HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - October 18, 2006LODI CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2006
C-1 CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
The City Council Closed Session meeting of October 18, 2006, was called to order by
Mayor Hitchcock at 6:30 p.m.
Present: Council Members — Beckman, Hansen, Johnson, Mounce, and Mayor Hitchcock
Absent: Council Members — None
Also Present: City Manager King, City Attorney Schwabauer, Deputy City Clerk Perrin, and
City Clerk Johl
C-2 ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION
a) Actual Litigation: Government Code §54956.9(a); one case; Hartford Accident and
Indemnity Company, et al. v. City of Lodi, et al., Superior Court, County of San Francisco,
Case No. 323658
b) Actual Litigation: Government Code §54956.9(a); one case; People of the State of
California: and the City of Lodi. California v. M & P Investments, et al., United States
District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CIV -S-00-2441 FCD JFM
C-3 ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION
At 6:30 p.m., Mayor Hitchcock adjourned the meeting to a Closed Session to discuss the above
matters.
The Closed Session adjourned at 6:55 p.m.
C-4 RETURN TO OPEN SESSION / DISCLOSURE OF ACTION
At 7:01 p.m., Mayor Hitchcock reconvened the City Council meeting, and City Attorney
Schwabauer disclosed that Item C -2(a) was discussion only and Item C -2(b) was not discussed.
A. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
The Regular City Council meeting of October 18, 2006, was called to order by Mayor Hitchcock at
7:01 p.m.
Present: Council Members — Beckman, Hansen, Johnson, Mounce, and Mayor Hitchcock
Absent: Council Members — None
Also Present: City Manager King, City Attorney Schwabauer, Deputy City Clerk Perrin, and
City Clerk Johl
B. INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Reverend Michael Voytek, Providence Reformed Church.
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Hitchcock.
D. AWARDS / PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS
D-1 (a) Following introductory comments by Joseph Wood, Community Improvement Manager,
Mayor Hitchcock presented the Community Improvement Award to Gerry and Valerie
Phillips, owners and residents of 930 S. Central Avenue, for their efforts in improving and
maintaining the appearance of their property.
D-2 Proclamations — None
D-3 Presentations — None
Continued October 18, 2006
E. CONSENT CALENDAR
In accordance with the report and recommendation of the City Manager, Council, on motion of
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson, Beckman second, unanimously approved the following items
hereinafter set forth except those otherwise noted:
E-1 Claims were approved in the amount of $5,404,572.47.
E-2 The minutes of August 16, 2006 (Regular Meeting) and September 19, 2006 (Shirtsleeve
Session) were approved as written.
E-3 Approved the plans and specifications and authorized advertisement for bids for roof
replacement improvements at Legion Park, 835 South Hutchins Street, and Kofu Park,
1145 South Ham Lane.
E-4 Adopted Resolution No. 2006-183 awarding contract for Traffic Signal Preventive
Maintenance and Repair Program, Fiscal Year 2006-07, to Republic ITS, of Novato, CA, in
the amount of $18,894, and appropriating funds for on-call traffic signal repairs in the
amount of $20,000.
E-5 Adopted Resolution No. 2006-184 authorizing the Fee Payment Agreement for 2223 West
Kettleman Lane and authorizing the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the standard
fee payment agreement on behalf of the City.
E-6 Adopted Resolution No. 2006-185 approving Hold Harmless Agreement with Lodi Unified
School District for temporary placement of six portable classrooms on north Grape Bowl
parking lot.
E-7 Adopted Resolution No. 2006-186 authorizing the City Manager to enter into a professional
services agreement with Power Engineers, Inc. of Hailey, ID, in the amount of $115,819, for
engineering and design of the scaled-back rehabilitation of Killelea Substation and to reject
all other design/engineering proposals.
E-8 "Authorize the City Manager to execute a land lease with the Community Partnership for
Families of San Joaquin for construction of a Family Resource Center at Blakely Park" was
removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed and acted upon following
approval of the Consent Calendar.
E-9 Adopted Resolution No. 2006-187 authorizing the City of Lodi to endorse the California
Memorandum of Understanding in support of the National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency.
E-10 Adopted Resolution No. 2006-188 authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute
standard Electrical Interconnection and Co-Energy/Net Energy Metering Payment
Agreements and adopting the standard form of said Agreements.
E-11 Adopted Resolution No. 2006-189 authorizing the receipt of $23,000 in grant funding from
the State Department of Housing and Community Development.
