HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - May 16, 1990CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI
CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET
WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 1990
7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL Present: Council Members - Hinchman, Olson,
Pinkerton, Reid, and Snider (Mayor)
Absent: Council Members - None
Also Present: City Manager Peterson, Assistant City
Manager Glenn, Assistant City Engineer
Prima, City Attorney McNatt, and City Clerk
Reimche
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by
Assistant City Manager Jerry
Glenn.
PLEDGE OF
The Pledge of Allegiance was
led by Mayor Snider.
ALLEGIANCE
CONSENT CALENDAR
In accordance with report and
recommendation of the City
Manager, Council, on motion
of Council Member Reid,
Hinchman second, approved
the following items hereinafter
set forth with the following
listed exceptions:
1) Agenda item
E-16, entitled, "Intention to
vacate City
property north of Turner Road
between the
Southern Pacific Railroad and
private property fronting Awani Drive" was
removed from
the agenda.
2) Agenda item
E-18, entitled, "Purchase of
aerial fire
truck" was removed from the
Consent Calendar
and discussed and acted
upon under the
Regular Calendar.
3) Agenda item E-19, entitled, "Update on
2 -hour fire wall requirements contained in
Ordinance No. 1482 adopting the 'Uniform
Fire Code, 1988 Edition' was removed from
the Consent Calendar and discussed and acted
upon under the Regular Calendar.
CLAIMS CC -21(a) Claims were approved in the amount of $1,699,607.25.
MINUTES The Minutes of March 21, 1990 and April 4, 1990 were
approved as written.
1
Continued May 16, 1990
SPECIFICATIONS
APPROVED FOR 10,000 -LB
CAPACITY FORKLIFT
CC -12.1(b) The City Council approved the specifications and authorized
advertisement for bids for the purchase of one 10,000 -pound
capacity forklift for use at the Municipal Service Center.
The City Council was advised that the existing
higher -capacity lift at MSC is a 1961 Moline, purchased
used by the City in December, 1974, and having a rated
capacity of 6,000 pounds. Because of its age, repair parts
are increasingly harder to find, and extended periods of
downtime are becoming more frequent.
Additionally, because of its capacity limitation, it is
unable to handle the larger transformers and vaults that
are being purchased for use in the City's electrical
distribution system.
The new forklift would be used to handle materials and
equipment weighing over 3,000 pounds, the rated capacity of
the smaller lift at MSC. In addition to transformers and
vaults, cable reels, metalclad switchgear, units -of
crossarms, pallets of paint for streets, and bins of scrap
metal all exceed 3,000 pounds in weight.
The estimated cost of this equipment is $35,000, the amount
of which has been included in the 1989/90 budget.
The bid opening is scheduled for May 30, 1990.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
TRANSFORMER STORAGE
RACKS
CC -12.1(b) The City Council approved the specifications and authorized
the advertisement for bids for the purchase of eight
sections of galvanized transformer storage racks.
The City Council was informed that transformer storage
space requirements at the Municipal Service Center yard
have increased during the past two years as order
quantities and equipment sizes have grown. Transformers
may now be stored in up to four separate locations,
depending on the availability of space. During the last
inventory, auditors cited the condition as a deficiency,
and recommended that the transformers be located in a more
centralized location.
These racks would provide storage for up to 48 pad -mount
and 80 pole -mount transformers, allowing crews easier
identification and giving more direct access to individual
2
04
Continued May 16, 1990
pieces of equipment. This storage would be located
immediately to the west of the existing storage racks.
The estimated cost of this purchase is $12,000, an amount
which has been allocated in the 1989/90 budget.
The bid opening is for May 29, 1990.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
LODI LAKE PATROL BOAT
CC -12.1(b) The City Council approved the specifications and authorized
advertisement for bids for one 18 -foot Gregor pontoon -style
patrol boat for Lodi Lake.
The City Council was advised that in 1989 the City Council
approved funding to replace an aging patrol boat at Lodi
Lake. After studying various boat designs, the Parks
Department selected the pontoon -style as the one best
suited for the needs at the lake.
First, the twin hull provides stability necessary when
bringing a swimmer on board. Second, the low deck allows
easier access to persons or objects in the water. Third,
the shallow hull allows accessibility to virtually all
areas of the lake and shoreline if law enforcement or
assistance becomes necessary.
The 1989-90 Parks Department budget includes $8,000 for
this purchase.
The bid opening is scheduled for Tuesday, May 29, 1990.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ROCK AND SAND MATERIAL
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
CC -12.1(c) The City Council approved the specifications for rock and
sand material and authorized advertisement for bids to be
received Wednesday, May 30, 1990.
The City advertises for rock and sand material on an annual
basis. This bid will cover rock and sand material needed
during the fiscal year July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1990.
A recap of the quantities is shown below:
ROCK AND SAND MATERIAL
Item No. 1
Item No. 2
Item No. 3
3
UANTITIES
100 tons 3/4" class II aggregate
300 tons concrete sand
350 tons 1/4" x #10 crushed rock
Continued May 16, 1990
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR
FIRST AND SECOND QUARTERS
OF FISCAL YEAR 1990-91
,4-15
CC -12.1(c) The City Council approved the specifications for asphalt
materials and authorized advertisement for bids to be
received Wednesday, May 30, 1990.
