Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - October 6, 1982C 29.c� CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS OCTOBER 6, 1982 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning at 8:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 6,1982 in the City Hall Council Chambers. ROLL CALL Present: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Pinkerton, Snider, and Reid (Mayor) Absent: Council Members - None Also Present: City Manager Glaves, Assistant City Manager Glenn, Community Development Director Schroeder, Public Works Director Ronsko, City Attorney Stein, and City Clerk Reimche INVOCATION The invocation was given by Dr. Wayne Kildall, Center of Hope PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance to the flag was led by Mayor Reid REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER, CONSENT CALENDAR In accordance with report and recommendation of the City Manager, the following actions hereby set forth between asterisks, on motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Murphy second, were approved by the Council. Wayne Fregien Construction $41,560.00 W.•M. Lyles Company 42,375.20 Crutchfield Construction 43,419.90 Wonmor Contracting 43,977.05 Claude C. Wood Company 44,444.00 Granite Construction 45,910.00 Jerry Gavrilko 50,606.00 Bowers Company 50,713.00 Agir Corporation 52,758.21 Teichert Construction 53.362.nn CLAIMS CLAIMS WERE APPROVED IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,565,.939.84. KINUTES THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 4, 1982, AUGUST 18, 1982, SEPTEMBER 1, 1982 AND SEPTEMBER 15, 1982 WERE APPROVED AS WRITTEN. City Manager Glaves presented the following bids which had been received for "Catch Basin Replacement 81/82". BIDDER BID Granite Construction $18,503.51 Case Construction 22,083.20 Claude C. Wood Company 22,327.50 Stanfield and Moody 31,548.00 D.S.S. Company 36,045.00 Following recommendation of the City Manager, Council adopted the following Resolution: RES. NO. 82-109 RESOLUTION NO. 82-109 AWARD - "CATCH RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR "CATCH BASIN REPLACEMENT BASIN REPLACEMENT 81/82" TO GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, THE LOW BIDDER, IN 81/82" THE AMOUNT OF $18,503.51 AND APPROPRIATED $4,400.00 FROM THE CAPITAL OUTLAY RESERVE FUND TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. City Manager Glaves presented the following bids which had been received for "Main Street Storm Drain, Elm Street to Lockeford Street". BIDDER BID Wayne Fregien Construction $41,560.00 W.•M. Lyles Company 42,375.20 Crutchfield Construction 43,419.90 Wonmor Contracting 43,977.05 Claude C. Wood Company 44,444.00 Granite Construction 45,910.00 Jerry Gavrilko 50,606.00 Bowers Company 50,713.00 Agir Corporation 52,758.21 Teichert Construction 53.362.nn 6:ih Continued October 6, 1982 BIDDER BID Stanfield and Moody, Inc. $55,633.00 On recommendation of the City Manager, Council adopted the following Resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 82-110 AWARD - MAIN RESOLUTION AWARDING THE BID FOR "MAIN STREET STORM DRAIN, STREET STORM DRAIN, ELM STREET TO LOCKEFORD STREET" TO WAYNE FREGIEN CONSTRUCTION, ELM STREET TO THE LOW BIDDER, IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,560.00. LOCKEFORD STREET RES. NO. 82-110 AWARD - CONTRACT FOR City Manager Glaves presented the following bids which had ASPHALT MATERIALS - been received for the contract for asphalt materials - second SECOND AND THIRD and third quarters fiscal year 1982-83: QUARTERS F.Y. 1982-83 m +! N G7 O U 4 d Ln O r- 0 0 to "o ^ � RC1 j W C- W O - to ( tri I "•C d> O N N N N N GJ r �O Rf s UL O U y ut C N N C a U N i d N F kO �O O C •r O Z E O Ln to to Z �� R �� N N N N N f d a Jv "Oil V'Y 64 aA 4A W In F� CD go CD = C b QQ iCn QCY a C C7 Q 1-O r`�Cf N � 1 co O N ¢ m O 40 CO In 0 C y O v O � In %G 1- co C N b N N N NS. N - r Ll.. W 44 Vi HR Vi C N di 4- C. 0)CSj O O to U 4-+ W> G> N N N N N N G) t RS 010 vi 49 4.4 44 44 i VI a U O O G1 VI U•0 O r C r C O Y 4J N N O O O U >,•� O i Cl r N N N N N N i V, 1d •O N U J v 44 W M !R 44 F- L11¢Cl i ►r G)N C7 4 VIM to CT co C„ d CO O rtf VI U L Q F- CG CA 9 r� f� N O 1� -� C M 4Ad O O � U) ko CG N O _ NW OCG>Q M 44 M 4NR LL O U X U X X Y � i' O ..00- � i O O 4- O 4- 4- U V U U W U 41 C 4J7 C 4jS C N O C U CT W C U 01 Q C Cn U Iti 3 4j >� v o 4j >, aai e- *3 Z U 4 .- • v - 4> ,2 to •S. r . �"� E 4J N U Gl O W U E d .W-� Gl C a CL +� C C. J Q) J r .]C J VI GJ a E 4J U) ¢ c U 4J 0 ¢ ='O ++ ut O O O i 4j 4n O F- O -Q .0 Cn Vt O 7 C7 N U a F- — J U a 2.41 Continued October 6, 1982 Following recommendation of the City Mananger, Council adopted the following Resolution: RES. NO. 82-111 RESOLUTION NO. 82-111 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE BID FOR ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD QUARTERS OF FISCAL YEAR 1982-83 AS FOLLOWS: Claude C. Wood Co. Item No. lA and B Item No. 2A, B and C Granite Construction Item No. 1C ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA WITH THE TACIT CONCURRENCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, AGENDA ITEM e 1 F "ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, LAKESHORE VILLAGE" WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA. ACCEPTANCE OF "LOCKEFORD COUNCIL ACCEPTED THE IMPROVEMENTS FOR "LOCKEFORD STREET STREET IMPROVEMENTS, HAM IMPROVEMENTS, HAM LANE TO CALIFORNIA STREET", AND DIRECTED LANE TO CALIFORNIA STREET THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE. Council was apprised that the contract was awarded to j Claude C. Wood Company of Lodi on July 7, 1982 in the amount of $208,019.00 and has been completed in substantial conformance with the plans and specifications. The final contract price was $220,499.05. The difference between the contract amount and the final contract price is due to a slight over -run in asphalt and