HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - November 18, 1981CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
November 18, 1981
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning
at 8:00 p.m. . Wednesday, November 18, 1981 in the City Hall Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL Present: Councilmen - Hughes, Katnich,
Murphy, Pinkerton
and McCarty (Mayor)
Absent: Councilmen - None
Also Present: City Manager Glaves, Assistant
City Manager Glenn, Community
Development Director/Deputy
City Clerk Schroeder, City
Attorney Stein, Assistant Planner
Morimoto, and Public Works
Director Ronsko.
INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Sammy P. Walls,
Pentecostal Church of God, Woodbridge.
PLEDGE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor McCarty
PUBLIC HEARINGS Notice thereof having been published and posted in
accordance with law and affidavit of publication and
posting being on file in the office of the City Clerk,
L \' Mayor McCarty called for the Public Hearing to
consider the Turner Road and Cluff Avenue Assessment
District.
TURNER ROAD AND
CLUFF AVENUE
ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1
RES. NO. 81-153-
81-157
C. - !O CO
cc - aJ
Mr. Timothy J. Hachman, Attorney -at -lav, Blew•ett,
Garretson and Hachman, 141 E. Acacia Street, Stockton,
California addressed the Council outlining the
procedure as set forth by law.
There were no other persons in the audience wishing
to speak on the matter and the public portion of the
hearing was closed.
Following Council discussion with questions being
directed to Staff and to Mr. Hachman, Council on
motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Katnich second,
adopted the following resolutions by unanimous vote:
TURNER ROAD AND CLUFF AVENUE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1
Res. No. 81-153 Resolution Overruling Protests on
Resolution No. 81-39
Res. No. 81-154 Resolution ordering changes and
modifications in assessments, in Boundaries of
Assessment District, and directing Amendment to
Engineer's Report and Assessment diagram.
Res. No. 81-155 A resolution determining convenience
and necessity, adopting Engineer's Report, as
amended, confirming assessment, and Ordering the
Work and Improvements.
Res. No. 81-156 Resolution Awarding of Contract.
Res. No. 81-157 A resolution Awarding Sale of Bonds.
1G7
1`8
Continued November 18, 1981
Notice thereof having been published in accordance
with law and affidavit of publication being on file
d in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor McCarty called
�J for the Public Hearing to consider the City Planning
Commission's recommended approval of the General
Plan -Land Use Element Amendment No. GPA -LU -81-3
which consists of two sections:
Section 1. The request of Vernon Ekstrom, et al
to redesignate the . 62 acre parcel at 1435 Academy
Street from Low Density Residential to Comas rcial;
and to certify the filing of a Negative Declaration
(ND -81-25).
Section 2. The request of Moss and Craig on behalf
of Aladdin Real Estate to redesignate the 2. 30 acre.
parcel at 1420 West Kettleman Lane from Office -
Institutional to Commercial; and to certify the filing
of a Negative Declaration.
Notice thereof having been published in accordance
with law and affidavit of publication being on file
in the office of the City Clerk, that the Public
Hearings to consider the following items would also
be conducted at this time:
1. Consider the City Planning Commission's
recommended approval of the request of Vernon
Ekstrom, et al to rezone the . 62 acre parcel at
1435 Academy Street from R-2, Single -Family
Residential to C -M, Commerical- Light Industrial and
2. To consider the City Planning Commission's
recommended approval of the request of Moss and
Craig on behalf of Aladdin Real Estate to amend P -D
15, Planned Development No. 15, to permit the
2. 30 acre parcel at 1420 West Kettleman Lane to
conform to the C -S, Commercial Shopping District,
rather than the R -C -P, Residential -Comore rcial-
Professional District.
Assistant Planner Morimoto presented transparencies
which illustrated zoning, land use and the General
Plan for the above Ekstrom request. He also presented
the Planning Commissions recommendations.
Mr. Glen Baumbach, c/o Baumbach and Piazza,
consulting Engineers, 323 West Elm Street, Lodi,
was present and outlined the basis for the Ekstrom
request.
As there was no one else to be heard on this matter
and no correspondence had been received, Mayor
McCarty declared the public portion of the hearing
closed.
