HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - January 2, 1985CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHXI BERS
WIM'ESDAY, JANUARY 2, 1985
A regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Lodi was held beginning at
7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, January 2 1985 in the City Hall Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Present: Council b'wbers - Hinchman, Pinkerton, Reid,
and Snider (Mayor)
Absent: Council Members - Olson
Also Present: City Manager Glaves, Assistant City Manager
Glenn, Camamity Development Director
Schroeder, Public Works Director Ronsko, City
Attorney Stein, and City Clerk Reimche
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Darrell Thomas, 1st United
Methodist Church
PLEDGE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Snider
PRESENTATICNS
There were no awards, or presentations or proclamations
presented at this meeting
CONSENT CALENDAR
REPORTS OF THE
In accordance with report and recommendation of the City
CITY MANAGER
Manager, Council, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman,
Reid second, approved the following actions hereinafter set
forth.
CLAIMS
CLAWS WIRE APPWM IN ME AMU -NT OF $1, 608,743. 10
lv MINUTES
THE MINUTES OF NUMBER 7, 1984 AND DECeJ3ER 5, 1984 WERE E
APPROVED AS TARITTEN.
AWARD - ASPHALT
City Manager Glaves presented the following bids which had
MATERIAL FOR
been received for Asphalt Materials for the second half of
p
LAST HALF OF
F. Y. 1984-85:
F.Y. 1984-85
'
SEE PAGE NO. 2
RFS. NO. 85-01
On recommendation of the City Manager, Council adopted
Resolution No. 85-01 awarding the contract for Asphalt
Materials for the second half of F. Y. 1984-85 as follows:
Claude C. Wood Company - Item No, 1A, B and C
Item No. 2A, B and C
ITEM REAX'ED
With the tacit concurrence of the Council, Agenda item a -1-D
FROYE AGENDA
"Approve Cedarwood Subdivision Map was removed from the
Agenda.
i BL1<jakW VILLAGE
COUNCIL APPROVED THE FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION DOCUV1ENM FCR
rSI-MIVISICN MAP
TRACT NO. 1691, BURaNDY VILLAGE, AND AUTEMIZED THE CITY
%� APPROVED
MANAGER AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE SUBDIVISION AGREBIVNTS
CN BEHALF OF THE CITY.
Council was apprised that Bennett Development, Inc., et al,
developers of Burgundy Village, have furnished the City with
the necessary Agreements, Improvement Securities and fees for
the proposed subdivision. This 5 -acre subdivision is located
north of Nana Ranch subdivision and south of Kettleman Lane
and is zoned R-2. It contains 32 single-family lots.
CITY OF LODI
BIDS FOR ASPHALT MATERIAL
ITEM NO. I
Dense Grade Asphalt Concrete, Type B
3/8". Asphalt binder shall be Viscosity
Grade AR -4000 Paving Asphalt.
ITEM NO. 2
Dense Grade Asphalt Concrete, Type B
1/2". Asphalt binder shall be Viscosity
Grade AR -4000 Paving Asphalt.
n
0
a
rt
Fl -
(D
n,
w
a
w
n
N
r
w
Ln
CJt
A
'B
C
A
B
C
SUPPLIER
F.O.B. Plant
Stockpile
Hopper of Paver
F.O.B. Plant
Stockpile
Hopper of Paver
City Limits
City Limits
(500 Tons)
(100 Tons)
(300 Tons)
(50 Tons)
(50 Tons)
(50 Tons)
Claude C. Wood Co., Clements
$ 21.73
$ 25.07
$ 26.55
$ 21.73
$ 24.80
$ 26.29
Cost Per ton including tax
Plus: City cost for mileage
` 4.85
4,85
TOTAL
$ 26.58
$ 25.07
$ 26.55
S 26.58
$ 24.80
$ 26.29
Granite Construction Co., Stkn
$ 24.38
$ 27.83
$ 29.15
$ 23.85
$ 27.30
$ 28.62
Cost per ton including tax
Plus: City cost for mileage
6.28
6.23
TOTAL
$ 30.66
$ 27.83
$ 29.15
$ 30.13
$ 27.30
$ 28.62
n
0
a
rt
Fl -
(D
n,
w
a
w
n
N
r
w
Ln
CJt
c�e�h
Continued January 2, 1985
PLANS AM SPECS COUNCIL APPROVED THE PLANS AND SPBCIFICATICNS FOR "CI-RCH
i FM CHIFDi STREET Sn EST TREE REPLACHMU - 1985 - LC 1DI AVENUE TO IOCICEPU RD
TREE REPLAMIENT STR=' AND ALaMI ZED THE ADVERTISING FCR. BIDS THE MCN.
