HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - April 18, 2006 SSCITY OF LODI
INFORMAL INFORMATIONAL MEETING
"SHIRTSLEEVE" SESSION
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
TUESDAY, APRIL 18, 2006
An Informal Informational Meeting ("Shirtsleeve" Session) of the Lodi City Council was held Tuesday,
April 18, 2006, commencing at 7:01 a.m.
A. ROLL CALL
Present: Council Members — Beckman, Hansen, Johnson, Mounce, and Mayor Hitchcock
Absent: Council Members — None
Also Present: City Manager King, City Attorney Schwabauer, and Deputy City Clerk Perrin
B. TOPIC(S)
B-1 "Discuss 'Project Opportunity,' a review of City -owned property, its use, and productivity"
City Manager King stated that the City of Lodi owns over 1,400 acres (most of which is at
the White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility) and 118 parcels throughout the City. In
reviewing the City's real estate assets, staff looked at the properties that deliver service to
the public (i.e. fire stations, parks, etc.), as well as other properties that may not have a
specific purpose or that may not be developed for a period of time.
Fire Chief Pretz reported that this property survey (filed) is an outgrowth of the City
Manager's work plan, which should be reviewed to determine if properties are at their most
productive use, if changes are necessary, or whether the City should continue to own the
property or sell it and use the proceeds to further the City's agenda on a number of
projects. Chief Pretz reviewed the top 11 properties as identified by staff.
1119 — 1120 Awani Drive — This property was an old city dump, which was originally owned
by the City, sold, and then re -purchased by the City. An environmental review is necessary
in order to determine what is on the property and whether or not it may be developed.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson commented that, when the Parks and Recreation Master Plan
was discussed, this property was considered to be another access point to the river, and it
was vehemently fought by the neighbors.
2 E. Lodi Avenue — This is the Maple Square property, which has future plans for the front-
end of the right of way to be part of the under or overpass over the railroad tracks. The
possibility exists to sell off or otherwise develop the back half of that acreage, which is
approximately 0.62 acres.
22 E. Locust Street and 111 N. Stockton Street — These properties were acquired as part of
the proposed indoor sports complex and, with the creation of the Grape Bowl Ad Hoc
Committee, may be better suited to go onto or be built in conjunction with the Grape Bowl
property. Additionally, the City has not yet acquired all of the necessary properties
required for the sports complex.
100 E. Pine Street — This is the New Shanghai building, which currently houses Lodi Adopt -
A -Child. This is an appropriate use for the property; however, there may be a better place
to house Adopt -A -Child (e.g. the parking structure) in order to turn this facility into a
different type of rental space.
275 Culbertson Drive — This is a 1.13 -acre property for a future neighborhood park; however,
it has great potential for other uses.
Continued April 18, 2006
500 S. Guild — This 9 -acre site was considered as a possible location for the new animal
shelter and Electric Utility headquarters. It would appear that this project will not be
developed in the near future and is an asset that is not being used.
City Manager King stated that this 9 -acre property would be the site to seriously consider
whether or not the City uses it for generation of cash. The prospect of developing this
property for Electric Utility purposes is not anticipated in the near future, and it presents the
least amount cf challenges of all the properties. During the budget process, staff will
present issues associated with Electric Utility that the City continues to struggle with.
Council Member Hansen stated that, when the City was in a better financial condition, the
animal shelter was the number one priority on the capital projects list. The cost of the
animal shelter was reduced because the City had the land for it. He expressed concern
about selling the property and suggested that the City hold onto a couple of acres for the
future animal shelter, to which Mr. King replied that the City could easily do so and still be
able to generate interest in the development community.
705 E. Lodi Avenue — This 1.01 -acre site is where Fire Station 2 is currently located. Chief
Pretz explained the "triple flip" concept that involves the San Joaquin County Mosquito and
Vector Control District, which presently has a lease at White Slough that it would like
enhanced. In order to do that, the Mosquito District would abandon or trade its long-term
lease at White Slough for the property it owns on Beckman Road. The City would make
the swap and sell the Fire Station 2 property to the highest bidder, using the money to off-
set costs of rebuilding Fire Station 2 on the Beckman Road property.
Council Member Mounce expressed support for this concept as it would solve a number of
problems facing the City.
