Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - August 4, 1976I CITY COU\CTL, CITY OF LODI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 4, -1976 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning at 8:00 p. m. , Wednesday, August 4, 1976 in the City Hail Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present. Councilmen - KATNICH, KATZAKIAN, PLNKERTON and HUGHES (Mayor) Absent: Councilman - EHRHARDT Also Present: City Manager Glaves, Assistant City Manager Glenn, Public Works Director Ronsko, Assistant Planner Freitas, City Attorney Mullen, and City Clerk Reimche. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Reverend Robert W. �%4atthe_s, St. Paul's Lutheran Church. PLEDGE Mayor Hughes led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. PUBLIC HEARINGS Notice thereof having been published in accordance with law and affidavit of publication being on file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Hughes called for the public hearing to consider the City Planning Commission's recommendation for approval of the request of H & Ivl Builders by Mr. PwIarvin Wiebe to amend Planned Development District No. 10 (P -D (10)) so as to make the Vineyard Subdivision, Unit No. 3 at the Northeast corner of South Hutchins Street and West Harney Lane conform to R-2, Single -Family Residential zoning with qj si-gie-family lots and 17 duplex parcels. Councilman Katzakian asked to abstain from discussion and voting or. this matter, inasmuch as his company handled the =ale of this property to Mr. Wiebe. REQUEST TO Assistant Planner Freitas introduced the matter. A AMEND P -D '10 diagram of the subject area was presented for Council's S :rutiny, and the recommendation was outlined by Staff. Mr. Terry Piazza, 221 W. Oak Street, Lodi spoke in support of the proposed amendment to Planned Develop- ment District No. 10. j There being no other persons in the audience wishing It to speak either In favor of or in opposition to the matter, the public portion of the hearing was closed. 9 Minutes o_` August 4, :976 ccntinued ORD. NO. Following aiszus-ion, Councilman Pinkerton moved 1084 INTRO. introducticn of Ordinance Ne. 1084 amending Planned Development District No. 10 (P -D ( 10)) so as to make the Vineyard Subdivision, unit No. 3 at the Northeast ^ corner cf South -lutchins Street and West Harney Lane conform to R -Z Single -Family Residential zoning with - 95 single -'am -Ay lots and 17 duplex parcels. The motion was seconded by Councilman Katnich and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen - KATNiCH, PINKERTON, and HUGHES N oes: Councilmen - None Abstain: Councilman - KATZAKIAN Absent: Councilman - EHRHARDT APPEAL RE Notice thereof having been published in accordance with VINEYARD SUBD. #3 law and affidavit of publication being on file in the office DECORATIVE WALL of the City Clerk, Mayor Hughes called for the Public Hearing to cons'_der the appeal of Mr. Marvin Wiebe, Developer of the Vineyard Subdivision No. 3 concerning the constructicn on Harney Lane between Banyon Drive and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way of a decorative wail. Councilman Katzakian also asked to abstain from the discussion and voting on this matter, as his company handled the sale of tris property to Mr. Wiebe. Public Works Director Ronsko introduced the matter apprising the Council that one of the conditions set fortis by the Pianning Commission of the Tentative Map for Vineyard Subdivision No. 3 was that a decorative wall be installed as outlined on the precise plan for Harney Lane and that the wall be continued from Banyon Drive all the way to the Southern Pacific Railroad Tracks. Mr. Ronsko further stated that the type of fencing Staff has recommended for the area has slumpstone pilasters at regular intervals with 2" x 2" grape stake -type slats and would he a re•.erse frontage type fence. Mr. Ronsko expressed concern regarding the difficulties property owners have in mak--ng repairs to chain link -type fences; and also that because th;s fence would be located in the area of a major street, it should be a type of fencing that would hold up. Mr. Terry Piazza, ?21 W. Oak Street, Lodi, representing Mr. Wiebe, Dcvelopez of the Vineyard Subdivision, Unit #3, apprised the Councii that their firm estimates that the Hutchins Stree: style fence would cost approximately twice the amount a ::ha;.c link fence would cost, and for this reason they are requesting that they be allowed to install a chain 1'_r.k fence: with redwood slats as had been allowed in the previously approved tentative map for this Subdivision. Ddinutes cf A•,gv.s`. 