1985 APPF40M
SPECS FOR WATIfM OOMIL APPROVED TOE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATICNS AMID AUIHCIEZIZED
PSSTHE AI)VERTISINC 1111 BIDS 11-IERDCN:
APPROVED
a) Purchase of 576 V^latthour Meters
b) Purchase of six 37.5 RVA, Twelve 50 KVA, ten 75 KVA and
four 100 KVA single-phase padmount transformers.
RES. ND. 85-02 Ca NCIL ADOPTED PMSO[ TICK NO. 85-02 ESTABLISHING A STOP SIGN
1 1l AT ADCEE AMID CHU CH STREET.
RES. NO. 85-03 OCCNOIL ADOPTED RESOLUTICN NO. 85-03 ESTABLISHING A STOP SIGN
�J AT SCHLENKEt AND C imm SIItF.ET.
STOP SIGNS
ESTABLISH® AT
' ADCBE AND CHL)RC i
I.J
AND
SCHLENKER AND
CHIIiiCH STREETS
J ACCEPTANCE OF OGIIL AOCEPTED THE IMPROVEMENTS IN "MAIN STREET STUN DRAIN
NC
"N1AIN STREET WAUA7 TO PINE" AND DIRHCTFD THE PUBLIC UUM DIRHCICR TO
ST'CRVI DRAIN" FILE A NOTICE OF OCINPLETICN WITH THE COMW RHOCMER'S
OFFICE.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Notice thereof having been published in accordance with law
INTROULICED
and affidavit of publication being on file in the office of
the City Clerk, Mayor Snider called for the Public Hearing
SPECIFIC PLAN
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation for the
FOR THE FUTURE
adoption of a Specific Plan for the future development of
DEVELOPlVIENr OF
West Tokay Street from Lower Sacramento Road west, to the
WEST TCKAY STREET
General Plan Limits.
FMI LOWER
last report was made to the City Council at its December 19,
;- SACRANIENTO ROAD
The matter was introduced by Public Works Director Ronsko,
_ WEST, TO ME
who presented diagrams of the subject area and responded to
ORAL PLAN
questions as were posed by the Council.
LIMITS ADOPTED
On recommendation of the City Attorney and L. J. Russo
There were no persons in the audience wishing to speak on the
matter, and the public portion of the hearing was closed.
CRD,ND 1343
Council Member Reid then moved for introduction of Ordinance
INTROULICED
No. 1343 adopting a Specific Plan for the future development
of ;Nest Tokay Street from Lower Sacramento Road west, to the
General Plan limits. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro
Tempore Hinchmran and carried by unanimous vote of all those
%
present.
PLANNING
No meeting of the Planning Commission had been held since the
OCASIISSICN
last report was made to the City Council at its December 19,
1984 meeting.
OCMVLNICATICNS
CITY CLERK
�. CLAIMS
On recommendation of the City Attorney and L. J. Russo
Insurance Services, Inc., the City's Contract Administrator,
Council, on motion of Council Member Reid, Hinchman second,
denied the following claims and referred them back to L. J.
Russo Insurance Services, Inc.:
a) Bane Insurance vs City of Lodi DOL 11/26/84
b) Hintz vs City of Lodi DOL 11/2/84
Continued January 2, 1985
13JaQ= FRCM Following introduction of the matter by the City Clerk,
AMERICAN RID Council, on motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Hinchman
CROSS REQUESTING second, with regret and not wishing to establish a precedent
FUNIS denied the request from the American Red Cross for a grant of
$500.00 for the purchase of supplies for CPR SAIUFDAY. City
Clerk Reimche was directed to correspond with the American
Red. Cross regarding the Council's action in this matter and
the reasons for it.
PUBLIC HEARING Following introduction of the matter by City Clerk Reimche,
RE REVRAT Council, on motion of Mayor Snider, Hinchman second, set a
SHARING SET Public Hearing for the Regular Council Meeting of January 16,
1985 at 7:30 p.m. to consider uses for Revenue Sharing Funds.
