HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - May 17, 2016 SSLODI CITY COUNCIL
SHIRTSLEEVE SESSION
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
TUESDAY, MAY 17, 2016
A. Roll Call by City Clerk
An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held
Tuesday, May 17, 2016, commencing at 7:01 a.m.
Present: Council Member Johnson, Council Member Mounce, Council Member Nakanishi,
Mayor Pro Tempore Kuehne, and Mayor Chandler
Absent: None
Also Present: City Manager Schwabauer, Deputy City Attorney Fukasawa, and City Clerk
Ferraiolo
NOTE: Deputy City Attorney Fukasawa arrived at 7:41 a.m.
B. Topic(s)
B-1 Receive Information from Staff on Potential Uses for Potential Sales Tax Measure
Revenue (CM)
City Manager Schwabauer provided a presentation regarding the possible uses for potential sales
tax measure revenue. Specific topics of discussion included potential sales tax measure recap;
Police Department options; Scenarios A and B; Fire Department spending plan; Parks
expenditure plan; description of projects, timeline, and costs for Lodi Lake Park, playgrounds,
restrooms, aquatics, and sports fields; Parks 1/8 cent sales tax, 15 -year spending plan; and next
steps.
Mike Lusk questioned why the proposed sales tax measure did not include an element to address
the California Public Employees Retirement System (Cal -PERS) debt and whether the proposals
would increase staffing in order to accommodate oversight of the projects or if the current staffing
level was adequate. Further, Mr. Lusk stated that he believed a 1/4 cent sales tax increase for
public safety is inadequate; it should be 1/2 percent instead. He questioned if the issues would be
put forward as separate measures or combined.
Mr. Schwabauer responded that his understanding from Council was that this measure would be
pursued as separate issues; not combined. With regard to Cal -PERS, the only element of the
spending plan that has a cost associated for additional employees and Cal -PERS implications is
the Police Department for a police officer, while the Parks and Fire spending plans are based on
the assumption that existing staff will accomplish the goals. Mr. Schwabauer stated the spending
plan assumes that the Fire engine will be fully staffed with overtime hours, explaining that it would
cost $1.4 million to staff the engine with overtime hours and $1.5 million with new firefighter
positions.
In response to Council Member Mounce, Mr. Schwabauer explained that his $1.4 million estimate
for overtime hours to staff the engine is the current expense of $650,000 to run the engine
and the additional $798,000 necessary to return the engine to full service.
Pat Patrick, President & CEO of the Lodi District Chamber of Commerce, reported that the
Chamber posed a question to its members on what they think about the proposed sales tax
measure for Parks and public safety. From the 30 responses, the reply from half was that this is
another hit on businesses, especially on the heels of the increase to the minimum wage, pending
legislation on workers compensation, higher taxes in general, and other regulations that are
harmful to local businesses. Many responders felt the City could move funds from one
department to another and consider other options before growing the tax base, while others were
sympathetic to the erosion at Lodi Lake but questioned if new regulations on jet skis and boats
would be enacted to prevent further erosion that will cost residents more down the line. With
regard to public safety, many of the responders expressed concern about the high cost of
pensions, stating they felt the Police Department has funding from the last budget because it
could not hire or retain officers. Mr. Patrick stated that a confused mind will likely vote no on such
an issue, adding there are too many questions and unknowns regarding this endeavor.
Larry Long, Chair of the Recreation Commission, stressed that the Parks spending plan
addresses maintenance on facilities, structures, and sites that should have been corrected a long
time ago. He stated the Commission voted unanimously to support a 1/8 cent sales tax, which
equates to roughly $3 per household. Overall, he is against sales tax increases; however, it is
imperative that maintenance in Parks be addressed, and he urged Council's support for the
proposal.
Greg Goehring stated he did not believe Lodi has a revenue problem; instead, the problem is with
public pensions, which are rising every year. Without the pension problem, there would be money
available for other things. He believed raising sales tax is the wrong direction for Lodi and pointed
out that citizens are not asking Council to put this on the ballot. Mr. Goehring stated that he read
an article in which Governor Brown called for restraint on spending because State revenues are
not as anticipated and Lodi should heed that warning. He believed Council Members were
elected on a platform of fiscal restraint, not on raising taxes, and the City should look at other
solutions, such as eliminating some parks or privatization, before increasing the sales tax.
