Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - December 3, 1986 (68)t WITHDRAWN City Clerk Reimche announced that Kris Cromwell, owner of ` the Wine and Roses Country Inn had called asking that her CC -46 request for deferment of developwnt requirements at 2505 West Turner Read be withdrawn from the agenda. - rA;_�r 1 [11CITY vLODI F COUP CIL COMMUNICATION PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: City Council FROM: City Manager MEETING DATE: December 3, 1986 AGENDA TITLE: Request for Deferment of Development Requirements, Wine & Roses Country Inn, 2505 W. Turner Road RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council review the request of Wine & Roses Country Inn owner Kris Cromwell and take whatever action it deems appropriate. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Public Works Department was first in contact witH the owners prior to the annexation of the property and have informed them on a number of occasions what the City requirements were. Since the annexation, many additional discussions have taken place, as well as letters written, covering various aspects of development including requirements. On October 6, 1986, a proposal was submitted by the owners requesting a deferment of bonding and design engineering and the related costs. The departm-ent`s reply ttheir request Was that staff did not have the authority to grant such a request and it would have to be directed to the City Council. Our reply again recapped all of the City requirements. (See Exhibit A.) More recently, the owners have requested, by letter dated November 14, 1986 (Exhibit B), that offsite improvements be postponed for one year and that they not be required to pay storm drainage fees. Staff met with Del Smith, representing the owners, on Friday, November 21st, and discussed at some length their letter and specific request. It was our understanding that they will be putting up the necessary guarantee for the offsite construction and that they intend to make all necessary offsite improvements during the summer of 1987. As a consequence, no postponement of improvements is necessary. The owners do feel that the storm drainage fees should not be applicable to this development since they have large landscaped and grassed areas and presently plan to keep all run-off on the parcel and not use our storm drain system. Refer to Exhibit C for their proposed development plan.. The roads are built up to ensure that they stay dry, and drainage from the rear built up area is being piped to the low central area for storage and disposal using dry wells. However, should the owners wish to connect their drainage to the City system due to on-site problems, they would be.able to tie into our storm drain system at any time. It should be noted that this tie would be required should a nuisance be created on-site. APPROVED: FILE N0. Cs( . THOMAS. A. PETERSON, City Manager CWINE/TXTW.02M November 26, 1986 City Council December 3, 1986 Wine & Roses Country Inn Page 2 This department's position is that storm drainage fees are applicable since the entire area is now being used. Residential homes pay the same fee and, in many cases, drainage on the rear of the lot has no way of getting to the street for disposal. The "RCA' building across the street paid drainage fees, as do all schools and planned unit developments where large areas are typically in lawn or landscaping. A copy of Resolution Nos. 3618 and 4394 and the guidelines (revised 9/2/86) reviewed with Council earlier this year are enclosed for Council's information as Exhibits D, E, and F, respectively. Master drainage and intract fees for this development amount to $10,416.00. Based on the guidelines, a reduction of 10,C00 square feet z was made for the existing structure which remains. It would seem to be setting a dangerous precedent if all or a portion of the area were excu:.ed from paying drainage fees only because they were not tying to our drainage system at the time of initial development. It is therefore the department's recommendation to the Council that the request to excuse the storm drainage fees be denied. If the Council wishes to approve the request, it is felt that the City drainage resolutions and guidelines should first be revised. Jack L. Ronsko Public Works Director JLR/GER/ma Attachments cc: Kris Cromwell November 26, 1986 CETT COUNCIL ^ THOMAS A PETERSON CITY /� V CRV Manager FRED Kt F! ID Mayor [ 1 1 1 O F L O D 1 ALICE M REIMCHE EVIINN M CIL SON �J 1 �! City Clerk Ma,, or Pro Tempore CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET DAME) M HINCHMAN CALL BOX 3006 RONALD M STEIN JAAIE S W PINKERTON• jr LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 Citv Attorney IOHN R (Randi,) SNtDER (209) 334-S634 ti October 17, 1986 Kris Cromwell Wine and Roses Country Inn 2505 W. Turner Road Lodi, CA 9524C SUBJECT: Development @ 2505 W. Turner Road This letter is in answer to your written request of October 6, 1986 to defer the requirement of a bond guaranteeing offsite improvement construction for your development. As discussed several times earlier and as described in my attached letter of July 11, 1986, development standards include a development agreement with some type of bond or other acceptable guarantee covering installation of all offsite improvements. This is a City Council policy and cannot be deferred by staff. Any request for a change, variance, or deferment should be addressed to the City Council. You should be aware that in the past, deferments of construction have been granted only in those cases where it is in the City's best interest to do so or the improvements would not be of use. I know of no deferments of bonding requirements. Because of new construction in the area and annexation since some of our earlier discussions and letters, I have recapped the requirements of the Public Works Department. r - If you desire City water service prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Pay for water meter, cost dependant upon size. 1" - $95, 1-1/2" - $225, 2" - $325. 