HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - April 19, 2011 SSLODI CITY COUNCIL
SHIRTSLEEVE SESSION
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 2011
A. Roll Call by City Clerk
An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held
Tuesday, April 19, 2011, commencing at 7:00 a.m.
Present: Council Member Hansen, Council Member Katzakian, Council Member Nakanishi, and
Mayor Johnson
Absent: Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce
Also Present: City Manager Bartlam, City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Johl
B. Topic(s)
B-1 Development Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update (PW)
City Manager Bartlam briefly introduced the subject matter of the impact mitigation fee program.
Public Works Director Wally Sandelin, Alison Bouley, and Victor Irzyk provided a PowerPoint
presentation regarding the Impact Mitigation Fee Program. Specific topics of discussion included
the study area, growth forecast, projected citywide residential development, growth forecast for
non-residential, fee incentive areas, fee assignment by area, methodology, fees being analyzed,
assumptions, fund balance and interfund loans, and financing plan.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated the projection numbers for residential are
based on market conditions and the numbers were agreed upon by staff and members of the
building industry.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated there is less of a demand for high
density and apartment complexes. A brief discussion ensued regarding market conditions driving
the future numbers of renters versus property owners and the need for the land to be almost free
for apartment building construction in order for the numbers to pencil out.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Bartlam stated development impact fees are
charged to build capital projects in that development and the fees have to be charged
accordingly.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Bartlam stated multi -use corridors are a mixed-use
designation that run along Kettleman Lane, Cherokee Lane, and Lodi Avenue, which provide
greater flexibility for land uses in those areas.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated a review will be completed every five years,
which will allow for staff to catch any slippage of the numbers based on the market.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated that in the past, while there may have been
some tweaks to the impact fee program, there was no formal update.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Bartlam stated the program is a 20 -year program with 5 -year
updates built into the program, unlike the previous program.
In response to Council Member Nakanishi, Mr. Bartlam stated impact fees include the costs
Continued April 19, 2011
associated with police and fire facilities such as the fire stations and the new public safety
building.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Ms. Bouley stated they are starting with a review of the
existing program and its coverage and they will assess the need for reimbursements for old
facilities along with construction needs for new facilities.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Ms. Bouley stated the assessments related to the need for new
facilities will include parks and general City facilities as well.
In response to Council Member Nakanishi, Mr. Sandelin stated comparisons with other cities in
the County will also be provided in the future although they do not necessarily match up because
every community is different.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated the last two development
agreements included the creation of Mello -Roos districts to address long-term and ongoing facility
needs.
In response to Council Member Nakanishi, Mr. Sandelin stated the community facilities district
was created but there has been no residential development in the district to date.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated the comparison communities were chosen by
him and reflect other cities in the County such as Manteca and Tracy.
In response to Council Member Nakanishi, Mr. Bartlam confirmed that a portion of regional
transportation needs are also assessed in impact fees as those needs are not completely met by
grants and other funding.
In response to Council Member Nakanishi, Mr. Irzyk stated none of the comparable communities
are doing an art in public places fund and the City Council will need to decide whether that is a
continuing priority in this community.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Irzyk stated all cities differ in their balances
for impact fees because each community's needs differ. Mr. Bartlam stated it is important to
assess whether the facilities that were planned 20 years ago were built and if not then how much
money is needed to construct those facilities.
In response to Council Member Nakanishi, Mr. Sandelin stated commercial projections
include Home Depot, Reynolds Ranch build out, Wal-Mart, and the South Hutchins medical office
building.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated the per acre fee has been in place
since 1991 and the commercial calculation is per 1,000 square feet of building space.
A brief discussion ensued between Council Member Hansen, Mr. Bartlam, and Mr. Sandelin
regarding the Highway 99 interchange and grade separation projects, the current likelihood
of those projects being done in 20 years, and the ability to include them in the 5 -year reviews.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated funding from the San Joaquin Council of
Governments for these projects will not be available until after 2018 and the improvements are
expected to have a lifetime of 15 to 20 years.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin confirmed that the only park constructed by
the developer to date has been Century Meadows. He stated developers can build a park for
N
Continued April 19, 2011
less than a municipality because they do not have to pay prevailing wages and the bidding
environment is different for private developers. Mr. Bartlam confirmed DeBenedetti is a regional
City park and some Southwest Gateway Development impact funds should be directed to the
same.
Council Member Hansen requested general information regarding how much it costs to live in the
City of Lodi with respect to the services provided.
Jeffrey Kirst provided a brief history of the development of the impact fee program and spoke in
regard to his concerns about being competitive with other utilities including electrical.