E-12 Set public hearing for November 1, 2006, to consider the following (CD):
a) Certify the Lodi Annexation Environmental Impact Report for the Southwest
Gateway Project (including "other annexation areas") and Westside Project
b) Approve the Southwest Gateway Project, which includes an annexation;
pre -zoning; amendment to the Bicycle Transportation Master Plan; and
Development Agreement; to incorporate 305 acres into the City of Lodi (257 acres
with the Southwest Gateway Project area and 47.79 contiguous acres outside the
Project); to allow construction of 1,300 dwelling units, 5 neighborhood/community
2
Continued October 18, 2006
parks, and a public elementary school on the west side of Lower Sacramento
Road, south of Kettleman Lane, north of Harney Lane
Including a City initiated request for the 'other annexation areas" (47.79 acres) for
annexation, General Plan Amendment from a land use designation of PR (Planned
Residential) to MDR (Medium Density Residential), and a pre -zoning of FMD
(Residential Medium Density) to avoid creation of a county island
C) Approve the Westside Development Project, which includes an annexation;
pre -zoning; amendment to the Bicycle Transportation Master Plan; Development
Agreement; and an amendment to the Westside Facilities Master Plan to
incorporate 151 acres into the City of Lodi to allow construction of 750 dwelling
units, 3 neighborhood/community parks, and a public elementary school at
351 East Sargent Road, 70 East Sargent Road, 212 East Sargent Road, and
402 East Sargent Road
ACTION ON ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
E-8 "Authorize the City Manager to execute a land lease with the Community Partnership for
Families of San Joaquin for construction of a Family Resource Center at Blakely Park"
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson pulled Item E-8 for further discussion.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson expressed various concerns regarding the proposed lease
including those associated with mental health treatment at the facility, a public park located
next to the youth facility, 50% usage capacity, probation services, and abandonment for a
year. He also suggested six months would be a better time frame for leaving the building
vacant should the program end.
Mayor Hitchcock stated she was concerned with the 50% capacity potential. She also
stated the probation officer works closely with children already on probation in the
surrounding schools.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson stated the probation, lease terms, mental health uses and
other fine points should be clearly spelled out in the lease.
City Attorney Schwabauer advised that the language in the lease provides the City Council
with an ability to approve, strikeout, or otherwise lockout specific uses.
City Manager King stated the 50% amount was set forth as a limitation to ensure the
programs offered currently will continue to be offered in the future. He also stated that the
50% provides that no more of the space may be dedicated to a particular use; although, the
City Council can decrease that amount or prohibit a particular use outright.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson stated he preferred to discuss alternatives and options for
filling the gaps if certain uses were prohibited and a shorter abandonment time period at a
future meeting.
Council Member Mounce stated she has the same concerns as Mayor Pro Tempore
Johnson and two additional concerns. The two additional concerns pertained to a shorter
overall lease term, in lieu of the 55 years, and maintenance problems with an outdated
facility at the end of the term. She suggested returning the facility to a park if the
partnership no longer needs the facility. Ms. Mounce preferred the item be brought back to
Council after the concerns are addressed.
Council Member Hansen stated he is not opposed to addressing concerns but would prefer
to take action on the matter tonight. He stated the persons running the program will ensure
Continued October 18, 2006
employees are not endangering the public and the Boys and Girls Club has a similar 55
year lease. Mr. Hansen stated he agreed with reducing the abandonment period to six
months and would like to move forward.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson stated the present situation is not similar to the County jail
program because the persons working in the parks are screened by the Sheriff's
Department and are convicted of non-violent and benign crimes.
Council Member Beckman stated he agreed with the six-month abandonment term and
inquired about prior approval regarding use flexibility. City Attorney Schwabauer advised
there is an implied duty to allow reasonable use and the City Council may tighten up the
uses so long as the modifications are reasonable.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
oo Robina Asghar, Executive Director of Community Partnership for Families of San
Joaquin (CPF), provided a brief overview of the program. In addressing particular
concerns, Ms. Asghar stated probation officers work on youth grounds and serve
families and children in the Family Resource Center (Center). She stated they do not
bring in criminals to the Center and mental health services refer to the counseling
services offered to families and children.
Council Member Hansen inquired about the specifics of the probation program.