Council Member Mounce agreed that raising taxes is a last resort; however, she believed it was
ultimately the citizens' decision to raise taxes and define the type of community they want. She
stated the City cannot meet its Cal-PERS obligation and still put more police officers on the
streets, staff the fire engine and train firefighters, and improve the parks system. If the Cal-PERS
obligation did not exist, the City could fund this wish list. She stated that she routinely lobbies the
Governor, legislators, and Cal-PERs to help them understand that the pension system is not
sustainable and will likely bankrupt cities across the state. Council Member Mounce pointed out
that Lodi Lake is deteriorating and the money that was set side from the sale of the land for the
water plant was utilized for an emergency. She stated she would only support a measure that is a
special tax with an oversight committee made up of professionals and outside accountants to
ensure the money is managed properly and a sunset of no more than 15 years. In addition, she
preferred to package the measure together and fairly distribute the money between Police and
Fire with the remainder going to Parks. Council Member Mounce stated that adding sworn
officers adds to the pension costs and will only be paid for during the life of the measure, after
which the officers are no longer covered. The citizens will have to speak for what they want, and
she believes this will be an uphill battle.
In response to Mr. Schwabauer, Council Member Mounce clarified that she is concerned about
the higher spending plan for the Police Department that will add officers with benefits packages
while the Fire Department is only getting $798,000. She suggested a fair split between the two,
even if it means fewer officers for the Police Department, and further clarified that this be one
measure, not two.
Council Member Nakanishi expressed his opposition to the proposed measure, stating he
believed it was not fiscally sound. He stated the City is in a positive situation at the moment, but
the future may bring another recession, and that may be the more appropriate time to present a
measure.
Mayor Pro Tempore Kuehne agreed this is a tough decision, stating a significant amount of
excess has already been trimmed from the budget after the last recession and the Cal-PERS
problem is a serious issue for the City, as well as the state as a whole. Lodi Lake and Hutchins
Street Square are jewels of this community, and many of the amenities set Lodi apart from other
communities; however, if they are not maintained, those assets will continue to deteriorate and
cost more money down the line to repair. Mayor Pro Tempore Kuehne also believed this measure
should be packaged together as a special tax with an oversight committee to ensure that citizens
2
know exactly what they are voting for on the ballot. He stated he would go along with a 15 -year
measure, but he was more amenable to 10 years. With regard to the two scenarios on the Police
spending plan, he stated he prefers Option A because it does not result in a negative bottom line.
Mayor Pro Tempore Kuehne stated that the voters should decide if they want to keep Lodi safe.
Council Member Mounce stated that she would support a 10 -year sunset on the measure.
Council Member Johnson stated that he supports putting the tax initiative on the ballot at either a
10- or 15 -year sunset and expressed disappointment in Council Member Nakanishi for not
allowing the voters to make up their minds. The Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services
Department prepared a Strategic Plan and performed outreach and surveys that seem to
demonstrate a level of support, and the public should be given the opportunity to vote on the
matter. The revenue from the tax, as laid out in the spending plans, will return the fire engine to
full service at a relatively reasonable cost and put additional officers on patrol. He agreed it is
expensive to accomplish this, but there is no other alternative. Council Member Johnson
appreciated the Police Department's reconsideration of its initial proposal to ensure there will be
more officers on the street instead of lieutenants and stressed the need to have fully -trained and
qualified firefighters in the Fire Department. He stated that all three measures need to move
forward, whether it is for 10 or 15 years or as a special or general tax.
Mayor Chandler stated he agrees that the voters should decide, stating he was less concerned
about whether it was a special or general tax. He was, however, in support of separating the two
measures, i.e. one for Parks and the other for public safety, so individuals can support their pet
projects, making it more likely that one or the other will pass. Lodi Lake and the City's parks
system is suffering from deferred maintenance; this will give the public the opportunity to decide if
they want to protect these assets.
With regard to Cal-PERS, Mr. Schwabauer agreed that it is putting a significant strain on the
City's general fund. In 2000, the City was paying zero for Cal-PERS and now the obligation
continues to increase by significant amounts each year, increasing by as much as $13 million in
the year 2020/21 if the Cal-PERS actuary is correct. This equates to a significant amount of
money that could have been applied to the parks system and public safety. It is possible to leave
the Cal-PERS system, but that would only eliminate the Cal-PERS liability going forward, not
backwards, and the City would be required to pay off 100 percent of the unfunded liability without
the discounted rate. He explained that Stockton borrowed $100 million to detach from Cal-PERS
and is now upside down, due to Cal-PERS losses, and is now paying more than its earning on
the discounted rate of Cal-PERS. Mr. Schwabauer stated options to reduce costs to
accommodate the expenses in Parks and public safety could be researched, but these
departments represent a significant portion of the City's budget and it would take reducing or
eliminating much of everything else to come up with $3 million a year in PRCS and Fire and pay
the Cal-PERS liability. Another option is to reduce salaries, which City employees did once
before, and, given what they gave back at that time, he believed it would be a difficult task to ask
employees to do so again. He pointed out that employees may be asked in the future to help
address the growing Cal-PERS obligation and asking them twice would be another hit.