2. Pay $948.75 for your share (1/2 of an 8" main) of that portion Yl of the 10" water line recently installed along the Turner Road frontage of your property. 3. Have a registered engineer design, and a licensed contractor t install, a 100 water main across the remaining frontage of your property. This may require a fire hydrant installation. The City will pay for a portion of the work. N: 4. Obtain a permit and abandon your existing well in conformance with requirements of the County Health Department. 5. Pay engineering fees in the amount of 3% of the estimated cost of the above. [Exhibit A .z If you desire City sewer service prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Pay $1,034 for your share (1/2) of that portion of the sanitary sewer line recently installed along the Turner Road frontage of your property. 2. Pay connection fees based on the number of Sewage Service Units (S.S.U.) connected. This is your "buy -in" cost of the existing treatment plant. Fees are $290 per S.S.U. Attached is a chart showing how the number of S.S.U.s are established. 3. Have a registered engineer design, and a licensed contractor install, a 6" sanitary sewer across the remaining frontage of your property. This will probably require a manhole at the western end of the extension. 4. AbanOon the existing sewer septic tank in conformance with local codes. 5. Pay engineering fees in the amount of 3% of the estimated cost of the above. If you desire storm drain service prior to issuance of a building permit: 1. Pay standard storm drain fees for the property of $10,416 (2.1 acres), 2. Have a registered engineer design, and a licensed contractor g.. install, a 12" drain across the remaining frontage of your s property and a service into your property. This would require a manhole at the point where your service is connected. The City would reimburse you $8.50 per foot for the 12' storm = drain, 3. Pay engineering fees in the amount of 3% of the estimated cost of the above. If you wish to take out a building permit with a valuation in excess of b I -; $12,900, the following requirements must be met prior to the issuance: 4 r 1. All of the above. 2. Have a registered engineer design, and a licensed contractor install, curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lights, and street compaction and paving along your Turner Road frontage. ; 3. Pay engineering fees in the amount of 3% of the estimated cost of the above. �= 4. Enter into an agreement with the City regarding the above items, provide evidence of insurance naming the City as additional insured, and provide improvement security (surety bond, cash, instrument of credit, or certificate of deposit 1 - with assignment) in the amount of 150% of estimated cost of above improvements. The offsite improvements must be installed prior to occupancy of the new building. 5. Provide all necessary right of way or easement dedications. These requirements do.not include the requirements of any other departments. It is highly recommended that you discuss your development in detail with the Utility, Fire, and Community Development Departments. Should you have any questions, contact me at any time. 4OF 4 G. -Y . Robison Assistant City Engineer GER/ma cc: Building Division Community Development Department Fire Department Utility Department Water/Wastewater Superintendent July It, 1966 Kr I s Crewel I WIrw & Roses Country inn 2505 West Turner Road Lodi, CA 95240 SUBJECT: tiff -Site Improvement at Wines Roses Country Ina Prior to the Issuance of a building permit for the Wine & Roses Country Inn, plans for the offsite Improvements at this location will be needed. Also, prior to the Issuance of the building permit. a development agreement oust be executed. The agrearant requires a faithful performance and labor and materials guarantee to cover the Installation of the required Improvements. These Improvements Include curb, gutter, sidewalk. Paving and water and sewer and storm drain extensions. Under the terms of the agreernnt, the developer has ona year In which to complete these offsite Improvements. The agreement also requires general comprehensive liability Insurance. If you;',have any questions or need additional Information, Please contact Me. Sincerely G. E. Rob I son Assistant City Engineer OWSBAS cc: Stockton HDrt9W Attn;; Jim Saunders I,— MEMORANDUM. MEMORANDUM, City of Lodi, Public Works Department TO: Developers/Contractors FROM. Public Works Director DATE: October 2, 1986 SUBJECT: New Sewer Connection Fees On October 1, 1986, the City Council adopted a resolution establishing new charges and fees for sewer services, holding tanks, and the use of storm drain system. The monthly services fees will go into effect on October 1, 1986. The sewer con ill be li submitte as otober 2. 