HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - March 4, 2008 SSCITY OF LODI
INFORMAL INFORMATIONAL MEETING
"SHIRTSLEEVE" SESSION
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 2008
An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held Tuesday,
March 4, 2008, commencing at 7:01 a.m.
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Council Members — Hitchcock, Hansen, Johnson, and Katzakian
Absent: Council Members — Mayor Mounce
Also Present: City Manager King, City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Johl
B. TOPIC(S)
B-1 "Regional Housing Needs Assessment Allocation Report"
City Manager King briefly introduced the subject matter of the Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA) Allocation Report.
San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) Executive Director, Andrew Chesley,
provided an overview of the State program and requirements for affordable housing and the
need for some change to assist local governments in meeting the goals.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen, Mr. Chesley stated the professional planners
are made up of community development directors from within the County.
SJCOG Senior Regional Planner, Mike Swearingen, provided a PowerPoint presentation
regarding the RHNA Allocation Report. Specific topics of discussion included an overview of
the report, purpose, statutory objectives, RHNA development committee, methodology in
draft RHNA report, controversial nature of process, what RHNA is and is not, mandated
RHNA schedule, RHNA development in other regions, San Joaquin County RHNA target for
region, sum total based on single cumber for entire State and then divided among the
various counties, City of Lodi methodology and household income distribution numbers,
other RHNA factors, housing unit transfers, incentives for housing element compliance, and
the next steps.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Swearingen confirmed that there was only a
700 unit adjustment in consideration of the foreclosures within the County. Community
Development Director Randy Hatch stated the State sets a specific number for the entire
State and then divides and allocates a portion of that number to each County. Mr. Hatch
stated adjustments are rare because if one jurisdiction receives fewer units then another
must receive more.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Mr. Swearingen stated the weight factor reflects
a one to one ratio for jobs and housing.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen, Mr. Swearingen stated that, although the
housing element is an unfunded mandate, it is important to be compliant by having a
housing element plan because it may affect eligibility for Community Development Block
Grant funds or other programs. Mr. Hatch stated it is also important to show ongoing efforts
and be compliant by receiving the certification from the State for the housing element plan
even though the reality of actual development may differ.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen, Mr. Hatch stated the RHNA program has been
in place since the 1980s. Mr. King discussed the lack of evidence showing improved
affordable housing developments, the need to show parcel availability, penalties and
enforcement associated with non-compliance, and the impact on the General Plan with
respect to the amount of land that is mailable in inventory regardless of the City's 2%
growth rate.
Continued March 4, 2008
A brief discussion ensued between Council Member Johnson and Mr. King regarding similar
concerns with Tracy that too much land is shown in the General Plan and the debate of
signing units based on housing, jobs, and population.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen, Mr. Swearingen and Mr. King confirmed that
open land identified in the General Plan is not only limited to affordable housing
development.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Mr. Swearingen stated that the methodology for
the County is similar to that used in the last RHNA process. He also confirmed that, while
each region may have a different methodology based on their community's characteristics,
they all have a tie in with jobs and population. Mr. Hatch stated that the basic components
of any methodology are set by the State and other regions may be a bit more sophisticated
with their housing breakdown. A brief discussion ensued between Council Member
Hitchcock and Mr. Hatch regarding the fallacy of the jobs, housing, and population balance
and the ratio of one to one.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Mr. Chesley stated one reason for not using a
more sophisticated methodology is the difficulty it creates with staff administering the
process and assessing compliance. He stated it might be appropriate to consider past
inequities in affordable housing within the County as a factor.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen, Mr. Swearingen stated Lodi is the only city
that does not show a negative difference on income from previous allocation as listed in
Attachment A because the information is based on historical data, including economic
development. He stated the output numbers from the formula are not set in stone.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Mr. Swearingen stated there is benefit for a
bedroom community under this formula. He stated the draft methodology will be evaluated
by the Committee after the public comment period ends and suggestions are provided by
the communities.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen, Mr. Swearingen confirmed that for Lodi's
numbers to go down, another jurisdiction's number would need to rise. Mr. Hatch stated
jobs information from the Regional Transportation Plan is the primary factor that is driving
the numbers. He stated SJCOG is working with the University of Pacific to obtain more
current and accurate data regarding the same.
Discussion ensued between Council Member Johnson and Mr. Hatch regarding exporting
jobs over the Altamont Pass, the proposition that employees do not necessarily equal jobs,
employee tie in with commute and residence, job tie in with geographic location, and
employed residents versus jobs available.
In response to Council Member Johnson, Mr. Hatch stated the Lodi numbers are consistent
with the available data, but it is important to try to obtain more current and accurate data as
SJCOG is attempting to do so with the University of the Pacific.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Mr. Swearingen stated the City's numbers
shown for the low and very low categories are based on median family income data from the
last decennial census and the formula that defines the very low, low, moderate, and above
moderate categories.
Council Member Hitchcock requested a copy of additional data that is available regarding
the methodology and numbers. She also suggested revising the draft methodology based
on her concerns that it is too simple and does not reflect current thinking.
W
Continued March 4, 2008
Mr. Swearingen stated he would be happy to provide the requested information and will
forward the same to staff. He also requested the City provide its concerns to him in writing
so that he may take the same back to the Committee to evaluate the methodology.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen, Mr. Hatch stated the slow growth benefits the
City in the sense that it is factored into the household growth component which is reduced.
Mr. Hatch stated that is only a partial factor, however, and the numbers are primarily being
driven by the job issue.
Mayor Pro Tempore Hansen stated the City will likely provide a written summary of its
concerns and concurred with Council Member Hitchcock regarding her request for
additional data and spreadsheets.
Mr. King stated the item will be brought back to the City Council for consideration and
solidification of its formal position. A brief discussion ensued between Mr. King and SJCOG
representatives regarding the tentative date of April 24, 2008, for final methodology approval
by the SJCOG Board and submission to the State.
In response to Myrna Wetzel, Mr. Hatch stated the housing element is a process driven by
the State Legislature.
C. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
None.
D. ADJOURNMENT
No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 8:23 a.m.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl
City Clerk
D'
AG ENDA ITEM &I
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
1M
AGENDA TITLE: Regional Housing Needs Assessment Allocation Report
MEETING DATE: March 4,2008
PREPARED B Y Community Development Department
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive report on the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
assessments for San Joaquin County and, more specifically, the city
of Lodi, from Andrew Chesley, Executive Directorof the San
Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG).
