"00'08" West, 1,320 feet, (15) North 89"12'40" West, 1,280 feet to the
former east line of Lower Sacramento Road, (16) along said former east line, South
O"00'25" East, 1,592.04 feet, (17) South 89"08'43" East, 170.02 feet, and (18) South
O"00'25" East, 57.01 feet to the north line of SUNNYSIDE ESTATES (the map of which
is filed in Book of Official Maps and Plats, Volume 17, page 128, San Joaquin County
Records); (19) thence leaving said City Limit line. North 89"08'43" West, 155.02 feet to
a point on the existing east line of Lower Sacramento Road, said point being 55.00 feet
easterly of the north-south quarter section line through said Section 15; (20) thence
South O"00'25" East along said east line, 935 feet to the northerly end of the round
corner curve at the northeast corner of the intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and
Harney Lane; (21) thence along said round corner, southeasterly along a curve to the
left having a radius of 30.00 feet, a central angle of 89"06'57" and an arc length of 46.66
feet to the easterly end of said round corner curve; (22) thence southerly, 55.07 feet to
the easterly end of the round corner curve at the southeast corner of said intersection;
(23) thence along said round corner, southwesterly along a curve to the lefl having a
radius of 30.00 feet, a central angle of 87"09'44" and an arc length of 45.64 feet to the
southerly end of said round corner curve; (24) thence westerly 121.60 feet to the
southerly end of the round corner curve at the southwest corner of said intersection;
(25) thence along said round corner curve, northwesterly along a curve to the left having
a radius of 30.00 feet, a central angle of 65"52'48" and an arc length of 34.49 feet to the
westerly end of said round corner curve. being on the south line of Harney Lane, said
south line being 30.00 feet southerly of the north line of said Section 22; (26) thence
along said south line, North 89"14'47" West, 597.8 feet to the southerly projection of the
west line of that certain parcel of land conveyed to Robert S. Pinnell, et ux. by deed
recorded as Document No. 2005-293965, San Joaquin County Records:
(27) thence along said southerly projection and west line, North O"01'12" West,
408.50 feet to the northwest corner thereof; (28) thence along the westerly projection of
the north line of said Pinnell parcel, North 89"14'47" West 625 feet to the east line of
Parcel 1 of parcel map filed in Book 16 of Parcel Maps, at page 87, San Joaquin County
Records; thence along the east, north and west line of said Parcel 1 the following four
(4) courses (being courses 29 through 32): (29) North O"01'12" West, 261.18 feet,
(30) North 89"14'47" West, 185.00 feet, (31) South O"01'12" East, 410.00 feet, and
(32) South 89"14'47" East, 50.43 feet; (33) thence continue along said west line and its
southerly projection, South 4"49'38" West, 260.31 feet to said south line of Harney
Lane; (34) thence along said south line North 89"14'47" West, 1,160 feet, more or less,
to the west line of said Section 22; (35) thence along said west line and along the west
line of said Section 15, Northerly, 5,313 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning.
Containing 320 acres, more or less
APPROVED AS TO DESCRIPTION:
County Suweyor
By:
Assistant County Surveyor
SV-7BOOI-Tl
EXHI Pc
EXHIBIT G
FORM OF ASSIGNMENT
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Document entitled to free recording
Government Code Section 61 03
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Lodi
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241-1910
Attn: City Clerk
(SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE)
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
RELATIVE TO FRONTIER COMMUNITY BUILDERS WESTSIDE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (hereinafter, the "Agreement")
is entered into this day of , 200- -, by and between Frontier
Community Builders, a corporation (hereinafter "Developer"), and
,a (hereinafter "Assignee")
RECITALS
1. On , 2006, the City of Lodi and Developer entered into that certain
agreement entitled "Development Agreement By and Between The City of Lodi and Frontier
Community Builders, Inc. related to the development known as Frontier Community Builders
Southwest Gateway Project (hereinafter the "Development Agreement"). Pursuant to the
Development Agreement, Developer agreed to develop certain property more particularly
described in the Development Agreement (hereinafter, the "Subject Property"), subject to
certain conditions and obligations as set forth in the Development Agreement. The
Development Agreement was recorded against the Subject Property in the Official Records of
San Joaquin County on , 2006, as Instrument No. --
2. Developer intends to convey a portion of the Subject Property to Assignee, commonly
referred to as Parcel , and more particularly identified and described in Exhibit A-1
and Exhibit A-2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter the
"Assigned Parcel").