The City advertises for asphalt materials on a semi-annual
basis. This bid will cover asphalt materials needed during
the first and second quarters of fiscal year July 1, 1990
through December 31, 1990.
A recap of the quantities is shown below:
ASPHALT MATERIALS QUANTITIES
3/8" Asphalt Concrete 2,400 Tons
1/2" Asphalt Concrete 250 Tons
SPECIFICATIONS FOR
MAINTENANCE OF
LANDSCAPED AREAS
CC -12.1(c) The City Council approved the specifications for
maintenance of landscaped areas and authorized
advertisement for bids to be received Wednesday, May 30,
1990.
The City is advertising for maintenance of 38 landscaped
areas within the City of Lodi and the landscaped area at
the White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility. This
bid will cover maintenance of the areas during the fiscal
year July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1991.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR LODI AVENUE AND
HAM LANE INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
CC -12.1(c) The City Council approved the plans and specifications for
the Lodi Avenue and Ham Lane Intersection Improvements and
authorized advertising for bids.
This project consists of installing three City -furnished
vaults, two cable TV -furnished boxes, and conduit of
various types and diameters. Electrical and cable TV
wiring will be installed at a future date as a separate
project.
This project also includes an asphalt overlay of the Lodi
Avenue/Ham Lane intersection. The overlay project had been
4
41,66 Continued May 16, 1990
originally budgeted in 1988 but was postponed until the
underground conduit was installed.
PURCHASE OF 15KV
UNDERGROUND CONDUCTOR
RES. NO. 90-66-B
CC -12(d) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-66 awarding the
CC -47 bid for the purchase of two sizes of 15kv underground
CC -300 conductor to the low bidders in each category, in the
amounts shown below:
24,000 feet #2 Cablec Industrial Cable, $25,219.50
New City, New York
20,000 feet 1#2/0 Reynolds Metal Co., $22,610.00
Richmond, Virginia
On December 20, 1989, the City Council approved
specifications and authorized advertisement for bids. Bids
were opened on January 16, 1990.
After evaluation of proposals, the recommendation was made
to reject bids for #2 and #2/0 underground conductor and to
reopen bidding. On March 7, 1990, the City Council
approved that recommendation.
During March the price of copper experienced a period of
volatility, and reopening of the bidding process was
delayed to allow prices to stabilize. During April the
markets stabilized, and on May 2, 1990 new bids were
opened. Results of the bidding were as follows:
Bidder 24.000' #2AWG 20,000' #2/OAWG
Cablec Industrial
$24,760.50*
$28,283.75*
Cable, NY
Cablec Industrial
$25,219.50
$28,708.75
Cable, NY
Reynolds Metals,
$27,718.50
$22,610.00
Richmond, VA
Pirelli Cable,
$25,296.00
$23,205.00
Co.lusa, CA
Canada Wire,
$27,004.50*
$28,963.75*
Ontario, Canada
*Price subject to
escalation, based
on metals prices at
time of shipment
5
Continued May 16, 1990
Although price volatility has eased somewhat in recent
weeks, copper supplies remain tight and strikes persist in
some copper -producing countries. It is therefore
Purchasing's recommendation that Cablec's firm price of
$25,219.50 be used for the purchase of the #2AWG conductor.
Funding for this purchase is available in the Electric
Utility Department's Operating Fund.
CONTRACT AWARD FOR
PINE STREET OVERLAY,
SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD TO CHEROKEE
LANE
RES. NO. 90-67
CC -12(a) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-67 awarding the
CC -12(c) contract for the Pine Street Overlay, Southern Pacific
CC -300 Railroad to Cherokee Lane to Claude C. Wood Company in the
amount of $132,742.00.
This project consists of edge grinding and a pavement
overlay on Pine Street between the Southern Pacific
Railroad tracks and Cherokee Lane. Also included in the
project is the replacement of miscellaneous sections of
curb and gutter, specifically the section between Garfield
Street and Cherokee Lane where there are a number 'of large
City trees adjacent to the curb.
Plans and specifications for this project were approved on
April 18, 1990.
The City received the following three bids for this project:
Bidder
Engineer's Estimate
Claude C. Wood Company
Teichert Construction
Granite Construction
REPORT OF THE
SALE OF CITY PROPERTY
Location Bid
$147,027.70
Lodi $132,742.00
Stockton $141,079.67
Stockton $157,887.00
The City Council was apprised by Purchasing Officer Joel E.
Harris that in accordance with recently -enacted Ordinance
No. 1474, this report of the sale of City property is
hereby submitted by Purchasing Officer Joel E. Harris for
the information of the City Council.
The following item of City property has been sold within
the last thirty days:
0
X10
Continued May 16, 1990
4/17/90 1 Dodge 318 Cu. In. Engine $ 250.00
This item was originally included in the sale of vehicles
and equipment approved by the City Council in February,
-1990. One bid was received for the engine, and because it
was below the established minimum bid price, that bid was
rejected. Subsequent to the closing of the vehicle sale,
an offer was received for the item at the minimum bid price
of $250, and that offer was accepted.
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
- HOUSE REMOVAL AT
12001 NORTH THORNTON ROAD
CC -6 This information was given to the City Council in
CC -90 accordance with the policy approved by Resolution No.
85-172.