In response to Myrna Wetzel, Mr. Sandelin stated Measure K funds are available for the Highway
99 interchange and grade separation projects.
C. Comments by Public on Non -Agenda Items
None.
D. Adjournment
No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 a.m.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl
City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM & 10\
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
TM
AGENDA TITLE: Development Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update
MEETING DATE: April 19, 2011 (Shirtsleeve Session)
PREPARED BY: Public Works Director
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Development Impact Mitigation Fee Program Update.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: On March 16, 2011, City Council approved the professional services
agreement with Harris and Associates for the Development Impact
Fee Program Update. Members of the project team will make a
presentation to the City Council regarding a number of topics
including, but not limited to, the following:
1. Study Area and Vacant Land Area
2. Growth Projections
3. Incentive Areas (Downtown and Mixed -Use Corridors)
4. Assumptions and Changes to the Old Program
5. Methodology Used to Set Impact Fees _
A total of four Shirtsleeve Sessions are scheduled with the City Council over the next seven months,
leading to adoption of the Program on December 7, 2011.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FUNDING AVAILABLE:
FWS/pmf
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
A"", J"'-_
F. Wally S delin
Public Works Director
nradt Bartlam, City Manager
K:\WP\IMFees\2011 IMF Update\CIMFUpdate_Shirtsleeve.doc 4/13/2011
Engineering
fi�
Impact Mitigation Fee Program
Shirtsleeve
April 19, 2011
Study Area
• Vacant Property Inside City Limit
• Vacant Property Outside City Limit Within
General Plan Boundary
• Land Expected to Develop By 2035
• Fee Incentive Areas
�2 ZD �D fnD j -
Q
Z —_-- --
Growth Forecast
Total
3,050
520
3
508.00
35
543.00
Dwelling
Units
Acres
Low
Medium
High
Low
Medium High
Density
Density
Density
Density
Density Density
Year
(LDR)
(MDR)
(HDR)
Total
(LDR)
(MDR) (HDR)
Total
2011
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
2012
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
2013
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
2014
50
-
-
50
8.33
- -
8.33
2015
100
-
-
100
16.67
- -
16.67
2016
125
-
-
125
20.83
- -
20.83
2017
175
-
-
175
29.17
- -
29.17
2018
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2019
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2020
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2021
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2022
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2023
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2024
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2025
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2026
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2027
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2028
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2029
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2030
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
Total
3,050
520
3
508.00
35
543.00
PROJECTED CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Year
Low
Density
(LDR)
Dwelling Units
Medium High
Density Density
(MDR) (HDR)
Total
Low
Density
(LDR)
Acres'
Medium High
Density Density
(MDR) (HDR)
Total
2011
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
2012
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
2013
-
-
-
-
-
- -
-
2014
50
-
-
50
8.33
- -
8.33
2015
100
-
-
100
16.67
- -
16.67
2016
125
-
-
125
20.83
- -
20.83
2017
175
-
-
175
29.17
- -
29.17
2018
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2019
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2020
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2021
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2022
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2023
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2024
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2025
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2026
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2027
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2028
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2029
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
2030
200
40
-
240
33.33
2.67 -
36.00
Total
3,050
520
-
3,570
508.00
35 -
543.00
Growth Forecast — Non Residential
Non -Residential Growth Forecast
Units of 1,000 Square Feet
2015-19
2020-24
2025-29
2030-35
Industrial
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi Shopping Center
South Hutchins
Northeast
896
792
800
Southeast
Major Retail
Reynolds Ranch
134
Lodi Shopping Center
217
South Hutchins
Multi -use Corridor
100
Downtown Multi -use
Minor Retail
Reynolds Ranch
466
Lodi Shopping Center
26.5
26.5
South Hutchins
109
Multi -use Corridor
Downtown Multi -use
Office
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi Shopping Center
South Hutchins
90
90
Multi -use Corridor
180+70
Southeast
100
Medical
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi Shopping Center
South Hutchins
68
Multi -use Corridor
Downtown Multi -use
Non -Residential Growth Forecast
Units of L000 Square Feet
2015-19 2020-24 2025-29 2030-35
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi Shopping Center
Industrial
South Hutchins
Northeast
8961 792 800
Southeast
I
Reynolds Ranch
134
_
Lodi Shopping Center
217
Major Retail
South Hutchins
Multi -use Corridor
100
Downtown Multi -use
Reynolds Ranch
466',
Lodi Shopping Center
26.5' 26.5
Minor RetaiI
South Hutchins
109
Multi -use Corridor
Downtown Multi -use
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi Shopping Center
Office
_ South Hutchins
90 90
Multi -use Corridor
180 + 70',
Southeast
100
Reynolds Ranch
Lodi Shopping Center
Medical
south Hutchins
_ 68
Multi -use Corridor
Downtown Multi -use
I I I f
;.
i
>: f 1
.;;' 1
::�:
:
:i:
i •'
t i
I :
{
::i:
:t;
O
O
I
is
I: 'i'
I
7. •.-.....,,•,•,•.,,•..
