HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - September 11, 2007 SSCITY OF LODI
SPECIAL JOINT INFORMAL INFORMATIONAL
MEETING "SHIRTSLEEVE" SESSION
WITH THE LODI IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2007
A Special Joint Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) d' the Lodi City Council and Lodi
Improvement Committee was held Tuesday, September 11, 2007, commencing at 7:00 a.m.
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Council Members — Hansen, Hitchcock, Katzakian, Mounce, and Mayor Johnson
Absent: Council Members — None
Present: Lodi Improvement Committee Members — Forkas, Jarrett, Ortiz, Takeuchi,
Yadav, and Chairperson St. Yves
Absent: Lodi Improvement Committee Members — Lesan and Spinelli
Also Present: City Manager King, City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Johl
B. TOPIC(S)
B-1 "Discussion of Items of Mutual Concern"
City Manager King briefly introduced the subject matter.
Lodi Improvement Committee Chairperson, Eileen St. Yves, provided some introductory
remarks. General topics of discussion included homelessness, affordable housing,
shopping carts, Cherokee Lane, and Census dress rehearsal.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Chairperson St. Yves stated Lawrence Park is more of a
problem during the evening because there is a larger gathering of homeless individuals and
the new bus shelter is being used for sleeping purposes.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Chairperson St. Yves stated the church contributes to the
homeless problem on Tuesday evenings primarily.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Chairperson St. Yves stated she is not sure if
the problem of homelessness would be fixed if the bridge problem was corrected and the
Police Department and Caltrans are working in the area on an ongoing basis.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Chairperson St. Yves stated the hours of use
might be adjusted to address some of the park concerns. City Attorney Schwabauer stated
park hours vary from park to park, are generally from dusk to dawn, and are established as
posted. Mr. Schwabauer also stated the hours may be changed if necessary.
Committee Member Jarrett suggested researching solutions for assisting the homeless
population on a long-term basis rather than focusing on enforcement mechanisms only.
City Manager King provided an overview of the 2008 Census dress rehearsal to be held in
San Joaquin County. Mr. King specifically discussed utilizing the expertise of the Lodi
Improvement Committee in conjunction with the Census request for a committee to assist
with public outreach efforts.
Census Bureau representative, Jaime Hernandez, provided an overview of the requested
partnership with the City for the 2008 dress rehearsal. Specific topics of discussion
included public outreach, space for training, and direction for the Lodi Improvement
Committee regarding the same.
Continued September 11, 2007
In response to Council Member Hansen, Mr. Hernandez stated there are a variety of ways
the City can partner with the Census Bureau including efforts related to public outreach,
training facilities, and media usage. City Manager King stated the Census Bureau to date
has requested the City's assistance with a full count committee.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Chairperson St. Yves stated Barbara Fary of the Census
Bureau will be attending the Lodi Improvement Committee meeting on October 2, 2007, to
provide additional information. She urged the City Council and public to attend.
In response to Council Member Hitchcock, Committee Member Jarrett stated the
St. Mary's dining room and adjacent building in Stockton are an example of potential
solutions to homelessness. Mr. Jarrett stated the Salvation Army has changed its direction
and now serves as more of a transitional facility rather than a homeless shelter. Discussion
ensued between Mr. Jarrett, Mayor Johnson, and Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce regarding
options to address the homelessness in the City and the City's obligation regarding the
same.
In response to Committee Member Takeuchi, Mayor Johnson stated it would be beneficial
for the Committee to be involved with the Census because the Committee already reviews
some of the general subject matter and it would prevent the formation of another committee
for the sole purpose of the Census. City Manager King concurred, stating that it is a good
opportunity for the City to engage in meaningful work and be visible.
Chairperson St. Yves provided general comments regarding affordable housing options
within the City. Discussion ensued between Chairperson St. Yves and Council Member
Hansen regarding the location of the potential affordable housing project.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Mounce, City Manager King stated staff can arrange for
a bus tour to the affordable housing site if it is so desired.
Council Member Hitchcock requested copies of all of the affordable housing proposals by
Friday. Community Development Director Hatch stated staff was planning to present
summaries of all the proposals and will provide copies of the proposals themselves as well.
In response to Mayor Johnson, Mr. Hatch stated the location for each of the proposals is
the same.
Chairperson St. Yves provided some general comments regarding abandoned shopping
carts. Discussion ensued between Chairperson St. Yves, Mayor Johnson, Mayor Pro
Tempore Mounce, and Council Member Hitchcock regarding partnering options available
with the businesses, contract services for City sweeping of shopping carts, and the
obligations of individual stores to maintain shopping carts.
City Manager King provided an overview of varying policies and regulations associated with
shopping carts, homelessness, and affordable housing. In response to Mayor Pro Tempore
Mounce, Chairperson St. Yves stated Cherokee Lane should probably be a top priority and
the Committee does a prioritizing and goal setting workshop every year in April.
In response to Mayor Johnson, City Attorney Schwabauer stated the homeless individuals
do have a constitutional right to beg; although, ordinances addressing aggressive
solicitation are permissible. Mr. Schwabauer also stated he would need to research staffs
ability to retrieve shopping carts from private property, but common areas were likely
permissible.
