HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - January 2, 1969292
CITY COU`3CIL, CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JANUARY 2, 1959
A regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning at
8:00 p.m. on Thursday,
January 2, 1969, in the City Hall Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Present: Councilman - BROWN, CULBERTSON, KIRST_EN,
SCHAFFER and HUNNELL (Mayor)
Also present: City Manager Glaves, Assistant City Manager
Peterson, City Attorney Mullen and Planning Director Schroeder.
PLEDGE
'Mayor Hannell led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
MINUTES
On motion of Councilman Culbertson, Kirsten second, the Minutes of
December 18, 1968, were approved as written and mailed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
REZONE 112
Notice thereof having been published in accordance with law,
W. TOKAY
Mayorrunnell called for the public hearing on the proposal to
rezone a parcel located at 112 West Tokay Street from the R-4 to
ORD. NO. 881
the R-2 District as recommended by the City Planning Commission.
INTRODUCED
There was no one in the audience who wished to speak in favor of
or against the proposal and the public portion of the hearing was
closed. Councilman Brown then moved the introduction of
Ordinance No. 881 rezoning a parcel at 112 West Tokay Street
from the R-4, Multiple -Family Residential Institutional District
to be in the R-2, Single -Family Residential District. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Schaffer and carried by unanimous vote.
REZONE 515-723
Notice thereof having been published in accordance with law,
W. KETTLEMAN
Mayor iunnell called for the public hearing on the proposal to
rezone parcels located between 515 and 723 West Kettleman Lane
ORD. NO. 882
from the R-3 to the R-220 District as recommended by the City
INTRODUCED
Planning Commission. There being no one in the audience who
wished to speak in favor or against the proposal, the public
portion of the hearing was closed_ on motion of Councilman
Kirsten, Schaffer second, the Council introduced Ordinance No. 882
rezoning parcels located between 515-723 West Kettleman Lane
from the R-3, Limited Multiple -Family Residential District to
be in R -MD, Medium Density Multiple -Family Residential District.
REZONE REAR Notice thereof having been published in accordance with law,
OF 950 S. Mayor Hunnell called for the public hearing on the proposal to
FAIRMONT rezone a parcel to the rear of 950 South Fairmont Avenue from
the R-3, Lirited Multiple -Family Residential District to the
HEARING R-1, Single Family Residential District as recommended by the
CONT'D City Planning Commission. The Planning Director introduced the
matter and explained that the parcel proposed for rezoning was
an off-street parking lot used in conjunction with the Fairmont
Convalescent hospital. The Planning Commission had originally
advertised the parcel to be rezoned to C -P, but later changed
their recommendation to R-1.
Dr. George Williams, owner of the property, stated he had not attended
the Planning Commission meeting when the matter was heard because he
thought it was being recommended for rezoning to C -P_ He stated that
he and Dr. Walter Reiss had plans to enlarge the convalescent hospi-
tal and would like to use the existing parking lot for construction
of an additional building. Dr. Williams said he felt the Planning
Commission was not aware of the future plans for the property when
they recommended the R-1 zoning. he requested the property be rezoned
to C -P as originally recommended by the City Planning Commission.
Victor Mever, 41 South Sacramento Street, also spoke against the
rezoning and requested C -P zoning for the parcel. Planning Director
Schroeder pointed out .hat the two adjacent lots should also be
considered in the rezoning.
-1-
29,9
Minutes of January 2, 1969 cont:.nued
City Manager Claves then suggested a meeting with the State might
be helpful. After further discussion, Mr. Meyer requested a
continuation of the matter and Councilman Kirsten moved that the
matter be continued pursuant to Mr. Meyer's request and directed
the City Manager to set up a meeting between the State Division
OF Highways, _Mr. Meyers and City officials as soon as possible.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Schaffer and carried by
unanimuous vote.
CV=
After Council discussion, Councilman Kirsten moved the hearing
be continued and the matter be sent back to the Planning
Commission_ for reconsideration and recom-nendation. The
_
motion was seconded by Councilman Brown and carried wish
Councilman Schaffer abstaining because of a conflict of interest.
REZONE -
Notice thereof having been published in accordance with law,
BEACON OIL
the Mayor called for the public hearing on the proposal to
REQUEST
rezone a 25 -foot parcel on the south side of East Elm Street
adjacent to the existing commercial zoning along North Cherokee
ORD. NO. 883
Lane from the R-4 to the C-2 District.