This contract was unusual in that SUDA, Inc./Delmer
Almer was paying the City of Lodi $2,657.84 for the
house/garage located at 12001 North Thornton Road. Under
the contract, the contractor was obligated to remove the
house and garage and clear the property. The abandonment
of the existing septic tank was a City responsibility.
Since the septic tank was in the way of moving the house
and the contractor was licensed to do septic tank removal
work, a change order was issued.
ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS
UNDER ELM STREET PARKING
LOT, 207 AND 211 WEST ELM
STREET, CONTRACT
CC -90 The City Council accepted the improvements under the "Elm
Street Parking Lot" contract, and directed the Public Works
Director to file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder's office.
The City Council was advised that the contract was awarded
to Gooden Paving Company of Acampo on September 20,
1989, in the amount of $33,846.00. The contract has been
completed in substantial conformance with the plans and
specifications approved by the City Council.
The contract completion date was April 26, 1990 and the
actual completion date was May 1, 1990. The final contract
price was $37,551.00. The difference between the contract
amount and the final contract price is mainly due to
additional imported fill.
The County of San Joaquin has contributed $80,000 toward
the construction cost. The lighting and landscaping of the
parking lot will be done in the near future under separate
contracts.
Continued May 16, 1990
ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS
AT 1918 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
RES. NO. 90-68
CC -46 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-68 accepting the
CC -300 development improvements for 1918 South Church Street.
Improvements at 1918 South Church Street have been
completed in substantial conformance with the requirements
of the Development Agreement between the City of Lodi and
Geweke Properties, dated December 21, 1988, as shown on
Drawing Nos. 88DO44, 88DO45, and 88D065, and as
specifically set forth in the plans and specifications
approved by the City Council.
The streets to be accepted are as follows:
STREETS LENGTH IN MILES
Church Street 0.00
Anderson Avenue 0.01
TOTAL NEW MILES OF CITY STREETS 0.01
ITEM REMOVED FROM
THE AGENDA
Agenda item E-16, entitled, "Intention to vacate City
property north of Turner Road between the Southern Pacific
Railroad and private property fronting Awani Drive" was
removed from the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING SET
REGARDING SUNWEST
PLAZA REORGANIZATION
RES. NO. 90-69
CC -8(a) Mayor Snider abstained from discussion and voting on this
matter because of a possible conflict of interest.
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-69 - Resolution
directing the City Clerk, pursuant to State of California
Government Code Section 5700 et. seq., to set a public
hearing for Wednesday, 7:30 p.m., June 6, 1990, to consider
the Sunwest Plaza Reorganization including annexation to
the City of Lodi and detachment from the Woodbridge Fire
District and the Woodbridge Water Users Conservation
District.
On March 13, 1990, this proposal was initiated by petition
of property owners and on March 13, 1990, the Executive
Officer of LAFCO certified the application filed for
4"O
Continued May 16, 1990
processing in accordance with the Local Government
Reorganization Act.
Following a public hearing regarding the matter held on
April 27, 1990, the Local Agency Formation Commission of
San Joaquin County determined and ordered the following:
1. The Environmental Impact Report adopted by
the City of Lodi as lead agency has been
reviewed and considered, and a statement of
overriding considerations is hereby adopted.
2. The above entitled reorganization is
approved subject to the terms and conditions
contained herein.
3. The boundaries are hereby approved, said
boundaries being set forth in Exhibit A.
4. The affected territory is uninhabited.
5. The City of Lodi is designated as the
conducting authority and the City Council is
authorized to initiate proceedings for
uninhabited reorganization in accordance
with Section 5700 et. seq. of the Government
Code.
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
CHANGE ORDER FOR 60 -KV
AND 12 -KV LOW VOLTAGE
COMPONENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL
SUBSTATION SWITCHYARD
CC -51(d) The City Council, by motion action, granted approval of
CC -90 change order to the construction contract for the
Industrial Substation with Kinetic/Chapek Construction,
to include construction of the 12-kv low voltage
component of the switchyard facilities, and
changes/modifications to the 60-kv side, at a total cost
of $288,219.
At the January 17, 1990 Council meeting, the City Council
awarded the construction contract for the Industrial
Substation to Kinetic Engineering of Loomis, California
in a joint venture with Chapek Construction, Inc. of
Sacramento, California. The project included "the
complete construction of one substation" (Bid Documents,
Volume 1, Section 3.1) . It was understood at the time of
bidding that the substation would include a 12-kv low
voltage component, but plans for this aspect of the project
had not been completed when the bid was awarded.
Continued May 16, 1990
.ter.
It would have created problems with the construction
schedule to wait until the 12-kv plans were complete
before awarding the general contract, so a determination
was made to award the general contract and to thereafter
execute a change order for the 12-kv component and such
other changes as were deemed necessary. For that purpose,
bids were solicited on a "unit price" basis (Bid Documents
Volume 1, Section 3.3) and the general contractor has
agreed to perform the work for that unit price.
Approximately 65% of the $288,219 figure (or about
$187,342) would be for modifications to the 60-kv side.
The remaining 35% ($100,877) is the cost of the 12-kv
portion of the change order. That would complete the work
contemplated in the original contract. The remainder of
the 12-kv yard would be constructed utilizing Electric
Utility Department staff.
Funding for this change order is available within the
overall funding source of the project.