198L Following are the new sewer connection fees. 01A DOMESTIC SYSTEM Z90 A. Residential Connection Fees Number of Bedrooms Sewage Service Units* Connection Fee 1 0.75 S 9 00 2 1.00 1,2 .00 3 1.25 1 0.00 4 1.50 ,800.00 5 1.75 ,100.00 6 2.00 2,400.00 7 2.25 2,700.00 Example. Type of Construction Total Connection Fee 4 -Bedroom Single-family Home 1,800.0 Duplex'- (1) 2 -Bedroom & (1) 3 -Bedroom 2,700. 6 -Unit Apartment Complex - (2) 1 -Bedroom and (4) 2 -Bedroom 6,60 QO B. Commercial Connection Fee S 1, .00 per unit C. Industrial Connection Fee Moderate Strength User 1,200.00 High Strength User Unit Item Unit Charqje Flow - MG S388.0 r MG BOD - 1,000 lbs 160. per 1,000 lbs. SS - 1,000 lbs. 7 .00 per 1,000 lbs. The Connection fee for commercial and industrial users with moderate - strength wastes shall be determined based on the sewage service units assigned to each category of users as follows: Example: Type of User Sewage Service Units Motel - (7) Bed,., Restaurant & Bar (Restaurant seats, (50) Bar seats, (25) Warehouse (47 Employees 1.4 6.0 (5.0+1.0) 4.7 Connection Fee S 1,680/-90 $ 7,2 .00 $ 640.00 Unit - Sewage Service Unit, defined as each increment of flow of a typical two-bedroom residence. INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM Connection Fee To be determined annually by the Public Works Director as outlined.in Section 13.12.210 of the Lodi City Code HOLDING TANK WASTES Dumping Charge $36.00 r 1.000 gal. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM Storm DraMDIS I Charge $550/00 per MG U I P U, " (Jack . Ronsko Publi Works Director A4MAcag SewaeService Number Category Unit of Measure units* 1. Meeting place, religious Ea 200 seats 2. Meeting place, public Ea 100 seats 3. Hotel. motel Ea 5 beds 4. Veterinary clinic Ea 10 kennels 5. Post Office Ea 25 employees 6. Funeral parlor Ea 2 employees 7. Service station pumps Ea 3 pumps 8. Car wash bays Ea bay One sewage 9. School - to 8th grade Ea 25 students service unit 10. High school Ea 20 students shall be 11. Eating place, seating only Ea 10 seats assigned to 12. Eating place, seating & takeout Ea 7 seats each unit of 13. Eating place, takeout only Ea 5 employees measure. 14. Lunch truck business Ea 5 employees 15. Laundry, coin op., reg machine Ea 2 machines 16. Laundry, coin op., big machine Ea machine Fees shall be 17. Comm. laundry & dry cleaning Ea 2 employees based on 18. Doctor's office Ea 10 employees nearest one - 19. Dentist's office Ea 5 employees tenth sewage 20. Chiropractor's office Ea 10 employees service unit 21. X-ray Laboratory Ea 10 employees except 22. Office, store, warehouse Ea 10 employees minimum 23. Bar Ea 25 seats number of 24. Barber, beauty shop EA 4 chairs sewage servic 25. Hospital, convalescent home Ea 2 beds units shall 26. Rest & Retirement home Ea 3 beds be 1.0 27. Mobile home park 1 pad - .75 units Example: Type of User Sewage Service Units Motel - (7) Bed,., Restaurant & Bar (Restaurant seats, (50) Bar seats, (25) Warehouse (47 Employees 1.4 6.0 (5.0+1.0) 4.7 Connection Fee S 1,680/-90 $ 7,2 .00 $ 640.00 Unit - Sewage Service Unit, defined as each increment of flow of a typical two-bedroom residence. INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM Connection Fee To be determined annually by the Public Works Director as outlined.in Section 13.12.210 of the Lodi City Code HOLDING TANK WASTES Dumping Charge $36.00 r 1.000 gal. STORM DRAIN SYSTEM Storm DraMDIS I Charge $550/00 per MG U I P U, " (Jack . Ronsko Publi Works Director A4MAcag 61-t Cownci 1, R*,vc. Fill c -SIP VA Ismu 10 NOV 14 PH 3:44 ALICE M. REIMCHE CITY CLERK CITY OF LODI UP T ),"k It POW TAX ul ry - r s• f + yY •� iii � • } 1 t LANDSCAPING ;rf "LAWNS � r i s TURNER ROAD' 1 t _ U Exhibit C u - y , bo t f� i J. STORM - 3 RESOLUTION NO. -361-8- - - MASTER DRAINAGE PROGRAM FEE WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of having a continued orderly growth, cnd the extension of the storm drainage system is a basic ingredient in providing cdditio:nl areas for development; and, WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of having properties that are to be developed pay the cost of additional storm drain facilities so as said costs will not become a burden on City taxpayers; A NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lodi:(`, 1. That a Master Drainage Program fee be established at a rate$at 1490'er gross acre; 2. That this Master Drainage Program fee shall be adjusted on January 1 and July 1 of each year based upon the change of the U. S. Average Engineering News -Record Construction Cost index; 3. That, the adjusted acreage fee shall be calculated by the Public Works Director 3.; using the following formula: Adjusted fee - S1�'.90/ to er X ENR Index for December or June ENR Index of 1655 for December, 1971 <r' L 0 and that the adjusted fee shall be rounded to the nearest $10.00 and paid at the time of development; 4. That the Master Drainage Program shall include the following as a City `= responsibility for construction: �� �= Gam✓ 81 A. Storm Water Retention Basins E (including land acquisition, site development, excavation, structures, r pumps and controls, interior drainage system, fencing, sprinkler systems, tf and turfing) €� B. Major Storm Drain Lines P 1. Lines necesscry to connect drainage basins to each other and outlet points; 2. 