HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - November 6, 1985 (60)_ CITY COUNCIL MEEPING
c IJOV�R 6 1985
ACCEPT Council accepted the improvements in "Grape Bowl
IMPROVEMENTS - Restroom and Concession Staid Renovation", and
GRAPE BOWL directed the Public Works Director to file a
RESTROOM AND Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's
CONCESSION STAND Office.
RENOVATION
Council was apprised that the contract for these
improvements had been completed in substantial
_ conformance with the plans and specifications
approved by the City Council. The critract was
awarded to RHS Construction, Inc. of
Sacramento on May 15, 1985, in the ancunt of
$89,140. The final contract price was $107,840.
The difference between the contract amount and the
final contract price is mainly due to:
1. Fire damage created by vandalism prior to
their start.
2. Additional work found necessary because of
dry rot and unsafe conditions.
3. Approximately $6,000 attributed to additional
concrete work related to the paving contract.
t
n
z
I.?.--
.a-�ti✓
s
t
_AN.
iFk,�,+EY
,'M..f����`�F•h
xr G
�
T:
CITY OF LODI
. • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
COUNCIL COh1MUNICATION
TO:
City Council
Project Data
Originally Budgeted:
1984
FROM:
City Kanager
Budgeted Fund:
148.0-760.39
October 28, 1985
Amount Budgeted:
$145,000 -
DATE:
Fund Project Cost:
$120,200
SUBJECT•
Accent Improvements
- Over -run Fund: $6,000 -
Capital Outlay
Grape Bowl Restroom
and Concession Stand Renovation
RECOMMENDED ACTION:. That the City Council accept .the improvements in "Grape
Bowl Restroom and Concession Stand Renovation," and direct the Public Works
Director to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's office.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The contract was awarded to RHS Construction Inc. of
Sacramento on May 15, 1985, in the amount of $89,140. The contract has been
completed in substantial conformance with the plans and specifications approved
by the City Council.
The contract completion date was September 15, 1985, and the actual completion
date is October 23, 1985• The time of completion was extended 44 days to cover
additional work. The final contract price was $107,840. The difference between
the contract amount and the final contract price is mainly due to:
1. Fire damage created by vandalism,prior to their start.
2. Additional work found necessary because of dry rot and unsafe
conditions.
3. Approximately $6,000 attributed to additional concrete work
related to the paving contract.
� 0
rJacX L. Ronsko
ublic Works Director
JL^n/GER/eeh
, City Manager