FORMALIZATION OF
INTEGRATED OPERATION
OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
POWER AGENCY (NCPA)
GEOTHERMAL PROJECT
THROUGH EXECUTION OF
THE GEOTHERMAL PROJECT
OPERATING AGREEMENT
CC -7(j) The City Council authorized the City Manager and City Clerk
CC -90 to execute the Geothermal Project Operating Agreement
(Agreement).
The City Council was apprised that when each of the two
NCPA Geothermal Projects began their commercial operation,
they were accounted for and operated as though the two
projects were separate. Controlled operation of the
Geothermal Projects has demonstrated that better
utilization of the plants can be accomplished through
unified operation and equitable allocation of steam between
the projects.
Therefore, a Geothermal Project Operating Agreement was
prepared which allows NCPA to make "best use" of the
Geothermal resource, allocate steam and well drilling costs
on the basis of the net output from each pfoject - all in
accord with the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the
NCPA Geothermal Projects dated July 28, 1983.
Several years of study and review by NCPA and participant
staffs have resulted in 'an agreement which allocates
project costs equitably and make participants indifferent
to the source of steam as well as make best use of the
10
422
._/ Continued May 16, 1990
generation facilities. City of Lodi staff have
participated in the development of the Agreement and
recommend its approval.
CLASS SPECIFICATIONS
AND SALARY RANGE FOR
LEAD EQUIPMENT MECHANIC
APPROVED
RESOLUTION NO. 90-71
CC -34 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-71 approving the
CC -300 new class specification and salary range ($2143.80 -
$2605.78) for Lead Equipment Mechanic.
The City Council approved the addition of an advanced
journey level mechanic in the Public Works Department 89-90
budget.
A classification study was conducted to establish the
appropriate allocation; the study concluded that a Lead
Equipment Mechanic should be established. This new
classification would provide lead direction to journey
level mechanics, assist the Equipment Maintenance
Supervisor in administrative duties, and supplement the
staff by also performing skilled mechanical repair work.
This new classification would be assigned to the
Maintenance and Operators (IBEW) bargaining unit, at
A B C D E
2143.80 $2250.98 $2363.52 $2481.69 $2605.78
The Public Works Director concurs with this new
classification and salary range.
AMENDED JOB SPECIFICATIONS
AND SALARY ADJUSTMENT FOR
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
SUPERVISOR AND BUILDING AND
EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT
RES. NO. 90-72
CC -34 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-72 approving the
CC -300 revised class specification for Equipment Maintenance
Supervisor and adjusting the salary ranges for Equipment
Maintenance Supervisor by 4.56% and Building & Equipment
Maintenance Superintendent by 4.18%.
The current salary differential. between Building &
Equipment Maintenance Superintendent and Equipment
Maintenance Supervisor is 17.87%. As a result of adding a
Lead Equipment Mechanic in the equipment maintenance shop,
11
Continued May 16, 1990 422
the existing differential is changed. To maintain an
equitable distribution between the two higher level
positions it is recommended that the salaries be adjusted
accordingly.
The additional compensation of 4.56% would place the salary
range for Equipment Maintenance Supervisor as follows:
A B C D E
$2358.15 2476.06 $2599.87 $2729.87 $2866.37
The additional compensation of 4.18% would place the salary
range for Building & Equipment Maintenance Superintendent
as follows:
A B C D E
$2770.84 2909.38 3054.85 $3207.60 $3367.98
CLASS SPECIFICATIONS AND
SALARY RANGE FOR ASSISTANT
WATER/WASTEWATER SUPERINTENDENT
RESOLUTION NO. 90-80
CC -34 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-80 approving the
CC -300 new class specification and salary range for Assistant
Water/Wastewater Superintendent.
The City Council was reminded that it had granted
authorization to add a new position to the Public Works
89-90 budget. This new position, Assistant
Water/Wastewater Superintendent, will provide
administrative support to the Water/Wastewater Division.
That support will focus on supervision and coordination of
all field operations of the division, supervise the water
conservation program and assist in the critical area of
ensuring compliance with governmental regulations.
A classification and salary study was completed to
establish the appropriate allocation. The study concluded
that a mid -management level classification would assist the
division as it grows and responds to increasing
environmental demands.
The new classification, ASSISTANT WATER/WASTEWATER
SUPERINTENDENT, monthly salary range, $2853.39 - $3468.32,
would be assigned to the mid -management group. This salary
range is equivalent to the Wastewater Treatment Supervisor,
who performs the same level function over the Wastewater
Treatment Plant.
The Public Works Director concurs with this new
classification and salary range.
12
94
Continued May 16, 1990
COMMENTS BY CITY
COUNCIL MEMBERS The following comments were received under the "Comments by
City Council Members" segment of the agenda:
COUNCIL MEMBER PINKERTON
EXPRESSES DISPLEASURE
REGARDING MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
CONCERNING ALMOND DRIVE
CC -16 Council Member Pinkerton expressed his displeasure
regarding a memorandum received from Public Works Director
P,onsko regarding the condition of Almond Drive which stated
that it was his feeling that there was no problem with the
condition or street maintenance of Almond Drive within the
Country jurisdiction. Therefore, a letter will not be sent
to the County as requested by the Mayor at the last City
Council meeting.