On motion of Councilman Katnich, Murphy second,
Council certified the filing of a Negative. Declaration
as adequate Environmental Documentation for the
above request of Vernon Ekstron, et. al.
GENERAL PLAN AMENMENTS
On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Katnich second,
ORDINANCE NO. 1244
Council introduced section I of Ordinance 1244
INTRODUCED �.
which redesignates the . 62 acre parcel at 1435
J
Academy Street from Low Density Residential to
���
Commercial on the Land Use Element of the General
/.2-7
Continued November 18, 1981
REZUNE .62 ACRE PARCEL AT On motion of Councilman Murphy, Hughes second,
1435 ACADEMY FROM R-2 Council introduced Ordinance 1245 which amends the
TO C -M ORDINANCE NO. Official District Map by rezoning the .62 acre parcel
1145 INTFtODtiCEU at 1435 Academy Street from R-2, Single -Family
y�.
x.(r? Residential to C -M, Commercial -Light 't:.rl=.:strial.
` Assistant Planner Morimoto presented transparencies
which illustrated zoning land use and general plan
for above requests on Moss and Craig on behalf
of Aladdin Real Estate.
Mr. Wayne Craig, c/o Moss and Craig, Cornrercial
Real Estate, 222 West Lockeford Street, Lodi, was
present and outlined the basis for the Aladdin Real
Estate request.
As there was no one else wishing to be heard on this
matter and no correspondence had been received,
Mayor McCarty declared the public portion of the
hearing closed.
Assistant Planner Morimoto introduced the matter
and presented transparencies which illustrated the
surrounding zoning, land use and general plan
designations.
The following persons were present and spoke in
favor of the appeal:
1. Dr. Jack L. Gilliland, 900 South Fairmont Avenue,
Lodi. He stated that the General Plan Amendment and
ultimate rezoning were being sought so the subject
parcel could be used for off-street parking for an
existing professional office building at 916-924 South
Fairmont Avenue which was proposed for remodeling.
He gave the history of professional office development
in the area of Memorial Hospital.
On motion of Councilman Murphy, Katnich second,
Council certified the filing of a Negative Declaration
by the Community Development Director as adequate
environmental documentation on the above requests
of Moss and Craig on behalf of Aladdin Real Estate.
On motion of Councilman Murphy, Pinkerton second,
Council introduced Section II of Ordinance 1244 which
redesignates the 2. 30 acre parcel at 1420 West
Kettleman Lane from Office Institutional to Commercial
on the Land Use Element of the General Plan.
REDESIGNATE 2.30 ACRE
On motion of Councilman Katnich, Murphy second,
PARCEL AT 1420 W.
Council introduced Ordinance 1246 which amends the
KETTLEMAN LANE FROM
Official District Map by amending P -D (15, Planned
OFFICE -INSTITU=TIONAL TO
Development District No. 15 so that the 2. 30 acre
COMMERCIAL— ORDINANCE
parcel at 1420 West Kettleman Lane shall conform
#1216
-`
to the C -S, Commercial Shopping District.
PP e
APPEAL OF DR. DENNIS R.
Notice thereof having been published in accordance
SWANSON AMEND LAND USE
with law and affidavit of publication being on file in
ELEMENT AT 1001 WINDSOR
the office of the City Clerk, Mayor McCarty called
DRIVE
for the Public Hearing to consider the appeal of Dr.
Dennis R. Swanson of the Lodi City Planning
Commission's denial of his request to amend the
Land Use Element of the General Plan by redesignating
the parcel at 1001 Windsor Drive, Lodi from Low
Density Residential to Office Institutional.
Assistant Planner Morimoto introduced the matter
and presented transparencies which illustrated the
surrounding zoning, land use and general plan
designations.
The following persons were present and spoke in
favor of the appeal:
1. Dr. Jack L. Gilliland, 900 South Fairmont Avenue,
Lodi. He stated that the General Plan Amendment and
ultimate rezoning were being sought so the subject
parcel could be used for off-street parking for an
existing professional office building at 916-924 South
Fairmont Avenue which was proposed for remodeling.
He gave the history of professional office development
in the area of Memorial Hospital.
