HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - June 7, 1972470
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JUNE 7, 1972
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning
at 8:00 p. m. on Wednesday, June 7, 1972 in the City Hall Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen - HUGHES, KATNICH,
PINKERTON, SCHAFFER
and EHRHARDT (Mayor)
Absent: Councilmen - None
Also present: City Manager Glaves, Assistant City
Manager Peterson, City Attorney Mullen, Planning
Director Schroeder and Public Works Director Jones.
INVOCATION The invocation was given by Mayor Ehrhardt.
PLEDGE Mayor Ehrhardt led the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag.
MINUTES On motion of Councilman Schaffer, Pinkerton second,
the Minutes of May 24, 1972 were approved as written
and mailed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
APPEAL RE Notice thereof having been published in accordance with
PREZONING law and affidavit of publication being on file in the
FRAHM PROP. office of the City Clerk, Mayor Ehrhardt called for
DENIED the public hearing on the appeal of Attorney Raymond
B. Lucas on behalf of Dr. Chris R. Keszler, Dr.
Melvin E. Taves and Mr. Brad Frahm from the decision
of the Planning Commission in denying their request
for the prezoning of a 32 -acre parcel located at the
southwest corner of West Lane and Harney Lane from
the GA -5, General Agriculture (County classification)
and I -PA, Interim -Protected Agriculture (County
classification) to the P -D (7), Planned Development
District No. 7.
Planning Director Schroeder introduced the matter
and presented a drawing of the area proposed for
rezoning. A memorandum prepared by the Planning
Director concerning the above appeal had also been
forwarded to the City Council prior to this meeting.
The following persons were present and spoke in favor
of the prezoning:
Attorney Raymond B. Lucas, 318 West Pine Street,
representing the property owners, Dr. Chris R.
Keszler, Dr. Melvin E. Taves and Mr. Brad
Frahm, reviewed the history of the requested
prezoning and discussed the plan for development
of the property. Mr. Lucas said he felt the
Planning Commission had denied the request for
471
Minutes of ,Tune 7, 1972 continued
prezoning because it was felt that utilities would not
be available to the area in question. He said that
due to the development of English Oaks Manor
by Westmont Development Company, certain
utilities would be available to the area. He then
requested Mr. Victor Meyer to discuss the utilities
available to the area.
2. Mr. Victor Meyer, 221 West Oak Street, discussed
the Master Plan for sanitary sewer and storm
drainage in the English Oaks area. He explained
that the developer, Westmont Development Company,
had been required to provide for oversized sewage
lines in the area south of Harney Lane south of
English Oaks Manor and the parcel of land in question
could be served by these lines. Mr. Meyer said
the land available for development within the City
was very limited and he recommended the prezoning
oe granted so the property might be developed as
proposed.
3. Mr. Brad Frahm, 3720 West Benjamin Holt Drive,
Stockton, said the area proposed for prezoning
would be developed as an adult community and he
recommended approval of his request.
The iollowing persons were present and spoke in oppo-
sition to the proposed prezoning:
1. Mr. Jeryl Fry, 12495 North West Lane, Lodi.
Mr. Fry stated the prezoning should be denied
because it would not be consistent with the City's
General Plan. He felt urban development on this
property would be detrimental to agricultural
operations and suggested that future development
should be on an orderly and rational basis.
2. Mr. Felix J. Costa, 13160 North West Lane, Lodi.
He opposed the prezoning stating it was of utmost
importance that piecemeal development be avoided
and asked that a General Plan for the City be
developed. He said the City had made prior
commitments in the area of storm drainage which
must be fulfilled before further development is
approved.
3. Mr. Thomas A. Griffin, 721 West Kettleman Lane,
Lodi, stated he represented Lodi Ecology Action
and was opposed to the prezoning because it violated
good planning principles. He said he felt the develop-
ment was premature and if approved would violate
recent legislation (AB 1301) which states that land
use and general plans must be in agreement.
Mr. Marlowe Weil, 1243 East Harney Lane, opposed
the prezoning ior the above reasons.
-2-
479
Minutes of June 7, I972 continued
5. Mr. Ray Everitt, 1320 East Harney Lane, opposed
the prezoning and felt it to be very poor planning,
The City Clerk stated that notarized petitions bearing
signatures of 153 persons who were opposed to the
prezoning were received.
There being no other persons in the audience wishing
to be heard on the matter, the public portion of the
hearing was closed.
After considerable discussion, Councilman Hughes
moved the decision of the Planning Commission be
upheld and the appeal be denied. The motion was seconded
by Councilman Katnich and carried by unanimous vote.
On motion of Councilman Hughes, Schaffer second,
the Council then directed the staff to study the possibility
of using the proposed freeway route of Highway 12 as
a planning boundary and requested the Planning Commission
to take this under advisement and incorporate this into
the City's General Plan.
Mr. Victor Meyer, 221 West Oak Street, then requested
the Council to relieve Westmont Development of the
responsibility imposed by the City to provide for over-
sized sewage lines in the areas south of the English Oaks
Manor development since the above prezoning denial
would preclude development in that area.
