Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - August 23, 2011 SSLODI CITY COUNCIL SHIRTSLEEVE SESSION CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET TUESDAY, AUGUST 23, 2011 A. Roll Call by City Clerk An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held Tuesday, August 23, 2011, commencing at 7:00 a.m. Present: Council Member Hansen, Council Member Katzakian, Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, and Mayor Johnson Absent: Council Member Nakanishi Also Present: City Manager Bartlam, City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Johl B. Topic(s) B-1 Development Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update (PAW City Manager Bartlam briefly introduced the subject matter of the impact mitigation fee update. Public Works Director Wally Sandelin, Harris and Associates representative Alison Bouley, and Goodwin Consulting representative Victor Irzyk provided a PowerPoint presentation regarding the impact mitigation fee update. Specific topics of discussion included project progress, transportation projects and costs, outstanding funding assumptions, transportation impact fee, storm drainage fee concept, storm drainage project costs, storm drainage impact fee, general facilities impact fee, general facilities project costs, revised fire impact fee, fire project costs, police fee methodology survey, and Reynolds Ranch Project water supply assessment. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated that, while the signal at Mills Avenue and Elm Street was previously discussed, traffic projections still show the signal will be warranted in 5 to 15 years and the project would still come back to Council for final approval. In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated 20% of the traffic light project funding will come from impact fees based upon the new traffic that is generated. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated the Woodbridge Irrigation District Crossing project is complete but a portion of the cost will be recovered from impact fees. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Sandelin stated the transportation project costs represent the entire cost but there are other outside funds that may be available, such as Measure K funds, to accelerate the projects. In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated the City may not receive funding from the other funding sources for many years to come. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated the Harney Lane project was primarily attributed to new growth. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Sandelin stated the City was already collecting for Harney Lane improvements but has not yet collected for the grade separation. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated Temple Baptist Church may assert the permanence of the temporary basin, which is currently used for baseball. Continued August 23, 2011 In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated the pump station at DeBenedetti Park is currently being constructed. In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated the mechanical trash racks are related to the new permit requirement for disposing of trash before it hits the Mokelumne River. In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Bartlam stated pursuant to the General Plan low-income density is 2 to 8 units per acre and medium density is 8 to 20 units per acre. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Irzyk stated the per capita methodology is the most commonly used in impact fee analysis. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated in the future the City could add additional space to the library or construct a new facility. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Sandelin stated the money could also be spent on technology related improvements at the library so long as the use is being expanded for new growth. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated the primary reason for the decrease in fees is that there are fewer projects pending and several projects have already been completed. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Bartlam stated he anticipates the City's landscaping and maintenance district policy to continue for new growth purposes. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Sandelin stated that, while Fire Station No. 5 is not currently included because a need does not exist, he does anticipate that the station will be included in the first five-year update. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Sandelin confirmed that all water related to the assumptions is derived from surface water and not groundwater. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Bartlam stated the Reynolds Ranch fee recommendation is $6,843 per dwelling unit and the final approval will come back to the City Council. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated staff will be closely reviewing and monitoring growth projections for future housing growth analysis and fee determination purposes. John Beckman, representing the Building Industry Association, spoke in regard to his concerns about the water connection fee and the need to factor in safe yield numbers in the final calculations as set forth in the General Plan. In response to Myrna Wetzel, Mr. Bartlam stated staff is still in the process of negotiating with the property owner for a proposed site for Fire Station No. 2. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, Mr. Bartlam stated a trailer on site while the current station is being rebuilt is the last alternative. In response to Myrna Wetzel, Mr. Bartlam confirmed that drivers of vehicles in the City will likely have to pay an additional $12 when registering their vehicles as a result of SB 375, which is an unfunded State mandate related to air pollution. N Continued August 23, 2011 None. Comments by Public on Non -Agenda Items Adjournment No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 7:55 a.m. ATTEST: Randi Johl City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 13 '0 1 CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION • TM AGENDA TITLE: Development Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update MEETING DATE: August 23, 2011 (Shirtsleeve Session) PREPARED BY: Public Works Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: Development Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update. - BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On March 16, 2011, City Council approved the professional services agreement with Harris and Associates for the Development Impact Fee Program Update. Members of the project team will make a presentation to the City Council regarding a number of topics including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Storm Drainage Fee 2. Streets Fee 3. Parks and Recreation Fee Two additional Shirtsleeve Sessions are scheduled with the City Council over the next three months, leading to possible adoption of the program on December 7, 2011. FISCAL IMPACT: FUNDING AVAILABLE: FWS/pmf Not applicable. Not applicable. F. Wally Sa delin Public Works Director APPROVED: �, - onradt Bartlam, City Manager K:\WP\IMFees\2011 IMF Update\Council Communications\CIMFUpdate—Shirtsleeve3.doc 8/17/2011 Engineering fi� Impact Mitigation Fee Update Shirtsleeve Session August 23, 2011 Project Progress • Growth Forecast • Vacant Land Inventory April 19 Fee Incentive Areas • Location of Development Ongoing 0 Facilities Master Plans • Water Connection Fee July 12 Wastewater Connection Fee • Storm Drainage Fee Concept • Police Fee • Fire Fee Project Progress • Streets, Interchange and Grade Separation Fee • Storm Drainage Fee Today 0 General City Facilities Fee • Revised Fire Fee • Parks and Recreation Fee September 27 9 Electric Utility Fee Shirtsleeve . Art in Public Places Fee October 18 • Draft Fee Program Overview Shirtsleeve December 21 9 Adopt Impact Fee Program sortation Pro-lect Uc Project Signal at Mills Ave. and Elm St. Signal at Turner Rd and California St. Signal at Turner Rd. and Sacramento St. Signal at Cherokee Ln. and Elm St. Signal at Guild Ave. and Victor Rd. Guild Ave. Re -stripe from 2 to 4 lanes Harney Ln. Widen to 4 lanes from SR 99 to Lower Sacramento Rd. Harney Ln. Grade Separation of UPRR SR 99/Harney Lane Interchange Interim Improvements Victor Rd. Widen to 4 Lanes between SR 99 and Guild Harney Lane WID Crossing — Widen to 4 lanes Total Cost Fee Funded Share Cost 20% $51,800 20% $56,000 30% $84,000 30% $84,000 100% $315,000 100% $43,366 100% $3,615,078 100% $19,684,000 100% $176557172 100% $6,092,064 50% $623,952 $32,3043433 ortation Prc "F twfE 111 i; ,... rtwa," RO. rUANER Wl . 