Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - July 15, 2008 SSLODI CITY COUNCIL SHIRTSLEEVE SESSION CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET TUESDAY, JULY 15, 2008 A. Roll Call by City Clerk An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held Tuesday, July 15, 2008, commencing at 7:02 a.m. Present: Council Members - Johnson, Katzakian, and Mayor Mounce Absent: Council Members - Hansen and Hitchcock Also Present: City Manager King, City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Johl 1 B-1 Storm Water Development Standard Plans and Inspection Fee (PW) City Manager King briefly introduced the subject matter of storm water development standards. Streets & Drainage Manager George Bradley introduced John Terayskis of WGR Southwest, Inc. Mr. Terayskis provided a PowerPoint presentation regarding the City of Lodi's Storm Water Development Standards Plan (DSP). Specific topics of discussion included DSP as a State mandate, calendar of events, comparisons and differences with other local plans, purpose and examples of DSP, standards application to new projects and significant redevelopment projects, best management practices (BMP), requirements for minimum, geographic, and activity -specific BMPs, implementation process, and a summary of the City's development standards plan. In response to Myrna Wetzel, Mr. Terayskis stated the signs labeling the drains would be required for private developments, in addition to public. He stated that, while there are no specific requirements for design and lettering, similar signs can be found along the drains on Pine Street and other locations. Mr. Bradley stated aesthetics may also be considered with the signage. In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Terayskis stated monitoring and inspection will be needed for grassy swell areas as well. He stated other mechanisms such as the Fire Code will also come into play to regulate the height of the grass among other things. Discussion ensued between an unknown citizen, Mr. Terayskis, and Mr. Bradley regarding the affect of the proposed standards on smaller developments, filtration systems, and the costs associated with inspections and permitting. City Attorney Schwabauer stated there will be little to no impact on single-family residential developments and membranes can also be used. In response to Council Member Johnson, Public Works Director Sandelin stated a basin is included in the Reynolds Ranch and Blue Shield projects. He stated the trend going westward toward the Southwest Gateway project will likely be a series of smaller basins dumping into a larger area. Mr. King briefly discussed the ongoing debate by municipalities and the development community of storm water development standards, specifically with respect to the costs associated with the standards, as well as the monitoring and inspection requirements versus actual best management practices. Continued July 15, 2008 C. (:nmmPnts by Piihlir on Non -Agenda Items None. D. AdinurnmPnt No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 7:41 a.m. ATTEST: Randi Johl City Clerk 2 AGENDA ITEM Z 'I CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TM AGENDA TITLE: Storm Water Development Standard Plans and Inspection Fee MEETING DATE: July 15,2008 (Shirtsleeve Session) PREPARED B Y Public Works Director RECOMMENDEDACTION: Receive information presented by John Terayskis of WGR Southwest on the implementation of the Storm Water Development Standard Plans as required by the State Water Resources Control Board and on setting the inspection fee. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The State Water Resources Control Board issued the City of Lodi Permit WDID No. 51339NP00028 that governs the discharge of storm water runoff. A condition of that permit requires the adoption of development and redevelopment design standards per Attachment No.4 of the State's General Discharge Permit. These standards were scheduled to be in place by May of 2007. The Public Works and Community Development Departments have been working with WGR Southwest, a local firm with expertise in this area, on developing standard plans (DSP) that would comply with the requirements of the State's Attachment No. 4. The DSP addresses all new development and qualifying "significant redevelopment". New development project categories that trigger DSP are defined as commercial developments of over 100,000 square feet, automotive repair shops, retail gasoline outlets, restaurants, parking lots of over 5,000 square feet or 25 spaces, and home subdivisions of more than ten units. Significant redevelopment is defined as creation or addition of at least 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces on an already developed site. Staff has held several meetings with members of the building industry and has met with the Executive Officer of the Building Industry Association (BIA) to discuss these changes. These standards require an annual inspection of the post construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) to confirm they are being maintained and operated correctly. The proposed $122 inspection fee is the same fee charged for construction inspections related to erosion control during construction. The property owner would be billed for each inspection when completed. Should a site require multiple inspections, that expense would also be billed. The inspection fee would be subject to inflationary price adjustments. Subdivision developments would be required to establish an assessment district to address the inspection of post construction BMP's. These properties would be tracked by GIS plotting and recorded with the County Assessor's Office. A copy of the final document is available in the offices of the Public Works and Community Development Departments. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of implementing these required State standardswould be borne bythe developers of all new development and qualifying significant redevelopment. Ongoing annual inspectionswill be billed to the property ownerwhen service is rendered. FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable. W LC.r�(.C./ F. Wally Sarl0el ia - 4AdA A - Public Works Director Preparedby George M. Bradley. Streets 8 Drainage Manager FWSIGMl3ldsg cc: Charles E. S Armley, Jr., water SwAces Manager Curt Juran. Assistant Streets 8 Drainage Manager Dennis Canright. Building Official APPROVED: Blair Kty Manager K:1WPlCOUNCIL�O8tShirtsleeve_StormWtrDevRedevDesignStdsRev.doc 712/2008 State's Requirements • ,. - 1► - BWs Slang Implementation Summary i+ V�71,,g�.-� �YCi'Yy'i 9e � �'• e ,14 k 9 zJtw J J J part of Phase II, the State Water Resources ntrol Board adopted a General Permit for the .charge of Storm Water from Small MS4s (WQ der No. 2003-0005-DWQ) to provide permit ierage for smaller municipalities. Ii was identified by the State as one of these all MS4s and, therefore, prepared a Storm ter Management Plan (SWMP) in January 33. is DSP was prepared in accordance with the juirements contained in the City's MS4 permit tachment 4) and the SWMP. J J J Phase I cities (Stockton, the Port of Stockton, ramento) and many Phase II cities (San quin County, Tracy, Lathrop, Manteca) have !ady implemented their version of the DSP. relopers who do work in these other cities or :he County have already had to comply with se regulations for, in some cases, several rs. Lodi's DSP Calendar of Events 006- State required the DSP to be in place and enforced by May 2007. 