HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 27, 1982 (45)AREA AND Agenda iteri k-3 ",Request for extended parking in the lot behind
by C
PARKING LIMITS the Senj,:��r 'ns
EXTENDED IN Additional information was providol- by public 'V,o::ks
PARKING LOT Ronsko and discussion followed.
NO. 5 on motion of council Member Snider, Murphy second, Council
RES. NO. adopted Resolution No. 82-120 extending the area and the
82120 parking limits to five hour parking In a Section of larking
Lot No. 5.
LODI
I ETBALL
A .CLUB
"The Athletic Club
RECEIVED
ALICE M. REIMCHE
CITY et Fax
May 18, 1982
The honorable Alice Reimche
City Clerk
221 West Pim Street U,k_eh�•, x=g''�
Lodi, CA 95240
Dear Ms. Reimche:
My purpose in writing you is to request that another look may be
given to the parking situation at Lodi Racquetball & Swim Club.
It has been almost eight months since the "No Parking" signs have
been installed by tha City. Of course, to say the least, this
has affected our business! We have, in all honesty, done all the,
City has isked us to do since the inception of this project. We
installed a frontage road with sidewalks and gutters at'a cost.of-'
$40,000, which was then given to the City as a gift., We instAiled
a new parking lot in the rear of -Max Hittle•s home on our south
side at a cost of $8,000, plus a monthly lease payment of.$500.00.
The council asked us to look for property to purchase.'- We have.,
but. to no avail. The northside property is up for sale,>but at
a.price that is beyond our means and likewise on our Southside.:::
The property is up for sale, but beyo74d our means. The property
directly behind us is not up for sale; so that leaves°us with
parking in the leaned property, in our front parking, lot'and on
the east side of the frontage road and on the east side of Hutchins.
I have waited until now to attemp to re -open discussions with�you
hoping a change of decision might be made on your part. I asked
Jack Ronsko to send me copies of the proposals made to the -Council
back in May, 1981. In looking them over, you will notice that: -:`the:,
Public +Norks Department suggested to the City Council that they -
approve the "modified design", which is the last page of a -group
of 12 (Exhibit "H") . �'" ' - �•
May 18, 1982
Page 2
S_ 1
Of course, as you know, the previous Council decided to accept r
Exhibit "P" which, as said before, has caused several problems:
1. Parking tickets to our cuotome s
2. Difficulty of large trucks to travel in and out
of our business.
3. Lack of parking spaces
We would, at thi3 time, appreciate your consideration and accep-
tance of the Public Workds proposal dated, May 18, 1981. We would
also appreciate it if you would look at Exhibit "G", which is tine
design that would suit us most. Of course, the advantages would
be:
1. No snore parking tickets, which would relieve the
Police Department to more important work and re-
lieve the frustration of our customers in having
to pay $20.00 for a ticket because they parked on
the wrong side of the frontage road.
2. It would give us ten "additional" parking spaces
in Exhibit "H" or thirty additional spaces in
Exhibit "G".
3. It would allow large trucks to come into the
business from the south and continue north from
`f the frontage road.
Of course, we would help for whatever cost would bE.incurred to
install stripping, signs or blacktop over the present dirt area
between the frontage road and Hutchins; and, as always, we will
cooperate 1008.
Thank you for your time in listening to our request, and we look
forward to an action on your part that will help relieve our
present situation.
Most sincerely,
Gary J. Vochatzer
General Partner
GJV/msm
Attachments
On
G
w L•..i i
F � �
TO: City Council
FROM: 0 ty Manager
DATE. 0, y 3 J, i �6 i
COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
SUBJECT: Hutchins Street Frontage Road Parking at Lodi Sports Center
Attached is our previous memo of March 16, 1981, related to this subject.
It is recommended that the Council adopt the mod.fted design as shown on the
attached Exhibit "H" of the attached memo. This alternate provides for the
parking of approximately 47 vehicles in the vicinity of the Lodi Sports
Center. creates an exit of the frontage road onto Hutchins Street at the
Sports Center's north property line, and eliminates parking on the west side
of the frontage road from the Lodi Sports Center driveway southerly and on
the south side on the frontage road fronting the apartment complex. This
alternate also provides for an interim one-way street from the Lodi Sports
Center driveway northerly. With the future northerly extension of the
frontage road, the one-way would be changed to two-way traffic and the
parking would be restricted on the west side.
it is also recommended that, between the Lodi Sports Center driveway and
the Hittle driveway, 2 parking stalls be provided for and that these stalls
be painted as shown in the sketch below. The Hittles have recommended that
the area between the driveways be painted red and all parking be restricted.