COMENM BY Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchm m wished everyone a very Happy New
CITY COUNCIL Year.
MEMBERS
CCMVWM BY THE
PUBLIC ON NON
AGENDA ITEW
FCxVL PRESEW D Mr. David J. Sherman presented the City of Lodi with a
"TO CITY FQi. dancing partner for Dr. Norman King, who had recently
DR. 1VCMIAN KING performed his infamous "CHICKEN SCRATaT1 to raise funds for
Hutchins Street Square. Mr. Sherman dubbed the fowl "KING A'
IA CHICKIN" and continued his presentation expounding the
many virtues of the "bird".
NEPOTISM IN CITY Mr. J. Anthony Abbott, Attorney-at-law of the firm of Mayall,
_v EMPL0ZV1 NT Hurley, et al, addressed the Council presenting the following
i �`� information which was contained in a letter addressed to the
Lodi City Council dated December 27, 1984:
"As you laim, the undersigned appeared at the City Council
Meeting on December 19, 1984, to bring to the Council's
attention the case of Michael Faught, whose application for
employment by the City of Lodi Fire Department is currently
pending, As regards the facts of the case, I refer you to my
letter of December 18, 1984, which by now you should have
received. At the meeting of December 19, I was informed by
the Mayor and by Mr. Stein that it was not proper for the
Council to overrule the decision of the City Manager, Henry
Glaves, with regard to Mr. Faught. Rather, the City Council
could only grant relief by amending its policy, contained in
Resolution Number 83-15, and applying that amendment to Mr.
Faught 's case. It is to this question that this letter is
addressed.
The pertinent portion of Resolution 83-15 is (2), which
allows the City to refuse employment to any person who has a
relative already working in the department, division, or
facility, where application for employment is made. I am
sure that the language of the exception is well known to you,
but for convenience sake I repeat it here:
112. To refuse to place both spouses or relatives in the same
department, division, or facility where such has the
potential for creating adverse impact on supervision, safety,
security, or morale, or involves potential conflicts of
interest."
As stated in my previous letter, I have been informed by Mr.
Stein and Mr. Glaves that normally this exception would be
applied on a case by case basis, and judged by the merits of
the particular situation. However, Mr. Glaves stated that in
the case of the Police Department or Fire Department,
employment would be refused uniformly. That is, the
existence of a familial relationship alone would preclude
employment by one in Michael Faught's position.
337
336
Continued January 2, 1985
If this is in fact the City's policy as applied, it is
certainly not a policy which can be deduced from an
examination of the language of the Resolution. Nowhere in
the language is the Police Department or Fire Department
specifically mentioned by name. There is simply the general
statement to the effect that where determination is made that
employment of two relatives in the same department has the
potential for creating supervision, safety, security or moral
problems, the City reserves the right to refuse employment.
This would seem to imply, as Mr. Stein and Mr. Glaves have
indicated, that a case by case evaluation will occur.
The policy as applied by the City Administration in the case
of the Fire Department and Police Department, and
specifically in the case of Michael Faught is an easy
standard to apply: Once the determination of familial
relationship has been made, the decision follows
automatically. However, while this standard is easy on those
making the employment decision, it is very hard on those
against wham the standard is invoked. Conceivably, Michael
Faught could be the best fireman in the land, and he would
still be denied employment based solely on his familial
status.
In deciding whether you wish to amend your Resolution 83-15
to change this policy, you must of necessity ask yourselves
"is this the result we intended?" If not, the solution would
seem to be to amend the Resolution to give the City
Administration more specific guidance as to how it is to
decide whether family mmenbers may be placed in the same
department. In this connection, it should be noted that
Police and Fire Departments across the Country have long
employed fathers and sons together. We have all heard of
"police families" in cities such as New York and Los Angeles,
where generation after generation of fathers and sons have
served in the police department. It is the wide perception
that this type of tradition builds esprit, commitment, and
dedication. One such case which appeared in the news some
months ago was that of Stockton Police Officer Cecchetti who
was tragically killed in the line of duty. Officer
Cecchetti's father, of course, is Julio Cecchetti, the
Stockton Chief of Police. To our knowledge, there has been
no adverse fallout from this situation, of calls from the
commamity for a policy prohibiting employment or more than
one family member in the same department.