rock quantities and the cost of repairing soft subgrade below the normal construction depth. SPECS FOR STREET COUNCIL APPROVED THE SPECIFICIATIONS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL KPARTMENT TRACTOR % TRACTOR, FRONT LOADER FOR THE STREET DEPARTMENT AND k0ADER APPROVED AUTHORIZED THE PURCHASING AGENT TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS THEREON. APPROVAL OF SAND CREEK COUNCIL APPROVED THE FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION DOCUMENTS FINAL MAP AND SUB- FOR SAND CREEK CONDOMINIUMS, TRACT NO. 1810 AND DIRECTED DIVISION DOCUMENTS THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT AND MAP ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. Council was apprised that Thomas Luckey Construction Inc. . the developer of Sand Creek Condominiums has furnished the City with the necessary agreements, improvement securities, and fees for the proposed subdivision. This is a 3 lot condominium subdivision located at the corner of Sand Creek Drive and Mills Avenue. It is proposed that Lots 1 and 2 each contain 46 condominium units and Lot 3, 38 condominium units. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT COUNCIL APPROVED THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT ADDENDUM FOR STONE TREE ADDENDUM WITH STONE TREE INVESTMENT COMPANY FOR THE APPROVED IMPROVEMENTS OF ALMOND DRIVE AND CHEROKEE LANE, AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE ADDENDUM ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. Council was informed that as part of the development of Stonetree Subdivision, the subdivider will be installing street improvements along Almond Drive and Cherokee Lane. The City has a responsibility for reconstructing the pave- ment on Almond Drive and Cherokee Lane. Included in the subdivider's bid proposal was the City's portion of the work. The low bid for the City's portion was $16,026.80. The price is reasonable, and it is in the City's best interest to install these improvements at the same time as the subdivision improvements. MOWING AGREEMENT WITH COUNCIL APPROVED AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, WHEREBY THE CITY AGREES TO DISTRICT APPROVED PROVIDE MOWING SERVICES AT THE FOLLOWING ATHLETIC FIELD AREAS FOR THE PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 15, 1982 AND ENDING 2.8 Continued October 6, 1982 OCTOBER 15, 1984 AT A COST OF $46.26 PER HOUR AND AUTHORIZED THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY: LODI HIGH SCHOOL TOKAY HIGH SCHOOL (NEW CAMPUS) WOODBRIDGE SCHOOL HERITAGE SCHOOL AGREEMENT WITH SCHOOL COUNCIL APPROVED AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR USE OF. DISTRICT FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S USE OF THE STADIUM STADIUM FOR SCHOOL ACTIVITIES FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR COMMENCING ` SEPTEMBER 1, 1982 AND AUTHORIZED THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. AGREEMENT WITH JUNIOR COUNCIL APPROVED AN AGREEMENT WITH JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF ACHIEVEMENT OF SAN JOAQUIN, SAN JOAQUIN, INC. TO USE A PORTION OF THE CARNEGIE LIBRARY INC. APPROVED FOR A SEVEN MONTH PERIOD ENDING ON APRIL 30, 1983 AND AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. PUBLIC HEARING SET TO COUNCIL SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR 8:00 P.M. ON OCTOBER 27, CONSIDER THE 1982-83 1982 TO CONSIDER THE LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DECLARATION LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL OF IMPACTION REPORT 1982-83. DISTRICT DECLARATION OF IMPACTION City Manager Glaves apprised the Council that the following bids had been received for a Turf Truckster for the Parks and Recreation Department: Central Valley Equipment Co. $21,696.08 Duke Equipment Company $22,047.79 H. V. Carter $24,422.40 AWARD - TURF TRUCKSTER , On recommendation of the City Manager, Council adopted FOR PARKS AND RECREATION Resolution No. 82-117 awarding the bid for a Turf DEPARTMENT Truckster for the Parks and Recreation Department to Central Valley Equipment Company, the low bidder, in the RES. NO. 82-117 Via` amount of $21,696.08. PUBLIC HEARINGS Notice thereof having been published in accordance with law and affidavit of publication being on file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Reid called for the Public Hearing to consider the request of Joanne Shuter, c/o Dial Realty, 529 West Lodi Avenue, Lodi, to amend the Specific Plan for Howard Street between Lockeford Street and Lake Street, Lodi as adopted by Ordinance No. 917, December 3, 1969. NO ACTION TAKEN ON City Clerk Reimche read a letter from Ms. Elaina R. Kepler, REQUEST TO AMEND HOWARD Agent representing Mrs. Shuter as follows: STREET SPECIFIC PLAN "Dear Mayor and Council Members: This is in regards to the notice of public hearing set for October 6, 1982 at 8 PM in the matter of the request from Joanne Shuter to amend the specific ordinance no. 917, between Howard Street and Lockford Street. Due to events we had no control over, Mrs. Shuter will not be able to purchase the porperty involved with the specific ordinance in question. . Although, after notification of the hearing date to area property owners, we have several telephone calls in regards to this matter. None have been in favor of the specific ordinance taking place and have voiced their opinion to myself and Mrs. Shuter in the hopes of having it amended. Therefore, we request that the City Council read this letter to the public at the hearing already set to determine what 299 Continued October 6, 1982 action, if any, should be taken. Respectfully, Elaina R. Kepler, Agent Representing: Mrs. Joanne Shuter" There were no persons in the audience wishing to speak on the matter, and the public portion of the hearing was closed. Following discussion, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy, Reid second, Council