4, 1976 continued APPEAL RE There being n,� ether peracnc %n the audience wishing to DECORATIVE speak eithe_ is fa.or of or in opposi`icn to the appeal, WALL VINEYARD the pu'oiic po_­:i,ctt. of the h-aring -as closed. SUBD. #3 (Continued) Following a length; discussion, with questions being directed ro Staff -arid to Mr. Piazza, on motion of Counc`_l-nar. Ka:nich, Pinkerten second, the matter was continued tc a date uncertain to allo%c• Council time to look at various type_ of fen_'n tAG:ouohout the City, by the fol:c:vi_r.a Ayes: Counciinen - EATNiC.H, PINKERTON, HUGHES Noes: Ccu:.cilrr,en - None Abstain: Counci,man - KATZAKIAN Absent: Ccunciirnan - EHRHARD= PLANNING The City Manager gave the foliowing report of the COMMISSION Planning Commi--sior, meeting of July 26, 1976: ITEMS OF The Planning Commission - INTEREST 1. Conditio-:ally approved the request of lair, James L. Ficklin, Jr. for a Use Permit to Establish a family recreation c;•rtNr (i, e., coin-operated devices) at 16 West Pine Street (formerly _\lann's Pharmacy) in an area zoned C -Z, General Commercial. Z. Appro-:ed the recommendation of Chairperson Margaret Talbot to reappoint 1,Ir. Donald P. Kundert ar_d to appoin' 1VSr, A. Roger- Stafford to the Site Plan and Archi`ectural Rev --',e- &:;rnmittee, 3. Approved the request of Mr.. Harry Dale for a Variance to nal e a small bedroom addition to an alley hcust on a ict measuring 25 feet by 50 feet at 508 1/2 Hi.lhc:n Street in an area zoned R -MD, Medium Dens_ty :vluitiple Family Residential. 4, Re.ornme-nded t'qre condiaonai approval to the San Joaquin Coun-v board of Zon'_ng Adjustment of the reque_t cf Sani-a:y City and Transhaul, Inc. by Mr, Ed De Benedetti for a Use Permit to establish an execuc a -typa golf course cn the south side of the Mokelumnever : ehe nor -,h end of Cluff Road it an a.re3 ......-gid ?-PA, rote m -Protective Agriculture. 5, Elected Commissioner Avery T. Gassin, Chairman, ar.d Cortin._-_ i.orer ETMgene L. Larkin, Vice Chairman :er the f..sea' year '11 6-7�. E Minutes of August 4, 1976 continued A presentation was made by San Joaquin County Supervisor George Barber regarding the area north of the Mokelumne River. Supervisor Barber apprised the Council that the County had recently adopted a County General Plan and consequently various parts of the County will be rezoned to conform with thA new General Plan and that the area north of the river is due to come up at a meeting on August 19, 1976. Council was advised that at the time the General Plan was adopted that this particular area was designated as an "Agricultural" zoning. City Manager Glaves introduced Agenda item entitled - "Presentation on Controlled Growth - Bonnie Meyer". A Staff presentation on Residential Growth Statistics - City of Lodi was presented by Assistant Planner Gregory Freitas. Questions regarding the presentation were directed by Council to Staff. PRESENTATION RE CONTROLLED The following persons who were in the audience spoke GROWTH to the topic: a) Raymond Loftus, 616 N. School, Lodi b) Robert Engelson, '301 N. Crescent, Lodi c) Ms. M. Gritsch, 821 E. Turner Road, Lodi d) Beryl Georguson, 2223 W. Cochran Road, Lodi e) Nancy Engelson, 301 N. Crescent, Lodi -4- Copies of the San Joaquin County Planning Department Staff Report entitled - "Reclassification Petition No. Z-76-44 of San Joaquin County PlanningCommission/ Lodi -North, to reclassify property now classified as RA -15, EA -5, I -PA and GA -20 to GA -10, GA -20 or GA -40 and to reclassify property now classified as EA-1/AP to EA-10/AP, generally bound by Wood- bridge Road on the north, State Highway 99 on the east, PROPOSED Mokelumne River on the south and Lower Sacramento RECLASSIFICATION Road on the west, north of Lodi", was presented by OF PROPERTY Supervisor Barber for Council's perusal, with an NORTH OF invitation being extended for Council input. MOKELUMNE RIVER Supervisor Barber also spoke to the subject of AB 15. PRESENTATION BY SUPERVISOR Discussion followed with questions being directed to BARBER Supervisor Barber by the Council and Staff, which questions also included the subject of the