. :...:...:.....
I
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, E
..... 1. .'
:E
- - _
I I ' N //" I I F 1ao { i
__
- ---
1, 'rao I. -- � --- -
i_ - - - -
- - r'I ' i
. _ I
i ��.
w
1 I: ; jl
I. I j I_
l
,
I afi i
.... .
-.:.::-::.:::::
r'
_ x I I I
3
I A
A O
1 1 / I r I`3 VjcrunO 3AV!amn
. 1 L '
I I
I
,,
i'
1 D 'rl;.. ;I I �, ' - .._.
1 -.. )-- ''! 1 �, f
- I : I.i I i�
i ?. {
1 �I ��F— Ii l' : I 1
i II1
-7 I11� _
Iwt LI 1
- `7-'' I I 1 l I Ij w r I 11
�' ''
I i
_ - _
- , I 11 1 I_
I ! jI
:I
_i
IU I.
,'I
<
I
,IIS 1;I ' I / '. j' i , : 1 a 1,1
_ .j I (
,;
. - I a , ,11
,I
R J
11.II ;I IIt
,- z)_I (i i r
I�
I I I ��
�)
II
I ;l ; _ I Irl ,�. I' i I - 66J.1111H 1
, .
_
- ,: ,, h 3 ,,
,' r 1
177
I
66 JIMH 1„ , , ; i _1 „ 1:' ,1 It
:
l
EiE::c:::::r•:
a
3 d
..
, ,;
;i Iii ,f , 4-;
_
11
I I i I
0213bOOW ,
{ ( :j` ,t} - i-ic 1 Iii, , , ,, s . .'} t
I.
t
,
II ii 7 <iF=:� ( 17 _ ' ; ,i; "' Ir l
:t'
Ono
I
I I I I I- 11 i
I
ffi , Ilti -� J - 1, 7' ,I,
- 11{ , -. I. •-.t 'ri "�-Ii: �,�; {!.t Sl SI :I
I : ,
; )yf f[ a.i.
_ J
,,,.
t:'
3
'
�� ) ��
i S NOiNO 1
1 O S
, 9{ i
t Y
LU1;
Z
y
I
I
I
J
- b a
: - dln
- , 7 f I ,
�; -
k' t
I .`
I J
- - : -., ,
°, I lii -
, , ;,;; I
....
E : `; ::
W
x
t ., I' ;' ;';;
;l 1S H 2inH0,I:
j
..>, , ,,,,; ,;�11 , , t , ,,
o. ,
• , i f - �,:. IF ,.-.: { !t , ua I ,1:,?: it
_ __��t I 1 _ ; I
,.. --,! --- --
3
-Oa-SI/�Vd ;[ ! i:::::::.:::1
--- -- .. -. _ __._.. .._-__-_ _.._._
I
o:j:;:;:�::;�. I
- -„- :, , i --: 1 ;;-
,'. ,
_:
/ , , . .I I :", :.., ,.-. :, :; _- .. �. , .. .. 1 I ,;, ,t , I, .. ,.I.I .. .:,.! . , ,.-� , ;,..;.,' 1, . I'!f
I
1clHr!;
f t '-,i ., I, I ;. , t ; C.t„ J$SNIH' -1 I , ;;`i
, • %1 ,
;.;.;.
jh I� r t it + { , ± a ° ,; I ;: ,.1
+r I,
, Y' -I
-,1 -_IJ
TM r ` ',t, i', _Z.
' I
N l �A!!
„s ;:, ,,.. ;. ,:-;: -,
:,-, 1 I ,-i ,, ,.. moi: t, ,.,. g�".,.: ,
iql'i
I -
,
:r 3 t$, 3.
4 ,..,::. , n,,.-., ' , i, '. :_'-:k:
I ,
:;jr{ f• ;i .,I -
Ir, : j ..r'S
-'
:,
..., ,.
: ,
!,
r, ,_, J
, ti j
lt,
f :� ., -,
a
F
,... .,-Y �� f.
:-
-. " . } .. .:::
<:
,
,•.., ,I:I ,- I::
„_. o .:
.... ..•
;Ic
3 s::
I
Nl WVH ` - m
F
r
..F/NY(O �E I M..