INTRODUCED
Mr. Joseph Deluchs, representing Beacon Cil Company, and Ralph
Lewis, Realtor, 111 Wes_ Lodi Avenue, spoke in favor of the
rezoning. There were no others in the audience who wished to
speak in favor of or against the proposal and the public portion
of the hearing was closed. Councilman. Schaffer then moved intro-
duction of Ordinance No. 883 rezoning a 25 -foot Parcel on the
south side of East Elm Street adjacent to the existing commer-
cial zoning along North Cherokee Lane from the R-4, Multiple -
Family Residential Institutional District to the C-2, General -
Commercial District. The motion was seconded by Councilman
Brown and carried by unanimous vote.
PLANNING COMMISSION
APPEAL -
The discussion of the appeal of victor Mever regarding the
McDANIEL IND.
tentative map of McDaniel Industrial Park having been contin-
PARK MAP
ued from the meeting of December 18, 1968, the City Manager
reviewed the opinion of the City Attorney as set forth in his
letter to the City Council of December 30, 1968, stating that
the requirement of the Planning Commission relating to the
area to be used for -he grade separation_ to be a reasonable
condition to approval of the subdivision map. Mr. Victor Meyer,
41 South Sacramento Street, representing Mr. McDaniel, stated
he felt -,t was unfair to require a 25 -foot strip to be set
aside as right of way for a grade separation when it was not
known for certain that there would be a grade separation. He
felt the City had caused Mr. McDaniel undue delay in the develop-
ment of his property. The City Manager stated the commitment
of the State Highway Commission was such that there could he
little doubt that the grade separation would be constructed.
Councilman Kirsten also assured Mr. Meyer that he had communi-
cation from the Division of Highways giving assurance that the
project would be constructed- The engineering delay of the
grade separation is due to the City's request for an underpass
rather than an over ass. The project is presently being delayed
while the State prepares models of the requested underpass. City
Manager Gla.w_s stated that the City and the State have progressed
as speedily as any government agency could on such a project. He
questioned Mr. Meyer as to what it was Mr. McDaniel wanted from
the City and explained that the City is not in a position to state
a definite time for acquisition of right of way. Mr. Meyer
stated that he realized the City could not be precise as to time
of acquisition and description of the property to be acquired,
but he wanted estimates as near as possible, ie stated his client
did not want to frustrate the project but did not feel his own
development should =ontinue to be delayed indefinitely,
City Manager Claves then suggested a meeting with the State might
be helpful. After further discussion, Mr. Meyer requested a
continuation of the matter and Councilman Kirsten moved that the
matter be continued pursuant to Mr. Meyer's request and directed
the City Manager to set up a meeting between the State Division
OF Highways, _Mr. Meyers and City officials as soon as possible.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Schaffer and carried by
unanimuous vote.
CV=
294
COMMUNICATIONS
Minutes of January 2, 1969 continued
CVD, LCC Notice was read of the Central Valley Division, League of
California Cities, meeting to be held in Riverbank on January
23, 1969, _
LEGISLATION A letter was read from the City of Marysville requesting the
City co adopt a resolution regarding property tax legislation.
No action was taken,
ABC Notice of application for alcoholic beverage license was read
LICENSE as follows: Person-to-person transfer, off -sale general, from
Doris and Hassan. Mosri to Robert J. Bennett and Forest J.
Gruniy-en, Lodi Avenue Liquar Store, 914 nest Lodi Avenue.
REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER
CLAIMS Claims in the amount of $290,523 were approved on motion of
Counc.Ll:an Kirsten, Schaffer second.
AGRICULTURAL City Manager Glaves read a notice of public hearing which was
PRESERVES - held December 16, 1968 by the San Joaquin County Board of
SJ COUNTY Supervisors for the purpose of creating an agricultural
preserve within one mile of the exterior boundaries of every
city in San Joaquin County, He recommended no action at
this time,
GASOLINE As requested at the meeting of December 18, 1968, the City
PURCHASE - Manager reported he had contacted local distributors and found
SJ COUNTY there to be no opposition to the City purchasing its year's
supply of gasoline, oils and greases through the County contract.
SALE OF City Manager Giaves reported that he had contacted the firm of
BONDS - Stone and Youngberg, the City's financial consultants, for
AGREEMENT advice regarding the sale of sewer and drainage bonds. He
found that a new agreement would be in order because of the
time elapsed since the last bond sale had exceeded that
origir_aLy planned_ The City 'Manager requested authorization
to sign the new agreement with Stone and Youngberg for services
r -for a sum of $4500. as submitteda On mot -on of Councilman _Kirsten, Culbertson
second, the Council auth-^rized the City Manager to sign said
agreement on behalf of the city-
LODI AVE. - The City Manager read a memorandum from the Public Works
CHURCH ST. Director recuesting authorization to install a water line on
WATER LINE Lodi Avenue and Church Street. This line would be installed
rather than the Cherokee Lane, Lockeford to Murray Street line
as budgeted. The line is necessary for the development on Lodi
Avenue between Church and School Street, The City Manager
recommended approval of the request. On motion of Councilman
Culbertson, Kirsten second, the City Council approved the
installation of the water line as requested.