Mr. Schwabauer further mentioned that the Lodi Unified School District indicated it may have a
bond measure in 2016, instead of 2018 as originally intended. The School District was also asked
to invest greater in the Grape Bowl, which is why there is a low level of expenses in the spending
plan for this facility.
In response to Mayor Chandler, Mr. Schwabauer stated he did not feel confident that the District
was ready to move forward for the 2016 ballot.
Council Member Mounce stated that two ballot measures, one for property tax and the other for
sales tax, on the same ballot would likely cause neither of them to be successful.
Mr. Schwabauer agreed, stating he recommends Council continue to move forward and the item
can be pulled at a later date if the School District decides to move forward in this election cycle.
In response to Mayor Chandler, Mr. Schwabauer stated this item will return to Council at its
Regular meeting of June 15 as an ordinance and staff will incorporate the suggestions brought
forward by Council.
C. Comments by Public on Non -Agenda Items
None.
D. Adjournment
No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jennifer M. Ferraiolo
City Clerk
0
AGENDA ITEM ,
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Receive Information from Staff on Potential Uses for Potential Sales Tax Measure
Revenue
MEETING DATE: May 17, 2016
PREPARED BY: City Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive Information from staff on potential uses for sales tax
measure revenue.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Staff will bring additional information to the Council and discuss
various issues before determining its next steps.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable.
ephen chwaWuer
City Manager
APPROVED: AUFAVOWWWON
POTENTIAL SALES TAX
MEASURE
City Council
May 17, 2016
Potential Sales Tax Measure
Recap
• Discussion:
• One-quarter cent for Public Safety ($2.8 million)
• $1.8 million Police, $1 million Fire
•One-eighth cent for Parks capital program ($1.4 million)
•After May 3 shirtsleeves
• Revised Police plans based on feedback
• Completed PRCS expenditure plan
• May 9 Parks & Recreation Commission
• Unanimous support for parks expenditure plan
• Public comment in favor of plan
Police Department
Two options
• Both include:
• Nine additional officers
Seven patrol, two gang enforcement
• Full-time youth outreach worker
• Park officer staffing options
• Full-time civilian park ranger (non -sworn)
• Effectively 1,600 hours after paid leave
• Four part-time sworn officers
Approximately 3,840 hours
Scenario A
TOTAL Salary and OE $1,638,381
Allotment $1,680,000
Remainder $41,619
* salaries projected at top step, all benefits are projected fully loaded.
** salaries are projected at top step based on other cities' payscales, all benefits are projected fully loaded.
includes leather goods, tasers, gun/rifle, vests, additional peripherals.
POMT16NS,.
Classification
Assignment Quantity Salary
Benefits
Total
Officer*
Patrol 7 $81,958
$90,051
$1,204,063
Officer*
Gang Enforcement 2 $81,958
$90,051
$172,009
F/T Park Ranger (Civilian) **
1 $57,085
$42,814
$99,899
Youth Outreach Coordinator *
1 $53,697
$31,593
$85,290
TOTAL
$1,561,260
operpOng E� re w
Officer Equipment 1
10
$57,750
Training
11
$19,371
TOTAL
$77,121
TOTAL Salary and OE $1,638,381
Allotment $1,680,000
Remainder $41,619
* salaries projected at top step, all benefits are projected fully loaded.
** salaries are projected at top step based on other cities' payscales, all benefits are projected fully loaded.
includes leather goods, tasers, gun/rifle, vests, additional peripherals.
Scenario B
TOTAL Salary and OE $1,680,749
Allotment $1,680,000
Remainder [$749]
* salaries projected at top step, all benefits are projected fully loaded.
** Use Of Retired Annuitants for parks patrol.
1 includes leather goods, tasers, gun/rifle, crests, additional peripherals.