:I:: :i:-.;
I
.
:. <
o ; -
o
_r,::,A a:,r I,,
,I w . ,.
i
I
,, , ; ,,
a. .,_ ,; - . , _ ,
,
, , jf ,, I {.
, „ I ,,
I :, r,,
:: .
::..
....
...: .i i „ 't. ,.. Lii ( I , j ;' ,;- fig," { , t , I,,
, i
„ , I .,It., ,, , . , ,,,, t1
::::.
,1 I,..:
_. ,.. ,.. ., ....1.51 f, ,. , i.:: - ',.,; I , ,;, ,.,;I • : ,; ... - , "% .. -...__r-
::
,.
„_.. _ _,..,_,
S 11W . .,. I , _,lli :
\1 I3Ab' l - I1. , ,.,_.
, . :
Q, I
/ .'
Q - r.
4 ao ,, . -,
bS 4
n
- �
:.
I :
�M7,: - 1
; r
€1
(- ...... , ,-i, - L I..,. . 7. .... , j -..a '.:, ,.. tl. ,,., ;- -_F..., _. r:. S. , :: stall
.,
_ .. -,
,. _.. ,, 1 :: .. q�,: : ., ..r r .. ,,.�.
Y.- .. .,., .:.....-. :s. ,, :.:-:, :. i
:, , s,.., I , I„ +, ,. � . Jt ,,
.-. 1:,,,,, II ,. 1,
:4:
_, „ „ a:l x. ,,.
.. -
,,, 1
III!'
.< ,,
),;; l as INwvaOds
3
0
,r,.}' L 1
,, ,
f
I
is
%� 1, lilt ,,
„,
i
( 1' f 1l'j
„J'
t 1, I i
1.; i I V
I rz;
i 1
I
7 I:
o�,lav ,:
-.
l it I' I 1) -Y Y {
f/ L :� !1 ,4 ' 111,; i ';
-.
,
-_._-: 1
1 ,I
w.t . �x4 a�n�o
f }
s r ,
7;' �
3,-I I, ;`
f, f 1 / -
I N_
I
}
t 2
E j
I r Ejl]
'
r, tr
i
_: �1'�t:'fii� r, `' `_;",) 101'',
j.: l"':' :'.
, 1
v
I
I t
I
{
3�. !1 ����S �/ .,:.e- .-:-.;.._.
,{tii?1t113f �t 1 ,.
,
:::
i
1,
IL W, NHO' '1'M ::.....:::::: E
................
4
- 11�--**..............................
:a:
::�:
:
:i:
-
::i:
:t;
O
O
I
is
I: 'i'
I
7. •.-.....,,•,•,•.,,•..
. :...:...:.....
I
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, E
:E
I :;
:E:
:'
I
is
.•.•.....-.-.-.:-.
.... .
-.:.::-::.:::::
r'
t, '
i::::::
w
:)0
0
Of
�
_
, I
...... :• •:: :1:
I ........ 5Ei: I
'h
:Ii
E
:I:
..�...
:I
0
I I
i
II __:
j
R J
E
9
o
i_
'
fn
w
w
Z❑W
O��
R=Q
J
Z
:
E ..
EiE::c:::::r•:
..
m
w
_
11
I I i I
0213bOOW ,
i
I.
1
QQco
.-.•.......