The Council accepted the formal request of Mr. Victor
Meyer and directed the staff to study the request and
to submit a recommendation to the Council. Councilman
Hughes then moved the Council direct the staff to be
present when the Board of Supervisors hears the appeal
of the Frahm development under a County Use Permit
and to register objections. The motion was seconded
by Councilman. Schaffer and carried unanimously.
RECESS At approximately 9:30 p.m. the Mayor declared a five-
minute recess and the Council reconvened at 9:35 p.m.
REPORT ON Dr. Frank V. Johnson, 221 West Oak Street, asked
1965 BOND the Council to provide a report to the citizens of Lodi
MONIES showing how the 1965 bond monies were spent. He
REQUESTED asked that the report include the amount appropriated
and spent for each of the items approved on the ballot;
the balance now remaining from the bond monies; explana-
tion of what remains to be accomplished to fulfill the
commitments made by the Council at that time. He
asked that the report be simple and concise and made
available to all interested citizens.
Mr. Victor Meyer asked that information also be furnished
which would supply an inventory of land available for
development within the City.
-3-
473
Minutes of June 7, 1972 continued
Councilman Pinkerton suggested the report include
the amount of bond monies spent in the various depart-
ments; the amount spent from the General Fund and an
indication of increase in costs over the original estimates.
On motion of Councilman Hughes, Pinkerton second,
the Council directed the staff to prepare a written report
concerning the 1965 Bond monies as requested and to
make said report available to the public.
COMMUNICATIONS
ABC Applications for alcoholic beverage license were received
LICENSE as follows:
-4-
1. Rocco D. Benigno, Costanza's Golden Husk, 2 12
South School Street, on -sale beer and wine eating
place, person-to-person transfer.
2. Arlene R. and R. A. Mastro, 7 -Eleven Store,
401 North California Street, off -sale beer and
wine, person-to-person transfer.
PLANNING
The City Clerk read a letter received from Planning
COMMISSIONER
Commissioner Dean N. Robinson stating his intent not
D. ROBINSON
to serve another term on the Planning Commission and
thanking the Council for having had the opportunity to
serve as Planning Commissioner for the past eight
years.
EHLERS-ROGET
A letter was received from Attorney Robert J. Mertz,
APPEAL
121 West Pine Street, in which he requested the appeal
RESCHEDULED
of Ehlers and Roget for the rezoning of a parcel of land
located on the southeast corner of Lower Sacramento
Road and Lodi Avenue be rescheduled to Wednesday,
July 19, 1972. On motion of Councilman Schaffer,
Hughes second, the Council rescheduled the appeal as
requested.
REPORTS OF
THE CITY MANAGER
DRIVEWAY
City Manager Glaves reported that Mr. Fred Baybarz,
REQUEST-
owner of Lodi Metal Technology, had reached an impasse
LODI METAL
in discussions with the City Engineer regarding the
TECHNOLOGY
number of driveways allotted by the City for his business
on Kelly Street. At the last Council meeting in a letter
to the City, Mr. Baybarz requested and was granted a
hearing before the City Council to resolve the matter.
The City Manager summarized the request and stated
the Public Works Director had attempted to keep the
number of driveways to the minimum required for
reasonable street access in order to preserve some
curb parking and minimize street congestion caused
by loading and unloading'in the street.
-4-
474
Minutes of June 7, 1972 continued
Mr. Lester LaMaie, General Manager for Lodi Metal
Technology, 3 i i Kristmcnt Street, explained that his
company is now manufacturing large bulky items which
necessitate a large amount of space for loading and
unloading of materials, He said it was not the Company's
desire to unload materials in the street; therefore,
they were requesting seven driveways rather than the
three approved by the Public Works Director,
After considerable discussion, Councilman Hughes
moved that the City staff meet with representatives
prior to the next Council meeting in an effort to work
out a suitable arrangement concerning the driveways;
said arrangement should facilitate the loading and
unloading of freight and avoid as much as possible the
stopping and unloading of trucks on Kelly Street, The
motion was seconded by Councilman Ehrhardt and
carried unanimously.
City Manager Glaves told the Council that complaints
had been received concerning the Building Code, and he
said he had instructed the staff to make no more exceptions
to the Code. He said this policy would be followed unless
the Council objected.
CRIMINAL Mr. Howard Morter, Criminal Justice Planner, reported
JUSTICE to the Council on the progress of the Planning and Developmen
PLANNER Project in the Police Department. He explained the
purpose of the projectis to develop a planning capability
in the Police Department and produce a master plan for
future growth into a model police department.
CLAIMS Claims in the amount of $240, 829. 55 were approved on
motion of Councilman Schaffer, Pinkerton second.
AGREEMENT The City Manager presented an agreement between the
WI TH LUSD Lodi Unified School District and the City for use of the
RE STADIUM Stadium by the School District, On motion of Councilman
Schaffer, Pinkerton second, the Council approved the
agreement and authorized the Mayor to execute the same
on behalf of the City.