3. Developer desires to assign and Assignee desires to assume all of Developer's right,
title, interest, burdens and obligations under the Development Agreement with respect to and as
related to the Assigned Parcel.
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION
NOW, THEREFORE, Developer and Assignee hereby agree as follows:
1. Developer hereby assigns, effective as of Developer's conveyance of the Assigned
Parcel to Assignee, all of the rights, title, interest, burdens and obligations of Developer under
the Development Agreement with respect to the Assigned Parcel. Developer retains all the
rights, title, interest, burdens and obligations under the Development Agreement with respect to
all other property within the Subject Property owned by Developer.
2. Assignee hereby assumes all of the rights, title, interest, burdens and obligations of
Developer under the Development Agreement with respect to the Assigned Parcel, and agrees
to observe and fully perform all of the duties and obligations of Developer under the
Development Agreement with respect to the Assigned Parcel. The parties intend hereby that,
upon the execution of this Agreement and conveyance of the Assigned Parcel to Assignee,
Assignee shall become substituted for Developer as the "Developer" under the Development
Agreement with respect to the Assigned Parcel.
3. All of the covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein shall be binding upon and
shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and
assigns.
4. The Notice Address described in Section 28 of the Development Agreement for the
Developer with respect to the Assigned Parcel shall be:
FRONTIER COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC
101 00 Trinity Parkway, Suite 420
Stockton, California 95219
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written. This Agreement may be signed in identical counterparts.
DEVELOPER: ASSIGNEE:
FRONTIER COMMUNITY BUILDERS, INC.
a
By:
Print Name: By:
Title: Division President Print Name:
EXHIBIT H
SCHEDULE OF IMPROVEMENTS
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
Implementation and Phasing Memorandum MAY 2 4 2006
GOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEFT Introduction oi LODt The project phasing described below is intended to outline the anticipated see%ncing o
development. The project phasing plan is also intended to help ensure all necessary
infrastructure would be in place and operational for connection and use as portions of the
project phases come on line. The phasing schedule should be used as a guideline rather
than a binding commitment because phasing must be flexible to respond to market
absorption and other relevant conditions
Phasing
The project is expected to be developed in four phases over a period of five to eight
years. The first phase is expected to begin in the Spring of 2007 and the final phase is
anticipated to be completed by the end of2014.
The following schedule represents the expected phasing of the residential villages
1 LDR
Units Village(s) - 2,4,5 345
1 MDR 1
1 LDR 3
Subtotal
2 MDR 6
2 HDR 7
Subtotal
84
- 120
= 549
64
3 LDR
3 MDR
Subtotal
9,12 214
8,lO - 96
= 310
4 LDR 11,13 - 148
Grand Total 1281
Phase 1: The first phase includes the extension of Century to the west edge of the
property. Five villages totaling 549 homesites, a neighborhood park, the school site and
the central parkhasin are part of this phase. The sewer trunk lines will be relocated along
the south end of the commercial property to Westgate Drive then south to Century
Boulevard and extended west to edge of the project.
Phase 2: The second phase includes Villages 6 and 7 west of the commercial site. This
phase includes the apartment site. The psrk basin and fire station will be included with
this phase unless previously developed with the shopping center improvenlenrs.
Phase 3: The third phase ofthe project is planned to include Villages 8,9,10 and 12
totaling 3 10 homesites. This phase includes the remaining two parks and the secondary
entrance off of Lower Sacramento Road.
Phase I: The final phase ofthe project includes Villages 1 I and 13. All remaining
streets and facilities will be installed with this phase.