In response to Council Member Hansen, Public Works Director Prima explained that the
property leased by the Mosquito District is south of the plant and consists of a series of
small ponds used to raise mosquito fish, in addition to a small trailer used as an office.
The Mosquito District is interested in a long-term lease and in developing the property to be
similar to that on the Beckman Road site. The City cannot sell the land as it would have to
de -annex it. The proposal does not conflict or overlap with the potential future power
generation plant.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson stated that this idea is worth being explored; however, he
stated that he would like to see profits from the sale of property also be reserved for the
Parks and Recreation Department, which has been struggling for years.
Mayor Hitchcock questioned if any of the park properties were purchased with impact fees,
because if they are not used for parks, the City should reimburse those impact fees.
City Manager King responded that there are surplus procedures in place. If the Council
declares property as surplus, the Planning Q)mmission has to concur that the surplus
procedure would be consistent with the General Plan. Typically, the City would obtain an
appraisal for the property and, with the exception of park land, make the land available at
market price for development of low-income housing or for park purposes. If there is no
interest in buying the property at the appraised price, it would then be put out for a formal
bid process. Land originally dedicated as park land is different, because the Cty is
primarily obligated to find replacement park land, for which there are specific procedures.
In reply to Mayor Hitchcock, City Attorney Schwabauer stated that impact fees can only be
used for items within the impact fee program and would need to be returned.
903 W. Turner Road — This parcel is 12.75 acres of undeveloped area west of Lodi Lake. It
is used occasionally as a parking lot, but it was purchased as part of a grant for future
expansion of Lodi Lake and the properties surrounding it.
2
Continued April 18, 2006
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson questioned what the time line is in looking A this list of
properties, to which Chief Pretz responded that a reasonable time frame would be 20 years;
however, due to the City's financial constraints, it might be more realistic to forecast out 5
years. Mr. Johnson suggested that the City revisit the capital projects "wish list" to
determine what is current, timely, and needed. In regard to the Turner Road property, Mr.
Johnson cautioned that it be studied carefully, as the loss of land would prevent future
expansion of the Lake. He suggested that future development agreements or a partial sale
of the property could help fund enhancements needed at Lodi Lake.
City Manager King stated that the City could lease two or three acres of this property for
commercial development for a longer period of time, and the revenue from that lease could
be dedicated to the maintenance of Lodi Lake. Future City Councils would still have the
asset to develop and expand.
In response to the 2229 Tienda Drive property, which is 8.03 acres of undeveloped park, Mr.
Johnson stated that this property was a gift from the Roget Family to be used for park
purposes. He questioned if the property would be returned to the Roget Family if it was not
used for park purposes, to which City Attorney Schwabauer responded that he was unsure
whether or not the Roget Family restricted the gift in that way; however, he would look into
the matter.
Chief Pretz added that there is a portion of the Roget property that the City used impact
fees to purchase, and any disposition would not necessarily involve the gifted portion.
Century Boulevard at Stockton Street — This area is a right of way and has been difficult to
maintain. A portion of it is a future right of way for Century Boulevard crossing the railroad
tracks; although, it is unknown when this will occur.
In response to Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson, Mr. Prima responded that the plan is to have
Century Boulevard run as an east -west thoroughfare; however, it is unlikely that it will be
extended through as an at -grade crossing. The railroads oppose at -grade crossings on a
main -line track, and the California Public Utilities Commission is very reluctant to approve
it.
Mayor Hitchcock questioned what the plan was for the property on Lockeford Street, which
was not on staff's condensed list, as it was purchased with no plan in mind.
Chief Pretz responded that, in earlier discussions, the area from Turner Road south to
Lockeford Street, between Stockton Street and an eastern boundary, was included as one
large parcel. It was decided not to include it on the list because the Grape Bowl Ad Hoc
Committee is currently reviewing options for the area.
Mayor Hitchcock expressed her preference that, if Council is going to consider selling
properties, it should review the entire list, and the area surrounding the Grape Bowl should
be included in the discussions.
Chief Pretz stated that Council also has redevelopment options, without eminent domain,
as a means to acquire needed property.
The San Joaquin Council of Governments Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open
Space Technical Advisory Committee approached staff about the concept of conservation
easements. There are 400 to 500 acres in the southern boundary of White Slough, which
the City could sell the easement rights to and allow for the land to be kept under its current
use in perpetuity (i.e. the City could not develop it).
