Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 27, 1982 (37)City Clerk Reimche presented the following letter which had been received from Mary Jo Williams, President, Leroy Nichols PTA and Jerome Abatanqle, Principal: CROSSING GUARD "Cur P.T.A. has been watching with some concern our student REQUEST AT crossings on Highway 12. The traffic has increased considerably HAM AND and therefore pose a danger to our students. The Hutchins HIGHWAY 12 crossing has a guard to walk the children, but still some danger exists. Students are beginning to use the Ham Lane and Highway 12 more as housing begins to develop in the western area of the Beckman Ranch Subdivision. We feel that consideration should be given to placing a crossing guard at that point also. We urge you to consider the guard at the Ham Lane and Highway 12 crossing and reply to us as soon as possible." With the tacit concurrence of the Council, Mayor Reid referred the matter to Staff for investigation and information. r F , 'CM COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 1982- City Clerk Reimche presented the following letter which had been received from Mary Jo Williams, President, Leroy Nichols PTA and Jerome Abatanqle, Principal: CROSSING GUARD "Cur P.T.A. has been watching with some concern our student REQUEST AT crossings on Highway 12. The traffic has increased considerably HAM AND and therefore pose a danger to our students. The Hutchins HIGHWAY 12 crossing has a guard to walk the children, but still some danger exists. Students are beginning to use the Ham Lane and Highway 12 more as housing begins to develop in the western area of the Beckman Ranch Subdivision. We feel that consideration should be given to placing a crossing guard at that point also. We urge you to consider the guard at the Ham Lane and Highway 12 crossing and reply to us as soon as possible." With the tacit concurrence of the Council, Mayor Reid referred the matter to Staff for investigation and information. Unified ach®®l delliatt'llet NICHOLS SCHOOL REC LN ED 1501 S. Crweont Avonvo, Lodi, CA 95M �`�QZ��L 411kA XE .CITY CRC L66 OF LODI October 18, 1982 City of Lodi City Council City Hall Lodi, CA 95240 Sirs: Our. P.T.A. has been watching with some concern our student crossings on Highway 12. The traffic has increased considerably and therefore pose a danger to our students. The Hutchints crossing has a guard to walk the children but still some danger exist s. Students are beginning to use the Hamm Lane and Highway 12 more as housing begins to develop in the wentern area of the Beckman Ranch subdivision. We feel that consideration should 'be given to placing a crossing guard at that point also. We urge you to consider the guard at the Ham Lane and Highway 12 crossing and reply to us as soon as possible. MJW:djs Sincerely, Mary Jo Williams, President LEROY NICHOLS P.T:Ae J e 2'bme Abatangle, Principal al Maned by Facilities wW PlannbZg July 1, 1982 INIRODLX7I ON The purpose of this report is to discuss the process used by IL,odi Unified School District to relate development fee revenue to expenditures for temporary school facilities. Contained within is a discussion on the impotmded development fees and a summary of revenue amounts by jurisdiction; a summ. ry of expenditures incurred during the impoundment period; a fixed figure representing the amount of development fee.revenue which can be returned to the General and/or Site Funds as a "payback;" complete detail on how that figure was calculated; a conplete listing of assumptions and qualifiers relative to the process of allocation; an outline of the process to be used in allocation by the District; and a summary of income and expenditures beyond those related to the impounded fees. DEVELOPWgT FEE REVF.IVUE In 1978 the Cities of Lodi and Stockton and the County of San Joaquin adopted ordinances requiring the collection of per bedroom fees for the mitigation of the impact of development on specified overcrowded schools in the Lodi Unified Sctool District. Between 1979 and May, 1982 (inclusive) the local agencies collected fees at the time building permits were taken out for residences on parcels created after the date of the. ordinance; however, as a result of litigation in Shasta County, all fees were "im- pounded" until the State Supreme Court settled the issue, whereupon the "impounded" fees, plus inter'-st, were released to the School District. A summary of the impounded development fees (also called the bedroom tax and impaction fee) is shown below. Since release of the "impounded" fees each Jurisdiction sends the District a check as fees are received and an accounting of where the subject residence is located by subdivision. Tt is this infonnation which enables the District .to allocate the fees by attendance area or school. IMPOL NDED DEVELOPMENT FEF REV "IRM SCHOOL ATTeMANCE AREA SUBDIVISION Development Fees - Lodi as of 3/16/82 Heritage - Sr. Elem - Tokay High Cambridge Place Nichols Sr. Elem Tokay High Beckrun Rance Winchester flaks Reese - Woodbridge - Lodi High Millswood Vinewood/Henderson - Sr. El - Tokay Lakeshore Village Development Fees - Stockton as of Manch. 1982 Elkhorn - Sr. Eleni - Tokay High Colonial Estates No. Davis - Morada - Tokay High Fox :reek Clairmont •1 Parklane - Sr. Elea - Tokay High Suawerplace III 1st Pentecostal Church S 44,094.36 6,063.01 36,170.18 30,190.40 �f4 S 273,232.00 141,662.00 $4,174.00 10,463.00 6,680.00 450,11).00 Development Fees - Son 31otWAn County as of 4%30/82 S 25,412.00 Listed with Revenue/brpenditure Accatmting Forms GRAND TOTAL ;'f ► e • Interest included in each subdivision total - Lodi - S 6,719.74 Stockton - 58,906.DO °• Last 1/4 revenue for 1981-82 - $3,380 (See Chart at end of Report). INTERIM FACILITY EXPENDITURES Between 1977 aA 1932 the District incurm' a number of expenditures for the purpose of providing interim housing facilities, consistent Ath the provisions of the State Gcriernment Code. All of these expenditures were made from Pund 01 (the C•eneral Fund) and Rind 03 (the Site Fund) , and most were made with the expressed intention of applying development fee revenue towards those expenditures when it became available. Interim thing