Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - December 9, 1981 (59)REQUEST FOR REQUIRE- City Clerk Reimche apprised Council that a letter had MENT TO COMPLETE been received from Mr. Bill Stemler, 1200 tJ. Lodi Avenue INSTALLATION OF and Mr. Earl 11. Johnson 305 S. Sunset Drive, requesting SIDEWALKS ON EAST that Council require completion of installation of side - SIDE OF SOUTH SUN- walks on the east side of South Sunset Drive, south of SET DRIVE, SOUTH OF Lodi Avenue. Following Council discussion, with the LODI AVENUE tacit concurrence of the Council, this matter was referred to Staff. i 17 November 1981 Mr. Hears (slaves, City !tanager City Hall Lodi, California 95240 Dear Mr. (;laves; I refer you to a meeting which was held the later part of July 1954 at the hose of Mrs. H. B. Rencher. At this meeting Mw requirements were discussed regarding improvements which were to be made after South Sunset Drive was annexed to the City of Lodi. Your letter of 5 August 1954 indicated that the property owners did not want to form a Special Assessment District, but preferred to pay for the improvements in advance to the city. This also included installment of sidewalks at the coat of ench property owner. For some reason most of the property on the East side of Sunset Drive south of Lodi Avenue did not then and have not to this date fulfilled their agreement to in*tall sidewalks. All of the West Side of the street has sidewalk. I request that the City of Lodi implement procedures provided in the ordinances of the city to require completion of installation of sidewalks in the area on South Sunset Drive, south of Lodi Avenue. TI -Is will also, increase safety for pedestrians, because people walk in the street due to lack of the sidewalks on the east side of the street. V Ynset Dr. Lodi'if. 9524o I �-vo w ko4 / d JE C Qo, CITY COUNCIL JAMES A. MCCARTY. Mayor ROBERT C. MURPHY, Mayor Pro Tem RICHARD L. HUGHES WALTER KATNICH JAMES W. PINKERTON. If. 7) (7, CITY OF LODI CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 320 LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 (209) 3345634 December 11, 1981 Mr. Brill Stemler 1200 W. Lodi Avenue Lodi, CA 95240 Mr. Earl H. Johnson 305 S. Sunset Drive Lodi, CA 95240 Gentlemen: HENRY A CLAVES. If. City Manager ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk RONALD JAI. STEIN City Attorney Your November 17, 1981 letter requesting that the City of Lodi implement procedures provided in the Ordinances of the City to require completion of installation of sidewalks in the area on South Sunset Drive, south of Lodi Avenue was presented to the Lodi City Council at an adjourned regular meeting held December 9, 1981. Following discussion, the matter was referred to staff for review and recommendation. You will be apprised when staff has completed its report and the matter is brought back to the City Council. very truly yours, '7 1 , Alice M. Rebache City Clerk AR: dg 17 November 1981 Mr. Henry Claves, City Manager City Hall Lodi, Cali f orftia 95240 Dear Mr. (claves, There is before the City Council a petition to restrict parking on the west side of South Sunset Drive immediately south of Lodi venue. I wish to express my opposition to this proposal. Such action will only increase parking in front of my property which is immediately to the south of the proposed property to be restricted. The problems referred to in.the petition are not month in and month out conditions. We now have a condition that if you park in front of a certain parcel of property the owner immediately calls the police to protest. This requires that the police department must take time to check out the matter only to find that there is no illegality involved. Reduction of parking may increase the parking in front of this property which may require more time of a department with mor- important problems than parked cars in front of this persons property. If this parking restriction is imposed the property owner will be restricted from parking in front of his home on Sundet Drive. It certainly is not possible to park on Lodi Avenue. In fairness to the property owners immediately adjacent to the area proposed for restriction, I request that the proposed restrictions be denied. How IRp g t q, o e �er thin the fist four parcels i►f proper mme a al sou o Avenue ci ed the petition? Very,,tryly, 117 305et y S. SvDrive Lodi, cif. 9524o 17 November 1981 Mr. Henry Glaves, City Manager City Hall Lodi, California 95240 Dear Mr. Glaves, There is before the City Council a petition to restrict parking on the west side of South Sunset Drive immediately south of Lodi venue. I wish to express my opposition to this proposal. Such action will only increase parking in front of my property which is immediately to the south of the proposed property to be restricted. The problems referred to in -the petition are not month in and month out conditions. We now have a condition that if you park in front of a certain parcel of property the owner immedi"tely calls the police to protest. This requires that the police department must take time to check out the matter only to find that there is no illegality involved. Reduction of parking may increase the parking in front of this property which may require more time of a department with more important problems than parked cars in front of this persons property. If this parking restriction is imposed the property owner will be restricted from parking in front of his home on Sundet Drive. It certainly is not possible to park on Lodi Avenue. In fairness to the property owners immediately adjacent to the area proposed for restriction, I request that the proposed restrictions be denied. How %%(A tj ewoMer s Avenue the first four parcels if proper y mme is ely sou o venue signed the petition?' t 305 S.ret Drive Lodi, . 95240