\a$
Continued November 18, 1981
The following correspondence was received in
opposition to the appeal:
1. A letter from Mr. Del Cay -wood, 921 Windsor Dr. , Lodi
2. A petition signed by 18 residents of the 800 and 900
blocks of Windsor Drive.
The following persons were present and spoke in
opposition to the appeal:
1. Mr. Reid Cerney, 900 Nest Vine Street, Lodi. He
stated that the people of the area were opposed to
further office and parking encroachment into the
residential area and presented a petition containing
48 signatures supporting his statement.
2. Mr. Lloyd Bresnikoff, 901 Windsor Drive, Lodi.
3. Mr. Harold L. Roberts, 831 Windsor Drive, Lodi.
As there was no one else wishing to be heard on this
matter and no additional correspondence to be read,
Mayor McCarty declared the public portion of the
hearing closed.
On motion of. Councilman Hughes, Murphy second,
Council certified the filing of a Negative Declaration
as adequate environmental documentation for the
above appeal of Dr. Dennis R. Swanson.
After discussion on motion of Councilman Hughes,
Murphy second, Council, by a 4 ro 1 vote with Council-
man Katnich noting "no", approved the appeal of
Dr. Dennis R. Swanson and introduced Ordinance No.
1246 which amends the Land Use Element of the General
Plan by redesignating the parcel at 1001 Windsor Drive,
Lodi from Low Density Residential to Office -Institutional.
RECESS
Mayor McCarty declared a five minute recess at
9:10 p.m. and the council reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
PLANNING
The following report of the November 9, 1981 Planning
COMMISSION
Commission meeting was presented.
ITEMS OF
1. Tabled the request of Lawrence St. Germain and
INTEREST'
Robert Herrington for a Use Permit for an electronic
games center (i.e. video entertainment center) at
w
108-c Turner Road in the Arbor Shopping Center in
an area zoned P -D (17), Planned Development District
No. 17, because Barry Spivak, owner of the Shopping
center, was opposed to the request.
2. Denied the request bf Rex Martin for a Use Permit
for an electronic games center (i. e. pinball and video
arcade) at 20 North School Street in an area zoned
C-2, General Commercial.
3. Conditionally approved the request of Charles Taormina
for a Use Permit to use a bus as a permanent sandwich
shop at 223 North Church Street in an area zoned C-2,
General Commercial.
Continued November 18, 1981
4. Conditionally approved the request of Luis
Arismendi on behalf of Grupe Communities for a
Tentative Subdivision Map for Pheasant Ridge, a
5.245 acre, 49 -unit condominium project proposed
for Lot 57, Lakeshore Village, Unit #1 (i. e. north-
west corner of South Mills Avenue and Sandcreek
Drive) in an area zoned P -D(21), Planned Develop-
ment District No. 21.
5. Conditionally approved the request of Luis
A rismendi on behalf of Grupe Communities for a
Use Permit for Pheasant Ridge, a 5. 245 acre
49 unit condominium project proposed for Lot 57,
Lakeshore Village, Unit r#l, in an area zoned P -D
(21), Planned Development District No. 21.
6. Conditionally approved the request of Wayne
Craig on behalf of M C & P Investments for a
Tentative Subdivision Map for an industrial/Commercial
condominium project at 1901 South Stockton Street
(i. e. Lot 1, Maxwell Industrial Park) in an area zoned
M-2, Heavy Industrial.
7. Recommended that the San Joaquin County Board
of Zoning Adjustment approve the request of Wayne
Craig on behalf of Jungle Growth Products for a Use
Permit to allow plant food manufacturing in the existing
Happy Holmes Farm buildings on the west side of
Lower Sacramento Road, 2800 feet north of Harney
Lane in an area zoned GA -40, General Agricultural.
8. Reaffirmed its action of September 14, 1981 and
recommended that the San Joaquin County Board of
Zoning Adjustment deny the request of John Taylor
Fertilizers for a Use Permit to establish a fertilizer
distribution plant at the west end of Winery Road,
2300 feet west of the State Route 99 frontage road in
an area zoned GA -40, General Agricultural.
