The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - November 19, 1986 (65)RES. NO. 86-170 Council was apprised that, at the November 4, 1986 General Election, the electorate amended the Land Use Element of the CC -8(a) General Plan by adding Maggio Industrial Park. This project. is a 37.8 acre, 16 parcel industrial developany-ant at the northwest corner of Harney Lane and South Stockton Street. _ pproyunately 14 months ago, the City Council prezoned the property to M-2, Heavy Industrial' and certified the Environmental Impact Report as adequate_ These actions are still valid. Council adopted Resolution No. 86-170 initiating the annexat;.on of Maggio Industrial Park (ixDunded by Salas Park on the north; South Stockton Street on the east; Harnev Lane on the south; and the Southern Pacific Railroad right--of-way on the west). KtUUMMtNUtll ACTION: That the City Council initiate the an;:exation of the Maggio Industrial Addition to the City of Lodi. (Adopt Resolution 86-169 - see Exhibit A attached) 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: At the November 4, 1986 General Election the electorate amended the Land Use Element of the General Plan by adding Maggio Industrial Park. This project is a 37.8 acre, 16 parcel }' industrial development at the northwest corner of Harney lane and South Stockton Street. Approximately 14 months ago, the City Council prezoned the property to M-2, Heavy Industrial and certified the Environmental Impact Report as adequate. These actions are still valid. \ J M S B. SCHROEDEP C munity Development Director -.f 1' • CITY COUNCIL THOMAS A. PETERSON f FRED M: REID, Mayor CITY OF Ij n J J I City Manager EVELYN M. OLSON ALICE M. REINICHE Mayor Pro TemporeCITY HALL. 2:7 WEST .PINE STREET City Clerk DAVID M. HINCHMANCALL BOX 3006 RONALD M. STEIN JAMES W. PINKERTON, Jr.LODI, CALIFORNIA 95241-1910 City Attorney JOHN R. (Randy) SNIDER (209, 334-5634 4 <..: December 2, 1986 ;t i Mr. Gerald Scott Executive Officer Local Agency Formation Camussion J 1810 East Hazelton Street Stockton, CA 95105 - Dear Mr. Scott: Enclosed herewith please find 4 certified copies of Resolution No. } 86-170 - "A Resolution of the Lodi City Council for the Application to !.. the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission in the Matter of the proposed "Maggio Industridl Reorganization", Including the d Detachment of Certain Territory 4.rithin the Area Proposed for A^u. xation to the City of Lodi" Also enclosed please find the following doc�unents pertaining to this (;ra a) Three (3) copies of Justification of Proposal. b) Fifteen (15) copies of legal metes and bounds de.sc_'Dtion of r), affected territory consistent with standards acceptable to the 1= rY P County Surveyor's office. c) Fifteen (15) copies of maps showing affected territory. d) Filing and processing fees in accordance with LAE•'CO fee schedule - $500.00. Should you need additional information or have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call. AM:]j Enc. Very truly yours, Alice M. Reimche City Clerk "3 RESC?LUTION N0. 86-170 RESOLUTION OF THE LODI CITY COUNCIL FOR THE APPLICATION TO THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION 0"4ISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED "MAGGIO INDUSTRIAL RD'JRGANIZATION" , $ INCLUDING THE DETACRaW OF CERTAIN TERRITORY WITHIN THE AREA PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION '10 THE'CITY OF LODI r � WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese -Knox- Local }'` t Government Reorganization Act of 1985, and; WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed charge of organization, is the annexation to the City of Lodi an area comprising 43.7 acres, rrore or less, and withdrawal of said 43.7 acres from the Woodbridge Rural Fire f` Protection District, and located within the area to be annexed to the City of Lodi as described and depicted in Exhibit "A", a..'; WHEREAS, no other counties,.cities, or districts are affected, and; {{ WHEREAS, the subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of Lodi and detached frcrn the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District is ,i uninhabited, and; ti €.; WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by t -:,-Lis 1 reorganization, and; WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are