expen- ditures during this period are detained belaw. W 4W INTERIM HOUSING EXPENDITURE REVIEIV Original Expenditure School Expenditures Through June 30, 1982 Fiscal Year Pund 03 • Fund 01 •• 77 - 78 Parklane Mini 0 f 93,169 Relocate Portables Loekeford(2)Elkhorn(1) 1 $22,562 0 67,686 78 - 79 Relocate Portables - Elkhorn S 24,018 0 79 - 80 Relocate Portables Parklane (9)Oakwood (6)/ 442,875 0 Tokay High (2) 1 $26,OS1.47 Elkhorn Mini 9,525 44,200 80 - 81 State Portables 1 $2,000 + setup (leese prorated) Oakwood (8) 72,887 40,245 Elkhorn (2) 4,089 8.732 Marada (4) 1,406 19,587 Parklane (8) 2,890 47,210 Tokay High (8) 5,874 35,162 Woodbridge (2) 706 8.772 Mini School Leases 33,600 81 - 82 Otto Drive Maxi School 0 114,500 Mini School Leases 0 33,600 SLatePortables 1 $2,000 (see above) 0 64,000 Lease Trailers ••O Woodbridge - 8,211 Morada (2) - 15,990 Davis - 8,487 Heritage - 4.661 Needham - 4,388 ALL YFARS Subtotal $S6S.270 $ 652,600 GELNM TMAL $ 1,217 .870.00 ° Final 03 Special Reserve, or Site Fuxh •• Find 01 - General Final ••• Expenditures for Lease Trailers Presumed to be Entirely from General Rad -3- ALIDCATION OF REV MU TS In May, 1982, Lodi Unified received $638,942.74 from local jursidictions. This was the total amount of Development Fee Revenue, plus interest, that had been collected, and impounded, between 1979 and the date of release. It has been determined that $595,987.74 of the $638,942.74 collected could be returnea to the General and/or Site Funds as payback for expenditures made during the qualifying period. In May of 1982 the Board authorized a transfer of $138,558.00 from the Development Fee Fund to the General Fund to cover the startup costs for Henderson and Needham Schools for school year 198Z -19E3. $457,429.74 remains which can be transferred out of the Devel kv 1t Fe-e-Fudn-d to the General an or 9-1te Holds at this time. It is anticlpa d that additional l.evenue may also be transferred from -fourth quarter revenue recently received as payback: for 1981-1982 expenditures; however, those figures are not included here. Below is a summary of the disposition of the impounded Development Fee Revenue. SUMMARY OF ALLOCATION OF II+IPOl LADED DEVELOPbIENT FEES Fiscal Year Development Fee Total Qualifying Total Expenditures Total Revenue 'Unexpendable" Total Expenditure Revenge Expenditures "Recovered" Applied to Qualify- Revenue to be Not "Recovered" ing btperditures Carried Forward (2) (3) (7) 1979-1980 1 274,370.17 S 496,600.00 $ 279,221.74 S 268,370.17 S 6,000.00 S 217,378.26 1980-1981 255,149.02 248,560.00 247,438.00 250,991.02 (4) 4,158.00 1,122.00 1981-1982 109,423.55 106,137.00 69,328.00 76,626.SS (5) 32,797.00 3111809.00 (3 quarters) Totals $ 638,942.74 (1) 8S1,297.00 595,987.74 595,987.74 (6) 42,955.00 2S5,309.26 (1) Amount that was inpourded by Lodi, Stockton, and San Joaquin Canty and sent to LiISD in May, 1982 (Z) See chart "Interim Nothing Expenditure Review" and discussion on assumptions and qualifiers (3) See Development Fee Raven e/Expenditure Accounting Forms for expenditures relative to income by year (4) Includes $3,553.02 in interest which was applied to 1979-1980 expenditures - see qualifiers (5) Includes $7,298.55 in interest which was applied to 1979-1980 expenditures - see qualifiers (6) $595,987.74 - $138,SS8.00 (transferred 5/82 as a "pay back" to General Fund to cover Needham and Henderswa School startup costs) - $4S7,429.74 for transfer to Gwwrai and/or Site Funds at this time (as "payback") (7) Revem;e from msidential developments in attendance areas where there were not equal qualifying expenditures On July 6, 1982 the Board received a copy of this report. Following discussion it was moved, seconded (Todd; Meyer) and unanimously approved to authorize the immediate transfer of $457,429.74 to the General Fund from the Development Fee Fund as "repayment" for Interim Housing Expenditures. --4- V The Process T The process developed for allocation of Impounded Development Fee Revenue hinges around the need to directly relate revenue from residential develop- ments to the school or attendance area serving that development. "Plan A" adopted by the Board in March, 1979, to guide the distribution of impact fee revenue states, Apply the total fee to any one of the attendance aroas that is impacted, even though all three attendance anus qualify within the geographic element. Advan- tages: 1) more flexibility in the use of funds; 2) more rapid accumulation of furxis; 3) less likely that unencumbered balances will remain. Disadvan- tages: 1) more likelihood of responding to localized politicAl pressure; 2) greater difficulty in responding to criticism that 'Lodi money is used in Stockton' and vice versa; 3) greater difficulty in convincing elected officials that resources collected are used in the immediate area. This process implements the Board's formula. The steps in development of the process were: 1) establish assumptions and qualifiers as a basis for determining qualifying and eligible expenditures and allocating revenues in less than clear- cut cases; 2) determination of attendance areas by year for each development; 3) charting of revenues by development and expenditures by school for each fiscal year since adoption of the ordinances up to release of the impounded fees; 4) allocation of the revenues to each expenditure on the "Development Fee Revenue/ Expenditure Accounting Forms;" S) summing all figures to provide a "Summary of Allocation of Impounded Development Fees;" and 6) adaptation of the process to the ongoing situation. Assumptions and Qualifiers Inherent in any process is the need to establish a base. The recommended allocation of develoj.lment fees is based on strict interpretation of the enabling legislation. Government Code Sections 65970-65978 (SB 201 - 1968) permit local jurisdictions to adopt ordinances to exact fees from residential devel- opers in lieu of land dedication for purposes of providing interim school facilities. Lodi, Stockton and San Joaquin County adopted ordinances in late 1978 and immedi- ately started collecting fees from builders k4iose parcels were created after the effective date of the applicable ordinance. Section 65978 