Ms. Asghar stated there is no invitation to adults who are on probation and the program
provides supervision. Mr. Hansen asked if the probation program played more of a
preventive and supportive role. Ms. Asghar replied yes. Mr. Hansen inquired about the
peacekeeper program for gang outreach. Ms. Asghar stated the peacekeepers work
with children who are in gangs or subjected to gangs. She stated peacekeepers work
with Lodi Unified School District directly and are not housed at the Center.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson indicated Ms. Asghar has reasonable responses to the
Council's concerns, the solutions should be clearly written into the lease, and the lease
should be brought back to Council if it cannot be rewritten tonight.
Council Member Mounce stated she still has concerns regarding he 55 -year term and
building maintenance at the end of the lease.
Mayor Hansen stated the lease cannot be rewritten from the dais, agreed that the six-
month abandonment period is sufficient, suggested a lease term reduction to 25 to 30
years and urged the revised lease be brought back to Council at the next meeting.
Mayor Hitchcock requested clarification regarding uses. City Attorney Schwabauer advised
the uses are spelled out in the lease and the Council would need to amend the lease now
in order to effectuate any proposed changes or restrictions to the mental health, probation,
and gang outreach uses.
MOTION:
Council Member Beckman made a motion, Hansen second, to authorize the City Manager
to execute a land lease with the Community Partnership for Families of San Joaquin for
construction of a Family Resource Center at Blakely Park, with an amendment to the
language in the lease regarding abandonment/cessation of use by CPF to be for a
continuous period of six months, rather than 360 days.
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson stated he is not prepared to approve the matter tonight and
suggested Ms. Asghar meet with the City Attorney to revise the lease as needed.
0
Continued October 18, 2006
MOTION WITHDRAWN:
Council Member Hansen stated he can support continuing the item for language
modifications as long as the matter comes back to Council at the next meeting. Mayor
Hitchcock suggested the matter be placed on the Consent Calendar for the next City
Council meeting. Council Member Hansen withdrew his second, and the motion died for
lack of a second.
City Attorney Schwabauer stated he was generally clear on the direction Council wanted to
take and asked for specific direction regarding building maintenance. Council suggested a
form of security, such as a rehabilitation bond, be researched.
The matter was continued to the November 1, 2006 City Council meeting.
F. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
oo Woody Alspaugh spoke in opposition to the potential development of the greenbelt area
between Stockton and Lodi. He provided a description of transfer development rights and
requested that the City remain apprised of related issues.
oo Chuck Easterling spoke in favor of stronger law enforcement efforts to control vagrancy within
the City. Mr. Easterling spoke specifically of his concerns regarding vagrancy in the downtown
area on Sacramento Street between Pine and Elm Streets and suggested the matter be
reviewed by the City Council at a regular meeting. Council Member Hansen stated the
aggressive solicitor ordinance is coming before the Council shortly and the ordinance may have
some overlap, but it focuses on a different issue. Mayor Hitchcock suggested the ordinance
come back to Council in the near future.
00 David Johnson spoke in opposition to a recent decision by SPARC to overturn conditions of his
use permit. Mr. Johnson stated he addressed the City Council last month on the same issue
and due to a lack of a response, is requesting the matter be put on a shirtsleeve session or
Council agenda before November 7, 2006. Mayor Hitchcock stated staff is working on the
matter and Mr. Johnson's patience is appreciated.
G. COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
00 Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson urged the public to attend the Candidate's Forum at Hutchins
Street Square and complimented the Fire Department in its handling of the fire on Pine Street.
00 Mayor Hitchcock stated she attended the annual arts open house, which was a great success.
H. COMMENTS BY THE CITY MANAGER ON NON -AGENDA ITEMS
00 In regard to the vagrancy concerns, City Manager King stated the aggressive solicitation
ordinance and the loitering ordinance will be coming before the City Council shortly. Mr. King
stated the Police Department is continuing to look at loitering in the downtown area and may be
addressing the matter by way of an anti -camping ordinance.
In regard to David Johnson's comments, City Manager King stated the matter is on the looking
ahead schedule and is prioritized with additional citizen requests. Mr. King stated it is difficult
to process and manage the numerous issues that arise, but staff is trying to address the matter
in an expeditious manner.
City Manager King introduced new City Clerk Randi Johl.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1-1 Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on
file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Hitchcock called for the public hearing to consider
adopting resolution levying annual (2007) assessment for Downtown Lodi Business
Improvement Area No. 1 and confirming the Downtown Lodi Business Partnership 2006-07
Annual Report (as approved by Council on October 4, 2006).