proposed "Joint Powers Agreement" on Storm Drainage Fees. Supervisor Barber expressed his appreciation for the opportunity to address the Council and stated that from time to time in the future, he would like to appear before the Council on items of mutual interest. The City Council, in turn, expressed its appreciation to Mr. Barber. City Manager Glaves introduced Agenda item entitled - "Presentation on Controlled Growth - Bonnie Meyer". A Staff presentation on Residential Growth Statistics - City of Lodi was presented by Assistant Planner Gregory Freitas. Questions regarding the presentation were directed by Council to Staff. PRESENTATION RE CONTROLLED The following persons who were in the audience spoke GROWTH to the topic: a) Raymond Loftus, 616 N. School, Lodi b) Robert Engelson, '301 N. Crescent, Lodi c) Ms. M. Gritsch, 821 E. Turner Road, Lodi d) Beryl Georguson, 2223 W. Cochran Road, Lodi e) Nancy Engelson, 301 N. Crescent, Lodi -4- Minutes of August 4, 1976 continued PRESENTATION RE A presentation was then made by Mrs. Bonnie Meyer CONTROLLED who complimented Council and the City Staff for past GROWTH efforts to achieve quality growth for Lodi by tying (Continued) growth to services and further stated that now is the time to establish concrete guidelines to insure that future growth is based on need. Mrs. Meyer =added that the information presented here by Staff is really a first step. The need has been estimated - housing for approximately 44, 000 people by the year 2, 000. Now it is the City Council's responsibility, according to Mrs. Meyer, to establish some guarantees t'r_at Lodi will grow according to this need and establish an official stance on quality control and rate of growth. Mrs. Meyer then asked that the Council give themselves and the Staff the tools to accomplish steady, reasonable, controlled growth and outlined four steps toward attaining that goal: 1) Adopt a phasing plan (possibly based on ponding basins) that will utilize rational land use principals. 2) Review and adopt a rate of growth that is financially feasible and based on the estimated need. 3) Review the present ordinance on apartment zoning and upgrade the standards in an attempt to inter - grate growth into existing community characteristics. 4) Enlarge the scope of the Site Plan and Arch_tectural Review Committee to include all nev, apartment complexes Mrs. Meyer concluded her remarks by stating that she feels "we" need a plan and that the plan is needed now. Mrs. Meyer added that she feels that the information presented by Staff entitled - "Approved Subdivision Maps Not Yet Built or Completed" shows a buildout of plans that are already approved and would take "us" to the year 1985. Mrs. Meyer s-ated'that this really brings hone the fact that guidelines are needed. Council discussion followed with questions regarding the presentation being directed to Mrs. Meyer. Mayor Hughes expressed appreciation to Mrs. Meyer for her presentation and stated that the data presented by the Planning Department will be very helpful to the Council and that certainly all points raised by Mrs. Meyer will be taken into account in an effort to develop s. -me sort of policy that will meet not only needs of our Fresent citizens, but also those of future residents. Additional discussion followed, with the follcv:ing persons who were in the audience, commenting to the subject: a) Dr. Frank Johnson, 402 W. Elm Street, Lodi b) Gene Larkin, Member of the Lodi Planning Commission c) Margaret Talbot, Member of the Lodi Planning Commissic d) Glen Baumbach, 221 W. Oak Street, Lodi -5- 6 Minutes of August 4, 1976 continued PRESENTATION RE e) John Ferraiolo, 2710 Tejon., Lcdi CONTROLLED f) Lynn Victor, 120 N. California, Lod: GROWTH (Continued) g) Ione Taunton, 1020 Kirkwood Drive, Lodi h) John Lagno, 321 N. California Street, L.cd,. i) Terry Piazza, 221 W. Oak Street, Lodi j) Ron Thomas, 730 Maplewood Drive, Lodi Mayor Hughes concluded the discussion by compli- menting the Staff and the Planning Commission and by extending an invitation to "all" to participate in Zny development that comes before the Council or Planning Commission so that input can be made on a specific development and not just "talk" in generalities. '.Mayor Hughes also stated that the City will continue to monitor and evaluate what other cities are doing in this area. RECESS At 11: 15 