Classification Assignment
Quantity Salary
Benefits
Total
Officer* Patrol
7 $81,958
$90,051
$1,204,063
Officer* Gang Enforcement
2 $81,958
$90,051
$172,009
P/T Park Ranger (Sworn) **
4 $117,312
$2,346
$119,658
Youth Outreach Coordinator *
1 $53,697
$31,593
$85,290
TOTAL
$1,581,020
Operating E pertsgp.
Officer Equipment 1
13
$75,075
Training
14
$24,654
TOTAL
$99,729
TOTAL Salary and OE $1,680,749
Allotment $1,680,000
Remainder [$749]
* salaries projected at top step, all benefits are projected fully loaded.
** Use Of Retired Annuitants for parks patrol.
1 includes leather goods, tasers, gun/rifle, crests, additional peripherals.
Fire Department spending plan
• Cost to return Engine 1 to full service
Cost of captain staffing to reach minimum level
Top Step Overtime $53/hour
X 24 hours per day $1,271
X 365 days per year $463,930
x 3 positions $1,391,789
Minus current OT budget ($592,860)
Total $798,929
Fire Department spending plan
• Need for additional training
Specific Training Opportunities:
Special Teams annual training $22,000
Fire Captain Academy (five personnel) $50,000
Haz-Mat specialist certification (two personnel) $56,.000
Classes at National Fire Academy (four personnel) $32,000
Special team advanced training $45,000
Total $205,000
Parks Expenditure Plan
• Consistent with Strategic Plan goals, survey of
community support
• More than $7 million for Lodi Lake Park
• $5 million for neighborhood parks
• Builds, rehabilitates trails
• Three-quarters on repairs, deferred maintenance
• One-fourth on upgrading existing facilities
If approved, a one-eighth cent sales tax measure would raise an estimated $21
million over 15 years to repair, maintain and upgrade parks in Lodi.
Repair and maintain: $15.5 million*
$5.5 million*
• Reconstruct roadway and parking lots
Protect Lodi
■ Repair eroded riverbank, reclaim collapsed amphitheater
Lake Park
■ Replace north playground
a Develop park master plan, invest in community -desired improvements
■ Rehabilitate Nature Area trail system
■ Build kayak launch improvements
■ Replace outdated or previously removed playgrounds at Candy Cane, Emerson, Beck -
Protect our
man, English Oaks, Henry Glaves; update other playgrounds as needed
children
■ Rep]ace and maintain playground Fall zones with adequate materials
■ Install dog park amenities
■ Rep]ace and repair worn Skate Park features rather than eliminating them
Fix what's
■ Replace facility roofs, garbage cans, sports courts, sports lighting, bleachers, swim -
■ Install playground/picnic shelter at Beckman Park, others; replace restrooms
ming wading pool mechanical systems and surfaces as they wearout
broken
■ Irrigation repairs
Safe and
■ New picnic tables, benches, drinking fountains, renovated restrooms
comfortable
■ Prune or remove diseased, dying trees
■ Rehabilitate parking lots
parks
■ Park turf aeration, gopher control, leveling, etc.
■ Replace failing irrigation systems
Save water
■ Remove tittle -used turf areas and replace with low water -use alternatives
Upgrades:
$5.5 million*
Make Lodi
■ Build new three-quarter mile riverfront trail, explore potential for water bridge
■ Replace restrooms
Lake Park
a Develop park master plan, invest in community -desired improvements
better
■ Build kayak launch improvements
■ Build splash pad
■ Improve sports field lighting
Improve our
■ Install dog park amenities
neighborhood
■ Grape Bowl access improvements
parks, other
■ Install playground/picnic shelter at Beckman Park, others; replace restrooms
facilities
■ Improve picnic area on west side of Peterson Park
■ Reconfigure sports fields at Blakely Park
"Investment dollar amounts reflected on this document are estimations and subject to change.
LODI LAKE PARK
Expand, upgrade, repair or
replace park facilities, amenities
South Parking Lot Reconstruction
2017/18
$800,000 (plus $250,000 Parks Capital)
Demolish and construct reconfigured
south parking lot with separate
pedestrian path
Erosion Control
2017/18
Design, obtain permitting, $150,000
Establish erosion control
2018/19
Permitting, construction, $1,000,000
improvements along Mokelumne
River and Lodi Lake
2019/20
Construction, $1,240,000
North Pavement Reconstruction
2020/21
$750,000
Reconstruct roadway connecting
south park project to Boat Launch
facility improvements, including
Rotary Area parking lot
Nature Area Trail renovations
2020/21
$180,000
Park Restrooms
2021/22
$400,000 (South side)
Demolish and rebuild restrooms
2028/29
$400,000 (North side)
Riverfront trail
2022/23
$675,000
Lodi Lake Master Plan, Development
2023/24 through 2026/27
$2 million ($500,000 set-aside each year)
Create Lodi Lake Park Master Plan to
determine future development,
future facility location and
development of plan
PLAYGROUNDS Replace or build
new play structures that
are closed, previously
removed, or deficient
in at least seven parks,
and provide funding
for e• .