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In compliance with the state schedule for housing element updates
(Gov. Code Section 65588), the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has
notified SJCOG that the housing unit need in San Joaquin County for the period of 2007-2014 is a total of
38,220 housing units. HCD uses 2000 Census data to distribute those regional housing needs across
four income categories: very low, low, moderate, and above moderate. It should be noted that originally
HCD assigned a higher number of housing units needed in the County. SJCOG appealed this original
number and the County number of 38,220 represents this lower number.
SJCOG, in turn, is required to distribute those percentages and corresponding number of housing units to
local jurisdictions countywide. These allocations are not a forecast of building or housing permits that
local agencies are required to build, but are more of a goal or target for jurisdictions to strive for as they
prepare their updated housing element. Indeed, Section 65584 recognizes that future housing
production may not equal the housing need established for planning purposes. Updated housing
elements in San Joaquin County are to be submitted to HCD by August 31, 2009.
As part of the allocation process to local jurisdictions, SJCOG has developed a Draft Methodologyfor
Allocation to Local Jurisdictions. The State statute requires that SJCOG take into consideration, among
other things, market demand for housing, employment opportunities, the availability of suitable housing
sites and public facilities, commuting patterns, the type and tenure of housing need, and farm worker
housing need. However, by law, SJCOG may not consider local constraints that may prevent
jurisdictions from receiving a "fair share" allocation of housing units. These constraints could include
local growth control or sewer and water infrastructure capacity. The statute also requires that the
allocation not perpetuate the concentration of low income housing within any jurisdiction in the region.
Copies of all of the SJCOG documents related to that Drat7 Methodology and the proposed allocations
are attached to this staff report. It should be noted that SJCOG is proposing to use the same
methodology for this current round of Housing Needs Allocation for the period 2007 — 2014, as was used
for the last round (2001 — 2007).
• Attachment A —Year 2007-2014 RHNA & Year 2001-2008 RHNA
• Attachment B — RHNA Draft Methodology
• Attachment C — RHNA Key Factors
• Attachment D — RHNA Plan FAQ
APPROVED:
Blair King, City Manager
• Attachment E — RHNATransfer Limitations
• Attachment F — SJCOG Feb'08 Staff Report re: RHNA Process Updates
• Attachment G —State HCD letterto SJCOG (wl attachments) re: Regional Housing Needs
Determination
FISCAL IMPACT: NIA
FUNDING AVAILABLE: NIA q
LLV
f� R dy tch
C munity Development Director
Attachments
Attachment A
Year 2007 - 2014 RHNA by Income Category
Escalon
Very Low
107
Low
68
Moderate Above Moderate
84
220
TOTALS Percentage
480
Difference
1%
from Previous
Allocation
0%
Lathrop
172
130
177
463
941
2%
0%
Lodi
1,184
794
889
1,963
4,830
13%
2%
Manteca
648
484
628
1,390
3,150
8%
-1%
Ripon
120
86
111
320
638
2%
-1%
Stockton
3,946
2,376
2,643
5,582
14,547
38%
-8%
Tracy
931
650
851
2,693
5,126
13%
-3%
Sj County
Total
2,038
9,146
1,359
5,947
1,590
6,974
3,521
16,152
8,509
38,220
22%
100"/o
11%
Year 2001- 2008 RHNA by Income Category
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
TOTALS
Percentage
Escalon
109
78
84
219
491
1%
Lathrop
188
158
189
494
1,029
3%
Lodi
990
664
738
1,622
4,014
10%
Manteca
785
651
745
1,643
3,823
10%
Ripon
228
181
206
593
1,208
3%
Stockton
4,934
2,972
3,277
6,897
18,081
46%
Tracy
1,178
914
1,054
3,323
6,469
16%
§j Coun
1,085
714
829
1 1,828
1 4,456
1 11%
Attachment B
SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
(SJCOG)
REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION
(RHNA)
DRAFT METHODOLOGY
(February 1, 2008)
This document describes SJCOG's the Draft Methodology proposed to be used for the San Joaquin County RHNA
process. The public review and comment period for the Draft Methodology will take place from February 6, 2008
through April 9, 2008. For additional information on the RHNA process, please see the FAQ se_ction of the SJCOG
website.
PROPOSED RHNA METHODOLOGY
The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) notified the SJCOG on August
31, 2007 that the housing unit needs for the period of 2007-2014 is 38,220. The HCD approach did not
account for the historic foreclosure rate the region of San Joaquin County is experiencing. Based on
preliminary analysis provided to HCD by from SJCOG, a calculation was employed to take in account
this fact which resulted in lowering the original HCD housing target number from 39,071 to 38,220.
HCD distributed the housing units among the four household income categories using historic rates of
household formation. The household income category definitions that units are distributed include:
Very Low: Income not exceeding 50 % median family income in the county
Low: Income between 50% and 80% of median family income
Moderate: Income between 80% and 120% of median family income
Above Moderate: Income above 120% of median family income
Data from the 2000 census was used by HCD for the regional housing distribution across the income
categories. For example, census data shows that 24% of the households in San Joaquin County had very
low incomes based on a regional household income of $41,282. Therefore 24% of the housing units
allocated for the period must be accessible to households in this income category. Based on this
approach, the region's RHNA for the period of January 2007 through June 30, 2014 across the income
categories is as follows:
INCOME CATEGORY HOUSING UNIT NEED PERCENT
Very Low
9,314
24%
Low
Moderate
6,032
6,972
16%
18%
Above Moderate
15,902
42%
TOTAL
38,220
100%
SJCOG must maintain these percentages and the corresponding number of units on a countywide basis as
it allocates units to the local jurisdictions.
It is important to note that the housing units to be allocated are not a forecast of building or housing
permits, nor are local agencies responsible for constructing housing. The numbers are goal targets and are
not meant to match, and often exceed anticipated growth in housing units.
Attachment B
A proposed Draft Methodology for Allocation to Local Jurisdictions has been prepared by SJCOG based
upon the SJCOG Board -adopted methodology used in the previous RHNA planning period (2001-2007).