requires that Lodi �hnified School District maintain a&--1 accounting of fees, while Section 65980 limits their use to strictly def.inedinterim facilities. In addition, Government Code Section 6S974 (d) states in part, The location and -mtmt of land to be dedicated or the amount of fees to be paid, or both, shall bear a reasonable relationship and will be limited to the needs of the col mw i ty for interim elementary or high school facilities and shall be reasonably re - laced and Limited to the reed for schools caused by the develop- ment; . . . -y- In relating income and expenditures by attendance area and school for each, the following were asstmd or used as a basis for decision: ASSUTIF I' I ONS AND QUAL I F I ERS 1. pwa starting date for allocation is fiscal 1979-1980. The fiscal year is used as a time unit; however, some. reve,,aue and expenditures may have originatcKl between January -Jun- 1979. It is assumed that these figures are negligible for the purpose and are, therefore, incorporate with the !979-1980 figures in the matrices and surmmry charts. Experxittures before 1979 ($184,873.00) were not ce.^.sidered "eligible," and, therefore. do not appear in any totals. Use-,! on a. 1980 change in thr definition of interim, a State Attorney General Opinion 79-625 (10-16-79), and the advise of County Cmmsel, the expense of OttoDrive *taxi -hool in the amount of $114,500 was not considered eligible, and, therefore, doer not appear in any totals. 3. Elkhorn Hint was consWereed eligible because the lease and encumbrances pr, -date the change in language of Section 65980 and the facility is clearly interim. The lease renewal will not qualify in 1982-1983. 4, The net soomt of "eligible" or qualifying" expenditures was reduced to $851,297.00, ftcxa a gross aacunt of $1,150,670.00. 5. Consistent with Government Code Section 65974, all rrpenditures must ix related to the impacted Attendance area containing the cjntributing residential development. Expenditures by school were "credited" on the basis cf the District's Declaration of Impaction Report and the Board formula. Non -Impacted schools are not considered eligible. 6. expenditures made at a school not in the attendan_e area crnta:ring the developm°~:t, but which was used to house children from that subdivision. as outlined in the ararual atterr_::nce area reports prepared by the Assistant Superintendent, offices, were considered eligible on the basis of the District's equal loading policy. This wvald inclu a Woodbridge taking the over- flow from Senior Elementary and Lodi High School taking the overflow from Tokay High School. 7. In those attendance areas with severai schools (spem ifieally Elkhorn), it is recognized that the impact of any specific development is on the entire attendance area; therefore, expen.-li- tures made for any schaol in the attendance area are considered relatire to any paying devel- opment built in the atteerdance area. 8. "Dripaid" or "unrecovered" expenditures made in any given year are not carried to the next year. It is reaioned that if expenditures for interim facilities must relate to :seed, they are logi- cally made after the building permit is taken out or, the residence and not in advance. It is understood that facilities in place: certainly serve the :>w students as well. 9. 'Vnspent" fees or "mexpetxiable" reveimw received in any given year is carried from year to year on the basis that the need for interim :Facilities to serer children fTxn the related daerelur+ments may not arise until some time after the building permit (at which time the fees are collected). Such revenue may be used in arry succeeding year fon schools serving that development. 10. Interest was a one-time- income to the district as a result )f fee impoundments. The interest did not comae from, any developer and was. therefore, allocated at District discretion for any "eligible" expenditure. It was arpolied: however. only to qualifying expenditures and not for aaf other district purpose, althoamgh tlu>t may technically be possible. Since the local juris- dictions willingly turned this revenue over to the District, it is felt that the only proper use is in the manner ascribed. 11. Lease trailers financed directly, or indirectly, by the General And are included in the 1981-1982 eaa:penditures. Stu3ents nous. -d in lease trailers are substantially frnm the atten- dance area of 0w school where they are locate -J. Attendance Areas Elementary, Middle and high School Attendance Areas and specific schools serving each City subdivision paying fees, are listed below. All County fees were accounted for pend t by permit; therefore, attendance areas for County develop- ments are listed with the fees on the Development Fee Revenue/Expenditure/Account- ing forms. All attendance area information was obtained from the annual attendance area reports. � 11• M • H � 6g DEVELOP"an 1981-1982 1980-1981 1979-1980 Colonial Estates No. K -Elkhorn Mini K -Elkhorn Mini K -Elkhorn Mini 1-6 Needham and 1-6 Needham 1-3 Elkhorn Elkhorn AA Maxi School Sr. E1 4 Henderson Sr. El and Tokay Tokay S Washington 6 Needham Sr. El & Tokay High Fox Creek X -Parklane Mini K -Parklane Mini K -Parklane Mini 1-6 Davis 1-6 Davis 1-S Davis Davis AA Morada IIorada 6 Parklane Tokay Tokay Morada Tokay Clairmont 11 K -Parklane Mini K -Parklane Mini 2-6 Parklane 2-6 Parklane Davis AA Sr. E1 Sr. E1 (assume assignment Tokay Tokay same as Normandy Village) 9u merpiace III K-6 Parklane K-6 Parklane Parklane AA Sr. El Sr. El (Cimarrar) Tokay Tokay Pentecostal Church K-6 Parklane Sr. El Tokay Cambridge Place K-6 Heritage K-6 Heritage K -S Heritage Sr. El Sr. El 6 Needham Heritage AA Tokay Tokey Sr. El Tokay Beckman Ranch K-6 Nichols K-6 Nichols K-6 Nichola Sr. El Sr. E1 Sr. E1 Nichols AA Tokay Tokay Tokay Winchester Oaks K-6 Nichols K-6 Nichols K-6 Nichols Sr. El Sr. E1 Sr. E1 Nichols AA Tokay Tokay Tokay MiIIswood K-6 Reece K-6 Reece K-6 Reece Woodbridge Woodbridge Woodbridge Reece AA Dodi Lodi Lodi Lakeshore Village Henderson Sr. El Vinewood rural Tokay 7- Devefbplrent Fee Revenue/Expenditure Accounting Forms This form was developed to provide a format for allocating revenues to expen- ditures. Included herein are the completed forms and allocations for fiscal years 1979-1980 and 1980-1981 and the first three quarters of 1981-1982. It is anticipated that the form can be used for ongoing accounting of Development Fee Revenue/Expenditure allocations. The steps in filling -out the form, and thereby allocating revenues are as follows: ALLOCATING DEVELOPMENT FEE REVENUE I. Determine reporting period. ie. fiscal year, quarter, month, etc. Note on form. 2. an form, enter each subdivision and the amvtmt of fee revenue received from that sub. division during the period. 