Council Member Hansen stated that the county is in desperate need to meet certain
requirements in terms of endangered species, and selling the easement rights to the
county would generate significant revenue for the City. There are a lot of ramifications that
would need to be examined, and he hoped that this could be done without jeopardizing the
future of White Slough.
Continued April 18, 2006
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson requested that Council be provided with information on the
possible costs and how the figure of $10,000 per acre compares with what others are
paying elsewhere.
Council Member Beckman stated that for the last two years he has attended the San
Joaquin Council of Governments Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space
Technical Advisory Committee meetings, and he was shocked to see the $10,000 figure,
because it was very high compared to other easements it has purchased. In 20 years,
easements will be as high as $30,000 per acre. Mr. Beckman stated he would be in favor
of this; however, he would like a very clear understanding of how long the City will be able to
discharge effluent on land. If the state suddenly puts restrictions on discharging, the City
will own a large piece of land that it cannot use, and once those easements are in place, it
cannot be undone.
Council Member Mounce questioned if the developers of the Lowe's project purchased and
set aside land as part of its mitigation plan and, if so, where it is located.
City Attorney Schwabauer stated that cne of the stipulations in the settlement agreement
with Lodi First was that it would be "prime agricultural land'; however, the area immediately
surrounding Lodi did not fit the statutory definition, and Lowe's purchased the land south of
Elk Grove.
Mayor Hitchcock stated that she preferred the City property list to be all of those that are
not being utilized for their intended purpose, including the source of money that paid for
them to help determine if there are gifts, donations, or restrictions.
Council Member Hansen preferred that the matter not be revisited until the City has funding
to build the capital projects on the "wish list."
C. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
None.
D. ADJOURNMENT
No action was taken by the City Council. The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 a.m.
ATTEST:
Jennifer M. Perrin
Deputy City Clerk
0
AGENDA ITEM g" I
CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
' TM
AGENDA TITLE: Discuss Project Opportunity, A Review of City -Owned Property, its Use and
Productivity
MEETING DATE: April 18, 2006
PREPARED BY: Michael E. Pretz, Fire Chief and Blair King, City Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Review the use and productivity of the City's real estate
portfolio to ensure an appropriate return is being realized in
public services or financially; and, discuss potential use,
development, or disposition of identified underutilized property.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lodi is a large property owner. Staff has conducted
a preliminary review to identify City property that could be
considered under-utilized. The City of Lodi owns 118 parcels
ranging in size from .01 acres to over 1,000 acres for a total real estate portfolio of 1,400
acres (for the sake of comparison, General Mills owns 75 acres in Lodi). The majority of
these parcels include parks, pump stations, electric utility sub -stations, fire stations and
miscellaneous properties used in conducting City business. (See attached inventory list.) This
real estate represents a significant investment in public assets. The City Council and staff have
a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that real property assets are serving the best interest of the
public.
An important constituent of providing City services is City ownership of real estate. However,
publicly -owned property is not taxed, (unless a tenant pays possessory interest tax or a utility
pays an in -lieu tax), and is typically "dead weight" on the tax roles. In some cases, the City
properties are serving a public benefit by housing a community program or service. In those
cases, the Council may want to verify that this is consistent with the Council desires. Also, there
are properties being banked for a future use. The Council should re -affirm the use for which the
property is being banked, check the time horizon or practicality of development and confirm its
desire to bank the property or explore temporary uses.
APPROVED:
Blair King, City Manager
City staff has reviewed City -owned property and has identified several parcels that could be
looked at more closely and/or concepts that deserve more scrutiny. The following 11 properties
have been identified for initial review at the Shirtsleeve session; they are intended to initiate the
discussion:
Address
1. 1119-1120 Awani Drive
2. 2 East Lodi Avenue
3. 22 East Locust Street
4. 100 East Pine Street
Parcel Size
3.65 acres - vacant
0.62 acres
0.79 acres
0.31 acres
5. 275 Culbertson Drive
1.13 acres
6. 500 South Guild Avenue
9.09 acres
7. 705 East Lodi Avenue
1.01 acres
8. 903 West Turner Road
12.75 acres
9. 2229 Tienda Drive 8.03 acres
10. Century Blvd. at Stockton St. 3.06 acres
11. 111 N. Stockton St. 0.62 acres
Parcel Description
The property is an old city
dump site and will need an
environmental review in order
to determine proper
disposition.