COMMUNICATIONS Dep uty City Clerk Schroeder presented a letter which
had been received from Mr. Tom Dutra requesting
REQUEST FOR STOP
that Council look into having stop signes put in on
SIGN IN5TA LLA TIONS
Brandywine -Fairmont and Brandywine -Re Drive.
Following Council discussion, on motion of Council-
man Katnich, Murphy second, Council referred the
matter to Staff for investigation and recommendation.
CLAIMS
On recommendation of R. L. Kautz and Company and
the City Attorney, Council on motion of Councilman
T
Pinkerton, Murphy second, denied the claim presented
by Michael Villarin and referred same back to
R. L. Kautz and Company.
ABC LICENSE, ,
Mr. Schroeder presented to Council an application
for Alcoholic Beverage License which had been
'
received from Olga J. Moore, Sandwich Maker,
104 N. School Street, Lodi - On sale Beer and Wine
Eating Place and an application for Alcoholic
Beverage License which had been received for
Charles L. Keagle, et al, Cask'n Cleaver, 1230 W.
Kettleman Lane, Lodi, On -Sale General Eating Place.
Mr. Schroeder presented a letter which had been
received from Richard Sanborn, Sanborn Chevrolet,
w�. Qct
1210 5. Cherokee Lane, regarding Council's decision
to accept a bid for Dial -A -Ride vehicles from a dealer
/-30
Continued November 18, 1981
UNMET TRANSIT. Following introduction of the matter, Council, on
NEEDS HEARING motion of Councilman Katnich, Murphy second, set
SET f `, the following Public Hearings regarding unmet Transit
needs within the City of Lodi.
a) 3:00 p.m. December 16, 1981 - Hale Park Recreation
Center.
b) 8:00 p.m. December 16, 1981 - Council Chambers
COMMENTS BY Council had no remarks under "Comments by
CITY COUNCIL- City Councilmen".
MEN
REPORTS OF In accordance with report and recommendation of
THE CITY the City Manager, the following actions, hereby
MANAGER set forth between asterisks, on motion of Councilman
Pinkerton, Murphy seconC, were approved by the
Council.
CONSENT
CALENDAR
CLAIMS, 21C�) CLAIMS WERE APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF
$1,682,407
MINUTES THE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 7, 1981 AND OCTOBER
21, 1981 WERE APPROVED AS MAILED.
City Manager Glaves apprised the Council that the
only bid which had been received for a Utility
Department Stake and Platform Truck was as follows:
BIDDER AMOUNT
Geweke Ford $12,466.76
AWARD - BID FOR Following recommendation of the City Manager, Council
UTILITY DEPT. adopted the following resolution:
STAKE AND
PLATFORM TRUCK RESOLUTION NO. 81-163
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AWARDING THE BID FOR THE STAKE
81-163
AND PLATFORM TRUCK TO GEWEKE FORD IN THE
AMOUNT OF $12,466.76
Council was apprised that the City's reec-rds- indicate
there is a wedge-shaped strip of land lying between
the original north line of the Ayers and Pitchers
addition and the south line of 60 -foot wide Daisy Avenue.
4
From what can be determined, it appears this strip
RES. OF INTENTION
was originally part of Daisy Avenue. Since all curbs, i
TO VACATE PORTION
gutters, sidewalks and other public utilities are
OF DAISY AVENUE
located within the 60 -foot portion of Daisy Avenue, there
is no reason to retain the strip of land lying to the
RES. NO. 81-158
south and it is therefore Staff's recommendation that
the area be vacated. -
On recommendation of Staff, Council adopted Resolution
No. 81-158
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ABANDON PORTION OF
DAISY AVENUE, REFERRING THE MATTER TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION AND SETTING THE .MATTER FO".
PUBLIC HEARING ON DECEMBER 16, 1981.
Continued November 18, 1981
/3/
LOT LINE ADJUST-
MENT LOTS 255
AND 256 VINEYARD
NO. 3
RES. NO. 81-160.