3. Determine the attendance area and schools serving that subdivision. 4. On form, enter each school and the amount of eligible expenditures. S. On the form enter the amount of revenue brought fo hard from earlier periods, for each development. 6. work acre=s the form allocating the fee -revenue recieved to the schools or attendance areas serving the development: or work down assigning expenditures to each development. 7. Expenditures for which there is no revenue are totaled at the bottom of the form, and revenues for which there is no qualifying expenditure are totaled on tho right. Only revenue can be cArried forward, by development, for eximnditure in a future period. (Be watchful of attendance area c;ranges fma year to year - docunw."a any relationship to revenue carried forward by development). Expenditures are not carried forward. If the amount spent exceeds the revenue, funds presumably come from the General and/or Site FuM. Facilities paid through categorical program frmds are not considered eligible. 8. Development Fee revenue from developments covered by an Agreement should be )Dept on a form separate from those shok'-nR revenue received via local agencies. as fees from agreements may be spent on any school facilities which serve the development. There is no limitation to interim facilities. Expenditures for interim facilities is ongoing in the District. In 198Z-:983 an anticipated $2196,132 will be expended for the lease and setup of an additional 52 State portables, leash renewal on 32 State portables and lease rcenewa1 on at least 76 trailers, as shown on the following chart. All of these leases are eligible for payrient directly from Development Fee revenues. It is anticipated that: expenditures will exceed reveu�w, , primarily because of the depressed h,using industry. In addition to the eligible leases, the District will continue lease of the Maxi School ar:d the two Mini Schools totaling $126,600. The District will also lease additional trailers for categorical programs. We M ANTICIPATED INTERIM HOUSING EXPENDITURES 1982-1983 School New Portables Old Portables Trailers Total Henderson $24,000 $24,000 Oakwood $36,000 $16,000 $52,000 Needham $32,000 $32,000 Morada $16,000 $ 8,000 $8,749 $32,749 Elkhorn $16,000 $ 4,000 $20,000 Davis $16,000 $16,000 Lawrence $12,000 $12,000 Parklane $ 8,000 $16,000 $24,000 Nichols $ 8,000 $ 8,000 Tokay $24,000 $16,000 $40,000 Lodi High $ 8,000 $6,334 $14,334 L.ockeford S 4,000 $ 4,000 Live Oak $ 4,900 $ 4,000 Heritage $4,661. $ 4,661 Woodbridge $ 4,000 $4,388 $ 8,388 $208,000 $64,000 $24,132 $296,132 M LODI IMFIFD SGML DISIRICr DEVELOFMW FEE R VEHM / EXPENDrPJRE ACOOLNritG IUM For Period 1979-1980 Page I of FEE R6VEMJE RECEIVED BY DEVE EX?END 7 RE5 BY SCHOOL OR AT[F3iLk4CE AREA REV04M TO CARRY FORVIARD FRON El kho rr: Mini Parklane Oakwood Tokay THIS PERIOD ONLY PAST PERIODS 53,725 l56,3QM2 231+,463 52,103.1 Fox Creek 69,875 59J75 -0- Colonial Heights No. 153,66o 53.725 99.93S - - td111 s wood 4, WO 4,800 County - Morada 8,800 -0- Cybrid3 e Place 18,400 118,400 -0- County - Lodi High 1,200 1,200 Interest 17,635•17 17 635.1 -0- Interest from 80-81 3,553.02 3,55.3. f, Interest from 81-82 7,288.55 33583.S6 3,714.9 -0- l "unpaid" expenditures -0- 86,433:82130',54;,.4 '0- • See separate listing for attendance area W/or school serving each subdivision or development LIJDI TIMI FIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FEE REVENUE / EXPENDITURE ACCOINTING FOW For Period -1930-1981 Page I of 2 FEE REVENLE RECEIVEfl BY �LOP}¢M B ROUOIrr EXPEND17iRES BY SCH7OL OR ATna AREA REVEWE TO CARRY FORKARD FP04 F0irIA W Parklane Elktiorn Oakxood Tokay Aorada FNc,-)dbridge 50,100 12,821 113,132 I 9,478 41,036 21,993 THIS PERIOD ONLY PAST PERIODS Suraelace rg,440 6,440 -0- Clal-mont 47,610 43,660 colonial Estates I:o. 98,59`. 8S.774 -0- ".12,821 Ca^brifl7,e Plane 22,400 'incheater Oa':,.,, 16,000 13,564 2,436 a 11 rwood lo,600 4,800 9.478 1,122 4.800 County-T,odi III ;h 1,200 1,200 County - Clem/Lock, Houstog60Lodi High County - Live Oak, morada, Tokay 600 -600 -0- County - Vine::ood, Sr. r.1.., ToIAay F,00 -0- County - Davis, Morada, Tokay 5600 8,600 -0- • Sex separate listing for attendance area and/cr school serving each subdivision or development ►J 0 WOI tMF1ED SCIML DISTRICT wiannowr FEE REvENw / EXPENDITmE AaxxKrINC mm For Period 1980-1981 Page 2 of 2 FEDREVE P�£KE �friTJMnEG _ EXPeOrnitES 33Y SCHOOL OR ATTENDANCE AREA Parklane &lxhorn Oakwood uoodbrid+e roka' Morada REVENUE 70 CA FORXARU •MIS PERIOD ONLY PAST PERIODS Interest L6,104.02 27,358 IS.193.02 t0 79-80 600 — "•�npsio" e/penditures -0- -0- -0- -0- 522 I • Sae separate listing for atterAvnce area and/or school serving each subdivision or development LODI UNIFILD SCPDDL DISMICr DEVELDPMC FU REVMX / EXMMITM ACCOLRIMNC, F FOT Period -1981-1982 3 quarters Page I of 2 FFE W-NEXX RECEIVED BY DEMDPbe4T F0 E2P.7 E EMMMI-nitEs BY SCHOOL OR ATTF)CWKE AREA BROUGHT REVMX TO CARRY FORWARD FROM FORIU'A RD Oakwood I Needham I Morada Elkhorn LAVIE Par;,lane THIS PERIOD CNLY PAST PERIODS 16 f"00 1:.788 23,990 4,000 19. 