Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - April 2, 1986LVU SPECS FOR THREE- PHASE PADMOUNT SWITCHGEAR APPROVED Council approved specifications for the purchase of three- phase padmount switchgear and authorized the CC 12.1 (b) advertising for bids thereon. IMPROVEMENTS IN "GARFIELD STREET STORM DRAIN, LOCUST STREET TO RAILROAD AVENUE" APPROVED Council accepted the improvements in "Garfield Street Storm Drain, Locust Street to Railroad Avenue" and directed OC -14 (d) the Public Works Director to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office. Council was apprised that the subject contract was awarded to Bowers Company of Stockton on February 5, 1986 in the amount of $22,136. The contract has been completed in substantial conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council. The final contract price was $22,373. IMPLEMENTATION OF SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PROGRAM RES. NO. 86-46 Council was informed that the claims against the City, resulting from deficiencies in the sidewalks, have risen CC -6 drastically the last few years. For this reason the City CC -24 Council adopted a Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Repair Policy CC -45 (e) on July 24, 1985. Money was also budgeted to do an 1 CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS WEDNESDAY, APRIL 2, 1986 ROLL CALL Present: Council Members - Olson, Pinkerton, Reid, Snider, & Hinchman (Mayor) Absent: Council Members - None Also Present: City Manager Peterson, Assistant City Manager Glenn (arrived 7:35 IrO, Public Works Director Ronsko, City Attorney Stein, and City Clerk Reimche INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Richard Lungren, Retired, 1st United Methodist Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Hinchman. PRESENTATIONS There were no presentations, awards, or proclamations presented at this meeting. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER CONSENT CALENDAR In accordance with report and recanwidation of the City Manager, Council, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Reid, Olson second, approved the following actions hereinafter set forth with the exception of Agenda item E -1-D - "Award Contract - Well 6 Enclosure" which was removed from the Consent Calendar and discussed under the Regular Calendar. CLAIMS CC -21 (a) Claims were approved in the amount of $1,438,005.33. SPECS FOR THREE- PHASE PADMOUNT SWITCHGEAR APPROVED Council approved specifications for the purchase of three- phase padmount switchgear and authorized the CC 12.1 (b) advertising for bids thereon. IMPROVEMENTS IN "GARFIELD STREET STORM DRAIN, LOCUST STREET TO RAILROAD AVENUE" APPROVED Council accepted the improvements in "Garfield Street Storm Drain, Locust Street to Railroad Avenue" and directed OC -14 (d) the Public Works Director to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office. Council was apprised that the subject contract was awarded to Bowers Company of Stockton on February 5, 1986 in the amount of $22,136. The contract has been completed in substantial conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Council. The final contract price was $22,373. IMPLEMENTATION OF SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PROGRAM RES. NO. 86-46 Council was informed that the claims against the City, resulting from deficiencies in the sidewalks, have risen CC -6 drastically the last few years. For this reason the City CC -24 Council adopted a Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Repair Policy CC -45 (e) on July 24, 1985. Money was also budgeted to do an 1 197 Continued April 2, 1986 do an inventory and temporary patching of the City sidewalks. The inventory and patching have been completed at a cost of $22,000. The 1986 Capital Improvement Program allocated $50,000 to sidewalk upgrading. A procedure must now be established for an orderly process of sidewalk replacement. From the figures which have been obtained through the sidewalk inventory it is estimated that it will take eight to ten years to complete the work if the same amount of money is budgeted annually and the requested equipment can be purchased. Staff proposed that the replacement program start with those sidewalks which are in the worst condition, i.e., those having deviations of 8" or more. This replacement would total approximately 600 square feet. Since most of these areas will incur more engineering and tree costs, the cost per square foot of sidewalk replaced will be high and it may take the majority of the first year's allocation to replace the major deviations. If the 1986 funds are not expended on the 8" and larger offsets, replacement of the 6" - 8" offsets would begin. There are approximately 3,000 square feet of 6" - 8" offsets. Upon completion of these offsets, the program will continue to the 4" - 6", etc., until completion. Replacement will be made only in the categories designated in each year's program. If deviations are made and smaller offsets are replaced there will be areas with extreme offsets