Of course, where there is a demonstrated potential for
nepotism, such as that situation described in (1) of the
Resolution or where it is demonstrably probable that
employment of relatives in the same department would create
difficulties of the type described in the Resolution, the
Resolution would seem to have a rational basis. However, we
do not think that it was the intention of the Council, when
it enacted Resolution 83-15, to bar in all cases employment
of more than one family member by the Police or Fire
Departments. Hence, if the Council feels it necessary to
amend its Resolution to create its intended result, I would
suggest that (2) of Resolution 83-15 be amended to read as
follows:
"2. To refuse to place both spouses or relatives in the same
department, division, or facility, when it is demonstrably
probable that such placement will create adverse impact on
supervision, safety, security, or moral, or involves
demonstrably probable conflicts of interests."
Continued January 2, 1985
Under the foregoing standard, Michael Faught could and would
be hired by the City of Lodi as a Fireman. This is true
because, as everyone agrees, there are no specific facts in
Mr. Faught's situation which speak against his employment
other than his familial status itself. In other words, it is
not demonstrably probable that his employment will cause
problems in the area of supervision, safety, security, or
moral; in fact, in view of his support from the community and
from the Department itself, all indications are that his
employment will have the opposite effect.
'thank you for your attention to the foregoing. We look
forward to presenting Michael Faught's case in further detail
at the Council Meeting of January 2, 1985.
Sincerely,
BY: s1J. Anthony Abbott"
A very lengthy discussion followed with questions being
directed to the City Manager, City Attorney, Fire Chief
MacLeod and other members of the Staff who were present.
Ch motion of Mayor Snider, Hinchman second, Council directed
the City Attorney to draft an amendment to current City
policy that would restrict the hiring of relatives (of second
consanguinity) within the same department by the City
Manager, Council, employees with appointive authority or
employees with supervisorial responsibilities. The City
Attorney was further directed to have the subject draft
available for discussion by the Council at a future Informal
Informational Meeting.
The motion carried by unanimous vote of all Council Members
present.
Mayor Snider directed the City Manager not to fill the vacant
Firefighter position until this matter is resolved.
RECESS Mayor Snider declared a 5 minute recess, and the Council
I
meeting reconvened at approximately 9:50 p.m.
LCDI POLICE Chief of Police Floyd Williams advised the City Council that
DEPA MVHNT his department had just received word of the approval of the
C -CAP G[VM Department's C -CAP Grant Application. Captain Hanson
1 presented an overview of the Grant application process, and
some of the provisions and conditions of the Grant which
included staffing requirements. A lengthy discussion
followed with questions regarding the matter being directed
to Chief Williams and Captain Hanson.
On motion of Mayor Snider, Hinchman second, Council accepted
the C -CAP Grant contingent upon the condition that the City
be able to hire the required personnel under an 18 month
contract. The continued employment of the subject personnel
will be contingent upon the continuation of the grant and
r� Council approval.
J
CERTAIN POLICE Following introduction of the matter by Chief Williams,
DEPARMV NT FEE Council, on motion of Council Member Hinchman, Reid
AMENDED AND second, adopted Resolution No. 85-04 amending fees for the
CRHTRS ESTABLISHED processing of certain applications by the Police Department
and the establishment of certain other charges relating to
Concealed Weapons Permits and.Photographs.
RES. NO. 85-04
339
340ContinuedJanuary 2, 1985
RBQUEST FRIM
Council was presented with an exhibit depicting the parcel
DART OCNI'AINER
map which divides the Teresi property into two parcels. The
_ OCRPORATICN TO
parcel split includes a 16 acre parcel on the west side of
DEFER STREET
Myrtle Street and Dart Container Corporation's 29 acre parcel
IMI?ROVEMENTTS ON
STREET
on the east side of Myrtle Street.
MYRTLE
A copy of the City Code outlining the City's off-site
improvement and dedication requirements was presented for
Councils' perusal. These requirements indicate that when a
development takes place, similar to the proposed Dart
Corporation development, that certain standard off-site
improvements must be installed fronting the property being
developed. Under Section 5-22, the City may defer all or
portions of the required improvements if the Public Works
Director determines that it's in the City's best interest to
cause all of the work to be done on an area -wide basis. In
this particular case, because the construction of half of
Myrtle Street would provide for two travel lanes and a
parking lane, and since all of the required utilities are
being installed in the Myrtle Street alignment, and based on
requirements made of other industrial developments, the
Public Works Department has required that the Myrtle Street
improvements (i.e. curb, gutter, sidewalk and street paving)
go in at this time.
