The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes - March 7, 1990CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LODI CARNEGIE FORUM, 305 WEST PINE STREET WEDNESDAY, MARCH 7, 1990 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Council Members - Hinchman, Olson, Reid, Pinkerton and Snider (Mayor) Absent: Council Members - None Also Present: City•Manager Peterson, Assistant City Manager Glenn, Community Development Director Schroeder, Assistant City Engineer Prima, City Attorney McNatt, and City Clerk' Reimche INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor David S. Hill, Grace Presbyterian Church. PLEDGE OF The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Snider. ALLEGIANCE PRESENTATIONS LODI FOOD DISTRIBUTION CENTER CC -73 A presentation was made by Dustin Costa regarding the CC -124 Lodi Food Distribution Center. WOMEN'S CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN - LODI BRANCH CC -124 A presentation was made by Linda Fawcett of the Women's Center of San Joaquin - Lodi Branch. Their new facility will be located at the old Lincoln School site at the corner of Cherokee Lane and East Pine Street. An invitation was extended to attend their Open House on March 28, 1990, 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. UPDATE ON DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE REPORTER'S REWARD PROGRAM CC -24(b) A presentation was made by representatives of the Driving Under the Influence Reporter's Reward Program. An invitation was extended to attend their Stockton Branch Kickoff which will be held in the Civic Auditorium on March 15, 1990, 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR In accordance with report and recommendation of the City 1 287 Continued March 7, 1990 Manager, Council, on motion of Council Member Reid, Hinchman second, approved the following items hereinafter set forth. Further, agenda item E-12 - "Class Specifications and salary range for Lead Equipment Mechanic" was removed from the agenda. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CLAIMS CC -21(a) Claims were approved in the amount of $2,934,167.29. MINUTES The Minutes of February 7, 1990 and February 14, 1990 (Special Meeting) were approved as written. SPECIFICATIONS FOR ONE 600 AMP 15 - KV CIRCUIT BREAKER APPROVED CC -20 The City Council approved the specifications for the CC -47 purchase of one 15 -KV vacuum power circuit breaker and authorized advertising for bids. The power circuit breaker will be installed at Henning Substation as a part of a new underground feeder system to the Lakeshore area. The estimated cost of this purchase is $16,500 with delivery expected in approximately four months. Funding for this purchase was included in the Department's 1989-90 fiscal year budget. SPECIFICATIONS FOR TWO TRACTOR -LOADERS CC -20 The City Council approved the specifications and authorized CC -47 advertising for bids for two tractor/loaders with extendable backhoe. The City Council was advised that the replacement of one tractor/loader-backhoe in the Water/Wastewater Division and a new tractor/loader backhoe for the Electric Utility Department was approved in the 1989-90 Operating Budget. The unit for the Water/Wastewater Division will be replacing a 1974 unit that has been rebuilt once and is now worn out. The old unit is also underpowered for the work which must be completed on a daily basis. Because of the difficulty in renting units and the workload of the other departments who have backhoes, the Electric Utility Department's request for a tractor/loader was approved. The budgeted amount of the Electric Utility Department is $45,000. The amount budgeted by Wacer/Wastewater was $38,520 plus an anticipated trade-in or resale value of $6,000. N •• rAfELO"O Continued March 7, 1990 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 1990 ASPHALT OVERLAYS, TOKAY STREET AND LODI AVENUE APPROVED CC -12.1(c) The City Council approved the plans and specifications for the 1990 Asphalt Overlay, Tokay Street and Lodi Avenue and authorized advertising for bids. The City Council was advised that this project consists of placing approximately 1,250 tons of asphalt concrete; 6,060 square yards of pavement reinforcing fabric; 3,430 square feet of pavement repair; 5,415 linear feet of pavement grinding, and other incidental and related work, all as shown on the plans and specifications for the project. CONTRACT AWARD FOR WELL 23 CHAIN LINK FENCE, 55 EAST HARNEY LANE RESOLUTION NO. 90-25 CC -12(d) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-25 awarding the CC -300 contract for Well 23 Chain Link Fence, 55 East Harney Lane to Stockton Fence Company in the amount of $6,838.94. The City Council was advised that this project consists of furnishing and installing perimeter fencing and mow strips for this new well site. Plans and specifications for this project were approved on February 7, 1990. The City received the following eight bids for this project: Bidder Engineer's Estimate Stockton Fence Company Pisor Fence Economy Fence Central Fence Precision Fence Company Torres Fence Company C&R Fence Dura Fence Location Bid $ 7,400.00 Stockton $ 6,838.94 Citrus Heights $ 7,347.75 Stockton $ 8,520.06 Sacramento $ 8,741.00 Stockton $ 8,768.50 Fresno $ 9,076.00 Stockton $ 9,729.00 Sacramento $10,407.27 3 M.e M Continued March 7, 1990 CONTRACT AWARD FOR LOD1 LAKE PARK RESTROOM :I4PROVEMENTS (NORTH AND SOUTH,) 1301 WEST TURNER ROAD RESOLUTION NO. 90-26 CC -12(c) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-26 awarding the CC -300 contract for Lodi Lake Park Restroom Improvements (North and South), 1301 West Turner Road to Diede Construction in the amount of $232,261.00 and appropriated an additional $44,000.00 from the Capital Outlay Reserve and Lodi Lake funds to complete the project. This project consists of constructing a new restroom on the north point of Lodi Lake. This replaces the existing structure built in the late 1930s which could not be modified for handicap accessibility because of its size. Also included in the project is the construction of a small packaged sewage lift station and piping to replace the malfunctioning gravity sewer which -served the old north restroom. This project also consists of modifying the south restroom at the lake for handicap accessibility and replacement of the old fixtures with new vandal resistant ones. The project is jointly funded by the City and 1986 State Park Bond funds. Plans and specifications for this project were approved on January 17, 1990. The City received the following four bids for this project: Bidder Location Base Bid Alternate A Engineer's Estimate $217,600.00 71,300.00 Diede Construction Woodbridge $227,521.00 $4,740.00 McDonald Glenn Co. Manteca $246,828.00 $4,345.00 Sawyer McCollum Cedar Ridge $312,500.00 $3,500.00 Scrimsher & Mineni Escalon $326,144.00 $5,500.00 Alternate A includes the demolition and removal of the old restroom on the north point. It is recommended that this work be included in the award. Additional funds of $44,000.00 are needed to complete the project. The Lodi Lake revenue account has $5,000.00 available. The Finance Department has verified that the remaining amount ($39,000.00) is available in the Capital Outlay Reserve. 