that won't be replaced for years. However, deficient sidewalks will be replaced in conjunction with other CIP street projects. It is recommended that sidewalk replacement be done partly by contract and partly by City forces. This recommendation would include the City preparing the plans and going to contract once a year. Work would start preferably in the middle of June and last approximately six months. The contractor would remove and install the sidewalk. The City forces would do all necessary tree removal or tree surgery and subgrade compaction. It is imperative that the work by the contractor and City crews be closely coordinated and a reasonable completion time limit be imposed on the contractor. The limit would be spelled out in the contract documents. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY. As part of the City's sidewalk program, property owners are required to replace deficient sidewalk which is their responsibility, i.e. sidewalks damaged by private trees. Each year only those property owners whose sidewalk offsets are the sane as those being replaced by the City will be notified to replace their sidewalk. There is a total of approximately 14,200 square feet of sidewalks which are the responsibility of approximately 290 property owners. Property owners who are required to replace their sidewalks will be notified as prescribed by law. Prior to the formal notice which gives them 14 days to complete repairs, an informal letter explaining the City's sidewalk replacement policy and giving the City's contractor's name will be sent. The formal notice will be sent to coincide with the City's construction schedule. If the owner has not started the replacement within the allotted time limit, the City will make repairs and lien the property. The City's equiprent and personnel needed to implement this program were outlined. It was proposed that Council ly0 Continued April 2, 1986 approved the purchase of a grinder and mini backhoe at an estimated cost of $35,000. Tuo additional part-time laborers would be needed from June through November to help with the sidewalk replacement program and to do the required annual temporary patching of sidewalks. This would cost approximately $13,000. Council adopted Resolution No. 86-46 approving the implementation procedure for the City's sidewalk Replacement Program heretofore set forth and approved the purchase of equipment and hiring of part-time personnel as outlined above. REALLOCATION OF STREET FUNDS RES. NO. 86-47 City Manager Peterson reported to the Council that at the time that the City's revenue projections were made for the CC -7 (f) 1986 Capital Improvement Plan, the amount of money the City CC -45 (a) would receive under SB -300 was not known therefore, that money was not used in the revenue projections. The City has now received $138,360. Since this money has specific guidelines for its use and the Asphalt Overlay Projects meet these guidelines, the City will be using the entire amount on this project and reallocating most of the money which was budgeted under the Asphalt Overlays to other projects. Staff further requested that several other changes in funding be made, including adding the additional traffic signal approved by the City Council for 1986. A recap of the proposed changes is outlined below: CHANGES IN 1986 STREET CIP Present Proposed TDA Gas Tax SB 300 TDA Gas Tax SB 300 Century Blvd. $ 99,533 - - $99,533 $ 25,000 - Asphalt Overlays $100,000 - $ 41,000 $138,000 (see below) 1986 Traffic Signals $ 80,000 - - $80,000 $ 80,000 - Church & Lodi Signal Coordination $100,000 - - $54,000 - - Locust St.RR Xing - $ 46,000 - - $ 46,000 - $279,533 $146,000 0 $233,533 $192,000 $138,000 Total $425,533 $563,533 1986 PROPOSED OVERLAPS Project New Cost Estimate* Victor Rd. - Cherokee to 99 $ 37,000 Pine St. - 99 to Kelly 27,000 Pine St. - Cherokee to 99 48,000 Lodi Ave. - Cherokee to 99 50,000 Kettleman Lane - 99 to Beckman 17,000 $179,000 3 1VV Continued April 2, 1986 *This new cost estimate is based on the recently ccnpleted deflection testing of the streets considered for overlays. Council adopted Resolution No. 86-47 approving the allocation of SB -300 funds which has been received and reallocated "other street funds" depicted on the schedule detailed for Council. N=IATED SALARY INCREASES FOR POLICE OFFICERS APPROVED RFS. NO. 86-48 Council was apprised that the MOU with the Police Officers Association of Lodi calls for an across the board CC -34 a� salary increase equal to 75% of the change in the CPI measured from August 1985 to February 1986. The August index was 319.6 and the February index is 327.5, an increase of 2.5%. 75% of the increase of 2.5% equals 1.9%. Council adopted Resolution No. 86-48 authorizing salary increases of 1.9% to all sworn police officers effective April 7, 1986. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.20.230C CITY CODE RE PARKING IN OTHER THAN DESIGNATED SPACES ORD. NO. 1380 INTRODUCED Council was apprised that a number of vehicles in the City Hall parking lot have been parked in other than the CC -48 (a) designated spaces. Specifically they have been parked between two spaces. The Meter Deputies have cited them for being in violation of Section 10.28.090 of the Municipal Code which section relates to parking adjacent to parking meters. In researching this section, it has been determined that this section would not apply to a space where no meter was, in fact, erected. Therefore, the City Attorney believes that it is necessary to amend the code to provide for parking in between two spaces in a parking lot where there is no meter designation. Following the City Attorney's reccmrendation, Council introduced Ordinance No. 1380 amending Title 10, Chapter 10.20.230 of the Lodi Municipal Code as it relates to parking in other than designated spaces in City parking lots. APPROVAL OF STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SUPPLE24EM NO. 24 RES. NO. 86-49 Council was apprised that Program Supplement No. 24 to the Local Agency/State Agreement No. 10-5154 with the CC -7 (f) Department of Transportation covers the construction and CC -45 (a) construction engineering for Stockton Street, Vine Street �c $00• to Tokay Street. The estimated total cost of the project is $248,000. The Federal contribution (Federal Aid Urban Funds) will be $213,825, approximately 86.228 of the project. The City's responsibility will be $34,175 which has been budgeted in the 1986 C.I.P. using TDA Funds. The project has been advertised for bid and construction is expected to start the end of April. Continued April 2, 1986 Council adopted Resolution No. 86-49 approving Program Supplement No. 24 to the Local Agency/State Agreenent No. 10-5154 with the Department of Transportation and authorizing the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. AWARD - CONTRACT FOR "LODI GRAPE BOWL INTERIOR FENCING" RES. NO. 86-51 City Manager Peterson presented the following bids which had been received for "Lodi Grape Bowl Interior Fencing" CC -12 (a) CC -12 (d) BIDDER AND AMOUNT OF BID Econamr Fence Co., $14,084.84 (addendum not included in bid) Frontier Guardco, Inc., $17,314.50 C & R Fence Co., $20,079.00 The Yard Lumber and Fence Supply, $20,428.20 (Addendum not included in bid) Stockton Fence Co., $21,264.83 Pisor Fence Div., Inc., $24,444.00 Clark -Whittaker Co, Inc., $27,266.70, Alt., $21,737.70 Central Fence Co., $27,645.00, Alt. $20,515.50 Council was apprised that this project includes the installation of a 4 ft. high, vinyl -coated fence along the rim of the stadium. Alternative fencing was evaluated and due to the high cost (more than double this fence) , they were not included in the specifications. Problems involving the bids received were outlined for Council's information. Council adopted Resolution No. 86-51 awarding the contract for "Lodi Grape Bowl Interior Fencing" to Frontier Qmxdco, Inc. in the amount of $17,314.50. PUBLIC hEARINGS No Public Hearings had been set for this meeting. PLANNING Ca4USSION City Manager Peterson presented the following Planning REPORT Commission Report of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 24, 1986: CC -35 The Planning Commission - ITEMS OF INTEREST 1. Conditionally approved the request of Baumbach and Piazza, Consulting Engineers, on behalf of Neal Weaver, et al, for the Tentative Subdivision Map of Black Diamond Park, a one -lot commercial condominium which combines Lots 9 and 10, Industrial Lite (i.e. 915 and 921 Black Diamond Way) in an area zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. 2. Conditionally approved the request of Wong Engineers on behalf of Feather -March Investments, Inc., for the approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to resubdivide 1806 and 1816 West Kettleman Lane (i.e. APN 058-160-30 and 5 6U1 Continued April 2, 1986 058-160-77) into three lots with parcel "8A" containing 0.844 acres, Parcel "9B" containing 0.477 acres and Parcel "9C" containing 0.477 acres with Parcels "W' and "9C" designated for commercial condominium purposes in an area zoned P -D (21), Planned Development District No. 21. 3. Accepted a staff recommended alternative and took no action on the request of Moss and Craig Property Management on behalf of Dr. Charles Ward to vary the landscaping requirements of the Site Plan and Architectural Review Catmittee by removing certain trees in the wine Country Plaza Center at 1420 West Kettleman Lane, in an area zoned P -D (15), Planned Development District No. 15. 4. Determined that a Zoning Hardship did not exist and denied the request of Henry Berretty, c/o Alumalite Sign Company on behalf of Dr. Charles Ward for a Zoning Variance to increase the area of tenant enumeration on a shopping center identification sign at Wine Country Plaza, 1420 West Kettleman Lane, in an area zoned P -D (15), Planned Development District No. 15. 