HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 17, 1986 (69)CITY COUNCIL Y=NrIl
SEPTEMER 17,. 1986
PUBLIC HEARINGS Notice thereof having been published according to law, an
affidavit of which publication is on file in the office of
CC -6
the City Clerk, Mayor Reid called for the Public
CC -55
Hearing regarding the proposed Hotel Lodi Renovation
Project.
HOTEL LODI
The matter was. introduced by Cnity. Development Director
RENOVATION PRr17fXT
James Schroeder.
The history of the project and a CDBG Program Chronology of
Events regarding the project were presented for Council's
perusal.
Mr. Schroeder presented a letter that had been received
from Mr. Robert Stone, Program Manager, State of Californta _
Department of Housing and Community Development, which read
as follows:
"I am writing in response to your inquiry about the status
of our SUHRP loan commitment for the Hotel Lodi should the
City of Lodi fail to provide the financial assistance to
this project described in your SUHRP application.
In brief, our ccmmi.tment does not hinge on the availability
of the City funds. Should you be able to substitute
private equity capital for these funds, and produce a
project that is otherwise as approved last March, our
camnitment would still stand and the project could move
forward.
The City's withdrawal of its financial participation would
be extremely disappointing, especially in light of its
previously stated support in the project's application, and
at a convocation we attended which included city officials,
businessmen and residents, on February 28, 1986, to
encourage the State's approval. Even if the City's
withdrawal did not render the Lodi Hotel protect
infeasible, the quality of the project otherwise
potentially achievable may be decreased. This would be to
the detriment of both the community and future residents
after the Hotel'.s renovation.
Should you require further elaboration on this matter,
please contact Russ Schmunk at 916-323-7244."
The following persons spoke on behalf of the project:
`a) Mr. David F. Beatty, Attorney -at -Law, McDonough,
Holland and Allen, representing the developer of the
proposed project, Daniels C. Logue.
b) Mr. Jack Carter, 620 Turner Road, Lodi, feels that
downtown merchants would be much better off if City
has control of the project.
c) Ms. Shirley Kleim, 216 East Oak Street, Lodi,
presented a petition signed by 72 people in support of
the project.
d) Mr. Terry Knutson, 29 North Alien Drive, Lod:., stated
that he believes that if City CDBG funds are kept in
the City, the City will retain its control.
e) Mr. John. L. Barkley, Attorney -at -Law, 404 West Pine
Street, Lodi,:representing the property owner John
Graffigna, stated' that Mr.. Graffigna is committed to
sell the property and Mr. ''Logue is committed to buy.
•
They will go, forward with or without .the, City.
c) Ms. Judy Peterson, 40 Downtown Mall, Lodi,
representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association.
h) Mr. Richard Woolstrcm, Golden Era Hotel, South Main
Would Logue and Graffi.gna;;consider an alternate
Street, Lodi.
{
Other persons addressing the Council on the matter were:
>.i
b)
a) Ms. Jody Dante, 224 Louie Avenue, Lodi..
goes forward as it is proposed today, would
b) Mr. Bill Canepa, 131 South Orange Street, Lodi.
they,(LDBA)
want the`City:.involved?
Mayor Reid closed the public hearing.
A lengthy discussion followed with questions being directed
to Staff and to persons who had given testimony.
Y
Council Member Hinchman then moved to withdraw the $110,000
Co munity Development.Block Grant 'Funds. The motion died
for lack .of a'second.
Following additional discussion, on motion' of Mayor Pro `
all
Tempore Olson, 'Pinkertonsecond, the .Public Hearing .was
continued to the Regular` Council Meeting of October 1, 1986.
Ly
The motion carried by the following' vote:
Ayes:. Council Members = Olson, Snider, and Pinkerton
Noes: 'Council Members - I3inchman and Reid (Mayor)
Council. Member Snider then asked Mike Lapenta to have the
Lodi- Downtown Business Association consider the following
questions
a)
Would Logue and Graffi.gna;;consider an alternate
project?
b)
If project
goes forward as it is proposed today, would
they,(LDBA)
want the`City:.involved?