290- Continued March 7, 1990 PURCHASE OF 69 POLE -MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS RESOLUTION NO. 90-27 CC -12(d) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-27 awarding the CC -300 bid for the purchase of 69 pole -mounted transformers to the bidder whose proposal and equipment met all Electric Utility Department specifications, and whose transformers yielded the lowest overall life -cycle cost, Cooper Power Systems of Burlingame, California. The purchase price for this equipment is $63,833.96. On January 17, 1990, the City Council approved specifications and authorized advertisement for bids. Bids were opened on February 20, 1990. A summary of the results of the bid and of the evaluation are shown on the following page: 5 m l It ATTAMIMM 1 D`D CD SUMMARY BIDS RECEIVED*/LIFE CYCLE COSTS n PADMOU14TED TRANSFORMERS 610 OPENING FEBRUARY 20, 1990 WESTINGHOUSE COOPER POWER CEN. MOLONEY WEST. STATES GEN'L ELECT. MAYD.&HART PAUWELS TRF. CONCORD BURLINGAME ARKANSAS PORTLAND EMERYVILLE BRISBANE MISSOURI a TRANSFORMER DESCRIPTION------------ ------------ ------------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------ (1) (2) (3) (4) SINGLE-PHASE PADMOUNTED: S 5 EA 37.5KVA, 240/120V 56,215.63/ 56,125.31/ 55,121.25/ NO BID 59,832.17/ S 5,795.94/ NO BID $11,305.63 511,585.31 511,821.25 $13,032.17 511,595.94 " 2 EA 50KVA, 240/120V 53,006.88/ 52,730.63/ 52,828.38/ $3,436.13/ 53,777.45/ S 2,717.88/ NO BID � 55,270.88 55,586.63 55,648.38 56,040.13 $5,957.45 S 5,573.88 6 EA 100KVA, 240/120V 511,188.13/ 514,401.13/ 510,710.00/ 512,252.75/ 513,204.16/ 511,194.50/ NO BID 526,116.13 528,441.13 526,322.00 526,904.75 528,540.16 527,010.50 THREE-PHASE PADMOUNTED: 2 EA 112.5Y,VA, 208/120V 58,589.25/ 57,945.38/ NO BID NO BID S10,269.15/ S 7,949.63/ S 6,806.38/ 514,757.25 $14,725.38 516,533.15 515,089.63 $14,956.38 1 EA 150Y,VA, 408/277V 54,749.38/ 54,323.31 110 BID NO BID $5,509.62/ S 4,327.56/ S 4,192.63/ 58,301.38 58,981.31 59,423.62 S 8,569.56 S 8,522.63 3 EA 300YVA, 208/120V S18,423.75/ 517,936.00/ NO BID NO 810 530,097.91/ $18,882.75/ $17,658.751 539,681.75 $41,024.00 544,485.91 540,248.75 $40,698.75 FOOTNOTES: * BIDS RECEIVED ARE TOTAL BIO PRICES FOR EACH SIZE, TAXES INCLUDED, DELIVERED (1) CENTRAL MOLONEY DISQUALIFIED DUE TO LACK OF SERVICE FACILITIES WITHIN 200 MILES OF LODI; HEIGHT FOR ITEM 2 EXCEEDS SPECIFIED LIMIT OF 28" (2) WESTERN STATES' PROPOSAL FAILED TO MEET SPECIFICATIONS IN THAT APPLIED VOLTAGE TESTS ARE NOT PERFORMED ON GRD. WYE UNITS; TRANSFORMER HEIGHTS ARE NOT INDICATED. (3) GENERAL ELECTRIC'S PROPOSAL CONTAINED LOSS EVALUATION CLAUSES WHICH DIFFERED FROM SPECIFICATIONS; DRAWINGS SUBMITTED INDICATE ONLY ONE PARKING STAND ON SINGLE-PHASE UNITS VS. TWO AS SPECIFIED; BAYONET FUSES DO NOT MATCH SPECIFICATIONS; TRANSFORMEP.S "MAY NOT IN ALL CASES MEET CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS ON MAXIMUM HEIGHT". (4) PAUWELS' PROPOSAL INDICATES TRANSFORMER HEIGHTS ARE "NOT BINDING". D`D CD 292 Continued March 7, 1990 Transformer proposals are evaluated by combining estimated _ costs of losses during operation with the bid price to yield an estimated total life -cycle cost. Bidders proposing equipment which have the lowest life -cycle cost while meeting specifications are recommended to be awarded the bid. Funding for this purchase is available in the Electric Utility Department's Operating Fund. PURCHASE OF 19 PAD -MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS RESOLUTION NO. 90-28 CC -12(d) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-28 awarding the CC -300 bid for the purchase of 19 pad -mounted transformers to the bidders whose proposals and equipment met all Electric Utility Department specifications, and whose transformers yielded the lowest overal life -cycle costs: Westinghouse Utilities, Concord: 5 ea. 37.5KVA Single-phase $ 6,215.63 2 ea. 50KVA Single-phase 3,006.88 6 ea. 100KVA Single-phase 11,188.13 1 ea. 150KVA Three-phase 4,749.38 3 ea. 300KVA Three-phase 18,423.75 Total $43,583.77 Cooper Power Systems, Burlingame: 2 ea. 112.5KVA Three-phase $ 7,945.38 On January 17, 1990, the City Council approved specifications and authorized advertisement for bids. Bids were opened on February 20, 1990. A.summary of the results of the bid and of the evaluation are shown on the following page: 7 � Tr 7 EA 37.5Y.VA, CONV, 1201240V $5,414.25/ $7,846.56/ $5,183.94/ SUMMARY $10,162.16/ $13,648.25 o $13,849.94 $14,077.43 $15,1118.16 BIDS RECEIVED*/LIFE. CYCLE COSTS $5,227.50/ $5,323.12/ $5,331.67/ $11,533.13 413,361.25 $12,643.50 POLEMODUTED TRANSFORMERS $12,087.67 6 EA 50Y,VA, CONV, 277V $6,496.13/ $6,368.63/ $4,360.50/ $5,374.13/ $7,527.86/ $141296_13 810 OPENING FEBRUARY 20, 1990 $15,628.50 $14,398.13 $24,615.86 3 EA 75Y,VA, CONV, 277V $5,227.50/ $4,959.75/ $4,041.75/ $3,946.13/ $4,622.13/ $10,297.50 $11,445.75 ro $9,640.13 $10,196.13 COOPER POWER WESTINGHOUSE CEN. MOLONEY WEST. STATES GEN'L ELECT, n BURLINGAME CONCORD ARKANSAS PORTLAND EMERYVILLE 3 TRANSFORMER DESCRIPTION ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ (1) (2) (3) 3 EA 15KVA CP, 120/240V $1,906.13/ $2,639.25/ $1,494.94/ $1,159.50/ $2.780.71/ $3,142.13 $4,343.25 $3,534.94 $3,589.50 $3,818.71 8 EA 25Y.VA CP, 120/240V $5,304.00/ $1,352.50/ $4,836.50/ $5.134.00/ $8.478.41/ � $12,840.00 $14,088.50 $13,188.50 $13,646.00 $13,534.41 0 17 EA 37.5Y.VA, CP, 12.01240V $15,136.38/ $20,464.81/ $13,908.13/ $11,556.75/ $26.56.71/ $36,556.38 $40,490.111 $35,906.13 $37,106.75 $39,4ZZ.11 10 EA 50Y,VA, CP, 1201240V $11,326.25/ $12,537.50/ $8,298.13/ $11,241.25/ $15,5311.99/ $26,346.25 $28,437.50 $29,138.13 $26,181.25 $27,510.99 2 EA 75KVA, CP, 120/240V $3,752.75/ $3,920.63/ $3,512.63/ $3,519.00/ $3,464.35/ $7,664.75 $8,384.63 $1416_63 $7,495.00 $7,524.35 4 EA 15Y.VA, CONY, 120/240V $2,256.75/ $2,141.25/ $1,802.00/ $2,023.00/ $3,423.80/ $4224.75 $4,949.25 $4,442.00 $4,399.00 $4,727.80 3 EA 25Y,VA, CONY, 120/240V $1,762.69/ $2,760.38/ $1,679.81/ $2,180.25/ $2,973.30/ $41_,450269 $5,190.38 $4,679.81 $4,628.25 $4,755.30 7 