The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Report - November 18, 1981 (25)LOT LINE ADJUST- Following introduction of the matter by Staff, Council MENT LOTS 2.55 adopted the following resolution: AND 256 VINEYARD NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. 81-160 RES. NO. 81-160 RESOLUTION APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN LOTS 255 and 256 VINEYARD SUBDIVISION, UNIT N3, (I. E. 453 and 459 CEDAR COURT). �i COUNCIL h y)AMES A. WCARTY. Mom � ROSERT C MUR►HY Maya Pro Tem "j RKHARq L HUGHES '�' h� WALTER KATNKN ' . r : S.W. PINKERTON. It. jS % J� n'tx CITY OF LODI CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 320 LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 (209) 334-5634 Mrs Mary Lark Broker Vintage Rea 730 West di Avenge Lodi 95240 Dear Mary: November 11, 1981 RE: Lot Line Adjustment - Lots 255 and 256, Vineyard No. 3 HENRY A. CLAVES. Ir. City Manse► ALICE M. REtMCHE City CICA RONALD M STEiN City Attorney The Lodi Community Development Department has cbmpleted its review 3 of the proposed Lot Line Adjustment between lots 255 and 256, Vineyard Subdivision, Unit x3 (i.e. 453 and 459 Cedar Court). Our office will recommend approval of this Lot Line Adjustment to the City Council at its meeting of Wednesday, November 18, 1981. Sincerely, �r J s B Schroeder pity Development cc: City Cierk/ Asn s'� t as< ^i.tr�"if+ k �u°'4 F't.erit r F a, t a r : cr s 4,; r �•;se ?a.r c ik rim y 3r r cif P r - t � f . ` 5 4 t �.: '� .. �' - pit f� •: TiNa..iLN.. SO meow Y' S - - t' v 255 s 7. v r Asn s'� t as< ^i.tr�"if+ k �u°'4 F't.erit r F a, t a r : cr s 4,; r �•;se ?a.r c ik rim y 3r r cif P r - t � f . ` 5 4 t �.: '� .. �' - pit f� •: TiNa..iLN.. h S t' v 255 Q\T Y5 } s r s r\ 5 2<,54 4 grYaiti�:±. s. 6 S �' � L t . V l t y� •�� st�,�+��s. 1'•�'i. i'•nK'11yM1 Uri _XE .S c CI`X i -.ii / .•! FS'i i' - .\.' .. 1� �"�k=3Q'i�K rT �� tOAOUT'LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT' y., a Slalia j,qtr' u k,�, YY 3 so 1': �' :rs�'F} 777mmI't '+a 1 �t ♦ r f r 4 5 A .1 RESOLUTION NO. 81-160 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN LOTS 255 AND 256, VINEYARD, N0. 3 RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Lodi that pursuant to Government Code Section 66412, the lot line adjust- ment between Lots 255 and 256, Vineyard Subdivision, Unit No. 3 (i.e. 453 and 459 Cedar Court) as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and thereby made a part hereof is hereby approved. Dated: November 18, 1981 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 81-160 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held November 18, 1981 by the follow- ing vote: Ayes: Councilmen - Murphy, Hughes, Katnich, Pinkerton, and McCarty Noes: Councilmen - None Absent: Councilmen - None 7 ACE M. H City Clerk 81-160 -1- RKMAM L HUCHE S WALTEK KATNKH JAMES W, MNKERTON. it. CITY HALL. 221 WEST PINE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 320 LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 (209) 3345634 December 2, 1981 Mary Larkin Vintage Realty 730 N. Lodi Ave.. Lodi, CA 95240 Dear lis. Larkins Enclosed please find a certified copy of Resolution No. 81-160 - "Resolution Approving the Lot Line Adjustment Between Lots 255 and 256, Vineyard, No. 3" - which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held November 180 1981. ARsdg Enc. Very truly yours, NaLI �I' Alice M. Reimche. City Clerk HENRY A. CLAVES. Jr. City Manaser MICE M REIMCHE City Cierk RONALD M. STEIN City Attorney January 1962 h Mr. Jin Schroeder, secretary Lodi Planning Commission Lodi:, California Bear Hr, Schroeder, This letter is in reference to the public hearing scheduled for January 11 and at which time Dr. Swanson's request for a zoning change at 1001 Windsor Dr. to R -C -P will be heard. On Wednesday November 18, 1981 I made a statement