HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - October 21, 1987 (72)CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 21, 1987
AWARD - ROUGH
TERRAIN CRANE
RES. NO. 87-141 City ;Manager Peterson presented the following bids which
CC-12(d) had been received for a Rough Terrain Crane:
Supplier Price
Morgan Equipment Co. $157,924.10
Coast Crane Co. $185,177.76
Santa Fe Equipment Co. No response
Council was apprised that this machine will be used in the
Electric Utility Department for handling the increasingly
larger transformers and vaults used on the system. At
present, the City has no equipment capable of handling such
material. For scheduled tasks, rental equipment has been
utilized. However, under an emergency condition, in the
event of a transformer failure at a large commercial
complex or an industrial customer, it is very unlikely that
equipment can be made available within a reasonable period
of time for restoration of service.
This machine will also be used in the warehouse operation
to handle the same type of equipment at time of receipt and
again when issued. It is further anticipated that the unit
will be used at other 'lifting needs' in various other City
operations.
Following discussion, Council, on motion of CouncW Member
Pinkerton, Reid second, adopted Resolution`.`No.`� 87-141
awarding the bid for the purchase of a Rough Terrain Crane
to Morgan Equipment Company in the amount of $157,924.10.
Cr-'TINCIL COMMUNICATION
TO! THE CITY COUNCIL DATENO.
Meeting of
FROM: THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE October 21, 1987
SUBJECT: AWARD PURCHASE OF ROUGH TERRAIN CRANE (EUD-87-12)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt a resolution awarding the
bid to the low bidder Morgan Equipment Company in the amount of $157,924.10.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 'his machine will be used in the Electric Utility
Department for handling .,e increasingly larger transformers and vaults
used on the system. At p.esent, the City has no equipment capable of
handling such material. For scheduled tasks, rental equipment has been
utilized. However, under an emergency condition, in the event of a trans-
former failure at a large commercial complex or an industrial customer, it
is very unlikely that equipment can be made available within a reasonable
period of time for restoration of service.
The machine will also be used in the warehouse operation to handle the
same type of equipment at time of receipt and again when issued. It is
further anticipated that the unit will be used at other 'lifting needs'
in various other City operations.
Funding for this purchase was included in the Department's 1987-88 fiscal
year equipment budget.
Attached is a copy of the responses to several questions concerning this
piece of equipment raised at the SeptPinber 16 City Council meeting. Also
attached is an excerpt from the 1987-88 Budget Message detailing its need.
Henry J. lheb
Electric Utility Director
Attach.
C.C. Assist. Electric Utility Director
Purchasing Officer
Suvulier
Morgan Equipment Co.
Sacramento, CA
Coast Crane Company
San Leandro, CA
Santa Fe Equipment Co.
Santa Fe Springs, CA
BID EVALUATION
ROUGH TERRAIN CRANE
EUD-87-12
Price Delivery
Incl. Tax (Weeks)
$157,924.10 6
2.85,177.76 8
No Response
P & H
Century 118
Grove, 528C
s
ii
RESOLUTION NO. 87-141
AWARD - CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF ROUGH TERRAIN CRANE
WHEREAS, in answer to notice ,duly published in accordance with law
and the order of this City Council, sealed bids were received and publicly
opened by the City Clerk of this City on October 6, 1987 at 11:00 a.m. for the
contract for Purchase of Rough Terrain Crane, described in the specifications
therefor approved by the City Council September 16, 1987; and
WHEREAS, said bids have `,een compared, checked, and tabulated and a
report thereof filed with the City Manager as follows:
Bidder Amount
Morgan Equipment Co. $157,924.10
Coast Crane Co. $185,177.76
Santa Fe Equipment Co. No response
WHEREAS, the City Manager recommends that award for the contract for
Purchase of Rough Terrain Crane, be made to the low bidder, Morgan Equipment
Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Lodi that award of contract fo- Rough Terrain Crane, the low bidder, in the
amount of $157,924.10.
Dated: October 21, 1987
I hereby certify that Resolution No. 87-141 was passed and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting
held October 21 1987 by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Pinkert.,n, Reid, Snider and
Olson (Mayor)
Noes: Council Members - None
Absent: Council Members - None
Ito h7 "
Alice M. Re mche
City Clerk
87-141
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: TOM PETERSON, CITY MA14AGER
FROM: HENRY J. RICE, ELECTRIC UTILITY DIRECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1987
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO COUNCIL MEMBER PINKERTON'S QUESTIONS
The following answers are offered in response to Council Member Pinkerton's
questions at the regular meeting on September 16, 1987, pertaining to the
Rough Terrain Crane.
Question #i: Number of times, this year, the Electric Utility
Department has rented cranes?