voted to take no action on the matter. Notice thereof having been published and posted in accordance with law and affidavit of publication and posting being on file in the Office of the City Clerk, Mayor Reid called for the Public Hearing to consider vacating a 20 -foot strip of land lying north of Lot 37, Walnut Orchard Tract, Lodi, California. The matter was introduced by Public Works Director Ronsko who presented a diagram indicating the subject area for the perusal of the Council. ORDER OF VACATION ADOPTED It was Staff's recommendations that the adoption of the VACATING A 20 -FOOT STRIP Order be conditioned upon the retention of the necessary OF LAND LYING NORTH OF LOT public easements and that the order not be recorded until 37,WALNUT ORCHARD TRACT, funds have been received for pole relocation in the area. LODI There were no persons wishing to speak on the matter, and .; the public portion of the hearing was closed. On motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Olson second, Council adopted an Order of Vacation, thereby vacating a 20 -foot _ strip of land lying north of Lot 37, Walnut Orchard Tract, Lodi, reserving, however, and excepting from the vacation, the permanent easment included therein. Further, the City Clerk was directed not to record the Order until such time as the condition had been met regarding pole relocation in the subject area. REVENUE SHARING Notice thereof having been published in accordance with APPROPRIATIONS 1982-83 law and affidavit of publishing being on file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Reid called for the Public Hearing to consider the proposed uses of Revenue Sharing Funds. The matter was introduced by City Manager Glaves who present- ed the following recommended Revenue Sharing Appropriations for 1982-83: Capital Outlay Storm Drainage $247,000 Other Facilities 341,400 $588,400 Classification and Salary Survey 25,000 City Telephone Study 4,000 $617,400 There being no persons in the audience wishing to speak on the matter, the public portion of the hearing was closed. Following discussion, on motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Murphy second, Council approved the Revenue Sharing Appropriations for 1982-83 as heretofore set forth. 300 Continued October 6, 1982 PLANNING COMMISSION City Manager Glaves gave the following report of the City Planning Commission meeting of September 13, 1982: ITEMS OF INTEREST The Planning Commission - I. Approved the request of Thomas Luckey Construction Company for a Tentative Parcel Map of Lakeshore Business Park which resubdivided Lots "G" through "N" and Lots 26 _ and 36 located in West Kettleman Lane in the Lakeshore Village Subdivision. 2. Approved an alternate Tentative Subdivision Map for Beckman Ranch, Unit #5 which permits the substitution of a 3.75 acre church site for residential units at the northwest corner of South Ham Lane and Chablis Drive. 3. Determined that a Zoning Hardship did not exist and denied the request of Jon and Donna Koehnen for a Variance to construct a 6 foot fence in the required street side -yard area at 810 Denby Way, Lots 27, Burlington Manor, in an area zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential. 4. Set a Special Joint Meeting with the San Joaquin County Planning Commission for 7:30 p.m. Thursday, September 30, 1982 in the County Planning Commission Auditorium to consider the Circulation Element for Woodbridge. At its meeting of September 27, 1982 the Planning Commission: 1. Accepted the request of the applicant to withdraw the proposed amendment to the Howard Street Specific Plan and took no action on the matter. 2. Conditionally approved the request of Fotomat Corporation for a Use Permit to allow drive-through photographic kiosk at 730 West Kettleman Lane in the Vineyard Shopping Center, in an area zoned P-1)(15), Planned Development District No. 15. REPORT GIVEN ON SPECIAL Community Development Director Schroeder gave a brief report JOINT SESSION OF THE on a special joint session of the San Joaquin County SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Planning Commission and the Lodi City Planning Commission to PLANNING COMMISSION AND , consider General Plan - Circulation Element Amendment THE LODI CITY PLANNING No. GPA -82-1 to amend the Circulation Element of the Lodi COMMISSION 1 ; % General Plan by adding the Woodbridge Circulation Plan. COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL Council Member Snider reported on a recent meeting of the MEMBERS Recreation Commission that he and Mayor Reid had attended and outlined the following recommendations of the Recreation Commission resulting from that meeting as follows: a) Continue the.$1.00 entrance fee at Lodi Lake Park 3. Permanently approved the Temporary Use Permit for an electronic games center in the Lakewood Mall in an area zoned C -S, Commercial Shopping Center. COMMUNICATIONS City.Clerk Reimche presented a -letter which had been received from Mr. Jon S. Koehnen, 810 Denby Way, Lodi, appealing the APPEAL OF JON S. KOEHNEN Planning Commission's denial of his request for a Zoning RE ZONING VARIANCE SET Variance to permit a 6 foot fence in the required street FOR HEARING side -yard area at 810 Denby Way (i.e. Lot 27, Burlington Manor) in an area zoned R-2, Single -Family Residential. On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy, Snider second, the matter was set for Public Hearing on October 27, 1982. CLAIMS City Clerk Reimche presented a claim which had been filed on behalf of Dorene Berutto, Date of Loss April 13, 1982. On motion of Council Member Snider, Murphy second, Council denied_ the claim and referred same to R. L. Kautz and Company. REPORT GIVEN ON SPECIAL Community Development Director Schroeder gave a brief report JOINT SESSION OF THE on a special joint session of the San Joaquin County SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY Planning Commission and the Lodi City Planning Commission to PLANNING COMMISSION AND , consider General Plan - Circulation Element Amendment THE LODI CITY PLANNING No. GPA -82-1 to amend the Circulation Element of the Lodi COMMISSION 1 ; % General Plan by adding the Woodbridge Circulation Plan. COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL Council Member Snider reported on a recent meeting of the MEMBERS Recreation Commission that he and Mayor Reid had attended and outlined the following recommendations of the Recreation Commission resulting from that meeting as follows: a) Continue the.