Continued October 18, 2006
Mayor Hitchcock reviewed the mechanics of the hearing procedure requesting business
owners in the affected area protesting the proposed levy to speak first for the ease of
recording the formal protest, followed by general public comments on the matter.
City Manager King stated the item is a follow-up action item to a work plan submitted by
the Downtown Lodi Business Partnership (DLBP) and the process requires the City Council
to conduct a public hearing. Mr. King stated the City Council must open the public hearing
and close it within thirty (30) days. He also stated an ordinance will be bought back to
Council at a later date.
Chuck Easterling, President of the DLBP, provided an overview and history of the financial
statements submitted to the City Council, which were submitted as part of the record. Mr.
Easterling discussed topics including, but not limited too, coinciding the statements with
the DLBP and City fiscal years, public access to the financial statements, Brown Act
compliance for Board meetings, making and correcting mistakes by an all -volunteer Board
and paid staff of two, an increase in fees to account for inequities, proposed 20% increase
to offset City funding, layout of funds in the financial statement, and general promotion and
improvement of the downtown business area.
Mayor Hitchcock stated she has seen positive changes in the downtown area over the
years and asked how long it has been since the last increase. Mr. Easterling replied
assessments have never been raised in the DLBP's eight year existence.
Council Member Hansen stated his prior comments may have been misunderstood and
suggested there may be a better way to perform similar functions without bureaucratic
oversight. Mr. Easterling analogized the Lincoln Center scenario stating it is not a similar
situation because the DLBP does not have access to similar resources. Council Member
Hansen stated the timing is good to reassess the process to ensure success can be
achieved within a large group of diverse and independent business owners.
Council Member Mounce thanked Mr. Easterling for the revised financials and stated she
did not believe the DLBP was involved in any wrongdoing. Mr. Easterling stated recovery will
be difficult and the job of the DLBP is to manage downtown affairs, but it has become more
of an event organization. Mr. Easterling stated it is difficult to do capital improvements and
street clean-ups when baselines are so low, and any alternative is going to involve costs to
businesses.
Council Member Beckman stated the problem appears to be within the ordinance and
inquired about the status of the organization's existence. City Attorney Schwabauer stated
the organization is funded through June 2007, but it will not be able to carry itself from
January to June 2007 if the assessment is not approved. Mr. Schwabauer stated the
organization will legally exist but will have no funds to operate. Mr. Easterling stated the
three remaining events are service related and give back to the community.
Mayor Hitchcock stated she would hate to see funding cut off because the organization did
improve the downtown area over the last eight years. She stated it is difficult to operate a
business on a shoestring budget with no increases over the last eight years.
Hearing Opened to the Public
NOTE: Hearing opened to receive formal protests against the levy of assessment
00 Russ Daniels (Stogie's Cigar Lounge) protested against the proposed increase based
on his concerns of a lack of benefit to the businesses on the outer edge of the district
boundaries and two businesses operating with the same name.
NOTE: Protest portion of the hearing closed.
n
Continued October 18, 2006
RECESS
At 8:45 p.m., Mayor Hitchcock called for a recess, and the City Council meeting reconvened at 8:55
p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING (Continued)
1-1 NOTE. Hearing portion remained open to receive general comments regarding the subject
matter.
(Cont'd.)
00 Peter Westbrook spoke in favor of the proposed increase based on his support of the
DLBP and their efforts in the community over the years.
00 Ramona Henninger spoke in opposition of the proposed increase based on her
concerns of inequities in zoning and DLBP's poor business relations with other
businesses.
00 Bryan Hayn spoke in opposition of the proposed increase based on his concerns of
vacancies on Sacramento Street, DLBP's poor business relations with other
businesses, financial accounting, and openness of Board meetings. Mayor Hitchcock
asked Mr. Hayn if he attends Board meetings. Mr. Hayn stated he does not attend but
he did provide ideas to his sister, the former DLBP president.
00 Russell Smith spoke in opposition to the proposed increase based on his concern of a
lack of communication by DLBP with its members. Council Member Hansen asked Mr.
Smith if he received any information regarding the assessment when he purchased the
business eighteen months prior. Mr. Smith replied he was told about the assessment
but did not receive any literature from the City or DLBP.
co Trina Anderson spoke in opposition of the proposed increase based on her concerns of
DLBP's poor business relations with other businesses, lack of oversight, inequities
between businesses based on event location, and financial practices.
