Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances - No. 1766TO PD(37), PLANNED ~EV~L~P~~NJ , FOR LUCA PLACE ...................................... I CITY C~~NCIL A p of the City of Lodi adopted by Title 17 of the Lodi Code is hereby amended as follows: estgate Drive (APN 027-420-09) are hereby ingle Family, to PD(37), Planned Development "'A" attached~ which is on file in the office of the n Costamagna, Applicant). Section 2. The Planning Commiss~on adopted ~es~lution P.C. 05-31 recommending approval of this req~es~ for a ;e~ona at ils meeting of Septembe ~ 2005, following a duly held c hearing, at which app~opriate documents and any comments received were reviewed and laration (~D-05-04} has been prepared in compliance with the lity Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines provided ing Commission has reviewed and considered the information aration with respect to the project identified in their Resolution thereunde~, Further, the conta~ned in said Nagativ .C. 05-31. nce is not intended to and shall not be ich imposes upon the City, or any officer or employee s persons or property within ?he City or outside of the City so as to pr~vide a basis of civil lia~itit~ for dama es, except as otherwise imposed by law. If any p~ovision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any s is held invalid, such i~validi~ shall not affect other provisions or ap~lica~ions of the o;dinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or ap~lication. To this end, the provisi~ns of this ordinance are severable. The City Council hereby declares that it would have a~opted this o;dinance irrespective of the invali~ity of any particular portion thereof. Section 6. The alterations, said Official District Map of the Council of this City after duly Title 17 of the Lodi Municipal and the laws of the State of California ~pplica~le thereto at which the City Council reviewed and considered the appfopria~e documents and any c5mmen~s received, whether orally or in ~F~tin~. Section 7. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Negative Qeclaration for this praject and has adopt d same befo~e ~onside;a~~on of this Sec?ion 8. find as follows: h in The City Council based an the evidence within the staff report and project file 1) that the rezane to ~~~~?) will not adversely affect surrounding prope~ies (37) is consistent with the Lodi ~eneral Plan diagra~, policies and ~~affdafds. There is no appjicable specific plan for the area. 3) vegetativE habitat. that th~ ~ro~e~, with a PD(37) zone, will have no adverse effect on wildlife and Section 9. as such conflict may exist. ii ofdinances and arts of ordinances in conflict herewith are repealed insofar Section 10. and take effect thi~y d This ordinance shall be publishEd one time in the “Lodi ~ews-Sentinel,~’ a daily en~fal circula~~on printed nd pub~ished in the City of Lodi, and shall be in force pas$age and approval. Approved this 16‘h day of November, 2005. ity Clerk tate of Calif~rnia County of San Joaquin, ss. rk of the City of Lodi, do hereby certify that ~rdinance No. 1766 eeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi held Nove~ber 2, ado~ted and ordered to print at a regular meeting of said y the ~ollowing vote: ERS - Hansen, Hi hcock, Johnson, Mounce, A ERS - None S - None I further certify that its passage and the was approved and signed by the Mayor on the dale of ~s~ed pur~uan~ to law. STON City Clerk roved as to Form: City A~torney i ... ....... ! i ~ i ! .............