CC - 3co
AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENT FOR
CITY OF LODI
FOR 1980 -81
RECEIVED FOR
FILINGp1
COUNCIL APPROVED AGREEMENT FOR OPERATIONS
AND MAINTENANCE AGRE EMENT FOR SPUR TRACK
CROSSING #61B-0. 65-C AT WICKES FOREST INDUSTRIES
AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF
OF .THE CITY.
Following introduction of the matter by Staff, Council
adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 81-160
RESOLUTION APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
BETWEEN LOTS 255 and 256 VINEYARD SUBDIVISION,
UNIT #3, (I. E. 453 and 459 CEDAR COURT).
COUNCIL RECEIVED FM FILING THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE CITY OF LODI
1980-81.
Council was apprised that the City of Lodi applied to
the PUC for permission to build a portion of Lodi
Avenue across an existing spur track serving Wickes
Forest Industries. The spur track is owned by
Robert L. Griffin and operated by Central California
Traction Company.
AGREEMENT RE
The PUG has granted authority to the City of Lodi to
SPUR CROSSING OF
build the street. The commission has also ordered
E. LODI AVENUE
the City of Lodi to provide an agreement between the
APPROVED
parties involved, stating that the above mentioned
ADDITION PARKING
crossing shall be reconstructed, operated and maintained
- _
according to the general orders references in their
cc _ ��pc>
decision #93083.
, S�
The Agreement specifices that Mr. Griffin, owner of
the spur track, will assume all responsibility for
maintenance of said spur track.
LOT LINE ADJUST-
MENT LOTS 255
AND 256 VINEYARD
NO. 3
RES. NO. 81-160.
CC - 3co
AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENT FOR
CITY OF LODI
FOR 1980 -81
RECEIVED FOR
FILINGp1
COUNCIL APPROVED AGREEMENT FOR OPERATIONS
AND MAINTENANCE AGRE EMENT FOR SPUR TRACK
CROSSING #61B-0. 65-C AT WICKES FOREST INDUSTRIES
AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF
OF .THE CITY.
Following introduction of the matter by Staff, Council
adopted the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 81-160
RESOLUTION APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
BETWEEN LOTS 255 and 256 VINEYARD SUBDIVISION,
UNIT #3, (I. E. 453 and 459 CEDAR COURT).
COUNCIL RECEIVED FM FILING THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE CITY OF LODI
1980-81.
PROPOSED WOOCK Mr. C. M. Sullivan, Attorney at Law, 1111 West Tokay
REORGANIZATION Street, Lodi, was present and asked the City Council
INCLUDING to withdraw its request that the Local Agency Formation
ANNEXATION AND Commission (LAFCO) reconsider the proposed Woock
DETACHMENT Reorganization, a proposed 210. 7 acre annexation proposed
for Southwest Lodi. He gave a brief history of the
proposed annexation and described its relationship to
Mr. Walter Sanborn, Chairman of the CLIC Committee
addressed the Council requesting a resolution endorsing
efforts of the Central Lodi Improvement Committee -to
meet with representatives of the Southern Pacific
Transportation Committe regarding additional parking
in the downtown area.
cc
RES. ENDORSING
Following discussion, Council on motion of Councilman
CLIC EFFORTS TO
Katnich, Murphy second, adopted Resolution No. 81-161
MEET WITH SP RE
endorsing the efforts of the Central Lodi Improvement
ADDITION PARKING
Committee to meet with representatives of the Southern
IN DOWNTOWN AREA
Pacific Transportation Company to explore the avail-
ability of Southern Pacific Transportation Company
RES. NO. 81-161
Property within the downtown area of the City of Lodi
that might be used for parking purposes.
PROPOSED WOOCK Mr. C. M. Sullivan, Attorney at Law, 1111 West Tokay
REORGANIZATION Street, Lodi, was present and asked the City Council
INCLUDING to withdraw its request that the Local Agency Formation
ANNEXATION AND Commission (LAFCO) reconsider the proposed Woock
DETACHMENT Reorganization, a proposed 210. 7 acre annexation proposed
for Southwest Lodi. He gave a brief history of the
proposed annexation and described its relationship to
13 D_
ContinuedNovember 18, 1981
by the Lodi Electorate on August 25, 1981. Mr. Sullivan
felt the initiative ordinance should bs interpreted by
the Court and that a return to LAFCO would be premature.