Response: A crane has been rented four times so far
this year for prearranged work. Each time it
required a minimum of 48 hours preplanned
notification.
Question #2: What is the cost per rental'
Response: CITY COST - Our cost has been $95/hour with a
minimum of $400 per incidence.
CUSTOMER COST - $25,000 to $40,000 per hour
potential loss due to interrupted production of
large industrial customers.
Question #3: How often will we need a crane?
Response: EMERGENCv - Most important - Cannot be planned,
but responsible and prudent utility practice
requires prompt responses to emergency power
restoration.
NON -EMERGENCY - The Department has 12 large industrial
transformer units in service subject to emergency
change out. Two such units are currently in stock
awaiting installation in the field. Two units are
on order and need to be unloaded when received
and subsequently placed in the field. The City has
invested in backup transformers for all classes of
customers. However, at present the larger units
cannot be handled with existing equipment.
The attached table illustrates prudent operation
of other utilities having -mergency response capability.
Electric utility
Alameda
Modesto Irrigation District
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Palo Alto
Santa Clara
S.M.U:D.
Turlock Irrigation District
Redding
Roseville
Crane Availability
Purchased 18 -ton crane in 1986,
Has 30 -ton crane in electric
equipment inventory.
Has crane available regionally.
Has truck -mounted cane.
Has 17 -ton rubber tire mounted
crane.
Has crane equipment in vehicle
fleet.
Has crane available through the
water operation.
Can handle largest transformer
(1000 KVA) with existing line
trucks.
Currently budgeting for a crane.:
Excerpt.
1987-88 Budget Message
20 -TON CRANE - This budget provides for the purchase of a
?O -ton, rubber tire, mounted crane. This
Electric Utility Department's operation has
reached sufficient size that such a piece of equipment is
necessary. Industrial customer requirements are such that we
are now :manipulating transformers that weigh up to eight tons.
Recent installations of this size are in place at Dart Container
Corporation, Pacific Coast Producers, Cottage Bakery's Pastry
Express Central Plant, Wallace Computers and California Cushion
Company. A transformer of like size will be installed at the
Minton Company facility currently under construction. The
transformers now in place were installed utilizing rented cranes,
available from private crane companies in the area oa a scheduled
"s
basis. Rental cranes will not work for emergencies, particularly
f
off -hours, should there be a transformer malfunction at one of
-'
these key industrial locations or elsewhere in the industrial and
I .:
cormmercial communities. Until recently, the department has not been
faced with the requirement of working with transformers of such huge
weight and dimensions. The reason the 20 -tan capacity is required
is that as the need to reach out for the equipment to be lifted is
t..a
increased, the rated capacity of the crane decreases. Far example,
to lift 20,000 pounds (the weight of a large transformer) from a
point 18 feet from the pivot point of the boom, requires a crane
with twice that lifting capacity. The staf-, has thoroughly
-M26-
researched the alternatives to this acquisition. One, the purchase
of used equipment remains a possibility. Other alternatives which
have been considered, evaluated and rejected as unacceptable include
renting such a crane when an emergency occurs. Crane companies with
whom we have been in contact can respond in emergencies if
everything falls into place. However, no firm response times can be
given. It depends in large part on the availability of equipment
and operators. The general consensus is that a six to eight hour
delay could be expected at a minimum. With large numbers of
employees idled and product either not being processed and/or being
damaged by such an extended power outage, this alternate will not
suffice. The possibility of borrowing such a piece of equipment
from a sister electric utility c�$ty, the Sacramento Municipal
Utility District, or Pacific Gas & Electric Company is remote, if
not )ut of the question. The prospect of incurring an emergency
situation in one's own system while the expensive egwipment
purchased to quickly respond to such an emergency is "on loan," is a
risk that would be impossible to justify. Additionally, this
type of equipment is not designed for highway travel. ($175,000)
Among the uses for this piece of equipment are:
Installing transformers at the customer's facility. This is
currently being done with rental units at $100 per hour with
a $400 minimum charge. The Electric Utility Department has
already rented such units on four separate occasions this spring.
Loading and unloading transformers in the warehouse yard.
These units are shipped on flat bed trucks and the purchaser
(in this case the City of Lodi) is expected to be able to
unload when the truck arrives. At the present time a fork lift
and a line truck are used as a "team" to lift the units. The
flat bed truck is then eased out and the transformers very
carefully lowered to the ground. This is not a recommended
material handling process.
-M27-
Handling and setting large precast, concrete vaults. The
department's existing equipment is at, or exceeding rated
capacity, when performing these tasks.
Assisting other departments in maintenance and repair operations.
In the past, cranes have been rented to lift standby generators.
At the White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility, the lifting of
large motors has proven to be difficult mainly because of the
reach -capacity problem.
-M28-