as follows: Y (1) The uninhabited subject area is within the urban 51 confines of the City and will generate service needs substantially similar to that of other incorporated y rp° urban areas which require municipal govexrunent service; (2) Annexation to -the City of Lodi of the subject area will result in improved economics of scale in.goverpment ( operations while improving coordination in the delivery of planning services; (3) The residents and taxpayers of the County of San .7oaquin will benefit from the proposed reorganization as a result of savings to the County by reduction of County required services in unincorporated but urban oriented area; t' (4) The subject area proposed to be annexed to the City of ! Lodi is geographically, socially, economically and politically part of the same urban area of which the City of Lodi is also a part; 86-170 (5) The subject area is within the: Lodi Sphere of Influence. (6) Future inhabitants in the subject area will gain immediate response in regard to police and fire protection, unlimited city garbage and trash collection service, street lighting service,, a modern sewer system, other municipal services, and improvement of property values. NOW, TORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Lodi that the San Joaquin County Local Agency Formation Commission is hereby requested to approve the proposed "Maggio Industrial Reorganization" which includes annexation of 43.7 acres from the Woodbridge Rural Fire Protection District, as described and depicted in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. This all, subject to the aforementioned terms and conditions. Dated: November 19, 1986 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 86-170 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City cf Lodi in a regular meeting held November 19, 1986 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Mambers - Olson, Pinkerton, Snider and Reid (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council rkmbers - Hinchman ' Alice M. Reimvhe City Clerk 86-170 � � z ` P too 1tdr4 —� 025- Qr=NBI v1� r. i MAC410 ADDN. r � ��•�®�!lsE�ONE unan SE®am a Ilion unman !ii!l.EaoaEE9OEM s® - ... t>."salons. • o X111118 n/EEE OE®®o�® --- r il..`. ..+wir4M'.n Y r.;., _ .- , .L,ac� F'2'" ..s ...�...'- 4 ^M.�.:':. . � . •- r-. � .. - _--e_ r�li�ti �� r�� ■�/��e rer ® F r. i MAC410 ADDN. r � 6 i�� i200�Al �. MIS l[�Sl t •SjS H4[1 r il..`. ..+wir4M'.n Y r.;., _ .- , .L,ac� F'2'" ..s ...�...'- 4 ^M.�.:':. . � . •- r-. � .. - Exhibit "A" I MAGGIO REORGANIZATION k That certain real property situated in the County of San Joaquin, State of California, described as follows: - Being portions of Section 24 and the Southwest one-quarter of Section 13, Township 3 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, San Joaquin County, California, more particularly described as follows: Commencing on the North line of said Southwest one-quarter at point of intersection with the West line of the 100 foot wide right-of-way for the • Southern Pacific Railroad (SPRR); thence South 03055' West 1214.07 feet along said right-of-way to the true point of beginning; Thence North 870421 East 1242.07 feet along the South line of "Salas Park Addition" (San Joaquin County Resolution No. 236 and City of Lodi { Ordinance No. 1061) and the existing City Limit Line, to a point on the r`s East line of South Stockton Street (40 feet wide) and 20 feet easterly of; as measured perpendicular to, the East line of said Southwest one-quarter; Thence South 00006108" West 1482.28 is>et parallel to and 20.0 feet easterly of, as measured perpendicular to, the East line of said Southwest one-quarter along the East line of South Stockton Street and its extension .a to the South line of Harney Lane (50 feet wide); Thence South 88011' West 1340.08 feet parallel to and 25.0 feet Southerly of, as measured perpendicular to, the North line of Section 24 along the x South line of Harney Lane and its extensions to the West line of said SPRR fight-of-wa, A -Thence North 3055' East 1478.37 feet along the West line of said SPRR right-of-way and the. Easterly line of the "J.C. Beckman Addition" (San Joaquin County Resolution No. 3259 and City of Lodi Ordinance No. 901) and the existing City Limit Line to the true point of beginning; Containing 43.7 acres more or less.