$1.00 entrance fee at Lodi Lake Park 60 L Continued October 6, 1982 Rosenstraugh, 21641 Cherry Street, Lodi. Mrs. Rosenstraugh b) Possible establishment of a park curfew for all City Parks. Said curfew to be 10:00 p.m. with exceptions granted through a "permit" process. c) Continue pursuing the possibility of "Park Rangers". CITY PARKS A lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff and to the City Attorney. Council tacitly concurred that Council Member Snider and City Attorney Stein are to meet and to bring back to the Council at a future meeting a COMPLAINT RECEIVED FROM model ordinance regarding a park curfew within the City of LODI SENIOR CITIZENS' Lodi. CLUB RE PARKING Council Member Snider asked to continue with the Task Force relating to all Parks within the City of Lodi. A lengthy discussion followed regarding the maintaining of Police personnel in the area of Lodi Lake Park. The specifications for a park ranger and the difficulties of developing such specifications were discussed at length. LODI LAKE PARK Council Members expressed their feelings regarding the PLAN entire subject with the majority of the Council relating to.the-City Manager that during the summer months, there should be close police survellience of the Lake area; however, the allocation of manpower at that location should be left up to the management personnel of the Police Department. CITY EMBLEMS ON ALL CITY Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy proposed the placement of City VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT PROPOSED Seals or Emblems on all City vehicles/equipment. Discussion followed with Council taking no formal action on the matter. -OMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC y WW AGENDA ITEMS Mrs. Pat Senner, 831 South Washington, Lodi, addressed the Council stating that she was attending the Council Meeting to advise the Council that she was not aware that the parking problems in the area.of PCP were going.to be a matter of discussion at the September 15, 1982 Council meeting and to.report that "we" were not satisfied with Council:'s decision of that date concerning this matter. Mrs. Senner stated that they don't feel red curbing is going to stop the problem and that they are sure the workers don't understand what is going on because the problems have just gotten worse. PARKING PROBLEMS IN AREA Also addressing the Council on the matter was Maxine OF PCP Rosenstraugh, 21641 Cherry Street, Lodi. Mrs. Rosenstraugh asked why they can't have permits to park in front of their homes. , City Attorney Stein explained the City ordinance relating to permit parking, and outlined some of the disadvantages of such an ordinance. Mayor Reid asked that Mrs. Senner meet with City Attorney Stein to discuss that matter more fully and for the City Attorney to explain the limitations involved to Mrs. Senner. COMPLAINT RECEIVED FROM Mr. Bob Rivers representing the Lodi Senior Citizens' LODI SENIOR CITIZENS' Club addressed the Council regarding parking problems CLUB RE PARKING their club members have encountered since the 5 hour meters were removed from -behind their club house. Following discussion, with questions being directed to Staff, City Manager Glaves indicated that he would like the opportunity to check into designating the area as a five-hour parking lot. LODI DOWNTOWN DEVELOPEMENT Council Member Pinkerton gave the following report regarding PLAN proposed improvements in downtown Lodi: As a portion of this report, Mr. Larry Wenell of the firm 2()_? Continued October 6, 1982 of Morris and Wenell presented the plans for the Lodi Main Post Office. Councilman Pinkerton reported that "At the September 1, 1982 Council Meeting, Mayor Reid appointed me to their a Task Force consisting of representatives of both the proponents and opponents of the proposed Downtown Assessment District to discuss their differences in an effort to arrive at unanimity regarding this project. I was directed to report back to the Council at the October 6, 1982 Council Meeting with recommenda— tions resulting from these discussions. Five weekly Task Force meetings were held with representatives of each group attending and the following recommendations were derived from discussions at those meetings: a) It is the belief of the -group that the opponents and proponents of the proposed Downtown Assessment District are merging into one supportive group whose goal is the improvement and beautification of downtown Lodi. b) It is recommended that the firm of Morris and Wenell be retained at a cost of $10,000 to develop a schematic Master Plan for downtown Lodi which would be acceptable to the group, which plan would be an extension of the plan developed by Quad. It is requested that Council allocate $10,000 for the development of this plan. These funds are to be allocated from the Hotel -Motel tax (Beautification funds). It is the intention of the group that upon the completion of the project, that this sum and the original $25,000 allocated for .the development of the Quad Plan will be reimbursed to the City. c) It was agreed that the ultimate plan has to have '. IMPACT. 1) The Beautification Plan must, as a minimum requirement to be a viable investment, reverse and stop the appearance of physical deterioration on Sacramento Street. 