Mr. Robert Mullen, Attorney at Lav, 1111 :Vest Tokay
Street was present and stated that neither the City
Council nor staff could interpret Measure "A" and he
felt it was to eve ryones best interest to find out if
the initiative was constitutional.
2. There is a six-foot high block wall located at the
sidewalk line which extends from the west property line
of 1200 -West Lodi Avenue to the center of the curb
return at Sunset Drive (at this point the wall reduces in
height to 4 feet). This wall blocks the vision of a driver
on Lodi Avenue from seeing a parked vehicle on Sunset
Drive until the driver is well into the right turn:
3. The curb -to -curb width of Sunset Drive is 36 feet;
two 8 -foot parking lanes and two 10 -foot travel lanes.
If a vehicle is parked at the curb, and another traveling
north on Sunset Drive approaching the stop sign, a
driver turning right has little room to negotiate the turn.
City Attorney Stein outlined the various alternatives
available to the City Council.
After lengthy discussion it was moved by Councilman
Hughes, Katnich second, that Council direct the
Deputy City Clerk to correspond with the Local Agency
Formation Commission and withdraw the Citys request
for the reconsideration of the Woock Reorganization.
Mr. Sullivan then asked the Council to determine if
it had the power to prezone the Woock Reorganization
without a vote of the people on the General Plan Amendment.
On motion of Councilman Hughes, Murphy second, Council
determined that it would be inappropriate to submit the
Woock. Reorganization to the people for a General Plan
Amendment Election and therefore the Council could
not prezone the area.
REQUEST FOR "NO
Council was apprised that the City of Lodi has received
— PARKING" AREA ON
a petition from 33 residents of the 300 block of South
SOUTH SUNSET
Sunset Drive, asking for the parking restriction. The
DRIVE
petition represents 69% of the total properties along
IL
_,;t ci-
the street.
There are 3 conditions that :may contribute. to the--kraffic
hazard stated in the petition:
1. There is an existing no parking zone on the auuth side
of Lodi Avenue betveen Ham Lane and Sunset Drive.
Drivers of vehicles traveling east on Lodi Avenue and
preparing to turn right on Sunset Drive must be positioned
in the curb lane immediately north of the South curb line.
The natural tendency of most drivers making the turn
is to parallel the curb line and, upon completion of the
turn, the vehicle would normally be positioned only
5 or 6 feet from the west curb line of Sunset Drive. A
vehicle parked along the west curb line could protrude
as much as 8 feet into the street area, and the driver
making the turn would have to veer to the left to avoid it;
2. There is a six-foot high block wall located at the
sidewalk line which extends from the west property line
of 1200 -West Lodi Avenue to the center of the curb
return at Sunset Drive (at this point the wall reduces in
height to 4 feet). This wall blocks the vision of a driver
on Lodi Avenue from seeing a parked vehicle on Sunset
Drive until the driver is well into the right turn:
3. The curb -to -curb width of Sunset Drive is 36 feet;
two 8 -foot parking lanes and two 10 -foot travel lanes.
If a vehicle is parked at the curb, and another traveling
north on Sunset Drive approaching the stop sign, a
driver turning right has little room to negotiate the turn.
/,33
Continued November 18, 1981
Printer Cable 30.00
$. 14, X0. 00
Text Pack 3 $25. 00 per month to rent or 1 time
charge - $725.00
Further, Council in this action, increased Revenue
sharing appropriations for this Word Processing
equipment from $20, 000 to $31, 500. 00
Even though elimination of this amount of parking will
mean the resident at 1200 West Lodi Avenue will have
no curb parking adjacent to the residence, it is
recommended that the no parking zone be adopted.
Mr. Manual Rocha, 324 S. Sunset Drive, Lodi spoke
on behalf of the proponents of the petition.
REQUEST FOR
Following a lengthy discussion, with que stions being
"NO PARKING"
directed to Staff and to those who had given testimony,
AREA ON SOUTH
Council on motion of Councilman Katnich, Hughes
SUNSET DRIVE
second, directed the Public Works Director to
correspond with Mr. William Stemler, 1200 West Lodi
Avenue, Lodi, requesting that he refrain from parking
his boat on the west side of Sunset Drive between his
driveway and Lodi Avenue.