AGREEMENT- The City Manager then presented the agreement between
GOLF DRIVING the City and Harold and Edith Walz for operation of the
RANGE golf driving range and authorized the Mayor to execute
the same on behalf of the City. On motion of Councilman
Schaffer, Hughes second, the Council approved the
agreement.
NO PARKING - On motion of Councilman, Katnich, Pinkerton second,
LKFD STREET the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3639 estab-
lishing a "No Parking" zone on the north side of Lockeford
RES. NO. 3639 Street between_ Main and Stockton Streets,
-5-
475
Minutes of June 7, 1972 continued
CPS CLASS City Manager Glaves presented a limited classification
STUDY study performed by the Cooperative Personnel Services,
APPROVED State Personnei Board, for certain classes in the Public
Works Department. He recommended the study be
RES. NO. 3640 approved. The City Council, on motion of Councilman
Katnich, Hughes second, adopted Resoluticn No. 3640
approving the findings of the classification study and
establishing the effective date to be June 8, 1972.
INTENT TO
The City Manager recommended that Council action
ANNEX
be taken to annex approximately 95 acres of the City's
WHITE SLOUGH
property at White Slough. He explained that this acreage
PROPERTY
contains the White Slough Water Pollution Control Plant
and facilities. He further explained that the Government
Code provides for annexation of a maximum of 100
acres of City -owned property which is not contiguous
to the corporate limits of the City. The above action
was recommended so that the property n.ight be removed
from the tax rolls and reduce the City tax bill. The
balance of the City's property at White Slough is used
for agricultural purposes and the City Manager recom-
mended this land be included in an agricultural preserve
under the provisions of the Williamson Act.
RES. NO. 3641
On motion of Councilman Schaffer, Katnich second,
the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3641 expressing
its intent and desire to annex to the City of Lodi approxi-
mately 95 acres presently used by the City in the
maintenance and operation of the White Slough Water
Pollution Control Plant facilities.
AGR. PRESERVE - The City Council on motion of Councilman Schaffer,
WHIrE SLOUGH Katnich second, then adopted Resolution No. 3642
PROPERTY authorizing the City Attorney and City Clerk to initiate
and conclude the necessary proceedings to place a
RES. NO. 3642 portion of the property at White Slough under the
Williamson Act of the State of California.
MEETING City Manager Glaves reported he had met with repre-
WITH S. P. sentatives of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company
COMPANY recently to discuss areas of mutual concern such as
a bike route to Micke Grove, relocation of the switching
yards to south of Kettleman Lane and the problem of
the tracks in Lockeford Street.
ORDINANCES
REZONES PARCEL ORDINANCE NO. 972, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE
ON N SIDE W. AMENDING THE OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE
VINE S OF CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY REZONING A PARCEL
FAIRNIONT TO LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST VINE
C -P STREET BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 130 FEET AND
300.67 FEET EAST OF THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH
ORD. NO. 972 FAIRMONT AVENUE TO BE IN THE C -P, COMMERCIAL -
ADOPTED PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT, " having been introduced
at an adjourned regular meeting on May 24, 1972,
-6-
476-
REZONING
76
REZONING
LOT 3
WINDSOR
TRACT
ORD. NO. 973
ADOPTED
Minutes of June 7, 1972 continued
was brought up for passage on motion of Councijman
Katnich, Pinkerton second. Second reading was emitted
after reading by title, and the ordinance was then
passed, adopted and ordered to print by the following
vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - Hughes, Katnich, Pinkerton
Schaffer and Ehrhardt
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
ORDINANCE NO. 973, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE
CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY REZONING THE WESTERLY
55 FEET OF LOT 3 WINDSOR TRACT TO BE IN THE
C -P, COMMERCIAL -PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT,"
having been introduced at an adjourned regular meeting
on May 24, 1972, was brought up for passage on motion
of Councilman Pinkerton, Katnich second. Second
reading was omitted after reading by title, and the
ordinance was then passed, adopted and ordered to
print by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - Hughes, Katnich, Pinkerton,
Schaffer and Ehrhardt
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
REZONE LOTS ORDINANCE NO. 974, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE
13, I4 & 15 AMENDING THE OFFICIAL DISTRICT MAP OF THE
BLOCK 27, CITY OF LODI AND THEREBY REZONING LOTS 13,
CITY OF LODI 14, AND 15, BLOCK 27, CITY OF LODI, TO BE IN
THE M- I, LIGHT -INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, "having
ORD. NO. 974 been introduced at an adjourned regular meeting on
ADOPTED May 24, 1972, was brought up for passage on motion
of Councilman Schaffer, Hughes second. Second
reading was omitted after reading by title, and the
ordinance was then passed, adopted and ordered to
print by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmen - Hughes, Katnich, Pinkerton,
Schaffer and Ehrhardt
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
EXECUTIVE The meeting was adjourned to an executive session
SESSION to discuss personnel matters at approximately 11:35
P. M.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 12:23 p.m.
Attest: B. SSIE I'. BENNETT
City Clerk