EA 37.5Y.VA, CONV, 1201240V $5,414.25/ $7,846.56/ $5,183.94/ $6,433.43/ $10,162.16/ $13,648.25 $15,602..56 $13,849.94 $14,077.43 $15,1118.16 6 EA 37.5Y,VA, CONV, 277V $5,221.13/ $6,821.25/ $5,227.50/ $5,323.12/ $5,331.67/ $11,533.13 413,361.25 $12,643.50 $11,563.12 $12,087.67 6 EA 50Y,VA, CONV, 277V $6,496.13/ $6,368.63/ $4,360.50/ $5,374.13/ $7,527.86/ $141296_13 $15,668.63 $15,628.50 $14,398.13 $24,615.86 3 EA 75Y,VA, CONV, 277V $5,227.50/ $4,959.75/ $4,041.75/ $3,946.13/ $4,622.13/ $10,297.50 $11,445.75 $10,671.75 $9,640.13 $10,196.13 FOOTNOTES: * BIDS RECEIVED ARE TOTAL BID PRICES FOR EACH SIZE, TAXES INCLUDED, DELIVERED (1) CENTRAL MOLONEY DISQUALIFIED DUE TO LACY. OF SERVICE FACILITIES 141TIlIN 200 MILES OF LODI. (2) WESTFPN STATES' PROPOSAL FAILED TO PROVIDE TEST DATA AT OR BEFORE TIME OF SIIII'I•IENT OF TRANSFORMERS; PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE PROPOSED DIFFERED FROM SPECIFICATIONS. (3 GENERAL ELECTRIC'S PROPOSAL CONTAINED LOSS EVALUATION CLAUSES WHICH DIFFERED FROM SPECIFICATIONS. GD 294 Continued March 7, 1990 Transformer proposals are evaluated by combining estimated costs of losses during operation with the bid price to yield an estimated total life -cycle cost. Bidders proposing equipment which have the lowest life -cycle cost while meeting specifications are recommended to be awarded the bid. Funding for this purchase is available in the Electric Utility Department's Operating Fund. BIDS REJECTED FOR NO. 2, AND NO. 2/0, AND 750 KCM PRIMARY UNDERGROUND CONDUCTOR CC -12(b) The City Council rejected the bids for #2AWG, #2/OAWG, and #750KCM 15KV Underground Cable, and authorized re -opening of the bidding process. On January 16, 1990, bids for four sizes of Primary Underground Conductor were opened and read, and on February 7, 1990, the City Council awarded the bid for #1000KCN Conductor to Canada Wire. The other three sizes, #2AWG, #2/OAWG, and #750KCM, were not awarded at that time due to bid irregularities and failure of some vendors to meet specifications. Since only one bidder met specifications, and was not the low bidder, it is recommended that all bids be rejected, and the bidding process for these three sizes be reopened. NEW CLASS SPECIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGE APPROVED FOR SENIOR PROGRAMMER/ANALYST RESOLUTION NO. 90-29 CC -34 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-29 approving CC -300 Class Specifications and salary range as set forth below for Senior Programmer/Analyst. In the Finance Department's 89-90 budget, City Council's authorization was granted to add a programmer/analyst classification. A classification study was completed to establish the appropriate allocation; the study concluded that the Data Processing Division would be best served by adding an experienced, skilled programmer.. The new class specification, Senior Programmer/Analyst, salary range $2659.36 - $3232.47, occupational code 120, assigned to the mid -management group, was submitted for Council approval. Continued March 7, 1990 295 i The Finance Director and Data Processing Manager concur with this new classification and salary range. ITEM REMOVED FROM AGENDA Agenda item E-12 - "Class Specifications and salary range for Lead Equipment Mechanic" was removed from the agenda. CLASS SPECIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGE FOR SENIOR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN APPROVED RESOLUTION NO. 90-31 CC -34 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-31 approving CC -300 Class Specifications and salary range as set forth below for Senior Engineering Technician: The City Council was advised that a classification study was completed to establish the appropriate allocation; the study concluded that this position should be.reciassified to Senior Engineering Technician. This change will assist the Traffic Section in carrying out increased traffic engineering activities. This new classification is assigned to the General Services Unit, occupational code 161, $2242.98 - $2726.35. The Public Works Director concurs with this new classification and salary range. AGREEMENT WITH NIETSCHKE REAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FOR MANAGEMENT OF CITY PROPERTY AT 303 WEST ELM STREET APPROVED CC -27(a) The City Council approved an agreement with Neitschke Real Estate and Property Management for management of City property at 303 West Elm Street and authorized the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. The City Council was advised that requests for Proposals were sent out to eight property management firms. Six responded by attending a tour of the facility; completed proposals were received from three property management firms. National Real Estate Company Property Management submitted the best proposal, but it was withdrawn later when the 10 Z96 Continued March 7, 1990 Property Manager handling the proposal left the firm to start her own business. A new Property Management Proposal was submitted by Dee Nietschke Real Estate and Property Management for 8% of the gross collected monthly rent. The monthly rent is anticipated to be approximately $1,200.00, and the monthly management fee about $96.00. The contract is renewable on a yearly basis and the City will renew the contract if the service received is satisfactory. Request for approval includes authorization to renew the proposal at that time. The Property Management Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney. JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC AGENCIES FOR PARTICIPATION IN DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT APPROVED CC -154 The City Council approved entering into a joint powers CC -90 agreement with the Central Valley Wastewater Managers Association to participate in an analysis of the State Water Quality Management Plan and the State's present NPDES Standard Provisions and authorized the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. The City Council was advised that at the October 26, 1989 meeting of the Central Valley Wastewater Managers Association (CVWMA), the attached proposal from Piper and Marbury was submitted for review. The proposal addresses the review and analysis of the State Water Quality Management Plan and the present NPDES Standard Provisions. It would also include the development of a model NPDES permit to be used as guidance in developing discharge requirements. The cost of the proposal is estimated to be $55,000.00 and would be shared proportionally by members of CVWMA based on their total flow for a twelve month period. Each member's share would be a percentage of the combined flows