EXHIBIT I
PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Westside/Southwest Gateway Development Agreement
Basin/Park Area Summary
Westside Annexation
Location Basin (1). acres Net (2),acres Gross, acres Total, acres
A 29 f6 16 45
B 21 21 21
C 82 54 61 14 3
Park
Southwest Gateway Annexation
Park
Location Basin (I), acres Net (2).acres Gross, acres Total, acres
D 5.9 1.5 1.5 7.4
E 6.7 24 24 9.1
F 4.8 1.5 15 6.3
G 2.2 2.2 2.2
H 2 2 2
Open Space on Century Blvd. 0 0 0
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Westside Annexation area basin calculations not approved.
The basin area numbers are subject to change.
Net area measured from street right of way.
Area requirements are exclusive of bike and ped routes.
Park to be located at the southwest end of designated area
Park to be located at the south end of designated area.
Two slivers of open space are shown on Century Blvd.
Neither area provides sufficient space for park facilities.
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
EXHIBIT J
REQUIRED PARK AMENITIES
Picnic
Shelter Off Irrigation
Bike Water Picnic (Rental) Passive Street Booster Drinking
Rack Pool Play Tennis Basketball Bocce Horseshoes Playground Table BBQ Area Fields Parhng Trees Turf Pump Restoom Fountain Fumihue Light Ped Signs
859465
Version 5 Final 11/09/06
EXHIBIT K
AGREEMENT TO AMEND
SOUTHWEST GATEWAY
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
AND REFRAIN FROM CHALLENGING LAND USE PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 15th day of November 2006 by and between the City
of Lodi (City), a California General Law city, represented by the City Manager and City
Attorney with the limited authority as described in Section 1.A; Citizens for Open
Government, an unincorporated association (Citizens): and Frontiers Community Builders
(Developer) a dba of Frontier Land Companies, a California Corporation. The Parties agree
as follows:
1. Recitals.
A.
The City of Lodi ("City") is a General Law city governed by a five-member city council.
For all purposes herein and during all times during the negotiation of this Agreement the City
Manager and City Attorney have represented the City. However in this Agreement and at all
times during the negotiation of the Agreement the City Manager and/or City Attorney have
lacked the capacity or legal authority to bind the City of Lodi and/or the City Council. The
parties understand that throughout the negotiation and in executing this Agreement the City
Manager and City Attorney can only recommend to the City Council that it take certain
actions. All authority and discretion remains with the City Council over whether the City
Council will approve or disapprove of this Agreement. The City Council is scheduled to hear
the Project at a duly noticed public hearing scheduled for November 15, 2006.
Citizens is an Unincorporated association that has commented on the development
proposed by Developer, The "Project" referred to herein is as defined in the Development
Agreement for the "FCB Southwest Gateway Project" with all Project Approvals described
therein. Citizens desire to have certain mitigation measures and clarifications added to the
Development Agreement negotiated between City and Developer that in the opinion of
Citizens will further the interest of the City and the interest of the public. If these
amendments are added to the draft Development Agreement in the form of this Agreement,
which shall be an exhibit to the Development Agreements, then Citizens will support the
Project, will not make negative comments about the Project's EIR or the Project at any City
Council or other public hearings, and will not subsequently challenge the certification of the
EIR or the Project Approvals, directly or indirectly. Ann Cerney shall be the sole spokesperson
for Citizens and make these statements at City Council hearing.
The Parties to the Agreement.
1
Developer, a private entity, is the applicant for the Development Agreements and
Project Approvals described therein. The term "Developer" includes all related entities of
Developer and their successors in interest.
B. The parties agree that the Development Agreements contain commitments for
major infrastructure and amenities that will result in public benefits for the City.
C. Although Citizens are not fully satisfied with all aspects of the Project and EIR,
it has balanced the benefits of the Project, including the changes to the draft Development
Agreements as set forth in this Agreement, against the adverse effects of the Projects and
has concluded that the Projects, separately or combined, are substantially more beneficial
to the City than detrimental.
2. Modification of Develoornent Agreement.
The parties agree that the draft Development Agreement for the Project, scheduled to
be considered by the City Council at the public hearing on November 15, 2006, is to be
hereby amended by and through this Agreement, which shall be attached to the
Development Agreement as Exhibit "K".
A.