6- Staff advises the building community that Attachment 4 requirements are required. 7- Draft DSP prepared and reviewed with Community Development and Public Works. 007- During the Hutchins Street Square Got SWPPP Event, the DSP was presented to the building community invited (HSS) 65 attendees — 5 different companies present. 07- A workshop held by the San Joaquin Storm Water Partnership at Micke Grove presented the DSP requirements to the 49 attendees. Scheduled to present DSP to the Lodi Task Force of the BIA. compare is similar in that it: ie Small MS4 permit Attachment 4 requirements. ame flow and volume data for the design criteria. vi l y on the concepts contained in the CASQA manual and incorporates in Low Impact !nt measures. :ed similar to the Lathrop and Port of Stockton ich have been approved by the RWQCB, and ;P, which is pending submittal to the RWQCB. i L[)L/P3,f plLwldiffer PIL/j,13,f differs with some of the other local plans in imit the developer to a set list of treatment controls. ier criteria beyond flow and volume based, such as ce based. mbody the CASQA information, but cross-references aspects of the DSP that apply to all new construction. to meet the State's MEP standard by incorporating in vels of BMPs (Mandatory Minimum, Regional, Priority 3MPs, and Treatment Control Measures.) Development standards for storm water are design features that are built into the proposed project that either: 1) Prevent pollutants associated with that new development from coming into contact with storm water, or 2) Treat storm water and remove pollutants from the discharge. Veaetated Examples of these include: (Examples are from the California Stormwater Quality Association BMP Handbook for New Development) Design Considerations ■ Tributary Area ■ Slope ■ WaterAvaflabilfty ■ Aesthetics • Vegetated buffer strips • Vegetated swales • Extended detention basins • Wet ponds • Constructed wetlands • Infiltration trenches • Media filter • Retention / irrigation • Alternative and proprietary control measures, including wet vaults, oil/water separators, and vortex separators ign standards apply? he State as Priority ries: • Home subdivisions with 10 housing units or more • Commercial developments (>= 100,000 sq.ft.) • Automotive repair shops • Restaurants • Parking lots exposed to rainfall >5,000 sq. ft. or with >= 25 parking spaces. • Retail Gasoline Outlets ign standards apply? Projects: "Significant Redevelopment" is defined as the creation or addition of at least 5,000 sq. ft. of impervious surfaces on an already developed site. It includes, but is not limited to, expansion of a building footprint, replacement of a structure, replacement of an impervious surface, and land disturbing activities related to structural or impervious surfaces. sign standards apply? ill apply to all • Storm drain labeling • Trash and garbage enclosures • How roof drains are plumbed • Loading docks • Vehicle and equipment maintenance and washing areas • Swimming pool and fountain filters • Sample boxes ign standards apply? But, they do not, apply to existing properties unless that property has "significant redevelopment". BMPs in the context of Lodi's storm IJ J water Development Standards Plan are the design measures that are included in a project to prevent storm 4anii : - f l t I"I f water from being contaminated or to treat contaminated water. They vary in complexity from: age To Complex Filtration No oUMP,7NG_ systems A HS T ) ER � ity of Lodi has chosen to use ROMPalifornia Stormwater