Therefore, Dart Container Corporation is appealing to the
City Council, under Section 5-28 of the City Code, that the
Myrtle Street improvements fronting their property not be
required until the adjacent Myrtle Street property develops.
Since Dart Corporation is not developing along the Pine
Street frontage of their property at this time, the Pine
Street improvements are not being required now.
Following discussion, with questions being directed to Staff,
Council, on motion of Council Member Reid, Snider second,
granted the request of Dart Container Corporation to defer
street improvements on Myrtle Street, and authorized the
Public Works Director to sign the Dart Container Corporation
Parcel Map as being technically correct.
DART CCNTA.INER
Mayor Snider advised Council that the Bond closing for Dart
OCPPCP.ATICN IDA
Container Corporation had been completed at 11:00 a.m. on
APPLICATION
December 31, 1984 and congratulated Staff for its efforts in
this matter.
-` POLICE CANINE
Following a presentation by Chief of Police Williams regard-
OCRPS PROGRAM
ing the Police Canine Corps, with questions being posed by
REINSTITUTED
Council, on motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Snider
second, Council authorized the Police Department to reinstate
the Police Canine Corps Program.
LCT LINE ADJUST-
Following introduction of the matter, Council, on motion of
MENr, LOTS 66, 67
Council Ntwber Pinkerton, Reid second, adopted Resolution No.
AND 68 N 3KEIIA E
85-05 approving a Lot Line Adjustment between Lots 66, 67,
VILLAIM
and 68, Mokelumne Village Subdivision (i.e., 140 Nbkelumne
River Drive and 1059 and 1053 Miwok Drive).
RES. NO. 85-05
SELF INSURANCE Assistant City Manager Glean apprised the City Council that
FOR, DRgrAL CARE as a way of further controlling costs of employee health
BENEFITS care benefits, Staff has explored means of providing similar
benefits at reduced costs or expanded benefits at the same
cost.
An excellent means of accomplishing this is to self fund -
that is, the city will pay directly the fees charged by the
provider. The major advantages of taking this approach are:
Following discussion with questions being directed to Staff,
Council, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Reid
second, approved the self funding of dental care benefits for
the City of Lodi as outlined, which program is to be
administered by the California Dental Service. This program
t will be effective as of January 1, 1985.
PER ASE OF XEROX Council was informed that in December 1976, the City of Lodi
1035 FOR PARKS purchased a Xerox 4500 copier which served us well until
AND RECREATION early 1984. In July 1984, the City obtained new copying
APPROVED equipment and moved the old Xerox 4500 to the Parks and
Recreation Department which had need for a copier.
The service contract for the 4500 is $185.00 per month, plus
tax and extra copies. At the present rate of usage, our
maintenance costs will be approximately $2400 a year. The
City can purchase a smaller unit which is more compatible
with the needs of the Parks and Recreation Department than
the 4500. The Xerox 1035 has a purchase price of $3,795.00
plus tax and we will receive $1,850.00 credit on the 4500, a
net difference of $2,172.00. The maintenance costs on this
equipment are estimated to be $650.00 per year. By
purchasing the new equipment which has a lower maintenance
cost, the City will recover the entire purchase price of the
equipment in approximately 15 months.
Council is requested to authorize the City Manager to
purchase a Xerox 1035, the funds to come from the 12 fund.
Following disucssion, Council, on motion of Council Member
Reid, Hinchman second, approved the purchase of a Xerox 1035
for the Parks and Recreation Department at a cost of
approximately $2,200.00, which amount is to be charged to the
12 Equipment Fund.
341
Continued January 2, 1985
{�
1) Any savings are the cities not the insurance company's
2) The interest on necessary reserves belongs to the City
and not the insurance company
3) No surprises from large premium increases - we monitor
the history of paid claims on a monthly basis
In all fairness, the plan is not without some risk:
If an inordinate amount of usage is experienced the City is
liable for that. However, if this happened under our present
plan the present carrier would raise premiums the following
year and we would pay for those claims a year later.
