HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - February 7, 193815
ce.urcIL C AR:3ERS -- CITY CC•U;CIL
_`_ -- CITY OF LODI
Monday, February 7, 1938.
The City Council of the City of Lodi met in
regular session at b:GO o'clock P.M. of Monday, February 7,
199t, Councilmen Clark, Craffiena, Spooner, .:eine and
Steele present, none absent.
The minutes of the last regular meeting held
January 17, 193b and that of the special meeting held
January 31, 193d were read, approved as read and so indorsed
by the Mayor.
No persons appearing at thts time, the order of
public aearings was passed and the eouncil proceeded to hear
communications and reports.
The Clerk read notices from the "tate Loard of
equalization in resard to several applications to sell
alcoholic beverages in the City. No action taken.
A letter of thanks ..as received from the Lodi
Community ty Male Chorus.
0. is. Schroeder applied for the position of
Buildin= Inspector.
The Aca :po Farm Loan Association thanked the
Council by letter for allowing them to use the auditorium
in the City ,--a11 for their annual meeting.
A letter was received from Mr. 0. C. Parkinson
Attorney for F. Dolcater, alleging that the dumping of
storm and serer rater by the City into the .00dbridge
Canal Sy stem damaged Mr. Dolcater' s land. On motion of
Councilman Spooner, seconded by Councilman ; ei^e, the
communication was ordered referred to the City Attorney.
Y Communication was received and read from the
City "o'.._.dil of the City of Los rngeles in reard to
presenting a nroposal for a nevi allocation oflicuor license
fees and excise taxes on the agenda of the call session of
the State Legislature. No action taken.
The Clerk reported that he had received another
notice iron the State Division of Immigrat?on and housing
as to unsanitary conditions at Martin's Camp Ground, 400
'est Lockeford Street.
The report of the Chief of Police and that of
the ?oundmaster for the month of January were received,
read and ordered filed.
On motion of 'ouncilran Spooner, seconded by
Councilman Graffi._na, :resolution Yo. 948 was introduced
and read by the -lerk.
RESc:L-jTIC NO. `..8
IN THE _. __iR OF THE PETITION OF HE= FINK E_ AL
FCR 1EG0NIisG CF REAL ?RC?NTY It: THE CIT_ CF LCDI
or, the 21st day of December, 1957,
Henry rink and others filed a petition asking that the
Southerly 100 feet of each of Lots 23 and 24in-lock 10
of the Lodi Barnhart 'Tract be removed from the Multi-
family residence Lone to the Commercial Lone; and,
16 C _p
C =;CIL C.A.*3--IS -- CITY CCJ?GC=L
Cl HALL -- CI, -j' -- LC1J_ ..
-- v
Lon--av, -ebruary 7, 1956
Continued
'WHEREAS, said netiticn was .referred to the City
Plannir_fv Com=ission and by said Co:r i ssion returned to this
Cit -,.r Council :.i t'n its reconmenLation that said netition be
granted, and,
4)r:L3 A5, this City "cuncil caused notice to be
published in accordance .:ith the provisions of Ordinance i.o. �.
2�8 wherein it vias stated that a public hearing uculd be
held uro~ said Let_tioz at :CC o'clock P.::i, of I,--onda-y,
February 7, 1538 and that cerscns objecting to said change
in zo:in- could f_*le objections thereto up to the said hour
and date, and,
:JyR:�S, no objections have been filed with- the
City Clerk or presented to this City Council and this City
Council ras r_o•zr jurisdiction to order the chane in zone made
in accordance `ri =: said petition;
BL IT v=SCI:; I:D T=�.T such petition be granted and
that the City At-,crney be, and he is hereby directed to draw
an amendment to said Grdinance ^:o. 23b and present the sa.,.e
to this Uity Council for aaortion.
The Foregoing Resolution No. Sob was then passed
and awo_-tecb? the assantin; votes of Councilmen Sooner,
Graffi-na, Clar::, ,ei're and Steele, Plones none.
The Clark read two alleged protests Tiled by
Jcrn = essel and i J. Phalws in regard to the proposed
orer_ing of Sout-h church Street and on motion of Council -an
Claris, seconded by Councilman ,:eii:e, Resolution i4o. 947
was i ^troduced, read b;- the Clerk and considered b;, the
Council.
RLSCL'Jl'• 10:i I•; C . 947
H!'SCL TICli SL TIPl DA - _E FCP .__6RT_ G 011 ALLEGED
`) T • r T nL r, ' IEN: T j.-,'_ T T_T__ ^, Fi
_ _-vT�S_3 __"-A_1T5 _r. 0_ _.. 0�' 1Ci;=,Y r��� v U=wH
ST i....TS rS -P; _ T:�__ Zd Tr;I R R S;;L_ _Ci! Tvv. �jL�L.
yRAS, this City Council of the city or Lodi
did, on the third day of January, 1 3b, pass and a_f_opt its
Resolution of intention i;o. �l�1r, wherein it stated th.at said
City "o�r_cil intended to do the follov:i= .aork and i.-nprovement
in said City, to
(1) That TCXAY ST -t^=.1 be opened, ::idened and extended
from the ::est Zine of the Lodi arnhart Bract to the east line
of South Sacramento Street, and from the ;.-est line of South
Sacr__Mento otreet to the .est lire of South Church Street
extended southerly.