Ono
I
I I I I I- 11 i
I
�i
I- — t_
_
_ J
3
'
�� ) ��
k' t
I �- -' -- _
i
j
II
I (� i 1 - - - . l _ _ _
-- i. - I I - —.I---._ .�..-. ._I- ll -._ _: -. ,,.. ,, i- t -,- -,--t"--
_ __��t I 1 _ ; I
,.. --,! --- --
3
-Oa-SI/�Vd ;[ ! i:::::::.:::1
--- -- .. -. _ __._.. .._-__-_ _.._._
I
o:j:;:;:�::;�. I
- -„- :, , i --: 1 ;;-
Z
0�_U)2
UJ w Q w
W2ww
0 a— i' Q
�
Oow
w
w ~ U
x9
m) w w W
O 0 Z
O
U
CNO
N
Z ❑ Z N ch
W wW0 w w W
a b N Cl) CO Q
O W o D 0 2 = 2
wW OWE ❑U)F h h I— CO
�-> w>= w:5za z z z Y
UW awl— W} W W W w
W � O
) fn❑N co 2 2 2 Q
o C9 F- W C9 0 W n. U) a a a °-
wzZ �'zN F-�o- o O O W
a�� Q�� Qu5wz w w w ly
V_ U ❑ U >
N o ❑ O Z> 04 > > > h
O O O W W W W W ❑
CN � Z=LL Z❑❑d. ❑ ❑ ❑ LL
No
F_
z z z z z z
W w W W W w W
❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0
W w W w W w W w W w W w W w
UW UW 0W UW UW UW UW
OC9U) OC91_- OC9H OC9F_ 0C9� 3,012OC9I
w Z— iw Z Z Iw Z Z w Z Z w Z Z iW Z ZLL Z Z
a — z a— a— a— a— a— a—
::) LO B O CID =) Lo � Z) Lf) 00� O a)� O N Z) O
CD opo 04pN 04pr� opo opo 0400
T- •- N N N
„
w
W W
JLL
O
O
N M
O O
N
a
I O
O
�R v
w
:)0
0
Of
�
v
O O
o
❑
X
❑
�
w
❑ Z)
>
QOU
0
�
Z
0
R J
H
G
—
9
o
i_
w
=
fn
w
w
Z❑W
O��
R=Q
J
Z
❑
W
X
Z
Q
F__V >_
CO
—�/ ❑
U
m
w
2 LL
WC9H
:)
QQco
Ono
Z ❑ Z N ch
W wW0 w w W
a b N Cl) CO Q
O W o D 0 2 = 2
wW OWE ❑U)F h h I— CO
�-> w>= w:5za z z z Y
UW awl— W} W W W w
W � O
) fn❑N co 2 2 2 Q
o C9 F- W C9 0 W n. U) a a a °-
wzZ �'zN F-�o- o O O W
a�� Q�� Qu5wz w w w ly
V_ U ❑ U >
N o ❑ O Z> 04 > > > h
O O O W W W W W ❑
CN � Z=LL Z❑❑d. ❑ ❑ ❑ LL
No
F_
z z z z z z
W w W W W w W
❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0 ❑0
W w W w W w W w W w W w W w
UW UW 0W UW UW UW UW
OC9U) OC91_- OC9H OC9F_ 0C9� 3,012OC9I
w Z— iw Z Z Iw Z Z w Z Z w Z Z iW Z ZLL Z Z
a — z a— a— a— a— a— a—
::) LO B O CID =) Lo � Z) Lf) 00� O a)� O N Z) O
CD opo 04pN 04pr� opo opo 0400
T- •- N N N
„
Fee Incentive Areas
Mixed Use Corridors
• Downtown
• North of Downtown
• LodiAvenue
• Sacramento Street
• Cherokee Lane
• Kettleman Lane
Fee Assignment By Area
O
OU)
y .N
y
o
L N
N
-p
to CL
O -p
Z
C4)
li
a) W
OC
a)
GC
0
V
Water System
1
✓
✓
Water Capacity
1
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sewer System
1
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sewer Capacity
1 or 2
Storm Drainage
1
✓
✓
Streets and Roads
1
✓
✓
Interchange/Grade
✓
✓
Separation
1
Police
1
✓
✓
Fire
1
✓
✓
Electric
1
✓
Parks Recreation Open
1
✓
Space
✓
✓
General City Facilities
1
✓
✓
✓
✓
Art In Public Places (2%)
1
Methodology
• Meetings with Development Community
• Growth Forecasts
• Master Plans and Level of Service Standard
• Project Identification and Cost Estimates
• Calculation of Fees
• Impact Mitigation Fee Program Report
Fees Being Analyzed
1. Traffic
2. Water
3. Sewer
4. Storm Drainage
5. Parks, Recreation and Open Space
6. Police
7. Fire
8. General City Facilities
9. Electric Substation and Feeder Lines
10 -Art In Public Places
Assumptions
• Twenty Year Program (2015 — 2035)
• Single Fee Zone
• Development Projects Build More
Infrastructure
• Oversizing Costs Not Included in Program
• Public Art Fee Segregated
• Required 5 -Year Updates Implemented
Fund Balance and Interfund Loans
Fund
Cash Balance
Wastewater Fund #173
$596,161
Storm Drain Fund #326
$495,658
Water Fund #182
$332,907
Streets Fund #332
$1769145
Regional Transportation Fund #338
$693,711
Police Fund #1215
$2779251
Fire Fund #1216
($1309428)
Parks and Recreation Fund #1217
$2,5461953
General City Facilities Fund #1218
($383,330)
Art In Public Places Fund #1214
$188,000
Total
$4,793,026
Financing Plan
• Revised Basis of Demand Assumption
• Preliminary Fee Calculations
• Comprehensive Fee Comparison
• Cash Flow/Funding Analysis
• Final Fee Calculations
• Art In Public Places Fee
MaaNaaa
Dilps'st-le