New playground equipment 2017/18
Candy Cane Park
$115,000, plus $60,000
Parks Capital
2018/19
Lodi Lake North Side
$175,000
2021/22
Beckman, Henry
$380,000 (Beckman
Glaves parks
removed about 2000)
2022/23
English Oaks Park
$245,000, includes picnic
area upgrades
2028/29
Borchardt or
$580,000 (new
Vinewood and
playground at Borchardt
Century parks
or Vinewood)
2029/30
Borchardt or
$820,000 (Borchardt or
Vinewood, Salas,
Vinewood)
Peterson and
Lawrence parks
2030/31
Hale, Blakely, Century
$580,000
Meadows parks
2031/32
Hutchins, Katzakian,
$450,000
pa rks
RESTROOMS
Additional
comfort for park visitors
Vinewood Park
2022/23
$245,000; demo existing, install
replacement
Blakely Park
2023/24
$80,000 renovate aquatics restrooms
2027/28
$225,000 new restrooms
Emerson Park
2029/30
$300,000 new restrooms
Hale Park
2030/31
$400,000 new restrooms, community
building
Kofu, Katzakian parks
2031/32
$375,000 in renovations (Kofu includes
concession renovations)
SPORTS FIELDS
Addresses ongoing
needs to minimize future expenses and closures;
provide for visitor
comfort, utilization and safety
Salas Park
2021/22
$300,000 complete lighting upgrades
2024/25
$500,000 parking lot reconstruction
2026/27
$5,000 bleacher seating repairs
Kofu Park
2024/25
$142,000, regrade diamond, dugout
improvements, trees, scoreboard
replacement, tennis court resurfacing
Softball Complex
2025/26
$575,000, parking lot improvements,
scoreboard replacement, concession
building demo and reconstruction
Zupo Field
2026/27
$150,000 lighting replacement
2027/28
$450,000 seating repairs
2029/30
$80,000 outfield turf renovations
Chapman Field
2027/28
$160,000, renovation concession stand,
upgrade driveway approach and trash
area, replace scoreboard
Grape Bowl
Throughout
$50,000 per year set-aside
Hen1N Parks spending plan: One-eighth cent, 15 years
2WAS 2UW9 21AWN 2020/21 2021/22
1 Lodi Lake Park South Shore Recant ruction 5800)000
2 Lodi Lake Erasion Control 5750)000 51,00000 51,24000
3 Candy lane Park Renownipns $115)000
4 Legion Park improvements 5706AD0
2022/23 2025/24 2024/25 2025/25 202" 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/51
Emerson Park pkryarau rad mm"inns/rred impranmenm
55.000
$175)000
S35A00
535,000
$500.000
%Oxo
530,000
$150.000
$40Aoo
5401000
5695100
$20A00
MAW
Lodi Lake Park Ranh Side Playground
S50A00
S50,000
$750.000
5200,000
SSA00
$75,000
$50)000
$55A00
$4381000
525)000
$25.00
5300,000
Lodi like Park Horth Pwyemem
$750,000
Parla A. roofreplacement
$65,000
Nature Area mra it rehahilhation
5190.000
Dog Park am rittias
S25ADO
Owkman Park playgnwad installation
$200,000
Replasrer Blakey Park pDWrepaks
500,000
Lodi Lake PaekSanh Shan Ftwtrcau eplaoemoni
WDA00
Pecence Park upgrades
S45A00
Was Park sports ligWia replace ment
MAW
Henry Glaw= Park playground replacement
5180,000
5225)000
EeWith Nin Common plwysrwo#&A k
$245A00
Lodi Lake rkwWM trail
S675AOo