5. Denied, by a 3 to 3 vote, the request of John Giannoni, Jr., on behalf of Search Development for a Use Permit to erect a 3 story office structure at 1420 South Mills Avenue, in the Lakeshore village Development, in an area zoned P -D (21), Planned Development District No. 21. COMMUNICATIONS (CITY CLERK) CLAIMS on reccmmendation of the City Attorney and L. J. Russo Insurance Services, Inc., the City's Contract CC -4 (c) Administrator, Council, on motion of Council Member Olson, Reid second, rejected the following claims and referred them back to the City's Contract Administrator: a) Marie Dillow, DOL 2/14/86 b) Nick Parises, DOL 10/19/83 POSTING DIRECTED FOR VARIOUS VACANCIES ON LODI ARTS COMMISSION CC -2 (k) On notion of Council Member Olson, Reid second, Council directed the City Clerk to post, as prescribed- by law, for the following pending vacancies on the Lodi Arts CommLission: Gwinnett Mitchell Elaine Wait Rev. Richard Lungren Allyn R. Fermier Cecil Church PUC APPLICATION City Clerk Reimche presented a letter that had been received from PG&E requesting authority from the CC -7 (f) California Public Utilities Commission under its Gas Adjustment Clause to decrease its gas rates, effective April 1, 1986 by about 8.2 percent or by approximately $256.5 million on an annualized basis. GVG Continued April 2, 1986 PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING EXTENDED PARKING LIMIT IN DOWNTOWN AREA Following receipt of a petition from the Classic Cut -Beauty / Salon requesting that the City extend the parking limit in v CC -16 front of that shop frau two hours to three hours, Council CC -48 (k) referred the matter to staff for presentation to the United Downtown Improvement District Committee for its review and recomiendation. CaNbZNTS BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS ORDINANCE NO. 1381 RE PARKING OF VEHICLES ON STREETS FOR DISPLAY FOR REPAIR Council Member Snider addressed the Council regarding Ordinance No. 1381 which had been introduced 3/19/86, CC -48 (a) entitled, "An Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Amending Section 10.20.070 of the Lodi Municipal Code to Substitute the Word 'Street' for the word 'roadway' as it Pertains to the Parking of Vehicles for Display or Repair" which is on the agenda for this meeting for adoption by the Council. Council Member Snider indicated that he was uncomfortable with the language of the proposed ordinance and stated that he felt that it was too restrictive. Council discussion followed with questions being directed to the City Attorney and the City Manager. Following discussion, Council tacitly concurred that the matter should be continued to a future agenda to allow time for additional study and possible revisions to the language of the proposed ordinance. NEWS RELEASES REGARDING PENDING STREET PROJECTS REQUESTED Mayor Pro Tempore Reid indicated his desire that news releases be published at least 10 days in advance of CC -6 canrencement of street projects advising the citizenry of CC -45 (a) the project, its scope and the anticipated duration of the project. nv'VITATION TO SPRING WINE TASTING Council Member Olson invited the citizens of Lodi to attend the Lodi Grape and Wine Festival Spring Wine Tasting to be held April 5th and 6th at the festival grounds. FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT CONFERENCE Mayor Hinchman complimented staff for including Fire and Police personnel in a recent Fair Labor Standards Act Conference. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON NON AGENDA ITEMS CONCERNS EXPRESSED BY CITIZEN RE PERMIT PARKING IN AREA OF PCP Ms. Inez villa, 817 S. Washington Street, Lodi, appeared before the Council stating that it was her intention to CC -16 circulate the following petition in the area of the Pacific CC -48 (1) Coast Producers Plant: 6U3 Continued April 2, 1986 "We, the undersigned residents of the area which is currently in the process of inplementing restricted parking 8 regulations do not support the actions of the City Council. The vote of the council members at the meeting of December 4, 1985 had led the area residents to believe that alternative D (2) had been approved. Since then, on March 20, 1986, letters were received by area residents with information regarding the adopted alternative (B2), plans for implementation, and enforcement. The contents were an unwelcamed surprise. On December 4, 1985, we had: 1. (3) 1 -hour no parking restrictions 2. No worries of monitoring rental unit use and/or abuse 3. No FEES Now, just 3 months later, We have: 1. (3) 1 -hour no parking restrictions 2. residential permit stickers, which may be a benefit if tight enforcement existed 3. FEES - regardless of the "insignificant amount" to sane, the fee is sanething which should not be the burden of the area residents in order to implement a program to ensure parking of Pacific Coast Producer employees into Pacific Coast Producer lots. It is imperative the City Council re-evaluate the intent of the area residents and the actions of the Council." Ms. Villa asked for detailed documentation regarding permit parking regulations presently being implemented in that area, stating that she did not feel that the neighborhood was fully apprised of the details. Council