Quality md iation (CASQA) Handbooks as 4est rence for the BMPs. Storinyyater Be st Se Califa r'tAexcellent m;a Stormw �an��emelli Pracfice(p�{,� 9uidan e to w. t, M u,�IP SQAStorm Geer Qijality Taske storntyvat ra ement Practi ) Harld cO aPdatedaality q. Farce cammunit ce Hand k3 Practi and exPan saciatian �SWTFj in y since the, b°oks pa about he standard tlea set of four B S l m 20d3 The S eQ iblicati � pr°` ded eit CIF(}h'.lrl STwebsite. effectiveness nd�MPscF t am ant of ak arnes ASS n by tCalifnmi 1 of ba s 2dd3 CA me the �4'.1T Click or addonalnawledge he d i7andbaaks rPublished an cdurfl h' an the links be/c?w ffaT" sine fleet the carr n*;a sr °n• Pleas e the early New D.., `""e uros 'anon {Cassa. T h;.� �.Edsite has been Dd_ , _ and dawnload the in e sit the C s my mailing a Click this ll c©mPleted I C}rc►ef F �apr nk t° Purchase OR °rm with by —C1-_dit Payment I'v Requirements: Geographic Specific BMPs Minimum KI d C 0 n t r 0 1 mum BMPs. • Are required for all parties subject to the -ctivity Specific DSP BMPs • Are basic pollution prevention or simple Geographic control practices that are universally Specific BMPskk applicable BAUrt., 40 • Are minimum BMPs based on the location of the facility and the sensitivities of that location • Areas that drain straight to the Mokelumne River require more controls than those that flow to a drainage basin. W-S�ecipc BMPs. • Are treatment control BMPs required for all applicable developments • State of California has identified types of development requiring treatment controls Activity Specific BMPs Pollutant Category of Concern T i c (B U New Development Project Category E o m xs `� o � 0) p E � �+ U X U (n z 2 O H m cess: Initial Project Receipt and Review • Building Permits • Tenant Improvements • Remodels Public Works and/or the Engineering Division review ' the Development Standards Plan submitted by developer to determine that it incorporates all of the required BMPs; addresses the appropriate potential pollutants; and is adequately designed and sized. Public Works will then communicate its approval or need for revision to PUBLIC WORKS the Planning or Building Division. Summary of the City of Lodi's Development Standards Plan • Initiated by the developer during the design phase or as a result of mitigation measures identified during the CEQA review. • Implemented during City of Lodi's Plan Check Process. • Identifies minimum, drainage zone specific, and activity specific best management practices (BMPs). • Incorporates the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) approved design standards and mitigation measures identified during the CEQA review. • Involves Lodi Public Works and Community Development Departments. • Integrates Lodi's overall Storm Water Management Plan. t4.ytr g - Wevelopment Standards Plan «.� n E5� `�o L• 0111 7.7 1[0 IMA,11' A�a7+i � ..rte i,•i. • :� ... � , -.__ • - '•'may} 'S� '' ^' i o-: J�.,yy li'�I• _ f n :�v}`' :A..7 .... kk +',N ±�_5;�y��_fyt!I} ys+'.1� •F..� �: .�vr - r 'fV - : r'r+�: '���'� .f rk�.. . '!r: �'J- 4 !]Y _ :�'' �'r�. `'tii4 t r� , �'`'',±'• k7,y � - � _ ti i� L- }} : ,,t � �. •- }� ys,,it�'r ':1�,•yx �..`:. iA �-, 1 :%:.� 1 :I `� +J-�- .qra,, �. aT �' ��. a` -`f � }!..i '•iaw ,�. •'�'F�.%!74 .'� 7 � f .' • �r.: �1 - * ti'' � L 7'1 . i I j �J*-.:% ' 4+'�`'•` a �1i5` 1' ,w;J,r•��'..e .'..,, } _ss•.•'+ts}Y:r;r�=,�: ¢ +_ "u•�.Y. • � r. .1:.'•r ,. �'' ..T'. � 5^ Jf��:� v �_ � 'C.N�I :__ •� - }Lg'V y,V+�:���±SS.r I +f �Cu 41. • Y4- 1'� h ':ate - 4 •�A�lx'S4- �•.r� ''`�i:'"'- QK'' �j � "� qq�4 � •Y �' • n5ti'•- �..{c1�+ r 4, _ .�p�.tr,��y.,'.� ,,t l +,;, +may, - -�•y '.7`..�.. .'q�' ,fJ* '.� _`�•. — +I - N,,,,, - J� _ 1 - .. a� 5. "k 'y. Y : �: T.