of all participating members. (Cities of Lodi, Stockton, Tracy, Merced, Manteca and Oakdale along with Sacramento Regional). The City of Lodi's share based on a twelve month flow of 2,400 million gallons would be approximately $2,000. The cost for this proposal is nominal when compared to the potential $50,000.00 per day which could be assessed by the Regional Board for violations. Lodi itself could be liable 11 Continued March 7, 1990 297 to a suit brought by a citizen's group based on improper and vague limitations pointed out in the issues section of the proposal. The use of floc; in our present discharge requirement is one such issue which could result in a penalty for the City of Lodi as it presently exceeds the daily maximum flow of 5.8 million gallons. If taken to court by a citizen's group it would be forseeable a judgement against the City of Lodi could be obtained. Receiving water impacts such as "undesirable discoloration", "objectionable growths" and "causing a nuisance" are examples of vague limitations presently included in the City's discharge requirements which could be difficult for Lodi to develop a defense should a citizen's group wish to pursue action against the City. In addition Piper and Marbury suggest permittees should not readily accept permit limits which are incorrect and unsupportable. If future, more restrictive discharge requirements were to be based on outdated or overly conservative permit procedures there could be a cost saving in keeping them at present levels. For example if Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Suspended Solids (SS) limits were not lowered, there could be savings in power and future design requirements. Other areas which could be affected are disinfection and sludge disposal. Bacause this is a timely topic in regard to Lodi's impending discharge permit renewal and because Lodi could be liable to financial penalties, it is recommended Lodi participate. CONTRACT FOR FIREWORKS FOR 4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS DISPLAY APPROVED CC -90 The City Council approved the Parks and Recreation Department Fourth of July Fireworks Program and concurred with the entering into a contract with Zambelli International Fireworks Manufacturing Company, Inc. for the 1990 show at a cost of $7,466.25. 12 L9 S Continued March 7, 1990 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF APPLICATION FOR CALIFORNIA SAFE DRINKING WATER BONDLAW FUNDS RESOLUTION NO. 90-32 CC -175 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-32 entitled, "A CC -300 Resolution of the Lodi City Council Authorizing the Execution of Application for California Safe Drinking Water Bond Law Funds." The City Council was advised that this is a first step requirement to submit a loan application to DWR by March 15, 1990. The purpose is to secure a low interest loan (3.14%) to address the City's DBCP problem. As of this writing a firm amount the City will request is not known. Estimates are from $4,000,000 to $6,000,000. A maximum loan amount is $5,000,000. WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM FOR 1990 INITIATED RESOLUTION NO. 90-33 CC -24(b) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-33 - "Resolution CC -300 Declaring Weeds a Public Nuisance and Initiating Abatement Proceedings on Various Parcels Throughout the City", and set the matter for public hearing at the regular City Council meeting of April 18, 1990. Throughout the spring and summer months, the Lodi Fire Department has an ongoing program of contacting property owners to remove weeds on property they own within the City. Follow-up contacts are made in an effort to have the weeds removed at the earliest possible date. The City Clerk's Office received a list from the Fire Department of 440 parcels within the City that are not in compliance with weed abatement requirements. It was recommended that Council adopt Resolution No. 90-33 - Resolution Declaring Weeds a Public Nuisance and Initiating Abatement Proceedings, as provided under the State of California Government Code Section 39501, et seq. The subject resolution also calls for a public hearing to be Feld concerning this matter at the regular City Council meeting of April 18, 1990. 13 Continued March 7, 1990 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN 1989 ANNUAL REPORT RECEIVED FOR FILING 299 CC -55 The City Council received for filing the Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin 1989 Annual Report. Section 34328 of the State of California Health and Safety Code provides that, at least once a year, an authority shall file with the Clerk of the respective city and with the Department of Housing and Community Development a report of its activities for the preceding year. The report shall contain information adequate to determine that the requirements of Section 34312.3 have been met for any activity undertaken pursuant to that section. COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS The following comments were received under the "Comments by City Council Members" segment of the agenda: MAYOR PLANTS TREE FOR ARBOR DAY Mayor Snider reported that he had joined the Lodi Garden Club and the Junior Garden Club in planting a Valley Oak Tree at Hutchins Street Square in honor of Arbor Day. STAFF DIRECTED TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBILITY OF REBUILDING THE HALE PARK FACILITY WITH HUD FUNDS CC -57 Mayor Snider, following a recent conversation with the Under-Secretary of HUD requested that Community Development Director Schroeder work with him to seek funding for the rebuilding of the Hale Park facility. REMINDER OF NEXT MEETING REGARDING THE GENERAL PLAN REVIEW; CC -35(a) Mayor Snider announced that the final joint meeting of the Planning Commission and the Lodi City Council pertaining to the Draft General Plan Update review will beheld on Wednesday, March 14, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. 14 300 Continued March 7, 1990 COMPLAINTS RECEIVED REGARDING PARKING ON PLEASANT STREET CC -16 CC -45(a) CC -45(i) COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC ON NON AGENDA ITEMS REQUEST RECEIVED FOUR 4 -WAY STOP SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTION OF EDEN STREET AND GARFIELD STREET Mayor Snider requested that Public Works Director P.onsko look into complaints that people working in the downtown area are parking all day on Pleasant Street. The following comments were received under the "Comrqents by the public on non -agenda items" segment of the agenda: CC -16 Pastor David S. Hill, Grace Presbyterian Church indicated CC -48(h) that he feels there is a need for 4 -way stop signs at the intersection of Eden Street and Garfield Street. The matter was referred to staff. PUBLIC HEARINGS Notice thereof having been published according to law, an affidavit of which publication is on file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor Snider called for the Public Hearing to consider residential permit parking in the Lodi High School vicinity. RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING IN THE LODI HIGH SCHOOL VICINITY RESOLUTION NO. 90-30 CC -48(1) The City Council was advised that currently, parking in the CC -300 residential area east of Lodi High School is prohibited between certain hours. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., school days only, on Walnut Street between Ham Lane and Pacific Avenue, Oak Street between Ham Lane and Pacific Avenue, Wellington Way, and the east side of Pacific Avenue from Walnut Street to 70 feet south of Elm Street. Parking is also prohibited between the hours of 6:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., school days only, on the east side of Pacific Avenue from Elm Street to 70 feet south of Elm, and the west side of Pacific Avenue from Elm Street to 100 feet south of Elm Street. These restrictions are currently enforced by the Police Department. They were imposed to reduce high school parking and other problems in the residential area. However, they also restrict use by residents. 15 301 Continued March 7, 1990 Two parking alternatives for the residential neighborhood were described as set forth. Alternative A - Residential permits provided with no modification to existing parking limits ("No Parking" 9 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., school days only). The existing signs will need to be modified. The advantage to this alternative is that non-resident parking is allowed, except as restricted. The disadvantage is that the area could be enforced only during the posted restricted hours. This alternative is recommended by the Police Department. Alternative B - Residential permits provided with modified limits to "no parking" any time or during certain time frame coinciding with school hours, school days only. The advantage to this alternative is that the area can be enforced at any time. The disadvantage is that non-resident parking is prohibited for a longer period, except on non -school days. Both alternatives will have similar costs of installing new signs and purchasing and selling permits. The permit program would affect the frontage of 61 residential lots. All of the lots are single-family except for 6 duplex lots and 4 apartment lots located on or adjacent to Walnut Street (total of 97 units). Currently, the permits for the residential parking program in the vicinity of Pacific Coast Producers (Zone A) costs the residents $3.00 per permit for a 3 -year period. The City Council may want to re-evaluate this fee. It will cost approximately $1,000 to install new signs for residential permit use. According to the Finance Department, 500 parking stickers will cost approximately $250 or $325 for 1,000 stickers. This does not include administration costs such as recordkeeping or distribution. Based on these costs, a permit price of $13 per unit or $6.50 per permit would recover the initial cost. The Finance Department now enforces the Pacific Coast Producers residential permit parking and they have indicated they do not have staff to enforce the Lodi High School area without reducing enforcement in other areas. The two Parking Enforcement Assistants enforce the downtown area, Pacific Coast Producers, and surrounding off-street handicapped parking stalls. It appears that the Lodi High School area could continue to be enforced by the Police Department with very little additional time. The following persons addressed the City Council regarding the matter: Speaking against making any changes in the area were: 16 302 Continued March 7, 1990 1. Mrs. Marge Elson, 290 Wellington Way, Lodi 2. Mr. Carl Lyons, 15 N. Wellington Way, Lodi 3. Mr. Leroy Hoffman, 19 N. Wellington Way, Lodi Speaking in support of Alternate A set forth above were: 1. Robert W. Russell, 1344 W. Walnut Street, Lodi 2. John DeHerrera, 1333 W. Walnut, Lodi 3. Anthony Stringham, 38 Wellington, Lodi 4. Carol Ellis, 1335 W. Walnut, Lodi 5. Wayne Scheideman, 1321 W. Oak, Lodi 6. Kathy Lyons, 15 N. Wellington, Lodi 7. Vic Cooper, 1350 W. Walnut, Lodi 8. Robin De Herrera, 1333 W. Walnut, Lodi There being no other persons in the audience wishing to speak on the matter, the public portion of the hearing was closed. On motion of Council Member Olson, Hinchman second, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-30 amending the Traffic Resolution and thereby approving residential permits provided with no modifications to existing parking limits (No Parking" 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., school days only). The permits will cost residents $3.00 per permit for a 3 -year period. RECESS Mayor Snider declared a five-minute recess and the meeting reconvened at approximately 9:10 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION City Manager Peterson presented the following Planning REPORT Commission Report of the Planning Commission Meeting of February 26, 1990: CC -35 The Planning Commission - ITEMS OF INTEREST 17 303 Continued March 7, 1990 1. Continued until 7:30 p.m., Monday, March 12, 1990 the requests of Terry Piazza, Baumbach & Piazza, Consulting Engineers, on behalf of J. Jeffrey Kirst, et al; a. for approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map of Almondwood Place, a 2.5 acre, 26 -lot residential subdivision proposed for 428, 440 and 448 Almond Drive, in an area zoned R -MD, Medium Density Multiple Family; and b. to certify the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation on the above project. 2. Continued until 7:30 p.m., Monday, March 12, 1990 the request of Leon Croce for a Use Permit to replace a single -wide mobile home with a double -wide mobile home at 1800 South Cherokee Lane in an area zoned C-2, General Commercial. 3. Conditionally approved the request of Olen McCombs for a Use Permit to add an attached "Granny Unit" to an existing single-family dwelling at 205 East Flora Street, in an area zoned R-1*, Single -Family Residential - Eastside. 4. Accepted the withdrawal of the request of Philip Monte for a Use Permit to conduct an automobile dismantling operation at 860 East Pine Street, in an area zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial. The Community Development Director determined that the applicant would not be operating a dismantling yard even thouch he needed a Dismantler's License from the State of California. 