The goal of the methodology is to promote a jobs\housing balance by equally weighting the HCD housing
allocation to jurisdictions based on where employment growth is expected to occur in the county and
where household growth is expected to occur. Employment growth estimates were derived from the
regionally adopted 2007 Regional Transportation Plan and housing estimates were derived from the State
Department of Finance projections. SJCOG's methodology also requires each jurisdiction to move 50%
of the way towards the regional average of each household income category over the 2007-2014 periods
to avoid skewing low income units in any one jurisdiction.
Minor manual adjustments are expected to be employed to the local allocations resulting from the formula
methodology to better match the countywide household income percentages and units distributed by
HCD. In addition, housing allocations by jurisdiction may be refined due to the latitude, prescribed in
state statute, which allows an incorporated city the ability to assume a portion of the unincorporated areas
housing allocation. Other modifications to the final R14NA may result based on SJCOG's analysis of the
following key factors:
• Each jurisdiction's existing and projected jobs / housing relationship;
• Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state law, regulations or regulatory
actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by service providers other than the local
jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary infrastructure for additional
development during the planning period;
• The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential use, the
availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and increased residential
densities, as well as the potential for increased residential development under alternative zoning
ordinance and land use restrictions;
• Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing state/federal programs designed
to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural resources on a long-term basis;
• Policies to preserve prime agricultural land within an unincorporated area;
• Changes in a jurisdiction's Sphere of Influence that may occur during the RHNA planning period;
• Distribution of household growth assumed for a comparable period in the Regional Transportation
Plan and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and existing transportation
infrastructure;
• Market demand for housing;
• Housing needs of farm workers; and
• Other factors that may affect growth.
By state statute, SJCOG is not allowed to consider local constraints that may prevent jurisdictions from
receiving a "fair share" allocation of housing units. These constraints include local growth ordinances.
The statute also requires that the allocation not perpetuate the concentration of low income housing in any
jurisdiction within the region.
Persons with questions regarding the housing needs allocation and allocation process may contact
Michael A. Swearingen, Senior Regional Planner at (209) 468-3913.
Attachment C
REGIONAL ROUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION
KEY FACTORS
In developing the methodology to establish the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RIINA) for
the 2007-2014 planning period, SJCOG staff will evaluate key factors that may affect growth
during this period, including:
• Each jurisdiction's existing and projected jobs/ housing relationship;
• Lack of capacity for sewer or water service due to federal or state law, regulations or
regulatory actions, or supply and distribution decisions made by service providers other
than the local jurisdiction that preclude the jurisdiction from providing necessary
infrastructure for additional development during the planning period;
• The availability of land suitable for urban development or for conversion to residential
use, the availability of underutilized land, and opportunities for infill development and
increased residential densities, as well as the potential for increased residential
development under alternative zoning ordinance and land use restrictions;
• Lands preserved or protected from urban development under existing state/federal
programs designed to protect open space, farmland, environmental habitats, and natural
resources on a long -tern basis;
• Policies to preserve prime agricultural land within an unincorporated area;
• Changes in a jurisdiction's Sphere of Influence that may occur during the RHNA
planning period;
• Distribution of household growth assumed for a comparable period in the Regional
Transportation Plan and opportunities to maximize the use of public transportation and
existing transportation infrastructure;
• Market demand for housing;
• Housing needs of farm workers; and
0 Other factors that may affect growth.
Attachment D
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
1. What is the Regional blousing Needs Plan (RIINP) and Regional Housing bleeds
Allocation (RII.NA)?
The Regional Housing Needs Allocation Plan (RHNP) allocates to SJCOG cities and counties
their "fair share" of the region's projected housing needs. The SJCOG Board of Directors
must adopt an update of the plan every five years. Each city and county in the RI INAP will
receive a Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RI -INA) of total number of housing units that it
must plan for within a 7.5 year time period. Within the total number of units, allocations are
also made for the number of units within four economic categories: very low, low, and
moderate and above moderate incomes.
2. What is ` ,X.'OG's role in the RHNAP`>
State law mandates that council of governments develop the RHNP. SJCOG is lead agency in
developing the RHNP for the seven incorporated cities and the unincorporated area that it
serves. It is SJCOG's responsibility to coordinate with the California Department of Housing
and Community Development (HCD) to determine a regional housing needs projection. Then
SJCOG will allocate the share each jurisdiction will receive.
3. What time period does the RHNAP cover?
The update of the RHNP that SJCOG is undertaking covers the 7.5 year period from January
1, 2007 through June 30, 2014. However, on May 24, 2007, in order to accommodate the
Department of Finance's July 2007 update of the State's population projections, HCD
extended the RHNA planning period through August 31, 2014.
4. Are there any State Law changes in the R1INAP process?
The Regional Housing Needs Determination (REND), a complex, state -mandated housing process
is impacted by three new housing laws: AB 2158, AB 2348, and SB 1818. These laws affect the
housing need allocation methodology, site selection, and density bonuses as follows:
• AB 2158 allows for increased input from local jurisdictions into the RHND methodology and
the regional planning process, including the creation of sub -regional entities
• AB 2348 is aimed at providing housing developers with greater certainty in the development
process
• SB 1818 changes the existing density bonus laws to provide developers with more incentives
to include affordable housing units in their projects.
5. What is the overall housing needs allocation for the region?
HCD issued a Regional Housing Needs Determination of 38,220 dwelling units to the region
from 2007-2014. This number was developed by the California Department of Finance and
issued in August 2007 through the California Housing and Community Development
Department. Subcategory allocations by economic category for the region are as follows:
Attachment D
® Very low income (less than 50% median household income [MFI]): 9,314 or 24%
® Low Income (50 to 80% MFI) 6,032 or 16% of total allocation
® Moderate (80 to 120% MFI) 6,972 or 18%
® Above Moderate (above 120% MFI) 15,902 or 42%
The allocation by HCD associated with the previous RHNA plan was 39,569 housing units.
5. What is the overa.il timeline fo►- the developitient of the Rl INP?
There are a number of requirements in state law that SJCOG will need to perform before the
SJCOG Board of Directors can adopt the updated RHNAP. In general, the time lines are as
follows:
SJCOG must develop and adopt a methodology for the allocation. The SJCOG Board of
Directors needs to adopt the methodology by March of 2008.
Written public comments requesting a revision to the draft allocations will be due by May 23,
2008.