(1) Developer shall obtain permanent easements to be held by the City or other qualified
entity (e.g., Central Valley Farmland Trust) limiting the use of San Joaquin County real
property to agricultural uses and related activities as are permitted from time to time under
the agricultural zoning laws of the County ("Agricultural Conservation Easements"). In
providing mitigation for impacts to agricultural land, Developer shall adhere to the terms of
the final adopted San Joaquin County Agricultural Mitigation Ordinance, now under
consideration by the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors. (See November 14, 2006
draft Ordinance.)
(2) At a minimum, and notwithstanding the terms of the final, adopted County
Ordinance, the Agricultural Conservation Easements shall be recorded on a 1:l acre
(conserved:developed) ratio against an aggregate total of up to 240 acres, more or less,
contained within FCB Southwest Gateway Project, involving one or more parcels of land -
though not necessarily contiguous - with each mitigation acre located within San Joaquin
County and zoned for agricultural uses ("Protected Properties"). If mitigation lands are
located in the Primary Zone of the San Joaquin Delta that lies within the County, the
mitigation ratio shall be on a 2:l acre (conserved:developed) basis. However, if prior to the
Developer's compliance with this agricultural mitigation requirement, the San Joaquin Board
of Supervisors excludes land within certain areas of the County (e.g., the Primary Zone of the
Delta) from being used for agricultural mitigation purposes, the parties agree that those
lands would be excluded from being used for mitigation purposes under this Agreement.
(3) At a minimum, and notwithstanding the terms of the final, adopted County
Ordinance, the Agricultural Conservation Easements may only apply to Protected Properties
that are not encumbered by (a) any other perpetual open space conservation easement or
MitiPation For Agricultural Conversion Impacts of Proiect
2
deed restriction or (b) any other perpetual agriculture mitigation easement or deed
restriction. The cost of obtaining the Agricultural Conservation Easements shall rest with the
Developer. The Protected Properties must be subject to permanent restrictions on use to
ensure the availability of agricultural production capacity by limiting non-agricultural
development that is inconsistent with agriculture uses and related activities. In accordance
with the County's November 14, 2006, draft Mitigation Ordinance section 9-1080.3,
subdivision (e)(l). the Developer shall pay an administrative fee to cover the costs of
administering, monitoring and enforcing the farmland conservation easement in an amount
to be determined by the qualified entity that will hold the conservation easement. If the City
holds the Agricultural Conservation Easements, the City will monitor the Protected Properties
subject to the easements biannually through its Planning Commission to ensure compliance
with the requirements of this provision. If the City is selected to hold the Agricultural
Conservation Easements, Developer will pay City $5,000 to compensate the City for
monitoring cosvcontingencies in connection with the Agricultural Conservation Easements
for the Southwest Gateway Project.
(4) The Agricultural Conservation Easements shall be recorded in the applicable ratio(s)
against a minimum of each acre to be developed (or more) within any phased Final
Subdivision Map of the Project prior to the date the first residential building permit is issued
to Developer for any such phase thereof.
(5) City shall notify Citizens of which site(s) are selected to meet the requirements of this
provision 30 days prior to the recordation of any Agricultural Conservation Easements
pursuant to this Agreement. If both Citizens and the City agree, the mitigation ratio
applicable to mitigation lands outside of the Delta Primary Zone may be reduced if the
Developer proposes to obtain conservation easements that, in the judgment of both Citizens
and the City, have a greater mitigation value than lands that could otherwise be used as
mitigation for agricultural impacts of the Projects under this provision.
B. Home Building. Enerm and Conservation Features within the Proiect
1)
homes within the Projects. The California Green Builder program requires that all
Developer shall become a California Green Builder prior to the construction of
the
homes are at least 15% more energy efficient that currently mandated by Title 24 in
California and meet guidelines for energy efficiency set but the US Environmental Protection
Agency, The homes within the Projects may contain a variety of energy efficient features
and alternative energy features such as high efficient insulation, high performance windows,
high efficient heating and cooling equipment, cool roofing, radiant barriers, awnings,
overhangs day lighting and qualified lighting.
2) Developer's status as a California Green Builder requires Developer to
implement water conservation features that saves 20,000 gallons per home per year.