Vincwuod Park Pastmam demgrreplamerern
5255,900
Century Meadows Park phyaraund wrface
555088
Lodi Lake Park Muter Plan imprawmenta 78D
$500.00
$500.00
5500,000
55001000
Vlnewood Park Irrigation system upgrades
S1SOAo0
Hutchins Sheet Square Pool HVAC system
$ISO"
English Oaks dmesixe playgrdt rad area, wall repair
555400
3lakek park aquatics restroom repoyecivr/Trdd repairs
$80A00
590500
Remove Lawrence Park reHrovm
$10)000
Sales Park parking tut reraratmdbm
5500)000
Kaifu Park repairs
5142)000
Softba II CompkK renasvlloeS
5525,000
Replasredmedsanial repecemenet Lake wading pod
$20)000
R"Mrs Park irrgam4on boater pump
$60,000
Construct spluk pad at location TBD
5200AW
2upo Flow I* iris rephument
SMA09
Chapenen Field tepaks
$160.000
Zupo Field seating repairs
5450.000
Aquatic FaaHy mechan kat replacement
$40)000
New playgrwnd at 6orchardt and Virrewood parks
5200.000
52014000
Beckrren Park picnic sheher
5225,000
Century Park playground replacement
5180.000
Replace Lodi lake Park Honk rwroorm
$400,000
Sales Park playground replacement
5225)000
Lawrence Park play"od replacement
5175)000
Petersw park playground replacement
$225,000
Zupo Fleld outfield turf renomlon
$95A09
Replace EmersQm Park re5leocros
5301109
Perks Mechanic shop improver is
No Is Pa rk CammumIt0ortroom n tluns
36kek Pak PLWgrwndlspuns Doan replacement
We Park p4ygtwnd replacercrnt
Century FAeWcwa playground replxenMm
Replan Hutckins Street Square Pool liner
Hutchins Street Sgrram p"rmmd mplacemem
kofu Park rernverions
kauakiao Park restroom/play4rwnd renowrlon
Van euakkk Park playground rephcemeru
Lawrence Park remvat ions, TBD
Hale Park parking lot reconstruction
Sales park re9nnns renoretian
Sales Park bleacher Seating repairs
55,000
Replace- playgrwndapparA-)b llmnes
SSA00
55,000
$5,000
55,000
55.000
$SA00
Kwo
$5,000
5S.Os
55)000
55,000
55.000
55.000
Park fumkurehhelter rapa"mplocarnew
$35100
535,090
5301000
$30ADO
$30ADO
WA00
WA00
WA00
$40A00
$10000
$35AD0
S40AOD
OSAol1
ReplaceAepair instal d nm king Fountains
WA00
S10A00
S10A00
$10ADO
S10ADO
WA00
S10A00
MAW
$10A0o
S10A00
5101000
570,000
$10A00
Tree safety l Pep ming, reverm
575AN
550,000
$QA00
540A00
5401000
590A00
$QA00
$QA00
$40A00
WAN
$40A00
5401000
$QA00
Tw4msimenance/reputpose
$20)000
$20,000
520A00
S10A00
S30AD0
WACO
$20.00
$40A00
$120,000
S1LSA00
MOAK
$120.000
90AW
Grape gal inproyem nts Iseeasldel
550A00
550.000
550AO0
S50ADO
S50ADO
WA00
SSOA00
SSOAoe
$50A00
SSOA00
S50AOD
5501000
$50A00
Skate Park annual reps In
55,000
$5,000
$5,000
SSA00
SSA00
$5,000
S5A00
551000
S51M
$5,000
SSAOO
SSAOO
55,1100
Park irrigation system repairs/upgradn
535)000
525.000
WACO
SISAW
538)000
$10"
57500
5100000
Parking lot rcrinanuroyrenowtions (set-aside)
$25,000
$25.o0
$25400
52!,.M
$25,000
$25)000
525)000
525.00
$25)000
525,00
Taal
53,400,000
53AD0r080
S1^000
51,400,080
53,400,000
53,400,080
$1,404000
51,40¢000
61AOMW
$1,484000
$1,404000
31,404000
SlAOM00
$66)00!!