Currently Leased
Acquired as part of the indoor
Sports Arena.
New Shanghi Building -
currently houses Adopt -A -
Child offices.
Neighborhood Park
Future EUD/Animal Shelter
Fire Station #2
Undeveloped area west of
Lodi Lake.
Undeveloped Park
Century Park Right of Way
Parks and Recreation Annex
This listing is not exhaustive and staff will continue to review all properties from the full property
list to provide Council a more comprehensive report of property utilization.
CONCEPTS:
Part and parcel of examining the productivity of our real estate assets is looking at concepts for
leveraging the city holdings to improve services or increase revenues or improve the tax base.
The following are concepts intended to maximize the value of the city's assets.
Accepting Conservation Easements at White Slough:
An intriguing idea concerning the ability of the City to use White Slough property for future
conservation easements is currently being researched. The San Joaquin COG Multi -Species
Habitat Conservation and Open Space Technical Advisory Committee have inquired into the
City's interest to sell development easements to the San Joaquin Council of Governments for
White Slough agriculture land. Staff will continue research and discussion with the technical
Advisory Committee.
Fire Station Two Triple Flip:
In addition to the conservation easements discussion, City staff members have been involved in
informal and indirect conversations with Mosquito and Vector Control District personnel to
consider a possible land swap of their Beckman Road property for additional property at White
Slough. The District already leases property at White Slough. The Beckman Road property is
well situated for relocating Fire Station #2. The current Fire Station #2 site would then be sold to
pay for a new Fire Station.
Downtown Hotel Feasibility:
City staff is continuing evaluation of specific City -owned downtown properties as possible sites
for a downtown hotel. A Shirtsleeve presentation is proposed within the next two months to
discuss this concept.
FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined revenues could be realized depending upon Council direction.
For example, if the City were to sell development rights on 500 acres at White Slough for
$10,000 per acre in exchange for conservation easements, the City could realize $5 million in
revenue. (A conservation easement is a public easement that limits the development of the
property. If it is the City's intention to not develop the property there is little risk from this type of
transaction.) .
Another example would be that a new 75 -room high-end hotel on City -owned property could
potentially bring in $150,000 - $200,000 annually in new Transient Occupancy Tax revenue, plus
possessory interest tax, and new sales tax. In addition to these direct revenues, there would be
a ripple effect resulting in derivative revenues to the City and other businesses in the downtown.
However, these fiscal impacts are unknown and merely speculative.
FUNDING: Not Applicable
Ci 91
Michael E. Pretz, Fird Chief
Attachment
Blair King, Ci Manager
City Owned Parcels
APN
Num.
Dir
Street
Str.
Acres
Actual City Use
01523013
2101
W
TURNER
RD
1.81
McLane Substation, Well 7
01523015
903
W
TURNER
RD
12.75
Lodi Lake (westside)
01548013
1036
WOODHAVEN
LN
0.02
Sewer Lift Station
01553056
2735
W
TURNER
RD
4.66
Katzakian Park
02704036
619
S
LOWER SAC
RD
0.01
future Tokay St. R/W
02710101
520
S
LOWER SAC
RD
0.14
Well 13
02714030
356
S
SHADY ACRES
DR
0.13
Well 9, Shady Acres SD Pump Station
02726008
2204
GRENOBLE
DR
0.10
Pedestrian Walkway
02731010
2017
W
VINE
ST
0.14
Well 17
02741004
2229
TIENDA
DR
8.03
Roget Park
02908206
401
N
MILLS
AV
0.14
Well
02917010
831
N
LOWER SAC
RD
0.07
Well 15
02921052
180
N
LOWER SAC
RD
0.55
Fire Station 4
02938011
0
20.94
Petersen Park, E -Basin, Sewer Lift Sta.
02941002
2206
W
OXFORD
WY
13.15
Glaves Park, B-1 Basin, Well 14
02952043
144
BOXWOOD
CT
0.04
Pedestrian Walkway @ LSR/WID
03104004
1426
W
CARDINAL
ST
2.37
Kofu Park (Northwest por.)
03104021
1145
S
HAM
LN
21.49
Kofu Park, Municipal Service Center
03104024
2000
TIENDA
DR
0.05
Sewer Lift Station
03114035
503
W
VINE
ST
0.18
Legion Park (Southeast por.)