.y
all
d
N F
J u
COUNCIL COM, NICATION
EXHIBIT P
NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
T"E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI
WILL CONDUCT A CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE
PUBLIC INPUT REGARDING THE PROPOSED
HOTEL LODI RIIJOVATION PRQ7ECP
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Wednesday, September 17, 1986 at
the hour of 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be
heard, the Lodi City Council will conduct a continued public hearing
in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 221 West Pine Street, Lodi,
California, to receive public input regarding the proposed Hotel Lodi
Renovation Project.
The Hotel Lodi Rehabilitation Project will be a public-private
partnership project, incorporating participation of the following
„public and private entities and programs: City of Lodi -Community
Development Block Grant; State of California Office of Housing and
CcFmRinity Development -Special User Housing Rehabilitation Program;
{
The Savings Association Mortgage Cor.�pany (SAMCO);, and the Daniels C.
t
Logue Development and Construction Company of Sacramento.
Upon completion the Hotel Lodi, located at the corner of School
k
and Pine'Streets,.will provide 110 furnished residential rental units
available to low and moderate income persons.
If you are interested in further information, please ccntact
Rick Barnum, Associate Planner,`City of Lodi Commnity'Developrent
Department, 221 W. Pine Street, Lodi, or call 333-6711.
All interested persons are invited to present their views on
this matter. Written statements may be filed, with the City Clerk at
i'
3'
any time prior to the hearing scheduled herein and oral statements
may. be made at said hearing.
If you challenge the subject matter in court you may be limited
-
those issues you or scoeone else raised at the Public
to raising only
Hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the Public Hearing.
BY Order of the Lodi City Council,
tzi.ice`.M. Reimche
City Clerk
x
_
Dated,:. September 17, 1386
4
s
t
-
._..
i
E -
yy
R
t
q
al'
t,
0
Terry Knutson
ChaIrMan
UDID
rte,
203 South School Street
Lodi, CA 95240 -
r
A
Trella Arieda
Chain
.
Sr. Citizens CcmTdssion
1330 Midvale Drive
Lodi, CA 95240
,51
Charlene Lange
Sr. Citizens Laison
Hutchins Street Square
Oak 'and Hutchins Street
_
:'
Lodi, CA 95240
r l
41
nodi News Sentinel
North Church Street
-
Lodi, CA 95240
David F. Beatty -
-
�k
Attorney. at Law
:
.
McDonough, Holland and Allen
5-5 Capital Mall;`Suite 950
Sacramento, CA 95814'(Sent Certified Mail, return receipt requested)
t 4
John, Graffigna
.
(;
P.' 0. Box 388 388-
'Lodi CA 9524E:
a
Mike Lapenta, Chairman
Lodi '.Downtown Business Assn.
F;
=-
The Toggery.
i
28 South ScYiool Street
+'
Lodi CA 95240
'..
Daniels C. Logue
k:
'.
Development and ConstructionCo.
.:
1001 6th Street,, Suite 200
Sacramento'. CA 95814
,f
Mailing list approved by City Attorney Stein, Cam mity Development Director..
?
Schroeder and City Clerk.Reinche
E�
f
s
r_
RECEIVED
TAT
,
r -
r .. -
,
how
.L
..
w
, r _
`.
lo
V.:
lz
5P T4
Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the Lodi City Council: ,
Ve the undersigned, being concerned citizens of, Lodi, feel that the Hotel Lodi
project is a just project and should be allowed to be completed for. the following,.
reasons:
1. There is a,definite need for low to moderate income housing in the city-, There.
is not enough of this type ;housing especially for the senior citizens of Lodi, whom
comprize most of the city's population. It.is hard: to find housing in town that 'is
not only economical (under",$250.00 per month) but also kept in a livable condition
(many landlords that rent at a"cheap rate do not keep the property in shape).