On June 26, 2008, the SJCOG Board will hold a hearing on the appeals.
On July 24, 2008, the SJCOG Board will hold a public hearing and determine whether to
adopt the RHNAP, which is the document encompassing the Regional Housing Needs
Allocation.
Cities and the County of San Joaquin will have until August 31, 2009 to adopt their housing
elements, which identify how each will address its housing allocation during the RHNAP
timeframe.
6. What is the current status of the REINA?
SJCOG staff negotiated with HCD to reduce the allocation due to the high incidence of
home foreclosures.
SJCOG received the Regional Housing Need Determination of 38,220 housing units in
September 2007.
First major step is to arrive at a consensus with jurisdictions regarding the methodology
to be used to calculate the housing unit distribution.
7. )Flow have local governments and interested parties been involved or how can they Met
involved in the development of the R11NA ?
The SJCOG RHNAP Advisory Committee meetings are the main forum for local government
staff to hear and discuss updates in the RHNAP process. This committee is comprised of the
Planning Directors and/or their assigned staff and is primarily a technical planning
committee. All are welcome to attend these meetings, but the chairs at the table are reserved
first for Planning Directors or their designee
8. Can S,1COG provide notice of meetings with other stakeholder groups?
SJCOG staff will inform local governments of updates to other stakeholder groups (e.g.,
development industry, affordable housing advocates, and neighborhood groups) as it seems
Attachment D
appropriate. Staff will use its judgment when to invite local governments to discuss the
RHNAP topics depending on the purpose of the meeting, the audience, and other factors.
9. Call SJC.'OG provide an online forum for discussion so other .jiirisdictit�ns can see what
comments it is receiving?
Once product is developed, anyone may go the SJCOG website for an online discussion about
any issue regarding the RHNA. SJCOG jurisdictions and others may also provide written
comments on the RHNAP methodology for the public record. Comments will be forwarded to
the SJCOG's RHNAP Advisory Committee and the SJCOG Board of Directors.
11. What does the adopted methodology allocate?
The RHNAP has two parts as required by state law. Part 1 is an allocation of the total number
of housing units to each jurisdiction for which zoning capacity must be provided from
January 1, 2007 through August 31, 2014. This part is referred to as the "overall allocation".
Part 2 is the distribution of the same total number of units among four income categories; the
sum of the housing units within the four categories must add up to the total overall number of
units. Part 2 is referred to as the "income category distribution".
12. Describe how the adopted methodology calculates the overall allocation to each
jurisdiction.
To Be Determined
13. Describe how the adopted methodology allocates units by income category.
To Be Determined
14. Are there situations that SXOG or its local governments have no control over that
could change the .RFINA numbers?
Yes, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is reviewing the suitability of flood levees
throughout the region. If flood zone designations are changed and local jurisdictions receive a
mandate to stop residential development in these areas, the methodology states that SJCOG
will have to reallocate the entire RHNAP, even if this happens after it is adopted.
15. The RHNA addressed planned units, and the RTP has built units. What's the
difference?
The RTP must represent the best estimate of what will actually be built in the region between
2005 and 2030. Within the forecast, there are interim years that lead up to 2030. Each forecast
year shows the placement of the number of units that are projected to be built by the end of
that year. These estimates are based on local governments' General Plans and Specific Plans.
HCD requires cities and counties to show through their Housing Elements how they can
accommodate their projected housing allocation by planning and zoning enough residential
land. The RHNA does not necessarily mean that these zoned residential lands will be built by
end of the RHNP period.
Attachment E
Two types of RHNA Transfers:
1) County to existing city
a. Only a County (until due date of its Housing Element) can transfer a RHNA share
(only to cities within the County), providing ALL of the following is met:
i. Cities agree to accept transfer
ii. County's transfer of very -low and low is proportional to transfer of
moderate and above -moderate RHNA
iii. COG verifies compliance and approves transfer
2) County to new city
a. Only a County (until due date of its Housing Element) can transfer a RHNA share
(only to cities within the County), providing ALL of the following is met:
i. Within 1 year of incorporation
ii. Both governments determine transfer or request COG to make
determination
California Government Code 65584.07
a) During the period between adoption of a final regional housing needs allocation until the due
date of the housing element update pursuant to Section 65588, the council of govermnents, or the
department, whichever assigned the county's share, shall reduce the share of regional housing
needs of a county if all of the following conditions are met:
(1) One or more cities within the county agree to increase its share or their shares in an amount
equivalent to the reduction.
(2) The transfer of shares shall only occur between a county and cities within that county.
(3) The county's share of low-income and very low income housing shall be reduced only in
proportion to the amount by which the county's share of moderate- and above moderate -income
housing is reduced.
(4) The council of governments or the department, whichever assigned the county's share, shall
approve the proposed reduction, if it determines that the conditions set forth in paragraphs (1),
(2), and (3) above have been satisfied. The county and city or cities proposing the transfer shall
submit an analysis of the factors and circumstances, with all supporting data, justifying the
revision to the council of governments or the department. The council of govermnents shall
submit a copy of its decision regarding the proposed reduction to the department.
(b) The county and cities which have executed transfers of regional housing need pursuant to this
section shall amend their housing elements and submit them to the department for review
Attachment E
pursuant to Section 65585. All materials and data used to justify any revision shall be made
available upon request to any interested party within seven days upon payment of reasonable
costs of reproduction unless the costs are waived due to economic hardship. A fee may be
charged to interested parties for any additional costs caused by the amendments made to former
subdivision (c) of Section 65584 that reduced from 45 to 7 days the time within which materials
and data were required to be made available to interested parties.
(c) In the event an incorporation of a new city occurs after the council of govermnents, or the
department for areas with no council of governments, has made its final allocation under this
section, the city and county may reach a mutually acceptable agreement on a revised
determination and report the revision to the council of governments and the department, or to the
department for areas with no council of governments. If the affected parties cannot reach a
mutually acceptable agreement, then either party may request the council of governments, or the
department for areas with no council of governments, to consider the facts, data, and
methodology presented by both parties and make the revised determination.
The revised determination shall be made within one year of the incorporation of the new city
based upon the methodology described in subdivision (a) and shall reallocate a portion of the
affected county's share of regional housing needs to the new city. The revised determination
shall neither reduce the total regional housing needs nor change the previous allocation of the
regional housing needs assigned by the council of governments or the department, where there is
no council of governments, to other cities within the affected county.