to the city council on this issue..1 was a spokesman for the 4$ individuals who opposed a zoning change at 1001 Windsor Dr. and signed a petition to that effect. I have unclosed my statement and our petition for you to share with the mem- born of the Planning Commission. The opposition to a zoning change remains the sass. We were shocked that the council voted against the Planning Commission's earlier refusal to grant Dr.. Swanson"s request for a zoning change. I would safely estimate that 95 percent of those individuals who reside within 300 feet of 1001 Windsor Dr. are strongly opposed to any change in soning. We want the` residential character (R-1) of all the regaining properties on York, Windsor, and Vine and east of Fairmont to remain residential. I cannot begin to tell you how strongly we feel about this. It is our fervent wish that the Planning Coa mission will listen to us, the people who live there. We will be at the Planning Commission meeting on January 11 to be heard and seen. . Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. B/j �ly t V:.fi:�,�G Reid Carney s a Pinkerton, Katnich, and Murphy Dear. Councilmen, This petition refers to Dr. Dennis R. Swanson's appeal to the city council to reverse the city planning commission's denial of his re- quest to amend the land use element of the General Plan by redesig- nating the parcel'at 1001 Windsor Drive, Lodi, from low density res- idential to office institutional. We petition the city to deny Dr. Swanson's request to amend the land use element of the General Plan from lour density residential to of - institutional. We bought our homes in this neighborhood because this area had been zoned residential. Over the years we have been saddened by the planning commission's and the council's ready wil- lingness to-make.,:change after change (spot zoning) from low density residential to rofessional commercial and now the request fore face inetitutionil.',. We have been greatly displeased by this' encroach went.:Les s than three years ago Dr. Swanson requested and was a. i ward"a' zoning achange at 1000 W. Vine, .Street, one block north- of (Windsor br.��ParceI by Parcel and lot by lot Dr. Swanson and. others are changing the residential character of our neighborhoods. We»ntren- }, uously;object_.to this piecemeal redesignating of residential land. Past decisions of, the planning commission and the council have al ready altered tha residential character of Vine and Windsor.Streets;f' last of Fairmont. We petition the city council to support the Plan-- :. i ning commission on this issue and stop further encroachment along the designated residential zones of Vine and Windsor. Enough is enough. `i'• We beg the council to listen to those who would be effected by a - k pother change in zoning. we, the undersigned, represent some of those Mho 'seside ;.in;t,the immediate (300 feet) residential neighborhood and who would be effected by a zoning change. We simply wish for Mind- sokand Vine> 6 , eats to remain residential throughout as originally intended. We feel quite certain that those same medical and pro- . 3. feseionhl people who continually come before the planning commission and,.the council would object to any encroachment or zoning changes Where they live. No are grateful to the planning, commission for its decision to deny' Dr.-Bwanson's request. We ask you, .gentlemen of the council, to deny., his.,. appeal. . Respectfully submitted, Residents within 300 feet of '1001 Windsor Dr. 1R71ME signature) ADDRESS " ' �TETZPnOM'p y 2- 4 5 vow �,.,;,� _...._........q�!...._Lt%+��oY• �_ . .3�5�' •..tali N _ _ "' " O �/� Qom• • ��~/`{! w " cea MENEM 15 • ; J,* tr�A i I • •• 1s . __.� .... _.. 4C 17 dx is dff-7 19 / -azo •21 ADDRESS de '/ ✓ TELEPHONE as Ll 07-73 z 4 a.- _ fir._.. _._._.. . 30 368-3th'ly..__ _ 32 "(signature) TELEPHONE NAME" ADDRESS 33 34 ��.