The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - December 8, 1982 (59)41"syr.r. hi CITY COUNCIL MEETING S L-XEMBER ..1982'. UC APPLICATIONS City Clerk presented information which had been received on order granting rehearing for the purposes of further consideration re PG&E Docket No. ER80-219-002. The City Clerk presented a letter which had been received from PG&E Co. giving notice that on ttovenber 19, 1982, it filed an amendment to Application No.. 82-09-17 pertaining. to its Conservation Financing Adjustment. The Amendment asks for a mailer increase in gas rates than the original filing and for a decrease rather than an increase in electric rates. 3 RECEI nn PAC 13F I C C.3 L9 3 ,A.ND 3P 9 C C O 1d PANY' 2s t IP�Q�l�t13 77 0[ALE iTR[[T SAN fR�lp40Qp, CA�IFOR�TA OAlOi • (41i1 101.1!11 Fry.- �� DA UL a. IoM Y C *AWMW SOMA" swam v November 24, 1982 TO: THE STATE, COUNTY AND CITY OFFICIALS AND INTERESTED PARTIES PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (PGandE) hereby gives notice that on November 19, 1982, it filed an Amendment to Application No. 82-09-17 pertaining to its Conservation Financing Adjustment. The Amendment asks for a smaller increase in gas rates than the original filing, and for a decrease rather than an increase in electric rates. These changes are due to revised estimates of the revenue require= sent needed to support PGandE's 1983 Zero Interest Program of conservation financing. The rates proposed in the Amendment would decrease PGandE's electric revenues by approximately $2.42 million or about 0.06 percent (instead of an increase of approximately $3.05 million or about 0.075 percent oriinally pr sed) and increase gas revenues by approximately 13.76 million or about 0.37 percent (instead of an increase of approximately $38.73 million or about 1.04 percent) for a twelve month period beginning January.i, 1983. The increase in gas revenues will not raise PGandE's rate of return above the level last found just and reasonable by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). PGandE also gives notice that on November 19, 19821 it also filed an Amendment to Application No. 82-08-18 pertaining to its Residential Conservation Service Balancing Account. The Amend- ment asks for smaller increases in electric and gas rates than the original filing due to revised estimates of costs needed to support the Residential Conservation Service Program in 1983. The rates proposed by this Amendment would increase PGandE's electric revenues by approximately $1.1 million or about 0.027 percent (instead of an increase of approximately $1.41 million or about 0.035 percent as originally proposed) and increase gas revenues by approximately $2.97 million or about 0.08 percent (instead of an increase of approximately $4.40 million or about 0.118 percent) for a twelve month period beginning January 1, 1983. The State, the counties, the municipal corporations and other parties interested in the above-described filings will bf ' furnished copies of either or both, with related exhibits, upon written request made to PGandE, 77 Beale Street, P.O. Box 74420, San Francisco, California 94120, Attention) Daniel E. Gibson, Assistant General Counsel. The state, County sad City Officials and Zaterestod Parties November 24, 1982 Page 2 '.. t e We notice is given in accordance tsith Rule 24 of the revised Mules of Practice and Procedure of the California Public Utilities Commission. Very truly yourst. PACIPIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY sY $0, Z. WDSON x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 0 Before Commissioners: C. M. Butler III, Chairman= Georgiaria Sheldon and Oliver G. Richard III. Pacific Gas and Electric ) Docket No. ERSO-214--002 Company ) ORDER GRANTING REHEARING FOR PURPOSES OF FURTHER CONSIDERATION (Issued November 22, 1982) On September 22, 1982, the Commission issued Opinion No. 147, which determined the appropriate rate to be charged by Pacific Gas and Electric Company -to Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bay Point Light and Power Company, CP National Corporation, and the California Cities of Alameda, Healdsburg, Lompoc, Ukiah,. Santa Clara, Lodi and Palo Alto, which are members of the Northern California Power Agency. The Northern California Power Agency filed an application for rehearing of Opinion No. 147 on October 22, 1982. Pursuant to our rules-, the rehearing application would be deemed denied by operation of law if not acted on by November 22, 1982. In order to allow sufficient time to consider the merits of the rehearing application, the Commission finds it proper and in the public interest to grant rehearing for the sole purpose of further review of this matter. Since this order does not grant rehearing on any substantive issues, no answers to the application for rehearing, as provided for in 18 CFR 5385.713(d), will be entertained. The Commission orders: Rehearing of Opinion 11o. 147, issued September 22, 1982, is granted for the limited purpo#e of further consideration. By the Commission. ( S E A L ) /00* to Lois D. Cashell, Acting Secretary. DC -A-44 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Before Commissioners: C. M. Butler III, Chairman; Georgiana Sheldon, J. David Hughes, A. G. Sousa and Oliver G. Richard III. Pacific Gas and Flectric ) Docket No. ER80-214-002 Company OPINION NO. 147-A ORDER DENYTMG REHEARING (Issued November 30, 1982) On September 22, 1982, the Commission issued Opinion No. 147, which determined the appropriate rate to be charged by Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Sierra Pacific Power Company, Bay Point Light and Power Company, CP National Corporation, and the California Cities of Alameda, Ilealdsburg, Lompoc, Ukiah, Santa Clara, Lodi and Palo Alto, to, which are members of the tlorther-n California Power Agency. The Northern California Power Agency filed an application for rehearing of Opinion No. 147 on October 22, 1982. An order granting. rehearing for purposes of further consideration was issued November 22, 19£t2. • NCPA requests rehearing on two issues: the treatment of sales to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the steam sales expense offset issue. NCPA raises no matters on rehearing that were not previously considered by the Commission. Its rehearing application therefore is denied. The Commission orders: The October 22, 1982 rehearing application filed by the Northern California Power Agency in the above docket is denied. By the Commission. ( S F. A L ) Leis D. Cashell, Acting Secretary. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMtSStON WASHINGTON. D.C. 2D426 OFFICIAL 11MINESS iNALTY FOR PRWAII USE. 1300 RECEIVED 1992 NOV 29 M 9- S5 AUCE M. RENCHE CITY CLERK CITY OF LOCI City of Lodi. r;xuu—�lti 221 West Pirie Street Lodi, CA 95240 POSTAGE AND FEEL PAID PEDERAL VARGY REGLI ATORY COM ISMOR FERC m •