Attachment F
2/2008
SJCOG Board
SUBJECT: Regional Housing Needs Allocation:
Process Updates
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Information Only
DISCUSSION:
BACKGROUND
San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) is mandated by California government code
section 65584 to determine the Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) for its local
jurisdictions for the years 2007-2014. By state law, the allocation must be received by the
California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by August 31, 2008.
Local jurisdictions are required to incorporate the allocation into an updated general plan housing
element, which must be submitted to HCD by August 31, 2009. The last time a housing needs
allocation was adopted by the SJCOG Board was in 2002. It covered the 2001-2007 planning
period.
The law requires, as the first step in the RHNA process, that HCD project housing construction
needs at the regional level for the 2007-2014 time period. HCD utilizes population and
employment projections from the SJCOG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the most recent
projections (in this case, July 2007) by the California Department of Finance (DOF) as the basis of
their housing need determination for SJC. In addition, HCD uses Census data to distribute housing
units among various income levels. The housing construction needs for San Joaquin County (SJC),
as determined by HCD, are shown on the next page in Table 1.
Once the housing need determination is made by HCD, SJCOG is mandated to allocate the
determination to the municipalities and unincorporated areas within the region. Specifically,
SJCOG is required to allocate the HCD determination by household income category.
RHNA ALLOCATION
The units to be allocated as part of SJCOG's final RHNA Plan are not a forecast of building or
housing permits, nor are local agencies responsible for constructing housing. The numbers HCD
submits to SJCOG are "goal numbers" and are not meant to match, and often exceed, anticipated
growth in housing units.
For the final RHNA plan, the statute requires that SJCOG take into consideration, among other
things, the market demand for housing, employment opportunities, the availability of suitable
housing sites and public facilities, commuting patterns, the type and tenure of housing need, and
farm worker housing needs. However, by state law, SJCOG may not consider local constraints
that may prevent jurisdictions from receiving a "fair share" allocation of housing units. These
Attachment F
constraints could include local growth control ordinances and sewer and water infrastructure
capacity. The statute also requires that the allocation not perpetuate the concentration of low
income housing within any jurisdiction in the region.
NEXT STEPS
The next step in the process is for SJCOG staff to develop a methodological tool for allocating the
HCD determination. An advisory committee, consisting of members from local jurisdictions and
partnering agencies, was formed in November 2007 to provide guidance and expertise in the
development of the RHNA methodology. Staff has met with the committee three times since
November and, as a result, has produced a draft methodology for the current R14NA cycle.
The draft methodology was submitted for public comment and review by local jurisdictions on
February 1St, 2008. The 60 -day public comment period will conclude with a public hearing on
April 10, 2008. Member agencies and local jurisdictions are encouraged to provide feedback and
input regarding the draft methodology during the public comment period. It is anticipated that
there will be adjustments and modifications made to the draft methodology based on input
received during the comment period and other statutory factors. Once completed, the final RHNA
methodology will be submitted for approval to the SCJOG Board of Directors at the April 24, 2008
meeting.
TIMELINE
A summary of the key dates and deliverables for the current RHNA planning period are listed
below:
• Draft Methodology Public Comment Period—February l't, 2008 through April 9"', 2008
• Submit final RHNA Methodology to SJCOG Board for review and approval—April 24"',
2008
• SJCOG issues Draft Allocation Numbers for 60 -day Public Comment and Appeal
Period—April 28th, 2008 through June 27t', 2008
• SJCOG decides appeals, proposes Final RHNA Plan for SJC—June 30"', 2008 through
August 21St, 2008
• Public hearing and Adoption by SJCOG Board of Directors—August 21St, 2008
• Submit Adopted RHNA Plan to HCD for review and approval—by August 31St, 2008
Prepared by: Anthony M Zepeda, Associate Regional Planner
M.• ISTAFFRP7120MFEBRUARY WARDIRNNA. Update. doc
Attachment F
California Department of Housing and Community Development
2007-2014 Regional Housing Need Determination
San Joaquin County
Income Category Housing Unit Need Percent
Very Low 9,314 24
Low 6,032 16
Moderate 6,972 18
Above Moderate 15,902 42
Total 38,220 100%
Attachment F
REGIONAL
117 - 2014 PLANNING PERIOD
SCHEDULE / DELIVERABLES
Preparation of Methodology Dec 2007 — Jan 2008
• RHNA Advisory Committee 11/30/07
• Outreach to Local Jurisdictions 12/01/07 — 12/31/07
o Request Data/Develop Methodology
• Issue Proposed Methodology 02/01/08
Review of Methodology Jan 2008 — Apr 2008
• Public Comment Period (60 Days) 02/01/08 — 04/09/08
• Public Hearing about Proposed Methodology 04/10/08
• Review of Final Methodology by Advisory Committee 04/07/08 — 04/17/08
• Present Final Methodology to SJCOG Board for Adoption 04/24/08
Develop Draft RHNA Plan Apr 2008.— July 2008
• SJCOG issues Draft Allocation Numbers 04/25/08
Ap eals Process (60 days) April 2008.— July 2008
• Local Jurisdictions may request revisions 04/28/08 — 06/27/08
• SJCOG responds to revision requests 04/28/08 — 06/27/08
• Public Comment about appeals 04/28/08 — 06/27/08
• SJCOG decides appeals and proposes Final RHNA Plan 06/30/08 — 07/11/08
Preparation and Adoption of Final RHNA Plan July 2008 — Aug 2008
• SJCOG issues Final RHNA Plan 07/15/08
Public Hearing and Adoption by SJCOG Board of Directors 08/21/08
Submit Adopted RHNA Plan to HCD 08/25/08
*Due Date for Jurisdictions to Update their Housing Needs Element August 31,'2009
I Attachment G
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
1800 Third Street, Suite 430
P. O. Box 952053
Sacramento, CA 94252-2053
(916) 323-3177
FAX (916) 327-2643
August 31, 2007
Mr. Andrew Chesley, Executive Director
San Joaquin Council of Governments
555 E. Weber Avenue
Stockton. CA 95202
Dear Mr. Chesley:
RC MINIVEj1
SEP ° 42007
RE: Regional Housing Needs Determination
San JoaquiA
cotmcu of ..-.-wernment,
This letter transmits the Regional Housing Needs Determination for San Joaquin Council of
Governments (SJCOG) region pursuant to Government Code Section 65584. 01 of State
housing element law. As you are aware, local governments play a critical role in advancing
the State's housing goals through the update of their general plan housing elements. The
determination of regional housing need is to be used for development of a regional housing
need allocation plan (RHNP) to update housing elements.
