HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - August 13, 2013 SSLODI CITY COUNCIL
SHIRTSLEEVE SESSION
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
TUESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2013
A. Roll Call by City Clerk
An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held
Tuesday, August 13, 2013, commencing at 7:00 a.m.
Present: Council Member Hansen, Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tempore Katzakian,
and Mayor Nakanishi
Absent: Council Member Mounce
Also Present: City Manager Bartlam, City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Johl-Olson
B. Topic(s)
B-1 Presentation on Draft City of Lodi Short -Range Transit Plan Update (PW)
Traffic Engineer Paula Fernandez and Gordon Shaw with LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
provided a PowerPoint presentation on behalf of the Public Works Department in regard to the
Short -Range Transit Plan update. Specific topics of discussion included the purpose of the short
range transit plan, existing conditions, service plan recommendations, capital plan
recommendations, management plan recommendations, and performance measures.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Shaw confirmed that there is a bus stop within one
quarter of a mile of almost every house in the City of Lodi and they are located approximately two
blocks from one another.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Ms. Fernandez stated that there is no student discount
per se but there is a youth pass available during the summer months.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Bartlam and Ms. Fernandez confirmed that the
school district does not provide general bus service to students with few exceptions including out
of town service.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Shaw stated the 218,819 figure represents the total
number of rides for 2012-2013.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Shaw stated the decline in Dial -A -Ride usage may
be due to higher fixed -route usage and a segment of the ridership aging so that they no longer
use Dial -A -Ride. Mr. Shaw indicated routes can be adjusted as needed for Dial -A -Ride
throughout the year.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Katzakian, Mr. Shaw stated express routes are designed to
serve schools more than anything else and run during peak times.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Shaw described how individual rides are calculated
and the process for gaining public input through poster service.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Shaw stated currently routes end at 3:00 p.m. on
Saturday and 1:00 p.m. on Sunday. Mr. Shaw indicated the recommendation is to extend the
hours to 9:00 p.m. on Saturday and 4:00 p.m. on Sunday.
In response to Mayor Nakanishi, Mr. Shaw indicated there is an increase in federal funds to cover
the recommended extension of service hours and most if not all cities over 50,000 do provide
transit services. Mr. Bartlam briefly explained the history of the City providing transit services
through contract over the last 15 years while maintaining ownership of the equipment and
infrastructure.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Katzakian and Mayor Nakanishi, Mr. Shaw stated transit
service operations vary from city to city in that some are provided through contract while others
may be in-house or provided jointly through the county or a joint powers agreement.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Ms. Fernandez stated Council acceptance of the plan is
scheduled for September 4, 2013, and the extended hours would begin in mid-September.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Shaw stated certain loops will be available based on
demand to ensure all buses can meet as needed for transfer requirements. Mr. Shaw stated the
on demand service will be advertised and placards will be placed at bus stops and on the buses
themselves.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Shaw stated the Costco stop is permanent and not
on demand. Ms. Fernandez indicated staff previously spoke to Blue Shield about employee
transit needs and will review the same if the company expresses an increased interest for transit
use.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Ms. Fernandez confirmed that staff has not looked into
options for electric charging buses in light of the fact that the City has its own electric utility
primarily due to costs associated with the same.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Shaw stated that, with respect to general comments
received, the biggest concern expressed pertained to the lack of seating and shelter at the bus
stops and the biggest compliment expressed pertained to the great relationship between the
riders and the drivers. Mr. Shaw stated comparatively out of all comments received the City
performed very well.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Katzakian, Ms. Fernandez indicated that Public Works
continues to make efforts to install shelters and benches at bus stops throughout the year at an
average rate of 7 to 8 annually.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Shaw stated based on his experience with other
communities there are both pros and cons to advertising on benches at bus stops.