Developer shall provide front yard landscaping using weather based irrigation controllers
and drip irrigation and may utilize other water conservation features such as high efficiency
fixtures and efficient plumbing technologies, products and materials. Developer also agrees
to use weather based irrigation controllers in front yards, parks and common areas.
3
3) Developer shall make available solar power features and electrical car
charging stations or outlets that homeowners within the Projects may elect to purchase as
part of that homeowner's option package.
4) Developer agrees that at least 50% of the construction site waste shall be
recycled or otherwise diverted from landfill disposal.
5) Developer shall use only EPA approved natural gas fireplaces, fireplace
inserts, woodstoves or pellet stoves when such fireplaces are installed. Developer will
comply with all federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to the installation of
wood burning fireplaces.
6) Developer will encourage landscape maintenance companies to use electric-
powered equipment.
7) Shade trees will be planted where appropriate throughout the Project and
located to shade paved areas and to protect dwellings from energy consuming
environmental conditions.
8) Developer agrees to comply with the California Green Builder program that
applies to high density residential units. Currently a pilot program exists that is substantially
similar to the low density program, with the exception of the 20.000 gallon per home per
year in water conservation.
C. New Urbanism neighborhood desien.
Developer believes that the Project's current land use plans promote the principles of
New Urbanism that include neighborhoods that are walk-able, interconnected, that include
pedestrian friendly streetscapes; bicycle friendly design elements: well integrated, highly
visible, and publicly accessible open spaces. Developer is also committed to designing the
specific components of the Projects to include housing and structural forms that are visually
interesting, well modulated, constructed of high quality materials, proportionate to their
surroundings, and a range of housing types, sizes and affordability.
D. Pedestrian Transit and Bicycle Infractructure: Developer agrees to implement the
following measures:
1) Provide pedestrian enhancing infrastructure that includes: sidewalks
and pedestrian paths, direct pedestrian connections, street trees to shade sidewalks,
pedestrian safety designs/infrastructure, street lighting and/or pedestrian signalization and
signage. and
2) Provide bicycle-enhancing infrastructure that includes: bikeways/paths
connecting to a bikeway system as well as secure bike parking.
E. Lodi Eastside: This provision is not applicable to the Southwest Gateway Agreement.
4
F. Water Su~ol~ Additional entitlements for urban development within the Project area
(i.e., subdivision maps, parcel maps, building permits, etc.) shall not be granted for any
dwellings within the Project area after total water use exceeds the projected safe
groundwater yield of the Project area until additional water sources (e.g., W.I.D. groundwater
recharge or water treatment or otherwise) are available. According to the Westside-
Southwest Gateway Project Water Supply Assessment (July 2006) ("WSA"), a total of
approximately 347 acre feet per year for Southwest Gateway will be available for the Project
upon its annexation while the total projected water demand will likely be in excess of that
amount before full build-out occurs. The purpose of this provision, then, is to ensure that
water use by the Project does not exceed the projected increase in safe groundwater yield
attributable to annexation of the Project area into the City until additional water sources
(e.g., W.I.D. groundwater recharge or water treatment or otherwise) are available. [See WSA,
Figure 5-4.)
G. Amiculturaf Conflicts: Developer shall strive to phase development in a manner that
will reduce land use conflicts with lands currently in agricultural use to the west of the
Project. To the extent feasible, Developer will generally develop the Project in an east to
west direction.
H. Challenges:
1) No Challenge bv CitizensKerney: This Agreement will not become
effective in the event that Citizens and/or Ann Cerney: (1) file any legal action challenging
the City's certification of the EIR; (2) file any legal action challenging the City's approval of
the Project's land use approvals, including the amendments to the West Side Facilities
Master Plan: (3) file any legal action challenging the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation
Commission's compliance with CEQA: (4) file any legal action challenging the San Joaquin
Local Agency Formation Commission's approval of the annexation of the territory to the City
of Lodi; (5) qualify a referendum petition to require an election concerning one or more of
the Project's legislative approvals, or (6) violate the terms or the spirit of this Agreement in
any other manner.