Lea. Sf" ,
C� Szrw�c�►4`a P.;���"� Z.
�►' 1 U3� 1 rte' t ZS
acL. Lk
IP is Works Director
Att.
APPROVED:
cc: Gary Vochatzer
Mr. 6 Mrs. Hittle
8. Hertz, Atty. at Law
MAY A. G SES, C ty tanager
r
FILE 40.
�.._ ..__...a�:v,r.. s>,^..--„....�: :. , :-+r:,:.�^n Za..F?4...... _ f,�r'r.-wx ,�a*5'-"T?.'."1?.; a'.e �'�'r-y _��`+ ti5�".N.i+w . g:;�yy x a ,.ty,.;.`n'z •i.a.�✓°v'pc ".
111
March i6, 1981
Hutchins Street/Lodi Sports Center Parking Congestion B Deficiency
BACM ROUND INFOPAATiON: The Lodi Planning Commission in 1978, reviewed and
approved t9 request or s Use Permit to re-establish a private swim and
athletic club at 1900 South Hutchins St. The plan submitted at that time
included a 19 stall parking lot on their property and a 28 stall parking lot
on the adjacent prppsirty to the south owned by the Hittles. Ik*mver, the
Planning Commission determined that the on-site 19 stalls would be adequate
with the 29 stalls serving as a bcous. The Zoning Ordinance requires the
Planning Commission to determine the required off-street parking for tW-s
type of use. in October of 1979, the Planning Commission approved the parcel
map for the Lodi Sports Center which joined the proposed Hittle parcel (for
parklog) to the proposed development. in February of 1980, the City was In-
formed that the project could not be constructed as originally proposed since
acquisition of the Hittle property would not be economically feasible in
May of 1980, thit Planning Commission ,approved a modified Use Permit for the
facility allowing for a c mge In location for the additionsi parking. This
proposal moved the parking from the Hittle parcel to th-b property to the north
owned by Jake Ferguson. Tho Ferguson property acquisition did not take place
and development took place with only the.19 required on-site parking stalls.
One condition that was common to all of the approvals by the Planning Commission,
was the dedication of the necessary rights of ray for the Hutchins Street frontage
road and the construction of ikese lwprovwaonts.
t.
The attached Exhibit A is a copy of the adopted Specific Man for Hutchins St.
which shows a geowetric section of the frontage road as having two trawl lanes
with parking only on the east side. The attached Exhibit 11 shows the Sports
Center development, including the daveloped frontage road tot -ether with the
adjacent properties. This exhibit shows the 16 on-31to parking stalls provided
by Lodi Sports Center. Between Century Bivd. and the Lodi Sports Center north
property line, there are 35 logo) on -street spaces on Hutchins Street and the
frontage road. Howavar, during peak hours, we have witnessed over Co vehicles
parked in the Inadlate area when using the Lodi Sports Canter facility.
During these peak hours (4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. week days), perking is taking
plaro on both sides of the frontage road (witch ears perked In both directions).
on Hutchins Street and in the on-site parking lots of Lodi Sports Center and
Hittles. This reflects only the current parking problem and it Is anticipated,
as summer appirwwaches, that this problem will Increase once the outdoor
Lmf
City Council
March 16, 1981
Pale 2
Pool facility is utilized. Lodi Sports Center expects another 40 vehicles
this zWmmr during peak hours,.
The only real 'o
However, sinker the City requirer.�ent was met, the City cannot roquire additional
perking to be installed. On Exhibit 8, highlighted In yellow, are those
areas or parcels that could be considered for providirg additional or -site
parking. Ekme of these parcels are owned by Lodi Sports Center.
The Fire Departmwt Indicates their major problems to be:
1. Cars parked in the red zones fronting the Wdl Sports Center
and property blocking the building fire eonnectlon and flee
hydrantO.
2. Cars blocking access to the Hittle property.
3. Fire trucks unable to turn around or exit from the area.
4. Snorkel unable to coke turn at Century with parking on
both sides of frontage road.
The Dodi Sports,Center currently has 1100 paid members (500± applications) and
expects Its membership to increase to 1400-1600 by this summer.
The attaeDtiad Ex'ilblts C and 7 s`rv.+ plet-ir-2s r7f the ::tIstlrq en -Sita snJ off-street
parklag sl;sation.
The attac:gad Exhibits E, r, G, and 11, show tha foilowing informatlon:
Exhibit E - this shows the existing situation which acccw.Todates
60 on-strsat p3rkinj spaces.