discussion followed with questions being directed to the City Attorney, the City Manager, and Ms. Villa. REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER REGULAR CALENDAR NELL 6R EQCIJOSURE City Manager Peterson introduced this agenda item which had been reooved fran the Consent Calendar advising that the project includes the installation of a block wall, driveway RFS.NO.86-45 and miscellaneous improvements at Well 6-R in Blakely Park. The enclosure is completely covered with steel CC -12 (a) grating to prevent access. Mr. Peterson further advised 30� that the plans and specifications for this project were approved on February 19, 1986 and that the City had received the following 5 bids: BIDDER AND AFDLZn OF BID Neth Construction, $26,548 John D. Wait Masonry, $28,875 Diede Construction, $32,793 8 G V `t Continued April 2, 1986 LODI DISTRICT CHAbMER OF COMMERCE REQUESTS FUNDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMOLVEME:NT A presentation was made by Mike Bradley, Executive Manager of the Lodi District Chamber of Commerce regarding the CC -6 Chambers involvement in Economic Development. Mr. Bradley CC -7 (k) voiced appreciation to the City for its past support indicating that the achievable goals were: 1. To broaden the awareness of Economic Development through educational seminars, conferences, etc. 2. To facilitate the feasibility efforts of attracting a major hotel to Lodi. 3. To develop a City Host Group available to meet with businesses looking to locate in Lodi. 4. To provide existing Lodi businesses with seminars and educational services to assist in their continued success. 5. To identify and review topics for a future Community Congress. Mr. Bradley further advised that the Chamber had established the commitment of 25 Committee volunteers to study economic development, with the plan for self educations as to Lodi's future growth, its infrastructure problems, and its real needs. Mr. Bradley requested that the City renew its financial commitment to economic development in 1986-87 requesting funding in the amount of $5,000.00. Following discussion, Council, on imtion of Council Member Snider, Olson second, appropriated $5,000 from the Hotel- byotel Tax fund for the Lodi District Chamber of Commerce 1986-87 Economic Development programs. Falco Construction, $35,400 Ford Development, $36,885 Ms. Delma Schmidt, 219 Mission Street, Lodi, addressed the Council indicating her consternation regarding the unsightliness of this well installation and asking that the installation be placed underground. Ms. Schmidt talked about deed restrictions that may have been placed on the Blakely Park property at the time it was sold to the City. The City Attorney indicated that he would research the matter and provide the requested information. Following discussion, the Council tacitly concurred to continue the matter to the Regular Council Meeting of April 16, 1986 to allow staff additional time to review questions raised regarding this installation. HELEN WEBER KENNEDY GALLERY AT THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HISTORICAL KjSEUM A presentation was made by Michael Bennett, Museum Director, regarding the Grand Opening of the Helen Weber CC -7 (a) Kennedy Gallery at the San Joaquin County Historical Museum and the Weber Family Celebration which will be held on May 2 and 3, 1986. LODI DISTRICT CHAbMER OF COMMERCE REQUESTS FUNDS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IMOLVEME:NT A presentation was made by Mike Bradley, Executive Manager of the Lodi District Chamber of Commerce regarding the CC -6 Chambers involvement in Economic Development. Mr. Bradley CC -7 (k) voiced appreciation to the City for its past support indicating that the achievable goals were: 1. To broaden the awareness of Economic Development through educational seminars, conferences, etc. 2. To facilitate the feasibility efforts of attracting a major hotel to Lodi. 3. To develop a City Host Group available to meet with businesses looking to locate in Lodi. 4. To provide existing Lodi businesses with seminars and educational services to assist in their continued success. 5. To identify and review topics for a future Community Congress. Mr. Bradley further advised that the Chamber had established the commitment of 25 Committee volunteers to study economic development, with the plan for self educations as to Lodi's future growth, its infrastructure problems, and its real needs. Mr. Bradley requested that the City renew its financial commitment to economic development in 1986-87 requesting funding in the amount of $5,000.00. Following discussion, Council, on imtion of Council Member Snider, Olson second, appropriated $5,000 from the Hotel- byotel Tax fund for the Lodi District Chamber of Commerce 1986-87 Economic Development programs. LU5 Continued April 2, 1986 RECESS Mayor Hinckmnan declared a five-minute recess and the meeting reconvened at approximately 9:00 pm. ELECTRICAL RATE COMPARISON At its regular meeting of March 19, 1986, the City Council briefly discussed the