2) Challenge bv Third Partv:
a. The amendment to the Development Agreement called for in this
Agreement will become partially ineffective as set forth below in the event that any other
party: (1) files any legal action challenging the City's certification of the EIR; (2) files any
legal action challenging the City's approval of the Project's land use approvals: (3) files any
legal action challenging the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission's compliance
with CEQA; (4) files a legal action challenging the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation
Commission's approval of the annexation of the territory to the City of Lodi; or, (5) qualifies a
referendum petition to require an election concerning one or more of the Project's legislative
approvals.
b. If an event triggers a partial invalidity as called for above, the
5
ratio of number of acres to be mitigated per Section 2.A. will be reduced by 50% and
reimbursement of a portion of the fees paid to Citizens under this Agreement (see
Paragraph 3C. below) shall be due from Citizens to Developer (within 60 days of its written
notice to Citizens) in the amount of $7.600. Moreover, Citizens' statute of limitations to file
an action challenging the City's certification of the EIR and/or land use approvals will be
tolled for thirty (30) days from the limitations period established by CEQA. City and
Developer grant a second conditional and limited tolling of the statute of limitations to file
an action challenging City's certification of the EIR. This conditional and limited tolling will
only arise upon a legal challenge by a third party to LAFCO's determination on the EIR
and/or annexation and Citizens' time to file an action shall extend for only thirty (30) days
after the third party files its action.
C. In the event that dismissals with prejudice are filed with any
applicable Court before answers are filed in the third party litigation then Citizens will
dismiss any subsequent actions and the terms of this Agreement shall be fully restored.
3. Miscellaneous.
A. Ann Cerney, as the sole representative of Citizens, shall appear at all
appropriate City Council hearings and express support for the approval of this Agreement,
and non-opposition to the City Council's approval of the Project and certification of the EIR.
B. Citizens represents and warrants that Ann Cerney has authority to execute
this Agreement on behalf of Citizens and is authorized to speak on behalf of the organization
at all Lodi City Council and other public meetings.
C. Developer conditionally agrees to pay $40.000 to Citizens to reimburse
Citizens for attorney fees expended in the negotiation and executing of this Agreement and
to reimburse members of the Citizens for extraordinary time and effort expensed in this
process. The distribution of the money shall be at the sole discretion of Citizens. The
payment of these fees shall be due and payable thirty (30) days after the last day to take
any of the actions described in Section 2.F.1).
D. If the public benefits included in this Agreement are not adopted by the City
Council, Citizens' support for approval of this Agreement and non-opposition to the City
Council's approval of the Projects and certification of the EIR will be withdrawn and its
previously stated objections will be renewed. City and Developer agree not to assert an
exhaustion of administrative remedies defense as to those issues specifically raised and
exhausted at hearings regarding the Project if litigation ensues and this agreement becomes
null and void, or partially invalid, under this Agreement.
4. IndeDendent Effect Effective Date of Agreement.
Only Section 3.A and 3.8 of the Agreement shall be immediately effective and binding
upon Citizens and Developer. The remainder of this Agreement shall only become effective
upon the City Council approval of the amendment to the draft Development Agreement that
are described in Section 2. Notwithstanding any other provision herein to the contrary.
6
because of the nature of the mitigation measures set forth herein (e.g., ratio of 1:l acres for
agriculture mitigation), the parties agree that this Agreement shall be effective as stand-
alone resolutions of their disputes as to this Project.
5. Agreement Not to Sue or Circulate a Referendum Petition.
If the amendment to the Development Agreement called for in this Agreement are
adopted by the City Council, Citizens agrees that neither it nor its individual members shall
sue the City or the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission over the sufficiency of
the EIR or the land use/annexation decisions by these public agencies. Further neither
Citizens nor its members shall encourage or give assistance to any others to challenge the
Developer's Project either administratively or judicially. Moreover, neither Citizens, nor its
members, will encourage, indirectly assist or actually circulate a petition to place a
referendum on the ballot to force an election about the Project's legislative approvals.
6. Countervarts.
This agreement may be executed in counterparts.
Frontier Land Companies
By: Tom Doucette, President
I /?.sz.-+ Ff)
City of Lodi
By-Blair King, City Manager
/
Citizens for Open Governmht
By: Ann Cerney
7