�� _ .,/_ mQ__ _..ate. 3-P' dz Ae. 35 _ _..' . w_ foo o ._-__3`-_�9. jy 36 37 a r -Y 41 42 Y 43 44 45 clope -SCF Q 9 47 le� 48 49 so EXCERPT FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 1981 RE: DENHIS R. SWANSON APPEAL Notice thereof having been published In accordance with law and affidavit of Publication being on file in the office of the City Clerk, Mayor McCarty called for the Public Hearing to consider the appeal of Dr. Dennis R. Swanson of the Lodi City Planning Commission's denial of his request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan by redesignating the parcel at 1001 Windsor Drive, Lodi, from Low Density Residential to Office institutional. Assistant Planner Morimoto introduced the matter and presented transparencies which illustrated the surrounding zoning, land use and general plan designations. ° The following persons were present and spoke in favor of the appeal: 1. Dr. Jack L. Gilliland, 900 South Fairmont Avenue, Lodi. He stated that the General Plan Amendment and ultimate rezoning were being sought so the subject parcel could be used for off-street parking for an existing professional officc building at 916-924 South Fairmont Avenue which was proposed for remodeling. He gave the history of professional office development in the area of Memorial Hospital. The .following correspondence was received in opposition to the appeal: 1. A letter from Mr. Del Caywood, 921 Windsor Drive, Lodi. 2. A petition signed by 18 residents of the 800 and 900 blocks of Windsor Drive. The following persons were present and spoke in opposition to the appeal: 1. Mr. Reid Carney, 900 West Vine Street, Lodi. He stated that the people of the area were opposed to further office and parking encroachment into the residential area and presented a petition containing 48 signatures supporting his statement. 2. Mr. Lloyd Brosnikoff, 901 Windsor Drive, Lodi. 3. Mr. Harold L. Roberts, 831 Windsor Drive, Lodi. As there was no one else wishing to be heard on this matter and no additional correspondence to be read, Mayor McCarty declared the public portion of the hearing closed. After discussion on motion of Councilman Hughes, Murphy second, Council, by a 4 to 1 vote with Councilman Katnich noting "No", approved the appeal of Dr. Dennis R. Swanson and introduced Ordinance No. 1246 which amends the Land Use Element of the General Plan by redesignating the parcel at 1001 Windsor Drive, Lodi from Low Density Residential to Office -Institutional. • ED EXZ-tk-o-"�) L t i I Del PF �HIBIT B Lioyd Brosniko'tf O Florence W. ilarkiti% ;901` Windsor Drive 900 Windsor Dr Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Frank L. Jacinto 911 Windsor Or James J. Huber 830 Windsor Or Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Clayton Caywood 921 Windsor Edward Nyske Lodi, CA 93240 831 York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Joseph S. O'Shea Frank Remus 931 Windsor Drive 901 W. York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Dennis R. Swanson Raymond L. Shates 1930 Ed Or 911 York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Assn of 7th Day Adventist Woodrow W. Ensminger 14199 N. Curry Ave 921 York St. Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Truman R:Krause Clarence A. Wermers ;1.000 Windsor Or 931 York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 John.V Slbole 930 Windsor Or Georgga J. Williams Codi, CA 95240 873 S. Fairoaks Pasadena, CA 91105 Francis M. Engelhart George J. Williams '920` W. Windsor Or Walter E. Reiss Lodi,'CA 95240 1121 W. Vine St Lodi, CA 95240 Ida R. Krause Daryl Geweke 910 Windsor P. 0. Box 41 Lodi , CA -,95240 Lodi, CA 952 0 Page 2 of 11 Beverly En—t--V-71-45 Jack Gilliland, M.D. 900 S. Fairmont St. Lodi, CA 95240 Dennis Swanson, D.C. 900 S. Fairmont St. Lodi, CA 95240 - C -Z Page i of EXHIBIT B. Beverly Ent -U -81-4t i Lodi Memorial Hospital Assoc Delbert. Riffel Margaret Schultz P:':0.'Doti 110, 900 W. Park Street 1001 S. Crescent Ave Lodi, CA Lodi. CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 ,Warren W Canepa Leon Henifen 131 S. Orange 830 Park Street Donald Baumbach Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 9524.0 801 W. Park Lodi, CA 95240 Carl 6 Bernice Wille Warren Canepa 1000 York St 131 S. Orange Ave Delmar Street e Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 811 Parkk SStre Lodi, CA 95240 Richard i Janet Wilcox Paul R. 6 Gladys Mayer 1007 S. Orange 930 W. York Michael Williams 820 Park Street Stret Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 Lodi, CA 95240 T K A Schultz, 101.3 S. Orange Lode, CA 95240 Pat.P. Mercurio .10191. Orae Lodi CA 95240 iris T. Fatheringhom 1025 S. Orange Ave Lodi, CA 95240 Warren t Clara McMillen 930 W. Park St Lodl, CA 95240 Robert Beglau 920 W. Park St Lodi, CA 95240 Gerard Seigle 910 W. Par Loaf CA5240 Elmer Nichols 1006 Orange Ave Lodi, CA 95240 Bernice Tredway 916 York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Arthur Schimke 900 York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Matt A. Petrick 830 York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Charles Kramer 820 W. York St Lodi, CA 95240 Milo N. Stafford 810 York Street Lodi, CA 95240 Erna Sanders 830 W. Park Strep Lodi, CA 95240 John Ratty 901 W. Park Lodi, CA 95240 Jean Brown 911 W. Park Stre Lodi, CA 95240: Carl Kundert 1012 S. Orange S Lodi, CA 95240 Lorrette Perrin 931 W. Park Lodi, CA 95240 Harold L. Robert 831 Windsor Lodi, CA 95240 .w �...... vi .: V&l-_&% 3.. v,.a+.�a,�i a..r.r.v, r...i. ,. 7vv v. FAIRMONV AVE.,OF THE.PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF HIS REQUEST TO REZONE THE PARCEL AT 1001 WINDSOR DRIVE, LODI, (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 031-103-21) FROM R-1, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO R -C -P, RESIDENTIAL -COMMERCIAL -PROFESSIONAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, March 17, 1982 at the hour of 8:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a continued public hearing in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California, to consider the appeal of Jack L. Gilliland, M.D., 900 S. Fairmont Ave., of the Planning Commission's denial of his request to rezone the parcel at 1001 Windsor Drive, Lodi, (Assessor's Parcel No. 031-103-21) from`R-1, Single -Family Residential, to R -C -P, Residential -Commercial -Professional. Information regarding this item may be obtained in the Office of the Community Development Director at 221 West Pine Street, Lodi, California. All interested persons are invited to present their views either for or against the above 'proposal: Written statements may be filed with the City Clerk at any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements may be :Wade at said hearing. Dated: February 18, 1982 By Order of the City Council ALICE �'.�1. RE&C=E� City Clerk DECLA RA TION OF MAILING On February 19, 1982 In the City of Lodi, San Joaquin County, California, I deposited` in the United Staten Mail, envelopes with first-class postage prepaid thereon, containing a copy of the Notice attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A"; said envelopes were addressed as is more EXHIBIT "A" ACTION' OFA LODI 6ITY COCIL RE appeal, of Jack L. Gilliland;' N2.D.,90.0 South Fairmont Avenue, Lodi, ' of the Planning C4udissiori's' `denial of his request to rezone the parcel at 1001 Windsor"rive, Lodi, (Assessor's Parcel No. 031-103-21) from R-1, Single -Family Residential, to R -C -P, Residential -Commercial -Professional. Councilman Hughes moved that on the following premises that the appeal of Dr. Gilliland, et al.,: be approved subject to the fact that, number (1) the area right now is substandard with