p.m., Mayor Hughes declared a five minute recess, and the Council reconvened at 11:20 c—m, Mr. Gene Dillow, 5100 N. 99 Highway, Lodi and Mr. Charles Johnson, 413 Poplar, Lodi addressed the Council complaining of police involvement in the strike that is currently underway at the Lodi Iron Wcrk=. Mr. Dillow complained that when the law comas down and is used as an i ntricatepartof the strike breaking COMPLAINTS RE procedure, he feels it is time the matter is locked into. POLICE DEPARTMENT Mr. Dillow further related that the police daily usher IN DEALING WITH "scab" workers in and out of the plant, but that "nobody" STRIKE SITUATION is taking care of the striking employees. AT LODI IRON WORKS Mayor Hughes responded that the City is not taking sides at all in the stri.ke; however, it is the .responsibility of the City to see that people are protected. City Manager Glaves stated that the police are there merely to give everyone their rights and that -whenever there is a strike people are entitled to ingress a. -.d egress to their property, and it is the duty cf the police department to protect that right, Mr. Glaves invited Mr. Dillow and Mr. Johnson to come to dee him if they had any specific problems so that they could be straightened out.Mayor Hughes reiterated City Manager, Glaves' invitation and further stated that if any examples of favoritism by the police are witnessed, they should be reported tc the City Manager, apprising him of the specifics. Mr. Johnson stated that he feels the police sh.c,Ad act if a crime is committed; but up until a crime is committed. they are stepping but of 'line in c.—ming in. City Manage= Glaves stressed that the offer he made was a sincere one - that if Mr. Dillow or Mr. J.�,hnson feel their rights are not being protected, they hould come in and apprise him. -h- Minutes of August 4, 1976 continued I;],PORTS OF THE In accordance with the reports and recommendations of CITY MANAGER the City Manager, the following actions hereby set forth between asterisks were approved by Council on motion _ CONSENT CALENDAR of Councilman Katnich, Pinkerton second. i CL AIMS Claims were approved in the amount of $2, 302, 006, 90. ACQUISITION OF City Manager Glaves presented for Council approval an PROPERTY LOCATED Agreement between Richard and Edith Neuharth and the AT 3861 E. City of Lodi covering the acquisition by the City of ALMOND DR. property located at 3861 E. Almond Drive, Lodi. A PPRVD . COUNCIL APPROVED AGREEMENT BETWEEN RICHARD AND EDITH NEUHARTH AND THE CITY OF LODI COVERING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY BY THE CITY LOCATED AT 3861 E. ALMOND DRIVE, LODI AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. City Manager Glaves presented for Council approval an Agreement between Webster Tyson, Jane Tyson, and Judith E. Tyson and the City of Lodi covering the acquisition by the City of property located at ACQUISITION OF 300 South Sunset, Lodi, California. PROPERTY LOCATED AT 300 S. SUNSET COUNCIL APPROVED AGREEMENT BETWEEN DRIVE APPRVD. WEBSTER TYSON, JANE TYSON, AND JUDITH E. TYSON AND THE CITY OF LODI COVERING ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY BY THE CITY LOCATED AT 300 SOUTH SUNSET DRIVE, LODI AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. City Manager Glaves reported that each year the City enters into an Agreement for a safety services contract for various accident prevention programs with the San Joaquin County Safety Council. Mr. Glaves requested Council to authorize the Mayor to execute the agree- ment for these services in the amount of $1600.00, AGREEMENT - which funds were approved in the 1976-77 budget. SAN JOAQUIN CTY SAFETY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 4242 RES, NO. 4242 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE I AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SAFETY COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF LODI FOR VARIOUS ACCIDENT PREVENTION PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1976-77 IN THE AMOUNT OF $1600. 00. 'i'#'�#######k##yF##',�'F#m�k�`�,m#�%##a`#',F�kk#a`a=a"•',�#'�.•',<##*#>k#a=;,,#*#',�#k#==;=�X� �#m'n####�k;=�k#r=#-'r-�'.