5. Extended for one year the Use Permit of Holz Rubber Company for a temporary portable office at 1129 South Sacramento Street, in an area zoned M-2, Heavy Industrial and indicated that next year it must be removed or made permanent. 6. Cancelled Use Permit No. U-89-05 of Mataga Olds -Buick, Inc. for a travel trailer as a sales office at 880 South Beckman Road in an area zoned M-1, Light Industrial because the travel trailer was no longer on site. 7. Denied the request of Mataga Olds -Buick, Inc. to extend Use Permit U-87-29 for a temporary mobile office at 880 South Beckman Road in an area zoned M-1, Light Industrial because the temporary structure was no longer in use. 304 y Continued March 7, 1990 8. Received a letter from Gary G. Greider requesting amendment of Municipal Code Section 17.57.160, Accessory Buildinqs. 9. Set the following requests of Kristen I. Cromwell and Del G. Smith for Public Hearing at 7:30 p.m., Monday, March 12, 1990: COMMUNICATIONS (CITY CLERK) CLAIMS CC -4(c) a. to amend the Land Use Element of the Lodi General Plan by redesignating the south 2.66 acres of the parcel located at J693 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-20 and 29) from Agricultural to Neighborhood Commercial. b. to prezone the south 2.66 acres of the parcel at J693 East Turner Road (APN 015-230-20 and 29) from GA -1, Agricultural, San Joaquin County to C-1, Neighborhood Commercial. C. to certify the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Community Development Director as adequate environmental documentation of the above projects. On recommendation of the City's Contract Administrator, Insurance Consulting Association, Inc., and the City Attorney, on motion of Council Member Reid, Olson second, the City Council rejected the following claims: a) Ralph Hickingbottom, Date of loss, October 2, 1989 b) Ann Michelle Young, Date of loss, August 2, 1989 REQUEST FROM MARY, NEWFIELD TO CONDUCT A CONSIGNMENT BUSINESS AT 107 AND 109 NORTH SCHOOL STREET CC -35(a) The City Council received a letter from Mark Newfield proposing to conduct a consignment business at 107 and 109 North School Street in which local people can liquidate their unwanted articles. The matter was referred to the Planning Commission.. 19 Continued March 7. 1990 STOCKTON EAST WATER DISTRICT SEEKING SUPPORT RE GROUNDWATER, QUALITY STUDY CC -6 Following receipt of a letter from the Stockton East Water District seeking support for San Joaquin County General Fund participation in the Groundwater Quality Study, Assistant City Engineer Richard Prima gave a brief report regarding the matter. LETTER REGARDING ORDINANCE NO. 1474 RECEIVED CC -16 The City Council received a letter from Ray G. Davenport requesting reconsideration of Ordinance No. 1474, entitled, "An Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Amending Chapter 12 of the Lodi Municipal Code by Adding a Section Establishing Procedures for the Disposal of Surplus Property by the City Manager." A statement regarding the letter and certain implications contained therein was made by City Manager Peterson. MAINTAINING THE NATURAL STATUS OF THE RIPARIAN WETLANDS ON THE NORTH BANK OF THE MOKELUMNE RIVER URGED CC -27(a) The City Council received letters from E. J. McCaughna and Robert H. Peters supporting the Mokelumne River Conservation Alliance in their effort to maintain the natural status of the riparian wetlands on the north bank of the Mokelumne River between Highway 99 and Woodbridge. AMENDMENT OF LODI MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 17.57.160 URGED CC -16 Upon receipt of a letter from Gary G. Greider urging CC -53(b) amendment of Lodi Municipal Code Section 17.57.160 to include a five foot easement between property lines for accessory buildings, the City Council was advised that this matter will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. REGULAR CALENDAR 'o 2 305 305. Continued March 7, 1990 CITY OF LODI PERSONNEL BOARD OF REVIEW ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCEDURES ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 90-34 CC -34 City Attorney McNatt advised the City Council that CC -300 following a series of meetings the Lodi Personnel Board of Review had unanimously recommended adopting Administrative Hearing Procedures which were presented for the City Council's review. Personnel Board of Review Chairman - Marcelo Lopez addressed the City Council regarding the matter and responded to questions. Following discussion, on motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Olson second, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-34 entitled, "A Resolution of the Lodi City Council Approving the City of Lodi Personnel Board of Review Administrative Hearing Procedures." AMENDMENTS TO LODI MUNICIPAL CODE - ARTICLE II PERSONNEL BOARD OF REVIEW ORDINANCE NO. 1477 ADOPTED CC -6 The City Council was advised that the Lodi Personnel Board CC -34 of Review had recommended amendments to Article II of the CC -149 Lodi Municipal Code, entitled, "Personnel Board of Review". A copy of the proposed amended ordinance was presented for City Council's review. Following discussion with questions being directed to the City Attorney and Personnel Board of Review Chairman Lopez, the City Council, on motion of Council Member Pinkerton, Olson second, introduced Ordinance No. 1477, entitled, "An Ordinance of the Lodi City Council Repealing and Reenacting Lodi Municipal Code Sections 2.44.070 Through 2.44.110 Relating to the Personnel Board of Review". The motion carried by unanimous vote of the City Council. REPORT ON GRAFFITI IN THE CITY OF LODI CC -6 City Manager Peterson advised the City Council that at the CC -16 regular City Council meeting of January 3, 1990, the City Council heard a presentation by a citizen, Mr. Arthur Price, regarding the extent of graffiti in various locations throughout the City. 21 307 Continued March 7, 1990 Since that date staff has had a number of conversations with Mr. Price concerning this topic. Police Sergeant Frank Grenko, who is in charge of the Police Department's Gang Unit presented a video tape which graphically illustrated the extend of the problem. Sergeant Grenko responded to questions regarding the matter. Various alternatives to assist in resolving the problem were discussed. Mr. Arthur- Price was in the audience and addressed the City Council regarding the problem and possible solutions. Following .discussion, the Mayor directed staff to proceed with alta native methods to resolve the problem. N METHODS OF COLLECTION OF SIDEWALK REPAIR COSTS RESOLUTION NO. 90-35 CC -45(e) The City Council was reminded that at its meeting of CC -300 February 21, it asked what methods were available for the collection of costs of the maintenance of the sidewalks. The Streets and Highways Code delineates several alternatives if the bill for the replacement or repair of the sidewalk is not paid within five days of the billing. Those alternatives are listed below. 