4 3 = LOrKEFOFM ST s VIC'DRfw. dwy..12 } UM 8T P--IIW .ST f LOQIAV€ c i L �I , m TOKAY ST ul a � w c! 1 i<E'REwUr Lk a v CEWU Y El VO ■ Fwi4FY u+ SEOM&NT 1 aMMEmT Z sEnMENI b -1OGAN R0. o v z a,' u Amount Total Traffic Improvement Cost $32,304,433 RSTP Funding -$41000,000 RTIF Funding -$1219791988 SJCOG Funding -$81000,000 Measure K Renewal -$2,0001000 Total Cost Allocated to Future Development $59324,445 Ole] r:ll101a01a110 Current Residential Low Density $2,648 Medium Density $2,076 High Density $1,938 Non -Residential Retail $3,034 Office/Medical $3,975 Industrial $1,491 Percent Proposed Change Per Dwelling Unit $649 -75% $353 -83% $433 -82% Per 1,000 Building Square Feet $1,095 -64% $796 -80% $405 -73% arm Dra-inac v� UAKF w H E c_ j'F.')Rn fBL EL L{£T L}C.;r M -1 y r..r 1�_Ual AVE B-1 F +ry+ry��rr TCKa,�- ME $T Y M- r _ A-1 4 1 Le 1 1 2 W J V-1 kErTIEM1Uin_n ti I DEBENEDETTI PARK PUMP STATION A-� C Sh T. IH- 6LVE: N-2 - L-2 L-1 K_3 � f n � 3 F • TJRK=R RG H F{5'fY. li 11NE :'T CLUFF AVE �. MP STATION c w Y�hESi � L PILEY PARK PUMP STATION u 0 Storm Drainage Fee Concept • Core Area — A, B, C, D, E, H and G — Conventional Fee Type — Fees Pay for Over Sizing Pipes (> 18 inches) — Projects • Pixley Park Pump Station • Cluff Ave. Pump Station Trash Rack • DeBenedetti Park Pump Station Storm Drainage Fee Concept • West Area — F and I — Option to Build Facilities and Pay No Fees — Funds Credited for Past Development — Temporary Basins Become Permanent? • South Area — K and L — Build Facilities and Pay No Fees arm Drainaae Pro-lect Gc Project City Core Area Cost C -Basin Pump Station $2,055,900 C -Basin $912,593 DeBenedetti Pump Station $1,600,000 Mechanical Trash Racks Cluff Ave $560,000 Less SD Fee Fund Revenue: -$2,000,000 City Core Total: $391289493 West Area F -Watershed Pipes $1,841,490 F -Watershed Storm Drainage Basins $9,576,879 -Watershed Pipes $1,565,480 -Watershed Storm Drainage Basins $9,010,148 Less SD Fee Fund Revenue: -$5515733 West Area Total: $21,442,264 City Core Area Percent Current Proposed Change Residential Per Dwelling Unit Low Density $3,404 $3,182 -7% Medium Density $1,361 $1591 17% High Density $817 $1,279 57% Non -Residential Per 1,000 Building Square Feet Retail $2,494 $767 -69% Office/Medical $2,078 $767 -63% Industrial $1,559 $2,055 32% 0 Current Residential Low Density $3,404 Medium Density $1,361 High Density $817 Non -Residential Retail $2,494 Office/Medical $2,078 Industrial $1,559 West Area Percent Proposed Change Per Dwelling Unit $5,452 60% $2726 100% $2,192 168% Per 1,000 Building Square Feet $5,256 111% $4,380 115% $3,520 126% General Facilities Impact Fee • Per Capita Methodology • Same Methodology Used in 1991 Fee Study • 1 Employee Equals 0.5 Resident Project Existing Public Safety Building Remodel Future City General Plan Library Expansion — 5,900 SF Current Fee Program Update Future Fee Program Updates Total Cost mwlroiect Ca Fee Funded Share Cost 19% $185,000 19% $371,000 100% $2,376,000 100% $550,000 100% $200,000 $3,682,000 0 Percent Current Proposed Change Residential Per Dwelling Unit Low Density $1,478 $617 -58% Medium Density $845 $519 -39% High Density $993 $433 -56% Non -Residential Per 1,000 Building Square Feet Retail $725 $270 -63% Office/Medical $1,038 $433 -58% Industrial $399 $144 -64% Revised Fire Impact Fee • Based on Service Calls Methodology • Same Method as in 1991 Fee Study • Fire Dept Provided 2010 Service Call Data • Cost Allocation - 63% Residential / 37% Non - Residential Ure Project Outstanding Fire Station #4 Loan Fire Station #2 Expansion — 4,300 SF Fire Station #2 Debt Financing Cost Total Cost 0 Fee Funded Cost $1)225)000 $1,290,000 $310,000 $2,825,000 Percent Current Proposed Change Residential Per Dwelling Unit Low Density $358 $385 8% Medium Density $280 $324 16% High Density $371 $270 -27% Non -Residential Per 1,000 Building Square Feet Retail $530 $338 -36% Office/Medical $404 $540 34% Industrial $77 $180 134% Police Fee Methodology Survey ■ All Surveyed Cities Use a Per Capita Fee Methodology Project Description: Project Average Annual Water Demand Average Safe Yield Project Average Annual Safe Yield Net Reliance Upon Surface Water Percentage Reliance Upon Surface Water Associated Water Connection Fee Versus 220 Acres 1084 Residential Units 250,000 SF Retail/Commercial 501 Acre Feet per year 1.7 Acre feet per acre per year 374 Acre feet per year 127 Acre feet per year 25% $1,711 $6,843 MaaNaaa Dilps'st-le