-'��` -7- 0 • Minutes of August 4, 1976 continued SPECS FOR Specifications for a hydraulically operated digger(. UTILITY LINE derrick line truck for the Utility Department were TRUCK APPRVD. presented by City Manager Glaves for Council's scrutiny. Councilman Katnich moved that the specification for the Utility Line Truck be approved and that the Purchasing Agent be authorized to advertise for bids thereon. The motion was seconded by Council- man Katzakian and carried. Noes: Councilman - PINKERTON Absent: Councilman - EHRHARDT City Manager Glaves presented the plans and specif- ications for "Ham Lane Median, Port Chelsea Circle to Arundel Court" for Council approval. Mr. Glaves apprised the Council that in general the work consists of constructing approximately 450 lineal feet of raised median to be situated within the English Oaks Manor, Unit No. 2 subdivision presently under construction. PLANS 8c SPECS It was noted that on June 16, 1976 the City Council FOR "HAM LANE had approved this project as part of the claims for MEDIAN, PORT Transportation Development Act (SB 325) funds. CHELSEA CIRCLE temporary storm drain basin and is part of the Master TO ARUNDEL COURT On motion of Councilman Katnich, Katzakian second, APPROVED Council approved the plans and specifications for "Ham Lane Median, Port Chelsea Circle to Arundel Court" and authorized the City Clerk to advertise,for PLANS & SPECS bids thereon by the following vote: FOR "VINE STR. Ayes: Councilmen - KATNICH, KATZAKIAN, and STORM DRAIN HUGHES Noes: Councilman - PINKERTON Absent: Councilman - EHRHARDT Plans and specifications for the "Vine Street Storm Drain, 700' east of Lower Sacramento Road, 300' South of Vine Street to Vine Street" were presented by City Manager Glaves for Council's perusal. Mr. Glaves apprised the Council that in general the work consists of furnishing and installing approximately 206 lineal feet of 36 inch storm drain pipe and 14 lineal feet of 30 -inch storm drain pipe. The storm drain has been designed by Siegfried & Associates as part of the engineering plans for the Vine Street temporary storm drain basin and is part of the Master Drainage System providing drainage service to the area between Lower Sacramento Road and the Wood- bridge Irrigation District Canal. It will tie into the Vine Street temporary storm drain basin and in the PLANS & SPECS future will be extended to the G Basin to be situated FOR "VINE STR. near Kettleman Lane. STORM DRAIN 700' E. OF LWR. Discussion followed with questions being directed to SACTO. RD. Staff. Councilman Katzakian then moved that Council APPROVED approve the plans and specifications for "Vine Street Storm Drain, 700' East of Lower Sacramento Road, 300' South of Vine Street to Vine Street" and that the City Clerk be authorized to advertise for bids thereon. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pinkerton and carried. -8- L Minutes of August 4, 1976 continued PLANS & SPECS The City Manager presented the plans and specifications FOR "ELM ST for "Elm Street Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Replacement, CURB, GUTTER, Central Avenue to Garfield Street", advising that work & SIDEWALK in general consists of removing and replacing approxi - REPLACEMENT" mately 1000 lineal feet of curb and gutter and 2000 APPROVED square feet of sidewalk. Council discussion followed with questions regarding the matter being addressed to Staff. On motion of Councilman Katzakian, Katnich second, Council approved the plans and specifications for "Elm Street Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Replacement, Central Avenue to Garfield Street" and authorized the City Clerk to advertise for bids thereon. The City Manager presented to the Council the revised proposed 1976-77 San Joaquin County Council of Government's budget for Council's perusal. This budget is submitted to the Council in conformity with the provisions of the Joint Power Agreement under which the COG was formed. Discussion followed with Council questioning the amount PROPOSED COG of $11, 469 listed under Account No. 0191 Retirement - 1976-77 BUDGET Transportation Planning Budget. RATIFIED Councilman Pinkerton then moved that Council ratify the revised proposed 1976-77 San Joaquin County Council of Government's budget as submitted requesting, however, for a clarification of the $11,469 figure listed under Account No. 0191 Retirement - Transportation Planning Budget. The motion was seconded by Councilman Katnich and carried. A petition was presented for installation of street lights on Wellswood Avenue between Mission Street