In response to Mayor Nakanishi, Ms. Fernandez stated transit employees do receive customer
service and courtesy training. She stated that, based on the responses at the public hearing, all
riders with the exception of one, expressed good relationships with their drivers. Mr. Shaw
indicated the City received a 4.9 out of 5 on the survey question pertaining to driver quality and
interaction.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Ms. Fernandez stated the City currently does not have
advertising policies for buses and any advertising funds generated would need to go back into
transit for operations or capital projects.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Shaw stated the 12.75 number is paid for by federal
funds and does not receive General Fund dollars. Mr. Shaw indicated the number will go down to
the average of 12.40 based on increased ridership during extended hours and both numbers are
good based on comparisons with other similar communities.
In response to Mayor Nakanishi, Ms. Fernandez briefly discussed the funding for operations in
2012-2013, which is paid through Transportation Development Act funds, Measure K funds, and
fare box recovery.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Ms. Fernandez stated the standard numbers are
created by the San Joaquin Council of Governments based on a formula and the City must
meet two out of three criteria to receive funding.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Katzakian, Mr. Shaw confirmed that the fares are set by the
City Council based on market conditions and the fare amount that patrons are able to pay for
usage.
Myrna Wetzel expressed her concerns about advertisement clutter on buses and stops. In
response to Ms. Wetzel, Ms. Fernandez stated Dial -A -Ride and Vine Line provide transportation
between Lodi and Woodbridge.
C. Comments by Public on Non-Aaenda Items
None.
D. Adjournment
No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 a.m.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl-Olson
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM
3'0 1
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Presentation on Draft City of Lodi Short -Range Transit Plan Update
MEETING DATE: August 13, 2013 (Shirtsleeve Session)
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Presentation on draft City of Lodi Short -Range Transit Plan update.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Staff will present information on the draft City of Lodi Short -Range
Transit Plan update (FY 2013/14 — FY 2023/24), a 10 -year planning
document designed to provide a blueprint for sustainable transit
service in our community. The presentation will provide an overview of the existing transit services,
recommendations for route modifications, extended hours, capital improvement plan, financial plan and
marketing strategies.
Public participation included two public workshops held on June 12, 2013 at the Lodi Public Library and
Transit Station; individual bus surveys taken on June 12, 2013; comment cards posted at City Hall, the
Transit Station, and City transit website for two weeks; and three public workshops held on July 18, 2013
at Loel Senior Center, Lodi Public Library, and Farmer's Market (large bus on display). The first set of
meetings was primarily to gather information from the public about how the existing transit system can be
improved to better meet their needs. The second series of meetings provided results, presented
alternatives for extended hours, and gathered additional public input on route recommendations.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable
FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable
JL2 1,6, )IQ A, d Xl—:—
F. Wally S delin
Public Works Director
Prepared by Paula J. Fernandez, Transportation Manager
FWS/PJF/pmf
cc: Transportation Manager/Senior Traffic Engineer
LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc., Principal Gordon Shaw
SJCOG, Associate Regional Planner Zepeda
APPROVED: L ..._
onradt Bartlam, Clue
K:\WP\PROJECTS\TRANSIT\ShortRangeTransitPlan\2013 SRTP Update\CShirtsleevedraftSRTP.docCShirtsleevedraftSRTP.doc
8/5/2013
EIM
EIM
EIM
EIM
EIM
Short Range Transit Plan
August 13, 2013
City of Lodi
City Council Shirtsleeve
Purpose of the Study
Meeting
Existing Conditions — Community and Transit
Potential Service Alternatives
Potential Capital Alternatives
Draft Plan / Recommendations
Purpose of the Study
• What is this project used for?