Exhibit F - this layaut is in conformance with the Specific Pian
and accormdates 3' on -street parking spaces.
Ex1Abit G - tt.ls shows angled parking on one side and conversion of
this portion of the frontage road to a one-way street and provides
for 54 on -street parking spaces. it should be noted that this can
be only an Interin proposal until such time as the Finnegan and
rorguson parcels develop. This alternate would require striping of
the dlagonnl stalls And their removal ($1100) at a later crate. This
proposal provides for an exit oily on to lhrtehlns Street fror. the:
frontage road at the northerly property line of tine Ledl Sports*Center.
R
City Council
March 160 1981
Page 3
In
Exhibit H - this is a rmdified design which provides for two-way
traffic up to th_� t , ; i rz,..,
the Lodi Sports `ioantc
Hutchins St. frmtha frontage road and provides for 47 on -street
parking spocos.
Staff will review this material with tie Council at the Council meeting of
!larch 1$- 1931
Jack L. Ronsko
Public Vbrks Di-eector
Attachments
JLR/eeh
�•'�OROINAarCE NO. td• State of Callformis and ppuursuant to tato drawings attached to this or&1 twom Wert an mand
AN ORDINANCE ADO►TINO A !•.hat certain General Plea av a. mance. 1West "arms LOW.
SPECIFIC PLAN FOR SOVTN mended. for the City M Lmhl�adowted Section L Pur9osa. It b heretr- IiseKfow i. ItextN
ulaws The mini• .
NUTCNINi STREET BETWEEN by City Council Resolution No. 1883 tared that this Specii'e Pisa is mom front Yard or street die fsrd
WEST KETTLEMAN LANs AND n Octohrr' 0. 1150. a Specific plan adopted to provide for and protect required far bulldtmge or strwt -.m
WEST HARNEY LAN[. for South Hutchins Street between the health. safety, convenience and by Section 3:7 of the Lodi Municipal
The City Council of the city of West Ke:Ur mea Lame and West Har welfare of the cit3sens at the city Code (Zoning OrdiaanoN r amend-
Lodi does ordain as +Pulsus; a" Lane Is hereby adopted ed. shall be mneasmred trans the (n•
Section L Authority. Pursuant to tune r�4of way Hee ft
the providom+ of Chapter 3 Ieotn- The SpwriCk Mas adopted hereby Pt�n 3. Description, Drawlmp ow Drawlnp 71Dh n Ovicted and
meMNag at Section 4115am of TueIIncludes the regmistloms prescribed71DS7. 711738 and 7ID59 dlaptay the 731 .
7 at th* Government Code of the 1 by this Ordinance and includes eer" Pian view of South Hutchins Street Beetlon Il Vleiattrn. Any person
whether as prips4 ssggeemmt, ems web line and rmprlsonment. Approved this 17th day of Novena. Air at Lodi held Novsmbar 3 IM
ploye* or r. erwndIn vtolatirnt�g or Section 8. AO ordinances amid porta bar. 3171. and was thereafter passed. a 4;R; t�
causing or permitting or hast UZ of ordinances in conflict herewith WALTER J. KATNICH and ordered toprint at a regular
In any use of land which is )n are hereby repealed lnsolar as such Mayor meeting held Novennber 17. 1971
rlolstfoa of the pr"100 t of " t'oftfm may exISL Attelt: Beal* L BeAOCU by the following vote:
Ordinance shall be ru ty of a mit Section 7. This ordinance shall be City Clerk Ayer. Councilmen - EMMARDT.
demeanor and upon convicum tbwe• ppuublished one timIR
e In the "Lodi State of California. HUGItlS. KSTZN. SCIiAIPl`1M
of, shall �►e punisbed by a time of =a Semumet M a daily mewtpaper County of ban Joaquin, ss. and KATNICH
not more thea five hundred dollars ofefrcWatfon, printed msd
ad I. bee L. Bennett. Clan Clerk Now Council== - Nome
t3M or by Irmprlsomaent lu the Pu�In the cmy of Lodi. sad of the City of Lodi. do hereby certify Absent: Councilmen - Nene
County Jett for a term o! mot mon shall in fvrm and take *fleet that the foregoing Ordinamee No. Besde L. Bennett
thhMy days from sad atter iia M was Introduced at a regular CRY Clerk
than girl 84h r a ter Of
or by both passage mad approval. meeting of the City Council of tM November 3% 1971 —214
.
Qv
0
M
X
Liz.