and Vine Street. The petition was certified by the City Clerk to contain signatures of owners of more than 60% of the property described in the petition. The petitioners WELLSWOOD AVE, waived the investigation provided for by the "Special ST. LT. DISTRICT Assessment, Investigation, Limitation and Majority _ Protest Act of 1931" in connection with the installation, Plans and specifications for the proposed district were also presented for Council approval by City Manager Glaves. On motion of Councilman Katnich, Katzakian second, RES. NO. 4240 the Council adapted Resolution No. 4240 adopting the plans and specifications for the Wellswood Avenue Street Lighting District. On motion of Councilman Katnich, Katzakian second, Council adopted Resolution No. 4241 stating the Counall0s RES. NO. 4241 intention to form the Wellswood Avenue Street Lighting District and setting the hearing thereon for September 1, 1976. W to Minutes of August 4, 1976 City Manager Glaves presented proposals which had been received from various Auditing Firms to conduct the audit - of the financial statement of the City of Lodi'for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1976 as follows: Blomberg & Bott $5,000 Elmer Fox & Company $6, 000 Ernst and Ernst $8,000 Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. $7,800 Additional information regarding the proposals was given to the Council by City Manager Glaves. Council discussion followed with questions regarding the matter being directed to Staff. Councilman Katzakian then moved that the City retain the firm of Elmer Fox and Company to conduct the annual audit for the City of Lodi for the ' fiscal year ended June 30, 1976. The motion was seconded by Councilman Katnich and failed to pass by the following vote: ACTION DEFERRED ON Ayes: Councilmen - KATNICH and KATZAKIAN RETAINING AUDITOR FOR Noes: Councilmen - PINKERTON and HUGHES ANNUAL AUDIT Absent: Cou,-,, i1man - EHRHARDT Further discussion followed. At the request of Mayor Hughes and with Council's concurrence, action was deferred on the matter to allow time to interview the auditor from the firm of Blomberg & Bott who would be conducting the City's audit should that firm be retained to conduct the annual audit. Council was apprised by City Manager Glaves of a third filing which has been made by P. G. & E. to the Federal Power Commission for an increase in the wholesale R- 1 Rate to the six municipally -owned utilities in Northern California, which increase is to become effective August 23, 1976, and the ramifications such an increase would have on the City of Lodi. A summary regarding the matter was presented for Council's scrutiny by Mayor Hughes. Mayor Hughes stated that "we" are not necessarily arguing the merit of the P G. & E, rate increase, what "we" are really THIRD P. G. L. E. concerned about is the actions of the Federal Power RATE INCREASE - Commission which has allowed these rate increases to THROUGH F. P.C. go into effect, and which are putting "Us" in an almost untenable position. City :Manager Glaves stated that at the root of the whole thing is the different procedures followed by the California Pubic Utilities Commission and the Federal Power Commission. Mayor Hughes apprised the Council that there is pending legislation sponsored by Congressman McFall which will require that the Federal Power Commission change its operational procedures and hold hearings and issue decisions before rates are put into effect. Minutes of August 4, 1976 continued THIRD P. G. &. E. Mayor Hughes asked and received tacit Council RATE INCREASE - concurrence to take whatever action is necessary THROUGH F. P.C. to try to get the Federal Power Commission in line, (Continued) to not have the F. P.C. consider this rate increase until they get their house in order and pass on previous rates, and until the competitive rates outside the area are brought in line. This according to Mayor Hughes, will allow time for the California Public Uti::ties Commission to act to get their rate increases through. NLC Departure time for the National League of Cities CONFERENCE Goals Conference was discussed. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Hughes adjourned the meeting at 12:30 a.m. , on motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Katnich second. Attest: yyrC:�t.f— ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk Mae 13