54011)000
5300.000
5180,000
MOOD
2051/52 ProJece Souls
59aD,DaD
52,390.000
5115.000
5225,000 5325,000
5175,000 5350,000
Sz9D,DaD
575n,00a
Sas,ODo
5190.000
$25,000
5200,000
500,000 5160,000
$400.000
$45,000
5300A00
$405,000
5245A00
$675,000
5255,000
SSSA00
$2,000,000
SWA00
S3S0,000
555400
$485)000
510,000
5500,000
51421000
$575,000
520,000
$60A00
$200,000
5150.000
SWAN
$450,000
540,000
$400.000
5225,000
$180,000
$400,000
$225,009
S17SA00
5225,000
$85)000
5300.000
580.000
5400,000
$300,000
5180,000
5200.000
575,000 $75,000
5225,000 5225,000
S1SDAW S13DIDN
$225,000 5225,000
So
50
50
So
55000
5S.00
55.000
575400
S35A00
535,000
$500.000
%Oxo
530,000
$150.000
$40Aoo
5401000
5695100
$20A00
MAW
$705,000
S50A00
S50,000
$750.000
S51M
SSA00
$75,000
$50)000
$55A00
$4381000
525)000
$25.00
5300,000
53,404400 53,406,000 521,004000
Next steps?
• Develop ordinance? (June 15 deadline to
Introduce)
• Direction to modify Spending Plan?
• Direction to Pursue any or all proposed
measures?
• Direction on Duration of measure?
• Direction on Special vs. General Measure?
• Direction on Oversight Committee?
If approved, a one-eighth cent sales tax measure would raise an estimated $21
million over 15 years to repair, maintain and upgrade parks in Lodi.
Repair and
maintain: $15.5 million*
$5.5 million*
•
Reconstruct roadway and parking lots
Protect Lodi
•
Repair eroded riverbank, reclaim collapsed amphitheater
Lake Park
•
Replace north playground
Develop park master plan, invest in community -desired improvements
•
Rehabilitate Nature Area trail system
Build kayak launch improvements
•
Replace outdated or previously removed playgrounds at Candy Cane, Emerson, Beck -
Protect our
man, English Oaks, Henry Glaves; update other playgrounds as needed
children
•
Replace and maintain playground fall zones with adequate materials
Install dog park amenities
•
Replace and repair worn Skate Park features rather than eliminating them
Fix what's
•
Replace facility roofs, garbage cans, sports courts, sports lighting, bleachers, swim -
Install playground/picnic shelter at Beckman Park, others; replace restrooms
facilities
ming/wading pool mechanical systems and surfaces as they wear out
broken
•
Irrigation repairs
Safe and
•
New picnic tables, benches, drinking fountains, renovated restrooms
comfortable
•
Prune or remove diseased, dying trees
.
Rehabilitate parking lots
parks
•
Park turf aeration, gopher control, leveling, etc.
•
Replace failing irrigation systems
Save water
•
Remove little -used turf areas and replace with low water -use alternatives
Upgrades:
$5.5 million*
Make Lodi
•
Build new three-quarter mile riverfront trail, explore potential for water bridge
•
Replace restrooms
Lake Park
•
Develop park master plan, invest in community -desired improvements
better
•
Build kayak launch improvements
•
Build splash pad
•
Improve sports field lighting
Improve our
•
Install dog park amenities
neighborhood
•
Grape Bowl access improvements
parks, other
•
Install playground/picnic shelter at Beckman Park, others; replace restrooms
facilities
•
Improve picnic area on west side of Peterson Park
•
Reconfigure sports fields at Blakely Park
*Investment dollar amounts reflected on this document are estimations and subject to change.
Item #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Parks spending plan: One-eighth cent, 15 years
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31
Lodi Lake Park South Shore Reconstruction $800,000
Lodi Lake Erosion Control $150,000 $1,000,000 $1,240,000
Candy Cane Park Renovations $115,000
Legion Park improvements $100,000
Emerson Park playground renovations/field improvements
Lodi Lake Park North Side Playground
Lodi Lake Park North Pavement
Parks Annex roof replacement
Nature Area trail rehabilitation
Dog Park amenities
Beckman Park playground installation
Replaster Blakely Park pool/repairs
Lodi Lake Park South Shore Restroom replacement
Peterson Park upgrades
Salas Park sports lighting replacement
Henry Glaves Park playground replacement
English Oaks Common playground/picnic
Lodi Lake riverfront trail
Vinewood Park Restroom demo/replacement
Century Meadows Park playground surface
Lodi Lake Park Master Plan improvements TBD
Vinewood Park irrigation system upgrades
Hutchins Street Square Pool HVAC system
English Oaks downsize playground area, wall repair