(2) That mouth Church Street be opened, v:idened and ,
e,tenced fro-: its rresent ter -urination at the north line of
Lot 1, 31oci_ 7 of "autehins Addition to the '1'cvrn of Lodi"
to the s:;utherr, city limit lire on the r ettleman-Terminous
Road.
._= _i7AIS, notice of the a�eption of said
Resolutionyi1o. Q).4 ::as published in time, form and manner in
the "Lodi Times° the official oualication of said City as is
evidenced by the affidavit of Ruth o. Durfey on file and of
record in the office of the City (;ler--c of this City, and,
1 11
4
C J1"! 1L ✓71ti. L_�5 -- C-1 f CCUI"v=
C --'---Y HALL -- C111 -l' G LCD
i,:orday , February 7, 1936.
Cont -hued
_,L.5, notice similar in form a nd substance to
'hat-ablis'aed as aforesaid vas posted alonz the line of
said c�ntemplated 'i.ork and ir:prover:ent as recrired by law
as is eviderced by the affidavit of Clifford uatzert, also
- on file ani: o' record in the office of said City clerk; and,
Y. E X15, over ten days have elapsed since the final
pu::lication of said notice and since t>:e postin. t1nereof and
two (2) objections or alleged objections have been filed
ritb: the Gity Clerk by persons interested in the lands to be
assessed to pay the cost and expenses or said `rork and
improvement;
BB ii i-ESCL`.D, that this City Council does and
it hereby sets ,Lcrday, the 21st day of February at b:00
o'clock r.;,. of said day and the Council Chambers of this
City Council in the City Zlall in, this City as the ti, *.e and
place :risen and nhere said objections shall be heard. The
bit,T Clerk will notify the said objectors or -_urported
objectors of such hearing in the manner provided by lavr.
The forezlcir.; Resolution bio. 9L.7 was then passed
and adopted by the f olloviinS vote:
A,=S: Co-nciI en, Clark, -eihe, Cra ft na,
Spooner and Steele
_S: Ccuci -en, acne
^.
A:3S; _ I. Cou.^cii^en, _:on e
The Cit77 znoineer presented a final map of
"Samert Suidivisicn" and on motion of `�our_ci_man Clark,
seconded by Co, ci_man ".eine, :resolution 14o. C,46 approvinE
this sub.ivision Sas introduced and read by the clerk.
..M.S%Lv_ 1Gii 1L V . 946
�" ZREAS, F. T S ;::-, HT and :.ARY J. B 1:E iT, his
fe and CLQ S. Jr CrSGi and 3`£ILIA JACtiSGiti, his Wife,
have presented a ?yap numbered Tract No. 22, Subdivision of
San Joaquir_ County and entitled "lap of Banert Subdivis_or.
Being a ne-subdivision of Lots 7 to 22 and Lots 29 to 41
inclusive of "Bi :MEY SUBU B '+ ACRES"";
APID ''LHEREFS, the preliminary map of said sub-
division vias approved by the City Flannino Commission of this
City or. the llt day of Oanuary, 19311 and the said nap first
herein mentioned a^roes with the said prelir.inar;y map,
IT RESCLY�D, by the City Leouncil oi' the ''ity
of Lodi that said :.gip be, 2nd the 2arie is hereby accepted as
a leval subdivision and this Gity Council, for and on behalf
of said pity, he_eby accepts tae streets, avenues and drives
and ^_--lic utility easements as delineated on said nap as
public str,ats, avenues, drives and easexaents,
The forezoin.� Jesolution No. 9L6 •has then passed
and adopted b-- the folio,. -,rim.,- vote:
n �S; Gcunci leen, Claris, "eihe, Graffilna,
Spooner and Steele
:G15: Cou^.ci'l, en, r cne
AB3L_,-T. Co:ncilnen, Kone
18
CC�rCIL C7AE.B� S -- CI`rv_ Ctu :Cli ^�^
CIT i_7UL -- CT-: li^ LODI V
Llonday, February 7, 1930.
Continued.
On motion of the 1,:ayor, seconded by Councilman Clark,
the Ulerk was directed to write to the oviners of property in
blocks :'mer a majority of the sidewalks had been installed
except inf ont of their property and state that the Coar_cil
intended to take legal proceedings to con -plate sidewalks in
swch cases.
Claims i