2) The Beautification Plan must establish a degree of aesthetic uniformity throughout the existing downtown area, and place its emphasis on areas that need- improvement the most. 3) The Beautification Plan, as previously stated, must be consistant with and actually should be an extension of the final plan for the Post Office. 4) Customer amenities should be top priority in any plan and should include: A) Public restrooms and phone booths B) Weather protection (awnings and trellis covers) C) Sidewalk improvement D) Mid -block pedestrian crossings E) Benches strategically located in all downtuvn areas d) Traffic circulation patterns for downtown will be determined later in the planning process. e) Plan must provide for additional parking. If it is feasible, a School Street parking plan should be developed with parallel parking on one side of the street and diagonal parking on the other. I would ask Council to commend this Task Force for its commitment of time and effort and to support the recommenda- tions heretofore set forth: ! Continued October 6, 1982 I would further ask that Mayor Reid appoint me to continue working with this group through the completion of this project." Task Force Representative Barbara McWilliams and Jack Bowen addressed the Council commending the work of the Task Force, complimenting Council Member Pinkerton for his efforts in this matter confirming the belief that both groups were now merging into one supportive group whose goal is the improvement and beautification of downtown Lodi. Following discussion, on motion of Council Member Olson, Snider second, Council accepted the heretofore listed recommendations and authorized the expenditure of $10,000 from the Hotel -Motel Tax Fund for the Lodi Design Group to develop a schematic Master Plan for downtown Lodi improvements, which would be acceptable to the Task Force and would be an extension of the plan developed by Quad. The motion passed by unanimous vote. -303 Mayor Reid appointed Council Member. James Pinkerton to continue serving with this group through the completion of this project. HUTCHINS STREET SQUARE A check in the amount of $27,600 was presented to the Council on behalf of the Old LUHS Site Foundation by Chairman Ken Boyd. These monies represent revenues collected from the Field and -Fair Day III Celebration and smaller donations and memorials that have been collected -by the Foundation over the past few months. Mr. Boyd also apprised the Council that the Foundation has also taken the initiative on the site to implement several public awareness projects, including the fund -drive — thermometer, renovating the Hutchins Street Marquee and installing building signs. These projects have been paid for by the Foundation at a cost of $1,600.00 and Mr. Boyd requested,on behalf of the Foundation,that this amount also be forgiven from the debt due. On motion of Mayor Reid, Murphy second, Council forgave an additional $1,600.00 of the site debt .as requested by the Foundation. Following a suggestion by Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy to forgive the entire debt, Mr. Boyd stated that ".it's the feeling of the Foundation Board that they would like to continue with raising that money, that they would prefer that the debt not be forgiven; that they feel it -might damage their credibility with .the community at large". Mayor Reid then proposed that.the City match the Foundation dollar for dollar everytime the Foundation presents a check, which amount would go to the final detail plan. Mayor Reid stated that he knows right now that plans are needed on conduit to be placed.before the sidewalks can.be placed that were donated and that he believes the City should do that. A very lengthy discussion followed. On introduction of Councilman Snider, Council discussion followed regarding funding for the development of Hutchins, Street Square, which discussion included the possibility of bonding the project or establishing an assessment district to cover the development- Mayor evelopment Mayor Reid then moved that the City of Lodi match dollar for dollar any contributions by the Foundation toward the site debt payment, which amount is to be used for detail plan work to be prepared by the Lodi Design Group. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pinkerton and carried by unanimous vote. 6()4 Continued October 6, 1982 At the suggestion of Council Member Olson, Council tacitly concurred to hold 4 study sessions a year with the foundation and the Lodi Design Group to discuss the Hutchins Street Square Community Center Project. RECESS Mayor Reid declared a five-minute recess and the meeting reconvened at approximately 9:45 p.m. City Manager Glaves apprised the Council that at the August NCPA Commission meeting, the Commission approved release to the participants of the following four Ordinances relating to the Shell No. 3 East Block Project: DESCRIPTION 1) $300 Million Note Ordinance 2) $300 Million Bond Ordinance 3) $130 Million Refunding Bond Ordinance 4) $30 Million Amendment to Second Phase Agreement Under California Law, NCPA cannot issue debt for a project unless the participants in the project have each approved an Ordinance authorizing the issuance of such debt. NCPA would like the flexibility to finance the East Block Project and those facilities related to it with either bonds, bond anticipationnotes, bank loans, tax-exempt commercial paper or demand notes. The $300 million Bond Ordinance and $300 million Note ordinance provide NCPA with the flexibility to use any of these financing options. NCPA would like the flexibility to temporarily finance the entire Project with tax exempt commercial paper or -bond anticipation notes backed by a bank's irrevocable letter of credit. The final terms and conditions of any NCPA debt are subject to Commission approval. The estimated $300 million is broken out as