2. Being,in the downtown area would not only enhance the surroundings because the
Hotel would be brought back to life and made a place of beauty instead of an"eye-sore
F
in the :downtown 'area. It would also help to bring to life the dying _downtown
shopping. These -people that 'would be on foot and within walking -distance -of the
downtown hopping would frequenting those „places that are close at hand' to pur-
chase their needs (this including the restaurants in the area), ;Wouldn't it be
nice,torelocate the pigeons living on the second floor and repairing the open roof
and.moving in people that would appreciate that roof over their head? These are the
=
people that are currently living in cardboard boxes, cars or just plain living,in
the open because they cannot obtain adequate housing and this is in our liveable city
It is too bad that people have to be branded a "low life" person just because of the
unfortunate circumstances that have placed them in that position. Why not give
someone 'a chance before youbrand them.
3. It is not everyday 'that someone walks into town and is willing to put over 2.5 -
million'dollars'into a project to help'' the citizens of that, town (especially to -help
those people needing this type of_help)_ Maybe certain points of the project are
- undesireable and "some . have been changed already to meet the oppositions -request.
such as bathrooms in every room along with kitchen-ets, we should instead of: fighting
get together to compromise and make,",sure that we'do not loose 'this much needed
project and help those 'people needing this help.
`
Sincerely,
Y
pp
t` ..'S,.,h✓�,.-
/f J p/ til .�I•`+
t
IJ � ✓ 1. `r t. � • "`. r
_
4Y
Dear'Mr. Mayor and Members of thu. Lodi- City Council:
We the undersigned, being concerned citizens of Lodi, feel that the Hotel Lodi
project is a just project and should be allowed to be completed for the following
reasons:
1. There is a definite need for low to moderate income housing in the city. There
is not enough of this type housing especially for the senior citizens of Lodi, whom
comprize most of the city's population. It is hard to find housing in town that is
not only economical (under $250.00 per month) but also kept in a livable condition
(many landlords that rent at a cheap rate do not keep the property in shape).
2. Being in the downtown area would not only enhance the surroundings because the
Hotel would be brought back to life and made a place of beauty instead of an eye -sore -
in the downtown area. It would also help to bring to life the dying downtown
shopping. These people that would be on foot and within walking distance of the
downtown shopping would be frequenting those places that are close at hand to pur-
chase their needs (this including the restaurants in the area). Wouldn't it be,,
nice to relocate the pigeons living on the second floor and repairing the opgA roof
and moving in people that would appreciate that roof over their head? These are the
people that are currently living in cardboard boxes, cars or just plain living in
the open because they cannot obtain adequate housing and this is in our liveable city
It is too bad that people -have to be branded a "low life" person just because of the
unfortunate circumstances that iIave placed them in that position. Why not give
someone a chance before you brand them.
r3. It is not everyday that someone walks into town and is willing tv put over 2.5
million dollars into a project to help the citizens of that town (especially to help
those people needing this type of help). Maybe certain points of the project are
undesireable and some have been changed already to meet the oppositions request
such as bathrooms in every room along with kitchen-ets, we should instead of fighting
get together to compromise and make sure that we do not loose this much ne
project and help those people needing this helS�l
Sincerely, - �v`S O
z
ell
e1w,�,
To Lodi City Council REC
EI``D
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Businaw tgQ,nn
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of a {s�= J�
of the Hotel Lodi as a -hm jamw housing project. AUCE 13. REIMCH
Cf T y
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxktjfgre
improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown i
Cmmunity.
To: Lodi. City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition'of the use
of.the Hotel Lodi as a 4McitAbNa housing project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
C==ity.
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a ievr i"eewe housing project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District axx. will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
C,ammunity. .
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
F of the Hotel Lodi as a ARM Unwie housing project.
Zhis is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as. an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy.our Downtown Lodi
Community.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an _
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy. our Downtown Lodi
C MT mity.
67
�--1L is t "' W
._.JCI
V"7
U�'C�•� � / �iC��
n
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in'opposition of the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a housing project. y
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
rj
Community.