W
Continued September]], 2007
Constance Zweifel spoke of her concerns regarding abandoned shopping carts and PG&E
and City barricades being utilized by children in her neighborhood. She also requested a
listing of bus stops.
Myrna Wetzel stated the poor will always be among the community and the issue is how to
work with them.
Chairperson St. Yves thanked the Council for their consideration. Committee Member
Yadav thanked the Council for attending the Committee's meetings.
Council Member Hansen requested the Lawrence Park postings be reviewed as necessary.
Council Member Hitchcock and Mayor Johnson suggested reviewing successful
enforcement activity and centralized locations in other communities in regards to
homelessness.
C. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
►=
D. ADJOURNMENT
No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 a.m.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl
City Clerk
3
Lodi Improvement Committee & Lodi City Council
September 11, 2007
ISSUES OF MUTUAL CONCERN
Lodi Improvement Committee's Proposed Topics for Discussion
Homeless
2. Affordable Housing
3. Shopping Carts
4. Cherokee Lane
City Manager's Proposed Topics for Discussion
2008 Census Dress Rehearsal
MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Community Development Department
To: Randy Hatch, Community Development Director
From: Joseph Wood, Community Improvement Manager
Date: August 27, 2007
Subject: Shopping Cart Issues
Regarding our ability to place requirements on retail stores to equip their shopping carts with
locking wheels, the State Legislature has determined that restrictions and regulations pertaining
to shopping carts is a matter of statewide concern and accordingly, they have established
uniform guidelines within the Business and Professions Code for local government agencies to
follow when crafting local ordinances.
Having these special wheel -locking devices is not one of the requirements covered under those
uniform guidelines. Most store owners opt for such a feature on their carts just to keep from
having to abide by the local regulations, as several jurisdictions provide an exception for
retailers who equip their carts.
These guidelines allow for us to establish a local ordinance that requires retail store owners to
mark their carts as follows:
• Clearly identify the owner of the cart,
• Notifies the public of the procedure for authorized removal of the cart from the premises,
• Notifies the public that unauthorized removal is a violation of state law,
• Lists a valid telephone number or address for returning the cart or contacting the retailer
for retrieval.
Likewise, the guidelines establish procedures for the local government agencies to adopt which
include:
Provides three business day waiting period after cart owner has been notified before
City can retrieve the cart,
o Unless the card impedes emergency services,
• Allows for local agency to recover actual costs for impounding carts,
• Requires that carts be held at a location that is reasonably convenient to the cart owner
and is accessible six hours of each business day,
• Allows local agencies to fine cart owners no more than $50 for each occurrence in
excess of three within a six-month period.
A copy of the Business and Professions Code is attached for your review. I am prepared to
forward a draft ordinance to the City Attorney after we finish the development and adoption of
the graffiti ordinance.
Attachments
ATTACHMENT B
CALIFORNIA CODES
BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE
SECTION 22435-22435.8
22435. As used in this article:
(a) "Shopping cart" means a basket which is mounted on wheels or a
similar device generally used in a retail establishment by a
customer for the purpose of transporting goods of any kind.
(b) "Laundry cart" means a basket which is mounted on wheels and
used in a coin-operated laundry or drycleaning retail establishment
by a customer or an attendant for the purpose of transporting fabrics
and the supplies necessary to process them.
(c) "Parking area" means a parking lot or other property provided
by a retailer for use by a customer for parking an automobile or
other vehicle.
22435.1. The provisions of Section 22435.2 shall apply when a
shopping cart or a laundry cart has a sign permanently affixed to it
that identifies the owner of the cart or the retailer, or both;
notifies the public of the procedure to be utilized for authorized
removal of the cart from the premises; notifies the public that the
unauthorized removal of the cart from the premises or parking area of
the retail establishment, or the unauthorized possession of the
cart, is a violation of state law; and lists a valid telephone number
or address for returning the cart removed from the premises or
parking area to the owner or retailer.
22435.2. It is unlawful to do any of the following acts, if a
shopping cart or laundry cart has a permanently affixed sign as
provided in Section 22435.1:
(a) To remove a shopping cart or laundry cart from the premises or
parking area of a retail establishment with the intent to
temporarily or permanently deprive the owner or retailer of
possession of the cart.
(b) To be in possession of any shopping cart or laundry cart that
has been removed from the premises or the parking area of a retail
establishment, with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive
the owner or retailer of possession of the cart.
(c) To be in possession of any shopping cart or laundry cart with
serial numbers removed, obliterated, or altered, with the intent to
temporarily or permanently deprive the owner or retailer of
possession of the cart.
{d) To leave or abandon a shopping cart or laundry cart at a
location other than the premises or parking area of the retail
establishment with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive
the owner or retailer of possession of the cart.
(e) To alter, convert, or tamper with a shopping cart or laundry
cart, or to remove any part or portion thereof or to remove,
obliterate or alter serial numbers on a cart, with the intent to
temporarily or permanently deprive the owner or retailer of
possession of the cart.