On May 24, 2007, the Department of Housing and Community Development (Department)
notified you that it extended the due date for jurisdictions to update their housing elements
from June 30, 2009 to August 31, 2009. This extension was necessary to accommodate
the Department of Finance's July 2007 update of the State's population projections.
The Department completed its consultation process after Linda Wheaton and Glen
Campora held an initial consultation meeting with Dana Cowell, Mike Swearingen and
Anthony Zepeda on July 17, 2007. At this meeting, the Department provided a copy of its
draft determination of the regional housing need for San Joaquin County. In addition, a
briefing was given on applicable statutory requirements and changes relating to
development of the distribution of the allocation and factors to be considered in the
methodology of the RHNP. The Department informed representatives of the opportunity to
provide comments and information for the Department to consider in finalizing its
determination.
The determination, shown on Attachment 1, represents the final determination of minimum
housing need for SJCOG to be allocated among cities and counties in the RHNP for the
planning period 2007 — 2014. The determination represents a revision of the Department's
initial draft determination, based upon consideration of factors discussed in phone
conversations with SJCOG staff subsequent to the July 17th consultation meeting and
in an August 31 letter.
Attachment G
Mr. Andrew Chesley, Executive Director
Page 2
Please note that the RHNP is required to be consistent with the following objectives, as set
forth in more detail in statute (Section 65584(d)):
(1) Increasing the housing supply and the mix of housing types, tenure, and affordability;
(2) Promoting infill development and socioeconomic equity, protection of environmental and
agricultural resources, and encouragement of efficient development patterns;
(3) Promoting an improved intraregional relationship between jobs and housing; and
(4) Balancing the distribution of households by income category.
Each jurisdiction must be allocated a share of housing need, by income category, to plan to
accommodate in updating their housing elements by August 31, 2009. Regarding local
government's regional housing need allocation, jurisdictions may take credit for housing
units permitted since the January 2007 baseline of the housing element planning period that
ends August 31, 2014,
Government Code Section 65584.01(d)(1) allows 30 days from the date of this letter to file
an objection and proposed alternative to the Department's determination based only on
demographic issues set forth in the statute. Pursuant to Government Code Section
65584.05 (h), the RHNP is to be submitted to the Department for review within 60 days of
adoption by the council of governments. The Department is required to determine whether
the RHNP is consistent with the regional housing need determination made by the
Department (conveyed by this letter) and is authorized to revise the RHNP to obtain this
consistency,
The Department appreciates the important role your organization plays in the regional housing
needs process and the cooperation provided by representatives. Staff is available to further
assist development and implementation of the RHNP and updates of the housing elements.
For assistance, please contact Glen Campora, of our office, at (916) 327-2640.
Sincerely,
I
Cathy . Creswell
Deputy Director
Enclosures
Attachment G
Attachment 1
San Joaquin County
Regional Housing Need Determination
For the Period January 2007 through June 30, 2014
Housing Unit
Income Category Need Percent
Very Low 9,314 24
Low 6,032 16
Moderate 6,972 18
Above Moderate 15,902 42
Total 38,220 100%
Attachment G
Attachment 2
San Joaquin County: Explanation of Regional Housing Need Determination
For the Period January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2014
Methodology, Assumptions, and Data Sources Used to Project Housing Unit Need:
1. Household (HH) growth (37,389) was derived by subtracting 1/1/2007 "Occupied Housing
Units" (215,127) from 6/30/2014 "Projected Households" (252,516). The Demographic
Research Unit of the California Department of Finance (DOF) prepares these official estimates
and projections last updated July 2007 (Population Projections by Race/Ethnicity, Gender and
Age for California and Its Counties 2000-2050, July 2007). For planning period purposes, DOF
provides the Department projections of HH population and projected number of households.
The HH population projection reflects the population housed (occupied housing units) and
excludes the group quarters population. Occupied housing units are estimated by DOF in its
E-5 report (Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 2001-2007,
with 2000 Benchmark, May 2007). The projected change in HH population reflects the change
between January 1, 2007 (662,646) and June 30, 2014 (808,877). In projecting households,
DOF uses the cohort -component method by applying age- and ethnicity -specific HH formation
ratios from Census 2000 to the projected population as described on its webpage
(http://www.dof. ca.gov/html/DEMOGRAP/ReportsPapers/Projections/P3).
2. Homeowner and Renter households (HHs): allocation based on Census 2000 proportion of
owner -occupied HHs (60.4%) held constant through projection period. Renter HHs reflect the
difference in subtracting homeowner HHs from projected HH growth.
3. Vacancy allowance: rates of 1.8% (owner) and 5.0% (renter) reflect adjustments from
standard targets of 2.0% and 6.0%, respectively, for current conditions. Standard targets
identified by Office of Planning and Research, Economic Practices Manual (1984:37). These
rates were additionally decreased 50% to account for documented market abnormality.
4. Replacement allowance: empirical demolition rate per housing unit averages .09% per year
for 2001 through 2007 based on DOF demolition permit data (average 196 demolition permits
.among jurisdictions within the county, 2001-2007). The average rate is adjusted by a multiple
of 2 to account for other losses, such as demolitions without a permit, conversions from
residential use to other uses not involving demolition, and/or dwelling units destroyed because
of a disaster. The adjusted rate is multiplied by 7.5 (years in the planning period) yielding a
1.41% replacement allowance rate. The standard minimum replacement percentage is 1%
whereas the maximum replacement percentage applied is 2%. These rates were additionally
decreased 50% to account for documented market abnormality.
5. Income category allocation: each income category was calculated by multiplying total housing
need by the proportion of HHs in each income category based on County median HH income
(Census 2000) and income definitions (H&S Code Sections 50079.5 and 50105, et.seq.).
Housina Unit Need Proiection:
Household growth, Census 2000 headship rates (1) 37,389
Homeowner HHs (2) 60.4% 22,576
Homeowner HH vacancy allowance (3) .9% 203
Renter HHs 39.6% 14,813
Renter HHs vacancy allowance (3) 2.5% 370
Subtotal 37,962
Replacement allowance (4) .71% 258
Total 38,220
Regional Housing Needs
PURPOSE
Allocation (RHNA)
• Is astate-mandate (unfunded) that requires a
region's Council of Government (COG) to develop
a methodology to determine the number of
housing units a jurisdiction must zone for in
their General Plan's Housing Element
• The RHNA Plan must divide each jurisdiction's
allocation into four (4) income categories of
housing affordability (Very Low, Low, Moderate,
Above Moderate)
STATUTORY OBJECTIVES
I)Increase the housing supply and mix of housing
types,
jurisdictions
tenure, and affordability in all
2)Promote infill development and socioeconomic
equity, protection of environmental and
agricultural resources, and encourage efficient
development patterns
3)Promote and improve the intraregional
relationship between jobs and housing
3)Balance disproportionate household income
distributions (Based on the most recent
decennial United State census)
RHNA DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
RHNA Development Committee was established
consisting of Community Development
Directors and/or their designee from each
jurisdiction
• Been meeting since November 2007
• Unanimous agreement on the current DRAFT
RHNA Methodology out for 60 day review
• San Joaquin County has challenged the DRAFT
Methodology regarding the accuracy of the
"Jobs" data set from the Reaional
v
Transportation Plan used in the methodology
NIk WR WTI
RHNA CAN GENERATE CONTROVERSY
o (4th RHNA for San Joaquin County)
• State's involvement in local land use endeavors
• Plans for affordable housing when it is not
necessarily desired
• Housing targets tend to contradict local land use
policy objectives and constraints
• Misperception that RHNA targets must be built as
opposed to "Plan For"
WHAT RHNA IS
Projection of additional housing units needed to
accommodate projected household growth of
all income levels by the end of the housing
element's statutory period
WHAT RHNA IS NOT
• Prediction of additional housing units or building
permit activity
•Quota of housing that must be produced
• Limitation due to existing land use capacity or
growth control
MANDATED RHNA SCHEDULE
0
1) Regional allocation by
income category for SJC
2) Preparation of Methodology
01/2008
08/31/2007
09/2007 -
3) Review of Methodology 01/2008 ~ 04/2008
4) Develop Draft RHNA Plan 04/2008 - 07/2008
5) Appeals Process (60 Days) 04/2008 ~ 07/2008
6) Preparation/Adoption of 07/2008 ~ 08/2008
final RHNA Plan by SJCOG Board
7) Update of General Plan 08/31/2009
Housing Element by each
jurisdiction
a
r�-
RHNA DEVELOPMENT IN OTHER REGIONS
or the time period of 2006 ~ 2013:
Fresno COG
Kern COG
SANDAG
SCAG
SACOG
ABAG
AM BAG
Time Periods for All Remaining Regions is from
calendar year 2007 ~ 2014
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RHNA
From Housing &Community Development
Calendar Year January 2007 -- June 30, 2014
Income Category Housing Unit Need
Percent
Very Low 9,314 24%
Low 6,032 16%
Moderate: 6,972 18%
Above Moderate:
RHNA DRAFT METHODOLOGY
1. Uses household growth projections from DOF specific
to each jurisdiction
2. Uses "Job" growth projections specific to each
jurisdiction
3. Takes individual household and jobs growth compared
to the regional growth to arrive at a % within each
category
4. A jobs / housing formula with equal weights is applied
to the individual jurisdiction's job and household
growth to arrive at the housing target
5. This target
is then applied
to the censes
derived
income
categories
for
the
individual
jurisdiction
'r 20072014 RHNA DRAFT METHODOLOGY
CITY OF
OD
H ouseholds
2014
-
-
x
H ouseholds
2007
=
=
+
H ousehdd F
Growth
3,912
Job
Growth
2,810
Share of
H ousehold
Growth
10.461/6 d x
Household i
24.32%
15.71%
18.31%
41.661/6
100%
Regional
H ousehdd
Growth
F
x
Share of
H ousehdd
Growth
=
26,419
22,507
37,389
10.46%
Jobs
2014
Jobs
2007
Regional
Job Growth
Share of
Job Growth
27,059
24,249
18,975
14.81%
Share of
Job
Growth
Weight
Factor
Weight
Factor
H CD
Regional
Need
Total
Prqected
N eed
14.81%
Very Low
0.5
24.70%
0.5
Distribution
24.51%
38,220
4,829
1184
Low
17.17%
16.44%
794
Moderate
18.52%
18.42%
889
Above Moderate
39.62%
40.64%
1,963
TOTAL
100%
100%
4,830
Nlk WR WTI
OTHER RHNA FACTORS
JCOG will conduct an inventory to document resources
nd constraints, including, but not limited to, the
.�Ilowing:
• Household characteristics
• Jobs and housing relationship
• Opportunities and constraints to development of
additional housing
• Preservation of agricultural land in the unincorporated
area
• Housing for persons with special needs
• Transition of existing housing from low-income to
another Income categories
• Identify funding resources to foster and preserve
lower income households
Nlk WR WTI
HOUSING UNIT TRANSFERS
Transfers can only be performed from the County
)f San Joaquin to an incorporated city
• SJCOG would need to approve the transfers
• To date, no City has welcomed additional housing
targets
• All
transfers would need
an analysis of the
factors
and
circumstances which
support the action
and
submitted to the state
INCENTIVES FOR HOUSING ELEMENT COMPLIANCE
Q The City of Lodi, along with the other jurisdictions in San
Joaquin County, have GP Housing Elements that comply with
state law
Qualify for funding under the following programs:
• Building Equity &Growth in Neighborhoods (BEGIN)
• Home Investments Partnerships (HOME) Program
(Federal)
• Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
• Planning &Technical Assistance
• Infill Incentive Grant (11G)
• Workforce Housing Reward
• California Debt Limit Allocation Committee of State
Treasurer's Office Single Family Home Program
• California Infrastructure &Economic Development Bank (I -
Bank) Infrastructure State Revolving Fund (ISRF)
NEXT STEPS
he RHNA Development Committee will meet in
larch 2007 to:
• Review and discuss comments received by
SJCOG on DRAFT Methodology
• Review and discuss results of new "Job" data set
based on EDD data
• Recommend adjustments to draft methodology
and assess overall impact
Regional Housing Needs
Allocation (RHNA)
Question Answer
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Division of Housing Policy Development
1800 Third Street Suite 430
P O Box 952053
Sacramento CA 94252-2053
(916) 3293177 Is
FAX (916) 327-2643
January 2008
Incentives for Housing Element Compliance
Housing elements have been mandatory portions of local general plans in California since
1969. This reflects the statutory recognition that the availability of housing is a matter of
statewide importance and cooperation between government and the private sector is
critical to attainment of the State's housing goals. Housing element law is the State's
primary market-based strategy to increase housing supply, affordability and choice. The
law recognizes that in order for the private sector to adequately address housing needs and
demand, local governments must adopt land -use plans and regulatory schemes that
provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development.