To: :Lodi:City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a using project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
1
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
C Tmunity.
-
C c
v
=
E
1 1.
r�
Q A�
.
t
W -I
6
�J
...._....,,y.,.,>rr..,--«r,—.--� ..,, �.-^^+.v3•v+a+.'*+tYF;.?.,S,a Ff`T, �' J`! .« .. w:^T^^ ` - 1 _Fy„ .-Fb"'k '�A`..F, "`H: `S"„�,.•.N
u:++�...'.m^t+ee; k* ,L+.?+Y'�T
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the LOU Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a housing project.
s
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District and will only serre to destroy. our Downtown Lodi
Cofflmmi ty .
i
.✓ /�
t
f]
t
f]
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi'Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a Jj!housing project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
Community.
J� /-f- A4
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
of the Hotel_ Lodias a ane housing project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
Community.
..
�frA+m ,«....grs�w"R �+^ "*"- n.F�,>'n> 4 +.4� :, ,.� R.
y9h iJ.""
t`i`x',.-.: �e+.r✓ ; .t�.�,:x ,a"
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of'the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a Jow1morw housing project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
Community.
7
-17
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representingthe Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
of -the Hotel Lodi as a housing project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
;r
a m amity,
r To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Dc
concerned merchants and citizens, go on'rec
of the Hotel Lodi as a ousing F
This is in direct conflict to everything we
Improvement District and will only serve tc
Community.
A
u3�L�G ti�S
4 o
9
i
To: Lodi City Council
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business Association,
concerned merchants and citizens, go on record in opposition of the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a housing project.
This is in direct conflict to everything we Dave been taxed for.as an
Improvement District and will only serve to destroy our Downtown Lodi
CM=ity.
ROLL: CALL VOTE
RECORDED AS FOLLOWS:
To: LodiCity Council OLSON REID
We the undersigned representing the Lodi Downtown Business A"$NCMAIjn, PINKERTON
concerned merchants and citizens,' go on record in opposition of the use
of the Hotel Lodi as a low income housing projer:t. SNIDER
This is in direct conflict to everything we have been taxed for as an
ITprovement District and will only serve-to destroy our Downtown Lodz -
C am unity.
. .— fait ted Wwki.�it�I; v�t,� �11►�.1,1,14bi
'_ d: Al3L Nff i QOYNAhI. E411tp
3oston's booming urban revivcxl,
Faneuil Marke�t koce sta rts
By KEN FRANCKLING
t, t't Feature Writer
BOSTON (UI'D — The weekday
rowd at F aneutl (fall Marketplace
s a mix of bushwasmen taking a
unch break, tourists who combine
ightsming with shopping and
lozens watching the antics of a
I reet juggler.
Ever since the festive site
copened on Aug. 26, 1976, it has
wen a magnet for downtown
toston, key to the city's booming
irban revival.
The market remains a trend-
etter, the first of dozens of "rec-
eational shopping" areas that
,ave opened in cures all over
nnierica.
flows of colorful pushcarts offer
rainbow• array of belts and
uspenders, T-shirts, buttons,
rafts, flowers, handmade
Jtwlens, original art, jewelry,
rafts and spicQ9 '
Those who arrive with full
,ellies find the wafting aromas of
resh baked breads and other food
0o much a tepi0ouon to resist.
ME
But choices dgq't come easy, gtven "There was an idea, a vision, but
the market's` 1 r(stauranta sttd' there was a lot of risk involved,"
joined b� PtopeeT place to Po
tend Ore:; ja0ksgnvUle l:andlo
taverns and S4`fopd'@taUs gestktd!�
Mcirean.said. "We sat here for
Florjoa;ar,dweatla}jm ySpatsle::
among iso retail lttWps , tide' 6
acre site. : ,
fotKarYlve yeas with no return on
inva'#ment because we were pum-
C1itc(tg0.• ot(I�have bet
woFking to 2ireathq=3tttw .life : to
It is a far cry from the tame set-
ting in the }96gs. Where aaa' a '
ping evtrytping back Into it
,oWhat you need for recreational
-4
the clty'i old' Navy -,Plan whh
reopened; this., year_, Tb4 w r
wholesale marYek operating it the
shopper 13 commitrnpnt by the
hol se-4denwharf, buUt fn..1aM=
Site then, but It was falling appaart.
