The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes - November 30, 2010 SSLODI CITY COUNCIL SHIRTSLEEVE SESSION CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2010 A. Roll Call by City Clerk An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held Tuesday, November 30, 2010, commencing at 7:05 a.m. Present: Council Member Hansen, Council Member Johnson, Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, and Mayor Katzakian Absent: Council Member Mounce Also Present: City Manager Bartlam, City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Johl B. Topic(s) B-1 Receive Report on Harney Lane Specific Plan (PW) City Manager Bartlam briefly introduced the subject matter of the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Public Works Director Wally Sandelin provided a PowerPoint presentation regarding the Harney Lane Specific Plan. Specific topics of discussion included the purpose of the plan, history, one- on-one meetings, issues and concerns, four segments of the plan, west of Lower Sacramento Road, Lower Sacramento Road to County line, Legacy Way to Hutchins Street, grade separation, Costa property, and next steps. In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Sandelin confirmed that right in / right out means you can only turn right coming in and out of the intersection. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, Mr. Sandelin stated homes would need to be purchased in some areas in the future in order to acquire the entire right of way that is needed for access purposes. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated that Lower Sacramento Road is an example of an expressway while Lodi Avenue is an example of a minor arterial. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin agreed that for time line purposes the most critical improvements were those associated with Harney Lane and Highway 99 because they are imminent in relation to development. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated the timing for improvements is based on the level of service exceeding Level E, which is the standard for the County. He stated in addition intersections are improved before arterials. In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Sandelin stated four lanes cannot be built across the railroad and the improvements from Banyan to Stockton will occur with the grade separation. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, Mr. Sandelin agreed that the Specific Plan is important for developers and property owners for long-term planning purposes. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, Mr. Sandelin stated lanes on all sides of the intersections should match up as traffic is coming through the intersection. Continued November 30, 2010 In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated staff will continue to monitor the area in the County near the Williams property. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, Mr. Sandelin stated there is a left -turn lane on Lower Sacramento Road and Harney Lane in Segment 2 but future widening may not happen for 15 years or so because it is driven by development. In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated enough right of way was acquired during development of the King property. In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated removing the bike lane, sidewalk, and landscaping near the Mansero property is reasonable and consistent with other areas in the City. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hitchcock, Mr. Sandelin stated staff is continuing to look at the Hutchins Street and West Lane intersection to ensure consistency with the level of service as set forth in the General Plan. In response to Mayor Katzakian, Mr. Sandelin stated Alternate 3 is the most expensive design for the grade separation and is similar to the Hammer Lane underpass in Stockton. In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Sandelin stated the cost estimate for the grade separation project varies from $18 million to $30 million. Greg Costa spoke in regard to this concerns about access for trucks and employees near the Costa property. Tony Amador spoke in regard to his concerns about the noise impact with Harney Lane being four lanes across. C. Comments by Public on Non -Agenda Items None. D. Adjournment No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 7:57 a.m. ATTEST: Randi Johl City Clerk N AGENDA ITEM 40% CITY OF LODI ,. COUNCIL COMMUNICATION im AGENDA TITLE: Receive Report on Harney Lane Specific Plan MEETING DATE: November 30, 2010 (Shirtsleeve Session) PREPARED BY: PublicWorks Director RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive report on Harney Lane Specific Plan BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Staff will present information regarding the progress of the project. Proposed improvementsand right-of-way limitswill be presentedfor discussion and comment. The presentation will include an overview of the initial public meeting and subsequent one-on-one meetings with individual property owners. Staffs presentation will include a number of exhibits depicting the future improvementsto Harney Lane. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. FUNDING "Al LABLE: Not applicable. F. Wallv San4elin Public Works Director Prepared by Chris Boyer, Junior Engineer FWS/CB/pmf APPROVED: — Kon a artlam, City Manager K:\W P\PROJECTS\STREETS\HarneyLaneSpecificPlan\CHarneyLaneSpecificPlan—Shi rtsleeve.doc 11/22/2010 Engineering Harney Lane Specific Plan Shirtsleeve Meeting November 30, 2010 Purpose • Establish the future right of way -City Limit to SIR 99 • Inform Public of Planned Future Improvements — Four lane expressway East of Lower Sacramento Rd — Four lane minor arterial West of Lower Sacramento Rd — Auxiliary Lanes at some intersections • Adopt Over- or Under -Crossing at UPRR • Identify Potential Acquisitions at 47 properties — Dedications Associated with New Development — Interim and Ultimate Plans for Construction — Need Driven by Future Growth History • January 2008 -Shirtsleeve Meeting • July 2008 —Retained Mark Thomas and Co. • June 2010 - 1St Public Meeting • July 2010 -One-on-One Meetings • Today -Shirtsleeve Meeting • January 24, 2011 - 2nd Public Meeting One -On -One Meetings • First Public Meeting • 543 notices mailed • Newspaper advertising • Posted on City website • 52 Citizens attended • Follow Up - 30 One -on -One meetings • Two Invitations Sent to Property Owners • Multiple meetings with 3 property owners Issues/Concerns • How much of my property will be needed? • When is the street widening going to occur? • How will I get compensated for the right of way? • Moving the right of way closer to my house will devalue my property and how will I be compensated? • Why does the median have to be so wide? • Will the access to my property change? A IT 7 - NMI Segment 1 West of Lower Sacramento Rd .h M Ah 40 Ah IIw, Ul ,.. Segment 3 .c ,� �,;.:�� a-,. p + - sem_- .f ��=�.� �'A�!; . �� ; � ��r` .+' •_:Yeti � "``�,;: F r Legacy Wy to fy V. Hutchins St '.tr4�y; . '�.:; �,. �}+}� :. y_�a 7 J%ri + r ..,j '17-7 '�t4fa�*�-s?I _ • �i T � `\%" +�}� +` -,,yI'I~-'-f -4 #+'fir l=_ +,Ir-''' �•� I --i 1' 1 •�'l� ' _1 *' „pi. tl ��•. , . _ .. -.. .. � ��w. s `- - � '. - '_t '� _ _ LL-� to M 1 now - - Segment 2 Lower Sacramento Rd to Legacy Wy dr Segment 4 r Hutchins St to '{ �" ��µ I''i "•,ri *;=.*' Stockton StNow j,-.. 1A 7 d +fl +r; 4 M 0 0 0 Segment 1 West of Lower Sacramento Road Existing Conditions Interim Improvements ✓ 7.5 feet —north side ✓ 0 to 2.5 feet —south side Ultimate Improvements through 2020 Segment 2 Lower Sacramento Road to County Line Existing Conditions (55 feet) Interim Improvements ✓ Add intersection lanes ✓ 4 reduced yards (0 — 7 feet) Ultimate Improvements (110 feet) through 2025 2025 ✓ North side — 2 acquisitions, 6 reduced yards (29 feet) ✓ South side — 11 reduced yards (26 feet) Segment 3 Legacy Way to Hutchins Street • Interim Improvements (91 feet) 2025 ✓ Four lanes ✓ South side — 12 properties (7 — 12.5 feet) • Ultimate Improvements (110 feet) ✓ North side — 2 reduced yards (7 — 24 feet) ✓ South side — 12 properties (31 feet) ➢ Development properties ➢ Timing Development Driven Segment 4 Grade Separation • Overpass • Lowest cost • Right-of-way greatest • Underpass • More expensive • Right-of-way least Segment 4 Costa Property • Two access points on Harney Lane • Maintain Corner Access —Foreseeable Future • Relocate Corner Access —Operations and Accidents • Grade Separation -Funding Available Next Steps • January - Public Meeting • Shirtsleeve — Final Specific Plan & Grade Separation Alternatives • May — Adopt Specific Plan MaaNaaa Dilps'st-le LEGEND: EXISTING R/W INTERIM PROPOSED R/W ULTIMATE PROPOSED R/W PROPERTY LINE �� • �� CITY/COUNTY LIMITS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION . ULTIMATE R/W WIDTH R INTERIM R/W WIDTH R W 67.5' R/W R/W 1 8. _ J 8' J 19, 14' 1 19' 1o 1 c 1 77.5' INTERVOPSTPLPVEMIRT ULTIMAT 0I HARNEY LANE SPECIFIC PLAN INTERIM IMPROVEMENT SEGMENT t FUTURE RD. TO LOWER SACRAMENTO RD. SCALE r=50' LEGEND: EXISTING RIW INTERIM PROPOSED RIW ULTIMATE PROPOSED RIW PROPERTY LINE CITY/COUNTY LIMITS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ULTIMATE RIW WIDTH INTERIM R/W WIDTH R/W Vm 62'-6S' R/V 1 b 2 SNIb -1 ' S .5 -7.5 N IRAN (STRIPED) NIIIiM NPROVEMENi LOVER SACRAMENTO ROAD TO CITY/COUNTY J.TS NO SCALE R/W Vw R1'-915' - 1 STN,. -F, nERWo SIDEWALK NTEW NPROVB`ENi CITY/COUNTY UMTS TO LEGACY WAY NO SCALE R/W 110'• A 15' 6• EANDERING SOEWALK YEANDERINC SIOEWLLK - S' IN RESDENTIAL AREAS - 5' W RESIDENTIAL AREAS - ]' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS LLTMIATf NPROVB�IQItf - 7 1N COMMERCIAL AREAS LEGACY WAY TO MILLS AVENUE NO SCALE ....Txo NAs ror►Axr, IxE WY OF LODI //�,SNI W e!W..1_rG SII' - Ea =-'ii ��E - - 1 STN,. -F, nERWo SIDEWALK NTEW NPROVB`ENi CITY/COUNTY UMTS TO LEGACY WAY NO SCALE R/W 110'• A 15' 6• EANDERING SOEWALK YEANDERINC SIOEWLLK - S' IN RESDENTIAL AREAS - 5' W RESIDENTIAL AREAS - ]' IN COMMERCIAL AREAS LLTMIATf NPROVB�IQItf - 7 1N COMMERCIAL AREAS LEGACY WAY TO MILLS AVENUE NO SCALE ....Txo NAs ror►Axr, IxE WY OF LODI //�,SNI W e!W..1_rG LEQEND: EXISTING R/W PROPERTY LINE CITY/COUNTY LIMITS -- _ - ALTERNATIVE(: OVERHEAD WITH SLOPES ALTERNATIVE2: OVERHEAD WITH WALLS ALTERNATIVE3; UNDERPASS WITH WALLS ALTERNATIVE4: UNDERPASS WITH WALLS (SHIFTED) Q SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION E F r wr wv M°S I m' F tl11lTs's I �. �T-� ---- -------tea ------------ .c.0 ALTFANATNE 2 0_\%BW 1D V4M WALLS ALTERNATIVE & U)OMPASS WITH WALLS TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS FOR DFFERENT ALTERNATIVES ALTS NATM 4: UWIS ASS WITH WALLS (SHF'IEO) m HARVEY LANE GRADE SEPARATION ALTERNATIVES 11 zffL111