MAYOR REMINDS COMMUNITY
OF UPCOMING LODI POLICE
DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION
FAIR
CC -24(b) Mayor Snider reminded the citizens of this Community of the
Lodi Police Department Crime Prevention Fair being held
this weekend at the Grape Festival Pavilion.
COMMENTS BY THE
PUBLIC ON NON
AGENDA ITEMS The following comments were received under the "Comments by
the public on non -agenda items" segment of the agenda:
CITY COUNCIL ASKED TO
CONSIDER EXTENDING THE
PAVEMENT ON THE NORTHBOUND
LANE OF LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD
BETWEEN ELM STREET AND
PARKWEST DRIVE FROM THE
EXISTING PAVEMENT TO THE
EAST SIDE CURB
CC -16 Mrs. Michelle Downing, 2424 Elmwood Court, Lodi, Ca
CC -45(a) addressed the City Council asking that it consider
extending the pavement on the northbound lane of Lower
Sacramento Road, between Elm Street and Park West Drive
from the existing pavement to the east side curb. The
matter was referred to staff.
PUBLIC HEARINGS There were no public hearings scheduled for this meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION The City Council was advised that the Planning Commission
had not met since Council received the last report.
13
Continued May 16, 1990`'
COMMUNICATIONS
(CITY CLERK)
TERMS EXPIRING ON
VARIOUS BOARDS AND
COMMISSION
CC -2(a) On motion of Council Member Olson, Hinchman second, the
CC -2(d) City Council directed the City Clerk to post for the
CC -2(g) following terms expiring on various City of Lodi Boards and
CC -2(1) Commissions:
CC -2(k)
PLANNING COMMISSION
James Griffith
LIBRARY BOARD
4 year term expiring 6/30/90
C. M. Sullivan 3 year term expiring 6/30/90
SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
James Griffith 4 year term expiring 6/30/90
LODI ARTS COMMISSION
Barbara Bennett
Doris Johnson Mann
Eleanor Kundert
Alicia Miller
ASSEMBLY CONCURRENT
RESOLUTION NO. 121
3 year term expiring 5/5/90
3 year term expiring 5/5/90
3 year term expiring 5/5/90
3 year term expiring 5/5/90
CC -28 The City Clerk presented a letter which she had received
regarding Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 121, relative
to victims of pornography.
APPEAL RECEIVED REGARDING
SENIOR APARTMENT PROJECT
CONTAINING 51 -ONE BEDROOM
APARTMENTS TO BE LOCATED
AT 217 NORTH SCHOOL STREET
CC -53(b) Following receipt of a letter from Jim Pryor, Projects
Manager, Commercial Division, Lodi Development, Inc.
appealing the decision of the Planning Commission to deny
14
42`'
Continued May 16, 1990
the request for a Use Permit to construct a senior
apartment project containing 51 -one bedroom apartments to
be located at 217 North School Street in an area zoned C-1,
General Commercial, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore
Hinchman, Olson second, the City Council set the matter for
public hearing on June 6, 1990.
REGULAR CALENDAR
"NO SMOKING" ORDINANCE
INTRODUCED
ORDINANCE NO. 1488
CC -24(b) Following introduction of the matter by City Manager
CC -149 Peterson, City Attorney McNatt reminded the City Council
that at the "shirtsleeve" session of April 10, 1990, two of
three draft ordinances were presented for Council's review
regarding the regulation of smoking in public places. Both
regulated smoking in certain designated public places and
places of employment, with Option 1 being the more
stringent version. At that time, it was directed that the
proposed ordinances be returned to the Council at a regular
meeting for consideration and possible adoption.
Based on Council input since that time, a third option has
been drafted. This version would be the most stringent of
all, and would be an absolute prohibition of smoking in
specified public places, with no provisions for designating
portions of restaurants, waiting rooms, etc. as "smoking"
areas.
All options now contain the same set of findings for
consistency sake. Options Nos. 1 and 3 specify that the
Fire Marshal shall be the official responsible for
enforcement of the smoking ordinance. This is consistent
with most other jurisdictions which have smoking
ordinances.
A brief synopsis of each of the proposed ordinances is set
forth below:
OPTION 1.
This option would apply to any employer having one or more
employees [Section .030(5)], and gives the employer 60 days
in which to adopt a smoking policy. [Section .050(8)]. It
further allows any employee to designate his or her
workspace "smoke free".
This version of the ordinance requires that at least 50% or
more of all seating in such places as restaurants, waiting
rooms, etc. be designated nonsmoking. It is an infraction
punishable by a maximum fine of $500. There are no waivers
15
Continued May 16, 1990
or exemptions provided for deviation from the requirements
of the ordinance.
OPTION 2.
This version applies to all employers having 5 or more
employees, excluding owners [Section .020(F)] and allows
the employer 90 days in which to adopt a smoking policy
[.040(C)]. The stated goal of the ordinance is to provide
for a "reasonable balance" between the rights of smokers
and nonsmokers. It would not apply to restaurants having
less than 1,000 square feet of customer seating [Section
.020(J) and otherwise provides for nonsmoking areas, with_a
minimum of 50a of the square footage to be designated
nonsmoking.
Although it is an infraction also, it does not specify
fines nor designate an official to enforce the ordinance.
It provides for waivers under "unusual circumstances" such
as financial hardship or structural infeasibility [.080].
OPTION 3.
This is similar to Option 1 in all respects, except that it
does not allow for the designation of set aside areas
within facilities to be deemed "smoking" areas. It
generally prohibits smoking in all "public places" as
defined. The only difference in this version is that it
allows owners to set aside smoking areas in employee
lounges for use by employees, as long as such area is
separated from places in which the public may be present,
by walls and doors through which smoke cannot easily pass.
None of the ordinances would require employers or business
owners to make structural changes to implement the proposed
ordinances.
Addressing the City Council regarding the matter and
speaking in support of an ordinance regulating smoking in
public places were:
a) Eileen St. Yves, 310 South Orange Street,
Lodi
b) David Monk, San Joaquin Non -Smoking
Coalition
c) William Rude, Managing Partner, Carrows
Restaurant
d) Dr. Phillip Ross, 2135 West Vine Street,
Lodi
e) Candice Neff, 1612 Amber Leaf Way
16
4Z
Continued May 16, 1990
f) Sherri Senft, Sunshine Nutrition Center,
6 North School Street
g) Ms. C. Lee, 1993 Carmel Circle, Lodi
h) Reverend Loren Stacy, 2237 Newberry
Circle
Those speaking against such an ordinance were:
a) Ms. Margaret Ebnet, 615 Nevins Drive,
Lodi
b) Mr. Frank Alegre, 200 Edgewood Drive,
Lodi
Following discussion, the City Council on motion of Mayor
Pro Tempore Hinchman, Olson second, by the following vote
introduced Ordinance No. 1488 (Option 3), entitled, "An
Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Regulating or
Prohibiting Smoking in Certain Public Places and in Places
of Employment."
Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Olson, Reid, and Snider
Noes: Council Members - Pinkerton
Absent: Council Members - None
RECESS Mayor Snider declared a five-minute recess and the City
Council reconvened at approximately 9:00 p.m.
PRESENTATION BY LODI
DISTRICT CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE REGARDING
ALCOHOLIC TAX ACT
OF 1990
CC -28 Larry Mettler, President of the Lodi District Chamber of
Commerce addressed the City Council advising that it has
taken a position against the Alcohol Tax Act of 1990, an
initiative that they feel would have a devastating effect
on many facets of California's economy. Following his
indepth presentation regarding the matter, Mr. Mettler
indicated that as this Act would have a direct effect on
Lodi's agricultural and wine industries, the Chamber is
requesting that the City of Lodi also stand in opposition.
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Reid second, the
City Council voted to take no position on the matter.
17
Continued May 16, 1990
NOVEMBER 6, 1990 GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION
RESOLUTION NOS. 90-73 - 90-79
429
CC -18 The City Clerk advised the City Council that the 1990
CC -300 General Municipal Election for three council seats will be
held on Tuesday, November 6, 1990. The terms of Council
Members Olson, Reid and Snider are expiring.
By State Statute a number of actions and decisions must be
made by the Council prior to the opening of nominations
(July 16, 1990).
a) It will be necessary for the Council to
adopt a resolution calling for the
election.
b) The California Elections Code allows each
candidate, for a nonpartisan elective office
in a city, to prepare a statement to be
included with the sample ballot and mailed
to each registered voter.
The law requires the council to adopt a policy no later
than seven days before the nominations period opens
regarding the candidates' obligation for payment for
candidates' statements. The policy may also include the
City's position on three additional aspects of the Voters
Pamphlet mailing:
PAYMENT: Elections Code Section 10012 allows the City to
estimate the cost of the Candidates' Statement and require
each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the
City his or her pro rata share as a condition of having
his or her statement included in the voters pamphlet. The
cost of the Candidates' Statement may be borne by the city,
the candidate, or the cost shared between them. (It should
be noted that the city has in the past elected not to
charge candidates for the cost of the Candidate's
Statements.)
WORD LIMIT: The Council may authorize an increase in the
limitation on words for the statement from 200 to 400
words. (It should be noted that the city has in the past
elected not to increase the word limitation to 400 words.)
SPANISH LANGUAGE: The city may wish to include a summary
of its policy regarding the Voting Rights Act in the policy
resolution. (It should be noted that Federal Law does not
require Spanish translation except to voters in four
California counties. San Joaquin County is not one of the
four mandated counties. The City of Lodi has for many
lu
Continued May 16, 1990
years undertaken an oral assistance program, which we
recommend we continue to do.)
By law, the City Clerk must issue a copy of the city policy
relating to Candidates' Statements at the time nomination
papers are issued.
The City Council may adopt an ordinance requiring a filing
fee, not to exceed $25.00, to be paid at the time
nomination papers are filed. California courts have ruled
that the City Clerk may not refuse to place a candidates
name on the ballot due to an inability to pay the filing
fee. If you cannot waive the fee, you must provide an
alternative. Court guidelines are similar to Elections
Code Section 6555 providing for the substitution of four
signatures of registered voters for each one dollar of the
filing fee, or 10% of the total of registered voters in the
district in which he seeks nomination, whichever is less.
The Council must take appropriate action to enact or repeal
the filing fee ordinance sufficiently in advance of the
first day of the nomination process. (It should be noted
that the City has in the past determined that there will be
no filing fee).