437 16.000 U:.L.i a ri) a c e 2,760 2.760 Fox C.'Cek 23,990 8,487 ,:oluntal Estates tin. 1 12,13-, Pent,2c,-,stal C►,urch 5,580 5L880- 0,000 .1inchester Acres 15,8o0 2-436 llsa000 'Ai' 13,°00 5,922 9,600 County-Live0ak, 14oradas ToKaY 780 County - Clem/Lock, Houston, Lodi High 600 Cownty - Da vis,lior&da To' --ay 2 j,82 0 ,;ounty- Lodi Hisb Interest 7,29b.55 1,200 "unpaid" expenditures 16,000 4,788 -0- 4,000 -0- 7,360 E 'S LODI UNIFIED 5000L. DISTRICT DEVEIDMW FEE REVENUE / EJlPMIT M AtS27UKTINC FOM For Period1991-1982 3 quarters Page 2 of 2 FEEREVENUE ECEIVI� "RPElDMRES BY SLMOL OR ArTENW E AREA REVENUE 70� R HARD BY Tokay woodbridg Heritage THIS PERIOD ONLY PAST PERIODS 16,000 12,211 4,661 Su rme rp 1 ac e -0- Fox Creek 6,000 6.143 (Fees colli Colonial Estates No. -12,135 error - rei Pentecostal Church -0- 3ec,.ma'i Ranch 6,000 T :inchester Acres 18,BUU,436 112,00d 1Z.211 789 9,600 5'922 • Lakeshore Village :�ounty- Live a.:, ,4orada, TW ay 780 County - Clem/Lock, Houston, Lodi Hi 600 County - Davis, Horada Tokay Hit3h 2,820 county - Lodi High r 1,200 Interest "unpaid" exrenditures -0- -0- 4,661 ! , V 7V . J J bV 79-80 acted in mbursed) j LJ DI LKIFIED 9CIIODL DISIRICr DEVEMINEIC. FEE REVERIE / EXPEND1711RE ACCn(NTIK FIOFM For Period Last 114 - 1901-82 Page 1 of 1 FIE REVEN E RFXMIITD REVEYL E 7D CARRY F(EfMD BY MVELO MNT EXPEMITURE5 BY SCHOOL OR ATTENDANCE AREA F7b-*l REVERE Oakwood Needham Elkhorn Parklane Heritage THIS PERI00 ONLY PAST PER B1�T 16,000 4,788 4,000 7,360 4,661 6,143 6.143 Colonial Estates W. -12,135 -12.135 Be0iRm Ranch 6,000 6,DOO Winchester Acres 21,236 21,236 i9.600 9,600 Coun:y-Live Oak 780 780 County -Clements, Lockeford, Huston, 2.600 600 i Ni .7 ,600 600 County -Davis, NDrada. 2,820 Tbka 2,820 County - Lodi High 1.200 1,200 780 County -Lakewood. 7 30 0 See separate listing for attendance arra and/or school serving each subdivision or development U] 11 E 9 N Adjadr.1stration ar Ellerth E. Larson, S,�jmrinterxg"Amt F ,. Tcat RmUlin,, Assi.-Ptaut SuperJnttmdmt RuWd Vm_T, Assistant Supwrintendent mary Joan Starr, facility Plamer. jmn P ipas 0 AC ting Ws ims s f%_mW r Ralj:h Wetwre, A+AnistraLivp, Di,.rector OfPerswael .41 E2 Dodi Unified School District 1982-1983 DECLARATION OF IMPACTION REPORT Approved by the Board of Education September 7, 1982 Prepared by Facilities and Planning office 1982 - 1983 DECLARATION OF IMPACTION REPORT This report declaring continued conditions of student overcrowding in certain school attendance areas in the Lodi Unified School District, has been prepared in fulfillment of the requirements of State Government Code Section 65978 and the requirements of the implementing ordinances of the Cities of Stockton and Lodi and San Joaquin County. DECLARATION OF IMPACTION In January of 1982 approximately 4,970 students in the Lodi Unified School District were considered "unhoused" by the State Allocation Board, meaning that there were insufficient permanent cla.;srooms to adequately house that number of students. Enrollwnt projections indicate the number of unhoused students will continue to exceed 4,500 in the 1982-1983 school year, thereby necessitating continued and additional temporary student housing alternatives. It is the District's plan to house regular, special education and pull-out program students in the following manner during the 1982 - 1983 school year. 420 permanent classrooms ??? "other" in -school spaces, ie. storage areas, work rooms, offices, etc. that are used as classroom space 16 leased and District -owned trailers 8 mini -school rooms in temporarily converted duplexes 16 maxi -school rooms in temporarily converted duplexes 37 District -owned relocatable rooms 7 District -owned relocatable rooms for Adult Education 84 State -lease emergency portables (32 in-place, 52 new) 6 rooms in leased quarters for the Career Center 1 leased house used for blind student education Attendance Areas are determined each year by the Assistant Superin- tendent, Elementary Education in cooperation with the District Administration and Staff. A publication, revieged by the Board, is prepared each year. There may be more than one elementary school in an Attendance Area. 2. i ::nmllment projections and classroom loading are detailed by Attendance :-.rea school in Exhibit A. New enrollm-:nt for the 1982-1983 year.is expected to b4 slightly less than or equal to that in previous years as a result of tiw stagnant housing market; however, a sharp economic turnaround. could result in a sudden influx of new students if only a fraction of approximately 6,330 NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT await!y, approval andjor tuiancIng are coniitructed. Tn addition, one could expect accelerated subdivision o a£ acreage now stxown on local General Plan Maps for eventual residential development, the greenbelt initiatives notwithstanding. Based on the known extent of overcrowding, the anticipated increase in enrolLment, and the known potential for all subdivision activity within the impacted attendance areas of the Lodi Unified School District, the Governing Board declared the following attendance areas impacted for the purposes of requesting the continued imposition and collection of develop.nent fees by local governments. A copy of Board Resolution 82-40 and amending Resolution 82-43 are set forth as Exhibits B and C in this report. Lodi Unified School District IMPACTED SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AREAS 1982 - 1983 Lodi High School Attendance Area Tokay High School Attendance Area Liberty High School Attendance ."-sea Morada Middle School Attendance Arem Senior Elementary School Attendance Area Woodbridge Midge School Attendance Area Needham Middle School Attendance Area Davis Elementary School Attendance Area Elkhorn Elementary- School Attendance Area Henderson Elementary School Attendance Area Heritage Elementary School Attendance Area Lakewood Elementary School Attendance Area Lawrence Elementary School Attendance Area Lockeford/Clements Elementary School Attendance Area Leroy Nichols Elementary School Attendance Area Oakwood Elementary School Attendance Arrea Ottc Drive Elementary School Attendance Area Parklane Elenwntary School Attendance Area Victor Elementary School Attendance Area Vinewood Elementary School Attendance Area EXHIBIT A DETERMINATION OF IMPAMON PMOOM@ti Mkssmooc snxxw CAPAzny OF PF3i1VXW SPACE: LI: ILI2AT IM 1NrERM FWSDIG amt. w a ct.a.nar a rat/pen, Mad. olds t r Y dStwtad M a M altfttff tLtt" r•a• - CLASSP400M 1 1 (19) liner 1 is f -t.e.r� fres %— of a3- old Oa.Yt res ot11 1. So." A E Ca Cb D 9 F G H I J K L N tbw""~ - mllAa for n is O O'Ir.' �bRw� b YYt -.L7 S.O.1•.: :- f t1Ac. etpr.. a.a tA1nt tw.t ti tfo r.rtet r M .dtrYt.� MMel..tla1. M Yo dr tth. aro rAl. �tt�lL{ 44 1:,r t .411 Ire «.a .•a -wru e,.. r.�+r n11's .t.IM .r cw«c of Heat .r ufq.r arNrrrtm M AM)i r - r - a .a-Yws. IMewew» atd.rs rY.l v (31 tsar •t0ss, �1sA.tt r a wwr fts"M yArl�IwlMwrds a�tfacert� patttauty resets to M aat11-1 !t1 t..-- to . eol+ 1.1 ufm-1 .It. I t 1 pet .*A.** ewe L-kofet+/O�n M .. (M) Tm+t Mf l.talle awNt.M[ X01.. 1w, MlodrM an tY pulp" me e4.nr. / 1.... 111 N --a .n .n Y rr bMtn .�. tr do- � t►O ae OS, d Loma A"ustmos are to werfq M.WwMir -. w f111.4 teas o.it "miss oh -sabre st.atma u w Tmn an t agMea.etw t.or With J rrdM. traYrt M prows stat ad a Ora olds t ebf. !i .- [••w ..t I ►fdrrpet.l r.tfmr r anlsJhraLm IU) 0.Z hl Otho I. t Fwm C.r.+G M rNr1A OMrcr ..IM lt..r.rr wMlMnr � Yr •'�� �m-a. tr.'Mw ano MYo~ � • •�Mt M aa.br .n. w .nr Yes YM wt6iMPC �1A ttrtlw T.tlw r f.rtt tYn f.A../.t-iM tfdrtetrMi.t+r .tt:+e tlldln. tflstr••tt tYw/t-e. iaa■r ris Mlmw 1. TT VL;'* Rtw as pa& Ir. LYdrrprtwwMi atge Bltrtl 111, +ku < v CJ< UQ Vit ri Z O. .•.W 0 •:r 11w. M 16 total tntgrq ..r..r. two tlsaletas t M are 1Marl. M Mw. aw sept ttlfwt+. - ., t. -. •,. Lodi Hiidl school 66 S 61 1830 60 1890 :040 -ISO 2 4- - low Hish school. 69 4 - 65 1950 36 1966 2602 - 615 14 2 1 - Liberty EEigh 3 - 1 2 60 12 72 293 • 221 4 - - Ilbrraa a-i$are 12 1 - 10 300 24 324 SSO -226 Senior E:omentpry 32 2 - SO 900 21 924 917 - 63 - 3 2 - Woodbridge Riddle 17 3 14 420 36 I56 575 119 2 1 1 - iked}taat "1*(� 13 - 1 12 360 12 372 S00 - 140 (v s eoenta27 20 1 I—= 18 S40 12 SSI 903 • 309 4 - - 6(17) Elidwwf Elowntary 2) k3) 7 0 2 S 1S0 24 174 690 - S16 6 6 11(17) Ebaderson Eles". 3 0 0 - 3 90 0 90 205 - US 6 - - - Heritap Kleaelntary 18 2 2 18 SIO 24 $64 660 • 96 - 2 - Haustan E1lewetttsry(4) 13 1 12 1 3W 1 372 AA240 G ' ry 11 492 S14 - 22 - - - -. Lamm= E levarntaly 7 1 2 - 6 1S0 24 201 300 - 96 3 - . Live *A Elaratsry 11 1 3 - 9 270 36 306 364 - S8 2 tockeford Blown, (S) 7 0 0 7 210 0 210 256 - 46 1 2 - - Q_talants fi?eel+n. S Miro Iqr S 1 3 1 4 - t4 + L M Mchols Ele. (7) 20 2 1 21 630 12 - 642 60 750 - •198 2 - 1 - Oakbood iaomatorr (8) 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 660 • 660 17 S _ Otto Aries Ldeawn. (9) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 414 - 414 - 13 r� Dali19M. (10 1 27 - - - Tunwr Elowntary (11) 2 0 0 - 2 60 0 60 S3 + - - - Eaves Neese E'.larntary 17 1 3 1 14 420 36 4S6 4S4 • Tokay Calarq life. (12) 4 1 0 0 - 4 120 0 120 97 • 23 Victor 9.10WA ria 9 1 1 - 6 240 12 2SZ 2S2 0 vineslaw Mashinatm ETlw MuTy 11 15 11(13 1 1 3 12 360 36 516 3% 603 392 27-11 • 4 - - NOTATIO nn G -ANO 1-6 rta.d TQA► w., N asattoststl r.Me tfo/ e0 (111 amt. w a ct.a.nar a rat/pen, Mad. olds t r Y dStwtad M a M altfttff tLtt" r•a• - Iftl lacfraw dl ttR tpatW Motlw tYar., t.. aO/V M • n -i/ !�R!�tt/tf. w�o� - [f l liner 1 is f -t.e.r� fres %— of a3- old Oa.Yt res ot11 1. So." W tats .ta f.ta dsaI d 10 R m ie1-R v a f1�= ..�. L. a >• �. p r 1Q � Iwtll glmtalmlt� d tf. ^tm rAaM/ r wa fgtur. iaer .twm.arr t1hM-J t q ihdrls ON 1•+ q tgmmMt c .....as tt qft . o b mama: Ilsfi mod me a 4 tita.flsaf s volas . m 4"UN M VS"- a .mho is 74Y cla.a.a. O..ta . M who aa.atne cblfala "Itd!•tl�.- Tsar aYiY M ttd"a to. - _ �Ma' p1� tAr. OM>rr . `� sr M /w. f t�lt.e i,.- �t�Ili."M W gape. do �wt.ItMtw ad t? .at. Mi fir+1►. srlwn 1— NI owMo• Uy M3Oo/ M p q nu r tbw""~ - mllAa for n is O O'Ir.' �bRw� b YYt -.L7 S.O.1•.: :- f t1Ac. etpr.. a.a tA1nt tw.t ti tfo r.rtet r M .dtrYt.� MMel..tla1. M Yo dr tth. aro rAl. �tt�lL{ 44 1:,r t .411 Ire «.a .•a -wru e,.. r.�+r n11's .t.IM .r cw«c of Heat .r ufq.r arNrrrtm M AM)i r - r - a .a-Yws. IMewew» atd.rs rY.l v (31 tsar •t0ss, �1sA.tt r a wwr fts"M yArl�IwlMwrds a�tfacert� patttauty resets to M aat11-1 !t1 t..-- to . eol+ 1.1 ufm-1 .It. I t 1 pet .*A.** ewe L-kofet+/O�n M .. (M) Tm+t Mf l.talle awNt.M[ X01.. 1w, MlodrM an tY pulp" me e4.nr. / 1.... 111 G. tiM t • p Y l ai.Md :rA f• 1 b CI.rM. .n Y rr bMtn .�. tr do- � t►O ae OS, d Loma A"ustmos are to werfq M.WwMir -. lei f111.4 teas o.it "miss oh -sabre st.atma (11) Tmn an t agMea.etw t.or With J rrdM. traYrt M prows stat ad a Ora olds t ebf. !i 9&46 -Al test- tem ou Ove -aft— M atter bcbU [••w ..t I ►fdrrpet.l r.tfmr r anlsJhraLm IU) Gs—silt tq atsai a Ars (AA) w. the .dl..t r. ds. Sot te.c..r. r at.41a NtlatlMa (M Mta ��aatl' • � hl Otho I. t Fwm C.r.+G M rNr1A OMrcr ..IM lt..r.rr wMlMnr � Yr •'�� �m-a. tr.'Mw ano MYo~ � • •�Mt M aa.br .n. w .nr Yes YM wt6iMPC ttrtlw T.tlw r f.rtt tYn f.A../.t-iM tfdrtetrMi.t+r .tt:+e tlldln. tflstr••tt tYw/t-e. iaa■r ris Mlmw 1. TT VL;'* Rtw as pa& Ir. LYdrrprtwwMi atge Bltrtl 111, (191 Dries M MI Y trwot .mwt.a r t)o P w aldnug% fa. M cin ta. tdfla.. tea. ad arm* r"star (10) M.;ilrm Lapin Paths 7•l /tM a-t.orl/ ttll-p dit.t.ttw (MI 1.11 farts ah"I - : (ti) G—Oft t•t -lad mor 4 groin t • 6.tame Tm.M 00 •:r 11w. M 16 total tntgrq ..r..r. two tlsaletas t M are 1Marl. M Mw. aw sept ttlfwt+. - ., t. -. •,. BEFORE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LODI INIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT t 4. OF THE OJIMY OF SAN JOAWIN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 81-40 1982-1983 DECLARATION OF 114pACTION WHEREAS, the development of new residential property results in the demand for school facilities; and WHEREAS. the corstruction of new residences and the resultant increase of students continues; and WHEREAS, students from new residential units in overcrowded attendance areas cause an immediate need for classroom solutions; and WHEREAS. Lodi Unified School District has considered ark' acted upon such options ass (1) presentation to the voters of bond measures to provide capital Rads for permanent school housing, (2) temporary buildings. (3) double sessions, (4) bussing, (S) school attendance boundary realignment, and has considered, and for good and sufficient reasons chosen not to act upon, (6) year-round school attendance and (7) extended day programs (high school); and WHEREAS. there have been no developer provided facilities as defined in Government Code Section 6S978. WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 6S978 the City of Lodi has enacted Ordinance No. 3095-C.S., and the County of San Joaquin has enacted Ordi- nance No. 2574 to assist school districts mitigating the impact of new home construc- tion; and HHERFAS. the aforementioned Ordinances require residential developers to participate in the cost of interim solutions necessitated by the ov-rcrowriing of existing classroom facilities due to new residential construction; mai WHEREAS, this Board has reviewed the content of the master Site Capacity Table prepared by staff. a copy of which is attached hereto. and has approved said report for public distribution; THEREFORE. IT IS HERESY RESOLVED that the Lodi Unified School District de- clares ispaction in these school attendance areas affected by current and proposed development plans, to wit: Davis Elementary School Attetdanre Area Elkhorn Elemanttary School Attendance Area Heritage Elementary School Attendance Area Lakewood Elementary School Attendance Area Lawrence Elementary School Attendance Area Leroy Nichols Elementary School Attendance Area Oakwood Elementary School Attendance Area Vinewood Elementary School Attendance Area Nora" Middle Sclrool Attendance Area Woodbridge Middle School Attendance Area Lodi High School Attendance Area Tokay High School Attendance Area Liberty High School Attendance Area BE IT FURTHER RESOLVFD that the Superintendent be, and he hereby is, directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution and the accompanying staff report to the City Councils of Lodi and Stockton and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Joaquin for the consideration and concurrence follow"ng public hearings before their respective bodies. PASSED Aim ADOPTED this 3rd day of August, 1982, by the following vote of the Board of Trustees, to wit: AYES: Yetsula, Meyer, Johnston, Todd, Derrick, Dale. Ball NOES: None ABSENT.00, Moue i ATTEST: jJQW VAMU, President Board of Trustees Broard of Trustees EXHIBIT C BEFORE THE MUM OF TRUSTEES OF THE LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF Till COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN. STATE OY CALIFO.!NIA RESOLUTION 82-43 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 82-40 1982-83 DECLARATION OF UWACTION WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of August, 1982, this Board of Trustees ouly adopted Resolution 82-40 1982-83 Declaration of Impaction, and; WHEREAS. said Resolution sets forth the District's condition of over- crowded classrooms and determines the impacted attendance areas; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution d2-40, is hereby amended by altering the list of Impacted Attendance Areas to include the follovin*: Live Oak Attendance Area Lockeford/Clments Attendance Area Parklane Attendance Area Sr. Elemeutary Attendance Area Victor Attendance Area Needham Middle School Attendance Area Henderson Attendance Area Otto Drive Attendance Area PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of September 1982, by the follovt% vote of the Board of Trustees of the Lodi Unified School District. to vitt AYES: Vatsula, Johnston, Meyer. Rall, Derrick, Todd NOES: Now ABSENT: done JOHN ATSULA, Presid*ut� Board of Trustees ATTEST: PONNI7Y R. Clark^ — Board of Trustees 0 6. HOUSING OPTIONS The Lodi Unified School District is actively pursuing solutions to existing and projected student housing inadequacies on two fronts. First, the District is pursuing permanent facilities with applications for eight new schools and expansion of two others in -process with the Office of Local Assistance at the State level. A summary of the status of these appli- cations is contained in the "Facility Project Update Report" presented to the District Board on August 3, 1982. in December, 1982 student housilig needs will be re-evaluated by the District, the State Board of Education and the Office of Local Assistance. The District's applications will be reviewed and consideration will be given to amendment or addition of projects based on the number of unhoused students and the number of priority points. Secondly,the District is making every effort to house children on an interim basis with minimal adverse impact on the educational program. An important consideration in determining the most reasonable housing alternative is the neighborhood school concept. Also important is the equal loading policy which causes all schools throughout the District, within a given grade span, to house the same proportion of students relative to capacity, where practical. Equal loading is a concept that works well in an urban area but provides extraordinarily long bus rides for students when the area of impaction and growth is substantially removed from the area where classrooms are available. As growth continues, and the schools become overcrowded before new facilities can be constructed, the District has considered and will contir:ue to consider the following alternatives: Bussing Bussing is used as an interim process to implement the equal load policy. The Board finds that no pupil should be bussed from his attendance area, but if necessary, never more than 10 miles from the "full" school to the school of redirection. Double sessions - Elementary Schools Double sessions in the primary grades retain the same amount of in -class time. In each of the instructional sections, double sessions are preceived as being disadvantageous to the students attending school in the p.m. shift. The fabric of society rejects the concept of young children being in school from 12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. followed by what may be an extended period of time on the school bus. Older children (above grade 4) lose a significant amount of instructional time through the device of double sessions, and it is perceived as being totally unacceptable as other than art extremely short- term measure for grade 1- 3 pupils. Extended day programs - High Schools Program--, in the early morning ar in the late afternoon may be devised to utilize a high school plant at above - normal carrying capacity. Such 7. programs are found to have relatively small pupil/parent interest, are not conducive to intergration with, estabLished bussing schedules, and are not viable answers to impaction. School boundary