Its regular visitors Included W=_ :
developer, the city,. the architect
Jeader. Those t r feces
✓4 9 per p
be renovated K'jk h th
p 1n4
call_ . for .shops, %hes privy
pests, and Hawater' In the; bate-
ments. Tberq'-';jpas no niglawfe In
ntikq ,,'these urban festival
. margetp*—go."
eonco��ggipn stan{i8 farmer
marketgandloftapaceforprtists.
the area; tt,h,�� 'rticknwned "Gtp;ta
Town." T
And theyhave.
Cyi rreptlYi the pier offers blsto
This hasfile"$ape to}^ Ute �
rest of developi0pnt In every, man,
' 4das�`. all across the . country
have zbuilf on- their downtowns,
i torp ,brae art. grog{ rytsta a:
flea %t�ets•to,ttte.publfc; Map
jor city where {estival
marketplaces have occurred Ida ,
with retail areas that tend to. focus
an water _ a nearby take. a river,
Harold ,x W4 hingt' tis at:
,�
iclleduled' �Jnte d�tRtt
ierwas �toatthet�`Qo wtgivtts�pf:,`wtrteittcstlledBaystd
or even the ocean, as is happening
that ith- it new Rouile retall isVelo
)Ae. world.l�gnfere
.31
citMe.baSktA11PON [o is ba fib
America, says Jappes B. T a'i
Jr., vice president'Ri The F>otiae+<Uled.talopen
next year inMiami.
yam. SP 'by r�devetopme
'Port.
Co., the Maryland firm that dev -
oped FaineuB Hall Marktplafe :
H *bo I e in Baltimore, South
rp
Street Sea !n NewYork, Tabor
bletoric Oldse
ti . -Its
tree Its gqpalrx' buck sad cy
blestone 1@{til has beome a maj
After pioneering.''rR op)
Center fn ver, Market East in
to„ trjFewt,r
enclosed Shppplrig m r .t{te
1960s, Rouse turned Its sigh�g,. a'
Phfiadelpjla, 'NatJartal Place in
Afashington. D.C:, "The .Grand
i . "V -t,
A• P
new concep) for, cigq iAp�l g_
with Boston t
Av�.'oue iq Milwaui ". tend Union
S�Bdodilit SV lM4 a{e Spon to pp
.
t InLei t4
general' and
"ours"„
They.: also had. •the:, friancl
Troer i it yrs r (ngith#.1 o exp11*JIc u, fete
`/ ed .4t'gJd Tho�tnas a>°ilcau, the e
♦,,,i y.bpt trtatlPn. Bn
watertronCYBclltt(esr
. - 'tI Would say the area has,4e)
65th a n n i v e rs ry :bOffq,,:�aceediva}y €'
mgr for iz lumber o 1' ns j!to
the are; seeing .a`>¢pd .-town:
itaiph and Emma Trovinger
)bserved their 65th wedding amli-
rersary at a recent buffet patio
tarty at their Acampohome.
Fifty guests attended the event
.Which was hosted by their child -
.en, Wilbert Trovinger, Harry
Tr(vinger, John Trovinger, Ber-
nice Schmierer, Ruth fileb and
.)oris Neddnnan, all of Lodi. One
dher daughter, Mildred G'eisler of
t'ork, I'a., was unable to attend.
rheir grandchildren and great-
;randchnldren also were present.
Mr. and Mrs. Trovinger were
Harried on July ?S, 1921 ht the
'rinulive Methodist Church in hit.
arnnel. I'a. and spent their
tor:aeyt:enoo at Niagara Falls.
