HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - March 4, 1953187
CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LODI
COUNCIL CHA,-:BERS, CITY HALL
MARCH 4, 1953
This regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi
held beginning at 5:10 o'clock p.m. of March 4, 1953: Councilmen
Preszler, Richey, Rinn, Robinson and Haskell (Mayor) present;
absent, none.
Minutes of the previous meeting, February 18, 1953, were
approved as written and mailed.
COMMUNICATIONS
Letter from the California Roadside Council urging
opposition to State Senate bills 733 and 734 which
BILLBOARD will abrogate certain rights of the counties regarding
CONTROL billboard control. The matter was deferred until
the next meeting to allow time to study the bills.
Letter from Joe E. Brown, Chairman of National Smile
SMILE Week, requesting the Mayor to cooperate in the ob-
WEEK servance of National Smile Week, March 9 through
March 14, was tabled with no action taken.
Letter from Better Fishing, Inc., stating that a
BETTER registration certificate evidencing registration
FISHING,INC. in the National Better Fishing Program for Boys and
Girls was being forwarded to the City of Lodi by
parcel post.
Letter from Carlos A. Sousa, San Joaquin County
INVITATION Sheriff, extending an invitation to the Mayor and
TO SJC LAW City Council to attend a meeting of the San Joaquin
ENFORCEMENT County Law Enforcement on Civil Defense March 12,
OFFICERS 1953, at the County Honor Farm. City Manager H.D.
MEETING Weller is to be the speaker. Mayor Haskell indicated
that he would attend.
Letter from the Western Advertising System request-
ing permission to place bus benches in the City
which would carry advertising. The City would re-
RE�UEST TO
ceive 4' .50 per bench per month. The advisability
PLACE BUS
of permitting advertising on the City streets with -
BENCHES ON
out control of the Council was questioned by Coun-
STREETS
cilman Robinson. Councilman Rinn suggested that
perhaps this matter could be handled locally with-
out bringing in an outside advertising firm. Action
on the matter was deferred until it could be re-
ferred to the Chamber of Commerce for comment.
Letter from Lodi Post No. 22, American Legion, in -
AMERICAN
viting the Mayor and City Council to the 31st Annual
LEGION
American Legion Picnic on May 2 and 3, 1953, at
PICNIC
Micke Grove.
REPORTS
OF THE CITY MANAGER
City Manager Weller presented the Project Statement
for Secondary Street Maintenance prepared by the City
SECONDARY
Engineer. Mr. Weller pointed out that the specific
STREET
streets included in the statement for work were
MAINTENANCE
tentative and the final determinations could be made
PROJECT
at a later date. With the understanding that the
STATEMENT
Council would be consulted on any modifications to
the plan, the Council passed the motion of Council-
man Rinn, Richey second, to approve the recommenda-
tions of the City Engineer and authorize the City
Manager to sign the statement for the City.
188 Minutes of March 4, 1953 continued.
The City Manager reported that one bid was received
I
or the installation of sanitary sewers in Lowe's
Village and Century Manor. The bid received was
REJECT
substantially higher than the estimate of the City
SEWER BIDS
Engineer, so the City Manager recommended that the
RES. #1727
work be done by force account. On the motion of
ADOPTED
Councilman Rinn, Richey second, the Council adopted
Resolution No. 1727 rejecting the only bid and
authorizing the work to be done by day labor. —
Mr. Weller called the attention of the Council to
the fact that the lease to Griffin and Miller of the
80 -foot strip east of Cherokee Lane had expired and
GRIFFIN
should either be renewed or cancelled. He explained
AND
that the City had received complaints from the resi-
MILLER
dents in the vicinity regarding the stacking of
LEASE
lumber and the creation of.dust. He further sug-
gested that the matter be pended until the next meet-
ing to allow time for study of the situation.
A claim on the part of Mary Reichenberg was presented.
The claim is for personal injury suffered by a fall
REICHENBERG
in a hold surrounding the base of a broken light
CLAIM
standard, November 5, 1952. On the motion of Coun-
cilman Robinson, Richey second, the claim was re-
jected and ordered forwarded to the insurance carrier
for the City.
Mr. Weller reminded the Council of the meeting with
the Super Mold Corporation and the protesting resi-
dents of the area -on March 24. When it was pointed
SUPER MOLD
out that this was the same evening the Chamber of
MEETING
Commerce was to hold a meeting to discuss the traffic
and parking problem, it was agreed that the meeting
of the Council should be postponed to the following
evening, Wednesday, March 25.
The final map of the Costa Tract was submitted for
approval. There being no objections to the lot
design or the street dedications, the map was ap-
proved on the motion of Councilman Robinson, Rinn
FINAL MAP OF
second, and the Mayor was authorized to sign said
COSTA TRACT
map in approval thereof. Mr. Costa then addressed
APPROVED
the Council and requested that he be relieved of
the 4175 per acre charge for storm drainage for
those lots facing on West Lockeford Street and on
California Street. Mr. Costa explained that his
request was based on the fact that improvements on
these streets, including curbs, gutters, and storm
sewers have been in many years and that this property
has been within the City for the same period or
longer. Councilman Robinson suggested that the
matter should be referred to the City Engineer for
recommendation. Councilman Rinn asked if this isn't
the same problem the Council will face with each
new subdivision. Mr. Weller stated that he fi4t
that it was more a problem for the City Council
than for the City Engineer since the question in-
volved is whether the City Council wishes to deviate
from its standing policy or not. Mr. Clifford
Gatzert, appearing on behalf of Mr. Costa, explained
that the problem was different from other subdivi-
sions in that the drainage pattern has already been
set up and the pending subdivision will not intro-
duce a change to this drainage pattern on the
streets in question. Mayor Haskell pointed out
that the curbs, gutters and storm sewers on these
streets were installed by the City and the property
owner did not bear the expense at the time of in-
stallation. Mr. Weller pointed out that the improve-
ments to be constructed on the property abutting on
'•:inutes of March 4, 1953, continued.
189
said streets will increase the water run-off, and
the expense of this increased run-off will eventually
have to be met by someone, whether it is the City
or the subdivider. City Attorney Mullen stated that
practical application of the exception to the present
council policy may later prove emc:mrrassing to the
City Council. Councilman Preszler moved, Rinn
second, that there be no deviation from the Council
policy regarding storm drain charges in this case.
Mr. Gatzert then pointed out that the approved
subdivision contained five lots, included in the
subdivision for convenience only, which are already
built upon. These lots are at the present time
in different ownerships, and have been for many
years. Councilman Preszler then amended his motion,
FIVE LOTS
with approval of the second, to exclude the five lots
EXCLUDED
(Lots 1, 52, 53, 54 and 55) since they were already
FROM
developed and the improvements were in, and because
STORM SEdER
they were included in the subdivision map only as
CHARGE
a matter of convenience. The motion was approved
by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmen, Preszler, Richey, Rinn and
Haskell
NOES: Councilmen, Robinson
1'0ir. Weller introduced the discussion of the problems
confronting the City by the street trees which
have grown and are extending their roots to the
point where the roots have injured the sidewalk
and curbs. He reviewed the problems of liability
STREET
for injuries sustained as a result of faulty side -
TREES
walks and drainage problems resulting from the roots
pushing up the curbs and streets and preventing the
normal flow of water in the gutters. He further
reviewed the action taken by the City Council in
calling upon the Davey Tree Surgeions to survey
the street trees within the City and to report
DAVEY
thereon. He then submitted: -the report of the Davey
REPORT
Tree Surgeons. The report designated 899 trees
SUBi:ITTED
surveyed for some type of remedial action. Of
this number 285 trees were designated for removal,
542 trees were designated for root surgery, and
72 trees were designated for heading, pruning and
balancing. Councilman Richey stated that she
would be the last person to advocate the unneces-
sary removal of street trees, but since the greatest
offenders were the sycamore trees, a fast growing
variety, they could be replaced with trees more
adaptable for growing in confined spaces. Council-
man Robinson pointed out that the trees are our
most valuable asset and every possible means should
be taken to preserve them. Mr. H.E.Looser protested
the removal of trees, and questioned the costs to
the taxpayers of the removal. Mir. Karl Nickel,
addressing the Council as a representative of the
Native Sons of the Golden West, stated that the
Native Sons were interested in preserving trees
wherever their existence is threatened. He further
stated that cracks in sidewalks or damage to curbs,
gutters or sewers was relatively unimportant where
trees were concerned. The President of the Native
Sons of the Golden West informed the Council that
;:r. nickel was not authorized to speak for the
Native Sons, nor were his views those of the Native
Sons. Mr. itiEax Eison informed the Council that
approximately 950 of the claims. against the City
over the past ten years arose from faulty side-
walks. I�X . Don Berry, agent for the City's present
insurance carrier, stated that his insurance firm
19 () Kinutes of March 4, 1953 continued.
had recentl; completed a survey of the City of
Lodi and the firm was not happy about the condition
of the sidewalks in the City. Failure to correct
the situation, he stated, will cost the City more
money for liability insurance. Councilman Richey
indicated that she favored a replanting program in
conjunction with any plans for the removal of offend-
ing trees. Councilman Rinn stated that he believed
the Council should proceed carefully in any re-
moval program and he favored a careful screening _
of each tree, if need be, before it is removed.
Mayor Haskell replied that the Council would have
to come to some agreement as to authority to deter-
mine the destiny of the tree. He stated further
that if the Council has to approach each tree
with an emotional ooinion, then he did not wish to
sit on that Council. Councilman Robinson stated
that he felt that the Council had already made
some progress on the subject, but that he had not
had an opportunity to study the report thoroughly
as yet. Therefore, he suggested that a decision
on the matter be postponed. The City Manager
suggested that perhaps the Davey people could be
prevailed upon to visit Lodi, at the convenience
of the City Council, and offer additional informa-
tion or explain the report in further detail. This
was agreed upon.
Mayor Haskell then announced that the City had
been approached by representatives of the owners
of the Turnage Market and the adjoining parking
lot relative to•the acquisition of that property
by the City. The City Council had indicated an
TURNAGE
interest and had entered into negotiations with
MARKET
the owners in an attempt to establish a firm
asking price. The Council was interested only
in getting a fair and realistic price set upon
the property before bringing the matter before
the public and reaching a decision. They were
never able, he said, to receive -a figure which
in their opinion was a reasonable figure. The
owner has been notified to this effect. The Coun-
cil will continue to have an interest in the
property as long as it is available, he added,
but the Council does not feel that it should pay
more than the property is worth. He further
added that the Council had never committed itself
to pay 4113,000 or any other figure. Mr. H.E.
Looser addressed the Council to state that at no
time does the City Council have to have secrecy
in property negotiations.
Claims in the amount of 4118,399.98 were approved
CLAIMS
and ordered paid on the motion of Councilman
Robinson, Richey second.
A map providing for the development of seven lots
on the north side of Graffigna Avenue east of
Cross Street by Ralph Graffigna was considered.
REQUEST FOR
City Clerk Glaves explained that the map was sub -
APPROVAL OF
witted for approval of the City Council under the
LOT DESIGN
provisions of Section 11535, (b), (1), of the
BY RALPH
Business and Professions Code, which except from
GRAFFIGNA
the Subdivision MaD Act Darcels of less than five
acres which abut upon an improved street and which
call for no street opening or improvement. A
representative for the developer addressed the
Council to ask if, in the event approval of the
map were given by the City Council, it would be
possible to redesign the lots to a smaller size.
The Council agreed that, since the design of the
lots was not in final form, the matter should be
submitted to the Planning Commission for recommen-
dation to the City Council.
Minutes of March 4, 1953 continued.
191
A letter was submitted by the City Attorney as a
result of a request by the Roman Catholic Archbishop
of San Francisco that the City of Lodi initiate the
necessary proceedings to abandon an alley lying be -
INTRODUCE
tween Lots 2 and 3 in Block 6 of the City of Lodi.
ORD. NO.470
The strip of land is not shown as an alley on the
ABANDONMENT
original map of "Mokelumne" but was created by a
OF ALLEY
reservation in a deed from Ada L. Hutchins. The
EAST OF
church has obtained a quitclaim deed from Ada L.
ST. ANNE'S
Hutchins, but wishes abandonment proceedings in order
SCHOOL
to remove any question of public interest in the
matter. Ordinance No. 470, declaring the intention
of the City Council to abandon said alley was intro-
duced on the motion of Councilman Robinson, Preszler
second.
The City Clerk reported on the proceedings to waiver
the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation,
and Majority Protest Act of 1931" in re: "The South
Church Street Lighting District". He reported the
receopt of 75 cards from property owners of which 7
S.CHURCH ST,
requested the benefits of the special investigation.
LIGHTING
This represented approximately 5% of the property
DISTRICT
owners in the special assessment district. On the
motion of Councilman Rinn, Robinson second, the Coun-
RES. #1724
cil adopted Resolution No. 1724, adopting the plans
RES. #1725
and specifications for the installation of street
RES. #1726
lights in said district. The Council then adopted
Resolution No. 1725, finding and determining that
the owners of less than 15% of the area of lands
in the proposed district have demanded the making
of the special investigation, on the motion of
Councilman Rinn, Preszler second. The -Council then
adopted Resolution No. 1726, declaring its intention
to order the erection and construction of street
light standards and the necessary wires and conduits
for the purpose of providing street lights on South
Church Street between West Lodi Avenue and Kettleman
Lane, on the motion of Councilman Robinson, Preszler
second. The above resolution further declared that
public hearing on the matter would be held April 15,
1953.
A petition requesting the annexation of Lots 29,
32 and 37 of the Gerard Tract and signed by Angelo
Grattone was presented. Mr. Grattone is the sole
RES. #1722
owner of the property involved. The boundary des -
ADOPTED
cription of the proposed annexation was approved by
the County Boundary Commission and the annexation
GRATTONE
was approved by the City Planning Commission. Reso-
ADDITION
lution No. 1722, declaring the intention of the City
Council to annex the above territory as uninhabited
territory and setting the date for public hearing on
April 1, 1953, was adopted on the motion of Council-
man Rinn, Preszler second.
A petition signed by Charles S. Canepa and Myrtle
Canepa, Christ J. Mettler, and Lillian H. Bunch
requesting the annexation of uninhabited territory
RES. #1723
owned by the petitioners abutting on South Fairmont
ADOPTED
Avenue opposite Lodi Memorial Hospital was presented
for approval to the pity Council. The description of
50TH ADDI-
the boundaries of the proposed annexation had been
TION, LANDS
approved by the Boundary Commission and approval of
EAST OF
the annexation had been received from the Planning
LODI MEM.
Commission. On the motion of Councilman Preszler,
HOSPITAL
Robinson second, the Council voted to adopt Resolu-
tion No. 1723, declaring its intention to annex the
above territory to the City of Lodi and setting
April 1, 1953, as the date for public hearing.
At 10:50 o'clock p.m, the Council adjourned on the
motion of Councilman Robinson.
ATTEST: i
V
HENRY A. GLAVES, JR.
City Clerk