realignment This device has been used to accommodate growth in an immediately adjacent attendance area. Where growth is scattered or substantially removed frown school houses with room available, realignment is ineffective. Bouzidaty realignment is not a viable permanent solution beyond that already accomplished considering the gruorth rate of the several attendance areas in this District and their close proximity to each other. A de -annexation of territory (formation of a new district or transfer of territory to an existing neighboring district) is not considered a political reality. Year-ro-.md SchoolF A year-round school program has the potential of increasing available classroom space by 18% to 25% or more. District staff, Board members and the YRS CoMmittee are continuing studies on the appropriateness of NTZS in LUSD and tc determine those schools most suited for possible implementation of such a program in the 1983-1984 school year. Long term class toad factors have been 27 pupils at grades K-3, and 28 pupils at grades 4-8; however, it has h<:en necessary because of lack of space, to load the classrooms at an average of 30 pupils per room. Classloading is a contractual item with teachers. Emergency classrooms- State lease Portables Assembly Bill 8, signed by the Governor on July 24, 197/9, enacted the Emergency Classroom Law of 1979. Under tl.is Law, Lodi Unified School District has received thirty two (32) portables for use in 1981-1982 and will receive 52 portables for use in 1982-1983. T"t.e!:e units are subject to recall by the State of California should there be a greiter need elsewhere in the State. These units can be used for regular classroom programs only and must be loaded at the rate of 30 studens per unit. Although the units are quite utilitarian and most sites have room on an interim basis, support facilities such as play area, bathrooms, cafeteria, multi-purpose room, lockers, etc. are taxed well beyond capacity with the additional classroom units. Trailers The District currently lejses a number of trailers to house special education programs. The capactiy of these c^iits is approximately 12 students and the lease and se"up costs are two to three times the cost of the State rortables. The District will attempt to phase out all trailers in favor of State lease portables where possible. TT,.is will require moving special edu::ation classes into regular classrooms and regular programs into the portables. 8. Temporary Buildings The District currently leases duplex units for classrooms in North Stockton. A spot amendment to legislation was necessary to permit their use as theeyy do not meet earthquake safety standards. The legislation expires in 1986. These units were also very costly to setup and rents far exceed the cos: of State portables. However, they are self-contained sets. The District also ?cases a store building for the ROP program. Relocatable Units Relocatables are herein defined as portable units owned by the District. Mmy of these units are more than 15 years old; however, they have been quite serviceable. As a matter of policy, all new schools are being designed with a certain number of relocatable portables in anticipation of a declining enrollment situation in the future. This will give the District flexibility in housing students in the future and the use of relocatables in the master plans gives the District bonus points which can be applied towards additional square footage in permanent buildings. DEVELOPMWr FEF-: The Development Fee has become an important means for the provision of interim housing solutions in the Lodi Unified School District, and will become increasingly so as the District receives decre9sed State appropriations. Since 1978, the Lodi Unified School District has spent $1,150,670.00 to provi::e interim housing (not including the $203,000 budgeted for the new portables). In total $666,992.00 has been collected in Development Fees through .lune, 1982. Consistent with the requirements of State law and the intent of local ordinances, Development Fee revenue has been used to provide interim facilities in the attendance area where it was collected. A detailed explanation and breakdown of revenues and expenditures is in the Julie, 1982 report, "Allocation of Development Fees." The District can use development fees only for interim facilities which are strictly defined in the State Goverrunent Code. Basically portables only. 1 Section 65980 of the State Goverpment Code states, For the purposes of Section 65974, 'classroom and related facilities,' and ' elewntary or high school facilities' mean 'interim facilities' as defined in this section and shall include no other facilities. "Interim facilities for the purposes of Section 65974 shall be limited to the following: (a) Temporary classrooms not constru:ted with permanent foundations and defined as structures containing one or more rooms, each of which is designed, intended, and equipped for use as a place for formal instruction of pupils by a teacher in a school. (b) Temporary classroom toilet facilities not constn�cted with permanent fc+undatians. (c) Reasonable site preparation ami installation of temporary classrooms." Although definitely of an interim nature, the mini and maxi schools are excluded by definiti.c n; therefore, development fee revenue can not be used for the am nuai lease payments of =126,000. a During the time the development fees were impounded, the Lodi Unified School District negotiated nine separate agreements with developers for direct payment of fees to the District in -lieu of payment of the "bedroom tax" at the time of the building permits. To date, no fees have been collected under an agreement. The District is now contacting each developer during the project planning and approval stage to request that they voluntarily enter into an in -lieu agreement. Fee$ and fiords collected by the District under the authority of an agreement can be used for any school facilities serving the attendance area. The School District is tentatively projecting 150 new units in the 1982-1983 school year with an average fee of $700/unit which will provide a projected revenue of approximately $105,000.