The City has asked Delta Benefit Plans, our agent for
enployee benefits, to explore the feasibility of a self
funded program for dental care benefits.
Delta Benefit Plans has submitted a program administered by
California Dental Service for the City of Lodi. Mr.
McCormack has also done a cost project for us based on our
past experience and indicates we should have first year
savings in excess of $12,000.
The proposed program provides the same basic benefits as our
present plan so there will be no reduction in service to our
employees. It also includes a stop -loss provision which will
cap the cities liability.
Council is requested to authorize the establishment of a self
funded program for dental care benefits.
Following discussion with questions being directed to Staff,
Council, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Reid
second, approved the self funding of dental care benefits for
the City of Lodi as outlined, which program is to be
administered by the California Dental Service. This program
t will be effective as of January 1, 1985.
PER ASE OF XEROX Council was informed that in December 1976, the City of Lodi
1035 FOR PARKS purchased a Xerox 4500 copier which served us well until
AND RECREATION early 1984. In July 1984, the City obtained new copying
APPROVED equipment and moved the old Xerox 4500 to the Parks and
Recreation Department which had need for a copier.
The service contract for the 4500 is $185.00 per month, plus
tax and extra copies. At the present rate of usage, our
maintenance costs will be approximately $2400 a year. The
City can purchase a smaller unit which is more compatible
with the needs of the Parks and Recreation Department than
the 4500. The Xerox 1035 has a purchase price of $3,795.00
plus tax and we will receive $1,850.00 credit on the 4500, a
net difference of $2,172.00. The maintenance costs on this
equipment are estimated to be $650.00 per year. By
purchasing the new equipment which has a lower maintenance
cost, the City will recover the entire purchase price of the
equipment in approximately 15 months.
Council is requested to authorize the City Manager to
purchase a Xerox 1035, the funds to come from the 12 fund.
Following disucssion, Council, on motion of Council Member
Reid, Hinchman second, approved the purchase of a Xerox 1035
for the Parks and Recreation Department at a cost of
approximately $2,200.00, which amount is to be charged to the
12 Equipment Fund.
342
V1,Continued January 2, 1985
CIRDINANCES Ordinance No. 1341 - An Ordinance redesignating a 3.17 acre
parcel at 2430 West Turner Road, Lodi, from Commercial to
'REDESIG WING 3.17 Medium Density Residential, having been introduced at a
ACRE PARCEL AT regular meeting of the Lodi City Council held December 19,
+ 2430 WEST TUSNER 1984 was brought up for passage on motion of Council Member
ROAD, LCDI Reid, Hinchman second. Second reading of the Ordinance was
FFJMI omitted after reading by title, and the Ordinance was then
C{MYI[MIAL TO adopted and ordered to print by the following vote:
NO UM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
Ayes: Council Members - Reid, Hinchman, Pinkerton,
CID. NO. 1341 and Snider (Mayor)
ADD=
Noes: Council N'iwbers - None
Absent: Council Members - Olson
AMR01NG P -D (1)
Ordinance No. 1342 - An Ordinance amending P -D (1), Planned
SO THAT THE
Development District No. 1, so that the 3.17 acre parcel at
PARCEL
2430 West Turner Road, Lodi, conforms to the requirements of
,/SLBJECT
1` ICCNFCFVLS TO TIS
the R -GA, Garden Apartment Residential District rather than
RBQUIRIIkMM OF
the C -S, Cammrcial Shopping District having been introduced
THE R -CA, RATHER
at a regular meeting of the Lodi City Council held December
A\ TBAN C -S
19, 1984 was brought up for passage on motion of Council
Meaber Reid, Hinchman second, Second reading of the
Ordinance was omitted after reading by title, and the
CHD. NO. 1342
Ordinance was then adopted and ordered by print by the
ADOP'T'ED - —
following vote:
Ayes: Council Members - Reid, Hinchman, Pinkerton,
and Snider (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - Olson
ADJOLIFU9Ni'
There being no further business to came before the Council
Mayor Snider adjourned the meeting at approximately 11:15
p.m. to a Closed Session of the Council pertaining to
Personnel matters to be held at 7:00 a.m., January 16, 1985.
Attest:
4zr'l"
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk