Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - November 5, 1986 (101)CITY COUNCIL MEETIM NMEMBER 5, 1986 APPEAL OF AVIIAJE INVESTMENT RECaMI: ASSESSMENT OF NEW SEWER CONNF rioN FEE ON ITS LODI AVENUE/FMM LANE DEVELOPMENT Council Member Snider asked to abstain from discussion and voting on the following matter, because of a possible CC -16 conflict of interest. OC -44 CC -51(a) City Manager Peterson reminded the Council that a letter OC -56 had been received from Mr. C. A. Wentland, Managing partner of Avenue Investment, protesting the new sewer connection fee with regard to his Lodi Avenue/Hcm Lane development. Mr. Wentland had just received word that the app nved plans for development of Suite "0" at 1300 West Lodi Avenue and learned that they would be assessed the connection fee at the new rate rather than at the previous rate. Mr. Wentland's letter was presented at the Regular Council Meeting of October 15, 1986 and was referred to staff at that ti m, for review and the presentation - of a recommendation at this meeting. City Manager Peterson further advised the Council that on October 1, 1986, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 86-112 which established an increase in the sewer connection fees. Subsequent thereto, it was determined that a number of buildings had been erected or were under construction within the City prior to the date of the adoption of the sewer connection fees. These buildings are in a status that could best be described as a "shell" structure. At the time those projects were initiated, the developer did not pay sewer connection charges because the ultimate occupant and the interior finish were unknown. The developers are required to pay the sewer connection fees when they acquire a building permit for the "tenant improvements". Si,joe the plans and specifications for the "shell" structures had already been approved by the Building Division and necessary permits issued prior to the time the new fee structure was adopted, it seems logical to "grandfather" these buildings. Accordingly, it is recon that the sewer connection charges for the "tenant improvemeznts" in thaca v^