03304022
1824
W
TOKAY
ST
11.99
Vinewood Park, B-2 Basin
03308043
835
S
HUTCHINS
ST
5.52
Legion Park (North por.)
03517408
1324
HOLLY
DR
0.27
Candy Cane Park
03719025
125
S
HUTCHINS
ST
10.08
Hutchins Street Square, Well 3
03721014
11
N
HUTCHINS
ST
1.87
Emerson Park
03727016
303
W
ELM
ST
0.23
Police Bldg. (portion)
03727038
310
W
ELM
ST
0.97
Public Parking Lot, Court 1
03727046
215
W
ELM
ST
0.66
Police Bldg. (portion)
03728015
305
W
PINE
ST
0.39
Carnegie Forum
03902010
1101
W
TURNER
RD
0.71
Lodi Lake (along Laurel Ave.)
03910020
0
51.88
Lodi Lake
03938028
838
N
HAM
LN
0.10
Pedestrian Walkway
04111018
600
N
PLEASANT
AV
0.98
VanBuskirk Park
04116405
13
E
PEFORCE
AV
0.05
Alley
04122002
217
E
LOCKEFORD
ST
1.36
Parking Lot, Vacant (S/Armory)
04123039
333
N
WASHINGTON
ST
3.17
Armory Park, Armory
04124027
221
E
LAWRENCE
AV
15.24
Grape Bowl
04124028
350
N
WASHINGTON
ST
10.20
Lawrence Park, Zupo Field
04124041
401
N
STOCKTON
ST
7.53
Softball Complex
04125038
1119
AWANI
DR
3.00
Scenic Overlook (por.)
04131055
407
E
TURNER
RD
0.05
Sewer Lift Station
04141001
1120
AWANI
DR
0.65
Scenic Overlook (por.)
04146039
412
YOKUTS
DR
0.04
Sewer Lift Station Access
04302109
201
W
LOCUST
ST
1.25
Library
04302213
215
W
ELM
ST
1.01
Police Bldg. (portion)
04302302
114
W
LOCKEFORD
ST
0.01
Well
04302610
11
W
ELM
ST
0.20
Public Parking Lot (Portion)
04302612
17
W
ELM
ST
0.16
Public Parking Lot (Portion)
04303109
210
W
ELM
ST
1.50
Public Safety Bldg., Parking Lot
04303111
221
W
PINE
ST
1.50
City Hall, Parking Lot
04303401
10
S
CHURCH
ST
0.43
Downtown Parking Lot #1 (por.)
04303409
30
S
CHURCH
ST
0.31
Downtown Parking Lot #2
04303707
50
N
SACRAMENTO
ST
1.32
Lodi Station Parking Structure
04303708
1
S
SACRAMENTO
ST
1.00
Lodi Station (por.)
4/12/2006 Page 1 of 3 CityParcels.xls
City Owned Parcels
APN
Num.
Dir
Street
Str.
Acres
Actual City Use
04303709
24
S
SACRAMENTO
ST
1.91
Lodi Station (por.)
04304304
114
W
OAK
ST
0.31
Downtown Parking Lot #3
04304313
117
W
WALNUT
ST
0.25
Downtown Parking Lot #4 (por.)
04304314
140
S
CHURCH
ST
0.13
Downtown Parking Lot #4 (por.)
04304315
120
S
CHURCH
ST
0.07
Downtown Parking Lot #4 (por.)
04304411
219
S
SCHOOL
ST
0.04
Abandoned Well #3 (fut. PCE cleanup site)
04304520
107
S
SACRAMENTO
ST
0.00
Electric Vault
04304703
112
S
SACRAMENTO
ST
0.01
Electric Vault ??
04304705
6
E
OAK
ST
0.18
Lodi Station (por.)
04304707
8
E
OAK
ST
0.21
Lodi Station (por.)
04307201
100
E
PINE
ST
0.31
Old Shanghai (Adopt -A -Child lease)
04308204
22
E
LOCUST
ST
0.79
Vacant (acquired for Indoor Sports Facility)
04308407
111
N
STOCKTON
ST
0.62
Park & Recreation Annex
04308408
122
N
MAIN
ST
0.02
Park & Recreation Corp Yard, Water Tank
04308410
122
N
MAIN
ST
0.00
Park & Recreation Corp Yard, Water Tank
04308411
125
N
STOCKTON
ST
1.22
Park & Recreation Office
04308601
208
E
LOCUST
ST
2.64
Hale Park
04320228
543
E
LOCUST
ST
0.39
Kilellea Substation
04323006
705
E
LODI
AV
1.01
Fire Station 2, Well 1
04530033
1330
S
SACRAMENTO
ST
0.01
Industrial Wastewater Lift Station
04531001
2
E
LODI
AV
0.62
Maple Street Square (leased to AA group)
04710001
1050
S
STOCKTON
ST
8.96
Blakely Park, Well 6
04902014
824
E
TURNER
RD
0.35
Well 11
04904038
77
S
CLUFF
AV
0.14
Cluff SD Pump Station
04912031
6013
E
ST RT 12
HY
0.04
Abandoned Well #11
04913002
18021
N
KENNISON
LN
0.16
Abandoned Well #10
04913047
17700
N
GUILD
AV
0.08
Abandoned Well #1 OR
04918028
515
N
CLUFF
AV
0.05
Sewer Lift Station
04925013
1215
E
THURMAN
ST
8.10
Reid Industrial Substation
04925061
500
S
GUILD
AV
9.09
Future EUD/Animal Shelter Yard
04925083
930
S
BECKMAN
RD
28.33
Pixley Park, C -Basin
05512003
12001
N
THORNTON
RD
158.57
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05512008
11889
N
THORNTON
RD
12.64
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05512011
0
N
THORNTON
RD
235.73
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05513004
12299
N
THORNTON
RD
65.65
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05513013
12351
N
THORNTON
RD
58.88
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05513016
0
160.00
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05515014
12919
N
THORNTON
RD
2.00
Wastewater Treatment Plant (vacant por.)
05515015
12849
N
THORNTON
RD
10.30
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05515017
12905
N
THORNTON
RD
6.20
Wastewater Treatment Plant (vacant por.)
05515029
0
225.35
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05519001
11839
N
THORNTON
RD
99.15
Wastewater Treatment Plant (por.)
05803010
2800
W
KETTLEMAN
LN
4.10
Future Elec. Substation, Well
05810020
1520
E
HARNEY
LN
0.30
Sewer Lift Station
05816053
2126
W
KETTLEMAN
LN
0.07
Well 20 (por.)
05816088
2126
W
KETTLEMAN
LN
0.05
Well 20 (por.)
05823023
0
1.98
DeBenedetti Park, G -Basin, Fut. Well
05823024
2350
S
LOWER SAC
RD
45.96
DeBenedetti Park, G -Basin, Fut. Well
05851061
1811
LEXINGTON
DR
2.66
Neighborhood Park (Century Meadows)
06010006
1426
W
CENTURY
BL
16.63
Beckman Park, Fire Sta. 3, A-2 Basin, Well 16
06012307
2238
W
NEWBURY
Cl
0.04
Pedestrian Walkway
06013049
2184
NEWBURY
Cl
3.69
Century Park
06021011
1105
W
BRADFORD
Cl
0.05
Pedestrian Walkway
06022025
1012
W
WIMBLEDON
DR
0.05
Pedestrian Walkway
4/12/2006 Page 2 of 3 CityParcels.xls
City Owned Parcels
APN
Num.
Dir
Street
Str.
Acres
Actual City Use
06024002
601
E
HARNEY
LN
0.07
Well 19
06202041
1420
S
HUTCHINS
ST
0.01
Well 12
06206001
1408
S
STOCKTON
ST
0.09
Well
06215031
334
W
LAMBERT
CT
0.01
Landscape Strip
06215032
335
W
LAMBERT
CT
0.01
Landscape Strip
06222016
200
W
CENTURY
BL
0.11
Well 18
06228002
2101
S
STOCKTON
ST
21.00
Salas Park, D -Basin
06229019
2001
S
CHEROKEE
LN
0.29
Well 22
06229036
275
CULBERTSON
DR
1.13
Neighborhood Park
06241027
2459
MAGGIO
CI
0.09
Well 23
06264034
2449
SAN MARTINO
WY
0.76
Harney/99 widening RM
119
Parcels
1,422
Acres
4/12/2006 Page 3 of 3 CityParcels.xls
Under Utilized
City Parcels
M:\OPEN\EXHIBITS\06X012.dwg, Layoud, 4/12/2006 8:26:59 AM, jpizzo