➢ Review existing services and identify current service
areas and level of service
➢ Identify community's transit demand and need
➢ Develop strategies to address mobility and needs
➢ Goal is to enhance and improve transit options in the
City of Lodi
CITY OF LODIGRAPELINE
WEEKDAY
WEEKDAY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUS ROUTES
CITY OF LODI WEEKEND
EEKEI D
WEEKEND
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUS ROUTES
Hus Routes -Weekend
N ® Lodi Tlan:nMet—
Bus Bion
W
E Tr fe.PaiM
e.,. Ra trio
Bus Rahe 5131
S — Bus Raine 2122
eus Rahe 34
Bus Routes -Weekday
N
8 Lodi Tmdatl Station
Bus stops - Weekday
W E
— Bus Route t
Bus Route 2
Bus Route 3
S
—Bus Route 4
_ Bus Route 6
CITY OF LODI WEEKEND
EEKEI D
WEEKEND
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUS ROUTES
Hus Routes -Weekend
N ® Lodi Tlan:nMet—
Bus Bion
W
E Tr fe.PaiM
e.,. Ra trio
Bus Rahe 5131
S — Bus Raine 2122
eus Rahe 34
CITY OF LODI GRAPLL.INI:
> XPRP.SS
PI.[HI .rc tiroRKS D 'ARI-MENr
BITS ROiJTF'S
Bus Raures Express
N
Q Lodi Trend Slalion
as Stpps - Express
W E
Express oris Rome r
Express hue Rowe 2
express B., Raul. 6 A
S,
Express &�s Raure 6 -PM
Express Sus R, tl I
6«911I6i1N[o
TABLE 6: Historical Ridership by Month
FixedRoute - Grapeline Dial A Ride - VineLine
Change % Change
FY 10-11 to FY 10-11 to
FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 12-13 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 12-13
July
12,143
13,918
14,754
21.5%
3,050
2,703
2,900
-4.9%
August
17,006
17,731
15,913
-6.4%
3,094
2,965
3,250
5.0%
September
15,508
16,385
14,902
-3.9%
2,988
2,910
2,691
-9.9%
October
15,503
14,987
17,882
15.3%
2,835
2,988
2,639
-6.9%
November
13,816
14,886
14,136
2.3%
2,639
2,765
2,434
-7.8%
December
11,221
15,422
13,555
20.8%
2,497
2,733
2,458
-1.6%
January
14,893
14,061
16,279
9.3%
2,645
2,917
2,614
-1.2%
February
13,890
14,100
15,805
13.8%
2,275
3,011
2,394
5.2%
March
14,878
13,376
15,843
6.5%
2,689
3,248
2,598
-3.4%
April
15,974
14,190
17,739
11.0%
2,524
3,080
2,680
6.2%
May
16,687
15,922
17,195
3.0%
2,617
3,048
2,746
4.9%
June
14,571
13,268
12,701
-12.8%
2,826
2,933
2,711
-4.1%
Total Ridership 176,090 178,246 186,704 6.0°0 32,679 35,301 32,115 -1.7°0
Total Grapeline and
208,769 213,547 218,819 4.8%
VineLine Ridership
Source: City of Lodi, 2013
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
Lq
S
�L
L 25,000
20,000
Lq
m
CL
15,000
10,000
5,000
n
�<-) �N �� (0
0
�?'c 0ti?
6«911I6i1HO
Grapeline Ridership by Route
t «e1 Biel 111911 RAMMO
Figure 3
City of Lodi Senior Population by Census Tract
41.06
Amn. 41.04 — —
I
Legend: Senior Population
( Number of Persons)
bus Route 1 Bus Route 4 146 183 r --j 609 - 1.481
Bus Raute 2- Bus Route 5 184 386 r --j 1,482 - 2,214
Bus Route 3 F City Limits 367 -608
Existing Conditions —
Needs & Demand
• What are transit needs?
— The number of people in a given area likely to require a passenger
transportation service
— The number of trips that would be made by those persons if they
had minimal limitations on their personal mobility
— Lodi Transit Needs = 1,642 passenger -trips per day; 492,690
per year
• What is transit demand?