respect to parking, that number (2) I believe a large, well landscaped parking lot such as should be depicted in the proposed plan would enhan;.a the property value if in fact furtherr ea rgac#pent :were prevented, (3) that the parcel is subject toj,. Site. Plan. -review and that we direct the - -sPARc Committee: to, require that the landscaping be in the City requirements and that it be used as a parking lot and fourthly, without jnclud ng. that in the motion, that we follow that with a motion to require that it be dedicated for perpetuity. ORDINANCE NO. 1253 INTRODUCED Counc Laan Pinkerton seconded -the motion and...,the.iaotion .. . carries, ,by the. following vote::. Ayes. Councilmen - Hughes, Pinkerton, .;McCarty, and Murphy ,,. Noes. Councilmen - itatnich lbsent: Councilmen - None Further, on motion of� Councilman Pinkerton,, .Hughes,.second, Council instructed,;thp'City Manager :and:.the',,C_fitef Buil}ding Offic als th8tt the. City not_ issue any buildia gerxniitd _iuntil such time thatti�e City„Attorney. . is satisf led that th owners of the subject; parcels,have;filed ,for record two...thng8; the necess ; ary crossover agreements,.an....an agreem6fit.. at requires that those,parking.lo.ts servo for. perpetuity as parking 'gts;on1y,..for those structures.-_. The motion`cairied; - ALICE M. REIMCHE City Clerk CITYCOUNCIL'COUNCIL HENRY A. GILAVES. Jr. City Manager JAMES ARTY. Mayor ROBERT G MURPHY, Maya Pro Tem CITY OF LO D I ALICE M. RE IMCHE RICHARD L. HUGHES City. Clerk WALTER KATNICH CITY HALL, 221 WEST PINE STREET POST OFFICE BOX 320 RONALD M. STEIN JAMES W. PINKERTON. Jr. LODI. CALIFORNIA 95241 City Attorney (209) 3345634 March 17, 1982 Jack L. Gilliland, M.D. 900 S. Fairmont Avenue Lodi, CA 95240 Dear Dr. Gilliland: This letter will confirm the actions of the Lodi City Council at its regular meeting of March 17, 1982 whereby the Council, following a public hearing on the matter, introduced Ordinance No. 1253 overturning the denial of the Planning Commission; thereby rezoning the parcel at 1001 Windsor Drive, Lodi (Assessor's Parcel No. 031-103-21), from R-1, Single -Family Residential, to R -C -P, Residential -Commercial -Professional, with conditions. The.full context of the motions approving this rezoning with conditions is set forth below and has been entered into the official minutes of the March 17, 1982 Council Meeting. Councilman Hughes moved that on the following premises that the appeal of Dr. Gilliland, et.al, be approved subject to the fact that (1) the area right now is substandard with respect to parking, that (2) I believe a large, well -landscaped parking lot such as should be depicted in the proposed plan would enhance the property value if, in fact, further encroachment were prevented, (3) that the parcel is subject to Site Plan review and that we direct the SPARC Committee to require that the landscaping be in the City requirements and that it be used as a parking lot, and (4) without including that in the motion, that we follow that with a motion to require that it be dedicated for perpetuity. Further, on motion of Councilman Pinkerton, Hughes second, Council instructed the City Manager and the Chief Building Officials that the City not issue any building permits until such time that the City - ry Pag y Attorney is :.satisfied that the owners of the subject parcels have`"filed for record two things --the necessary crossover agreement and an agreement that requires that those parking IIW serve for perpetuity as parking lots only for those structures. Both motions carried. Second reading of Ordinance No. 1253 will be on the agenda for the April 7, 1982 Council meeting This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after its final passage. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call this office. Very truly yours, A ce M me e City Clerk AR: dg