30 -inch and larger that are necessary to provide the basic drainage network in various drainage areas throughout the City; �-j -1- Exhibit D STORM - 3 5. That the fee established by this resolution shall be collected at the time of development (i.e., approval of subdivision final map, issuance d' building permit, or conversion from vacant to any higher use) of any property that has not previously paid a storm drainage fee; 6. That this fee shall apply to all properties developed ofter March 15, 1972 except tentative maps or use permits approved by the Planning Commission prior to that date and developed within 18 months of the cpproval . dcte by the Planning Commission. Dated: April 5, 1972 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 3618 was passed and adopted by the City Council of tNe City of Lodi in regular meeting held April 5, 1972 by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen - Ehrhardt, Hughes, Schaffer and Katnich Noes: Councilmen - Kirsten Absent: Councilmen - None BESSIE L. BENNETT City Clerk • t g r STORM - 2 RESOLUTION 1\70. 4394 INTRACT DRAINAGE FEE WHEREAS, the installation of storm drainage fa _ilities is considered to be an overall City-wide problem for which it is very difficult to fix specific responsibilities within the limits of each subdivision or' development; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to equalize the storm drainage responsibilities in each subdivision or develop- ment; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lodi: 1. That Resolution No. 3619 is repealed and an intract drainage fee of $1, 100 per gross acre of property being developed is established; 2. That each subdivision or development shall be credited on the following schedule for all storm drain facilities installed by the developer within public streets or rights-of-way: 12" pipe $ 8.50 per lineal foot 15" pipe $ 9.50 per lineal foot I8" pipe $ 11.00 per lineal foot 21" pipe $ 13. 10 per lineal foot 24" pipe $ 16.20 per lineal foot 27" pipe $ 18. 10 per lineal foot 30" pipe $ 20.00 per lineal foot 48" manhole $ 600.00 each 60" manhole $1250.00 each. 3._ That whenever the fees exceed the credits the developer will pay to the City the balance at the time of develop- ment (i.e., approval of the subdivision final map, or issuance of building permits); 4. That whenever the credits exceed the fees the City will reimburse the developer. 5. That the fees established by this resolution shall be collected at'the time of development (i.e., approval of subdivision final map, issuance of building permit, or conversion from vacant to any higher use) of any [Exhibit E STORM - 2 property that has not previously paid a storm drainage fee; 6. That this Resolution is effective immediately upon passage. Dated: September 21, 1977 { s. I hereby certify that Resolution No. 4394 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held September 21, 1977 by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmen - Ehrhardt, Hughes, Pinkerton and Katnich Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - Katzakian AL I E M. kR-EIiHE CITY CLERK a, I -2- 4394 STORM - 4 CITY OF LODI PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT POLICIES AND -- PROCEDURES STORM DRAINAGE FEE COLLECTION Rev. 9/2/86 These guidelines outline the basic strom drainage fee collection procedure. It is not the intent that these guidelines cover every possible situation, but they are to establish basic concepts from which proper decisions concerning storm drainage fee collections can be made. STORM DRAINAGE FEE COLLECTION o Those areas shaded in green on the Storm Drainage Fee Map are responsible for Master Storm Drainage and Intract Drainage fees. The map is not all inclusive. o Areas which are converted to a higher use are also responsible for Master Storm Drainage and Intract Drainage fees unless fees have already been collected for the area. o Master Storm Drainage and Intract Drainage fees shall be collected at the time of development or redevelopment (i.e., approval of subdivision final map, parcel map, issuance of building permit, or conversion to higher use such as vacant or agricultural to storage or parking, parking or open storage to single family, single family to multiple, residential to commercial, etc.). o The amount of the Master Storm Drainage Fee and Intract Fee shall be as established by City Council Resolutions 3618 and 4394. o The area used shall be computed to the centerline of the street or 40 feet from the ultimate right-of-way, whichever is less. o A deduction of 10,000 square feet or the size of the lot, whichever is less, may be allowed where an existing commercial, industrial, or residential structure is to remain as part of the overall development. No deduction will be allowed if the structure is to be removed. o If a building is demolished to provide a vacant parcel, and a building permit is issued within one year for a building of like size and similar use, no storm drain fees will be assessed. Jack L. Ronsko Public Works Director JLR/GER/ma