State Statute allows the Council to set a limit on campaign
contributions which are more stringent than those imposed
by FPPC. (It should be noted that the City has in the past
determined that no limit would be set on campaign
contributions).
On motion of Council Member Reid, Olson second, the City
Council adopted Resolution No. 90-73 - Resolution calling
for the November 6, 1990 General Municipal Election.
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Reid second, the
City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-74 - Resolution
adopting regulations for the candidates pertaining to
materials submitted to the electorate and the cost of the
Candidate's statement as follows:
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Reid second, the
City Council limited the number of words to be allowed on a
Candidate's statement to 200 words.
On motion of Council Member Olson, Hinchman second, the
City Council determined that no candidates will be
permitted to include additional materials in the sample
ballot.
On motion of Mayor Snider, Hinchman second, the City
Council determined that there would be no charge levied to
the candidates for the printing, handling, or distribution
of the candidate's statement.
19
Continued May 16, 1990
.43J,
Onmotion of Council Member Reid, Olson second, the City
Council directed the City Clerk to once again initiate an
oral assistance program. Further, to adopt a policy that
the City Clerk shall have translated and printed in the
voter's pamphlet in Spanish only the candidates statement
of those candidates who request translation and printing
and to assess the candidates requesting this translation if
it is determined that such assessment can legally be made.
On motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Olson second, the
City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-75 - Resolution
determining not to impose a filing fee of $25.00 to be paid
upon the filing of nomination papers.
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Reid second, the
City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-76 - Resolution
determining that no limit shall be set on campaign
contributions which are more stringent than those imposed
by FPPC for the November 6, 1990 General Municipal
Election.
City Clerk Reimche advised the City Council that Section
20501 of the State of California Elections Code provides
that the determination of a tie vote by Candidates who
receive an equal number of votes and the highest number of
votes for one office in an election to be either by lot or
by the conduct of a special runoff election.
A special runoff election shall be held only if the
legislative body adopts the provisions for the special
election prior to the conduct of the election resulting in
the tie vote.
Because of the time and cost involved in conducting a
special runoff election, it was recommended that the tie
vote be determined by lot which procedure would be
conducted by the City Clerk at the City Council meeting
immediately following the canvass of the subject General
Municipal Election.
On motion of Council Member Reid, Olson second, the City
Council by the following vote adopted Resolution No. 90-77
- Resolution providing that the determination of a tie vote
by candidates who receive an equal number of votes and the
highest number of votes for one office in the November 6,
1990 General Municipal Election will be by lot.
Ayes: Council Members - Olson, Pinkerton, Reid, and
Snider
Noes: Council Members - Hinchman
Absent: Council Members - None
20
42 Continued May 16, 1990
The City Clerk advised the City Council that Sections
22843.5 and 22844 of the Elections Code allow for one of
the following courses of action to be taken by the City
Council in the event there are not more candidates than
offices to be elected, or if no one is nominated:
1. Appoint to the office the person who has
been nominated.
2. Appoint to the office any eligible voter if
no one has been nominated.
3. Hold the election if either no one or only
one person has been nominated.
Council was reminded that a number of years ago only the
incumbents were nominated for office at the General
Municipal Election. State Statute, at that time, mandated
that the election be held. The City had to bear the cost
of the election and the voter turnout was extremely low.
State Statutes have since been amended to allow for a
number of courses of action, which can be followed, should
this happen. However, the decision on which course of
action is to be followed must be adopted by the Council
prior to the election.
The provisions of this statute does not apply if, at the
subject election, more than one person has been nominated
to another city office to be elected on a City-wide bases
or city measure has qualified to be placed on the ballot.
In the event that no nominations are received, this matter
will be brought back to the Council following the close of
nominations for Council to decide if it wishes to appoint
eligible voters to the office or hold the election which
would then allow for write-in candidates.
On motion of Council Member Reid, Olson second, the City
Council adopted Resolution No. 90-78 - A Resolution of the
City Council of the City of Lodi providing for the
appointment to the offices of this city that were to be
elected Tuesday, November 6, 1990 of the persons who have
been nominated if there are not more candidates than
offices to be elected.
The City Clerk reminded the City Council that it had on
October 19, 1988 adopted Ordinance No. 1438 entitled, "An
Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Consolidating Municipal
Elections with Statewide General Elections." This
ordinance was adopted pursuant to Section 36503.5 of the
State of California California Government Code.
It is necessary for the City of Lodi to enter into an
Agreement with the County of San Joaquin to provide certain
21
Continued May 16, 1990
PURCHASE OF AERIAL
FIRE TRUCK
RESOLUTION NO. 90-70
4�3
services in the conduct of the November 6, 1990 General
Municipal Election. The City will reimburse the County for
these services when the work is completed and upon
presentation to the City of a properly approved bill. The
County Registrar of Voters and the City Clerk have met and
have concurred on the materials, equipment and services to
be provided by the County.
On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Olson second, the
City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-79 - Resolution
approving the City entering into a contract with the County
of San Joaquin for the County Registrar of Voters to
provide certain services for the November 6, 1990 General
Municipal Election.
CC -12(d) Assistant City Manager Glenn advised the City Council that
CC -20 he was notified at 10:15 a.m. on May 8, 1990 that the
CC -47 Pierce 75' aerial ladder truck authorized by the City
CC -300 Council, was sold on Monday evening to Clinton Township,
Michigan. Staff knew that the vehicle would be sold to the
first entity confirming the sale. At 4:00 p.m. Monday the
vehicle had not been sold.