follows: $150 Million Construction Costs Including Interest During Construction of -the 110 MW East Block Project $ 50 Million Construction Costs Including Interest During Construction of New Transmission which NCPA Might Build Jointly with PG&E $ 10 Million NCPA's Share of Costs of a Possible Joint Chemical Disposal Facility in the Geysers $ 10 Million NCPA's Share of Costs of a Possible Joint Maintenance Facility in the Geysers $ 5 Million Cost of a Possible NCPA Buy -In of PG&E Transmission Facilities $ 25 Million Contingencies $ 50 Million Bond Reserves and Financing Expenses $300 Million TOTAL The above costs have all been estimated conservatively. The East Block Project will require geothermal steam from both the East Block and the Primary Area. NCPA Shell Project #2 currently has a first call on steam in both areas. To allow the financing of the East Block Project at reasonable terms, it might be advisable or necessary to advance refund the DOE loan and/or the $55 million outstanding Shell Project #2 Bonds to defease the legal covenants which 305 Continued October 6, 1982 create Shell Project n2's prior lien on steam. It also might be economical from an interest saving standpoint to advance refund the DOE loan and/or the $55 million outstanding Shell Project "2 Bonds. An indepth presentation on the project was presented by Utility Director Dave Curry which included the following information: PROJECT SLZMARY NCPA NO. 3 GE0THER?I4L POWER PLANT Project Description The Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) No. 3 project will consist of two 55 MW geothermal turbine -generator units complete with associated electrical equipment, cooling system, hydrogen sulfide abatement system, 230 kv trans- mission line, and steam collection system. The plant site is located within The Geysers Known Geothermal Resource Area (KGRA) approximately 75 miles north of San Francisco. The site of the power plant is under lease from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and is located in Sonoma County, California. The plant will be located 1 mile east of the NCPA Geothermal Power Plant No. 2 (Ref; Figure 1-1). Steam to the plant will be provided via a steam gathering system designed and constructed by Shell California Production Inc. (SCPI). The gathering system will connect together several steam wells to provide an integrated steam supply system to NCPA No. 2 and NCPA No. 3 plants. _ Capacity Factor The power plant units are designed to run as base loaded (continual operation) units at their maximum efficiency point. The design point has been selected such that the units provide the maximum power at the most economical rate. Based on operating experience of geothermal plants in The Geysers area, an average annual capacity factor of 83.37. is expected. Plant Design Gibbs & Hill, Inc. (G&H) is doing the engineering and construction management for Project No. 3. The plant design will be based on the experience of the G&H organization, the operating experience at NCPA Geothermal Project No. 2, and the extensive geothermal operating experience of the NCPA power plant operations staff. It will incorporate the very latest technology associated with geothermal plants in terms of efficient running and maximum availability, and is expected to operate at top performance throughout its design life time of 25 years. Cost & Timetable NCPA 3 Project cost is estimated at $175,000,000, assuming commercial operation of the plant by 1986. Site preparation is scheduled for 1983. �jttti Continued October 6, 1982 Financial Considerations Under California Law, NCPA cannot issue debt for a project unless the participants in the project have each approved an ordinance authorizing the issuance of such debt. NCPA would like the flexibility to finance the NCPA 3 Project and those facilities related to it with either bonds, bond anticipation notes, bank loans, tax-exempt commercial paper or demand -notes. The $300 million Bond Ordinance and $300 million Note Ordinance provide XCPA with the flexibility to use any of these financing options. The NCPA 3 Project will require geothermal steam from both the East Block and the Primary Area. NCPA (Shell) Project #2 currently has a first call on steam in both areas. To allow the financing of the NCPA 3 Project at reasonable terms, it might be advisable or necessary to advance refund the DOE loan and/or the $55 million outstanding Project #2 Bonds to negate the legal covenants which create Shell Project #2's prior lien on steam. It might also be economical, from. an interest saving standpoint, to advance refund the DOE loan and/or the $55 million outstanding Shell Project #2 Bonds. The $130 million Refunding Bond Ordinance would allow NCPA to advance refund the $55 million outstanding Shell -Project #2 Bonds and/or the DOE loan. NCPA cannot practically issue debt unless it has a take -or -pay commitment (Member Agreement) from the participants in the project being financed to secure the debt. The only outstanding Member Agreement for the NCPA 3 Project is the East Block Second Phase Agreement which is currently limited to $5.5 million. The proposed $30 million Amendment to this Agreement would provide the security to allow NCPA to borrow $30 million to repay the $5.5 million bank loan, and fund construction costs and interest during. construction of the Project through December, 1983. Continued October 6, 1982 3©7 Mayor Reid then moved for introduction of Ordinance No. 1276 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lodi approving the terms and conditions of amendment No. Two to the Member Agreement (Second Phase) for Financing and Development Activities of the Shell East Block Geothermal Project between Northern California Power Agency and Certain Participating Members, and Authorizing the Execution of and Delivery of said Amendment by Officers of the City of Lodi. The motion was