Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Report - September 5, 1984 (70)O CITY OF LODI T0: City Council FROM: City Manager DATE: August 30, 1984 5 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION SUBJECT: 1984-85 Transportation Development Act Claim RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the City's 1984-85 Transportation Development Act claim for Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) and authorize the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City's 1984-85 TDA Claim is requesting all of the '84-85 STA apportionment which amounts to $96,920 and all of the LTF apportionment which amounts to $664,213. The LTF claim includes an apportion- ment of $97,364 that has not yet been approved by the COG Board. COG re- presentative suggested that we include this amount conditioned on the Board's approval of the apportionment. This saves amending the claim at a later date. This year it is estimated that we will use approximately $55,000 of the LTF for the D:al-A-Ride System. This is less than last year because this year's STA apportionment is higher. The LTF portion of the claim includes all of the projects which are being con- sidered for construction during the next fiscal year. Those projects are shown on the attached list. This action is not approving projects for construction, it just allows us the flexibility to use TDA funds if the projects are in- cluded in the City's 1985 Transportation Improvement Program. The pedestrian/ bicycle apportionment will be used in conjunction with the Ham Lane Improvement Project - Lodi Avenue to Elm Street. Ham Lane is included as a primary bicycle route in the San Joaquin County bicycle plan and meets the intent of that apportionment. TDA funds are used in conjunction with other City funds for the Transportation Improvement ogr am and the maintenance of our streets. Jack L. Ronsko Jerry L. Glenn ubli Works Director Assistant City Manager Attachment JLR/SB/eeh P.S. Complete claim form in City Manager's file. APPROVED: FILE NO. HENRY A. GLAVES, City Manager TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment (84-85) $ 555.281 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 11,568 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 97.364 D. Unexpended Carryover 579.602 Total Available for 1984-85 Claim $ 1.243.815 II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment (84-85) $ 95.638 B. Special Transit Apportionment (84-85) 1.232 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 0 D. Unexpended Carryover 10,841* Total Available for 1984-85 Claim $ 107,761 * Includes $772 in Streets E Roads to be reprogrammed for transit and $10,069 which had been claimed for capital but was not used for that purpose. - 7 - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ALLOCATIONS Claim Purpose I. Public Transportation Article 4 (99260) - Operator Article 8 (99400(c)) - Contractor II. Pedestrian and Bicycle Article 3 (99234) Article 8 (99400(a)) III. Roads and Streets Article 8 (99400(a)) IV. Other Article 8 (99400(b)) Total Claimed Total Available Apportionment Total Claimed Unclaimed Apportionment (1984-85) I. LTF 4 22.64 II. STA* 1,243,815 1,243,815 107,761 1 107,761 1 -0- - ::::j . -This will automatically be classified as Article 6.5 (99313.3) for purposes of the Act. ..- PART III- ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND LTF Cost JProject Title and Descriortion Project Limits, Total Cost i Miscellaneous Widening $ 50,000 Miscellaneous Curb 6 Gutter 50,000 Asphalt Overlays i Turner Road `Ham -Railroad Underpass 160,000 1 Main Street ( Lockeford - Lawrence 27,000 Railroad Crossing Approach Improvements Lodi Avenue 63,000 Pine Street ! 76,000 Elm Street 40,000 i Tokay Street ( , 27,000 Railroad Grade Crossing Protection j Loma Turner California t Washington Cherokee ! Traffic Signals Hutchins & Tokay (upgrade) Pine b Sacramento Stockton Street Improvements Ham Lane Improvements RW & Engineering Hutchins St. Median ,Cherokee Lane Lockeford Street !!Street Maintenance fprimacy 9i v 1e Brute STATE TRA:JSiT ASSISTAINCF. FUND Project Title- and Description Kettleman - Vine Lodi - Elm Harney - Vineyard Lockeford - Murray (W. side) Mills - Cross ZUAcAddii-on a 8,000 14,000 Moo 000 8,000 9,000 35,000 70,000 492,000 177,000 10,000 5,000 115,000 52,000 age if Necessary STA Cost ` Project Limits _ TortaTZcst I - 19 -(Use Additional Page if Necessary) 4 PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND JProject Title and Description 1 lAdministration/Planning /computer 1 I I LTF Cost Pro ect Limitso al Cost $ 8.000 i TOTAL ( S 1,1663629 1,504,000 I I I I i I 1 I t STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE; FUND ---TU—s,; AM c Project Title and Description Project Limits 1 STA Cost lottai Gst - 19 -(Use Add:Cional Pare if Nleces.;arv) RESOLUTION NO. 84-132 RESOWTION APPROVING THE CITY OF LODI'S 1984-85 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT CLAIM FOR LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF) AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby approve the City of Lodi's 