— The number of trips likely to be made over a given period within a
given area at a given price
— Lodi Transit Demand = 88,400 passenger -trips per year for local
service
Existing Conditions —
Public Outreach
• Public Outreach Efforts
— Poster sessions at Public Library and Lodi
Transit Station on June 12tH
— Public workshops at Loel Senior Center and
Public Library on July 18tH
— Poster session at Farmer's Market on July
18th
Existing Conditions —
Public Outreach
• Conclusions
• Passengers are pleased with both services
• Strong need for transit services in Lodi based on certain
characteristics
• GrapeLine Fixed Route and DAR/VineLine are meeting the
primary transit needs
• GrapeLine Fixed Route and DAR/VineLine are providing an
adequate level of service
• Service to Costco / Home Depot
• Service to DMV
• Later evening service on weekdays and weekends
• Earlier service on weekdays for commuting
•
•
•
0
Potential Service Alternatives
Expand GrapeLine Fixed Route and DARNinel-ine hours
➢ GrapeLine Fixed Route weekend hours to 9:15 PM? 8:15 PM? 7:15 PM?
➢ Dial -A -Ride / VineLine hours to 9:30 PM? 8:30 PM? 7:30 PM?
➢ GrapeLine Fixed Route weekday hours to 7:15 PM?
➢ Dial -A -Ride / VineLine hours to 7:30 PM?
Begin weekday GrapeLine services earlier
➢ Start at 6:30 AM?
➢ Start at 7:00 AM?
Eliminate
Express
Route
7
➢ Lowest
performing
route in
the system, with about 1 passenger per hour
Add service to Costco and the DMV on Route 5
Potential Capital Alternatives
• Purchase vehicles as needed for GrapeLine and Dial -A -Ride /
VineLine services
• Install AVL technology on buses
• Upgrade bus stop facilities to improve accessibility and as ridership
increases
• Security enhancement — additional cameras on buses and at transit
station / parking structure
• Add additional formal transit center at the Lower Sacramento Rd /
Kettleman Ln intersection
• Expand existing transit center to have secured bus storage and a
driver training facility
Draft Plan/Recommendatir
0
Lodi Transit SRTP Update - Recommended Service Plan Elements
All Figures in Thousands
Plan Element
Service Plan Elements
Expand weekday operating hours to 7:30 PM
Expand Saturday operating hours to 9:30 PM
Expand Sunday operating hours to 4:30 PM
Begin weekday fixed route service at 6:30 AM
Revise Route 5 to Include Costco / Home Depot as Scheduled Stop
Eliminate Express Route 7
Total Net Impact
Note 1: This analysis assumes an annual inflation rate of 3 percent.
Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.
Projected FY13-14
Operating Fare box
Cost Ridership Revenue
$75,010
10,200
$10,447
$55,929
2,200
$1,737
$32,480
1,400
$1,078
$46,582
4,500
$3,176
$40,000
6,400
$4,467
-$28,119
-600
-$410
$221,881
24,100.0
$20,496
Draft Plan/Recommendations -
Institutional
• Institutional elements
— Improve service quality
• Continue conducting annual on -board passenger
surveys, boarding/alighting counts by stop and
tracking on-time performance
— Marketing for new services and service
changes
— Develop advertising policy, using existing
advertising panels on EZ Rider buses
City of Lodi TDA Performance Measures
Current City of Anticipated Performance
Standards for City of Lodi Lodi Performance with Plan Elements
Source: City of Lodi Transit, 2013
Baseline
(FY 2010-11) FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15
FY 2012-13
FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15
Cost per Vehicle Hour
$129.11 $135.11 $137.82 $140.85
$93.81
$89.51 $93.76
Passenger -Trips per Vehicle Hour
6.6 6.8 6.9 6.9
6.9
6.8 7.1
Subsidy per Passenger -Trip
$12.40 $12.40 $12.40 $12.40
$12.75
$12.30 $12.31
Source: City of Lodi Transit, 2013
Questions or Comments?