Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - May 21, 2004 SM (3)LODI CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET FRIDAY, MAY 21, 2004 Re -adjourned from Wednesday, May 19, 2004 (Original meeting date was May 18, 2004) A. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL The Adjourned Special City Council meeting of May 21, 2004 (re -adjourned from Wednesday, May 19, 2004), was called to order by Mayor Hansen at 7:00 a.m. Present: Council Members — Beckman, Howard, Land, and Mayor Hansen Absent: Council Members — Hitchcock Also Present: City Manager Flynn, Interim City Attorney Schwabauer, and City Clerk Blackston B. REGULAR CALENDAR B-1 "Approve Special Allocation for expenses incurred by outside counsel/consultants relative to the Environmental Abatement Program litigation ($313,529.16)" MOTION #1 / VOTE: The City Council, on motion of Mayor Hansen, Beckman second, approved Barger & Wolen invoice #200028.25 in the amount of $61,499.75 and invoice #198068.25 in the amount of $64,342.76. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members — Beckman, Howard, and Mayor Hansen Noes: Council Members — Land Absent: Council Members — Hitchcock MOTION #2 / VOTE: The City Council, on motion of Mayor Hansen, Beckman second, approved Treadwell & Rollo invoice #0099687 in the amount of $37,526.50; Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard invoice #213150 in the amount of $91,609.68 and invoice #213604 in the amount of $53,509.47; and the Downey Brand invoice in the amount of $414. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members — Beckman, Howard, Land, and Mayor Hansen Noes: Council Members — None Absent: Council Members — Hitchcock C. CLOSED SESSION At 7:00 a.m., Mayor Hansen adjourned the Special City Council meeting to a Closed Session to discuss the following matters: a) Actual Litigation: Government Code §54956.9(a); one case; People of the State of California: and the City of Lodi. California v. M & P Investments, et al.; United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CIV -S-00-2441 FCD JFM b) Actual litigation: Government Code §54956.9(a); one case; Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, et al. v. City of Lodi, et al., Superior Court, County of San Francisco, Case No. 323658 C) Conference with legal counsel — initiation of litigation: Government Code §54956.9(c); two cases d) Conference with legal counsel — anticipated litigation — significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9; one case; pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b)(3)(A) facts, due to not being known to potential plaintiffs, shall not be disclosed e) Actual Litigation: Government Code §54956.9(a); one case; City of Lodi. a California Municipal Corporation. and Lodi Financing Corporation. a California nonprofit corporation v. Lehman Brothers. Inc. and US Bank National Association, United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. CIV. S-04-0606 MCE-KJM Continued May 19, 2004 f) Public Employment: Government Code §54957 — to consider the appointment or employment of an independent contractor serving in the capacity of a public officer or employee The Closed Session adjourned at 7:45 a.m. D. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION / DISCLOSURE OF ACTION At 7:46 a.m., Mayor Hansen reconvened the Special City Council meeting, and Interim City Attorney Schwabauer disclosed that the City Council voted 40 to file a petition for review by the State Water Resources Control Board of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Cleanup and Abatement Order No. R5-204-004. No other reportable action was taken in Closed Session. E. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 7:46 a.m. ATTEST: Susan J. Blackston City Clerk W