WESTWOOD The City Manager explained that the Public Works Department is
EXTENSION proceeding with the extension of Westwood Avenue and needs a
determination as to who will be responsible for the improvements
on the west side of the street. Also, it will be necessary to
extend the water line in this area, In 1958 the owner of the
property on the west side of Westwood Avenue dedicated 2.4 feet
of right of way with the understanding that he would be responsible
for construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to his
property as well as the cost of one-half of the paved width of
Westwood Avenue along the south 67 feet of the property. Based
on the above understanding, the present property owner would be
recui.red to install 170 feet of curb, gutter and sidewalk for the
2.4 feet of right of way. The Public works Director and the City
Manager felt this was too much to ask of the property owner, as
they would not benefit greatly by the improvements. City Attorney
Mullenfelt this was a unique situation and the property owners
-3-
295
Minutes of January 2, 1969 continued
should not be required to pay for tae improvements on Westwood
Avenue. After further discussion, Councilman Culbertson
moved the City install curb, gutter, sidewalk and paving in
exchange for right of way on both sides of Westwood Avenue
from its end to Lake Street and the property owners on the
South side of Lake Street be required to install curb, gutter
and sidewalk as necessary. The motion was carried by unanimous
vote.
Councilman Brown then moved approval of the extension of the existing
in Westwood ater line .A The motion was seconded by Councilman Culbertson
to Lake Street. Ave.. an Carrie by unanimous vote.
SPECS -PUMP The City Manager presented specifications for a pump and motor
AND MOTOR for well 414. On motion of Councilman Kirsten, Schaffer second,
the Council approved the specifications and authorized calling
for bids thereon.
DRAINAGE -
The City Manager explained that the question of City participa-
ST. PETER'S
tion in the cost of storm drainage had been raised by the
LUTHERAN
Lutheran Church which is proceeding with the develooment of a
CHURCH
church west of Twin Oaks ?ark and a subdivision on the north
side of Oxford Way and across the street from the Park. In
developing cost figures for the development contract the church
and subdivider have been charged the acreage fee for drainage
and the credits for oversized pipes have been applied. Bids
for the construction have been received and the developers
are faced with costs in addition to the acreage fee. It is the
contention of the developers that the City, as a joint
developer, should share in this additional expense. The City
Manager stated that, in view of the fact the City has previously
agreed to share costs or water and sewer expense, it is reason-
able for the City to pay its share of the excess drainage
expense as a joint developer. He explained the acreage fee
charged the developers for the section of ievelopment involved
totaled $6,328 and the credits allowed totaled $13,53.50. The
City's share of the excess costs would amount to $793.25. After
discussion by the City Council, Councilman Kirsten moved approval
of City participation to the extent of $793.25 in the store
drainage costs as a joint development. Councilman Schaffer
seconded the motion and it carried by unanimous vote.
ORDINANCES
AMEND ZONING
ORDINANCE NO. 877, entitled "ADT ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 27
ORD. TO PROVIDE
(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF TIZE LODI CIT`: CODE AND THEREBY ESTABLISHING
INDUS. DISTRICTS
THE FOLLOWING INDUSTRIAL DISTRT_CTS - C -M, M-1 AND M-2," having
been introduced at the meeting of December 18, 1968, was brought
ORD. NO. 877
up for passage on motion of Councilman Kirsten, Schaffer second.
ADOPTED
Second reading was omitted after reading by title, and the
ordinance was then passed, adopted and ordered to print by the
following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - BROWN, CULBERTSON, KIRSTEN,
SCHAFR and HUNNELL
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
SIDEWALK - Councilman Brown asked questions regarding the sidewalk. repair
700 BLOCK which is being required of 12 property owners in the 700 block
N. CHURCH of North Church Street. He stated he had talked with some of
the property owners and they were not anxious to install new
-4-
296
Minutes of January 2, 1969 continued
sidewalks unless the planting strip is removed and the street
widened at the same time. They do not wish to oay for the
installation of sidewalks a second time if the City should
decide to widen the street in a year or two. The Public Works
Director explained that when the City is prepared to widen the
street it will relocate the sidewalk at no expense to the
property owners. The property owners are only being asked to
repair the sidewalks that are defective. Mr. Jones then
stated he would be happy to discuss the matter with the property
owners. Councilman Brown said he would explain this to the
property owners.
CAPITAL Mayor Hunnell asked the City Manager if it would be possible to
OUTLAY have the report on the Capital Outlay Program by April. The
PimGRAM City Manager stated he hoped the matter would be ready before that
time.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Mayor adjourned the
meeting at approximately 11:10 �p�m.
Attess BESSIE i. T
City Clerk
-5-