At Tuesday morning's "Shirtsleeve" meeting Chief Hughes
notified the Council that he received a proposal from
Federal Signal Corporation to sell to the City an
Emergency -One 75' aerial ladder truck. This vehicle is
comparable to and will meet our needs as well as the Pierce.
There is a fiscal advantage to the purchase of the
Emergency -One truck. Even though the initial price is
higher, the offered interest rate is lower, thus lowering
the overall cost. Secondly, the first payment is due upon
receiving the truck, not upon placing the order.
Therefore, no appropriation of funds is required for fiscal
year 1989-90. The funds for the first payment are included
in the 1990-91 budget presently being prepared.
Council was respectfully requested to approve the lease
purchase of an Emergency -One 75' aerial ladder truck at a
purchase price of $338,908.81 including tax from Federal
Signal Leasing Corporation.
Following discussion, Council, on motion of Mayor Snider,
Pinkerton second, rescinded its action of Tuesday, May 8,
1990 to purchase a fire truck from Pierce Equipment Co. and
to adopt Resolution 90-70 authorizing the purchase of one
Emergency -One 75' aerial ladder truck from Emergency -One,
Inc. and Federal Signal Leasing Corporation.
22
43.4
1'j Continued May 16, 1990
UPDATE ON 2 -HOUR FIRE
WALL REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE
NO. 1482 ADOPTING THE
"UNIFORM FIRE CODE,
1988 EDITION"
CC -24(b) The City Council was reminded by Fire Chief Hughes that at
its meeting of April 18, 1990 it adopted Ordinance No.
1482, "Adoption of the 1988 Uniform Fire Code as amended".
One of the amendments to the Fire Code was the requirement
that automatic fire sprinklers be installed in all
buildings hereafter constructed if the building was in
excess of 6,000 square feet, three or more stories in
height, or remodeled in excess of $100,000 and met the
above noted criteria. The Council, in response to concerns
that we had not included the allowance of two hour fire
walls, directed the Fire Chief to meet with those
expressing such concern. The purpose of such a meeting
being to determine if we could find a solution to the
concerns.
The Fire Marshall sent out letters to 11 individuals
inviting them to discuss their concerns with us on May 9,
1990. The following persons came to the meeting:
a) Chris Faszer, Vic Meyer Engineering
b) Ted Molfino, a local builder
c) Jim Pryor, Lodi Development
d) Charles Faszer, Charles J. Faszer Inc.
e) Marty Weybret, Lodi News Sentinel
At this meeting we agreed to amend the automatic fire
sprinkler section of Ordinance No. 1482 to allow the
installation of two hour fire walls, with no openings to
separate buildings into areas of 6,000 square feet or
less. This exception will require the identification of
such walls on the sight plans and identification of the
location of the fire wall on the exterior of the building.
While this requirement will place an additional 'burden of
inspections on the Fire Department, we feel it is the best
compromise for all concerned at this time and therefore
support the adoption of the amendment of Ordinance No. 1482.
Following discussion, the Mayor directed that this matter
be brought back to the City Council for consideration at
the June 6, 1990 City Council meeting.
23
435
Continued May 16, 1990
ORDINANCES
ORDINANCE NO. 1486 ADOPTED
ORDINANCE AMENDING
LODI MUNICIPAL CODE BY
DELETING FROM THE
DEFINITION OF "REFUSE"
ALL INFECTIOUS WASTE
CC -24(b) Ordinance No. 1486 entitled, "An Ordinance of the Lodi
CC -22(b) City Council Amending Lodi Municipal Code Section 13.16.010
CC -149 (I) By Deleting from the Definition of 'Refuse' all
Infectious Waste" having been introduced at a regular
meeting of the Lodi City Council held May 2, 1990 was
brought up for passage on motion of Council Member Olson,
Reid second. Second reading of the ordinance was omitted
after reading by title, and the ordinance was then adopted
and ordered to print by unanimous vote of the City Council.
ORDINANCE REZONING THE
2.5 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED
AT 428, 440, AND 448 ALMOND
DRIVE FROM R -MD, MEDIUM
DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL TO P -D (28),
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
NO. 28
ORDINANCE NO. 1487 ADOPTED
CC -53(a) Ordinance No. 1487 entitled, "An Ordinance of the Lodi City
CC -149 Council Amending the Official District Map of the City of
Lodi and Thereby Rezoning the 2.5 Acre Parcel Located at
428, 440 and 448 Almond Drive from R -MD, Medium Density
Multiple Family Residential to P -D (28), Planned
Development District No. 28" having been introduced at a
regular meeting of the Lodi City Council held May 2, 1990
was brought up for passage on motion of Council Member
Reid, Hinchman second. Second reading of the ordinance was
omitted after reading by title, and the ordinance was then
adopted and ordered to print by unanimous vote of the City
Council.
ADJOURNMENT On motion of Council Member Olson, Hinchman second, the
meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:05 p.m. to
Thursday, May 31, 1990 at 7:00 a.m. to address taxi cab
service.
ATTEST: p�
Alice M. Reimche
City Clerk
24