Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - December 3, 2014 C-5AGENDA ITEM Cin 5 AM CITY OF LODI COUNCIL COMMUNICATION TM AGENDA TITLE: Approve Responses to the 2013-2014 Grand Jury Report Regarding Case No. 1613 MEETING DATE: December 3, 2014 PREPARED BY: City Manager RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve responses to the 2013-2014 Grand Jury report regarding Case No. 1613. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City received a Grand Jury report in June regarding City Council responses to Grand Jury requests. The City Clerk's office interpreted the report to require no response from the City. However, the secretary to the Grand Jury believes one is due. That misunderstanding led to this report being late. Once staff clarified the matter, they immediately prepared and agendized this draft response. Staff has carefully reviewed Grand Jury Case No. 1613 and offers the attached response. Upon City Council approval, the responses will be finalized and submitted to the presiding judge of San Joaquin County Superior Court by December 4, 2014. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. FUNDING AVAILABLE: Not applicable. Attachment APPROVED: , City Manager CITY COUNCIL PHIL KATZAKIAN, Mayor LARRY D. HANSEN, Mayor Pro Tempore BOB JOHNSON JOANNE MOUNCE ALAN NAKANISHI December 3, 2014 CITY OF LODI CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET P.O. BOX 3006 LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 (209) 333-6700 / FAX (209) 333-6807 www.iodi.gov Hon. Lesley Holland, Presiding Judge San Joaquin County Superior Court P.O. Box 201022 Stockton, CA 95201 STEPHEN SCHWABAUER City Manager JENNIFER M. ROBISON City Clerk JANICE D. MAGDICH City Attorney RE: Follow -Up Report to the 2013-2014 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Case No. 1613 Dear Judge Holland: The City of Lodi has reviewed the follow-up report to the 2013-2014 San Joaquin County Grand Jury Case No. 1613, regarding City Council input on Grand Jury responses. The Council has seriously considered Grand Jury finding 2.1 and the accompanying Grand Jury recommendation applicable to the City of Lodi, discussed the same with its professional staff and pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05, submits its comments as set forth below. As required by Penal Code section 933(c), the Council's comments were approved at the Council's regularly scheduled meeting of December 3, 2014. Finding 2.1: Over the last four years, almost all responses by the County and the Cities were approved by unanimous votes after little or no discussion by the elected officials or the public. City Response: Lodi agrees with this finding in part and disagrees in part. Lodi agrees that the majority of its responses were approved unanimously. Lodi further agrees that there was little literal discussion about the approvals. However, focusing exclusively on literal discussion misapprehends the majority of the legislative process. Legislatures speak through majority assent towards a proposition. That proposition must necessarily be in written form. Each of Lodi's responses over the four-year period were fully reasoned and explained in staff reports and draft responses. Council, following review and consideration, adopted each of those reasoned responses. Recommendation 2.1: All legislative bodies publicly explain the reasons for its response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations prior to voting to approve their response. City Response: The City already implements this recommendation. The reasoning behind the response is fully detailed in the staff report to Council and letter responding to the Grand Jury. Both are published as part of the City's agenda in advance of the Council meeting and, following Council review and consideration, adopted by the Council. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions. Respectfully, Stephen Schwabauer City Manager cc: City Clerk City Attorney