Blakely Park aquatics restroom renovation/field repairs
Remove Lawrence Park restroom
Salas Park parking lot reconstruction
Kofu Park repairs
Softball Complex renovations
Replaster/mechanical replacement Lake wading pool
Beckman Park irrigation booster pump
Construct splash pad at location TBD
Zupo Field lighting replacement
Chapman Field repairs
Zupo Field seating repairs
Aquatic facility mechanical replacement
New playground at Borchardt and Vinewood parks
Beckman Park picnic shelter
Century Park playground replacement
Replace Lodi Lake Park North restroom
Salas Park Playground replacement
Lawrence Park playground replacement
Peterson Park playground replacement
Zupo Field outfield turf renovations
Replace Emerson Park restrooms
Parks Mechanic shop improvements
Hale Park Community/Restroom renovations
Blakely Park playground/sports court replacement
Hale Park playground replacement
Century Meadows playground replacement
Replace Hutchins Street Square Pool liner
Hutchins Street Square playground replacement
Kofu Park restroom/concession renovations
Katzakian Park restroom/playground renovation
Van Buskirk Park playground replacement
Lawrence Park renovations, TBD
Hale Park parking lot reconstruction
Salas Park restroom renovations
Salas Park bleacher seating repairs
Replace worn playground apparatus/fall zones
Park furniture/shelter repairs & replacement
Replace/repair/install drinking fountains
Tree safety (pruning, removal)
Turf maintenance/repurpose
Grape Bowl improvements (set-aside)
Skate Park annual repairs
Park irrigation system repairs/upgrades
Parking lot maintenance/renovations (set-aside)
Total
$175,000
$200,000
$750,000
$85,000
$180,000
$25,000
$200,000
$80,000
$400,000
$45,000
$300,000
$180,000
$245,000
$675,000
$255,000
$225,000
$55,000
$500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
$150,000
$350,000
$55,000
$80,000
$405,000
$10,000
$500,000
$142,000
$575,000
$20,000
$60,000
$200,000
$150,000
$160,000
$450,000
$40,000
$200,000 $200,000
$225,000
$180,000
$400,000
$225,000
$175,000
$225,000
$85,000
$300,000
$80,000
$400,000
$300,000
$180,000
$200,000
2031/32 Project totals
$800,000
$2,390,000
$115,000
$225,000 $325,000
$175,000 $350,000
$200,000
$750,000
$85,000
$180,000
$25,000
$200,000
$80,000 $160,000
$400,000
$45,000
$300,000
$405,000
$245,000
$675,000
$255,000
$55,000
$2,000,000
$150,000
$350,000
$55,000
$485,000
$10,000
$500,000
$142,000
$575,000
$20,000
$60,000
$200,000
$150,000
$160,000
$450,000
$40,000
$400,000
$225,000
$180,000
$400,000
$225,000
$175,000
$225,000
$85,000
$300,000
$80,000
$400,000
$300,000
$180,000
$200,000
$75,000 $75,000
$225,000 $225,000
$150,000 $150,000
$225,000 $225,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000 $75,000
$35,000 $500,000
$10,000 $150,000
$40,000 $645,000
$20,000 $705,000
$50,000 $750,000
$5,000 $75,000
$55,000 $438,000
$25,000 $300,000
$1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $21,000,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$35,000
$35,000
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$35,000
$40,000
$10,000
$35,000
$40,000
$35,000
$35,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$75,000
$50,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$20,000
$30,000
$20,000
$20,000
$40,000
$120,000
$115,000
$100,000
$120,000
$20,000
$20,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$5,000
$35,000
$25,000
$35,000
$15,000
$38,000
$10,000
$75,000
$100,000
$50,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
2031/32 Project totals
$800,000
$2,390,000
$115,000
$225,000 $325,000
$175,000 $350,000
$200,000
$750,000
$85,000
$180,000
$25,000
$200,000
$80,000 $160,000
$400,000
$45,000
$300,000
$405,000
$245,000
$675,000
$255,000
$55,000
$2,000,000
$150,000
$350,000
$55,000
$485,000
$10,000
$500,000
$142,000
$575,000
$20,000
$60,000
$200,000
$150,000
$160,000
$450,000
$40,000
$400,000
$225,000
$180,000
$400,000
$225,000
$175,000
$225,000
$85,000
$300,000
$80,000
$400,000
$300,000
$180,000
$200,000
$75,000 $75,000
$225,000 $225,000
$150,000 $150,000
$225,000 $225,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$5,000
$5,000 $75,000
$35,000 $500,000
$10,000 $150,000
$40,000 $645,000
$20,000 $705,000
$50,000 $750,000
$5,000 $75,000
$55,000 $438,000
$25,000 $300,000
$1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $1,400,000 $21,000,000