1984-85 Transportation Development Act Claim for Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA), a ropy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and thereby made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lodi does hereby direct the City Manager to execute the subject document on behalf of the City. Dated: September 5, 1984 I hereby certify that Resolution No. 84-132 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a Regular Meeting held September 5, 1984 by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members - Hinchman, Olson, Reid, and Snider (Mayor) Noes: Council Members - None Absent: Council Members - Pinkerton ALICE M, REIMCHE City Clark 84-132 •► Exh t t MA$$ M LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND LTF TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue _ Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address: Call Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 (City, zip Contact Person: Sharon Blaufus Phone: 333-6706 The City of Lodi hereby requests, in accordance withhChapter 1400, Statutes 1971 and applicable rules and regulations, that its annual transportation claim be approved in the amount of $ 1,243,815 for fiscal year 1984-85 to be drawn from the local- transportation fund. When approved, please transmit this claim to the County Auditor for payment. Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor to this applicant is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved annual financial plan. The claimant certifies that this Local Transportation Fund claim and the financial information contained therein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments By PETER D. VERDOORN Title Executive Director Date 19 - 5 - ApplA�ant B;► C i tar of Lod i Title City Manager Date September 5 19 84 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE CLAIM TO: San Joaquin County Council of Governments 1860 East Hazelton Avenue Stockton, CA 95205 FROM: Applicant: City of Lodi Address (City, Zip) : Call Box 3006, Lodi, CA 95241-1910 Contact Person, Phone: Jerry Glenn STA This claimant, qualified pursuant to Section 99203 and 99315 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with Chapter 1400, Statutes of 1971 as amended, and applicable rules and regula- tions, that an allocation be made in the amount of $ 107,761 for fiscal year 83-84 , to be drawn from the State Transit Assistance trust fund of San Joaquin County for the following purposes and in the fol owing respective amounts: Purposes Dial -a -Ride Amounts $107,761 Allocation instruction and payment by the County Auditor to this claimant are subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution, and to the provisions that such monies will be used only in accordance with the terms of the approved claim. The claimant certifies that this State Transit Assistance Fund Claim and the financial information contained herein, is reasonable and accurate to the best of my knowledge, and that the aforementioned information indicates the eligibility of this claimant for funds for the fiscal year of the application pursuant to CAC Section 6634 and 6734. APPROVED: San Joaquin County Council of Governments Title ecutive Director Date 19 ApplJc4_J,-t_I _ By Title City Manager Date September 5 1984 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT APPORTIONMENTS I. Local Transportation Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment (84-85) $ 555,281 B. Pedestrian/Bicycle Apportionment 11,568 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 97,364 D. Unexpended Carryover 579,602 Total Available for 1984-85 Claim 1,243,815 II. State Transit Assistance Fund Available Apportionment A. Area Apportionment (84-85) $ 95,638 B. Special Transit Apportionment (84-85) 1,282 C. Previous Years' Unclaimed Apportionment 0 D. Unexpended Carryover 10.841 Total Available for 1984-85 Claim 107,761 * Includes $772 in Streets b Roads to be reprogrammed for transit and $10,069 which had been claimed for capital but was not used for that purpose. - 7 - •, ART I PUBLIC TRANSPORTAT;C Please Check One; Article 4 Operator ❑ ❑ Article 8 Contractor FINANCIAL INFORMATION I. OPERATING REVENUE 1983-84 1984-85 ❑ Actual/Estimate © Budget Passenger Fares Special Transit Fares School Bus Service Revenues Freight Tariffs Charter Service Revenues Auxilliary Transportation Revenues Non -Transportation Revenues - Interest Taxes Levies. Directly by Transit System (Specify) Local Cash Grants and Reimbursements (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Local Special Fare Assistance State Cash Grants and Reimbursements (Specify) State Transit Assist. Fund (STA) State Special Fare Assistance Federal Cash Grants & Reimbursements (Specify) UMTA Grants Contributed Services (Specify) TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUE Federal Capital Grants & Subsidies (Specify) State Capital Grants & Subventions (Specify) State Transit Assist. Iunds (STA) Local Capital Provisions (Specify) Local Transportation Fund (LTF) Non -Governmental Donations TOTAL - 9 - 33,322 37,550 600 71 ,212 86,431 