Council was apprised that at the November 4, 1981
meeting, the City Council was notified that the Federal
Highway Administration has approved the environmental
report on the Stockton Street project. Since that
meeting, the document has been printed and submitted
to the State Clearinghouse to start the public review
period. To conform to FHWA and CEQA (State)
requirements, a public hearing must be held. At
the hearing, the Council will receive input on the
project and determine if the environmental document
is adequate. Per Federal requirements, a decision
on the project must be defBrred until a subsequent
meeting and a transcript of the hearing must be prepared.
On motion of Councilman Katnich, Murphy second,
Council set the Publid Hearing on the Stockton Street
Improvement Project to January 6, 1982.
Following review of a report prepared by City Clerk
_
Alice Reimche and Sharon Blaufus, Administrative
Assistant, Public Works and Council discussion, Council
authorized the lease/purchase of the following IBM
Word Processing Equipment for both the Administrative
Offices and Community Development/Public Works
Offices on motion of Councilman Hughes, Katnich second.
224, 000 Character Memory $4,210.00
COUNCIL AUTHOR-
Screen 365.00
IZES LEASE
PURCHASE OF
96 Character Keyboard 320.00
WORD PROCESS-
ING EQUIPMENT
Dual 2-d Diskette Unit 3,300.00
40 Character per second printer 3,875.00
Sheet Feeder 2,000.00
Printer Cable 30.00
$. 14, X0. 00
Text Pack 3 $25. 00 per month to rent or 1 time
charge - $725.00
Further, Council in this action, increased Revenue
sharing appropriations for this Word Processing
equipment from $20, 000 to $31, 500. 00
15�
Continued November 18, 1981
ACCESS FOR THE
Council was apprised that historically Southern Pacific
RAILROAD NORTH
Company has maintained their tracks by an access
OF TURNER
from Turner Road through a parcel of land that the
USE MURRA Y ST.
City of Lodi purchased many years ago. With the
construction of Mokelumne Village Subdivision, the
ORD. NO. 1243
City has agreed to quit claim the parcel which '_'as been
'ADOPTED
used for access by the City and Southern Pacific Company.
i
It now becomes necessary to provide the Southern
Pacific Company with an alternate acce ss. Following
,r
discussion on the matter, Council, on motion of
Councilman Pinkerton, Murphy second, voted not
to grant to the Southern Pacific Company an access
easement through the Scenic Overlook area.
AMENDATORY
Following introduction of the matter by City Manager
AGREEMENT TO
Glaves, Council on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore
U. S. DEPT. OF
Murphy. Htghes second, adopted Res. No. 81-162.
ENERGY,
unanimously approving an amendatory agreement to
BONNEVILLE POWER
the United States Department of Energy, Bonneville
ADMINISTRATION
Power Administration, Pre -Regional Act Powers
PRE -REGIONAL
Sales Contract(s) and authorized the City Manager
ACT POWERS
and City Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf
SALES CONTRACT .\
of the Council.
APPROVED ",I'
r
RES. NO. 81-1162
ORDINANCES
ORD. PROHIBITING
Ordinance No. 1243 - An Ordinance prohibiting the use
VEHICLES EXCEED-
of Murray Street by any commercial vehicles or by
- ING FIVE TONS TO
any vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight
USE MURRA Y ST.
limit of five tons having been introduced at a regular
meeting of the Council held November 4, 1981, was
ORD. NO. 1243
brought up for passage after reading :y title. On
'ADOPTED
motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy, Hughes second,
i
the Ordinance was then adopted and ordered to print
by the following vote:
,r
Ayes: Councilmen - Hughes, Murphy,
Pinkerton, Katnich,
and McCarty
Noes: Councilmen - None
Absent: Councilmen - None
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the
Council, Mayor McCarty adjourned the meeting at
approximately 12:15 P. m, to 8:00 p.m., December 9, 1981.
Attest: _
JAMES B. SCHROEDER
.
�J Deputy City Clerk