Mr. Trovinger was an anthracite
lard coal miner in Pennsylvania
!err more ..ran 30 years and came
o CaIifurnta In 1945. He was
rtnployed by Earl Fruit Company
for 11 years.
Among the cords and. gifts the
1'rovingersreceived 'wfls�+-Curt;.
rratylatorY-.Fa :�nh[.,Y�Pesi-.
L,rt and Mrs. Rnua d Reagan.
Itemindin
Vol
AUG. la
No meetings today.
AUG. 19
Singles World volleyball — 7 to 9
).un: At gyol"W'iutn, 550 W. Cen-
ury Blvd.
' : MR. AHD MRY. AAl'.itlf YtOVItM¢@!t .
heat
Weir
MIU'"liOI tO 1990 will .
)rth`of new buildin.
on.4pch- +par. Thal
Mclean said.
;' new tax revenur
ortunines. if a' et
ill) of li
011-41; .,Hilal make; slrawg
B h"re, Bney wa
7r efts _ tJ3¢nr�c[
KW .Y r
Fanoull ffgl! Marl�tpi.ecr, who
''draws 'an'average of.. 15 )nillL
visitors per year, is celebrating i
JOth anniversary this inotith with
ta
up
perfrser and a gala holly L
year-round : $qe ista
rants have; . tyQAr rout
trade; agdi Ppb1g '0Ea6ine:
F%glo i time th@ area was
i4
user 1!046ne trsditioaal%port at
^
Waritititdpiupuses. It mostly we
'sly
:ugnoticed and unappreciated 1
ordinary citizens. Only in the la
five years these other kinds of bu
blesses have
lr:tu� ti
r up,"BaAeatisaid
tai+
The econo>
a j i,
project# rte.
o. t:
7 $�i
terms of & new'cJew
01=110t.fain !ltd head for ne
' : MR. AHD MRY. AAl'.itlf YtOVItM¢@!t .
heat
Weir
MIU'"liOI tO 1990 will .
)rth`of new buildin.
on.4pch- +par. Thal
Mclean said.
;' new tax revenur
ortunines. if a' et
ill) of li
011-41; .,Hilal make; slrawg
B h"re, Bney wa
7r efts _ tJ3¢nr�c[
KW .Y r
Fanoull ffgl! Marl�tpi.ecr, who
''draws 'an'average of.. 15 )nillL
visitors per year, is celebrating i
JOth anniversary this inotith with
ta
up
perfrser and a gala holly L
� -
STATE OF CALIFOKNIA GEoxos
===== �
DEPARTMENTHOUSING AND x.OavMwNwx mcvccO*McrvT
Division of Community Affairs
�
' �2l Tenth Street, 3H
Sacramento, CA 95814-2774
'
`
September 16, 1986
Should you require further elaboration on this matter, please contact '
Russ Sohmunk at (9}6) 323-7244.
SA rel
^,
/ xuber^ :mne
' Program Manager
R5:klf `
`
`
`
..
DanielsC, Logue
DanielsC. Logue Development
and Construction Company
IUUl Sixth Street, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95814 '
`
Dear Dan:
`
I am writing in response to your inquiry about the status of our 3UHRP
loan commitment for the Hotel Lodi should the City of Lodi fail to
provide the financial assistance to this project described in your
3UHRP application.
In brief, our commitment does not hinge on the availab4lity of the
City funds. Should you be able to substitute private equity capital
for these fvnds, and produce o project that is otherwise as approved
last March, our commitment would still stand and the project could move
forward~
The City's withdrawl of its financial participation would be extremely
disappointing, especially in light of its previously stated support in
the project's application, and at a convocation wc attended which included
city officials, businessmen and residents, on February 28, 1986, to en- .
_
couroge the State's approval~ E�en if the City's withdra*U,did not render
the Lodi Hotel project infeasible~ the quality of the project otherwise
potentially achievable may be decreased. This would be to the detriment
of both the community and future residents after the Hotel's rennuvation.
Should you require further elaboration on this matter, please contact '
Russ Sohmunk at (9}6) 323-7244.