(f) To be in possession of any shopping cart or laundry cart while
ATTACHMENT 8
that cart is not located on the premises or parking lot of a retail
establishment, with the intent to temporarily or permanently deprive
the owner or retailer of possession of the cart.
22435.3. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this
article is guilty of a misdemeanor.
The provisions of this section are not intended to preclude the
application of any other laws relating to prosecution for theft.
22435.4. This article shall not apply to the owner of a shopping
cart or laundry cart or to a retailer, or to their agents or
employees, or to a customer of a retail establishment who has written
consent from the owner of a shopping cart or laundry cart or a
retailer to be in possession of the shopping cart or laundry cart or
to remove the shopping cart or laundry cart from the premises or the
parking area of the retail establishment, or to do any of the acts
specified in Section 22435.2.
22435.5. (a) In any civil proceeding, any shopping cart or laundry
cart which has a sign affixed to it pursuant to Section 22435.1 shall
establish a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of producing
evidence that the property is that of the person or business named
in the sign and not abandoned by the person or business named in the
sign.
(b) In any criminal proceeding, it may be inferred that any
shopping cart or laundry cart which has a sign affixed to it pursuant
to Section 22435.1 is the property of the person or business named
in the sign and has not been abandoned by the person or business
named in the sign.
22435.1. (a) The Legislature hereby finds that the retrieval by
local government agencies of shopping carts specified in this section
is in need of uniform statewide regulation and constitutes a matter
of statewide concern that shall be governed solely by this section.
(b) A shopping cart that has a sign affixed to it in accordance
with Section 22435.1 may be impounded by a city, county, or city and
county, provided both of the following conditions have been
satisfied:
(1) The shopping cart is located outside the premises or parking
area of a retail establishment. The parking area of a retail
establishment located in a multistore complex or shopping center
shall include the entire parking area used by the complex or center.
(2) Except as provided in subdivision (i), the shopping cart is
not retrieved within three business days from the date the owner of
the shopping cart, or his or her agent, receives actual notice from
the city, county, or city and county of the shopping cart's discovery
and location.
(c) In instances where the location of a shopping cart will impede
emergency services, a city, county, or city and county is authorized
ATTACHMENT B
to immediately retrieve the shopping cart from public or private
property.
(d) Any city, county, or city and county that impounds a shopping
cart under the authority provided in subdivisions (b) and (c) is
authorized to recover its actual costs for providing this service.
(e) Any shopping cart that is impounded by a city, county, or city
and county pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c) shall be held at a
location that is both:
(1) Reasonably convenient to the owner of the shopping cart.
(2) Open for business at least six hours of each business day.
(f) A city, county, or city and county may fine the owner of a
shopping cart in an amount not to exceed fifty dollars ($50) for each
occurrence in excess of three during a specified six-month period
for failure to retrieve shopping carts in accordance with this
section. An occurrence includes all shopping carts impounded in
accordance with this section in a one -day period.
(g) Any shopping cart not reclaimed from the city, county, or city
and county within 30 days of receipt of a notice of violation by the
owner of the shopping cart may be sold or otherwise disposed of by
the entity in possession of the shopping cart.
(h) This section shall not invalidate any contract entered into
prior to June 30, 1996, between a city, county, or city and county
and a person or business entity for the purpose of retrieving or
impounding shopping carts.
(i) Notwithstanding paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), a city,
county, or city and county may impound a shopping cart that otherwise
meets the criteria set forth in paragraph (1) of subdivision (b)
without complying with the three-day advance notice requirement
provided that:
(1) The owner of the shopping cart, or his or her agent, is
provided actual notice within 24 hours following the impound and that
notice informs the owner, or his or her agent, as to the location
where the shopping cart may be claimed.
(2) Any shopping cart so impounded shall be held at a location in
compliance with subdivision (e).
(3) Any shopping cart reclaimed by the owner or his or her agent,
within three business days following the date of actual notice as
provided pursuant to paragraph (1), shall be released and surrendered
to the owner or agent at no charge whatsoever, including the waiver
of any impound and storage fees or fines that would otherwise be
applicable pursuant to subdivision (d) or (f). Any cart reclaimed
within the three -business -day period shall not be deemed an
occurrence for purposes of subdivision (f).
(9) Any shopping cart not reclaimed by the owner or his or her
agent, within three business days following the date of actual notice
as provided pursuant to paragraph (1), shall be subject to any
applicable fee or fine imposed pursuant to subdivision (d) or (f)
commencing on the fourth business day following the date of the
notice.
(5) Any shopping cart not reclaimed by the owner or his or her
agent, within 30 days of receipt following the date of actual notice
as provided pursuant to paragraph (1), may be sold or disposed of in
accordance with subdivision (g).
22435.8. This article shall not invalidate an ordinance of, or be
ATTACHMENT B
construed to prohibit the adoption of an ordinance by, a city,
county, or city and county, which ordinance regulates or prohibits
the removal of shopping carts or laundry carts from the premises or
parking area of a retail establishment except to the extent any
provision of such an ordinance expressly conflicts with any provision
of this article.