4
dM
1-9
,
f
___ _ _ _ __ _- _ • r K W e
so,
r twaai/ i� fI
Ff
we uft
: m. •1154K, r.
w 11:
to s
w ea 9
'
•
Ws
ho
OW NBC 0A16 U
/•warns Pref
� Jt 1 �.J
�Z .
. .. r... ]� �.i� Los
_
1 t
M• !.T
� .n � rFrrn�i • • -r-. rr •rr—. rTn r^r mTwr'nT
.. ( �
�
J
'l
v.
�tP.S«
1, F. �•ar � w:rr•.�c • 1wst�
ll.Re i1:S, I
- W
{.EGi:ND NOTES
"
on s..f 4041"m
ft"001 tie.MVef l r...w a,.r M 0 —0. I ti
f..008" f If es err GUN if m.e+Nra M We N of
t l
rwwat amww
wwwa tw.�w.r 0.w fly N W� )+r n.wn
--- cow." a..rr.s Nw.+
Cow" we M n t. �«'r ...run a • hq .f. ern.
tLiLW • • ..
.0900 KCNf
w •
"W" ti f.M..." N "a N .M ry NfNt
N we a'4 N Wa, ew+rr Mon
w C.ti C."
M aq.—
.. w.w ......� ..lin
gar -.�naf F-�fn...-o-,..uw-I �.-.s i, -•r -a
SPECIFIC PLAN
HUTCHINS STRE=T
nt•�► ,.�.,,,
w.,..`U"
NARNEY LN. TO KETTLEsA LN. 71 D577
whether as prips4 ssggeemmt, ems web line and rmprlsonment. Approved this 17th day of Novena. Air at Lodi held Novsmbar 3 IM
ploye* or r. erwndIn vtolatirnt�g or Section 8. AO ordinances amid porta bar. 3171. and was thereafter passed. a 4;R; t�
causing or permitting or hast UZ of ordinances in conflict herewith WALTER J. KATNICH and ordered toprint at a regular
In any use of land which is )n are hereby repealed lnsolar as such Mayor meeting held Novennber 17. 1971
rlolstfoa of the pr"100 t of " t'oftfm may exISL Attelt: Beal* L BeAOCU by the following vote:
Ordinance shall be ru ty of a mit Section 7. This ordinance shall be City Clerk Ayer. Councilmen - EMMARDT.
demeanor and upon convicum tbwe• ppuublished one timIR
e In the "Lodi State of California. HUGItlS. KSTZN. SCIiAIPl`1M
of, shall �►e punisbed by a time of =a Semumet M a daily mewtpaper County of ban Joaquin, ss. and KATNICH
not more thea five hundred dollars ofefrcWatfon, printed msd
ad I. bee L. Bennett. Clan Clerk Now Council== - Nome
t3M or by Irmprlsomaent lu the Pu�In the cmy of Lodi. sad of the City of Lodi. do hereby certify Absent: Councilmen - Nene
County Jett for a term o! mot mon shall in fvrm and take *fleet that the foregoing Ordinamee No. Besde L. Bennett
thhMy days from sad atter iia M was Introduced at a regular CRY Clerk
than girl 84h r a ter Of
or by both passage mad approval. meeting of the City Council of tM November 3% 1971 —214
.
Qv
0
M
X
Liz.
•
AP�4RTMENTS
J. I N. F/NNEdo-AN
✓. I4. FEP.—wuso*v
N
o I
.I
11) LQD/ ARTS CENTER
1`
�- 4 S�cxrt!s Loi'
M. M. HfTTt_E
I
,gR^RTA/E NT5
C,EIV r[JRY BL. VG?
AndlL
..... ....
44alp/ I-Apla4ers
/Vgw.m Hwo'CHI'V6
40
A-4cwA,OZrAAE1VrS
A,c:,'4,oOz 7-A4,Er
E-:XISTING
It
a fU/�j
r!`LiIGi 8'pa �'o�i
i`
;i1I�?TA445"TS
-- D�SlG1�1
13? vEus .
CE/V TLJ1? y ZN- VO.'
24e VZWS EMT OWN I -
�4oA�%ML�°NTS
h
r
Ai'ARTf19ENTS
-- . 954 V614S.
CENTURY ,BL VD
t 7 St'a t ' i n� i•(��`' r f k+�--�-1� t "3 �,.•4" - n�. r'r'�
1777
4,47
.t
,
p A s
�» Al
✓, N. F/IVNEaAN
✓. +� R. FERsu�o/b+
Il'Lr0 '
1)
. i
� LAID/ �R7S CEs'NTEFt
�i
� �4 yrs tot
1
i
z
Af'AR7MENTS
�IF�G
_ -1 VEUS