seconded by Council Member Olson, and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Snider, and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton Absent:. Council Members - None Following a lengthy discussion, on motion of Mayor Reid, Snider second, Council adopted Resolution No. 82-112 indicating its percentage participation in the NCPA No. 3 Geothermal Power Plant to be 9.158 percent, thus retaining its entitlement to 10.074 MW. The motion carried by the following vote: NCPA SHELL NO. 3 Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Snider, and PROJECT Reid (Mayor) RES. NO. 82-112 Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton Absent: Council Members - None �_� ✓ Mayor Reid then moved for introduction of Ordinance No. '� 1273 - Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lodi Authorizing the Issuance of Public Power Revenue Bonds by Northern California Power Agency (Geothermal Generating Project No. 3). The motion was seconded by Council Member Snider and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Snider and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton Absent: Council Members - None Mayor Reid then moved for introduction of Ordinance No. 1274 - Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lodi Authorizing the issuance of Notes by Northern California Power Agency (Geothermal Generating Project No.3 ). The motion was seconded by Council Member Snider and carried by the following vote: ORD. NO. 1273, 1274, Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Snider, and 1275, and 1276 Reid (Mayor) INTRODUCED Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton Absent: Council Members - None Mayor Reid then moved for introduction of Ordinance No. 1275 - Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lodi authorizing the issuance of Public Power Revenue Refunding Bonds by the Northern California Power Agency. The motion was seconded by Council Member Olson and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Snider and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton Absent: Council Members - None Mayor Reid then moved for introduction of Ordinance No. 1276 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lodi approving the terms and conditions of amendment No. Two to the Member Agreement (Second Phase) for Financing and Development Activities of the Shell East Block Geothermal Project between Northern California Power Agency and Certain Participating Members, and Authorizing the Execution of and Delivery of said Amendment by Officers of the City of Lodi. The motion was seconded by Council Member Olson, and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Snider, and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton Absent:. Council Members - None sWi Continued October 6, 1982 BENEFIT AND SALARY Following introduction of the matter by Staff, Council, on INCREASE GRANTED LODI, motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Olson second, adopted FIRE FIGHTERS r,, Resolution No. 82-113 granting a 5% general salary increase RES. N0. 82-113 :plus an increased City contribution to 'he Employee's PERS C account, effective the pay period beginning October 11, 1982. SIDEWALK WIDTH IN Following introduction of Agenda item k-6 "Discuss Sidewalk INDUSTRIAL AREAS width in Industrial Areas", Council, on motion of Council - ESTABLISHED man Pinkerton, Murphy second, determined the sidewalk width ORD. NO. 1277 INTRODUCED .in industrial areas to be four feet, with the exception of State regulations as they pertain to handicapped. Agenda item k-7 - "Cluff Avenue Improvement Agreements" was introduced by Public Works Director Ronsko. Council ' Member Pinkerton asked to abstain from the discussion and excused himself from the Chambers. A very lengthy presenta- tion regarding the subject was made by Mr. Ronsko who also presented diagrams for the perusal of the Council. Following discussion, with questions being directed to Staff, Council on motion of Mayor Reid, Snider second, determined to have all property owners on the east side of Cluff Avenue; namely, Griffen, Lodi Door, and Medlan proceed with the installation of improvements pursuant to existing agreements with the City of Lodi. The motion carried.by the following vote: CLUFF AVENUE Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Snider, and Reid (Mayor) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS / Noes: Council Members - Murphy Abstain: Council Members - Pinkerton Absent: Council Members - None RES. ADOPTED Council was reminded, at its August 4, 1982 meeting, Council ESTABLISHING FEE introduced Ordinance -No. 1268 thereby amending Sections SCHEDULE FOR WATER 20-51 (i) and 26-14 (i) thereby establishing that the AND SEWER REIMBURSEMENT administrative fees for administering the reimbursement AGREEMENTS PURSUANT provisions of these Charters or Articles be set by TO ORDINANCE NO. 1268 Resolution. It is Staff's recommendation that the subject resolution establish the administrative fee at 2% of the RES. NO. 82-114 total reimbursable cost or $35.00, whichever is higher. The $35.00 minimum fee is based on the actual cost of the -'y Finance and Public Works Department to process the check i to the applicant. 1 Y On motion of Council Member Snider, Murphy second, Council adopted Resolution No. 82-114 establishing the subject administrative fees at 2% of the total reimbursable cost C of $35.00, whichever is higher. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Agenda item K-9 - "Capital Improvement Program - 1982-83" PROGRAM 1982-83 was introduced by Staff and reviewed by the Council. Following discussion with questions being directed to Staff, ORD. NO. 1277 INTRODUCED Council on motion of Mayor Reid, Murphy second, introduced . Ordinance No. 1277 - adopting the City of Lodi Capital Improvement Program - July 1, 1982 - December 31, 1983 in the amount of $4,326,000. The motion carried by the ' following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Pinkerton, Snider, and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None City Manager Glaves presented the following bids which had been received for Emerson Park Sprinkler System: BIDDER DID J & B Landscaping $15,500.00 Yamaguchi Landscaping 15,711.00 dll4 Continued October 6, 1982 BIDDER BID Sagert Construction $15,850.00 Gus Navarrete 18,423.00 Ken Owen 18,723.00 Fries Landscape 19,885.00 Singh Landscaping 20,200.00 Nisei Construction 21,376.00 Harmon Construction 21,620.00 Grover Landscaping 23,388.00 Talini Landscaping 29,152.00 Jonnie Galloway 35,042.00 AWARD - EMERSON PARK Following recommendation of the City Manager, Council, SPRINKLER SYSTEM on motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Olson second, adopted Resolution No. 82-115 awarding the bid for Emerson Park RES. NO. 82-115 � Sprinkler System to J & B Landscaping, the low bidder, in the amount of $15,500.00 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN Staff presented to Council a request dated May 20, 1982 PATH ESTABLISHED ON from the Lodi Unified School District for a Bicycle and NORTH SIDE OF TURNER Pedestrian Path on the north side of Turner Road between ROAD BETWEEN RIVERGATE Rivergate Drive and Gross Convalescent Hospital. Currently DRIVE AND GROSS there are approximately 34 children each day who bicycle CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL and walk between the subdivision to Lakewood School and Woodbridge Middle School. In addition, most after school and vacation activities to which these children (and adults) bicycle require travel along the same stretch of street. RES. NO. 82-116 A lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed to Staff and to representatives of the Lodi Unified School ��_.✓ District who were in the audience. On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy, Olson second, Council adopted Resolution No. 82-116 establishing a five foot bicycle and pedestrian path behind the telephone poles on _ the northside of Turner Road betwen Rivergate Drive and Gross Convalescent Hospital with the concurrance of the property owner, Mr. Cope. STUDY TO UPGRADE Following introduction of the matter by City Manager Glaves, TELEPHONE SYSTEM Council on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Murphy, Reid second, APPROVED authorized Henry L. Richter, President of TelPfnmm Consultants, Inc. to proceed with a study to upgrade and modernize the City of Lodi Telephone System at a cost not to exceed $4,000 - through Phase II. ORDINANCES Ordinance No. 1270 - Ordinance amending the General Plan Land Use Element consisting of two sections: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE Section 1 - Designating portions of Lobaugh Meadows, a ELEMENT CONSISTING proposed 91.17 acre development .on the south side of West OF TWO SECTIONS Kettleman Lane easterly of Lower Sacramento Road, as Medium Density Residential and Office -Institutional. ORD. NO. 1270 ADOPTED Section 2 - Redesignating the 9.96 acre parcel at the southwest corner of West Lodi Avenue and South Ham Lane ✓ from Medium Density Residential to Office -Institutional. Having been introduced at a regular meeting held September ' * ' 15, 1982 Ordinance No. 1270 was brought up for passage on motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Murphy second. Second reading was omitted after reading by title, and the Ordinance was then passed, adopted, and ordered to print by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, Pinkerton, Snider, and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None 310 Continued October 6, 1982 Ordinance No. 1271 - Ordinance rezoning the area encompassed by Lobaugh Meadows, a proposed 91.17 acre development on the south side of Kettleman Lane, easterly of Lower Sacramento Road, from U -H, Unclassified Holding, to P -D(24), Planned Development District No. 24, with the previso that the 72 acres presently lacking terminal storm drainage not be permitted to develop until such time as a City Council approved drainage system is constructed. ORDINANCE REZONING Ordinance No. 1271 having been introduced at a regular meeti AREA ENCOMPASSED BY held September 15, 1982 was brought up for passage on motion• THE LOBAUGH MEADOWS of Councilman Pinkerton, Olson second. Second reading was Attest: ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk omitted after reading by title, and the Ordinance was then ORD. NO. 1271 passed, adopted, and ordered to print by the following vote: ADOPTED Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Murphy, Pinkerton, 4 G� :G' Snider, and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None ORDINANCE REZONING Ordinance No. 1272.- Ordinance rezoning the 9.96 acre parcel 9.96 ACRE PARCEL AT at the south west corner of West Lodi Avenue and South Ham THE S/W CORNER OF Lane from R -GA, Garden Apartment Residential, to R -C -P, WEST LODI AVENUE Residential -Commercial- Professional having been introduced AND SOUTH HAM LANE at a regular meeting held September 15, 1982 was brought up FROM R -GA TO R -C -P for passage on motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Murphy second. Second reading was omitted after reading by title, ORD. NO. 1272 and the Ordinance was then passed, adopted, and ordered ADOPTED to print by the following vote: �.. Ayes: Council Members - Murphy, Olson, " Pinkerton, Snider, and ;. Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None CLOSED SESSION Mayor Reid adjourned the meeting at approximately 11:55 p.m. to a Closed Session. Upon request, City Clerk Reimche was excused from attending this session. ADJOURNMENT Council was apprised that the City. Council meeting of October 20, 1982 will be adjourned by the City Clerk to 8:00 p.m. Wednesday, October 27, 1982. Attest: ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk