HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - July 15, 1959430
CITY CO7N0IL. CiT•r O. LCDI
CO7 CIL C;!A 332, CI?Y F LT
Jun' 15. 105q
_.._s regular _-feting of the Ci^y Council of the City of Lod;
held beginning at 5:00 o'clock n.m. of ',:ednesda.y. July 15. 1959:
Councilmen Culbertson, Katza.kian. :•:i tchell. Robinson and 3rown
(!•:a'ror, p`'a,
resent: none absent. City nager (naves. Planning
Director Rodgers and City Attorney "sullen present.
i iter for July 1, 1959 were approved as
written and mailed nn motion of Councilman
_ .tzari a_r . _Witchell second.
Li'_7 TC I'ARI.:.S
-'0 .-2
TD2S 13 -t JJ 10
S-2DHRO TRACT
0R... c ,
- ,=3
.-.•-'r Brown called for hearing on the ..rnrosea
rez;n:ne from °-d multiple family residential
to .-P to^.r.-erci ^1 -prof. office of the nropert•.•
on the north side of .:est Pine Street from the
City =Ta.'1 to Hutchins Street and the south .tae
of Pine Street fon Plea=..n. Avenue to
Hatch4ns Street. The Dlanning Commission
_-^ommended the nraposel rezoning. Yiss Carol
-;',a _.loi e in behalf of the rezoning. =here
were no protests. either written or oral. On
mnt ton of Councilman Robinson. Katzakia:! second.
the City Council by unanimous vote introduced
O'riinance No. S53 rezoning said pronert:r to the
-ori-ercial-professional office district by
reading of title on1-r and waiving reading of the
ordinance in full.
--.e ::a:ror then called for public hearing on the
nr posed rezoning from the :?-d oultirle family
residential zone to the 0-2 general commercial
..one of Lots 13 and 10, Storro 'relt. being
on the north side of Kettleman Lane between
S;cc_;ton and Washington streets. :here being
no protests. either written or oral, on motion
of Councilman Mitchell, Culbertson second. the
Council by unanimous vote introduced
._.Cance No. 554 rezoning said lots to .-2 by
actin' of title only and waiving reading of
the ordinance in full.
At meeting
Jul. 13, 1959 the Planning
Co-.missionrecommended to the City Co'lno+l
that the fees for zoning c'^.ar._•-e re^uests and
..._nit rets be increased to more
..g age cover t.^._ actual Coat of oroo.essin-
e cpolicat!ons. as follows: The zone change
f._ should be increased from 320.00 to 540.00
and the use Permit fee from 310.00 to 320.00.
The City -anage- read the memorandum from she
Fla....'_n- Director outlining the basis for the
requested increase. After discussion of the
rroposed fees, on notion of Council -an Robin-
son, Yttohell second- the Council introduced
crdinanc_ N,. 655 amending Ordinance No. 359
changing the fees as recommended.
431
:JE- ER L ?°-. fo- Oamares of Hicnard D. by his
-',_- ,eor-_ ete_ner in e ar:oun c_ :?x,000 _ ,_
__ juries sustained •,rule Ola -in= at rsor
...^001-r0'ln _a. l:.^. mo -i— Of ..11"1..-_M_.-.=�atE?.___. .
Culbertson second cl..ir_ was ..ted and
..:.,__ed to the Citv's sent of Record.
BAR33RA -_t.__ from Edward Barbera renuesti^- nermission
CTILIT'�.- fc- . _nrnrar. _ .nnec+,i ons to *,he -v 19 11ter . R ew._ .
e t__ a,nri drainage systems f ?A acres - land
at 1561 South C„urnh Street out,ide the
;re ma.es the red',.-.st on the basis
the, -.1s nelrs or SCess-^). - --title ,,r 111
_site ..nnpxa tion of this na^cel and that such
t -moo-.sr'r services nay be termi n'-te; b: the C_ .
even` and ouch time , h'. his ,._.rs or
,_?.essors in titl= objeet or nro''egt
in or _ the e -ren, the oras=_nt
_-.__-.-_tion Oroceedin,s are not co -meted `'or .nr
^-soft. The Planning Director stated th^-t
--nerty is before the Count -r 3oAn:-.ry Commission
an_a-ral whi._ is _._-tired ore the
...,ef+it_on
be . resented to the Cit:. Counc4I m Ln O'ilberts,^
.--. ed. T atzakiar second, that ., _'-egiteR t t,e
e.a on the conditions stated in the letter ;:krd
.-Ilition that the netition nest b= fried with
C_.y within thi-tv dans.
S"= -;`: 7 ---,ter fre- the Ca'_ifornia Stat _ -.1 to Mobile ?ssnci-
CI ;_TIO::d ation inforrin? the Council thaw the Cit- has re-
ceived citation in the AAA Pedestrian PrO;ram for
no- h;Lrine P. sina_e nedestrian fat,.li t-✓ r?urinz
95:9 -nd tha.t F. certificate tharefor would be
-resented to the cit"'.
i
C,^
PT& ,I__ i C=-. anersr presented a lette- Eros the Par.ific
JOIT- POLE e'eOhnne and ^:elearanh Comnan? concernin?
COSTS di,iPion of .joint Viols costs undor the GenerRl
i -int Pole A?reement of 1910. it is rr000sed
-
-gc, 0 ?2A3 ,._at the r.or7a1 maxirn•ln snace r.er oo'. e for the
-DOS T ED o" Lodi be five feet -.rd for the Telenhnne
Corear,-r, three feet. Should either narty reserve
77-7e than the maximum normal snace.r.'n.at -,srty
bear the cost of the extr . -+ole 0n
-,)7;-on ._ ,unci lm n {attar; an. ,.11b-r+,son sec -end,
Cit ".o'<ncil adooted Resolution _io. 92d:9
�et,.-_
in =.4'reement to the above conditions as set fOrt:n
t.n-_.._...
DIi. 0? HHG: -- 2e=oll..ion `(o. 2249. an-orovin:a 1Q5q-50 .em-
[vA''.S oran, u^ of Ai7reement for Exrendit•tre of En-ineer-
in_ .allocation for City Streets" from the Stn.+e
Div4sion of si.�Thwa.,s and-.uthorizino the _-.'ro» to
.1.) 02 D exenute Same, wa4 .a'!onted on notion of Coon filmn
tchell. 'K�tz-.kian second.
DIV. 0' .._ii- The 1959-60 `fenorandum of Aareem.er` for Exner.ai-
;is.'f..w .. i'R�...._.-. ^. 0f saS _-.S Allocation fo.. �*o jo»Cif jt_eet?.
w' H, includes .maintenance of ma iii 0.nd senon.dn r.v
RDS. .i0. 2250 : •_eet._. nurchase of the Dow Oro^erty between Ham
AD0PTZD ani Pacific. c.nd therecon=tru^.tion of Turner Road.
was then -±resented for an-)rov-.1. Councilman 1at-
zakian moved. Vitnhell second. the adootion of
Resolution No. 2250 annrovin� said "HemorAndum of
s.areement" and authorizing- the -*n.vor to sign.
432
. 15, 95Q cont, �'
- . , '
5^e^i'.i^ations for Nater -,ire were-noroved
and _ vertisiri for bids authorize; on motion
o_" Councilman Katzakian. Robinson second.
-3"
'ne ..'_+v Manaeer stated that on=_ bid had been
.. ...--'.-_.i�
..._.•ed. from the CHcRPo Pu^_:r Com-r--_nv. for
the furnishing of a comminutor at 35.133.00.
_."S. ,. 22;
nd he _ecr,mmende! that the 333rd be made.
1t P^�C
Or notion of Cnuncilman"it^hell. 1at-zakian
second, the Council adore+.ed Recelu 4 on _'i o. 2251
-
a.w.rai_^.a the oontra.ct for the comm;n.itor to
...._.._�o Pum, Comranv.
=_ i:. RD
Two bids were received for install? -i o^ of
L AKE PARK
C'.._"''.} and crutter at Lodi L?.ka_ Park. '.. follows:
.=33 : .,-,_ _
Cl..:d._ .,. "Mood Com -pan 33.353.00 a -d Willi—
Burkh=.rit. 'Resolution o. 2252
�?'=. '.C. 2252
aw rdine the contract to Willi -.M B- rkh-.^? t
:.COPi 7
.as adonted on ^ration of Council�a-+ , IbsrtGon.
second.
`_RD
_e Ci v ..,.name then nr.esented the two bids
R..3 R 2.0
w:,ic + had been receive) for the Turner Road
P ,
Pa•rinc Project -tnd read the fo? 1ow4r_e me mor_
..;u^ addressed to the Cit•r Council from the
a-�. ..-. 2253
Dire^.:or of Public Works dated Jul'-- 15. 1959:
D ;PTSD
"':ie received two bids for Turner Re) -.d?^••
_n ---ne from the Claude C. `.wood ConDany
a -otal of 330.599.50. the other from the
Curertino Gravel Co., Inc.. _"or 340.7•51.00.
ij r;r e=timate of Cost for this nortinn of the
,work amounts to 313.350.00.
ccomnan•rin- the bid of the Claude C.
'.Rood C;-mnan'r was . letter s,atin� that they
_ _ unable to obtain. -.nd use a. 'Vod=1 5d Wood
.-_..er as srecified in Para�Trarh 2.09- of the
sneci`icaticns. This letter further states
--_, .'^ev wi1.1 ,,.se R Mode'_ d2 Wood ---Yer.
"in my opinion. whether a _Model 54 or a
:dodel 12 'flood "Miser is used is una.m.nortant.
3oth riachines will do the job ecue'l4 well
an: the Contract can be £uliv nerfor^:ed with
the use of ._ Model 12 lvond i•'i_cer. It is
further opinion that the Wood
,:=a -?'s cu�.lific-.tion is not ._ subs-an-
vari�tinn fro- the of the
s^e^___csti^ns: ^.na, the-,, bei:- thelow
r2C0^...._y`•7 u0 the rli' ,0:�_CL
Contr8e- be ...darned to .e Claale +
discus i on and further e xn'_an_tion.
was mored b -r Councilman K-.taakii-'_, sec-
onded by Council^.an. :?itchell an•= una:imousl;
carried that the Council finds that the
^.alifi^_ation and bid of the Crude :rood
Comna-. , was in substantial comnlia :c e with
t'.e :,o:ice Invitin- ?ids and that :he use
eauipment Dronosed by Claude .. ;rood
would result in the _:v ob.ainin.>_
com-ileted Droject as ^.alled for in the
--:.cations an_ accordin _. awards
bii to ..laude C. ':+ood Co :Dana for ,heir
bid _rice of 350,598.50 by adoDtior of
Resolution -"o. 2253
J_ ..rtes of __ -_nue
433
4.
were _.,.,.._,._._ the f_.
i%_ -Ii i;D so _H
..tree. - 'hts, -ha b44 c3-. f_._. ..._ec,__c
S13?_ _ 7.13,HTS
... 1_D enz n.0=7anj for .$10.13O.CC. -_._ lou=r___
=esolutl.,._ o. 2251 t___ leer.
2_S. _:1. X25^
'or ._._ street _1?ht',to , -e •'+l -'e tr e.. 7_-Jui .._._;
ASO _'
^o��an." on motion ofCot.-•---man
.,.____ second.
_,_?•r LA_,E RR
f.... • i' :.' -anli _ _eDorted that _7,7,,lication ..a1
CROSS 1_i
ceen to the Public rent:.;; ComM_ss ._ to
Cita on the priory_ist for ..rossin_
P=... =±0 2256
Protec__cr Funaz for sianalsat the Sou;^3rn
ADOPTE-D
Pa___'ic ComDar_-r Ham Lane .rossine. He st _tel
Cit,, ^. ,I been ._..^k inr the :.om _.-
.__, Californ.i _ Z`• _ t ..rc`35'_n - also ani th ,
:,._:;ns have been pla.eal on the streets to .. __._
...;or_.sts. .,ouncil_,.._ Hobinson =elt th'•t .._$c,ent
tr ._fi^ 'ices not just _._. .all?tion of .._ ._ ._
.. __ ._c. ... -..__ a- th13 t'me and
not nroc_ed w_,. the .^P.�iO .moi.. for funds unless
_., 'Je-e 4 -ire' it '.ra-ted the _-sta.tlation. .'Ie us=
of erre_._ for s_..._.• .._... d:s�:'..SS3.-. +O�lnp It i._nt-
zayia._ - , _t ._ -hat _if the State ;.rants -1h=-
_... the Cit, inonla .._•re V^,? s4--n?l s inst ----4
St-.tir- h -.t qe wF-.3 ie f;z.vor of 'h,vin, -iz^a's
rlt .... --ane. CouncilmcLn Culbertson roved .r.e
a.dontion o*_' '?Psolution _:.. 2255 ^.uthorizin the
.., make anolic'tion to the PllbliC _tilitieq
o^ci sion for Crossi.__ Protection Funds for sa-;
sane. `'he motion was seconded b; Councilman
•ii t r!he_ I and ,_ssed by _ fol lowin- vote:
Cons...^ilmPn - Katzal i_ -n Cul'o=_ „or..
r._tchel 1 .nd. 3ro w._
OP,;,. Council -en - Robins^.n
7PLI:, ;L7P_. _
?espi ,ion : o. 2255, -fire ,,_...- the Count-, .._
to collect del-_ .lent street _ice
-^scecsm_..ts in the 3,anset Aven•.._ and the lLcP.n,_-
R S. ti0. 2°95
_ ina_a.ck-Riribv Stre_.. Li? tin? District, waw`
7-�)PTEC
on notion of Counc__man Pob;nsnn. _r.7•
.•7__f.ian
7akiaSeco^a .
r1 1C rC__ _.1_
'�'o'.ncil-ian Katzaklan sta.ted that ther2 were Som._
oronert'r owners in the (it-, -,ll .,lock who w?nte-i
to '{"iow ',rpt?t the C1t'% intpnded to do remardin,
of thpir '+rooart s.-) ttiiat ,_rev co'.i?'l n an
e.ccor^in 17%, and in this connection he wished to
!,,:now ....en the C2,ai tal Outlav prowan would be
read-,- _„_ Dresentation to the Co•.ncil. The Cit -.
.'-3^ 9.23:- S a,id '!'. P. honed t0 I.a7e it read? in ::.i"1St.
�Iobinscn stated -hat t,e City should
nroceez to D'1rchase nro Derr: in the ',itv Rall
as it became available. Counci'_man Culbert-
son w s of the opinion th�.t the Council halre-
7P^rte_ 'JltP but had not desie-hated ano._.._
sire. .__ was -.ware that the other members of t^_
Cnunci= _zvored. the City Hall location, but he
felt that .definite plans should ne formulated as
to what ..o.,la bP .._Pded o,.eT at least the n-?xt
ten -rears, and that _akin= plans as the need arose
would be h9.Dhazardous. councilman Robinson movPd
that the esenT, C_tv Mall block be designated
as the site for a, riric Center. Ccuncilm..an .._.-
c'cell _conled the motion. Councilman Culbertson
restated that the Council should be more srecific
433
of i1a, v 1 19 �Q con �4 nued
KRtz-kian moved
t%at the mo -ion be table:! arld that the 'Oun-
cl Yinutes be cheesed as to sctior _read;
e
— =Otion Was seconled 0 "Inc
man lobinson. but he later withdrew hi s senond
-Lni asked for P vot--t on ;-is motion. 7here
vas further discussion an the nee^ for -)!E-nninb.
Go,incilnem ',itchell witlnd-.T '11a s=C')nl _�,'O
mntion and Council!r,!1L Robinson
them with,�rew his metion.
On motion of Council -.,.-.n 'ratzakian. Robinson
second. the neeti_n? adjourn- .
ATT ES T 3 EAT K C2 G ARIF-TuD I
Citv Clerk