SA rel
^,
/ xuber^ :mne
' Program Manager
R5:klf `
`
`
`
..
a
LODI
F'npula t i or.
43,29P
Single Family 11,551
2 to 4 1,623
PLEASANTON
Population 45,371
S'ngle Family 10,828
2 to 4 1.403
5 and up
4,134
5 and up 2,723
Mobile
399
mobile 345 3
Total
17,707
Total 15,299
Ratio
65.23/34.77
Ratite 70.77,/29.23
M0UECA
STOCR'TOi3
v
Population
35,437
Population 181,625
No exact figures. Planning
Single Family 43,920
Department
estimates:
2 to 4 7,426
'
5 and up 18,199
Ratio
75/25
Total 69,5L-5
MODESTO
Ratio 63.1.3/36.87
Population
134,282
TURLOCK
Single Family 40,087
Conl?o
2,832
P- ul-ation 36,546
K
Dunl.ex
3,933
3 and up
9,890
Single rami] --Y 8,516
y
Other
2,220
2 to 4 1,1.17
5 an:' u-oe5c
Total
59,862
Mobile 421
Ratio
68.46/31.54
Total. 12,912
;f
Ratio 65,0,/34.05
=
OA_KDALE
Population
2,954_a
TRACY
SinjL.le Family 2,957
Population 26,300
2 to 4
38"
5 and un
507
Sincle Fam-5.1;, h,9n,1
idab f, l.e
133
2 to L 651
5 and ui)
Total
3,283
1,obile 355
Ratio
74.P4,/25.76Total
0,00
Ratio 7.'73/23.27
Ji
---
,`
epi
PHOTOS
1
View of front of Hotel.
W'r 2 & 3
Two residents approximately 45-55.
r! 4
Elderly resident - very neatly dressed.
# 5
Janitor? Made many trips in and out.
# 6 & 7
Younger resident - approximately 28-30 long hair, beard, unker.pt.
8
Two residents in 50's.
9
T'nree residents - yellow hat 50's, white hat 28-30, long hair, goatee
-
one entering Hotel.
#10
Yellow hat and white hat walking west.
# 11
Two residents loitering in front - one possibly 40's, green shirt
late 50's.
# 12
Elderly resident 60's.
# 13
Elderly resident 60's.
# 14
Blue shirt and shorts 20's.
# 15
One entering. and one leaving.
'•
#16
Late 50's early 60's leaving'- portly gentleman in shadows under Key
Booth snent much time in and out and leaning on booth.
#17,18,19
Two men in 20's attempting to visit a resident. Spent approximately
twenty minutes outside trying to get in. Fianlly located someone to
;$
gain access. Note drinking from bottle in brown bag.
c
:i
}
z
a F
r
�.
MCDONOUGH, HOLLAND ALLEN
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- -
ATTORNEYS
NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE
-
4041 MACARTHUR BOULEVARD.SUITE aOI - - -
555 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 950
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 '
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814
1714) 8SI-1180 - _ d-
F. BEATTY (916) 444-3900
OAKLAND OFFICE
DAVID
P. O. BOX 3448
-
September 16, 1986
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94669-
,415, 847-0106
ARTHUR H. BERNSTEIN -
OF COUNSEL
t
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Mr. Ronald Stein
City Attorney
City of Lodi
221 West Pine Street
Call Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95240
Dear Ron:
I am enclosing a copy of a letter from Robert
Store of
HCD to Dan Logue regarding the status of HCD's
loan commit-
ment and its dependence upon the City's CDBG
grant. I hope
3�4
the letter will be of assistance to the City
Council in its
deliberations Wednesday.
Sinc rely,
t
i
David F. Beatty
DFB/kh
Enclosure
cc: Daniels Logue
SEP 17 1986 .
;.
'T ; �§° he4+1,?.^` om.✓c1Y'JD'. c"+ 1�--i�'�f'W(c^y X53 W �' .. h SCK.
ME
a
i S
�e