1. File a Notice of Lien oi; the property (Streets and Highways Code §5627) This lien is filed with the County Recorder and remains on the property until it is paid or until the City files an action to foreclose the lien in the manner and under the same procedures as that which delinquent bonds are foreclosed. With this alternative, it could be years before the City collects. 2. Order the Notice of Lien to be turned over to the Tax Collector (Streets and Highways Code §5628) The Tax Collector would collect the cost with the next year's property tax and, if it is not paid with next year's taxes, it would become delinquent and be handled the same as other delinauent property taxes. This is the method used for the street light WA 308 Continued March 7, 1990 assessment districts and installation of sidewalks. City Attorney McNatt addressed the Council as to the appropriate process for setting interest. 3. Determine that the cost can be paid in annual installments not to exceed five years (Streets and Highways Code §5628.1) The legislative body may determine that annual installment payments, not to exceed five, may be made. These payments would include interest on the unpaid balance. The interest rate must be determined by the legislative body but not to exceed the rate permitted by bonds under §53531 of the Government Code. The rate in the Government Code is "12 percent per year... unless some higher rate is permitted by law". It was staff's recommendation that the City turn the Notice of Lien over to the Tax Collector to be collected with the next year's property tax if the property owner has not paid within the required time. This method would be consistent with the way the City now collects for street lighting districts and installation of sidewalk. It should be pointed out that it would take considerable Finance Department staff time to administer an installment payment program. Under the Sidewalk Repair Policy, there is a potential over the next few years of more than 150 areas within the City where sidewalks must be replaced by the property owner. Administering the payment program would require extensive recordkeeping to bill the property owners at the proper time, compute and keep track of interest, etc. If the owner defaults, the City would have to start the lien process from the beginning. On motion of Council Member Olson, Reid second, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-35 determining the method of collection of sidewalk repair costs for 315 Sierra Vista Place, 1418 South School Street and 900 North Mills Avenue as follows: Alternative 2 - Order the Notice of Lien to be turned over to the Tax Collector (Streets and Highways Code Section 5628). The Tax Collector would collect the cost with the next year's property tax, and if it is not paid with next year's taxes, it would become delinquent and be handled the same as .other delinquent property taxes. 23 Continued March 7, 1990 SURPLUS CITY TRUCK: DONATION! TO ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP 309 CC -6 City Attorney McNatt introduced the matter advising the CC -20 City Council that The City is presently offering for sale CC -47 to the public certain used vehicles no longer required for City service. The California Striped Bass Club, a private non-profit group has made inquiry concerning one of the vehicles, a Ford flatbed truck. It is apparently the Club's desire to circumvent the public sale bid process and get the truck so that it may be presented to the United Anglers Chapter of Casa Grande High School in Petaluma. This latter group is carrying on a program to clean up Adobe Creek near Petaluma, and to reintroduce steelhead trout to the waterway. It is my understanding that the truck would be used to transport fish from the hatchery to the creek. I am still not sure if the Striped Bass Club wants the City to donate the truck, offer it at a reduced price, or simply agree to sell it for the indicated minimum bid ($1500) without going through the competitive bid sale procedures. The question presented was whether this would violate the legal prohibitions against making a gift of public funds or property. ANALYSIS: Article 16, Section 6 of the California Constitution prohibits making a gift of public funds or property to individuals or organizations. An exception to this rule is the "public purpose" situation. In such cases, where the gift or use serves a "public purpose" (as determined by the legislative body responsible for the funds or property) it is permissible and does not violate constitutional prohibitions. This law has been interpreted in ways which sometimes appear inconsistent to the casual observer. For example, a grant by a county for relief of victims of a flood was declared void under this Article (Patty v. Colgan 31 P.1133) but cities or counties may channel federal assistance to individuals under the Federal Disaster Relief Act (62 Ops. AG 562). This illustrates the problem of determining what is a true "public purpose". The courts have said they will not overturn the determination of a legislative body in such matters "... so long as that determination has a reasonable basis" (San Francisco Board of Supervisors v. Dolan (1975) 119 Cal.Rptr. 347 24 L 310 Continued March 7, 1990 The cases found suggest that a "reasonable basis" will be found if the public purpose served is one the public agency could have acted upon directly. As stated by the California Attorney General, the test is "... whether the money or property is to be used for a public or private purpose, and if it is for a public purpose within the jurisdiction of the appropriating board or body, it is not a gift" (28 Ops. AG 282). Using this language 'as a guide, the question in our situation then becomes whether the City of Lodi could spend money on the cleanup of a waterway and reintroduction of game fish, since that is the purpose for which the surplus truck is sought. The City Attorney believes the City could do so legally. It is my understanding that Lodi has in the past participated in both clean water and game fish protection programs, with no questions that these are "public purposes." It is also noted that the California Department of Fish and Game and Sonoma County have contributed more than $133,000 toward this project for which the truck would be used . WiMMICi'M Although the subject site (Adobe Creek) is not physically within the limits of Lodi, I believe that the City could legally assist or cooperate with the organization working on the project. This appears to fit the definition of "public purpose" as defined by the courts. In considering the request, however, the Council may wish to weigh the precedent which would be set by an affirmative vote. Following discussion, on motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Reid second, the City Council declared a Ford flatbed truck as surplus property and donated it to the United Anglers of Casa Grande High School to be used for their project to rebuild their fish hatchery. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Olson, Pinkerton, and Reid Noes: Council Members - Snider (Mayor) Absent: Council Members - None 25 Continued March 7, 1990 FEES FOR RENTAL OF HUTCHINS STREET SQUARE FACILITIES ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 90-36 CC -56 CC -300 311 The City Council was advised that as the Square continues to develop, facilities are available for the comi+uni ty to rent for private activities. Rental fees for the multipurpose room were originally set in 1982 and have remained constant. Since that date, the room has been improved including a hardwood floor, new ceiling, paint, air conditioning and. blinds. Staff is recommending an increase of $100.00 per event to offset improvements and maintenance expenses. The other assessments are new rates which are comparable to other similar facilities in the north county. At this time, weekends at Hutchins Street Square are completely booked for the next six months. Most rentals are dates calendared six months to one year in advance. On motion of Council Member Reid, Hinchman second, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-36 approving new rental fees for the Hutchins Street Square Facilities as set forth below: NORTH HALL (old boys' gym) Capacity: Dining 400 Dancing 800 Any 10 -hour period $600.00 Kitchen 50.00 Additional, per hour 60.00 Deposit 100.00 FINE ARTS THEATRE Capacity: Theatre Seating 90 Any 10 -hour period $150.00 Piano 25.00 Additional, per hour 15.00 Deposit 100.00 011 312 Continued March 7, 1990 MULTIPURPOSE BUILDING (cafeteria) Capacity: Dining 250 Dancing 350 Any 10 -hour period Kitchen Additional, per hour Deposit ALSO AVAILABLE 6 X 8' Riser with skirt, 24" high 10 X 10' Canopy, yellow & white stripe AGREEMENT FOR TEST WELL, MONITORING WELL, AND MOKELUMNE RIVER MONITORING PROCEDURES APPROVED $200.00 75.00 20.00 100.00 $ 20.00 25.00 CC -90 The City Council was reminded that the City has entered CC -183 into an agreement with the engineering firm of Brown and Caldwell to evaluate and do preliminary engineering for treatment of DBCP contaminated wells. However, this is only a portion of the overall solution. Since the City must drill new wells to accommodate present and future growth, the purpose of this additional work is to increase our chances of drilling new wells that will meet the DBCP MCL for the life of the well. Drilling new replacement wells may be a less expensive alternate than treatment. Successfully doing this, however, requires testing, monitoring and engineering analysis beyond the scope of our past practices. The direction and scope of this work will depend on results of initial cost estimates and trial test wells. Therefore, this agreement differs from previous agreements in that a detailed description of work is not included. Instead, the agreement sets general terms and conditions. Subsequent "Task Orders" will define specific work to be done by Brown and Caldwell. These would be approved by staff under this general approval. The City will also be performing a major part of the work in arranging for drilling sites, preliminary well site design, laboratory work, and project coordination and review. The tasks as presently envisioned and a rough cost are as follows: Task/Description Approximate Cost 1. Evaluation and selection of test well procedures - $ 6,000 This will include cost estimate and preliminary 27 Continued March 7, 1990 designs to determine the appropriate procedures for subsequent work. Task/Description Approximate Cost 2. Test well drilling evaluation, analysis and $11,000 recommendations for additional work - Brown and Caldwell along with a City .engineer will participate in drilling approximately three test wells and define subsequent work. 3. Mokelumne River Monitoring Plan - Brown and Caldwell $ 4,000 will prepare a recommendation on testing Mokelumne River water in relation to production well water quality. 4. Monitoring well system - Based on results of above $ 5,000 work, Brown & Caldwell will recommend a system or plan for monitoring Lodi's water supply. 313 This work will be accomplished this spring in conjunction with other City and Brown and Caldwell work on the DBCP issue. Given the undefined nature of the work, formal deadlines could not be established at this time. Both Brown and Caldwell and City staff are anxious to proceed on the project; however, coordination with drillers and the amount of City involvement would make any specific deadlines unrealistic even if a scope of work was defined in more detail. A large part of this work will involve the use of qualified drillers. This cost, not shown above, could range from $20,000 to $60,000 for the anticipated three test wells depending on a number of factors. Brown and Caldwell needs to have control over and be able to schedule and direct the drillers. While Brown and Caldwell could arrange for a drilling subcontractor, this arrangement would increase the cost to the City by 15%. Provided they could act as our agent, Brown and Caldwell is willins to let the City directly hire the driller they recommend. While this would save the City a considerable amount of money, it also requires a waiver of the formal bidding procedure which staff recommends. Funds for this work are already included in the Water Capital Improvement Program. On motion of Mayor Pro Tempore Hinchman, Olson second, the City- Council approved a Task Order Agreement with Brown and Caldwell for engineering services to develop test well, monitoring well and Mokelumne River monitoring procedures, and waive formal bidding procedures for test/monitoring well drilling. 28 314*' Continued March 7, 1990 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the _. City Council, Mayor Snider adjourned the meeting at approximately 11:10 p.m. ATTEST: A ice M. Reictie 'j� City Clerk 29