matter of electrical rates as charged CC -51 (d) by both the City of Lodi and the Pacific Gas and Electric Company. The staff was directed to present data supporting the statement that rates, and as a result, actual bills received by consumers, are approximately 158 lower for customers served by the City of Lodi versus customers served by P. G & E. Electrical Utility Director Henry Rice presented an analysis of the rate structures of both utilities and the ultimate result on the actual electric bill and responded to questions as were posed by members of the Council. "NO PARKING" 7.ONES ESTABLISHED AT HAM AND LOCKEFORD AND TURNER AMID CHURCH STREETS RES. NO. 86-50 Agenda item K-4 - "Establish "No Parking" zones at Ham and Lockeford Street and Turner and Church Streets" was CC -48 (e) introduced by Public Works Director Ronsko. C c 3u� Council Member Snider asked to abstain from discussion and voting on this matter as it pertains to Ham and Lockeford Street, because of a possible conflict of interest. . Council was reminded that it had earlier approved the installation of traffic signals at Ham Lane and Lockeford Street, and Turner Road and Church Street-Rivergate Drive. The design includes left -turn lanes on Ham, Lockeford and Church Street; thus, restriping for additional lanes is necessary at both intersections. Exhibits depicting the proposed "No Parking" zones were presented for Council's perusal. Following discussion, with questions being directed to Staff, Council, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Reid, adopted Resolution No. 86-50 (Section 1) approving the establishment of "No Parking" zones at Ham Lane and Lockeford Street. The motion was seconded by Mayor Hindman and carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Pinkerton, Reid, and Hinchman (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Abstain: Council Members - Snider Absent: Council Members - None On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Reid, Snider second, Council adopted Section 2 of Resolution No. 86-50 approving the establishment of "No Parking" zones at Turner Road and Church Street/Ri.vergate Drive. The motion carried by unanimous vote. PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR CITY OF LODI DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM RES. NO. 86-52 Following receipt of a report by Assistant City Manager 10 t1vv Continued April 2, 1986 I iL4,kt,4.:J Alice M. Reimche City Clerk 11 Glenn, regarding public liability coverage for the CC -21.1 (a) Dial -A -Ride program, Council, on motion of Council Member CC -50 (b) Pinkerton, Olson second, adopted Resolution No. 86-52 approving the following actions contingent upon verifications of information received`by telephone on April 2, 1986 regarding this matter: a) Authorized the City of Lodi to pay the public liability insurance premium covering the Dial -A -Ride program in the amount of $15,000, which amouht is to be appropriated from TDA Finds. b) Authorized modifying the present Agreement with the City Cab Ccapany covering the Dial -A -Ride program whereby the City Cab Company will -be reimbursed at the rate of $2.75 for each Dial -A -Ride ticket presented to the City for service within the City of Lodi and $3.25 for each ticket presented to the City of Lodi for service in the County. ORDINANCES Ordinance No. 1378 - An Ordinance of the City of Lodi Establishing and Providing for the Regulation of Cross CC -6 Connections to the City's Potable Water System having been CC -51 introduced at a regular meeting of the Lodi City Council held March 19, 1986 was brought up for passage on motion of ORDINANCE Council Member Olson, Snider second.- Second reading of the ESTABLISHING Ordinance was cmitted after reading by title, and the REGULATIONS FOR Ordinance was then adopted and ordered to print by the CROSS CONNECTIONS following vote: TO CITY'S POTABLE WATER SYSTEM Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Pinkerton, Reid, Snider, and Hirschman (Mayor) ORD.NO. 1378 ADOPTED Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None ORD. NO. 1379, ADOPTED Ordinance No. 1379 - An Ordinance of the Dodi City Council Amending Section 9.08.080 - Subsection B of the Lodi ORDINANCE REG- Municipal Code as it Pertains to the Size of Signs Posted ULATING SIZE OF Prohibiting Trespassing and Loitering having been introuced SIGNS PROHIBITING at a regular meeting of the Lodi City Council held March TRESPASSING AMID 19, 1986 was brought up for passage on motion of Council LOITERING Member Snider, Reid second. Second reading of the Ordinance was omitted after reading by title and the Ordinance was CC -6 then adopted and ordered to print by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Pinkerton, Reid, Snider, and Hincimian (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Council, Mayor Hanctu an adjourned the meeting at apprnimately 10:10 pm to Tuesday, April 15, 1986 at 7:00 pm for the Canvass of the April 8, 1986 Election and Swearing-in Ceremonies. I iL4,kt,4.:J Alice M. Reimche City Clerk 11