00 Pat Patrick, President of the Chamber of Commerce, spoke in support of the proposed
increase pursuant to the Chamber's policy to support the DLBP and assist in making it
a successful organization. Mr. Patrick suggested a focus group assess the best way to
move forward and work together to ensure the success of the downtown area. Council
Member Hansen asked Mr. Patrick if he believes businesses benefit from the DLBP.
Mr. Patrick stated while he can better speak about the Chamber's events, some
businesses might benefit more than others from the DLBP events. Mayor Hitchcock
suggested some businesses may indirectly benefit simply by other businesses being
located in the area.
00 Maureen Williams spoke in opposition to the proposed increase based on concerns of
zoning and event exposure, inequities for Sacramento Street business owners and
DLBP's poor business relations and practices. She requested an audit be performed
before an increase is implemented. Council Member Hansen inquired about
Ms. Williams' event. Ms. Williams stated she did not know if the DLBP included her
event as their own.
co Tilly Easterling spoke in favor of the proposed increase based on her support of the
improvements made in the downtown area over the last several years. She stated there
is a collateral benefit to all businesses because businesses would not exist without
one another and urged everyone to get involved with the DLBP to work together to
address concerns.
7
Continued October 18, 2006
00 Greg Solligan spoke in favor of the proposed increase based on his support of the
DLBP as a volunteer organization with minimal resources and encouraged business
owners to serve on the Board.
00 Nancy Hauan, Treasurer of the DLBP, stated she was not paid to audit the books, an
informal audit was done by Aletha Cochran, tax returns are done by a district member,
and payroll is done by an outside agency. Mayor Hitchcock inquired about the
concerns voiced at the meeting. Ms. Hauan stated she would need to review the
information.
Council Member Mounce inquired about the money received at the Farmers Market.
Ms. Hauan and Mr. Easterling stated the proceeds are received by the Beer and Wine
Company and then given to the DLBP. Ms. Mounce suggested reviewing the event
income to determine whether or not the event is worth doing.
00 Peter Westbrook stated every transaction at the Beer and Wine Garden is cash and
the process probably needs to be reviewed. He also stated special events create a
collateral benefit by bringing awareness to the downtown area.
oo Chuck Easterling stated the two schools of thought are events create synergy and
everyone benefits or it takes away from businesses because merchants sell their own
products. He stated the DLBP did a sponsorship fee for the Beer and Wine Garden this
year. He stated due to Alcoholic Beverage Control (%BC) requirements, the vendor
does set up, collects proceeds directly, turns the proceeds over to the DLBP, and
DLBP writes a check for the product. Mr. Easterling stated they get approximately
$5,000 for beer and wine. He also reputed earlier claims regarding business practices
and zoning inequities.
Council Member Johnson asked why the income of $5,000 for a sponsorship fee was
not listed. Mr. Easterling stated the process for the Beer and Wine Garden is set up to
meet the requirements of the ABC and the license.
Council Member Hansen confirmed the cash collection was based on ABC
requirements and asked if the one that owns makes a profit. Mr. Easterling replied yes.
Mayor Hitchcock suggested rotating the sponsorship and Mr. Easterling agreed it was
a good idea and stated as of the current time no other person wanted to do it.
00 David Johnson spoke in opposition to the procedures associated with handling cash at
the Beer and Wine Garden.
oo Trina Anderson stated DLBP was not in compliance with the financial obligations
imposed upon it as a 501c(6) business.
00 Brian Hayn stated the process for allowing Lodi Beer and Wine Company to have the
Beer and Wine Garden is flawed and suggested a review of the same.
00 Roger Remche, owner of Lodi Beer and Wine Company, provided a brief history of how
and why the business began holding fie Beer and Wine Garden, stated the $5,000
amount was a benchmark set by the previous company, and suggested that logistically
it makes sense to hold the event where it is.
Public Portion of Hearing Closed
Council Member Hansen inquired about the number of businesses that protested. Deputy
City Clerk Perrin replied approximately 100.
Continued October 18, 2006
MOTION #1 / VOTE:
The City Council, on motion of Council Member Mounce, Hitchcock second, unanimously
certified the results of the protest hearing as follows:
Averaged total weighted assessment: 37,450
50% of the weighted assessment: 18,725
Protest fails at: 10,163 (equivalent to 27.14%)
Discussion ensued among the City Council and City Manager King regarding the difficulty
of making a decision, how the DLBP evolved, the need for an audit, minority and majority
concerns, business improvement district history, and the City facilitating a solution between
the two groups.
MOTION #2:
Mayor Hitchcock made a motion to adopt resolution levying annual (2007) assessment for
Downtown Lodi Business Improvement Area No. 1 and confirming the Downtown Lodi
Business Partnership (DLBP) 2006-07 Annual Report. The motion died for lack of a
second.
MOTION #3:
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson made a motion, Mounce second, to approve the DLBP 2006-
07 Annual Report, with the elimination of the levy of assessment. City Attorney
Schwabauer pointed out that it was unnecessary to approve the DLBP Report, as it was
previously approved at the regular Council meeting of October 4, 2006.
MOTION #4 / VOTE:
Council Member Mounce made a motion, Johnson second, to adopt a resolution levying
annual (2007) assessment, without the proposed 20% increase, and confirming the DLBP
2006-07 Annual Report; and further to require the DLBP to have a full audit performed on its
financial records in order to address the concerns of the business owners and review the
matter in six months to determine whether or not to assess the 20% increase. The motion
failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members — Johnson and Mounce
Noes: Council Members — Beckman, Hansen, and Mayor Hitchcock
Absent: Council Members — None
Council Member Beckman suggested tabling the item to modify the structure of the
organization. City Manager King stated the two camps associated with business
improvement districts are the "David Kilborn Model" and "Marco LiMandri Model" and stated
the City's current set up is based on the Kilborn model. Mr. Beckman suggested
contacting Marco LiMandri.
MOTION #5:
Council Member Beckman made a motion to direct the aty Manager to contact Marco
LiMandri regarding the possibility of contracting with him as a consultant to address the
issues brought forward by the business owners. The motion died for lack of a second.
City Attorney Schwabauer advised that tabling the matter past September would result in
operational difficulties for the DLBP because it would legally exist but there would be no
funding.
Council Member Johnson inquired about holding the current level assessment while
providing research time for the LiMandri model. City Attorney Schwabauer stated the legal
mechanism to do that is to approve the existing assessment and return in six months with
a revised assessment, which would require additional procedures.
E
Continued October 18, 2006
MOTION #6 / VOTE:
The City Council, on motion of Council Member Hansen, Hitchcock second, adopted
Resolution No. 2006-190 levying annual (2007) assessment for Downtown Lodi Business
Improvement Area No. 1, as submitted (i.e. including the 20% increase in the assessment),
and confirming the DLBP 2006-07 Annual Report. The motion carried by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members — Beckman, Hansen, and Mayor Hitchcock
Noes: Council Members — Johnson and Mounce
Absent: Council Members — None
Further, Council Member Hansen suggested that the DLBP address the issues raised by
the property owners and that it review other potential models under which it could be
formulated.
VOTE TO CONTINUE WITH THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING
Mayor Pro Tempore Johnson made a motion, Hitchcock second, to continue with the remainder of
the meeting following the 11:00 p.m. hour. The motion failed by the following vote (requires a four-
fifths vote):
Ayes: Council Members — Hansen, Johnson, and Mayor Hitchcock
Noes: Council Members — Beckman and Mounce
Absent: Council Members — None
J. COMMUNICATIONS
J-1 Claims filed against the City of Lodi — None
J-2 Appointments — None
J-3 Miscellaneous — None
K. REGULAR CALENDAR
K-1 "Authorize the City Manager to execute agreement with property owner for watershed mural
at 207 West Oak Street" was pulled from the agenda pursuant to the above vote.
K-2 "Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager to accept a grant award for the Railroad
Corridor Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Plan from the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) in the amount of $75,000 with an in-kind contribution of $9,250
and a fiscal contribution of $9,500 and to execute all necessary agreements; and upon
execution of the grant by Caltrans, authorize the City Manager to solicit proposals from
qualified consultants to prepare a Railroad Corridor TOD Plan in a designated area
downtown" was pulled from the agenda pursuant to the above vote.
K-3 "Adopt resolution authorizing the City Manager and Electric Utility Director to procure
energy and/or natural gas for fiscal year 2007-08 at a cost not to exceed $25 million" was
pulled from the agenda pursuant to the above vote.
K-4 Approve expenses incurred by outside counsel/consultants relative to the Environmental
Abatement Program litigation and various other cases being handled by outside counsel
($11,309.23) was pulled from the agenda pursuant to the above vote.
L. ORDINANCES
None.
10
Continued October 18, 2006
M. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at
11:14 p.m.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl
City Clerk
11