�; } � S%i%, r • _ =X � i�'. � - _ a • '•' �1M1 �. - - _ ry f K vr'. �T1_1'� T 4 I ,1 ..1 '� * !� !! �'.r � _ �'` �•Ly • .: � _ LLL YJ t ' n v�SL.'tLJr..M. •... 1'� '1 n.�:a, .. .. .,, •Y,L} — � -- �qi':;,j�'• ,:,-r.+.:rt .`,, �y'�� 1 * i�� �;�tf.L.l .. = ='o -•7j . +ti .,f, '?�' � : '. y .a r �' •.���r.' tl '. li_ �'•1f+a�+ •, �Fi�. �� .��'4�'•f': "'' _ ;k aa•c' ,� • _ I ,{i +%•. �'. -:,,, ..�,t�y .y Wil'.} i._ .f�'�"'+ _ ...i I `� _ �sL ' tiG.� - tY• /-.:l,r."..A 1-., •, - ���'�Y�'FLr`.y � ..�y■��� - 3•� `�'_ .y�,. .}ayh:;j .!. +��vcinW�' .rJ '�' - �1�`�Yy'� �.U,.� +_c.<'r. j} �Srk � LI,�� �,s `iii}-., ��91 lr'.�L¢�F/�'� •� ',i= �� .�• �ti;i wY; _ : _ J Y '}' F �i .' :4r1r, �I -� l • •'+ =." ` s '� : >.iil. r.a _., air _ '� �� I��'•'�,'k�''_ �' . . ' Yi` F J i F ,��1�� iryL,�. �}.•- _,^j-��t�''r�'. �I:J' :�,*•� L� '�;�� � .. ^'I• r4 Ak.•_ . _ -a�. z.s. ., '! '��,:�:}.=°•5'.}��� r xs''r�f�."1 . 'P r` '�':"Yrr-,:.�,�TM,�� lu��t - .. ••I' � •� ;,_�`: !r�..•. -.� :fir ;�.� -;'f•'L }� °•ti'� -- ly�'�` •:r,•.-�,_-_ L:•� - �� fi• yrs. �Iwc.Vs�•-:�,.;�-''� ',,. .`J%• �. _;� .rr C:5? {,fir� ,f +t F,• x: �r - - :�-,<.7•�f{ }9 4 �r ��.�. F� Y}..: + .e _ f.'i. Y �� :' ''��:E'::i'. ��. ]e ���'` �vs -, � • �� �rL'.:.yfl, +c �x4S�... - f� VN �- �' `_ •:_ '''{'•' Yt�- �L� .'>. . r r ::r ':L'• ti.. `�' h ti -+ryc �•,�} III �' ''- "• - ._ 4.Yr'itya _ •v /r 'cr 1.'"Vrij4v. y...•„ •_}. ..•,� i""1^� y ,L 1; L�_ _ •, '✓'�f L r +'S'•a 4};.�flli �}' + t',�� ^,_ ����v ' �••• /� I •,L 7�-d(' ;' 1 4+1_ • } x' .7kF �:: M1F. 4• i. '� a r' J! Rust } I .. :�L jJ, �' t ,.1, 1._r +�.N _1... _v a ,.. ,}+T+CJ• _" � ��.Y''�1F�t '. rTr' '��~ �I� �4'•' -�' —__ I ,i �L �Qk-'.4;.. ' .,+r,`,, . �' •','t ia'a_ Y"ff {, � i.� l.: .r ._1 J..:7.y �r;� ',� r �, _x } . r,_I�... _ - S iv.3r. tom'. - '��'{ - .so, z -s ; �. ,YL,. k NJ �.',.: !J. '-• ;':'. ' +� r';'b s�ia.t V •-' 'y tip" � - '�.. * ` L:_r r _ yY�:? ±'t' ,+� ...4'r "7•: x.,ti.. K+.. I �, c-: ^' 4ti �rvt � y4 _. - �,�'.. _Y-':- _,,}ki '�;4. JF."v7.} tom.. r:d 1 ;r .k, v. �� �`i■ — - 'h � � : t�� � Y� ."�_ h. .. •-�.ri �;,..'_" � _ :.: h. L' '� 'fir . � . �.g ` °'° :.," _r s:_ x? iK_':. si -':' .' •::=•` J s t '� }h `d::, .i' �� '' I Soot' h_ •• .lr xt' �' 1' :� _ j'�.'o-� ff, „ :.�.�•'�. y��` a ST,��aL _ ti.•k�y. 7 .y Lr�tT-+a �- IC '4 '4 `J+ /� - .. F.�+ - - � 1 L If "*'° �•'�7d1. �_� �''�� _ I`Yi � I '��� J T',? E.'#,���F••V ..•'._•',� -, ,. - t Jr a:_}��Fe.lr � ,Y. f'aJc s'' i Y Iw � " I,, 1 ..dal.:.._ 'r �. .-- � ` .�� � .Y,• LI �; ' M1 R'iY 7,r-.• L :x,�A L .: r�bt; '_ r,'!� .ra','R,�.I W:�A•! .T_'-,�.' - _7 y'' :•- �- — titulpi' mo �,� .f Y �"�.� 4- :ti.:; }. - '•';t'Si •}. ,fit ,! r �.� .'r" .. � .1 �.1 �� _w � ,_f r r- ��-,�:::a'�hY._y4..: F'�titi•''Yk:s°' ,�� � '��: y. - -�• �o- 1�� i. ''.:' + ,•' •+�'•',• �J+,Yr; �L�i... ,Sr.4•- ,.' ti� �- •J,- . '�• �v. Ste: S � : h .- � : L }�'•,.t•. +-:. �ti}.7 ' • � r ' 4K> .. � �... 3 .'•' v.�r`_ .:_ _ 1_5 � ��+til r1 _ , :r y.� r . +1 �vS ,L .,+..'. .� tf,S!'• �II1 N. 'J�:i..rt _ }r}Y.: 3 , I t� � 5•.. a. •ice _ � r ,�i• _ _ ` _ � _ . ��. . � . . 1r.'T_�C hi7VhfY�' J49.}r�T�{s'.R{ i� Y �Y' r t F i I '- b'. �• .f r h �.JI- �:.r;L� y •.k A-1, Kofu 491 12` 41.5 A-2, Beckman 564 16.2 2 60.0 B-1, Vinewood 964 16.0 41.5 B-2, Glaves 450 13.2 31.1 Pumped/flows to Mokelumne R. C-1 Approx. 591 Pumped/flows to the Mokelumne R. C-2, Pixley Approx. 500 27.3 128.7 D, Salas 790 21.0 94.0 E, Peterson 340 20.9 61.0 Pumped/flows to the Mokelumne R. F (at Kettleman) 30.0 68.5 369 30.0 68.5 F (near Tokay) G (DeBenedetti) 866 46.3 202.0 H (Discharge to 428 Pumped/flows to the River) Mokelumne R. I (Undeveloped) 320 25.0 Total: 1 6,673 1 227.9 1 728.3 1 1