191,636 54,539 107,761 'Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description OPERATIONAL INFORMATION* Actual Estimated Proposed. FY 1982-83 FY 1983-84 FY 1984-85'- 1. Patronage a. Total Passengers 56,386 63,100 64,000 b. Revenue Passengers 787 — 880 890 C. Youth Passengers d. Elderly Passengers 55,599 62,220 _ 63,110 e. Handicapped Passengers 2. Vehicle Miles a. Total Vehicle Miles 97,529 108,335 110,000 b. Revenue Vehicle Miles 3. Revenue Vehicle Hours 3,817 `4. Revenue Vehicle Fuel Cons! ion a. Diesel 9,708 10,000 b. Gasoline C. Liquid natural Compressed Gas 5. Fare Structure a. Base _...2_.Afl_ _ 2.4CL- 2.00 b. Zone C. Youth ' d. Senior _0 ,so 0.50 e. HandicappedII.S,p 0_40 ---(L so f. Monthly Pass ^_ _ g. Other _ h. Average Fare 0_52 0.52 0.52 'Attach additional pages as necessary to alter or complete description . Atfi-cle 4 Operator Only i f FLEET INVENTORY _r Production of Fuel Seat S e Make & Model Year Veh. Type Capacity AC, Chevrolet 1982 6 dissel 6 X station wagon cia Fey tures EP I WC I Other 1 TOTAL XX) XMKXXXX XX Vehicles to be Purchased in FY i I AC - Air Conditioned EP - Environmental Package WC - Wheel C`iair Lift Has this system utilized its grace year? iv. Has this system been in non-compliance with its required local support ratio? If yes, Identify the year or years: 3. Extension of Service An extension or new service is exempt from the required farebox and local support ratios if: A. The extension of service has been in operation for less than two years at the end of the fiscal year. B. The claimant's operating cost for the fiscal year, after excluding the operating cost of the extension of service, exceeds its operating cost for the prior fiscal year. C. The claimant submits a report on the extension of service to COG. (For details of the report, see 6633.8(c)). i. Is this a new service? ii. Is there an extension of service being claimed? If so, please identify the extension of service: 4. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15. the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. 5. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. - 15 - Vol"' V Operating Cost (minus depreciation) $ Total Passengers Operating Cost per Passenger v. What is the Operating Cost per Passenger Objective for this claim? Budgeted Operating Cost (minus depreciation) $ Estimated Total Passengers Operating Cost per Passenger _ 3. Fifteen Percent Expenditure Increase If any of the line items on the attached budget exceed by more than 15% the expenditure for that same item in the previous year's budget, then an explanation for that increase must be attached. 4. Narrative Description Describe any changes in service characteristics from the previous fiscal year. Please attach an additional page if necessary. PART I I I - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND STATE TRa::S:T ASSISTANCE FUND LTF Cost Project Limits Totar-Zost $ 50,000 50,000 am -Rai 1 road Underpass Lockeford - Lawrence ettleman - Vine )di - Elm arney - Vineyard ckeford - Mu. -ray (W. side) ills - Cross ZUsc Ad3tiona Project Limits 160,000 27,000 63,000 76,000 40,000 27,000 8,000 14,000 8,000 8,000 9,000 35,000 70,000 492,000 177,00 10,000 5,000 115,000 52,000 age iz Necessary STA Cost ota cast 19 -(;-'se Additional Page if. Necessary) rik:.A�':'h:stir; _^::acc>✓w...aw':d+^{sa�:/..v. .. . ., .. .., ,.. -- - ., .sw,+..�..,^ewetexe �:�,.. z: y+.'k�P'.�iidi$$= _m..:�..,.'.:ux..:.-x.�a+:r.'.�i�..ei'i+.._...`t.r:,. `a:•.:.�z. Project Title and Description _ Miscellaneous Widening Miscellaneous Curb b Gutter Asphalt Overlays 1H Turner Road Main Street ' Railroad Crossing Approach Improvements Lodi Avenue ' Pine Street Elm Street ' Tokay Street Railroad Grade Crossing Protection j Loma 1 Turner I California Washington ! Cherokee Traffic Signals Hutchins & Tokay (upgraee) Pine & Sacramento Stockton Street Improvements K Ham Lane Improvements K4 & Engineering L Hutchins St. Median H i Cherokee Lane Lo Lockeford Street M Street Maintenance 6rimary Riry to Route STATE TRa::S:T ASSISTANCE FUND LTF Cost Project Limits Totar-Zost $ 50,000 50,000 am -Rai 1 road Underpass Lockeford - Lawrence ettleman - Vine )di - Elm arney - Vineyard ckeford - Mu. -ray (W. side) ills - Cross ZUsc Ad3tiona Project Limits 160,000 27,000 63,000 76,000 40,000 27,000 8,000 14,000 8,000 8,000 9,000 35,000 70,000 492,000 177,00 10,000 5,000 115,000 52,000 age iz Necessary STA Cost ota cast 19 -(;-'se Additional Page if. Necessary) rik:.A�':'h:stir; _^::acc>✓w...aw':d+^{sa�:/..v. .. . ., .. .., ,.. -- - ., .sw,+..�..,^ewetexe �:�,.. z: y+.'k�P'.�iidi$$= _m..:�..,.'.:ux..:.-x.�a+:r.'.�i�..ei'i+.._...`t.r:,. `a:•.:.�z. • PART III - ROAD AND STREET PROJECTS Please provide the requested information for each project being identified for Transportation Development Act funding. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND LTF Cost JPro ect Title and Description _ Pro ect Limitso'otal Cost ,i jAdninistration/Planning /computer $ 5,000 TOTAL $ 1,166,629 i1,504.50o 1 ' ! i i H STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND ......... ;(ITS --;"t STA Cost