To incentivize and reward local governments that have adopted compliant and effective
housing elements, several housing, community development and infrastructure funding
programs include housing element compliance as a rating and ranking or threshold
requirement.
Housing element compliance is generally included as a rating and ranking criteria in
programs where the primary applicants are local governments. As eligible applicants vary
by program, (e.g., only non-entitlementjurisdictions eligible for State CDBG or HOME
programs) not all jurisdictions are affected by these programmatic requirements.
The effect or significance of the housing element factor within the context of other
competitive factors varies by program. Please refer to program specific information
available for the specific criteria utilized including timing requirements.
California Department of Housing and Community Development
gullding Equity and Growth in Neighbarhaads (BEGIN) Program
httpalwww. hcd.ca.gov/fa/begin
Program Description: The BEGIN Program is a homeownership program providing
grants to local governments that reduce regulatory constraints to housing. Grants are
provided for downpayment assistance to low- and moderate-incomefirst-time
homebuyers.
Housina Element Criteria: Points are granted for jurisdictions with an adopted housing
element found in substantial compliance with State housing element law.
Incentivesfor Housing Element Compliance Page 1
Home Investments Partnerships (HOME) Program (Federal)
http:llwww. hcd.ca.aov/fa/home
Proaram Description: The HOME Program provides grants to cities, counties, and
State -certified CH DO's for housing rehabilitation, new construction, and acquisition and
rehabilitation for both single family and multifamily housing projects serving lower-
income renters and owners.
Housing Element Criteria: Points are granted for jurisdictions with an adopted housing
element found in substantial compliance with State housing element law.
■ Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
http:llwww. hcd. ca. povlfalcd ba
GeneralAl location
Program Description: The CDBG/GA Program provides funds for new construction,
housing acquisition, housing programs, housing rehabilitation, public services,
community facilities, economic development, and public works.
Housing Element Criteria: To be eligible for funding, a jurisdiction's housing element
must be adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65585 by a date established in
the NOFAIApplication.
Planning and Technical Assistance
Program Description: CDBGIPTA Program provides funds for planning and feasibility
studies related to CDBG-eligible activities.
Housing Element Criteria: To be eligible for funding, a jurisdiction's housing element
must be adopted pursuant to Government Code Section 65585 by a date established in
the NOFAIApplication.
Infill Incentive Grant (IIG) Program
http://w.hcd.ca.gov/fa/iig/
Program Description: The IIG Program providesfunds for infrastructure improvements
necessary to facilitate new infill housing development.
Housina Element Criteria: To be eligible for funding, projects must be located in a
locality which has an adopted housing element that has been found by the Department
to be in substantial compliance as of the due date for applications pursuantto the
N O FA.
Incentives for Housing Element Compliance Page
Workforce Housing Reward (WF H) Program (no current funding available)
hftr)://www.hcd.ca.aov/fa/whrr)
Program Description: The WFH Program provides financial incentivesto cities and
counties that issue building permitsfor new housing affordable to very low- or low-
income households. Grant funds can be used for a wide range of capital asset projects
including parks, street/infrastructure improvements, recreational facilities, housing,
neighborhood improvements, public safety and community revitalization efforts.
Housing Element Criteria: To be eligible for funding, a jurisdiction must have an
adopted housing element that has been found in compliance by the Department by a
date established in the NOFA/Application.
Other Statewide Proarams
■ California Debt LimitAllocation Committee of State Treasurer's Office
Single Family Home Program
http://www.treasurer.ca.aov/cdlac/procedures/adopted.pdf
Program Description: Reduced interest, tax-exempt bonds to finance affordable
housing projects, both rental and homeownership.
Housing Element Criteria: The proposed Single Family Home Program must be
consistent with the adopted housing element for the jurisdiction in which the program is
to be operated.
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (I -Bank)
Infrastructure State Revolving Fund (ISRF) Program
http://www.ibank.ca.gov/ttca/gdfs/detail/1nf ba nk/Boa rdApproved Criteria revised02-01-
07.pdf
Proaram Description: The ISRF Program provides low-cost financing to public agencies
for a wide variety of infrastructure projects. Eligible project categories include city
streets, county highways, state highways, drainage, water supply and flood control,
educational facilities, environmental mitigation measures, parks and recreational
facilities, port facilities, public transit, sewage collection and treatment, solid waste
collection and disposal, water treatment and distribution, defense conversion, public
safety facilities, and power and communications facilities.
Housing Element Criteria: Pointswill be granted for jurisdictions or applicants located
within a jurisdiction with a Department approved housing element.
Incentives for Housing Nement Compliance Page 3
■ California Housing Finance Agency
Housing Enabled by Local Partnerships (HELP) Program
http://www.calhfa.ca.aov/localities/help/index.htm
Program Description: The HELP Program and the Residential Development Loan
Program (RDLP) offer reduced rate loans to local government entities for locally
determined affordable housing activities and priorities (acquisition, construction,
rehabilitation, single-family homeownership, or preservation of multifamily and special
needs units).
Housing Element Criteria: Proposals must include documented housing plans that
demonstrate that the proposed housing activity described in the application has been
identified as a local housing priority. Eligible documented housing plans include the
housing elements, consolidated plans, redevelopment plans or other general housing
plans that the locality's governing board has ratified. Applications must also include
evidence that a plan has been approved.
January 2008
Incentives for Housing Element Compliance Page 4